Hubbry Logo
Deep Sea Drilling ProjectDeep Sea Drilling ProjectMain
Open search
Deep Sea Drilling Project
Community hub
Deep Sea Drilling Project
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Deep Sea Drilling Project
Deep Sea Drilling Project
Deep Sea Drilling Project
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Glomar Challenger

The Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) was an ocean drilling project operated from 1968 to 1983. The program was a success, as evidenced by the data and publications that have resulted from it. The data are now hosted by Texas A&M University, although the program was coordinated by the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California, San Diego. DSDP provided crucial data to support the seafloor spreading hypothesis and helped to prove the theory of plate tectonics. DSDP was the first of three international scientific ocean drilling programs that have operated over more than 40 years. It was followed by the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) in 1985, the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program in 2004 and the present International Ocean Discovery Program in 2013.[1]

History

[edit]
See also: Project Mohole

The initial contract between the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Regents of the University of California was signed on June 24, 1966. This contract initiated the first phase of the DSDP, which was based in Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California, San Diego. Global Marine, Inc. conducted the drilling operations. The Levingston Shipbuilding Company laid the keel of the Glomar Challenger on October 18, 1967, in Orange, Texas.[2] It sailed down the Sabine River to the Gulf of Mexico, and after a period of testing, DSDP accepted the ship on August 11, 1968.[1]

Through contracts with Joint Oceanographic Institutions (JOI), NSF supported the scientific advisory structure for the project and funded pre-drilling geophysical site surveys. Scientific planning was conducted under the auspices of the Joint Oceanographic Institutions for Deep Earth Sampling (JOIDES). The JOIDES advisory group consisted of 250 distinguished scientists from academic institutions, government agencies, and private industry from all over the world. Over the next 30 months, the second phase consisted of drilling and coring in the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Ocean as well as the Mediterranean and Red Sea. Technical and scientific reports followed during the period. The second phase of DSDP ended on August 11, 1972.[3]

The success of the Glomar Challenger was almost immediate. On one of the sites with a water depth of 1,067 m (3,501 feet), core samples revealed the existence of salt domes. Oil companies received samples after an agreement to publish their analysis. The potential of oil beneath deep ocean salt domes remains an important avenue for commercial development today.[4][1]

As for the purpose of the scientific exploration, one of the most important discoveries was made when the crew drilled 17 holes at 10 different locations along an oceanic ridge between South America and Africa. The retrieved core samples provided strong proof for continental drift and seafloor renewal at rift zones.[5] This confirmation of Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift strengthened the proposal of a single, ancient land mass, which is called Pangaea. The samples gave further evidence to support the plate tectonics theory, which at the time attempted to explain the formation of mountain ranges, earthquakes, and oceanic trenches.[6] Another discovery was how youthful the ocean floor is in comparison to Earth's geologic history. After analysis of samples, scientists concluded that the ocean floor is probably no older than 200 million years.[7][1] This is in comparison with the 4.5 billion-year age of the Earth.

The International Phase of Ocean Drilling (IPOD) began in 1975 with the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and France joining the United States in field work aboard the Glomar Challenger and in post-cruise scientific research.[8] The Glomar Challenger docked for the last time with DSDP in November 1983. Parts of the ship, such as its dynamic positioning system, engine telegraph, and thruster console, are stored at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C. With the advent of larger and more advanced drilling ships, the JOIDES Resolution replaced the Glomar Challenger in January 1985. The new program, called the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP), continued exploration from 1985 to 2003, at which point it was replaced by the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP).[1]

Coring operations

[edit]

Although itself a remarkable engineering accomplishment, the Glomar Challenger saw many advances in deep-ocean drilling. One problem solved involved the replacement of worn drill bits.[2] A length of pipe suspended from the ship down to the bottom of the sea might have been as long as 6,243 m (20,483 feet). The maximum depth penetrated through the ocean bottom could have been as great as 1,299 m (4,262 feet). To replace the bit, the drill string must be raised, a new bit attached, and the string remade down to the bottom. However, the crew had to thread this string back into the same drill hole. The technique for this formidable task was accomplished on June 14, 1970, in the Atlantic Ocean in 3,000 m (10,000 feet) of water off the coast of New York. This re-entry was accomplished with the use of sonar scanning equipment and a re-entry cone that had a diameter of 5 m (16 feet) and height of 4.5 m (14 feet).[2]

One major technological advance was the extended use of the holes after drilling.[9] Geophysical and geochemical measurements were made during and after drilling, and occasionally long-term seismic monitoring devices were installed in the holes. This extended understanding of the dynamic processes involved in plate tectonics. Another technological advance involved the introduction of the hydraulic piston corer (HPC[10]) in 1979, which permitted the recovery of virtually undisturbed cores of sediment.[11] This greatly enhanced the ability of scientists to study ancient ocean environments.

From August 11, 1968, to November 11, 1983, the Glomar Challenger achieved the following accomplishments:

Total distance penetrated below the seafloor 325,548 m (1,068,071 feet)
Total interval cored 170,043 m (557,884 feet)
Total core recovered and stored 97,056 m (318,425 feet)
Overall core recovery 57%
Number of cores recovered 19,119
Number of sites investigated 624
Number of expeditions completed 96
Deepest penetration beneath the ocean floor 1,741 m (5,712 feet)
Maximum penetration into basaltic crust 1,080 m (3,540 feet)
Deepest water 7,044 m (23,110 feet)
Total distance traveled 375,632 nautical miles (695,670 km)

Core samples, publications, and data

[edit]

The ship retrieved core samples in 9-meter-long (30 ft) cores with a diameter of 6.5 cm (2.5 inches). These cores are currently stored at three repositories in the US, Germany, and Japan. One half of each core is called the archive half and is preserved for future use. The working half of each core is used to provide samples for ongoing scientific research.[9]

The scientific results were published as the "Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project", which contains the results of studies of the recovered core material and the associated geophysical information from the expeditions from 1968 to 1983.[12] These reports describe the core materials and scientific data obtained at sea and in shore-based laboratories post-cruise. These volumes were originally prepared for NSF under contract by the University of California, Scripps Institution of Oceanography. In 2007, the printed books were scanned and prepared for electronic presentation by the Texas A&M University College of Geosciences.[12]

Discovery and accomplishment in Antarctic region

[edit]

DSDP completed four drilling programs; Legs 28, 29, 35 and 36 around Antarctica during four Austral summers, 1972–73, 1973–74, 1974–75 and 1975–76. These programs were focused on two main objectives: Cenozoic global paleoclimatic changes and plate tectonic movements around Antarctica.[13][14][15][16] There were a total of 15 wells drilled around the Antarctic continent, including 4 wells in the Ross Sea, 5 wells on the continental margins, 2 wells in the abyssal plain and 4 wells across the SE Indian Ridge, among which the Site 270 was drilled at the highest latitude (77° 26.45′ S).[13][a] Analyses of data collected from the drilling accomplish the following results:

Sea floor spreading

[edit]

Prior to the deep sea drilling program, the ages of the oceanic basalt were estimated based on magnetic lineations generated at the spreading center as the sea floor pulled apart. Sediments immediately overlying the basalt should have ages similar to the age of magnetic stripes. This is confirmed by the micropaleontologic analyses of the basal sediments sampled above the penetrated basalts. These analyses furthermore substantiate that Australia was separated from Antarctic 85 Mya [million years ago][18][19][13][b]

Inception of Antarctic ice cap

[edit]

Based on paleo-soil study, the Ross shelf began to sink below sea-level about 25 Mya in the Oligocene. This suggests that Antarctic glaciers already advanced to the Ross Sea shelf.[21][22] This age is consistent with the dating of the shallow unconformity seen on the seismic profiles. The unconformity was attributed to the glacier erosion when advancing to the coastal area. Development of the Circum Antarctic Current was also initiated in the Oligocene.[14][23] In addition, drilling onshore around the Ross Sea and on the Antarctic Peninsular also confirms that Antarctic ice sheet already existed at least since the Oligocene.[24][25]

Ice-rafted debris

[edit]

The occurrence of ice-rafted debris in marine sediments is an indication of icebergs' presence. Hence the earliest occurrence in the high latitudes could possibly reveal the inception of sea-level glaciations. It should be pointed out that there are factors influencing the distribution of ice-rafted debris, such as ocean currents, and sea water near surface temperatures. Hence the earliest occurrence should be considered as the minimum age of ice rafting at sample locations. Investigations of ice-rafted debris reasonably conclude that the Antarctic ice sheet was initiated at least 25 Mya and cumulated at about 4.5 Mya, as evidenced by ice-rafted debris reaching farthest away from the continent[14][c][d][e][29][30]

This interpretation of Antarctic glaciation history based on marine sediments was subsequently supported by the onshore study of the Antarctic Peninsular [31] and by the coring results around McMurdo Ice Shelf.[32][33]

Paleoclimate

[edit]

Micropaleontologic data from deep sea sediments around the Antarctic continental margin indicate that since at least the late Oligocene-early Miocene, surface waters were relatively cool. With the continued cooling trend, the cold water mass gradually expanded northward until early Pliocene during which an intensified cooling episode resulted in a temperature minimum as evidenced by the northward shift of the silica/carbonate facies boundary. This deduction is similar to the conclusion based on ice-rated debris studies.[34][35]

Surface temperatures inferred from the oxygen and carbon isotope analyses of both benthonic and planktonic foraminifera in high-latitude marine sediments show a general continuous cooling since early Eocene with a significant temperature drop at the Oligocene/Eocene boundary. This surface water temperature appears to indicate that Antarctic ice sheet probable at this time already reached to the coast. Glaciers on the continent at higher altitudes, however, may have started to grow since the early Eocene.[36] This conclusion is in consistence with other reports documented above.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e "About DSDP". Deep Sea Drilling Project.
  2. ^ a b c "Ocean Drilling Program: Glomar Challenger drillship". www-odp.tamu.edu.
  3. ^ Cornford, Chris (1979). "19. Organic Petrography of Lower Cretaceous Shales at DSDP Leg 47B Site 398, Vigo Seamount, Eastern North Atlantic" (PDF). DSDP Volume XLVII Part 2. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 47 Pt. 2. Deep Sea Drilling Project: 523–527. doi:10.2973/dsdp.proc.47-2.119.1979. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 20, 2018. Retrieved August 3, 2019.
  4. ^ "Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, Volume XV" (PDF). Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Joint Oceanographic Institutions for Deep Earth Sampling (JOIDES) / National Ocean Sediment Coring Program, National Science Foundation. June 1972. LCCN 74-603338. Retrieved August 3, 2019.
  5. ^ "Objectives of drilling on young passive continental margins; application to the Gulf of California" (PDF).[full citation needed]
  6. ^ "Plate Tectonics: Early Ideas About Continental Drift". Archived from the original on February 27, 2010. Retrieved December 10, 2009.[self-published source?]
  7. ^ Hsü, Kenneth J.; Bernoulli, Daniel (April 1, 1978). "Genesis of the Tethys and the Mediterranean" (PDF). Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. 42: 943–949. doi:10.2973/dsdp.proc.42-1.149.1978.
  8. ^ Heise, Elizabeth A. (1993). "Stone Soup: Acronyms and Abbreviations Used in the Ocean Drilling Program" (PDF). Technical Note No. 13. Ocean Drilling Program, Texas A&M University. Retrieved August 3, 2019.
  9. ^ a b "DSDP Phase: Glomar Challenger". IODP Texas. A&M University.
  10. ^ Chaney, Ronald C.; Almagor, Gideon (2015). Seafloor Processes and Geotechnology. CRC Press. p. 142. ISBN 9781482207415. Retrieved August 24, 2016. As part of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, a hydraulic piston corer (HPC) was developed which can be used with motion-uncompensated drill pipe [...].
  11. ^ Storms, M.A.; Nugent, Wil; Cameron, D.H. (May 2, 1983). "Hydraulic Piston Coring-A New Era in Ocean Research". All Days. Houston, Texas: OTC: OTC–4622–MS. doi:10.4043/4622-MS.
  12. ^ a b "Deep Sea Drilling Project Reports and Publications". Deep Sea Drilling Project.
  13. ^ a b c Hayes, D. E. and Frakes, L. A. 1975. General synthesis, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 28. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, Vol. 28, p. 919.
  14. ^ a b c Kennett, J. P., 1975. Cenozoic Paleoceanography in the Southwest Pacific Ocean, Antarctic Glaciation, and the Development of the Circumantarctic Current. DSDP Proc. Vol. 29, p. 144.
  15. ^ Craddock & Hollister 1976.
  16. ^ Barker, P. F., Dalziel, Ian. W. D. and Wise, S. W ., (1977) Introduction, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 36. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, Vol. 36, p. 5.
  17. ^ Craddock & Hollister 1976, p. 725.
  18. ^ Frakes, L. A. and Kemp, E. M. 1973. Palaeogene continental positions and evolution of climate. In: Tarling, D. H. and Runcorn, S. K.eds. Implications of continental drift to the earth sciences. Vol 1. London, Academic Press, p. 539.
  19. ^ Thomson, M. A, Crakes, J. A., and Thomson J. W. 1987. Geological Evolution of Antarctica. International Symposium on Antarctic Earth Sciences 5th, Cambridge, England.
  20. ^ Craddock & Hollister 1976, p. 729.
  21. ^ Drewry, D. J. 1975. Initiation and growth of the East Antarctic ice sheet. Journal of the Geological Society (London), Vol. 131, p. 255.
  22. ^ Ehrmann, W. U., and Mackensun, Andreas. 1992 Sedimentological evidence for the formation of an East Antarctic ice sheet in Eocene/Oligocene time Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, & palaeoecology ISSN 0031-0182, 1992, Vol. 93(1–2), pp. 85–112.
  23. ^ Fillon, R. H. 1975. Late Cenozoic Paleo-Oceanography of the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 86, p. 839.
  24. ^ Webb, P. N. and Hanwood, D. V., 1991.Late Cenozoic glacial history of the Ross embayment, Antarctica. Quaternary Science Reviews. 10(2–3), p. 215.
  25. ^ Davies, B. J., Hambrey, M. J., Smellie, J. L., Carrivick, J. L., and Glasser, N. F., 2012. Antarctic Peninsula Ice Sheet evolution during the Cenozoic Era. Quaternary Science Reviews, 2012. 31(0): p. 30–66.
  26. ^ Craddock & Hollister 1976, p. 735.
  27. ^ Craddock & Hollister 1976, p. 738.
  28. ^ Craddock & Hollister 1976, p. 724.
  29. ^ Wilson, G. S., et al., 2012. Neogene tectonic and climatic evolution of the Western Ross Sea, Antarctica — Chronology of events from the AND-1B drill hole. Global and Planetary Change. Volumes 96–97, October–November 2012, p. 189.
  30. ^ Margolis, S. V., 1975. Paleoglacial History of Antarctica Inferred from Analysis of Leg 29 Sediments by Scanning-Electron Microscopy. DSDP Proc. Vol. 29 p. 130.
  31. ^ Ivany L.C. et al., 2006. Evidence for an earliest Oligocene ice sheet on the Antarctic Peninsula. Geology (2006) 34 (5): 377–380.
  32. ^ Wilson, G. S., et al., 2012. Late Neogene chronostratigraphy and depositional environments on the Antarctic Margin: New results from the ANDRILL McMurdo Ice Shelf Project.Global and Planetary Change.Volumes 96–97, October–November 2012, p 1.
  33. ^ Passchier, S., et al., 2011. Early and middle Miocene Antarctic glacial history from the sedimentary facies distribution in the AND-2A drill hole, Ross Sea, Antarctica. GSA Bulletin (2011) 123 (11–12): 2352–2365.
  34. ^ Kemp, E. M. and others. 1975. Paleoclimatic significance of diachronous biogenic facies, Leg 28, Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, Vol. 28, p. 909.
  35. ^ Kennett, J. P. and Vella, P. 1975. Late Cenozoic planktonic foraminifera and paleoceanography at DSDP Site 284 in the cool sub-tropical south Pacific. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, Vol. 29, p. 769.
  36. ^ Shackleton, N. J. and Kennett, J. P. 1975. Paleotemperature history of the Cenozoic and the initiation of Antarctic glaciation: oxygen and carbon isotope analyses in DSDP Sites 277, 279, 281. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, Vol. 29, p. 743.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Deep Sea Drilling Project

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) was the inaugural international scientific ocean drilling program, operating from 1968 to 1983 aboard the specialized drilling vessel Glomar Challenger to retrieve core samples from the seafloor, thereby providing unprecedented insights into the age, composition, and geological evolution of the ocean basins. Initiated in 1966 through a contract between the (NSF) and the , with initial operations based at the , the DSDP marked a pivotal advancement in by enabling the first systematic deep-ocean coring efforts across the Atlantic, Pacific, Indian, Mediterranean, and Red Seas. Over its 17-year span, the project conducted 96 expeditions, drilling 1,053 holes at 624 sites worldwide and penetrating up to 1,741 meters below the seafloor, while recovering approximately 97,056 meters of core material with a 57% recovery rate. These efforts were supported by the Joint Oceanographic Institutions for Deep Earth Sampling (JOIDES) and involved international collaboration, particularly through the International Phase of Ocean Drilling (IPOD) starting in 1975, which expanded participation from multiple nations. Among its most transformative contributions, the DSDP provided empirical evidence confirming the theory of and during Leg 3 in 1968, when drilling revealed that is no older than about 200 million years, fundamentally reshaping understandings of and Earth's dynamic interior. The project also pioneered drilling technologies, such as the hydraulic piston corer for undisturbed sediment sampling and re-entry systems for deeper penetrations, which facilitated discoveries like ancient salt domes relevant to petroleum exploration and detailed reconstructions of paleoclimate and paleoceanographic conditions through and geochemical analyses of cores. Data from the DSDP, including geological, geophysical, and logging records, have been archived and made publicly available since the , underpinning decades of subsequent research in Earth sciences. The DSDP concluded in 1983, transitioning in 1985 to the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) aboard the JOIDES Resolution, which built upon its legacy to further explore Earth's history, climate variability, and geohazards through ongoing international ocean discovery initiatives.

Background and Establishment

Scientific Context

In the early 20th century, proposed the theory of , suggesting that Earth's continents were once assembled into a single , , which began breaking apart around 200 million years ago, with landmasses drifting to their current positions. Although supported by evidence such as matching continental coastlines, similar distributions across oceans, and paleoclimatic indicators like glacial deposits in now-tropical regions, the theory faced skepticism due to the absence of a convincing driving mechanism. By the 1960s, renewed interest in continental movement emerged through Harry Hess's sea floor spreading hypothesis, which posited that molten material rises at mid-ocean s to form new , which then spreads laterally and pushes continents apart, recycling older crust into at zones. This mechanism addressed Wegener's shortcomings but required empirical validation regarding the age and composition of ocean floor rocks. A pivotal supporting observation was the pattern of magnetic striping on the sea floor, interpreted by Fred Vine and Drummond Matthews in 1963 as symmetric bands of alternating magnetic polarity in the basaltic crust, created by periodic reversals of Earth's geomagnetic field as new crust formed and migrated away from s. These linear anomalies, aligned with ridge axes, implied relatively young oceanic crust but demanded direct sampling to confirm predicted ages and structures. Existing sampling techniques, such as —which retrieved only scattered surface rocks—and shallow piston coring, which penetrated at most a few hundred meters into soft sediments, proved inadequate for accessing basement rock or recovering complete stratigraphic records from deeper layers. These methods yielded fragmented data, insufficient to resolve debates on formation, its variation with distance from ridges, or long-term sedimentary histories tied to Earth's tectonic and climatic evolution. The international oceanographic community, coordinated through the Joint Oceanographic Institutions for Deep Earth Sampling (JOIDES) established in 1964 by leading U.S. institutions, identified deep drilling as essential to bridge these gaps and test emerging concepts. The U.S. (NSF) recognized the project's potential to illuminate ocean crust age, composition, and global geological processes, providing critical funding and administrative support to initiate systematic deep-sea coring efforts.

Initiation and Organization

The Joint Oceanographic Institutions for Deep Earth Sampling (JOIDES) was established in May 1964 by four leading U.S. oceanographic institutions—the , Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory, , and the University of Miami's Institute of Marine and Atmospheric Science—to coordinate planning for deep earth sampling initiatives, including what would become the Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP). This followed the cancellation of in 1966, an earlier NSF initiative for deep crustal drilling whose experiences informed the shift to targeted ocean floor sampling. Under the sponsorship of the (NSF), JOIDES provided scientific oversight and advisory functions, while the NSF awarded a contract to the to manage operations through its , serving as the project's administrative and operational base in , . The NSF provided primary funding, starting with a $5.4 million contract in 1966, with multi-year extensions as the project progressed. Initial planning efforts involved geophysical site surveys conducted by research vessels such as the R/V Robert D. Conrad, which gathered seismic and bathymetric data to identify potential drilling locations. In 1968, the project transitioned to full operations with the lease of the specially designed drilling vessel from Global Marine Inc., enabling systematic coring in water depths up to 6,000 meters. The DSDP was initially a U.S.-led . It expanded internationally starting in 1975 through the International Phase of Ocean Drilling (), involving partner nations including the , , , , and the , each contributing to costs and scientific expertise via annual dues. By the end of the , up to ten nations participated. was managed by a system of JOIDES advisory panels, including specialized groups for ocean drilling programs, which reviewed proposals and prioritized locations based on geophysical data and scientific objectives. Key figures included William R. Riedel of Scripps, who served as co-chief scientist on multiple legs and chaired the JOIDES Sample Distribution Panel, ensuring equitable access to core samples while advancing stratigraphic .

Operational Methods

Drilling Technology

The Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) employed the Glomar Challenger, a specialized equipped with a system that utilized acoustic transponders deployed on the seafloor to maintain precise station-keeping without the need for anchors. This system relied on hydrophones to track signals from the transponders, allowing the vessel's thrusters to adjust position within a few meters, essential for operations in water depths up to 7,044 meters where traditional anchoring was impractical. Central to the project's operations was a rotary drilling rig adapted for marine environments, featuring tungsten carbide insert bits designed to withstand the abrasive nature of ocean sediments and basaltic basement rocks. Drilling fluid, primarily seawater with occasional additions of barite-weighted mud, was circulated through the drill string to cool the bit, remove cuttings, and stabilize the borehole, enabling penetrations of up to 1,741 meters below the seafloor into unconsolidated sediments and up to 1,080 meters into hard basaltic crust. Drill pipe handling involved assembling and lowering 30-foot (9.1-meter) sections of pipe via a heave compensator system, which absorbed vertical ship motions caused by waves, ensuring steady advancement of the drill string. The compensator, rated at 400 tons, allowed for safe deployment in maximum water depths of 7,044 meters while maintaining tension on the pipe to prevent buckling or disconnection. Safety features included blowout preventers installed at the seafloor to seal the well in case of pressure surges, alongside real-time downhole logging tools such as , resistivity, and sonic sondes for evaluating formation properties without interrupting . Efficiency improved over the project through the evolution of coring methods, transitioning from conventional piston corers to advanced hydraulic piston corers that minimized disturbance to soft sediments. Key engineering challenges addressed included operating in high-pressure deep-water environments exceeding 600 atmospheres, where specialized seals and pressure-compensated systems prevented equipment failure; corrosion resistance achieved through marine-grade alloys and protective coatings on the ; and remote operations facilitated by communications and automated monitoring to oversee parameters from the surface. These adaptations ensured reliable performance across diverse oceanic conditions.

Coring and Sample Recovery

The Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) employed several coring systems to extract samples from the ocean floor, tailored to sediment type and depth. The standard piston corer, capable of recovering up to 9.5 meters of soft , was the primary tool for initial sampling in unconsolidated layers. This device used a piston mechanism to minimize disturbance by advancing the core barrel ahead of the , allowing sediment to enter without rotation. For softer or semi-lithified sediments where the standard corer was insufficient, the extended core barrel (XCB) was deployed, featuring a rotating shoe to cut through cohesive materials while maintaining higher recovery in transitional zones. In hard rock formations, such as , rotary coring with a diamond-impregnated bit was utilized, enabling penetration but often at the cost of sample integrity. The recovery process involved lowering the core barrel through the to the target depth, overdriving it into the formation using vessel weight and heave, followed by wireline retrieval to the surface. In soft sediments, recovery rates typically averaged around 85%, with some legs achieving over 93% using advanced variants, reflecting effective penetration in low shear-strength materials. However, in basaltic rocks, rates dropped significantly to 10–20% on average, due to fracturing and incomplete capture of indurated material. Gaps in recovery were common, particularly in heterogeneous layers, where only partial intervals were obtained despite full coring attempts. Upon retrieval, cores underwent immediate onboard handling to preserve scientific value. Each core was logged for visual properties including color, sedimentary structure, and , then cut into sections and split lengthwise into working and archive halves using a to avoid contamination. High-resolution and close-up images were taken of the split surfaces, alongside descriptive notes on any artifacts. Sampling protocols prioritized minimal disturbance, with initial aliquots allocated for shipboard analyses while restricting broader access to prevent cross-contamination between cores. Key innovations enhanced sample quality during later DSDP legs. The French hydraulic piston corer (HPC), introduced in 1979, allowed for virtually undisturbed recovery of soft sediments up to 250 meters below the seafloor by maintaining constant pressure and decoupling from motion, achieving near-100% recovery in ideal conditions. Additionally, X-radiography was routinely applied to whole-round cores to reveal internal structures, such as or voids, invisible in surface views, aiding in the identification of coring-induced artifacts. These advancements marked a shift toward higher-fidelity paleoenvironmental records. Despite these methods, coring faced inherent limitations. Disturbances were prevalent, including fracturing from mechanical stress, flow-in of overlying during penetration, and soupy deformation in rotary-cored intervals. Gas expansion upon pressure release often created voids or displaced material, particularly in organic-rich sediments, complicating interpretations. Recovery gaps persisted in hard rocks, where basaltic pillows or veins led to fragmented or voided samples, underscoring the challenges of deep oceanic sampling.

Historical Timeline

Early Expeditions (1968–1970)

The Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) commenced its operational phase in 1968 with Leg 1, serving as a proof-of-concept expedition in the to validate the Glomar Challenger's drilling capabilities in deep water. This initial cruise, conducted from August to September 1968, targeted seven sites and involved drilling 17 holes, with penetrations reaching up to 609 meters below the seafloor at Site 1. The effort successfully recovered cores from unconsolidated sediments, demonstrating the vessel's ability to maintain position and conduct rotary drilling in water depths exceeding 3,500 meters, thus confirming the project's technological viability for broader oceanographic exploration. Subsequent early legs expanded into the Atlantic Ocean. Leg 2, from to 1968, traversed a from the to , drilling five sites and achieving the first penetration into oceanic rocks off the margin, where sediments were sampled alongside evidence of deposits. Leg 3, spanning December 1968 to January 1969, continued across the equatorial and South Atlantic to , targeting ten sites (13–22) to investigate sediment sequences, recovering -age materials and layers indicative of ancient current systems. These operations marked the project's initial forays into sampling and provided baseline data on Atlantic sedimentary architecture. By the end of 1970, the DSDP had completed ten legs, extending from the Atlantic margins to the , with cruises probing diverse geological settings including the and eastern Pacific basins. Site selection for these expeditions relied on pre-cruise seismic reflection surveys conducted by research vessels such as the R/V Vema and R/V Robert D. Conrad, which identified promising locations based on acoustic profiles of layers and reflectors. Preliminary findings from core recoveries revealed variations in thickness, ranging from thin pelagic deposits over to thicker accumulations exceeding 500 meters in abyssal plains, offering initial insights into depositional patterns without deeper paleoceanographic analysis. The formative years presented significant operational challenges, including weather-related delays from rough Atlantic seas and equipment failures such as premature breakage, which occasionally necessitated pulling out of holes and reduced core recovery rates to below 50% at certain sites. A key milestone occurred in , when the project formally invited international participation following a post-cruise announcement in , enabling scientists from non-U.S. institutions to join subsequent legs for the first time. Shipboard scientific teams, typically comprising 10–15 specialists, rotated among members selected from the Joint Oceanographic Institutions for Deep Earth Sampling (JOIDES) advisory panels, ensuring multidisciplinary expertise in , , and drawn from academic and government institutions.

Expansion and Key Cruises (1970–1983)

Following the initial testing phases, the Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) expanded significantly in the 1970s, shifting from primarily Atlantic-focused operations to a broader global scope that encompassed the Pacific, Indian, and Southern Oceans, as well as marginal seas like the Mediterranean and . This growth enabled drilling at diverse geological settings, including remote and challenging regions, with operations culminating in a total of 96 legs and visits to 624 sites worldwide by 1983. Notable expansions included Leg 22 in 1972, which targeted the northeastern along the Ninetyeast Ridge and adjacent basins, marking one of the project's first major forays into that ocean basin. Several key cruises highlighted the project's advancing capabilities during this period. Leg 15 in 1972 focused on the western North Atlantic near , where efforts emphasized deep penetration into oceanic basement rocks to sample underlying crustal materials. In the , Leg 28 (1972–1973) represented a pioneering expedition, drilling sites on the continental margin south of to probe high-latitude sedimentary records amid seasonal ice influences. Similarly, Leg 42 in 1975 ventured into the , coring through thick sedimentary sequences in enclosed basin environments. These expeditions demonstrated the Glomar Challenger's adaptability to varied water depths and seafloor conditions, with cumulative core recovery reaching approximately 97 kilometers across all legs. Operationally, the DSDP evolved through increased international collaboration, particularly after the initiation of the International Phase of Ocean Drilling () in 1975, which brought in funding and scientific input from countries including , , the , the , and , eventually expanding to 11 member nations by the late 1970s. This multinational support facilitated operations in harsh environments, such as the Antarctic's ice-edge zones during Leg 28, where and ice monitoring were critical for safe drilling in waters up to 5,000 meters deep. Logistically, the project conducted multiple cruises annually, with each leg typically lasting 2 to 3 months and involving teams of 10–20 scientists aboard the Glomar Challenger, enabling systematic site surveys and coring at depths exceeding 600 meters below the seafloor in many cases. The DSDP concluded in 1983 amid U.S. budget constraints that limited further operations with the aging Glomar Challenger, paving the way for its successor, the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP), which began in 1985 with a new vessel and expanded international framework. The final expedition, Leg 96 in the , targeted intraslope basins on the continental slope to assess sediment stability and fan deposition processes, wrapping up the project's 15-year legacy with over 1,000 holes drilled globally.

Major Scientific Discoveries

Sea Floor Spreading and

The Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) provided direct evidence for sea floor spreading through core samples that demonstrated sediment ages increasing with distance from mid-ocean ridges, confirming the hypothesis that new forms at ridges and migrates outward. During Leg 3 in the South Atlantic (December 1968–January 1969), drilling at multiple sites across the revealed this pattern explicitly: for instance, at Site 16 (191 km from the ridge axis), the oldest sediments were dated to 11 ± 1 million years (Ma), while at Site 21 (1,617 km from the axis), they exceeded 76 Ma, indicating progressive sediment accumulation away from the spreading center. These biostratigraphic ages aligned closely with geophysical models of ridge-crest formation, supporting spreading rates of approximately 2 cm/year (half-rate) or 4 cm/year (full rate). Basement rock recovery further substantiated the young age of , with radiolarian cherts and basalts yielding dates under 200 Ma that matched patterns, thus validating the continuous renewal of the sea floor. Radiolarian cherts from Pacific sites during early legs, such as Leg 7 (1969), dated the onset of sedimentation to the (around 150 Ma), with no older sediments recovered on the Pacific floor, consistent with the crust's formation and absence of pre-Mesozoic oceanic remnants. Similarly, basalts from Atlantic sites showed paleomagnetic ages increasing symmetrically away from ridges—for example, 9 Ma at Site 16 and 70–72 Ma at Site 20—demonstrating bilateral symmetry in crustal layers across spreading centers. Integration of DSDP cores with geophysical data confirmed the Vine-Matthews hypothesis, which posits that linear magnetic anomalies arise from seafloor spreading and geomagnetic reversals recorded in crustal basalts. Paleomagnetic analyses of core samples established reversal timescales that correlated precisely with marine magnetic anomaly sequences, such as those modeled by Heirtzler et al. (1968), providing the first direct calibration of these features with dated basement rocks. This empirical validation transformed plate tectonics from a speculative framework into a consensus theory by the mid-1970s, with DSDP datasets serving as the pivotal empirical foundation for global crustal dynamics.

Paleoceanography and Climate Evolution

The Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) provided critical cores that enabled paleoceanographers to reconstruct ancient circulation patterns, chemical compositions, and their links to global shifts through proxy analyses of foraminiferal shells, nannofossils, and geochemical signatures. These records, spanning from the to the , revealed how variations in gateways, , and deep-water ventilation influenced Earth's over millions of years. By examining isotopic ratios and lithologies, DSDP data illuminated transitions in dynamics that drove or responded to planetary cooling and atmospheric CO₂ fluctuations. Oxygen isotope analysis of benthic and planktonic from DSDP cores demonstrated glacial-interglacial cycles through shifts in δ¹⁸O/¹⁶O ratios, which reflect changes in ice volume and seawater temperature. For instance, cores from Leg 38 in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea (Sites 336 and 350) showed pronounced δ¹⁸O enrichments during glacial stages, indicating expanded ice sheets and cooler surface waters as early as the late , with cycles intensifying toward the Pleistocene. These records highlighted how Nordic Sea deep-water formation varied, with interglacials marked by lighter isotopes signaling warmer inflows from the Atlantic. Similar patterns in equatorial Pacific sites from Leg 16 further corroborated global ice volume signals, linking glaciation to broader ocean circulation reorganizations. Deep-sea cores also documented variations in the , the level below which dissolves, providing insights into past ocean chemistry and its ties to atmospheric CO₂ and biological . In the , Leg 22 sites (e.g., Site 238) revealed a shallowing CCD during the early , from about 3,500 m in the to deeper levels by the Eocene, attributed to increased deep-water corrosivity from elevated CO₂ and reduced carbonate preservation amid high . These shifts correlated with global CCD deepening trends, where enhanced during cooling phases lowered CCD by up to 1,000 m, preserving more carbonate and influencing long-term . Such records underscored how blooms, driven by nutrient-rich waters, amplified dissolution above the CCD during greenhouse intervals. DSDP investigations into ocean gateway evolution highlighted how tectonic changes altered circulation and climate. The progressive Eocene closure of the Tethys seaway, inferred from Leg 42B cores in the Mediterranean (Sites 374–382), restricted equatorial flow, leading to warmer, more stratified surface waters and reduced ventilation in the proto-Mediterranean basin during the late Eocene. This constriction contributed to regional anoxia and influenced global heat transport by isolating Tethyan waters from Atlantic inflows. Complementing this, Miocene cores from the Indian Ocean (Leg 22, Site 219) evidenced monsoon intensification around 8–10 Ma, marked by increased siliciclastic input and upwelling indicators, as Himalayan uplift and Tethys remnants enhanced seasonal winds, boosting productivity and carbon drawdown. Biostratigraphic studies of and nannofossil assemblages in DSDP cores tracked water mass changes and oxygenation events. Assemblages from multiple legs showed shifts from warm-water Tethyan species to cooler, polar-adapted forms during the , reflecting deepening of and its spread into low latitudes. Black shale layers, indicative of oceanic anoxic events (OAEs), were prominent in records; for example, Cenomanian-Turonian black shales at Site 530 (Leg 75, South Atlantic) contained radiolarian-rich, organic-carbon-enriched sediments (up to 5% TOC) with low-diversity foraminiferal faunas, signaling widespread basin anoxia driven by high sea levels and restricted circulation. These layers, correlated across sites like 367 (Leg 41), demonstrated pulsed tied to volcanic CO₂ releases and . Long-term trends in DSDP cores illustrated the Cenozoic transition from a to an icehouse world, with progressive cooling evident in benthic δ¹⁸O records and nannofossil diversity declines. Eocene-Oligocene boundary cores from various sites (e.g., Leg 29, Site 277 in the ) captured a 1–2‰ δ¹⁸O increase around 34 Ma, signaling Antarctic ice-sheet inception and global deep-water cooling by 3–4°C, amid declining atmospheric CO₂ from . This shift marked the end of the Eocene , with later Miocene intensification of cooling linked to Isthmus closure and strengthened ocean fronts, as seen in Pacific and transects. Overall, these records emphasized ocean circulation as a key amplifier of the icehouse regime.

Antarctic Region Insights

The Deep Sea Drilling Project's Legs 28 and 29, conducted between December 1972 and March 1973, marked the first operations south of the , targeting the , margin, and sites near the . These expeditions recovered over 3,000 meters of sediment cores from seven sites on Leg 28 and ten on Leg 29, providing unprecedented access to polar sedimentary records previously inaccessible due to ice cover and harsh conditions. Cores from Leg 28 sites, particularly Site 270 in the , revealed Eocene sediments dominated by nannofossil oozes indicative of warm, ice-free marine conditions, with no evidence of ice-rafted debris (IRD) prior to the . This absence of coarse terrigenous grains suggested minimal glacial influence during the Eocene, contrasting with later deposits. Oxygen isotope analyses from Leg 29 sites (277, 279, and 281) on the confirmed a sharp cooling event at the Eocene- boundary around 34 million years ago (Ma), with benthic foraminiferal δ¹⁸O values increasing by approximately 1.0‰, signaling the inception of the and the onset of continental-scale glaciation. Leg 29 drilling on the provided key evidence for tectonic influences on climate, confirming the opening of around 30 Ma through the identification of unconformities and sediment shifts marking the separation of from . This event facilitated the initiation of the circum- current, as indicated by the transition from Eocene terrigenous silts to siliceous oozes, reflecting enhanced deep-water circulation and isolation of the polar region. The current's development amplified cooling by promoting and nutrient-rich waters, further stabilizing the nascent ice cap. Paleoclimate reconstructions from these cores highlighted a stark contrast in ice dynamics: the lack of pre- IRD across 28 sites underscored an absence of significant iceberg calving, while the first prominent IRD layers appeared in lower strata at Site 270, composed of quartz and lithic fragments up to 2 cm in size, denoting expanded glacial erosion. Post-glacial sediments transitioned to diatom oozes by the early , signaling increased productivity driven by nutrient fertilization from the circum-Antarctic current and seasonal sea-ice dynamics. These findings from Legs 28 and 29 overturned earlier assumptions of uniformly warm early conditions in the , demonstrating instead that experienced monsoon-like climates during the Eocene, characterized by warm, wet summers and dry winters as inferred from the fine-grained, biogenic-rich sediments lacking glacial indicators. The evidence for rapid ice-sheet growth at 34 Ma established a pivotal threshold in global paleoceanography, linking polar cooling to broader circulation changes.

Data, Publications, and Legacy

Core Repositories and Access

The core samples recovered during the Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) are primarily stored at the Gulf Coast Repository (GCR) at in , which has curated approximately 97 kilometers of DSDP cores since their transfer in 1983, as part of a larger collection exceeding 151 kilometers that includes subsequent programs. These samples, consisting of and rock sections split longitudinally into and working halves, are maintained under strict curation standards to ensure long-term viability, including climate-controlled storage at temperatures around 4°C. Digital initiatives enhance accessibility, with high-resolution core scans initiated in 2006–2007 through digitization efforts that converted analog shipboard photographs into electronic formats, and shipboard descriptions archived in searchable databases. The Scientific Earth Drilling Information Service (SEDIS) provides a centralized portal for querying DSDP core descriptions, metadata, and images, integrating data from over 100,000 records across legacy programs. To facilitate global collaboration, duplicate archive halves are housed at secondary facilities, such as the Bremen Core Repository in , which stores DSDP samples from Atlantic and regions. Access to these cores is managed through the (IODP), which succeeded the DSDP and allows qualified researchers to request samples via formal proposals reviewed for scientific merit, with guidelines limiting sampling to minimal volumes—typically no more than 10-20 cubic centimeters per meter—to preserve irreplaceable material for future studies. Preservation challenges persist, including risks of physical degradation from oxidation, microbial activity, and handling, necessitating ongoing conservation protocols.

Publications and Ongoing Research

The Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) disseminated its findings through the Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project series, comprising 96 volumes published between 1970 and 1985. These volumes documented shipboard scientific proceedings, including core descriptions, preliminary analyses, raw geophysical and geochemical data, and initial interpretations from each of the 96 legs, serving as the primary repository for at-sea results and enabling subsequent shore-based research. Data from the DSDP and successor scientific ocean drilling programs have underpinned over 14,000 peer-reviewed publications as of June 2024, many appearing in high-impact journals such as and to report breakthroughs in paleoceanography and . The Scientific Ocean Drilling tracks these contributions, highlighting DSDP's role in generating foundational datasets that continue to be cited in studies on Earth's and crustal evolution. Following its conclusion in 1983, DSDP transitioned into the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) in 1985, which expanded multinational collaboration and advanced drilling technologies before evolving into the (2004–2013) and the current (IODP). This legacy includes re-entry expeditions that revisited and deepened DSDP sites, such as ODP Leg 198 in 2001 on Shatsky Rise, which recovered extended sequences to refine paleoceanographic records previously limited by early drilling constraints. Contemporary research leverages DSDP cores and data for diverse applications, including climate modeling that incorporates legacy stable isotope records to reconstruct ancient ocean temperatures and circulation patterns. Microbial studies have revealed active subsurface biospheres in altered basaltic glasses from DSDP samples, demonstrating carbon isotope fractionation by ancient microbial communities in ocean crust. Additionally, DSDP datasets are integrated into open-access platforms like , facilitating global data synthesis for geochemical and paleoenvironmental analyses. Post-1983 efforts have addressed sampling gaps through reanalysis of archived cores using advanced techniques, such as high-resolution , to enhance understanding of sediment diagenesis and volcanic sequences initially undersampled during DSDP operations. Recent initiatives, such as the Extending Ocean Drilling Pursuits (eODP) project launched in , synthesize legacy DSDP data with standardized formats to support modern geoscience research. These ongoing investigations, often in conjunction with core repositories, underscore DSDP's enduring value in bridging historical and modern ocean science.

References

  1. https://www.iodp.tamu.edu/publicinfo/glomar_challenger.html
  2. http://deepseadrilling.org/about.htm
  3. https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/geology/dsdp/history.htm
  4. https://www.iodp.org/about-iodp/history
  5. https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/historical.html
  6. https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/HHH.html
  7. https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/stripes.html
  8. https://divediscover.whoi.edu/history-of-oceanography/ocean-drilling/
  9. https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/science/G380A/article.htm
  10. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/9702/chapter/16
  11. https://psu.pb.unizin.org/sciod/chapter/joides-institutions-assemble/
  12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208831/
  13. http://www.deepseadrilling.org/82/volume/82dsdp.pdf
  14. https://www.gao.gov/assets/b-171989.pdf
  15. http://deepseadrilling.org/13/volume/13pt1dsdp.pdf
  16. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/metadata/landing-page/bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.ngdc.mgg.geology:G00993
  17. https://www.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/usssp-iodp-us-science-support-program-associated-international-ocean/6682/nsf06-575/solicitation
  18. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/aapg/aapgbull/article/51/9/1787/35347/Deep-Sea-Drilling-Project1
  19. http://deepseadrilling.org/77/volume/77dsdp.pdf
  20. http://deepseadrilling.org/07/volume/07pt1dsdp.pdf
  21. https://scripps.ucsd.edu/news/william-riedel-1927-2020
  22. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19750012611/downloads/19750012611.pdf
  23. http://acoustics.whoi.edu/resources/oceanusv2002wood.pdf
  24. http://www-odp.tamu.edu/publications/tnotes/digital/tnote_21.pdf
  25. http://deepseadrilling.org/25/volume/dsdp25_appendixII.pdf
  26. http://deepseadrilling.org/82/volume/dsdp82_14.pdf
  27. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/toc/10.1002/%28ISSN%292169-9356.LOGMEAS1
  28. https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/glomar.html
  29. http://deepseadrilling.org/88/volume/dsdp88_02.pdf
  30. http://deepseadrilling.org/85/volume/dsdp85_01.pdf
  31. http://www.deepseadrilling.org/95/volume/dsdp95_01.pdf
  32. http://deepseadrilling.org/91/volume/dsdp91_03.pdf
  33. http://deepseadrilling.org/34/volume/dsdp34_08.pdf
  34. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1989/0496/report.pdf
  35. https://www.iodp-france.org/deep-sea-drilling-project/
  36. http://deepseadrilling.org/19/volume/dsdp19_35.pdf
  37. http://deepseadrilling.org/01/volume/01dsdp.pdf
  38. http://deepseadrilling.org/02/volume/02dsdp.pdf
  39. http://deepseadrilling.org/03/volume/03dsdp.pdf
  40. http://deepseadrilling.org/40/volume/dsdp40_01.pdf
  41. http://deepseadrilling.org/42_1/volume/dsdp42pt1_01.pdf
  42. https://www.iodp.org/expeditions/expedition-statistics
  43. http://www.deepseadrilling.org/22/volume/22dsdp.pdf
  44. http://deepseadrilling.org/28/volume/28dsdp.pdf
  45. https://tos.org/oceanography/article/scientific-ocean-drilling-a-truly-international-program
  46. http://www-odp.tamu.edu/publications/ODP_Final_Technical_Report.pdf
  47. https://joidesresolution.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Plate-Tectonics.pdf
  48. http://www.deepseadrilling.org/07/volume/dsdp07pt2_28.pdf
  49. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05017-0
  50. https://polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/download/2477/5728/
  51. http://www.deepseadrilling.org/38/dsdp_toc.htm
  52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377839803001208
  53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031018208004082
  54. http://deepseadrilling.org/28/volume/dsdp28_36.pdf
  55. http://deepseadrilling.org/29/volume/dsdp29_44.pdf
  56. http://deepseadrilling.org/28/volume/dsdp28_21.pdf
  57. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/JC082i027p03843
  58. http://www-odp.tamu.edu/publications/120_SR/VOLUME/CHAPTERS/sr120_12.pdf
  59. http://deepseadrilling.org/29/volume/dsdp29_17.pdf
  60. https://gcr.tamu.edu/info/about.html
  61. https://www.iodp.org/resources/core-repositories
  62. https://gcr.tamu.edu/curation/repositories.html
  63. https://iodp.tamu.edu/database/migration.html
  64. http://sedis.iodp.org/
  65. https://www.marum.de/en/Bremen-Core-Repository.html
  66. https://www.iodp.org/resources/access-data-and-samples
  67. https://eps.rutgers.edu/stratigraphy-projects?id=49&view=category&start=10
  68. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2022GC010655
  69. http://deepseadrilling.org/i_reports.htm
  70. https://iodp.tamu.edu/publications/AGI_studies/2024_Pub_Impact.pdf
  71. https://iodp.tamu.edu/publications/citations/database_new.html
  72. http://www-odp.tamu.edu/publications/198_IR/198toc.htm
  73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016703798002774
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0009254100002850
  75. https://iodp.pangaea.de/
  76. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-020-0860-1
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.