Hubbry Logo
CrossbillCrossbillMain
Open search
Crossbill
Community hub
Crossbill
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Crossbill
Crossbill
Crossbill
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
This article is about the genus of birds. For the lens series, see Zeiss Loxia. For the medical condition, see torticollis.

Crossbill
Red crossbill or common crossbill (Loxia curvirostra)
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Aves
Order: Passeriformes
Family: Fringillidae
Subfamily: Carduelinae
Genus: Loxia
Linnaeus, 1758
Type species
Loxia curvirostra
Species

Loxia curvirostra
Loxia leucoptera
Loxia megaplaga
Loxia pytyopsittacus
Loxia scotia
Loxia sinesciuris
†Loxia patevi

Crossbills are birds of the genus Loxia within the finch family (Fringillidae), with six extant and one extinct species. These birds are characterized by their mandibles with crossed tips, which gives the group its English name. Adult males tend to be red or orange in color, and females green or yellow, but there is much variation.

Crossbills are specialist feeders on conifer cones, and the unusual bill shape is an adaptation which enables them to extract seeds from cones. These birds are typically found in higher northern hemisphere latitudes, where their food sources grow. They irrupt out of the breeding range when the cone crop fails. Crossbills breed very early in the year, often in winter months, to take advantage of maximum cone supplies.

Systematics and evolution

[edit]

The genus Loxia was introduced by the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus in 1758 in the 10th edition of his Systema Naturae.[1] The name is from the Ancient Greek loxos, "crosswise".[2] The Swiss naturalist Conrad Gessner had used the word Loxia for a crossbill in 1555 in his Historiae Animalium.[3] The type species was designated as Loxia curvirostra (red crossbill) by George Robert Gray in 1840.[4][5]

Analysis of mitochondrial cytochrome b sequence data indicates that the crossbills share a common ancestor with the redpoll, which diverged during the Tortonian (c. 8 mya, Late Miocene).[6] The research suggests that the genera Loxia and Carduelis might be merged into a single genus, for which the name Loxia would then have priority. But this would imply changing the name of a large number of species, and given that the adaptations of the crossbills represent a unique evolutionary path (see Evolutionary grade), it seems more appropriate to split up the genus Carduelis as it had already been done during most of the 20th century. The fossil record of Loxia is restricted to a Late Pliocene (c. 2 mya) species, Loxia patevi, found at Varshets, Bulgaria.

The species of crossbills are difficult to separate, and care is needed even with the white-winged and Hispaniolan crossbills, the easiest. The other species are identified by subtle differences in head shape and bill size, and the identification problems formerly led to much taxonomic speculation, with some scientists considering that the parrot and Scottish crossbills and possibly the Hispaniolan and white-winged crossbills are conspecific.

The identification problem is least severe in North America, where only the red, white-winged and (locally) Cassia species occur, and (possibly) the most challenging in the Scottish Highlands, where three similar-looking species breed and the two-barred (known as white-winged in North America) is a possible vagrant.

Work on vocalization in North America suggests that there are eight or nine discrete populations of red crossbill in that continent alone, which do not interbreed and are (like the named species) adapted to specialize in different conifer species. While several ornithologists seem inclined to give these forms species status, no division of the American red crossbills has yet occurred.[7] Preliminary investigations in Europe and Asia suggest an equal, if not greater, complexity, with several different call types identified;[8][9] these call types being as different from each other as from the named species of the parrot and Scottish crossbills - suggesting either that they are valid species, or else that the parrot and Scottish crossbills may not be.

Genetic research on their DNA failed to reveal any difference between any of the crossbills (including the morphologically distinct two-barred), with variation between individuals greater than any difference between the taxa. This led to the suggestion that limited interbreeding between the different types prevented significant genetic differentiation, and enabled each type to maintain a degree of morphological plasticity, which may be necessary to enable them to feed on different conifers when their preferred food species has a crop failure. Research in Scotland, however, has shown that the parrot and Scottish crossbills are reproductively isolated from each other and also from the red crossbill, despite irruption of that species into their ranges, and the diagnostic calls and bill dimensions have not been lost. They are, therefore, good species.[10]

Currently accepted species[11] and their preferred food sources are:

Image Scientific name Common name Food source Distribution of species
Loxia curvirostra Red crossbill Spruce (Picea) species; some populations (distinct species?) on various pine (Pinus) species and (in western North America) Douglas fir Eurasia, North Africa, and North America
Loxia leucoptera Two-barred crossbill Larch (Larix) species, particularly L. sibirica, L. gmelinii, L. laricina and (in North America) also hemlock (Tsuga) Eurasia and North America
Loxia megaplaga Hispaniolan crossbill Hispaniolan pine (Pinus occidentalis) Hispaniola (Haiti and the Dominican Republic)
Loxia pytyopsittacus Parrot crossbill Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) Northern, Eastern, and Central Europe
Loxia scotica Scottish crossbill Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and larch (Larix) species (particularly plantations of L. decidua) Scotland
Loxia sinesciuris Cassia crossbill Isolated population of the lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta latifolia) South Hills and Albion Mountains, Idaho, United States
†Loxia patevi Loxia patevi Unknown Fossils dated to the Late Pliocene are known from Varshets, Bulgaria

Originally, several species such as the chestnut-backed sparrow-lark (Eremopterix leucotis),[12] pine grosbeak (Pinicola enucleator) and northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis)[13] were also included in Loxia.

Feeding behavior

[edit]
Red crossbill skull and jaw anatomy from William Yarrell's A History of British Birds (1843)

The different species specialize in feeding on different conifer species, with the bill shape optimized for opening that species of conifer. This is achieved by inserting the bill between the conifer cone scales and twisting the lower mandible towards the side to which it crosses, enabling the bird to extract the seed at the bottom of the scale with its tongue.

The mechanism by which the bill-crossing is developed (which usually, but not always, occurs in a 1:1 frequency of left-crossing or right-crossing morphs), and what determines the direction, has hitherto withstood all attempts to resolve it.

It is very probable that there is a genetic basis underlying the phenomenon (young birds whose bills are still straight will give a cone-opening behavior if their bills are gently pressed, and the crossing develops before the birds are fledged and feeding independently), but at least in the red crossbill (the only species which has been somewhat thoroughly researched regarding this question) there is no straightforward mechanism of heritability.

While the direction of crossing seems to be the result of at least three genetic factors working together in a case of epistasis and most probably autosomal, it is not clear whether the 1:1 frequency of both morphs in most cases is the result of genetics or environmental selection. Populations that feed on cones without removing or twisting them will likely show a 1:1 morph distribution, no matter what the genetic basis may be: the fitness of each morph is inversely proportional to its frequency in the population. Such birds can only access the cone with the lower mandible tip pointing towards it to successfully extract seeds, and thus a too high number of birds of one morph will result in the food availability for each bird of this morph decreasing.[14]

They can utilize other conifers to their preferred, and often need to do so when their preferred species has a crop failure, but are less efficient in their feeding (not enough to prevent survival, but probably enough to reduce breeding success).

Fossil record

[edit]

Loxia patevi was described from the Late Pliocene of Varshets, Bulgaria.[15]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Crossbill

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Crossbills are small to medium-sized birds in the genus Loxia of the family Fringillidae, distinguished by their mandibles that cross at the tips, an adaptation that allows them to efficiently pry open the scales of cones to extract . These birds are specialized feeders on conifer seeds, with bills varying in size and shape among and populations to match different cone types, and they often forage in flocks while clinging to branches in a parrot-like manner. Their is typically streaked in females and juveniles, with males showing red, orange, or yellowish hues depending on diet and . The genus Loxia includes at least six recognized , reflecting a complex influenced by vocalizations, morphology, and . These comprise the widespread (L. curvirostra), which spans much of the Holarctic region; the white-winged crossbill (L. leucoptera), found in boreal forests of and ; the crossbill (L. pytyopsittacus), a larger Eurasian species; the (L. scotica), endemic to and debated as a distinct ; the Cassia crossbill (L. sinesciuris), restricted to lodgepole pine forests in , ; and the endangered Hispaniolan crossbill (L. megaplaga), confined to pine forests in and the . Within like the , distinct "call types" function as cryptic ecotypes or potential , each adapted to specific hosts and identified by unique flight calls. Crossbills inhabit coniferous forests worldwide, particularly boreal and montane regions dominated by pines, spruces, , larches, and hemlocks, where they depend on abundant crops for survival. Their distribution is dynamic due to nomadic and irruptive movements in response to fluctuating food supplies, with populations sometimes appearing far south of breeding ranges during poor northern years. Breeding occurs opportunistically year-round when food is plentiful, with females constructing cup nests in and males feeding them through incubation; clutch sizes are typically 3–4 eggs. Ecologically, crossbills play a key role in and predation in ecosystems, consuming thousands of seeds daily and influencing regeneration. They face threats from loss, affecting cone production, and competition with like red squirrels, particularly for endemic taxa such as the Cassia and Hispaniolan crossbills. Ongoing research into their vocal and continues to refine species boundaries and conservation needs.

Taxonomy

Species

The genus Loxia comprises six extant species of crossbills, all specialized finches adapted to coniferous forests and characterized by their crossed mandibles for extracting seeds from cones. These species exhibit varying degrees of variation, bill morphology, vocalizations, and habitat preferences, with distributions spanning the . The (Loxia curvirostra) is the most widespread, occurring in coniferous forests across and , where it utilizes a variety of pines, spruces, and . Males display brick-red with brown wings, while females and juveniles are streaked olive-yellow. It is known for its nomadic movements tied to cone crop availability. The two-barred crossbill (Loxia leucoptera), also called the white-winged crossbill, inhabits boreal coniferous forests of and , showing a preference for larch and hemlock stands. Distinctive white wingbars on dark wings set it apart, with males rose-pink and females greenish. Like other crossbills, it is irruptive, wandering in response to food resources. The Hispaniolan crossbill (Loxia megaplaga) is endemic to the montane pine forests of , primarily in the and , where it forages in Pinus occidentalis groves. It features a robust bill and subdued , with males showing reddish-brown tones and females duller grayish. Its restricted range makes it vulnerable to habitat loss. The parrot crossbill (Loxia pytyopsittacus) occurs in northern and , favoring mature Scots pine () woodlands for its large-coned seeds. It has a deeper, more powerful bill than the , with males brick-red and a bull-necked build. Populations are partially migratory, with irruptions southward during poor cone years. The (Loxia scotica) is confined to the Caledonian pinewoods of , utilizing remnant ancient Scots pine forests. Morphologically similar to the but with slightly larger bills on average, it shows subtle differences in calls and tones. Its limited distribution has prompted conservation focus. The Cassia crossbill (Loxia sinesciuris) is endemic to lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) forests in the South Hills of south-central Idaho, USA, occupying a tiny range of about 70 km². It resembles the red crossbill in appearance but has adapted bills for local cone types and distinct vocalizations. Sedentary behavior ties it closely to this isolated habitat. Taxonomic debates persist within the genus, particularly regarding cryptic differentiation. The Cassia crossbill was proposed as a distinct species in 2009 based on morphological, vocal, and ecological divergence from the red crossbill complex, with subsequent genetic analyses confirming . For the Scottish crossbill, ongoing uncertainty surrounds its status due to hybridization with , with some authorities questioning full species rank based on and morphological overlap. Within the , at least 12 call types suggest potential additional cryptic species, each adapted to specific hosts and exhibiting . Recent studies have also identified additional call types in the Palearctic, with up to 18 reported globally, underscoring the dynamic nature of this diversification. One extinct species, Loxia patevi, is known from Early Pleistocene fossils in Bulgaria, representing an early record of the .

Classification history

The Loxia was established by in the 10th edition of Systema Naturae in 1758, with the (L. curvirostra) designated as the , and the genus originally placed within the Fringillidae, the true finches. The parrot crossbill (L. pytyopsittacus) was also described by Linnaeus in the same work, marking an early recognition of distinct European species within the genus. During the 19th and 20th centuries, taxonomic debates arose regarding potential mergers of Loxia with the genus Carduelis, driven by morphological similarities among cardueline finches, though such proposals were ultimately rejected in favor of maintaining Loxia as a distinct based on bill structure and ecological specializations. Post-2000 genetic studies, including mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analyses, have confirmed the of Loxia within the Carduelinae of Fringillidae, with its closest relatives including genera such as Acanthis and Spinus, reflecting an linked to conifer seed exploitation across host . These investigations highlight the genus's phylogenetic position as a specialized within the , distinct from polyphyletic groups like Carduelis. Modern developments include the recognition of cryptic driven by vocalizations, with the exhibiting at least 10 to 12 distinct call types that correspond to ecological variants and contribute to , as detailed in foundational work by Groth (1993) and subsequent refinements identifying up to 12 types in . A key outcome was the 2017 elevation of one such variant, the Cassia crossbill (L. sinesciuris), to full status by the , based on genetic distinctiveness, unique vocalizations, and isolation in Idaho's lodgepole pine forests, supported by research from Benkman (2009) through genomic analyses up to 2021 confirming its relative to other L. curvirostra types. This split, the first from the complex, underscores the role of vocal and genetic data in resolving Loxia's , now comprising six extant .

Description

Plumage and morphology

Crossbills (genus Loxia) exhibit moderate size variation across species, with overall lengths ranging from 14 to 20 cm, wingspans of 25 to 30 cm, and weights between 25 and 50 g. The Parrot Crossbill (L. pytyopsittacus) is the largest, measuring 16 to 18 cm in length and weighing 44 to 69 g, while the White-winged Crossbill (L. leucoptera) is the smallest at 15 to 17 cm long and 24 to 26 g. This stocky build, characterized by a large head, short tail, and strong legs adapted for perching on conifer branches, is consistent across the genus and supports their arboreal lifestyle. Adult male crossbills display brick-red to orange , with redder tones predominant in the (L. curvirostra) and yellower hues in the White-winged Crossbill. Females exhibit more subdued dull olive-green or yellowish , providing in coniferous forests, while juveniles are heavily streaked with brown and develop their characteristic crossed bills early in life. is pronounced in adults, with males showing brighter coloration than females; the White-winged Crossbill additionally features two bold white wing bars, a diagnostic trait for identification. Crossbills undergo two molts annually, with breeding appearing brighter due to wear and replacement, enhancing display during the reproductive season. This dimorphic plumage pattern persists into adulthood, though juveniles may show early signs of sexual differences in body feathering.

Bill structure

The bill of crossbills features distinctive crossed s, in which the tips of the lower and upper bills overlap in the vertical plane, with the lower mandible curving either to the left or right of the upper one. Approximately 50% of individuals exhibit left-over-right crossing, and 50% show right-over-left crossing, forming a balanced polymorphism that enhances foraging efficiency on cones. The inward-curving tips act as levers, allowing the mandibles to separate tightly closed cone scales. Bill depth varies among to match cone types; for instance, the Parrot Crossbill (Loxia pytyopsittacus) possesses a deeper, more robust bill (average depth ~11 mm) suited to the thicker scales of cones (Pinus spp.), compared to the shallower bill of the White-winged Crossbill (L. leucoptera, average depth 8.1 mm). The crossing of the mandibles develops during the nestling stage, typically beginning around 3–4 weeks of age as young birds start prying at cones under parental guidance. Nestlings hatch with straight, conical bills that gradually twist through repeated use, achieving full crossing by about 30 days post-hatching, shortly after fledging at 15–25 days. The direction of crossing is fixed early in this process with no post-hatching plasticity, though the underlying mechanism remains debated: some evidence supports a genetic basis involving simple dominance models, while other studies find no significant and suggest nongenetic developmental responses to environmental cues like cone orientation during feeding practice. Compared to other finches, crossbill bills are notably thicker and more decurved, with greater depth and width enabling higher biting force for scale separation (e.g., average depth 9.6 mm vs. White-winged Crossbill 8.1 mm). This structure is supported by specialized anatomy, including robust jaw adductor muscles that generate powerful closing force and a longer (relative to bill length ~1.00 in ) for extracting seeds after prying. The rhamphotheca (horny sheath) provides durability against abrasive cone resins during prolonged . Morphological variations in bill depth and shape correlate with vocal "call types" in the Red Crossbill (L. curvirostra), reflecting adaptations to specific ; for example, Type 8 individuals have shallower bills (average depth ~8.5 mm) optimized for the thin-scaled cones of black spruce (), while Type 2 birds exhibit deeper bills for larger-scaled (Pinus ponderosa). These differences, often subtle (e.g., 0.5–1 mm in depth), influence rates and contribute to ecological specialization among types.

Distribution and habitat

Geographic range

Crossbills (genus Loxia) are primarily distributed across the , ranging from approximately 30°N latitude northward to the , with their core populations centered in boreal forest regions of and ; they are absent from southern continents such as , south of the , , and . One exception is the Hispaniolan crossbill (L. megaplaga), which occurs at lower latitudes around 19°N. The (L. curvirostra) has the broadest distribution, spanning from to eastern and , (including ), and from and southward to and the . The white-winged crossbill (L. leucoptera) occupies across the Palearctic from to eastern and , as well as northern , including , , and the across both eastern and western regions. The parrot crossbill (L. pytyopsittacus) is more restricted to northern and northeastern , primarily in (Norway, ) and western , with scattered records in . The (L. scotica) is endemic to , confined to remnant Caledonian pine forests in the Highlands, particularly in the eastern and northwestern regions. The Hispaniolan crossbill (L. megaplaga) is restricted to pine forests on the island of , shared by and the . The Cassia crossbill (L. sinesciuris) has an extremely limited range, occurring only in lodgepole pine forests of the South Hills and Albion Mountains in south-central , USA, encompassing approximately 70 km². Crossbills expanded their ranges post-glacially from refugia during the Pleistocene, with genetic evidence indicating fragmentation and diversification as forests recolonized northern latitudes after the . Fossil records from the Pleistocene reveal broader distributions than today, including occurrences in where suitable habitats were more extensive during glacial periods. No established introduced populations of crossbills are confirmed globally, though have been recorded outside their native ranges, such as and crossbills in and various species sporadically in the .

Habitat requirements

Crossbills are primarily dependent on mature coniferous forests characterized by closed-canopy stands of (Picea), (Pinus), (Abies), (Larix), and hemlock (Tsuga), where abundant seed-bearing cones provide essential food resources. These habitats feature trees that produce heavy cone crops, typically in upland or boreal regions with moderate canopy density to allow access. Crossbills generally avoid woodlands, open young regrowth, or heavily disturbed areas lacking mature cone production. Habitat preferences vary by species, reflecting specialized adaptations to specific conifer types. The common crossbill (Loxia curvirostra) is versatile, occupying a broad range of conifer-dominated forests including spruce, pine, and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) stands. In contrast, the white-winged crossbill (L. leucoptera) favors habitats dominated by larch and spruce, particularly tamarack (Larix laricina) in boreal settings. The South Hills crossbill (L. sinesciuris) is highly specialized, restricted to lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) forests in isolated mountain ranges. Similarly, the Hispaniolan crossbill (L. megaplaga) occurs exclusively in high-elevation forests of Hispaniolan pine (Pinus occidentalis). Microhabitat requirements center on structural features that support nesting and . Crossbills nest in the upper branches of trees, often in dense foliage for , and forage preferentially in cone-laden crowns of mature individuals. These birds are sensitive to alterations in cone production cycles, which can disrupt suitability in forests subject to natural disturbances like or human interventions such as . Altitudinally, crossbills occupy elevations from in coastal zones to the treeline, with examples including up to 2,400 m in the for L. curvirostra and 540–2,600 m for L. megaplaga in montane forests.

Behavior and

Feeding adaptations

Crossbills utilize a distinctive technique adapted for extracting seeds from . Typically perching on the cone or a nearby branch, a grasps the cone with one foot and inserts the crossed tips of its between adjacent scales. The lower mandible braces against the base of a scale while the upper mandible levers it upward, creating access for the to flick out the seed; the , or , is then discarded. This efficient process allows birds to handle one scale every 1–3 seconds, enabling rapid consumption during periods of abundance. The diet of crossbills is dominated by seeds, which can comprise over 90% of their intake in winter, drawn primarily from species in genera such as Pinus (pines) and Picea (spruces). In summer, they supplement this with , tree buds, and occasionally seeds from deciduous trees like or to meet nutritional needs during breeding. To fulfill requirements, particularly sodium, crossbills frequently ingest grit or from roadsides or exposed banks, aiding both digestion and electrolyte balance. Several physiological and behavioral adaptations optimize crossbill feeding on resinous conifer seeds. Bill depth varies among populations or "call types" to match the thickness of cone scales in preferred tree —for example, shallower bills suit thin-scaled spruces, while deeper bills handle thicker scales on Douglas-fir or pines, enhancing prying efficiency. Grit ingestion supports mechanical breakdown of tough seed coats and husks in the , while flocks facilitate collective assessment of cone quality through vocalizations, allowing to target high-yield trees and boost overall success. Daily seed intake ranges from hundreds to up to 3,000 per bird, varying with seed size, cone crop abundance, and ; intake shifts toward supplemental foods when primary conifer resources decline.

Breeding biology

Crossbills exhibit opportunistic breeding strongly tied to the availability of seeds, allowing them to reproduce year-round in regions with abundant food resources, though breeding most commonly peaks in late winter to early spring (December to April) or late summer to early autumn ( to ) when cone crops are at their height. This flexibility enables pairs to initiate nesting as soon as sufficient seeds are accessible, with juveniles reaching in just a few months and potentially breeding in their first year. In areas with irregular cone production, such as northern coniferous forests, breeding synchronizes with mast years of abundance, often leading to loose colonies where multiple pairs nest in proximity to shared food sources. Nests are typically cup-shaped structures constructed primarily by the female using twigs, conifer needles, grasses, lichens, and , lined with finer materials like feathers, , or roots, and placed 3-15 meters above ground in the upper branches of , often near the trunk for protection. Clutch sizes generally range from 3-5 eggs, though 2-6 is possible, which are laid daily and are whitish to pale green with reddish or dark spots concentrated at the larger end. Incubation lasts 12-16 days and is performed almost exclusively by the female, who may brood continuously in cold weather; the male supports her by delivering regurgitated seeds to the nest, a that underscores the monogamous maintained throughout the year. Nestlings are altricial, hatching helpless and sparsely down-covered after about two weeks of incubation, and remain in the nest for 15-25 days before fledging, during which both parents provision them with conifer seeds pried from cones using their specialized bills. Males often take a primary role in feeding and guarding the fledglings post-departure, while females may initiate a second or even third brood if food remains plentiful, allowing annual productivity of up to 2-3 successful nests per pair in optimal conditions. This biparental care system enhances offspring survival in harsh, variable environments, with males also defending small territories around the nest site to secure seed supplies.

Movement patterns

Crossbills in the genus Loxia are primarily non-migratory residents that exhibit nomadic wandering patterns, irregularly dispersing within and beyond coniferous forests in response to fluctuating food resources. Unlike true migrants with fixed routes, these birds track variable conifer seed crops, often moving unpredictably across boreal and montane habitats without seasonal consistency. Irruptive movements occur every 2–10 years, triggered by widespread cone crop failures in northern breeding areas, which prompt large-scale southward displacements. These irruptions involve birds leaving core ranges en masse, sometimes appearing hundreds of kilometers from typical haunts and utilizing alternative food sources like seeds. Notable examples include the 2020–2021 irruption across , driven by poor yields following mast failures, and outbreaks in during the early 2020s, particularly in 2024, linked to deficient Norway spruce (Picea abies) production. A notable irruption occurred in 2025 across and parts of , driven by variable seed production, with flocks observed as far south as the northern U.S. states (as of November 2025). During nomadic and irruptive phases, crossbills travel in flocks typically numbering 10–100 individuals, with larger congregations up to thousands during peak events, as they follow maturing cone crops from summer to winter. Most species, such as the red crossbill (L. curvirostra) and white-winged crossbill (L. leucoptera), show strong nomadism, but exceptions exist; the Cassia crossbill (L. sinesciuris) remains largely resident and non-nomadic within its limited Idaho range, tied to lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) abundance. Vagrant individuals occasionally reach subtropical regions, with records of L. curvirostra in Central America during irruptions. Seed shortages from uneven mast years—periods of synchronized high conifer production followed by scarcity—primarily drive these movements, with birds responding to local depletions by relocating to areas of surplus. Navigation relies on flock cohesion maintained through contact calls and orientation via visual landmarks, rather than celestial cues or fixed pathways common in obligate migrants. Historical irruption cycles align with multi-year mast fluctuations in boreal forests, but climate change is altering these dynamics by increasing variability in seed production and winter conditions, potentially raising irruption frequency.

Vocalizations

Crossbills produce a range of vocalizations, with flight calls being the most distinctive and frequently heard. These calls, often described as a series of sharp "jip-jip" notes, vary significantly among species and ecotypes, serving as key diagnostic traits for identification. In the Red Crossbill (Loxia curvirostra), at least 12 discrete call types have been documented in North America as of 2025, each tied to specific foraging adaptations and conifer seed sources; for instance, Type 1 features a clear, downslurred "jip" associated with tamarack (Larix laricina) specialists, with up to 18 recognized in the Palearctic. The Parrot Crossbill (Loxia pytyopsittacus) exhibits deeper, more resonant "chip-chip" calls, which contrast with the higher-pitched variants of the Red Crossbill and aid in distinguishing cryptic species during field observations. These flight calls function primarily to maintain flock cohesion during nomadic movements and irruptions, while also promoting assortative mating by attracting conspecifics of matching vocal types. Male crossbills deliver consisting of variable warbling phrases, typically from elevated perches, which are notably simpler and less complex than those of many other finches in the Fringillidae family. These , comprising short series of chirps and trills lasting 2–5 seconds, play a central role in territorial proclamation and rituals during the breeding period. Vocal development in crossbills involves early learning, where juveniles imitate adult calls and within family groups, yet the discrete nature of suggests underlying genetic predispositions that constrain learning to specific types rather than arbitrary dialects. Recent recording studies, utilizing spectrographic of thousands of audio samples, have solidified the recognition of at least 12 call types in Red Crossbills across and up to 18 in the Palearctic as of 2025, confirming their stability without regional dialects and emphasizing their utility in delineating ecotypes. These analyses reveal no significant cultural divergence within types, supporting the hypothesis that vocal consistency reinforces among ecotypes during breeding and irruptive flocking events.

Conservation

Population status

The population status of crossbill species varies widely, with most exhibiting large but fluctuating abundances due to their irruptive nature and dependence on seed crops. The common crossbill (Loxia curvirostra) maintains a global estimated at 30–48 million mature individuals, with approximately 9.6 million mature individuals in alone (Partners in Flight 2024); overall, it is decreasing, with regional declines noted. The white-winged crossbill (L. leucoptera) has a global breeding of around 79 million (Partners in Flight), though numbers fluctuate dramatically year to year, numbering in the millions during peak irruptions. The parrot crossbill (L. pytyopsittacus) supports a global estimate of 416,000 to 957,000 mature individuals ( 2018), primarily concentrated in with 56,000 to 190,000 breeding pairs. Rarer taxa face greater risks. The Scottish crossbill (L. scotica), endemic to the Caledonian pine forests of , has a total population of 8,100 to 22,700 mature individuals (2021) with an unknown trend and is classified as Amber (medium concern) on the UK Red List due to its small range and habitat pressures. The Hispaniolan crossbill (L. megaplaga), restricted to pine forests on , numbers 1,000–3,375 individuals (surveys 1996–1999) and is listed as Endangered globally. The Cassia crossbill (L. sinesciuris), endemic to two isolated mountain ranges in southern , has an estimated population of 5,800 individuals in 2016 (95% confidence interval: 3,100–11,000), with indications of subsequent decline (e.g., ~500 fewer by 2021 and potential halving from fire events as of 2025); it is stable but vulnerable due to isolation, has not been formally assessed by IUCN, but warrants Near Threatened status. According to IUCN assessments (various dates, e.g., 2024–2025 via ), most crossbill species are categorized as Least Concern (L. curvirostra, L. leucoptera, L. pytyopsittacus, L. scotica globally), reflecting their extensive ranges, while L. megaplaga is Endangered. trends show declines of 20–50% over the past 50 years in parts of and for several species, driven by loss, though irruptive movements often obscure local population crashes. Monitoring efforts, including eBird submissions and breeding bird atlases, increasingly track vocal call types to distinguish cryptic populations and assess trends more accurately.

Major threats

Crossbills face several major threats from anthropogenic activities and environmental changes that disrupt their specialized dependence on conifer seeds. Habitat loss and degradation, primarily through logging of old-growth conifer forests, significantly impact populations reliant on mature trees with abundant cones. For instance, the Scottish crossbill (Loxia scotica) is particularly vulnerable to the loss of Caledonian pine woodlands in Scotland, where commercial forestry practices, including felling and replacement with non-native conifers, have reduced suitable habitat from approximately 15,000 km² to just 160 km² over millennia. Fire suppression in conifer-dominated ecosystems further exacerbates this by favoring younger forests with fewer serotinous cones, limiting seed availability; this is a key concern for the Cassia crossbill (L. sinesciuris) in Idaho's lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) stands, where exclusion of natural fires hinders forest regeneration essential for cone production, compounded by increased fire risks and bark beetle outbreaks under climate stress as of 2025. Climate change poses an escalating risk by altering production cycles and causing mismatches between crossbill ranges and food resources. Warmer winters and higher spring temperatures can disrupt masting events—the synchronized, heavy production critical for crossbill survival—leading to irregular crops and potential during breeding seasons. For the Cassia crossbill, models indicate that premature opening due to elevated temperatures reduces long-term stores, with projections suggesting substantial population declines, potentially up to 80% in severe scenarios by the end of the century as lodgepole pines become unsuitable. Range shifts driven by warming may further isolate populations, as seen in potential northward movements that outpace adaptations. Introduced species and ecological interactions add to these pressures. Competition for cones from invasive squirrels, such as gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) in parts of the (affecting subspecies) and introduced American red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) in Newfoundland (affecting the percna subspecies of L. curvirostra), reduces seed availability; in , native red squirrels compete with L. scotica, removing 64–96% of cones during poor crop years in some areas. Hybridization with closely related , such as between L. scotica and L. curvirostra, complicates identification and may dilute genetic distinctiveness in overlapping ranges, though the full extent remains understudied amid ongoing taxonomic debate. Pesticides indirectly threaten crossbills by diminishing populations, which serve as a supplementary food source, particularly for fledglings during summer. Species-specific threats highlight the vulnerability of endemic taxa. The Cassia crossbill suffers from fire exclusion policies in that prevent lodgepole pine renewal, compounded by bark beetle outbreaks intensified by climate stress. Similarly, the Hispaniolan crossbill (L. megaplaga) is imperiled by in Haiti's pine forests, where loss from and uncontrolled fires has reduced pine cover dramatically, threatening local persistence. These factors collectively contribute to observed population declines across crossbill taxa, underscoring the need for targeted management.

Fossil record and evolution

Known fossils

The earliest known fossil record of the genus Loxia is represented by L. patevi, an extinct species described from five bone fragments (including a humerus, tibiotarsus, and ulna) recovered from unconsolidated terra rossa sediments at the Ponor site near Varshets in northwestern Bulgaria. This find dates to the Middle Villafranchian stage of the Early Pleistocene, approximately 2.2 million years ago (MN 17 biozone), and predates all other Loxia records, with the species showing morphological similarities to the modern common crossbill (L. curvirostra) but distinguished by narrower bone features such as a less constricted humeral condylus ventralis. No pre-Pleistocene fossils of the genus have been identified, establishing L. patevi as the basal record in the Western Palearctic, though molecular estimates suggest the lineage diverged from other finches around 7–10 million years ago in the late Miocene. Pleistocene fossils of L. curvirostra are documented from multiple sites across and , indicating broader historical distributions than those of extant populations. In , remains attributed to L. curvirostra have been reported from localities associated with -dominated woodland environments during glacial periods. In and the , approximately 30 fossil records of Loxia (predominantly L. curvirostra-type) span the Middle and , with key sites including Stranska Skala (, Middle Pleistocene), Tornewton Cave (, Middle to ), Arene Candide (, ), and Hayonim Cave (, ). These European finds, concentrated in southern refugia during glacial maxima (e.g., Würmian stage, ~115,000–11,700 years ago), suggest persistent populations in Mediterranean and Near Eastern forests amid northern range contractions. Additional notable records include fossils of the Hispaniolan crossbill (L. megaplaga) from Abaco Island in , comprising eight specimens (e.g., mandibles and humeri) dated to approximately 15,000–9,000 years ago, preserved in pellet accumulations within a dry . These birds were likely extirpated from following post-glacial sea-level rise, which fragmented island habitats and reduced available woodlands by up to 80%; however, the identification as a resident population of L. megaplaga has been contested, with some researchers suggesting the fossils represent vagrant red crossbills (L. curvirostra). Across all known Loxia sites, preservation is dominated by skeletal elements such as long bones and mandibles, with intact bills being rare due to taphonomic biases in and sediment deposits; this fragmentary record nonetheless points to historically wider ranges, including now-extinct northern and insular populations tied to Pleistocene expansions.

Evolutionary adaptations

Crossbills (genus Loxia) exhibit a long history of with hosts, where adaptations in bill morphology have closely tracked evolutionary changes in and scale structures. This reciprocal selection pressure, evident since the when crossbills first diverged as a lineage specialized for extraction, has driven the development of bills optimized for prying apart tightly closed scales in various species. For instance, the Cassia crossbill (L. sinesciuris) has specialized on Rocky Mountain lodgepole (Pinus contorta latifolia), with its bill morphology allowing efficient extraction from with relatively thin scales, exerting selective pressure that favors tighter closure in response. Speciation in crossbills often occurs rapidly and cryptically, driven by ecological specialization on specific resources in isolated habitats, leading to divergence in bill morphs and call types that promote . The South Hills crossbill (L. sinesciuris), for example, has diverged from other (L. curvirostra) populations in as little as 6,000 years through ecological , where selection for lodgepole pine cone has resulted in distinct bill shapes and vocalizations that limit interbreeding. This exemplifies ecological without complete geographic isolation, as divergent on efficiency overrides . Genetic studies reveal that based on learned call variants is a key mechanism maintaining divergence among crossbill types, with low between morphs despite potential for secondary contact. Pleistocene glaciations played a pivotal role in this diversification, as repeated contractions forced populations into southern refugia, where isolation and localized selection on varying resources accelerated adaptive radiations upon post-glacial recolonization. Beyond direct adaptations, crossbills potentially influence evolution by aiding secondary through dropped or uneaten seeds during , though this effect is secondary to predation pressure from competitors like . Ongoing evolution is evident in responses to contemporary shifts, such as altered cone serotiny and seed release timing, which may drive further bill or behavioral adjustments or heighten risk for specialized taxa like the Cassia crossbill.

References

  1. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/redcro/cur/introduction
  2. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/redcro/cur/foodhabits
  3. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Red_Crossbill/id
  4. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/redcro/cur/systematics
  5. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/whwcro/cur/introduction
  6. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/redcro9/cur/introduction
  7. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/hiscro/cur/introduction
  8. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/news/crossbills-of-north-america-and-red-crossbill-call-types/
  9. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Red_Crossbill/overview
  10. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/White-winged_Crossbill/lifehistory
  11. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/news/north-american-red-crossbill-types-status-and-flight-call-identification/
  12. https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/10410-Loxia
  13. https://ebird.org/news/crossbills-of-north-america-species-and-red-crossbill-call-types
  14. https://ebird.org/species/redcro
  15. https://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/red-crossbill
  16. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/whwcro/cur/habitat
  17. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/White-winged_Crossbill/overview
  18. https://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/white-winged-crossbill
  19. https://ebird.org/species/hiscro
  20. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/hiscro/cur/appearance
  21. https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/parrot-crossbill-loxia-pytyopsittacus
  22. https://ebird.org/species/parcro2
  23. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/parcro2/cur/introduction
  24. https://ebird.org/species/scocro1
  25. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/scocro1/cur/introduction
  26. https://www.bto.org/learn/about-birds/birdfacts/scottish-crossbill
  27. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Cassia_Crossbill/overview
  28. https://ebird.org/species/redcro9
  29. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1474-919X.2002.00064.x
  30. https://ebird.org/news/recrtype/
  31. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/bird-science/articles/10.3389/fbirs.2024.1363995/full
  32. https://avesrares.wordpress.com/2024/11/25/crossbill-call-types-in-the-palearctic-a-birder's-perspective-update-eastern-palearctic-call-types-distribution-areas-and-drivers-of-differentiation/
  33. http://e-ecodb.bas.bg/zb/sci/125_boev_1999_loxia_patevi.pdf
  34. https://www.mindat.org/taxon-2494154.html
  35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790308005174
  36. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19027082/
  37. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/White-winged_Crossbill/id
  38. https://www.rspb.org.uk/birds-and-wildlife/crossbill
  39. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/redcro/cur/appearance
  40. https://www.oiseaux.net/birds/red.crossbill.html
  41. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03078698.2011.587253
  42. https://flatheadaudubon.org/bird-of-the-month/red-crossbill/
  43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230703522_Sexually_dimorphic_body_plumage_in_juvenile_Crossbills
  44. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01239352
  45. https://www.uwyo.edu/benkman/pdfs%20of%20papers/benkman_1987_wilsonbull.pdf
  46. https://www.audubon.org/news/when-does-crossbills-beak-get-twisted
  47. https://ebird.org/atlasny/news/species-spotlight-red-crossbill
  48. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=22371&context=auk
  49. https://pure.knaw.nl/ws/files/469590/Edelaar_ea_3754.pdf
  50. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/2937103
  51. https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/red-crossbill-loxia-curvirostra
  52. https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Loxia_curvirostra/
  53. https://animalia.bio/two-barred-crossbill
  54. https://www.bto.org/learn/about-birds/birdfacts/parrot-crossbill
  55. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bird-conservation-international/article/first-survey-of-the-global-population-size-and-distribution-of-the-scottish-crossbill-loxia-scotica/63E0BB20C67FAF723BC6F4995274E348
  56. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/hiscro/cur/distribution
  57. https://bioone.org/journals/ornithological-applications/volume-120/issue-3/CONDOR-17-257.1/Habitat-associations-and-abundance-of-a-range-restricted-specialist-the/10.1650/CONDOR-17-257.1.full
  58. https://pimedelaar.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Bjorklund-et-al.-2013-the-genetic-structure-of-crossbills-BJLS.pdf
  59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301215474_Earliest_finds_of_crossbills_genus_Loxia_Aves_Fringillidae_from_Varshets_NW_Bulgaria
  60. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/redcro/cur/habitat
  61. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=2211
  62. https://wgfd.wyo.gov/media/7652/download?inline
  63. https://www.birdsofpei.info/p/white-winged-crossbill.html
  64. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/redcro9/cur/habitat
  65. https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/hispaniolan-crossbill-loxia-megaplaga
  66. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/hiscro/cur/habitat
  67. https://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/virtual_sara/files/cosewic/sr_red_crossbill_e.pdf
  68. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Red_Crossbill/lifehistory
  69. https://academy.allaboutbirds.org/white-winged-crossbill-foraging-adaptation/
  70. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/redcro/cur/movement
  71. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/whwcro/cur/movement
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11837231/
  73. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ibi.13328
  74. https://finchnetwork.org/the-irruption-of-2020-21-comes-to-a-close-in-the-west
  75. https://finchnetwork.org/winter-finch-forecast-2025-2026
  76. https://www.audubon.org/magazine/buckle-birders-winter-looking-finchy
  77. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1418414112
  78. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10336-024-02173-0
  79. https://finchnetwork.org/red-crossbill-loxia-curvirostra
  80. https://avesrares.wordpress.com/2024/11/25/crossbill-call-types-in-the-palearctic-a-birders-perspective-update-eastern-palearctic-call-types-distribution-areas-and-drivers-of-differentiation/
  81. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3441086/
  82. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/redcro/cur/sounds
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6191197/
  84. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ibi.13253
  85. https://birdfact.com/birds/parrot-crossbill
  86. https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/scottish-crossbill-loxia-scotica
  87. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/hiscro/1.0/demography
  88. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/redcro9/cur/demography
  89. https://blog.nature.org/2025/10/06/a-search-for-the-cassia-crossbill-idahos-endemic-bird/
  90. https://www.fs.usda.gov/media/248129
  91. https://mnbirdatlas.org/species/red-crossbill/
  92. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01918.x
  93. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Cassia_Crossbill/lifehistory
  94. https://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/virtual_sara/files/public/RedCrossbillPercnaSubspecies.pdf
  95. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/redcro/cur/conservation
  96. https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/hiscro/cur/conservation
  97. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298436983_Crossbill_genus_Loxia_evolution_in_the_West_Palearctic_-_a_look_at_the_fossil_evidence
  98. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1707660114
  99. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1716928114
  100. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1717497114
  101. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047248422001695
  102. https://bioone.org/journals/ornithological-applications/volume-111/issue-1/cond.2009.080042/A-New-Species-of-the-Red-Crossbill-Fringillidae--Loxia/10.1525/cond.2009.080042.full
  103. https://www.unr.edu/nevada-today/news/2016/new-bird-species
  104. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2019.0761
  105. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17273981/
  106. https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.03798.x
  107. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235443966_The_genetic_structure_of_crossbills_suggests_rapid_diversification_with_little_niche_conservatism
  108. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226889576_Diversifying_Coevolution_between_Crossbills_and_Conifers
  109. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27860509/
  110. https://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/blog/will-climate-change-drive-a-new-species-of-crossbill-to-extinction/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.