Hubbry Logo
Tournament (medieval)Tournament (medieval)Main
Open search
Tournament (medieval)
Community hub
Tournament (medieval)
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tournament (medieval)
Tournament (medieval)
Tournament (medieval)
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
An early 14th century depiction of mounted combat in a tournament from the German Codex Manesse

A tournament, or tourney (from Old French torneiement, tornei), was a chivalrous competition or mock fight that was common in the Middle Ages and Renaissance (12th to 16th centuries). It is a type of hastilude.

Tournaments included mêlée, hand-to-hand combat, contests of strength or accuracy, and sometimes jousts. Some considered the tournaments to be frivolous pursuits of celebrity, and even a potential threat to public order;[1] but the shows were popular and often put on in honor of coronations, marriages, births, recent conquests or peace treatises, or to welcome ambassadors, lords, or others considered to be of great importance. Other times tournaments were held for no particular reason or simply for entertainment.

Etymology

[edit]
Further information: Hastilude

The word tournament evolved from the Middle English tornement which entered the English lexicon from the Old French torneiement around the 12th century. That noun and its associated verb, tornoier, ultimately derive from the Latin tornare ("to turn") which also gave rise to the Italian torneo, the modern French tournoi, and modern English's tourney. Tournament and its derivates had been adopted in English (via Anglo-Norman) by the 14th century.

The Old French tornoier originally meant "to joust and tilt", but came to refer to the knightly tournament more generally while joster, meaning "approach, meet"[2] (also adopted before the 14th century) came to refer to jousting specifically.

By the end of the 12th century, tornement and Latinized torneamentum had become the generic term for all kinds of knightly hastiludes or martial displays. Roger of Hoveden writing in the late 12th century defines torneamentum as "military exercises carried out, not in the knight's spirit of hostility (nullo interveniente odio), but solely for practice and the display of prowess (pro solo exercitio, atque ostentatione virium)."[3]

Origins

[edit]

Medieval equestrian warfare and equestrian practices originate in Ancient Rome, just as the notion of chivalry goes back to the rank of equites in Roman times.[4] There may be an element of continuity connecting the medieval tournament to the hippika gymnasia of the Roman cavalry, but with the sparsity of written records during the 5th to 8th centuries this is difficult to establish. It is known that such cavalry games were central to military training in the Carolingian Empire, with records of Louis and Charles' military games at Worms in 843. At this event which was recorded by Nithard, the initial chasing and fleeing was followed by a general mêlée of all combatants.

Documentation of equestrian practice during the 9th to 10th centuries is sparse, but it is clear that the tournament was a development of the High Middle Ages. It is recognized by several medieval historical sources: a chronicler of Tours in the late 12th century attributes the "invention" of the knightly tournament to Angevin Baron Geoffroi de Preulli. In 16th-century German historiography, the setting down of the first tournament laws is attributed to Henry the Fowler; this tradition is cited by Georg Rüxner in his Thurnierbuch as well as by Paulus Hector Mair in his De Arte Athletica.[5]

The earliest known use of the word "tournament" comes from peace legislation by Count Baldwin III of Hainaut for the town of Valenciennes, dated to 1114. It refers to the keepers of the peace in the town leaving it "for the purpose of frequenting javelin sports, tournaments and such like."[citation needed] A pattern of regular tournament meetings across northern France is evident in sources[who?] for the life of Charles, Count of Flanders. The sources of the 1160s and 1170s portray the event in the developed form it maintained into the 14th century.[citation needed]

High Middle Ages

[edit]

Tournaments centered on the mêlée, a general fight where the knights were divided into two sides and charged at each other, fighting with blunted weapons. Jousting, a single combat of two knights riding at each other, was a component of the tournament but was not its main feature.[6]

The standard form of a tournament is evident in sources as early as the 1160s and 1170s, notably History of William Marshal and the Arthurian romances of Chrétien de Troyes.[7] Tournaments might be held at all times of the year except the penitential season of Lent (the 40 days preceding Easter). The general custom was to hold them on Mondays and Tuesdays, though any day but Friday and Sunday might be used. The site of the tournament was customarily announced a fortnight before it was to be held. The most famous tournament fields were in northeastern France (including between Ressons-sur-Matz and Gournay-sur-Aronde near Compiègne, in use between the 1160s and 1240s) which attracted hundreds of foreign knights from all over Europe for the 'lonc sejor' (the tournament season).

Knights arrived individually or in companies to stay at one or other of the two settlements designated as their lodgings. The tournament began on a field outside the principal settlement, where stands were erected for spectators. On the day of the tournament one side was formed of those within the principal settlement, and another of those outside.

Parties hosted by the principal magnates present were held in both settlements, and preliminary jousts (called the vespers or premières commençailles) offered knights an individual showcase for their talents. On the day of the event, the tournament was opened by a review (regars) in which both sides paraded and called out their war cries. There was then a further opportunity for individual jousting carried out between the rencs, the two lines of knights. The opportunity for jousting at this point was customarily offered to the new, young knights who were present.

At some time in mid-morning the knights would line up for the charge (estor). At the signal which was usually a bugle or herald's cry, the two knights would ride at each other and meet with levelled lances. Those remaining on horseback would turn quickly (the action which gave the tournament its name) and single out knights to attack. There is evidence that squires were present at the lists (the staked and embanked line in front of the stands) to offer their masters up to three replacement lances. The mêlée would tend to degenerate into running battles between parties of knights seeking to take ransoms and would spread over several square miles between the two settlements which defined the tournament area. Most tournaments continued until both sides were exhausted or until the light faded. A few ended earlier, if one side broke in the charge, panicked and ran for its home base looking to get behind its lists and the shelter of the armed infantry which protected them. Following the tournament the patron of the day would offer lavish banquets and entertainment. Prizes were offered to the best knight on either side and awarded during the meals.[8][page needed]

Melee

[edit]
Two teams stand ready just before the match begins; each side has 24 knights, each with a banner-bearer.[9] There is a central spectators' box for the four judges, and one on each side for the ladies; inscribed over the boxes is plus est en vous which is the motto of the Gruuthuse family of Bruges.[10]
A tournament in progress (René d'Anjou), only the banners of Bourbon and Brittany are shown left in the field of view. The individual knights' banners are seen to the right.

Melee (/ˈmeɪleɪ/ or /ˈmeleɪ/, French: mêlée [mɛle]; in English frequently spelled as mêlée, melée, or simply melee) is a term for a type of mock combat in medieval tournaments.[11][12][13] The "mêlée" was the "mass tournament" where two teams, either on foot or horse, clashed in formation. The aim was to smash into the enemy in massed formation, with the aim of throwing them back or breaking their ranks. Following a successful maneuver of this kind, the rank would attempt to turn around without breaking formation (widerkere or tornei); this action was so central that it would become eponymous of the entire tradition of the tourney or tournament by the mid-12th century.[citation needed] Weapons were often blunted before fights in order to prevent serious injury.

The Middle High German term for this type of contest was buhurt (adopted in French as bouhourt); some sources may also make a distinction between mêlée or mass tournament and buhurt, as the latter could refer to a wider class of equestrian games not necessarily confined to the formal tournament reserved to nobility.[clarification needed]

The Old French meslee "brawl, confused fight; mixture, blend" (12th century)[14] is the feminine past participle of the verb mesler "to mix" (ultimately from Vulgar Latin misculāta "mixed", from Latin miscēre "to mix"; compare mélange; meddle, medley). The modern French form mêlée was borrowed into English in the 17th century and is not the historical term used for tournament mock battles.[clarification needed] The term buhurt may be related to hurter "to push, collide with" (cognate with English to hurt) or alternatively from a Frankish bihurdan "to fence; encompass with a fence or paling").

Tournaments often contained a mêlée consisting of knights fighting one another on foot or mounted, either divided into two sides or fighting as a free-for-all. The object was to capture opposing knights so that they could be ransomed, and this could be a very profitable business for such skilled knights as William Marshal.

The mêlée or buhurt was the main form of the tournament in its early phase during the 12th and 13th centuries. The joust, while in existence since at least the 12th century as part of tournaments, did not play the central role it would acquire later by the late 15th century.

Jousting

[edit]
The joust outlasted the tournament proper and was widely practiced well into the 16th century (sketch by Jörg Breu the Elder, 1510).

Jousting formed part of the tournament event from as early a time as it can be observed. It was an evening prelude to the big day and was also a preliminary to the melee. In the 12th century, jousting was occasionally banned in tournaments. The reasons given are that it distracted knights from the main event and allowed a form of cheating. Count Philip of Flanders made a practice in the 1160s of turning up armed with his retinue to the preliminary jousts and then declining to join the mêlée until the knights were exhausted and ransoms could be swept up.

Jousting had its own devoted constituency by the early 13th century, and in the 1220s it began to have its own exclusive events outside the tournament. The biographer of William Marshal observed c.1224 that in his day noblemen were more interested in jousting than tourneying. In 1223, we have the first mention of an exclusively jousting event, the Round Table held in Cyprus by John d'Ibelin, lord of Beirut. Round Tables were a 13th-century enthusiasm and can be reconstructed to have been an elimination jousting event. They were held for knights and squires alike. Other forms of jousting also arose during the century, and by the 14th century the joust was poised to take over the vacancy in aristocratic amusement caused by the decline of the tournament.

Popularity

[edit]

The first English mention of tourneying is in a charter of Osbert of Arden, Lord of Kingsbury of Warwickshire, which reveals that he travelled to both Northampton and London and crossed the English Channel to join in events in France. The charter dates to the late 1120s.[15] The great tournaments of northern France attracted many hundreds of knights from Germany, England, Scotland, Occitania, and Iberia. There is evidence that 3,000 knights attended the tournament at Lagny-sur-Marne in November 1179 promoted by Louis VII in honour of his son's coronation. The state tournaments at Senlis and Compiègne held by Philip III in 1279 can be calculated to have been even larger events.[citation needed]

Aristocratic enthusiasm for the tournament meant that it had travelled outside its northern French heartland before the 1120s. The first evidence for it in England and the Rhineland is found in the 1120s. References in the Marshal biography indicate that in the 1160s tournaments were being held in central France and Great Britain. The contemporary works of Bertran de Born talk of a tourneying world that also embraced northern Iberia, Scotland and the Empire. The chronicle of Lauterberg indicates that by 1175 the enthusiasm had reached the borders of Poland.

Despite this huge interest and wide distribution, royal and ecclesiastical authority was deployed to prohibit the event. In 1130, Pope Innocent II at a church council at Clermont denounced the tournament and forbade Christian burial for those killed in them. The usual ecclesiastical justification for prohibiting them was that it distracted the aristocracy from more acceptable warfare in the defense of Christianity elsewhere. However, the reason for the ban imposed on them in England by Henry II was most likely because of its persistent threat to public order.[16] Knights going to tournaments were accused of theft and violence against the unarmed. Henry was keen to re-establish public order in England after the disruption during the reign of King Stephen. He did not prohibit tournaments in his continental domains, and indeed three of his sons were avid pursuers of the sport.

Tournaments were allowed in England once again after 1192, when Richard I identified six sites where they would be permitted and gave a scale of fees by which patrons could pay for a license. But both King John and his son Henry III introduced fitful and capricious prohibitions which much annoyed the aristocracy and eroded the popularity of the events. In France, Louis IX prohibited tourneying within his domains in 1260[citation needed], and his successors for the most part maintained the ban.

Equipment

[edit]

It is a debated issue as to what extent specialized arms and armor were used in mêlée tournaments, and to what extent the military equipment of knights and their horses in the 12th and 13th centuries was devised to meet the perils and demands of tournaments, rather than warfare. It is, however, clear from the sources that the weapons used in tournaments were initially the same as those used in war. It is not certain that swords were blunted for most of the history of the tournament. This must have changed by the mid 13th century, at least in jousting encounters. There is a passing reference to a special spear for use in jousting in the Prose Lancelot (c. 1220).[citation needed] In the 1252 jousting at Walden, the lances used had sokets, curved ring-like punches instead of points. Edward I of England's Statute of Arms of 1292 says that blunted knives and swords should be used in tournaments.[17]

Late Middle and Early Modern Ages

[edit]
Further information: King René's Tournament Book, Bem cavalgar, Thurnierbuch, and Freydal
Watercolor, probably by Barthélemy d'Eyck, from King René's Tournament Book
German Tournament ca. 1480, by the Master of the Housebook

The tournament had a resurgence of popularity in England in the reign of the martial and crusading King Edward I and under his grandson Edward III, yet the tournament died out in the latter's reign. Edward III encouraged the move towards pageantry and a predominance of jousting in his sponsored events. In one of the last true tournaments held in England (in 1342 at Dunstable), the mêlée was postponed so long by jousting that the sun was setting by the time the lines charged.

A tournament took place in Norwich in 1350 which was attended by Edward III's son, commonly known as the Black Prince. The tournament, held at the expense of the citizens of Norwich, cost £37.4s.6d.;[18] approximately 5 years' wages for a skilled craftsman. The tournament survived little longer in France or Burgundy. The last known tournament at Bruges took place in 1379. That same year the citizens of Ghent rioted when the count of Flanders announced a tournament to be held at their city. The cause of their discontent was the associated expense to them.

By using costumes, drama, and symbolism tournaments became a form of art, which raised the expenses for these events considerably. They had political purposes: to impress the populace and guests with their opulence, as well as with the courage of the participants. Loyalty to a lord or lady was expressed through clothes and increasingly elaborate enactments. Tournaments also served cultural purposes. As the ideals of courtly love became more influential, women played a more important role in the events. Events often took place in honor of a lady, and ladies participated in the playacting and symbolism.

Edward III regularly held tournaments, during which people often dressed up, sometimes as the Knights of the Round Table.[19] In 1331, the participants of one tournament wore green cloaks decorated with golden arrows. In the same year at a tournament at Cheapside, the king and other participants dressed as Tartars and led the ladies, who were in the colors of Saint George, in a procession at the start of the event.[20] Edward III's grandson, Richard II, first distributed his livery badges with the White Hart at a tournament at Smithfield.[21]

Mythology and storytelling were popular aspects of tournaments. In 1468 Duke Charles the Bold of Burgundy organised a tournament to celebrate his marriage with Margaret of York. The tournament was supposedly at the bidding of the 'Lady of the Hidden Ile'. A golden tree had been erected with all the coats of arms of the participating knights. They were dressed like famous figures from legend and history, while their squires were dressed as harlequins. A notable example of an elaborate costume was that of Anthony of Luxembourg: chained in a black castle he entered the lists; he could only be freed with a golden key and approval of the attending ladies.[22]

The 1511 Westminster Tournament Roll Detail showing Henry VIII in front of Catherine of Aragon

In Florence, the military aspect of the tournaments was secondary to the display of wealth. For a tournament honoring his marriage to Clarice Orsini in 1469, Lorenzo de' Medici had his standard designed by Leonardo da Vinci and Andrea del Verrocchio. He also wore a large amount of jewelry, including the Medici diamond 'Il Libro'.[23]

The fatal tournament between Henry II of France and Gabriel Montgomery (1559)

Royalty also held tournaments to stress the importance of certain events and their nobility's loyalty. King Henry VII of England and Queen Elizabeth of York presided over a series of tournaments when their infant son Henry VIII became duke of York in 1494. These tournaments were noted for their display of wealth. On the first day, the participants showed their loyalty by wearing the king's colors on their bodies and the queen's colors on their helmets. They further honored the royal family by wearing the colors of the king's mother, Margaret Beaufort, on the next day.[24]

In 1511, at the court of King Henry VIII, a tournament was held in honor of the king's wife Catherine of Aragon. Charles Brandon came out of a tower which was moved onto the battlefield, dressed like a pilgrim. He only took off his pilgrim's clothes after the queen had given him permission to participate.[25] In 1559, King Henry II of France died during a tournament when a sliver from the shattered lance of Gabriel Montgomery, captain of the Scottish Guard at the French Court, pierced his eye and entered his brain. The death caused his 15-year-old son Francis II to take the throne, beginning a period of political instability that ultimately led to the French Wars of Religion.

Spanish knights in the 16th century practised a team fight known as the "cane game".[26] In Spanish Italy, tournaments could include an equivalent gioco de canne.[27] The decline of the true tournament, as opposed to the joust, was not a straightforward process, although the word continued to be used for jousts until the 16th century - forced by the prominent place that tourneying occupied in popular Arthurian romance literature.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Tournament (medieval)

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A medieval tournament was a form of chivalric combat event in from the 12th to the 16th centuries, typically involving knights in armored contests such as the mêlée—a large-scale team battle simulating warfare—and the joust, an individual lance charge between two riders separated by a barrier called the . These events originated in northern around the mid-12th century as organized mock battles to train in horsemanship and tactics, evolving from earlier unstructured warrior practices dating back to around AD 1000. By the 13th century, tournaments had become spectacles of noble culture, emphasizing , , and social display, often held on open fields or purpose-built arenas with pavilions, feasts, and crowds of spectators including royalty and commoners. Tournaments served multiple purposes beyond recreation: they provided essential military preparation for and wars, allowed knights to gain fame, ransom, and patronage through victories, and functioned as diplomatic tools to forge alliances or resolve tensions without full-scale conflict. Prominent figures like William Marshal, the 12th-century English knight celebrated in the epic The History of William Marshal, amassed wealth and status through tournament successes, highlighting how these events reinforced the feudal hierarchy and knightly ideals. The Church periodically condemned tournaments as violent and profane—issuing bans as early as 1130 and —but they persisted, adapting to regulations that limited fatalities and incorporated religious elements like prayers before combat. Over time, the format shifted dramatically: the chaotic mêlées of the gave way to more controlled jousts in the , influenced by events like the , while the saw the rise of theatrical pas d'armes—staged "passages of arms" where knights defended symbolic barriers against challengers, as in the 1446–1447 Pas de la Joyeuse Garde or the 1463 Bruges tournament. Specialized equipment emerged, including lighter "tournament armor" with reinforced lances and crests for visibility, distinguishing it from battlefield gear. Notable spectacles included the 1390 Saint-Inglevert jousts, where three French knights faced over a hundred challengers from across , and the 1520 Field of the Cloth of Gold meeting between of and , blending tournament with diplomacy. By the late , the rise of firearms, centralized monarchies, and shifting warfare rendered tournaments obsolete, though their legacy endures in modern reenactments and romanticized depictions in literature and art.

Terminology and Origins

Etymology

The word "" derives from the term torneiement, first attested in the 12th century, which referred to a knightly contest or mock battle. This noun stems from the verb torneier, meaning "to turn" or "to ," evoking the circular maneuvers and wheeling formations characteristic of early mounted combats where participants would charge, turn, and regroup. The root traces back to the Latin tornare, meaning "to turn on a " or "to round off," reflecting a adaptation tornidiare that entered via Norman influences. Possible connections to earlier Frankish or Germanic terms for simulated battles exist, though direct etymological links remain speculative; for instance, the general Latin hastiludium (" game") was used broadly for sports before specific terms like torneiement emerged. Related terminology evolved alongside torneiement to distinguish specific combat types. The term justa (or jousts), from joste or juste and ultimately Latin iuxta ("near" or "close to"), denoted single combats between two mounted knights approaching each other, with early 12th-century uses in Latin chronicles like those of describing such encounters as justae. Similarly, behourd (or behorde), from behorder meaning "to strike" or "to buffet," referred to lighter foot combats or skirmishes, often for training, and appears in 12th-century texts such as the German Kaiserchronik, where it describes informal melee-style fights among . These terms highlight a 12th- to 13th-century shift from generic mock battles to more defined events, as chroniclers differentiated torneamentum for large-scale mounted melees from justas and behourd for targeted engagements. Regional linguistic variations reflect the spread of these practices across . In English, tournament entered via Anglo-Norman sources in the mid-12th century, notably in Wace's Roman de Rou (c. 1160–1174), which uses torneier to depict Norman knightly exercises, marking one of the earliest literary attestations in texts. In German-speaking areas, the cognate Turnier derives from turnieren, borrowed directly from torneier by the late 12th century, as seen in chronicles like the Annales Magdeburgenses, adapting the term for local knightly gatherings. By the 13th century, torneiement had become the dominant generic term in French and Latinized forms (torneamentum) across chronicles, encompassing various hastiludes while retaining its core connotation of rotational combat.

Historical Origins

The medieval tournament emerged in northern during the mid-11th century as an organized form of mock combat designed to train knights in warfare without the full risks of actual battle. Several later chroniclers, including the early 13th-century Chronicle of St , attribute its invention to the French baron Geoffroi de Préuilly, who reportedly devised these events around 1060 and was killed in one in (or 1062). However, this attribution is widely regarded as a local legend unsupported by contemporary sources, with broader historical evidence suggesting tournaments evolved more gradually in late 11th-century northern from unstructured practices as essential training exercises for knights; the earliest contemporary references appear in early 12th-century documents, such as a 1114 prohibiting feuds at tournaments. These early tournaments served as a vital alternative to real warfare amid the feudal disorders of 11th-century , allowing knights to maintain martial prowess and resolve disputes in a controlled manner. In regions like Anjou and , they evolved from chaotic armed encounters following battles—such as those described in Norman chronicles after the 1066 —into structured gatherings that emphasized horsemanship, lance work, and tactical coordination. By the 1090s, chroniclers like noted these activities as regular occurrences among Norman elites, reflecting their role in knightly and social bonding. The rise of tournaments coincided with the movements, initiated by church councils in the and 1030s, which aimed to curb endemic feudal violence by prohibiting armed conflict on holy days and protecting non-combatants. These initiatives inadvertently encouraged the redirection of aggressive energies into sanctioned outlets like tournaments, providing knights with opportunities to demonstrate valor while adhering to broader calls for restraint. This channeling of violence helped legitimize tournaments as extensions of chivalric ideals, though they remained controversial for their potential lethality. From their French heartland, tournaments spread to England and the German lands by the late 11th and early 12th centuries, facilitated by Norman conquests and dynastic ties. In England, they gained traction among the Anglo-Norman aristocracy following the 1066 invasion, with early instances recorded in chronicles by the 1120s. The church responded swiftly to this expansion; at the Council of Clermont in 1130, Pope Innocent II issued the first major prohibition, denouncing tournaments as idolatrous and denying Christian burial to participants killed in them, as recorded in canon 9 of the synod's decrees.

Formats and Practices in the High Middle Ages

Melee

The was the predominant form of tournament in the early , simulating a large-scale battle between two opposing teams of knights, often comprising 20 to 100 or more participants per side, conducted across expansive open fields. The core objective was to capture enemy knights or seize standards and equipment, with victors holding captives for payments that could range from modest sums to substantial fortunes, thereby incentivizing tactical prowess and economic gain. These events served as practical training for warfare, fostering skills in group coordination and individual combat while reinforcing chivalric bonds among the . During the 12th and 13th centuries, melees typically commenced with a thunderous mounted charge, where teams advanced en masse on horseback using blunted weapons—such as rebated swords, maces, and lances without sharp points—to replicate battlefield conditions while reducing the risk of fatal wounds. Combat devolved into a fluid, often chaotic fray lasting hours, with knights dismounting to continue on foot if unhorsed, until one side yielded or a horn signaled the end; ransoms were then tallied, and prizes distributed based on captures. A prominent practitioner was William Marshal, who in the late amassed wealth equivalent to a baron's fortune through over 500 captures across numerous melees, exemplifying the format's emphasis on endurance and opportunism. Variations in melee formats emerged over time, including the "round table" style, held in a circular arena to evoke Arthurian ideals and encourage fluid, all-around engagements rather than linear advances. Traditional s occurred in unregulated open terrain between villages, but by around 1200, organizers introduced rudimentary safety measures such as wooden barriers or rope-enclosed lists to delimit the fighting area, protect onlookers, and prevent pursuits from spilling into surrounding countryside. These enclosures marked an evolution from entirely uncontrolled brawls, though accidents remained common due to the format's intensity. Tactically, melees relied heavily on cavalry charges to shatter formations and create openings for captures, with destriers providing the speed and power essential for initial impacts and subsequent maneuvers. In some instances, or offered support, engaging in foot to aid mounted knights or secure downed opponents, adding layers of combined-arms simulation. Victory was determined not by mock fatalities but by the tally of prisoners and recovered gear, prioritizing restraint and over brute force to align with chivalric norms.

Jousting

developed in the as a more individualized form of combat within broader tournaments, allowing knights to demonstrate personal prowess in a controlled setting separate from the chaotic group engagements of early tourneys. Initially practiced in around the mid-, it evolved from exercises into a chivalric spectacle that emphasized honor and skill, gaining widespread popularity among the by the late as tournaments shifted toward structured events. By the 1190s, jousting had become a prominent feature of High Medieval tournaments, with the introduction of fixed barriers known as to define the combat area and prevent knights from circling or evading opponents, thus enforcing direct confrontations. These , often wooden enclosures or ropes marking the field boundaries, ensured fair play and spectator safety, marking a refinement from the open-field melees of earlier centuries. The first recorded exclusively event occurred in 1223 as the tournament organized by John d'Ibelin, Lord of , in , where participants engaged solely in lance-based duels rather than mixed combat formats. In core mechanics, jousting involved two mounted knights charging toward each other at high speed along parallel lanes, each wielding a lance—typically 2.4 to 3 meters long and made of wood—to strike the opponent and achieve unhorsing. The objective was to unseat the rival while remaining mounted oneself, with knights targeting the chest, throat, or helmet; later regulations emphasized hits on the shield to minimize lethality. For identification amid the dust and speed, combatants displayed elaborate crests on their helmets, heraldic shields, and colorful caparisons on their horses, often augmented by favors such as scarves or veils bestowed by ladies as tokens of affection or allegiance. Scoring focused on the quality of contact: primary points for unhorsing the opponent, secondary for cleanly breaking the lance (ideally three times or more), and touches or grazes awarding lesser value, with judges tallying results after a set number of passes or "courses." Jousting variants included à plaisance, friendly contests using blunted lances and specialized armor to avoid serious injury, and à l'outrance, more intense matches with sharper tips and standard war gear, though still intended as non-lethal demonstrations rather than duels to the death. The à plaisance form dominated circuits, promoting chivalric display, as seen in the 1285 Chauvency-le-Château event where knights competed amid and feasting. Penalties were imposed for fouls such as missing entirely, striking the horse, or failing to maintain the lance's proper alignment, potentially resulting in disqualification or loss of points to uphold the event's emphasis on precision and courtesy.

Rules and Regulations

In the , medieval tournaments were governed by a series of royal and ecclesiastical regulations aimed at curbing their violent tendencies and ensuring they served as controlled military exercises rather than sources of disorder. King imposed a comprehensive ban on tournaments throughout his realm during the 1180s, motivated by concerns over the feuds, riots, and disruptions they provoked among the ; this prohibition effectively halted organized events in until the reign of his son I in 1194. Subsequent ordinances under later monarchs, such as those in the , restricted participation exclusively to knights and nobles of sufficient birth, excluding merchants, heretics, adulterers, and commoners to maintain the events' chivalric exclusivity and prevent social unrest. These rules also mandated the use of non-lethal weapons, evolving from outright bans on edged blades to requirements for blunted swords and lances by the late . The played a significant role in regulating tournaments, viewing them as breeding grounds for sin, violence, and distraction from crusading duties. In 1130, denounced tournaments at the , prohibiting Christian burial for participants killed in them and imposing ecclesiastical penalties to deter involvement. This outright ban was reinforced at the Fourth in 1215, which strictly forbade tournaments for three years under penalty. The prohibition persisted through the 13th century, with regulations focusing on specific issues such as holding events on Sundays or holy days, which could result in ; the ban was only officially lifted in 1316 by . Church influence thus complemented royal codes, emphasizing moral conduct and safety without fully eradicating the practice. Tournament-specific rules further formalized conduct and logistics, with heralds serving as key overseers responsible for verifying participants' identities through heraldic displays and announcing combatants to prevent disputes over lineage or . A central economic mechanism was the system, where captured knights paid a monetary sum—often standardized in during the 13th century—to their captors for release, incentivizing non-lethal combat and turning tournaments into profitable enterprises for skilled fighters; this practice mirrored wartime customs but was regulated to avoid excessive exploitation. Additional prohibitions targeted unfair advantages, such as banning or allowing infantry formations to dominate proceedings, ensuring the focus remained on mounted knightly and individual prowess rather than ranged or massed tactics. Enforcement of these regulations fell to royal justices and tournament marshals, who investigated violations through itinerant courts and imposed penalties ranging from fines and equipment confiscation to imprisonment for repeat offenders. The 1292 under exemplified this framework, mandating blunted weaponry, prohibiting pointed daggers or maces, and requiring organizers to secure royal licenses, with transgressors facing seizure of horses and armor as punishment. These measures, while not eliminating all dangers, transformed tournaments from chaotic brawls into structured spectacles, integrating them more firmly into the feudal order.

Equipment and Participants

Armor and Weapons

By the late 12th century, the standard protective gear for participants in High Medieval tournaments consisted of the , a knee-length shirt of interlocking iron rings known as chainmail, which provided flexible defense against slashes and thrusts while allowing mobility on horseback. These hauberks often incorporated an integrated (hood) and mittens, evolving from earlier shorter versions to offer fuller coverage during the dynamic combat of melees and early jousts. By the late , began to be reinforced with plates of or metal, particularly on the limbs such as knees (kneecops), to enhance resistance against the powerful impacts of lances and maces prevalent in settings; these additions addressed vulnerabilities in pure chainmail against concentrated blunt force. Torso reinforcements, such as coats of plates worn over the , developed in the late 13th century as an adaptation for safer yet realistic mock warfare. Weapons employed in these events were modified for reduced lethality while simulating battlefield conditions. The jousting , typically 8-10 feet in length and crafted from lightweight ash wood for easy handling at speed, featured a blunted coronal tip with three or more prongs to snag on armor without piercing flesh. In melee combats, swords had rounded tips and edges dulled or sheathed to prevent deep wounds, and maces—short-hafted clubs with flanged or spiked heads—were used in their standard form as inherently non-penetrating tools for stunning blows. Horse armor, or , emerged in the 13th century as an extension of knightly protection, initially consisting of fabric caparisons dyed in heraldic colors to identify riders, later incorporating chainmail panels and rigid chanfrons (face guards) of or metal to shield the animal's head from incidental strikes. Over the , knights wore surcoats—loose tunics emblazoned with personal or familial —to facilitate recognition amid the dust and chaos of tournament fields. Safety innovations proliferated after 1250 to curb the high injury rates in tournaments, including lances designed with weaker shafts to on impact rather than transfer full force, and the introduction of great helms—enclosed, barrel-shaped helmets of riveted iron plates that safeguarded the head and neck during falls or collisions. These enclosed helms, often flat-topped for the period, replaced earlier open-faced designs and were particularly valued in for their ability to glance off lances.

Social Roles of Participants

In High Medieval tournaments, primary participants were professional knights, known as miles in Latin, who were typically elite horsemen from noble or landowning families, often sponsored by lords to compete for renown and ransoms. These knights, evolving from skilled warriors without hereditary status around AD 1000 to formalized by the 12th century, formed the core combatants, testing their prowess in melees and jousts while adhering to emerging chivalric codes. Assisting them were , young male attendants aged 14 or older from noble backgrounds, who managed the knights' horses, maintained armor and weapons, and gained practical experience by accompanying them into the lists, often handling logistical support during events. Women primarily served as spectators and symbolic figures in tournaments, seated in grandstands or pavilions to observe the proceedings, which reinforced social hierarchies and courtly ideals. In the context of courts of love, noblewomen acted as prize-givers, bestowing favors such as scarves or on knights to inspire their , or awarding with jewels, , or banners as of and . Noble hosts and judges, including kings, earls, and princes, organized tournaments to foster political alliances, display prestige, and bond elites through shared spectacle. For instance, King Edward I hosted a grand "tournament of peace" at in July 1278, involving high-ranking nobles such as the Earls of and Lincoln, William de Valence (), and his sons Prince Edward and (), with knights like Roger de among the competitors; the event emphasized regulated chivalric display over violence, using specialized equipment to promote harmony among the aristocracy. Commoners occupied marginal roles, such as barriers-men who maintained the wooden fences enclosing the or musicians providing with horns and , but they were strictly banned from combat participation, which remained an exclusive privilege of the to preserve class distinctions. Exceptional cases of involvement in combat occurred rarely, such as in the 12th century when Dionisia Hotot of donned armor to joust and unhorsed an opposing in defense of her family's honor, an act celebrated as a singular "deed of arms" that highlighted deviations from normative gender roles. Training pathways to knighthood integrated tournaments as essential experiential stages, beginning with boys serving as pages from age seven in a lord's household to learn basic manners, horsemanship, and courtly behavior, progressing at age 14 to squire status where they received intensive instruction in weapons handling and assisted knights in actual events to build combat readiness. By their early 20s, successful squires were dubbed knights after demonstrating proficiency, often through tournament performance that showcased their chivalric education and martial skills, as exemplified by figures like William Marshal, whose early career victories in the lists advanced his status.

Evolution in the Late Middle Ages

Format Changes

From the 13th century onward, with further formalization in the , medieval tournaments underwent significant structural transformations, shifting from the chaotic open-field melees of earlier periods to more controlled events within enclosed lists, reflecting growing and increased royal oversight to mitigate risks and enhance spectacle. In , this evolution was formalized through 14th-century royal ordinances, which mandated confined spaces for combats to prevent the disorder of sprawling battles and to align tournaments with state-controlled chivalric displays. These regulations emphasized barriers and designated areas, transforming tournaments into organized public events that balanced martial training with ceremonial pomp, influenced by the need to manage crowds in expanding urban centers like . A key aspect of this shift was the heightened focus on theatrical display, with tournaments extending over multiple days and incorporating elaborate processions, heraldic pageantry, and point-based judging rather than simple captures or ransoms. The 1390 Smithfield tournament under King Richard II exemplifies this trend: held over three days in , it featured in high saddles with standardized , followed by foot s, all within closed lists where performance was evaluated by lance breaks and strokes, awarding prizes like gold-mounted horns to the most skilled participants as judged by ladies and lords. Processions from the to the field, involving richly caparisoned horses and international knights in unified liveries such as the , underscored the event's role as a courtly , blending with revelry and dancing to celebrate chivalric ideals. Foot combats, known as buhurt in some contexts, became integrated for non-mounted participants, allowing knights and squires to engage in dismounted duels with weapons like pollaxes, swords, and daggers under strict rules to ensure safety and fairness. These bouts, often lighter in armor than mounted jousts, emphasized technique over brute force, with ordinances prohibiting lethal strikes and requiring blunted edges; for instance, in English events like Smithfield, combatants fought in rounds of fixed strokes, such as 27 with swords or axes, within marked enclosures to simulate battlefield conditions without the hazards of open fields. This format catered to emerging professional soldiers training for infantry roles, promoting disciplined combat skills amid the era's tactical shifts toward combined arms warfare. Regional variations highlighted these changes: in , giostre evolved into highly theatrical jousts prioritizing visual splendor and allegorical themes, often in urban squares with crowds as central to the event, diverging from the more focus of northern traditions. In contrast, English tournaments retained elements of melee-style team combats into the early , though increasingly hybridized with and foot fights under royal licenses, as seen in prolonged events blending horsed and dismounted action until around 1400. These adaptations ensured tournaments remained vital to chivalric culture while adapting to political and social demands for controlled, inclusive spectacles.

Pas d'armes and Specialized Events

The , or passage of arms, emerged as a distinctive late medieval tournament format in the 14th and 15th centuries, particularly in regions such as , , and the , where a knight or group of knights would symbolically defend a fixed location—often represented by a mock , tree, or barrier—against all comers in a series of chivalric combats. This innovation transformed traditional into a narrative-driven spectacle inspired by literature, including Arthurian tales, emphasizing themes of quest, honor, and defense rather than open-field melees. Unlike earlier tournament forms, the pas d'armes required defenders (known as tenans) to hold their position for an extended period, inviting challengers (vengeres or dehors) from across Europe to test their prowess under predefined rules, thereby blending martial exercise with theatrical pageantry. The format first appeared in recorded form in Castile around 1428, but it flourished in the mid-15th century amid truces in the , allowing for such elaborate displays. Mechanically, a began with the issuance of chapitres or challenge letters outlining the event's rules, symbolic theme, and combat parameters, which challengers had to formally accept by touching designated shields or striking a barrier at the site. Combats were structured in sets of three courses, typically starting with charges (aiming for a specified number of breaks, such as 13 or 17) and progressing to swordplay if no clear victor emerged, with each bout limited to around 30 minutes and judged by heralds or marshals to ensure safety and fairness using blunted weapons. Successful challengers received symbolic prizes, such as gold chains, rings, or even a caparisoned (trappered ), awarded in ceremonial fashion to underscore the event's romantic ideals, while events often spanned weeks and incorporated banquets, processions, and heraldic decorations to heighten the spectacle. This ritualized approach not only tested skill but also fostered courtly etiquette, with participants often adopting literary personas to evoke tales of knights errant. One prominent example was the Pas de la Belle Pèlerine, held between 1446 and 1449 near in (modern northern ), organized by Jean de Luxembourg, Lord of Haubourdin, where defenders upheld a symbolic "beautiful pilgrim's" castle against international challengers over several years, incorporating jousts and foot combats amid lavish festivities. Another notable instance was the Pas d'Armes of the Golden Tree, held in Bruges in 1468 and organized by , the Bastard of Burgundy, which featured a central golden tree adorned with shields representing various combat types, drawing knights to undertake quests reminiscent of Arthurian adventures like those in the tales of or , and emphasizing endurance through prolonged defensive stands. These events exemplified the format's literary influences, with organizers crafting scenarios from romance texts to elevate the tournament beyond mere into a performative affirmation of chivalric virtue. By the early 16th century, around 1500, the pas d'armes had largely declined due to escalating costs for staging such prolonged, resource-intensive spectacles, including the construction of temporary structures, prizes, and provisions for participants and spectators, amid shifting military priorities and the rise of warfare. Nevertheless, its legacy persisted in the form of festivals and courtly entertainments, where elements of themed challenges and pageantry influenced masques, tilts, and mock combats in and , preserving the chivalric ideal in a more symbolic, less combative manner.

Cultural and Social Impact

Role in Chivalry and Society

Medieval tournaments served as pivotal arenas for embodying and promoting the core virtues of , including courage, honor, and , as idealized in the 12th-century Arthurian romances of . In works such as Erec et Enide and Cligés, tournaments are portrayed as fields of honor where knights demonstrate prowess through , not for personal gain but to uphold largesse and courtesy, transforming brutal mêlées into displays of noble conduct. These events functioned as informal "schools of ," allowing knights to refine their skills and ethical behavior in a controlled setting that mirrored valor while emphasizing restraint and generosity. Historians regard tournaments as the ultimate expression of chivalric identity, where participants openly exhibited martial excellence alongside refined manners, thereby reinforcing the societal ideal of the as a protector of honor. Beyond individual virtue, tournaments fostered social cohesion among the by enabling alliances and mitigating conflicts without resorting to full-scale , particularly in the 13th and 14th centuries. During truces or diplomatic pauses, such as the formal combats at Chauvency in 1345, these events provided a ritualized outlet for tensions between rival factions, allowing nobles to compete symbolically and resolve disputes through prowess rather than bloodshed. Grand spectacles like the 1390 Smithfield jousts in drew participants from across , promoting interactions between English and foreign knights through shared feasts and processions, which strengthened bonds and asserted royal authority amid local rivalries. This integrative role extended to hierarchical structures among participants, where established lords mentored emerging knights, embedding them further into the noble network. Gender dynamics in tournaments highlighted women's influential yet largely passive positions, as they awarded prizes and shaped knightly motivations without direct combat involvement, except in rare historical anomalies. At events like the 1390 Smithfield tournament, groups of noblewomen led processions and presented symbolic rewards—such as a or —to victorious knights, a practice that encouraged displays of performed in their honor. Ladies often sponsored tournaments or bestowed favors like veils, fostering by linking male success to devotion toward women, though active participation remained exceptional and undocumented in most records. This arrangement reinforced patriarchal norms while elevating women's ceremonial status as arbiters of honor. Tournaments' cultural significance is vividly captured in literary and artistic depictions, such as the 14th-century , which illustrates knights in dynamic combat scenes that blend elite entertainment with chivalric pageantry. The manuscript's folio 20v shows Sir Geoffrey Luttrell in jousting armor being seen off by his wife and daughter-in-law, emblematic of the era's shift toward individualized jousts as spectacles for noble audiences, underscoring tournaments' role in aristocratic leisure and identity. Such representations in illuminated manuscripts not only romanticized the events but also perpetuated chivalric ideals across generations, portraying them as harmonious gatherings of the elite rather than mere violence.

Economic and Political Dimensions

Medieval tournaments imposed considerable financial burdens on hosts, encompassing prizes, elaborate feasts, and logistical arrangements for participants and spectators. These expenses were typically shouldered by noble patrons or monarchs, as seen in the 1285 Chauvency tournament, which included opulent banquets, musical performances, and accommodations for hundreds of knights. mechanisms included spectator tolls, entry fees from competitors, and the lucrative practice of ransoms, where defeated knights paid to reclaim their captured horses, armor, and equipment—a system that could yield substantial profits for victors and offset participation costs. Beyond direct expenditures, tournaments generated significant economic ripple effects by drawing large crowds and stimulating ancillary trades. Local economies benefited from heightened demand for specialized , including custom armor from smiths, high-quality destriers from breeders, and lodging from innkeepers, often transforming host towns into temporary hubs of commerce. A notable example occurred during the Champagne fairs of the late , where the 1179 tournament at —organized by Count Henry the Liberal—coincided with the annual trade cycle, integrating knightly combat with international markets in textiles, spices, and finance, thereby amplifying regional prosperity through the 1270s. Politically, tournaments functioned as instruments of and , enabling rulers to cultivate alliances and demonstrate martial prowess without full-scale . They provided neutral venues for elite interactions, where truces could be tested and negotiations advanced amid displays of . The 1390 at Saint-Inglevert near illustrates this utility: during a fragile Anglo-French truce in the , three French knights challenged over 100 English opponents in jousts, promoting cross-channel camaraderie that paved the way for formal peace talks at Leulinghen and a 1396 alliance between Charles VI and Richard II. Ecclesiastical authorities imposed regulations on tournaments to mitigate associated moral hazards, particularly betting and exploitative trade practices. Canon law prohibited games of chance from the early medieval period, viewing as a that undermined Christian virtues, and extended scrutiny to tournament crowds where wagers on outcomes were commonplace. By the , papal decrees and preaching orders, such as those of Franciscan Observants, explicitly condemned alongside and betting, with bans on interest-bearing loans in event zones aimed at preventing amid the influx of merchants and speculators.

Decline and Legacy

Factors Leading to Decline

The introduction of gunpowder weapons in the mid-15th century fundamentally undermined the relevance of traditional knightly skills practiced in tournaments, as firearms rendered charges and armored combat increasingly obsolete on the battlefield. Battles like Agincourt in 1415 demonstrated the vulnerability of mounted knights to disciplined armed with longbows, where English archers decimated despite their superior armor and tactics. By the , maintained over 7,700 handguns in royal arsenals by 1547, surpassing the number of bows and signaling a broader shift toward projectile-based warfare that diminished the prestige of lance-wielding prowess. Escalating costs of specialized equipment, such as reinforced lances with safety "stops" and custom armor, confined participation to the wealthiest elites by the , while persistent dangers led to mounting fatalities that eroded public and royal support. Despite regulations like blunted weapons and barriers, injuries remained severe, with head trauma and lance s causing numerous deaths; for instance, King succumbed to a piercing his eye during a 1559 Paris , prompting immediate bans on such events in . Similarly, Henry VIII's 1536 jousting accident resulted in a lifelong injury that curtailed his participation and highlighted the sport's risks, contributing to its waning appeal amid growing concerns over safety. The rise of centralized monarchies further restricted tournaments as kings sought to curb noble autonomy and prevent gatherings that could foster rebellion. In , initially sponsored lavish events to display royal power but increasingly monopolized them for favorites, transforming into an exclusive spectacle under royal control rather than a widespread noble activity. This shift aligned with broader efforts to centralize authority, eventually giving way to less martial entertainments like courtly masques by the late 1500s. Renaissance humanism and renewed ecclesiastical opposition portrayed tournaments as barbaric relics of a violent past, accelerating their cultural delegitimization. Humanists like in the 14th century derided them as "dangerous folly" unfit for civilized society, a view echoed in 16th-century works that parodied chivalric ideals as outdated and savage, such as in Cervantes' . Papal condemnations, which had lapsed in enforcement, resumed amid Reformation-era scrutiny of secular excesses, reinforcing perceptions of tournaments as incompatible with emerging humanist values emphasizing intellect over brute force.

Influence on Later Traditions

As medieval tournaments declined due to factors like the rise of weaponry and shifting social norms, their traditions evolved into more ceremonial and theatrical forms in the . In 16th-century , the tilt—a refined joust separated by a barrier—became a staple of royal courtly entertainment, reviving medieval combat displays but emphasizing spectacle over violence. Queen Elizabeth I's tilts, held annually to commemorate her 1558 ascension, exemplified this shift; the 1590 event at featured courtiers in allegorical armor performing poetic challenges before the queen, blending chivalric pageantry with political . Similarly, the emerged from tournament training exercises, where knights practiced lance work in circular formations; by the , Italian and French courts transformed these into elaborate equestrian ballets with rings and targets, influencing the modern amusement ride's design. The romanticized image of tournaments profoundly shaped 19th-century literature and cultural revivals, perpetuating ideals of in the Romantic era. Sir Walter Scott's 1819 novel idealized medieval jousts as noble spectacles of honor and romance, drawing on historical tournament accounts to inspire a broader fascination with knightly traditions among European audiences. This literary influence culminated in events like the 1839 in , organized by Archibald Montgomerie, 13th Earl of Eglinton, as a grand reenactment of medieval pageantry; over 150 participants in period costume staged jousts and feasts for 100,000 spectators, though marred by rain, it symbolized the Gothic Revival's effort to recapture chivalric splendor. In the , tournament legacies persist in sports, reenactments, and symbolic practices, adapting martial elements for recreation and heritage preservation. (HEMA) groups and festivals, such as those at medieval fairs, directly recreate tournament formats like the mêlée and tilt, fostering education on chivalric combat while prioritizing safety over lethality. as an Olympic sport traces its roots to the swordplay of tournament foot combats, evolving through Renaissance dueling manuals into a codified discipline emphasizing precision and strategy. , born from the need to identify armored knights in tournaments, endures in coats of arms, national symbols, and ceremonial badges, maintaining visual traditions from the onward. While Western influences dominated, echoes appear in non-European contexts, such as the Ottoman cirit—a horseback game akin to —though these developed independently within Islamic military training.

References

  1. https://www.medievalists.net/2022/06/tournaments-middle-ages/
  2. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1142&context=ljh
  3. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/217873912/Brown-Grant_9781835537671_web.pdf
  4. https://www.etymonline.com/word/tournament
  5. https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/25720781.pdf
  6. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/m/mec/med-idx?type=id&id=MED46597
  7. https://www.britannica.com/sports/tournament-medieval-military-games
  8. https://www.karwansaraypublishers.com/en-us/blogs/medieval-world-blog/geoffrey-de-preuilly-not-invent-tournament
  9. https://urresearch.rochester.edu/fileDownloadForInstitutionalItem.action?itemId=24924&itemFileId=76491
  10. https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/gb19f6442
  11. https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/EMDO/COM-490.xml?language=en
  12. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/canons-of-the-third-lateran-council-of-1179/disputes-decretals-and-the-1179-conciliar-canons/DAC92F814B3BDC483D70AE44807967EC
  13. https://www.academia.edu/34191794/Manly_jousting_at_Smithfield
  14. https://www.castlewales.com/marshal_tour.html
  15. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofEngland/William-Marshal-Knights-Tale/
  16. https://ir.library.louisville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4565&context=etd
  17. https://wamupdates.worcesterart.org/2020/06/a-short-history-of-tournaments.html
  18. https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/21a456bd-7068-426c-a036-cf9667ad8a8a/content
  19. https://www.worldhistory.org/Jousting/
  20. https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Jousting
  21. https://thehistoryofengland.co.uk/resource/medieval-tournaments-illustrated-glossary/
  22. https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/inspire-me/brief-history-of-knights-tournaments/
  23. https://www.medievalists.net/2022/04/rules-medieval-tournament/
  24. https://journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/SPP/article/download/13690/11361
  25. https://www.medievalists.net/2020/12/medieval-tournaments-wrong/
  26. https://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum12-2.htm
  27. https://www.medievalists.net/2022/07/medieval-heralds-and-the-tournament-at-chauvency/
  28. https://deremilitari.org/2014/07/killing-or-clemency-ransom-chivalry-and-changing-attitudes-to-defeated-opponents-in-britain-and-northern-france-7-12th-centuries/
  29. https://www.academia.edu/34019340/Lances_and_Legislation_Knighthood_Kingship_and_Tournament_during_the_Reigns_of_Henry_III_and_Edward_I
  30. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/arms-and-armor-in-medieval-europe
  31. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/60767/60767-h/60767-h.htm
  32. https://www.shorthistory.org/middle-ages/the-duties-of-a-squire-in-the-middle-ages/
  33. https://www.medievalists.net/2016/02/five-medieval-love-tokens/
  34. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/archaeologia/article/xxxvi-copy-of-a-roll-of-purchases-made-for-the-tournament-of-windsor-park-in-the-sixth-year-of-king-edward-the-first-preserved-in-the-record-office-at-the-tower-communicated-by-samuel-lysons-esq-frs-vp-in-a-letter-to-nicholas-carlisle-esq-secretary/1F7FD62A823ED6FF147271D83511CC5B
  35. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1240/how-to-become-a-medieval-knight/
  36. https://archive.org/download/historyoftournam00crip/historyoftournam00crip.pdf
  37. https://www.lonniecolson.com/index.php/article-medieval-foot
  38. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/1430/1/Ralph_Moffat_PhD_2010.pdf
  39. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/96919
  40. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03044181.2024.2378125
  41. https://chaucer.fas.harvard.edu/pages/tournament-romances-chr%C3%A9tien-de-troyes-lhistoire-de-guillaume-le-mar%C3%A9chal
  42. https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd/3402/
  43. https://www.worldhistory.org/Medieval_Tournament/
  44. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/5473/1/PhD%20Thesis%20Tournaments%2C%20Jousts%20and%20Duels.pdf
  45. https://www.wga.hu/html_m/zgothic/miniatur/1301-350/1english/765engli.html
  46. https://deremilitari.org/2013/05/the-tournament-at-lagny-sur-marne-from-the-history-of-william-the-marshal/
  47. https://sheilaghogilvie.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/Edwards-Ogilvie-2012-Champagne-Fairs.pdf
  48. https://www.medievalists.net/2020/12/medieval-tournaments-jousting/
  49. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06375b.htm
  50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43855974
  51. https://hsu.edu/site/assets/files/4558/2003-4afthedeathof_the_knight.pdf
  52. https://www.medievalists.net/2018/01/not-fun-games-dangers-medieval-tournament/
  53. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004378216/BP000024.xml
  54. https://nobility.org/2020/01/popes-kings-and-church-fathers-condemned-the-tournament/
  55. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.2307/750148
  56. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/dizzy-history-carousels-begins-knights-180964100/
  57. https://www.futuremuseum.co.uk/collections/people/lives-in-key-periods/empire-industry/gothic-revival-the-eglinton-tournament
  58. http://nationaljousting.com/history/romantic.htm
  59. https://www.battlemerchant.com/en/blog/from-medieval-tournament-to-modern-show-fight
  60. https://olympiafencingcenter.com/fencing-ages/
  61. https://www.worldhistory.org/Medieval_Heraldry/
  62. https://dariocaballeros.blogspot.com/2011/10/cirit-ancient-turkish-game.html
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.