Hubbry Logo
Unit loadUnit loadMain
Open search
Unit load
Community hub
Unit load
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Unit load
Unit load
Unit load
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Reach truck handling stretch wrapped unit load
Air cargo container of the AKH type on a trailer

The term unit load refers to the size of an assemblage into which a number of individual items are combined for ease of storage and handling,[1] for example a pallet load represents a unit load which can be moved easily with a pallet jack or forklift truck, or a container load represents a unit for shipping purposes. A unit load can be packed tightly into a warehouse rack, intermodal container, truck or boxcars, yet can be easily broken apart at a distribution point, usually a distribution center, wholesaler, or retail store for sale to consumers or for use.[2]

Function

[edit]

Most consumer and industrial products move through the supply chain in unitized or unit load form for at least part of their distribution cycle. Unit loads make handling, storage, and distribution more efficient. They help reduce handling costs and damage by reducing individual handling.

A typical unit load might consist of corrugated fiberboard boxes stacked on a pallet or slip sheet and stabilized with stretch wrap, pressure-sensitive tape, strapping or shrink wrap. About 2 billion unit loads are in daily use in the United States.[3]

Unit load design

[edit]

There are three kinds of unit load design: component-based, systems-based, and standards-compliant. These have different applications.

Component-based design

[edit]

Component-based design is the outmoded ad hoc method of unit load design. Components are sometimes over-specified to get assured performance, or tested to get inexpensive economic performance.

Unit load storage and distribution systems consist of several interacting parts:

Considerable knowledge exists regarding the design of each of these components: their interactions have more recently been studied. When packaging, pallet, and handling systems are designed separately at different locations by different teams, the result might be inefficient unit load systems.

The consequences of independent component-based design in the supply chain can include:

  • Unsafe workplaces
  • Product damage
  • High packaging costs
  • Reduced handling efficiency
  • Wasted natural resources
  • Reduction of environmental quality

Systems-based design

[edit]

Systems-based design is a proven process of unit load component cost optimization based on an understanding of how the pallet, packaging and material handling equipment interact during product distribution and storage to design the unit load component parts.

A systems-based approach to unit load design uses software tools and lab testing to create a package that uses just the right amount of material to protect the product, make for safe handling and transportation and minimize the use of non-recyclable materials.[4]

Companies must now consider sustainability when determining how their packaging products will be reused or recycled at the end of their journey. By combining sustainability with unit load science, they not only create the optimal unit load, but also reduce the amount of packaging material used to transport that load, maximizing the materials that can be recycled and minimizing what goes into a landfill.[4]

Unit loads move via an unpredictable combination of many types of vehicles and storage areas, and the exact set is difficult to predict. Therefore, unit loads must be designed to travel by any such vehicles, and be stored in a wide variety of places. There are many similarities in the requirements for long-term storage and long-distance transportation of unit loads.

Factors considered in unit load systems-based design include:

  • Distribution vibration and resonance
  • Load bridging and deformation
  • Unit load deflections
  • Interfacial friction and load stability
  • Compression stress and product protection
  • Vertical and horizontal stabilization

Often a few inexpensive additions to the packaging can stabilize or stiffen a critical part and give good unit-load performance at a low cost.[5]

Standards-compliant design

[edit]

Standards permit a unit load to be designed and tested to meet a written specification or test method. A unit load can be verified to comply with a standard and validated to determine that the unit load is indeed effective.

Standards provide institutional memory of the many conditions in real logistic trains, and collect the best practices for design and testing unit loads. Standards also describe load requirements, so that logistic providers can plan to meet them.

  • Material-based standards describe proven designs for particular circumstances. These are often used to describe unit load components such as pallets, strapping, seals, caps, retaining rings and battens.
  • Performance testing standards describe needs and allow flexibility in the choice of materials. These are applied to particular unit load designs.

ASTM D4169 has standard test protocols for unit loads. These vary based on the value of the load, the expected hazards, and the distribution environment. This is a performance-based standard.

Another standard for unit loads is MIL-STD-1660, a standard for ammunition unit loads.[1] DOD unit loads generally use 40 in × 48 in (1,016 mm × 1,219 mm) pallets, which unfortunately do not pack efficiently into ISO containers. They weigh less than 4,000 lb (1,814 kg) to limit the stresses on handling equipment. They are weatherproof, and stack 16 ft (4.877 m) high. They often use steel pallets, steel straps with notched seals, outdoor plywood, and plastic film. MIL-STD-1660 mandates that loads must never be less than the width of a pallet, while permitting some overhang. The markings are LOGMARS bar codes and standard inventory numbers. The standard describes major parts of the logistic path, including storage, ship, air, truck, forklift and sling (i.e. ship-to-ship and parachute). There are auxiliary standards for ship-to-ship transfers, and amphibious transfers. There are tests for stacking, transport, sling, forklift and pallet jack, impact, drop tests, tip, water-retention (i.e. weather), and safe disassembly.

MIL-STD-1660 at first looks like overdesign to commercial unit-load designers. However, similar marking standards, safety, stability, volumetric efficiency, weight limits and impact resistance are routinely needed in commercial logistics. Sling handling is routine for small ports and noncontainer transports. Weatherproofness could be optional. It is sometimes valuable, and the baggies are cheap. High, standardized stacking could be optional as well. It is expensive, but sometimes valuable for rackless and military customers.

Further reading

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Unit load

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A unit load is a collection of materials or products assembled, arranged, and restrained together such that it can be handled, stored, protected, and controlled as a single entity throughout the . This approach optimizes by minimizing individual item manipulation, thereby enhancing efficiency in storage, transportation, and distribution processes. The concept of unit loads emerged prominently during to meet urgent demands for rapid and efficient cargo movement, with early innovations like wooden pallets enabling the use of lift trucks for faster loading and unloading. Post-war, the unit load principle became a cornerstone of modern , as outlined in the Material Handling Industry of America's (MHIA) guidelines, which emphasize handling products in the largest practical unit to reduce costs, damage, and pilferage while improving safety and space utilization. Benefits include streamlined , lower equipment needs, and better , making unit loads essential for industries ranging from to retail. Common forms of unit loads include pallets, which serve as stable bases for stacking goods and are compatible with forklifts and conveyor systems; containers, such as intermodal shipping units for global transport; and slip sheets or totes for lighter or specialized applications. Design considerations for unit loads fall into three categories: component-based, focusing on individual elements like materials; systems-based, integrating with overall equipment; and standards-compliant, adhering to modular dimensions for . International standards, such as ISO 3676:2012, define preferred plan dimensions for unit loads to facilitate efficient goods distribution across transport modes, ensuring compatibility in stacking and vehicle loading. In contemporary supply chains, unit loads support efforts by reducing and enabling reusable components, while advancements in —such as automated guided vehicles—further amplify their role in high-volume operations. Literature reviews highlight ongoing evolution, with research from 1950 to 2020 underscoring improvements in stability testing and digital tracking to address challenges like during transit.

Definition and History

Definition

A unit load is the assembly of multiple individual items, packages, or goods into a single, standardized entity designed for efficient handling, storage, and transportation as one cohesive unit in and operations. This consolidation allows for streamlined movement using mechanical equipment, reducing the complexity of managing disparate pieces during distribution. Key characteristics of a unit load include to enable compatibility with handling tools like forklifts and conveyors, through bases such as pallets, containers, or crates that allow interchangeability across stages, and an emphasis on by minimizing labor and time in loading and unloading processes. These features ensure the load maintains during transit, supporting scalability from warehouse storage to intermodal . The basic components of a unit load typically comprise a platform or base, such as a or slip sheet, which provides ; load containment elements, including reusable containers or totes, to preserve the and protect contents; and unitization methods, like stretch wrapping, , or banding, to secure the assembly against shifting or damage. Together, these elements form a stable, handleable package that optimizes space utilization and equipment compatibility. Unlike an individual package, which represents a single item or small grouping handled separately, a unit load consolidates multiples into a larger, unified structure for bulk processing. It also differs from a full container load, which involves dedicating an entire to one shipment at a larger scale, whereas unit loads operate at a smaller, more flexible level, such as palletized batches that can be aggregated into containers.

Historical Development

The concept of the unit load, referring to goods assembled into a single, standardized entity such as a palletized load for efficient handling and transport, originated during as a critical innovation in . In the late 1930s, the U.S. government initiated pallet procurement programs, with major developments accelerating during the war to enable rapid movement of supplies, particularly in the Pacific theater. By 1942, the military ordered over one million pallets, leading to the creation of standardized sizes like 48x40 inches and the development of the four-way entry pallet, which facilitated mechanized handling with early lift trucks. This palletization approach dramatically increased efficiency, doubling the tons handled per worker at depots between 1943 and 1945, and addressed the challenges of large-scale supply chains under wartime pressures. Following the war, the unit load concept expanded rapidly into civilian industries during the , driven by surplus military equipment and the need for streamlined production. Pallets became widespread in sectors like , where they enabled faster loading and reduced manual labor, marking a shift from loose to consolidated loads. A pivotal influence was Malcolm McLean's introduction of in 1956, when his company, Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corporation, launched the first container ship voyage from Newark to Houston on April 26, carrying 58 standardized 35-foot trailers as unit loads, which slashed shipping costs by up to 90% and transformed intermodal transport. This innovation extended the unit load principle beyond warehouses to maritime , promoting global trade efficiency. In the 1960s and 1970s, the unit load gained formal recognition within material handling frameworks and extended to aviation. The unit load principle was incorporated into the foundational guidelines of material handling, emphasizing consolidated loads to optimize flow and storage, as outlined by the Material Handling Institute. Concurrently, air cargo adopted unit load devices (ULDs), with the first standardized container, the "Paul Bunyan Box," introduced by American Airlines in 1958, evolving into widespread use by the 1970s alongside wide-body aircraft like the Boeing 747. Standardization efforts among airlines began in the early 1970s, enabling interlining and reducing ground handling times for freight and mail. From the 1980s onward, unit loads underwent further standardization and technological integration, culminating in modern adaptations for and . The (ISO) published ISO 3676 in 1983, defining modular unit load dimensions like 1200 mm x 1000 mm to harmonize global packaging and distribution. Advancements in , such as automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS), emerged in the late to handle palletized unit loads more efficiently in warehouses. Since the , the surge in has boosted non-pallet unit loads, like individual boxes and parcels, as retailers adapted to high-volume, shipping, with global e-commerce sales rising from under 5% of retail in 2010 to 18% by 2020 and continuing to grow to approximately 19.4% by 2023, driven further by the .

Functions and Benefits

Core Functions

The unit load principle in emphasizes treating assembled goods as a single entity to streamline operations throughout the . This approach enables mechanical handling by equipment such as forklifts and conveyors, allowing multiple items to be moved together rather than individually, thereby reducing manual labor requirements. In storage, unit loads optimize density by facilitating stable stacking of pallets or containers, which maximizes vertical and horizontal space utilization without the need for additional support structures in block stacking configurations. During , unit loads protect by securing them against shifting or damage through containment methods like or wrapping, ensuring stability across various modes of shipment. They also serve as a consistent interface connecting storage, order picking, and shipping processes, allowing seamless transitions between activities and outbound . As the foundational element in systems, unit loads integrate with tracking by providing a standardized unit for monitoring stock levels and facilitating efficient flow in supply chains, aligning with objectives for just-in-time delivery and mixed-load flexibility. This concept gained widespread adoption during to enable rapid deployment of palletized supplies.

Advantages in Logistics

Unit loads significantly enhance efficiency in logistics by enabling mechanization and standardization, which streamline material handling, storage, and distribution processes. By consolidating goods into standardized units such as pallets or containers, handling time can be reduced by up to 60% during loading and unloading operations, allowing for faster throughput in warehouses and transportation networks. This mechanized approach minimizes individual item manipulation, supporting automated systems like forklifts and conveyors to accelerate order picking and inventory movement. Economically, unit loads lower operational costs through reduced labor requirements and minimized product losses. Labor costs in warehouses, where picking activities account for 30-40% of total labor costs, decrease as unit loads facilitate and reduce manual interventions. Additionally, palletized unit loads can reduce damage rates by approximately 35%, preserving value and cutting associated replacement expenses that may reach 0.5% of gross sales in transit-related losses. also optimizes space utilization, enabling denser storage and more efficient vehicle loading to lower transportation expenses per unit. From a perspective, unit loads mitigate worker injuries by replacing manual lifting with mechanical handling, addressing a primary cause of musculoskeletal disorders in . Palletized loads allow forklifts to eliminate floor-level lifts, reducing physical strain and overexertion risks that contribute to back injuries and strains. In terms of , reusable unit load platforms like pallets, which endure up to 200 cycles compared to 6-8 for , decrease waste generation and resource consumption while supporting practices in supply chains. Quantitative examples illustrate these advantages in practice: in fulfillment, unit loads shorten processing times by integrating with automated sorting, enabling same-day shipping and reducing order cycle durations. In global trade, standardized unit loads such as ISO containers ensure across modes, facilitating seamless transfers and cutting delays in international .

Design Approaches

Component-Based Design

Component-based design represents a traditional approach to unit load formation, where individual elements such as platforms and containment materials are selected and optimized independently based on specific load requirements, rather than integrating them within a broader system. This method prioritizes simplicity and focuses on matching components to immediate needs, such as selecting a type suited to the anticipated load weight to ensure basic during handling. For instance, designers might choose a wooden for its cost-effectiveness in general distribution, evaluating its capacity independently before adding other elements. Key components in this design paradigm include platforms and containment methods. Platforms, often pallets, serve as the foundational base for stacking and are available in materials like , , or metal to accommodate varying durability needs. A common specification is the 48x40-inch wooden , which supports a minimum dynamic load of 2,500 pounds and features four-way entry for . Containment methods secure the load atop the platform, with options such as stretch that wraps tightly around the stack to prevent shifting, polyester that provide tension for heavier items, and corner boards that reinforce edges against compression and abrasion. These elements are chosen based on their standalone performance, like the film's ability to maintain force under basic handling stresses. Design considerations emphasize practical attributes of these components to ensure reliability in isolation. Load is assessed to avoid uneven stress on the platform, aiming for uniform placement that maximizes the pallet's rated capacity, such as up to 4,600 pounds for a standard wooden model under static conditions. Material durability focuses on properties like compression strength, where wooden pallets must withstand vertical forces without excessive deflection, for example limited to 0.5 inches in automated supported applications. Basic stability testing, including tip tests that simulate tilting to evaluate overturn risk, verifies the unit's balance under manual or mechanical manipulation. Despite its straightforward application, component-based design has limitations, as it may overlook how individual elements interact with external factors like transport vibrations or storage racking, potentially resulting in suboptimal overall performance and increased risk of damage during operations. This isolated focus can contribute to inefficiencies in broader functions, where unit loads are handled repeatedly.

Systems-Based Design

Systems-based design for unit loads represents a holistic approach that integrates the interactions between load components, handling equipment, and environmental factors throughout the . Originating from research at Tech's for Packaging and Unit Load Design in the mid-2000s, this methodology emphasizes modeling the unit load as an interconnected system rather than isolated parts, such as ensuring dimensions align with trailer configurations or racking systems to optimize space utilization and stability. Key processes in systems-based involve simulating load flow and stress distribution using specialized software to predict during transit and handling. These simulations balance critical factors, including dimensions for secure , warehouse layouts for efficient storage, and compatibility with systems like conveyors or forklifts, thereby minimizing disruptions in material flow. For instance, finite element analysis tools model how forces propagate through the unit load under various conditions, allowing designers to refine configurations iteratively. Advanced considerations focus on dynamic stability, accounting for vibrations and accelerations encountered in real-world operations, which can cause load shifting or failure if unaddressed. Optimization extends to multi-modal transport scenarios, such as road, rail, and air, by evaluating containment strategies that maintain integrity across diverse conditions like humidity fluctuations or impact forces. This approach ensures the unit load performs reliably in integrated logistics networks. Compared to component-based methods, systems-based reduces inefficiencies such as jamming in or excess usage by 10-20%, leading to lower operational costs and improved sustainability through optimized resource use. Real-world applications, like those audited by researchers, have demonstrated savings of up to 19% in expenses by addressing systemic interactions.

Standards-Compliant Design

Standards-compliant design ensures that unit loads adhere to established international and industry norms, promoting universal handling, safety, and across global supply chains. This approach involves specifying dimensions, materials, and performance criteria based on recognized standards such as ISO 3676, which defines modular plan dimensions for unit loads to facilitate efficient distribution from origin to destination. Compliance testing is conducted prior to deployment to verify that the unit load can withstand typical stresses without failure, thereby minimizing risks in transportation and storage. Key design elements include precise dimensioning aligned with standard footprints, such as the 1200 mm × 800 mm Euro pallet base or the 1219 mm × 1016 mm North American standard, to ensure compatibility with handling equipment like forklifts and conveyor systems. Material selection emphasizes durability and load-bearing capacity, with safe working load (SWL) ratings determined through performance tests that account for factors like deflection limits and safety margins; for instance, Euro pallets are rated for static loads up to 4000 kg and dynamic loads up to 1500 kg per industry standards including ISO 8611. These elements prioritize materials like engineered wood or high-density plastics that meet creep resistance and ultimate strength requirements, ensuring the unit load's integrity under rated payloads. Testing protocols for compliance encompass basic checks to validate structural integrity, including drop tests to simulate impact during handling and environmental conditioning to mimic temperature and humidity variations in transit. Under ISO 10531, unit loads may be subjected to drop tests, such as edge or flat drops from appropriate heights based on load size, to assess shock resistance, while ASTM D4332 outlines conditioning in controlled atmospheres (e.g., 23°C and 50% relative humidity) to prepare unit loads for subsequent performance evaluations. Stability is further verified via ISO 10531 protocols, which involve tilting or vibrational tests on complete, filled unit loads to measure resistance to tipping or shifting during palletized handling. These tests confirm that the design meets predefined thresholds for safety and performance before operational use. This method integrates seamlessly with component-based or systems-based designs by adding a layer, where individual elements (e.g., custom ) or holistic assemblies are refined to conform to the same global benchmarks, enhancing overall efficiency without compromising tailored optimizations.

Applications and Standards

Industrial Applications

In , unit loads such as pallets are integral to operations, enabling just-in-time () delivery of components to minimize inventory holding and streamline production flows. For example, in the automotive sector, suppliers transport parts on standardized pallets to plants, where these unit loads are moved via automated guided vehicles or robotic systems directly to assembly stations, ensuring timely availability without excess stock. This approach supports mixed-model assembly lines by allowing precise sequencing of diverse parts, as seen in practices adopted by major automakers like for internal . In retail and , unit loads facilitate efficient by organizing into manageable, standardized formats for sorting, picking, and shipping. Companies like Amazon employ reusable totes as unit loads within fulfillment centers, where items are grouped into these containers for automated conveyor systems and robotic processing, reducing handling errors and speeding up order assembly. Palletized unit loads are also common for inbound shipments to warehouses, allowing high-volume processing of goods before distribution to customers. The food and beverage industry relies on temperature-controlled unit loads to preserve perishables throughout the , particularly in . Palletized loads of fruits, , and products are often wrapped with insulating materials, such as blankets or foam liners, to maintain required temperatures during and storage, preventing spoilage and ensuring compliance with standards. These insulated pallet configurations allow for bulk handling of sensitive items like frozen meats or chilled beverages, supporting efficient distribution from farms or processing plants to retailers. In air and sea freight, specialized unit loads optimize transport for global trade. Unit load devices (ULDs), including pallets and containers, are used in to secure freight in holds, providing structural integrity and compatibility with fuselages while facilitating rapid loading and unloading at airports. For maritime shipping, containerized unit loads standardize the movement of goods across oceans, enabling intermodal transfers and reducing handling risks for diverse in international commerce. Despite their advantages, applying unit loads presents challenges, particularly in adapting to irregular items or managing high-volume peaks. Irregularly shaped or unevenly weighted often require custom securing within pallets or containers to prevent shifting during transit, increasing preparation time and risk of if not handled with specialized equipment like adjustable restraints. High-volume periods, such as seasons, strain systems by overwhelming storage and throughput capacities for standard unit loads, necessitating scalable solutions like temporary overflow facilities or flexible packaging to avoid delays.

Key Standards and Regulations

The (ISO) has developed several key standards to govern the design, testing, and handling of unit loads, ensuring compatibility across global supply chains. These standards focus on dimensions, conditioning, performance testing, and specific applications like pallets and , promoting uniformity and reducing logistical inefficiencies. ISO 3676:2012 specifies the maximum plan dimensions for unit loads, establishing a modular system with preferred sizes such as 1,200 mm × 1,000 mm to ensure they fit standard transport equipment like containers and vehicles, thereby preventing oversizing that could cause jamming or underutilization of space. This standard applies to complete, filled transport packages and unit loads in distribution activities, from origin to consumption, facilitating efficient movement of goods. ISO 2233:2000 outlines methods for conditioning complete, filled transport packages and unit loads prior to testing, including exposure to controlled environmental factors such as , , and to simulate real-world transport conditions. These procedures help evaluate the robustness of unit loads under varying climatic influences during handling and transit. ISO 2234:2000 provides three methods for conducting stacking tests on complete, filled transport packages or unit loads using static loads, assessing compression strength and stability to determine safe stacking heights in warehouses or during transport. The tests involve applying compressive forces to mimic vertical pressures, ensuring unit loads can withstand typical distribution hazards without deformation or failure. Other significant standards include ISO 445:2013, which defines vocabulary and terms for pallets used in unit load methods of materials handling, including those made from timber, to standardize communication and specifications in the industry. For , ISO 21100:2025 sets minimum airworthiness requirements, performance criteria, and test parameters for unit load devices (ULDs) such as pallets and containers on civil , replacing earlier standards to incorporate updated and operational needs. Regionally, the European Pallet Association (EPAL) regulates pallet exchange systems through technical regulations that enforce quality classifications, repair protocols, and interchangeability for Euro pallets, enabling seamless cross-border trade within the . Compliance with these standards is essential for ensuring the safety of personnel and goods during handling, as well as facilitating by promoting and reducing barriers associated with incompatible unit loads. Recent updates, such as the 2025 revision of ISO 21100, reflect technological advancements and incorporate considerations for , including more efficient designs that minimize material use and environmental impact in operations.

References

  1. https://www2.isye.gatech.edu/~mgoetsch/cali/logistics_systems_design/material_handling_systems/material_handling_systems.pdf
  2. https://blog.nelsoncompany.com/home/history-of-the-unit-load-how-we-got-here
  3. https://www.mecalux.com/warehouse-manual/the-warehouse/pallet-unit-load
  4. https://www.interlakemecalux.com/warehouse-manual/the-warehouse/pallet-unit-load
  5. https://www.iso.org/standard/50989.html
  6. https://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/breaking_down_the_unit_load
  7. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187725002068
  8. https://www.aardwolf.co.in/what-is-a-unit-load-in-material-handling/
  9. https://www.prologistik.com/en/logistics-lexicon/load-unit/
  10. https://www.logos3pl.com/glossary/unit-load/
  11. https://www.buske.com/what-is/load-unit
  12. https://palletenterprise.com/another-sneak-attack-war-heralded-pallet-in-industry/
  13. https://www.library.hbs.edu/working-knowledge/the-truck-driver-who-reinvented-shipping
  14. https://www.mhi.org/downloads/learning/cicmhe/guidelines/10_principles.pdf
  15. https://www.aacargo.com/about/history.html
  16. https://www.caaa.com.au/unit-load-devices-and-civil-aviation-a-brief-history/
  17. https://www.iso.org/standard/9136.html
  18. https://www.dhl.com/content/dam/dhl/global/core/documents/pdf/glo-core-rethinking-packaging-trend-report.pdf
  19. https://redstagfulfillment.com/2010s-ecommerce-growth-decade/
  20. https://www.statista.com/statistics/534123/e-commerce-share-of-retail-sales-worldwide/
  21. https://pallitegroup.com/us/news/what-is-material-handling/
  22. https://www.ecr.digital/wp_contents/uploads/2016/07/The_Efficient_Unit_Loads_Report.pdf
  23. https://www.interlakemecalux.com/blog/block-stacking-warehouse
  24. https://materialhandlingequipmentmanufacturers.com/unit-load-formation-equipment/
  25. https://spi3pl.com/palletized-shipping-how-smart-logistics-save-time-and-costs/
  26. https://www2.isye.gatech.edu/~mgoetsch/cali/Logistics%20Tutorial/order/article.htm
  27. https://www.connerpackaging.com/understanding-impact-of-in-transit-damage/
  28. https://www.inboundlogistics.com/articles/pallets-stack-supply-chain-advantages/
  29. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/media/pdfs/Ergonomic-Guidelines-for-Manual-Material-Handling_2007-131.pdf
  30. https://www.gorillahaulers.com/guide-to-international-shipping-containers/
  31. https://www.freightamigo.com/all-promotion-and-news/understanding-unit-load-devices-ulds-revolutionizing-air-freight-efficiency/
  32. https://palletenterprise.com/virginia-tech-series-the-next-big-idea-a-case-for-systematic-vs-component-unit-load-design/
  33. https://www.unitload.vt.edu/education/white-papers/5-wp-load-carrying-capacity-of-pallets.html
  34. https://www.palletone.com/products/gma-pallets/
  35. https://www.unitload.vt.edu/facilities/pallet-testing-lab/unitload-containment.html
  36. https://www.kampspallets.com/48x40-gma-pallets-for-sale/
  37. https://scispace.com/pdf/evaluation-of-stability-of-unit-loads-for-tilt-and-shock-217mmlskar.pdf
  38. https://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/building_the_better_unit_load
  39. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstreams/4881f96c-3a09-42cb-bb5e-1e607c82140f/download
  40. https://www.iso.org/standard/50114.html
  41. https://www.iso.org/standard/18600.html
  42. https://www.astm.org/d4332-22.html
  43. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:21520/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  44. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1387&context=gradschool_diss
  45. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/139406/schoder-mschoder-mba-mgt-2021-thesis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  46. https://sellercentral.amazon.com/help/hub/reference/external/G200978400?locale=en-US
  47. https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/TransportPerishableFoodsbyTruck%255B1%255D.pdf
  48. https://www.atlasmoldedproducts.com/blog/cold-chain-packaging-solutions-for-food-and-beverage-companies
  49. https://www.iata.org/en/programs/cargo/cargo-operations/unit-load-devices/
  50. https://porteconomicsmanagement.org/pemp/contents/part1/maritime-shipping-and-international-trade/
  51. https://www.forkliftsafety.com/2023/09/12/how-should-operators-manage-loads-that-are-irregularly-shaped-or-unevenly-weighted/
  52. https://www.metroscg.com/insights/peak-season-fulfillment-challenges-and-solutions/
  53. https://www.iso.org/standard/32409.html
  54. https://www.iso.org/standard/32410.html
  55. https://www.iso.org/standard/61915.html
  56. https://www.iso.org/standard/87165.html
  57. https://www.epal-pallets.org/eu-en/load-carriers/epal-euro-pallet
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.