Hubbry Logo
Package trackingPackage trackingMain
Open search
Package tracking
Community hub
Package tracking
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Package tracking
Package tracking
Package tracking
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Tracking packages with stationary bar code reader in a warehouse sorting operation

Package tracking or package logging is the process of localizing shipping containers, mail and parcel post at different points of time during sorting, warehousing, and package delivery to verify their provenance and to predict and aid delivery.

Package tracking developed historically because it provided customers information about the route of a package and the anticipated date and time of delivery.[1] This was important because mail delivery often included multiple carriers in varying environmental circumstances, which made it possible for a mail to get lost.[2][3]

Identification

[edit]
A multifunction barcode scanner being used to monitor the transportation of packages of radioactive pharmaceuticals.

Mail tracking is made possible through certified mail and registered mail, additional postal services that require the identity of a piece of mail to be recorded during various points of delivery, so that the sender can obtain a proof of delivery and the receiver can predict the time of delivery.[2] The service is provided for an additional charge[4][5] but recently free service has been introduced as the cost of the associated technology has been decreasing.[6]

Initially, a piece of mail was identified by the sending date and the addresses of the sender and the recipient; later tracking numbers came to be used for identification.[7] Traceability has been improved even further by barcoding: by non-specific 1D linear barcodes and 2D matrix barcodes and specialized augmented postal codes such as Postal Alpha Numeric Encoding Technique (PLANET), Postal Numeric Encoding Technique (POSTNET) and Intelligent Mail barcode, and other electronic product codes (EPC-s).

Methods

[edit]

To identify the location of the mail, two methods have been used. One approach involves reporting the arrival or departure of the package and recording the identity of the package, the location, the time, and the status. This approach has been used for package tracking provided by the delivery companies, such as Deutsche Post, United Parcel Service, AirRoad, or FedEx. Another approach is to use a GPS-based vehicle tracking system and nowadays Beacons to locate the vehicle that contains the package and record it in a real-time database.[8]

As package tracking technologies have evolved, it has also become possible to increase the amount of information and metrics returned about a package and to report beside its location also temperature, humidity, pressure, acceleration, elevation and exposure to light at different time points—factors that are important for delicate or perishable contents.[1]

Querying and reporting

[edit]

Web-based package tracking has been used from the early days of the Internet[9] to automate customer service and as a cheaper alternative to phone-based call centers, providing the ability to track the status of a package "within minutes".[9] The service became quickly popular: for UPS the number of packages tracked on the web increased from 600 a day in 1995[9] to 3.3 million a day in 1999.[10] On-line package tracking became available for all major carrier companies, and was improved by the emergence of websites that offered consolidated tracking for different mail carriers.[11] With the rise of smart phones, package tracking mobile apps were able to send tracking info to customers' cell phones. With improved data processing, e-mail programs were able to automatically detect tracking numbers in messages[12] and receipts and print the real time location of the package.[13]

Internal package tracking

[edit]

Most traditional package tracking systems do not track packages after a package is dropped off at a centralized mail services center with single-point delivery, such as the ones used at apartment complexes, college residence halls, corporate mailrooms, post-office box stores and mail and parcel centers. These mail services centers receive all incoming mail and sort it; the mail may then be delivered to individual recipients or the recipients may have to pick up the mail themselves. To cover that gap and track a package at different points within the internal delivery process, specialized internal or "inbound" package tracking systems have been developed.

These systems log in the packages that arrive by recording the items from different carrier companies, the time the delivery is made, the name of the recipient, tracking number and other data. The recipients are notified of the packages or sent reminders. Once the package is received by the end recipient, the systems record the timestamp, the recipient signature and method of authentication and the package is logged out.

Several technologies have evolved with slightly different features (Winn Solutions or WITS, PackageLog, PakLog, SCLogic, TekTrack, Oden Industries, Inc. (PacTrac), WTS by Quadient and others), including patented solutions.[14]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Package tracking

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Package tracking is the process of monitoring the location, status, and progress of a shipped package from its point of origin to final delivery, typically using a unique alphanumeric assigned by the carrier to enable real-time or periodic updates on transit events such as pickup, sorting, and arrival. This system provides visibility into the package's journey, including estimated delivery times and any exceptions, primarily through digital platforms accessible via websites, mobile apps, or automated notifications. Originating as a tool for operational efficiency, package tracking has evolved into a customer-facing service essential for in and global supply chains, handling billions of shipments annually by major carriers like UPS and . The historical roots of package tracking trace back to ancient courier systems, such as those in around 2,400 BCE, where messengers relayed goods and information over long distances without systematic monitoring. Modern developments began in the with the rise of organized postal and express services; for instance, the (UPS), founded in 1907, initially relied on manual logs for package handling, while the in the 1860s represented early expedited delivery efforts during the . A pivotal advancement occurred in the when , established in , pioneered the use of tracking numbers in 1979 for internal quality control via its COSMOS system, which integrated handheld barcode scanners to log package movements in real time. By 1980, had deployed a nationwide MHz wireless network to transmit tracking data, and in 1994, it launched the first online tracking platform, setting an industry standard that shifted tracking from manual to digital accessibility. Contemporary package tracking leverages a suite of technologies to ensure accuracy and efficiency. Barcodes and QR codes serve as primary identifiers, scanned at key points like sorting facilities and delivery trucks to update status information. (RFID) tags enable contactless, bulk scanning for high-volume operations, while (GPS) and real-time location systems (RTLS) provide precise geolocation data, especially for last-mile delivery. Advanced integrations include (IoT) sensors for monitoring environmental conditions in sensitive shipments, such as temperature-controlled pharmaceuticals, and for on delivery times and route optimization. These technologies have been accelerated by the e-commerce surge, with carriers like UPS processing over 20 million packages daily and offering features like real-time GPS mapping introduced in 2016. The significance of package tracking extends beyond to enhance customer trust and operational resilience, reducing inquiries and enabling proactive issue resolution in a global market where delays can impact supply chains. As of the , it supports across air, sea, and ground, with ongoing innovations focusing on for secure data sharing and enhanced privacy in tracking.

Overview and History

Definition and Purpose

Package tracking is the process of monitoring a package's , status, and progress throughout its journey from origin to final delivery, utilizing unique identifiers assigned to each parcel and data collection at various points along the . This system allows carriers and customers to trace shipments in real time or near-real time, providing updates on key milestones such as pickup, transit, sorting, and arrival. By integrating these elements, package tracking ensures and visibility across logistics networks, from fulfillment centers to last-mile delivery. The primary purpose of package tracking is to mitigate risks associated with loss or by enabling rapid detection of deviations in a shipment's path, thereby enhancing for high-value goods. It also boosts through increased transparency, allowing recipients to anticipate arrivals and plan accordingly, which fosters trust in shipping services. Furthermore, tracking optimizes overall efficiency by identifying bottlenecks and streamlining operations, while supporting predictive delivery estimates based on historical and real-time patterns. In an era of surging , package tracking plays a critical role in managing the global volume of shipments, with approximately 200 billion packages delivered worldwide in 2024, driven by growth in online retail since the . For carriers, it delivers key benefits including substantial cost savings through reduced instances of lost parcels—potentially lowering losses by up to 30%—and minimized operational inefficiencies. Additionally, by facilitating route optimization, tracking contributes to environmental , decreasing fuel consumption and carbon emissions associated with inefficient deliveries.

Historical Development

Package tracking originated in the 19th-century postal services, where manual logging and record-keeping were employed to monitor mail and parcels across expanding networks. In the United States, the , operational from April 1860 to October 1861, represented an early milestone in expedited delivery, using a relay system of horse-mounted riders to transport mail over 1,900 miles from to in about 10 days, with rudimentary documentation such as waybills to record shipments at relay stations. This service, though short-lived due to the completion of the transcontinental telegraph, highlighted the need for faster and more reliable tracking methods in remote areas. Advancements in the shifted toward mechanized and computerized systems. In 1979, Federal Express (now ) introduced the (Customer, Operations, and Service Master Operating System), a centralized computer system that enabled real-time tracking of packages, vehicles, and weather conditions, revolutionizing logistics by providing updates accessible to customers. During the 1980s, major carriers like (UPS) adopted technology for package identification and sorting, allowing drivers to scan labels with handheld devices to update shipment status electronically, marking a transition from manual to automated processes. The digital era began in the mid-1990s with the launch of web-based tracking platforms. UPS debuted its website in 1994, followed by online tracking capabilities in 1996, initially handling modest volumes that scaled dramatically as adoption grew, reaching tens of millions of queries daily by the early . By the 2010s, mobile applications further enhanced accessibility; for instance, UPS released its app in 2009, enabling users to track shipments, locate stores, and manage deliveries on the go. Recent growth has been propelled by the boom, particularly post-2020 amid the , with platforms like Amazon and Alibaba driving unprecedented demand for tracked deliveries. Global parcel volumes reached approximately 217 billion items annually in 2025, supported by integrations of (IoT) technologies such as multi-sensor trackers for real-time monitoring of location, temperature, and humidity. From 2023 to 2025, advancements in for and for secure data sharing have further enhanced tracking accuracy and privacy, with major carriers like UPS and incorporating these into their systems. A notable development in this was Tive's $54 million Series B in 2022, which accelerated advancements in sensor-based visibility solutions for supply chains.

Identification Systems

Tracking Identifiers

Tracking identifiers are unique alphanumeric codes assigned to individual packages to enable their monitoring throughout the shipping process. These identifiers, often referred to as tracking numbers, serve as the primary means of distinguishing one package from another in vast logistics networks operated by carriers worldwide. The most common types of tracking identifiers consist of 10 to 34 digits or characters, varying by carrier and international standards. For instance, the United States Postal Service (USPS) typically uses a 22-digit numeric format for services like Priority Mail (e.g., starting with 9400), with variations for other mail types. Internationally, the S10 format for freight containers is specified by ISO 6346, a 10-character code using uppercase letters A-Z (excluding I, O) and digits 0-9, consisting of a 3-letter owner code, 6-character serial number, and 1 check digit. For parcels, standards like the GS1 Serial Shipping Container Code (SSCC), an 18-digit numeric identifier, enable unique tracking in supply chains. The structure of these identifiers is meticulously designed to encode essential information while incorporating error-detection mechanisms. Key components often include a carrier-specific prefix (e.g., indicating the shipping service or origin), a serial number for uniqueness, and a checksum digit calculated via algorithms such as the modulo-10 method, which validates the code's integrity by verifying that the weighted sum of digits modulo 10 equals zero. This structure allows carriers to embed details like service type and point of origin without compromising the code's brevity or scannability. Tracking identifiers are generated automatically during the shipment creation process, typically by the carrier's or shipping software, ensuring each package receives a globally unique code to avoid duplicates across interconnected networks. This begins at the point of printing or manifest entry, integrating with the carrier's database to link the identifier to package details like weight, dimensions, and destination. Prominent examples illustrate these conventions: UPS tracking numbers often start with the "1Z" prefix to denote ground or air services, followed by the shipper's six-digit account number, a three-digit service code, and an eight-digit package identifier, culminating in a —resulting in an 18-character string. Similarly, uses a 10- or 11-digit numeric code that incorporates shipper account information and a , facilitating seamless tracking across its international operations. These identifiers are ultimately scanned at key points in the to update status information, as detailed in subsequent tracking methods.

Labeling Technologies

Labeling technologies for package tracking encompass a range of physical and digital methods designed to affix machine-readable identifiers to parcels, enabling efficient identification and data capture throughout the . These technologies include traditional systems, (RFID) tags, and emerging (NFC) and smart labels, each offering varying levels of data capacity, readability, and environmental resilience. Barcode systems remain a foundational labeling approach, with one-dimensional (1D) barcodes such as and (UPC) used for encoding basic identification information like product or shipment numbers. , standardized under ISO/IEC 16388, supports alphanumeric characters and is widely applied in for its simplicity and compatibility with linear scanners. In contrast, two-dimensional (2D) barcodes, including QR codes and , provide higher data density, accommodating additional details such as timestamps or serial numbers in a compact format. These 2D symbologies, governed by standards like ISO/IEC 15415, allow for error correction and are particularly useful in space-constrained packaging environments. RFID tags represent an advancement over optical barcodes by enabling wireless, non-line-of-sight reading, which facilitates bulk scanning in warehouses and distribution centers. Passive RFID tags, which lack an internal power source and are powered by the reader's , offer short read ranges of 1 to 10 meters and low costs ranging from $0.08 to $0.50 per tag, making them suitable for high-volume applications. Active RFID tags, powered by batteries, provide extended ranges up to 100 meters and support real-time data transmission but at higher costs of $12 to $45 per tag, ideal for tracking high-value or time-sensitive shipments. NFC and smart labels build on RFID principles with contactless chips that enable quick, proximity-based reads, often integrating sensors for enhanced functionality. These labels, compliant with ISO/IEC 14443 for NFC, allow users to tap a for instant data access and are increasingly combined with IoT sensors to monitor package conditions, such as fluctuations via embedded thermistors. In the 2020s, such smart labels have gained traction in logistics, where NFC-enabled sensors provide real-time alerts to prevent spoilage of perishables. These labeling technologies are applied through printed labels, adhesive stickers, or embedded tags directly integrated into packaging materials, ensuring seamless attachment during manufacturing or fulfillment. Durability is a key consideration, with standards requiring labels to withstand extreme conditions, including temperatures from -40°C to 60°C, as well as and mechanical stress common in global transit. Adoption of advanced labeling, particularly RFID, has surged in , with the global RFID market growing from approximately $6.5 billion in 2010 to USD 12.61 billion in 2025, reflecting increased integration for automated inventory and tracking efficiency. This expansion, driven by cost reductions and standardization, has elevated RFID usage in supply chains from niche applications, with ongoing growth in major operations as of 2025.

Tracking Methods

Manual and Barcode-Based Methods

Manual and barcode-based methods represent the foundational approach to package tracking, relying on human operators to scan visual barcodes at predefined checkpoints using handheld devices. These scanners, typically or image-based, capture the encoded from labels affixed to packages, which is then transmitted wirelessly or via cable to a central database for logging status updates such as location and handling events. This process occurs at key facilities including sorting hubs, transportation vehicles, and final delivery points, enabling sequential tracking without continuous monitoring. The workflow involves multiple discrete scans per package to record its progression through the . Operators scan barcodes upon receipt at the origin facility to confirm intake, during transit points such as customs clearance at airports for international shipments, and at the destination for sorting and delivery confirmation. Depending on the route complexity, a package may undergo several scans—commonly between five and fifteen—to provide a trail of custody, with each scan updating the database in near real-time to reflect the package's current status. These methods achieve high accuracy, often exceeding 99% success rates when using error-checking algorithms inherent to symbologies, which detect and correct read errors through in the code structure. However, limitations arise from the need for direct line-of-sight between the scanner and , as well as potential human factors like or misalignment, leading to misread rates of approximately 1-2% in practical environments. Such errors can result in delayed updates or rerouting but are mitigated by rescanning protocols. A prominent example is the United States Postal Service's (IMb), implemented in 2006 to enhance tracking for domestic mail by encoding routing, tracking, and service data into a single 65-bar code. The IMb allows automated sorting and piece-level visibility, replacing earlier POSTNET and barcodes, and has become mandatory for certain mail classes to support detailed deliverability reporting. Globally, barcode-based tracking is integral to parcel delivery, forming the basis for over 130 billion annual shipments by 2020 across major markets, with widespread adoption in express for status updates and bottleneck identification. The cost-effectiveness of these methods stems from their simplicity, primarily driven by low hardware requirements like handheld scanners priced between $100 and $300 each. Nonetheless, the approach remains labor-intensive, as it depends on manual intervention at each scan point, increasing personnel costs in high-volume operations despite the inexpensive technology.

Real-Time and Automated Methods

Real-time and automated methods in package tracking leverage advanced technologies to provide continuous, location-specific updates during transit, minimizing human intervention and enhancing efficiency. These approaches integrate satellite-based positioning, sensor networks, and intelligent processing to monitor shipments dynamically, offering visibility into position, environmental conditions, and potential disruptions. GPS integration plays a central role in vehicle-mounted tracking units, which are affixed to transport vehicles to monitor package locations in real time during transit. These systems achieve positioning accuracy of approximately 5-10 meters under open-sky conditions, relying on signals from multiple satellites and seamless handoffs between them to maintain continuous coverage. IoT sensors embedded in packages or containers further enable comprehensive real-time data collection, capturing not only location but also metrics like , , and temperature to detect anomalies such as mishandling or environmental excursions. Devices like Tive's Solo series trackers, introduced in , exemplify this by transmitting shipment conditions via cellular or satellite links, supporting applications in sensitive sectors like pharmaceuticals where real-time monitoring ensures compliance and quality. These sensors have driven broader IoT adoption in , with tracking usage rising to 60% in recent years for high-value shipments. As of 2025, innovations like the Tive Solo Pro tracker, launched in April, enhance versatility for life sciences with advanced compliance features. In distribution hubs, automated systems employ scanners equipped with imaging technology to identify and sort packages at high speeds without manual input, integrating with AI algorithms for predictive that anticipates delays based on , , or network data. Such AI-assisted predictions can reduce overall delays by optimizing paths and , with automated sorting alone cutting processing times by up to 65% in large-scale operations. Achieving global coverage requires hybrid satellite-cellular networks, which combine low-Earth satellites for broad reach with terrestrial cellular for high-bandwidth data in populated areas, ensuring tracking continuity for international shipments. However, challenges persist in remote regions, where signal obstructions and gaps—particularly in rural —limit reliability and create coverage voids in underserved locales. Platforms like DHL's Resilience360 illustrate the integration of these methods, providing end-to-end visibility through risk monitoring and real-time analytics for international freight.

User Querying and Reporting

Tracking Interfaces

Tracking interfaces provide customers and carriers with accessible platforms to query and view package status information, typically by entering a tracking number or integrating with external systems. Major carriers like FedEx offer web portals such as fedex.com, launched in 1994 as the first transportation website enabling online package tracking by number. These portals display shipment details including status updates, estimated delivery times, interactive maps showing delivery routes, and timelines of key events like pickup and transit scans. Similarly, UPS provides a web-based tracking tool through ups.com, allowing users to search shipments and access real-time data sourced from automated scanning systems. Mobile applications extend these capabilities with on-the-go access and enhanced user engagement. The UPS My Choice app, for instance, enables users to track packages, receive push notifications for status changes, and manage deliveries from a single dashboard, serving millions of members worldwide since its expansion. FedEx's complements this by supporting scanning for quick tracking initiation, proof-of-delivery images, and integration with real-time location data for route visualization. Additionally, as of 2025, some carriers and third-party services integrate with voice assistants like Alexa and for hands-free tracking queries. These apps leverage real-time data from carrier networks to provide timely updates, improving convenience over traditional web access. Surveys indicate that approximately 31% of online shoppers use mobile apps for package tracking, reflecting a growing preference for app-based interfaces in . Application programming interfaces (APIs) facilitate seamless integration for e-commerce platforms, allowing automated querying of tracking data without manual intervention. UPS offers a suite of APIs through its developer portal, enabling real-time shipment status retrieval for platforms like Shopify via official plugins that handle rate calculations, label generation, and tracking updates. These integrations use OAuth 2.0 for secure token-based authentication, where access tokens are generated to authorize API calls on behalf of users or businesses. Accessibility features ensure broad usability across diverse user groups. FedEx and UPS tracking interfaces support multiple languages, including English, Spanish, French, and others, through localized websites and app settings to accommodate international users. For visually impaired individuals, FedEx provides accessibility features, including support options to assist with retrieving tracking details. Security measures, including HTTPS encryption for web portals and token authentication for APIs, protect sensitive tracking information from unauthorized access. Overall, these interfaces prioritize user-friendly design, with studies showing that a majority of consumers—around 64%—prefer mobile apps over websites for interactive services due to their responsiveness and immediacy.

Notifications and Reporting Features

Package tracking systems provide users with timely notifications to keep them informed about shipment progress, reducing uncertainty and enhancing . Common alert types include and messages triggered by key status changes, such as when a package is out for delivery or arrives at a facility. For instance, carriers like UPS and send automated notifications for events like departure from origin or attempted delivery, allowing recipients to prepare accordingly. These notifications often feature customizable thresholds to alert users about potential issues, such as exceeding 24 hours or temperature excursions in perishable shipments. Platforms like SafeCube enable users to configure alerts based on specific needs, including daily reports for beyond predefined limits, ensuring proactive management without overwhelming recipients. Similarly, logistics tools from Tive allow setting thresholds with buffer periods, such as alerting at 40 hours for a 48-hour window, to avoid alert while maintaining visibility. Reporting tools in package tracking extend beyond individual alerts to provide dashboards for carriers and businesses, offering insights into operational . These dashboards typically display metrics like delivery rates, which measure the percentage of on-time arrivals, and route indicators. For example, Sendcloud's Dashboard tracks parcel by analyzing delays and non-deliveries, helping carriers optimize carrier selection. ParcelPerform's platform compares carrier , highlighting those with high rates while flagging issues like frequent exceptions. Sustainability reporting is increasingly integrated, with dashboards estimating carbon footprints based on shipment routes, modes, and distances. Tools like Maersk's Emissions Studio consolidate Scope 3 GHG emissions data across carriers, enabling businesses to track and report environmental impact for compliance and reduction strategies. Similarly, Röhlig Logistics' CO₂ Dashboard provides real-time emissions tracking per shipment leg, filtered by mode or volume, to support green logistics initiatives. Automation enhances notification efficiency through proactive features, such as rerouting alerts when disruptions occur. Systems from Elite EXTRA send real-time notifications to dispatchers for driver rerouting, adjusting ETAs and resolving issues before they escalate customer inquiries. Integration with personal calendars further streamlines ; for example, e-commerce plugins like Order Delivery Date have offered sync since 2018, automatically adding delivery events to users' schedules for better planning. For interactions, standardized EDI formats facilitate structured reporting of tracking data. The ANSI X12 standard, particularly transaction set 214 (Transportation Carrier Shipment Status Message), enables carriers to transmit status updates like pickup, in-transit, and delivery confirmations electronically, ensuring across supply chains. considerations are addressed through filters that anonymize sensitive data in reports, such as masking personal addresses or using aggregated metrics to comply with regulations like GDPR. In , tools from Arviem apply anonymization to tracking data, removing identifiable information while preserving analytical value for carbon reporting and performance reviews. Representative examples illustrate these features' impact. Amazon's provides delivery predictions within 2-4 hour windows, updated in real-time via app notifications, improving accuracy and user trust. In , regulatory frameworks like NIS2 emphasize enhanced cybersecurity and real-time visibility for , with platforms like Shippeo providing alerting systems for .

Troubleshooting No Tracking Status

When a package tracking number shows no available status, it may be due to common reasons such as the package being too new to have updates yet, already delivered and archived, or an issue with the tracking number itself. Users can follow general troubleshooting steps based on practices recommended by major carriers. First, wait 1-3 days after dispatch and retry the tracking query, as updates may lag due to processing delays. Next, verify the accuracy of the tracking number with the sender and confirm the exact dispatch date. Universal tracking services, such as 17TRACK, can be used to attempt retrieval across multiple carriers by entering the tracking number. If issues persist, contact the carrier's customer service, such as UPS support, providing additional details like origin, destination, and dispatch time to facilitate alternative searches.

Advanced and Internal Tracking

Internal Facility Systems

Internal facility systems in package tracking encompass specialized software and hardware deployed within warehouses, sorting centers, and carrier hubs to monitor and manage packages from intake through outbound dispatch, enhancing and minimizing errors. These systems typically integrate tracking software that logs package movements at key stages, such as , sorting, storage, and loading. For instance, PakLog is a cloud-based platform designed for mailrooms and parcel centers, enabling real-time logging of incoming and outgoing packages, digital signature capture, and record management to streamline intra-facility workflows. Such software ensures continuous visibility, allowing operators to reconcile inventory against expected arrivals and departures for seamless internal flow. Key processes in these systems involve automated sortation and inventory , often leveraging technologies like RFID to direct packages along predefined paths while capturing for accuracy. RFID-enabled automatically detect and route tagged items, updating system records in real time to track locations and statuses within the facility. When integrated with AI vision systems, these setups support precise inventory matching with reported accuracies of 95-99% in optimized environments. Conveyor-based scanning further automates this by reading identifiers as packages move, integrating with central databases to flag discrepancies and enable rapid . Hardware components include conveyor scanners for high-volume throughput and robotic arms equipped with vision AI for label reading and manipulation. Conveyor scanners, such as those in ship sorter systems, use image-based barcode readers to identify and divert packages at speeds supporting thousands per hour, reducing manual intervention. Robotic arms, like Amazon's Cardinal system, employ computer vision to scan and sort labels from mixed piles, achieving efficient handling in dynamic environments. These elements integrate with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, such as SAP, via solutions like ShipERP, which embeds parcel tracking directly into ERP workflows for synchronized data across intake, sorting, and outbound processes. The adoption of these internal systems yields significant benefits, including reduced operational losses through precise tracking and the capacity to manage peak volumes effectively. For example, facilities implementing such technologies can cut discrepancies and related losses by enhancing visibility, with case studies reporting reductions in time by up to 30 minutes per session and improvements in stock accuracy to 95%. Amazon fulfillment centers, for instance, process up to 650,000 packages daily using integrated robotic and scanning systems to handle surges without proportional staffing increases. A notable example is DHL's 2022 pilot of robotic sortation in its facility, which incorporated automated arms for label reading and achieved near-zero error rates while sorting packages in an average of 3.6 seconds, boosting overall hub productivity.

Emerging Technologies

Artificial intelligence and machine learning are transforming package tracking through predictive analytics that forecast delays based on factors like weather, traffic, and historical data, achieving up to 87% accuracy in predictions up to nine days in advance. These models enable logistics providers to proactively reroute shipments and optimize schedules, particularly for weather-impacted routes where traditional methods often fall short. Additionally, machine learning algorithms detect anomalies in tracking data to identify potential fraud, such as unusual route deviations or shipment tampering, by analyzing patterns in real-time logistics feeds and reducing theft risks through predictive risk assessment. Blockchain technology provides decentralized ledgers for tamper-proof package tracking, ensuring immutable records of custody transfers across global s and enhancing transparency for all stakeholders. In 2025, the blockchain supply chain market reached approximately $3.27 billion, reflecting growing adoption for secure provenance verification in . Platforms leveraging blockchain reduce administrative costs and mitigate counterfeiting by maintaining verifiable digital twins of physical packages throughout their journey. Drones and autonomous vehicles are integrating advanced tracking for last-mile delivery, with systems like synchronizing GPS data to provide precise location updates during flights, enabling deliveries in under 60 minutes for eligible packages. connectivity further enhances these operations by supporting sub-second latency for real-time data transmission, allowing coordinated drone fleets to relay position and status information instantaneously to control centers. Sustainability technologies in package tracking include carbon-tracking sensors embedded in IoT devices that monitor emissions in real-time during transit, helping logistics firms calculate and reduce the environmental impact of shipments. These sensors integrate with multi-modal tracking systems to provide granular on fuel consumption and route efficiency, supporting net-zero goals. Prototypes of quantum dot-based labels, developed in 2024, offer unbreakable anti-counterfeiting features through optically readable, unclonable nanotags that withstand physical damage while enabling secure authentication in supply chains. Emerging technologies face challenges, including data privacy concerns addressed by 2025 regulations like the EU AI Act, which mandates mitigation in high-risk AI systems used in to prevent discriminatory outcomes in predictive routing. Blockchain scalability remains an issue, with transaction costs ranging from 0.5% to 1% of shipment value, potentially limiting adoption for high-volume, low-value packages despite overall cost reductions of up to 37% in .

References

  1. https://developer.fedex.com/api/en-us/catalog/track/docs.html
  2. https://www.detrack.com/blog/how-do-delivery-companies-track-packages/
  3. https://turvo.com/articles/shipment-tracking/
  4. https://www.wired.com/2013/04/40-years-of-fedex/
  5. https://www.speedcommerce.com/what-is/unique-parcel-identifier/
  6. https://www.unisco.com/comparison/package-tracking-vs-logistics-accounting
  7. https://www.freightamigo.com/blog/mastering-package-tracking-a-comprehensive-guide-for-seamless-shipping
  8. https://www.airistaflow.com/resources/what-is-logistics-tracking/
  9. https://www.loginextsolutions.com/blog/smarter-shipping-starts-with-real-time-parcel-tracking/
  10. https://fareye.com/resources/blogs/real-time-delivery-tracking
  11. https://www.a1qls.com/blog/understanding-the-importance-of-real-time-tracking-in-logistics/
  12. https://www.clickpost.ai/blog/package-delivery-statistics
  13. https://www.digittrix.com/blogs/why-real-time-tracking-is-a-game-changer-for-parcel-delivery
  14. https://tracki.com/blogs/post/how-gps-tracking-is-revolutionizing-delivery-companies
  15. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/brief-history-united-states-postal-service-180975627/
  16. https://facts.usps.com/pony-express-history/
  17. https://www.nps.gov/poex/learn/historyculture/index.htm
  18. https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/top-50-projects-cosmos-11727
  19. https://about.ups.com/us/en/our-company/our-history.html
  20. https://www.retaildive.com/ex/mobilecommercedaily/ups-launches-iphone-app-to-cater-to-busy-holiday-season
  21. https://techcrunch.com/2022/04/11/tive-a-startup-developing-supply-chain-visibility-tools-raises-54m/
  22. https://tools.usps.com/go/TrackAction
  23. https://www.gs1.org/standards/id-keys/sscc
  24. https://www.iso.org/standard/36557.html
  25. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/saver_bar_code_reading_msr_17june2013_508.pdf
  26. https://www.onbarcode.com/kb/barcode-faq/code-39/
  27. https://www.gs1.org/standards/gs1-datamatrix-guideline/25
  28. https://www.cykeorfid.com/active-rfid-vs-passive-rfid-what-actually-works-in-the-field/
  29. https://www.atlasrfidstore.com/rfid-insider/active-rfid-vs-passive-rfid/
  30. https://cclhealthcare.com/packaging-products/pharmaceutical-labels/smart-and-intelligent-packaging/nfc/nfc-temperature-sensor/
  31. https://www.aipia.info/news-Coldcha-launches-NFC-label-for-temperature-monitoring-of-produce-and-plants-1760.php
  32. https://www.nxp.com/company/about-nxp/smarter-world-blog/BL-ANATOMY-SMART-PHARMA
  33. https://identco.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/TT417.pdf
  34. https://www.weber-marking.com/blog/hot-tips-for-cold-temperature-labeling/
  35. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/rfid-market-446.html
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667096822000271
  37. https://www.idtechex.com/en/research-article/passive-rfid-market-2025-growth-dynamics-explained/33910
  38. https://packagex.io/blog/barcode-scanning-in-logistics
  39. https://www.ontime360.com/blog/post/barcode-scanning-guide
  40. https://www.extensiv.com/blog/complete-guide-to-barcode-scanning-for-3pl-warehouses
  41. https://www.finaleinventory.com/barcode-inventory-system/shipping-barcode-scanner
  42. https://barkoder.com/industries/logistics
  43. https://www.fcbco.com/blog/barcode-use-reduce-warehouse-costs
  44. https://www.camcode.com/blog/what-is-barcoding/
  45. https://www.brother.is/business-solutions/resource-hub/blog/efficiency/2022/logistics-barcode-labelling-accuracy
  46. https://postalpro.usps.com/resources/mailing/intelligent-mail-barcode
  47. https://www.uspsoig.gov/sites/default/files/reports/2023-01/CP-AR-18-007.pdf
  48. https://www.smarty.com/articles/usps-imb-intelligent-mail-barcode
  49. https://eliteextra.com/why-you-should-adopt-courier-tracking-for-your-business/
  50. https://www.creativesafetysupply.com/qa/barcoding/how-much-does-a-warehouse-scanning-solution-cost
  51. https://edsystemsinc.com/blog/f/how-much-does-barcode-scanning-equipment-cost
  52. https://www.abetech.com/blog/the-hidden-costs-of-manual-barcode-scanning-in-warehouses
  53. https://marvelmind.com/solution/indoor_positioning_system_terminology/
  54. https://telematica.com.au/gps-vehicle-tracking-accuracy-explained/
  55. https://www.tive.com/products/real-time-trackers
  56. https://www.tive.com/blog/the-cold-chain-logistics-revolution-next-gen-tech-in-pharma-food
  57. https://www.tive.com/blog/tives-journey-to-a-million-trackers-unprecedented-end-to-end-visibility
  58. https://www.tive.com/blog/iot-adoption-in-2025-winning-tactics-for-real-time-shipment-updates
  59. https://www.tive.com/blog/introducing-the-tive-solo-pro-real-time-visibility-redefined-for-life-sciences-logistics
  60. https://7xcel.com/blog/ai-warehouse-automation/
  61. https://blog.locus.sh/automated-sortation-system/
  62. https://blog.tryleverage.ai/blog/7-ways-ai-automation-reduces-supply-chain-delays
  63. https://www.imarcgroup.com/hybrid-satellite-cellular-terminal-market
  64. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2017/12/the-evolving-role-of-satellite-networks-in-rural-and-remote-broadband-access_0598dd05/7610090d-en.pdf
  65. https://www.dhl.com/global-en/delivered/global-trade/four-logistics-trends-to-watch-in-2024.html
  66. https://codewave.com/insights/artificial-intelligence-logistics-use-cases-benefits-implementation/
  67. https://www.imarcgroup.com/connected-logistics-market
  68. https://www.fedex.com/en-us/about/history.html
  69. https://www.fedex.com/en-us/customer-support/faqs/receiving/tracking-questions/how-to-track-with-map-view.html
  70. https://www.fedex.com/en-us/tracking/advanced.html
  71. https://www.ups.com/us/en/track/ups-my-choice
  72. https://www.parcelandpostaltechnologyinternational.com/news/operations/ups-my-choice-service-registers-20-million-users.html
  73. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.fedex.ida.android
  74. https://www.globaltrademag.com/voice-ai-in-logistics-enabling-real-time-shipment-tracking-and-support/
  75. https://parcelindustry.com/file-279-State-of-Online-Shoppers-Study.pdf
  76. https://developer.ups.com/
  77. https://apps.shopify.com/ups-shipping-dashboard
  78. https://developer.ups.com/get-started
  79. https://developer.ups.com/oauth-developer-guide
  80. https://www.fedex.com/en-us/tracking.html
  81. https://blog.expresstracking.org/2018/02/multilingual-tracking-are-launched-on.html
  82. https://www.fedex.com/en-us/accessibility.html
  83. https://www.ups.com/us/en/support/tracking-support
  84. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/software/website-statistics/
  85. https://www.routific.com/blog/delivery-notifications
  86. https://dexatel.com/blog/order-confirmation-text-message/
  87. https://www.safecube.ai/product/alert
  88. https://www.tive.com/blog/managing-the-data-deluge-avoiding-alert-fatigue-in-logistics
  89. https://support.sendcloud.com/hc/en-us/articles/31520548510353-Analytics-Shipping-Performance
  90. https://www.parcelperform.com/insights/logistics-intelligence-that-compares-carriers-performance
  91. https://www.maersk.com/digital-services/emissions-studio
  92. https://www.rohlig.com/digital-services-tools/reporting-analytics/
  93. https://eliteextra.com/how-to-automate-delivery-notifications/
  94. https://www.tychesoftwares.com/set-up-google-calendar-integration-to-automatically-export-order-deliveries-using-plugin/
  95. https://www.stedi.com/edi/x12/transaction-set/214
  96. https://arviem.com/carbon-footprint-reporting-emissions-monitoring-logistics-chain/
  97. https://www.amazon.com/gp/help/customer/display.html?nodeId=GK8CZJ8DR2J2WS5H
  98. https://www.shippeo.com/en/platform/predictive-visibility
  99. https://www.ups.com/us/en/support/tracking-support.page
  100. https://faq.usps.com/articles/FAQ/Where-is-my-package
  101. https://www.17track.net/en
  102. https://www.usps.com/help/missing-mail.htm
  103. https://www.ups.com/us/en/support/tracking-support/where-is-my-package/understanding-tracking-status
  104. https://www.capterra.com/p/159728/PakLog/
  105. https://packagex.io/blog/ai-warehouse-workflows-case-studies
  106. https://www.cognex.com/industries/logistics/sortation/ship-sorter-scanning
  107. https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/operations/amazon-robotics-robots-fulfillment-center
  108. https://shiperp.com/our-shipping-solutions/
  109. https://inoxoft.com/blog/why-invest-in-real-time-inventory-tracking-system/
  110. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RmG0ZsxPFE
  111. https://www.dhl.com/us-en/home/press/press-archive/2022/dhl-increases-productivity-with-successful-robotic-sortation-pilot-in-atlanta.html
  112. https://docshipper.com/logistics/ai-changing-logistics-supply-chain-2025/
  113. https://debales.ai/blog/how-ai-detects-and-prevents-fraud-and-theft-in-the-supply-chain
  114. https://www.jittransportation.com/posts/machine-learning-for-fraud-in-e-commerce-logistics
  115. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/services/consulting/articles/blockchain-supply-chain-innovation.html
  116. https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/blockchain-supply-chain-global-market-report
  117. https://www.scnsoft.com/blockchain/supply-chain
  118. https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/transportation/amazon-drone-deliver-package
  119. https://www.meegle.com/en_us/topics/autonomous-vehicles/autonomous-vehicle-technology
  120. https://anvil.so/post/how-5g-enables-real-time-drone-operations
  121. https://axidio.com/blog/real-time-carbon-tracking-in-scm-2025
  122. https://iotbusinessnews.com/2024/03/19/55855-decoding-the-environmental-footprint-leveraging-multi-sensor-tracking-devices-for-greener-logistics/
  123. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01463
  124. https://babl.ai/navigating-the-new-frontier-how-the-eu-ai-act-will-impact-the-transport-and-logistics-industry/
  125. https://bvnk.com/blog/blockchain-cross-border-payments
  126. https://coinlaw.io/blockchain-in-supply-chain-finance-statistics/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.