Hubbry Logo
Coral TriangleCoral TriangleMain
Open search
Coral Triangle
Community hub
Coral Triangle
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Coral Triangle
Coral Triangle
Coral Triangle
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The Coral Triangle and countries participating in the Coral Triangle Initiative[1][2]

The Coral Triangle (CT) is a roughly triangular area in the tropical waters around Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Solomon Islands, and Timor-Leste. This area contains at least 500 species of reef-building corals in each ecoregion.[3] The Coral Triangle is located between the Pacific and Indian oceans [4] and encompasses portions of two biogeographic regions: the Indonesian-Philippines Region, and the Far Southwestern Pacific Region.[5] As one of eight major coral reef zones in the world,[6] the Coral Triangle is recognized as a global centre of marine biodiversity[7] and a global priority for conservation.[8] Its biological resources make it a global hotspot of marine biodiversity. Known as the "Amazon of the seas" (by analogy to the Amazon rainforest in South America), it covers 5.7 million square kilometres (2,200,000 mi2) of ocean waters.[9] It contains more than 76% of the world's shallow-water reef-building coral species, 37% of its reef fish species, 50% of its razor clam species, six out of seven of the world's sea turtle species, and the world's largest mangrove forest.[4] The epicenter of that coral diversity is found in the Bird's Head Seascape of Indonesian Papua, which hosts 574 species (95% of the Coral Triangle, and 72% of the world's total).[10] In 2014, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) reported that the gross domestic product of the marine ecosystem in the Coral Triangle is roughly $1.2 trillion per year and provides food to over 120 million people.[11][4] According to the Coral Triangle Knowledge Network,[12] the region annually brings in about $3 billion in foreign exchange income from fisheries exports, and another $3 billion from coastal tourism revenues.

The World Wide Fund for Nature considers the region a top priority for marine conservation, and is addressing ecological threats to the region through its Coral Triangle Program,[13] launched in 2007. The center of biodiversity in the Triangle is the Verde Island Passage in the Philippines.[14] The coral reefs in the region that have been declared UNESCO World Heritage Sites are the Tubbataha Reef Natural Park in the Philippines[15] and the Raja Ampat UNESCO Global Geopark in Indonesia.[16]

Biodiversity

[edit]

While it covers only 1.6% of the planet's oceanic area, the region has 76% of all known coral species in the world. As a habitat for 52% of Indo-Pacific reef fishes and 37% of the world's reef fishes, it contains the greatest diversity of coral reef fishes in the world[17] More than 3,000 species of bony fish are distributed over more than 90% of the Coral Triangle. Among the largest of these fish are the whale shark, the coelacanth and the chimaerans.[4]

The Coral Triangle is the epicentre for the biodiversity, not only of corals and fish, but also of many other marine organisms. It contains roughly 950 species of Molluscs and 458 crustacean species.[4] It is also the habitat for six of the world's seven marine turtle species.[4]

Thirteen percent of the Coral Triangle has been identified as being clustered into hotspots of high marine biodiversity importance, including the southern part of the Philippines, the north-eastern part of Sabah in Malaysia, the central to eastern zones of Indonesia, the eastern part of Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands.[18] The parts of the Coral Triangle that have the highest number of species comprise 6% of the triangle's total area. They include stretches along the coast of the Philippines (including the northern coast of Luzon, Bohol, Mindanao, Palawan, and the Sulu Archipelago),[18] Malaysia (the northeastern coast of Sabah), Indonesia (the northern and southeastern part of Sulawesi, the Banda Sea, Maluku Islands (the Mollucas), and the Raja Ampat Archipelago of Indonesian Papua),[18] Papua New Guinea (the coastal areas of Madang Province, New Britain, Milne Bay, the Louisiade Archipelago, and Bougainville Island),[18] and the Solomon Islands (Guadalcanal and Makira-Ulawa Province).[18][4] However, more than half (70%) of the zones in the Coral Triangle are classified as low species richness areas.[4]

The sites of highest marine biodiversity importance in the Coral Triangle include: (1) the northern tip of Sulawesi, (2) Ambon Island, (3) Kai Islands (also Kei Islands), (4) Raja Ampat Archipelago of Indonesian Papua, (5) the Verde Island Passage in the Philippines, (6) the southern part of Negros in the Philippines, and (7) Cebu in the Philippines.[18]

The greatest extent of mangrove forest in the world is also found in the Coral Triangle. These forests' large area and extraordinary range of habitats and environmental conditions have played a major role in maintaining the staggering biodiversity of the Coral Triangle.[19]

The Coral Triangle countries comprised a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 19 seagrass species that belong to four distinct families (Hydrocharitaceae, Cymodoceaceae, Zosteraceae, and Ruppiaceae) and cover almost 58,550.63 km2. While a total of 21 species of seagrass have been found throughout this eco-region.[20]

A joint Indonesian–U.S. marine survey expedition in 2008 discovered deep-sea biodiversity and underwater active volcanoes at a depth of 3800 meters along the western ridge. Around 40 newly identified deep-sea coral species were found there. Most are whitish in color, because the area is not a habitat for colorful algae species, which are generally shallow-living. Hydrothermal vents and coral reefs at a depth of 4000 meters were found to have created a habitat for marine niche shrimps, crabs, barnacles, and sea cucumbers.[21]

According to Indonesia's Minister of Research and Technology / National Research and Innovation Agency (Menristek / Head of BRIN), Bambang Permadi Soemantri Brodjonegoro, Coral Triangle countries are in need of a greater number of taxonomists and oceanographers to address the challenges of cataloguing the biodiversity in the area. He has said that goal of this research is not only to increase human knowledge, but also to apply that knowledge to the project of protecting coastal and marine biodiversity from extinction.[22]

Theories behind high species diversity of the Coral Triangle

[edit]

There are three different theories as to why the Coral Triangle (East Indies Triangle) has such a high diversity of species, and each theory proposes a different explanatory model. They are usually termed the "centre of origin" model, the "centre of overlap" model, and the "centre of accumulation" model.[23][24]

  • The centre of origin model posits that the high diversity populations in the area of the archipelago are part of a centrally located ancestral population that later dispersed to various peripheral locations.
  • The centre of overlap model posits that species originally in different biogeographic regions came together as a result of population division (vicariance) and later expanded their range.
  • The centre of accumulation model posits that ancestral populations that were originally scattered among peripheral locations came together in a central location and formed a diverse population.

Threats

[edit]

The Coral Triangle lies at a crossroads of rapidly increasing anthropogenic activities, (population growth, economic growth and international trade),[25] habitat change, over-exploitation of resources,[20] and climate change.[4] Competition, predation, fishing practices, marine pollution, marine debris, dredging, sunscreen contamination, climate change, ocean acidification (OA), disease, recreational diving, sea level rise, temperature increase and other issues briefly described in environmental issues with coral reefs.[20]

Ocean acidification is a global threat to coral reef ecosystems.[26] Based on the biodiversity in the Coral Triangle area, damage will come to many sectors, because the coral reef is a fundamental ecosystem in the coastal area. Started by rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, the calcium carbonate decrease then enhances bioerosion and dissolution rate. The CT should have oligotrophic waters, so the light would penetrate and support photosynthesis by zooxanthellae algae. However coral reef in West Maui, Hawaii, has a sustained condition of nutrient-rich, lower pH submarine groundwater discharge that lowers the pH of seawater. Also, the corals are exposed to nitrate concentrations 50 times higher than ambient.[clarification needed] Rates of coral calcification are substantially decreased, and rates of bioerosion are orders of magnitude higher than in healthy oligotrophic waters. Measurement using heavier nitrogen isotope (δ15N) values shows that eutrophication of reef seawater by land‐based sources of pollution can magnify the effects of ocean acidification through nutrient-driven-bioerosion. These conditions could contribute to the collapse of coastal coral reef ecosystems sooner than current projections based only on ocean acidification predict.

The biodiversity and natural productivity of the coral triangle are under threat from poor marine management (primarily from coastal development, overfishing and destructive fishing), lack of political will, poverty, high market demand, local disregard for rare and threatened species, climate change (warming, ocean acidification and rising sea levels). Coral reefs have experienced mass bleaching, which threaten to degrade the important ecosystems. An estimated 120 million people live within the Coral Triangle, of which approximately 2.25 million are fishers who depend on healthy seas to make a living. These threats are putting at risk livelihoods, economies, and future market supplies for species such as tuna.[27] Studies have highlighted the alarming decline of coral cover in this region.[28] However, a report published in 2021 described the reefs of the Coral Triangle as having shown resilience to large scale bleaching events. The Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) reported in 2021, that the East Asian Seas region, which includes the Coral Triangle, was the only region where coral cover was substantially greater in 2019 (36.8%) as compared to 1983 (32.8%), which is the year that the earliest data was collected. This increase in coral cover occurred notwithstanding the reefs were affected by large scale coral bleaching events during the 2010s. The data on the cover of algae in the East Asian Seas shows that the cover of algae has progressively decreased resulting in an average of five times more coral than algae on these reefs.[29]

Since the marine resources are a principal source of income for the population, the downstream effects of losing these critical coastal ecosystems are enormous.

Conservation

[edit]

The Coral Triangle is the subject of high-level conservation efforts by the region's governments, nature conservation organizations such as World Wide Fund for Nature, The Nature Conservancy and Konservasi Indonesia, and donor agencies such as the Asian Development Bank, the Global Environment Facility and USAID.

Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries, and Food Security

[edit]

In August 2007, Indonesia's President Yudhoyono proposed a multilateral partnership to "safeguard the region's marine and coastal biological resources" with five other countries geographically located in the CT (Malaysia, Timor-Leste, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, and the Philippines).[25] The multilateral partnership then named as Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI-CFF).

Goals of CTI-CFF

[edit]

The plan of action of the CTI-CFF, is to achieve the following:[30][31]

  1. Priority seascapes designated and effectively managed
  2. Ecosystem Approach to Management of Fisheries (EAFM) and other marine resources fully applied
  3. Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) established and effectively managed
  4. Climate change adaptation measures achieved
  5. Threatened species status improving

The longer-term goals of the CTI-CFF are to:[32][33]

  • Stabilize and/or maintain coral reef ecosystem integrity and services
  • Improve and sustain fish stocks
  • Improve the affordability, availability, quality, and safety of food coming from coastal and marine environments

Meeting

[edit]

The solid-science resources management strength[clarification needed] builds with the scientific support of the university and research institute. On 28 February - 1 March 2017, the 1st Meeting of the CTI-CFF University Partnership in Manado[34] was held, aimed at:[35]

  1. agreeing on CTI-CFF University Partnerships conceptual framework and mechanism, and the election of CTI-University Partnership Coordinator;
  2. building-up tangible and collaborative programs and funding support (education, research, and outreach) among Universities and research institutes that can be developed for supporting regional capacity buildings, research needed, and outreach programs related to the CTI-CFF Regional Plan of Action (RPOA) goals as to achieved qualified CTI-CFF outcomes;
  3. identifying possible support and mechanism to strengthening capacity and quality of Regional Secretariat, Technical Working Groups and the National Coordination Committee to undertake their functions.

The results of this meeting:

  1. the conceptual framework and mechanism of CTI-CFF University Partnerships was established,
  2. three tangible program/actions, specifically (a). capacity building priority program which establishes international M.Sc. subject on Coral Triangle Ecosystem Governance and special assistance program for Timor-Leste in developing fisheries and marine sciences education; (b). nine research priority programs and nine identified topics; (c). outreach priority actions[clarification needed]
  3. University Partnership Coordinator of CT-CFF is Prof. Dr. Grevo Gerung from Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia for 2017-2020 and the second Meeting of the CTI-CFF University Partnership will be held in 2018.[needs update]

[25]

Delineation

[edit]

The primary criteria used to delineate the Coral Triangle were:

There is considerable overlap between the boundaries of the Coral Triangle that are based primarily on high coral biodiversity (more than 500 species), and the boundaries based on the area of greatest biodiversity for coral reef fishes.[37][38]

Media

[edit]

The 2013 documentary film Journey to the South Pacific tells the story of Coral Triangle conservation against the backdrop of island life.[39]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Coral Triangle

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

The Coral Triangle is a triangular-shaped marine ecoregion spanning approximately 6 million square kilometers in the tropical waters of the western Pacific Ocean, encompassing the exclusive economic zones adjacent to Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Solomon Islands, and Timor-Leste.
This region serves as the global epicenter of marine biodiversity, harboring over 75% of the world's coral species—nearly 600 in total—more than 2,000 species of reef-associated fish, and six of the seven extant marine turtle species.
It underpins the food security and economic livelihoods of roughly 120 million coastal inhabitants reliant on reef fisheries and related activities, generating billions in annual value from sustainable resource use.
In response to escalating pressures from overexploitation, destructive fishing, and environmental degradation, the six nations formalized the Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries, and Food Security in 2009 to coordinate conservation, management, and sustainable development efforts across the shared seascape.

Definition and Delineation

Geographical Boundaries and Extent

The Coral Triangle encompasses approximately 5.7 million square kilometers of ocean waters across the western Pacific and eastern Indian Oceans, centered on the Indonesian archipelago with extensions into surrounding exclusive economic zones. This region includes marine areas of , the Philippines, (particularly ), , the Solomon Islands, and Timor-Leste. The spatial boundaries were delineated through expert analysis integrating biological and physical data, including coral species diversity, habitat types, oceanographic features, and . Specifically, the core extent prioritizes marine zones supporting at least 500 of reef-building corals, a threshold reflecting exceptional diversity concentrations. This mapping, refined in 2008 from earlier assessments, approximates a triangular shape spanning from the southern northward, westward to Timor-Leste, and eastward to the .

Constituent Nations and Jurisdictional Issues

The Coral Triangle encompasses marine areas within the exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of six nations: , , , the Philippines, , and Timor-Leste. holds the largest portion, accounting for approximately 65% of the region's area, which spans roughly 1,782 km² within its CT boundaries. These jurisdictions overlap in complex ways due to the region's archipelagic geography and historical colonial boundaries, complicating coordinated across national borders. Jurisdictional challenges arise primarily from undelimited or disputed maritime boundaries, which fragment governance and impede transboundary conservation efforts. For instance, parts of the in the and overlap with contested areas in the , where overlapping claims with non-CTI actors like create sovereignty tensions that extend into CT waters. Bilateral disputes, such as those between and Timor-Leste or and its neighbors, further highlight gaps in EEZ delimitations, with some boundaries resolved through treaties but others remaining provisional. These overlaps foster regulatory fragmentation, as each nation maintains sovereign control over its EEZ, limiting the effectiveness of regional initiatives like the Initiative in achieving unified against threats like illegal . Despite formal cooperation frameworks, political sensitivities over resource rights—particularly fisheries and potential seabed minerals—persist, often prioritizing national interests over . Empirical assessments indicate that while maritime border agreements exist for some pairs (e.g., Papua New Guinea's treaties with adjacent states), unresolved claims contribute to inconsistent protection levels across the shared . This jurisdictional mosaic underscores the need for bilateral delimitations and multilateral protocols to mitigate conflicts, though progress remains uneven as of 2025.

Physical and Environmental Features

Marine Habitats and Topography

The Coral Triangle encompasses diverse marine habitats dominated by systems, including fringing reefs that form directly along coastlines, barrier reefs offset from shores by lagoons, and atolls consisting of ring-like reefs surrounding central lagoons often atop subsided volcanic foundations. These reef formations cover a total area of approximately 101,000 km², distributed across (51,000 km²), the (25,800 km²), (13,800 km²), Timor-Leste (5,800 km²), (3,600 km²), and (800 km²). Associated coastal and shallow-water habitats include forests spanning about 58,000 km² and extensive meadows, which together form interconnected ecosystems stabilizing sediments and buffering reefs from terrestrial runoff. beds in the region, particularly extensive in at over 30,000 km², thrive in sheltered bays and contribute to the topographic complexity by trapping fine sediments. The underlying topography features wide continental shelves with depths rarely exceeding 50 meters, interspersed with rugged seabeds, deep basins, and trenches such as the Java Trench, which plunges to depths greater than 7,000 meters along the southern margin. Volcanic islands and archipelagos, prevalent throughout the area, create steep bathymetric gradients that enhance water mixing and nutrient availability via , while and surveys have mapped hundreds of distinct geomorphic zones supporting habitat variability.

Oceanographic and Climatic Conditions

The Coral Triangle encompasses warm equatorial waters with sea surface temperatures predominantly ranging from 27°C to 30°C, where coral reefs experience approximately 70% of their time within this narrow thermal band conducive to symbiotic activity. Salinities typically fall between 32 and 35 practical salinity units (psu), modulated by heavy seasonal rainfall, river discharges, and the influx of lower-salinity Pacific waters. Dominant currents include the Indonesian Throughflow (ITF), which conveys an average of 15 Sverdrups (Sv; 1 Sv = 10^6 m³ s⁻¹) of warm, oligotrophic Pacific water southward through narrow straits in , , and the into the , driving basin-scale mixing and heat redistribution. This flow is augmented by northward equatorial countercurrents in the Pacific, which supply source waters to the ITF and create gyre-like eddies that retain nutrients within the region. Seasonal Asian-Australian monsoons induce reversals in surface winds, enhancing vertical mixing and coastal —particularly in the during the southeast monsoon—elevating nutrient availability and primary productivity to levels 2–5 times higher than surrounding oligotrophic tropics. The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) superimposes interannual variability, with La Niña conditions strengthening easterly trades and to increase subsurface nutrient flux, while El Niño phases weaken these dynamics through reduced winds and altered sea levels. float profiles and moored buoy data reveal associated chlorophyll-a peaks exceeding 0.5 mg m⁻³ during upwelling phases, sustaining robust pelagic and benthic food webs.

Biodiversity and Ecological Dynamics

Metrics of Species Richness

The Coral Triangle contains 605 species of scleractinian corals, comprising 76% of the global total of 798 known species, based on comprehensive surveys of reef-building taxa. This figure exceeds coral diversity in other major reef systems, such as the Great Barrier Reef's approximately 400 species or the Red Sea's 250–300 species, as documented in regional analyses. Reef-associated fish diversity stands at over 2,000 , representing 37% of the world's total, with empirical counts derived from ichthyological inventories across the region's ecoregions. The overall marine assemblage surpasses 3,000 , highlighting the area's role as a global maximum for reef ichthyofauna when compared to baselines like the Great Barrier Reef's 1,500–1,600 reef .
Taxonomic GroupSpecies Count in Coral TriangleGlobal PercentageKey Source
Scleractinian Corals60576%Coral Triangle Atlas (CTI)
Reef-Associated Fishes>2,00037%WWF Biodiversity Factsheet
Shallow-Water Molluscs~745N/A (regional peak)Indo-West Pacific Mollusc Surveys
Marine Turtles6 of 7~86%IUCN and WWF Assessments
Invertebrate richness includes around 745 species of shallow-water molluscs, concentrated in the Coral Triangle as the epicenter of Indo-West Pacific diversity, alongside approximately 458 crustacean species from targeted taxonomic catalogs. The region supports six of the seven extant marine turtle species—green, hawksbill, loggerhead, ridley, flatback, and leatherback—verified through IUCN habitat mapping and nesting site data. rates remain modest at 8% for reef fishes (235 species locally restricted), lower than in peripheral high-diversity areas, per ecoregional endemism patterns. These metrics draw from standardized protocols like Reef Check monitoring and evaluations, which emphasize verifiable field observations over extrapolated estimates.

Dominant Ecosystems and Keystone Species

Coral reefs constitute the primary in the Coral Triangle, characterized by high structural complexity and serving as the foundation for marine productivity. Scleractinian corals, particularly genera such as and Porites, dominate reef frameworks, with species often exhibiting high densities and contributing to branching and tabular formations essential for habitat provision. These corals support symbiotic relationships with , enabling and growth in oligotrophic waters. Mangrove forests and meadows complement reefs as interconnected coastal habitats, functioning as nurseries for and that migrate to reefs. Mangroves stabilize sediments and filter nutrients, while seagrasses provide foraging grounds and refuge, enhancing overall resilience through land-sea connectivity. These ecosystems collectively form a that buffers against wave energy and supports detrital food webs. Keystone species play pivotal roles in maintaining ecological balance within these systems. Apex predators, including reef sharks such as the (Triaenodon obesus), exert top-down control by preying on mesopredators, preventing of herbivores and preserving community structure. Groupers (Epinephelus spp.) similarly regulate mid-trophic levels, curbing herbivore populations to avoid excessive depletion. Herbivorous (Scaridae family) fulfill functional keystone roles by bioeroding algae and dead , promoting space availability for coral recruitment and inhibiting macroalgal overgrowth. The interplay among these dominant ecosystems and underpins the region's capacity to harbor 76% of global coral and over 3,000 reef-associated , fostering trophic stability and functional redundancy observed in field assessments.

Explanations for Exceptional Diversity

The center of overlap hypothesis attributes the Coral Triangle's elevated species richness to the convergence of faunas originating from the western and eastern , facilitated by historical oceanographic barriers like the Sunda and shelves that allowed independent radiations before overlap. This mechanism emphasizes passive accumulation via range expansions and larval dispersal rather than accelerated speciation, with phylogenetic analyses of reef fishes and corals showing sister taxa from these provinces co-occurring without deep within the region. Larval dispersal models corroborate this by illustrating the Triangle as a net recipient of propagules from peripheral populations, driven by prevailing currents that concentrate settlers in this central position. Habitat heterogeneity further contributes through tectonic-driven variability in , substrates, and coastal , as the collision of the Eurasian, , Pacific, and Australian plates generates fragmented seascapes with steep gradients in depth, current exposure, and sediment types that promote niche diversification. This structural complexity, spanning fringing to atolls across productivity gradients influenced by monsoon-driven and equatorial nutrient inputs, supports higher rates by isolating populations and enabling adaptive radiations in microhabitats. Empirical mapping of reveals that such features correlate with local hotspots, exceeding uniform-area models in predictive power for observed richness patterns. Phylogenetic and fossil-calibrated genetic studies indicate persistently low extinction rates in the Coral Triangle, enabling long-term species accumulation under relatively stable paleoenvironmental conditions, in contrast to the 's higher Pliocene-Pleistocene losses tied to closure of the and cooling events. For instance, analyses of coral genera show Indo-Australian lineages retaining ancestral diversity with minimal pruning, while equivalents exhibit elevated turnover. Critiques of area-alone explanations highlight that, despite the Triangle's ~5.7 million km² extent surpassing the 's ~2.6 million km², normalized per-unit-area diversity remains disproportionately high, underscoring causal roles of isolation, stability, and heterogeneity over mere scale.

Historical and Evolutionary Background

Geological Origins

The Coral Triangle's geological framework emerged primarily during the epoch (approximately 23 to 5.3 million years ago), driven by the convergence of the Indo-Australian and Eurasian plates, which generated zones, volcanic arcs, and shallow marginal seas conducive to reef initiation. This tectonic activity formed extensive Sunda and shelves, as well as inter-arc basins, enabling the accumulation of platforms through continuous reef accretion over 10 to 20 million years. Fossil coral assemblages from Miocene strata in , , document early diversification of scleractinian corals, with patterns mirroring modern gradients and indicating the region's role as an ancient cradle. Stratigraphic evidence reveals a reef hiatus in parts of the Coral Triangle (roughly 5.3 to 2.6 million years ago), attributed to accelerated tectonic and eustatic sea-level shifts that temporarily submerged reef crests beyond the , interrupting growth before recovery. Paleontological records from Oligocene-Miocene boundary deposits further support the hotspot's origins, showing transitional coral faunas that prefigure the exceptional diversity of contemporary assemblages through adaptive radiations on newly available substrates. Pleistocene glaciations (2.6 million to 11,700 years ago) superimposed dynamic sea-level oscillations on this foundation, with glacial maxima lowering levels by up to 130 meters and exposing vast shelf areas, thereby isolating reef populations in fragmented refugia and promoting via vicariance. Reef terraces and drowned pinnacles preserved in northern Coral Triangle sites, such as Cape Bolinao in the , record these cycles, with episodic exposure and inundation shaping habitat heterogeneity and evolutionary trajectories without eradicating foundational structures.

Long-Term Environmental Changes

Paleoecological evidence from uplifted reef terraces in the northern Coral Triangle, such as those at Cape Bolinao in the , documents extensive development during periods of the , particularly Marine Isotope Stage 5e around 125,000 years ago, when high sea levels and warm conditions facilitated peak reef extents up to 155 meters above modern levels. These formations, shaped by tectonic uplift at rates of approximately 1.17 mm per year, reflect repeated cycles of growth and exposure tied to glacial- fluctuations rather than a unidirectional decline in diversity or structure. Sediment cores from such sites reveal community compositions resilient to sea-level variability, with no indication of permanent degradation but rather episodic expansions during favorable climatic phases. In the , radiometrically dated cores from the Coral Triangle's Coastal West Pacific region, part of a global dataset of 46 such samples, show vertical accretion rates averaging 3.56–9.52 mm per year, with higher rates in the early (up to 50 mm per year locally) during rapid post-glacial sea-level rise, transitioning to stabilization around 6,000–7,000 years ago. These records capture natural fluctuations, including partial mortality and recovery phases analogous to bleaching events, driven by paleoclimate signals of ENSO-like variability that intensified at times such as the 4.2 ka event, disrupting growth for centuries in analogous settings without preventing overall persistence. Turbid systems, common in the region, demonstrate particular resilience, maintaining stress-tolerant assemblages over millennia amid episodic high loads and climatic shifts, as evidenced by cores spanning up to 7,000 years with stable siliciclastic-carbonate ratios. Archaeological and paleoenvironmental data indicate that pre-colonial human populations in the , including the Coral Triangle, had negligible impacts on reef baselines due to low densities and localized subsistence harvesting, preserving natural dynamics until intensified post-contact exploitation altered trajectories. Overall, these long-term records underscore reefs' capacity for recovery from environmental perturbations, challenging notions of static pre-industrial equilibria and highlighting inherent adaptive mechanisms over geological timescales.

Human Interactions and Economic Value

Fisheries and Food Security

The fisheries of the Coral Triangle produce approximately 9.1 million tons of marine capture fisheries annually, based on 2010 data across the six Coral Triangle countries (CT6: , , , , , and Timor-Leste), representing 11.8% of global capture fisheries output. This production, valued at around $9.9 billion USD in 2007 for marine capture alone, supports the livelihoods of an estimated 4.6 million people directly employed in fisheries and , with broader dependency affecting up to 120 million coastal residents who rely on these resources for income and sustenance. Reef-associated fisheries alone contribute about $3 billion USD annually, comprising 30% of the total capture value. Small-scale and artisanal fisheries dominate, accounting for the majority of coastal production—often exceeding 80% in municipal and subsistence sectors—while industrial fleets focus on offshore tuna. Dominant species include pelagic fish such as mackerels, anchovies, and sardines (53% of capture), reef-associated species (32%), and tunas like yellowfin and skipjack, which represent 29% of global production from the region. In countries like the Philippines and Indonesia, over 2 million small-scale fishers target reef fish and nearshore pelagics using traditional gears, contrasting with limited commercial operations. These fisheries are central to , providing more than 50% of animal protein intake in coastal diets across and , with fish supply ranging from 3 kg in Timor-Leste to 60 kg in as of 2009. However, limits are evident from widespread , with the majority of stocks fully exploited or depleted, and declining catch per unit effort (CPUE) observed in Indonesian bottom trawling, purse seining, and from 1990 to 2007, alongside similar trends in Philippine small-scale fisheries for species like round scad.

Tourism and Coastal Economies

The Coral Triangle's marine , centered on diving, , and beach activities, generates substantial direct revenue, estimated at approximately $6.25 billion annually as of 2017, representing 45% of the region's $13.9 billion in total economic returns from coral reefs across , fisheries, and coastal development sectors. This figure derives from modeled assessments incorporating visitor expenditures on reef-related activities. In , a core Coral Triangle nation, alone attracted over 6.2 million international visitors in 2019, with reefs serving as a primary draw for many through and diving excursions. Pre-COVID estimates placed nature-based value in the region above $12 billion yearly, underscoring reefs' role in attracting divers to sites like Raja Ampat. Indirect economic benefits include employment for over 6.5 million people in coastal and marine tourism roles, second only to in scale, alongside investments in such as ports, accommodations, and transport networks that enhance local connectivity. Multiplier effects amplify these impacts, as tourism spending circulates through supply chains, with studies indicating higher local income multipliers for reef-based activities compared to other sectors due to demand for regional . However, economic leakage occurs where foreign-owned operators and imported supplies capture portions of revenue, limiting net GDP contributions in some areas despite overall positive spillovers. Empirical valuations from willingness-to-pay studies reinforce tourism's economic significance, with divers in sites like Bali expressing premiums for access to high-coral-coverage reefs, correlating positive values per person-year with ecosystem health metrics. Aggregate visitor metrics, while not precisely tallied region-wide, align with millions of annual reef-focused trips, supporting GDP infusions through expenditures averaging thousands per diver on packages and equipment. These dynamics highlight tourism's role in coastal economies, where reef attractiveness drives sustained inflows pre-2020 disruptions.

Resource Extraction and Traditional Uses

In and the , small-scale sand and coral occurs along coastal areas, supplying construction materials but causing localized degradation and sediment plumes that smother benthic habitats. In Madura Island, , such extraction targets Tertiary limestones and Quaternary sands, with operations often unregulated and contributing to beach erosion rates exceeding 1 meter per year in affected sites. 's sea sand exports, peaking in the , have led to documented environmental damage including coastal and habitat loss, prompting a 2025 policy review amid concerns in the Coral Triangle. In June 2025, revoked mining permits in key Coral Triangle islands to mitigate these impacts, though enforcement remains inconsistent. Mangrove forests in the Coral Triangle supply wood for and , with coastal communities harvesting for cooking, heating, and building materials like houses and fences. This extraction drives mangrove loss, accounting for up to 20-30% of in some areas, as wood demand outpaces regeneration in densely populated zones of and the . In the , reliance on mangroves for fuelwood sustains livelihoods but exacerbates vulnerability to erosion and reduced coastal protection against storms. Trade-offs include short-term energy access versus long-term carbon storage loss, with harvested mangroves holding 25-75% less than intact stands after four decades of partial recovery efforts. Seaweed farming, a traditional practice, has expanded rapidly in and the , providing economic alternatives to destructive extraction. Indonesia's production rose from 6.5 million tons in 2012 to 10.5 million tons in 2017, comprising 69% of global supply and growing at rates up to 10-fold in key regions like . In the Philippines, similar operations contribute to the Coral Triangle's 95% share of regional volume, though unchecked expansion has led to shading and in bays like Laikang, where 46% of farmers depend solely on this activity. These practices offer sustainability benefits over mining but risk ecosystem strain without , as evidenced by localized collapses from and poor . Pearl culture, rooted in indigenous diving traditions, persists in the Coral Triangle, particularly in Indonesia's Raja Ampat and the ' Palawan. In Raja Ampat, farms produce high-quality South Sea pearls from Pinctada maxima oysters, balancing commercial output with mangrove replanting and reef monitoring since the early 2000s. The accounts for 15% of global South Sea pearls, or about 3,700 pounds annually, drawing on Badjao communities' historical pearl-seeking expertise while integrating modern techniques. These operations minimize seabed disturbance compared to but require vigilant to prevent overharvesting, with farms often collaborating on habitat restoration to offset expansion pressures. Indigenous practices in the Coral Triangle incorporate cultural taboos and rotational systems to regulate resource use, fostering amid extraction pressures. Melanesian communities enforce tabu periods prohibiting harvest during breeding seasons, preserving stocks through customary laws enforced via social sanctions rather than formal regulations. In and , hybrid traditional-modern systems blend ancestral knowledge with community-based management, adapting to modern threats while maintaining viability for non-timber extracts like substrates. These approaches yield lower environmental footprints than industrial , though integration with national policies remains challenged by and .

Threats and Vulnerabilities

Natural Perturbations and Cycles

(Acanthaster planci) outbreaks represent a recurrent natural disturbance in the Coral Triangle, particularly in Philippine reefs where they have been documented since , with intensified episodes over the past five decades leading to selective predation on and Pocilloporidae corals and coral cover reductions of approximately 29%. These outbreaks align with predator-prey dynamics, where population fluctuations of the starfish—facilitated by high fecundity and larval dispersal—periodically exceed natural controls, consuming up to 5 square meters of live coral per individual annually during peaks. Such events maintain reef diversity under the by preventing competitive exclusion among coral genera. El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycles drive thermal bleaching perturbations every 4 to 7 years historically, with elevated sea surface temperatures during El Niño phases triggering expulsion and partial mortality, as seen in the 1997-1998 event that affected reefs including the Coral Triangle. In , post-1998 recovery varied by habitat, with some shallow Acropora-dominated assemblages rebounding through larval recruitment within a , demonstrating depth-dependent resilience where deeper corals experienced lower mortality. Tropical cyclones further contribute physical breakage, with wind-driven waves fragmenting branching corals, though empirical monitoring in analogous systems shows cover declines of 5-fold in severe cases yet subsequent stabilization via colonization. Volcanic activity, such as the 2018-2019 eruptions of in Indonesian waters bordering the Coral Triangle, generates localized tsunamis and ash deposition that smother or abrade nearby reefs, with the December 2018 flank collapse displacing over 0.25 cubic kilometers of material and propagating waves impacting ecosystems. These disturbances underscore inherent ecosystem adaptability, as paleoecological baselines indicate reefs evolved amid frequent perturbations, sustaining high coral cover through cycles of mortality and regrowth without anthropogenic influence. Overall, such natural cycles foster biodiversity by resetting competitive hierarchies and promoting , with recovery trajectories dependent on connectivity and .

Anthropogenic Stressors

More than 85 percent of coral reefs in the Coral Triangle face threats from local human activities, including , destructive fishing practices, coastal development, , and . depletes herbivorous and predatory fish populations essential for maintaining reef balance, leading to phase shifts toward algal dominance in affected areas. In regions with high coastal population densities, such as parts of and the , unsustainable harvest rates have reduced fish biomass by up to 50 percent in some fisheries since the . Destructive fishing methods exacerbate these pressures, particularly blast fishing prevalent in Indonesia, where explosives pulverize coral structures, reducing live coral cover to rubble and impairing reef recovery for decades. Despite bans enacted in the 1980s, blast fishing persists and contributes to threats across approximately 95 percent of Indonesia's reefs, which form a significant portion of the Coral Triangle's total area. Such practices not only destroy habitat but also diminish fish yields long-term, as fragmented reefs support fewer species and lower biomass. Watershed-based pollution and , driven by , , and urban expansion, threaten over 45 percent of the region's reefs, with more than 15 percent at high risk from these sources alone. Runoff delivers excess nutrients and sediments that smother corals, reducing photosynthetic efficiency and increasing disease susceptibility; for instance, fine sediments from deforested catchments in and the have been linked to burial rates exceeding coral tolerance thresholds of 10-50 mg/cm² per day. These inputs also promote , fostering microbial outbreaks that further degrade reef health. Shipping activities introduce through ballast water discharge and hull fouling, amplifying in the Coral Triangle's ports and busy straits. Rising vessel traffic, including from commercial and resource extraction fleets, has facilitated the establishment of non-native and that outcompete endemic species, with documented cases of toxic dinoflagellates transported via international shipping vectors. This vector ranks among the top introduced risks, compounding habitat alteration from other stressors.

Climate Variability Debates

Mass coral bleaching events in the Coral Triangle occurred during the 2014-2017 global episode, with significant impacts in 2016 driven by elevated sea surface temperatures exceeding 1°C above seasonal norms in regions like Indonesia and the Philippines. Subsequent monitoring indicated regional recoveries, such as in East Asian Coral Triangle areas where live coral cover rebounded to approximately 40% by 2016 following earlier disturbances. A 2020 bleaching pulse, linked to localized heat stress, affected parts of the region but showed variable severity, with some reefs exhibiting partial recovery within 1-2 years through recolonization by heat-tolerant species. Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data from 2016-2023 reveal fluctuating live hard coral cover in the Coral Triangle and adjacent Pacific areas, averaging around 25-30% with declines during El Niño-driven events (e.g., -2.4% in akin to 1998 patterns) but no consistent trajectory toward ; instead, cover stabilized or increased in surveyed sites post-disturbance due to macroalgal shifts and larval . These trends contrast with alarmist projections of uniform reef demise, as empirical surveys underscore site-specific resilience influenced by water depth, , and connectivity rather than solely global averages. Ocean pH in the Coral Triangle has declined by approximately 0.1 units since pre-industrial levels, correlating with reduced rates in some lab and field studies (e.g., 10-20% drops under simulated conditions), yet historical reef frameworks demonstrate net accretion under past natural variability including higher CO2-equivalent atmospheres during Pleistocene interglacials. Paleoecological records from Coral Triangle reefs indicate to swings of 2-4°C and sea-level fluctuations over millennia, with turbid inshore sites serving as refugia through enhanced sedimentation buffering and diverse symbiont communities. Meta-analyses suggest warming impairs more than acidification alone in certain taxa, challenging singular CO2 attribution. Debates persist on bleaching causation, with mainstream models attributing primary drivers to anthropogenic CO2-induced warming, while empirical critiques highlight confounding local factors such as nutrient runoff, , and episodic UV increases from ozone variability amplifying heat stress thresholds. For instance, peer-reviewed analyses note that pre-bleaching health, modulated by anthropogenic , determines mortality rates more than absolute temperature anomalies, with natural cycles like El Niño historically triggering similar events without collapse. Evidence from paleo-adaptive traits, including symbiont shuffling and genetic shifts in marginal reefs, supports potential for evolutionary resilience absent pervasive local degradation. Proximity to fossil fuel infrastructure poses additional variability risks, as 2024 assessments document over 100 offshore and gas blocks in the Coral Triangle, elevating spill probabilities and chronic that exacerbate bleaching susceptibility via toxicant synergies with . Increased tanker traffic from expansions could introduce particulate and residues, documented to inhibit coral recruitment in affected zones, independent of climatic forcing. These localized threats underscore causal complexities beyond atmospheric CO2, with reports emphasizing enforcement gaps in high-biodiversity overlap areas like the Sulu-Sulawesi Seas.

Conservation Strategies and Outcomes

Multilateral Initiatives

The Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries, and Food Security (CTI-CFF) was formally launched in 2009 as a multilateral partnership among six countries—, , , , , and Timor-Leste—to address the sustainable management of marine resources amid threats like and habitat degradation. The initiative's foundational Regional Plan of Action (RPOA), spanning 2009–2019, outlined five core goals: designating and managing priority seascapes; adopting an ecosystem approach to ; establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) covering at least 20% of coastal waters by 2020; enhancing measures; and improving the status of . This target for MPAs was partially achieved, with regional coverage reaching approximately 18% by the deadline, though effective management varied by country due to enforcement challenges. Funding for CTI-CFF has exceeded US$500 million since inception, drawn from bilateral donors like the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which supported programs such as the Sustainable Coral Triangle initiative for preservation, and multilateral institutions including the (ADB). Regional plans emphasize through ecosystem-based approaches, including the development of national plans for sustainable fisheries and live fish trade regulations, alongside conservation efforts targeting sharks, sea turtles, and corals via regional assessments and action plans. For instance, CTI-CFF facilitates annual gatherings, such as those planned for 2025 on , to harmonize conservation strategies across borders. Supporting tools include the Coral Triangle Atlas, an online GIS database launched with ADB funding to map spatial data on reefs, fisheries, and threats, enabling data-driven decision-making for governments and NGOs. Partnerships with organizations like the (WWF) have bolstered implementation, providing technical expertise for seascape management and under the updated RPOA 2.0 (2021–2030), which refines goals for ecosystem health and resilience amid ongoing pressures.

Protected Areas and Enforcement

The Coral Triangle encompasses more than 1,900 marine protected areas (MPAs) spanning approximately 200,881 km², representing about 1.6% of the combined exclusive economic zones of the six member countries. Prominent examples include Indonesia's Ampat Marine Protected Area, a network covering roughly 1.18 million hectares integrated into the larger 4.5 million-hectare Bird's Head Seascape, and the ' Apo Reef Natural Park, which safeguards 34 km² of contiguous reef ecosystems including three islands and surrounding waters. These MPAs form interconnected networks aimed at preserving hotspots, with varying designations from no-take reserves to multiple-use zones. Enforcement remains a persistent barrier to MPA efficacy, hampered by insufficient funding for patrols, surveillance technology, and personnel, which limits monitoring across vast oceanic expanses. Illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing incursions are widespread, often involving foreign vessels exploiting weak jurisdictional controls and leading to documented poaching rates that undermine stock recovery in under-patrolled zones. Regulations in many areas are inadequately applied, fostering ongoing destructive practices such as and overexploitation despite formal protections. In select no-take zones with relatively stronger compliance, empirical assessments reveal fish biomass elevations of 2 to 3 times higher than in adjacent fished reefs, attributable to reduced extraction pressure allowing rebound and spillover effects. Such gains, however, hinge on sustained deterrence of violations, with lapses in correlating to diminished benefits and persistent depletion.

Evaluations of Success and Shortcomings

While certain marine protected areas (MPAs) in the Coral Triangle have demonstrated localized improvements, such as increased fish biomass and in well-monitored sites like those in Indonesia's Raja Ampat, these gains are often confined to areas with strong and community involvement. However, the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network's 2020 assessment reports a steady decline in hard cover across Southeast Asian reefs, including the Coral Triangle, averaging 1-2% annual loss since 2010, attributed to persistent pressures outpacing localized protections. Independent evaluations of the Coral Triangle Initiative note progress in MPA establishment—over 1,900 sites covering 200,881 km² by 2014—but highlight insufficient scaling and connectivity to reverse regional degradation trends. Criticisms of conservation strategies center on top-down approaches that frequently overlook indigenous tenure and customary practices, fostering local resistance and undermining long-term viability. A 2014 NOAA-led assessment of the Coral Triangle Initiative identifies challenges in integrating local governance, with many MPAs failing due to inadequate stakeholder consultation, resulting in and habitat non-compliance. Economic evaluations, such as those in the , reveal high upfront costs for MPA implementation—often exceeding $1,000 per in initial setup and monitoring—frequently outweighing immediate benefits for coastal communities reliant on fisheries, particularly when alternative livelihoods are not secured. Compliance rates remain low, with global MPA syntheses indicating non-adherence in up to 50-70% of sites due to enforcement gaps, a pattern echoed in Coral Triangle case studies from the where community exclusion correlated with higher violation incidences. Alternatives emphasizing rights-based management, such as territorial use rights in fisheries (TURFs), have outperformed strict no-take zones in sustaining yields and compliance, as evidenced by Philippine and Indonesian pilots where local tenure allocation increased and by 20-30% over bans alone. These approaches mitigate shortcomings by aligning incentives with traditional practices, though scaling remains limited by institutional resistance to devolving authority from central governments. Overall, while MPA networks provide measurable ecological refugia in isolated cases, systemic evaluations underscore the need for hybrid models incorporating empirical cost-benefit analyses and adaptive local input to address enforcement deficits and equity concerns.

Recent Developments

Post-2020 Initiatives and Data

The Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI-CFF) launched Regional Plan of Action (RPOA) 2.0 in 2021, establishing a framework through 2030 with two overarching goals— resilience and sustainable fisheries—and seven targeted programs addressing seascape management, protected areas, climate adaptation, and threatened species conservation. This plan emphasizes control and species recovery, building on prior efforts with measurable indicators such as expanded marine protected areas covering 20% of priority seascapes by 2030. In September 2025, hosted the inaugural in-person CTI-CFF Bismarck Solomon-Seas Seascape Dialogue from 22 to 26 September in , convening regional partners to advance , protection, and women's leadership in . The event integrated discussions on mitigation and aligned with RPOA 2.0 priorities, resulting in commitments for enhanced cross-border monitoring of migratory species like sea turtles and . The Global Monitoring Network (GCRMN) published a Pacific regional status report in June 2025, analyzing data from 1980 to 2023 across Coral Triangle nations, which documented a net decline in hard cover averaging 1-2% annually post-2016 due to bleaching and crown-of-thorns outbreaks, alongside variable trends influenced by local management. Separately, a December 2024 oil and gas threat assessment mapped over 100 active offshore production blocks and 450 exploration sites within the region, projecting heightened risks of spills and vessel strikes from expanded infrastructure, with 19 terminals operational as of January 2024. COVID-19 restrictions from 2020 onward reduced tourism revenues by up to 80% in key sites like Indonesia's Raja Ampat, easing consumptive pressures and yielding short-term fish biomass gains of 10-20% in monitored no-take zones, though diminished patrols correlated with a 20-30% uptick in incidents region-wide.

Emerging Challenges and Projections

Projections for Coral Triangle reefs under business-as-usual scenarios indicate substantial risks from cumulative bleaching events, with models estimating that up to 90% of global reefs, including those in , could face severe declines by 2050 due to repeated heat stress exceeding adaptation thresholds. However, regional analyses suggest more variable outcomes, with potential coral cover reductions of 5-20% in parts of the under high-emission pathways like RCP8.5, driven by ocean warming and acidification rather than uniform collapse. Adaptation strategies, including of heat-tolerant genotypes, show promise; experiments demonstrate increased thermal tolerance in offspring corals through genetic selection, potentially mitigating 10-30% of projected mortality in targeted restoration. Emerging challenges include intensified activities, with over 100 oil and gas blocks overlapping high- zones, elevating risks of spills and chronic that could degrade 20-50% of adjacent reefs via smothering and toxic exposure. Increased tanker traffic from these developments, projected to rise 15-25% by 2030 in regional straits, facilitates introductions, which already threaten endemic through competition and habitat alteration. Geopolitical tensions in overlapping claims, such as the , hinder cross-border enforcement, allowing illegal fishing and unregulated shipping to exacerbate localized stressors like blasting, which destroys up to 1,000 hectares annually in disputed areas. Policy realism underscores prioritizing data-driven marine protected areas (MPAs) over broad global emission caps, as localized monitoring has improved compliance rates by 30-50% in enforced zones through real-time satellite and acoustic surveillance. Recommendations emphasize enhancing national enforcement capacities, such as community-based patrols in MPAs, which have reduced by 40% via adaptive rules tied to stock assessments, rather than relying on unenforceable international quotas. Integrating genomic data into MPA design could further optimize resilience by protecting genotypic hotspots, balancing development trade-offs like coastal with empirical fisheries yield gains of 20-100% in no-take reserves.

References

  1. https://www.coraltriangleinitiative.org/about
  2. https://wwf.panda.org/discover/knowledge_hub/where_we_work/coraltriangle/coraltrianglefacts
  3. https://coralreef.noaa.gov/aboutcrcp/news/featuredstories/jun20/welcome.html
  4. http://sdgs.un.org/partnerships/coral-triangle-initiative-coral-reefs-fisheries-and-food-security-cti-cff
  5. https://coraltriangleinitiative.org/sites/default/files/resources/economics-fisheries-aquaculture-coral-triangle.pdf
  6. https://wwf.panda.org/discover/knowledge_hub/where_we_work/coraltriangle/
  7. https://www.conservationgateway.org/Files/Pages/delineating-coral-triangl.aspx
  8. https://www.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/Publikationen-PDF/climate_change___coral_triangle_summary_report.pdf
  9. https://coral.org/en/where-we-work/coral-triangle/
  10. https://tricruise.id/member/area-of-coral-reefs-in-indonesia/
  11. http://ctatlas.coraltriangleinitiative.org/Country/Index/IDN
  12. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:96426cb/MisFit_Report.pdf
  13. https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=126ba936940b453090310e72404b0c50
  14. https://amti.csis.org/maritime-disputes/
  15. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/42413/state-coral-triangle-papua-new-guinea.pdf
  16. https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/download/5362/2765
  17. https://www.coraltriangleinitiative.org/library/marine-protected-areas-coral-triangle-progress-issues-and-options
  18. https://coraltriangleinitiative.org/sites/default/files/resources/Statistics_on_the_CTI.pdf
  19. https://www.coraltriangleinitiative.org/sites/default/files/resources/INO%2520SCTR_web%2520copy.pdf
  20. https://escholarship.org/content/qt49n9x3t4/qt49n9x3t4.pdf
  21. https://geology.byu.edu/0000018e-d34f-d48d-adff-d7ffab540000/2023-harris-et-al-boulder-paper-compressed-pdf
  22. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-021-00958-z
  23. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2012JC008199
  24. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/925/1/012024/pdf
  25. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018PA003387
  26. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1117304/full
  27. https://geoscienceletters.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40562-018-0102-2
  28. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2025JC022520
  29. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S007966111730191X
  30. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-25629-w
  31. https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/1203/2023/
  32. http://ctatlas.coraltriangleinitiative.org/About
  33. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2020.00487/full
  34. https://oceanconservancy.org/blog/2022/08/25/coral-triangle/
  35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266879354_Centres_of_species_richness_and_endemism_of_shallow_water_marine_molluscs_in_the_tropical_Indo-West_Pacific
  36. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77665-z
  37. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9969856/
  38. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018JC014648
  39. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989421002341
  40. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1707962114
  41. https://www.whoi.edu/reefs/7-essential-reef-species/
  42. https://coral.org/en/coral-reefs-101/why-care-about-reefs/biodiversity/
  43. https://masmahaaveshi.maldivesresilientreefs.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Module-1-Keystone-reef-species-infographic-5.pdf
  44. https://www.coraltriangleinitiative.org/sites/default/files/resources/IntegratedGuide_Final_Aug2013.pdf
  45. https://wwf.panda.org/discover/knowledge_hub/where_we_work/coraltriangle
  46. https://academic.oup.com/evolut/article/72/2/288/6882226
  47. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2148-11-189
  48. https://www.coralsoftheworld.org/page/distributions/
  49. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11461
  50. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0056245
  51. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaq1508
  52. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07617-4
  53. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016CorRe..35..765S/abstract
  54. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00338-023-02412-5
  55. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2019/2715-oligocene-miocene-corals
  56. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbi.12416
  57. https://www.ioes.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Barber_Feature-Article_F09.pdf
  58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X25002065
  59. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-024-03228-w
  60. https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/15/105/2019/
  61. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/13/6/251
  62. https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/stories/bali-tourism-2024.html
  63. https://reefresilience.org/case-studies/coral-triangle-tourism-recreation/
  64. https://cbe.miis.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=cbe_working_papers
  65. https://www.responsibletravel.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/213/2021/03/costal-marine-tourism-trends-coral-triangle.pdf
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Willingness-to-pay-as-a-function-of-coral-coverage-US-person-yearWLT-Wanlitong-HW_fig4_334364854
  67. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949790625001314
  68. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356356661_Sand_and_coral_mining_at_Pasean_Madura_Indonesia_-resource_utilization_in_a_rapidly_changing_earth
  69. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/42414/state-coral-triangle-philippines.pdf
  70. https://dialogue.earth/en/nature/indonesias-risky-gamble-with-sea-sand-exports/
  71. https://www.conservation.org/blog/in-treasured-islands-indonesia-halts-mining
  72. https://www.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/Publikationen-PDF/climate_change___coral_triangle___full_report.pdf
  73. https://www.mangrovealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/SOWM-2024.pdf
  74. https://coraltriangleinitiative.org/sites/default/files/resources/SCTR-SI.pdf
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11801255/
  76. https://pair.australiaindonesiacentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/An-Analysis-of-the-South-Sulawesi-Seaweed-Industry-English-FINAL.pdf
  77. https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/Indonesia_Seaweed_Guide_FINAL.pdf
  78. http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/aquaculture_as_solution_for_food_security_in_the_ct.pdf
  79. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10946
  80. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0964569121000715
  81. https://news.mongabay.com/2024/03/pearl-farming-raja-ampat-indonesia-marine-fisheries-pacific-business-sustainability/
  82. https://thepearlgirls.com/blogs/pearl-blog/pearl-farming-in-the-philippines
  83. https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/Pearl_Case_Study_TNC_web.pdf
  84. https://fspiblog.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/tabus-or-no-taboos.pdf
  85. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3920&context=capstones
  86. https://cdn.wcs.org/2022/02/04/867eepjgbt_Final_Governance_Whitepaper.pdf
  87. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724028389
  88. https://www.nfrdi.da.gov.ph/tpjf/etc/Five%2520Decades%2520Behind%2520the%2520Limelight%2520Crown%2520Of%2520Thorns%2520Sea%2520Star%2520Outbreaks%2520Razing%2520the%2520Already%2520Ailing%2520Philippine%2520Reefs.pdf
  89. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9023020/
  90. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X09003816
  91. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08920753.2010.509466
  92. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327340082_Cumulative_effects_of_cyclones_and_bleaching_on_coral_cover_and_species_richness_at_Lizard_Island
  93. https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/20/549/2020/
  94. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5786882/
  95. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.4280
  96. http://pdf.wri.org/reefs_at_risk_revisited_coral_triangle.pdf
  97. https://www.coraltriangleinitiative.org/library/study-reefs-risk-revisited-coral-triangle
  98. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/coral-overfishing.html
  99. https://wwf.panda.org/discover/knowledge_hub/where_we_work/coraltriangle/problems
  100. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006320721003591
  101. https://www.coralguardian.org/en/indonesia-coral-restoration-projects/
  102. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rec.12866
  103. https://taskforce.coralreef.noaa.gov/assets/mitigation/responsescoralreefs_organismssedimentation.pdf
  104. https://coraltriangleinitiative.org/sites/default/files/resources/SCTR-IN.pdf
  105. https://assets.takeshape.io/17e2848c-4275-4761-9bf5-62611d9650ae/dev/fbd728bf-566c-409b-914d-a0d982c5dc01/Coral%2520Triangle%2520Risk%2520Assessment.pdf
  106. https://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/analyses_guidance/global_coral_bleaching_2014-17_status.php
  107. https://icriforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GCRMN_East_Asia_Regional_Report_2020-high_resol_spread.pdf
  108. https://ballardbrief.byu.edu/issue-briefs/the-impact-of-coral-degradation-on-coastal-communities-in-southeast-asia
  109. https://gcrmn.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Status-of-Coral-Reefs-of-the-World-2020-Full-Report.pdf
  110. https://reeflifesurvey.com/publications/status-and-trends-of-coral-reefs-of-the-pacific-1980-2023/
  111. https://gcrmn.net/pacific-report-2025-v1/
  112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6127156/
  113. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949790624004506
  114. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2020.00127/full
  115. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9545801/
  116. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/32240/noaa_32240_DS1.pdf
  117. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11541557/
  118. https://www.cell.com/cell-reports-sustainability/pdf/S2949-7906%2824%2900450-6.pdf
  119. https://www.earth-insight.org/report/coral-triangle-threats-impacts/
  120. https://skytruth.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Press-Release%25E2%2580%2594Coral-Triangle-Report.pdf
  121. https://icriforum.org/coral-triangle-threat-assessment-2024/
  122. https://iwlearn.net/resolveuid/de66c516-d9ba-4ad7-9fb0-8991ef593276
  123. https://www.coraltriangleinitiative.org/
  124. https://coraltriangleinitiative.org/sustainablecoraltriangle
  125. https://www.coraltriangleinitiative.org/eafm
  126. http://ctatlas.coraltriangleinitiative.org/
  127. https://www.coraltriangleinitiative.org/partner/wwf
  128. https://coraltriangleinitiative.org/sites/default/files/resources/Regional%2520Plan%2520of%2520Action%25202.0%2520CTI-CFF%25202021-2030_web.pdf
  129. https://ccafs.cgiar.org/resources/publications/marine-protected-areas-coral-triangle-progress-issues-and-options
  130. https://kkprajaampat.com/en/
  131. https://www.apo-reef.com/
  132. https://marine-conservation.org/blueparks/awardees/raja-ampat/
  133. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/lack-of-funding-and-enforcement-jeopardize-marine-life-by-dadang-mujiono-2025-03
  134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006320714003541
  135. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352485516301682
  136. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0964569119300419
  137. https://journals.lww.com/coas/fulltext/2011/09030/emerging_marine_protected_area_networks_in_the.1.aspx
  138. https://www.coraltriangleinitiative.org/sites/default/files/resources/Marine%2520Protected%2520Areas%2520in%2520the%2520Coral%2520Triangle%2520Progress%2520Issues%2520and%2520Options.pdf
  139. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/57436/noaa_57436_DS1.pdf
  140. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13504509.2014.957254
  141. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320721000446
  142. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08920753.2015.1030330
  143. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320713004047
  144. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/4/1/105
  145. https://www.coraltriangleinitiative.org/news/solomon-islands-hosts-landmark-regional-gathering-marine-conservation-threatened-species-and-wo
  146. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10096236/
  147. https://marine-conservation.org/on-the-tide/dont-believe-the-hype-a-reality-check-on-covid-19-and-marine-protected-areas/
  148. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9303460/
  149. https://www.coralresiliencelab.com/selective-breeding
  150. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-40601-6
  151. https://news.mongabay.com/2024/11/coral-biodiversity-hotspot-at-risk-from-fossil-fuel-expansion-report-warns/
  152. https://coraltriangleinitiative.org/sites/default/files/resources/9_Guidelines%2520for%2520a%2520Monitoring%2520and%2520Assessment%2520System%2520for%2520Community-Based%2520Compliance%2520and%2520Enforcement%2520in%2520Solomon%2520Island%2520MPAs.pdf
  153. https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/11/163/2019/
  154. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.3389/fmars.2018.00400/full
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.