Hubbry Logo
Burrowing owlBurrowing owlMain
Open search
Burrowing owl
Community hub
Burrowing owl
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Burrowing owl
Burrowing owl
from Wikipedia

Burrowing owl
Brazilian burrowing owl
A. c. grallaria
Pantanal, Brazil
CITES Appendix II (CITES)[2]
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Order: Strigiformes
Family: Strigidae
Genus: Athene
Species:
A. cunicularia
Binomial name
Athene cunicularia
(Molina, 1782)
Subspecies

About 20 living, see text

Range of A. cunicularia
  Summer breeding range
  Winter non-breeding range
  Resident breeding range
Synonyms

Strix cunicularia Molina, 1782
Speotyto cunicularia
Spheotyto cunicularia (lapsus)

The burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), also called the shoco, is a small, long-legged, primarily terrestrial—though not flightlessspecies of owl native to the open landscapes of North and South America. They are typically found in grasslands, rangelands, agricultural areas, deserts, or any other open, dry area with low vegetation.[3] They nest and roost in burrows, and, despite their common name, do not often construct these dwellings themselves, rather repurposing disused burrows or tunnels previously excavated and inhabited by other species, such as American badgers (Taxidea taxus), foxes (Vulpes sp.), ground squirrels or prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.), among others.

Unlike most owls, burrowing owls are often active during the day, although they tend to avoid the heat of midday. But, similar to many other species of owls, they are mostly crepuscular hunters, as they can utilize their night vision and attuned hearing to maximum potential during sunrise and sunset. Having evolved to live on open grasslands and prairie habitat (as well as badlands, chaparral and desert ecosystems), as opposed to dense forest, the burrowing owl has developed longer legs than other owls, a trait which enables it to sprint when pursuing its prey, not dissimilarly to the greater roadrunner, as well as providing momentum when taking flight; however, burrowing owls typically only become airborne for short bursts, such as when fleeing threats, and typically do not fly very high off of the ground.

Taxonomy

[edit]

The burrowing owl was formally described by Spanish naturalist Juan Ignacio Molina in 1782 under the binomial name Strix cunicularia from a specimen collected in Chile.[4][5] The specific epithet is from the Latin cunicularius, meaning "burrower" or "miner".[6] The burrowing owl is now placed in the genus Athene which was introduced by German zoologist Friedrich Boie in 1822.[7][8]

The burrowing owl is sometimes classified in the monotypic genus Speotyto (based on an overall unique morphology and karyotype). Osteology and DNA sequence data, though, suggests that the burrowing owl is a terrestrial member of the little owls genus (Athene), thus it is placed in that group today by most authorities.

A considerable number of subspecies have been described, though they differ little in appearance; the taxonomic validity of several is still up for debate.[9] Most subspecies are found in or near the Andes and within the Antilles of the Caribbean Sea. Although distinct from each other, the relationship of the Florida subspecies, for instance, to (and its distinctness from) the Caribbean owls, is not quite clear.[10]

The 18 recognised subspecies, of which two are now extinct, are:[8]

includes A. c. partridgei (Olrog, 1976): Corrientes burrowing owl – Corrientes Province, Argentina (probably not distinct from A. c. cunicularia)

A paleosubspecies, A. c. providentiae, has been described from fossil remains from the Pleistocene of the Bahamas. How these birds relate to the extant A. c. floridana – that is, whether they were among the ancestors of that subspecies, or whether they represented a more distant lineage that completely disappeared later – is unknown.

In addition, prehistoric fossils of similar owls have been recovered from many islands in the Caribbean (Barbuda, the Cayman Islands, Jamaica, Mona Island and Puerto Rico). These birds became extinct towards the end of the Pleistocene, probably because of ecological and sea-level changes at the end of the last ice age rather than human activity. These fossil owls differed in size from present-day burrowing owls, and their relationship to the modern taxa has not been resolved.

Description

[edit]

Burrowing owls have bright eyes; their beaks can be dark yellow or gray depending on the subspecies. They lack ear tufts and have a flattened facial disc. The owls have prominent white eyebrows and a white "chin" patch which they expand and display during certain behaviors, such as a bobbing of the head when agitated.

Adults have brown heads and wings with white spotting. Their chests and abdomens are white with variable brown spotting or barring, also depending on the subspecies. Juvenile owls are similar in appearance, but they lack most of the white spotting above and brown barring below. The juveniles have a buff bar across their upper wings and their breasts may be buff-colored rather than white. Burrowing owls of all ages have grayish legs longer than those of other owls.

Males and females are similar in size and appearance, so display little sexual dimorphism. Females tend to be heavier, but males tend to have longer linear measurements (wing length, tail length, etc.). Adult males appear lighter in color than females because they spend more time outside the burrow during daylight, and their feathers become "sun-bleached". The burrowing owl measures 19–28 cm (7–11 in) long and spans 50.8–61 cm (20–24 in) across the wings, and weighs 140–240 g (5–8 oz).[3][13][14] As a size comparison, an average adult is slightly larger than an American robin (Turdus migratorius).[3][failed verification]

Distribution and habitat

[edit]

Before European colonization, burrowing owls probably inhabited every suitable area of the New World, but in North America, they have experienced some restrictions in distribution since then. In parts of South America, they are expanding their range due to deforestation.[15] The western burrowing owls (A. c. hypugaea) are most common in the Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge, as well as in most of the western states. Known resident populations inhabit areas of Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and California, where their population is reportedly threatened by human encroachment and construction.[16][17]

Burrowing owls range from the southern portions of the western Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba) and all the way through Mexico to western Panamá. They are also found across the state of Florida, as well as some Caribbean islands. In South America, they are fairly common, and are known to inhabit every country on the continent, with the exception of the dense Amazon rainforest interior and the highest ranges of the Andes Mountains. Their preference is for the cooler, possibly sub-tropical coastal and temperate regions. South of the Amazon, their population seems to again rebound, as they are widely distributed from southern Brazil and the Pantanal down to Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego.

Burrowing owls are year-round residents in most of their range. Birds that breed in Canada and the northern U.S. usually migrate south to Mexico and the southern U.S. during winter months.

Behaviour and ecology

[edit]
Burrowing owl in flight

This species can live for at least 9 years in the wild and over 10 years in captivity.[3] They are often killed by vehicles when crossing roads, and have many natural enemies, including badgers, coyotes, and snakes.[18] They are also killed by both feral and domestic cats and dogs. Two birds studied in the Parque Nacional de La Macarena of Colombia were free of blood parasites.[19]

Burrowing owls often nest and roost in the burrows made by ground squirrels, a strategy also used by rattlesnakes.[18] When threatened, the owl retreats to the burrow and produces rattling and hissing sounds similar to those of a rattlesnake. The behavior is suggested to be an example of acoustic Batesian mimicry and has been observed to be an effective strategy against animals that are familiar with the dangers posed by rattlesnakes.[20]

Breeding

[edit]
A family of burrowing owls

The nesting season begins in late March or April in North America. Burrowing owls usually only have one mate but occasionally a male will have two mates.[3] Pairs of owls will sometimes nest in loose colonies. Their typical breeding habitat is open grassland or prairie, but they can occasionally adapt to other open areas like airports, golf courses, and agricultural fields. Burrowing owls are slightly tolerant of human presence, often nesting near roads, farms, homes, and regularly maintained irrigation canals.

The owls nest in a burrow, hence the name burrowing owl. If burrows are unavailable and the soil is not hard or rocky, the owls may excavate their own. Burrowing owls will also nest in shallow, underground, man-made structures that have easy access to the surface.

During the nesting season, burrowing owls will collect a wide variety of materials to line their nest, some of which are left around the entrance to the burrow. The most common material is mammal dung, usually from cattle. At one time it was thought that the dung helped to mask the scent of the juvenile owls, but researchers now believe the dung helps to control the microclimate inside the burrow and to attract insects, which the owls may eat.[21]

The female lays an egg every one or two days until she has completed a clutch, which can consist of four to 12 eggs (usually 9). She then incubates the eggs for 3–4 weeks while the male brings her food. After the eggs hatch, both parents feed the chicks. Four weeks after hatching, the chicks can make short flights and begin leaving the nest burrow. The parents still help feed the chicks for 1–3 months.

Site fidelity rates appear to vary among populations. In some locations, owls will frequently reuse a nest several years in a row. Owls in migratory northern populations are less likely to return to the same burrow every year. Also, as with many other birds, the female owls are more likely to disperse to a different site than are male owls.[22]

Food and feeding

[edit]
A burrowing owl on the lookout

When hunting, they wait on a perch until they spot prey. Then, they swoop down on prey or fly up to catch insects in flight. Sometimes, they chase prey on foot across the ground. The highly variable diet includes invertebrates and small vertebrates, which make up roughly one third and two thirds of the diet, respectively. Burrowing owls mainly eat large insects and small rodents. Although burrowing owls often live close to ground squirrels (Marmotini), they rarely prey upon them. They also hunt bats.[23] An analysis of burrowing owl diets in the Dominican Republic found the owls consumed ~53% invertebrates, ~28% other birds, ~15% reptiles, ~3% amphibians, and 1% mammals.[24]

Rodent prey is usually dominated by locally superabundant species, like the delicate vesper mouse (Calomys tener) in southern Brazil. Among squamates and amphibians, small lizards like the tropical house gecko (Hemidactylus mabouia), snakes, frogs, and toads predominate.[23] Generally, most vertebrate prey is in the weight class of several grams per individual. The largest prey are usually birds, such as eared doves (Zenaida auriculata) which may weigh almost as much as a burrowing owl, as well as sparrows.[25][23]

Regarding invertebrates, the burrowing owl seems less of a generalist. It is extremely fond of termites such as Termitidae, and Orthoptera such as Conocephalinae and Copiphorinae katydids, Jerusalem crickets (Stenopelmatidae), true crickets (Gryllidae) and grasshoppers.[25][23] Bothynus and Dichotomius anaglypticus scarab beetles (Scarabaeidae) were eaten far more often than even closely related species by many burrowing owls across central São Paulo (Brazil). Similarly, it was noted that among scorpions Bothriuridae were much preferred, among spiders Lycosidae (wolf spiders), and among millipedes (Diplopoda) certain Diplocheta. Small ground beetles (Carabidae) are eaten in quantity, while larger ones are much less popular as burrowing owl food, perhaps due to the vigorous defense the large species can put up.[26] Earthworms are also preyed upon.[23] Burrowing owls are also known to place the fecal matter of large herbivorous mammals around the outside of their burrows to attract dung beetles, which are used to provide a steady source of food for the owls.[27] Burrowing owls can also predate on invertebrates attracted to artificial night lighting.[28]

Unlike other owls, they also eat fruits and seeds, especially the fruit of tasajillo (Cylindropuntia leptocaulis) and other prickly pear and cholla cacti. On Clarion Island, where mammalian prey is lacking, they feed essentially on crickets and prickly pear fruit, adding Clarión wrens (Troglodytes tanneri) and young Clarion mourning doves (Zenaida macroura clarionensis) on occasion.[29]

Status and conservation

[edit]
A burrowing owl makes a home out of a buried piece of pipe.
A. c. floridana by its burrow in Florida

The burrowing owl is endangered in Canada[30] and threatened in Mexico. It is a state threatened species in Colorado and Florida[31] and a California species of special concern. It is common and widespread in open regions of many Neotropical countries, where they sometimes even inhabit fields and parks in cities. In regions bordering the Amazon Rainforest they are spreading with deforestation.[15] It is therefore listed as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List.[1] Burrowing owls are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act in Canada, the United States, and Mexico. They are also included in CITES Appendix II. NatureServe lists the species as Apparently Secure.[24]

California Endangered Species Act Listing Petition

[edit]

In March 2024, Center for Biological Diversity, Urban Bird Foundation, Defenders of Wildlife, Burrowing Owl Preservation Society, Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society, Central Valley Bird Club and San Bernardino Valley Audubon Society submitted a California Endangered Species Act listing petition to the Fish and Game Commission to get protections for five populations of the western burrowing owl.[32][33][34]

The petition requests endangered status for burrowing owls in southwestern California, central-western California and the San Francisco Bay Area, and threatened status for burrowing owls in the Central Valley and southern desert range.[35][36]

Dependency on burrowing animals

[edit]

The major reasons for declining populations in North America are loss of habitat, and control programs for prairie dogs. While some species of burrowing owl can dig their own burrows, most species rely on burrowing animals to burrow holes that the owls can use as shelter and nesting space.[37] There is a high correlation between the location of burrowing animal colonies, like those of ground squirrels, with the presence of burrowing owls.[38][39] Rates of burrowing owl decline have also been shown to correlate with prairie dog decline.[37][40][41] Western burrowing owls, for example, nest in burrows made by black-tailed prairie dogs since they are unable to dig their own.[37] However, prairie dog populations have experienced a decline, one of the causes of this being prairie dog eradication programs.[40] When prairie dogs dig burrows, they can uproot plants in the process.[42] This is most common in agricultural areas, where burrows cause damage to existing crops, creating a problem for local farmers.[42] In Nebraska and Montana, eradication programs have already been put in place to manage the population of prairie dogs.[40][42] Eradication programs for ground squirrels have also been put in place.[43] In California, California ground squirrels have been known to feed on crop seedlings as well as grasses meant for cattle, which prevents crop growth and decreases food supply for cattle.[43] However, as burrowing animal populations decrease, burrowing owls become more vulnerable to exposure to predators.[44] With fewer burrows available, burrowing owl populations will be more concentrated, with more owls occupying fewer burrows .[40] As a result, predators will more easily detect owl populations and be capable of eliminating larger broods of owls at once.[40] Prairie dogs and ground squirrels also act as a buffer between owls and their predators, since they become the target prey rather than the owls.[40][44] Another benefit prairie dogs in particular provide burrowing owls takes the form of their alarm calls, which alert burrowing owls if predators are nearby, therefore giving the owls ample time to hide or escape.[40] Without burrowing animals, almost every aspect contributing to suitable and safe living for burrowing owls will no longer be available. Organizations have tried contributing to the conservation of burrowing owls by digging artificial burrows for these owls to occupy in areas with no active colony of burrowing animals.[45] However, creating artificial burrows is not sustainable and is not effective as a long term solution.[45]

Anthropogenic impacts

[edit]
Burrowing owls at a golf course in Plantation, FL
Burrowing owls at a golf course in Plantation, FL
At Buenos Aires, Argentina

Burrowing owls readily inhabit some anthropogenic landscapes, such as airport grasslands or golf courses, and are known to take advantage of artificial nest sites (plastic burrows with tubing for the entrance) and perches.[46][47] Burrowing owls have demonstrated similar reproductive success in rural grasslands and urban settings.[48][49] The urban-residing burrowing owls have also developed the behavior of digging their own burrows[50] and exhibit different fear responses to human and domestic dogs compared to their rural counterparts.[51] Research has suggested that this species has made adaptations to the rapid urbanization of their usual habitat, and conservation efforts should be considered accordingly.[52][53] Genetic analysis of the two North American subspecies indicates that inbreeding is not a problem within those populations.[10]

In Florida specifically there is a rise of urban development which impacts the burrowing owl's populations. While burrowing owls can adapt to urban settings, the rapid change and construction causes issues including habitat destruction and car strikes[54]. Studies have recently shown that in areas that have a lower adult survival rate, juvenile survival rates increase. This is due to increased nesting opportunities and is called compensatory demographic response[55]. However groups like FAU[56] and Project Perch[57] have helped preserve the habitats in place and relocating the burrowing owls nearby if necessary.

Relocation

[edit]

Where the presence of burrowing owls conflicts with development interests, a passive relocation technique has been applied successfully: rather than capturing the birds and transporting them to a new site (which may be stressful and prone to failure), the owls are half-coerced, half-enticed to move on their own accord. The preparations need to start several months prior to the anticipated disturbance with observing the owl colony and noting especially their local movements and site preferences. After choosing a location nearby that has suitable ground and provides good burrowing owl breeding habitat, this new site is enhanced by adding burrows, perches, etc. Once the owls have accustomed to the changes and are found to be interested in the location – if possible, this should be at the onset of spring, before the breeding season starts – they are prevented from entering the old burrows. A simple one-way trapdoor design has been described that is placed over the burrow for this purpose.[58] If everything has been correctly prepared, the owl colony will move over to the new site in the course of a few nights at most. It will need to be monitored occasionally for the following months or until the major human construction nearby has ended.[59]

Some organizations like Center for Biological Diversity and Urban Bird Foundation contend that the removal from their burrows, either through active or passive relocation, has been a factor in the extirpation of burrowing owl populations in California[60] because of the species high site fidelity.[61]

Predation

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) is a small, long-legged of native to the , distinguished by its ground-nesting habits in burrows typically excavated by mammals such as prairie dogs or ground squirrels, and its diurnal activity unlike most . It exhibits a mottled brown plumage with white spotting, bright yellow eyes, and a characteristic upright perch with head-bobbing displays near burrow entrances. Inhabiting open, dry landscapes including grasslands, prairies, deserts, and agricultural fields, the ranges from southern through the and to southern . Burrowing owls hunt primarily , small s, and birds using perches, hovers, or ground pursuits, and they demonstrate unique adaptations such as tolerance for elevated levels in burrows. Globally assessed as Least Concern by the IUCN owing to its wide distribution, the burrowing owl nonetheless experiences population declines in northern regions due to habitat conversion, pesticide use, and reduction of burrowing mammal colonies essential for shelter.

Taxonomy and Systematics

Taxonomic Classification

The burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) is classified within the order Strigiformes, which encompasses all owls, and the family Strigidae, comprising the typical owls distinguished from barn owls (Tytonidae) by features such as a rounded facial disk and zygodactyl feet. Within Strigidae, it belongs to the genus Athene, a small group of primarily Old World species adapted to open landscapes, with the burrowing owl as the sole New World representative. The binomial nomenclature originates from the original description by Giovanni Antonio Scopoli in 1786, though often attributed to Molina's 1782 account; the genus name Athene derives from the Greek goddess Athena, symbolizing wisdom and owls in mythology, while the specific epithet cunicularia stems from Latin cunicularius, meaning "burrower" or "miner," reflecting its subterranean nesting. Phylogenetic analyses using mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences affirm the of the genus Athene, grouping A. cunicularia with Eurasian congeners such as the (A. noctua) and (A. brama), supported by shared synapomorphies including reduced facial disks and elongated tarsi. Molecular clock estimates from fossil-calibrated phylogenies indicate that the burrowing owl lineage diverged from these Eurasian relatives during the epoch, approximately 7–10 million years ago, marking an early vicariance event likely tied to continental separation and habitat shifts to arid grasslands. This placement distinguishes it from superficially similar ground-nesting strigids like the (Asio flammeus), which genetic data resolve in a separate within Strigidae.

Subspecies and Genetic Variation

The burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) is characterized by multiple recognized , with estimates ranging from 13 to 19 based on morphological distinctions in coloration, pattern, and body size across its range from southern to . varies clinally, with darker forms in humid regions such as the and , and paler, less marked individuals in arid zones of , , and . Body size also shows geographic variation, with larger individuals in western compared to smaller southern forms. Key subspecies include A. c. hypugaea, distributed across western from to , where populations exhibit partial migration with northern birds moving south seasonally, contrasting with resident southern groups. In contrast, A. c. floridana is restricted to and , remaining non-migratory and facing state-level threats due to habitat loss, resulting in patchy, isolated populations. Other notable subspecies are A. c. grallaria in eastern and A. c. cunicularia in southern , both resident and adapted to local open habitats with subtle plumage differences. Genetic analyses, including (mtDNA) cytochrome b sequencing, reveal low inter- divergence, suggesting clinal rather than discrete genetic boundaries tied to latitude and environmental gradients. Microsatellite loci studies indicate subtle structure, with reduced variation in isolated populations like Florida's A. c. floridana compared to widespread western forms, though no strong evidence of recent bottlenecks exists. Genomic resequencing further links migratory in northern to specific genotypic variants influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. These patterns underscore adaptive variations in residency and morphology without significant hybridization signals between .

Physical Description

Morphology and Adaptations

The burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) measures 19–25 cm in total length, with a of 50–61 cm and body mass of 127–255 g, making it one of the smallest in the . Its build features a rounded head lacking tufts, a short tail, and relatively long, sparsely feathered legs extending below the tibiotarsal joint, which facilitate across open habitats. These proportions—longer legs relative to body size compared to most arboreal —support ground-dwelling lifestyles, including walking and short runs. Wings are moderately rounded and comparatively short, enabling agile, low-altitude flight over grasslands rather than sustained soaring. The feet bear sharp, curved talons suited for capturing and holding small and prey, with anatomical strength derived from robust phalanges and flexor tendons typical of strigiforms. A reversible outer allows reconfiguration from zygodactyl (two toes forward, two backward) to anisodactyl footing, aiding perching on uneven burrow rims or grasping varied substrates. Bright yellow eyes are positioned forward on the flattened , conferring binocular overlap for essential in diurnal , distinct from the more lateral placement in many nocturnal raptors. This eye morphology, combined with a high of rods and cones adapted for varied light conditions, aligns with the species' crepuscular and activity. is minimal across subspecies, with adults showing little difference in size; measurements from southern populations indicate males may have slightly longer tarsi, tails, and wings, while females occasionally exhibit marginally greater mass, though overlaps are extensive. Juveniles possess downier, buff-tinged with less distinct spotting than adults' mottled brown upperparts and barred underparts, reflecting ontogenetic development observed in museum specimens.

Vocalizations and Displays

Burrowing owls produce diverse vocalizations including cooing, warbling, rasping, clucking, screaming, and rattling sounds, which are less frequent overall compared to more vocal species but adapted for diurnal communication in open habitats where acoustic signals must carry over distances amid wind and ambient noise. Spectrographic analyses reveal the primary song as a two-noted "coo-coo" call, typically delivered by males, with frequencies of 0.5–1.3 kHz and note durations of 0.05–0.55 seconds, functioning in territorial defense and signaling availability. Alarm calls feature rapid chattering sequences of 3–15 notes at 0.875–2.15 kHz, transcribed as "prrrt" or chatter, employed during of predators or to warn conspecifics of threats. Distress is conveyed through rasping calls with variable frequencies up to 6.6 kHz and durations under 1 second, often grading into screams spanning 0.1–5.3 kHz to deter approaching dangers. These vocalizations differ from the deep hoots of nocturnal by emphasizing higher-frequency, elements suited to visual environments, enabling integration with daytime visual cues for effective predator deterrence and . Field recordings confirm that chattering alarms elicit evasive responses in nearby individuals, enhancing group vigilance without requiring close-range confrontation. Visual displays complement acoustics in territorial communication, with owls perching on rims to advertise occupancy and monitor surroundings, reducing intrusions through passive signaling. postures involve partial wing-spreading and body orientation toward rivals, often without weaving motions, to intimidate conspecifics while minimizing energy expenditure and injury risk. Head-bobbing accompanies these displays, combining for assessment with signaling of , as observed in agonistic encounters. Such behaviors prioritize non-aggressive resolution in dense populations, per ethological studies of defense.

Distribution and Habitat

Geographic Range

The burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) is native to the , with a distribution spanning from southern and the southward through , , and into as far as , including isolated populations in and the . Breeding occurs across western , from and in to and in the United States, though the species favors open, arid landscapes. Populations in the southern extent of the range are largely resident year-round, while those in northern and central exhibit partial migration, with individuals moving southward from late to mid-October, primarily juveniles dispersing first. The eastern boundary in has contracted westward since the mid-20th century, with the species no longer breeding in former strongholds east of the . Range contractions are evident in , where North American Breeding Bird Survey data document an average annual decline of 1.1% from 1966 to 2011 across the and , with steeper losses—exceeding 70% in regions like the , Midwest, Dakotas, and —since the 1970s, reflecting empirical shifts in verified sightings and survey routes. Vagrant occurrences outside the remain rare and unestablished.

Habitat Preferences and Requirements

Burrowing owls inhabit open, dry landscapes including grasslands, prairies, deserts, and scrublands characterized by short, sparse typically under 31 cm in height and low visual obstruction readings of 5–12 cm. These conditions facilitate ground and visibility for detecting prey and predators. The empirically avoids dense forests and areas with tall , which limit availability and open hunting grounds. Essential for nesting and roosting, friable soils—loose and easily excavated—are required to construct or modify burrows, often 1–3 meters long and up to 1 meter deep. In natural settings, owls preferentially select sites with existing mammal burrows from species like prairie dogs or ground squirrels in well-drained, sandy or loamy soils. Vegetation cover at burrow entrances averages 12–36%, supporting prey abundance while preventing burrow collapse. Where natural burrow providers are absent, burrowing owls readily occupy anthropogenic habitats such as grazed pastures, courses, airfields, and unused agricultural margins, where densities are often higher due to artificially maintained short grass via mowing or grazing. Studies in regions like the Columbia Basin indicate greater occupancy in disturbed, open areas compared to ungrazed shrublands. The tolerates arid to semi-arid climates, with burrows providing buffered microclimates that stabilize internal against external extremes; for instance, deeper burrows reduce by approximately 0.03°C per cm of overlying , maintaining conditions suitable for occupancy year-round.

Behavior and Ecology

Daily Activity and Social Structure

Burrowing owls exhibit primarily diurnal activity with crepuscular peaks at dawn and dusk, though they demonstrate flexibility by extending into nocturnal periods, particularly in response to prey availability or environmental conditions. In northern populations, such as those in and the , activity is seasonal, aligning with the breeding window from March to October before migration southward, whereas tropical and subtropical populations, including those in and , sustain year-round activity without pronounced dormancy. Burrowing owls display semi-colonial , forming loose aggregations around burrow clusters rather than strict solitary nesting, with colonies comprising 9–19 individuals or up to 100 in high-density sites, enabling densities of 2–6.9 breeding pairs per km² in grasslands and urban edges. Within these groups, monogamous pairs defend compact territories of 0.1–1 ha immediately surrounding their nest , minimizing intraspecific conflict while permitting shared foraging zones beyond. Group dynamics enhance anti-predator defenses, as colonial nesting dilutes individual risk through collective vigilance and behaviors, where multiple harass intruders such as hawks or mammals, often in coordination with heterospecific alarm signals from burrow providers like prairie dogs. Experimental exposures to owl models indicate that intensity correlates with perceived threat levels, supporting its role in reducing predation probability for participants compared to solitary responses.

Diet and Foraging Behavior

The burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) primarily consumes , which constitute 70–95% of prey items by number across studies using stomach content analyses, with dominating at 85–90% of those . Orthopterans such as grasshoppers and often comprise the largest share, accounting for up to 59% of total prey items in samples from agricultural areas (n=53 stomachs), while coleopterans (beetles) and tenebrionids are prevalent in arid regions. Vertebrates, including small , , and birds, represent less than 20–30% of items by count but up to 70% of due to their larger size. Diet composition shifts seasonally, with vertebrates increasing during the breeding period to provide higher-energy prey for nestlings, as evidenced by pellet analyses showing mammals and birds exceeding 69% of delivered in studies. Foraging occurs diurnally and nocturnally, with owls employing multiple techniques suited to open habitats: stalking prey on foot across ground surfaces, which is the primary method; pouncing from low perches; hovering briefly at heights under 5 meters to spot and dive on targets; and aerial pursuits for flying . These behaviors enable high opportunistic capture rates in grasslands and fields, where owls pursue mobile prey like directly or from entrances. Excess prey is cached in burrows or nearby, reducing risk during prey scarcity. By targeting pest species such as scarab beetles and grasshoppers, burrowing owls provide ecological benefits to , suppressing outbreaks in croplands without reliance on chemical controls, as quantified in regional diet studies from the .

Reproduction and Breeding

Burrowing owls typically form monogamous pairs that occupy and defend a dedicated nesting during the breeding season, with genetic studies confirming low rates of extra-pair paternity even in high-density urban environments. In northern portions of their range, breeding occurs from to , while southern populations may breed year-round, with peak activity in spring. The female lays 2 to 12 eggs in a , averaging 6 to 9, directly on the burrow floor or lined with minimal materials such as dried , feathers, or grass; eggs are laid at intervals of about 2 days. Incubation begins after the clutch is complete and lasts 28 to 30 days, performed almost exclusively by the , who remains in the while the forages and delivers prey to the nest entrance. Nest burrows are typically abandoned excavations of mammals like prairie dogs or ground squirrels, selected for loose soil and elevated vantage points such as dirt mounds. Hatchlings are altricial, brooded by the for the first 2 weeks until they achieve , after which both parents provision the brood; young first emerge from the around 14 to 21 days and at 44 to 53 days post-hatching. Pairs may attempt 1 to 2 broods per year, with renesting possible if the first fails early. Nesting success, defined as the proportion of nests producing at least one fledgling, varies from 40% to 60% across populations, with long-term monitoring attributing limitations primarily to food scarcity during chick-rearing; experimental food supplementation has increased fledging rates by an average of 47% in unsupplemented years. Empirical data from grassland habitats, often disturbed by grazing or agriculture, show higher nest success (up to 81%) and productivity compared to urban sites, likely due to elevated prey abundance in such modified landscapes.

Symbiotic Relationships and Predation

Burrowing owls exhibit commensal relationships with burrowing mammals such as black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) and ground squirrels, utilizing their excavated burrows for nesting without providing reciprocal benefits or causing harm to the hosts. These mammals provide primary burrows across approximately 60-61% of the owls' range, with owls preferentially occupying abandoned tunnels that offer protection and structural stability. Nesting densities of burrowing owls are significantly higher in active or remnant prairie dog colonies compared to areas without such burrow networks, as evidenced by transect surveys showing positive correlations between colony size and owl pair occupancy. Declines in host populations, such as through prairie dog control, have been linked to corresponding reductions in owl nesting pairs, underscoring the dependency. As predators, burrowing owls face significant threats from mammalian carnivores like American badgers (Taxidea taxus), coyotes (Canis latrans), and avian raptors, which target adults, eggs, and nestlings. Badgers are particularly impactful, accounting for up to 90% of documented nest predation in certain regions based on direct observations and remains analysis. Overall nest predation rates contribute to fledging success varying from 45-51% in monitored populations, though burrow depth—often exceeding 1-2 meters in host excavations—provides partial mitigation by limiting access to subterranean nests. In their role as predators, burrowing owls exert localized top-down pressure on and populations through consistent in open habitats, potentially aiding in natural population regulation. However, empirical studies indicate no substantial evidence of overpredation leading to prey declines attributable to owls, as their biomass consumption remains modest relative to larger predators or environmental factors influencing prey dynamics. This balanced interaction supports ecosystem stability without cascading disruptions.

Conservation Status

The burrowing owl maintains a global population estimated at around 3 million individuals across its extensive range from to southern , with no evidence of a species-wide decline warranting elevated conservation concern. In , however, regional populations have shown declines over decades, with U.S. Breeding Bird Survey data indicating an overall decreasing trend since the mid-20th century, though not deemed statistically significant until analyses in 2014. In , targeted surveys in prairie provinces documented a 90% population reduction from 1990 to 2000, followed by a further 64% decline between 2005 and 2015, contracting the breeding range substantially. Western subspecies populations in have decreased by approximately 60% since the 1960s, with breeding colony numbers in surveyed areas dropping nearly 60% from the 1980s to the early 1990s. In contrast, Florida's burrowing owl counts in key areas like Cape Coral rose from about 5,200 individuals in 2024 to 7,008 in 2025, reflecting localized increases amid broader state variability. Population monitoring relies on standardized protocols including burrow occupancy checks via visual surveys, point counts, and area searches to estimate abundance and detect trends. Motion-activated camera traps are increasingly used to document activity, nesting success, and individual occupancy without disturbance, often deploying one to two units per site for extended periods. These methods enable tracking of regional variations, such as stable or augmented numbers in parts of the southwestern U.S., while confirming the ' overall Least Concern status under IUCN criteria due to its large global extent and absence of imminent pressures.

Primary Threats and Causal Factors

Habitat loss and fragmentation from conversion of grasslands to agriculture and urban development represent the foremost drivers of burrowing owl declines in North America, reducing available open, short-grass habitats essential for nesting and foraging. These changes have contracted breeding ranges, with Canadian populations dropping 90% between 1990 and 2000, and overall North American numbers declining sharply over the past half-century. Eradication of burrowing mammals like prairie dogs via rodenticides and has compounded habitat degradation by eliminating nest sites, as these species create the majority of suitable ; populations have fallen over 98% since 1900. Agricultural pesticides further exacerbate burrow site loss indirectly through prey reduction and direct , with insecticides diminishing populations—a primary food source comprising grasshoppers, beetles, and —and residues accumulating in owl feathers, impairing reproduction and survival. Secondary anthropogenic factors include vehicle strikes on low-flying individuals near roadsides, contributing to adult mortality in developed areas. Natural variability, such as periodic droughts affecting prey abundance, has occurred historically without precipitating population crashes, as burrowing owls demonstrate resilience through opportunistic and burrowing adaptations prior to intensified human pressures.

Dependency on Burrow-Providing Species

Burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia) primarily utilize burrows excavated by other species for nesting and roosting, reflecting a dependency on engineers such as prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus), ground squirrels, badgers, and marmots. In the , two-thirds of 543 documented nests were located within colonies, underscoring the owl's preference for these pre-existing structures over self-excavation in most western populations. Prairie dogs, acting as , maintain burrow networks that enhance heterogeneity and support , including avian species like burrowing owls that exploit these systems for shelter. Empirical studies reveal correlated declines between burrowing populations and availability. A seven-year (1990–1996) across 17 colonies recorded a 63% reduction in nesting pairs, from 91 to 34, following significant drops in active densities; declines lagged reductions by 1–2 years, indicating a delayed response to loss. This temporal pattern suggests that while owls can persist temporarily in degrading s, sustained maintenance by s is critical for long-term occupancy in these regions. Despite this reliance, burrowing owls exhibit partial adaptability, with no absolute dependency on specific burrow providers. In areas lacking natural excavators, owls successfully occupy artificial made from pipes, buckets, or tubing, as demonstrated in conservation efforts on bases and grasslands. Additionally, while western rarely dig their own , the population (A. c. floridana) frequently excavates independently, highlighting regional variation in self-sufficiency. These behaviors enable persistence in modified landscapes, though natural burrow systems provided by mammals like prairie dogs remain optimal for population stability.

Anthropogenic Impacts and Economic Trade-offs

Human development contributes to loss and fragmentation for burrowing owls through and , often requiring costly measures such as relocations and incidental take permits. In , developers face significant expenses for owl preservation, including fees funneled into state funds from permit approvals and city expenditures like Cape Coral's $900,000 allocation in 2023-2025 for purchasing lots to protect burrows. These requirements can delay projects and impose direct costs on landowners, with individual relocations involving and donations exceeding $3,000 per site in some reported cases. Conflicts arise in rangelands where burrowing owl overlaps with colonies, whose protection limits rancher control efforts and reduces available for . compete directly with , clipping vegetation and occupying grazing land, which economic analyses indicate can decrease ranch profitability by reducing herd sizes and production by substantial margins, potentially up to 20-50% in heavily colonized areas depending on colony expansion. Regulatory emphasis on preserving these colonies for species like burrowing owls, which rely on burrows, thus trades agricultural productivity for goals, though owl populations often persist in grazed landscapes where moderate disturbance maintains open s. Burrowing owls provide economic benefits through natural , preying heavily on and that damage crops and require costly chemical interventions. Studies of owl diets show over 99% of prey in agricultural settings consist of agricultural pests, potentially reducing the need for rodenticides and supporting , as evidenced in and field trials where raptor presence correlates with lower pest densities. Their adaptability to human-modified environments, including golf courses and grazed fields, allows coexistence without extensive exclusion, thriving in areas with ongoing that prevents succession to unsuitable dense vegetation. Listing petitions highlight tensions, as seen in California's 2024 effort to designate the western burrowing owl as threatened under state law, despite stable subpopulations in regions like Imperial County where agricultural practices sustain numbers without federal protections. Proponents cite declines from habitat conversion, but critics argue such designations overlook local stability and could impose undue regulatory burdens on farming and , prioritizing speculative risks over amid evidence of no range-wide crash. Ongoing status reviews, extended into 2025, underscore debates where empirical population data tempers alarmist narratives from advocacy groups.

Management and Recovery Efforts

Conservation Strategies and Interventions

Artificial burrows, constructed from materials such as PVC pipes or culverts buried at appropriate depths, have been deployed in habitat-depleted areas to provide nesting sites where natural burrows from prairie dogs or ground squirrels are scarce. Studies indicate these structures can facilitate occupancy and nesting, with mitigation plans establishing success criteria like 5% annual use rates in monitored sites, though actual utilization varies by location and . In grazed landscapes, artificial burrows combined with short vegetation management have supported higher nest reuse and fledgling production compared to ungrazed areas, as owls prefer open sightlines for predator detection and foraging. Grazing regimes, particularly by cattle or sheep, maintain the short, sparse grasslands essential for visibility and prey capture, mimicking natural disturbance patterns that prevent vegetative overgrowth. Research on managed grasslands shows that enhances habitat suitability without the need for intensive mowing, promoting prey abundance like and while reducing nest predation risks from taller cover. However, such practices must balance owl needs against , which can degrade soil and stability. In the United States, conservation interventions are guided by state-level designations, with the burrowing owl classified as threatened in , requiring permits for disturbance and habitat mitigation. In , it holds threatened status under state wildlife regulations, mandating avoidance or compensation during development. California's Fish and Game Commission designated the western subspecies as a candidate under the California Endangered Species Act in October 2024, triggering interim protections pending a full status review. Federally, it receives safeguards via the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, prohibiting take without authorization, though no nationwide endangered listing exists. Internationally, protections are more limited; it is endangered in and threatened in , with Appendix II restricting trade but offering minimal enforcement across its broader South American range. Reintroduction efforts, including captive-rearing and soft-release techniques, have achieved local successes, with soft-released owls exhibiting 86% site retention compared to 66% for hard-released individuals, alongside comparable or higher rates to wild populations. Nonetheless, these interventions often falter without concurrent mitigation of underlying factors, such as suppression of burrow-providing mammals through or persistent that curtails prey populations and dispersal. Evidence from reinforcement programs underscores that poor or unaddressed ecological deficits lead to low long-term , highlighting the necessity of integrated approaches over isolated releases.

Relocation and Habitat Restoration

Relocation efforts for burrowing owls, often necessitated by urban development or projects, typically involve either passive methods—where owls are evicted from and allowed to self-relocate to nearby artificial or natural sites—or active translocation, entailing capture and transport to distant . Passive relocation in has shown higher retention, with 84% of owls remaining in areas featuring abundant and familiar home ranges, compared to active methods that frequently result in dispersal or abandonment. Protocols for active relocation include constructing acclimation at release sites to mimic natural conditions, followed by monitoring via radio-telemetry or recapture surveys; however, short-term survival rates post-translocation range from 50% to 70% in initial months, with long-term viability assessed through low recapture rates indicating high abandonment, particularly when prey availability or density is suboptimal. Failures in relocation are commonly attributed to inadequate , such as areas lacking sufficient prey or exposed to elevated predation without control measures, leading to poor nest in the first breeding season after release. Successes, conversely, occur in predator-managed sites with high availability, where translocated exhibit nesting productivity comparable to residents after two years of . Short-distance nest relocations, limited to within visual range of original sites, have succeeded in 40% of cases (2 out of 5 documented attempts), minimizing territorial disruption. Habitat restoration for burrowing emphasizes reintroducing burrow-providing species like black-tailed , whose colonies supply essential nest sites and enhance prey habitats through soil aeration and vegetation disturbance. Reintroduction projects, such as those on military bases from 2019 to 2023, have increased owl occupancy by fostering active colonies, with owls preferring sites featuring higher prairie dog activity and burrow density within 100 meters, correlating to up to 40% greater nesting density in restored versus abandoned towns. These efforts boost owl populations by providing refugia, but costs are substantial, often exceeding thousands of dollars per due to translocation logistics, fencing for predator exclusion, and vegetation management to sustain colonies. Restoration efficacy hinges on integrating prairie dog reintroduction with shrub control to prevent encroachment, extending habitat suitability over decades, though challenges persist from reducing colony persistence.

Recent Developments and Case Studies

In 2024, the California Fish and Game Commission designated the western burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia hypugaea) as a candidate species for listing as threatened or endangered under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), following a received in March 2024 and subsequent findings published on , 2024. This status immediately prohibits "take" of the species without an incidental take permit, imposing new compliance requirements on development projects even if previously approved under the (CEQA), with a final listing decision expected by spring 2026 after a 12-month review period extended through 2025. Critics, including development stakeholders, argue that the candidacy may reflect regulatory overreach given variable local population data and the species' adaptability, while proponents cite habitat loss as justification, prompting public comment periods through February 2025. In , the 2025 annual burrowing owl census recorded a record 7,008 individuals, marking a substantial increase from approximately 5,200 in 2024 and demonstrating success from collaborative urban conservation efforts. This growth followed a July 2023 grant of up to $900,000 for land acquisition, which enabled property purchases approved in February 2025 to preserve habitat amid suburban expansion, emphasizing community-driven monitoring and voluntary protections over strict regulatory measures. The Department of Defense Avian Knowledge Network (DoD AKN) released updated burrowing owl monitoring protocols in February 2025, developed from focus group discussions spanning August 2023 to May 2024, standardizing methods such as point counts, nest visits, and data structures for installations to enhance detection accuracy and track occupancy trends. Concurrent studies, including a January 2024 analysis of occupancy in (Cynomys ludovicianus) colonies on national grasslands, underscore the symbiotic benefits of prairie dog burrows for owl nesting, informing habitat management that prioritizes these associations to counter declines from isolated prairie dog control.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.