Hubbry Logo
GamblingGamblingMain
Open search
Gambling
Community hub
Gambling
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gambling
Gambling
Gambling
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Caravaggio, The Cardsharps (c. 1594), depicting card sharps

Gambling (also known as betting or gaming) is the wagering of something of value ("the stakes") on a random event with the intent of winning something else of value, where instances of strategy are discounted. Gambling thus requires three elements to be present: consideration (an amount wagered), risk (chance), and a prize.[1] The outcome of the wager is often immediate, such as a single roll of dice, a spin of a roulette wheel, or a horse crossing the finish line, but longer time frames are also common, allowing wagers on the outcome of a future sports contest or even an entire sports season.

The term "gaming"[2] in this context typically refers to instances in which the activity has been specifically permitted by law. The two words are not mutually exclusive; i.e., a "gaming" company offers (legal) "gambling" activities to the public[3] and may be regulated by one of many gaming control boards, for example, the Nevada Gaming Control Board. However, this distinction is not universally observed in the English-speaking world. For instance, in the United Kingdom, the regulator of gambling activities is called the Gambling Commission (not the Gaming Commission).[4] The word gaming is used more frequently since the rise of computer and video games to describe activities that do not necessarily involve wagering, especially online gaming, with the new usage still not having displaced the old usage as the primary definition in common dictionaries. "Gaming" has also been used euphemistically to circumvent laws against "gambling". The media and others have used one term or the other to frame conversations around the subjects, resulting in a shift of perceptions among their audiences.[5]

Gambling is also a major international commercial activity, with the legal gambling market totaling an estimated $335 billion in 2009.[6] In other forms, gambling can be conducted with materials that have a value, but are not real money. For example, players of marbles games might wager marbles, and likewise games of Pogs or Magic: The Gathering can be played with the collectible game pieces (respectively, small discs and trading cards) as stakes, resulting in a metagame regarding the value of a player's collection of pieces.

History

[edit]

Gambling dates back at least to the Paleolithic period, before written history. In Mesopotamia the earliest six-sided dice date to about 3000 BCE. However, they were based on astragali dating back thousands of years earlier. In China, gambling houses were widespread in the first millennium BCE, and betting on fighting animals was common. Lotto games and dominoes (precursors of Pai Gow) appeared in China as early as the 10th century.[7]

Playing cards appeared in the 9th century CE in China. Records trace gambling in Japan back at least as far as the 14th century.[8]

Poker, the most popular U.S. card game associated with gambling, derives from the Persian game As-Nas, dating back to the 17th century.[9]

The first known casino, the Ridotto, started operating in 1638 in Venice, Italy.[10]

Great Britain

[edit]
Main articles: Gambling in the United Kingdom and History of gambling in the United Kingdom

Gambling has been a main recreational activity in Great Britain for centuries.[11] Queen Elizabeth I chartered a lottery that was drawn in 1569.[12] Horseracing has been a favorite theme for over three centuries.[13] It has been heavily regulated.[14] Historically much of the opposition comes from Nonconformist Protestants, and from social reformers.[15][16]

Singapore

[edit]
Main article: Gambling in Singapore

Gambling has been part of Singapore's history, though it was strictly controlled by the government for many years. In the mid-20th century, illegal gambling was common. However, with the opening of regulated casinos in 2010, the approach shifted. Today, the government enforces strict laws to promote responsible gambling and prevent illegal activities.[17][18][19][20]

United States

[edit]
Main article: Gambling in the United States

Gambling has been a popular activity in the United States for centuries.[21] It has also been suppressed by law in many areas for almost as long. By the early 20th century, gambling was almost uniformly outlawed throughout the U.S. and thus became a largely illegal activity, helping to spur the growth of the mafia and other criminal organizations.[22][23] The late 20th century saw a softening in attitudes towards gambling and a relaxation of laws against it.

Regulation

[edit]
Gamblers in the Ship of Fools, 1494
"Players and courtesans under a tent" by Cornelis de Vos
Main article: Gambling law

Many jurisdictions, local as well as national, either ban gambling or heavily control it by licensing the vendors. Such regulation generally leads to gambling tourism and illegal gambling in the areas where it is not allowed. The involvement of governments, through regulation and taxation, has led to a close connection between many governments and gambling organizations, where legal gambling provides significant government revenue, such as in Monaco and Macau, China.

Most jurisdictions that allow gambling require participants to be above a certain age. In some jurisdictions, the gambling age differs depending on the type of gambling. For example, in many American states one must be over 21 to enter a casino, but may buy a lottery ticket after turning 18.[24]

There is generally legislation requiring that gambling devices be statistically random, to prevent manufacturers from making some high-payoff results impossible. Since these high payoffs have very low probability, a house bias can quite easily be missed unless the devices are checked carefully.[25]

Insurance

[edit]

Because contracts of insurance have many features in common with wagers, insurance contracts are often distinguished in law as agreements in which either party has an interest in the "bet-upon" outcome beyond the specific financial terms; for example, a "bet" with an insurer on whether one's house will burn down is not gambling, but rather insurance, as the homeowner has an obvious interest in the continued existence of the home independent of the purely financial aspects of the "bet" (i.e., the insurance policy). Nonetheless, both insurance and gambling contracts are typically considered aleatory contracts under most legal systems, though they are subject to different types of regulation.

Asset recovery

[edit]

Under common law, particularly English Law (English unjust enrichment), a gambling contract may not give a casino bona fide purchaser status, permitting the recovery of stolen funds in some situations. In Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd, where a solicitor used stolen funds to gamble at a casino, the House of Lords overruled the High Court's previous verdict, adjudicating that the casino return the stolen funds less those subject to any change of position defence. U.S. Law precedents are somewhat similar.[26] For case law on recovery of gambling losses where the loser had stolen the funds see "Rights of owner of stolen money as against one who won it in gambling transaction from thief".[27]

An interesting question is what happens when the person trying to make recovery is the gambler's spouse, and the money or property lost was either the spouse's, or was community property. This was a minor plot point in a Perry Mason novel, The Case of the Singing Skirt, and it cites an actual case Novo v. Hotel Del Rio.[28]

Religious views

[edit]
Max Kaur and religious leaders protest against gambling, Tallinn, Estonia.

Buddhism

[edit]

The Buddha stated gambling as a source of destruction in Singalovada Sutra.

Professions that are seen to violate the precept against theft include working in the gambling industry.[29]

Hinduism

[edit]

Ancient Hindu poems like the Gambler's Lament and the Mahabharata testify to the existence of gambling among ancient Indians, while highlighting its destructive impact.[where?] The text Arthashastra (c. 4th century BCE) recommends taxation and control of gambling.[30]

Judaism

[edit]

Ancient Jewish authorities frowned on gambling, even disqualifying professional gamblers from testifying in court.[31]

Christianity

[edit]
Main article: Toys and games in ancient Rome

Although the bible does not condemn gambling, instead the desire to get rich is called to account numerous times in the New Testament.[32]

Catholicism

[edit]

The Catholic Church holds the position that there is no moral impediment to gambling, so long as it is fair, all bettors have a reasonable chance of winning, there is no fraud involved, and the parties involved do not have actual knowledge of the outcome of the bet (unless they have disclosed this knowledge),[33] and as long as the following conditions are met: the gambler can afford to lose the bet, and stops when the limit is reached, and the motivation is entertainment and not personal gain leading to the "love of money"[34] or making a living.[35] In general, Catholic bishops have opposed casino gambling on the grounds that it too often tempts people into problem gambling or addiction, and has particularly negative effects on poor people; they sometimes also cite secondary effects such as increases in loan sharking, prostitution, corruption, and general public immorality.[36][37][38] Some parish pastors have also opposed casinos for the additional reason that they would take customers away from church bingo and annual festivals where games such as blackjack, roulette, craps, and poker are used for fundraising.[39] St. Thomas Aquinas wrote that gambling should be especially forbidden where the losing bettor is underage or otherwise not able to consent to the transaction.[40] Gambling has often been seen as having social consequences, as satirized by Balzac. For these social and religious reasons, most legal jurisdictions limit gambling, as advocated by Pascal.[41]

Protestantism

[edit]

Gambling views among Protestants vary, with some either discouraging or forbidding their members from participation in gambling. Methodists, in accordance with the doctrine of outward holiness, oppose gambling which they believe is a sin that feeds on greed. Other denominations that discourage gambling are the United Methodist Church,[42] the Free Methodist Church,[43] the Evangelical Wesleyan Church,[44] the Salvation Army,[45] and the Church of the Nazarene.[46]

Other Protestants that oppose gambling include Mennonites, Schwarzenau Brethren,[47] Quakers,[48] the Christian Reformed Church in North America,[49] the Church of the Lutheran Confession,[50] the Southern Baptist Convention,[51] the Assemblies of God,[52] and the Seventh-day Adventist Church.[53]

Other Christian denominations

[edit]

Other churches that oppose gambling include the Jehovah's Witnesses, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,[54] the Iglesia ni Cristo,[55] and the Members Church of God International.

Islam

[edit]

There is a consensus among the 'Ulema' (Arabic: عُـلـمـاء, Scholars (of Islam)) that gambling is haraam (Arabic: حَـرام, sinful or forbidden). In assertions made during its prohibition, Muslim jurists describe gambling as being both un-Qur'anic, and as being generally harmful to the Muslim Ummah (Arabic: أُمَّـة, Community). The Arabic terminology for gambling is Maisir.[56]

They ask you about intoxicants and gambling. Say: 'In them both lies grave sin, though some benefit, to mankind. But their sin is more grave than their benefit.'

— Surah Al-Baqara 2:219

In parts of the world that implement full Shari'ah, such as Aceh, punishments for Muslim gamblers can range up to 12 lashes or a one-year prison term and a fine for those who provide a venue for such practises.[57] Some Islamic nations prohibit gambling; most other countries regulate it.[58]

Bahá'í Faith

[edit]

According to the Most Holy Book, paragraph 155, gambling is forbidden.

Types

[edit]

Casino games

[edit]

While almost any game can be played for money, and any game typically played for money can also be played just for fun, some games are generally offered in a casino setting.

Table games

[edit]
Main article: Casino game § Table games
The Caesars Palace main fountain. The statue is a copy of the ancient Winged Victory of Samothrace.
A pachinko parlor in Tokyo, Japan
Mahjong tiles

Electronic gambling

[edit]
RAY's Ruusu and Tuplapotti slot machines in Finland

Other gambling

[edit]

Non-casino games

[edit]

Gambling games that take place outside of casinos include bingo (as played in the US and UK), dead pool, lotteries, pull-tab games and scratchcards, and Mahjong.

Other non-casino gambling games include:

*Although coin tossing is not usually played in a casino, it has been known to be an official gambling game in some Australian casinos[60]

Fixed-odds betting

[edit]
Main article: Fixed-odds betting

Fixed-odds betting and Parimutuel betting frequently occur at many types of sporting events, and political elections. In addition many bookmakers offer fixed odds on a number of non-sports related outcomes, for example the direction and extent of movement of various financial indices, the winner of television competitions such as Big Brother, and election results.[61] Interactive prediction markets also offer trading on these outcomes, with "shares" of results trading on an open market.

Parimutuel betting

[edit]
Main article: Parimutuel betting

One of the most widespread forms of gambling involves betting on horse or greyhound racing. Wagering may take place through parimutuel pools, or bookmakers may take bets personally. Parimutuel wagers pay off at prices determined by support in the wagering pools, while bookmakers pay off either at the odds offered at the time of accepting the bet; or at the median odds offered by track bookmakers at the time the race started.

Sports betting

[edit]
Main article: Sports betting
Tokyo Racecourse in Tokyo, Japan

Betting on team sports has become an important service industry in many countries. Before the advent of the internet, millions of people played the football pools every week in the United Kingdom. In addition to organized sports betting, both legal and illegal, there are many side-betting games played by casual groups of spectators, such as NCAA basketball tournament Bracket Pools, Super Bowl Squares, Fantasy Sports Leagues with monetary entry fees and winnings, and in-person spectator games like Moundball.

Virtual sports

[edit]
Main article: Virtual sports

Based on Sports Betting, Virtual Sports are fantasy and never played sports events made by software that can be played every time without wondering about external things like weather conditions.

Arbitrage betting

[edit]
Main article: Arbitrage betting

Arbitrage betting is a theoretically risk-free betting system in which every outcome of an event is bet upon so that a known profit will be made by the bettor upon completion of the event regardless of the outcome. Arbitrage betting is a combination of the ancient art of arbitrage trading and gambling, which has been made possible by the large numbers of bookmakers in the marketplace, creating occasional opportunities for arbitrage.

Other types of betting

[edit]

One can also bet with another person that a statement is true or false, or that a specified event will happen (a "back bet") or will not happen (a "lay bet") within a specified time. This occurs in particular when two people have opposing but strongly held views on truth or events. Not only do the parties hope to gain from the bet, they place the bet also to demonstrate their certainty about the issue. Some means of determining the issue at stake must exist. Sometimes the amount bet remains nominal, demonstrating the outcome as one of principle rather than of financial importance.

Betting exchanges allow consumers to both back and lay at odds of their choice. Similar in some ways to a stock exchange, a bettor may want to back a horse (hoping it will win) or lay a horse (hoping it will lose, effectively acting as bookmaker).

Spread betting allows gamblers to wager on the outcome of an event where the pay-off is based on the accuracy of the wager, rather than a simple "win or lose" outcome. For example, a wager can be based on the when a point is scored in the game in minutes and each minute away from the prediction increases or reduces the payout.

Staking systems

[edit]
Main article: Betting strategy

Many betting systems have been created in an attempt to "beat the house" but no system can make a mathematically unprofitable bet in terms of expected value profitable over time. Widely used systems include:

  • Card counting – Many systems exist for blackjack to keep track of the ratio of ten values to all others; when this ratio is high the player has an advantage and should increase the amount of their bets. Keeping track of cards dealt confers an advantage in other games as well.
  • Due-column betting – A variation on fixed profits betting in which the bettor sets a target profit and then calculates a bet size that will make this profit, adding any losses to the target.
  • Fixed profits – the stakes vary based on the odds to ensure the same profit from each winning selection.
  • Fixed stakes – a traditional system of staking the same amount on each selection.
  • Kelly – the optimum level to bet to maximize your future median bank level.
  • Martingale – A system based on staking enough each time to recover losses from previous bet(s) until one wins.

Other uses of the term

[edit]
Gloria Mundi, or The Devil addressing the sun, a cartoon showing the British politician Charles James Fox standing on a roulette wheel perched atop a globe showing England and continental Europe. The implication is that his penniless state, indicated by turned-out pockets, is due to gambling.

Many risk-return choices are sometimes referred to colloquially as "gambling."[62] Whether this terminology is acceptable is a matter of debate:

  • Emotional or physical risk-taking, where the risk-return ratio is not quantifiable (e.g., skydiving, campaigning for political office, asking someone for a date, etc.)
  • Insurance is a method of shifting risk from one party to another. Insurers use actuarial methods to calculate appropriate premiums, which is similar to calculating gambling odds. Insurers set their premiums to obtain a long term positive expected return in the same manner that professional gamblers select which bets to make. While insurance is sometimes distinguished from gambling by the requirement of an insurable interest, the equivalent in gambling is simply betting against one's own best interests (e.g., a sports coach betting against his own team to mitigate the financial repercussions of a losing season).
  • Situations where the possible return is of secondary importance to the wager/purchase (e.g. entering a raffle in support of a charitable cause)

Investments are also usually not considered gambling, although some investments can involve significant risk. Examples of investments include stocks, bonds and real estate. Starting a business can also be considered a form of investment. Investments are generally not considered gambling when they meet the following criteria:

  • Economic utility
  • Positive expected returns (at least in the long term)
  • Underlying value independent of the risk being undertaken

Some speculative investment activities are particularly risky, but are sometimes perceived to be different from gambling:

  • Foreign currency exchange (forex) transactions
  • Prediction markets
  • Securities derivatives, such as options or futures, where the value of the derivative is dependent on the value of the underlying asset at a specific point in time (typically the derivative's associated expiration date)

A levant or levanting characterises the act of absconding following the outcome of a bet.[63]

Negative consequences

[edit]
Main article: Problem gambling

Problem gambling has multiple symptoms. Gamblers often play again to try to win back money they have lost, and some gamble to relieve feelings of helplessness and anxiety.[64]

In the United Kingdom, the Advertising Standards Authority has censured several betting firms for advertisements disguised as news articles suggesting falsely that a person had cleared debts and paid for medical expenses by gambling online. The firms face possible fines.[65]

A 2020 study of 32 countries found that the greater the amount of gambling activity in a given country, the more volatile that country's stock-market prices are.[66] Legalization of online sports betting was found to decrease household saving, decrease investment with positive expected value and increase financial distress.[67]

Public opinions against or for gambling varies by age.[68]

Psychological biases

[edit]

Gamblers may exhibit a number of cognitive and motivational biases that distort the perceived odds of events and that influence their preferences for gambles.

  • Preference for likely outcomes. When gambles are selected through a choice process – when people indicate which gamble they prefer from a set of gambles (e.g., win/lose, over/under) – people tend to prefer to bet on the outcome that is more likely to occur. Bettors tend to prefer to bet on favorites in athletic competitions, and sometimes will accept even bets on favorites when offered more favorable bets on the less likely outcome (e.g., an underdog team).[69]
  • Optimism/Desirability Bias. Gamblers also exhibit optimism, overestimating the likelihood that desired events will occur. Fans of NFL underdog teams, for example, will prefer to bet on their teams at even odds than to bet on the favorite, whether the bet is $5 or $50.[70]
  • Reluctance to bet against (hedge) desired outcomes.[71] People are reluctant to bet against desired outcomes that are relevant to their identity. Gamblers exhibit reluctance to bet against the success of their preferred U.S. presidential candidates and Major League Baseball, National Football League, National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) basketball, and NCAA hockey teams. More than 45% of NCAA fans in Studies 5 and 6, for instance, turned down a "free" real $5 bet against their team. From a psychological perspective, such a "hedge" creates an interdependence dilemma – a motivational conflict between a short-term monetary gain and the long-term benefits accrued from feelings of identification with and loyalty to a position, person, or group whom the bettor desires to succeed. In economic terms, this conflicted decision can be modeled as a trade-off between the outcome utility gained by hedging (e.g., money) and the diagnostic costs it incurs (e.g., disloyalty). People make inferences about their beliefs and identity from their behavior. If a person is uncertain about an aspect of their identity, such as the extent to which they value a candidate or team, hedging may signal to them that they are not as committed to that candidate or team as they originally believed. If the diagnostic cost of this self-signal and the resulting identity change are substantial, it may outweigh the outcome utility of hedging, and they may reject even very generous hedges.[71]
  • Ratio bias. Gamblers will prefer gambles with worse odds that are drawn from a large sample (e.g., drawing one red ball from an urn containing 89 red balls and 11 blue balls) to better odds that are drawn from a small sample (drawing one red ball from an urn containing 9 red balls and one blue ball).[72]
  • Gambler's fallacy/positive recency bias.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Gambling

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Gambling is the wagering of or something of value on an event with an uncertain outcome, with the intent of winning or goods of greater value. It typically involves three elements: (the stake), chance ( determining the result), and (potential reward). In most commercial forms, operators structure games to maintain a mathematical edge, ensuring long-term profitability at participants' expense. The practice spans , with rudimentary forms evident in ancient societies through dice-like artifacts and betting on uncertain events. Today, it manifests in diverse activities including , lotteries, , and online platforms, accessible worldwide via regulated markets and illicit channels. The global gambling market generates substantial revenue, projected to exceed $449 billion in 2025, driven by expansion in digital and legalized betting sectors. This economic scale supports employment and taxation but masks pervasive risks, as roughly 46% of adults engage annually while about 2% develop , disproportionately affecting younger males. Problematic gambling yields measurable social costs, including elevated rates of , , , and among affected individuals, with aggregate burdens estimated in billions annually through lost and public services. Empirical studies link these outcomes to the addictive potential of near-miss effects and variable rewards, akin to operant conditioning in behavioral , rather than isolated moral failings. Regulatory efforts vary by jurisdiction, balancing revenue generation against harm mitigation via age restrictions, advertising limits, and treatment programs, though expansion in sports and online betting has intensified debates over impacts.

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Definition and Distinctions

Gambling constitutes the staking of or other valuables on an event whose outcome is primarily determined by chance, with the objective of securing a return exceeding the amount wagered. This activity inherently involves three elements: , in the form of the wager; chance, as the dominant factor in determining the result rather than ; and a , representing the potential winnings. Legally and conceptually, outcomes must not be wholly predictable or manipulable by participants for the activity to qualify as gambling, distinguishing it from mere transactions or calculated risks. A fundamental distinction lies in the : gambling mechanisms, such as or lotteries, incorporate a house edge—a mathematical advantage ensuring that, over repeated plays, the operator retains a portion of total wagers, yielding a negative for players. This contrasts sharply with investing, where returns derive from the of underlying assets like businesses or securities, allowing informed analysis to achieve positive over time through diversification and fundamentals assessment, rather than reliance on probabilistic fixed against the participant. , often conflated with gambling, involves calculated exposure to uncertain future events—such as price fluctuations—with potential for profit based on market inefficiencies or economic shifts, but without the systemic bias toward loss inherent in gambling structures. Further differentiation arises from , which addresses pre-existing pure risks (possibilities of loss or no loss, such as ) through mutual pooling among policyholders, transferring and mitigating unavoidable uncertainties without creating new hazards or promising gains beyond premium recovery. Gambling, by contrast, generates speculative risks (outcomes of gain, loss, or stasis) voluntarily for the thrill or potential upside, often unproductive as it redistributes existing rather than fostering new value, and is ineligible for insurability due to incentives. Activities blending and chance, like poker, may straddle categories but remain gambling when wagering occurs under rules where chance precludes guaranteed success, unlike pure contests without stakes.

Probability, Expected Value, and House Edge

In gambling, outcomes in games of pure chance are determined by , defined as the of favorable outcomes to total possible outcomes in a assuming randomization. For instance, in a six-sided die roll, the probability of rolling a specific number is 1/6, while in American with 38 pockets (numbers 1-36, plus 0 and 00), the probability of landing on a pocket when betting even-money on is 18/38 ≈ 0.4737. These probabilities form the basis for assessing long-term outcomes, as each trial is independent under ideal conditions, with no influence from prior results—a violated only by flawed or human error. The (EV) quantifies the average outcome per trial over infinite repetitions, calculated as the sum of each possible outcome multiplied by its probability: EV=∑(xi⋅pi)EV = \sum (x_i \cdot p_i), where xix_i is the net payoff and pip_i is the probability of outcome ii. In gambling, for a unit bet (e.g., $1), a fair game yields EV = 0, meaning neither player nor house gains an advantage on average; however, are structured with negative EV for the player to ensure profitability. For an even-money bet like red in American roulette, EV = (18/38)(+1) + (20/38)(-1) = -1/19 ≈ -0.0526, indicating an average loss of 5.26 cents per dollar wagered. This metric derives from first-principles summation of probabilistic payoffs, independent of bet size or frequency, and holds regardless of short-term variance, as the converges results to the EV. The house edge represents the casino's built-in advantage, expressed as a : house edge = -EV per unit bet × 100%. It arises from asymmetric payouts relative to true probabilities, such as the extra zeros in or restricted dealer actions in . In European (single zero, 37 pockets), the house edge on even-money bets drops to 1/37 ≈ 2.70%, as the probability adjustment yields EV = -1/37. Skill-influenced games like can reduce the house edge to approximately 0.5% with optimal basic , derived from combinatorial of card probabilities, though it remains positive due to rules like dealer standing on soft 17.
GameBet TypeHouse Edge (%)Key Factor
Roulette (American)Even-money (e.g., red)5.26Double zero pocket
Roulette (European)Even-money2.70Single zero pocket
Basic strategy~0.5Player decisions vs. dealer rules
Pass line1.41Specific dice combinations
These edges are mathematically fixed for standard rules and do not account for side bets or rule variations, which often increase the casino advantage; for example, blackjack insurance bets carry a 7.4% house edge. Empirical casino data confirms these figures, with long-run player losses aligning closely to theoretical edges after millions of trials.

Historical Development

Ancient Origins and Early Forms

Gambling practices emerged in prehistoric and ancient societies through rudimentary games of chance, often involving natural objects like (astragali) from sheep or goats used as proto-dice for betting. Archaeological evidence indicates such items were employed as early as the period, with more definitive artifacts from Mesopotamian sites dating to approximately 3000 BCE, where six-sided dice made from bone or clay facilitated wagers on outcomes. These early forms typically pitted participants against one another or the unpredictable roll, with stakes including , tools, or personal possessions, reflecting a universal human inclination toward under . In , one of the earliest structured games was , attested from around 3100 BCE in predynastic , featuring a linear board of 30 squares where players advanced pieces via throws of short sticks or four-sided dice-like markers, aiming to navigate symbolic hazards. While Senet initially held ritualistic connotations tied to the afterlife—evident in tomb depictions of pharaohs like playing it—archaeological finds of wagering tokens and textual references suggest it evolved into a betting activity among elites and commoners alike, with losers forfeiting goods or services. Complementary evidence from sites like Abydos includes gaming boards inscribed with royal names, underscoring its prevalence across social strata by (c. 2686–2181 BCE). Parallel developments occurred in , where Chinese artifacts unearthed from sites dating to 2300 BCE reveal tiles marked for lotteries or chance games, predating written records and possibly linked to early practices that incorporated wagers. In , Vedic texts from the second millennium BCE describe high-stakes games involving shells or carved stones, as in the Rigveda's hymns recounting losses of cattle and kingdoms on chariot race bets, indicating gambling's integration into ritual and social economies. These Asian variants emphasized communal participation, often blending chance with rudimentary strategy, and influenced later board games like precursors to . By the classical era, gambling permeated and Roman cultures through refined dice (kyboi in , tesserae in ) and , with evidence from 7th-century BCE Athenian showing scenes of astragaloi tossing for stakes during festivals. Romans extended this to public spectacles, betting on gladiatorial combats and races despite periodic senatorial bans, as documented in legal fragments from the era prohibiting excessive play among soldiers to maintain discipline. These Mediterranean forms highlighted gambling's dual role as entertainment and vice, with loaded dice artifacts revealing early cheating mechanisms driven by the negative inherent in house-favored odds even in informal settings.

Expansion in the Modern Era

The legalization of casino gambling in in 1931 catalyzed modern expansion in the United States, as the state sought economic recovery during the by attracting tourists and workers involved in the project. The opening of in 1941 marked the inception of the Strip, which experienced explosive growth post-World War II, with hotel-casino revenues surpassing $200 million annually by the late amid rising visitor numbers and infrastructure development. Corporate investment, exemplified by ' acquisitions in the 1960s, shifted control from influences to regulated enterprises, solidifying as the epicenter of American gambling by generating over $1 billion in casino revenue by 1970. This model proliferated domestically in the 1970s and 1980s, with authorizing in 1976 to revive its fading seaside economy, leading to the debut of in 1978 and subsequent establishments that peaked at over $5 billion in annual gross gaming revenue by the mid-1980s. Midwestern states followed with laws, such as Iowa's 1989 legislation enabling floating venues that launched operations in 1991, while the of 1988 permitted tribal casinos on lands, resulting in approximately 250 operational facilities by 2000 and contributing $10 billion in annual revenue. State lotteries revived as a fiscal tool, starting with New Hampshire's 1964 launch, expanding to 13 states by 1975 and generating $2.5 billion in sales by 1980, primarily funding education and infrastructure. Internationally, regulatory reforms mirrored U.S. trends, as the United Kingdom's 1960 Betting and Gaming Act licensed over 13,000 betting shops by 1965, formalizing off-course wagering and boosting industry participation. In , Japan's parlors, legalized in the but expanding post-war, reached peak revenues of ¥30 trillion (about $250 billion) in the , functioning as gambling hubs despite technical lotteries. These developments drove global gross gaming yield from roughly $200 billion in the early to over $400 billion by 2000, fueled by jurisdictional liberalization and tourism integration, though expansion often prioritized revenue over mitigating associated social costs like prevalence rates estimated at 1-2% among participants.

Contemporary Legalization and Digital Shift

In May 2018, the U.S. ruled in Murphy v. to strike down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992, which had restricted to a few states, thereby permitting individual states to authorize and regulate such wagering. This decision catalyzed a rapid expansion, with the number of states featuring operational sportsbooks rising from one in 2017 to 38 by 2024, alongside total sports wagers escalating from $4.9 billion in 2017 to substantially higher volumes amid widespread state-level approvals. States such as , , and subsequently legalized online casinos and , contributing to explosive growth in digital formats. Globally, legalization trends have mirrored this momentum, driven by revenue potential and technological accessibility, though varying by jurisdiction. In , regulated online markets in the and have expanded, while emerging economies like advanced sports betting frameworks post-2018, with full implementation accelerating by 2024. has seen selective openings, such as Japan's integrated resort developments incorporating casinos, approved in 2018 and progressing toward operational phases in the mid-2020s. These shifts often prioritize taxation and consumer protections, yet critics from perspectives highlight insufficient safeguards against risks in nascent markets. The digital shift has transformed gambling from land-based venues to pervasive online and mobile platforms, amplified by legalization. The global online gambling market reached an estimated $78.66 billion in 2024, with projections for a compound annual growth rate of 11% through 2030, fueled by smartphone penetration and live betting features. Approximately 80% of online participants access services via mobile devices, enabling real-time wagering on events like sports matches. Innovations such as app-based interfaces and data-driven personalization have lowered barriers, though regulatory fragmentation persists, with bodies like the U.K. Gambling Commission enforcing stricter digital oversight compared to less mature frameworks elsewhere. By 2025, total global gambling revenue, including digital segments, is forecasted to exceed $449 billion, underscoring the sector's pivot toward technology-enabled scalability. This evolution has integrated gambling into everyday digital ecosystems, with alone generating $10 billion in U.S. revenue through the third quarter of 2025, up 19% year-over-year, reflecting sustained post-legalization demand.

Forms and Mechanisms

Traditional Chance-Based Games

Traditional chance-based games constitute a core subset of gambling activities where outcomes rely almost entirely on random processes, such as the roll of , spin of a , or random draw, with player decisions exerting minimal to no influence on probabilities. These games emphasize the intrinsic of physical randomizers, distinguishing them from skill-influenced variants like poker. Historical spans ancient societies, where and rudimentary lotteries served ritualistic or recreational purposes, evolving into standardized casino offerings by the . Dice games, among the earliest forms, utilize polyhedral objects to generate unpredictable results, with craps exemplifying a modern iteration derived from the English game hazard. In craps, players wager on the sum of two six-sided dice rolls, where a "pass line" bet wins on an initial 7 or 11, loses on 2, 3, or 12, and establishes a point for subsequent rolls requiring the point to repeat before a 7. This structure, formalized in the United States by the mid-19th century from immigrant adaptations of hazard around 1818, maintains a house edge of approximately 1.41% on pass line bets due to the fixed probabilities of 36 possible outcomes. Ancient dice, traceable to prehistoric bone or stone implements used in rituals, underscore the game's enduring appeal rooted in verifiable randomness over millennia. Roulette exemplifies wheel-based chance games, featuring a rotating with numbered pockets and a ball that settles randomly, determining winning bets on numbers, colors, or parity. Originating in 18th-century from amalgamations of earlier wheels like and , the single-zero European variant was refined in 1842 by François and to reduce the house edge to 2.7% by eliminating the double-zero present in American versions (5.26% edge). No strategic input alters outcomes, as the wheel's physics—independent spins and uniform pocket distribution—ensure each result's independence, with red/black or odd/even bets offering near 48.65% win probability in European . Card-based chance games like , particularly the punto banco variant dominant in casinos, minimize by automating drawing rules: players bet on "player" or "banker" hands totaling closest to 9 (tens and face cards count as zero), with third cards drawn per fixed tableaux without choice. This yields a banker bet house edge of 1.06%, player at 1.24%, reflecting combinatorial probabilities from an eight-deck , where ties (9.5% occurrence) offer higher payouts but 14.36% edge. Originating in 19th-century as a simplification of earlier banking games, baccarat's appeal lies in its near-coin-flip dynamics devoid of decision-making. Lotteries represent draw-based chance mechanisms, where participants purchase tickets for selection matching pre-drawn results, often with exceeding 1 in millions for jackpots. Traditional state-run lotteries, funding since ancient draws in circa 200 BCE for fortifications, persist with minimal skill, as evidenced by fixed prize structures and independent draws verifiable via audited generators or mechanical balls. In modern iterations like , launched in 1992, the house edge approaches 50% through unclaimed prizes and operational costs, prioritizing volume over individual win rates.

Betting on Uncertain Events

Betting on uncertain events constitutes a primary form of gambling where participants wager on the outcomes of future occurrences whose results cannot be predetermined with certainty, such as athletic competitions, , or political contests. Unlike fixed-probability , these bets hinge on real-world unpredictability influenced by factors like participant performance, weather, or unforeseen incidents. The global segment, encompassing much of this activity, reached an estimated USD 100.9 billion in revenue in 2024. Operators, often termed bookmakers, assess probabilities using statistical models, historical data, and expert analysis to establish that incorporate a margin ensuring profitability regardless of the event's resolution. Common mechanisms include , where the quotes predetermined payouts at the time of wager acceptance, shielding bettors from post-bet odds fluctuations driven by public sentiment. This system prevails in sports like soccer and , allowing straightforward win, loss, or draw predictions. In contrast, aggregates all wagers into a communal pool, deducts a track or operator take—typically 15-25%—and redistributes the remainder to winning ticket holders based on the proportion bet on victorious outcomes. Predominant in and , parimutuel odds finalize only after betting closes, reflecting collective bettor convictions rather than impositions. Betting exchanges introduce a dynamic, enabling users to both back (bet for an outcome) and lay (bet against it) selections against fellow participants, with the platform claiming a commission on net winnings—often 2-5%. This format, exemplified by platforms like since its 2000 launch, can yield superior compared to traditional bookmakers by eliminating the fixed margin, though it demands greater and strategic acumen. Exchanges foster efficiency through competitive pricing but expose users to risks like unmatched bets or rapid price swings. Political and novelty events, such as elections, increasingly utilize fixed- or exchange models, though volumes remain dwarfed by sports. Across all variants, the inherent operator commission or "vig" ensures that aggregate payouts fall short of total stakes, rendering sustained profitability elusive for most bettors absent informational edges.

Skill-Element Games and Variants

Skill-element games in gambling incorporate player decisions, strategic , and probabilistic assessment that can meaningfully influence outcomes, contrasting with pure chance games like where results are independent of player input. Empirical analyses distinguish these by measuring variance attributable to versus ; for instance, games where repeated play by skilled participants yields persistent positive returns indicate skill dominance. In poker, long-term profitability correlates with strategic proficiency, as evidenced by studies of online play showing skilled players achieving returns on investment (ROI) of up to 30% while unskilled ones incur losses of 15%. Similarly, allows basic strategy—optimal play charts derived from simulations—to reduce the house edge to approximately 0.5%, with advanced techniques enabling players to gain a 1-2% advantage by tracking high-value cards remaining in the deck. Poker variants, such as Texas Hold'em and Omaha, emphasize bluffing, opponent modeling, and hand equity calculations, where skill manifests in bankroll management and positional awareness; quasi-experimental studies confirm that trained players outperform novices over multiple sessions, supporting classifications of poker as skill-predominant despite short-term luck variance. Blackjack's skill element extends to variants like , where altered rules reward adjusted strategies, though casinos mitigate advantages through multi-deck shoes and countermeasures like shuffling. Sports betting on events like involves —analyzing form, track conditions, and odds discrepancies—which skilled bettors exploit for edges, as motivational research links perceived skill to sustained involvement over luck-based pursuits. Modern variants blend traditional skill games with digital interfaces, such as platforms enabling data-driven analysis via hand histories and AI-assisted reviews, or hybrid slot machines incorporating arcade mechanics like galleries where player accuracy affects payouts. These aim to attract demographics favoring esports-like engagement, with examples including video game-inspired titles that reward timing and precision amid randomized elements. Games like , involving tile management and defensive play, further exemplify integration, as strategic depth allows proficient players to control scoring probabilities in competitive settings. However, regulatory scrutiny persists, with some jurisdictions deeming even skill-heavy games as gambling if chance exceeds a threshold, underscoring debates over dominance metrics.

Digital and Novel Formats

Digital gambling encompasses internet-based platforms offering , , and poker, which emerged in the mid-1990s following the development of secure software and regulatory licensing. The first online casino software was created by in 1994, coinciding with and Barbuda's passage of the and Processing Zone Act, which enabled offshore licensing for digital operators. By 1996, the first online sportsbook, Intertops, began accepting bets, marking the shift from physical to remote wagering. These formats replicate traditional games using random number generators (RNGs) for fairness, though operators maintain house edges through algorithmic advantages, typically 1-5% for slots and lower for . The global market reached approximately USD 78.7 billion in revenue in , driven by increased penetration and access, with projections to exceed USD 150 billion by 2030 at a (CAGR) of 11.9%. Mobile applications now dominate, capturing 54.2% of revenue share in due to app-based accessibility and features like live dealer streaming via video feeds. In the United States, apps alone generated USD 13.7 billion in , reflecting legalization expansions post-2018 Supreme Court ruling on PASPA. Platforms employ geofencing and identity verification to comply with jurisdictional restrictions, yet proliferation raises concerns over underage access and , with studies linking digital formats to higher rates than land-based due to constant availability. Novel formats extend beyond traditional simulations, incorporating emerging technologies and hybrid mechanics. betting, wagering on competitive video gaming events like tournaments, generated USD 2.5 billion globally in 2024, projected to reach USD 2.8 billion in 2025 amid viewer growth to billions of hours annually. Bets cover match outcomes, player kills, or in-game stats, often with lower house edges (around 4-6%) than , though outcomes depend on verifiable event data from organizers. Cryptocurrency-integrated platforms, accepting and , account for about 30% of online wagers in 2025, appealing for pseudonymity and faster transactions but exposing users to volatility and regulatory scrutiny in jurisdictions viewing them as unlicensed money transmission. Loot boxes in video games, purchasable randomized virtual item containers, have sparked debate over their gambling-like nature, involving chance-based rewards of tradeable value. Belgium's Gaming Commission classified certain loot boxes as illegal gambling in 2018, banning them in games like FIFA and Counter-Strike for real-money purchases yielding uncertain outcomes. The United Kingdom's Gambling Commission maintains they fall outside the Gambling Act 2005, lacking real-world monetary prizes, though empirical research associates them with problem gambling behaviors in youth due to Skinner-box reinforcement. Other innovations include daily fantasy sports (DFS), where users draft virtual teams for real-money contests based on athlete performance, legalized distinctly in the U.S. as skill-dominant despite probabilistic elements, generating billions in entry fees annually. These formats challenge distinctions between gaming and gambling, prompting calls for RNG transparency and age-gated mechanics to mitigate harms without stifling innovation.

Mathematical and Strategic Elements

Core Probabilistic Concepts

Probability in gambling refers to the mathematical measure of the likelihood of specific outcomes in games of chance, expressed as a value between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates impossibility and 1 certainty. For instance, in a six-sided die roll, the probability of landing on any single number is 1/6, approximately 0.1667. Games like or slot machines rely on such discrete probabilities, often derived from the number of favorable outcomes divided by total possible outcomes, assuming randomness and of trials. A foundational concept is , which calculates the long-term average outcome per unit bet, weighted by the probabilities and payoffs of each possible result: EV = Σ (probability_i × payoff_i). In casino games, EV is typically negative for players due to the house edge, ensuring the operator's profitability over volume; for example, American roulette's single-zero bet yields an EV of -5.26% per dollar wagered, meaning a $1 bet expects a loss of 5.26 cents on average. The house edge itself is quantified as the negative of the game's EV expressed as a percentage of the bet amount, arising from payout structures that pay less than the true odds—for instance, even-money bets in or often carry edges of 0.5% to 1.4% with optimal play. The dictates that as the number of independent trials increases, the average outcome converges to the EV, explaining why casinos profit from high-volume play despite short-term variance. This convergence holds under the assumption of identically distributed, independent events, as in repeated coin flips or card draws from a shuffled deck, where empirical frequencies approach theoretical probabilities only after thousands of trials. Contrasting this, variance measures the dispersion of outcomes around the EV, quantifying short-term fluctuations; high-variance games like slots exhibit large swings, where standard deviation can exceed 10 times the bet size per spin, allowing rare big wins but amplifying ruin risk in finite sessions. Independence of trials is critical, meaning past outcomes do not influence future ones in properly random games, as governed by the law of independent trials—e.g., a wheel's prior spins do not alter subsequent probabilities if unbiased. Violations of perceived lead to the gambler's fallacy, the erroneous belief that deviations from EV in small samples will self-correct, such as betting against a streak in independent events like coin tosses, which actually maintains the same probability per trial. This fallacy ignores that while the ensures overall convergence, individual sequences remain unpredictable, with no causal mechanism for "due" corrections in truly random processes.

Betting Systems and Their Limitations

Betting systems encompass a range of strategies designed to structure wagers in games of chance, purportedly to mitigate losses or capitalize on streaks, but demonstrates they preserve the negative inherent to . These systems typically involve progressive betting schemes that adjust stake sizes based on prior outcomes, assuming independence of trials does not alter per-bet probabilities. However, since each bet in house-banked games carries a fixed house edge—such as 5.26% in American —the overall expectation remains a loss proportional to total action risked, regardless of sequencing. The Martingale system exemplifies this, instructing players to double their bet after each loss on even-money propositions, aiming to recoup all deficits plus an initial unit profit on the first win. In practice, for , the probability of eventual success in a sequence is high short-term (e.g., over 12 steps, exceeding 99% in fair odds but reduced by the house edge), yet the per cycle is negative: for a unit start, it equals the house edge times the sum of bets in the cycle, yielding losses like -0.0526 units on average before a win in simplified models. Simulations and formulas confirm that while variance spikes—requiring exponential bankrolls—the drives long-run results toward the game's edge, with no dent in the casino's advantage. Other progressive systems fare similarly. The D'Alembert adjusts bets by fixed increments after losses and decrements after wins, while the follows the sequence (1,1,2,3,5...) for escalation; both assume mild progressions suffice but ignore that unresolved losing streaks compound exposure without shifting , leading to equivalent expected shortfalls. Paroli, a positive progression doubling after wins, exploits streaks but collapses on downturns, as wins occur below 50% in edged games like (house edge ~0.5% with basic strategy). Across these, ensures past results provide no predictive edge, debunking pattern-based claims as . Practical constraints exacerbate theoretical flaws: casino table limits (e.g., $5 minimum to $5,000 maximum) halt Martingale doublings after 9-12 losses, stranding players with unrecoverable sums exceeding 512 times the base bet, while finite bankrolls invoke theorems, where probability of eventual bankruptcy approaches 1 for players with less capital than the house. Empirical simulations over millions of trials affirm no system yields positive returns, with nearing certainty absent infinite funds. Even in skill-influenced games, systems overlaying bet sizing fail against variance, as edge exploitation requires probabilistic mastery beyond progression alone.

Analysis of House Advantages Across Games

The house edge quantifies the gambling operator's built-in mathematical advantage, expressed as the expected percentage loss per unit wagered over infinite trials, ensuring sustained profitability. It arises from discrepancies between true and payouts, compounded by rules like commissions or zeros on wheels. In pure chance games, the edge remains fixed; in those with skill elements, players can approach but rarely eliminate it through optimal play. Casino table games generally offer lower edges than machines or lotteries, rewarding strategic play. , under standard multi-deck rules with dealer standing on soft 17 and basic , yields a house edge of about 0.5%, dropping to 0.28% in single-deck variants with liberal rules like double after split allowed. pass line bets carry a 1.41% edge, reducible toward zero with maximum wagers at true payout. Baccarat's banker bet, after 5% commission, holds a 1.06% edge, the lowest among common table options due to the banker's positional advantage in drawing rules. Roulette edges depend on wheel type: 5.26% for American double-zero, versus 2.70% for European single-zero, highlighting how extra pockets inflate the disadvantage without altering even-money payouts. Slot machines exhibit wider variance, typically 2% to 15%, with U.S. casinos averaging 5-10% based on regulated return-to-player settings, where high volatility sustains player engagement despite poor odds. variants like full-pay Jacks or Better can achieve 0.46% with perfect strategy, but suboptimal machines exceed 5%. Beyond casinos, embeds in lines, creating a 4.55% hold for balanced -110 odds on both sides, as the implied probabilities sum over 100% (104.55% total). Lotteries impose the highest edges, often 40-60%, with games returning about 50% of sales in prizes after administrative costs and rollovers, rendering expected returns far inferior to table games. In poker rooms, the house extracts rake (5-10% of pots, capped), indirectly eroding player equity rather than via direct , though dominates outcomes.
Game/Bet TypeTypical House EdgeKey Factors Influencing Edge
(basic strategy)0.28-0.5%Rules (decks, dealer hits/stands), player strategy
(pass line + )1.41% (base; approaches 0% with high )Odds multiples allowed
(banker)1.06%Commission on wins
(European)2.70%Single zero vs. double
(-110 vig)4.55%Line balance, market efficiency
Slots5-10% (average)RTP programming, volatility
40-60%Prize allocation, ticket volume
These disparities explain revenue patterns: low-edge games like comprise smaller bet volumes but higher hold per player-hour, while slots and lotteries dominate gross intake through accessibility and frequent play, despite inferior value.

Regulatory Frameworks

Gambling regulations vary extensively by jurisdiction, often reflecting cultural, religious, and economic priorities, with outright bans in approximately 20-30 countries primarily driven by Islamic prohibitions against games of chance, while most nations permit regulated forms such as lotteries, , or . Complete prohibitions exist in , where law deems all gambling haram (forbidden), punishable by fines, imprisonment, or corporal penalties under the country's penal code. Similar absolute bans apply in , enforced via the Syariah Penal Code since 2014, extending to online activities; , with state-enforced total restrictions and harsh penalties including labor camps; and , where participation violates Islamic principles and incurs up to two years' imprisonment. In , China's mainland bans casinos and most betting under the 1949 , confining legal outlets to state-run lotteries and Macau's licensed resorts, which generated HK$183 billion in gross gaming revenue in 2023; regulates at the state level, with bans in and but legalization in and . permits pachinko parlors and but restricted private casinos until 2018 reforms allowing three integrated resorts by 2029, with entry fees and capacity limits to curb . Europe largely favors regulated markets, with the United Kingdom's Gambling Act 2005 enabling licensed operators for land-based and under the UK Gambling Commission, which issued 128 active remote licenses as of 2024; implemented the Interstate Treaty on Gambling in 2021, legalizing online slots and with a 5.3% gross gaming revenue tax. like liberalized in 2019, ending Veikkaus's monopoly, while retains state control via but permits offshore online access. In the Americas, the delegates authority to states, with Nevada's casinos operational since 1931 and 38 states plus Washington, D.C., authorizing post-2018 ruling overturning PASPA, alongside online expansions in 25 states by mid-2025; fully legalized and online casinos effective January 1, 2025, under Federal Law 14.790/2023, requiring operator licensing and a 12% on . permits provincially regulated casinos and lotteries, with online platforms like Ontario's iGaming market launching in 2022. Latin American nations such as allow licensed casinos under the 1947 Federal Law, while varies by province. Africa and Oceania show mixed approaches: South Africa legalized casinos via the 1996 National Gambling Act, operating 36 licensed venues; Australia regulates under state laws with a national interactive gambling ban since 2001, but permits sports betting and pokies generating AUD 24 billion annually. Enforcement often targets illicit operations, with international treaties like the UN Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime aiding cross-border restrictions on money laundering tied to underground gambling. Online gambling faces additional hurdles, such as the U.S. UIGEA of 2006 prohibiting financial transactions for unlawful internet gambling, though enforcement focuses on operators rather than players.
JurisdictionForms PermittedKey Restrictions
Casinos, , online slots, lotteriesAge 18+, mandates, point-of-consumption tax
(varies by state)Casinos (e.g., ), (38 states), tribal gamingFederal bans on interstate transport (Wire Act), online limited to states like NJ, PA
(mainland)State lotteries onlyCasinos banned except ; online prohibited
NoneTotal ban under , fines up to SAR 100,000

Economic and Fiscal Policies

Governments worldwide implement fiscal policies on gambling primarily to generate through taxation and licensing fees, often treating legalized gambling as a voluntary tax on . These policies typically impose taxes on gross gaming (GGR)—the difference between wagers placed and winnings paid out—rather than net profits, ensuring steady inflows regardless of operator profitability. For instance, point-of-consumption taxes, levied based on where bets are placed, are common in to capture from cross-border , with rates varying widely to balance maximization and market competitiveness. In the United States, state-level policies dominate, with gambling taxes contributing approximately $35 billion to state and local budgets in 2021, equivalent to about 1% of total own-source , primarily from lotteries, casinos, and . Tax rates on gambling operators differ significantly by and game type, reflecting goals of generation versus economic incentives for industry growth. Germany applies one of the highest rates at 90% on casino GGR, while Malta's effective rate is as low as 5% through tax credits to attract operators. In the UK, betting and gaming duties yielded £3.4 billion in fiscal year 2023/2024, taxed at rates up to 21% on remote gaming. states collected over $1.8 billion from taxes in fiscal year 2023, with rates ranging from 6.75% in to 51% in on adjusted GGR, often adjusted to encourage market entry post-2018 legalization. Empirical analyses suggest optimal GGR tax rates of 15-20% maximize under high market channelization, beyond which operators may shift offshore or reduce activity. Policies on taxing player winnings vary, with many countries exempting small wins to encourage participation while taxing larger amounts as . In the , federal taxes apply to winnings exceeding $5,000 at 24% withholding for non-casual gamblers, though states like impose no tax on winnings to bolster tourism-driven economies. European nations such as apply progressive rates up to 40% on winnings, while others like the exempt most gambling prizes. Legalization expansions, such as , have boosted short-term budgets—e.g., $90.8 million in in its first year—but studies indicate revenues plateau as novelty fades, providing limited long-term fiscal stability compared to traditional taxes. Policymakers increasingly incorporate fiscal safeguards, such as earmarking revenues for programs, though evidence shows taxation alone inadequately mitigates broader social costs like increased irresponsible betting among low-income groups.

Enforcement Against Illicit Activities

Law enforcement agencies worldwide target illicit gambling activities, including underground operations, illegal online platforms, match-fixing schemes, and through unregulated betting, to protect public integrity, recover assets, and disrupt networks. In the United States, federal authorities such as the FBI and Department of Justice enforce statutes like the Unlawful Gambling Act (UIGEA) and the Illegal Gambling Act, focusing on interstate and offshore operators that evade state regulations. A of 46 state attorneys general urged the DOJ in August 2025 to intensify actions against a $400 billion illegal offshore gambling industry, requesting injunctive relief to block access to unlawful sites and enhanced prosecutions. Major crackdowns often involve multi-agency operations yielding significant arrests and seizures. In October 2025, a federal probe dubbed Operation Royal Flush unsealed indictments against 31 suspects across 11 states for mafia-linked and underground poker rigging, including NBA figures like guard and coach , charged with conspiracy to fix high-stakes games in cities such as and . Earlier in 2025, U.S. authorities in states like and raided illegal gambling sites, shutting down operations that threatened regulated markets and tax revenues. Internationally, INTERPOL coordinates operations against cross-border illicit gambling, emphasizing cooperation among national police forces. Operation SOGA X, conducted from June to July 2024 across 28 countries, resulted in 5,100 arrests related to illegal football betting, the disruption of thousands of scam websites, and seizures targeting organized networks. Cumulatively, INTERPOL's eight SOGA operations through 2021 had led to over 19,100 arrests and more than $63 million in cash seizures, with ongoing efforts in 2025 recovering $439 million in a global financial crime sweep that included cyber-enabled gambling fraud. In Europe, Eurojust supported a October 2025 bust of an illegal online casino ring generating nearly €1 billion in sales, charging two suspects in France who were remanded in custody. Regional actions highlight persistent challenges with unregulated digital platforms and physical dens. In , INTERPOL's 2025 investigations into Philippine offshore gaming operators (POGOs) exposed links to illicit money flows funding other crimes like . Turkey's security forces executed 1,120 operations against online illegal gambling by October 2025, while arrested 328 individuals in a September 2025 nationwide sweep on underground dens. Proposals for enhanced global coordination, such as the Dutch Gambling Authority's 2025 call for a dedicated "Interpol of Gambling" to facilitate on illegal operators, underscore the need for unified enforcement amid jurisdictional hurdles.

Economic Dimensions

Revenue Generation and Industry Scale

The global gambling industry generated $536 billion in gross gaming revenue (GGR) in 2023, encompassing lotteries, casinos, , bingo, and other wagering forms, as estimated by H2 Gambling Capital, a leading sector consultancy. This revenue stems from operators retaining a portion of total wagers after payouts, sustained by inherent probabilistic advantages in games and betting odds that favor the house over extended play. Projections indicate 7% growth in 2024, driven by digital expansion and market liberalization in regions like the and parts of , though actual outcomes depend on regulatory enforcement and economic conditions. In the United States, commercial gaming operators reported $66.5 billion in GGR for 2023, a record surpassing prior years, according to the American Gaming Association's analysis of state-level data from 492 casinos and racinos. This broke down to $49.4 billion from slots and table games, $10.9 billion from sportsbooks, and $6.2 billion from iGaming, reflecting post-pandemic recovery and the 2018 Supreme Court decision enabling statewide sports betting. By 2024, U.S. GGR rose to $72 billion, with sports wagering handle exceeding $150 billion amid 38 operational states. Online gambling, a fast-growing subset, accounted for over $80 billion globally in 2024, per Statista's aggregation of operator and regulatory reports, up from $78.7 billion estimated for the prior year by Grand View Research. This segment's scale includes millions of active users via mobile apps and platforms, generating revenue through similar house edges adapted to virtual formats like slots (typically 4-15% edge) and poker rake fees. Asia-Pacific markets contributed prominently, with the region's online casino revenue reaching $3.9 billion in 2024 and Macau's land-based GGR recovering to pre-COVID levels of over $30 billion in 2023.
Region/Segment2023 GGR (USD Billion)Key Drivers
Global Total536Digital migration, regulatory openings
U.S. Commercial66.5 expansion, recovery
Global Online~70-80 (est. for year-end)Mobile access, live dealer tech
Casinos (e.g., )>30 ( alone)Tourist rebound from
Lotteries represent another major revenue stream, often state-operated, with global sales exceeding $300 billion annually as of recent European and North American data, though precise 2023 figures vary by due to differing reporting standards. Overall industry scale supports thousands of venues worldwide, from 1,000+ U.S. tribal and commercial casinos to Asia's mega-resorts, underscoring gambling's role as a multi-trillion-dollar economic activity when including ancillary spending.

Employment, Tourism, and Broader Contributions

The gambling industry employs over 2 million people worldwide in operations alone, encompassing roles in gaming, , , and administration. In the United States, commercial and tribal gaming supported approximately 1.8 million jobs in 2023, generating $104 billion in wages and benefits. Macau's gaming sector, a key global hub, employed 52,971 full-time workers by the end of 2024, reflecting a 2.3% year-on-year increase driven by post-pandemic recovery. Gambling significantly boosts in specialized destinations. , , derived $87.7 billion in total economic output from visitor spending in 2024, including direct, indirect, and induced effects, despite a dip in visitor numbers to 25.8 million through . welcomed over 34.9 million tourists in 2024, with casinos serving as the primary attraction and catalyst for inbound travel. These inflows support ancillary sectors like hotels, restaurants, and entertainment, amplifying local economic multipliers. Broader contributions include substantial tax revenues and GDP impacts. U.S. commercial gaming generated $15.91 billion in state and local taxes in from $72.04 billion in revenue. Nationally, the industry contributed $328.6 billion to economic activity in 2023, equivalent to about 0.45% of U.S. GDP, funding public services and infrastructure without direct burden. Globally, the sector's $305.8 billion market size as of April underscores its role in fostering , though benefits vary by regulatory efficiency and market maturity.

Quantified Costs and Net Assessments

Problem gambling affects approximately 1.3% of adults globally, with past-year prevalence rates for pathological gambling ranging from 0.5% to 8.6% across studies, and higher rates among young adults. In the United States, around 5 million adults meet criteria for compulsive gambling, while 8% report at least one indicator of problematic behavior occurring many times in the past year. Globally, the estimates that 11.9% of men and 5.5% of women experience some level of harm from gambling. Financial costs to individuals include substantial losses and accumulation, with problem gamblers facing rates of 5% to 22%. Aggregate consumer net losses worldwide are projected to reach $700 billion annually by 2028, representing direct transfers from participants to the industry. estimates per harmed adult vary widely, from 16 to 36,144 international dollars, depending on methodologies that account for losses, healthcare utilization, and impacts. In , gambling-related harms impose economic and social burdens estimated at £1.05 to £1.77 billion annually, likely an underestimate due to unquantified intangible harms like emotional distress. Health-related costs are severe, with 17% to 39% of problem gamblers experiencing suicidality, and past-year rates among them reaching 4.7% compared to 0.6% in non-gamblers. Gambling disorder independently elevates all-cause mortality risk and is linked to increased , mental illness, and . Crime statistics associate proximity to gambling venues with rises in , , and auto accidents, though is debated amid urban factors. Net assessments reveal mixed outcomes, with generating jobs, revenues, and in host regions—often modestly positive in economic terms for urban or monopoly settings—but social costs frequently offsetting these gains. Empirical studies indicate per capita income increases in urban areas with but declines in rural ones, alongside broader negative effects on and near venues. Balanced analyses, incorporating externalities like and suicidality, suggest that while industry revenues benefit governments and operators, the overall societal net impact tilts negative when harms to vulnerable subgroups are fully quantified, as voluntary participation assumptions fail under dynamics.

Behavioral and Psychological Dynamics

Cognitive Biases Influencing Decisions

Cognitive biases in gambling refer to systematic errors in thinking that lead individuals to overestimate probabilities of success or misjudge risks in games of chance, often resulting in continued participation despite long-term losses. These distortions arise from heuristics—mental shortcuts—that deviate from probabilistic reasoning, as evidenced in experimental and field studies of decision-making under uncertainty. For instance, a review of gambling psychology identifies key biases including the illusion of control, representativeness heuristic, and availability heuristic, which are amplified by game structures that mimic skill-based activities. Such biases contribute to the persistence of gambling behavior, as players interpret random outcomes through erroneous causal lenses rather than objective odds. The manifests as the erroneous belief that independent random events will balance out, prompting bets against recent streaks; for example, after a sequence of red outcomes on a wheel, players anticipate black due to perceived "due" compensation. from casino data shows this bias in action, with betting patterns shifting toward the opposite of recent results in rapid play, contradicting true of spins. Similarly, analysis of pari-mutuel betting reveals reduced wagering on favorites following their prior wins, as bettors fallaciously expect reversion to the mean. This fallacy is particularly prevalent among problem gamblers, who verbalize it during play, sustaining engagement by fostering misplaced confidence in impending corrections. Illusion of control involves overestimating personal influence over chance-determined outcomes, such as through ritualistic actions like selecting numbers or vigorous dice throws, which foster a skill-like in pure chance scenarios. Langer's seminal 1975 experiments demonstrated that factors like involvement and familiarity inflate perceived controllability, with participants rating their chances higher when allowed input despite . Recent studies confirm its role in disordered gambling, where higher correlates with pathological severity and predicts continued betting after losses, as individuals attribute near-wins to their actions. In dice-rolling tasks, active participation—versus passive observation—heightens this bias, leading to riskier subsequent decisions. The near-miss effect occurs when outcomes just short of a win, such as two matching symbols on a reel, are subjectively encoded as progress rather than losses, motivating extended play. Laboratory manipulations show near-misses elicit physiological akin to wins, with brain imaging revealing dopaminergic responses that reinforce persistence; for instance, studies indicate heightened feedback-related negativity for near-misses, interpreting them as motivational signals. Field data from s programmed with varying near-miss frequencies demonstrate they prolong sessions by 30% compared to full misses, as players chase the "almost" success, a pattern replicated in online and VR gambling environments. This bias is structurally induced, with game designs optimizing near-miss rates to exploit it without altering house edges. Optimism bias in gamblers entails inflated estimates of personal winning probabilities, often sustained through selective recall of successes and discounting of losses. Research comparing optimists and pessimists finds the former hold stronger positive expectations pre-gambling and maintain them post-loss, increasing vulnerability to habit formation. Neuroeconomic models link this to altered probability representation in pathological cases, where excessive drives decisions favoring low-probability high-reward bets, as seen in of compulsive players. Optimists also exhibit heightened persistence after near-wins, amplifying risk-taking in sequential gambles.

Mechanisms of Compulsive Participation

Compulsive participation in gambling, classified as gambling disorder in the DSM-5, arises from neurobiological alterations in the brain's mesolimbic reward pathway, where dopamine signaling becomes dysregulated in response to uncertain and intermittent rewards. Pathological gamblers exhibit heightened dopamine release during reward anticipation, particularly under conditions of uncertainty, which amplifies the motivational drive to continue betting despite losses. This sensitivity to probabilistic outcomes, rather than actual wins, sustains engagement by creating persistent incentive salience for gambling cues, akin to mechanisms observed in substance use disorders. Behavioral mechanisms center on via variable-ratio reinforcement schedules inherent in most gambling forms, such as slot machines or lotteries, which deliver rewards unpredictably and promote high resistance to extinction. Empirical studies demonstrate that near-misses—outcomes perceived as close to winning—elicit stronger responses than full losses, fostering illusions of control and encouraging repeated play to "chase" perceived imminent success. Over time, tolerance develops as the desensitizes, necessitating escalated wagering for equivalent surges, which entrenches the cycle of compulsion. Psychological pathways include escape-oriented , where individuals with poor emotion regulation use gambling to alleviate distress, mediated by experiences and heightened . The Pathways Model posits distinct trajectories: behaviorally conditioned gamblers driven by , emotionally vulnerable subtypes seeking relief from negative affect, and antisocial-impulsivist paths involving deficient , all converging on compulsive persistence through cognitive distortions like overestimation of personal in chance-based games. Longitudinal data indicate these mechanisms interact with genetic vulnerabilities, such as polymorphisms in genes, increasing susceptibility to chronic engagement.

Empirical Prevalence and Risk Factors

Global estimates indicate that approximately 1.41% of adults engage in problematic gambling, with a range of 1.06–1.84% across studies, while 8.7% (6.6–11.3%) participate in any form of risk gambling.00126-9/fulltext) A meta-analysis of studies from 2016 to 2022 reported a prevalence of 1.29% for problem or pathological gambling and 2.43% for moderate-risk gambling among adults. These figures translate to tens of millions affected worldwide, with one systematic review estimating up to 54.7 million adults experiencing gambling disorder or problematic gambling. Prevalence varies by region and methodology; for instance, young adults show higher rates, with problem gambling prevalence ranging from 0.5% to 8.6% (mean 3.1%) across global studies, often elevated among males and those in lower socioeconomic groups. Participation in gambling is widespread, though exact global rates differ by definition and access. In high-availability jurisdictions like Australia, 78% of adults reported gambling in 2022, driven by lotteries, sports betting, and electronic gaming machines. Worldwide, the World Health Organization notes that 5.5% of women and 11.9% of men experience some gambling-related harm, reflecting broad exposure but disproportionate impact on males. Online gambling exacerbates prevalence, with 2.7–11.1% of online gamblers classified as problematic in representative adult studies.00126-9/fulltext) Key demographic risk factors for gambling disorder include male sex, which consistently correlates with higher and severity across epidemiological data. Lower , , and reduced also elevate risk, as do early-life exposures like poor academic . Young adults, particularly males, demonstrate heightened vulnerability due to developmental and increased online access, with evidence linking adolescent gambling to persistent adult disorders. Psychological and behavioral risk factors encompass , sensation-seeking traits, and deficits in emotion regulation, which predict escalation from recreational to compulsive gambling. Comorbidities such as substance use disorders (e.g., alcohol and ), anxiety, and depression amplify susceptibility, with shared neurobiological pathways involving reward processing and decision-making impairments. Environmental factors, including proximity to gambling venues and aggressive marketing, interact with individual traits; for example, low parental supervision in youth heightens initiation risk, while high can serve protectively through resource buffers. Peer influences, such as or athletic involvement, further correlate with elevated in young cohorts.
Risk Factor CategoryExamplesEvidence Strength
DemographicMale gender, young age, low SESStrong; consistent across meta-analyses and longitudinal studies
Psychological, poor emotion regulationModerate to strong; linked to and data
Behavioral/EnvironmentalSubstance use, low parental oversight, venue accessModerate; supported by cohort and ecological studies

Cultural and Ideological Views

Religious Prohibitions and Endorsements

Islam prohibits gambling explicitly, classifying it as haram (forbidden) due to its association with enmity, hatred, and distraction from remembrance of God. The Quran states in Surah Al-Ma'idah 5:90-91: "O believers! Intoxicants, gambling, idols, and drawing lots for decisions are all evil of Satan's handiwork. So shun them so you may be successful. Satan only wants to cause enmity and hatred between you through intoxicants and gambling, and to prevent you from remembering Allah and from prayer." Additionally, Surah Al-Baqarah 2:219 describes intoxicants and gambling as containing "great sin" alongside some benefit, but the sin outweighs it. This stance reflects concerns over gambling's zero-sum nature, where winners gain at losers' expense without productive value, fostering moral and social harms. In , no verse directly condemns gambling, but principles against , , and poor stewardship underpin widespread discouragement. Key passages include 1 Timothy 6:10—"For the is a root of all kinds of evil"—and Proverbs 28:20—"A faithful person will be richly blessed, but one eager to get rich will not go unpunished"—which critique pursuits prioritizing chance over diligence. The holds gambling not intrinsically evil but morally unacceptable when it deprives individuals or families of necessities or entails excessive risk. Protestant denominations vary: Methodists oppose even raffles, viewing all forms as promoting , while some evangelicals permit moderate participation absent . The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints rejects all gambling, including state lotteries, as contrary to . Judaism discourages habitual gambling, associating it with idleness and potential theft, though not absolutely forbidden for occasional play. The ( 24b) permits games of skill but bars professional gambling to avoid neglecting or work. Eastern religions generally advise against gambling without outright bans. links it to tamas (ignorance and inertia), promoting detachment from material gains, while Buddhism's precepts caution against intoxicants and pursuits causing suffering, with recommending avoidance due to attachment risks. Other faiths like Bahá'í, , and explicitly forbid it, emphasizing ethical earning. Endorsements remain rare across religions, with historical tolerance in some Christian contexts for moderate betting as testing providence, akin to biblical casting of lots for decisions rather than profit. Modern stances prioritize prohibitions, citing empirical links to and societal costs over any perceived divine favor in chance.

Philosophical and Ethical Debates

Philosophical debates on gambling center on the tension between individual autonomy and potential harms, with libertarian perspectives emphasizing personal liberty. Libertarians contend that rational adults should retain the right to assume voluntary risks, including financial losses from gambling, as long as no coercion or direct harm to non-consenting parties occurs, viewing state prohibitions as unjust paternalism that undermines self-ownership. This stance aligns with John Stuart Mill's harm principle, which permits interference only to prevent harm to others, not self-inflicted risks, though critics argue gambling's addictive nature erodes true voluntarism by impairing future autonomy. Utilitarian analyses assess gambling by aggregating pleasures—such as and occasional wins—against disutilities like widespread financial distress, breakdowns, and rates linked to pathological gambling, estimated at 1-2% in legalized markets with disproportionate impacts on low-income groups. Empirical data from jurisdictions like the U.S. post-2018 sports betting legalization reveal increased calls to helplines by 30-50% in some states, suggesting net societal costs often exceed revenues, as losses are zero-sum transfers rather than productive value creation. Proponents counter that regulated gambling generates through voluntary participation and fiscal benefits, but this overlooks regressive taxation effects where the poor subsidize public goods via disproportionate spending. From a standpoint, gambling conflicts with eudaimonic by fostering vices like imprudence and intemperance, as it prioritizes chance over rational effort and erodes character traits essential for the good life, akin to Aristotle's of excess in pursuits detached from productive . Practitioners risk habituating to irrational optimism and short-termism, undermining virtues of thrift and , with historical texts like those in analyses portraying gambling as intellectually corrosive to deliberate agency. Deontological critiques, drawing from Kantian imperatives, further deem it unethical for treating one's rational faculties as means to probabilistic ends, violating duties to act from universalizable maxims rather than hope-based speculation. These frameworks collectively highlight gambling's incompatibility with reasoned , though moderate, non-commercial forms may evade outright condemnation if aligned with personal cultivation.

Societal Shifts in Acceptance

In the , societal attitudes toward gambling shifted markedly from moral condemnation in the 18th and 19th centuries—driven by Protestant denominations like and Methodists viewing it as sinful—to pragmatic acceptance by the mid-20th century, as states legalized lotteries and to generate revenue amid fiscal pressures. Legal wagering revenues expanded from $3 billion in 1975 to $51 billion by 1997, reflecting broadened participation and reduced stigma, with gambling venues integrating into everyday social settings beyond dedicated sites. Gallup polls indicate moral acceptance peaked at 67% in 2015-2016, up from earlier lows, correlating with the proliferation of state-sponsored lotteries in 45 states by 2018 and commercial in 24 states. The 2018 Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, which struck down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), accelerated this trend by enabling legalization in over 38 states by 2025, with public support for state-level legalization hovering around 60% in recent surveys despite rising concerns over societal impacts. Participation data from the National Council on Problem Gambling's NGAGE surveys show past-year at 19% of adults by 2022, though attitudes have nuanced, with 43% viewing legalized as harmful to society in 2025 Pew polling—up from 34%—particularly among young men exposed to aggressive marketing. In , liberalization began in the with regulatory frameworks like the UK's 2005 Gambling Act, which normalized betting shops and platforms, leading to a market valued at over $30 billion by 2022 and widespread acceptance of sports and casino gambling as recreational activities. legalization since the mid-2000s has embedded gambling in digital culture, with global surveys in 2021-2022 revealing only 23% favoring outright bans on online forms, attributing shifts to perceived economic contributions and reduced perceptions of moral deviance. Globally, commercialization via sports sponsorships, media integration, and digitization—exemplified by the World Health Organization's 2024 note on rapid normalization—has eroded traditional prohibitions, even in culturally restrictive regions, though empirical data from systematic reviews show prevalence stable at 2-3% amid , suggesting acceptance often prioritizes availability over harm mitigation. Factors include fiscal incentives, with governments deriving billions in taxes, and cultural normalization through , outweighing ethical reservations in peer-reviewed analyses of attitude formation. Recent NGAGE data indicate sustained positive views on gambling's role in entertainment, tempered by awareness of risks, underscoring a causal link between policy-driven expansion and attitudinal adaptation rather than vice versa.

Key Controversies

Claims of Exploitation Versus Voluntary Risk

Critics of gambling contend that it constitutes exploitation because operators maintain a mathematical house edge, guaranteeing long-term net losses for participants across games such as slots (typically 2-15% edge) and (5.26% for double-zero variants). This structural advantage, combined with marketing that emphasizes wins over losses, is argued to prey on cognitive vulnerabilities and lead to disproportionate harms among susceptible individuals, with analyses estimating global consumer losses approaching $700 billion annually by 2028. Such claims are bolstered by evidence that problem gamblers contribute a significant share of industry , though exact proportions vary by and are debated due to self-reporting biases in surveys. In contrast, economists frame gambling as a voluntary transaction akin to or , where participants knowingly exchange for the of risk and potential reward, with the house edge functioning as the implicit . Empirical supports this view: studies indicate that problem or pathological gambling affects only 0.7% of U.S. adults, while the vast majority engage recreationally without severe harm, as evidenced by repeat participation rates exceeding 80% among non-problem gamblers in population surveys. Mechanisms like programs, utilized voluntarily by millions worldwide, further underscore participant agency, allowing informed opt-outs without coercion. The debate hinges on and : while disclosures of (e.g., return-to-player percentages) mitigate claims, experiments show that framing risks as house edges or volatility warnings can reduce betting volumes by informing choices, suggesting baseline participation remains largely voluntary but improvable through transparency. Claims of systemic exploitation often overlook comparable risks in unregulated activities like stock trading or extreme sports, where adults bear responsibility for outcomes; however, gambling's addictive potential, affecting 1-3% globally, warrants scrutiny of operator practices without negating the consensual nature for the 97-99% unaffected. Regulatory data from legalized markets, such as , reveal sustained voluntary engagement post-legalization, with no evidence of widespread .
AspectExploitation PerspectiveVoluntary Risk Perspective
Prevalence of HarmFocuses on 1-3% problem gamblers driving revenue; cites social costs like debt and mental health burdens.Emphasizes 97-99% recreational participation; low addiction rates indicate self-selected risk tolerance.
Economic ModelHouse edge as predatory profit from losses.House edge as fair price for thrill in mutual exchange.
Policy ImplicationCalls for restrictions to protect vulnerable.Advocates disclosure over bans, respecting adult autonomy.
Gambling activities, particularly illegal operations, have long served as a revenue source for groups, enabling funding for other illicit enterprises such as drug trafficking and human smuggling. The FBI estimates that Americans wager nearly $64 billion annually through illegal online sportsbooks and bookies, with proceeds often channeled by networks. Globally, illicit betting markets handle up to $1.7 trillion in wagers each year, according to a 2021 Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) report, providing a substantial financial base for criminal syndicates. Money laundering represents a primary mechanism linking gambling to crime, as and online platforms facilitate the integration of dirty money into legitimate economies. Criminals exploit high-volume cash transactions by purchasing chips with illicit funds, gambling minimally, and cashing out to obtain clean currency, a process documented in UNODC analyses of Southeast Asian where junkets and underground banking networks process billions. , illegal online gaming alone exceeds $400 billion in annual volume, per estimates cited by state attorneys general, evading taxes and regulatory oversight while enabling laundering. Recent enforcement actions underscore organized crime's infiltration of gambling. In October 2025, the FBI and federal prosecutors in charged 31 defendants, including members of La Cosa Nostra and other crime families, with rigging high-stakes underground poker games dating back to 2019, defrauding players of millions through sophisticated cheating schemes. The operation involved figures operating illegal poker dens across multiple states, blending traditional mob tactics with modern for game manipulation. Concurrently, arrests of NBA players like and highlighted insider betting schemes tied to these networks, illustrating how illegal gambling erodes integrity in . Corruption extends to regulatory and institutional levels, where gambling's profitability incentivizes and influence peddling. The FBI's Crime and Corruption in Sport and Gaming program targets such vulnerabilities, including contract fraud and game-fixing linked to illegal betting, which organized groups exploit to corrupt athletes, officials, and bookmakers. Historical precedents, such as early 20th-century U.S. gambling scandals involving political machines, demonstrate recurring patterns where efforts coincide with graft, though modern cases often involve offshore operators bypassing oversight. Illegal markets' lack of transparency fosters these risks, contrasting with regulated environments where monitoring has exposed schemes, as in the 2025 federal indictments revealing mafia evolution toward online and sports-related fraud.

Policy Debates on Legalization Outcomes

Legalization of , particularly and , has sparked debates over its net societal impacts, with proponents emphasizing fiscal gains and regulatory control, while critics highlight elevated risks of , financial distress, and ancillary harms. Empirical studies post-2018 U.S. decision striking down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) reveal that expansion generated over $1.8 billion in state tax revenue in 2023, alongside job creation in host regions. However, peer-reviewed analyses indicate these benefits often concentrate in less densely populated areas without nearby , with yielding modest positive economic effects through and retail growth, though leakage of expenditures to out-of-state operators diminishes local gains. Opponents argue that legalization amplifies social costs, as evidenced by longitudinal tracking of U.S. sports bettors showing heightened severity following policy changes, with online platforms driving a surge in help-seeking—far exceeding impacts from physical sportsbooks. In , disordered gambling rates rose after mobile legalization in late 2022, correlating with broader U.S. trends of irresponsible spending increasing 372% and overall gambling expenditure by 369% post-legalization. Financial repercussions include state-level declines in aggregate credit scores, elevated bankruptcies, and reduced household savings, disproportionately affecting young men and low-income households, where online gambling policies exacerbate irresponsible betting more than higher earners. Crime linkages remain contentious, with problem gambling statistically associated with 4.3- to 7-fold higher crime commission rates, including intimate partner violence spikes tied to sports betting legalization in states like Oregon. Casino-specific evidence is mixed and inconclusive, often hampered by methodological issues in attributing causality, though expansion correlates with hazardous gambling prevalence rises across the Americas. Quantifying net outcomes proves challenging, as social costs—encompassing healthcare, legal fees, and productivity losses—are difficult to aggregate precisely, with some analyses suggesting underestimation of private burdens like those borne by families of problem gamblers. While certain reports claim no significant problem gambling surge, countervailing peer-reviewed data from helpline calls and consumer behavior underscore legalization's role in broadening participation and harms, particularly via online channels that evade traditional safeguards. Policymakers weigh these against purported reductions in illegal gambling, though evidence for substantial substitution is limited, and global trends project up to $700 billion in annual gambler losses by 2030 amid lax . policies yield the highest tax-to-harm ratios but also amplify helpline demands, prompting calls for framing over revenue maximization, given disproportionate vulnerabilities among lower socioeconomic groups.

References

  1. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/gambling
  2. https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/gambling-disorder/what-is-gambling-disorder
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/gambling
  4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230627/
  5. https://www.gambling.net/history/
  6. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-019-7391-z
  7. https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/gambling/worldwide
  8. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667%2824%2900126-9/fulltext
  9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39269778/
  10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230628/
  11. https://oasis.library.unlv.edu/grrj/vol5/iss1/1/
  12. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/07/how-gambling-affects-the-brain
  13. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1495100/
  14. https://www.cfainstitute.org/insights/articles/investing-vs-gambling
  15. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/09/compare-investing-gambling.asp
  16. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1996.tb00304.x
  17. https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/principles-of-risk/9780134082578/xhtml/fileP800041001600000000000000002E785.xhtml
  18. https://www.higginbotham.com/blog/speculative-risk-insurance/
  19. https://math.info/Misc/House_Edge/
  20. https://math.montana.edu/shancock/courses/stat401/Expected_Value.pdf
  21. https://online.stat.psu.edu/stat414/lesson/8/8.1
  22. https://wizardofodds.com/gambling/house-edge/
  23. https://daily.jstor.org/the-ancient-origins-of-dice/
  24. https://runerollers.com/blogs/dnd-dice/when-were-dice-invented-exploring-the-ancient-origins-and-cultural-significance
  25. https://discoveringegypt.com/ancient-egyptian-game-senet/
  26. https://www.metmuseum.org/perspectives/ancient-egypt-board-games
  27. https://www.theworldofchinese.com/2023/05/dice-dominoes-and-deadly-games-of-chance-gambling-in-ancient-china/
  28. https://cas-sca.journals.uvic.ca/index.php/anthropologica/article/download/1435/1208/2341
  29. https://www.historyadventures.co/history-of-gambling-in-ancient-greece/
  30. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&context=glj
  31. https://www.history.com/articles/las-vegas-history-mobsters-gambling
  32. https://ideagist.com/history-evolution-involving-the-casino-games/
  33. https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/a-history-of-american-gaming-laws-31222
  34. https://www.healdsburgtribune.com/us-gambling-culture-history/
  35. https://web.uncg.edu/dcl/courses/vicecrime/m2/gambling%2520in%2520california.html
  36. https://www.americangaming.org/resources/commercial-gaming-revenue-tracker/
  37. https://www.delasport.com/history-of-sports-betting/
  38. https://www.statista.com/statistics/253416/global-gambling-market-gross-win/
  39. https://www.theindianalawyer.com/articles/how-a-2018-supreme-court-decision-paved-the-way-for-meteoric-growth-in-legal-sports-betting
  40. https://today.ucsd.edu/story/study-reveals-surge-in-gambling-addiction-following-legalization-of-sports-betting
  41. https://slotegrator.pro/analytical_articles/games-by-markets-slotegrators-analysis-of-player-demand/
  42. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250808103169/en/Casino-Gambling-Market-Analysis-and-Growth-Trends-Report-2025-2033-Legalization-Digital-Innovation-Mobile-Access-and-Rising-Global-Acceptance-as-Entertainment-Fueling-Expansion---ResearchAndMarkets.com
  43. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/faculty-research/policycast/legalized-gambling-exploding-globally-how-policy-can-limit
  44. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/online-gambling-market
  45. https://www.demandsage.com/online-gambling-statistics/
  46. https://www.newsobserver.com/entertainment/article309295185.html
  47. https://www.kcra.com/article/sports-betting-booming-business-nba-probe/69141586
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11317449/
  49. https://www.crapsdicecontrol.com/gambling_history.htm
  50. https://www.readybetgo.com/craps/history/craps-history-85.html
  51. https://www.crapsdicecontrol.com/craps_history.htm
  52. https://games.davenportz.com/craps/craps-basics.php
  53. https://www.vegas-aces.com/articles/a-deep-dive-into-roulettes-history/
  54. https://www.ancientgames.org/history-and-origins-of-roulette/
  55. https://wizardofodds.com/games/baccarat/basics/
  56. https://www.tachipalace.com/blog/baccarat-strategy-guide/
  57. https://govinfo.library.unt.edu/ngisc/research/lotteries.html
  58. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/sports-betting-market-report
  59. https://www.pinnacle.com/betting-resources/en/educational/the-nature-of-uncertainty-in-betting/dvt2yd87e3dz2j5h
  60. https://www.twinspires.com/betting-guides/what-is-pari-mutuel-betting/
  61. https://www.bettingusa.com/racing/pari-mutuel/
  62. https://www.bettingusa.com/sports/exchanges/
  63. https://www.888sport.com/blog/sport-betting-guide/types-of-bet/betting-exchange
  64. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014292120301045
  65. https://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Papers/WSOP2011.pdf
  66. https://graphics.stanford.edu/~billyc/class/vis_win0304/as2/
  67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233757178_Poker_Is_a_Skill
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258529805_Skill_versus_luck_A_motivational_analysis_of_gambling_involvement
  69. https://blog.mcluck.com/fun-facts/skill-based-casino-games/
  70. https://oasis.library.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1114&context=grrj
  71. https://opus.uleth.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/a5cc275a-79b4-4cfb-b0a2-d3606afe2e3d/content
  72. https://essentiallypop.com/epop/2024/09/a-brief-history-of-the-evolution-of-online-casinos/
  73. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/online-gambling-market
  74. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/sports-betting-app-market/
  75. https://www.statista.com/topics/9667/online-gambling-in-the-united-states/
  76. https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/esports/esports-betting/worldwide
  77. https://esportsinsider.com/esports-betting-statistics-2025
  78. https://www.platinumcryptoacademy.com/cryptocurrency-investment/the-crypto-gambling-boom-why-2025-is-the-year-to-bet-with-blockchain/
  79. https://playtoday.co/blog/crypto-casino-trends/
  80. https://www.kg-legal.eu/info/it-new-technologies-media-and-communication-technology-law/the-legal-status-of-loot-boxes-and-items-related-to-them/
  81. https://gofaizen-sherle.com/loot-boxes
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8064953/
  83. https://philosophy.hku.hk/think/stat/node1.php
  84. https://people.se.cmich.edu/marci1t/203/facing_the_odds.pdf
  85. https://oasis.library.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1630&context=gaming_institute
  86. https://www.bettingnews.com/casino-guides/expected-value/
  87. https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2022/18/shsconf_icprss2022_03038.pdf
  88. https://accendoreliability.com/the-law-of-large-numbers-and-the-gamblers-fallacy/
  89. https://ifa.com/articles/gambler_fallacy_misuse_large_numbers
  90. https://hannig.cloudapps.unc.edu/STOR054/handouts/Casino.pdf
  91. https://www.888casino.com/blog/casino-math
  92. https://wizardofodds.com/gambling/betting-systems/
  93. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333532235_A_Statistical_Analysis_of_the_Roulette_Martingale_System_Examples_Formulas_and_Simulations_with_R
  94. https://frontroomcasino.com/heres-why-roulette-betting-systems-cant-guarantee-long-term-profits-probability-laws
  95. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/110415/why-does-house-always-win-look-casino-profitability.asp
  96. https://casino.betmgm.ca/en/blog/casino-games/house-edge-popular-casino-games/
  97. https://www.vegasinsider.com/casinos/craps/odds/
  98. https://www.cachecreek.com/baccart-odds-probabilities
  99. https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/10/study-busts-popular-myth-that-gamblers-can-sense-differences-in-house-edge/
  100. https://www.casino.org/blog/sports-betting-house-edge/
  101. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/gamble/odds/house.html
  102. https://www.gambling.com/us/online-casinos/strategy/10-casino-games-with-the-lowest-house-edge-1550900
  103. https://www.softswiss.com/knowledge-base/house-edge-igaming-faq/
  104. https://slotegrator.pro/gambling-regulations-map/
  105. https://playtoday.co/blog/guides/countries-where-gambling-is-illegal/
  106. https://www.gamblingzone.com/ca/the-zone/casino/where-are-casinos-illegal/
  107. https://www.casinoreviews.net/blog/destinations/driving-forces-behind-the-worlds-strictest-anti-gambling-nations/
  108. https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/2025/01/gambling-laws-of-the-world
  109. https://iclg.com/practice-areas/gambling-laws-and-regulations
  110. https://evenbetgaming.com/blog/articles/from-black-markets-to-licensing-how-asia-is-redefining-online-gambling-regulation/
  111. https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/about-us/freedomofinformation/online-gambling-licence-restricted-countries
  112. https://oc24.ltd/gambling-regulation-around-the-world/
  113. https://data40.com/articles/global-gambling-and-igaming-regulations-a-complete-list-2024/
  114. https://igamingexpress.com/what-changed-in-gambling-regulation-globally-in-the-first-months-of-2025/
  115. https://www.gamblinglaws.org/
  116. https://www.mondaq.com/gaming/1649860/the-international-gambling-laws-regulations-review-20252026
  117. https://sumsub.com/blog/igaming-regulations-around-the-world/
  118. https://sigma.world/play/blog/gambling-taxes/
  119. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11699665/
  120. https://taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/how-do-taxes-lotteries-casinos-sports-betting-and-other-types-state-sanctioned
  121. https://www.taxback.com/blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-gambling-tax-rates-around-the-world/
  122. https://sumsub.com/blog/top-gambling-friendly-countries/
  123. https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/global-economic-impact-gambling-tax-080000183.html
  124. https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/state/sports-betting-tax-revenue/
  125. https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/state/online-sports-betting-taxes/
  126. https://www.igaming.com/igamingcare/global-gambling-taxes-impact-on-gdps/
  127. https://www.sportsgamblingpodcast.com/2024/06/06/the-highest-and-lowest-gambling-taxes-around-the-world/
  128. https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/mrbet-unveils-groundbreaking-analysis-of-european-gambling-tax-landscape-12c4b790
  129. https://donahue.umass.edu/news-events/institute-news/the-first-year-economic-impacts-of-legalized-sports-betting-in-massachusetts
  130. https://rockinst.org/issue-area/state-revenues-gambling-short-term-relief-long-term-disappointment/
  131. https://cdspress.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/JGI-Jun-23-REVIEW-037.R1_Gunay_Proof_FINAL.pdf
  132. https://today.ucsd.edu/story/legalized-gambling-increases-irresponsible-betting-behavior-especially-among-low-income-populations
  133. https://ago.mo.gov/attorney-general-bailey-calls-on-doj-to-crackdown-on-400-billion-illegal-offshore-gambling-industry/
  134. https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2025/10/24/arizona-gambling-history/
  135. https://www.cnn.com/sport/live-news/nba-fbi-sports-betting-probe-10-23-25
  136. https://igamingbusiness.com/casino/illegal-gambling-operations-connecticut-mississippi/
  137. https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2024/Web-of-crime-exposed-5-100-arrests-in-illegal-football-gambling-crackdown
  138. https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2021/Illegal-gambling-Operation-SOGA-VIII-leads-to-1-400-arrests
  139. https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2025/USD-439-million-recovered-in-global-financial-crime-operation
  140. https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/news/illegal-online-gambling-ring-sales-nearly-eur-1-billion-busted
  141. https://igamingexpert.com/regions/latin-america/interpol-investigation/
  142. https://www.dailysabah.com/turkiye/turkish-authorities-intensify-crackdown-on-online-gambling/news
  143. https://www.gamblinginsider.com/news/31005/malaysia-hundreds-arrested-as-police-target-illegal-gambling-dens
  144. https://focusgn.com/dutch-regulator-calls-for-interpol-of-gambling-to-allow-global-enforcement-action
  145. https://h2gc.com/
  146. https://www.americangaming.org/2023-commercial-gaming-revenue-reaches-66-5b-marking-third-straight-year-of-record-revenue/
  147. https://igamingbusiness.com/finance/aga-new-gaming-revenue-record-2024/
  148. https://www.statista.com/forecasts/270728/market-volume-of-online-gaming-worldwide
  149. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/horizon/outlook/online-gambling-market-size/global
  150. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/horizon/outlook/online-casino-market/asia-pacific
  151. https://www.ggrasia.com/2023-year-of-the-great-recovery-for-asia-casinos
  152. https://casinoindustrynews.com/global-casino-statistics/
  153. https://www.americangaming.org/resources/national-economic-impact-of-the-u-s-gaming-industry/
  154. https://macaonews.org/news/business/macau-casinos-gambling-employment-statistics/
  155. https://cdcgaming.com/las-vegas-tourism-hit-record-levels-of-spending-in-2024/
  156. https://www.reviewjournal.com/business/tourism/does-las-vegas-need-to-rebound-from-dip-in-tourism-officials-say-key-metrics-are-solid-3508536/
  157. https://live.worldtourismforum.net/news/the-role-of-casinos-in-macaus-economy-and-tourism-a-global-benchmark-for-gaming-tourism
  158. https://www.americangaming.org/resources/state-of-the-states-2025/
  159. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/World-Revenue-from-gambling-and-betting-and-GDP-billion-USD_tbl1_334339397
  160. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468266724001269
  161. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11457025/
  162. https://www.addictionhelp.com/gambling/statistics/
  163. https://www.ncpgambling.org/training/ngage-survey/ngage-3/
  164. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154619301019
  165. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468266724001671
  166. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625002692
  167. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/gambling-related-harms-evidence-review/gambling-related-harms-evidence-review-summary--2
  168. https://www.russellwebster.com/the-economic-and-social-costs-of-gambling/
  169. https://bircheshealth.com/resources/concerning-gambling-addiction-stats-in-america
  170. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9645554/
  171. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6376387/
  172. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2012/10/30/studies-casinos-bring-jobs-but-also-crime-bankruptcy-and-even-suicide/
  173. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304609368_Social_and_Economic_Impacts_of_Gambling
  174. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016604622300087X
  175. https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/bus_econ_fac/19/
  176. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999323000974
  177. https://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/economic_brief/2022/eb_22-28
  178. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20923045/
  179. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/judgment-and-decision-making/article/biases-in-casino-betting-the-hot-hand-and-the-gamblersfallacy/8A9D1813D42FFA25634E7FD26A46D484
  180. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01064047
  181. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5215234/
  182. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9292938/
  183. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-025-00443-z
  184. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16066359.2024.2415590
  185. https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/39446/1/1307608_Griffiths.pdf
  186. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10867214/
  187. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/judgment-and-decision-making/article/impact-of-nearmiss-events-on-betting-behavior-an-examination-of-casino-rapid-roulette-play/FAD84ADB84012818CEA31FA9F6E91E60
  188. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15030630/
  189. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130429102400.htm
  190. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886918301582
  191. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3858640/
  192. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6855253/
  193. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19012276.2019.1616320
  194. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-024-10327-1
  195. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/behavioral-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00141/full
  196. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212144723000042
  197. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9872534/
  198. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382834051_Neurobiology_of_Pathological_Gambling_A_Literature_Review
  199. https://europepmc.org/article/med/36586057
  200. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382292600_The_prevalence_of_gambling_and_problematic_gambling_a_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis
  201. https://www.thenewstribune.com/news/business/article309295185.html
  202. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9994414/
  203. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735815301963
  204. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1320592/full
  205. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5657435/
  206. https://quran.com/en/al-maidah/90-91
  207. https://www.learnreligions.com/what-does-the-quran-say-about-gambling-2004114
  208. https://www.islamweb.net/en/article/176683/islam-on-gambling
  209. https://www.gotquestions.org/gambling-sin.html
  210. https://www.catholicnh.org/community/public-policy/issues/gambling/
  211. https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2009/07/19/some-faiths-allow-gambling-but/23403895007/
  212. https://wizardofodds.com/gambling/dice-and-divity/
  213. https://medium.com/bitcoin-news-today-gambling-news/what-do-various-religions-say-about-gambling-2cffb3ac5920
  214. https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/religion/41716-religion-and-gambling/
  215. https://www.acton.org/religion-liberty/volume-33-number-2/what-does-it-profit-gambling-and-christian-tradition
  216. https://www.pokertube.com/article/is-gambling-a-sin
  217. https://www.libertarianism.org/topics/gambling
  218. https://web.uncg.edu/dcl/courses/vicecrime/pdf/m2.pdf
  219. https://philosophypathways.com/the-ethics-of-chance-a-philosophical-examination-of-gambling/
  220. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=5d4164a6-bc71-4f77-9e74-02e5852f1816
  221. https://www.ijasr.org/paper/IJASR0042102.pdf
  222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2376380
  223. https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/sites/default/files/2018-07/105008.pdf
  224. https://news.gallup.com/poll/235379/acceptance-gambling-reaches-new-heights.aspx
  225. https://mynews13.com/fl/orlando/ap-top-news/2025/10/23/what-americans-think-about-legal-sports-betting-according-to-recent-polls
  226. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/10/02/americans-increasingly-see-legal-sports-betting-as-a-bad-thing-for-society-and-sports/
  227. https://www.ncpgambling.org/training/ngage-survey/
  228. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7952992/
  229. https://commercial.yougov.com/rs/464-VHH-988/images/YouGov-Global-Gambling-Report-2021.pdf
  230. https://responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au/documents/349/The_determinants_of_gambling_normalisation.pdf
  231. https://www.ncpgambling.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/NGAGE-3.0-Key-Findings-FINAL-FOR-DISTRIBUTION.pdf
  232. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5763410/
  233. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-540-35104-7.pdf
  234. https://nyproblemgambling.org/resource-lib-item/u-s-national-problem-gambling-research-data/
  235. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10628001/
  236. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306460322000740
  237. https://www.eastonbh.ac.nz/2010/04/the-benefits-and-costs-of-gambling-some-policy-implications/
  238. https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/transnational-organized-crime/integrity-in-sports-and-gaming
  239. https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/12/1107472
  240. https://www.unodc.org/roseap/uploads/documents/Publications/2024/Casino_Underground_Banking_Report_2024.pdf
  241. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/31-defendants-including-members-and-associates-organized-crime-families-and-national
  242. https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/24/us/mafia-la-cosa-nostra-nba-sports-gambling-probe
  243. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/current-and-former-national-basketball-association-players-and-four-other-individuals
  244. https://www.vitalcitynyc.org/articles/casinos-bring-the-rot-why-gambling-is-fertile-ground-for-corruption
  245. https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/exploring-the-impact-of-legalized-sports-betting-in-the-states
  246. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306460325002096
  247. https://www.medschool.umaryland.edu/news/2025/new-survey-shows-rising-rates-of-disordered-gambling-among-marylanders-since-legalization-of-online-sports-betting-.html
  248. https://phys.org/news/2025-07-sports-boom-surge-tax-revenue.html
  249. https://www.nbcnews.com/business/consumer/online-sports-gambling-bankrupting-households-reducing-savings-rcna167235
  250. https://aibm.org/research/how-sports-betting-can-harm-young-men/
  251. https://illinoislawrev.web.illinois.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Grinols-Mustard.pdf
  252. https://www.opb.org/article/2024/10/30/think-out-loud-university-of-oregon-sports-gambling-intimate-partner-violence-football/
  253. https://www.uvm.edu/d10-files/documents/2024-06/Casinos.pdf
  254. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11339040/
  255. https://reason.org/commentary/new-data-shows-no-surge-in-problem-gambling-following-sports-betting-expansion/
  256. https://nyproblemgambling.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/rr-Online-Gambling-Policy-Effects-on-Tax-Revenue-and-Irresponsible-Gambling.pdf
  257. https://www.smu.edu/cox/coxtoday-magazine/2024-09-26-complicated-legalize-gambling
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.