Hubbry Logo
Plastic wrapPlastic wrapMain
Open search
Plastic wrap
Community hub
Plastic wrap
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Plastic wrap
Plastic wrap
Plastic wrap
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
A roll of plastic wrap

Plastic wrap, cling film, Saran wrap, cling wrap, Glad wrap or food wrap is a thin plastic film typically used for sealing food items in containers to keep them fresh over a longer period of time. Plastic wrap, typically sold on rolls in boxes with a cutting edge, clings to many smooth surfaces and can thus remain tight over the opening of a container without adhesive. Common plastic wrap is roughly 12.7 μm (0.0005 in) thick.[1][2] The trend has been to produce thinner plastic wrap, particularly for household use (where very little stretch is needed), so now the majority of brands on shelves around the world are 8, 9 or 10 μm thick.

Materials used

[edit]

Plastic wrap was initially[when?] created from polyvinyl chloride (PVC), which remains the most common component globally. PVC has an acceptably-low permeability to water vapor and oxygen,[3] helping to preserve the freshness of food. There are concerns about the transfer of plasticizers from PVC into food.[citation needed] Pliofilm was made of various kinds of rubber chloride. Used in the middle of the 20th century, it could be heat-sealed.[4]

A common, cheaper alternative to PVC is low-density polyethylene (LDPE). It is less adhesive than PVC, but this can be remedied by adding linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), which also increases the film's tensile strength.[5]

In the US and Japan, plastic wrap is sometimes produced using polyvinylidene chloride (PVdC), though some brands, such as Saran wrap, have switched to other formulations due to environmental concerns.[6]

Food use

[edit]

Purpose

[edit]
Bread wrapped in plastic wrap

The most important role plastic wrap plays in food packaging is protection and preservation. Plastic wrap can prevent food from perishing, extend its shelf-life, and maintain the quality of food. Plastic wrap generally provides protection for food from three aspects: chemical (gases, moisture, and light), biological (microorganisms, insects and animals), and physical (mechanical damage). In addition to food protection and preservation, plastic wrap can also reduce food waste, tag food information, ease the distribution processes, and increase product visibility and microwavability.[7]

Health concern

[edit]

Plastic materials are widely used in the food industry due to their low price and convenience; however, there has been an increased health concern because of the possibility of releasing undesirable chemicals from plastic materials into food products. Plastic packages are made of various materials such as polyethylene, low-density polyethylene, etc. Additives, including lubricants, plasticizers, UV-absorbers, colorants, and antioxidants, are added into plastic materials in order to improve the quality and properties of the plastics. Besides, plastic materials are often coated and printed in the final processes, in which inks and varnishes are used. Although the barrier properties of the plastic packages provide protection of foods from external contaminations, the additives and coating materials in the plastic packages are able to penetrate into foods and cause health-related issues.[8]

"It is true that substances used to make plastics can leach into food," says Edward Machuga, Ph.D., a consumer safety officer in the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. "But as part of the approval process, the FDA considers the amount of a substance expected to migrate into food and the toxicological concerns about the particular chemical." A couple of cases have caught media attention in recent years. One case is in regard to diethylhexyl adipate (DEHA). DEHA is a plasticizer, a substance added to some plastics in order to make them flexible. There are public concerns about DEHA exposure while consuming food with plastic wraps. There are potentials of exposure to DEHA; however, the levels of the exposure are much lower than the no toxic effect levels in animal studies. Another case is in regard to the dioxins, labeled as "likely human carcinogen" by the Environmental Protection Agency. The public has been misled by the claims that plastics contain dioxins [citation needed], while Machuga stated that no evidence that shows plastic containers or films contain dioxins was seen by the FDA [citation needed]. According to writing in FDA Consumer Magazine as of November 2002, when used properly the use of plastic wrap in food preparation does not pose danger to human health.[9]

Environmental concerns

[edit]

The accumulation of plastic debris on the Earth is seen as a threat to both wildlife and the environment. Plastic debris might choke or trap wildlife, and it could also penetrate toxic compounds into ecosystems. This land-originated problem has become a problem in ocean ecosystem as well since streams and rivers which are close to the land have carried the plastic debris into the coast, and currents transfer it to everywhere in the ocean. Plastic debris is a potential danger to all forms of aquatic life. Some marine species, like sea turtles, take plastic as prey items by mistake. Also, some species might even pick up plastics to feed their offspring, which cause huge problems on growth and even cause mortality. Toxic compounds in plastics can disrupt hormone regulation in the cells of organisms, which can lead to alteration of animals' mating behavior, reproductive ability, and even cause the development of tumors.[10]

A study shows that using recycled plastic materials can reduce the environmental impacts significantly as a result of minimizing exploration, mining and transportation of natural gas and oil. One of the possible ways to increase the recycling rate is adding fibrous reinforcement into plastics. The environmental impact has been assessed using the life cycle assessment method. The results showed that plastics with fibrous reinforcement added can sharply reduce resource usage and global warming in civil applications.[11]

Medical use

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Plastic wrap

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Plastic wrap is a thin, flexible, transparent primarily used to seal containers and cover items, thereby preserving freshness by restricting oxygen exposure and moisture loss. It is most commonly manufactured from (LDPE) for general food-safe applications or (PVC) enhanced with plasticizers for stronger cling adhesion. The material originated from (PVDC), discovered accidentally in 1933 by Dow Chemical lab worker Wiley during equipment cleaning, when a residue proved resistant to solvents; this led to the development of Saran Wrap, first commercialized for industrial use in 1949 and households in 1953. Widely applied in kitchens for wrapping leftovers, steaming vegetables, and preventing , plastic wrap has enabled efficient storage and reduced spoilage-related waste, though its persistence in the environment raises concerns over microplastic and entanglement; empirical assessments nonetheless show that such films lower net ecological footprints by curbing waste emissions relative to less durable alternatives.

History

Invention and early development

In 1933, Ralph M. Wiley, a laboratory assistant and college student at in , accidentally discovered (PVDC) while cleaning glassware used in experiments related to solvents and adhesives. Wiley observed a clear, film-like residue coating the inside of a flask that resisted dissolution in common solvents, prompting further analysis which revealed it as a novel polymer formed from vinylidene chloride monomers. This serendipitous finding marked the initial identification of PVDC, distinct from earlier cellulosic films like cellophane, which Swiss chemist Jacques E. Brandenberger had invented in 1908 as a transparent, regenerated cellulose sheet for packaging but lacked inherent adhesiveness and superior chemical stability. Early evaluations highlighted PVDC's unique properties, including strong clinginess due to its tacky surface, exceptional resistance to oils, greases, and corrosive chemicals, and high impermeability to gases and moisture—qualities that surpassed cellophane's limitations in barrier performance and durability under varied conditions. These attributes stemmed from PVDC's chlorinated structure, which provided denser molecular packing and lower permeability compared to cellophane's more porous, hygroscopic base. Dow chemists recognized its potential for thin-film applications, initiating laboratory-scale studies to control the radical-initiated reaction of vinylidene , yielding consistent, flexible sheets rather than brittle residues. Through the late 1930s, pre-World War II research at Dow focused on refining PVDC synthesis, including copolymerization techniques to enhance processability and reduce crystallinity for extrudable films, laying the groundwork for scalable thin-film production without immediate commercial intent. By 1940, Dow formally registered the , solidifying its foundational role in developing durable, cling-forming wraps superior to wax papers or early variants in laboratory sealing and containment tests.

Commercialization and material shifts

Dow Chemical Company commercialized Saran Wrap in 1949 for industrial applications, followed by its national household launch in 1953 as the first dedicated cling film designed specifically for . Formulated from (PVDC), the product offered exceptional adhesion and moisture/oxygen barrier properties, enabling effective sealing of fresh foods and leftovers without refrigeration dependency. Within five years of the consumer rollout, over 200 million rolls were sold, establishing it as a staple in post-World War II kitchens and transforming routine practices. By the early 2000s, formulations began shifting from PVDC and (PVC) dominance due to escalating processing challenges and regulatory scrutiny of chlorine-containing polymers. In 2004, , then owner of the Saran brand, replaced PVDC with (LDPE), emphasizing environmental benefits like reduced emissions during production, though the change compromised original cling strength, tolerance, and gas barrier efficacy without substantiating direct health risks from PVDC residues in approved food contact uses. This transition prioritized manufacturability and compliance costs over maintaining superior performance metrics. Post-2000 adaptations accelerated globally toward non-chlorinated options such as LDPE or (LLDPE) for broader cost savings in and recyclability, particularly in North American markets where chlorinated variants faced stricter disposal regulations. Outside the , PVC-based films retained prevalence in cling wrap due to their inherent tackiness from formulations, sustaining demand in regions with less emphasis on phase-outs. These material evolutions reflected pragmatic responses to and policy incentives rather than uniform performance mandates.

Composition and Production

Primary materials and formulations

Plastic wrap formulations primarily utilize (PVC) as the base , valued for its inherent flexibility, clarity, and cling properties derived from its linear chain structure with polar atoms. (PVDC) serves as a key alternative or blend component, offering superior gas barrier performance with an oxygen permeability coefficient of 1.2 cm³·mm/(m²·24 h·MPa). (LDPE) and (LLDPE) are employed in non-PVC variants for their chemical inertness and compatibility with recycling streams. To achieve desired cling and processability, PVC-based formulations incorporate plasticizers such as di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA) at concentrations ranging from 22% to 28.3% by weight. These additives reduce the temperature, enabling thin-film while maintaining without natural tackiness in pure LDPE or PVDC polymers. Formulations are typically tuned for film thicknesses of 10 to 30 micrometers, balancing tensile strength and barrier efficacy; modern blends often employ co- of PVC outer layers with PVDC cores to enhance oxygen impermeability while preserving overall flexibility.

Manufacturing processes

The manufacturing of plastic wrap primarily relies on processes, where polymer , such as (PVC) or (PE), are melted and shaped into continuous thin films. In the standard flat-die method, pellets are fed into a screw extruder, heated to temperatures between 150°C and 250°C to achieve a molten state, and then forced through a narrow flat die to form a thin sheet of uniform thickness, typically ranging from 5 to 20 micrometers. The extruded is immediately cooled on chilled rollers to solidify it, preventing and maintaining clarity and flexibility, before being slit into narrower widths and wound onto rolls for further or . For enhanced barrier properties, co-extrusion techniques are employed to produce multi-layer films by simultaneously melting and extruding different polymer formulations through a multi-manifold die, allowing precise layering of materials like PVC with polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC) or PE to optimize cling, puncture resistance, and gas permeability. This process supports high-throughput production, with modern lines capable of outputs exceeding 500 kg per hour per extruder, facilitating scalability for industrial demands. Blown film extrusion variants, particularly for PVC cling wrap, involve extruding molten polymer through a circular die to form a tube, which is inflated with air, stretched, and cooled to achieve biaxial orientation and superior cling characteristics. Post-extrusion quality controls include , where the film surface is exposed to a high-voltage electrical discharge in air to generate and reactive species, increasing from around 30-35 dynes/cm to 38-42 dynes/cm or higher, thereby improving wettability for , , and without altering bulk properties. Uniformity is ensured through automated gauging and edge trimming, while the thin gauge of the films results in relatively low per unit length, often under 5 MJ per kg of output due to efficient and minimal material use in high-speed lines. These steps enable consistent production of defect-free rolls suitable for end-use.

Physical and Chemical Properties

Key mechanical and barrier properties

Plastic wrap demonstrates tensile strength ranging from 10 to 30 MPa, permitting the film to endure applied stresses during stretching without fracturing. Its elongation at break commonly exceeds 300%, facilitating extensive deformation prior to rupture and contributing to conformability around irregular shapes. Cling adhesion, essential for self-sealing, derives from triboelectric charging in unmodified films or incorporation of tackifying agents, quantifiable via peel force per ASTM D5458 standards. Barrier performance features low oxygen transmission rates, with PVDC formulations achieving values below 1 cc/100 in²/day at 23°C and 0% RH, substantially outperforming or uncoated alternatives that exhibit higher gas permeability and thus reduced efficacy against oxidative spoilage. Water vapor transmission rates remain minimal, typically under 5 g/m²/day for common thicknesses, enhancing moisture retention compared to porous substrates even when waxed. Thermal stability in PVC-based wraps supports up to 80-100°C, beyond which softening or risks emerge due to volatility and chain scission. Optical properties include high visible exceeding 90%, ensuring product visibility while minimizing for clarity in inspection.

Variations across material types

(PVC) films exhibit high cling properties due to inherent electrostatic , superior stretchability, and flexibility, with tensile strength typically around 20-30 MPa and elongation at break exceeding 200%. These attributes enable thin gauges while maintaining form-fitting coverage, though PVC shows moderate barrier performance with transmission rates (WVTR) of 5-10 g/m²/day and oxygen transmission rates (OTR) of 500-600 cc/m²/day at standard conditions. Polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC), frequently incorporated as a or layer in multilayer films, delivers the highest barrier efficacy among common plastic wrap polymers, achieving WVTR values below 1 g/m²/day (often 0.05-0.2 g/m²/day for 25 µm thickness) and OTR under 2 cc/m²/day. This stems from its dense, crystalline structure, which restricts gas and moisture permeation more effectively than PVC or , albeit with reduced flexibility and higher processing demands. Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and (LLDPE) prioritize mechanical robustness, with LLDPE offering tensile strengths of 20-40 MPa, superior puncture resistance, and elongation comparable to PVC but lower cling reliant on additives. Barrier properties are inferior, registering WVTR of 10-30 g/m²/day and OTR of 2000-8000 cc/m²/day, often requiring increased thickness (e.g., 50-100% thicker than PVC equivalents) to approximate similar protection levels.
MaterialWVTR (g/m²/day)OTR (cc/m²/day)Tensile Strength (MPa)Elongation at Break (%)
PVC5-10500-60020-30>200
PVDC<1<240-50100-200
LDPE/LLDPE10-302000-800020-40300-600
These variations necessitate trade-offs: PVC balances cling and economics with adequate barriers, PVDC excels in impermeability for demanding preservation but at elevated cost, and variants emphasize and processability despite limitations.

Applications

Food packaging and preservation

Plastic wrap functions primarily as a barrier in by sealing out oxygen, moisture, and airborne contaminants, thereby inhibiting oxidation, , and microbial proliferation that accelerate spoilage. This mechanism is particularly effective for perishable items stored under or freezing conditions, where it maintains product integrity by minimizing exposure to environmental factors that degrade quality. Empirical studies demonstrate its preservation efficacy; for instance, in the for cucumbers imported from to , plastic wrapping reduces retail-level losses by 4.8 percentage points, from 9.4% to 4.6% of total volume. Similarly, for meats and cheeses, the cling properties of plastic wrap limit surface drying and oxidation compared to uncovered alternatives, supporting extended refrigerated storage without compromising texture or flavor. Introduced commercially in the mid-20th century, plastic wrap gained global adoption post-1950s amid rising household and for convenient preservation methods. It is available in versatile formats, including continuous rolls with integrated dispensers for home and professional kitchens, and pre-cut perforated sheets for quick retail wrapping of sandwiches, , or deli items. These options facilitate airtight coverage tailored to varying food shapes and sizes, enhancing usability in both domestic and commercial settings.

Industrial and protective uses

Stretch variants of plastic wrap are extensively used in for palletizing goods, where the material is stretched and applied around stacked loads to provide unitization, stability, and resistance to tampering or shifting during transit. This application reduces product damage by up to 50% in some shipping scenarios through load containment and cushioning against vibrations and impacts. The 's high elongation—at rates exceeding 200%—allows it to conform tightly to irregular shapes, with common thicknesses ranging from 12 to 25 microns for optimal tension without film breakage. In and , plastic films function as temporary protective barriers over , components, and surfaces to prevent from dust, moisture, or construction debris. Polyethylene-based films, often 50-100 microns thick, are selected for their conformability and low-tack adhesives that avoid residue upon removal, enabling use on metals, plastics, and during fabrication, , or site work. These coverings withstand environmental exposure for periods up to several months, with tear resistance exceeding 100 N/mm in high-duty formulations. Agricultural applications include wrapping, where multi-layer plastic films—typically 25 microns thick and composed of —encase baled crops to establish anaerobic conditions for , thereby inhibiting aerobic spoilage and preserving protein content at levels above 90% of fresh values. Four to six overlapping layers are standard to achieve oxygen permeability below 50 cm³/m²/day, with UV stabilizers extending field durability to 12 months or more. This method supports bulk storage, reducing losses to under 5% compared to unwrapped methods.

Medical and sterile applications

Cling film, particularly variants, is employed in healthcare for secondary of sterile supplies, including bandages, pads, and dressings, where its tight adherence and barrier qualities help preserve sterility against environmental contaminants during storage and . Market analyses indicate this usage stems from the film's ability to form a conformal seal that minimizes microbial ingress without requiring specialized equipment. In wound management, plastic wrap serves as a temporary protective cover over dressings to shield sites from and during activities like showering, enabling visibility of the while maintaining a moist environment conducive to healing. Clinical recommendations from contexts endorse this practice for short-term use, citing the material's impermeability to liquids and ease of application. Evaluations of specific products, such as Press'n Seal cling film, have verified its capacity to retain sterility in intraoperative settings like treatments, attributing efficacy to properties including surface adhesion, optical clarity, and thermal retention, with no contamination observed in sterility tests. Adoption in sterile applications remains constrained by the need for validation under standards like , which mandates tests for , , and to confirm suitability for skin-contact devices. Polyethylene-based , often breathable to permit moisture vapor transmission, undergo these assessments to mitigate risks of adverse tissue reactions, ensuring limited but targeted deployment in non-invasive roles such as instrument overwraps or procedural barriers rather than primary surgical drapes.

Benefits and Impacts

Reduction of food waste and

Plastic wrap contributes to the reduction of food waste primarily by forming an airtight barrier that limits oxygen ingress, loss, and microbial , thereby extending the of perishable foods such as fruits, , meats, and baked goods. Empirical studies demonstrate this effect on specific items; for example, wrapping fruits individually in cling film extended marketable from 6 days at ambient for unwrapped samples to 12 days, with reduced and decay incidence. Similarly, cling film wrapping of curds maintained firmness, minimized (under 5% over 10 days at 5°C), and lowered respiration rates compared to unwrapped controls, preserving quality for retail and use. On a broader scale, flexible plastic films like those used in wrap applications enable packaging innovations that prevent substantial food losses in supply chains. In the United States, where approximately 60 million tons of food are wasted annually—equivalent to 40% of the food supply—strategies incorporating improved plastic packaging design could divert over 1 million tons of surplus food from waste each year by optimizing portion sizes, enhancing barrier properties, and delaying spoilage. This waste avoidance equates to avoiding economic losses valued in billions, given that U.S. food waste carries an estimated annual cost of $218 billion in retail, wholesale, and consumer expenses. Plastic wrap's stems from its minimal material requirements and low production costs relative to the value preserved. Typically consisting of thin or films (8-20 microns thick), it uses grams of material per application while outperforming heavier alternatives like or metal in weight reduction and transport efficiency, lowering logistics expenses in global . Economic analyses indicate that the value recovered from averted —factoring in production, retail, and disposal savings—exceeds costs by factors of 2 to 10 in modeled scenarios for perishables, as the high embedded value of (often $1,000+ per ton) dwarfs the fractional cent per unit cost of wrap.

Contributions to food security and supply chain

Plastic wrap, as a form of flexible , facilitates the extension of for perishable foods during transportation, enabling the distribution of fresh produce over extended distances and supporting in agricultural goods. This preservation capability reduces spoilage rates, which is particularly vital in developing countries where limitations exacerbate post-harvest losses; for instance, plastic protects against and physical , ensuring safer and more efficient global exports of items like fruits and . In regions with variable climates and longer s, such as parts of and , this contributes to stabilizing availability by minimizing losses estimated at 20-40% for certain commodities without adequate barriers. At the consumer level, plastic wrap enables household-level , allowing low-income families to store or bulk purchases longer, thereby decreasing the need for frequent grocery trips and associated transportation costs. By creating an airtight seal that limits exposure to oxygen and —key factors in oxidation and microbial growth—this application supports portion control and extends usability of affordable proteins and , indirectly bolstering access in resource-constrained settings. The broader flexible packaging films sector, encompassing plastic wrap, underscores its economic role in food supply chains, with the global market valued at $291.56 billion in 2024 and projected to reach $368.82 billion by 2029, driven by demand for efficient preservation technologies that enhance distribution resilience and . This scale reflects investments in materials that prioritize barrier properties, fostering vitality amid rising global demands.

Health Considerations

Potential chemical migration and exposure pathways

Chemical migration from plastic wrap primarily occurs through direct contact with food, where additives such as di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA), a common in (PVC)-based films, leach into the contacted material. This process is diffusion-driven, with DEHA partitioning from the matrix into simulants or fatty matrices, as DEHA's in facilitates transfer. Studies have quantified DEHA migration from PVC films containing approximately 28% DEHA, yielding levels up to 18.9 mg per square decimeter of film surface under contact conditions. Migration rates increase significantly under thermal stress, such as temperatures above 100°C, or in the presence of high-fat foods, which act as solvents for lipophilic additives. For instance, experimental contact with meats resulted in DEHA concentrations of 49 to 151 mg/kg in the food matrix, particularly when films were applied during heating or storage of lipid-rich products like cheeses. Phthalate plasticizers, though less prevalent in food-grade PVC wraps due to regulatory preferences for alternatives like DEHA, can similarly migrate under analogous conditions if present in non-compliant or older formulations. Microplastic shedding represents another exposure pathway, arising from mechanical wear, abrasion, or thermal degradation of the film during handling, cutting, or wrapping. Particles generated this way, typically in the to nanometer range, can transfer directly to surfaces via physical contact or become airborne for potential , with detected quantities in food contact scenarios on the order of nanograms per gram. exposure, including non-microwave sources like hot food wrapping, exacerbates fragmentation and release. Indirect pathways include trace incorporation via recycled content in downstream packaging, where residual additives persist through processing. Volatilization of additives from plastic wrap remains insignificant at , as these compounds exhibit low under ambient conditions, limiting gaseous exposure routes. Primary human exposure thus stems from during consumption of wrapped foods, with dermal or respiratory uptake secondary and minimal in typical domestic use.

Empirical evidence on risks and regulatory evaluations

Animal studies have demonstrated that high-dose exposure to like di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), commonly used in (PVC) plastic wrap, can induce endocrine disruption, including and developmental effects in . However, these effects occur at doses orders of magnitude higher than typical human exposure levels from , and direct extrapolation to humans remains limited due to species differences in metabolism and sensitivity. Human epidemiological studies report associations between urinary phthalate metabolites and outcomes such as reduced , altered neurodevelopment, and increased childhood risk, but evidence of causation specifically from plastic wrap exposure is weak, confounded by multi-source exposures (e.g., , medical devices) and lacking randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to establish dose-response at consumer levels. For instance, meta-analyses of prenatal DEHP exposure show inconsistent reproductive outcomes in humans compared to robust animal data, with no clear links to , cancer, or directly attributable to cling film use. Recent 2021-2025 cohort studies detecting phthalates in blood or linking broad exposure to heart disease mortality (e.g., estimating 91,000-107,000 U.S. premature deaths annually) fail to isolate plastic wrap as a causal vector and rely on observational correlations without mechanistic proof at low doses. Regulatory bodies evaluate risks based on migration limits and toxicological thresholds. The U.S. FDA permits specific phthalates in food contact substances, including plastic wrap, with overall migration not exceeding safe intake levels derived from no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) in animal data, affirming compliance for non-thermal uses like room-temperature wrapping. In the EU, Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 sets specific migration limits (SML) for phthalates such as DEHP at 1.5 mg/kg food, alongside an overall migration limit of 60 mg/kg, with amendments through 2023 tightening restrictions while allowing authorized uses; evaluations conclude that approved levels pose negligible risk under intended conditions. These thresholds incorporate uncertainty factors (e.g., 100-fold for interspecies extrapolation) and prioritize empirical toxicology over precautionary assumptions, reflecting that detected exposures from compliant packaging do not exceed reference doses associated with harm. Overall assessments indicate that while phthalate detection in human confirms ubiquitous low-level exposure, robust causal tying typical plastic wrap use to adverse outcomes is absent, with and prevention benefits empirically outweighing hypothetical risks in population-level data. No large-scale RCTs or longitudinal studies have demonstrated elevated incidence from standard consumer practices, underscoring regulatory confidence in current limits despite ongoing surveillance.

Environmental Evaluation

Lifecycle assessments and comparative impacts

Lifecycle assessments (LCAs) of plastic wrap, primarily films, evaluate cradle-to-grave environmental impacts, including raw material extraction, production, use-phase benefits from , and end-of-life disposal. These analyses often employ functional units such as kilograms of food protected or volume packaged to account for performance differences across materials. When incorporating food waste avoidance—where plastic wrap extends and reduces spoilage—PE films demonstrate net environmental advantages over alternatives like , , or aluminum in (GHG) emissions and energy use. A 2025 comparative LCA of PE packaging versus , , aluminum, and alternatives across multiple applications found average (GWP) savings of approximately 70% for PE, driven by lower fossil demand and reduced waste emissions. This holds particularly for flexible films used in wrapping, where the nature of PE (density ~0.92 g/cm³) minimizes material inputs compared to denser substitutes like (2.5 g/cm³). Production for PE films is around 70-80 MJ/kg, but per functional unit of preserved , it yields lower total impacts due to superior barrier properties that cut downstream waste-related and transport emissions. Specific case studies reinforce these findings; for instance, wrapping cucumbers in thin PE film versus loose storage results in a net positive environmental balance, as the packaging prevents and spoilage, avoiding GHG emissions equivalent to 2-3 times the film's production footprint over the product's lifecycle. Broader meta-analyses of LCAs confirm that flexible packaging outperforms rigid formats (e.g., bottles or trays) in 80% of impact categories, including and acidification, when use-phase efficiencies are factored in. These outcomes challenge narratives emphasizing only production-phase burdens, as full-system evaluations reveal plastics' role in offsetting higher impacts from alternative materials' greater weight and poorer preservation efficacy.

Waste accumulation, recycling, and degradation

Plastic wrap, primarily composed of (LDPE) films, contributes to waste streams dominated by disposal and , with approximately 85-90% of post-consumer plastic waste in the United States directed to these fates rather than . Flexible films like plastic wrap face structural barriers to diversion, including their low bulk density and tendency to entangle in processing machinery, exacerbating accumulation in . Recycling rates for plastic films remain below 10%, often cited at around 2-3% for flexible packaging, due to persistent contamination from food residues and the material's flexibility, which hinders sorting and mechanical separation at scale. In practice, clean LDPE films from industrial sources can achieve higher recovery through dedicated streams, but post-consumer plastic wrap typically enters mixed waste, leading to rejection in curbside programs and dominance of landfilling or energy recovery via incineration, where plastics constituted 16.3% of combusted municipal solid waste in 2018. These challenges stem from economic factors, such as low market value for recycled LDPE and high processing costs relative to virgin material. LDPE in plastic wrap is non-biodegradable under typical environmental conditions, persisting as an inert material with degradation rates on the order of decades to centuries via slow photo-oxidation and minimal biological breakdown, without significant in landfills. While fragmentation can produce , contributions from plastic packaging are dwarfed by dominant sources like wear particles, which account for up to 45% of total in terrestrial and aquatic environments. Recent mechanical recycling advancements, including pilot programs from 2023 onward, have targeted clean LDPE films through improved sorting and compatibilization techniques, yielding up to 50% material recovery in optimized processes by reducing contamination losses and enhancing pellet quality for . These efforts, often involving enzymatic or advanced washing pretreatments, demonstrate potential for higher efficiency in controlled streams but remain limited for contaminated consumer waste like used plastic wrap.

Policy responses, bans, and alternative materials

In response to environmental concerns over waste, the enacted the Single-Use Plastics Directive (Directive (EU) 2019/904) in 2021, which prohibits or restricts certain single-use items while mandating reductions in others, including films used in ; however, essential food wraps like cling film receive exemptions due to their role in preventing spoilage. The forthcoming and (PPWR), proposed in 2022 and advancing toward 2030 implementation, targets bans on single-use for most fresh produce, though flexible films for direct food contact remain partially exempt to avoid disruptions. In the United States, the voluntary U.S. Plastics Pact outlines 2025 targets for 100% of to be reusable, recyclable, or able, alongside efforts to recycle or 50% of , but progress reports indicate these goals will likely be unmet due to infrastructure limitations. Proposed alternatives to conventional plastic wrap, such as bio-based (bio-PE) and (PLA) films, aim to reduce dependency but often entail 20-50% higher production costs and exhibit inferior oxygen and moisture barriers compared to petroleum-based options, per life cycle assessments (LCAs). LCAs reveal that while bio-PE may lower certain impacts like fossil resource use, PLA films frequently yield higher during production and disposal, especially if composting is absent, and their reduced durability can accelerate , negating environmental gains. In scenarios where alternatives replace plastics without addressing barrier shortcomings, net increases, as evidenced by studies showing plastic films' superior performance in minimizing lifecycle emissions for applications. Empirical data on bans highlights trade-offs, with restrictions on leading to faster spoilage and elevated ; for instance, unwrapped fruits and exhibit 2-3 times higher spoilage rates, driving up replacement production and associated emissions from and . Analyses of bans, analogous to film restrictions, demonstrate unintended rises in total volumes and costs, as thicker "reusable" substitutes generate more material per use without proportional gains. These outcomes underscore the limitations of precautionary bans, which prioritize avoidance over comprehensive evidence; market-driven innovations in and hybrid materials, rather than mandates, better align with causal reductions in net environmental harm by preserving plastics' efficiency in curbing loss.

References

  1. https://cris.msu.edu/news/packaging/packaging-plastic-wrap/
  2. https://www.ecoartfullife.com/news/what-is-plastic-wrap-made-of/
  3. https://uspackagingandwrapping.com/plastic-wrap-101.html
  4. http://theinventors.org/library/inventors/blsaranwrap.htm
  5. https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10273848
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7664184/
  7. https://corporate.dow.com/en-us/about-dow/company/history/vintage-chemical-advertising/portfolio/saran-wrap.html
  8. https://www.thoughtco.com/history-of-pvdc-4070927
  9. https://montrealgazette.com/opinion/columnists/the-right-chemistry-dry-cleaning-research-led-to-saran-wrap
  10. https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/sealed-with-a-wrap/
  11. https://bioplasticsnews.com/2019/07/23/history-of-cellophane/
  12. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/story-of-plastic-sticky-problem-of-plastic-wrap
  13. https://shuttersparks.net/saran-wrap-isnt-what-it-used-to-be/
  14. https://www.tasteofhome.com/article/why-todays-saran-wrap-is-less-sticky/
  15. https://cameo.mfa.org/wiki/Polyvinylidene_chloride
  16. https://www.benkaico.com/knowledge-and-living-tips/plastic-wrap-benkai-co-ltd
  17. https://www.potop-polymer.com/info/barrier-properties-of-pvdc-films-99967578.html
  18. https://uspackagingandwrapping.com/blog/the-main-differences-between-pvc-polyethylene-and-polyolefin.html
  19. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/evaluating-existing-substances/screening-assessment-forchallenge2.html
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030200750405
  21. https://www.packagingsuppliesbymail.com/blog/post/micron-mil-and-gauge
  22. https://www.extrudergwell.com/product/PVC-PVDC-Cling-Film-Extrusion-Line.html
  23. https://www.twi-global.com/technical-knowledge/faqs/plastic-extrusion
  24. https://lakelandplastics.com/what-is-plastic-extrusion/
  25. https://www.benkextruder.com/pvc-cling-film-production-line/
  26. https://www.polyflex.uk.com/news/what-is-co-extruded-film
  27. https://www.enerconind.com/web-treating/library-resource/why-do-i-need-corona-treating-and-how-does-it-work/
  28. https://www.enerconind.com/web-treating/applications/film-extrusion/
  29. https://www.dsclingfilm.com/pvc-cling-film-with-color-box/packing-plastic-wrap/
  30. https://www.admet.com/blog/astm-d5458-peel-cling-of-stretch-wrap-film-how-to-guide/
  31. https://www.pilcherhamilton.com/metallized-vs-pvdc-coated-polyester-which-barrier-wins/
  32. https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/resources/paper-based-products-as-promising-substitutes-for-plastics-in-the-context-of-bans-on-non-biodegradables/
  33. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11926751/
  34. https://www.hyfpack.com/news/what-are-the-properties-of-pvc-film.html
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096399692200850X
  36. https://www.polfilm.net/en/article/otr_wvtr/
  37. https://www.emingfoil.com/news/industry-news/comparison-of-pvc-cling-film-and-pe-cling-film/
  38. https://www.emalufoil.com/news/pvc-cling-film-vs-pe-cling-film.html
  39. https://www.sorbentsystems.com/barrier_film_properties.htm
  40. https://vichem.vn/en/otr-wvtr-key-barrier-indices-in-plastic-packaging/
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/polyethylene-film
  42. https://americorpint.com/understanding-hdpe-lldpe-ldpe-pp-pvc-ps-pet-and-eva/
  43. https://lacerta.com/blog/plastic-packaging-for-food-and-the-science-of-shelf-life
  44. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7956554/
  45. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2022.750199/full
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388886502_Impact_of_Packaging_Materials_on_Food_Safety_and_Shelf_Life
  47. https://www.webstaurantstore.com/455/cling-wrap-and-plastic-food-wrap.html
  48. https://www.amazon.com/Plastic-Wraps-Pre-Cut-Sheets-Puncture-Resistant/dp/B07DDV8QGQ
  49. https://uspackagingandwrapping.com/perforated-wrap-dispenser.html
  50. https://uspackagingandwrapping.com/stretch-wrap-101.html
  51. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/stretch-wrap-market-109169
  52. https://www.industrialpackaging.com/complete-guide-to-stretch-film
  53. https://danapoly.com/construction-film/
  54. https://www.polifilm.com/products/protection-films-industry/protection-films-for-plastic-sheets/
  55. https://www.pregis.com/us-solutions/by-product/temporary-protection-films/protective-film-for-plastics/
  56. https://westernpackaging.com/silage-wrap-benefits/
  57. https://silopak.com/silage-plastic-film/
  58. https://www.trioworld.com/products/agriculture-horticulture-film/bale-wrap-mantle-film/bale-wrap/
  59. https://eyouagro.com/blog/tear-resistance-in-silage-film/
  60. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/cling-films-market-report
  61. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/cling-films-market-size-reach-153000434.html
  62. https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/fulltext/2004/03000/protection_of_dressings_and_wounds_by_cling_film.78.aspx
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6433354/
  64. https://www.fda.gov/media/142959/download
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10304299/
  66. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4648941/
  67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322077687_EFFECT_OF_CLING_FILM_WRAPPING_ON_EXTENDING_THE_SHELF_LIFE_OF_CAULIFLOWER
  68. https://www.rts.com/resources/guides/food-waste-america/
  69. https://refed.org/articles/how-to-design-packaging-to-prevent-food-waste/
  70. https://www.plasticsindustry.org/articles/life-cycle-analysis-shows-plastic-packaging-advantages/
  71. https://www.plasticsindustry.org/articles/role-plastic-flexible-films-reducing-food-waste/
  72. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tcsditcinf2025d8_en.pdf
  73. https://www.brunel.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/articles/Why-some-plastic-packaging-is-necessary-to-prevent-food-waste-and-protect-the-environment
  74. https://www.fao.org/4/mb061e/mb061e00.pdf
  75. https://www.sinoglass.com/blog/blogs/advantages-of-plastic-food-packaging-an-in-depth-look-at-daily-use/
  76. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/flexible-packaging-market-report-162180170.html
  77. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278691506002948
  78. https://www.center4research.org/plastic-wrap-plastic-food-containers-safe/
  79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12338441_Migration_of_di-2-ethylhexylexylAdipate_Plasticizer_from_Food-Grade_Polyvinyl_Chloride_Film_into_Hard_and_Soft_Cheeses
  80. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10210534/
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016041202400326X
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11336334/
  83. https://pirg.org/articles/studies-shows-how-microplastics-from-packaging-get-into-our-food/
  84. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725021990
  85. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/13/19/3125
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7308665/
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6786271/
  88. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8157593/
  89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412021005286
  90. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10937404.2018.1505354
  91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12173035/
  92. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/29/well/phthalates-heart-disease.html
  93. https://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-and-gras-ingredients-information-consumers/phthalates-food-packaging-and-food-contact-applications
  94. https://foodpackagingforum.org/news/16th-amendment-to-eu-regulation-10-2011-on-plastic-fcms-now-in-force
  95. https://www.fda.gov/food/hfp-constituent-updates/fda-update-phthalates-food-packaging-and-food-contact-applications
  96. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-024-00718-2
  97. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12442484/
  98. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10867844/
  99. https://www.americanchemistry.com/content/download/7885/file/Life-Cycle-Impacts-of-Plastic-Packaging-Compared-to-Substitutes-in-the-United-States-and-Canada.pdf
  100. https://phys.org/news/2025-02-packaging-materials-emissions-alternatives.html
  101. https://www.sustainableplastics.com/news/polyethylene-packaging-shows-average-70-lower-emissions-paper-glass-aluminium-steel
  102. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-024-02349-z
  103. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/the-us-recycled-just-5-percent-of-its-plastic-in-2021-180980052/
  104. https://plasticmakers.org/plastic-recycling-facts/state-of-plastics-recycling/
  105. https://recyclingpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2021/04/FF_Whitepaper_final.pdf
  106. https://blog.novachem.com/nova-knows/why-recycling-plastic-film-is-challenging-and-why-we-do-it-anyway
  107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25000108?via%253Dihub
  108. https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/documents/2207022.pdf
  109. https://www.packagingdigest.com/sustainability/package-recycling-stats-by-the-numbers
  110. https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/plastics-material-specific-data
  111. https://www.stretchbandpackaging.co.uk/post/the-challenges-of-recycling-ldpe-what-you-need-to-know
  112. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06635
  113. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10598529/
  114. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/one-of-the-biggest-microplastic-pollution-sources-isnt-straws-or-grocery-bags-its-your-tires
  115. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378380346_Technological_Advances_in_Mechanical_Recycling_Innovations_and_Corresponding_Impacts_on_the_Circular_Economy_of_Plastics
  116. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924004014
  117. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/plastics/single-use-plastics/eu-restrictions-certain-single-use-plastics_en
  118. https://www.digicomply.com/blog/ppwr-and-the-end-of-single-use-packaging-how-the-game-will-change-by-2030
  119. https://usplasticspact.org/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2021/06/USPP_Roadmap-to-2025_6.15.21.pdf
  120. https://foodpackagingforum.org/news/u-s-plastics-pact-to-miss-all-2025-commitments
  121. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.3c05191
  122. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789425000169
  123. https://financialpost.com/opinion/banning-plastic-food-packaging-second-big-plastics-mistake
  124. https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/climate-change/california-is-throwing-away-more-plastic-after-it-banned-plastic-bags/
  125. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652618301914
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.