Hubbry Logo
Technology-critical elementTechnology-critical elementMain
Open search
Technology-critical element
Community hub
Technology-critical element
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Technology-critical element
Technology-critical element
Technology-critical element
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A technology-critical element (TCE) is a chemical element that is a critical raw material[1][2][3] for modern and emerging technologies,[4][5][6] resulting in a striking increase in their usage.[4][7][1][8] Similar terms include critical elements,[9] critical materials,[4] energy-critical elements[7] and elements of security.[10]

Many advanced engineering applications, such as clean-energy production, communications and computing, use emergent technologies that utilize numerous chemical elements.[7] In 2013, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) created the Critical Materials Institute to address the issue.[11] In 2015, the European COST Action TD1407 created a network of scientists working and interested on TCEs, from an environmental perspective to potential human health threats.[12]

A study estimated losses of 61 metals to help the development of circular economy strategies, showing that usespans of, often scarce, tech-critical metals are short.[13][14]

List of technology-critical elements

[edit]

The set of elements usually considered as TCEs vary depending on the source, but they usually include:

Seventeen rare-earth elements

The six platinum-group elements

Twelve assorted elements

Elements such as oxygen, silicon, and aluminum (among others) are also vital for electronics, but are not included in these lists due to their widespread abundance.

Applications of technology-critical elements

[edit]

TCEs have a variety of engineering applications in fields such as energy storage, electronics, telecommunication, and transportation.[15] These elements are utilized in cellular phones, batteries, solar panel(s), electric motor(s), and fiber-optic cables. Emerging technologies also incorporate TCEs. Most notably, TCEs are used in the data networking of smart devices tied to the Internet of Things (IoT) and automation.[15]

Sample uses of technology-critical elements (excluding rare-earth) [12]
Element Compound Applications
Gallium (Ga) GaAs, GaN Wafers for (a) integrated circuits in high-performance computers and telecommunications equipment and (b) LEDs, photodetectors, solar cells and medical equipment
Trimethyl Ga, triethyl Ga Epitaxial layering process for the production of LEDs
Germanium (Ge) Ge Substrate for wafers for high-efficiency photovoltaic cells
Ge single crystals Detectors (airport security)
Hafnium (Hf) Hf Aerospace alloys and ceramics
HfO2 Semiconductors and data storage devices
Indium (In) In2O5Sn Transparent conductive thin film coatings on flat-panel displays (e.g. liquid crystal displays)
Niobium (Nb) CuNbGaSe (CIGS) Thin film solar cells
HSLA ferro-Nb (60 % Nb), Nb metal High-grade structural steel for vehicle bodies
NiNb Superalloys for jet engines and turbine blades
Nb powder, Nb oxide Surface acoustic wave filters (sensor and touch screen technologies)
Platinum-group metals (PGMs) Pd, Pt, Rh metals Catalytic converters for the car industry
Platinum (Pt) Pt metal Catalyst refining of petroleum and magnetic coating of computer hard discs
Iridium (Ir) Ir Crucibles for the electronics industry
Osmium (Os) Os alloys High wear applications such as instrument pivots and electrical contacts
Tantalum (Ta) Ta oxide Capacitors in automotive electronics, personal computers and cell phones
Ta metal Pacemakers, prosthetic devices
Tellurium (Te) CdTe Solar cells
HgCdTe, BiTe Thermal cooling devices and electronics products
Zirconium (Zr) Zr Ceramics for solid oxide fuel cells, jet turbine coatings, and smartphones

Environmental considerations

[edit]

The extraction and processing of TCEs may cause adverse environmental impacts. The reliance on TCEs and critical metals like cobalt can run the risk of the “green curse,” or using certain metals in green technologies whose mining may be damaging to the environment.[16]

The clearing of soil and deforestation that is involved with mining can impact the surrounding biodiversity through land degradation and habitat loss. Acid mine drainage can kill surrounding aquatic life and harm ecosystems. Mining activities and leaching of TCEs can pose significant hazards to human health. Wastewater produced by the processing of TCEs can contaminate groundwater and streams. Toxic dust containing concentrations of metals and other chemicals can be released into the air and surrounding bodies of water.

Deforestation caused by mining results in the release of stored carbon from the ground to the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide (CO2).[16]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Technology-critical element

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Technology-critical elements (TCEs) are chemical elements essential to modern and due to their unique physicochemical properties enabling applications in , , and , but they are distinguished by high supply risks stemming from geological scarcity, concentrated and , and geopolitical dependencies. These elements, often overlapping with categories like rare earth elements, platinum-group metals, and specialty metals such as , , , , , and , underpin devices from smartphones and batteries to turbines and defense systems, with global projected to surge amid the transition to low-carbon economies. Supply chains for TCEs remain vulnerable, with over 80% of certain refining capacities controlled by , exposing economies to disruptions from export restrictions, trade tensions, and that could impair and . Efforts to mitigate these risks include diversification through , alternative sourcing, and domestic production incentives, though geological constraints and environmental challenges limit rapid scaling.

Definition and Strategic Importance

Core Definition and Criteria

A technology-critical element (TCE) is a essential as a for manufacturing components in modern and , including , , and advanced manufacturing, where its scarcity or supply vulnerabilities amplify economic and strategic dependencies. These elements, such as , , , and rare earths, enable functionalities like semiconductors, , and high-performance alloys that lack viable substitutes, driving rapid demand growth— for instance, global consumption of rose over 10-fold from 2000 to 2020 due to production. Classification as a TCE hinges on dual criteria: high economic importance and significant supply risk. Economic importance is quantified by the element's irreplaceable contributions to in priority sectors, such as defense (e.g., in capacitors for ) or clean energy (e.g., in magnets), often benchmarked against EU or U.S. assessments where scores exceed thresholds like 5.0 on a 1-10 scale for sectoral reliance. Supply risk evaluates factors including production concentration—over 90% of rare earth processing occurs in as of 2023—geopolitical exposure, low yields (typically under 1% for many TCEs), and environmental extraction barriers, yielding composite risk indices that flag elements like , where supplies 50% of output amid instability. These criteria derive from standardized methodologies, such as those in the European Commission's raw materials assessments updated biennially since 2011, which integrate empirical on trade flows, reserve distributions, and substitution indices; analogous U.S. Department of evaluations since 2010 emphasize energy technology vulnerabilities, confirming overlaps like cobalt's dual role in batteries and superalloys. Variations arise from national priorities—e.g., prioritizes for tooling—yet core thresholds ensure focus on elements where supply disruptions could cascade to 10-20% GDP impacts in tech-dependent economies. Assessments exclude abundant elements like iron despite tech uses, prioritizing causal links between scarcity and innovation bottlenecks.

Economic and National Security Rationale

Technology-critical elements, encompassing minerals like rare earths, , , and , are vital for sustaining high-value economic sectors that contribute significantly to global GDP, including semiconductors, electric vehicles, and infrastructure. In the United States, for instance, these materials support industries generating trillions in annual output, with the clean energy sector alone projected to require minerals worth over $400 billion by 2050 to meet demand for batteries and turbines. disruptions in these elements can cascade into broader economic losses, as seen in 2010 when China's temporary rare earth export quotas caused global prices to spike by up to 500%, halting production in electronics and automotive assembly lines. Economic rationale thus emphasizes securing reliable access to prevent cost volatility and maintain competitiveness in technology-driven markets, where domestic processing capacity lags far behind consumption needs—U.S. reliance on imports exceeds 50% for 40 of 50 critical minerals as of 2025. From a national security perspective, these elements form the backbone of defense capabilities, enabling components in missiles, submarines, and electronic warfare systems; for example, neodymium-based permanent magnets in F-35 jets and precision-guided weapons depend on rare earth processing dominated by China, which controls approximately 85% of global refining capacity as of 2025. This concentration creates leverage points for geopolitical coercion, as demonstrated by China's 2010 embargo on rare earth exports to Japan amid territorial disputes, which delayed military component production worldwide. U.S. assessments identify supply vulnerabilities as direct threats to the defense industrial base, where even short-term shortages could impair readiness, prompting policies like the 2022 Defense Production Act invocations to onshore extraction and separation facilities. Diversification efforts, including alliances with allies like Australia and Canada, aim to reduce risks from single-source dependency, which could otherwise enable adversarial embargoes during conflicts, echoing historical precedents where resource control influenced strategic outcomes.

Classification of Elements

Primary Technology-Critical Elements

The primary technology-critical elements are chemical elements essential for advanced manufacturing in , , and defense technologies, distinguished by their scarcity, irreplaceable functionality in high-performance applications, and vulnerability to supply disruptions. These include the 17 rare earth elements (REEs)—, , and the 15 lanthanides from to —which provide unparalleled magnetic strength and optical properties for permanent s in motors, generators, and precision-guided munitions. and , specific REEs, enhance magnet heat resistance and , respectively, enabling compact, efficient designs without viable substitutes at scale. Lithium stands out for its high in lithium-ion batteries, powering portable , grid storage, and electric vehicles, with global demand projected to exceed 3 million metric tons annually by 2030 due to needs. complements lithium in cathode materials like , improving battery and cycle life, though its concentration in the Democratic Republic of Congo—over 70% of supply—poses extraction risks including child labor and documented in peer-reviewed assessments. , particularly high-purity forms, is increasingly vital for nickel-manganese-cobalt cathodes in high-range EV batteries, supporting energy densities above 250 Wh/kg. Gallium and are indispensable for compound semiconductors; and enable high-frequency transistors in infrastructure and LEDs, while germanium supports fiber-optic lasers and detectors for and night-vision systems. Natural , in synthetic or anode forms, conducts electrons efficiently in battery anodes, comprising up to 20% of lithium-ion cell mass. These elements' criticality stems from processing bottlenecks, with dominating 80-90% of refined REEs, gallium, and graphite output as of 2023, amplifying geopolitical risks over raw reserves.

Variations in Global Lists

Different nations and international bodies compile lists of technology-critical elements—often termed critical minerals—using methodologies tailored to their economic structures, vulnerabilities, and strategic priorities, resulting in variations in composition, length, and emphasis. These assessments typically evaluate factors such as import reliance, production concentration, and end-use importance in sectors like , , and defense, but diverge due to differing data sources, risk thresholds, and geopolitical contexts. For instance, the prioritizes implications, while the integrates green transition goals, leading to inclusions like in EU lists but not always in others. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) maintains a federal list updated periodically; the 2022 version included 50 minerals, expanding to a draft 2025 list of 54 that adds , , , and , reflecting heightened concerns over and battery supply risks. The European Commission's 2023 assessment identifies 34 critical raw materials, encompassing /, , and heavy rare earth elements, alongside 17 strategic materials prioritized for net-zero technologies, with criteria emphasizing EU-specific supply disruptions and potential. Australia's 2023 Critical Minerals List comprises 31 entries, including high-purity alumina, , and , selected for alignment with export opportunities and domestic endowments in and rare earths, distinct from its separate Strategic Materials List for bulk commodities like . Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry designates 35 minerals as critical, incorporating 31 individual elements plus platinum group metals and rare earths, with recent additions like in 2024 to bolster nuclear and high-tech resilience amid import dependencies exceeding 90% for many items. , as the dominant producer of over 60% of global rare earths and key battery minerals, does not publish a unified public list equivalent to Western counterparts but enforces export controls on strategic outputs like , , , , and —evident in 2023-2025 restrictions—to safeguard domestic processing dominance and . Overlaps exist in high-risk elements such as , , , and rare earths across U.S., EU, and other lists, underscoring universal vulnerabilities, yet exclusions like in EU assessments versus U.S. focus on highlight how national methodologies—quantitative supply risk models in the U.S. versus economic impact scoring in the EU—yield tailored inventories.
JurisdictionList YearNumber of ItemsNotable Inclusions/ExclusionsKey Criteria
(USGS)Draft 202554Adds , ; excludes some non-metallics like barite in prior focusSupply risk, economic/ importance
(EC)202334 critical + 17 strategic/, LREE; emphasizes recycling benchmarksEU import reliance, green tech demand
202331 criticalHigh-purity alumina, ; separate list for Geological potential, global supply role
(METI)Recent (post-2022)35 added 2024; PGMs/REEs groupedImport dependency >50%, tech/defense uses
These discrepancies complicate international cooperation, as evidenced by U.S.- agreements targeting shared battery minerals like despite list variances, and underscore the need for harmonized risk assessments to mitigate global chokepoints.

Technical Applications

Electronics and Computing

is essential for (GaAs) and (GaN) semiconductors, which enable high-frequency applications in radio-frequency (RF) devices, infrastructure, and for computing systems. These compounds provide superior compared to , supporting faster in smartphones, satellites, and centers. , often alloyed with or used in pure form, facilitates high-speed transistors, fiber optic transceivers, and sensors critical for transmission and components. Rare earth elements (REEs) such as and are key to permanent magnets in hard disk drives (HDDs), speakers, and vibration motors within computers and , offering high magnetic strength for compact, efficient storage and audio systems. , , and serve as phosphors in LED displays and LCD screens, enabling vibrant colors and energy-efficient backlighting in monitors, televisions, and mobile devices. , particularly in (ITO) coatings, forms transparent conductive layers for touchscreens and flat-panel displays, underpinning interactive computing interfaces. Tantalum capacitors, valued for their high in miniature form, stabilize voltage in microprocessors, chips, and portable electronics, where space constraints demand reliable . These elements collectively enable the and performance gains in integrated circuits, with over 50 critical minerals identified as inputs for fabrication processes as of 2023. Without them, advancements in computing power, such as those driven by analogs in specialized chips, would face material bottlenecks.
ElementPrimary Applications in Electronics and ComputingKey Properties Enabling Use
GalliumGaAs/GaN for RF amplifiers, LEDs, 5G base stationsHigh electron mobility, wide bandgap
GermaniumFiber optics, IR detectors, SiGe transistorsSuperior carrier mobility over silicon
NeodymiumNdFeB magnets in HDDs and cooling fansHigh coercivity for compact magnets
EuropiumRed phosphors in LEDs and displaysEfficient luminescence for color rendering
TantalumCapacitors in CPUs, GPUs, and mobile chipsHigh dielectric constant, stability
This table summarizes select applications, highlighting how these elements address performance demands in modern devices.

Energy Technologies

Technology-critical elements play a pivotal role in modern energy technologies, particularly those enabling the transition to low-carbon systems such as electric vehicles (EVs), renewable power generation, and grid-scale storage. Lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, and graphite are essential for lithium-ion batteries, which dominate EV propulsion and stationary energy storage due to their high energy density and cycle life. Rare earth elements (REEs), including neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium, and terbium, are critical for permanent magnets in wind turbine generators and EV motors, providing the magnetic strength needed for efficient power conversion without gearboxes in direct-drive designs. In battery applications, enables ion transport in the , while cathode materials like nickel-manganese- (NMC) blends—such as NMC 811 with 80% —optimize performance for EVs, with enhancing capacity and stabilizing structure, though efforts to reduce content continue due to supply constraints. An average 60 kWh EV battery requires approximately 6 kg of , alongside varying amounts of (up to 10-15 kg in high-cobalt chemistries) and (30-50 kg in nickel-rich variants), with global EV battery demand accounting for 60% of , 30% of , and 10% of consumption in 2022. , primarily synthetic or natural flake, serves as the material, comprising about 20-30% of battery weight by mass. For wind energy, REEs constitute the core of high-performance neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets in nacelles, where a single large offshore can incorporate up to 1 metric ton of REEs, predominantly (around 600 kg) and for thermal stability in harsh environments. These magnets enable lighter, more reliable generators, reducing maintenance costs and boosting efficiency by 5-10% over geared alternatives, though alternatives like ferrite magnets are explored to mitigate REE dependency. Other energy technologies rely on these elements to lesser but significant degrees: , a critical for conductivity, is vital for EV wiring, cabling, and transmission networks, with clean demand projected to double its market share by 2040; solar photovoltaics incorporate silver for conductive pastes and or in thin-film variants, though silicon-based panels dominate without REEs. -group metals like and support electrolyzers for , enabling efficient oxygen evolution reactions in systems. Overall, the International Agency forecasts that demand for these elements could quadruple by 2040 under net-zero scenarios, driven primarily by batteries and renewables.

Defense and Advanced Manufacturing

Technology-critical elements play a pivotal role in defense systems, enabling advanced sensors, propulsion, and guidance technologies that enhance precision and performance. Rare earth elements (REEs), such as and , are incorporated into high-strength permanent magnets for electric motors and actuators in fighter jets like the F-35, submarines including - and Columbia-class vessels, and missiles such as the and (JDAM). These magnets provide the magnetic strength necessary for compact, efficient operation in precision-guided munitions and radar systems. and , meanwhile, are vital for compound semiconductors in infrared detectors, night-vision devices, and high-frequency electronics used in and targeting systems. In advanced manufacturing for defense, elements like , , and support the production of high-temperature alloys and lightweight composites essential for hypersonic vehicles, armor-piercing projectiles, and structural components. 's high and make it indispensable for penetrators and shielding in munitions, while enables capacitors and alloys resilient to extreme conditions in nose cones. 's stiffness-to-weight ratio facilitates precision and structures, as seen in components and frames. and contribute to battery technologies powering unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and directed-energy weapons, where directly impacts operational endurance and lethality. These applications underscore the elements' irreplaceability, as substitutes often compromise system reliability or performance under combat stresses. Efforts to integrate these materials into additive processes aim to accelerate prototyping of defense hardware, such as niobium-based alloys for hypersonic leading edges that withstand Mach 5+ speeds. However, supply constraints heighten vulnerabilities, prompting initiatives like the U.S. Department of Defense's focus on domestic processing to mitigate reliance on foreign sources for over 90% of REE production. has similarly identified 12 defense-critical raw materials, including for electrodes in electric propulsion and for flame-retardant composites, emphasizing their role in sustaining scalability for large-volume wartime needs.

Global Supply Dynamics

Production and Reserves Distribution

Technology-critical elements, encompassing rare earth elements (REEs), , , and others essential for , batteries, and advanced manufacturing, display highly concentrated patterns in both production and reserves. Global mining output for these materials is dominated by a handful of countries, often in regions with favorable or lax regulatory environments, while reserves—economically extractable deposits—are unevenly distributed, with holding significant portions across multiple categories. This concentration arises from geological endowments, historical investment in extraction infrastructure, and state-supported industries, rather than uniform global accessibility. Rare earth elements, comprising 17 metals vital for magnets and catalysts, saw global mine production of 350,000 metric tons of rare earth oxide (REO) equivalent in 2023, with China accounting for approximately 70% (about 240,000 tons). China's dominance stems from its Bayan Obo deposit and integrated processing capabilities, though export restrictions have prompted diversification efforts elsewhere. Reserves total around 130 million metric tons globally, with China holding 44 million tons (34%), followed by Vietnam (22 million tons) and Brazil (21 million tons). Myanmar and the United States emerged as secondary producers in 2024, contributing 12,000 and 45,000 tons respectively, but remain minor relative to China's scale. Lithium production, critical for rechargeable batteries, reached 180,000 metric tons globally in 2023, led by at 86,000 tons (48%), leveraging hard-rock spodumene deposits in . followed with 44,000 tons from brine evaporation in the , while China's output grew to 33,000 tons amid expanding domestic refining. Reserves stand at 28 million tons, concentrated in the "" of (20 million tons), (14 million tons), and (9.3 million tons), though extraction challenges like limit near-term output from these South American holdings.
ElementTop Producers (2023/2024, metric tons)Share of Global ProductionTop Reserve Holders (million metric tons)Share of Global Reserves
Rare Earths (REO) (~240,000), (12,000), (45,000)China: ~70% (44), (22), (21)China: 34%
Lithium (88,000), (44,000), (33,000)Australia: 48% (20), (14), (7.9): ~75%
CobaltDRC (170,000), (20,000), (8,000)DRC: ~70%DRC (6), (1.7), (1.6)DRC: 50%+
Cobalt, used in battery cathodes and superalloys, had global production of 230,000 metric tons in 2023, overwhelmingly from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) at 170,000 tons (74%), primarily as a byproduct from the Katanga . Indonesia's output rose to 20,000 tons via processing, reflecting shifts toward battery-grade material. Reserves total 11 million tons, with DRC controlling 6 million tons (over 50%), underscoring artisanal and industrial mining vulnerabilities there. Similar patterns hold for other elements like ( 65% production) and high-purity , amplifying fragilities when disruptions occur in dominant producers.

Extraction and Processing Realities

Extraction of technology-critical elements typically involves large-scale open-pit or underground operations, which are capital-intensive and require substantial upfront investments, with global needs estimated at around USD 500 billion for new mining capacity through 2040 to meet demand projections. Development timelines from discovery to first production average 15.5 years, influenced by geological, regulatory, and infrastructural factors, often extending longer in jurisdictions with stringent permitting processes. These activities generate significant environmental externalities, including approximately 8% of global emissions from mining overall, of 1.4 million hectares between 2001 and 2020, and operations in water-stressed regions affecting 16% of sites. Processing and refining represent a distinct bottleneck in the , transforming raw ores into usable forms through energy-intensive chemical separations that produce hazardous wastes, such as acidic laden with , , and . controls the majority of global refining capacity for key elements, enabling and technical expertise accumulated over decades, while Western efforts face higher costs from environmental compliance and limited legacy infrastructure. For instance, rare earth processing in has led to documented soil and water contamination, landslides, and river clogging due to lax oversight, contrasting with more regulated but slower Western projects.
ElementChina's Share of Global Processing
Lithium>50%
Cobalt~66%
Nickel~33%
Rare EarthsNearly 100%
This concentration arises from China's early state investments and tolerance for pollution externalities, creating vulnerabilities as raw materials from diverse mining locales—like the Democratic Republic of Congo for 74% of cobalt or Indonesia for 54% of nickel—are frequently exported to China for final refinement. Geopolitical tensions exacerbate risks, with export controls demonstrating potential for supply disruptions beyond mere extraction limits. Domestic U.S. capabilities remain underdeveloped, relying heavily on imports for elements like rare earths, where supply chains are prone to interruption without diversified processing alternatives.

Geopolitical Vulnerabilities

Supply Concentration Risks

The production and processing of technology-critical elements exhibit high degrees of geographic concentration, amplifying risks of supply disruptions from geopolitical tensions, export restrictions, or political instability in dominant producer nations. For instance, rare earth elements (REEs), essential for magnets in electric vehicles and wind turbines, saw accounting for approximately 68% of global mine production in 2023, with its share of refined output exceeding 90%. This dominance stems from 's integrated control over mining, separation, and downstream manufacturing, enabling potential leverage through policies like the 2023 export controls on extraction technologies and the 2025 restrictions on rare earth magnets. Historical precedents, such as the 2010 temporary halt in REE exports to amid territorial disputes, underscore how such concentration can translate into deliberate supply squeezes, inflating prices and delaying technology deployment. Cobalt, a key component in cathodes, faces analogous vulnerabilities, with the (DRC) producing over 70% of global supply in recent years, reaching 73% in estimates for 2023. The DRC's output is predominantly from large-scale industrial mines intertwined with artisanal operations, exposing the chain to instability from civil unrest, governance challenges, and child labor issues that have prompted ethical sourcing mandates from buyers. Compounding this, refines a substantial portion of DRC-sourced cobalt, creating a dual concentration risk where disruptions in either extraction or —such as the DRC's occasional bans or Chinese bottlenecks—could cascade through battery supply chains. Lithium, vital for battery anodes, shows less mining concentration—primarily in (over 50% in 2023), , and —but processing remains heavily skewed toward , which controls much of the conversion to battery-grade chemicals. This bottleneck heightens risks, as evidenced by 's 2023-2024 export licensing requirements for processing technologies, which could limit global access amid surging demand from . Overall, the U.S. Geological Survey notes that leading countries account for over 5% of production for many critical minerals, but for REEs, , and , single-nation dominance exceeds 60-80%, fostering systemic fragility absent diversified alternatives.
ElementDominant Producer(s)Share of Global Production/Processing (Recent Data)Key Risk Factors
Rare Earth ElementsMining: ~68% (2023); Processing: >90%Export controls, geopolitical leverage
CobaltDRCMining: ~73% (2023)Political instability, artisanal mining ethics
Lithium/ (mining); (processing)Mining: Diversified; Processing: -dominantMidstream restrictions, demand surges
These concentrations not only elevate short-term disruption probabilities but also deter investment in alternative sources due to scale economies favoring incumbents, perpetuating dependency cycles for technology sectors reliant on stable supplies.

Policy Responses and Recent Events

In response to supply concentration risks, particularly China's dominance in processing over 80% of global rare earth elements and key battery minerals, the has implemented to bolster domestic production and diversify sources. The of 2022 provides tax credits and grants for critical mineral extraction, processing, and , with over $370 billion allocated to energy technologies requiring these materials. Complementing this, the Bipartisan Law funds permitting reforms and mine development, while the Department of Energy's 2025 actions under the Defense Production Act prioritize industrial-scale pilots for minerals like and to reduce technical and financial risks in deployment. The U.S. Geological Survey maintains an annual list of 50 critical minerals, updated in 2022 to emphasize supply disruptions over mere , guiding federal investments. The European Union enacted the Critical Raw Materials Act in 2023, targeting 10% of annual EU consumption from domestic extraction, 40% from local processing, and 15% from recycling by 2030, amid concerns over import reliance exceeding 75% for many elements. This includes streamlined permitting for strategic projects and joint ventures with third countries. Internationally, the Minerals Security Partnership, launched in 2022 by the U.S., EU, and allies including Australia and Japan, facilitates coordinated investments in mining and refining outside China, with over 30 projects by 2025 aimed at ethical supply chains. Stockpiling remains limited, as analyses indicate it addresses short-term shocks but not structural dependencies, prompting emphasis on reserves maintenance and recycling mandates. Recent events underscore escalating geopolitical tensions. On October 9, 2025, expanded export controls on rare earths, requiring licenses for seven elements including and , and scrutiny for products containing even trace amounts of Chinese-processed materials, targeting semiconductors and defense applications. This follows prior restrictions and amplifies supply risks, as processes 90% of heavy rare earths, potentially enabling selective disruptions without full bans. In response, the U.S. and signed a on October 20, 2025, enhancing joint exploration, processing investments, and against such controls. The International Energy Agency's Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025, released May 21, projects demand tripling by 2030 for and rare earths, warning that without accelerated non-Chinese capacity, vulnerabilities persist despite policy efforts. These developments highlight causal links between processing monopolies and leverage, with Western policies prioritizing derisking over confrontation.

Environmental and Sustainability Realities

Mining and Processing Impacts

Mining and processing of technology-critical elements, such as rare earth elements (REEs), lithium, and cobalt, involve open-pit extraction and chemical-intensive separation, leading to substantial environmental degradation including habitat destruction, water contamination, and toxic waste generation. These activities accounted for approximately 10% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2018, with projections indicating an increase due to rising demand for clean energy technologies. Land use changes from mining disrupt ecosystems, cause soil erosion, and contribute to biodiversity loss, while energy-intensive processing exacerbates carbon footprints. REEs mining and processing generate particularly severe due to the use of acids and solvents for separation, producing up to 2,000 tons of per ton of REE extracted. In , which supplied over 85% of global REEs as of 2021, decades of unregulated operations have resulted in heavy metal, , and of soil and water, alongside radioactive from thorium and byproducts. This has led to , groundwater , landslides, and river clogging, with cleanup efforts ongoing but challenged by the scale of legacy damage. Blasting and from REE sites further elevate particulate matter and radioactive dust emissions, impacting air quality and human health in surrounding areas. Lithium extraction, primarily via brine evaporation in South America's "" (Argentina, , ), consumes vast quantities of —up to 500,000 gallons per ton of —exacerbating in arid regions and contributing to habitat loss and poisoning. Cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo, which produces over 70% of global supply, generates , heavy metal leachate, and , polluting waterways and reducing . These operations also release GHGs and particulates, with artisanal methods amplifying diffuse across landscapes. Processing stages amplify impacts through high-energy refining and chemical use; for instance, REE separation involves leaching, yielding acidic wastewater that mobilizes toxins into environments if not managed. Overall, while technological advancements like could mitigate some effects, current practices in supply-concentrated regions with varying regulatory enforcement underscore persistent risks to , air quality, and terrestrial habitats.

Comparative Regulatory Burdens

Regulatory frameworks for mining technology-critical elements, such as rare earths, , and , impose disparate burdens across jurisdictions, with Western nations enforcing protracted permitting and stringent environmental standards that extend project timelines, while maintains dominance through historically expedited approvals despite environmental externalities. In the United States, developing a new mine for critical minerals from discovery to production averages nearly 29 years, ranking second-longest globally after , due primarily to multifaceted federal requirements including reviews, Act consultations, and permits. These processes often span 7-10 years for permitting alone, deterring investment and exacerbating supply shortages. China, controlling about 70% of global rare earth and 92% of capacity as of 2025, facilitates faster mine development through less rigorous and more predictable regulatory oversight, enabling projects to advance in years rather than decades. This approach, rooted in state-directed industrial policies, has displaced Western firms from Chinese operations and prioritized output over immediate ecological remediation, though recent measures since 2018 have curbed and imposed cleanup costs estimated at $5.5 billion. Inconsistent enforcement has nonetheless sustained 's market lead, contrasting sharply with Western constraints. The layers additional compliance demands via frameworks like REACH for chemical registration and emerging mandatory for minerals, amplifying administrative costs and slowing domestic extraction efforts. Analyses indicate these regulations erode EU competitiveness in critical raw materials, with calls for burden reduction to counter Chinese and Russian influence. Australia, a significant alternative supplier, contends with overlapping federal and state regulations that impose excessive hurdles on environmental, heritage, and safety assessments, impeding critical minerals investment without commensurate risk mitigation gains. Such disparities foster global supply concentration in less-regulated locales, heightening vulnerabilities for technology-dependent economies reliant on imported elements.

Debates and Criticisms

Overstated Criticality Claims

Claims of acute supply shortages for technology-critical elements, such as rare earth elements (REEs), have periodically surfaced, yet historical episodes reveal these risks as often transient and mitigated by market adjustments. In , China's imposition of export quotas on REEs caused prices to surge by factors of up to ten for elements like and , prompting widespread alarms about impending technological disruptions. However, non-Chinese production expanded rapidly in response, with Australia's Corporation and U.S. facilities scaling up output; by , prices had plummeted over 80% from peak levels as global supply exceeded demand. Substitution strategies have further diminished the perceived indispensability of certain elements. Over the past decade, innovations like REE-free permanent magnets using ferrite or alloys have been deployed in applications such as electric motors, while lighting technologies shifted away from REE phosphors (e.g., and in fluorescent lamps) toward LED alternatives that require minimal or no such materials. Sodium-ion batteries, lacking reliance on or , exemplify progress in , potentially offsetting lithium and REE demands in grid-scale applications. Recycling advancements underscore underappreciated domestic reserves within waste streams, challenging narratives of inevitable scarcity. E-waste from contains recoverable REE concentrations often higher than deposits, with emerging hydrometallurgical and processes achieving yields above 90% for and from spent magnets. U.S. mining tailings alone could supply domestic needs for elements like and through reprocessing, highlighting how overlooked secondary sources mitigate primary extraction dependencies. Market dynamics and economic incentives reveal systemic overstatements in criticality assessments, which frequently emphasize geopolitical risks while discounting price signals that spur investment. Reserves, defined by economic viability rather than geological abundance, expand with rising prices—evident in REE mining restarts in places like , post-2010—rendering static "criticality" lists prone to hype. Analyses contend that such claims, amplified by policy-driven lists from bodies like the U.S. Geological Survey, overlook adaptive substitutions and , fostering unnecessary stockpiling over innovation.

Economic Costs of Dependency Mitigation

Mitigation strategies for dependency on technology-critical elements, such as rare earths and battery minerals, typically involve government subsidies, investments in domestic extraction and infrastructure, programs, and strategic stockpiling, all of which impose substantial fiscal burdens. In the United States, the Department of Energy announced intentions in August 2025 to allocate nearly $1 billion in funding opportunities for advancing critical mineral projects, including and facilities, to reduce reliance on foreign supplies dominated by . Similarly, since 2020, the Department of Defense has committed over $439 million to develop midstream capabilities for rare earth elements, highlighting the scale of public expenditure required to onshore production. These outlays represent opportunity costs, diverting taxpayer funds from other priorities while aiming to enhance supply security amid geopolitical risks. Domestic production costs significantly exceed those of low-cost foreign producers, necessitating ongoing subsidies to make projects viable. For instance, the U.S. Department of Defense has subsidized rare earth oxide production by covering the difference between market prices—largely set by Chinese suppliers—and a target of $110 per kilogram for key elements like and , as implemented in contracts with producers such as in 2025. Global lowest-cost producers can generate rare earth oxide for as little as $11 per kilogram from hard-rock mines, whereas U.S. operations face higher expenses due to stringent environmental regulations, labor costs, and extended permitting timelines, often spanning years and requiring billions in upfront capital. The and related policies earmark approximately $2.5 billion for domestic production and stockpiling, but these interventions elevate end-product prices for technologies like electric vehicles and renewables, potentially increasing consumer costs by embedding subsidized inefficiencies. Recycling initiatives, while promising long-term supply stabilization, entail high initial investments and operational costs that strain economic resources. The estimates that enhanced could reduce the need for new by 25-40% by 2050, yet current efforts face barriers like collection inefficiencies and expenses, particularly for high-purity materials such as used in . U.S. policies, including those under the Bipartisan , fund hubs but yield limited immediate returns, with economic analyses indicating that subsidies distort markets by favoring uncompetitive technologies over imports. Stockpiling, another mitigation tool, incurs storage and maintenance costs without guaranteeing price stability, as modeled disruptions in supply from yield relatively low direct economic impacts—around $34 million—but overlook broader cascading effects on . Overall, these measures risk inflating dependency mitigation expenses without proportionally addressing underlying supply vulnerabilities, as domestic scaling remains hampered by comparative disadvantages in cost structures.

References

  1. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00244-021-00892-6
  2. https://www.usgs.gov/programs/mineral-resources-program/science/what-are-critical-minerals-0
  3. https://www.stapgef.org/resources/advisory-documents/technology-critical-elements
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969717324609
  5. https://www.iea.org/commentaries/with-new-export-controls-on-critical-minerals-supply-concentration-risks-become-reality
  6. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/a-us-framework-for-assessing-risk-in-critical-mineral-supply-chains/
  7. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/energy-research/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2022.957884/full
  8. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2025/1047/ofr20251047.pdf
  9. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4710
  10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355354646_Technology-Critical_Elements_An_Emerging_and_Vital_Resource_that_Requires_more_In-depth_Investigation
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978032390297700007X
  12. https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainscritical-materials
  13. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AGUFM.B22B..01E/abstract
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335748522_Less-Studied_Technology-Critical_Elements_Nb_Ta_Ga_In_Ge_Te_in_the_Marine_Environment_Review_on_Their_Concentrations_in_Water_and_Organisms
  15. https://www.cfr.org/article/us-critical-minerals-dilemma-what-know
  16. https://www.csis.org/analysis/elevating-role-critical-minerals-development-and-security
  17. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/ensuring-national-security-and-economic-resilience-through-section-232-actions-on-processed-critical-minerals-and-derivative-products/
  18. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1drqeev36qo
  19. https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4026144/securing-critical-minerals-vital-to-national-security-official-says/
  20. https://uscriticalmaterials.com/rare-earths-and-critical-minerals-a-national-security-imperative/
  21. https://www.iea.org/topics/critical-minerals
  22. https://www.energy.gov/cmm/what-are-critical-materials-and-critical-minerals
  23. https://www.netl.doe.gov/resource-sustainability/critical-minerals-and-materials/what-are-critical-minerals-materials
  24. https://www.usgs.gov/news/science-snippet/department-interior-releases-draft-2025-list-critical-minerals
  25. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/raw-materials/areas-specific-interest/critical-raw-materials_en
  26. https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/2025/draft-us-critical-minerals-list-clearer-priorities-persistent
  27. https://www.banqu.co/blog/the-critical-raw-materials-guide
  28. https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/australias-critical-minerals-list-and-strategic-materials-list
  29. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-04-24/australias-critical-minerals-what-are-they-for/105209758
  30. https://mineralprices.com/critical-minerals/japan/
  31. https://www.mining.com/japan-adds-uranium-to-list-of-critical-minerals/
  32. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-curbs-exports-strategic-minerals-2025-10-09/
  33. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/the-critical-minerals-to-china-eu-and-u-s-national-security/
  34. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48676
  35. https://www.iea.org/policies/15271-final-list-of-critical-minerals-2022
  36. https://www.csis.org/analysis/mineral-demands-resilient-semiconductor-supply-chains
  37. https://techcet.com/growing-supply-chain-risks-for-germanium-and-gallium/
  38. https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/executive_briefings/ebot_germanium_and_gallium.pdf
  39. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20241057/full
  40. https://natural-resources.canada.ca/minerals-mining/mining-data-statistics-analysis/minerals-metals-facts/rare-earth-elements-facts
  41. https://www.waferworld.com/post/rare-earth-metals-and-semiconductors
  42. https://versae.com/the-most-important-metals-in-electronics-manufacturing-rare-earth-metals/
  43. https://www.bgs.ac.uk/discovering-geology/maps-and-resources/critical-raw-materials-resources/modern-life-doesnt-grow-on-trees/critical-minerals-in-technology/
  44. https://naturalresources.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hr761_everyday_uses.pdf
  45. https://sciencepolicyreview.org/wp-content/uploads/securepdfs/2023/08/MITSPR-v4-191618004005.pdf
  46. https://www.sfa-oxford.com/knowledge-and-insights/critical-minerals-in-low-carbon-and-future-technologies/critical-minerals-in-artificial-intelligence/
  47. https://css.umich.edu/publications/factsheets/material-resources/critical-materials-factsheet
  48. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions/executive-summary
  49. https://rmi.org/the-ev-battery-supply-chain-explained/
  50. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC122671/jrc122671_the_role_of_rare_earth_elements_in_wind_energy_and_electric_mobility_2.pdf
  51. https://nickelinstitute.org/en/blog/2025/august/critical-minerals-driving-ev-performance-a-consumer-guide-to-ev-batteries-part-1/
  52. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2023/trends-in-batteries
  53. https://www.miningdoc.tech/2024/10/21/the-key-minerals-in-an-electric-vehicle/
  54. https://www.windsystemsmag.com/24015-2/
  55. https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2023/04/05/the-energy-transition-will-need-more-rare-earth-elements-can-we-secure-them-sustainably/
  56. https://blog.ucs.org/charlie-hoffs/just-and-sustainable-solutions-for-the-mining-and-recycling-of-rare-earth-elements-in-wind-turbines/
  57. https://www.iea.org/energy-system/industry/critical-minerals
  58. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions/mineral-requirements-for-clean-energy-transitions
  59. https://www.energy.gov/eere/ammto/critical-minerals-and-materials
  60. https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3700059/dod-looks-to-establish-mine-to-magnet-supply-chain-for-rare-earth-materials/
  61. https://uscriticalmaterials.com/download/rare-earths-in-selected-defense-applications/
  62. https://elements.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-how-rare-earths-power-u-s-defense/
  63. https://silverado.org/publications/strategic-defense-critical-minerals/
  64. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_231765.htm
  65. https://silverado.org/reports-and-publications/strategic-defense-critical-minerals/
  66. https://www.gao.gov/blog/critical-materials-are-high-demand.-what-dod-doing-secure-supply-chain-and-stockpile-these-resources
  67. https://nikon-slm-solutions.com/addictive-additive/how-additive-manufacturing-is-reshaping-defense-manufacturing/
  68. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2024/mcs2024.pdf
  69. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2024/mcs2024-rare-earths.pdf
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0883292724002634
  71. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2025/mcs2025-rare-earths.pdf
  72. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2024/mcs2024-lithium.pdf
  73. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/lithium-reserves-by-country
  74. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2024/mcs2024-cobalt.pdf
  75. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/cobalt-reserves-by-country
  76. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-critical-minerals-outlook-2025/overview-of-outlook-for-key-minerals
  77. https://www.wri.org/insights/critical-minerals-explained
  78. https://www.dw.com/en/can-the-west-break-chinas-grip-on-rare-earths/a-74474562
  79. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/05/business/china-rare-earth-environment.html
  80. https://www.usgs.gov/programs/mineral-resources-program/science/critical-mineral-resources
  81. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ee01701d-1d5c-4ba8-9df6-abeeac9de99a/GlobalCriticalMineralsOutlook2024.pdf
  82. https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-new-rare-earth-and-magnet-restrictions-threaten-us-defense-supply-chains
  83. https://natural-resources.canada.ca/minerals-mining/mining-data-statistics-analysis/minerals-metals-facts/cobalt-facts
  84. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099500001312236438/pdf/P1723770a0f570093092050c1bddd6a29df.pdf
  85. https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/most-of-the-worlds-cobalt-is-mined-in-the-democratic-republic-of-congo-but-refined-in-china
  86. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2025/3038/fs20253038.pdf
  87. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/fs20253038
  88. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-106395
  89. https://www.energy.gov/articles/energy-department-announces-actions-secure-american-critical-minerals-and-materials-supply
  90. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47982
  91. https://www.iea.org/reports/introducing-the-critical-minerals-policy-tracker/ensuring-supply-reliability-and-resiliency
  92. https://www.irena.org/Digital-Report/Geopolitics-of-the-Energy-Transition-Critical-Materials
  93. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-tightens-rare-earth-export-controls-2025-10-09/
  94. https://www.csis.org/analysis/unpacking-us-australia-critical-minerals-framework-agreement
  95. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-critical-minerals-outlook-2025
  96. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/critical-minerals-in-crisis-stress-testing-us-supply-chains-against-shocks/
  97. https://www.eesi.org/papers/view/issue-brief-critical-minerals-and-the-u.s-clean-energy-transition
  98. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378024000451
  99. https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions/sustainable-and-responsible-development-of-minerals
  100. https://hir.harvard.edu/not-so-green-technology-the-complicated-legacy-of-rare-earth-mining/
  101. https://ips-dc.org/mapping-the-impact-and-conflicts-of-rare-earth-elements/
  102. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-10105-2
  103. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1557/s43577-022-00286-6
  104. https://friendsoftheearth.uk/sustainable-living/whats-environmental-impact-critical-minerals
  105. https://ceo.beg.utexas.edu/assets/publications/Cobalt%2520paper%25202024.pdf
  106. https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2021/12/understanding-cobalts-human-cost
  107. https://news.ucar.edu/132918/monitoring-african-copper-and-cobalt-mining-emissions-space
  108. https://www.unep.org/topics/energy/renewable-energy/critical-energy-transition-minerals
  109. https://press.spglobal.com/2024-07-18-United-States-Ranks-Next-to-Last-in-Development-Time-for-New-Mines-that-Produce-Critical-Minerals-for-Energy-Transition%2C-S-P-Global-Finds
  110. https://me.smenet.org/us-mine-development-timeline-second-longest-in-world-sp-global-says/
  111. https://nma.org/resources/delays-in-the-u-s-mine-permitting-process-impair-and-discourage-mining-at-home/
  112. https://www.usfunds.com/resource/rare-earth-stocks-explode-as-china-clamps-down-on-exports/
  113. https://www.heritage.org/defense/commentary/rare-earths-supply-chains-and-confrontation-china
  114. https://rareearthexchanges.com/china-rare-earth-export-policy/
  115. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52024DC0415
  116. https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/97e481fd-2dc3-412d-be4c-f152a8232961_en
  117. https://ecipe.org/publications/trade-diversification-the-role-of-mercosur/
  118. https://minerals.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Future-Critical_Meeting-the-minerals-investment-challenge_2023.pdf
  119. https://www.vox.com/2014/10/22/7031243/china-grip-rare-earth-metals-supply-weakening
  120. https://www.mining-technology.com/features/featurethe-false-monopoly-china-and-the-rare-earths-trade-4646712/
  121. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435124001120
  122. https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2024/10/03/recycling--alternatives-vital-to-critical-minerals-sustainabilit.html
  123. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1342937X25001595
  124. https://rareearthexchanges.com/news/americas-throwaway-critical-minerals-fact-hype-and-what-needs-scrutiny/
  125. https://thecritic.co.uk/dont-panic-about-rare-earths/
  126. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921344924003872
  127. https://www.globalpolicywatch.com/2025/10/made-in-america-the-outlook-for-critical-minerals/
  128. https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/us-rare-earth-pricing-system-is-poised-challenge-chinas-dominance-2025-07-14/
  129. https://www.csis.org/analysis/developing-rare-earth-processing-hubs-analytical-approach
  130. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/energysource/make-critical-mineral-spending-matter-this-time/
  131. https://www.iea.org/reports/recycling-of-critical-minerals/executive-summary
  132. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/3af7fda6-8fd9-46b7-bede-395f7f8f9943/RecyclingofCriticalMinerals.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.