Hubbry Logo
BiofilterBiofilterMain
Open search
Biofilter
Community hub
Biofilter
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Biofilter
Biofilter
Biofilter
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Biosolids composting plant biofilter mound - note sprinkler visible front right to maintain proper moisture level for optimum functioning

Biofiltration is a pollution control technique using a bioreactor containing living material to capture and biologically degrade pollutants. Common uses include processing waste water, capturing harmful chemicals or silt from surface runoff, and microbiotic oxidation of contaminants in air. Industrial biofiltration can be classified as the process of utilizing biological oxidation to remove volatile organic compounds, odors, and hydrocarbons.

Examples of biofiltration

[edit]

Examples of biofiltration include:

Control of air pollution

[edit]

When applied to air filtration and purification, biofilters use microorganisms to remove air pollution.[1] The air flows through a packed bed and the pollutant transfers into a thin biofilm on the surface of the packing material. Microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi are immobilized in the biofilm and degrade the pollutant. Trickling filters and bioscrubbers rely on a biofilm and the bacterial action in their recirculating waters.

The technology finds the greatest application in treating malodorous compounds and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Industries employing the technology include food and animal products, off-gas from wastewater treatment facilities, pharmaceuticals, wood products manufacturing, paint and coatings application and manufacturing and resin manufacturing and application, etc. Compounds treated are typically mixed VOCs and various sulfur compounds, including hydrogen sulfide. Very large airflows may be treated and although a large area (footprint) has typically been required—a large biofilter (>200,000 acfm) may occupy as much or more land than a football field—this has been one of the principal drawbacks of the technology. Since the early 1990s, engineered biofilters have provided significant footprint reductions over the conventional flat-bed, organic media type.

Air cycle system at biosolids composting plant. Large duct in foreground is exhaust air into biofilter shown in previous photo

One of the main challenges to optimum biofilter operation is maintaining proper moisture throughout the system. The air is normally humidified before it enters the bed with a watering (spray) system, humidification chamber, bio scrubber, or bio trickling filter. Properly maintained, a natural, organic packing media like peat, vegetable mulch, bark or wood chips may last for several years but engineered, combined natural organic, and synthetic component packing materials will generally last much longer, up to 10 years. Several companies offer these types of proprietary packing materials and multi-year guarantees, not usually provided with a conventional compost or wood chip bed biofilter.

Although widely employed, the scientific community is still unsure of the physical phenomena underpinning biofilter operation, and information about the microorganisms involved continues to be developed.[2] A biofilter/bio-oxidation system is a fairly simple device to construct and operate and offers a cost-effective solution provided the pollutant is biodegradable within a moderate time frame (increasing residence time = increased size and capital costs), at reasonable concentrations (and lb/hr loading rates) and that the airstream is at an organism-viable temperature. For large volumes of air, a biofilter may be the only cost-effective solution. There is no secondary pollution (unlike the case of incineration where additional CO2 and NOx are produced from burning fuels) and degradation products form additional biomass, carbon dioxide and water. Media irrigation water, although many systems recycle part of it to reduce operating costs, has a moderately high biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and may require treatment before disposal. However, this "blowdown water", necessary for proper maintenance of any bio-oxidation system, is generally accepted by municipal publicly owned treatment works without any pretreatment.

Biofilters are being utilized in Columbia Falls, Montana at Plum Creek Timber Company's fiberboard plant.[3] The biofilters decrease the pollution emitted by the manufacturing process and the exhaust emitted is 98% clean. The newest, and largest, biofilter addition to Plum Creek cost $9.5 million, yet even though this new technology is expensive, in the long run it will cost less overtime than the alternative exhaust-cleaning incinerators fueled by natural gas (which are not as environmentally friendly).

Water treatment

[edit]
A typical complete trickling filter system for treating wastewaters.[4]
Image 1: A schematic cross-section of the contact face of the bed media in a trickling filter.

Biofiltration was first introduced in England in 1893 as a trickling filter for wastewater treatment and has since been successfully used for the treatment of different types of water.[5] Biological treatment has been used in Europe to filter surface water for drinking purposes since the early 1900s and is now receiving more interest worldwide. Biofiltration is also common in wastewater treatment, aquaculture and greywater recycling, as a way to minimize water replacement while increasing water quality.

Biofiltration process

[edit]

A biofilter is a bed of media on which microorganisms attach and grow to form a biological layer called biofilm. Biofiltration is thus usually referred to as a fixed–film process. Generally, the biofilm is formed by a community of different microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, yeast, etc.), macro-organisms (protozoa, worms, insect's larvae, etc.) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) (Flemming and Wingender, 2010). Air or water flows through a media bed and any suspended compounds are transferred into a surface biofilm where microorganisms are held to degrade pollutants. The aspect of the biofilm[6] is usually slimy and muddy.

Water to be treated can be applied intermittently or continuously over the media, via upflow or downflow. Typically, a biofilter has two or three phases, depending on the feeding strategy (percolating or submerged biofilter):

  • a solid phase (media)
  • a liquid phase (water);
  • a gaseous phase (air).

Organic matter and other water components diffuse into the biofilm where the treatment occurs, mostly by biodegradation. Biofiltration processes are usually aerobic, which means that microorganisms require oxygen for their metabolism. Oxygen can be supplied to the biofilm, either concurrently or countercurrently with water flow. Aeration occurs passively by the natural flow of air through the process (three phase biofilter) or by forced air supplied by blowers.

Microorganisms' activity is a key-factor of the process performance. The main influencing factors are the water composition, the biofilter hydraulic loading, the type of media, the feeding strategy (percolation or submerged media), the age of the biofilm, temperature, aeration, etc.

The mechanisms by which certain microorganisms can attach and colonize on the surface of filter media of a biofilter can be via transportation, initial adhesion, firm attachment, and colonization [Van Loosdrecht et al., 1990]. The transportation of microorganisms to the surface of the filter media is further controlled by four main processes of diffusion (Brownian motion), convection, sedimentation, and active mobility of the microorganisms. The overall filtration process consists of microorganism attachment, substrate utilization which causes biomass growth, to biomass detachment.[5]

Types of filtering media

[edit]

Most biofilters use media such as sand, crushed rock, river gravel, or some form of plastic or ceramic material shaped as small beads and rings.[7]

Advantages

[edit]

Although biological filters have simple superficial structures, their internal hydrodynamics and the microorganisms' biology and ecology are complex and variable.[8] These characteristics confer robustness to the process. In other words, the process has the capacity to maintain its performance or rapidly return to initial levels following a period of no flow, of intense use, toxic shocks, media backwash (high rate biofiltration processes), etc.

The structure of the biofilm protects microorganisms from difficult environmental conditions and retains the biomass inside the process, even when conditions are not optimal for its growth. Biofiltration processes offer the following advantages: (Rittmann et al., 1988):

  • Since microorganisms are retained within the biofilm, biofiltration allows the development of microorganisms with relatively low specific growth rates;
  • Biofilters are less subject to variable or intermittent loading and to hydraulic shock;[9]
  • Operational costs are usually lower than for activated sludge;
  • The final treatment result is less influenced by biomass separation since the biomass concentration at the effluent is much lower than for suspended biomass processes;
  • The attached biomass becomes more specialized (higher concentration of relevant organisms) at a given point in the process train because there is no biomass return.[10]

Drawbacks

[edit]

Because filtration and growth of biomass leads to an accumulation of matter in the filtering media, this type of fixed-film process is subject to bioclogging and flow channeling. Depending on the type of application and on the media used for microbial growth, bioclogging can be controlled using physical and/or chemical methods. Backwash steps can be implemented using air and/or water to disrupt the biomat and recover flow whenever possible. Chemicals such as oxidizing (peroxide, ozone) or biocide agents can also be used.

Biofiltration can require a large area for some treatment techniques (suspended growth and attached growth processes) as well as long hydraulic retention times (anaerobic lagoon and anaerobic baffled reactor).[11]

Drinking water

[edit]

For drinking water, biological water treatment involves the use of naturally occurring microorganisms in the surface water to improve water quality. Under optimum conditions, including relatively low turbidity and high oxygen content, the organisms break down material in the water and thus improve water quality. Slow sand filters or carbon filters are used to provide a support on which these microorganisms grow. These biological treatment systems effectively reduce water-borne diseases, dissolved organic carbon, turbidity and color in surface water, thus improving overall water quality.

Typically in drinking water treatment; granular activated carbon or sand filters are used to prevent re-growth of microorganisms in water distribution pipes by reducing levels of iron and nitrate that act as a microbial nutrient. GAC also reduces chlorine demand and other disinfection by-product accumulation by acting as a first line of disinfection. Bacteria attached to filter media as a biofilm oxidize organic material as both an energy and carbon source, this prevents undesired bacteria from using these sources which can reduce water odors and tastes [Bouwer, 1998]. These biological treatment systems effectively reduce water-borne diseases, dissolved organic carbon, turbidity and color in surface water, thus improving overall water quality.

Biotechnological techniques can be used to improve the biofiltration of drinking water by studying the  microbial communities in the water. Such techniques include qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction), ATP assay, metagenomics, and flow cytometry.[12]

Wastewater

[edit]

Biofiltration is used to treat wastewater from a wide range of sources, with varying organic compositions and concentrations. Many examples of biofiltration applications are described in the literature. Bespoke biofilters have been developed and commercialized for the treatment of animal wastes,[13] landfill leachates,[14] dairy wastewater,[15] domestic wastewater.[16]

This process is versatile as it can be adapted to small flows (< 1 m3/d), such as onsite sewage[17] as well as to flows generated by a municipality (> 240 000 m3/d).[18] For decentralized domestic wastewater production, such as for isolated dwellings, it has been demonstrated that there are important daily, weekly and yearly fluctuations of hydraulic and organic production rates related to modern families' lifestyle.[19] In this context, a biofilter located after a septic tank constitutes a robust process able to sustain the variability observed without compromising the treatment performance.

In anaerobic wastewater treatment facilities, biogas is fed through a bio-scrubber and “scrubbed” with activated sludge liquid from an aeration tank.[20] Most commonly found in wastewater treatment is the trickling filter process (TFs) [Chaudhary, 2003]. Trickling filters are an aerobic treatment that uses microorganisms on attached medium to remove organic matter from wastewater.

In primary wastewater treatment, biofiltration is used to control levels of biochemical oxygen, demand, chemical oxygen demand, and suspended solids. In tertiary treatment processes, biofiltration is used to control levels of organic carbon [ Carlson, 1998].

Use in aquaculture

[edit]

The use of biofilters is common in closed aquaculture systems, such as recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). The biofiltration techniques used in aquaculture can be separated into three categories: biological, physical, and chemical. The primary biological method is nitrification; physical methods include mechanical techniques and sedimentation, and chemical methods are usually used in tandem with one of the other methods.[21] Some farms use seaweed, such as those from the genera Ulva, to take excess nutrients out of the water and release oxygen into the ecosystem in a “recirculation system” while also serving as a source of income when they sell the seaweed for safe human consumption.[22]

Many designs are used, with different benefits and drawbacks, however the function is the same: reducing water exchanges by converting ammonia to nitrate. Ammonia (NH4+ and NH3) originates from the brachial excretion from the gills of aquatic animals and from the decomposition of organic matter. As ammonia-N is highly toxic, this is converted to a less toxic form of nitrite (by Nitrosomonas sp.) and then to an even less toxic form of nitrate (by Nitrobacter sp.). This "nitrification" process requires oxygen (aerobic conditions), without which the biofilter can crash. Furthermore, as this nitrification cycle produces H+, the pH can decrease, which necessitates the use of buffers such as lime.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Biofilter

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A biofilter is a biological treatment system that employs microorganisms, such as and fungi, attached to a porous filter medium to capture and degrade airborne or waterborne pollutants, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs), odors, , and pathogens, through metabolic processes that convert them into harmless byproducts like , , and . Biofilters operate on the principle of biofiltration, where contaminated gas or passes through a bed of organic or inert packing material—such as , , or synthetic media—that supports a of microorganisms; these microbes adsorb and biodegrade contaminants via aerobic or , achieving removal efficiencies often exceeding 90% for targeted pollutants under optimal conditions like neutral , moderate temperatures (20–30°C), and adequate . Common types include conventional biofilters with fixed beds for broad-spectrum air treatment, biotrickling filters that incorporate liquid recirculation to enhance solubility of hydrophobic compounds, and bioscrubbers that separate absorption and biodegradation phases for high-solubility gases. In , biofilters are widely applied to control emissions from industrial sources, plants, and agricultural facilities, effectively reducing VOCs like and from factory exhausts with up to 99% efficiency, while also mitigating odors such as in landfills and operations. For , they serve as sustainable alternatives to chemical disinfection, removing pathogens through mechanisms including physical straining, predation by in the , and competitive exclusion by native microbes, as seen in slow sand filters that achieve 2–6 log reductions in viruses and near-complete elimination of protozoan cysts like . Additionally, biofilters address heavy metal contamination in and via and , often using enhanced designs like vegetated systems with aquatic for and metal uptake. The technology's advantages include low operational costs, minimal energy requirements, and eco-friendliness, as it produces no secondary pollutants and operates effectively at low contaminant concentrations, making it suitable for decentralized applications in developing regions or integrated into for urban stormwater management. However, challenges such as filter clogging, sensitivity to toxic shocks, and the need for periodic media replacement necessitate careful design and monitoring to maintain performance.

Fundamentals of Biofiltration

Definition and Overview

A biofilter is a pollution control device defined as a fixed-bed where living microorganisms, primarily and fungi, are immobilized on a porous solid support to biologically degrade organic and inorganic contaminants present in air, water, or other fluids. This technology leverages the natural metabolic capabilities of microbial communities to treat pollutants without relying on chemical additives or high-energy inputs. In operation, contaminants from the incoming medium are captured on the surface of the porous media, where they diffuse into biofilms—thin layers of microorganisms embedded in a moist matrix—formed by the immobilized microbes. These biofilms enable the microorganisms to metabolize the pollutants through aerobic or anaerobic biological processes, converting them into harmless byproducts such as , , , and inorganic salts. The treated then exits the system with significantly reduced contaminant levels, achieving effective abatement. A basic biofilter setup involves an inflow of the contaminated medium passing through a of supportive media, such as , , wood chips, or , which hosts the microbial communities. This design ensures intimate contact between the pollutants and the bioactive layer, facilitating degradation while maintaining structural integrity and moisture for microbial activity. Key operational parameters include the empty bed contact time (EBCT), defined as the volume of the empty media bed divided by the , which represents the theoretical time the medium spends in contact with the filter. For air biofilters, EBCT typically ranges from 10 to 60 seconds, influencing the efficiency of contaminant removal by allowing sufficient for biological reactions.

Historical Development

The origins of biofilter technology trace back to the late with the development of s for . In the 1860s and 1870s, British Sir Edward Frankland conducted pioneering experiments on intermittent filtration using gravel and soil beds to treat , demonstrating effective and organic matter removal through microbial action. Building on this, engineers like William Dibdin advanced the concept in the 1880s by proposing biological treatment with cultivated microorganisms on porous media, leading to the first full-scale in 1890 at the Lawrence Experimental Station in , , where was dosed intermittently over stone beds to promote aerobic degradation. By 1893, similar systems were installed in the UK at , marking the shift from land-based to engineered biofiltration for municipal . In the early , trickling filters saw widespread adoption in plants across and , becoming a standard for by the due to their simplicity and efficiency in handling urban wastewater volumes. The first U.S. installation occurred in 1901 at , followed by rapid expansion in the Midwest and East by 1910. By the , biofiltration extended to odor control, with compost-based systems emerging in and the ; the first soil beds for treating odorous emissions from plants were implemented in 1959, using organic media to support microbial breakdown of volatile compounds. The modern era of biofilters began in the 1970s amid growing environmental regulations, such as the U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970, which spurred adoption for air pollution control, though initial advancements occurred primarily in Europe. In the 1980s, Dutch researcher S.P.P. Ottengraf developed foundational mathematical models for biofilter kinetics, enabling the treatment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in industrial waste gases using compost media, as detailed in his 1983 paper on organic removal rates. This period saw expansion from municipal sewage to industrial applications in Europe and Asia. The 1990s introduced biotrickling filters, which recirculate nutrient solutions over packed beds for enhanced VOC removal in industries like chemical manufacturing, while integration with recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) gained traction for ammonia control in fish farming, with key research from the mid-1990s onward. By the 2000s and 2010s, biofilters proliferated in Asia and Europe for wastewater reuse, supporting sustainable practices in water-scarce regions through advanced configurations in treatment plants.

Biological and Physical Principles

Microbial Degradation Processes

Microbial degradation in biofilters primarily involves communities of and fungi that form biofilms on filter media, enabling the breakdown of organic and inorganic pollutants. Key bacterial genera include and , which facilitate aerobic respiration and the oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), while fungi such as contribute to the degradation of recalcitrant hydrocarbons through extracellular enzyme secretion. These microorganisms also support , where autotrophic like convert to , and , performed by heterotrophs such as species that reduce to gas under microaerobic conditions. formation enhances these processes by providing a protected environment for microbial consortia, allowing synergistic interactions that improve overall degradation . Aerobic degradation pathways dominate in oxygenated zones of biofilters, particularly for VOCs like , where initial by monooxygenases produces , followed by oxidation to and benzoate, ultimately yielding and water. In contrast, anaerobic processes are crucial for nitrogen removal, with bacteria such as Candidatus Brocadia converting (NH₄⁺) and (NO₂⁻) directly to dinitrogen gas (N₂) without oxygen, reducing energy demands compared to traditional nitrification-denitrification. These pathways are governed by microbial growth kinetics, often modeled using the to predict contaminant removal rates: μ=μmax⁡⋅SKs+S\mu = \mu_{\max} \cdot \frac{S}{K_s + S} where μ\mu is the specific growth rate, μmax⁡\mu_{\max} is the maximum growth rate, SS is the substrate concentration, and KsK_s is the half-saturation constant. This model accounts for substrate limitation in biofilms, helping optimize biofilter performance for pollutants like styrene or ammonia. Efficiency of these degradation processes is influenced by environmental factors, including pH (optimal range 6.5–8.5 for most mesophilic microbes), temperature (20–30°C to support active metabolism), oxygen availability (essential for aerobic zones but limiting in deeper biofilms), and nutrient balance (C:N:P ratio approximately 100:5:1 to prevent nutrient deficiencies). Deviations, such as low oxygen leading to anaerobic shifts or imbalanced nutrients inhibiting growth, can reduce removal rates by up to 50%. Biofilm dynamics further modulate these factors through stages of initial attachment (reversible adhesion of planktonic cells), maturation (exopolymer production and microcolony formation), and sloughing (detachment of biomass to renew active layers), with mass transfer limitations arising from substrate diffusion resistance into the biofilm matrix, potentially slowing degradation in thick layers.

Filter Media and Design Elements

Filter media in biofilters serve as the structural foundation for microbial attachment and growth, providing the necessary surface area and void space for efficient passage and degradation. Common organic media include , , and wood chips, which offer high surface areas typically ranging from 200 to 800 m²/m³ and excellent nutrient retention to support development. Inorganic media, such as lava rock and materials, provide greater durability and resistance to , making them suitable for long-term applications where structural integrity is paramount. Design elements of biofilters encompass bed configurations that optimize flow dynamics and microbial exposure. Fixed-bed systems maintain stationary media for consistent biofilm stability, while packed beds enhance contact through densely arranged materials, and moving-bed configurations, such as those in MBBR systems, promote continuous media circulation to prevent clogging and improve mass transfer. Moisture control is critical, particularly in air biofilters, where irrigation systems maintain media humidity at 40-60% to ensure optimal microbial activity without waterlogging. Aeration mechanisms vary by application, with forced air distribution used in gas-phase systems to supply oxygen and with natural diffusion in submerged setups to avoid excessive shear on biofilms. Key parameters influencing biofilter performance include media , which is typically 40-60% to allow adequate flow while retaining sufficient , and for attachment. across the bed is calculated using a simplified adaptation of : ΔP=μ⋅v⋅Lk⋅ε3\Delta P = \frac{\mu \cdot v \cdot L}{k \cdot \varepsilon^3} where μ\mu is fluid viscosity, vv is superficial velocity, LL is bed depth, kk is permeability, and ε\varepsilon is ; this equation accounts for flow resistance in porous media. Startup procedures involve inoculation with microbial consortia to accelerate formation, often sourced from or mature filters, enabling operational readiness within weeks. Maintenance requires periodic media replacement every 1-3 years to address compaction and clogging from accumulation and particulate buildup. For industrial-scale implementations, bed volumes can reach 1000 m³ or more to handle high pollutant loads from or air treatment facilities.

Types of Biofilters

Conventional Systems

Conventional biofilters encompass longstanding designs that rely on simple, passive mechanisms to facilitate microbial degradation of pollutants in and air streams. These systems prioritize straightforward construction and operation, often utilizing natural gravity or mechanical rotation to distribute flows over fixed or moving media colonized by biofilms. Among the primary configurations are trickling filters, rotating biological contactors, and open-bed filters, each tailored to specific treatment needs while maintaining low energy demands. Trickling filters, one of the earliest biofilter types, consist of vertical beds filled with rock, slag, or plastic media through which trickles downward by gravity, allowing aerobic microorganisms to form a that degrades . Developed primarily for secondary , these systems achieve 80-95% removal of (BOD), effectively reducing soluble and particulate organics before final clarification. Operational loading rates typically range from 0.08 to 0.4 kg BOD per cubic meter of media per day, ensuring sufficient contact time without overwhelming the microbial community. Early municipal installations in during the 1890s, such as the first full-scale in 1893 at , demonstrated their efficacy for by integrating intermittent dosing over stone media to prevent clogging and enhance purification. Rotating biological contactors (RBCs) feature horizontal shafts supporting closely spaced disks partially submerged in , rotating slowly to alternately expose the biofilm-covered surfaces to liquid and air for oxygenation and substrate contact. Introduced commercially in the , RBCs provide high specific surface areas up to 100 m² per cubic meter of media, enabling efficient organic load reduction in compact footprints suitable for municipal and industrial applications. The disks typically rotate at 1-2 , with 30-40% submergence to optimize shear and while minimizing energy use. Open-bed compost filters address , particularly odors from plants, by directing contaminated air through shallow piles of organic media such as or wood chips, where heterotrophic and fungi metabolize volatile compounds. These systems use piled media beds typically 1-2 meters deep and 50-100 meters wide to accommodate high volumes, ensuring residence times of 30-60 seconds for effective control without forced ventilation. The passive relies on or low-pressure fans, with media replacement every 1-2 years to sustain and microbial activity.

Advanced Configurations

Biotrickling filters represent an advanced evolution of biofiltration, operating as closed systems where contaminated gas passes through packed media continuously trickled with recirculated liquid to maintain moisture and facilitate microbial activity. The liquid recirculation enables precise control of environmental conditions, including pH adjustment through nutrient dosing, which prevents acidification from metabolic byproducts like during (H₂S) oxidation. These systems achieve H₂S removal efficiencies exceeding 95% in air treatment applications, particularly for streams, due to the high surface area of the packing material supporting robust biofilms of sulfur-oxidizing . Membrane-aerated biofilters (MABs) incorporate oxygen-permeable membranes that supply oxygen directly to the from the gas side, enabling precise without bubbles and achieving near-100% oxygen transfer efficiency. This design is particularly suited for , where MABs facilitate by maintaining aerobic conditions at the membrane interface while allowing anoxic zones deeper in the for . Compared to conventional processes, MABs reduce the physical footprint by approximately 50% through higher retention and efficient space utilization, alongside a 70% decrease in for . Fluidized bed biofilters suspend filter media, such as or beads, in an upward flow, promoting intense mixing and enhanced between pollutants and microbial communities. In applications, this configuration supports high removal rates, reaching up to 1 g NH₄-N/m³/day under optimal hydraulic loading, as the fluidization prevents clogging and ensures uniform contact. The dynamic environment fosters rapid , with zero-order kinetics observed at rates around 0.5 g NH₄-N/m³/day in practical recirculating systems. Hybrid biofilter systems integrate biological treatment with physicochemical processes to handle complex pollutant mixtures, such as by combining bioscrubbers with adsorption or UV oxidation for pre-treatment. In bioscrubbers, microbial suspensions in the liquid phase target soluble gases like , achieving removal efficiencies of 69% and mineralization rates of 72-79% in hybrid bubble column/biofilter setups. enhances the capture of hydrophobic volatiles prior to , while UV pre-treatment breaks down recalcitrant compounds, improving overall elimination capacities for chlorinated solvents up to 70% for . Post-2010 innovations in biofilters emphasize modularity and automation to enhance deployability and performance in industrial settings. Modular, containerized units, often housed in double-walled shipping containers pre-packed with biofilter media like pine fibers, allow rapid installation at sites such as wastewater plants or landfills, with operational lifespans of 3-7 years for the media. These systems incorporate automation via sensors for real-time monitoring of pH and dissolved oxygen (DO), coupled with variable frequency drives for fans and irrigation controls, enabling adaptive responses to fluctuating loads and maintaining back-pressure below 1,000 Pa. Advanced reactor designs, including moving bed variants, further integrate AI-based controls for parameters like pH and DO, supporting efficient biochemical degradation in variable industrial wastewaters.

Applications in Pollution Control

Air Pollution Abatement

Biofilters are widely employed in abatement to treat gaseous emissions from industrial and municipal sources, particularly for controlling odors and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Target pollutants include VOCs such as and , (H₂S), and , which are common in and manufacturing processes. Removal efficiencies typically range from 70-95% for odors and 50-90% for VOCs, with H₂S often achieving over 99% elimination under optimal conditions. These systems leverage microbial communities to degrade these contaminants aerobically, as briefly referenced in general gas degradation principles. Biofilter configurations for air treatment include open systems, which expose the filter bed to ambient air, and closed systems, which enclose the to contain emissions and improve control. Compost-based , often mixed with wood chips or , provides the necessary structure and microbial habitat, with bed depths of 1-2 meters. Inlet gas is adjusted to 95-99% relative humidity to maintain microbial activity and prevent media drying, while empty bed (EBRT) is typically set at 30-60 seconds to ensure sufficient contact between the gas stream and . A key performance metric is the elimination capacity (EC), calculated as: EC=Q×(Cin−Cout)VEC = \frac{Q \times (C_{in} - C_{out})}{V} where QQ is the gas flow rate (m³/h), CinC_{in} and CoutC_{out} are the inlet and outlet pollutant concentrations (mg/m³), and VV is the media volume (m³). This yields EC in g/m³/h, with maximum values around 100 g/m³/h for H₂S, beyond which mass transfer limitations reduce efficiency. In plants, biofilters effectively control odors; for instance, at the of ' Hyperion Treatment Plant, a pilot system reduced H₂S from 10-50 ppmv to below 1 ppmv, achieving over 99% removal while treating approximately 31 m³/h of ventilation air. Industrial applications, such as in painting facilities, have utilized biofilters for VOC abatement since the , particularly in , where they handle emissions from coating processes with 50-90% VOC removal. Operational challenges in air biofiltration include bioaerosol emissions, where microbial particles can exceed safe limits (e.g., >10⁴ CFU/m³), posing health risks due to shear detaching biofilms. Pressure drop management is also critical, as media compaction can increase from 0.1 to 1.0 inches of water, requiring regular maintenance to avoid energy penalties and flow restrictions.

Water and Wastewater Treatment

Biofilters play a crucial role in water and by facilitating the biological degradation of organic and nutrient pollutants in liquid effluents, primarily through attached microbial growth on filter media. In municipal , biofilters such as trickling filters serve as a secondary treatment stage, where is distributed over a bed of media to promote aerobic by biofilms. This process effectively targets soluble and particulate organics, reducing pollutant loads before final discharge or reuse. The typical process flow begins with primary settling to remove settleable solids, followed by biofiltration where trickles downward through the media, allowing microorganisms to contaminants. from the biofilter then undergoes clarification in a secondary to remove sloughed and residual solids. Hydraulic loading rates for conventional trickling filters range from 0.01 to 0.04 L/m²/s in low-rate systems, ensuring adequate contact time for microbial activity while preventing media flooding. Recirculation of settled is often employed to enhance wetting and oxygen transfer, improving overall efficiency. Key target contaminants in wastewater include biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrogen (primarily as ammonia or nitrate), and phosphorus. Biofilters achieve typical BOD reductions of 80-95% in secondary treatment, with low-rate trickling filters often attaining 80-90% removal of organic matter. COD removal generally ranges from 65-85%, while nitrogen removal via nitrification can reach 70-90% under aerobic conditions, and phosphorus removal is more variable at 40-70% through biological uptake, though chemical enhancement may be needed for higher levels. These efficiencies help stabilize effluents for environmental discharge. BOD removal in biofilters follows kinetics, where the removal rate is proportional to the substrate concentration. The process can be modeled using the differential form dBOD/dt = -k · BOD. For a plug-flow , this integrates to BOD_out = BOD_in · exp(-k · τ), where k is the rate constant (typically 0.1-0.3 day⁻¹), and τ is the hydraulic (τ = D / q, with D as media depth in m and q as specific hydraulic loading rate in m/day). In industrial applications, biofilters address high-strength effluents from sectors like , which contain elevated organics from starch, proteins, and fats, and pharmaceuticals, involving complex compounds such as antibiotics. For wastewater, hybrid systems combining biofilters with anaerobic pretreatment effectively degrade organics, achieving up to 70-85% COD removal while managing high hydraulic loads. In pharmaceutical waste treatment, upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) hybrids with aerobic biofilters have demonstrated 72-85% COD removal at organic loading rates of 8 kg COD/m³·d, enabling degradation of recalcitrant pollutants like synthesis byproducts. Recent advances (as of 2024-2025) include biofilter adaptations for removing emerging contaminants such as pharmaceuticals and (PPCPs) from . Biofilter applications in must comply with regulatory standards to protect aquatic ecosystems. The EU Urban Waste Water Directive (1991) mandates for urban agglomerations, requiring BOD levels below 25 mg/L and below 125 mg/L to minimize oxygen depletion in receiving waters. Compliance ensures reductions in nutrient discharges, with many facilities achieving BOD under 20 mg/L through optimized biofiltration, aligning with broader environmental protection goals.

Specialized Applications

Aquaculture Systems

In recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS), biofilters are integral for detoxifying water by converting toxic ammonia (NH₃), a primary waste product from fish metabolism, into nitrate through biological nitrification. This two-step process involves autotrophic bacteria: Nitrosomonas species oxidize ammonia to nitrite (NO₂⁻), and Nitrobacter species subsequently oxidize nitrite to nitrate (NO₃⁻), which is far less harmful to fish at typical concentrations. By enabling the treatment and reuse of water, biofilters support recycling rates exceeding 95%, drastically reducing the need for fresh water inputs and facilitating intensive, sustainable fish production in closed-loop environments. Biofilter designs in aquaculture are adapted for high efficiency, commonly featuring submerged fixed-bed or moving bed bioreactor (MBBR) configurations with plastic media such as high-density polyethylene sheets or beads to maximize biofilm surface area for bacterial attachment. These systems accommodate stocking densities up to 100 kg of fish per cubic meter while maintaining optimal water flow rates of 1-2 bed volumes per hour, ensuring adequate oxygen supply and contact time for nitrification without excessive shear on the biofilm. Ammonia loading rates, which drive biofilter sizing, are calculated based on feed inputs, as uneaten feed and fish excretion contribute the majority of nitrogenous waste. The ammonia loading is determined by the equation: Ammonia loading=F×Cfish\text{Ammonia loading} = F \times C_{\text{fish}} where FF is the daily feed rate in kg, and CfishC_{\text{fish}} is the ammonia production factor of 0.03-0.05 kg NH₃ per kg of feed, accounting for protein content and assimilation efficiency. Biofilter volume VV is then sized using: V=loading (g TAN/day)VTRV = \frac{\text{loading (g TAN/day)}}{\text{VTR}} where VTR (volumetric TAN removal rate) is approximately 90-350 g TAN per m³ per day depending on media type (e.g., 90 g/m³/day for trickling filters, 350 g/m³/day for moving-bed reactors) under optimal conditions (e.g., 25-30°C, sufficient dissolved oxygen). In practice, biofilters have been widely adopted in Norwegian farms since the post-1990s expansion of RAS technology, achieving up to 99% water use reduction compared to conventional flow-through systems, with the sector supporting annual productions of several thousand tons as of 2024 and ongoing expansions such as facilities planning 36,000 tons head-on-gutted (HOG) annually. On a smaller scale, hobbyist aquaria utilize canister filters as compact for tanks of 100-1,000 liters, where ceramic rings or bio-balls serve as media to host nitrifying communities and stabilize levels during routine maintenance. Unique to biofilters is the extended startup phase of 4-6 weeks required for nitrifier population establishment, during which and levels must be monitored to avoid stress; this process can be accelerated by seeding with mature media from established systems. To mitigate risks in high-density setups, biofilters are frequently paired with UV sterilization, which inactivates and parasites without disrupting the nitrifying .

Drinking Water Purification

Biofilters play a crucial role in purification by leveraging microbial communities to degrade natural (NOM) and other biodegradable contaminants, thereby improving and stability for human consumption. These systems are particularly effective in removing precursors to disinfection byproducts (DBPs), which form when disinfectants like react with organics during treatment. By biologically oxidizing assimilable organic carbon (AOC)—a key substrate for bacterial regrowth—biofilters minimize microbial proliferation in distribution systems, ensuring safer potable water. Common configurations include slow sand filters (SSF) and granular (GAC) biofilters, which support development on media surfaces to facilitate this degradation without relying on chemical additives. In typical process integration, biofilters are positioned after and to treat clarified , where they achieve 50-80% reduction in AOC levels, depending on filter type and influent characteristics. For instance, biofilters following ozonation can remove 75-86% of AOC, while SSF systems provide 14-40% removal, both contributing to overall NOM degradation and DBP precursor control. This placement exploits the low-turbidity environment to optimize microbial activity, targeting issues such as taste and odor compounds like , as well as emerging contaminants including pharmaceuticals (e.g., ibuprofen). Backwashing is performed periodically—every 1-2 days for rapid / configurations—to maintain hydraulic efficiency and prevent clogging, though SSF requires less frequent cleaning via surface scraping. A key metric for evaluating biofilter performance is the AOC concentration, measured via biodegradation assays that quantify carbon supporting growth of standard bacteria such as Pseudomonas fluorescens P17 and Spirillum sp. NOX. The assay involves inoculating filtered water samples, incubating at 15-30°C for 5-9 days, and calculating AOC as follows: AOC (µg/L)=[(Average P17 CFU/mL4.1×106)+(Average NOX CFU/mL1.2×107)]×1000\text{AOC (µg/L)} = \left[ \left( \frac{\text{Average P17 CFU/mL}}{4.1 \times 10^6} \right) + \left( \frac{\text{Average NOX CFU/mL}}{1.2 \times 10^7} \right) \right] \times 1000 This empirical formula uses conversion factors derived from biomass yield per cell (approximately 0.24-0.83 pg C/cell), reflecting the initial carbon utilized for growth. Typical influent AOC in surface waters ranges from 100-500 µg/L, which biofilters reduce to below 50 µg/L, establishing biological stability and limiting regrowth potential. Since the early 2000s, biofiltration has seen widespread adoption in U.S. surface water treatment plants, driven by EPA Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (2006), which tightened limits on total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs). For example, plants treating Ohio River and Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta waters employ GAC biofilters post-ozonation to control DBPs while removing taste/odor compounds like geosmin, achieving over 90% biodegradation in some cases. Operationally, these systems maintain low nutrient conditions (e.g., limited phosphate addition) to curb excess microbial growth and routinely monitor effluent for breakthrough of biodegradable organics, ensuring consistent performance.

Performance Evaluation

Advantages and Benefits

Biofilters offer significant through their reliance on natural microbial processes for degradation, eliminating the need for chemical additives and minimizing secondary waste generation. Unlike chemical-based treatments, biofilters utilize living microorganisms to break down organic contaminants and adsorb or accumulate inorganic ones sustainably, producing no toxic byproducts and supporting ecological balance in treated effluents. This biological approach also results in lower compared to thermal methods like , as biofilters avoid high-energy combustion processes and can reduce from organic waste streams by over 90% in integrated systems. Economically, biofilters stand out for their low operating costs, driven by minimal requirements and simple protocols. The filter media, typically composed of organic materials like or , has a lifespan of several years under standard conditions, reducing replacement expenses and downtime in operational setups. Additionally, biofilters generate less sludge than conventional processes, lowering disposal costs and simplifying . Operationally, biofilters can handle some fluctuating loads and hydraulic shocks but may require adjustments to maintain consistent under highly variable influent conditions common in industrial or municipal applications. They excel in multi- removal, simultaneously degrading (BOD) alongside through integrated aerobic and anoxic zones, achieving efficiencies of 70-90% for both in optimized systems. Scalability is another strength, with designs readily transitioning from prototypes to full-scale industrial units without major redesign, facilitated by modular configurations. Quantitative metrics further underscore these advantages, including substantial energy savings relative to physical-chemical methods due to passive biological reactions requiring no external or heating. Biofilter-equipped wastewater plants often comply with green building standards such as , contributing credits for sustainable site development and through reduced resource consumption. On a broader scale, biofilters promote principles by enabling high-rate water reuse, particularly in systems where up to 95% of treated water can be recycled, closing loops and minimizing freshwater demands.

Limitations and Challenges

Biofilters require substantial space due to the need for large volumes of packing media to achieve adequate residence times for microbial degradation, typically demanding 10-20 m³ of volume per 1000 m³/h of treated. This extensive footprint poses challenges for deployment in urban environments, where availability is limited, often necessitating compaction techniques or modular designs to reduce spatial demands without compromising treatment efficacy. The startup phase of biofilters involves a prolonged acclimation period of 2-8 weeks for microbial communities to establish and adapt to the load, during which performance remains suboptimal. These systems are highly sensitive to environmental shocks, such as drops below 10°C, which can reduce microbial activity by up to 50%, or sudden spikes in toxic compounds like that inhibit key microbial enzymes and disrupt community structure. Such vulnerabilities can lead to process instability and require careful monitoring to prevent downtime. Performance limitations in biofilters include reduced efficiency for recalcitrant compounds, such as chlorinated volatile organic compounds (VOCs), where removal rates often fall below 50% due to slow kinetics. Additionally, accumulation over time causes clogging, resulting in pressure drops of 20-30% and uneven distribution, which further diminishes treatment effectiveness. Economic drawbacks are significant, with initial for large-scale systems ranging from $50,000 to $500,000, driven by media preparation, structural requirements, and . Removal efficiencies vary between 70-95% depending on type and conditions, frequently necessitating downstream polishing steps like adsorption to meet stringent regulatory standards. To address these challenges, strategies include pre-treatment methods such as adsorption to remove toxics before biofiltration, hybrid designs combining biofilters with physicochemical processes for enhanced resilience, and ongoing into of microbes to improve tolerance to shocks and degradation of recalcitrant pollutants. , such as physics-guided AI models (as of 2025), are being developed to predict biofilter performance and optimize operations.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9161908/
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7153332/
  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128182048000102
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323856027000194
  5. https://sleigh-munoz.co.uk/wash/Mara/History/HistSewTreat.pdf
  6. https://home.engineering.iastate.edu/~jea/w3-class/456/article/article-biofilmhistory.html
  7. https://www.biocycle.net/biofiltration-past-present-and-future-directions/
  8. https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act
  9. https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/kinetics-of-organic-compound-removal-from-waste-gases-with-a-biol/
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416625000658
  11. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323904520000165
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352513422002964
  13. https://liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/ees.2019.0395
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280925626_Characterization_and_Abundance_of_Anaerobic_Ammonia_Oxidizing_Anammox_Bacteria_in_Biofilters_of_Recirculating_Aquaculture_Systems
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3963643/
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9841534/
  17. https://objects.lib.uidaho.edu/uiext/uiext33161.pdf
  18. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/downloads/w0892d47p
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0144860916301406
  20. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemical-engineering/moisture-control
  21. https://apps.dasnr.okstate.edu/SSL/osuwastemanage.bae.okstate.edu/baeu18.pdf
  22. https://bae.k-state.edu/~zifeiliu/files/fac_zifeiliu/Zifeiliu/MF3387-20171016.pdf
  23. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25827361/
  24. https://www.cummins-wagner.com/manufacturer/biorem-odor-control/
  25. https://www.biocycle.net/compost-based-biofilters-control-air-pollution/
  26. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-10/trickling-filters-factsheet.pdf
  27. https://water.mecc.edu/courses/ENV110/lesson19_2.htm
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7252249/
  29. https://water.mecc.edu/courses/ENV110/Lesson16_print.htm
  30. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=2000GGPR.TXT
  31. https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/bitstreams/3d3dbc9b-251c-437e-a1d7-122d31e30474/download
  32. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10962247.2019.1645761
  33. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/15/3/436
  34. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/10919/90613/1/v7-ebeling.pdf
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3895922/
  36. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304389413008492
  37. https://bioteg.us/products/bioteg-modular-biofilter-systems/bioteg-modular-container-biofilter/
  38. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392439179_Advances_in_Reactor_Design_for_High-Efficiency_Biochemical_Degradation_in_Industrial_Wastewater_Treatment_Systems
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9585892/
  40. https://pscleanair.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5784/2---Using-Bioreactors-to-Control-Air-Pollution
  41. https://deshusses.pratt.duke.edu/sites/deshusses.pratt.duke.edu/files/u31/pdf/ja36.pdf
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/H2S-elimination-capacity-and-loading-rate-during-the-biofilter-operation_fig4_282511581
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7142688/
  44. https://files.dep.state.pa.us/water/bsdw/operatorcertification/TrainingModules/ww20_trickling_filter_wb.pdf
  45. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969720308810
  46. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43832-025-00279-x
  47. https://sleigh-munoz.co.uk/wash/Mara/WSP/BODremkin_transcript.pdf
  48. https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/bitstream/1826/4165/1/J_Biddle_Thesis_1995.pdf
  49. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-025-06582-3
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960852407001745
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S221192642400095X
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381900973_Recent_Advances_in_Biofiltration_for_PPCP_Removal_from_Water
  53. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/environmental-science/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.948366/full
  54. https://cales.arizona.edu/azaqua/ista/ISTA7/RecircWorkshop/Workshop%20PP%20%20&%20Misc%20Papers%20Adobe%202006/7%20Biofiltration/Nitrification-Biofiltration/Biofiltration-Nitrification%20Design%20Overview.pdf
  55. https://extension.rwfm.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2013/09/Fish-Farming-in-Recirculating-Aquaculture-Systems-RAS.pdf
  56. https://www.globalseafood.org/advocate/estimating-biofilter-size-for-ras-systems/
  57. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X24003920
  58. https://salmonevolution.no/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/salme-q4-2024-report.pdf
  59. https://web.mit.edu/lxs/www/cichlids/filtration.html
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9329406/
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4740787/
  62. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-05/documents/issuepaper_tcr_nutrients_posted.pdf
  63. https://awwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2000.tb09073.x
  64. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-03682-5
  65. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2006/01/04/06-3/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations-stage-2-disinfectants-and-disinfection-byproducts-rule
  66. https://www.odor.net/advantages-of-a-biofiltration-system/
  67. https://study.com/academy/lesson/biofiltration-process-advantages-disadvantages.html
  68. https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/070369-biofilters.pdf
  69. https://www.ssiaeration.com/how-much-does-a-wastewater-treatment-system-cost/
  70. https://bioteg.com/info/advantages_biofilter.htm
  71. https://www.suezwaterhandbook.com/processes-and-technologies/biological-processes/attached-growth-processes/biological-filters
  72. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2213343724025041
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935122023313
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894723031510
  75. https://www.energy.ca.gov/publications/2023/saving-energy-through-use-biofiltration-advanced-primary-treatment-wastewater
  76. https://waterloo-biofilter.com/resources/wastewater-treatment-applications/leed-projects/
  77. https://iwaponline.com/wst/article/34/11/253/5828/Biofilters-for-water-reuse-in-aquaculture
  78. https://finnforel.com/how-can-aquaculture-technology-reduce-water-pollution/
  79. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950263224000607
  80. https://www.aquaticed.com/blogs/deeper-dive/cycling-a-biofilter-aquatic-systems
  81. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43621-025-01784-8
  82. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsengineeringau.2c00020
  83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969718320576
  84. https://p2infohouse.org/ref/12/11505.pdf
  85. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10934529709376664
  86. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653522032441
  87. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-18585-8
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.