Hubbry Logo
Afghan AmericansAfghan AmericansMain
Open search
Afghan Americans
Community hub
Afghan Americans
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Afghan Americans
Afghan Americans
Afghan Americans
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Afghan Americans (Dari: آمریکایی‌های افغان‌تبار Amrikāyi-hāye Afghān tabar, Pashto: د امريکا افغانان Da Amrīka Afghanan) are Americans with ancestry from Afghanistan. They form the largest Afghan community in North America with the second being Afghan Canadians. Afghan Americans may originate from any of the ethnic groups of Afghanistan.

Key Information

The Afghan community in the United States was minimal until large numbers were admitted as refugees following the December 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Others have arrived similarly during and after the latest war in Afghanistan.[11][12] Afghan Americans reside and work all across the United States.[6] The states of California, Virginia and New York historically had the largest number of Afghan Americans.[2][3] Thousands may also be found in the states of Arizona, Texas, Georgia, Colorado, Washington, Oklahoma, Nebraska,[13] Missouri, North Carolina, Maryland and Illinois.[4][5][6][12][14][15]

History and population

[edit]

Afghan Americans have a long history of immigrating to the United States, as they have arrived as early as the 1860s.[16] This was around the time when Afghanistan–United States relations were being established. Wallace Fard Muhammad claimed to have been from Afghanistan. A World War I draft registration card for Wallie Dodd Fard from 1917 indicated he was living in Los Angeles, California, as an unmarried restaurant owner, and reported that he was born in Shinka, Afghanistan in 1893.[17] Between the 1920s and 1940s, hundreds of Afghans immigrated to the United States.[18][19][20] Between 1953 and early 1970, at least 230 lawfully entered the United States.[18] Some of them were students who had been granted scholarships to study in American universities.

Afghan refugees and the Refugee Act of 1980

[edit]
Further information: Afghan refugees and Refugee Act of 1980
Afghan refugees statutorily become lawful permanent residents (green card holders) as of the date of their arrival into the United States.

After the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, around five million Afghan citizens were displaced. They were compelled to secretly migrate to (or seek refuge in) other countries. These Afghan refugees or asylum seekers found temporary shelter in neighboring Pakistan and Iran, and from there thousands made it to Europe, North America, Oceania, and elsewhere in the world. Under the law, the ones born in Pakistan, Iran or India are not in any way Pakistanis, Iranians or Indians. Their birth certificates and other legal documents confirm that they are citizens of Afghanistan.

Beginning in 1980, Afghan Americans arrived into the United States as families. They were admitted as refugees or asylum seekers. In some cases a family was represented by only one parent due to the death of the other parent. They began settling in the New York metropolitan area, California (mainly in the San Francisco Bay Area and the Los Angeles-Orange County area) and in other parts of the United States, where large Muslim community centers keep them bonded. Fremont, California, is home to the largest population of Afghan Americans followed by Northern Virginia and then Queens in New York City.[2][4][14] Smaller Afghan American communities also exist in the states of Texas, Arizona, Oklahoma, Washington, Georgia, Michigan, Idaho, Missouri, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Florida, North Carolina, Massachusetts, Maryland, Connecticut, Colorado, Ohio, Utah, New Mexico, Oregon, Tennessee and so on.[5][6][3][12] In the city of Chicago, the 2000 census counted 556 Afghan Americans, approximately half of them within the city.[21]

The first arrivals of Afghan families in the early 1980s were mainly the wealthy and from the urban and educated elite. They had rightfully applied for refugee status while temporarily residing in Pakistan and India, and a large number had similarly resided in Germany before their firm resettlement in the United States. The family reunification program brought in less affluent communities from rural Afghanistan, many of which were illiterate and maintained a more traditional village lifestyle.[22]

Child Citizenship Act of 2000

[edit]
Further information: Child Citizenship Act of 2000

Those admitted under 8 U.S.C. § 1157 and becoming green card recipients under 8 U.S.C. § 1159(a) are statutorily protected against inadmissibility, even if they are not in possession of their green cards, Afghan passports, Afghan identity cards, or any other legal document.[23] In addition to that privilege or benefit, whenever one parent becomes naturalized all of his or her children statutorily become entitled to naturalization through such American parent.[24] This conferral of American nationality statutorily extends to all of his or her children that are born outside of the United States.[25] All such nationality claims are statutorily reviewable under the federal judiciary of the United States.[26]

Post September 11, 2001, the Afghan American community faced discriminations. President Bush's plan to legalize works to help the economy came to a halt after the terror attack in 2001. It interrupted talk of legalizing immigrants thus leading to few admitted immigrants from 2001 to 2005. 406,080 immigrant visas were issued in 2001. 395,005 were issued in 2005 according to the Department of Homeland Security.[27]

Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009

[edit]
Further information: Emergency Afghan Allies Extension Act of 2014
A U.S. soldier with an Afghan American interpreter in Jalalabad, Nangarhar Province, Afghanistan.

A news reporter in 2001 randomly stated, without providing any references or sources, that there were 200,000 Afghan Americans.[28] This wild assumption probably included Afghan Canadians. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there were approximately 65,972 Afghan-Americans in 2006. The American Community Survey (ACS) estimated a total of 94,726 Afghan foreign-born immigrants were residing and working in the United States in 2016, which shows a 30% increase in the last ten years.[29] Since 2005, thousands of Afghans have been admitted to the United States under the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) program.[30][5][31][32] Congress passed the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009, which was extended in 2014.[33] Afghans who had put their lives at risk during the US-led war in Afghanistan became eligible for SIVs.[34] This program for Afghans created a legal pathway towards U.S. citizenship for the recipients and their immediate family members.[35][36][37]

Evacuations of 2021

[edit]
Afghan refugees resettled per 100K residents after the 2021 Afghan withdrawal and evacuation in each U.S. state and the District of Columbia according to CBS News
Further information: Fall of Kabul (2021) and 2021 Kabul Airlift

Large numbers of Afghans, including those that worked with the United States, moved to the country following the Taliban take over of Kabul in August 2021.

Of the more than 100,000 Afghan nationals who have moved to the United States since August 2021, it has accepted more than 1,600 unaccompanied children, the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Refugee Resettlement records show.[38]

As many as 150,000 Afghans who assisted the United States remained in Afghanistan, including individuals who worked closely with US military forces.[39]

Discrimination of Refugees

[edit]

Afghans who went through resettlement difficulties may experience discrimination, worsening the trauma.[40] Afghans still continue to flee from Afghanistan and still struggle to find refuge, most recently on July 15 Canada had closed its Special Immigration Measures Program. Afghans who were relying on this program may face death or persecution due to being stuck in Afghanistan, especially since this program targeted former employees of the Canadian Armed Forces, the Canadian Governments and their families.[41]

Culture

[edit]
Further information: Culture of Afghanistan
Qabuli Palau, is a traditional rice dish topped with sweet carrots, raisins, sliced almonds and served usually with lamb, beef or chicken.
Traditional dish aushak served at an Afghan restaurant in California

As other immigrants in the United States, Afghan Americans have gradually adopted the American way of life. But many of those who were born in Afghanistan still highly value Afghan culture. For example, they often wear at home Afghan clothes, watch Afghan shows, listen to Afghan music, eat mostly Afghan food, and enthusiastically keep up with Afghan politics. They also value their oral tradition of story telling. The stories they sometimes tell are about Mullah Nasreddin, Afghan history, myths and religions.[18]

Afghan Americans celebrate August 19 as Afghan Independence Day,[42] which relates to August 1919, the date when Afghanistan became fully independent after the signing of the Anglo-Afghan Treaty. Small festivals are held in cities that have Afghan communities, usually at the parks where black, red and green colored Afghan flags are spotted around cars.[43] Eid and Nowruz remain popular festivals for Afghans. The 2021 American sitcom United States of Al featured American and Afghan culture.

A The Washington Post article from October 2001 claims that the Afghan-American community, "concentrated in the towns of Fremont and Hayward, is in many ways a microcosm of the country that's nearly a dozen time zones away." Various members of the community commented that the Afghan community, following conflicts and divisions at home, are still divided in the United States, but that they all share love for their home country.[44]

Ethnicity and race

[edit]
Further information: Ethnic groups in Afghanistan and religion in Afghanistan

Afghan Americans are composed of the various ethnic groups that exist in Afghanistan, which include Pashtun, Tajik, Hazara, Uzbek, Turkmen, Baloch, and a number of others.[45] Since 1945, Afghan Americans have been officially classified as Caucasians.[46] For U.S. Census purposes Afghans are racially categorized as White or Asian Americans. In recent years the creation of a new census category called SWANA (which includes Afghan Americans) has been proposed in an effort for more accurate categorization.[47][48][49][50]

Religion

[edit]
The Hazrati Abu Bakr Siddique Mosque in Flushing, Queens, New York City

The majority of Afghan-Americans are Muslims whom follow Sunni Islam, with a sizable community of Shia Muslims. Many Afghan Americans residing in Northern Virginia are members of the All Dulles Area Muslim Society, which has a number of local branches.[51][52] After the September 11 attacks in 2001, a mosque run by Afghan-Americans in New York City donated blood, held a vigil for those who died inside the World Trade Center (WTC) and funded a memorial for the New York City fire fighters.[53]

There is a community of Afghan Jews in New York City, numbering about 200 families in 2007.[8] A group of Afghan Americans in the Los Angeles area follow Christianity.[10] Hussain Andaryas is an Afghan Christian televangelist who belongs to the Hazara ethnic group.[54] Outside of the Abrahamic faiths, there exists a community of Afghan Hindus and Afghan Sikhs. They are mainly found in the states of New York and Maryland.[9][55]

Media

[edit]

Afghan Americans have formed media outlets dedicated for its diaspora. Examples include television channels such as Ariana Afghanistan,[56] Payam-e-Afghan, Tuti TV,[57] and Pamir TV. In the 1990s, Afghanistan TV broadcast on KSCI Channel 18 in Los Angeles and as well as magazines like the Afghanistan Mirror. Many organizations have also been formed for Afghan youth, solidarity, women's rights and more.[58] Recently a new radio station has also launched named Radio Afghan Los Angeles.[59] In 2020, "Afghanistan by Afghans" a TV show and podcast was started by Misaq Kazimi, showcasing the voices of Afghan artists, thinkers and cultural keepers.[60] The show is also showcased on Zarin TV.

Demographics

[edit]

Immigration

[edit]

According to estimates from the Migration Policy Institute website for 2017 - 2021, there were 118,500 Afghan immigrants in the USA.[61] The counties or county-equivalents with the most Afghan immigrants were as follows:

Afghan Immigrant Population by County or County-Equivalent
Rank County State Population
1 Sacramento County California 15,400
2 Alameda County California 7,200
3 Fairfax County Virginia 6,400
4 King County Washington 4,700
5 Contra Costa County California 4,500
6 Prince William County Virginia 4,300
7 Los Angeles County California 3,800
8 Orange County California 3,600
9 San Diego County California 3,300
10 Bexar County Texas 3,100
11 Queens County New York 2,700
12 San Joaquin County California 2,200
13 Stanislaus County California 1,900
14 Travis County Texas 1,800
15 Alexandria (city) Virginia 1,800
16 Riverside County California 1,800
17 Tarrant County Texas 1,700
18 Prince George's County Maryland 1,700
19 Maricopa County Arizona 1,600
20 Nassau County New York 1,500
21 Loudoun County Virginia 1,500
22 Harris County Texas 1,500
23 Dallas County Texas 1,100
24 Albany County New York 1,100

Economics

[edit]
Northern Virginia has a large Afghan American work force

Many Afghan Americans own real estate in Afghanistan,[62] which in some cases have been lawfully inherited from their earliest ancestors for generations upon generations. Afghan Americans who arrived before the 21st century are mostly found residing near other middle class Americans. Some may be found living in the upper middle class neighborhoods and earning high salaries.

Because the majority of Afghan Americans were originally admitted as refugees under 8 U.S.C. § 1157, the government provided various forms of assistance (welfare) and selected their city of residence.[63][12][11][15] Some[quantify] decided to move to other cities that had larger Afghan communities but most remained in the cities where they first arrived. They gradually left the government assistance programs and eventually mortgaged homes. Their children were sent to colleges or universities. Those who could not achieve this decided to build or franchise small businesses. Others became real estate agents, bank employees, office workers, hotel workers, store clerks, salespersons, security guards, drivers, mechanics, waiters, etc.[3]

Like many other immigrants in the United States, Afghan Americans often engage in the operation of small businesses. Many operate American and Afghan restaurants as well as Afghan markets,[62][2] while some have been reported in the 1990s as vendors in Manhattan where they have replaced Greek Americans in the field.[64]

The family incomes of Afghan Americans (specifically, those that were termed "refugees") was a median of $50,000 in 2015. This figure is higher than Mexican Americans, Cuban Americans and slightly higher than Hmong Americans, but lower than Vietnamese Americans.[3]

Education

[edit]

Afghan immigrants that were admitted to the United States before 1979 were well educated.[18] In contrast, current immigrants have escaped from totalitarianism, genocide, torture, persecution, mistreatment, and military conflicts. This group has had some trouble coping with learning the English language.[18] Those who have pursued their education in America during the middle of the 20th century and traveled back to Afghanistan faced trouble attaining employment when returning to the United States since their education, often in medicine and engineering, is frequently viewed as outdated.[18] After the 1979 Soviet invasion, Afghanistan's education system worsened, causing many migrants in the late 20th century to place less emphasis on educational attainment.[18]

Notable people

[edit]
For a more comprehensive list, see List of Afghan Americans.
Zalmay Khalilzad with George W. Bush in 2004
Lina Rozbih, Senior Editor and television personality at Voice of America

[65]

Author Tamim Ansary and activist Humaira Ghilzai
Ashraf Ghani, the 5th President of Afghanistan
Mohammad Qayoumi served as President of San Jose State University and California State University, East Bay

Politics, academia and literature

[edit]

Business and finance

[edit]

Sports

[edit]

Media and art

[edit]

Musicians

[edit]

Beauty pageant contestants

[edit]

Afghan royalty

[edit]

Other

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Afghan Americans

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Afghan Americans are U.S. citizens or residents of Afghan ancestry, encompassing immigrants, refugees, and their descendants who have primarily arrived in waves driven by prolonged conflict and political upheaval in since the late . The community, largely consisting of ethnic , , , and who predominantly adhere to , has settled in urban enclaves across states such as , , , and New York, where they maintain cultural institutions, businesses, and religious centers amid efforts at . Significant influxes occurred following the 1979 Soviet invasion, the 2001 U.S.-led intervention against the , and especially the 2021 U.S. withdrawal, which prompted the resettlement of nearly 150,000 Afghans through programs like Special Immigrant Visas and humanitarian parole, augmenting a pre-existing of around 100,000-200,000. While many have pursued professional careers in fields like , , and academia—exemplified by figures such as , a key U.S. envoy in Afghan negotiations, and Mohammad Qayoumi, former president of —the group faces ongoing challenges including cultural adjustment, employment barriers for recent arrivals, and scrutiny over security vetting in post-2021 admissions. These dynamics reflect broader patterns of refugee adaptation, with concentrations in areas like and the fostering community networks but also highlighting disparities in socioeconomic outcomes compared to native-born populations.

Historical Background

Pre-1980 Immigration

Prior to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in December 1979, Afghan migration to the remained extremely limited, consisting mainly of students pursuing higher education, diplomatic personnel, and occasional professionals entering via nonimmigrant visas such as F-1 student visas or official diplomatic channels. These arrivals were driven by voluntary motives, including access to American universities and technical training programs supported by U.S. foreign aid initiatives, rather than conflict or economic desperation. U.S. data did not enumerate -born residents separately in 1970, reflecting a population too small for distinct tracking amid the total foreign-born count of approximately 9.6 million, with the first specific recording in 1980 listing 3,760 such individuals—a figure that likely incorporated minimal early post-invasion arrivals. Educational exchanges formed the core of this pre-1980 influx, with Afghan students arriving as early as the 1930s and gaining momentum in the mid-20th century through bilateral agreements. For instance, the University of Illinois hosted Afghan students since at least 1939, including early enrollees in fields like chemical engineering. Similarly, under U.S. State Department contracts, the University of Wyoming's Afghan Project (1953–1973) trained Afghan agriculture students, beginning with a group of nine in 1956 and continuing to support technical capacity-building in Afghanistan until the program's end. These students often concentrated in academic centers in states like Illinois, Wyoming, and California, where universities offered specialized programs aligned with Afghanistan's development needs under U.S. aid efforts like the Point Four Program initiated in 1949. Diplomatic and familial ties supplemented student migration, as Afghanistan maintained formal relations with the U.S. since 1921, leading to temporary postings of envoys and their families in Washington, D.C., and other consulate locations. Lacking dedicated refugee mechanisms or resettlement aid—unlike post-1979 policies—these early Afghan residents formed nascent communities through personal networks, alumni associations, and informal ethnic ties, often returning home after completing studies or assignments. This self-reliant pattern contrasted sharply with later dependency on federal support systems, underscoring a pre-crisis era of selective, merit-based entry.

Soviet-Afghan War and Initial Refugee Influx (1979-1989)

The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan on December 24, 1979, deploying approximately 30,000 troops initially to prop up the faltering communist Democratic Republic of Afghanistan amid escalating mujahideen resistance, which precipitated widespread displacement as civilians fled aerial bombings, forced conscription, and reprisals by Soviet and Afghan government forces. By early 1981, an estimated 1.5 million Afghans had crossed into Pakistan and Iran, swelling to nearly 5 million by 1986, primarily ethnic Pashtuns seeking refuge in Pakistan's North-West Frontier Province camps and Tajiks in urban areas of both neighbors. These early exiles were motivated by opposition to the Soviet-backed regime's land reforms, secularization policies, and brutal counterinsurgency tactics, which targeted rural and tribal populations resistant to communist ideology. In the United States, the initial Afghan refugee influx remained limited, with admissions totaling in the low thousands annually through the mid-1980s, constrained by processing bottlenecks in third countries like and a U.S. resettlement focus on larger Southeast Asian caseloads post-Vietnam. The Refugee Act of 1980, signed by President Carter, standardized admissions by adopting the UN refugee definition—persons fearing persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular , or political opinion—and raised the annual ceiling to 50,000, enabling modest increases for anti-communist aligned with U.S. geopolitical interests during the Reagan administration's covert support for fighters via . Vetting was rudimentary due to wartime chaos, relying on UNHCR referrals from border camps with minimal biometric or intelligence checks, prioritizing educated urban professionals and families from who could demonstrate ties to anti-regime elements over rural fighters. Early arrivals, often comprising Pashtun and Tajik ethnic groups with professional backgrounds in engineering, medicine, or diplomacy, clustered in nascent ethnic networks for mutual aid, establishing footholds in Fremont, California—where Soviet-era refugees trickled in from the early 1980s, drawn by affordable housing and proximity to Silicon Valley jobs—and Northern Virginia, leveraging kinship ties for housing and employment amid resettlement challenges like language barriers and cultural dislocation. Voluntary agencies under the nascent Office of Refugee Resettlement provided initial cash and medical assistance, but integration strained by trauma from the invasion and limited federal funding reflected the era's ad hoc approach, with many refugees entering via student or diplomatic visas predating the war before seeking asylum adjustments. This wave laid groundwork for community institutions, including informal mosques and markets, though numbers paled against the millions languishing in regional camps, underscoring U.S. policy's emphasis on proxy warfare over large-scale humanitarian evacuation.

Post-Cold War and Taliban Era (1990s-2001)

The in February 1989 marked a transitional lull in large-scale outflows to the , with Afghan admissions shifting from the wartime peaks of the to more modest levels as civil war among factions persisted. By the mid-1990s, the overall Afghan population in the had grown slowly from the initial post-invasion cohorts, reflecting constrained resettlement amid competing global priorities for allocations. The Taliban's rapid consolidation of power, culminating in the capture of Kabul on September 27, 1996, triggered secondary displacements of urban professionals, intellectuals, and women, who faced bans on and employment under the regime's strict interpretations of law. These policies prompted further emigration, primarily to neighboring and , but admissions stayed limited, typically under 1,000 Afghans annually through asylum grants and processing, constrained by Immigration and Naturalization Service backlogs that exceeded 464,000 undecided cases by 1995. UNHCR data indicated Afghans filed around 164,500 asylum applications across industrialized nations during the decade, yet grants remained a fraction due to stringent vetting and prioritization of other crises. In parallel, early Afghan American communities saw the emergence of small professional enclaves, particularly in medicine and engineering, as pre-existing educated migrants from the 1980s leveraged skills in urban centers like and . These groups contributed to nascent networks, though overall integration faced hurdles from ongoing conflict perceptions. Pre-9/11 immigration discourse increasingly flagged risks in Afghan inflows, linking them to potential ties with support structures amid reports of the regime sheltering international militants from the late 1990s. This caution reinforced restrictive policies, setting a for heightened security scrutiny without expanding admission pathways.

U.S. Intervention and Special Immigrant Visas (2001-2020)

The U.S. military intervention in Afghanistan began on October 7, 2001, following the September 11 attacks, with the invasion aimed at dismantling al-Qaeda and removing the Taliban from power. This led to an influx of Afghan immigrants to the United States, initially through refugee programs, but increasingly via pathways tied to direct support for U.S. operations. Afghans who worked as interpreters, contractors, and support staff for American forces faced heightened risks from Taliban retaliation, prompting the development of targeted immigration mechanisms to honor their service. The Afghan Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) program was established by the Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009 to provide to eligible Afghan nationals employed by or on behalf of the U.S. government. Eligibility criteria included at least one year of service in a qualifying role, such as under Chief of Mission authority or directly with U.S. Armed Forces, coupled with evidence of a serious threat resulting from that employment. This merit-based system prioritized individuals who demonstrated loyalty through collaboration with U.S. efforts, contrasting with general admissions by requiring verifiable contributions to American objectives. By March 31, 2020, the U.S. Department of State had issued 15,093 SIVs to principal Afghan applicants out of a cap of 22,500, enabling resettlement for these individuals and tens of thousands of eligible family members. This contributed significantly to the Afghan-born population in the U.S., which grew to approximately 150,000 by 2020 according to estimates. The program's structure allowed for principal applicants plus spouses and unmarried children under 21, fostering family unity while maintaining focus on service-linked admissions. Delays in SIV processing, often spanning two years or more due to extensive security vetting and bureaucratic hurdles, drew criticism for exposing applicants to threats, including documented cases of , attacks, and murders targeting those awaiting approval. Reports highlighted thousands of such workers receiving threat letters and facing reprisals, underscoring the urgency of expedited pathways. Nonetheless, the rigorous vetting—encompassing interagency security checks—addressed concerns over potential betrayal risks, with no empirical data indicating widespread infiltration or disloyalty among approved recipients during this period; the emphasis on proven through employment mitigated such hazards.

2021 Withdrawal, Evacuation, and Post-Taliban Resettlement

The captured on August 15, 2021, following a swift offensive that overran Afghan government forces, prompting the collapse of the U.S.-backed regime and the rapid exodus of Afghan allies, civilians, and others from the capital. In the ensuing chaos at International Airport (HKIA), U.S. forces conducted one of the largest airlifts in history, evacuating approximately 123,000 individuals, including U.S. citizens, Afghan special visa applicants, and other evacuees, by August 31, 2021, when the final U.S. military flight departed. Logistical breakdowns, including inadequate planning for non-combatant evacuation operations (NEO) and failure to anticipate the speed of the advance, contributed to scenes of desperation, with thousands clinging to aircraft and a bombing on August 26 killing 13 U.S. service members and over 170 Afghans. To manage the influx, the Biden administration launched Operation Allies Welcome (OAW) in August 2021, processing and resettling around 76,000 Afghan evacuees from temporary bases like Fort McCoy and Holloman Air Force Base, with the majority granted two-year humanitarian parole rather than immediate permanent status. An additional estimated 100,000 Afghans entered via parole and other pathways by late 2022, often without comprehensive congressional review or complete passenger manifests, as the urgency of the withdrawal prioritized volume over exhaustive documentation. Critics, including congressional oversight reports, highlighted these expedited procedures as enabling potential security gaps and administrative disarray, though official after-action reviews from the State Department attributed primary failures to pre-withdrawal intelligence shortfalls rather than resettlement logistics alone. By 2025, the incoming Trump administration reversed course through 14163, issued January 20, suspending the U.S. Admissions Program indefinitely effective January 27 and halting further Afghan resettlement processing. This was followed by the termination of (TPS) for Afghans in July 2025, revoking deportation deferrals for thousands of parolees and exposing them to removal proceedings amid ongoing control. Deportations commenced, with reports indicating hundreds of Afghans repatriated by mid-2025, some facing facilitation in returns that raised concerns due to the regime's documented abuses against returnees and former collaborators. These policy shifts prioritized and , contrasting the prior administration's expansion of , though advocates argued they stranded verified U.S. allies in limbo without alternative pathways.

Immigration Policies and Mechanisms

Legislative Frameworks (Refugee Act of 1980, Child Citizenship Act of 2000, Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009)

The Refugee Act of 1980, enacted on March 17, 1980, formalized U.S. refugee policy by adopting the United Nations' definition of a refugee—persons unable to return home due to persecution based on race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion—and established annual admissions ceilings set through presidential determination in consultation with Congress. This framework directly facilitated the initial influx of Afghan refugees after the Soviet Union's December 1979 invasion, enabling over 70,000 Afghan admissions as refugees or through derivative asylum by the mid-1980s, with federal resettlement support including cash assistance and social services intended to promote economic self-sufficiency within months. While the act's intent was humanitarian protection and integration via family reunification and community sponsorship, empirical analyses indicate mixed outcomes for Afghan cohorts: short-term fiscal costs exceeded benefits in some studies, and provisions allowing secondary migration for family members with limited initial vetting have been linked to expanded networks but also persistent welfare dependency and cultural enclaves that slowed assimilation in early waves. The Child Citizenship Act of 2000, effective February 27, 2001, amended the Immigration and Nationality Act to automatically confer U.S. citizenship on certain foreign-born children under age 18 who are residing in the United States as lawful permanent residents (LPRs) in the legal and physical custody of at least one U.S. citizen parent meeting residency thresholds. For Afghan refugee families, who often adjusted from refugee or asylee status to LPR, this eliminated the prior need for separate petitions for minors, streamlining access to , employment, and civic participation for second-generation Afghan Americans and reducing administrative barriers to integration. Data on naturalization rates show Afghan immigrants lagging overall foreign-born citizens (37% vs. 53% as of 2022), but the act's automation likely accelerated citizenship for dependent children in resettled households, supporting family stability amid post-arrival challenges like language barriers, though no comprehensive Afghan-specific tabulations quantify the exact second-generation boost. The Afghan Allies Protection Act of 2009, incorporated into the for Fiscal Year 2010 and signed October 28, 2009, extended Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) eligibility to Afghan nationals employed by or on behalf of the U.S. government or forces for at least one year, initially capping visas at 1,500 annually to safeguard interpreters and contractors facing reprisals for their service. Intended to honor alliances formed during U.S. operations and facilitate skilled integration—many SIV holders possessed English proficiency and U.S. cultural familiarity—the program's expansions in subsequent years raised caps toward 8,000 derivatives per fiscal year, yet utilization consistently fell short, with only fractions of authorizations issued by 2020 due to protracted chief-of-mission approvals and heightened scrutiny. Fraud concerns, including documented bribery schemes involving U.S. officials and fabricated employment claims, have empirically constrained approvals, as evidenced by criminal convictions and program audits revealing systemic vulnerabilities that prioritized security over volume, thereby limiting the influx of potentially high-contributing Afghan allies while mitigating risks of inadmissible entrants.

Special Visa Programs and Humanitarian Parole

The Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) program provides a targeted pathway for Afghan nationals who worked for or on behalf of the U.S. government in since 2001, requiring at least one year of service in a exposing them to risk due to U.S. affiliation. Eligibility demands chief of mission approval attesting to faithful service, followed by a recommendation from the Department of Defense or State Department, emphasizing loyalty and direct support to U.S. operations as a merit-based criterion for admission. By mid-2021, prior to the U.S. withdrawal, approximately 18,500 visas had been authorized under cumulative caps set by , with issuances reflecting a selective process prioritizing proven allies over broader claims. Recipients of Afghan SIVs have demonstrated economic integration, with many entering skilled occupations and contributing through employment in sectors like translation, logistics, and defense-related fields, though aggregate data on fiscal impacts remains limited to projections of substantial tax and earnings potential exceeding $1 billion annually for similar newcomer cohorts. In contrast, humanitarian parole offers temporary admission without permanent status or benefits, invoked en masse during the 2021 evacuation to admit over 76,000 who bypassed annual admissions ceilings capped at around 125,000 globally. This mechanism, authorized under Immigration and Nationality Act Section 212(d)(5) for urgent humanitarian reasons, allowed entry for evacuees not qualifying for SIVs, with most of the 82,000 arrivals receiving rather than formal processing, which includes overseas vetting and resettlement support. Unlike SIV's service-based selectivity, parole's application in 2021 enabled rapid influx but sparked legal debates over executive authority, with critics arguing it constituted overreach by circumventing congressional limits on without dedicated funding or pathways to adjustment, as evidenced by subsequent lawsuits challenging large-scale parole programs. initially lacked access to cash assistance or full case management, relying instead on work authorization amid uncertainty, highlighting parole's role as a bridge rather than a standalone solution. Post-evacuation developments have included policy shifts affecting status, with non-renewals and terminations impacting thousands; for instance, by 2025, changes under executive actions led to revocations or expirations for certain parolees ineligible for re-parole, exposing them to potential removal absent adjustment . These adjustments, including the end of extensions tied to parole cohorts, underscore tensions between initial mass admissions and sustained legal frameworks, with reports indicating over 70,000 Afghans in limbo as parole terms lapsed without permanent resolution. While remains a narrow, merit-driven channel with over 50,000 total issuances by 2025, 's broader use has fueled discussions on balancing humanitarian imperatives with priorities.

Vetting, Screening, and Security Protocols

The vetting and screening of Afghan applicants for U.S. entry, including refugees, Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) holders, and humanitarian parolees, involves a multi-agency process coordinated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the (FBI), and elements of the intelligence community. Biographical data, fingerprints, and photographs are checked against U.S. government databases such as the (TSDB), Interagency Border Inspection System (IBIS), and (NCIC), alongside international intelligence sharing where available. Biometric enrollment occurs via the Automated Biometric Identification System (IDENT), with recurring checks post-arrival for parolees. During the 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal, DHS faced significant obstacles in applying these protocols to over 80,000 evacuees processed under Operation Allies Welcome, including incomplete or missing biographic data that hindered effective screening. A DHS Office of (OIG) report documented that critical information was often inaccurate, incomplete, or absent from databases, particularly for those arriving via humanitarian rather than standard channels, leading to reliance on limited on-site interviews at transit points like . Customs and Border Protection (CBP) admitted at least 35 Afghans despite unresolved derogatory information, prioritizing rapid evacuation over exhaustive pre-arrival vetting. Security efficacy has been critiqued empirically through post-admission findings, with at least 55 evacuees matching TSDB entries admitted amid screening gaps, and dozens more with derogatory records unlocatable after arrival. While formal denial rates for Afghan and applications remain low—often under 10% based on State Department metrics—subsequent investigations have revealed in documentation and undisclosed ties, underscoring causal limitations in database completeness and urgency-driven overrides. These lapses highlight that procedural rigor depends heavily on , which was systematically deficient for many arrivals due to the collapse of Afghan governance records.

Recent Policy Shifts (2021-2025)

Following the U.S. withdrawal from in August 2021, the Biden administration expanded humanitarian programs to facilitate the entry of Afghan nationals, granting to over 77,000 Afghans by October 2022 under Operation Allies Welcome, with extensions allowing up to two years of initial stay and streamlined re-parole processes announced in May 2023 for those already in the U.S.. These measures prioritized rapid processing for Afghans outside , contrasting with stricter caps, and included benefits like cash assistance and employment services for parolees.. Upon taking office in January 2025, the Trump administration implemented an indefinite suspension of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP), effective January 27, 2025, via , halting all refugee processing including for Afghan allies and resulting in zero refugee resettlements since early October 2024.. This policy explicitly paused admissions for humanitarian parolees and terminated cooperative agreements with resettlement agencies by February 2025, framing the shift as a realignment to address security vetting gaps from prior rushed entries.. The halt led to cancellations of evacuation flights and related contracts for Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) holders, stranding an estimated 170,000 Afghan SIV applicants in third countries or without relocation options, as processing for over 40,000 approved cases was frozen.. These actions ended extensions for prior Afghan parolees, increasing deportation risks for unvetted entrants and reducing net inflows through targeted removals, though specific deportation figures for Afghans remain limited in public data..

Demographic Profile

The Afghan immigrant population in the United States, primarily foreign-born individuals, numbered approximately 45,000 in 2000, reflecting modest growth from earlier decades driven by refugee admissions following the Soviet-Afghan War. By 2019, this figure had tripled to 133,000, incorporating increases from Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) programs and family-based immigration. The (ACS) data indicate further expansion, with the foreign-born Afghan population reaching 195,000 by 2022, nearly quadrupling from 54,000 in 2010 and marking a 257% increase over that period. Post-2021 evacuations significantly augmented these numbers, with U.S. government programs resettling over 160,000 Afghan newcomers through admissions, humanitarian parole under Operation Allies Welcome (including 76,000 parolees), and related pathways by mid-2024. This influx, combined with pre-existing stocks, yields estimates of 250,000 to 350,000 total Afghan-origin residents by 2025, encompassing foreign-born individuals, naturalized citizens, and limited U.S.-born descendants, though undercounts in ACS data for recent undocumented or parolee arrivals likely inflate reliance on adjusted figures from chain migration and delayed reporting. Growth trends have shown deceleration into 2025, with net population stagnation projected due to curtailed admissions under reduced ceilings (e.g., 7,500 slots proposed for FY2026, prioritizing non- cases) and increased deportation risks for certain resettled Afghans facing removal proceedings for security or criminal issues, potentially offsetting prior gains without new inflows. These dynamics reflect empirical constraints on further expansion, as verified by Department of State and DHS admissions data, amid repatriation pressures abroad.

Geographic Concentrations and Urban Settlements

Afghan Americans are primarily concentrated in a few states, with hosting the largest share at approximately 39 percent of the total immigrant population from as of 2022, followed by at 14 percent, at 10 percent, and New York at 6 percent. Within , the city of Fremont in the stands out as the epicenter, informally known as "Little " and home to the nation's largest Afghan community, estimated at tens of thousands, driven by chain migration and established support networks since the 1980s. , particularly areas near Washington, D.C. such as Fairfax and Loudoun Counties, forms another major hub, with around 17,600 Afghan immigrants in the broader D.C.- metro area as of recent estimates, facilitated by proximity to federal employment opportunities and advocacy organizations. Secondary concentrations exist in states like Washington (with notable settlements in the , estimating over 5,800 Afghan ancestry individuals pre-2021 plus additional arrivals) and , where urban pockets in and surrounding suburbs have grown through . These patterns reflect chain migration, where initial settlers attract relatives and compatriots, often overriding federal resettlement policies aimed at geographic dispersion to prevent overburdening local resources. In contrast to broader refugee dispersion guidelines from the Office of Refugee Resettlement, Afghan arrivals frequently form tight-knit urban enclaves, such as in Fremont's commercial districts lined with Afghan businesses, which can foster cultural continuity but also ethnic insularity by limiting integration into wider American locales. Following the 2021 U.S. withdrawal from , initial placements of over 76,000 evacuated Afghans involved temporary housing at military bases like in and Fort McCoy in , before redistribution to states via humanitarian parole and refugee programs. By late 2023, secondary migrations had amplified existing clusters, with absorbing a disproportionate share despite efforts to spread arrivals— for instance, and New York saw increased initial resettlement but ongoing movement toward and hubs for familial and community support. This post-2021 shift reinforced suburban and exurban settlements around major enclaves, as evidenced by sustained growth in Fremont and populations, where secondary moves from dispersed sites averaged 20-30 percent within the first year of arrival.

Age, Gender, and Household Structures

The Afghan American population exhibits a youthful , with a median age of 31 years in , markedly younger than the 47 years for all U.S. immigrants and 37 years for the native-born population. This skew toward younger ages stems from immigration patterns, including the arrival of children and working-age adults via refugee programs and the 2021 evacuation, which brought in many families fleeing control. Age distribution data from 2019 shows 22.3% under age 16, 48.2% aged 16-44, 18.6% aged 45-64, and 10.9% aged 65 and older, underscoring a high proportion in prime family-forming years. Gender ratios among Afghan Americans are approximately balanced overall, at about 48% male and 52% female in key settlement areas such as the -Baltimore metropolitan region. However, Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) principal applicants—who must demonstrate direct employment with U.S. government entities, typically in roles like interpretation or logistics—disproportionately feature males due to prevailing gender norms in such positions during the U.S. presence in . Subsequent family reunifications, including spouses and children, have mitigated this imbalance in the broader community. Household structures tend toward larger sizes, averaging roughly 4 persons per in 2019, 62% larger than native-born households, frequently incorporating extended kin networks amid resettlement challenges and cultural preferences for multigenerational living. This configuration elevates dependency ratios compared to the U.S. average household size of about 2.5. contributes to internal growth, with Afghan immigrant women exhibiting a general fertility rate of 155 births per 1,000 women aged 15-44 in 2019—nearly triple the 56 rate for native-born women—translating to an estimated around 2.5 children per woman, exceeding the national average of 1.6.

Socioeconomic Characteristics

Educational Attainment and Skill Levels

Afghan immigrants in the United States exhibit educational attainment levels below the national immigrant average, with approximately 27.6 percent of those aged 25 and older holding a or higher as of 2021 data. This figure contrasts with 35 percent among all immigrant adults in 2022. Earlier migration waves, particularly those arriving in the and following the Soviet invasion and , tended to include more urban professionals and elites, resulting in comparatively higher postsecondary completion rates, though comprehensive cohort-specific benchmarks remain limited. Recent arrivals, especially the post-2021 cohort evacuated amid the U.S. withdrawal, display lower average educational qualifications, with estimates suggesting less than 20 percent holding college degrees in preliminary assessments of broader groups, reflecting inclusion of rural populations and families with disrupted schooling under rule. disparities exacerbate these trends: 36 percent of Afghan women lacked a in 2022, compared to 23 percent of men, tied to historical restrictions on in . challenges persist, as many speak or as primary languages, with 's national rate at 37.3 percent in 2022—far lower for women at 22.6 percent—often carrying over to U.S. arrivals despite selection biases favoring skilled applicants. Recognition of foreign credentials poses significant barriers for Afghan professionals, such as physicians or engineers trained under varying Afghan standards, due to the absence of a unified federal and reliance on state-specific validations that frequently undervalue non-Western qualifications. This results in de facto , where pre-arrival expertise in fields like or —gained through U.S. collaborations—is not formally accredited, limiting access to commensurate roles despite demonstrated competencies. Specialized evaluations, when pursued, require additional exams and fees, further hindering utilization of among qualified subsets.

Labor Force Participation and Occupational Patterns

Afghan immigrants in the United States exhibit a labor force participation rate of 61 percent among those aged 16 and older, based on 2022 data, which is lower than the 67 percent rate for all immigrants and 63 percent for the U.S.-born population. This figure aligns closely with earlier estimates of 60.1 percent from 2019 data. Participation rates show notable gender disparities, with only 37 percent of Afghan women in the labor force compared to 57 percent of all foreign-born women, reflecting patterns observed across multiple datasets. Employed Afghan immigrants are disproportionately represented in , , , and occupations, followed by production, transportation, and material moving roles. Men frequently enter fields such as trucking and , leveraging transferable skills from prior roles like interpreting or in , with programs aiding transitions into commercial driving. Women often pursue caregiving and service positions, though overall workforce entry for recent arrivals remains constrained by credential recognition issues. Underemployment is prevalent, particularly among those with professional backgrounds such as or , who frequently accept low-skill manual or entry-level service jobs upon arrival. First-wave refugees from the and have shifted toward , including small businesses like grocery stores specializing in products and Afghan imports, building on community networks in urban enclaves. In contrast, 2021 evacuees and later cohorts initially cluster in low-skill sectors like transportation and basic services, with rates recovering from early post-arrival hurdles but often mismatched to prior expertise.

Income Levels, Poverty, and Welfare Dependency

Afghan immigrant-headed households had a median income of $43,423 in 2019, compared to $63,650 for native-born households, reflecting a 32 percent shortfall. This figure aligns closely with estimates from the , which reported $47,000 for Afghan immigrant households that year against a national immigrant median of $64,000 and $66,000 for U.S.-born households. for Afghan households stood at $11,335, roughly half the $26,839 for native households, attributable in part to larger average household sizes of 3.83 members versus 2.37. Poverty affects 25.4 percent of individuals in Afghan-headed households, more than double the 11.8 percent rate for native households; for children, the rate reaches 34.5 percent versus 16.0 percent. Half of Afghan household members (50.8 percent) live in or near , defined as below 200 percent of the federal , compared to 27.2 percent of natives; this includes 64.3 percent of Afghan children versus 35.4 percent of native children. These rates remain elevated even among longer-term arrivals from 2000 to 2009, at 24.2 percent in and 46.6 percent in or near . Recent post-2021 arrivals, often with limited transferable skills and English proficiency, exhibit even higher initial , akin to general patterns where those present five years or less report medians around $30,500. Welfare program usage is substantial, with 65.2 percent of Afghan households accessing at least one major benefit—such as , SNAP, or —in 2019, versus 24.5 percent for native households. SNAP participation stood at 35 percent for Afghan households, up from 19 percent in 2010, compared to 10.4 percent for natives; usage reached 61.8 percent, versus 22.2 percent for natives. welfare affected 10.3 percent of Afghan households, five times the native rate of 2.1 percent. Even working Afghan households show high reliance, at 64.7 percent using welfare, double the 21.5 percent for native working households. For arrivals from 2000 to 2009, overall welfare use was 72.5 percent, indicating persistent dependency beyond initial resettlement. Remittances sent by Afghan Americans to family in provide supplementary income flows, contributing to total inflows estimated at $788 million in 2020—about 4 percent of Afghanistan's GDP—though formal channels declined to $320 million by 2024 amid economic disruptions. These transfers, often informal, mitigate some pressures but do not offset broader self-sufficiency gaps, as evidenced by sustained and benefit reliance in U.S. .

Cultural and Religious Dimensions

Ethnic Composition and Linguistic Diversity

Afghan Americans hail from Afghanistan's multi-ethnic society, primarily comprising , who form the largest group at approximately 42 percent in the origin population, followed by at 27 percent, at 9 percent, at 9 percent, and smaller minorities including and Baluchis. Migration selectivity has led to over-representation of urban dwellers, particularly from and other cities, among earlier immigrant waves and special visa holders, though the 2021 evacuation broadened representation to include more rural and provincial evacuees. Some refugee assessments suggest constitute a disproportionately large share among U.S.-resettled Afghans due to historical flight patterns from northern regions during Soviet-era conflicts. The primary languages spoken by Afghan Americans at home are (32 percent) and or Persian variants (53 percent combined), reflecting Afghanistan's where these Indo-Iranian tongues serve as lingua francas alongside regional dialects. English proficiency remains limited for many, with about 56 percent of Afghan immigrants aged 5 and older speaking it less than "very well," a rate higher than the 46 percent among all immigrants; this figure approaches 50 percent in broader surveys and improves gradually with duration of residence, though recent post-2021 arrivals exhibit even lower initial fluency. Ethnic divisions imported from Afghanistan persist in U.S. communities, with the sharpest frictions between Pashtuns and non-Pashtun groups like Tajiks and Hazaras, often rooted in historical power imbalances and competition for resources, which can undermine social cohesion and complicate collective advocacy efforts. These tensions mirror Afghanistan's internal dynamics, where ethnic affiliations influence alliances and grievances, occasionally manifesting in diaspora disputes over representation or aid allocation despite shared displacement experiences.

Islamic Practices and Sectarian Variations

Afghan Americans are predominantly , comprising approximately 80-85% of the community, consistent with 's overall religious demographics where Sunnis follow the of Islamic . The remaining portion consists mainly of , primarily from the Hazara ethnic group, who adhere to and emphasize devotion to the alongside core Islamic tenets. This sectarian distribution influences community organization, with Sunnis forming the majority in most Afghan American enclaves and Shias often maintaining distinct networks due to historical persecution in . Core Islamic practices among Afghan Americans include observance of the five daily prayers, , payment of , and participation in Eid celebrations, with adherence varying by generation and settlement patterns. Mosque attendance serves as a central hub for communal worship and socialization, particularly in geographic concentrations like and , where Afghan-specific centers such as Khatam Mosque in , and the Afghan Community Islamic Center in facilitate these rituals. U.S. accommodations for these practices, such as flexible work schedules for prayer times and food availability, enable continuity, though urban isolation can challenge consistent observance for newer arrivals. Sectarian variations highlight differences in ritual emphasis and theological interpretation; Sunni Afghan Americans prioritize adherence to sunnah traditions derived from the Prophet Muhammad and his companions, while Shia Hazaras incorporate elements like mourning rituals for Imam Hussein during , which underscore themes of martyrdom absent in mainstream Sunni practice. A 2013 Pew Research Center survey of Afghan Muslims found 99% support for as the official law of the land, including corporal punishments for crimes like theft and adultery, reflecting orthodox conservatism that contrasts with U.S. constitutional emphasis on separation of religion and state. Such views, rooted in pre-migration cultural norms, can generate frictions in legal and social spheres, as 's prioritization of divine revelation over secular legislation inherently challenges pluralistic systems, though empirical data on diaspora adaptation shows gradual moderation among longer-term residents without wholesale abandonment of orthodoxy. Isolated risks of stricter interpretations persist, particularly among unassimilated recent immigrants, but community leaders generally promote moderate Hanafi or Twelver frameworks aligned with peaceful coexistence.

Family Dynamics, Gender Norms, and Social Customs

Afghan American families typically maintain extended household structures centered on patriarchal authority, where the eldest male exercises primary decision-making power over matters including , , and finances. This reflects imported norms from , where systems prioritize male lineage and collective family honor over individual autonomy, often leading to multigenerational living arrangements that contrast with prevailing U.S. models. Arranged marriages remain prevalent among first-generation immigrants, with cultural expectations favoring unions negotiated by elders to strengthen familial alliances, though such practices can involve coercion or early betrothals of daughters as young as . Gender norms emphasize rigid segregation and deference, with women traditionally confined to domestic roles involving child-rearing, cooking, and , while men assume provider responsibilities outside the home. Veiling and codes persist in conservative households, limiting women's public mobility and social interactions with unrelated males, which can hinder to egalitarian U.S. environments. Social customs reinforce these dynamics through codes of honor (e.g., among ), where family reputation hinges on female chastity and obedience, potentially escalating to punitive measures for perceived violations. Reports of are elevated within Afghan immigrant communities, with studies documenting lifetime prevalence exceeding 50% among Afghan women, a pattern that often carries over post-resettlement due to entrenched patriarchal enforcement and underreporting stemming from stigma. In the U.S. context, women face compounded risks from isolation and dependency, though exact rates specific to Afghan Americans remain understudied; general immigrant data indicate heightened vulnerability compared to native populations. Among second-generation Afghan Americans, generational tensions arise as youth increasingly embrace American individualism, challenging parental authority through preferences for love-based marriages, delayed family formation, and greater female autonomy in career and social choices. This shift fosters hybrid identities, with younger members prioritizing personal achievement and egalitarian partnerships, yet familial obligations like remittances or elder care often pull toward collectivist roots, complicating full assimilation of interpersonal norms.

Media Representation and Community Institutions

Afghan Americans receive limited visibility in mainstream U.S. media, often portrayed through the lens of war, , or cultural otherness, particularly in post-9/11 coverage that emphasized associations with the or extremism rather than diverse individual experiences. This framing has perpetuated stereotypes of Afghans as inherently tied to conflict or traditionalism, with sparse counter-narratives highlighting professional or entrepreneurial success among the . One notable exception is the sitcom (2021–2022), which featured an Afghan interpreter as a lead character navigating life in the U.S., though it drew criticism for simplifying cultural dynamics and reinforcing certain tropes of assimilation challenges. Within the community, self-expression occurs through cultural productions like and films that grapple with exile, displacement, and identity preservation. Afghan musicians resettled in U.S. enclaves such as , have adapted traditional genres like rubab and music to express themes of loss and resilience, often performing at events to maintain cultural continuity amid relocation trauma. Films and documentaries by Afghan American creators, such as those documenting music education in exile, similarly reflect the intergenerational impacts of migration and Taliban-era cultural suppression, though production remains niche and underfunded compared to broader immigrant cinemas. Ethnic media consumption supplements this, with many tuning into - and Pashto-language broadcasts from outlets like Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty's Afghan Service (Radio Azadi) for homeland news, fostering a sense of connection despite its primary focus on . Community institutions play a key role in supporting settlement and , with organizations like the Afghan-American Community Organization (AACO), established to promote , , and aid, providing resources such as scholarships, legal assistance, and cultural events for newly arrived families. Similarly, the Afghan American Association (AAA), founded in , focuses on empowerment through and , helping bridge gaps in integration while preserving ethnic ties. These groups emphasize to counter isolation, though their emphasis on ethnic-specific services can sometimes reinforce insularity, limiting broader inter-community alliances.

Integration Outcomes and Challenges

Economic and Social Assimilation Metrics

Among Afghan immigrants in the United States, proficiency serves as a key indicator of linguistic assimilation, with 44% of individuals ages 5 and older reporting the ability to speak English "very well" or better as of 2022, compared to 54% among all immigrants. This figure reflects slightly lower proficiency overall, particularly among women and girls (40% proficient) versus men and boys (47% proficient), though rates improve with longer residence and across generations. For long-term residents, rates underscore civic integration, reaching 81% for those present over five years by 2019, exceeding the 61% average for all immigrants. Intermarriage rates provide insight into social assimilation, yet specific quantitative data for Afghan Americans remains limited. Qualitative studies indicate a strong preference for , with second-generation individuals often selecting partners from within the Afghan-American to align with cultural traditions, suggesting rates below those of more assimilated groups like second-generation Asians (around 20-30% intermarriage in broader immigrant contexts). Ethnic networks facilitate initial economic entry, such as job placement through community ties, but can constrain broader interethnic social bonds, potentially slowing full societal integration. Economic mobility metrics reveal cohort-based progress, with pre-2021 arrivals demonstrating stronger adaptation through higher (64% labor force participation overall, 84% for men) compared to recent post-withdrawal cohorts facing temporary statuses and barriers. Homeownership, a marker of , lacks Afghan-specific figures but aligns with averages of 59% among established households, higher than the 52% for non-refugee immigrants, indicating potential for first-wave success around mid-level ownership amid lower median incomes ($48,000 household). Recent arrivals lag due to elevated (39%) and welfare reliance (65% of households), though longitudinal trends suggest upward mobility for earlier waves via and occupational gains.

Cultural Adaptation and Identity Formation

Afghan Americans commonly adopt hybrid identities that integrate elements of their ancestral heritage with American civic participation, often self-identifying as "Afghan-American" to reflect both cultural retention and national loyalty. on communities highlights how this hyphenated label facilitates adaptation, allowing individuals to maintain ties to Afghan traditions such as familial collectivism and while embracing U.S. norms like and democratic values. Political and generational differences influence identity choices, with some opting for a primary "American" label amid fragmentation from events like the 2021 resurgence, yet most express pride in Afghan roots alongside commitment to their adopted country. Second-generation Afghan Americans, particularly in higher education, demonstrate cognitive shifts toward bicultural competence, navigating ethnic pride through campus organizations that foster peer support and ethnic exploration. Studies of college students reveal active processes, where participants reconcile Pashtun, Tajik, or Hazara backgrounds with broader "" perceptions or post-9/11 stereotypes, often prioritizing as a bridge to mainstream inclusion. This adaptation involves selective retention, such as speaking or at home, while adopting English-dominant public personas, reflecting a pragmatic balance rather than full assimilation or isolation. Community practices exemplify syncretic identity formation, with events like — the Persian New Year marking spring renewal—serving as cultural anchors adapted to U.S. contexts. Afghan American gatherings feature traditional feasts of haft mewa (seven fruits and nuts symbolizing abundance) alongside American holidays, blending rituals like buzkashi-inspired games or poetry recitals with barbecues or fireworks, thus reinforcing intergenerational continuity amid relocation. Parents often emphasize these hybrids to counter perceived secular dilution of , using home-based instruction in and to instill values, though youth surveys indicate high retention of core Afghan social norms alongside U.S.-influenced . While overall integration metrics suggest low incidence of youth disaffection leading to , isolated cases of identity conflict among second-generation individuals underscore vulnerabilities tied to unresolved cultural dissonance, particularly in under-resourced enclaves. Broader research attributes resilience to family cohesion and educational access, which buffer against marginalization, though empirical tracking remains limited due to small population sizes and privacy constraints.

Reported Discrimination and Reverse Incidents

Following the , 2001, terrorist attacks, reported hate crimes against and individuals perceived as Middle Eastern, including , spiked significantly, with the FBI documenting 481 anti-Islamic religion-bias incidents in 2001 alone, up from 28 the prior year. This included cases of and vandalism targeting those mistaken for or associated with Afghan or backgrounds, amid a broader backlash documented in early reports of over 165 bias incidents against and perceived in the initial weeks post-attacks. However, such incidents declined sharply in subsequent years, with anti-Muslim hate crimes averaging around 150-200 annually through the and remaining a small fraction of total U.S. hate crimes (e.g., 155 in 2002). Surveys among Afghan Americans indicate higher levels of perceived , particularly post-9/11, with one study of 502 respondents reporting increased experiences of bias in , social interactions, and public spaces compared to pre-2001 levels. A cross-sectional survey of 259 in similarly found perceived to be a significant stressor, correlating with elevated distress and mental health issues like depression, though moderated by factors such as English proficiency and . These perceptions persist, with another analysis of first- and second-generation Afghan Americans linking everyday to poorer outcomes. Empirically, victimization rates remain low relative to the Afghan American population of approximately 167,000-200,000 as of recent estimates. FBI data does not disaggregate Afghan-specific incidents separately from broader anti-Muslim or anti-Arab categories, but the overall incidence for these groups equates to fewer than 0.01% of the affected populations annually, suggesting limited systemic targeting despite anecdotal spikes. Reverse incidents, involving tensions initiated or exacerbated by Afghan cultural practices, include documented frictions during resettlement, such as resistance to co-ed facilities or demands for gender-specific accommodations in temporary housing like Fort McCoy in , which strained local resources and led to community complaints about non-compliance with U.S. norms. In educational settings, some Afghan students have reported mutual with peers over cultural differences, including attire or religious observance, contributing to bidirectional interpersonal conflicts rather than unidirectional . These cases highlight reciprocal adaptation challenges, with Afghan conservative norms occasionally clashing against host expectations for integration, though systematic data on such "reverse" remains sparse and underreported compared to victim narratives.

Security and Policy Controversies

Vetting Failures and Security Incidents

A 2022 Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General report identified significant vetting deficiencies during the processing of Afghan evacuees following the 2021 U.S. withdrawal, including the absence of critical biographical and departure data for numerous individuals in systems like , which hindered effective screening and tracking. The report noted that over 100 independent departures lacked accurate dates, with some erroneously listed as January 1, 1900, and missing fields such as names and contact information for subsets of evacuees, complicating compliance verification with parole conditions. Additionally, the failed to incorporate all available Department of Defense tactical data during initial screenings, potentially overlooking security risks tied to insurgent affiliations. These lapses enabled the entry of individuals with potential ties to adversarial groups, as the rushed evacuation prioritized volume over comprehensive checks, including for members whose insurgent connections were not fully scrutinized amid operational urgency. A June 2025 Department of Justice Office of review further confirmed instances where initial vetting missed derogatory information, allowing suspected terrorists to receive protected status through Afghan evacuee programs. Verified security incidents include the October 2024 arrest of Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi, an Afghan national who entered the U.S. via humanitarian parole post-evacuation, for conspiring to provide material support to ISIS and plotting an Election Day attack using firearms and explosives against personnel in the Washington, D.C., area. Tawhedi, who arrived around October 2021, evaded detection for approximately 2.5 years despite multiple vetting opportunities, highlighting gaps in post-arrival monitoring. In April 2025, Dilbar Gul Dilbar, another Afghan who obtained a Special Immigrant Visa using forged documents, was arrested for visa fraud with documented ties to terrorist networks, discovered 13 months after entry. Such cases underscore causal links between accelerated processing—driven by the August 2021 Kabul fall—and subsequent national security exposures, with congressional probes citing at least these instances as emblematic of broader systemic shortcomings.

Criminal Activity Among Resettled Afghans

In September 2021, U.S. military bases housing Afghan evacuees from the Kabul withdrawal reported multiple incidents of assault and sexual misconduct by resettled Afghans. At Fort McCoy, Wisconsin, two Afghan evacuees faced federal charges for attempting to coerce minors into sexual acts and domestic violence against women; one, Bahrullah Noori, aged 20, was indicted on four counts related to sexual acts with boys as young as 12 and 14. At Fort Bliss, Texas, a female U.S. service member alleged assault by a group of male Afghan evacuees, prompting an FBI investigation. Pentagon officials confirmed additional reports of assaults, robberies, and other crimes among the evacuee population at bases, leading to detentions and ongoing probes, though military leaders described the issues as below average relative to the total population processed. Immigration and visa fraud schemes have involved resettled Afghans, often tied to falsified claims for Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs) or refugee status. In April 2021, the Department of Justice indicted six individuals, including Afghan nationals, in a wire fraud conspiracy that recruited unqualified linguists posing as translators for U.S. forces in to secure visas and entry. More recently, in May 2025, Afghan citizen Dilbar Gul Taj Ali Khan was charged with after participating in a scheme selling fraudulent immigration documents to obtain an SIV and U.S. admission. In November 2024, another Afghan national pleaded guilty to two counts of immigration , resulting in a two-year prison sentence and immediate order. These cases highlight patterns of document forgery and false representations in the resettlement pipeline, with federal prosecutions focusing on exploitation of humanitarian programs. Afghan-American communities in have seen involvement in street gangs linked to and assaults. In the Bay Area, particularly Fremont and East Palo Alto, Afghan youth gangs such as the "Taliban gang" and "Fremont Afghan Gangsters" emerged in the early 2000s, engaging in robberies, assaults, and territorial disputes; a 2009 sweep arrested 42 alleged members on gang-related charges. In Sacramento, Afghan teenage gangs have risen, with a July 2024 incident involving a group attacking a U.S. using deadly weapons. Local police reports associate these groups with higher localized rates, including under names like "Save Afghan Girls" (SAG), contrasting with broader immigrant cohort averages but elevated among unvetted younger resettlers. Empirical data on overall rates among Afghan resettled populations remains limited, with some analyses showing no aggregate public safety impact, though specific offender clusters in and exceed baseline expectations for recent arrivals.

Fiscal Costs, Public Burdens, and Policy Critiques

The resettlement of Afghan evacuees after the August 2021 U.S. withdrawal from has generated significant fiscal costs for U.S. taxpayers, exceeding $14 billion as of November 2024 for evacuation, processing, temporary housing, and initial support services for over 80,000 individuals paroled into the country. This includes $688 million for housing at U.S. military bases by January 2022 alone, plus per-person relocation stipends of up to $2,275 for essentials like food and transportation during community placement. Additional expenditures cover over $4 billion in intermediate processing at sites in and , alongside ongoing (ORR) programs funded through annual appropriations that surged post-2021 to handle the influx. Public burdens persist through elevated dependence on welfare programs, as Afghan parolees and special immigrants qualify for means-tested benefits like , SNAP (food stamps), TANF (cash aid), and Refugee Cash Assistance without the five-year bar imposed on many other immigrants. In 2022, 65 percent of Afghan immigrants relied on insurance coverage, far exceeding rates among the native-born and reflecting barriers to private employment-based options. This usage aligns with broader patterns among recent refugee arrivals, who incur net fiscal deficits in initial years due to low labor force participation and high service demands, though aggregate studies of refugees from 2005-2019 claim long-term surpluses of $123.8 billion nationwide—projections that assume uniform assimilation success and may not account for the Afghan cohort's distinct challenges, including widespread food insecurity and needs post-resettlement. Policy critiques emphasize the program's low economic return, driven by a predominantly low-skilled influx that contrasts with targeted Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) pathways for U.S. allies with verifiable contributions. Only 18 percent of Afghan immigrants aged 25 and older hold a or higher, compared to 37 percent of all U.S. immigrants, limiting immediate productivity and extending taxpayer subsidization. Analysts from the Center for Immigration Studies contend that mass under humanitarian authorities, bypassing rigorous admissions criteria, fosters dependency cycles by prioritizing volume over self-sufficiency potential, yielding minimal fiscal offsets from taxes or growth relative to upfront and recurrent outlays estimated at billions annually for support services. Advocates for reform propose shifting toward of skilled migrants, akin to high-contribution models in or , to achieve net positives by reducing welfare drawdowns and accelerating through and job-matching prerequisites. Such approaches, per first-principles evaluation of causal incentives, would mitigate burdens by aligning inflows with capacities for rapid value addition rather than protracted aid.

Notable Afghan Americans

Political and Military Figures

Zalmay Khalilzad (born March 22, 1951) stands as the most prominent Afghan American in U.S. diplomatic roles, having served as U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan (2003–2005), Iraq (2005–2007), and the United Nations (2007–2009) under President George W. Bush. Appointed Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation in 2018 by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Khalilzad led negotiations culminating in the 2020 Doha Agreement with the Taliban, aimed at facilitating U.S. troop withdrawal and intra-Afghan talks. His multilingual proficiency in Pashto, Dari, and English, combined with academic credentials from the University of Chicago, positioned him as a key advisor on South Asian policy, though his Doha role drew criticism for prioritizing withdrawal over Taliban concessions. Aisha Wahab (born 1991) achieved historic milestones as the first Afghan American woman elected to public office in the United States, winning a seat on the , City Council in 2018. In 2022, she became the first Muslim and Afghan American in the , representing District 10 in the Bay Area. Wahab, whose family fled Afghanistan's Soviet invasion, has advocated for immigrant rights, housing affordability, and Afghan refugee resettlement, leveraging her background to bridge cultural gaps in local governance. Afghan Americans have contributed to U.S. defense through military service, particularly former interpreters and allies who obtained Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs) and enlisted post-resettlement. Sher A. Najafy, a Hazara Afghan who immigrated in 2009 after aiding U.S. forces, joined the U.S. Army Reserve, serving in roles that utilized his regional expertise. Similarly, Rukhsar Yousufi, a former refugee from , enlisted in the U.S. Army at age 17 in 2023, exemplifying transitions from wartime collaboration to active-duty service. These enlistees often fill linguistically demanding positions in and , supporting ongoing U.S. interests in . Many SIV recipients have also secured federal roles in agencies like the Department of Defense and State Department, applying /Dari skills for translation, analysis, and veteran support programs.

Business Leaders and Entrepreneurs

Afghan Americans have pursued primarily in niche sectors like food production and import-export, often leveraging cultural ties to for authentic goods such as spices and sauces. These ventures emphasize self-made success through family recipes and supply chains, contributing to local job creation in ethnic enclaves. For instance, first-generation Afghan American Yasameen Sajady co-founded Maazah in 2015, transforming her mother's recipes into a line of Afghan-inspired sauces that expanded from farmers' markets to availability in over 800 U.S. stores by 2025, earning national awards and media recognition. Suliman Basir, with over 20 years in business and , established the Afghan American Business Alliance as founder and CEO to promote , , and networking between U.S. and Afghan enterprises, focusing on logistics and transit sectors where Afghan immigrants show high employment rates. Other examples include Chicago-based Heray Spice, founded by Afghan entrepreneurs sourcing directly from , which sustains U.S. operations while employing Afghan workers abroad and distributing products domestically. Similarly, Ziba Foods, co-founded by Afghan-origin Kabir Arghandiwal, imports nutrient-dense nuts and dried fruits via ethical chains, supporting small-scale job opportunities in processing and distribution. These businesses highlight self-reliance, with Afghan newcomers placing in business logistics (21%) and (13%) roles that enable entrepreneurial pivots, though expansion often remains localized due to dependence on networks rather than broad . Early waves of Afghan immigrants established firms for like carpets and groceries, creating enclave-based but facing challenges in scaling beyond community-centric models.

Cultural, Academic, and Athletic Contributors

Mohammad Qayoumi, an Afghan immigrant who arrived in the United States in 1978, advanced to become president of from 2011 to 2015, where he emphasized STEM education and programs during his tenure. Previously serving as president of from 2006 to 2011, Qayoumi held four graduate degrees in and nuclear fields from the , contributing to focused on technical disciplines rather than broad . In historical scholarship, has provided perspectives on Afghan and Islamic through works like Destiny Disrupted: A History of the World Through Islamic Eyes (2009), which examines global narratives from non-Western viewpoints, and his memoir West of Kabul, East of New York (2002), drawing from his bicultural experiences after emigrating from at age 16. Ansary's writings, including essays and radio segments on Islamic , have informed public discourse on Middle Eastern topics, though primarily appealing to audiences interested in narratives. Cultural preservation efforts include contributions from writers and poets such as Lina Rozbih, an Afghan-born author and journalist based in the U.S. since joining in 2003, whose Dari-language poetry and short stories address immigrant experiences and Afghan heritage. In music, singer and composer , who resettled in in the mid-1990s, has maintained Afghan folk traditions amid exile, blending them with contemporary styles to sustain cultural continuity for diaspora communities. Organizations like the Afghan American Writers and Artists Association promote such expressive works, fostering ethnic-specific outlets rather than widespread mainstream integration. Athletic participation among Afghan Americans remains limited at professional levels, with few achieving prominence in U.S. sports; notable examples include community initiatives like the Afghan American Sports League, established to build social cohesion through soccer and other activities within ethnic enclaves. Refugee women's soccer players resettled in since 2021 have pursued competitive play but faced barriers to professional recognition, highlighting niche rather than elite impacts. Overall, these contributions enrich targeted academic and cultural niches, preserving Afghan and perspectives, yet their scope reflects the community's small size and tendency toward insularity, constraining broader American cultural permeation.

References

  1. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/afghan-immigrants-united-states
  2. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45122
  3. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/ethnic-and-cultural-studies/afghan-americans
  4. https://iir.gmu.edu/immigrant-stories-dc-baltimore/afghanistan/afghan-population-in-the-washington-dc-and-baltimore-md-metropolitan-areas
  5. https://www.wyohistory.org/encyclopedia/university-wyomings-afghan-project-1953-1973
  6. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2006/demo/POP-twps0081.pdf
  7. https://www.library.illinois.edu/slc/illini-everywhere/afghan-illini/
  8. https://ejournals.eu/en/journal_article_files/full_text/018ecec1-40be-7361-8908-00a057338f9c/download
  9. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1977-1980/soviet-invasion-afghanistan
  10. https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-832
  11. https://arabcenterdc.org/resource/shoulder-to-shoulder-with-sorrow-afghan-refugees-past-and-present/
  12. https://archivesfoundation.org/documents/refugee-act-1980/
  13. https://www.fmreview.org/ruiz/
  14. http://www.culturalorientation.net/content/download/2137/12309/version/1/file/The%2BAfghans%2BCulture%2BProfile.pdf
  15. https://www.kqed.org/news/12050357/how-did-fremont-come-to-be-known-as-little-kabul
  16. https://acf.gov/orr/policy-guidance/refugee-act
  17. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/afghan-immigrants-united-states-2019
  18. https://www.refworld.org/reference/annualreport/uscri/2000/en/22007
  19. https://www.unhcr.org/us/news/briefing-notes/statistics-two-decades-asylum
  20. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/us-government-rush-evacuate-afghan-allies-allocate-special-visas
  21. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/immigrate/special-immg-visa-afghans-employed-us-gov/steps-of-the-afghan-siv-process.html
  22. https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/SIVs/Afghan-Public-Quarterly-Report-Q2-April-2020.pdf
  23. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/when-did-the-betrayal-begin
  24. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/State-AAR-AFG.pdf
  25. https://afsa.org/operation-allies-refuge-fs-view-front-lines
  26. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-the-biden-administrations-report-on-the-afghanistan-withdrawal-gets-wrong/
  27. https://www.dhs.gov/archive/operation-allies-welcome
  28. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/US-Withdrawal-from-Afghanistan.pdf
  29. https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/remarks/grassley-shines-light-on-biden-administrations-failure-to-vet-afghan-evacuees
  30. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/realigning-the-united-states-refugee-admissions-program/
  31. https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/information-for-afghan-nationals
  32. https://forumtogether.org/article/legislative-bulletin-friday-october-17-2025/
  33. https://www.mei.edu/publications/thousands-once-protected-afghan-refugees-united-states-face-deportation
  34. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/07/un-experts-appalled-mass-forced-returns-afghan-nationals
  35. https://refugeerights.org/news-resources/four-years-after-fall-of-kabul-trump-administration-has-turned-its-back-on-afghan-allies
  36. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/07/22/afghans-trump-resettlement-repatriation-afghanistan-siv-care-taliban/
  37. https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/fact-sheet/overview-us-refugee-law-and-policy/
  38. https://ohss.dhs.gov/topics/immigration/yearbook/2024/table13
  39. https://usipc.ucsd.edu/publications/usipc-fiscal-impact-refugee-resettlement.pdf
  40. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/travel-legal-considerations/us-citizenship/child-citizenship-act-of-2000.html
  41. https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-12-part-h-chapter-5
  42. https://www.stateoig.gov/report/aud-mero-20-35
  43. https://www.stateoig.gov/report/aud-mero-23-23
  44. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/us-navy-reserve-officer-convicted-bribery-scheme-impacting-department-states-approval
  45. https://cis.org/Report/Bills-Speed-Resettlement-Afghan-Allies-Cut-Corners-National-Security-Fraud-and-Public-Health
  46. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/immigrate/special-immg-visa-afghans-employed-us-gov.html
  47. https://www.globalrefuge.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/SIV-FAQ-August-2025-update.pdf
  48. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R43725
  49. https://www.upwardlyglobal.org/news/news/new-report-afghan-newcomers-bring-critical-value-to-the-u-s-economy-and-society/
  50. https://refugees.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/USCRI-9-2021-Humanitarian-Parole.pdf
  51. https://legal-forum.uchicago.edu/print-archive/past-present-and-future-humanitarian-parole
  52. https://www.rescue.org/announcement/support-back-aghan-siv-holders
  53. https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-and-asylum/refugees/refugee-processing-and-security-screening
  54. https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2022-09/OIG-22-64-Sep22-Redacted.pdf
  55. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/afghan-evacuees-dhs-watchdog-finds-department-lacked-critical-data-vetting/
  56. https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/117993/witnesses/HHRG-119-HM09-Wstate-LangE-20250311.pdf
  57. https://cis.org/National-Security-Vetting-Failures-Database
  58. https://www.stateoig.gov/uploads/report/report_pdf_file/aud-mero-22-38.pdf
  59. https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/fact-sheet/biden-administrations-humanitarian-parole-program-cubans-haitians-nicaraguans-and/
  60. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/R/HTML/R47654.html
  61. https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/humanitarian-or-significant-public-benefit-parole-for-aliens-outside-the-united-states/information-for-afghan-nationals-on-requests-to-uscis-for-parole
  62. https://acf.gov/sites/default/files/documents/orr/Benefits-for-Afghan-Humanitarian-Parolees-English.pdf
  63. https://welcome.us/explainers/us-refugee-admissions-program-suspended-until-further-notice-welcome-corps-terminated
  64. https://cwsglobal.org/blog/daily-state-of-play-trumps-indefinite-refugee-ban-and-funding-halt/
  65. https://www.rescue.org/article/how-have-trump-policies-impacted-refugees
  66. https://afghanevac.org/eo-crisis
  67. https://scottpeters.house.gov/2025/8/representative-peters-outlines-harmful-changes-to-afghan-refugee-resettlement-efforts
  68. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/flights-halted-afghans-approved-special-us-visas-advocate-official-say-2025-01-25/
  69. https://www.npr.org/2025/04/11/g-s1-59939/trump-afghanistan-tps-kristi-noem-dhs
  70. https://forumtogether.org/article/legislative-bulletin-thursday-august-7-2025/
  71. https://cis.org/sites/default/files/2021-09/camarota-afghans-9-21.pdf
  72. https://www.voanews.com/a/how-south-and-central-asia-s-footprint-in-us-population-is-growing-/7577092.html
  73. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Report-Proposed-Refugee-Admissions-for-FY25.pdf
  74. https://www.globalrefuge.org/news/four-years-later-afghan-allies-at-risk-in-the-u-s/
  75. https://www.kqed.org/news/12053196/how-fremont-became-a-hub-for-afghan-americans
  76. https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-afghans-of-fremont
  77. https://upgnorthamerica.com/project/afghans-in-the-seattle-metropolitan-area/
  78. https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/California-is-home-to-the-U-S-s-largest-16415531.php
  79. https://www.stateoig.gov/uploads/report/report_pdf_file/aud-mero-23-21_0.pdf
  80. https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/afghan-immigrants-in-the-united-states/
  81. https://cis.org/Report/Immigrants-Afghanistan
  82. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/college-educated-immigrants-united-states
  83. https://aulablog.net/2023/10/02/a-preliminary-portrait-of-the-educational-attainment-of-recently-arrived-afghan-refugees-in-the-washington-metropolitan-area/
  84. https://www.unesco.org/en/fieldoffice/kabul/expertise/education/literacy-learning-possibilities
  85. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/pubs/UScredentialrecognition.pdf
  86. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390798358_From_Arrival_to_Integration_Understanding_the_Challenges_and_Experiences_of_Afghan_Immigrants_in_the_United_States
  87. https://www.ece.org/Blogs/Naqib-Ullah-Journey.htm
  88. https://www.rescue.org/announcement/afghan-refugee-finds-independence-trucker
  89. https://www.ttnews.com/articles/veterans-trucking-jobs
  90. https://www.npr.org/2021/09/16/1038032116/the-jobs-that-await-afghans-in-the-u-s-are-often-far-below-their-skill-level
  91. https://www.globalrefuge.org/stories/asads-afghan-grocery-store-a-taste-of-home/
  92. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1724420
  93. https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/05.23_refugee_report_v3_0.pdf
  94. https://www.migrationdataportal.org/infographic/remittances-and-afghanistan
  95. https://tradingeconomics.com/afghanistan/personal-remittances-received-current-us%24-wb-data.html
  96. https://minorityrights.org/country/afghanistan/
  97. https://www.scph.org/sites/default/files/editor/Needs_Assessment_AFG.pdf
  98. https://www.coresourceexchange.org/working-with-afghans/
  99. https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-report-on-international-religious-freedom/afghanistan
  100. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2009/10/07/mapping-the-global-muslim-population/
  101. https://joshuaproject.net/people_groups/19314/US
  102. https://www.facebook.com/Afghancommunityofva/
  103. https://www.yelp.com/biz/afghan-community-islamic-center-san-diego-2
  104. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/section-12-religious-discrimination
  105. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-beliefs-about-sharia/
  106. https://www.opindia.com/2021/08/pew-research-survey-afghanistan-sharia-taliban/
  107. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2016/jun/16/donald-trump/trump-mostly-correct-about-sharia-law-support-afgh/
  108. https://ispu.org/report-2-mosque-survey-2020/
  109. https://culturalatlas.sbs.com.au/afghan-culture/afghan-culture-family
  110. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000794
  111. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2261&context=etd
  112. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12134-023-01098-6
  113. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02757206.2020.1865342
  114. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11002416/
  115. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/12/651
  116. https://ugresearchjournals.illinois.edu/index.php/juswr/article/download/973/841/2750
  117. https://repository.uel.ac.uk/download/794d580bb781683e963793c993b0b41c250b933f2679b3934441dc42ad9066c2/1663086/2022_DCounPsy_Panahi.pdf
  118. https://www.oregonhumanities.org/rll/beyond-the-margins/unapologetically-afghan-american/
  119. https://merip.org/2021/05/the-fog-of-the-forever-war-with-a-laugh-track-in-united-states-of-al/
  120. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/secrets-and-sisterhood-and-the-burden-of-afghan-representation
  121. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10646175.2024.2409087
  122. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10646175.2024.2409087
  123. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17411910500329658
  124. https://www.screendaily.com/features/afghan-filmmaker-sahra-mani-on-why-she-has-reconfigured-her-music-school-doc-kabul-melody/5163130.article
  125. https://about.rferl.org/service/afghan-service/
  126. https://aa-co.org/
  127. https://www.afghan-american.com/
  128. https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/article/not-your-mothers-norms-the-experience-of-second-generation-women-in-the-afghan-american-diaspora
  129. https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/report/economic-impact-refugees-america/
  130. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13602000802547898
  131. https://repository.digital.georgetown.edu/downloads/7aaac852-574e-4672-b00a-f4c3faa50ef8
  132. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/supporting-college-students-of-immigrant-origin/secondgeneration-afghan-immigrants-navigating-racial-and-ethnic-identities-in-college/E39BC5DE86F4A0C633E9C9CF139EC90C
  133. https://mars.gmu.edu/entities/publication/05d49e0e-c9e2-4883-92e1-ef1f00a48552
  134. https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2017/03/21/520879137/for-afghan-immigrants-nowruz-celebrations-of-spring-are-a-taste-of-home
  135. https://researchworks.creighton.edu/view/pdfCoverPage?instCode=01CRU_INST&filePid=13226812210002656&download=true
  136. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/250417.pdf
  137. https://www.mbda.gov/sites/default/files/migrated/files-attachments/September_11_Backlash.pdf
  138. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1597899
  139. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0196822
  140. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320657598_Effect_of_Perceived_Discrimination_on_Depressive_Symptoms_in_1st-_and_2nd-Generation_Afghan-Americans
  141. https://www.neilsberg.com/insights/lists/afghan-population-in-united-states-by-city/
  142. https://www.wpr.org/history/conflicts-disasters/afghan-families-face-culture-shock-uncertainty-about-immigration-status-they-resettle-wisconsin
  143. https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/education/2022/06/29/428002/afghan-refugee-students-in-houston-experienced-culture-shock-now-many-are-thriving/
  144. https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2022-10/OIG-22-79-Oct22.pdf
  145. https://natlawreview.com/article/pentagon-reports-security-concerns-over-afghan-refugees
  146. https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-continues-probe-of-biden-harris-administrations-failure-to-properly-vet-afghan-evacuees
  147. https://www.grassley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/doj_oig_afghan_evacuees.pdf
  148. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/justice-department-watchdog-confirms-grassley-oversight-biden-harris-gave-suspected-terrorists-protected-status-through-afghan-evacuee-program
  149. https://homeland.house.gov/2024/10/10/chairman-green-presses-dhs-fbi-on-failure-to-fully-vet-afghan-national-charged-with-plotting-election-day-terrorist-attack-increased-isis-related-threats/
  150. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/09/23/afghan-evacuees-fort-mccoy-face-charges-of-domestic-violence-sex-minors.html
  151. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/23/afghan-evacuees-us-military-base-charged-domestic-/
  152. https://abc7chicago.com/post/fort-bliss-soldier-assaulted-afghan-refugees-attack-new-mexico/11046524/
  153. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/09/25/female-soldier-fort-bliss-said-she-was-assaulted-group-of-male-afghan-refugees-officials-say.html
  154. https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2021/09/30/multiple-reports-of-assault-robbery-among-afghan-evacuees-at-military-bases/
  155. https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2021-09-30/top-general-pushes-back-on-claims-of-criminality-assault-among-afghan-refugees
  156. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/04/23/justice-department-indicts-six-alleged-afghanistan-translator-scam.html
  157. https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdny/pr/afghan-citizen-charged-visa-fraud
  158. https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/afghanistan-citizen-admits-immigration-fraud-immediate-deportation-ordered
  159. https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Bay-Area-sweep-arrests-42-alleged-gang-members-3169730.php
  160. https://www.reddit.com/r/Fremont/comments/1akur4l/fremonts_most_ruthless_street_gang/
  161. https://kausernews.com/afghan-gangsters-attack-us-military-veteran-in-sacramento-with-deadly-weapons/
  162. https://www.thecgo.org/benchmark/afghan-refugees-are-no-threat-to-public-safety/
  163. https://cis.org/Richwine/Afghans-America-Potentially-Severe-Culture-Clash
  164. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/nov/10/us-spent-14-billion-afghan-evacuees/
  165. https://www.military.com/daily-news/2022/01/13/cost-afghan-refugees-bases-reaches-688-million-pentagon-says.html
  166. https://fortune.com/2021/09/03/us-provides-up-to-2275-in-aid-afghan-evacuees/
  167. https://cis.org/Oped/Afghan-Refugee-Program-Unfixable-Mess-and-May-Bring-Next-Terrorist-Attack
  168. https://acf.gov/sites/default/files/documents/orr/orr-arc-fy2021.pdf
  169. https://www.nilc.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/afghan-publicbenefits-facts-2023-03.pdf
  170. https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/fiscal-impact-refugees-asylees
  171. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10218420/
  172. https://www.npr.org/2018/09/05/641094135/zalmay-khalilzad-appointed-as-u-s-special-adviser-to-afghanistan
  173. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/13/us-envoy-afghanistan-zalmay-khalilzhad-00110934
  174. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/ex-u-s-diplomat-who-wrote-afghanistans-constitution-reflects-on-exit-deal-with-taliban
  175. https://www.ktvu.com/news/womens-history-month-state-senator-aisha-wahab-is-1st-afghan-american-woman-elected-to-office-in-the-nation
  176. https://abc7news.com/post/aisha-wahab-hayward-california-state-senate-ca/12479214/
  177. https://sd10.senate.ca.gov/biography
  178. https://www.usar.army.mil/News/News-Display/Article/2538451/us-army-reserve-soldier-and-afghanistan-native-i-am-living-my-american-dream/
  179. https://www.army.mil/article/271692/former_afghan_refugee_becomes_american_soldier
  180. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/afghans-helped-the-u-s-military-blocked-from-america/
  181. https://www.kare11.com/article/news/local/kare11-saturday/minnesota-sisters-sauce-company-is-national-success-story/89-02a9f208-e9ef-4ac3-ae17-12b4fc16fe75
  182. https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/minnesota-sisters-sauce-company-gains-national-recognition/
  183. https://aa-ba.org/executives-members/
  184. https://www.linkedin.com/in/suliman-basir-6471214a
  185. https://www.businessofbusiness.com/articles/how-afghan-startup-founders-in-the-us-are-keeping-businesses-and-workers-alive-back-home/
  186. https://materialkitchen.com/blogs/object/material-object-kabir-arghandiwal
  187. https://www.upwardlyglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Afghan-Newcomers-Bring-Critical-Value-to-the-U.S.-Economy-and-Society-v3-4.pdf
  188. https://blogs.sjsu.edu/newsroom/2015/qayoumi-to-leave-sjsu-for-advisory-role-to-afghan-president/
  189. https://ccst.us/people/distinguished-experts/mohammad-h-qayoumi/
  190. https://cgs.la.psu.edu/teaching-resources/afghanistan-in-global-perspective/tamim-ansary/
  191. https://www.identitytheory.com/tamim-ansary/
  192. https://womensmediacenter.com/shesource/expert/lina-rozbih
  193. https://newlinesmag.com/reportage/preserving-afghanistans-soul-a-race-against-time/
  194. https://www.kqed.org/arts/13906386/bay-area-afghan-artists-step-up-in-response-to-crisis-facing-artists-in-afghanistan
  195. https://www.afghanasl.com/about
  196. https://www.houstonchronicle.com/sports/dynamo/article/afghan-womens-soccer-refugees-fifa-houston-20331543.php
  197. https://www.encyclopedia.com/social-sciences/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/afghan-americans
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.