Hubbry Logo
RedoxRedoxMain
Open search
Redox
Community hub
Redox
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Redox
Redox
Redox
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Sodium "gives" one outer electron to fluorine, bonding them to form sodium fluoride. The sodium atom is oxidized, and fluorine is reduced.
When a few drops of glycerol (mild reducing agent) are added to powdered potassium permanganate (strong oxidizing agent), a violent redox reaction accompanied by self-ignition starts.
Example of a reduction–oxidation reaction between sodium and chlorine, with the OIL RIG mnemonic[1]

Redox (/ˈrɛdɒks/ RED-oks, /ˈriːdɒks/ REE-doks, reduction–oxidation[2] or oxidation–reduction[3]: 150 ) is a type of chemical reaction in which the oxidation states of the reactants change.[4] Oxidation is the loss of electrons or an increase in the oxidation state, while reduction is the gain of electrons or a decrease in the oxidation state. The oxidation and reduction processes occur simultaneously in the chemical reaction.

There are two classes of redox reactions:

  • Electron-transfer – Only one (usually) electron flows from the atom, ion, or molecule being oxidized to the atom, ion, or molecule that is reduced. This type of redox reaction is often discussed in terms of redox couples and electrode potentials.
  • Atom transfer – An atom transfers from one substrate to another. For example, in the rusting of iron, the oxidation state of iron atoms increases as the iron converts to an oxide, and simultaneously, the oxidation state of oxygen decreases as it accepts electrons released by the iron. Although oxidation reactions are commonly associated with forming oxides, other chemical species can serve the same function.[5] In hydrogenation, bonds like C=C are reduced by transfer of hydrogen atoms.

Terminology

[edit]

"Redox" is a portmanteau of "reduction" and "oxidation." The term was first used in a 1928 article by Leonor Michaelis and Louis B. Flexner.[6][7]

Oxidation is a process in which a substance loses electrons. Reduction is a process in which a substance gains electrons.

The processes of oxidation and reduction occur simultaneously and cannot occur independently.[5] In redox processes, the reductant transfers electrons to the oxidant. Thus, in the reaction, the reductant or reducing agent loses electrons and is oxidized, and the oxidant or oxidizing agent gains electrons and is reduced. The pair of an oxidizing and reducing agent that is involved in a particular reaction is called a redox pair. A redox couple is a reducing species and its corresponding oxidizing form,[8] e.g., Fe2+
/ Fe3+
.The oxidation alone and the reduction alone are each called a half-reaction because two half-reactions always occur together to form a whole reaction.[5]

In electrochemical reactions the oxidation and reduction processes do occur simultaneously but are separated in space.

Oxidants

[edit]
Main article: Oxidizing agent

Oxidation originally implied a reaction with oxygen to form an oxide. Later, the term was expanded to encompass substances that accomplished chemical reactions similar to those of oxygen. Ultimately, the meaning was generalized to include all processes involving the loss of electrons or the increase in the oxidation state of a chemical species.[9]: A49  Substances that have the ability to oxidize other substances (cause them to lose electrons) are said to be oxidative or oxidizing, and are known as oxidizing agents, oxidants, or oxidizers. The oxidant removes electrons from another substance, and is thus itself reduced.[9]: A50  Because it "accepts" electrons, the oxidizing agent is also called an electron acceptor. Oxidants are usually chemical substances with elements in high oxidation states[3]: 159  (e.g., N
2O
4, MnO−
4, CrO
3, Cr
2O2−
7, OsO
4), or else highly electronegative elements (e.g. O2, F2, Cl2, Br2, I2) that can gain extra electrons by oxidizing another substance.[3]: 909 

Oxidizers are oxidants, but the term is mainly reserved for sources of oxygen, particularly in the context of explosions. Nitric acid is a strong oxidizer.[10]

The international pictogram for oxidizing chemicals

Reductants

[edit]
Main article: Reducing agent

Substances that have the ability to reduce other substances (cause them to gain electrons) are said to be reductive or reducing and are known as reducing agents, reductants, or reducers. The reductant transfers electrons to another substance and is thus itself oxidized.[3]: 159  Because it donates electrons, the reducing agent is also called an electron donor. Electron donors can also form charge transfer complexes with electron acceptors. The word reduction originally referred to the loss in weight upon heating a metallic ore such as a metal oxide to extract the metal. In other words, ore was "reduced" to metal.[11] Antoine Lavoisier demonstrated that this loss of weight was due to the loss of oxygen as a gas. Later, scientists realized that the metal atom gains electrons in this process. The meaning of reduction then became generalized to include all processes involving a gain of electrons.[11] Reducing equivalent refers to chemical species which transfer the equivalent of one electron in redox reactions. The term is common in biochemistry.[12] A reducing equivalent can be an electron or a hydrogen atom as a hydride ion.[13]

Reductants in chemistry are very diverse. Electropositive elemental metals, such as lithium, sodium, magnesium, iron, zinc, and aluminium, are good reducing agents. These metals donate electrons relatively readily.[14]

Hydride transfer reagents, such as NaBH4 and LiAlH4, reduce by atom transfer: they transfer the equivalent of hydride or H−. These reagents are widely used in the reduction of carbonyl compounds to alcohols.[15][16] A related method of reduction involves the use of hydrogen gas (H2) as sources of H atoms.[3]: 288 

Electronation and deelectronation

[edit]

The electrochemist John Bockris proposed the words electronation and de-electronation to describe reduction and oxidation processes, respectively, when they occur at electrodes.[17] These words are analogous to protonation and deprotonation.[18] IUPAC has recognized the terms electronation[19] and de-electronation.[20]

Rates, mechanisms, and energies

[edit]

Redox reactions can occur slowly, as in the formation of rust, or rapidly, as in the case of burning fuel. Electron transfer reactions are generally fast, occurring within the time of mixing.[21]

The mechanisms of atom-transfer reactions are highly variable because many kinds of atoms can be transferred. Such reactions can also be quite complex, involving many steps. The mechanisms of electron-transfer reactions occur by two distinct pathways, inner sphere electron transfer[22] and outer sphere electron transfer.[23]

Analysis of bond energies and ionization energies in water allows calculation of the thermodynamic aspects of redox reactions.[24]

Standard electrode potentials (reduction potentials)

[edit]

Each half-reaction has a standard electrode potential (Eo
cell), which is equal to the potential difference or voltage at equilibrium under standard conditions of an electrochemical cell in which the cathode reaction is the half-reaction considered, and the anode is a standard hydrogen electrode where hydrogen is oxidized:[25]

1⁄2 H2 → H+ + e−

The electrode potential of each half-reaction is also known as its reduction potential (Eo
red), or potential when the half-reaction takes place at a cathode. The reduction potential is a measure of the tendency of the oxidizing agent to be reduced. Its value is zero for H+ + e− → 1⁄2H2 by definition, positive for oxidizing agents stronger than H+ (e.g., +2.866 V for F2) and negative for oxidizing agents that are weaker than H+ (e.g., −0.763V for Zn2+).[9]: 873 

For a redox reaction that takes place in a cell, the potential difference is:

Eo
cell = Eo
cathode − Eo
anode

However, the potential of the reaction at the anode is sometimes expressed as an oxidation potential:

Eo
ox = −Eo
red

The oxidation potential is a measure of the tendency of the reducing agent to be oxidized but does not represent the physical potential at an electrode. With this notation, the cell voltage equation is written with a plus sign

Eo
cell = Eo
red(cathode) + Eo
ox(anode)

Examples of redox reactions

[edit]
Illustration of a redox reaction

In the reaction between hydrogen and fluorine, hydrogen is being oxidized and fluorine is being reduced:

H2 + F2 → 2 HF

This spontaneous reaction releases a large amount of energy (542 kJ per 2 g of hydrogen) because two H-F bonds are much stronger than one H-H bond and one F-F bond. This reaction can be analyzed as two half-reactions. The oxidation reaction converts hydrogen to protons:

H2 → 2 H+ + 2 e−

The reduction reaction converts fluorine to the fluoride anion:

F2 + 2 e− → 2 F−

The half-reactions are combined so that the electrons cancel:

H
2 		→ 2 H+ + 2 e−
F
2 + 2 e− 		→ 2 F−
H2 + F2 → 2 H+ + 2 F−

The protons and fluoride combine to form hydrogen fluoride in a non-redox reaction:

2 H+ + 2 F− → 2 HF

The overall reaction is:

H2 + F2 → 2 HF

Metal displacement

[edit]
A redox reaction is the force behind an electrochemical cell like the Galvanic cell pictured. The battery is made out of a zinc electrode in a ZnSO4 solution connected with a wire and a porous disk to a copper electrode in a CuSO4 solution.

In this type of reaction, a metal atom in a compound or solution is replaced by an atom of another metal. For example, copper is deposited when zinc metal is placed in a copper(II) sulfate solution:

Zn(s) + CuSO4(aq) → ZnSO4(aq) + Cu(s)

In the above reaction, zinc metal displaces the copper(II) ion from the copper sulfate solution, thus liberating free copper metal. The reaction is spontaneous and releases 213 kJ per 65 g of zinc.

The ionic equation for this reaction is:

Zn + Cu2+ → Zn2+ + Cu

As two half-reactions, it is seen that the zinc is oxidized:

Zn → Zn2+ + 2 e−

And the copper is reduced:

Cu2+ + 2 e− → Cu

Other examples

[edit]
2 NO−3 + 10 e− + 12 H+ → N2 + 6 H2O

Corrosion and rusting

[edit]
Oxides, such as iron(III) oxide or rust, which consists of hydrated iron(III) oxides Fe2O3·nH2O and iron(III) oxide-hydroxide (FeO(OH), Fe(OH)3), form when oxygen combines with other elements.
Iron rusting in pyrite cubes
  • The term corrosion refers to the electrochemical oxidation of metals in reaction with an oxidant such as oxygen. Rusting, the formation of iron oxides, is a well-known example of electrochemical corrosion: it forms as a result of the oxidation of iron metal. Common rust often refers to iron(III) oxide, formed in the following chemical reaction:
4 Fe + 3 O2 → 2 Fe2O3
Fe2+ → Fe3+ + e−
H2O2 + 2 e− → 2 OH−
Here the overall equation involves adding the reduction equation to twice the oxidation equation, so that the electrons cancel:
2 Fe2+ + H2O2 + 2 H+ → 2 Fe3+ + 2 H2O

Disproportionation

[edit]

A disproportionation reaction is one in which a single substance is both oxidized and reduced. For example, thiosulfate ion with sulfur in oxidation state +2 can react in the presence of acid to form elemental sulfur (oxidation state 0) and sulfur dioxide (oxidation state +4).

S2O2−3 + 2 H+ → S + SO2 + H2O

Thus one sulfur atom is reduced from +2 to 0, while the other is oxidized from +2 to +4.[9]: 176 

Redox reactions in industry

[edit]

Cathodic protection is a technique used to control the corrosion of a metal surface by making it the cathode of an electrochemical cell. A simple method of protection connects protected metal to a more easily corroded "sacrificial anode" to act as the anode. The sacrificial metal, instead of the protected metal, then corrodes.

Oxidation is used in a wide variety of industries, such as in the production of cleaning products and oxidizing ammonia to produce nitric acid.[citation needed]

Redox reactions are the foundation of electrochemical cells, which can generate electrical energy or support electrosynthesis. Metal ores often contain metals in oxidized states, such as oxides or sulfides, from which the pure metals are extracted by smelting at high temperatures in the presence of a reducing agent. The process of electroplating uses redox reactions to coat objects with a thin layer of a material, as in chrome-plated automotive parts, silver plating cutlery, galvanization and gold-plated jewelry.[citation needed]

Redox reactions in biology

[edit]
Enzymatic browning is an example of a redox reaction that takes place in most fruits and vegetables.
Ascorbic acid (reduced form of vitamin C)
Dehydroascorbic acid (oxidized form of vitamin C)

Many essential biological processes involve redox reactions. Before some of these processes can begin, iron must be assimilated from the environment.[26]

Aerobic cellular respiration, for instance, is the oxidation of substrates [in this case: glucose (C6H12O6)] and the reduction of oxygen to water. The summary equation for aerobic respiration is:

C6H12O6 + 6 O2 → 6 CO2 + 6 H2O + Energy[citation needed]

The process of cellular respiration also depends heavily on the reduction of NAD+ to NADH and the reverse reaction (the oxidation of NADH to NAD+). Photosynthesis and cellular respiration are complementary, but photosynthesis is not the reverse of the redox reaction in cellular respiration:

6 CO2 + 6 H2O + light energy → C6H12O6 + 6 O2

Biological energy is frequently stored and released using redox reactions. Photosynthesis involves the reduction of carbon dioxide into sugars and the oxidation of water into molecular oxygen. The reverse reaction, respiration, oxidizes sugars to produce carbon dioxide and water. As intermediate steps, the reduced carbon compounds are used to reduce nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) to NADH, which then contributes to the creation of a proton gradient, which drives the synthesis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and is maintained by the reduction of oxygen. In animal cells, mitochondria perform similar functions.

See also: Membrane potential

The term redox state is often used to describe the balance of GSH/GSSG, NAD+/NADH and NADP+/NADPH in a biological system such as a cell or organ. The redox state is reflected in the balance of several sets of metabolites (e.g., lactate and pyruvate, beta-hydroxybutyrate and acetoacetate), whose interconversion is dependent on these ratios. Redox mechanisms also control some cellular processes. Redox proteins and their genes must be co-located for redox regulation according to the CoRR hypothesis for the function of DNA in mitochondria and chloroplasts.

Redox cycling

[edit]

Wide varieties of aromatic compounds are enzymatically reduced to form free radicals that contain one more electron than their parent compounds. In general, the electron donor is any of a wide variety of flavoenzymes and their coenzymes. Once formed, these anion free radicals reduce molecular oxygen to superoxide and regenerate the unchanged parent compound. The net reaction is the oxidation of the flavoenzyme's coenzymes and the reduction of molecular oxygen to form superoxide. This catalytic behavior has been described as a futile cycle or redox cycling.

Redox reactions in geology

[edit]
Blast furnaces of Třinec Iron and Steel Works, Czech Republic

Minerals are generally oxidized derivatives of metals. Iron is mined as ores such as magnetite (Fe3O4) and hematite (Fe2O3). Titanium is mined as its dioxide, usually in the form of rutile (TiO2). These oxides must be reduced to obtain the corresponding metals, often achieved by heating these oxides with carbon or carbon monoxide as reducing agents. Blast furnaces are the reactors where iron oxides and coke (a form of carbon) are combined to produce molten iron. The main chemical reaction producing the molten iron is:[27]

Fe2O3 + 3 CO → 2 Fe + 3 CO2

Redox reactions in soils

[edit]

Electron transfer reactions are central to myriad processes and properties in soils, and redox potential, quantified as Eh (platinum electrode potential (voltage) relative to the standard hydrogen electrode) or pe (analogous to pH as −log electron activity), is a master variable, along with pH, that controls and is governed by chemical reactions and biological processes. Early theoretical research with applications to flooded soils and paddy rice production was seminal for subsequent work on thermodynamic aspects of redox and plant root growth in soils.[28] Later work built on this foundation, and expanded it for understanding redox reactions related to heavy metal oxidation state changes, pedogenesis and morphology, organic compound degradation and formation, free radical chemistry, wetland delineation, soil remediation, and various methodological approaches for characterizing the redox status of soils.[29][30]


Mnemonics

[edit]
Main article: List of chemistry mnemonics

The key terms involved in redox can be confusing.[31][32] For example, a reagent that is oxidized loses electrons; however, that reagent is referred to as the reducing agent. Likewise, a reagent that is reduced gains electrons and is referred to as the oxidizing agent.[33] These mnemonics are commonly used by students to help memorise the terminology:[34]

  • "OIL RIG" — oxidation is loss of electrons, reduction is gain of electrons[31][32][33][34]
  • "LEO the lion says GER [grr]" — loss of electrons is oxidation, gain of electrons is reduction[31][32][33][34]
  • "LEORA says GEROA" — the loss of electrons is called oxidation (reducing agent); the gain of electrons is called reduction (oxidizing agent).[33]
  • "RED CAT" and "AN OX", or "AnOx RedCat" ("an ox-red cat") — reduction occurs at the cathode and the anode is for oxidation
  • "RED CAT gains what AN OX loses" – reduction at the cathode gains (electrons) what anode oxidation loses (electrons)
  • "PANIC" – Positive Anode and Negative is Cathode. This applies to electrolytic cells which release stored electricity, and can be recharged with electricity. PANIC does not apply to cells that can be recharged with redox materials. These galvanic or voltaic cells, such as fuel cells, produce electricity from internal redox reactions. Here, the positive electrode is the cathode and the negative is the anode.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Redox

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Redox reactions, also known as reduction-oxidation reactions, are chemical processes in which electrons are transferred between , leading to changes in their oxidation states. In these reactions, oxidation occurs when a loses (increasing its oxidation number), while reduction occurs when another gains those (decreasing its oxidation number); the two half-reactions always proceed simultaneously to maintain electron balance. The that loses acts as the , and the one that gains them serves as the . Redox reactions underpin many essential phenomena across disciplines, from generation in living organisms to industrial applications and environmental dynamics. In , they are vital for processes like , where glucose is oxidized to produce ATP, and , where is reduced to form carbohydrates and is oxidized to produce oxygen. Technologically, redox principles power galvanic cells, batteries, and fuel cells by converting into through controlled flow. In and , redox conditions determine the mobility and fate of contaminants in and soils, influencing remediation strategies. Oxidation numbers, assigned according to standardized rules (such as 0 for elements in their pure form and -2 for oxygen in most compounds), provide a quantitative tool for identifying and balancing these reactions. Common examples include the rusting of iron (Fe oxidized by O₂) and of fuels, both of which release via .

Definitions and Terminology

Oxidation and Reduction

The concepts of oxidation and reduction originated in the late with , who defined oxidation as the combination of a substance with oxygen and reduction as the removal of oxygen from a compound, thereby establishing a dualistic framework that replaced the earlier . This oxygen-centric view dominated early chemistry but proved limited as reactions without oxygen involvement were observed. In the 19th century, advancements in , particularly Michael Faraday's investigations into during the 1830s, revealed that chemical changes at electrodes involved the passage of electricity, laying the groundwork for interpreting oxidation and reduction as charge transfer processes. By the early , the understanding had shifted to the modern perspective, with chemists like Harry Shipley Fry explicitly defining oxidation as the loss of electrons and reduction as the gain of electrons in 1915. This electron-based definition, often remembered by the mnemonic "" (Oxidation Is Loss, Reduction Is Gain), or alternatively "LEO GER" (Loss of Electrons is Oxidation, Gain of Electrons is Reduction), provides a precise and general framework applicable to all redox reactions. In this view, oxidation and reduction are complementary half-processes that occur simultaneously in a redox reaction, with no net change in electrons overall. A classic example illustrates these definitions: in the of magnesium, the reaction 2Mg + O₂ → 2MgO shows magnesium atoms losing two s each to form Mg²⁺ ions (oxidation), while oxygen molecules gain those s to form O²⁻ ions (reduction). Here, magnesium undergoes oxidation, and oxygen undergoes reduction, highlighting how drives the transformation from elements to compound. These foundational processes underpin all subsequent redox phenomena, including those in and , by establishing the core mechanism of electron redistribution between .

Oxidizing and Reducing Agents

An , or oxidant, is a substance that gains electrons from another during a redox reaction, thereby oxidizing that while undergoing reduction itself. This electron acceptance facilitates the oxidation process by providing a favorable site for . Common oxidizing agents include molecular oxygen (O₂), which supports by oxidizing fuels; (KMnO₄), used in for titrations; and (Cl₂), which reacts with various substrates to form chlorides. Conversely, a , or reductant, is a substance that loses electrons to another species in a redox reaction, reducing that species while becoming oxidized. These agents drive reduction by donating electrons, often metals or compounds with low oxidation states. Typical examples are sodium (Na), which reacts vigorously with to produce ; , employed in reactions; and iron (Fe), which can reduce higher-valence metal ions. The interplay between oxidizing and reducing agents underlies all redox processes through . Oxidizing and reducing agents are categorized by strength according to their reactivity in electron transfer. Strong oxidizing agents, such as fluorine (F₂) or the permanganate ion (MnO₄⁻), exhibit high reactivity and can oxidize many substances, including water under certain conditions. Weak oxidizing agents, like the nitrate ion (NO₃⁻) in dilute solutions, are less aggressive and typically require specific conditions to react. Strong reducing agents, including alkali metals like sodium (Na), donate electrons readily and react exothermically with oxidants, whereas weak reducing agents such as hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) participate only in milder reactions. This classification helps predict reaction feasibility based on relative strengths. Illustrative applications highlight the roles of these agents. Halogens like function as oxidizing agents in bleaching, where they oxidize chromophores in dyes and stains to colorless compounds, a process central to and industries. Metals such as serve as reducing agents in , for instance, in where coats iron to act sacrificially, oxidizing preferentially to prevent rusting of the . Safety considerations are paramount when handling oxidizing and reducing agents due to their reactivity. (HNO₃), a potent , is highly corrosive and can liberate toxic oxides (NOₓ) upon or reaction with organics, necessitating use in a well-ventilated with or gloves, safety goggles, and a . It should be stored in glass or compatible containers away from flammables and reductants to prevent violent reactions or explosions.

Oxidation States

Oxidation states, also known as oxidation numbers, represent the hypothetical charge that an atom would have if all bonds in a molecule or ion were completely ionic, providing a means to track the degree of oxidation or reduction of atoms in chemical compounds. This formal assignment aids in the systematic description of chemical behavior and electron shifts during redox processes. The rules for assigning oxidation states are based on electronegativity differences and conventional agreements, ensuring consistency across compounds. For an uncombined element in its standard form, the oxidation state is zero, as in N2N_2 or FeFe. In a monatomic ion, the oxidation state equals the ion's charge, such as Na+Na^+ at +1 or Cl−Cl^- at -1. For compounds or ions, the sum of oxidation states must equal zero for neutral species or the overall charge for ions. In covalent bonds, the more electronegative atom is assigned a negative oxidation state, while the less electronegative receives a positive one. Specific conventions apply to common elements: fluorine always has -1; oxygen typically -2, except in peroxides (-1) or compounds with fluorine (+2); hydrogen usually +1, except in metal hydrides (-1); alkali metals (group 1) always +1; and alkaline earth metals (group 2) always +2. Halogens like chlorine are usually -1, but can be positive in compounds with oxygen or fluorine. These rules are applied to determine oxidation states in various compounds. In water (H2OH_2O), each hydrogen is +1 and oxygen is -2, summing to zero. In potassium permanganate (KMnO4KMnO_4), potassium is +1, manganese is +7, and each oxygen is -2, yielding a neutral compound. For the sulfate ion (SO42−SO_4^{2-}), sulfur is +6 and each oxygen -2, with the total equaling -2. Oxidation states do not correspond to actual partial charges on atoms, which depend on distributions, but rather serve as a simplified formal construct. Exceptions to standard rules, such as the -1 state for oxygen in (H2O2H_2O_2), highlight that these assignments prioritize hierarchies over strict ionic models. In redox chemistry, oxidation states enable quick assessment of reaction feasibility by identifying atoms whose states change—an increase indicates oxidation, while a decrease indicates reduction—without requiring complete balanced equations. This utility is particularly valuable for predicting the oxidizing or reducing capacity of species in complex systems.

Electron Transfer and Energetics

Electron Transfer Processes

Electron transfer processes in redox reactions occur at the microscopic level, involving the movement of electrons between such as atoms, ions, or molecules. These processes can be classified as homogeneous, occurring in solution between dissolved , or heterogeneous, taking place at interfaces like where electrons transfer from a solid phase to a solution or vice versa. In homogeneous electron transfer, the reactants are typically metal complexes or organic radicals in the same phase, while heterogeneous transfer is central to electrochemical cells, where the acts as one redox partner. A key distinction in electron transfer mechanisms is between inner-sphere and outer-sphere pathways. In outer-sphere mechanisms, the electron transfers directly between the redox centers without forming a chemical bond between the reactants, often involving quantum tunneling through space or solvent molecules during a transient collision complex. This pathway is common for self-exchange reactions where the coordination spheres remain intact. In contrast, inner-sphere mechanisms involve a bridging ligand that temporarily coordinates both the oxidant and reductant, facilitating electron transfer through the bridge before dissociation; at least one reactant must be labile to allow bridge formation. Henry Taube's pioneering work demonstrated this through isotopic labeling, showing ligand transfer in inner-sphere processes like the Cr(II)-Co(III) reaction. The theoretical framework for these processes, particularly outer-sphere transfers, is provided by , which describes the rate as dependent on the reorganization energy and the driving force of the reaction. Reorganization energy comprises inner-sphere contributions from vibrational changes in the coordination spheres and outer-sphere contributions from solvent polarization adjustments to the changing charge distribution. The rate increases with driving force up to a maximum when it equals the reorganization energy, beyond which the inverted region occurs due to insufficient relaxation. A classic example is the Fe(H₂O)₆²⁺/Fe(H₂O)₆³⁺ self-exchange reaction, a prototypical outer-sphere with minimal structural change between reactants, allowing direct hopping without a bridge. Solvents play a crucial role by contributing to outer-sphere reorganization, where polar solvents like reorient to stabilize the , lowering the barrier in protic media compared to aprotic ones. Ligands influence both mechanisms: in outer-sphere transfers, they modulate inner-sphere reorganization by altering metal-ligand bond lengths and vibrational frequencies, while in inner-sphere cases, suitable bridging ligands such as or enhance electronic coupling between centers. For instance, π-acceptor ligands can delocalize the , facilitating faster transfer in both pathways.

Reaction Rates and Mechanisms

The rates of redox reactions are governed by kinetic principles, where the speed depends on the frequency and energy of collisions between oxidizing and reducing species, often centered around the key step of . Higher reactant concentrations increase , thereby accelerating the , as seen in general applicable to redox processes. Elevated temperatures enhance molecular kinetic energy, exponentially increasing rates according to the , which describes how thermal activation overcomes the energy barrier for electron transfer in redox systems. Catalysts significantly boost rates by lowering the ; in biological contexts, enzymes like facilitate rapid electron shuttling in respiration, while industrial metal catalysts such as or enable selective oxidations of hydrocarbons with high yields using peroxides as oxidants. Redox mechanisms can proceed via stepwise pathways, involving sequential or proton transfers with intermediate , or concerted mechanisms, where and proton transfers occur simultaneously in a single step. In stepwise mechanisms, such as the oxidative of L-malate by malic , oxidation precedes , forming a high-energy oxalosuccinate intermediate, as confirmed by effect studies showing altered kinetic . Concerted proton-coupled transfers (PCET), common in enzymatic redox, avoid charged intermediates and are distinguished by kinetic effects and dependence; for instance, reductive PCET activates carbonyls to radicals using photocatalysts and acids. Rate laws for simple bimolecular redox reactions typically follow second-order kinetics, expressed as rate = k [oxidant][reductant], reflecting the collision of one oxidant and one reductant . A representative example is the oxidation of by in acidic media, where the rate law is rate = k [MnO₄⁻][H₂C₂O₄][H⁺]², determined experimentally via initial rates at constant temperature, highlighting dependence on proton concentration for the stepwise mechanism. Certain redox reactions, particularly radical-mediated ones, operate through chain mechanisms that amplify rates via cycles. In of unsaturated , involves hydroxyl radical addition to double bonds, forming β-hydroxyl peroxyl radicals; proceeds with C–C scission to Criegee intermediates that regenerate hydroxyl radicals, sustaining the chain with chain lengths up to 70. Termination occurs via bimolecular radical recombination or Criegee reactions with aldehydes to form stable ozonides. Rates can be inhibited in processes, where passivation forms a protective layer on metals like aluminum or , blocking further and oxidation by impeding access of oxygen and water to the surface.

Thermodynamics of Redox Reactions

The thermodynamics of redox reactions centers on the Gibbs free energy change (ΔG), which predicts the spontaneity and direction of these electron transfer processes. For a redox reaction in an electrochemical cell, the standard Gibbs free energy change is directly related to the standard cell potential (E_cell) through the equation ΔG∘=−nFE∘\Delta G^\circ = -n F E_\circ where n represents the number of moles of electrons transferred, and F is the Faraday constant, the charge of one mole of electrons. This relationship quantifies the maximum non-expansion work available from the reaction, linking electrical energy output to thermodynamic feasibility. A negative ΔG indicates a spontaneous process, corresponding to a positive E_cell, as seen in galvanic cells where the reaction proceeds without external input. A classic example is the , featuring and electrodes separated by a , where metal spontaneously oxidizes while reducing copper ions, generating electrical current. This setup demonstrates how a positive cell potential drives the forward redox reaction, converting into electrical work efficiently. The spontaneity arises from the inherent tendency of the system to minimize free energy, favoring the direction that releases electrons from the more active metal to the less active one. The in redox reactions incorporates both enthalpic (ΔH) and entropic (ΔS) contributions via ΔG = ΔH - TΔS, where T is the absolute . changes typically stem from bond breaking/forming and in aqueous media, often making many metal reductions exothermic and thus favorable. changes, meanwhile, influence spontaneity through alterations in disorder, such as increased ion mobility or gas , which can tip ΔG negative even if ΔH is modestly positive. In practice, these terms balance to determine overall feasibility, with modulating the entropic impact. In biological contexts, non-spontaneous (endergonic) redox reactions are coupled to highly exergonic ones to enable essential processes. For example, in cellular , the exergonic oxidation of NADH to NAD⁺ is harnessed to drive endergonic reductions, such as the reduction of NADP⁺ to NADPH in photosynthetic electron transport. This coupling underscores the role of redox in life processes, where shared intermediates facilitate energy transfer without violating the second law.

Electrochemistry of Redox

Electrode Potentials

Electrode potentials quantify the tendency of a to undergo reduction or oxidation in an , serving as a foundational measure in for assessing reactivity. In such cells, a complete reaction is divided into two half-reactions: oxidation at the , where the loses electrons and is converted to its oxidized form, and reduction at the , where the gains electrons and becomes reduced. This separation allows the potential of each half-cell to be evaluated independently relative to a standard reference. To measure these potentials, two half-cells are combined in a setup, connected by a that permits migration to balance charge without mixing solutions, and linked externally by a to record the (EMF). The (SHE) acts as the universal reference, defined as having zero potential under standard conditions; it features a platinized immersed in a 1 M solution equilibrated with gas at 1 bar pressure, facilitating the 2H++2e−⇌H22H^+ + 2e^- \rightleftharpoons H_2. All other potentials are determined by pairing the test half-cell with the SHE, yielding the cell potential as the difference between the two potentials. In galvanic cells, spontaneous redox processes drive electron flow from the to the , producing a positive cell potential that indicates the reaction's favorability. Conversely, electrolytic cells employ an external power source to compel non-spontaneous reactions, but electrode potentials are conventionally measured and reported for the reduction half-reaction in galvanic configurations against the SHE. The stipulates that a positive potential signifies a greater tendency for reduction compared to the SHE, with the exhibiting a more negative potential in spontaneous cells. This approach ensures consistent comparison of redox strengths across systems. Electrode potentials are sensitive to environmental factors, including and solution concentrations, which qualitatively shift the equilibrium position of the and thus the measured driving force. For example, increasing can enhance or diminish the potential depending on the reaction's change, while varying concentrations of ions or gases alters the relative stabilities of oxidized and reduced . These potentials connect directly to the energetics of redox processes, reflecting the change that governs reaction spontaneity.

Standard Reduction Potentials

The standard , denoted as E∘E^\circ, quantifies the tendency of a to acquire electrons and be reduced under standard conditions, defined as 25°C (298 K), 1 M concentrations for solutes, 1 bar pressure for gases, and activity of 1 for pure solids. Note that since 1982, IUPAC has defined the standard pressure as 1 bar, though 1 atm was historically used; the difference has negligible impact on potentials. These potentials are measured relative to the (SHE), assigned a value of 0 V for the 2H++2e−⇌H22\mathrm{H}^+ + 2e^- \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_2. All tabulated values correspond to reduction half-reactions, allowing direct comparison of oxidizing strengths; a more positive E∘E^\circ indicates a greater propensity for reduction, while a more negative value signifies a stronger reducing agent. Standard reduction potentials reveal systematic trends across the periodic table. For instance, alkali metals exhibit highly negative values, reflecting their strong reducing nature, whereas display the most positive potentials, highlighting their potent oxidizing ability. These trends arise from factors such as , , and , with noble metals like showing positive but moderate values due to stable electron configurations. The following table excerpts key standard reduction potentials (E∘E^\circ in volts vs. SHE at 25°C) to illustrate these trends, selected from common half-reactions involving metals, halogens, and oxygen species:
Half-ReactionE∘E^\circ (V)
Li++e−⇌Li\mathrm{Li}^+ + e^- \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Li}-3.04
Na++e−⇌Na\mathrm{Na}^+ + e^- \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Na}-2.71
Zn2++2e−⇌Zn\mathrm{Zn}^{2+} + 2e^- \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Zn}-0.76
2H++2e−⇌H22\mathrm{H}^+ + 2e^- \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_20.00
Cu2++2e−⇌Cu\mathrm{Cu}^{2+} + 2e^- \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Cu}+0.34
Ag++e−⇌Ag\mathrm{Ag}^+ + e^- \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{Ag}+0.80
12O2+2H++2e−⇌H2O\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{O}_2 + 2\mathrm{H}^+ + 2e^- \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{H}_2\mathrm{O}+1.23
Cl2+2e−⇌2Cl−\mathrm{Cl}_2 + 2e^- \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{Cl}^-+1.36
F2+2e−⇌2F−\mathrm{F}_2 + 2e^- \rightleftharpoons 2\mathrm{F}^-+2.87
Values sourced from critically compiled data. These potentials enable prediction of reaction spontaneity in electrochemical cells. For a full cell, the standard cell potential is calculated as Ecell∘=Ecathode∘−Eanode∘E^\circ_\text{cell} = E^\circ_\text{cathode} - E^\circ_\text{anode}, where the cathode hosts reduction and the anode oxidation; if Ecell∘>0E^\circ_\text{cell} > 0, the reaction proceeds spontaneously under standard conditions, driving processes like metal corrosion or battery discharge. By comparing E∘E^\circ values, chemists can identify the stronger oxidant and reductant in a pair, ensuring the half-reaction with the higher (more positive) E∘E^\circ occurs as reduction. From these tables, the electrochemical series—or activity series for metals—is derived, elements by increasing E∘E^\circ to predict displacement ; for example, zinc (E∘=−0.76E^\circ = -0.76 V) displaces copper (E∘=+0.34E^\circ = +0.34 V) from solution because Ecell∘=1.10E^\circ_\text{cell} = 1.10 V > 0, confirming zinc's position above copper in the series. This series underpins qualitative assessments in , such as reactivity toward acids or . While invaluable for standard-state predictions, E∘E^\circ values have limitations, as real-world conditions like varying concentrations, temperatures, or pH shift actual potentials away from tabulated figures, potentially reversing predicted directions.

Nernst Equation Applications

The Nernst equation relates the electrode potential of a redox reaction under non-standard conditions to its standard potential, accounting for variations in temperature, concentration, and pressure through the reaction quotient. It is expressed as E=E∘−RTnFln⁡QE = E^\circ - \frac{RT}{nF} \ln Q where EE is the cell potential, E∘E^\circ is the standard cell potential, RR is the gas constant (8.314 J/mol·K), TT is the absolute temperature in kelvin, nn is the number of moles of electrons transferred in the balanced equation, FF is Faraday's constant (96,485 C/mol), and QQ is the reaction quotient defined analogously to the equilibrium constant KK but using concentrations or partial pressures of species at the given conditions. This equation derives from the fundamental relationship between and electrochemical work. The change in for a redox reaction is ΔG=−nFE\Delta G = -nFE, linking the cell potential directly to the reaction's spontaneity. Under non-standard conditions, ΔG=ΔG∘+RTln⁡Q\Delta G = \Delta G^\circ + RT \ln Q, where ΔG∘=−nFE∘\Delta G^\circ = -nFE^\circ. Substituting and rearranging yields the , providing a thermodynamic basis for predicting how deviations from standard states (1 M concentrations, 1 bar pressures, 25°C) affect the potential. At 25°C (298 K), the equation simplifies for base-10 logarithms to E=E∘−0.059nlog⁡QE = E^\circ - \frac{0.059}{n} \log Q since RTF≈0.0257\frac{RT}{F} \approx 0.0257 V and ln⁡Q=2.303log⁡Q\ln Q = 2.303 \log Q, making 2.303×0.0257≈0.0592.303 \times 0.0257 \approx 0.059 V. This form is widely used for practical calculations in aqueous electrochemistry. A key application involves concentration cells, where the same redox couple operates at different concentrations in each half-cell, generating a potential difference driven by the concentration gradient. For example, consider a cell with the reaction Zn(s) + Cu²⁺(aq) → Zn²⁺(aq) + Cu(s), where [Zn²⁺] = 0.1 M and [Cu²⁺] = 0.001 M at 25°C, with E∘=1.100E^\circ = 1.100 V and n=2n = 2. Here, Q=[\ceZn2+][\ceCu2+]=100Q = \frac{[\ce{Zn^2+}]}{[\ce{Cu^2+}]} = 100, so log⁡Q=2\log Q = 2 and E=1.100−0.0592×2=1.041E = 1.100 - \frac{0.059}{2} \times 2 = 1.041 V. This reduced potential reflects the cell's approach toward equilibrium due to the unequal concentrations. The also quantifies effects on hydrogen electrode potentials, crucial for understanding acidity-dependent redox behavior. For the 2H⁺(aq) + 2e⁻ → H₂(g) at 1 bar, the potential is E=E∘−0.0592log⁡P\ceH2[\ceH+]2E = E^\circ - \frac{0.059}{2} \log \frac{P_{\ce{H2}}}{[\ce{H+}]^2}. Since E∘=0E^\circ = 0 V by definition and P\ceH2=1P_{\ce{H2}} = 1, this simplifies to E=−0.059×pHE = -0.059 \times \mathrm{pH}, showing a 59 mV decrease per unit increase at 25°C. This relationship underpins measurements, where the potential difference between a sensitive to H⁺ activity and a follows the Nernstian slope of approximately 59 mV/. In batteries, the predicts voltage variations during charge and discharge as reactant and product concentrations change, particularly in systems with liquid electrolytes like lead-acid batteries. For instance, it calculates the under load, where QQ incorporates evolving concentrations, ensuring models account for performance degradation over cycles. Similarly, in electrochemical sensors such as pH meters, the equation enables by relating measured potentials to activities; the glass electrode's response to H⁺ follows E=E0−S⋅pHE = E_0 - S \cdot \mathrm{pH}, with slope S≈59S \approx 59 mV/pH at 25°C, allowing precise determination of solution from potential readings against standard buffers.

Balancing and Classification of Reactions

Balancing Redox Equations

Balancing equations ensures that both mass and charge are conserved in reactions where oxidation and reduction occur simultaneously, as electrons transferred in one must match those in the other. The ion-electron method, or method, is the standard systematic procedure for this purpose, involving the separation of the overall reaction into oxidation and reduction half-reactions. This approach first requires assigning oxidation states to identify the being oxidized and reduced, referencing the rules for determining oxidation numbers such as those for elements in their standard states or common ions. In acidic media, the steps of the ion-electron method are as follows: (1) Write the unbalanced equation and identify the oxidation and reduction half-reactions based on changes in oxidation states. (2) Balance all atoms except hydrogen and oxygen in each . (3) Balance oxygen atoms by adding H₂O to the appropriate side. (4) Balance hydrogen atoms by adding H⁺ ions. (5) Balance the charge by adding electrons (e⁻) to the side with the greater positive charge for reduction or the lesser positive charge for oxidation. (6) Multiply the half-reactions by integers to equalize the number of electrons transferred. (7) Add the balanced half-reactions and simplify by canceling common species. A representative example is the reaction between permanganate ion and iron(II) ion in acidic solution: Oxidation: \ceFe2+−>Fe3++e−\text{Oxidation: } \ce{Fe^2+ -> Fe^3+ + e^-} Reduction: \ceMnO4−+8H++5e−−>Mn2++4H2O\text{Reduction: } \ce{MnO4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^- -> Mn^2+ + 4H2O} Multiplying the oxidation half-reaction by 5 and adding yields the balanced equation: \ceMnO4−+5Fe2++8H+−>Mn2++5Fe3++4H2O\ce{MnO4^- + 5Fe^2+ + 8H^+ -> Mn^2+ + 5Fe^3+ + 4H2O} This confirms conservation of atoms and charge (left: +17; right: +17). For reactions in basic media, the initial steps mirror those in acidic conditions up to balancing hydrogen with H⁺, after which modifications account for the presence of OH⁻ ions: (1) Balance as if in acidic solution, including H⁺. (2) Add an equal number of OH⁻ to both sides to neutralize H⁺, forming H₂O on the side originally containing H⁺. (3) Cancel excess H₂O molecules. (4) Proceed with charge balancing, electron equalization, and combination as before. An example is the disproportionation of chlorine gas in basic solution, where Cl₂ is both oxidized to hypochlorite (ClO⁻) and reduced to chloride (Cl⁻). The half-reactions (using coefficients to avoid fractions in the overall equation) are: Reduction: \ce1/2Cl2+e−−>Cl−\ce{1/2 Cl2 + e^- -> Cl^-} Oxidation: \ce1/2Cl2+2OH−−>ClO−+H2O+e−\ce{1/2 Cl2 + 2OH^- -> ClO^- + H2O + e^-} Adding and multiplying by 2 to clear the fraction yields: \ceCl2+2OH−−>Cl−+ClO−+H2O\ce{Cl2 + 2OH^- -> Cl^- + ClO^- + H2O} Charge balance (left: -2; right: -2) and atom balance are satisfied. An alternative approach is the oxidation number method, useful for simpler reactions or verification. The steps include: (1) Write the skeletal and assign oxidation numbers to all atoms. (2) Identify changes in oxidation numbers and calculate electrons lost or gained per atom. (3) Determine multipliers to equalize total electrons transferred. (4) Balance other atoms, using H₂O and H⁺ (or OH⁻ in base) as needed. (5) Verify the final for mass and charge balance. For instance, applying this to the acidic permanganate-iron reaction yields the same balanced as the ion-electron method, confirming consistency between approaches.

Displacement and Combustion Reactions

Single displacement reactions, also known as single replacement reactions, are a fundamental class of redox processes in which a more reactive element displaces a less reactive one from a compound, resulting in where the displacing element is oxidized and the displaced element is reduced. This type of reaction is spontaneous when the displacing element has a higher tendency to lose electrons than the element it replaces. The metal activity series, or reactivity series, ranks metals by their relative reactivity, allowing prediction of whether a displacement reaction will occur; metals higher in the series, such as zinc or aluminum, can displace those lower, like copper or iron, from their salts. For instance, zinc metal reacts with copper(II) ions in solution to form zinc ions and copper metal, as zinc is more reactive and thus oxidized while copper(II) is reduced: Zn (s)+Cu2+(aq)→Zn2+(aq)+Cu (s)\text{Zn (s)} + \text{Cu}^{2+} \text{(aq)} \rightarrow \text{Zn}^{2+} \text{(aq)} + \text{Cu (s)} This reaction exemplifies the trend where reactivity decreases down the series from alkali metals to noble metals, driven by differences in standard reduction potentials. A dramatic example is the thermite reaction, where aluminum powder displaces iron from iron(III) oxide, producing molten iron and aluminum oxide in an intensely exothermic process: Fe2O3(s)+2Al (s)→2Fe (l)+Al2O3(s)\text{Fe}_2\text{O}_3 \text{(s)} + 2\text{Al (s)} \rightarrow 2\text{Fe (l)} + \text{Al}_2\text{O}_3 \text{(s)} Aluminum's position above iron in the activity series ensures the reaction's spontaneity. Combustion reactions represent another key redox category, involving the rapid oxidation of a by oxygen, typically producing and as the fuel is oxidized and oxygen is reduced to ions. In complete of hydrocarbons, such as , the fuel fully reacts with sufficient oxygen to yield and , maximizing release: CH4(g)+2O2(g)→CO2(g)+2H2O (g)\text{CH}_4 \text{(g)} + 2\text{O}_2 \text{(g)} \rightarrow \text{CO}_2 \text{(g)} + 2\text{H}_2\text{O (g)} This process is highly exothermic and serves as a primary mechanism for production in engines and power plants. Incomplete combustion occurs under oxygen-limited conditions, forming (CO) or soot (C) alongside , which reduces efficiency and generates hazardous byproducts. These reactions have broader analogies in natural systems; for example, can be viewed as a controlled, stepwise redox process akin to the slow of glucose with oxygen, producing CO₂ and H₂O to generate biological energy. Environmentally, incomplete contributes to emissions, a toxic that binds to in the blood, reducing oxygen delivery and posing health risks such as headaches and cardiovascular issues at concentrations above 9 ppm over 8 hours.

Disproportionation and Other Types

Disproportionation reactions represent a specialized class of processes in which a single , typically an element in an intermediate , undergoes simultaneous oxidation and reduction, yielding products in higher and lower s of the same element. This self-redox behavior distinguishes from standard reactions involving separate oxidizing and reducing agents. For instance, (I) ions (Cu⁺) in spontaneously disproportionate according to the reaction 2Cu⁺ → Cu + Cu²⁺, driven by the favorable standard difference (E°_cell = +0.368 V), making Cu⁺ unstable under dilute conditions. Similarly, gas (Cl₂) reacts with hydroxide ions in alkaline media to form (Cl⁻) and (OCl⁻) ions: Cl₂ + 2OH⁻ → Cl⁻ + OCl⁻ + H₂O, a process central to production that is thermodynamically favored at pH > 7 due to the pH-dependent of species. Comproportionation serves as the reverse of , wherein two species containing the same element in different oxidation states react to form the intermediate state, effectively combining oxidation and reduction in a complementary manner. A classic example is the comproportionation of metal and copper(II) ions to yield copper(I): Cu + Cu²⁺ → 2Cu⁺, which can be stabilized under high concentrations or in the presence of complexing ligands that alter the effective potentials and prevent reversal to . These reactions are governed by the relative stabilities of the oxidation states, often assessed via Latimer diagrams that map reduction potentials across states; comproportionation predominates when the intermediate state's potential lies between those of the higher and lower states. Beyond these, constitutes another redox variant involving the incorporation of molecular oxygen (O₂) as the oxidant, where a substrate is oxidized while O₂ is reduced to species like (O₂⁻) or (O₂²⁻), often without an external beyond the substrate itself. In inorganic contexts, ions (Fe²⁺) undergo autoxidation in aerated neutral solutions: 4Fe²⁺ + O₂ + 10H₂O → 4Fe(OH)₃ + 8H⁺, a rate-accelerating process at higher due to the formation of hydroxide complexes that facilitate O₂ binding. interconversions exemplify redox transformations among halogen species, such as the reaction of with to form gas under acidic conditions: \ce{ClO^- + Cl^- + 2H^+ -> Cl2 + H2O}, where shifts dictate the direction by influencing equilibria and favoring Cl₂ release below 5. Concentration effects further modulate these processes; for example, high Cu⁺ concentrations suppress by , while low stabilizes certain halogen intermediates by protonating reactive oxyanions.

Applications in Chemistry and Industry

Industrial Redox Processes

Industrial redox processes leverage electrochemical and catalytic redox reactions to produce essential chemicals, materials, and systems on a massive scale, often consuming significant while enabling key sectors like chemicals, metals, and . These processes are critical for global , with annual productions exceeding millions of tons for commodities like and aluminum, driven by the need for efficient in controlled environments. Electrode potentials guide the design of these systems to optimize yields and minimize losses, ensuring economic viability in high-volume operations. The chlor-alkali process exemplifies electrolytic redox on an industrial scale, electrolyzing (NaCl solution) to produce gas, , and , accounting for approximately 95% of global output at over 100 million tons annually as of 2025. At the , chloride ions undergo oxidation via the 2Cl−→Cl2+2e−2Cl^- \rightarrow Cl_2 + 2e^-, while at the , water is reduced: 2H2O+2e−→H2+2OH−2H_2O + 2e^- \rightarrow H_2 + 2OH^-, with overall cell potentials around 3-4 V in cells for energy efficiency. These products are foundational for PVC plastics, disinfectants, and pulp processing, with modern technologies reducing energy use to about 2.5 kWh/kg Cl₂, enhancing in chemical . The Haber-Bosch process, while catalytic rather than electrolytic, involves the redox reduction of gas to using over iron-based catalysts at 200-300 atm and 400-500°C, producing over 180 million tons of NH₃ yearly for fertilizers and explosives. The core reaction, N2+3H2→2NH3N_2 + 3H_2 \rightarrow 2NH_3, represents a net reduction of N₂ (oxidation state 0 to -3 in NH₃), with acting as the reductant derived from reforming, consuming about 1-2% of global energy supply. This process's efficiency, with single-pass yields up to 15-20%, underscores its role in sustaining , though it emits significant CO₂, prompting shifts toward greener alternatives. Electrolysis in the Hall-Héroult process extracts aluminum from alumina (Al₂O₃) dissolved in molten , a cornerstone of metal production yielding about 70 million tons globally each year for and . The cathodic reduction Al3++3e−→AlAl^{3+} + 3e^- \rightarrow Al occurs at carbon electrodes, paired with anodic oxidation of oxygen ions to CO₂, requiring 13-15 kWh/kg Al and temperatures of 950°C for fluidity. This energy-intensive redox setup dominates primary aluminum , with process optimizations like inert anodes under development to cut emissions by eliminating perfluorocarbons. In energy storage, redox reactions power industrial-scale batteries and fuel cells. Zinc-manganese dioxide (Zn-MnO₂) alkaline batteries, widely produced for consumer and grid applications, rely on Zn oxidation at the (Zn+2OH−→ZnO+H2O+2e−Zn + 2OH^- \rightarrow ZnO + H_2O + 2e^-) and MnO₂ reduction at the (2MnO2+H2O+2e−→2MnOOH+2OH−2MnO_2 + H_2O + 2e^- \rightarrow 2MnOOH + 2OH^-), delivering 1.5 V with capacities up to 3 Ah for primary cells. Lithium-ion batteries, central to electric vehicles and renewables storage with over 2 TWh produced annually as of 2025, feature anode intercalation (Li⁺ + e⁻ + C₆ → LiC₆) and cathode transitions like LiCoO₂ delithiation (LiCoO₂ → Li_{1-x}CoO₂ + xLi⁺ + xe⁻), enabling energy densities of 250-300 Wh/kg. Fuel cells, such as types, harness H₂ oxidation (H2→2H++2e−H_2 \rightarrow 2H^+ + 2e^-) and O₂ reduction (O2+4H++4e−→2H2OO_2 + 4H^+ + 4e^- \rightarrow 2H_2O) for efficient power in transportation and stationary uses, with efficiencies up to 60% in combined heat-power systems. Catalytic redox processes, like palladium-mediated , are vital for pharmaceutical and synthesis, converting unsaturated bonds via H₂ addition. Pd/C catalysts facilitate reductions with turnover frequencies exceeding 10,000 h⁻¹ and yields often >95%, as in the industrial production of intermediates like from glucose, minimizing byproducts through selective . These systems operate under mild conditions (, 1-10 atm), boosting efficiency in multi-tonne scales. By 2025, green redox advancements emphasize sustainable via water , targeting costs of $2/kg H₂ through improved electrolyzers. and alkaline electrolyzers have scaled to approximately 3 GW global installed capacity as of 2025, with electrolyzer capacity exceeding 40 GW annually; efficiencies reaching 70-80% (HHV basis), driven by renewable integration for net-zero fuels in industry and . Innovations like high-current-density stacks (up to 2 A/cm²) and durable catalysts reduce levelized costs, positioning as a key decarbonization tool.

Corrosion and Protection Methods

Corrosion represents a destructive electrochemical process where metals, such as iron, undergo oxidation at anodic sites and reduction reactions occur at cathodic sites in the presence of an electrolyte, leading to material degradation. For iron, the anodic reaction involves the dissolution of the metal: Fe → Fe²⁺ + 2e⁻, releasing electrons that drive the process. The corresponding cathodic reaction typically involves oxygen reduction in neutral or alkaline environments: O₂ + 2H₂O + 4e⁻ → 4OH⁻, which generates hydroxide ions. These ions react with ferrous ions to form initial corrosion products, ultimately leading to rust, a hydrated iron(III) oxide, through the overall reaction: 4Fe + 3O₂ + 6H₂O → 4Fe(OH)₃. Various types of corrosion arise depending on environmental and material factors. Uniform corrosion manifests as an even deterioration across the metal surface, often in moist atmospheres with adequate oxygen. occurs when two dissimilar metals are in electrical contact within an , accelerating attack on the less due to potential differences. is a localized form that creates small pits or holes, often initiated by ions breaking down protective films. Key factors influencing these processes include , which supplies for the electrolyte; salts, such as chlorides, that enhance conductivity and aggressiveness; and , which accelerates reaction rates. Protection against corrosion employs strategies that either isolate the metal from the environment or alter the electrochemical reactions. renders the metal surface cathodic by using sacrificial anodes, such as , which corrode preferentially due to their more negative electrode potentials (e.g., Zn → Zn²⁺ + 2e⁻). Coatings, including paints that form impermeable barriers and galvanizing with layers, prevent electrolyte access and provide additional sacrificial protection. are chemical compounds added to environments or applied to surfaces, where they adsorb to form protective films or interfere with anodic/cathodic reactions, such as calcium nitrite for . The economic ramifications of corrosion are substantial, with global annual costs estimated at $2.5 trillion as of a 2016 study, equivalent to 3.4% of world GDP at that time, underscoring the need for effective . , corrosion inflicts approximately $276 billion in damages yearly as estimated in a 2002 study across industries. A prominent case involves oil and gas s, where external accounts for a significant portion of failures; for instance, inadequate coatings and have led to leaks and repairs costing billions, as seen in incidents affecting buried transmission lines.

Organic Redox Transformations

Organic redox transformations play a central role in synthetic chemistry, enabling the controlled interconversion of functional groups through processes. These reactions typically involve the oxidation of alcohols to carbonyl compounds or the reduction of carbonyls and nitro groups to alcohols and amines, respectively, using selective that minimize over-oxidation or side reactions. Such transformations are essential for constructing complex molecules, with selectivity often dictated by the choice of and reaction conditions. Oxidation of primary alcohols to aldehydes and secondary alcohols to ketones is commonly achieved using mild chromium-based reagents like , which avoids further oxidation to carboxylic acids under anhydrous conditions in . Introduced by Corey and Suggs in 1975, PCC facilitates efficient conversions, as demonstrated in the oxidation of primary alcohols to s with yields exceeding 90% in many cases. Potassium permanganate (KMnO4) serves as a stronger oxidant for similar transformations, particularly in neutral or alkaline media, where it converts primary alcohols to carboxylic acids and secondary alcohols to ketones, though control is needed to halt at the stage for primaries using specific protocols. The , developed by Omura and Swern in 1978, employs , , and a base like triethylamine to achieve high-yield oxidations at low temperatures, preserving acid-sensitive groups and enabling selective formation from primary alcohols. Epoxidation of s to oxiranes represents another key oxidation, typically performed using peracids such as m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (mCPBA) via the , which proceeds stereospecifically to retain alkene geometry in the three-membered ring product. This method, first described in 1909, yields epoxides in high efficiency for electron-rich alkenes, with applications in synthesizing intermediates. Reductions in often target carbonyl or nitro functionalities. (NaBH4) selectively reduces aldehydes and ketones to primary and secondary alcohols, respectively, in protic solvents like at , as established in early work by Nystrom and Brown in 1947, offering mild conditions compatible with many functional groups. For nitro compounds, particularly aromatic nitroarenes, tin in (Sn/HCl) provides a robust reduction to amines, proceeding through and intermediates, with historical roots in 19th-century methods and yields often above 80% under conditions. A notable example of redox in is the , a base-catalyzed of aldehydes lacking alpha-hydrogens, where one is oxidized to the and another reduced to the alcohol, as discovered by Cannizzaro in 1853; often serves as the sacrificial reductant in crossed variants for selective alcohol formation. Modern advancements emphasize and selectivity, particularly through enzymatic methods. Alcohol dehydrogenases and ketoreductases enable asymmetric reductions of carbonyls with enantiomeric excesses (ee) >99%, as highlighted in reviews of biocatalysis for , allowing precise control in pharmaceutical production without harsh metal catalysts. These enzymes, often from microbial sources, facilitate kinetic resolutions and dynamic kinetic resolutions, enhancing the efficiency of redox transformations in chiral synthesis.

Redox in Natural Systems

Biological Redox Reactions

Biological redox reactions are fundamental to cellular energy production and maintenance of homeostasis in living organisms. These processes involve the transfer of electrons between molecules, often mediated by specialized cofactors, to drive metabolic pathways such as respiration and photosynthesis. In cellular respiration, the electron transport chain (ETC) in mitochondria facilitates the oxidation of reduced cofactors like NADH and FADH₂, ultimately reducing oxygen to water while generating a proton gradient for ATP synthesis. Similarly, in photosynthetic organisms, light-driven redox reactions split water to produce oxygen and reduce NADP⁺ to NADPH, powering carbon fixation. Disruptions in these redox balances can lead to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are managed by enzymatic systems to prevent cellular damage. Key redox cofactors in biological systems include (NAD⁺/NADH) and (FAD/FADH₂), which shuttle electrons in catabolic and anabolic reactions. The NAD⁺/NADH couple has a standard reduction potential of approximately -0.32 V, enabling NADH to serve as a potent in the ETC. FAD/FADH₂, derived from , participates in reactions like the oxidation of succinate in the Krebs cycle, transferring electrons to the ETC via complex II without directly pumping protons. These cofactors maintain the cellular redox state, with the NAD⁺/NADH ratio typically around 500:1 in aerobic conditions to favor oxidation. The mitochondrial ETC exemplifies oxidative redox reactions, where electrons from NADH enter at complex I (NADH:ubiquinone ), passing through iron-sulfur clusters and to reduce ubiquinone (CoQ), pumping four protons into the . Electrons then flow via the Q-cycle in complex III (cytochrome bc₁) to , pumping another four protons, and finally to complex IV (), where four electrons reduce O₂ to 2 H₂O, pumping two more protons. This sequence from NADH to O₂ translocates approximately 10 protons per NADH, yielding about 2.5 ATP molecules via , which utilizes roughly four protons per ATP. FADH₂ bypasses complex I, entering at complex II and yielding ~1.5 ATP. In photosynthesis, reductive redox reactions occur in chloroplasts, where photosystem II (PSII) catalyzes water splitting at the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC), a Mn₄Ca cluster, oxidizing 2 H₂O to O₂ + 4 H⁺ + 4 e⁻ during four light-induced turnovers. The released electrons travel through plastoquinone, the cytochrome b₆f complex, and plastocyanin to photosystem I (PSI), where light re-energizes them to reduce NADP⁺ to NADPH via ferredoxin-NADP⁺ reductase. This non-cyclic electron flow from H₂O to NADP⁺ generates both ATP (via proton gradient) and NADPH, essential for the Calvin cycle, with O₂ evolution exhibiting a characteristic four-flash periodicity. Redox cycling in biological systems often produces ROS, such as (O₂⁻), primarily from partial reduction of O₂ in the ETC at complexes I and III or by enzymes like . generation serves signaling roles at low levels but causes at high concentrations, damaging lipids, proteins, and DNA. (SOD) enzymes mitigate this by catalyzing the dismutation of 2 O₂⁻ + 2 H⁺ to H₂O₂ + O₂ at near-diffusion-limited rates (~10⁹ M⁻¹ s⁻¹), with isoforms like Cu/Zn-SOD in and Mn-SOD in mitochondria maintaining redox . Subsequent H₂O₂ detoxification by catalases or peroxidases completes the cycle, preventing toxicity while allowing controlled ROS signaling.

Geological Redox Processes

Geological redox processes play a crucial role in the formation and alteration of minerals within the and sedimentary rocks, driving the , dissolution, and transformation of redox-sensitive elements such as iron, , and . These processes occur in diverse environments, from ancient ocean basins to hydrothermal systems associated with volcanic activity, influencing the distribution of deposits and preserving records of past atmospheric and oceanic conditions. Redox reactions in are primarily abiotic, mediated by changes in oxygen availability, , and temperature, which control the mobility and of elements. Banded iron formations (BIFs), prominent in rocks, exemplify the impact of redox processes on formation and genesis. These layered deposits, primarily composed of iron oxides like and alternating with silica-rich chert, formed through the oxidation of dissolved Fe²⁺ in ancient by low levels of atmospheric O₂ around 2.4 to 1.8 billion years ago. The process involved the of Fe²⁺-rich hydrothermal fluids into oxygen-poor surface waters, where episodic oxygenation led to the precipitation of Fe³⁺ oxyhydroxides, creating the characteristic banding as denser iron particles settled to the seafloor. This oxidation not only sequestered iron to form vast reserves—such as those in the Hamersley Province of —but also buffered early Earth's oxygen levels, marking a key transition in planetary redox evolution. Modern analogs, like those in the Atlantis II Deep of the , confirm that such precipitation occurs at redox interfaces without requiring direct biological mediation for the iron chemistry. Redox fronts in sedimentary environments further illustrate element cycling, particularly for manganese (Mn) and iron (Fe), at boundaries between anoxic and oxic zones. In marine or lacustrine sediments, these fronts develop where pore waters transition from oxygen-depleted conditions below to oxygenated layers above, facilitating the reductive dissolution of Mn⁴⁺ and Fe³⁺ oxides in deeper anoxic strata and their subsequent oxidation and re-precipitation higher up. This cycling mobilizes associated trace elements like phosphorus and heavy metals, influencing nutrient availability and contaminant transport over geological timescales. For instance, in the Gulf of Finland's brackish sediments, Fe and Mn dynamics at these fronts exhibit seasonal variations tied to bottom-water oxygenation, with Mn²⁺ diffusing upward and oxidizing to form Mn(IV) oxides that scavenge other elements. Such processes contribute to the formation of Mn-rich nodules and Fe-Mn concretions in deep-sea sediments, serving as archives of past redox gradients. Volcanic gases, rich in sulfur species, undergo redox transformations that lead to mineral deposition through disproportionation reactions. Sulfur dioxide (SO₂), a dominant volcanic gas, can disproportionate in hydrothermal systems to produce sulfate (SO₄²⁻) and sulfide (S²⁻) species, particularly under varying pH and temperature conditions in magmatic fluids. This reaction, such as 4SO₂ + 4H₂O → 3H₂SO₄ + H₂S, occurs as gases interact with wall rocks or condense in crater lakes, resulting in the precipitation of sulfate minerals like anhydrite and sulfide minerals like pyrite in ore deposits. Evidence from isotopic studies of volcanic systems, including those at in , shows significant fractionation during this process, with sulfates enriched in ³⁴S relative to sulfides, confirming the disproportionation pathway. These reactions not only form economic sulfide ore bodies but also influence volcanic degassing budgets and atmospheric sulfur inputs. Paleoredox indicators, preserved in sedimentary rocks, allow reconstruction of ancient oxygen levels through ratios of redox-sensitive trace elements. (U) and (Th) are particularly useful, as U exists primarily as soluble U⁶⁺ under oxic conditions but reduces to insoluble U⁴⁺ in anoxic settings, while Th is relatively immobile and not affected by redox changes, serving as a reference for U enrichment. The U/Th ratio in black shales and carbonates, for example, increases under suboxic to anoxic conditions, with values above 1.25 indicating restricted oxygenation, as seen in Devonian-Mississippian sequences where elevated U/Th correlates with organic-rich, low-oxygen deposition. Other proxies like V/Cr or Th/U complement this, but U/Th provides sensitivity to fluctuating redox boundaries in marine settings. These indicators have been validated across rocks, enabling insights into events like the oceanic anoxia.

Soil and Environmental Redox

In soil and environmental systems, redox conditions are often characterized using Eh-pH diagrams, which illustrate the stability fields of various under different electrochemical potentials () and acidity levels (). These diagrams delineate redox zones, such as oxic conditions above +400 mV where oxygen dominates as an , transitioning to suboxic (100 to +400 mV) and anoxic zones below 0 mV where alternative acceptors like , oxides, iron oxides, and prevail. In these gradients, iron (Fe), (Mn), and (S) undergo cyclic redox transformations; for instance, under oxic conditions, Fe(III) and Mn(IV) oxides form and adsorb nutrients or contaminants, while in anoxic zones, microbial reduction mobilizes Fe(II) and Mn(II), and reduces to , influencing precipitation and dissolution. Redox dynamics significantly affect nutrient cycling, particularly nitrogen and carbon transformations. Denitrification occurs in moderately reducing soils (Eh around +200 to -100 mV), where bacteria reduce nitrate (NO₃⁻) to dinitrogen gas (N₂) using organic carbon as an electron donor, thereby mitigating nitrate leaching but contributing to N₂O emissions. In highly anoxic wetland environments (Eh < -200 mV), methanogenesis dominates, with archaea converting CO₂ or acetate to methane (CH₄) under sulfate-depleted conditions, enhancing greenhouse gas fluxes from saturated soils. Environmental pollution is modulated by soil redox, enabling remediation strategies and sometimes exacerbating contaminant mobility. The reduction of toxic (Cr(VI)) to less mobile trivalent chromium (Cr(III)) is facilitated in anoxic s through abiotic reactions with Fe(II) or microbial processes, a key mechanism in in-situ remediation efforts. Conversely, arsenic mobilization increases under reducing conditions, as Fe(III) oxides dissolve to release sorbed (As(V)), which may reduce to more soluble (As(III)), posing risks in flooded paddies or . Climate change intensifies redox shifts in permafrost regions, where warming induces thaw and creates anoxic microsites that promote methanogenesis. Permafrost thaw lowers Eh, enhancing organic matter decomposition and CH₄ production, potentially amplifying atmospheric methane concentrations by 125-190% compared to gradual warming scenarios, representing a major positive feedback in global carbon cycling.

Educational Tools

Mnemonics for Redox Concepts

Mnemonics serve as simple memory aids to help learners recall fundamental concepts in redox chemistry, such as the definitions of oxidation and reduction, without delving into complex mechanisms. These tools are particularly useful in educational settings to reinforce principles. One widely used mnemonic is "," which stands for "Oxidation Is Loss" of s and "Reduction Is Gain" of s, aiding in distinguishing the two processes in a redox reaction. A related phrase, "LEO GER" or "LEO says GER," expands on this by meaning "Loss of s is Oxidation" and "Gain of s is Reduction," often visualized as a (LEO) growling (GER) to emphasize the electron dynamics. These phrases promote quick recall of basic definitions in redox fundamentals. For electrochemical cells, the mnemonic "Red Cat, An Ox" helps remember electrode roles: "Reduction at Cathode" and "Anode Oxidation," clarifying where each half-reaction occurs. This device is especially helpful for distinguishing anode and cathode functions in galvanic or electrolytic setups. For balancing redox equations, educational aids often employ sequential acronyms such as EOHC in acidic media—"Elements (balance non-O/H atoms), Oxygen (add H₂O), Hydrogen (add H⁺), Charge (add e⁻)"—to guide the method step-by-step. Visual aids, including arrow diagrams, depict electron flow in redox reactions by showing curved arrows moving from the oxidized species (electron donor) to the reduced species (electron acceptor), providing a graphical reinforcement of the transfer process. These diagrams, commonly featured in textbooks, use directional arrows to illustrate the path electrons take, enhancing conceptual understanding of directionality in electron movement.

Common Misconceptions

One prevalent misconception in redox chemistry is that oxidation necessarily involves the addition of oxygen to a substance, stemming from historical definitions tied to oxygen transfer in processes. In reality, oxidation is fundamentally the loss of electrons from a species, which can occur in numerous reactions without any oxygen involvement, such as the displacement reaction where metal reduces (II) ions to while being oxidized to ions (Zn + Cu²⁺ → Zn²⁺ + Cu). This error often leads students to overlook as the core mechanism of redox processes. Another frequent confusion arises in interpreting reduction, where learners mistakenly view it solely as a process that results in a "less negative" charge on a , rather than recognizing it as the gain of . This oversimplification ignores the precise definition of reduction as electron acquisition, which typically increases the negative charge or decreases the positive charge on the reduced , regardless of initial oxidation states. Such misunderstandings can distort comprehension of charge balance in half-reactions and overall redox mechanisms. Students also commonly err in assuming that all spontaneous redox reactions proceed rapidly due to their thermodynamic favorability, indicated by positive potentials. For instance, the rusting of iron, a redox process involving iron oxidation by atmospheric oxygen, is thermodynamically spontaneous under standard conditions but occurs very slowly without catalysts like or electrolytes, highlighting the distinction between and kinetics. This misconception blurs the role of barriers in controlling reaction rates. A further oversight involves neglecting the involvement of protons (H⁺ ions) when balancing redox equations, particularly in distinguishing between acidic and neutral or basic media. In acidic conditions, protons are added to balance oxygen atoms in half-reactions, whereas in basic media, hydroxide ions (OH⁻) are used instead, leading to different balancing steps that affect the final equation. Failing to account for the reaction medium can result in unbalanced equations and incorrect predictions of products.

References

  1. https://www.monash.edu/student-academic-success/chemistry/primary-galvanic-cells-and-fuel-cells-as-sources-of-energy/redox-reactions
  2. http://ch302.cm.utexas.edu/echem/redox/redox-rxns.html
  3. https://greenchemistry.yale.edu/modrnu-modules/physicochemical-properties-modules/module-2-redox-reactions
  4. https://faculty.csbsju.edu/ssaupe/biol115/respiration-f01.htm
  5. https://www.usgs.gov/mission-areas/water-resources/science/oxidationreduction-redox
  6. https://homepages.uc.edu/~jensenwb/reprints/139.%20Oxidation%20States.pdf
  7. https://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch19/oxred_1.php
  8. https://www.chem.fsu.edu/chemlab/chm1lab/redox/background.html
  9. https://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch19/oxred_3.php
  10. https://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/huen/tpss435/redox.pdf
  11. https://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch9/redox.php
  12. https://www.kgs.ku.edu/Hydro/GWtutor/Plume_Busters/remediate_refs/redox_chemistry.htm
  13. https://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch10/group7.php
  14. https://www.chem.uwec.edu/Chem150_Resources/vlab/assignments/redox/redox/problem_description.html
  15. https://www.ehs.washington.edu/system/files/resources/nitric-acid-safety-focus-sheet.pdf
  16. http://hsrm.umn.edu/nitric-acid
  17. https://goldbook.iupac.org/terms/view/O04365
  18. https://iupac.org/recommendation/comprehensive-definition-of-oxidation-state/
  19. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Analytical_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_%28Analytical_Chemistry%29/Electrochemistry/Redox_Chemistry/Oxidation_States_%28Oxidation_Numbers%29
  20. https://www.chem.tamu.edu/rgroup/hughbanks/courses/462/lecturenotes/class9-3.pdf
  21. https://employees.csbsju.edu/cschaller/Reactivity/redox/ROinnersphere.htm
  22. https://research.cm.utexas.edu/nbauld/etmechanisms.htm
  23. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/taube-lecture.pdf
  24. https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2018/06/marcus-lecture.pdf
  25. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Inorganic_Chemistry/Supplemental_Modules_and_Websites_%28Inorganic_Chemistry%29/Advanced_Inorganic_Chemistry_%28Wikibook%29/01%253A_Chapters/1.25%253A_Electron_Transfer_Reactions
  26. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp011150e
  27. https://macmillan.princeton.edu/wp-content/uploads/MVW_ET.pdf
  28. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ar50092a002
  29. https://authors.library.caltech.edu/records/n1dvg-fw104/latest
  30. https://pressbooks.online.ucf.edu/chemistryfundamentals/chapter/factors-affecting-reaction-rates-2/
  31. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4613-4577-0_4
  32. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.241215
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005272803002019
  34. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00325
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/redox-process
  36. https://www.chm.uri.edu/mmcgregor/chm114/chm114exp1.pdf
  37. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1920765117
  38. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/General_Chemistry/Map%253A_A_Molecular_Approach_%28Tro%29/19%253A_Electrochemistry/19.09%253A_Corrosion-_Undesirable_Redox_Reactions
  39. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/General_Chemistry/Map%253A_Chemistry_-_The_Central_Science_%28Brown_et_al.%29/20%253A_Electrochemistry/20.05%253A_Gibbs_Energy_and_Redox_Reactions
  40. https://openstax.org/books/chemistry-2e/pages/17-4-potential-free-energy-and-equilibrium
  41. https://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch20/electro.php
  42. https://openstax.org/books/chemistry-2e/pages/16-4-free-energy
  43. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8327831/
  44. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Chemical/electrode.html
  45. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/5-111-principles-of-chemical-science-fall-2008/a42a19b7db3b027ae13b68c422454155_lecnotes25.pdf
  46. https://alpha.chem.umb.edu/chemistry/ch311/week7.pdf
  47. https://open.maricopa.edu/chemistryfundamentals/chapter/standard-reduction-potentials/
  48. https://www.chm.uri.edu/wp4/wp-content/uploads/userfileuploads/mdonnelly/2020S_CHM112_Chapter19.pdf
  49. https://chem.libretexts.org/Ancillary_Materials/Reference/Reference_Tables/Electrochemistry_Tables/P2:_Standard_Reduction_Potentials_by_Value
  50. https://www.chem.uci.edu/~unicorn/M3LCACTopics/AC06aNernstEquation.pdf
  51. http://ch302.cm.utexas.edu/echem/echem-free-energy/selector.php?name=potentials
  52. https://pubs.usgs.gov/twri/twri9a6/twri9a64/twri9a_6.4_ver2.0.pdf
  53. https://www.pveducation.org/pvcdrom/battery-basics/nernst-equation
  54. https://pressbooks.online.ucf.edu/chemistryfundamentals/chapter/balancing-oxidation-reduction-reactions/
  55. https://www.chem.tamu.edu/class/fyp/magnuson/redox-balance.pdf
  56. https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-content/supporting-files/Chem14B/Balancing_Redox_Reactions_Acidic_Conditions.pdf
  57. https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-content/supporting-files/Chem14B/Balancing_Redox_Reactions_Basic_Conditions.pdf
  58. https://www.chem.tamu.edu/class/fyp/chouai/chapter11-s06.pdf
  59. https://www2.chem.wisc.edu/deptfiles/genchem/sstutorial/Text14/Tx143/tx143.html
  60. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/hs-chemistry/x2613d8165d88df5e:chemical-reactions/x2613d8165d88df5e:types-of-chemical-reactions/a/single-replacement-reactions
  61. https://edu.rsc.org/experiments/displacement-reactions-between-metals-and-their-salts/720.article
  62. https://edu.rsc.org/experiments/the-thermite-reaction-between-aluminium-and-ironiii-oxide/724.article
  63. https://www.expii.com/t/combustion-reactions-definition-examples-8583
  64. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/cellular-respiration-and-fermentation/intro-to-cellular-respiration/a/intro-to-cellular-respiration-and-redox
  65. https://www.epa.gov/co-pollution/basic-information-about-carbon-monoxide-co-outdoor-air-pollution
  66. https://alpha.chem.umb.edu/chemistry/ch371/CH371_Information/CuCl_Pojection.pdf
  67. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp172-c6.pdf
  68. https://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch19/oxred_2.php
  69. https://chemistry.ucr.edu/sites/default/files/2019-10/Chapter17.pdf
  70. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ic001106y
  71. https://www.chm.uri.edu/weuler/chm401/studyaids/redoxpracticeproblems_answers.html
  72. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c07308
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4131935/
  74. https://kenis-group.chbe.illinois.edu/Publications/2023/kenis_2023_electrochemicalmanufacturing.pdf
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5789859/
  76. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1310477/chlorine-market-volume-worldwide/
  77. https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aesr.202000043
  78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0255270124003003
  79. https://www.acs.org/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/aluminumprocess.html
  80. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/2.0321811jes
  81. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-16259-9
  82. https://www.umicore.com/en/media/newsroom/what-are-fuel-cells/
  83. https://www.rystadenergy.com/insights/charged-for-growth-insights-into-the-evolving-batteries-market
  84. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.oprd.0c00536
  85. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.2c04920
  86. https://www.iea.org/energy-system/low-emission-fuels/electrolysers
  87. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-production-electrolysis
  88. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-12/hydrogen-shot-water-electrolysis-technology-assessment.pdf
  89. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2025/executive-summary
  90. https://knowledge.electrochem.org/encycl/art-c02-corrosion.htm
  91. https://nautarch.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ConservationManual.pdf
  92. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ml1122/ML11229A047.pdf
  93. https://public.ksc.nasa.gov/corrosion/corrosion-control/
  94. https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/technical-resources/pipeline/gas-distribution-integrity-management/65996/finalreportpipelinecorrosion.pdf
  95. https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/operating/oom/transportation-maintenance/repository/CathodicProtectionSystems.pdf
  96. http://impact.nace.org/economic-impact.aspx
  97. http://impact.nace.org/documents/ccsupp.pdf
  98. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscentsci.0c00549
  99. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jo00018a025
  100. https://www.organic-chemistry.org/namedreactions/prilezhaev-reaction.shtm
  101. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00283
  102. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11196959/
  103. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscentsci.0c01496
  104. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/10/8/832
  105. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK526105/
  106. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3360099/
  107. https://www.life.illinois.edu/govindjee/paper/gov.html
  108. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5987716/
  109. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8360020/
  110. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00121631
  111. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377027399001614
  112. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283476002_Sulfur_isotopic_effects_in_the_disproportionation_reaction_of_sulfur_dioxide_at_hydrothermal_temperatures
  113. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009254104000191
  114. https://homepages.uc.edu/~algeot/Tribovillard-Algeo-etal-CG-2006.pdf
  115. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425008248
  116. https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/vzj2.20149
  117. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10533-022-01012-9
  118. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012825222001891
  119. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3524552/
  120. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023MS004002
  121. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969721007221
  122. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304389422010287
  123. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2019JG005526
  124. https://science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/unexpected-future-boost-of-methane-possible-from-arctic-permafrost/
  125. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/General_Chemistry/Map%3A_Chemistry_-_The_Central_Science_(Brown_et_al.)/20%3A_Electrochemistry/20.01%3A_Oxidation_States_and_Redox_Reactions
  126. https://www.albert.io/blog/how-to-balance-redox-reactions-ap-chemistry-crash-course/
  127. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/chemistry/oxidation-reduction/redox-oxidation-reduction/a/oxidation-reduction-redox-reactions
  128. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1364158.pdf
  129. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/77297
  130. https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/General_Chemistry/Map%3A_Chemistry_-_The_Central_Science_(Brown_et_al.)/19%3A_Chemical_Thermodynamics/19.07%3A_Free_Energy_and_the_Direction_of_Spontaneous_Reactions
  131. https://edu.rsc.org/feature/electrochemistry-misconceptions/4016367.article
  132. https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.7_Issue.5_May2020/IJRR0016.pdf
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.