Hubbry Logo
BioswaleBioswaleMain
Open search
Bioswale
Community hub
Bioswale
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Bioswale
Bioswale
Bioswale
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Runoff from the vicinity flows into an adjacent bioswale

Bioswales are channels designed to concentrate and convey stormwater runoff while removing debris and pollution. Bioswales can also be beneficial in recharging groundwater.

Bioswales are typically vegetated, mulched, or xeriscaped.[1] They consist of a swaled drainage course with gently sloped sides (less than 6%).[2]: 19  Bioswale design is intended to safely maximize the time water spends in the swale, which aids the collection and removal of pollutants, silt and debris. Depending on the site topography, the bioswale channel may be straight or meander. Check dams are also commonly added along the bioswale to increase stormwater infiltration. A bioswale's make-up can be influenced by many different variables, including climate, rainfall patterns, site size, budget, and vegetation suitability.

It is important to maintain bioswales to ensure the best possible efficiency and effectiveness in removal of pollutants from stormwater runoff. Planning for maintenance is an important step, which can include the introduction of filters or large rocks to prevent clogging. Annual maintenance through soil testing, visual inspection, and mechanical testing is also crucial to the health of a bioswale.

Bioswales are commonly applied along streets and around parking lots, where substantial automotive pollution settles on the pavement and is flushed by the first instance of rain, known as the first flush. Bioswales, or other types of biofilters, can be created around the edges of parking lots to capture and treat stormwater runoff before releasing it to the watershed or storm sewer.

Contaminants addressed

[edit]
Two bioswales for a housing development. The foreground one is under construction while the background one is established.

Bioswales work to remove pollutants through vegetation and the soil.[3] As the storm water runoff flows through the bioswale, the pollutants are captured and settled by the leaves and stems of the plants. The pollutants then enter the soil where they decompose or can be broken down by bacteria in healthy soil.[4]

There are several classes of water pollutants that may be collected or arrested with bioswales. These fall into the categories of silt, inorganic contaminants, organic chemicals and pathogens.[5]

  • Silt. How bioswales and plants are constructed slow the conveyance of silt and reduce the turbidity of receiving waters. Filters can be established to capture debris and silt during the process.[6]
  • Organics. Many organic contaminants including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons will volatilize or degrade over time and bioswales slow the conveyance of these materials into waterways, and before they can affect aquatic life. Although not all organic material will be captured, the concentration of organic material is greatly reduced by bioswales.[5]
  • Pathogens are deprived of a host or from a nutrient supply long enough for them to become the target of a heterotroph.[7]
  • Common inorganic compounds are macronutrients such as phosphates and nitrates. Principal sources of these nutrients comes from agricultural runoff attributed to excess fertilization. Excess phosphates and nitrates can cause eutrophication in disposal zones and receiving waters. Specific bioswale plants absorb these excess nutrients.[8]
  • Metallic compounds such as mercury, lead, chromium, cadmium and other heavy metals are concentrated in the structures. Unfortunately, these metals slowly poison the surrounding soil. Regular soil removal is required in order to prevent metals from dissolving and releasing back into the environment. Some bioswales are designed to include hyperaccumulator plant species. These plants absorb but do not transform the metals. Cuttings from these plants often decompose back into the pond or are pruned by gardening services that do not know the compost they are collecting is poisonous.[9]

Best locations

[edit]

Bioswales can be implemented in areas that require stormwater management to regulate the runoff velocity and decontaminate the runoff. Bioswales are created to handle the first flush of pollutants during the event of rain, therefore, locations that have high areas of impervious surface such as roads, parking lots, or rooftops can benefit from additions of bioswales. They can also be integrated into road medians, curb cutouts, sidewalks, or any public space.[10]

Benefits

[edit]

Bioswales are useful low-impact development work to decrease the velocity of stormwater runoff while removing pollutants from the discharge. They are extremely beneficial in protecting surface water and local waterways from excessive pollution from stormwater runoff. The longer the runoff stays within the bioswale, the better the pollutant removal outcome. It is also beneficial in removing standing ponds that could potentially attract mosquitos. Bioswales can also be designed to be aesthetically pleasing and attract animals and create habitats. Bioswales can also be beneficial for groundwater recharge.[11]

Maintenance

[edit]

Improper maintenance can lead to high restoration costs to address inefficient bioswales. An accumulation of large sediments, trash, and improper growth of vegetation can all affect the quality and performance of bioswales. It is beneficial at the planning stages to set apart easements to allow for easier maintenance of bioswales, whether it be adequate space to locate machinery or safety to those working. Different types of filters can be used to catch sediments. Grass filter strips or rock inlets can be used to filter sediments and particulates; however, without proper maintenance, runoff could flow away from the bioswales due to blockage. Structural inlets have become more common due to the ease of maintenance, use, and its effectiveness. Avoiding the use of floating mulch and selecting the best fit low-maintenance plants ensure better efficiency in the bioswales.[12] Depending on a community's needs for a bioswale, a four step assessment program can be developed. Visual inspection, capacity testing, synthetic runoff, and monitoring are the four steps that can be used to evaluate performance and maintenance of bioswales.[13]

Routine inspection is required to ensure that the performance and aesthetics of bioswales are not compromised. Time and frequency of inspections vary based on different local governments, but should occur at least once a year. Various aspects of inspection can take place, either visually or mechanically. Visual observation of the vegetation, water, and inlets are all crucial to ensure performance. Some organizations utilize checklists to streamline the visual inspection process.[13]

There are different methods to determine if a bioswale needs maintenance. Bioswales are benchmarked to meet a specific level of infiltration to determine if maintenance is required. A staff gauge is used to measure the infiltration rate. Soil chemistry testing is also required to determine if the soil has a certain off-level of any pollutant. Phosphorus and high levels of salinity in the soil are two common pollutants that should be attended to. Analysis of inflow and outflow pollutant concentration is also another way to determine the performance level of bioswales.[12]

Maintenance can span to three different levels of care. Aesthetic maintenance is required to remove weeds that affect the performance of the other plants and the bioswale itself, clean and remove trash, and maintaining the looks of the vegetation. Partial restoration is needed when the inlet is blocked by sediments or when vegetation needs to be replaced. Full restoration is required when the bioswales no longer filter pollutants adequately and overall performance is severely lacking.[12]

Design

[edit]

Bioswales experience short, potentially intense, periods of rain, flooding and pollutant loading followed by dry seasons. It is important to take into account how the vegetation selected for the bioswales will grow and understanding what types of plants are considered the best fit.[12]

There are four types of bioswales that can be constructed based on the needs of the location.[14]

  • Low grass bioswales utilize low growing grass that can be landscaped, similar to lawns. These types of bioswales tend to be less effective than vegetated bioswales in treating stormwater runoff and sustaining an adequate collection time.
  • Vegetated bioswales are created with taller growing plants, ornamental vegetations, shrubs, and even trees. These types can also be lined with rocks to slow down the velocity of stormwater runoff that is flowing through bioswales to increase collection time for decontamination. Vegetated bioswales can also include vegetation that is highly useful in removing certain chemicals in runoffs very efficiently.
  • Low water use bioswales are helpful in areas that tend to be drier with hotter climate. Xeriscape bioswales are populated with runoff generally only after rain and storms and stay dry otherwise.
  • Wet bioswales are similar to wetlands in which they retain water for a much longer period of time that allows for infiltration of stormwater instead of simply emptying the water at the end of the bioswale into storm drain inlets.

Bioswales require a certain soil composition that does not contain more than 5% clay. The soil itself before implementation should not be contaminated. Bioswales should be constructed with a longitudinal slope to allow sediments to settle. Maximum slope of bioswales is 3:1. A minimum clearance is required to ensure that other infrastructure would not be damaged. The overfill drain should be located at least 6 inches above the ground plane to allow for maximum concentration time of stormwater runoff in the bioswales. Rocks can also be used to slow down the runoff velocity. The use of filters is important to prevent inlets from becoming blocked by sediments or trash.[10]

Examples

[edit]
A curbside bioswale in Chicago.

Two early examples of scientifically designed bioswales for large scale applications are found in the western US. In 1996, for Willamette River Park in Portland, Oregon, a total of 2330 lineal feet of bioswale was designed and installed to capture and prevent pollutant runoff from entering the Willamette River. Intermittent check dams were installed to further abet silt capture, which reduced by 50% suspended solids entering the river system.[15]

A second example of a large scale designed bioswale is at the Carneros Business Park, Sonoma County, California. Starting in 1997 the project design team worked with the California Department of Fish and Game and County of Sonoma to produce a detailed design to channel surface runoff at the perimeter of a large parking area. Surface runoff consists of building roof runoff, parking lot runoff and overland flow from properties to the north of the project site. A total of two lineal miles of bioswale was designed into the project. The purpose of the bioswale was to minimize runoff contaminants from entering Sonoma Creek. The bioswale channel is grass-lined and nearly linear in form. Downslope gradient is approximately 4% and cross-slope gradient is approximately 6%.[16]

A relatively recent project established was the "Street Edge Alternatives" (SEA) project in Seattle, Washington, completed in 2001. Rather than using traditional piping, SEA's goal was to create a natural landscape that represented what the area was like before development. The street was 11% more pervious than a standard street and was characterized with evergreen trees and bioswales. The bioswales were planted on graded slopes with wetland and upland plants. Other landscaping also focused on native and salmon-friendly plants. SEA provided a strong benefit for stormwater runoff mitigation that helped continue to protect Seattle's creek ecology. The project street also created a more inviting and aesthetically pleasing site as opposed to hard landscaping.[17]

The New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYC DEP) has built more than 11,000 curbside bioswales, which are referred to as 'rain gardens'.[18] Rain gardens are constructed throughout the city to manage storm water and to improve the water quality of city waterways.[19] The care and tending of rain gardens is a partnership between the NYC DEP and a group of citizen volunteers called "harbor protectors". Rain gardens are inspected and cleaned at least once a week.[20]

Permaculture

[edit]

In permaculture, swales are used for water harvesting.[21][22]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Bioswale

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A bioswale is a shallow, vegetated channel or linear depression engineered to collect, convey, and treat runoff from impervious surfaces such as roads, lots, and rooftops, primarily through infiltration, , and evapotranspiration processes that remove pollutants and reduce peak flows. These features typically consist of a gently sloped bottom lined with engineered media, native , and sometimes mulch or rocks, allowing water to percolate slowly into the ground while plants uptake nutrients and sediments settle out. As a key component of and low impact development (LID), bioswales mimic natural hydrological processes to manage urban more sustainably than traditional piped systems. The origins of bioswales trace back to broader strategies that emerged during the , initially developed in to mitigate water quality degradation in the watershed by promoting on-site retention and treatment. By the , bioswales gained prominence as practical implementations of bioretention principles, evolving from earlier swale designs used for and flood mitigation since the mid-20th century. Their adoption accelerated with federal policies like the U.S. Agency's emphasis on non-structural controls under the Clean Water Act, leading to widespread integration in across and beyond. Bioswales offer multifaceted environmental benefits, including up to 80-90% removal of , , and hydrocarbons from runoff through vegetative uptake and adsorption, while also recharging and minimizing overflows in urban areas. Economically, they can lower costs by 20-50% compared to conventional storm drains by reducing the need for extensive piping and , and they enhance community aesthetics and by supporting pollinator-friendly native plants. However, effective performance depends on proper design considerations such as permeability, hydraulic loading rates, and regular to prevent clogging, with studies showing optimal removal in systems sized to handle 1-2 inches of rainfall per event.

Definition and History

Definition and Purpose

A bioswale is a linear, vegetated channel designed to capture, convey, and infiltrate stormwater runoff while filtering pollutants through soil and plant media. Also known as biofiltration swales or bioretention swales, these features are modified open channels that incorporate vegetation and engineered soil media to enhance treatment processes during water flow. Bioswales function as a form of green infrastructure, integrating natural elements into urban landscapes to manage stormwater in a distributed manner rather than relying solely on centralized systems. The primary purposes of bioswales include controlling quantity by reducing peak flows and overall runoff volume, improving through the removal of contaminants, recharging supplies, and creating for . By slowing the movement of runoff, bioswales mitigate flooding risks and promote sustainable in developed areas. These objectives support broader environmental goals, such as decreasing the burden on municipal sewer systems and enhancing local . Unlike traditional storm drains, which rapidly convey to receiving waters without on-site treatment, bioswales integrate and infiltration directly into the conveyance pathway, providing ecological benefits alongside hydraulic function. In contrast to rain gardens, which are shallow, basin-like depressions focused primarily on storage and infiltration, bioswales are elongated, sloped channels optimized for both transport and treatment over linear distances. Typically measuring 1 to 3 meters in width with gentle longitudinal slopes of less than 6 percent, bioswales are commonly deployed in urban settings along streets, lots, and greenways to handle runoff from impervious surfaces.

Historical Development

The concept of bioswales originated from traditional vegetated channels used for erosion control and drainage, with practices dating back to the 19th century in agricultural and roadside settings to stabilize soil and direct runoff. These early swales primarily focused on conveyance and basic sediment trapping through grass cover, evolving from broader conservation techniques like grassed waterways that gained prominence in the early 20th century for preventing gully erosion in farmlands. Bioswales were formalized in the as a key component of low-impact development () in the United States, particularly through innovative stormwater management in , where they were integrated into site design to mimic natural and reduce impervious surface impacts. This shift emphasized treatment over mere conveyance, influenced by parallel research in bioretention and permeable pavements that highlighted infiltration and pollutant removal potential. A major milestone occurred with the widespread adoption of bioswales in 's Natural Drainage Systems program, launched in 1999 by Seattle Public Utilities to retrofit urban areas with vegetated infrastructure for runoff reduction and creek restoration. Post-2000, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency integrated bioswales into national guidelines via the Phase II stormwater rule, promoting them as post-construction best management practices to achieve water quality standards. Influential researchers like Richard Horner advanced bioswale development through studies on ultra-urban applications, including the Ultra-Urban Stormwater Management Project (2000–2003), which demonstrated up to 98% runoff reduction using engineered soil and vegetation mixes. Policy mandates followed in U.S. cities, such as Portland, Oregon's Green Streets program initiated in 2003, requiring bioswales in street rights-of-way to manage overflows. Internationally, adaptations emerged under the EU (2000), which encouraged sustainable urban drainage systems incorporating bioswale-like features to protect water bodies from diffuse . By the early , bioswales evolved from simple grassed swales to engineered systems featuring native plants, amended s, and check dams for enhanced and treatment efficacy, reflecting broader integration into frameworks.

Design and Construction

Key Components

Bioswales are composed of engineered structural elements and native vegetative components that work together to manage runoff effectively. The primary structural element is the engineered mix, which forms the filtration bed and is typically composed of 60-85% and 15-40% or (such as ), with possible inclusion of 0-25% or fines to balance permeability, retention, and local requirements. This layer is generally 18-48 inches deep to allow sufficient root penetration and . In areas with low-infiltration native soils, underdrain pipes—usually perforated PVC with a minimum 6-inch and a 0.5% slope—are installed at the base within a layer to convey excess and prevent . Check dams or berms, constructed from rock, , or and spaced to align crests with downstream toes, are incorporated along the swale's length to slow flow velocities, enhance infiltration, and reduce , with maximum heights of 18 inches. Vegetative components are integral to the bioswale's functionality, featuring a diverse planting of native grasses, shrubs, and perennials adapted to periodic inundation and . Species such as rushes ( spp.) and sedges ( spp.) are commonly selected for their deep root systems that stabilize , uptake pollutants, and support microbial activity, often achieving at least 85% vegetative cover for optimal performance. A 2-3 inch layer of organic , such as wood chips or shredded bark, is applied over the surface to minimize , retain moisture, and suppress weeds during establishment. Inlet and outlet features ensure controlled entry and exit of stormwater to protect the system from scour and sediment overload. Pre-treatment areas, including gravel forebays with at least 25% of the required storage volume for sediment , are positioned at the to capture coarse particles before water enters the main swale. Energy dissipators, such as pads or level spreaders, are used at inlets to reduce from 1.0 feet per second or higher, promoting even distribution across the vegetated surface and preventing channel incision. Sizing of bioswales is determined by the contributing drainage area, with a typical length-to-area ratio of 75-100 feet of swale per acre of impervious surface to provide adequate treatment residence time. The longitudinal slope is generally 1-6%, and the overall depth—including ponding and soil layers—ranges from 0.3 to 1 meter, with bottom widths of 4-8 feet for trapezoidal cross-sections to balance hydraulic capacity and land use.

Design Principles and Types

Bioswale design emphasizes maintaining uniform sheet flow across the vegetated channel to promote even distribution of stormwater and prevent erosion, with inflow ideally occurring along the entire length where site conditions allow. Longitudinal slopes are typically kept gentle at 1% to 5% to ensure non-erosive velocities, generally below 1 foot per second (fps) during water quality storms, facilitating sedimentation and filtration. Hydraulic residence time is a critical parameter, targeted at a minimum of 9 minutes for basic designs to allow sufficient contact with vegetation and soil for treatment, extending to 18 minutes for configurations with lateral inflows. Soil media must support infiltration, often requiring amendments such as compost or sand mixes to achieve permeability rates of at least 0.5 inches per hour, with underdrains incorporated if native soils are impermeable or groundwater is high. Integration with site hydrology is essential, including energy dissipation at inlets like curb cuts or riprap to manage velocities and pretreatment via sediment forebays for high-sediment areas. Bioswales are classified into several types based on and function, with dry bioswales designed primarily for infiltration and rapid drainage using engineered soil media, often in areas with suitable permeability. Wet bioswales, in contrast, incorporate permanent shallow or high water tables with and low-permeability liners to mimic wetlands, suitable for flat terrains with slopes under 1.5%. Linear bioswales follow straight or gently curving channels, commonly placed in medians or verges for efficient conveyance, while curvilinear designs enhance in settings. Hybrid systems combine bioswales with permeable pavements or bioretention cells to increase treatment capacity in constrained urban spaces, allowing for both conveyance and storage. Site-specific adaptations ensure effectiveness across diverse conditions; for poor-draining clay soils, amendments like 20% mixed into the top 6 inches elevate organic content and permeability, while underdrains prevent . In arid climates, drought-tolerant native are selected to minimize irrigation needs and maintain functionality during dry periods. For high or impervious sites, designs elevate channels or incorporate liners to direct excess flow, with side slopes limited to 3:1 horizontal to vertical for stability and accessibility. Design standards draw from local codes and federal guidelines, such as those from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, targeting 25-50% reduction in volume for small, frequent events through infiltration and . (ASCE) principles, reflected in municipal manuals, specify minimum lengths of 100 feet for basic bioswales and maximum drainage areas of 5 acres to optimize treatment without overflow risks. Local adaptations, like those in King County, require treating 91% of the annual runoff volume up to the water quality design storm, with overflow provisions for larger events via check dams or emergency spillways.

Mechanisms of Operation

Pollutant Removal

Bioswales target a range of stormwater contaminants through integrated physical, chemical, and biological processes. Sediments, including silt and particulates, are primarily removed via sedimentation in forebays or check dams at the inlet, where reduced flow velocities allow particles to settle, and subsequent filtration as water passes through vegetated soil and root zones. This combination typically achieves 60-90% removal of total suspended solids (TSS), with median efficiencies around 81% based on field studies of vegetated swales. Nutrients such as and are addressed through plant uptake, where vegetation absorbs forms like and , alongside adsorption to particles and microbial degradation in the anaerobic zones of the matrix. For instance, binds to via chemical and , while undergoes by microbes converting it to gas. Representative efficiencies include 30-50% removal for total (median 34%) and 40-80% for total (with higher rates in designs promoting ). like (Cu), (), and lead (Pb), often bound to sediments, are captured through , by and roots, and adsorption onto and clay particles in the engineered media; phytoextraction by plants further sequesters metals in , though this is secondary to binding. Efficiencies for these metals range from 50-90%, with medians of 51% for Cu, 67% for Pb, and 71% for . Pathogens, including , are filtered by the dense and layers, with additional reduction through predation by microbes and UV exposure in shallow flows. Organics such as and grease undergo to and surfaces, followed by microbial degradation in the . Pathogen removal can reach 50-100% in grassed channels, while hydrocarbons show medians around 62%. These processes are enhanced by factors like extended (e.g., 5-10 minutes via check dams or gentle slopes) and adequate media depth (typically 12-18 inches of amended ), which promote contact between water and treatment surfaces. Despite these capabilities, bioswales exhibit limitations in removing soluble pollutants, such as dissolved nutrients or metals, without soil amendments like or iron oxides to boost adsorption; unamended systems may even export soluble forms under high-flow or saturated conditions, with efficiencies dropping below 40% for dissolved . Overall performance varies with influent concentrations, hydraulic loading, and health, underscoring the need for site-specific design.

Water Management Processes

Bioswales manage primarily through infiltration into the underlying , where water percolates downward according to , expressed as Q=[K](/page/K)⋅A⋅dhdlQ = [K](/page/K) \cdot A \cdot \frac{dh}{dl}, with QQ as the flow rate, [K](/page/K)[K](/page/K) as the of the , AA as the cross-sectional area, and dhdl\frac{dh}{dl} as the hydraulic gradient. This process is enhanced by engineered media with typical saturated hydraulic conductivities allowing infiltration rates of 1-5 cm/hr, depending on composition and compaction. by vegetation further reduces stored water volumes post-storm, as plants uptake moisture through and from and leaf surfaces contributes to overall runoff loss. During extreme events exceeding the bioswale's capacity, excess water overflows to downstream drains or conveyance systems via designed outlets or weirs to prevent flooding. Flow control in bioswales is achieved by reducing velocity through from and , governed by Manning's equation: V=1nR2/3S1/2V = \frac{1}{n} R^{2/3} S^{1/2}, where VV is the average , nn is the Manning's roughness coefficient (typically 0.20-0.55 for vegetated channels), RR is the hydraulic radius, and SS is the channel slope. This frictional resistance slows flows to velocities often below 1 ft/s (0.3 m/s), promoting and infiltration while attenuating peak flows by up to 50% compared to predeveloped conditions for frequent storms. Infiltration processes also support by allowing percolated water to replenish aquifers, with rates of 1-5 cm/hr facilitating gradual subsurface flow that restores in streams during dry periods. This recharge mimics pre-urban , countering the reduction in natural inputs from impervious surfaces. Bioswales enhance by accommodating increased rainfall intensities through their capacity for volume reduction via infiltration and , as well as controlled overflow pathways that mitigate risks in urban settings projected to experience more frequent heavy storms.

Benefits

Environmental Benefits

Bioswales significantly enhance by filtering runoff through , , and engineered media, thereby reducing loads entering receiving waters. They effectively remove suspended solids, , and such as and , with studies showing average reductions of 63% for and 71% for roadway metals like and . This process also decreases nutrient loading, mitigating in downstream water bodies, as evidenced by up to 99% reductions in and in controlled experiments. By slowing runoff velocity, bioswales further reduce along streambanks and channels, preventing that can degrade aquatic habitats. In terms of water quantity management, bioswales promote infiltration and , leading to substantial reductions in volume and peak flows, which aids mitigation. Representative designs achieve 20-40% volume reduction for typical urban storms, with some systems capturing up to 90% of runoff from very small events before it reaches systems. This capacity helps alleviate risks and stabilizes , particularly in impervious-heavy landscapes. Bioswales support by incorporating native plants that create microhabitats for pollinators, birds, and other , fostering ecological connectivity in urban settings. The use of deep-rooted enhances local ecosystems, providing food and shelter while promoting over invasive alternatives. For climate adaptation, the vegetation in bioswales contributes to through plant growth and accumulation, similar to other urban . Additionally, they mitigate urban heat islands by providing shading and enhancing , maintaining surface temperatures approximately 25% lower than impervious surfaces like asphalt. Bioswales improve by facilitating greater infiltration rates—often exceeding 0.5 inches per hour in amended soils—which prevents surface compaction and promotes long-term sequestration in the root zone. This process builds over time, enhancing microbial activity and nutrient cycling without relying on chemical amendments. As of 2025, recent studies highlight enhanced benefits from integrating smart sensors and adaptive designs, improving overall pollutant removal and flood mitigation efficiencies by 10-20% in monitored systems.[](https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-03/epa- stormwater-report-2024.pdf)

Social and Economic Benefits

Bioswales contribute to urban livability by enhancing aesthetic appeal through integrated vegetation and landscaping, which transforms utilitarian stormwater features into visually attractive elements that improve the overall streetscape and encourage pedestrian activity. They also promote recreational value by fostering safer and more comfortable public spaces, such as medians and bulb-outs, where the greenery supports active mobility and community gatherings. Additionally, bioswales in roadside medians can reduce noise pollution by absorbing and dampening traffic sounds, creating quieter environments in dense urban areas. From a perspective, bioswales mitigate flooding risks by capturing and infiltrating , thereby decreasing the likelihood of urban flash floods that can endanger lives and infrastructure. They further protect against exposure by filtering and harmful microorganisms from runoff, with peer-reviewed studies showing reductions ranging from 28% to 100% in indicators like and E. coli. Bioswales also improve air quality through plant-based filtration, which captures airborne pollutants and supports respiratory health in populated neighborhoods. Economically, bioswales offer significant cost savings compared to traditional piped systems, with reductions ranging from 15% to 80% due to their decentralized design and use of natural materials. Specific implementations have demonstrated savings of 47% to 69% when bioswales replace storm sewers, lowering upfront expenses for municipalities and developers. Property values near bioswales often increase by approximately 8.8%, driven by the enhanced desirability of , resilient neighborhoods. Over the long term, bioswales provide a favorable through lower maintenance requirements than gray , with lifecycle analyses indicating sustained economic benefits over 20 years or more. Bioswales advance by providing access to green spaces in underserved urban areas, where they counteract environmental injustices by integrating nature into low-income or historically marginalized . involvement in bioswale and fosters and cultural , as participatory processes allow residents to influence projects that address local needs like flood protection and beautification. This inclusive approach helps bridge disparities in distribution, promoting healthier and more equitable city environments.

Siting and Implementation

Ideal Locations

Bioswales are particularly well-suited to urban settings such as road shoulders, edges, and green streets, where they can intercept runoff from adjacent impervious surfaces while integrating into the . These locations allow bioswales to serve as linear features that treat and convey water from small drainage areas, typically less than 0.5 acres, with contributing impervious surfaces that do not exceed moderate ratios to ensure effective infiltration. In low-density urban or rural contexts, they can replace traditional curbs and gutters, utilizing existing like roadside ditches to maximize treatment . Optimal site criteria emphasize gentle and favorable conditions to promote infiltration and prevent or . Longitudinal slopes of typically 1% to 5% facilitate water flow without excessive velocity, with side slopes ideally at 4:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter to ensure stability and . Well-draining native classified as Hydrologic Soil or B are preferred; these are often amended with engineered media having an infiltration rate of 5–10 inches per hour and containing no more than 5% clay to support and removal. Sites must avoid high water tables, maintaining at least a 2-foot (0.6-meter) separation from to prevent saturation and ensure drainage within 48 hours; depths greater than 2 feet below the underdrain or soil media are recommended in semi-arid regions. Additionally, locations should be distant from steep drops, unstable slopes, or known contamination sources, with any prior pollution requiring remediation before installation. Land use compatibility guides bioswale placement to balance functionality and risk. Residential and commercial areas provide ideal fits due to lower pollutant loads and available space for infiltration, while industrial sites may require impermeable liners to contain potential toxics and prevent contamination. Bioswales are unsuitable for high-traffic zones without protective barriers, such as curbs or bollards, to safeguard and vehicular safety. In all cases, sites must be evaluated for conflicts with subsurface utilities, ensuring minimum clearances to avoid infrastructure damage. Spatial planning prioritizes alignment with natural flow paths to enhance hydraulic performance and minimize . Bioswales should be configured as narrow, linear channels—typically 3 to 10 feet wide—with a minimum clear width of 1.8 meters (6 feet) for maintenance access and cyclist passage where applicable. Inlets via cuts, at least 18 inches wide and spaced 3 to 15 feet apart, direct runoff effectively, while a 2-inch grade drop from the street and a 6-inch overflow provision above the surface manage excess flows. Maximizing length along the flow path increases for treatment, and multiple inlets at sag points or median breaks distribute inflows evenly.

Construction and Installation

The construction and installation of a bioswale involves a multi-phase process that emphasizes minimal disturbance and integration with the surrounding to ensure long-term functionality. Typically undertaken as part of the final stages of site development, the process prioritizes stabilizing upstream areas to prevent influx and uses low-impact techniques to maintain permeability. Site preparation begins with staking out the bioswale alignment to limit equipment traffic and compaction within the designated area. Contributing drainage areas must be fully stabilized with or controls prior to excavation to avoid contamination. Construction should occur during dry weather to prevent saturated soils, and a minimum 2-foot separation from the seasonal high table is required. Excavation and grading follow, utilizing excavators or backhoes operated from adjacent stable ground to remove and shape the channel to a parabolic or trapezoidal cross-section with side of 4:1 (horizontal:vertical) or gentler and a longitudinal slope of typically 1-5%. Heavy machinery must avoid the bioswale bottom to prevent compaction, which can reduce infiltration; instead, low ground-pressure equipment is recommended, followed by roto-tilling the base layer to about 6 inches deep if underdrains are present. measures, such as silt fences or temporary seeding, are applied during this phase to protect exposed soils. Soil installation entails layering engineered media to promote infiltration, starting with a 12-inch aggregate of 1-2 inch clean stone for drainage, topped by a 2-3 inch layer of 3/8-inch chips, and a 6-12 inch surface layer of modified (75-90% , 0-10% , and up to 25% ) placed in 12-inch lifts that are saturated to achieve proper settlement without heavy compaction. Class 2 nonwoven geotextiles are installed along sidewalls for and to prevent migration of fines into the . Post-installation, the 's infiltration rate—targeting 0.5-6 inches per hour—is tested using infiltrometers or simple pour tests to verify performance before proceeding. Planting occurs after soil layering, incorporating native, deep-rooted tolerant of fluctuating moisture, such as sedges, rushes, and grasses, via hydroseeding, plugs, or installation. A 2-3 inch layer of fibrous is applied to retain moisture and suppress weeds, often secured with netting or blankets on slopes to prevent washout during establishment. may be provided temporarily until roots develop, typically over several weeks. Inlet and outlet structures are established concurrently or last, with inlets configured as curb cuts, pipe connections, or level spreaders to distribute sheet flow evenly, and outlets featuring perforated underdrains (e.g., 4-6 inch PVC) wrapped in to collect treated water while allowing overflow spillways for larger storms at non-erosive velocities below 5 feet per second. Initial performance monitoring involves observing dewatering times and accumulation during the first few events to confirm hydraulic function. Best practices include phased implementation to sequence activities and minimize site disturbance, such as completing excavation before soil import and delaying full runoff connection until establishes. For small projects, construction often spans 1-3 months, accounting for preparation, layering, and a 24-48 hour settlement period per lift, with planting ideally timed to favorable growing seasons like spring or fall to avoid wet periods that could cause or poor root development.

Maintenance

Routine Practices

Routine maintenance of bioswales involves regular inspections, care, , and performance monitoring to sustain their and infiltration capabilities. These practices ensure that the system remains functional without requiring extensive intervention, focusing on preventing minor issues from escalating. Inspections are typically conducted annually to assess for , buildup, and overall structural integrity, with visual checks performed in or early fall to evaluate health and drainage efficiency. Seasonal debris removal, such as clearing leaves and trash from inlets and outlets, occurs in spring and fall to prevent , and additional checks are recommended after significant events to identify any immediate concerns like excessive . Vegetation care includes weeding at least three times per year during the to control invasives and maintain density, with hand-pulling preferred to avoid chemical impacts on microbes. Mowing is limited to 1-2 times annually for grass components, targeting a of 4-6 inches to promote health without disturbing the layer. Replanting is necessary in areas where coverage drops below 90%, using suited to local conditions, and supplemental is provided during the establishment phase for the first 1-2 years, applying about 1 inch of water per week as needed. Soil management entails replenishing mulch layers annually or as needed, applying 2-3 inches of organic shredded to retain and suppress weeds while keeping it clear of drainage features. Sediment flushing can be achieved through controlled low-flow releases during wet periods to clear accumulated materials from the pretreatment areas, ensuring ongoing infiltration rates. Monitoring focuses on simple, observable metrics such as duration after rainfall, where should not remain for more than 48-72 hours to indicate proper function; deviations prompt further of infiltration or blockages. These routine activities, when consistently applied, help maintain the bioswale's removal efficiency over time.

Long-term Management

Long-term management of bioswales involves systematic monitoring to evaluate and ensure sustained functionality over decades. Protocols typically include periodic sampling during storm events to assess removal efficacy, with analyses for parameters such as , metals, and organic contaminants using established methods like EPA Method 200.8 for metals and EPA Method 625 for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Infiltration rates, a key metric, are measured using infiltrometers, such as double-ring or single-ring devices, at multiple points within the bioswale (e.g., and ) to detect or reduced , often compared against values to guide interventions. While monitoring may occur monthly post-construction, long-term assessments shift to annual or biennial , supplemented by sensor-based tracking of during rain events for continuous data on hydrological . Restoration efforts address degradation through partial or full interventions, adapting to natural processes like plant succession. Partial restoration, such as aeration via core aeration or deep tilling, is applied to alleviate surface from fine sediments, restoring infiltration without major disruption and typically performed every few years as needed. Full rebuilds, involving excavation and replacement of media, are recommended every 10-20 years if cumulative pollutant accumulation or structural failure impairs function, with strategies monitoring shifts to replant that enhance and resilience. These approaches prioritize minimal intervention, leveraging deep-rooted vegetation to prevent while maintaining at least 85% vegetative cover. Bioswales generally have an expected lifespan of 20-50 years, influenced by , conditions, and diligence, after which performance may decline due to media saturation or loss. At end-of-life, decommissioning involves assessing contamination levels; if pollutants like have accumulated, removal and disposal per environmental regulations are required, followed by site restoration or conversion to alternative uses. Lifecycle planning incorporates these phases to optimize costs, with total ownership costs including periodic rebuilds estimated at levels comparable to traditional when properly managed. Policy integration ensures bioswales are treated as critical assets in municipal frameworks, with many communities incorporating them into utility plans that allocate dedicated funding—such as fees or bonds—for inspections and repairs. For instance, programs track bioswale conditions via databases, prioritizing high-risk sites and aligning with NPDES permits to meet standards over the full lifecycle. This approach, seen in initiatives like those in and EPA-guided communities, facilitates compliance and long-term sustainability by embedding bioswales in broader inventories.

Challenges and Limitations

Common Issues

Bioswales, like other , are susceptible to hydrological failures that impair their ability to manage effectively. from excess is a primary concern, where fine particles from upstream runoff accumulate in the media or at inlets, significantly reducing infiltration rates; for instance, studies have shown that often occurs in the top 75 of the media, leading to ponded and diminished removal. Overflow during intense represents another hydrological issue, triggered when clogged media or undersized designs cannot accommodate peak flows, resulting in untreated runoff bypassing the system and increasing risks downstream. Recent studies indicate that climate change-induced increases in intensity can exacerbate these overflow risks. Biological challenges further compromise bioswale functionality over time. Plant die-off frequently arises from conditions or poor , such as inadequate drainage, high , or deficiencies, which stress vegetation and lead to reduced and capacity; excessive inundation during wet periods can exacerbate this by limiting oxygen to roots. takeover is also common, where aggressive non-native outcompete intended vegetation, altering and aesthetics while potentially releasing excess nutrients into the system; coverage exceeding 30% by species like reed canary grass can dominate within months if unchecked. Structural problems can undermine the physical of bioswales. Erosion at inlets occurs due to high-velocity flows scouring unprotected surfaces, forming gullies that compromise and allow to escape untreated. Underdrain failure from intrusion is particularly problematic in systems with marginal soils, as aggressive roots penetrate , causing blockages or collapses that prevent drainage and lead to prolonged saturation. Human-related issues often accelerate degradation through direct interference. , such as vehicle traffic compacting or damaging structures, creates ruts and exposes areas to , while poor public awareness contributes to these incidents. Dumping of trash, chemicals, or yard leads to contamination overload, where accumulated pollutants like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) exceed the system's treatment capacity, fostering toxic conditions for and microbes.

Mitigation Strategies

To address in bioswales, which can impair infiltration and increase overflow risks, pre-treatment upgrades such as forebays, grit chambers, or sumps are recommended to capture coarse and before runoff enters the main channel. These structures reduce loading by at least 50% in high- areas, extending the system's operational life. Additionally, regular vacuuming of surface and layers prevents accumulation that could seal the surface. Incorporating amendments like into the engineered mix enhances longevity by improving and binding, thereby reducing the rate of hydraulic over time; field tests indicate zeolite-amended soils can achieve over 90% heavy metal removal efficiency. Enhancing vegetation resilience is crucial for sustained pollutant uptake and in bioswales. Using diverse planting mixes of , such as a combination of deep-rooted grasses, sedges, and forbs, promotes ecological stability and adaptability to varying hydrologic conditions, as diverse assemblages support higher microbial diversity that aids in nutrient cycling and . This approach minimizes die-off from pests or . In dry climates, supplemental watering systems—such as or integration—ensure establishment during the first 1-2 years, with guidelines recommending watering once or twice monthly until native plants adapt. Structural fixes further bolster bioswale durability against erosion and hydraulic stress. Reinforced check , constructed from panels with reinforcement or timber with metal bracing, slow flow velocities to below 1 ft/s while preventing scour, allowing for even distribution and prolonged infiltration; installations with such dams have demonstrated 20-30% greater retention volumes in sloped sites. For underdrain systems, root barriers made of or fabric geotextiles installed around pipes inhibit invasive root intrusion that could block outlets, maintaining flow rates and extending infrastructure life by 5-10 years in vegetated channels. Emerging adaptive approaches, such as bioswales with IoT-enabled s, enable real-time monitoring of key parameters like , water levels, and infiltration rates to preemptively address performance declines. Low-cost arrays, including ultrasonic level sensors and probes, facilitate data-driven adjustments. These technologies integrate with urban models for proactive management, particularly in variable climates where early detection of anomalies like reduced permeability can prevent widespread failures.

Examples and Case Studies

Early and Notable Examples

One of the earliest documented large-scale bioswale implementations in the United States occurred in at the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry (OMSI) in , located along the . This retrofit project utilized bioswales in parking lots to treat stormwater runoff, marking one of the first applications of vegetated swales for pollutant capture and river protection in an urban setting. The initiative was part of Portland's emerging focus on low-impact development to address combined sewer overflows into the . In California, early adoption of bioswales at scale is exemplified by developments in Sonoma County during the late 1990s, where linear bioswales were integrated into business park designs to manage road-adjacent stormwater and minimize erosion. These projects collaborated with state agencies to enhance habitat and water quality, setting precedents for commercial applications. Urban-scale expansions of bioswales emerged in the 2000s, notably in New York City through the Greenstreets program, which began incorporating rain garden equivalents and bioswales into street rights-of-way as part of PlaNYC initiatives starting in 2007. By the early 2010s, the program had installed over 11,000 such features citywide, equivalent to rain gardens in function, to capture the first inch of rainfall and reduce combined sewer overflows. In Seattle, the Street Edge Alternatives (SEA Streets) project, piloted in 2001 and expanded through the late 2000s, integrated bioswales along residential streets, reducing stormwater runoff volume by 98% in monitored areas and mimicking natural drainage patterns. Internationally, pioneered integrated management in the 1990s with its voluntary downspout disconnection program, launched in 1998, which redirected rooftop runoff to pervious surfaces to alleviate sewer system pressures and improve in local ravines. This approach complemented separate bioswale installations in urban retrofits, emphasizing source control over traditional piping. Early implementations revealed key lessons, including the underestimation of long-term needs, such as regular removal and replacement, which strained municipal budgets due to limited funding for operations. In Portland, hotter and drier conditions exacerbated plant stress in bioswales, necessitating adaptive watering protocols. Despite these challenges, successes were evident in pollutant reduction; Portland's bioswales consistently achieved at least 70% removal of (TSS) from 90% of average annual runoff events, demonstrating effective for protection. Community stewardship programs helped mitigate issues by encouraging resident involvement in routine care.

Recent Global Applications

In recent years, bioswales have been integrated into U.S. federal climate adaptation strategies to enhance resilience against extreme heat and . The U.S. Department of the Interior's 2024-2027 Climate Adaptation Plan emphasizes , including bioswales alongside green roofs, to manage runoff and mitigate risks in vulnerable areas such as . For instance, post-Hurricane Sandy restoration at Prime Hook incorporated bioswales to improve and ecological functions, supported by funding from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law's Ecosystem Restoration Program. A 2024 study published in Scientific Reports modeled bioswale performance under climate change scenarios in urban settings like Cicheng New Town, Ningbo, China, demonstrating their potential to reduce stormwater runoff by up to 30% during 1-in-2-year events under baseline conditions, though effectiveness drops to 8-9% for rarer extreme events and further declines by about 60% in future projections (SSP2-4.5 to SSP5-8.5). To counteract these reductions, the study recommends expanding bioswale coverage to 4% of catchment areas, highlighting their role in adapting to intensified rainfall patterns. Community-led initiatives in have showcased bioswales' contributions to equitable climate adaptation since 2023. In and New Orleans, ClimateCafé projects—participatory efforts mapping over 500 —have evaluated bioswales and rain gardens for long-term infiltration in challenging soils, achieving rates of 26-300 mm/h and informing guidelines for urban equity in flood-prone, low-permeability areas. 's St. George Rainway project, operational since 2023, uses bioswales to capture stormwater, support , and reconnect ecological corridors, fostering community involvement in resilient design. In , bioswales are increasingly paired with green roofs to bolster , as explored in a 2024 Frontiers in Climate analysis identifying optimal locations for these interventions to capture substantial rainfall and reduce runoff coefficients by up to 70% when combined. Such integrations, applied in cities facing intensified , enhance control and services under EU urban adaptation frameworks. Technological advancements have enabled sensor-equipped bioswales for real-time monitoring within . A 2024 review in Water underscores their use in urban settings to track performance metrics like infiltration and pollutant removal, with from demonstrating ecohydrological benefits through data-driven maintenance. In small towns, bioswales support ; a 2024 Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Saint-Charles-Borromée, (population ~15,000), found that redesigned streets with bioswales improved perceptions of safety, aesthetics, and comfort for walking and cycling among 296 residents, particularly among eco-conscious individuals. In developing contexts, bioswales have driven hydrological sustainability gains, as detailed in a 2023 Sustainability bibliometric review analyzing global applications that reduce runoff volumes by 15-82% and peak rates by 4-87% in urban areas, restoring natural infiltration amid climate pressures. California's Delta Adapts plan, updated in 2025, incorporates bioswales as green infrastructure under Strategy ECO-4 to mitigate flood risks in developed Delta regions, yielding co-benefits like improved water quality, habitat enhancement, and increased green space coverage for multi-benefit resilience. As of 2025, federal funding under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act has supported bioswale expansions in cities like Los Angeles for urban flood mitigation, integrating them into streetscapes to handle increased rainfall intensities.

Integration with Broader Systems

In Permaculture

In permaculture, bioswales—often implemented as vegetated swales—serve as contour channels that passively capture and infiltrate surface runoff, promoting water retention and reducing erosion on sloped landscapes. These features align with foundational permaculture principles by mimicking natural hydrological patterns to maximize resource efficiency, as emphasized in early designs that prioritize earthworks for sustainable water management. Integration with food forests involves placing swales along contour lines to direct water toward multi-layered plantings, supporting zoning strategies that place high-maintenance elements near human activity while allowing passive irrigation for perennial crops. This approach, rooted in holistic system design, enhances overall site productivity without relying on mechanical inputs. On farms, bioswales facilitate recharge by slowing and filtering rainwater, allowing it to percolate into the for later use by crops, thereby reducing dependence on external sources. They also channel pollutant-free runoff toward orchards, protecting fruit quality while replenishing in agricultural settings. Designs inspired by , such as those in his seminal frameworks, adapt traditional swales into bioswale-like systems by incorporating to filter sediments and nutrients, as seen in contour-based earthworks for self-sustaining landscapes. Within contexts, bioswales contribute to enhanced through improved nutrient cycling, as infiltrated water transports and microbial life deeper into the profile, fostering long-term productivity. They also boost by creating habitats that attract pollinators and beneficial , which in turn support natural and reduce the need for chemical interventions. Studies on systems demonstrate these benefits, with increased carbon stocks and microbial activity leading to more resilient agroecosystems. Adaptations of bioswales in permaculture often include organic mulching along channels to suppress weeds, conserve moisture, and add nutrients as materials decompose, aligning with no-till principles. Edges of these swales are commonly planted with food-producing species, such as berry bushes or nitrogen-fixing shrubs, which not only filter water but also yield edible harvests, exemplifying the "each element performs many functions" ethic.

With Climate Adaptation and Green Infrastructure

Bioswales are frequently combined with complementary green infrastructure components to form integrated systems that provide multi-stage stormwater treatment and enhance urban hydrological resilience. Pairing bioswales with rain gardens allows for initial infiltration and filtration in depressed vegetated areas before excess runoff enters linear bioswale channels for further conveyance and pollutant removal. Permeable pavements, such as porous concrete or asphalt, can precede bioswales to reduce initial runoff volume and velocity, creating a layered approach that maximizes groundwater recharge and minimizes combined sewer overflows in dense urban settings. Additionally, porous asphalt inlets facilitate directed flow into bioswales, preventing erosion and optimizing treatment capacity in high-traffic areas like parking lots or medians. These combinations not only amplify water quality improvements but also support biodiversity by creating interconnected green corridors. In broader climate adaptation efforts, bioswales contribute to concepts, exemplified by China's nationwide expansions in the , where they form part of decentralized networks to absorb up to 70% of annual rainfall, reducing risks in rapidly urbanizing regions like . For coastal vulnerabilities, including sea-level rise, bioswales are adapted through elevated designs, such as integration with raised roadways or berms, to handle intensified and saline intrusion while maintaining functionality above projected inundation levels. In places like Beach and , such modifications enable bioswales to filter stormwater in low-lying areas prone to tidal flooding, supporting long-term infrastructure protection. Policy frameworks have increasingly incorporated bioswales into resilient . The U.S. (IIJA), enacted in 2021, allocates over $1 billion for projects, including bioswales as bioretention systems to bolster flood resilience in vulnerable municipalities. On a global scale, 2025 reviews of (NBS) frameworks highlight bioswales as cost-effective tools for mitigation, with tools like the Strategic NBS Framework aiding cities in prioritizing their deployment for equitable risk reduction. Emerging trends point toward AI-optimized bioswale networks, where models predict runoff patterns and adjust vegetation or inlet configurations in real-time to enhance performance under changing conditions. Simultaneously, equity considerations are gaining prominence, with initiatives targeting bioswale installations in low-income and flood-prone communities to address disproportionate impacts and promote . These advancements underscore bioswales' evolving role in sustainable, inclusive urban adaptation.

References

  1. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-04/green-infrastructure-toolbox_biofiltration-swale.pdf
  2. https://www.iowadnr.gov/media/8641/download?inline
  3. https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/water/supp_info/conservation/green_design/drainage_swales.html
  4. https://water.unl.edu/article/stormwater-management/low-impact-development/
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11133320/
  6. https://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure/types-green-infrastructure
  7. https://www.fs.usda.gov/psw/publications/mcpherson/psw_2017_mcpherson004_xiao.pdf
  8. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/documents/LID_Economics_Literature_Review.pdf
  9. https://dspace.lib.hawaii.edu/bitstreams/847417de-ff46-47fd-8f45-1e050695047e/download
  10. https://www.esf.edu/ere/endreny/GICalculator/BioswaleIntro.html
  11. https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/street-design-elements/stormwater-management/bioswales/
  12. https://engineering.lacity.gov/about-us/biodiversity-projects
  13. https://hgic.clemson.edu/factsheet/an-introduction-to-bioswales/
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479720316819
  15. https://elibrary.asabe.org/azdez.asp?JID=5&AID=23213&CID=min2007&T=1
  16. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/practLowImpctDevel.pdf
  17. https://www.epa.gov/npdes/national-menu-best-management-practices-bmps-stormwater
  18. https://www.ce.washington.edu/sites/cee/files/pdfs/research/hydrology/water-resources/WRS170.pdf
  19. https://cityparksalliance.org/resource/portland-green-street-program/
  20. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/16/6317
  21. https://your.kingcounty.gov/dnrp/library/water-and-land/stormwater/surface-water-design-manual/2021/amended-2024/2021-kcswdm-amended-2024-full-manual.pdf
  22. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-04/documents/green_streets_design_manual_feb_2021_web_res_small_508.pdf
  23. https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/DPS/Resources/Files/Land_Development/Bio%20Swale.pdf
  24. https://your.kingcounty.gov/dnrp/library/water-and-land/stormwater/surface-water-design-manual/Chapter%206%20FINAL%20draft%204%208%202016.pdf
  25. https://www.nashville.gov/sites/default/files/2025-10/Green_Infrastructure_Design_final.pdf
  26. https://mostcenter.umd.edu/sites/default/files/national_pollutant_removal_performance_database_stormwater_treatment_practices.pdf
  27. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-11/bmp-grassed-swales.pdf
  28. https://gacoast.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Stormwater-Factsheets.pdf
  29. https://www.in.gov/nirpc/files/Vegetated_Swale-Fact_Sheet.pdf
  30. https://www.wsdot.wa.gov/research/reports/fullreports/724.1.pdf
  31. https://wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/fulltext/M31-16/M31-16.04supplement.pdf
  32. https://your.kingcounty.gov/dnrp/library/water-and-land/stormwater/surface-water-design-manual/2021/2021-kcswdm-chapter-6-water-quality-design.pdf
  33. https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2015/5030/pdf/sir2015-5030.pdf
  34. https://library.isgs.illinois.edu/Pubs/pdfs/ofs/2016/ofs2016-2a.pdf
  35. https://www.fs.usda.gov/psw/topics/urban_forestry/products/psw_cufr761_P47ReportLRes_AC.pdf
  36. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-11/documents/final_gi_maintenance_508.pdf
  37. https://nrcsolutions.org/bioswales/
  38. https://thewatershedproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Native-Plants-of-the-Baxter-Creek-Bioswale-Trifold-Brochure.pdf
  39. https://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure/benefits-green-infrastructure
  40. https://www.giss.nasa.gov/edu/nycri/research/files/2015/2015-GISS-Gaffin_poster.pdf
  41. https://ugreen.io/bioswale-basics-transforming-urban-landscapes-for-better-water-management/
  42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25000602
  43. https://greenphl.com/water/eco-explainer-what-is-a-bioswale/
  44. https://alphaenvironmental.net/blog/benefits-of-bioswales-and-bioretention-in-stormwater-management/
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5126620/
  46. https://thrivingearthexchange.org/project/neworleans-la-acommunityvoice/
  47. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/bbfs3cost.pdf
  48. https://owl.cwp.org/?mdocs-file=4471
  49. https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/working-papers/green-infrastructure-home-values-land-value-capture-equitable-property/
  50. https://www.iaenvironment.org/webres/File/Natural%2520Infrastructure%2520Economic%2520Benefits%2520UPDATE2.pdf
  51. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264275122004905
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10460762/
  53. https://eos.org/features/growing-equity-in-city-green-space
  54. https://dam.assets.ohio.gov/image/upload/epa.ohio.gov/Portals/35/storm/technical_assistance/2.9_Bioretention.pdf
  55. https://wiki.sustainabletechnologies.ca/wiki/Bioswales
  56. https://www.andersoncountysc.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WQ-06_Bioswale_COMPLETE.pdf
  57. https://www.wbdg.org/FFC/ARMYCOE/PWTB/pwtb_200_1_139.pdf
  58. https://www.whenappearancematters.com/blog-posts/when-where-to-install-bioswales
  59. http://files.water.rutgers.edu/Water%20Resources%20Program/Projects/GreenInfrastructureChampions/2022%20Sessions/GENERIC-MaintenanceManual_SEPTEMBER2020.pdf
  60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5607960/
  61. https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/handle/10150/662546/sustainability-13-12520-v2.pdf?sequence=1
  62. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-04/documents/green_infrastructure-om_report.pdf
  63. https://mde.maryland.gov/programs/water/TMDL/TMDLImplementation/Documents/Archive/Regional_Meetings/Fall2013/presentations/Cost_Efficiency_WIP_Fall_Workshops_10312013.pdf
  64. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-01/long-term-stormwater-planning-guide-communities.pdf
  65. https://dep.nj.gov/floodresilience/asset-management/
  66. https://www.efc.csus.edu/stormwater_storymap/files/Grand_Rapids_SW_Asset_2016.pdf
  67. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-05/GoingGreenforGood_Long-term_Considerations_O%26M_GreenInfrastructure.pdf
  68. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479721011099
  69. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6879463/
  70. https://www.cityofventura.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/37698/Vegetated-Swale-Bioswale-and-Bioretention-Supplemental-Watering-and-Maintenance-Guide-2023
  71. https://www.nyc.gov/assets/dep/downloads/pdf/water/stormwater/green-infrastructure/green-infrastructure-standard-designs.pdf
  72. https://aspent.com/products/root-barrier/
  73. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12520
  74. https://ijsra.net/sites/default/files/IJSRA-2020-0045.pdf
  75. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7159
  76. https://www.nyc.gov/assets/dep/downloads/pdf/water/stormwater/green-infrastructure/nyc-green-infrastructure-plan-2010.pdf
  77. https://www.seattle.gov/utilities/neighborhood-projects/street-edge-alternatives
  78. https://www.portland.gov/bes/stormwater/about-green-streets
  79. https://www.iclr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/cities_adapt_rainfall_toronto.pdf
  80. https://www.sustainability.gov/pdfs/doi-2024-cap.pdf
  81. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-61878-7
  82. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-34967-6_103
  83. https://www.crcresearch.org/featured-project/vancouvers-st-george-rainway-project-how-bioswales-are-climate-resilient
  84. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/climate/articles/10.3389/fclim.2024.1287386/full
  85. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381964468_Bioswales_as_Engineering_Functions_of_Nature-Based_Solutions_to_Increase_Urban_Resilience_A_Review
  86. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8141
  87. https://www.deltacouncil.ca.gov/pdf/delta-plan/2025-06-26-delta-adapts-adaptation-plan.pdf
  88. https://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure/infrastructure-investment-and-jobs-act-and-green-infrastructure
  89. https://permies.com/t/12345/permaculture-swales
  90. https://www.amazon.com/Permaculture-One-Practical-Vision-Future/dp/0961392112
  91. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/14/7/1446
  92. https://citygreen.com/green-infrastructure-in-urban-planning/
  93. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364815219300532
  94. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2019.0222
  95. https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/articles/sponge-city-shenzhen-explores-benefits-designing-with-nature/
  96. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/transportation-planning/documents/adaptation-strategies-transportation-infrastructure-a11y.pdf
  97. https://www.mbrisingabove.com/climate-adaptation/green-infrastructure/bioswales/
  98. https://pelr.blogs.pace.edu/2024/04/24/how-norfolk-virginia-is-mitigating-sea-level-rise/
  99. https://www.nlc.org/article/2024/10/31/federal-funding-opportunities-that-support-resilient-infrastructure-smart-surfaces/
  100. https://www.georgetownclimate.org/adaptation/toolkits/green-infrastructure-toolkit/federal-funding.html
  101. https://www.wri.org/update/new-tool-helps-cities-select-and-scale-nature-based-solutions
  102. https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.70026
  103. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11269-024-03841-9
  104. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-19629-9
  105. https://www.c2es.org/2021/01/nature-based-solutions-for-resilient-equitable-cities/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.