Hubbry Logo
Gustave CourbetGustave CourbetMain
Open search
Gustave Courbet
Community hub
Gustave Courbet
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gustave Courbet
Gustave Courbet
Gustave Courbet
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Jean Désiré Gustave Courbet (UK: /ˈkʊərbeɪ/ KOOR-bay;[1] US: /kʊərˈbeɪ/ koor-BAY;[2] French: [ɡystav kuʁbɛ]; 10 June 1819 – 31 December 1877)[3] was a French painter who led the Realism movement in 19th-century French painting. Committed to painting only what he could see, he rejected academic convention and the Romanticism of the previous generation of visual artists. His independence set an example that was important to later artists, such as the Impressionists and the Cubists. Courbet occupies an important place in 19th-century French painting as an innovator and as an artist willing to make bold social statements through his work.

Key Information

Courbet's paintings of the late 1840s and early 1850s brought him his first recognition. They challenged convention by depicting unidealized peasants and workers, often on a grand scale traditionally reserved for paintings of religious or historical subjects. Courbet's subsequent paintings were mostly of a less overtly political character: landscapes, seascapes, hunting scenes, nudes, and still lifes. Courbet was imprisoned for six months in 1871 for his involvement with the Paris Commune and lived in exile in Switzerland from 1873 until his death four years later.

Biography

[edit]
Self-Portrait (Man with Leather Belt), c. 1845

Gustave Courbet was born in 1819 to Régis and Sylvie Oudot Courbet in Ornans (department of Doubs). Anti-monarchical feelings prevailed in the household. (His maternal grandfather fought in the French Revolution.) Courbet's sisters, Zoé, Zélie, and Juliette were his first models for drawing and painting. After moving to Paris he often returned home to Ornans to hunt, fish, and find inspiration.[4]

Courbet went to Paris in 1839 and worked at the studio of Steuben and Hesse. An independent spirit, he soon left, preferring to develop his own style by studying the paintings of Spanish, Flemish and French masters in the Louvre, and painting copies of their work.[5]

L'homme à la pipe (Self-portrait, Man with a pipe), 1848–49, Musée Fabre, Montpellier

Courbet's first works were an Odalisque inspired by the writing of Victor Hugo and a Lélia illustrating George Sand, but he soon abandoned literary influences, choosing instead to base his paintings on observed reality. Among his paintings of the early 1840s are several self-portraits, Romantic in conception, in which the artist portrayed himself in various roles. These include Self-Portrait with Black Dog (c. 1842–44, accepted for exhibition at the Salon of 1844), the theatrical Self-Portrait which is also known as Desperate Man (c. 1843–45), Lovers in the Countryside (1844, Musée des Beaux-Arts, Lyon), The Sculptor (1845), The Wounded Man (1844–54, Musée d'Orsay, Paris), The Cellist, Self-Portrait (1847, Nationalmuseum, Stockholm, shown at the 1848 Salon), and Man with a Pipe (1848–49, Musée Fabre, Montpellier).[6]

Trips to the Netherlands and Belgium in 1846–47 strengthened Courbet's belief that painters should portray the life around them, as Rembrandt, Hals and other Dutch masters had. By 1848, he had gained supporters among the younger critics, the Neo-romantics and Realists, notably Champfleury.[7]

Courbet achieved his first Salon success in the Salon of 1849 with his painting After Dinner at Ornans. The work, reminiscent of Chardin and Le Nain, earned Courbet a gold medal and was purchased by the state.[8] The gold medal meant that his works would no longer require jury approval for exhibition at the Salon[9]—an exemption Courbet enjoyed until 1857 (when the rule changed).[10]

In 1849–50, Courbet painted The Stone Breakers (destroyed in the Allied Bombing of Dresden in 1945), which Proudhon admired as an icon of peasant life; it has been called "the first of his great works".[11] The painting was inspired by a scene Courbet witnessed on the roadside. He later explained to Champfleury and the writer Francis Wey: "It is not often that one encounters so complete an expression of poverty and so, right then and there I got the idea for a painting. I told them to come to my studio the next morning."[11]

Realism

[edit]
The Wave (La Vague), 1869, oil on canvas, 66 cm × 90 cm (26 in × 35 in), Musée des beaux-arts de Lyon

Courbet's work belonged neither to the predominant Romantic nor Neoclassical schools. History painting, which the Paris Salon esteemed as a painter's highest calling, did not interest him, for he believed that "the artists of one century [are] basically incapable of reproducing the aspect of a past or future century ..."[12] Instead, he maintained that the only possible source for living art is the artist's own experience.[12] He and Jean-François Millet would find inspiration painting the life of peasants and workers.[13]

Courbet painted figurative compositions, landscapes, seascapes, and still lifes. He courted controversy by addressing social issues in his work, and by painting subjects that were considered vulgar, such as the rural bourgeoisie, peasants, and working conditions of the poor. His work, along with that of Honoré Daumier and Jean-François Millet, became known as Realism. For Courbet realism dealt not with the perfection of line and form, but entailed spontaneous and rough handling of paint, suggesting direct observation by the artist while portraying the irregularities in nature. He depicted the harshness of life, and in doing so challenged contemporary academic ideas of art. One of the distinctive features of Courbet's Realism was his lifelong attachment to his native province, the Franche-Comté, and of his birthplace, Ornans.

The Stone Breakers

[edit]
Main article: The Stone Breakers
Gustave Courbet, The Stone Breakers 1849, oil on canvas, first exhibited at the Paris Salon of 1850, destroyed during World War II.

Considered to be the first of Courbet's great works, The Stone Breakers of 1849 is an example of social realism that caused a sensation when it was first exhibited at the Paris Salon in 1850. The work was based on two men, one young and one old, whom Courbet discovered engaged in backbreaking labor on the side of the road when he returned to Ornans for an eight-month visit in October 1848. On his inspiration, Courbet told his friends and art critics Francis Wey and Jules Champfleury, "It is not often that one encounters so complete an expression of poverty and so, right then and there I got the idea for a painting."[14]

While other artists had depicted the plight of the rural poor, Courbet's peasants are not idealized like those in works such as Breton's 1854 painting, The Gleaners.[15]

During World War II, from 13 to 15 February 1945, the Allies continuously bombed the city of Dresden, Germany. German troops hastily loaded artworks from Dresden's galleries and museums onto trucks. The Stone Breakers was destroyed, along with 153 other paintings, when a transport vehicle moving the pictures to the Königstein Fortress, near Dresden, was bombed by Allied forces.[16]

A Burial at Ornans

[edit]
Main article: A Burial At Ornans
Gustave Courbet, A Burial At Ornans, 1849–50, oil on canvas, 314 cm × 663 cm (124 in × 261 in), Musée d'Orsay, Paris. Exhibition at the 1850–1851 Paris Salon created an "explosive reaction" and brought Courbet instant fame.[17]

The Salon of 1850–1851[a] found him triumphant with The Stone Breakers, the Peasants of Flagey and A Burial at Ornans. The Burial, one of Courbet's most important works, records the funeral of his grand uncle[19] which he attended in September 1848. People who attended the funeral were the models for the painting. Previously, models had been used as actors in historical narratives, but in Burial Courbet said he "painted the very people who had been present at the interment, all the townspeople". The result is a realistic presentation of them and life in Ornans.

The vast painting, measuring 10 by 22 feet (3.0 by 6.7 meters), drew both praise and fierce denunciations from critics and the public, in part because it upset convention by depicting a prosaic ritual on a scale which would previously have been reserved for a religious or royal subject.

According to art historian Sarah Faunce, "In Paris, the Burial was judged as a work that had thrust itself into the grand tradition of history painting, like an upstart in dirty boots crashing a genteel party, and in terms of that tradition it was, of course, found wanting."[20] The painting lacks the sentimental rhetoric that was expected in a genre work: Courbet's mourners make no theatrical gestures of grief, and their faces seemed more caricatured than ennobled. The critics accused Courbet of a deliberate pursuit of ugliness.[20]

Eventually, the public grew more interested in the new Realist approach, and the lavish, decadent fantasy of Romanticism lost popularity. Courbet well understood the importance of the painting, and said of it, "Burial at Ornans was in reality the burial of romanticism."[21]

Courbet, about 1850

Courbet became a celebrity and was spoken of as a genius, a "terrible socialist" and a "savage".[22] He actively encouraged the public's perception of him as an unschooled peasant, while his ambition, his bold pronouncements to journalists, and his insistence on depicting his own life in his art gave him a reputation for unbridled vanity.[23]

Courbet associated his ideas of realism in art with political anarchism, and, having gained an audience, he promoted political ideas by writing politically motivated essays and dissertations. His familiar visage was the object of frequent caricature in the popular French press.[24]

In 1850, Courbet wrote to a friend:

...in our so very civilized society it is necessary for me to live the life of a savage. I must be free even of governments. The people have my sympathies, I must address myself to them directly.[25]

During the 1850s, Courbet painted numerous figurative works using common folk and friends as his subjects, such as Village Damsels (1852), The Wrestlers (1853), The Bathers (1853), The Sleeping Spinner (1853), and The Wheat Sifters (1854).

The Artist's Studio

[edit]
The Artist's Studio (L'Atelier du peintre): A Real Allegory of a Seven Year Phase in my Artistic and Moral Life, 1855, 359 cm × 598 cm (141 in × 235 in), oil on canvas, Musée d'Orsay, Paris

In 1855, Courbet submitted fourteen paintings for exhibition at the Exposition Universelle. Three were rejected for lack of space, including A Burial at Ornans and his other monumental canvas The Artist's Studio.[26] Refusing to be denied, Courbet took matters into his own hands. He displayed forty of his paintings, including The Artist's Studio, in his gallery called The Pavilion of Realism (Pavillon du Réalisme) which was a temporary structure that he erected next door to the official Salon-like Exposition Universelle.[26]

The work is an allegory of Courbet's life as a painter, seen as a heroic venture, in which he is flanked by friends and admirers on the right, and challenges and opposition to the left. Friends on the right include the art critics Champfleury, and Charles Baudelaire, and art collector Alfred Bruyas. On the left are figures (priest, prostitute, grave digger, merchant, and others) who represent what Courbet described in a letter to Champfleury as "the other world of trivial life, the people, misery, poverty, wealth, the exploited and the exploiters, the people who live off death."[27]

In the foreground of the left-hand side is a man with dogs, who was not mentioned in Courbet's letter to Champfleury. X-rays show he was painted later, but his role in the painting is important: he is an allegory of the then-current French Emperor, Napoleon III, identified by his famous hunting dogs and iconic twirled mustache. By placing him on the left, Courbet publicly shows his disdain for the emperor and depicts him as a criminal, suggesting that his "ownership" of France is an illegal one.[28]

Although artists like Eugène Delacroix were ardent champions of his effort, the public went to the show mostly out of curiosity and to deride him. Attendance and sales were disappointing,[29] but Courbet's status as a hero to the French avant-garde became assured. He was admired by the American James Abbott McNeill Whistler, and he became an inspiration to the younger generation of French artists including Édouard Manet and the Impressionist painters. The Artist's Studio was recognized as a masterpiece by Delacroix, Baudelaire, and Champfleury, if not by the public.

Seascapes

[edit]
Gustave Courbet, The Sailboat (Seascape), c. 1869, oil on canvas, Clark Art Institute

While Courbet's seascapes, painted during his many visits to the northern coast of France in the late 1860s, were decidedly less controversial than his salon submissions, they furthered his contributions (willing or otherwise) to realism with their emphasis on both the beauty and danger of the natural world. There is a distinct range in the tones of this period with The Calm Sea (1869) depicting the serenity of the receded tide, and The Sailboat (c. 1869) showing a sailboat wrestling with violent tides.[30]

Realist manifesto

[edit]

Courbet wrote a Realist manifesto for the introduction to the catalogue of this independent, personal exhibition, echoing the tone of the period's political manifestos. In it, he asserts his goal as an artist is "to translate the customs, the ideas, the appearance of my epoch according to my own estimation."[31]

The title of Realist was thrust upon me just as the title of Romantic was imposed upon the men of 1830. Titles have never given a true idea of things: if it were otherwise, the works would be unnecessary.

Without expanding on the greater or lesser accuracy of a name that nobody, I should hope, can really be expected to understand, I will limit myself to a few words of elucidation in order to cut short the misunderstandings.

I have studied the art of the ancients and the art of the moderns, avoiding any preconceived system and without prejudice. I no longer wanted to imitate the one than to copy the other; nor, furthermore, was it my intention to attain the trivial goal of "art for art's sake". No! I simply wanted to draw forth, from a complete acquaintance with tradition, the reasoned and independent consciousness of my own individuality.

To know in order to do, that was my idea. To be in a position to translate the customs, the ideas, the appearance of my time, according to my own estimation; to be not only a painter but a man as well; in short, to create living art – this is my goal. (Gustave Courbet, 1855)[32]

Notoriety

[edit]
"Maitre Courbet Inaugurant l'atelier des peintres modernes, caricature by Émile Benassit from Le Boulevard, issue 1, 1861

In the Salon of 1857, Courbet showed six paintings. These included Young Ladies on the Banks of the Seine (Summer), depicting two prostitutes under a tree,[33] as well as the first of many hunting scenes Courbet was to paint during the remainder of his life: Hind at Bay in the Snow and The Quarry.[10]

Young Ladies on the Banks of the Seine, painted in 1856,[34] provoked a scandal. Art critics accustomed to conventional, "timeless" nude women in landscapes were shocked by Courbet's depiction of modern women casually displaying their undergarments.[35]

By exhibiting sensational works alongside hunting scenes, of the sort that had brought popular success to the English painter Edwin Landseer, Courbet guaranteed himself "both notoriety and sales".[36]

During the 1860s, Courbet painted a series of increasingly erotic works such as Femme nue couchée, culminating in The Origin of the World (L'Origine du monde) (1866), which depicts female genitalia and was not publicly exhibited until 1988,[37] and Sleep (1866), featuring two women in bed. The latter painting became the subject of a police report when it was exhibited by a picture dealer in 1872.[38]

Until about 1861, Napoléon's regime had exhibited authoritarian characteristics, using press censorship to prevent the spread of opposition, manipulating elections, and depriving Parliament of the right to free debate or any real power. In the 1860s, however, Napoléon III made more concessions to placate his liberal opponents. This change began by allowing free debates in Parliament and public reports of parliamentary debates. Press censorship, too, was relaxed and culminated in the appointment of the Liberal Émile Ollivier, previously a leader of the opposition to Napoléon's regime, as the de facto Prime Minister in 1870. As a sign of appeasement to the Liberals who admired Courbet, Napoleon III nominated him to the Legion of Honour in 1870. His refusal of the cross of the Legion of Honour angered those in power but made him immensely popular with those who opposed the prevailing regime.

Courbet and the Paris Commune

[edit]
A satirical sketch of Gustave Courbet taking down a "Rambuteau column" (a urinal), caricature published by a popular Commune newspaper, the Le Fils du Père Duchêne
Commune officials pose with the wreckage of the Vendôme column, pulled down based on a suggestion of Courbet. After the fall of the Commune, he was ordered to pay the cost of putting the column back up.

On 4 September 1870, during the Franco-Prussian War, Courbet made a proposal that later came back to haunt him. He wrote a letter to the Government of National Defense, proposing that the column in the Place Vendôme, erected by Napoleon I to honour the victories of the French Army, be taken down. He wrote:

In as much as the Vendôme Column is a monument devoid of all artistic value, tending to perpetuate by its expression the ideas of war and conquest of the past imperial dynasty, which are reproved by a republican nation's sentiment, citizen Courbet expresses the wish that the National Defense government will authorize him to disassemble this column."[39]

Courbet proposed that the Column be moved to a more appropriate place, such as the Hotel des Invalides, a military hospital. He also wrote an open letter addressed to the German Army and to German artists, proposing that German and French cannons should be melted down and crowned with a liberty cap, and made into a new monument on Place Vendôme, dedicated to the federation of the German and French people. The Government of National Defense did nothing about his suggestion to tear down the column, but it was not forgotten.[40]

Portrait of poet Max Buchon by Courbet: the two were lifelong friends.[41]

On 18 March, in the aftermath of the French defeat in the Franco-Prussian War, a revolutionary government called the Paris Commune briefly took power in the city. Courbet played an active part and organized a Federation of Artists, which held its first meeting on 5 April in the Grand Amphitheater of the School of Medicine. Some three hundred to four hundred painters, sculptors, architects, and decorators attended. There were some famous names on the list of members, including André Gill, Honoré Daumier, Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot, Eugène Pottier, Jules Dalou, and Édouard Manet. Manet was not in Paris during the Commune and did not attend, and Corot, who was seventy-five years old, stayed in a country house and his studio during the Commune, not taking part in the political events.

Courbet chaired the meeting and proposed that the Louvre and the Musée du Luxembourg, the two major art museums of Paris, closed during the uprising, be reopened as soon as possible and that the traditional annual exhibit called the Salon be held as in years past, but with radical differences. He proposed that the Salon should be free of any government interference or rewards to preferred artists; no medals or government commissions would be given. Furthermore, he called for the abolition of the most famous state institutions of French art; the École des Beaux-Arts, the French Academy in Rome, the French School at Athens, and the Fine Arts section of the Institute of France.[42]

On 12 April, the executive committee of the Commune gave Courbet, though he was not yet officially a member of the Commune, the assignment of opening the museums and organizing the Salon. They issued the following decree at the same meeting: "The Column of the Place Vendôme will be demolished."[43] On 16 April, special elections were held to replace more moderate members of the Commune who had resigned their seats, and Courbet was elected as a delegate for the 6th arrondissement of Paris. He was given the title of Delegate of Fine Arts, and on 21 April he was also made a member of the Commission on Education. At the meeting of the commission on 27 April, the minutes reported that Courbet requested the demolition of the Vendôme column be carried out and that the column would be replaced by an allegorical figure representing the taking of power of the Commune on 18 March.[43]

Nonetheless, Courbet was a dissident by nature, and he was soon in opposition with the majority of the Commune members on some of its measures. He was one of a minority of Commune Members who opposed the creation of a Committee on Public Safety, modeled on the committee of the same name which carried out the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution.[44]

Courbet opposed the Commune on another more serious matter: the arrest of his friend Gustave Chaudey, a prominent socialist, magistrate, and journalist, whose portrait Courbet had painted. The popular Commune newspaper, Le Fils du Père Duchêne, accused Chaudey, when he was briefly deputy mayor of the 9th arrondissement before the Commune was formed, of ordering soldiers to fire on a crowd that had surrounded the Hôtel de Ville. Courbet's opposition was of no use; on 23 May 1871, in the final days of the Commune, Chaudey was shot by a Commune firing squad. According to some sources Courbet resigned from the Commune in protest.[45]

On 13 May, on the proposal of Courbet, the Paris house of Adolphe Thiers, the chief executive of the French government, was demolished, and his art collection confiscated. Courbet proposed that the confiscated art be given to the Louvre and other museums, but the director of the Louvre refused to accept it.[46] On 16 May, just nine days before the fall of the Commune, in a large ceremony with military bands and photographers, the Vendôme column was pulled down and broke into pieces. Some witnesses said Courbet was there, others denied it. The following day, the Federation of Artists debated dismissing directors of the Louvre and of the Luxembourg museums, suspected by some in the Commune of having secret contacts with the French government, and appointed new heads of the museums.

One of a series of still-life paintings Courbet made while in prison for his role in the Commune (1871). He was allowed an easel and paints, but he could not have models pose for him.

According to one legend, Courbet defended the Louvre and other museums against "looting mobs", but there are no records of any such attacks on the museums. The only real threat to the Louvre came during "Bloody Week", 21–28 May 1871, when a unit of Communards, led by a Commune general, Jules Bergeret, set fire to the Tuileries Palace, next to the Louvre.[47] The fire spread to the library of the Louvre, which was destroyed, but the efforts of museum curators and firemen saved the art gallery.[48]

After the final suppression of the Commune by the French army on 28 May, Courbet went into hiding in the apartments of different friends. He was arrested on 7 June. At his trial before a military tribunal on 14 August, Courbet argued that he had only joined the Commune to pacify it and that he had wanted to move the Vendôme Column, not destroy it. He said he had only belonged to the Commune for a short period, and rarely attended its meetings. He was convicted, but given a lighter sentence than other Commune leaders: six months in prison and a fine of five hundred francs. Serving part of his sentence in the Sainte-Pélagie Prison in Paris, he was allowed an easel and paints, but he could not have models pose for him. He did a famous series of still-life paintings of flowers and fruit during his confinement.[49]

Exile and death

[edit]
The Trout, 1871

Courbet completed his prison sentence on 2 March 1872, but his problems caused by the destruction of the Vendôme Column were still not over. In 1873, the newly elected president of the Republic, Patrice de MacMahon, announced plans to rebuild the column, with the cost to be paid by Courbet. Unable to pay, Courbet went into a self-imposed exile in Switzerland to avoid bankruptcy. In the following years, he participated in Swiss regional and national exhibitions. Surveilled by the Swiss intelligence service, he enjoyed in the small Swiss art world the reputation as head of the "realist school" and inspired younger artists such as Auguste Baud-Bovy and Ferdinand Hodler.[50]

Important works from this period include several paintings of trout, "hooked and bleeding from the gills",[51] that have been interpreted as allegorical self-portraits of the exiled artist.[51] In his final years, Courbet painted landscapes, including several scenes of water mysteriously emerging from the depths of the earth in the Jura Mountains of the France–Switzerland border.[52] Courbet also worked on sculpture during his exile. Previously, in the early 1860s, he had produced a few sculptures, one of which – the Fisherman of Chavots (1862) – he donated to Ornans for a public fountain, but it was removed after Courbet's arrest.[53]

In May 1877, the state set the final cost of reconstructing the Vendôme Column at 323,000 francs for Courbet to repay in annual installments of 10,000 francs for the next 33 years.[54] On 31 December 1877, a day before the first installment was due,[55] Courbet died, aged 58, in La Tour-de-Peilz, Switzerland, of a liver disease aggravated by heavy drinking.

[edit]
  • Portraits
  • Portrait of Paul Ansout, c. 1842–43
    Portrait of Paul Ansout, c. 1842–43
  • Portrait of H. J. van Wisselingh, 1846
    Portrait of H. J. van Wisselingh, 1846
  • Zélie Courbet, 1847
    Zélie Courbet, 1847
  • Portrait of Baudelaire, 1848
    Portrait of Baudelaire, 1848
  • Proudhon and His Children, 1865
    Proudhon and His Children, 1865
  • Spanish Woman, 1854
    Spanish Woman, 1854
  • Gustave Mathieu, 1869, Sammlung Oskar Reinhart Am Römerholz, Winterthur
    Gustave Mathieu, 1869, Sammlung Oskar Reinhart Am Römerholz, Winterthur
  • Landscapes
  • Rocks at Mouthier, 1855
    Rocks at Mouthier, 1855
  • Cliffs at Etretat, After the Storm, 1870
    Cliffs at Etretat, After the Storm, 1870
  • The Wave, 1870
    The Wave, 1870
  • Sea Coast in Normandy, 1867
    Sea Coast in Normandy, 1867
  • The Pont Ambroix Languedoc, 1857
    The Pont Ambroix Languedoc, 1857
  • Laundresses at Low Tide, Étretat (1866 or 1869), oil on canvas, 21 3/8 × 25 7/8 in. (54.3 × 65.7 cm), Clark Art Institute
    Laundresses at Low Tide, Étretat (1866 or 1869), oil on canvas, 21 3/8 × 25 7/8 in. (54.3 × 65.7 cm), Clark Art Institute
  • Stream in the Jura Mountains (The Torrent), 1872–73, Honolulu Museum of Art
    Stream in the Jura Mountains (The Torrent), 1872–73, Honolulu Museum of Art
  • Snow effect, c. 1860s
    Snow effect, c. 1860s
  • The Calm Sea, 1869, Metropolitan Museum of Art
    The Calm Sea, 1869, Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Grotto of Sarrazine near Nans-sous-Sainte-Anne, c. 1875
    Grotto of Sarrazine near Nans-sous-Sainte-Anne, c. 1875
  • The Castle of Chillon, 1874
    The Castle of Chillon, 1874

Legacy

[edit]
Claude Monet, Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe (right section), with Gustave Courbet, 1865–66, Musée d'Orsay, Paris

Courbet was admired by many artists. Claude Monet included a portrait of Courbet in his own version of Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe from 1865 to 1866 (Musée d'Orsay, Paris). Courbet's particular kind of realism influenced many artists to follow, notably among them the German painters of the Leibl circle,[56] James McNeill Whistler, and Paul Cézanne. Courbet's influence can also be seen in the work of Edward Hopper, whose Bridge in Paris (1906) and Approaching a City (1946) have been described as Freudian echoes of Courbet's The Source of the Loue and The Origin of the World.[57] His pupils included Henri Fantin-Latour, Hector Hanoteau and Olaf Isaachsen.

Courbet once wrote this in a letter:

I have always lived in freedom; let me end my life free; when I am dead let this be said of me: 'He belonged to no school, to no church, to no institution, to no academy, least of all to any régime except the régime of liberty.'[58]

Courbet and Cubism

[edit]
Young Ladies Beside the Seine (Summer), 1856, Petit Palais, Paris: one of Courbet's best-known paintings, exemplifying his "uncompromising emphasis on density and weight"[59]

Two 19th-century artists prepared the way for the emergence of Cubism in the 20th century: Courbet and Cézanne.[60] Cézanne's contributions are well-known.[61] Courbet's importance was announced by Guillaume Apollinaire, poet-spokesperson for the Cubists. Writing in Les Peintres Cubistes, Méditations Esthétiques (1913) he declared, "Courbet is the father of the new painters."[62] Jean Metzinger and Albert Gleizes often portrayed Courbet as the father of all modern art.[62]

Both artists sought to transcend the conventional methods of rendering nature; Cézanne through a dialectical method revealing the process of seeing, Courbet by his materialism.[63] The Cubists would combine these two approaches in developing a revolution in art.[64]

On a formal level, Courbet wished to convey the physical characteristics of what he was painting: its density, weight, and texture. Art critic John Berger said: "No painter before Courbet was ever able to emphasize so uncompromisingly the density and weight of what he was painting."[65] This emphasis on material reality endowed his subjects with dignity.[66] Berger observed that the Cubist painters "were at great pains to establish the physical presence of what they were representing. And in this, they are the heirs of Courbet."[67]

Nazi-looted art

[edit]

During the Third Reich (1933–1945) Jewish art collectors throughout Europe had their property seized as part of the Holocaust. Many artworks created by Courbet were looted by Nazis and their agents during this period and have only recently been reclaimed by the families of the previous owners.

Courbet's La Falaise d'Etretat was owned by the Jewish collector Marc Wolfson and his wife Erna, who both were murdered in Auschwitz. After disappearing during the Nazi occupation of France, it reappeared years later at the Musée d'Orsay.[68]

The great Hungarian Jewish collector Baron Mor Lipot Herzog owned several Courbet artworks, including Le Chateau de Blonay (Neige) (c. 1875, "The Chateau of Blonay (Snow)", now at the Budapest Museum of Fine Arts),[69] and Courbet's most infamous work — L'Origine du monde ("The Origin of the World"). His collection of 2000–2500 pieces was looted by Nazis and many are still missing.[70]

Gustav Courbet's paintings Village Girl With Goat, The Father, and Landscape With Rocks were discovered in the Gurlitt Trove of art stashed in Munich. It is not known to whom they belonged.[71][72]

Josephine Weinmann and her family, who were German Jews, had owned Le Grand Pont before they were forced to flee. The Nazi militant Herbert Schaefer acquired it and loaned it to the Yale University Art Gallery, against whom the Weinmanns filed a claim.[73]

The French Database of Art Objects at the Jeu de Paume (Cultural Plunder by the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg) has 41 entries for Courbet.[74]

In March 2023, a museum at the University of Cambridge, in the United Kingdom, returned a painting La Ronde Enfantine by Gustave Courbet, which was stolen in 1941 by the Nazis in Paris. The canvas belonged to a Jewish member of the Resistance. The Spoliation Advisory Panel, a body created in 2000 by the British government, concluded on 28 March "that the painting was stolen by the Nazi occupation forces because Robert Bing was Jewish".[75]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Gustave Courbet

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Jean Désiré Gustave Courbet (10 June 1819 – 31 December 1877) was a French painter who led the Realist movement in mid-19th-century art by depicting unidealized scenes from everyday life with direct observation of nature, rejecting the romantic idealism and classical conventions dominant in academic painting. Born in Ornans to a prosperous farming family, Courbet moved to Paris in 1839, where he developed his style through self-study and copying masters in the Louvre, emphasizing palpable textures and earthy colors to convey the tangible reality of his subjects. His breakthrough came with monumental canvases like The Stone Breakers (1849, destroyed) and A Burial at Ornans (1849–1850), which portrayed laborers and rural funerals on the scale of history paintings, provoking outrage for their perceived vulgarity and democratic leveling of social hierarchies. Courbet's realism was not merely stylistic but ideological, rooted in a commitment to paint only what he could see and touch, as manifested in his manifesto-like (1855), a panoramic allegory of his artistic and political worldview that further alienated the Salon establishment. Politically radical, he supported the 1848 Revolution and served in the of , chairing its arts commission and overseeing the toppling of the Vendôme Column as a symbol of imperial excess, actions that led to his for six months and subsequent in after massive fines for restoration costs bankrupted him. Despite controversies over explicit nudes like The Origin of the World (1866), which shocked contemporaries with its unflinching anatomical detail, Courbet's influence extended to later modernists by prioritizing perceptual truth over narrative or moral elevation.

Early Life and Formation

Birth and Family Background

Jean Désiré Gustave Courbet was born on 10 June 1819 in Ornans, a rural town in the department of France's region. Ornans, situated in the scenic Loue River valley amid limestone cliffs and agricultural lands, provided the backdrop for his early years, fostering a deep connection to provincial life that permeated his later artistic subjects. Courbet was the eldest of four children and the only son born to Régis Courbet, a prosperous landowner and farmer who managed extensive family estates including vineyards and fields, and his wife Sylvie Oudot, from a similar agrarian background. The family's relative affluence—stemming from successful farming operations rather than mere subsistence—afforded Courbet a stable upbringing uncommon among rural peasants, though their staunch republican and anti-monarchical views, rooted in the revolutionary traditions of the region, instilled in him an early skepticism toward centralized authority and aristocratic norms. His three younger sisters completed the household, and the close-knit family dynamics, combined with exposure to the unvarnished realities of farm labor and local customs, laid the groundwork for Courbet's rejection of idealized in favor of direct observation of everyday existence. The paternal influence was particularly pronounced, as Régis's political activism and support for liberal causes prefigured Courbet's own combative stance against institutional hierarchies.

Education and Early Influences

Courbet's formal education began at the Petit Séminaire in Ornans, where he enrolled around 1831 and proved a mediocre pupil, though he received foundational drawing instruction from the Claude-Antoine Beau, who emphasized direct observation of nature over classical models. This early exposure to plein air sketching in the rugged landscapes of Franche-Comté fostered his lifelong commitment to depicting unidealized rural subjects. In autumn 1837, at age 18, Courbet transferred to the Collège Royal in , the regional capital, under his father's directive to prepare for a legal career; there, he continued academic studies but supplemented them with art lessons from local painter Antoine-Augustin Flajoulot, honing skills in portraiture and landscape rendering amid the ' terrain. His time in , lasting approximately two years, marked a shift from instruction to more structured artistic practice, though he resisted the rote prevalent in French provincial schools. By autumn 1839, Courbet arrived in , ostensibly to pursue law at his family's behest, but he swiftly abandoned this path for painting, briefly entering the atelier of history painters de Steuben and Nicolas Auguste Hesse on the before departing due to its academic rigidity. Instead, he adopted a self-directed approach, spending extensive periods copying masterpieces in the —drawing particular inspiration from the robust naturalism of Spanish artists like , Flemish realists, and Dutch painters such as van Rijn, whose earthy tones and unvarnished figures resonated with his provincial roots. This eclectic, non-systematic training, prioritizing empirical observation over atelier dogma, laid the groundwork for his realist ethos, rejecting idealized forms in favor of direct perceptual truth.

Artistic Career in Paris

Arrival and Initial Struggles

In 1839, at the age of twenty, Gustave Courbet arrived in , defying his parents' expectations of legal studies to commit to an artistic career. He briefly apprenticed in the studio of history painter Baron Charles von Steuben before departing to pursue , primarily by copying masterworks in the , including those by Dutch, Flemish, Italian artists, and contemporaries such as Ingres and Delacroix. Rejecting the rigid structure of the École des Beaux-Arts, Courbet emphasized self-directed learning, though he later claimed to have had no formal teachers, a statement at odds with his documented early training. Courbet's initial years in the capital were marked by persistent professional and financial hardships, as he navigated the competitive without steady or institutional support. Between 1840 and 1847, he submitted twenty-four paintings to the Salon, the official exhibition venue controlled by academic juries, yet only three were accepted, with his first success in 1844 featuring Self-Portrait with Black Dog. These frequent rejections—twenty-one in total—stemmed from his unrefined draftsmanship, heavy application of paint, and emerging style that clashed with neoclassical ideals, forcing reliance on family remittances and sporadic commissions for survival. Embracing a bohemian existence, Courbet immersed himself in intellectual circles at venues like the Andler Keller beer house, associating with radicals such as and , while grappling with personal instability, including a decade-long relationship with model Virginie Binet and the birth of their son in 1847. His early self-portrait The Desperate Man (c. 1843–1845) embodies this period's turmoil, depicting the artist in a wild-eyed, disheveled frenzy that evokes Romantic desperation and career anxiety amid unrelenting setbacks. Despite these obstacles, Courbet's tenacity laid the groundwork for his realist innovations, as he honed techniques through persistent practice and provincial returns for inspiration.

Development of Realist Style

Upon settling in Paris in 1840, Gustave Courbet pursued an independent path, eschewing formal enrollment at the École des Beaux-Arts in favor of studying old masters such as Rembrandt, Velázquez, and Caravaggio through copies at the Louvre. His early output included self-portraits infused with Romantic expressiveness, like The Desperate Man (c. 1843–1845), which conveyed personal anguish through dramatic poses and lighting, yet these works already hinted at his growing emphasis on direct observation over idealized narrative. The political upheavals of the 1848 Revolution profoundly shaped Courbet's artistic evolution, prompting a rejection of both Academic classicism and Romantic theatricality in favor of unvarnished depictions of contemporary life. Returning to his hometown of Ornans in the Franche-Comté region, he drew inspiration from everyday rural scenes, particularly observing an elderly man and a breaking stones roadside during a trip, which led to (1849, oil on canvas, 165 × 257 cm). In this painting, Courbet applied coarse, visible brushstrokes to render the laborers' tattered clothing and monotonous toil without sentimentality or heroic elevation, treating humble subjects on a grand scale typically reserved for historical themes. This methodological shift—prioritizing empirical observation of nature and models over studio invention—extended to subsequent works like A Burial at Ornans (1849–1850), a monumental canvas (314 × 663 cm) portraying a provincial funeral with unflinching detail on the faces and figures of ordinary participants. By 1851, Courbet formalized his commitment to this approach in a letter, declaring himself a "Realist" dedicated to representing only tangible reality as perceived by the senses. These innovations, grounded in 19th-century scientific positivism and a disdain for artistic artifice, established Realism as a movement centered on causal fidelity to observed conditions rather than contrived beauty.

Foundations of Realism

Realist Manifesto and Principles

In 1855, Gustave Courbet, frustrated by the rejection of his works from the official Exposition Universelle in , financed and erected an independent pavilion adjacent to the event, dubbing it the Pavilion of Realism to showcase approximately 40 of his paintings. This self-organized exhibition served as a direct challenge to the academic establishment, featuring large-scale depictions of contemporary rural and working-class life that defied conventional expectations for . Accompanying the display was the Realist Manifesto, published as the preface to the exhibition catalog, in which Courbet articulated his artistic philosophy as a commitment to rendering "the customs, the ideas, the appearance of my own era" through direct personal observation, free from imposed traditions. The manifesto's core principles rejected the romantic idealization and historical escapism prevalent in academic art, insisting instead that genuine artists "pick up their age exactly at the point to which it has been carried by preceding culture" without deference to outdated formulas or schools. Courbet argued for as an extension of lived , limited to tangible, visible subjects drawn from modern society—peasants, laborers, and everyday scenes—rather than invented fantasies or classical motifs, emphasizing empirical fidelity over embellishment. This approach privileged the artist's individual perception and , viewing formal training as superfluous since true expression arises from innate inspiration and unmediated study of . By embracing the label of "Realist"—initially imposed by critics—Courbet positioned his method as a progressive, democratic alternative to elitist conventions, aligning art with the social and material conditions of the mid-19th century. The thus framed realism not as a mere style but as a causal imperative: art must reflect verifiable contemporary existence to advance public understanding, eschewing abstraction for concrete depiction of human labor, landscapes, and social interactions as Courbet encountered them in his native and urban . This stance provoked immediate controversy, underscoring tensions between official taste and emergent demands for representational honesty.

The Stone Breakers and Early Rural Scenes

In 1849, Gustave Courbet completed The Stone Breakers, a monumental canvas measuring 165 by 257 centimeters that depicts two unnamed peasants—one elderly and stooped, the other young and vigorous—engaged in the backbreaking task of smashing rocks into gravel for road construction. The composition focuses tightly on their figures against a barren landscape, rendered in earthy tones with deliberate brushwork that conveys the dust, strain, and monotony of manual labor, eschewing any narrative drama or sentimental appeal. Courbet drew direct inspiration from observing such workers along a roadside near his native Ornans in the Franche-Comté region, aiming to capture the unvarnished reality of rural poverty rather than idealized rustic idylls common in prior art. Displayed at the Paris Salon of 1850 alongside Courbet's Burial at Ornans, The Stone Breakers elicited sharp debate for elevating humble subjects to the scale of history painting, challenging academic norms that privileged mythological or aristocratic themes. Critics from conservative circles decried its "socialist" undertones and lack of refinement, while it resonated with emerging realist sentiments amid post-1848 social unrest. The original perished in 1945 during Allied bombing of Dresden, where it had been stored; surviving oil sketches and contemporary accounts preserve its impact as a cornerstone of social realism. Courbet's contemporaneous rural scenes further exemplified this approach, as seen in After Dinner at Ornans (1849), a 200 by 270 centimeter portrayal of peasants lounging in a dimly lit interior after a meal, rendered with unflattering detail in their postures, attire, and expressions. This work, accepted at the same Salon, marked Courbet's breakthrough by applying grand-format techniques to prosaic village life, drawing from his upbringing amid Franche-Comté's agrarian communities. Similarly, paintings like The Peasants of Flagey Returning from the Fair (c. 1850) documented processions of rural folk in everyday garb, wagons laden with market goods, emphasizing collective drudgery over picturesque charm. These early efforts from 1848–1850 prioritized direct observation of provincial customs and labor, rejecting romanticized depictions that softened peasant hardship into noble simplicity, as in works by . Courbet's insistence on painting "only what I see" grounded his rural imagery in empirical fidelity, fostering realism's break from neoclassical artifice and laying groundwork for modern depictions of class and toil.

Major Realist Works and Scandals

A Burial at Ornans

A Burial at Ornans is an oil-on-canvas painting measuring 3.15 by 6.60 meters, created by Gustave Courbet between late 1849 and 1850. The work depicts the funeral of Courbet's great-uncle in the artist's hometown of Ornans, portraying a crowd of local peasants, clergy, and officials gathered around an open grave in a stark, unidealized manner. Courbet painted the scene from memory and sketches made during the actual event, emphasizing the banality of rural life without romantic embellishment or heroic elevation. Exhibited at the Salon from December 1850 to January 1851, the painting's monumental scale—typically reserved for historical, religious, or mythological subjects—provoked immediate controversy among critics and viewers accustomed to academic conventions. Detractors accused Courbet of or democratic vulgarity for granting ordinary provincials the grandeur of grand manner painting, with some likening the figures' unrefined features to a "photographic" or caricatural realism that challenged bourgeois ideals of beauty and hierarchy. Courbet rejected such political interpretations, insisting the work represented unvarnished truth from his native region, stating it showed "the world as I have observed it" without intent to flatter or moralize. In the context of Realism, A Burial at Ornans marked a pivotal assertion of Courbet's principles by elevating everyday rural existence to the status of , thereby democratizing subject matter and subverting the Salon’s preference for elevated narratives. The painting's composition, with its frieze-like arrangement of figures in subdued earth tones and absence of dramatic or , underscored a commitment to direct observation over idealization, influencing subsequent Realist artists by prioritizing empirical fidelity to social realities over neoclassical or romantic artifice. Today, it resides in the in , recognized as a foundational work in the shift toward modernist painting.

The Artist's Studio

The Painter's Studio: A Real Allegory Summing Up Seven Years of My Artistic and Moral Life (original French: L'Atelier du peintre. Allégorie réelle déterminant une phase de sept années de ma vie artistique et morale) is an oil-on-canvas painting completed by Gustave Courbet between 1854 and 1855, measuring 361 cm by 598 cm. The work was executed primarily in Ornans, Courbet's hometown, as a summation of his artistic development and realist principles up to that point. Courbet submitted it, along with thirteen other paintings, to the jury of the 1855 Exposition Universelle in , but it was rejected alongside major works like . In response, Courbet financed and erected the "Pavillon du Réalisme" adjacent to the official exhibition site on the Champs-Élysées, where he displayed approximately forty works, prominently featuring this painting as the centerpiece. The independent pavilion attracted over 11,000 visitors during the exhibition's run from May to November 1855, though financial losses ensued due to high construction and operational costs. The monumental composition divides into three zones: at the center, Courbet stands at his easel painting a from , accompanied by a reclining nude female model (possibly his sister or an anonymous figure), a young boy offering him brushes and holding two white puppies, and a disgruntled on a table strewn with art supplies. To the right, symbolic of artistic and intellectual allies, appear identifiable figures including the art patron Alfred Bruyas, the socialist philosopher , the realist critic Champfleury, and the poet , among others representing cultural "shareholders." The left side depicts a cross-section of everyday society—hunters, a , a merchant, beggars, and workers—evoking the raw, unidealized subjects of Courbet's realist oeuvre. Courbet himself explained the painting's intent: "It's the whole world coming to me to be painted... on the right, all the shareholders... On the left is the other world of —the , the miserable ones." This arrangement functions as a realist allegory, rejecting romantic or academic idealization in favor of direct engagement with contemporary life, positioning the artist's studio as a democratic arena where intersects with proletarian reality. The work's scale and inclusion of personal and political elements underscored Courbet's defiance of institutional gatekeeping, cementing its role as a foundational statement of realism. Reception was polarized: progressive critics such as Baudelaire, Champfleury, and hailed it as a bold , while traditionalists decried its rejection of classical and its embrace of mundane subjects. The painting remained in Courbet's possession until his death, later entering public collections through subscription; it has been housed at the since 1986.

Seascapes and Landscape Innovations

In the 1860s, Gustave Courbet expanded his realist approach to landscapes and seascapes, emphasizing direct observation of nature over idealized or romantic interpretations. These works marked a shift from his earlier focus on rural figure scenes, applying the same principles of unvarnished truth to natural elements, often rendered in large formats that challenged academic hierarchies favoring history painting. His landscapes typically depicted the rugged terrain of his native Franche-Comté region, using cropped compositions and thick impasto techniques to convey texture, light, and atmospheric depth with empirical precision. Courbet's innovations in included a radical focus on contemporary, unremarkable motifs—such as forests, cliffs, and streams—painted to capture transient effects like changing and seasonal variations, prefiguring impressionist methods while maintaining a staunch commitment to tangible realism rather than . Between 1855 and 1877, he produced numerous such scenes, including snowscapes and hunting views integrated with natural settings, executed during harsh winters to document unaltered environmental conditions. These departed from neoclassical smoothness by prioritizing rough, visible brushwork that mimicked the irregularity of rocks, foliage, and water surfaces, asserting that art should reflect observable reality without embellishment. Turning to seascapes, Courbet's marine paintings, beginning in the mid-1850s and intensifying in the 1860s, portrayed the sea's raw power through turbulent waves, foam, and expansive horizons, often observed firsthand along Normandy and Mediterranean coasts. In autumn 1865, during a visit to Trouville alongside James Whistler, he completed approximately twenty-five seascapes, relying on immediate sensory experience rather than studio invention or romantic dramatization employed by predecessors. Works like The Seashore at Palavas (1854) and later series in Normandy explored chromatic variations in sea and sky, using bold, gestural strokes to evoke motion and elemental force, thereby innovating marine art by grounding it in perceptual accuracy over poetic fantasy. This approach extended his realist manifesto to oceanic subjects, treating the sea as a democratic motif worthy of monumental scale and unfiltered depiction.

Political Involvement and Radicalism

Participation in the 1848 Revolution

During the of 1848, which erupted in on February 22 and led to the abdication of King Louis-Philippe I by February 24, establishing the Second French Republic, Gustave Courbet expressed strong sympathy for the republican uprising as a 28-year-old residing in the capital. Self-identifying as a "republican by birth," he viewed the events as an affirmation of against monarchical rule, though his background in rural and bohemian circles in shaped a perspective prioritizing social equality over violent overthrow. Courbet refrained from taking up arms or fighting on the barricades during the revolutionary clashes, adhering to personal pacifist principles that rejected physical combat as a means of political change. His contributions remained indirect, including modest artistic support through illustrations for publications aligned with circles, such as drawings for Le Salut Public, a periodical associated with his republican acquaintances. In the ensuing months of the Second Republic, Courbet deepened his political engagement by affiliating with radical clubs, including the Club des —revived as a forum for democratic-republican discourse—and the Club de , platforms for debating socialist reforms and opposing conservative elements within the . These affiliations positioned him among intellectuals and militants advocating for expanded and workers' rights, though he avoided the more militant actions seen in the later that year, maintaining his non-violent stance amid class tensions. This period marked the onset of his explicit alignment of art with populist ideals, influencing subsequent works that depicted unidealized rural and proletarian life.

Evolving Political Views and Socialism

Courbet's political outlook, shaped by his rural origins and exposure to republican ideals, initially emphasized democratic reform without violence. Following the 1848 Revolution, he described himself as a "republican by birth" yet adhered to pacifist principles, abstaining from armed conflict while founding a political club to promote artistic and social freedoms. By the early 1850s, Courbet's views shifted toward explicit , intertwining his realist aesthetic with critiques of class hierarchy. Critics, including journalist André Garcin, accused works such as (1849) of socialist propaganda for depicting laborers in unidealized toil, prompting Courbet to affirm the charge: "They call me ‘the socialist painter.' I accept that title with pleasure. I am not only a socialist but a democrat and a Republican as well—in a word, a partisan of all the revolution." This stance reflected his growing conviction that art should expose social realities to foster equality, rejecting romantic escapism in favor of depictions grounded in empirical observation of working-class life. A pivotal influence was , the mutualist thinker from , whose anarchist emphasized worker and opposition to state . Courbet's friendship with Proudhon, forged in the , informed his inclusion of the theorist in (1855) as a symbol of intellectual camaraderie. Proudhon's writings reinforced Courbet's belief in art's role in unveiling capitalist exploitation, aligning realism with proletarian awakening. In a 1865 letter after Proudhon's death, Courbet hailed him as "the nineteenth century’s guiding force" and vowed, "Like Proudhon, I will not have the revolution derailed," signaling deepened radicalism. This evolution manifested in Courbet's advocacy for art's democratization, including free exhibitions and rejection of state patronage, as seen in his 1870 refusal of the Legion of Honor to preserve independence. His socialism prioritized mutual aid over centralized control, critiquing both monarchy and emerging bourgeois liberalism through first-hand rural and urban observations, though detractors often overstated its doctrinal rigidity relative to his compassionate, experiential foundations.

Role in the Paris Commune

Activities During the Commune

Following the of the on March 18, 1871, Gustave Courbet actively supported the revolutionary government, drawing on his prior experience as head of the Arts Commission appointed in September 1870 under the to safeguard cultural institutions during the Franco-Prussian siege. He remained in , expressing militant enthusiasm for 's aims, and on April 16, 1871, was elected as a delegate to the Commune Council representing the 6th . In this capacity, he served as a delegate for public instruction, equivalent to a role in the Ministry of Public Education, focusing on educational and cultural policies. Courbet assumed leadership as president of the Federation of Artists, which succeeded his earlier Arts Commission and functioned as a ministry of culture for the Commune, comprising around 400 artists and artisans. In early April 1871, he co-organized a large assembly of artists—co-chaired with Eugène Pottier—to deliberate on artistic governance, resulting in the Federation's formation and a advocating artists' self-management of exhibitions and sales, equal rights for female artists, freedom of expression, and universal access to culture as a public right. His efforts emphasized protecting Parisian museums and artworks from both revolutionary unrest and potential looting, continuing safeguards initiated during . By April 30, 1871, Courbet wrote optimistically of the Commune's progress, declaring a "true paradise" amid its social experiments, reflecting his alignment with its radical democratic and socialist ideals. These activities positioned him as a key figure in the Commune's cultural sphere, bridging his realist artistic principles with political advocacy for decentralized, worker-oriented , though the short-lived regime limited implementation.

Destruction of the Vendôme Column

Gustave Courbet initially proposed the removal of the Vendôme Column on 14 September 1870, addressing a letter to the that criticized the monument as a symbol of and false glory, devoid of artistic value, and suggested its disassembly and relocation to the Hôtel des Invalides as a more fitting site for military trophies. During the , which began in March 1871, Courbet served as president of the Federation of Artists and was elected a member of the Commune on 16 April. On 12 April 1871, prior to Courbet's election, 's executive committee decreed the of the column, framing it as an act against "the monument of barbarism, the imperial regime's sign of false glory and international antagonism." Courbet supported broader cultural reforms under the Commune, including the removal of imperial symbols, but maintained his preference for careful disassembly over outright destruction to preserve its components. The column, a 44-meter bronze structure modeled after and topped by a of I, was toppled on 16 May 1871 in a staged public event organized by Communard engineers, accompanied by the singing of and cheers from spectators. While some contemporary accounts and later histories attribute leadership of the demolition to Courbet personally, evidence indicates his role was primarily ideological and administrative through federation, with the physical operation directed by commissions; ambiguities persist due to his vocal advocacy and the Commune's chaotic documentation. The act symbolized the Commune's rejection of imperial legacy but contributed to Courbet's postwar scapegoating as the principal instigator.

Trial and Financial Penalties

Following the fall of the on May 28, 1871, Gustave Courbet was arrested on June 7 for his role in advocating and overseeing the demolition of the Vendôme Column, which occurred on May 16 as a symbolic act against and . Although Courbet had publicly proposed the column's removal in a petition dated April 12, 1871, and served on the commission that executed the decree, he later maintained in his defense that responsibility lay with the Commune's collective executive and that he acted only as an artistic delegate without executive power. Courbet's trial before the Versailles War Council concluded on September 2, 1871, resulting in a sentence of six months' imprisonment and a 500-franc fine for in the destruction. He served the term from September 1871 to March 1872 in Sainte-Pélagie prison in , where he continued still lifes and portraits under constrained conditions. In July 1873, the French National Assembly decreed the column's reconstruction at an estimated cost of 323,000 francs and retroactively assigned primary financial liability to Courbet as the purported instigator, despite the involving military engineers and multiple Commune officials. This civil judgment, issued in May 1873, escalated the penalties beyond the initial criminal conviction, as the Third Republic sought to symbolically restore monarchical and imperial legacies while punishing radical figures. Courbet, whose assets from painting sales and prior -related seizures totaled far less, appealed unsuccessfully and faced seizure of his works and property to cover the debt. The unpayable fine precipitated Courbet's flight to on July 7, 1873, to evade re-imprisonment for non-payment, marking the effective end of his French career and financial solvency. Efforts by supporters to auction his paintings in in 1877 yielded insufficient funds, leaving the burden unresolved at his death.

Life in Swiss Exile

Following his conviction in 1873 for complicity in the destruction of the Vendôme Column, Courbet faced a fine of 300,000 francs plus restoration costs, which he refused to pay to avoid further and proceedings. On July 23, 1873, he crossed into , initially staying in various locations before settling in on the northern shore of (Lac Léman) by October. There, he rented a modest overlooking the lake, where he resided until his death, supported by sales of paintings to Swiss collectors and occasional aid from friends, though his French properties were seized to satisfy creditors. In , Courbet adapted his realist style to the alpine environment, producing over 100 works focused on landscapes, including panoramic views of the mountains, sunsets over Lac Léman, and the Château de Chillon. These paintings, often executed , emphasized dramatic natural forms and atmospheric effects, such as the moody tranquility of snowy scenes like Blonay Castle in Winter (c. ). He also continued his still-life series, notably depictions of symbolizing his hunting interests, and experimented with larger-scale compositions of the lake's waves and cliffs, maintaining his commitment to direct observation despite declining health and isolation from Parisian art circles. Courbet's final years were marked by physical deterioration, exacerbated by chronic and , which limited his mobility and productivity. On December 31, 1877, he died in at age 58 from , likely resulting from his excessive drinking and ; he was buried in a local , with his heart later repatriated to France per his wishes. His Swiss period, though productive, has been historically undervalued, overshadowed by earlier scandals, yet it demonstrated resilience in capturing the raw causality of alpine light and terrain through unidealized realism.

Death and Burial

Courbet's health deteriorated during his Swiss exile, exacerbated by chronic and the stress of mounting debts from the 323,000-franc fine imposed for the Vendôme Column's destruction. He suffered from dropsy (), a condition linked to , which confined him to bed in his final months at Villa "Les Sables" in . On December 31, 1877—just one day before the first installment of his reparations payment was due—he died at age 58 from this , surrounded by family and friends including fellow artist Alfred Bruyas. His funeral took place on January 4, 1878, in , drawing over 1,000 attendees despite the winter weather and his political notoriety; speeches emphasized his artistic independence and republican ideals, with no religious ceremony per his atheist convictions. He was initially interred in the local cemetery, but in 1919, his remains were exhumed and reburied in Ornans, his birthplace, near the River in a plot purchased by admirers; the tomb bears an inscription from his writings: "Look at the shadows in my paintings, they are painted from nature." This relocation symbolized a partial rehabilitation of his legacy in , though his estate remained insolvent, with paintings sold to cover lingering debts.

Personal Life and Character

Relationships and Illegitimate Children

Gustave Courbet never married and led a private life marked by numerous romantic liaisons, though he remained discreet about personal matters. One documented relationship was with Virginie Binet, depicted alongside him in the painting Lovers in the Countryside (1844), with whom he fathered an illegitimate son, Désiré Binet, in the mid-1850s. Courbet did not publicly recognize the child. The boy Désiré is possibly portrayed in Courbet's The Wheat Sifters (1854–1855), a work featuring the artist's sisters Zoé and Juliette sifting grain in a domestic scene intended to represent rural labor. No other illegitimate children are verifiably attributed to Courbet in historical records. In the early 1860s, while in London, Courbet entered a relationship with Joanna Hiffernan, an Irish model who became a significant muse and companion for about five years. She posed for provocative works including Jo, the Beautiful Irish Girl (1865–1866) and was likely one of the figures in the erotic painting Sleep (1866). This partnership influenced his exploration of female forms in art, though it ended amid personal and professional strains.

Lifestyle, Finances, and Vices

Courbet embraced a bohemian lifestyle after arriving in around 1841, rejecting formal academic training in favor of self-directed study at the and immersion in the city's . He frequented intellectual circles, capturing the raw energy of Parisian bohemia in portraits and genre scenes inspired by popular café songs, while cultivating an image of rugged independence symbolized by his frequent pipe-smoking, as depicted in his Self-Portrait with a Pipe (1847). Financially, Courbet achieved commercial success in the and through large-scale realist works that attracted patrons, enabling a comfortable existence amid his politically charged exhibitions. However, his role in the Paris Commune's destruction of the Vendôme Column in May 1871 led to severe repercussions: in 1873, he was ordered to bear the full reconstruction cost of 323,091 francs and 68 centimes, payable in annual installments of 10,000 francs. Unable to meet these demands, his assets in were seized, prompting self-imposed to that same year to evade imprisonment for debt; he declared and resorted to producing landscapes and still lifes in exile to generate funds toward repayment, though his health declined amid ongoing financial strain. Courbet's vices included heavy alcohol consumption, which contemporaries linked to his bohemian excesses and which aggravated the that caused his death on December 31, 1877, at age 58 in , —just one day before his first major installment payment was due. Described as earthy and ambitious with a strong appetite for women, he lived combatively and narcissistically, prioritizing personal and artistic autonomy over conventional restraint.

Artistic Controversies and Criticisms

Accusations of Ugliness and Propaganda

Courbet's commitment to realism in paintings such as The Stone Breakers (1849) and A Burial at Ornans (1849–1850) provoked widespread accusations of deliberate ugliness from 19th-century critics, who objected to the unidealized portrayal of laborers and peasants. These works featured figures with coarse physical traits—bulbous noses, wrinkled skin, and unrefined postures—rendered on a grand scale typically reserved for historical or mythological subjects, which shocked Salon audiences expecting aesthetic elevation. Critics argued that such depictions prioritized vulgarity over beauty, interpreting the raw humanity as a rejection of artistic decorum rather than faithful observation. In , the mourners' somber, unadorned features, including those modeled by Courbet's sisters, drew particular ire for their perceived lack of grace and refinement, with reviewers decrying the painting's elevation of provincial life to epic proportions as an affront to taste. Similarly, was faulted for its gritty depiction of manual toil without heroic glorification, leading to claims that Courbet sought to impose an "aesthetic of the ugly" on viewers. These criticisms reflected broader resistance to realism's challenge to academic norms, where truth to nature clashed with expectations of and . Accusations of also surfaced, with detractors viewing Courbet's focus on the working classes as veiled socialist agitation amid France's post-revolutionary tensions. By granting peasants and workers narrative centrality, works like were seen as endorsing proletarian dignity over bourgeois propriety, prompting labels of ideological manipulation. Courbet countered in his 1855 exhibition catalog that his art aimed solely to represent "the real and the true," denying any propagandistic motive and insisting on empirical fidelity to lived conditions.

Erotic Paintings and Moral Outrage

In the mid-1860s, Gustave Courbet produced a series of explicitly erotic paintings commissioned by the Ottoman diplomat Halil Şerif Pasha (Khalil Bey), a Paris-based collector known for amassing provocative depictions of the female nude. These works departed sharply from the idealized, mythological nudes of academic art, instead presenting unvarnished human anatomy with realistic flesh tones, body hair, and intimate poses that emphasized sensuality and physicality. Le Sommeil (The Sleepers), completed in 1866, portrays two nude women—one with dark skin and the other lighter—entwined in post-coital slumber on a bed, their bodies overlapping in a manner suggestive of intimacy. Commissioned directly for , the painting bypassed Salon exhibition but nonetheless ignited when details reached in Courbet's hometown of Ornans, where it was denounced as indecent and emblematic of foreign moral corruption. Critics like Maxime du Camp later decried it as degrading to women and society, associating its boldness with Courbet's radical politics during the . Similarly scandalous was (The Origin of the World), also painted in 1866 for Khalil Bey, featuring a hyper-realistic view of a woman's spread thighs, , and lower torso, devoid of any narrative or allegorical context. This work's raw explicitness provoked immediate moral revulsion among those who glimpsed it, with viewers shocked by the absence of artistic and the direct confrontation with female genitalia, leading to its concealment behind curtains and exclusion from public display for over a century. The painting's realism was perceived as pornographic rather than painterly, fueling accusations that Courbet deliberately courted outrage to subvert bourgeois sensibilities on sexuality. These erotic canvases amplified Courbet's reputation as an enfant terrible, with moral outrage stemming from their perceived promotion of vice and rejection of conventional beauty standards in favor of gritty anatomical truth. While private commissions shielded them from immediate censorship, leaked knowledge and Courbet's unapologetic realism intensified attacks from conservative critics who viewed the works as symptomatic of societal decay, contrasting sharply with the sanitized nudes tolerated in official Salons. The scandals underscored Courbet's commitment to depicting life unfiltered, even at the cost of public condemnation.

Technical and Aesthetic Critiques

Courbet's painting technique emphasized direct application of paint to capture the raw texture and form of subjects, often employing a palette knife alongside brushes to build thick impasto layers that conveyed tactility and volume. In landscapes such as The Grotto of Sarrazine (c. 1869), he sculpted paint into slab-like forms mimicking rock strata, combining palette knife strokes with glazes and scraping for varied surface effects. This approach, applied rapidly in alla prima sessions without extensive retouching, rejected the polished finishes of academic art, favoring empirical observation and spontaneous vigor over refined blending. His palette included earthy tones and dense pigments, consistent across career works as confirmed by elemental analysis, enabling bold, muscular renderings in seascapes and snow scenes. Aesthetically, contemporaries lambasted Courbet's realism for its deliberate embrace of the unidealized and coarse, viewing works like The Stonebreakers (1849, destroyed 1945) and (1849–50) as depictions of ugly, lowly figures scaled to historical proportions, deriding peasants as "in frock coats" unfit for grand art. Critics such as Théophile Thoré rejected the physical turbulence and lack of elevation, labeling the style antisocial and degenerate for prioritizing mundane labor over heroic ideals. This critique stemmed from Courbet's anti-academic stance, which privileged causal fidelity to observed reality—wrinkled skin, dirtied clothing—over aesthetic harmonization, provoking accusations of ugliness in female forms and disproportionate elements like cattle in Young Ladies of the Village (1851–52). Later assessments recognized the technique's innovation in evoking sensory immediacy, with and knife work influencing Cézanne's textural experiments and modern , though variability in execution persisted, sometimes yielding uneven quality. Courbet's aesthetic defied romantic sublimity for a grounded, individualistic realism, where brush flicks suggested light on deep colors, intensifying psychological depth in daily scenes despite initial moral and visual offense. Such directness, rooted in painting from nature without preparatory drawings, underscored a causal realism that valued material truth over contrived beauty, earning praise for vitality even as it alienated purists.

Legacy and Historical Assessment

Influence on Subsequent Art Movements

Courbet's insistence on painting only what he could observe directly, eschewing mythological and historical subjects in favor of contemporary rural and working-class life, established Realism as a foundational movement that rejected Romantic and academic conventions. By exhibiting large-scale works like (1849–50) independently in 1850–51, he demonstrated the viability of depicting unvarnished social realities on canvases traditionally reserved for elevated themes, thereby challenging the Salon system's dominance. This empirical approach and scale influenced the Impressionists, who, as immediate successors, adopted Courbet's focus on modern everyday scenes while extending his plein-air methods to capture transient light effects. , for instance, drew from Courbet's unidealized figures and compositional boldness in paintings such as The Luncheon on the Grass (1863), bridging Realism to Impressionism's emphasis on perceptual immediacy; and similarly credited Courbet's landscape innovations from the 1860s for inspiring their outdoor studies of nature and urban life. Courbet's defiant independence, including his 1855 Pavilion of Realism self-organized show, modeled avant-garde autonomy that resonated with Post-Impressionists like , who emulated his thick and structural solidity in bridging to . His rhetoric of artistic freedom, articulated in the Realist Manifesto (1855), prefigured modernist breaks from tradition, impacting early twentieth-century movements through a legacy of politically charged, observation-based representation over ornamentation.

Reappraisals and Enduring Reputation

Courbet's reputation, initially marred by scandals and political associations, experienced a profound reappraisal in the , positioning him as a pivotal precursor to rather than a mere provocateur. Art historians credit his insistence on from direct —eschewing romantic idealization for empirical of everyday subjects—with laying groundwork for practices, including the Impressionists' plein-air techniques and later abstract tendencies toward objective form. This shift was evident in exhibitions and scholarship from the mid-20th century onward, where his landscapes, once secondary to his realist figure works, were reevaluated for their structural rigor and atmospheric effects, influencing artists like Cézanne in rendering natural forms without narrative embellishment. By the late 20th and early 21st centuries, reevaluations emphasized Courbet's democratization of art, challenging elitist hierarchies by elevating peasant life and unvarnished nudes to the scale of , a move seen as proto-modern in its anti-academic stance. Critics like Charlotte Eyerman have argued that his oeuvre demands not rediscovery but sustained reevaluation for its "positive, objective, and vigorous" qualities, free from ideological overtones that clouded earlier assessments tied to his Commune involvement. This perspective counters lingering academic biases toward polished , privileging Courbet's causal fidelity to observed over contrived . Courbet's enduring reputation as the progenitor of Realism persists, with major institutions like the and Metropolitan Museum housing key works such as A Burial at Ornans (1849–50) and The Stonebreakers (1849), which continue to draw scholarly analysis for their social candor and technical innovation. His influence extended into 20th-century movements, from American Regionalism to European Expressionism, where painters adopted his thick and unidealized subjects to convey . Auction records underscore this legacy; for instance, The Unexpected Meeting: From the White Stocking (1851) fetched €3.2 million at in 2012, reflecting sustained market valuation driven by his role in bridging 19th-century traditions with modern autonomy. Recent retrospectives, such as the 2014 Royal Academy exhibition, affirm his status by juxtaposing his output against successors, highlighting enduring technical prowess amid evolving tastes.

Nazi-Looted Art and Recent Restitutions

Several paintings by Gustave Courbet from Jewish-owned collections were seized by Nazi authorities during as part of systematic looting campaigns targeting art deemed valuable for resale or allocation to high-ranking officials. One such work, La Ronde Enfantine (Child's Round Dance, 1862), a depicting a forest glade, was confiscated in October 1941 from the residence of David David-Weill, a prominent French-Jewish banker and art collector whose family had acquired it in the early 20th century. The was transported to via the ERR (Einsatzstab Rosenberg) organization, inventoried under the title Waldlandschaft (Forest Landscape), and reserved for the benefit of , though he did not ultimately take possession of it. Following the Allied liberation, the artwork reemerged in through a dealer and was purchased in 1946 by British Francis W. H. Shearwood for approximately £300; upon his death in 1952, it was bequeathed to the at the , where it remained on display despite incomplete provenance documentation. In 2019, David-Weill's heirs submitted a restitution claim to the UK's Spoliation Advisory Panel, arguing that the Nazi seizure constituted without compensation or voluntary sale. The panel's investigation, detailed in a report released on March 28, 2023, affirmed the looting based on archival evidence from French, German, and Swiss records, rejecting the museum's defense that post-war acquisitions in superseded pre-war ownership rights under moral and equitable principles. accepted the recommendation, prioritizing ethical restitution over retention, and returned La Ronde Enfantine to the David-Weill family shortly thereafter, marking one of the panel's rare interventions since 2016. This case underscored gaps in interwar and wartime tracking, as the painting's path involved multiple intermediaries obscured by the chaos of occupation and displacement. Another Courbet work subject to Nazi-era dispossession, Le Grand Pont (The Great Bridge, c. 1850s), originated in the collection of German-Jewish industrialist Max Silberberg, who was forced to sell it under duress at a 1935 amid escalating persecution; it later passed to Josephine Weinmann, whose family fled in 1938, leaving assets behind. Acquired by the in 1960 from a New York gallery with obscured , the painting's Nazi-looted status was uncovered through post-1990s research initiatives, leading to a negotiated settlement in 2014 whereby Yale restituted it to the Weinmann heirs in exchange for a modest payment reflecting shared good-faith acquisition. These restitutions reflect broader post-2000 trends in art law and , driven by databases like the Art Loss Register and Washington Conference Principles (1998), which prioritize victim restitution over statutes of limitations, though challenges persist in verifying coerced sales versus outright theft. No additional Courbet restitutions have been publicly confirmed as of 2023, but ongoing audits at institutions worldwide continue to scrutinize his oeuvre for similar histories.

References

  1. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/gustave-courbet-1819-1877
  2. https://www.theartstory.org/artist/courbet-gustave/
  3. https://www.gustave-courbet.com/biography.jsp
  4. https://www.musee-orsay.fr/en/whats-on/exhibitions/presentation/courbet-and-commune
  5. https://www.thefamouspeople.com/profiles/gustave-courbet-9439.php
  6. https://parkstone.international/2024/06/11/gustave-courbet-champion-of-realism/
  7. https://en.geneastar.org/genealogy/courbet/gustave-courbet
  8. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/larger-than-life-31654689/
  9. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/11875550/jean_d%25C3%25A9sir%25C3%25A9_gustave-courbet
  10. https://musee-courbet.fr/en/the-family-farm/the-courbet-family-and-flagey/
  11. https://www.fondationbeyeler.ch/en/exhibitions/past-exhibitions/gustave-courbet
  12. https://www.institut-courbet.com/biography-courbet/
  13. https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/artists/gustave-courbet
  14. https://rehs.com/eng/bio/gustave-courbet/
  15. https://www.metmuseum.org/press-releases/gustave-courbet-radical-and-rebellious-19thcentury-artist-featured-in-retrospective-at-metropolitan-museum-2008-exhibitions
  16. https://rehs.com/eng/2024/06/gustave-courbets-revolutionary-life-in-5-paintings/
  17. https://www.musee-courbet.fr/en/welcome-to-courbet-country/who-is-gustave-courbet/
  18. https://www.artistsnetwork.com/art-history/oil-painting-gustave-courbet-the-first-realist/
  19. https://smarthistory.org/courbet-the-stonebreakers/
  20. https://artuk.org/discover/stories/gustave-courbets-realism-knowledge-made-visible
  21. https://opentextbooks.concordia.ca/creating-the-modern/chapter/1-gustave-courbet-and-revolutionary-realism/
  22. https://www.artforum.com/features/gustave-courbet-all-the-worlds-a-studio-209368/
  23. https://artincontext.org/the-stone-breakers-gustave-courbet/
  24. https://www.1st-art-gallery.com/article/revolutionary-realism-6-courbet-paintings-that-confronted-the-19th-century-status-quo/
  25. https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/view-at-ornans-france-44420
  26. https://smarthistory.org/gustave-courbet-a-burial-at-ornans/
  27. https://www.musee-orsay.fr/en/artworks/un-enterrement-ornans-924
  28. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/becoming-modern/avant-garde-france/realism/a/gustave-courbet-a-burial-at-ornans
  29. https://www.theartstory.org/movement/realism/
  30. https://www.musee-orsay.fr/en/artworks/latelier-du-peintre-927
  31. https://smarthistory.org/courbet-the-artists-studio/
  32. https://eclecticlight.co/2021/07/29/reject-gustave-courbet-the-painters-studio/
  33. https://www.automachination.com/gustave-courbet-allegory-studio/
  34. https://www.christopherpjones.medium.com/how-this-self-taught-artist-excelled-at-controversy-and-daring-9c864c493dec
  35. https://www.metmuseum.org/exhibitions/listings/2008/gustave-courbet
  36. https://www.getty.edu/publications/resources/virtuallibrary/0892368365.pdf
  37. https://thewalters.org/news/courbet/
  38. https://www.artchive.com/artwork/seacoast-1865-by-gustave-courbet/
  39. https://www.muma-lehavre.fr/en/collections/artworks-in-context/19th-century/courbet-seashore-palavas
  40. https://www.getty.edu/publications/resources/virtuallibrary/0892369272.pdf
  41. https://medium.com/counterarts/gustave-courbet-the-revolutionary-artist-338ec136e8e9
  42. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2008/10/cour-o10.html
  43. https://tribunemag.co.uk/2021/05/when-the-communards-tore-down-the-vendome
  44. https://musee-courbet.fr/en/welcome-to-courbet-country/who-is-gustave-courbet/
  45. https://1870to1918.wordpress.com/2014/02/24/gustave-courbet-and-the-vendome-column/
  46. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/269671
  47. https://bonjourparis.com/history/gustave-courbet-and-the-fall-of-the-vendome-column/
  48. https://www.napoleon.org/en/magazine/places/vendome-column/
  49. https://www.courbet.ch/en/exile-and-the-liberty/
  50. https://www.socialistparty.ie/2021/03/gustave-courbet-realism-and-the-paris-commune/
  51. https://www.gazette-drouot.com/en/article/gustave-courbet-in-exile-in-switzerland/72468
  52. https://www.clevelandart.org/art/1964.420
  53. https://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/paintings/gustave-courbet-view-of-lac-leman
  54. https://www.mfab.hu/artworks/111/
  55. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Gustave-Courbet
  56. https://www.courbet.ch/en/courbet-grave/
  57. https://www.wga.hu/html_m/c/courbet/2/courb207.html
  58. https://matthiesengallery.com/work_of_art/mother-and-child-on-a-hammock
  59. https://www.the-artinspector.com/post/gustave-courbet-the-wheat-sifters
  60. https://theartbog.com/love-story-gustave-courbet-and-joanna-hiffernan/
  61. https://medium.com/counterarts/lets-talk-about-jo-la-belle-irlandaise-by-gustave-courbet-3ed3e89ffa5a
  62. https://www.finestresullarte.info/en/ab-art-base/gustave-courbet-life-works-and-style-of-the-father-of-realism
  63. https://www.museothyssen.org/en/collection/artists/courbet-gustave
  64. https://circlesofemotion.org/vocabularies/faces/item/af232c25/faces-of-emotion
  65. https://time.com/archive/6701526/art-an-abiding-passion-for-reality-gustave-courbet/
  66. https://www.bluffton.edu/courses/humanities/art/19c/real/courbet.html
  67. https://www.culturematters.org.uk/gustave-courbet-the-working-class-becomes-the-subject-of-art/
  68. https://www.frieze.com/article/who-commissioned-19th-centurys-most-notorious-painting
  69. https://www.petitpalais.paris.fr/en/oeuvre/sleepers
  70. https://www.artnews.com/feature/gustave-courbet-controversies-origin-of-the-world-1202694408/
  71. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.9783/9781734733853-013/pdf
  72. https://newcriterion.com/dispatch/an-evening-with-michael-fried/
  73. https://wcmfa.org/french-artist-gustave-courbet-embraced-realism-and-painting-real-people/
  74. https://www.metmuseum.org/essays/nineteenth-century-french-realism
  75. http://www.visual-arts-cork.com/famous-artists/courbet.htm
  76. https://jasonkaufman.com/courbet-reconsidered/
  77. https://forward.fergusmccaffrey.com/courbets-legacy-in-the-twentieth-centuryby-charlotte-eyerman/
  78. https://artincontext.org/gustave-courbet/
  79. https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/nazi-looted-courbet-painting-fitzwilliam-museum-returned-1234662793/
  80. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/28/arts/courbet-nazi-restitution-cambridge.html
  81. https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/03/30/courbet-paintingseized-by-the-nazis-and-owned-by-a-reverendto-be-returned-to-its-original-owners
  82. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-65116330
  83. https://ial.uk.com/spoliation-advisory-panel-recommends-return-of-courbet-painting-to-original-owners/
  84. https://plone.unige.ch/art-adr/cases-affaires/le-grand-pont-2013-weinmann-heirs-and-yale-university-art-gallery
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.