Hubbry Logo
DharaviDharaviMain
Open search
Dharavi
Community hub
Dharavi
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Dharavi
Dharavi
from Wikipedia

Dharavi compared to other great slums in the world. Map according to Mike Davis.

Key Information

Dharavi is a residential area in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. It has often been considered one of the world's largest slums.[1][2] Dharavi has an area of just over 2.39 square kilometres (0.92 sq mi; 590 acres)[3] and a population of about 1,000,000.[4] With a population density of over 418,410/km2 (1,083,677/sq mi), Dharavi is one of the most densely populated areas in the world.

The Dharavi slum was founded in 1884 during the British colonial era, and grew because of the expulsion of factories and residents from the peninsular city centre by the colonial government, and due to the migration of rural Indians into urban Mumbai. For this reason, Dharavi is currently a highly diverse settlement religiously and ethnically.[5]

Dharavi has an active informal economy in which numerous household enterprises employ many of the slum residents[6]—leather, textiles and pottery products are among the goods made inside Dharavi. The total annual turnover has been estimated at over US$1 billion.[7]

Dharavi has suffered from many epidemics and other disasters, including a widespread plague in 1896 which killed over half of the population of Bombay.[8] Sanitation in the slums remains poor.[9]

History

[edit]

In the 18th century, Dharavi was an island with a predominantly mangrove swamp.[10] It was a sparsely populated village before the late 19th century, inhabited by Koli fishermen.[11][12] Dharavi was then referred to as the village of Koliwada.[13]

Colonial era

[edit]

In the 1850s, after decades of urban growth under East India Company and British Raj, the city's population reached half a million. The urban area then covered mostly the southern extension of Bombay peninsula, the population density was over 10 times higher than London at that time.[13]

Shanty dwellings next to railway tracks in Dharavi (about 2010). A mosque inside the slum is visible. The railway network provides mass transit to the slum residents.

The most polluting industries were tanneries, and the first tannery moved from peninsular Bombay into Dharavi in 1887. People who worked with leather, typically a profession of lowest Hindu castes and of Muslim Indians, moved into Dharavi. Other early settlers included the Kumbhars, a large Gujarati community of potters. The colonial government granted them a 99-year land-lease in 1895. Rural migrants looking for jobs poured into Bombay, and its population soared past 1 million. Other artisans, like the embroidery workers from Uttar Pradesh, started the ready-made garments trade.[11] These industries created jobs, labor moved in, but there was no government effort to plan or investment in any infrastructure in or near Dharavi. The living quarters and small scale factories grew haphazardly, without provision for sanitation, drains, safe drinking water, roads or other basic services. But some ethnic, caste and religious communities that settled in Dharavi at that time helped build the settlement of Dharavi by forming organizations and political parties, building school and temples, constructing homes and factories.[12] Dharavi's first mosque, Badi Masjid, started in 1887 and the oldest Hindu temple, Ganesh Mandir, was built in 1883 and organizing Ganesh Chaturthi of 112th year since 1913 folloing the Southern Tirunelveli Culture.[13]

Post-independence

[edit]

At India's independence from colonial rule in 1947, Dharavi had grown to be the largest slum in Bombay and all of India. It still had a few empty spaces, which continued to serve as waste-dumping grounds for operators across the city.[13] Bombay, meanwhile, continued to grow as a city. Soon Dharavi was surrounded by the city, and became a key hub for informal economy.[14] Starting from the 1950s, proposals for Dharavi redevelopment plans periodically came out, but most of these plans failed because of lack of financial banking and/or political support.[12] Dharavi's Co-operative Housing Society was formed in the 1960s to uplift the lives of thousands of slum dwellers by the initiative of Shri. M.V. Duraiswamy, a well-known social worker and Congress leader of that region. The society promoted 338 flats and 97 shops and was named as Dr. Baliga Nagar. By the late 20th century, Dharavi occupied about 175 hectares (432 acres), with an astounding population density of more than 2,900 people per hectare (1,200/acre).[13][15]

Redevelopment plan

[edit]

The area is a hub for around 5,000 businesses and 15,000 single-room factories across leather, textiles, pottery, metalwork, and recycling, contributing to an annual economic output estimated at over $1 billion (₹10,000 crore). Despite being an economic powerhouse, Dharavi faces significant challenges. A 2006 UNHDR report highlighted an average of one toilet for every 1,440 residents, underscoring the area's inadequate sanitation infrastructure.

A traditional pottery unit in Dharavi.
Street vendors and farmers market along the road passing through Dharavi slum in Mumbai.

There have been many plans since 1997 to redevelop Dharavi like the former slums of Hong Kong such as Tai Hang. In 2004, the cost of redevelopment was estimated to be 5,000 crore (US$590 million).[16] The first formal plan for Dharavi’s redevelopment was announced in 2004, but it took the government five years to act on it. When the first tender was finally released in 2009, it saw zero bids which was a sign that developers saw the project as too risky. The tender was cancelled in 2011, and the project stalled once again. Companies from around the world have bid to redevelop Dharavi,[17] including Lehman Brothers, Dubai's Limitless and Singapore's Capitaland Ltd.[17] In 2010, it was estimated to cost 15,000 crore (US$1.8 billion) to redevelop.[16]

In 2008 German students Jens Kaercher and Lucas Schwind won a Next Generation prize for their innovative redevelopment strategy designed to protect the current residents from needing to relocate.[18]

Other redevelopment schemes include the "Dharavi Masterplan" devised by British architectural and engineering firm Foster + Partners, that proposes "double-height spaces that create an intricate vertical landscape and reflect the community's way of life" built-in phases that the firm says would "eliminate the need for transit camps," instead catalyzing the rehabilitation of Dharavi "from within."

Sector-Based Approach Fails: 2016

[edit]

The next attempt came in 2016, with a different approach which divided Dharavi into five sectors, with MHADA (Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority) handling one, while private developers were invited to bid for the remaining four. Yet, once again, no bidders came forward. Developers feared there was a low return on investment and the challenge of relocating thousands of businesses and families without resistance was a big one.[19]

[edit]

After the unsuccessful bid process and various concessions through the 5 November 2018 Government Resolution, the Dharavi Redevelopment Project/Slum Rehabilitation Authority came out with a tender process in November 2018. Seclink Technology Corporation (STC), a UAE-based firm emerged as the highest bidder with a bid of Rs. 7,200 crore. However, the state government was in talks with Indian Railways to acquire the 45 acres of additional land in Mahim, which posed a major roadblock in the project’s scope. This also led to a legal debate if the government should continue with the existing tender or if a fresh bidding process was required.[20]

In August 2020, the Committee of Secretaries (CoS) finally decided to cancel the 2018 Dharavi redevelopment tender, citing material changes due to the inclusion of 45 acres of railway land. This decision was based on Attorney General Ashutosh Kumbhkoni’s opinion who advised that a fresh tender was the right way to proceed. The Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) government, led by Uddhav Thackeray, approved the cancellation on 29 October 2020, and the Housing Department issued a formal resolution on 5 November 2020. Against GoM’s decision, the Highest Bidder (Seclink) filed a writ petition in the High Court, however, the High Court did not issue any stay for the fresh tender process.[21]

A Fresh Start: 2022 – 2023

[edit]

In 2022, the newly elected government made significant changes to the tendering process for the fourth time. Taking the learnings from past failures, the Government of Maharashtra issued a global Request for Qualification (RFQ) and Request for Proposal (RFP) with revised terms. This time around, instead of dividing Dharavi into five sectors, the entire redevelopment was consolidated into a single Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), allowing for integrated planning and execution.[22]

Adani Wins the Bid: 2023

[edit]

The fresh bidding process attracted multiple participants, but ultimately, in July 2023, Adani Properties Pvt Ltd sent out a ₹5,069 crore bid and secured the project. In the spring of 2023, it became known that the Indian billionaire Gautam Adani intends to do the reconstruction of Dharavi. Adani Properties Pvt. offers the largest amount of construction investments - 615 million dollars. Mumbai authorities estimate the total cost of the work at $2.4 billion.[23]

This is how Dharavi Redevelopment Project Private Limited (DRPPL) finally started, founded in. As of April 2024, a survey is being conducted by Adani Group to rehabilitate Dharavi residents for redevelopment.[24] On 20 December 2024, the High Court of Bombay awarded the Adani Group after the SecLink Group tried to sue.[25][26]

On 8 March 2025 the Supreme Court refused to stay the redevelopment work by Adani group based on the lawsuit by SecLink Group.[27]

[edit]

The DRPPL has since been renamed to Navbharat Mega Developers Pvt. Ltd. (NMDPL) is an SPV Company constituted to execute the Dharavi Redevelopment Project (DRP). The Dharavi Redevelopment Project is a first-of-its-kind initiative that aims to transform the Dharavi slum into a state-of-the-art township while preserving its legacy.[28]

NMDPL operates with a strong public-private partnership model: • The Government of Maharashtra holds a 20% stake. • Adani Group holds the remaining 80% and has to bear the responsibility to invest and execute. For the first time in decades, Dharavi’s redevelopment has moved beyond paperwork and politics.[29]

Dharavi’s redevelopment has been nearly two decades in the making pushed now and then due to bureaucratic delays, failed tenders, and concerns over displacement. The land, split between BMC, Indian Railways, and state agencies, saw unplanned settlement growth and demanded immediate course correction. This is when the Government of Maharashtra introduced the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance, and Redevelopment) Act of 1971 to rehabilitate the slums rather than displace them. In 1976, the census also attempted to formalize residency through photo passes, but large-scale redevelopment remained elusive.

Demographics

[edit]

The total current population of the Dharavi slum is unknown because of fast changes in the population of migrant workers coming from neighbouring Gujarat state, though voter turnout for the 2019 Maharashtra state legislative assembly election was 119,092 (yielding a 60% rate). Some sources suggest it is 300,000[30][31] to about a million.[32] With Dharavi spread over 200 hectares (500 acres), it is also estimated to have a population density of 869,565 people per square mile. Among the people, about 20% work on animal skin production, tanneries and leather goods. Other artisans specialise in pottery work, textile goods manufacturing, retail and trade, distilleries and other caste professions – all of these as small-scale household operations. With a literacy rate of 69%, Dharavi is the most literate slum in India.[33]

The western edge of Dharavi is where its original inhabitants, the Kolis, reside. Dharavi consists of various language speakers such as Gujarati, Hindi, Marathi, Tamil, Telugu, and many more.[34] The slum residents are from all over India, people who migrated from rural regions of many different states.[35]

About 29% of the population of Dharavi is Muslim.[36][37] The Christian population is estimated to be about 6%,[38] while the rest are predominantly Hindus with some Buddhists and other minority religions. The slum has numerous mosques, temples and churches to serve people of Hindu, Islam and Christian faiths, with Badi Masjid, a mosque, as the oldest religious structure in Dharavi.

Location and characteristics

[edit]
Dharavi is located in Ward H East, marked in dark blue, one of the many British-era administrative wards of Mumbai city limits (yellow). Dharavi is southern end of Ward H East, and other residential and commercial areas in the Ward marked in dark blue include Santacruz, Vile Parle and Mahim.

Dharavi is a large area situated between Mumbai's two main suburban railway lines, the Western and Central Railways. It is also adjacent to Mumbai Airport. To the west of Dharavi are Mahim and Bandra, and to the north lies the Mithi River. The Mithi River empties into the Arabian Sea through the Mahim Creek. The area of Antop Hill lies to the east while the locality called Matunga is located in the South. Due to its location and poor sewage and drainage systems, Dharavi particularly becomes vulnerable to floods during the wet season.

Slum shacks in Dharavi, India.

Dharavi is considered one of the largest slums in the world.[39] The low-rise building style and narrow street structure of the area make Dharavi very cramped and confined. Like most slums, it is overpopulated.

Economy

[edit]
An embroidery unit in Dharavi.

In addition to the traditional pottery and textile industries in Dharavi,[11] there is an increasingly large recycling industry, processing recyclable waste from other parts of Mumbai. Recycling in Dharavi is reported to employ approximately 250,000 people.[40] While recycling is a major industry in the neighborhood, it is also reported to be a source of heavy pollution in the area.[40] The district has an estimated 5,000 businesses[41] and 15,000 single-room factories.[40] Two major suburban railways feed into Dharavi, making it an important commuting station for people in the area going to and from work.

Dharavi exports goods around the world.[6] Often these consist of various leather products, jewellery, various accessories, and textiles. Markets for Dharavi's goods include stores in the United States, Europe, and the Middle East.[6] The total (and largely informal economy) turnover is estimated to be between US$500 million,[7] and US$650 million per year,[42] to over US$1 billion per year.[40] The per capita income of the residents, depending on estimated population range of 300,000 to about 1 million, ranges between US$500 and US$2,000 per year.

A few travel operators offer guided tours through Dharavi, showing the industrial and the residential part of Dharavi and explaining about the problems and challenges Dharavi is facing. These tours give a deeper insight into a slum in general and Dharavi in particular.[43]

Utility services

[edit]

Potable water is supplied by the MCGM to Dharavi and the whole of Mumbai. However, a large amount of water is lost due to water thefts, illegal connection and leakage.[44] The community also has a number of water wells that are sources of non-potable water.[citation needed]

Cooking gas is supplied in the form of liquefied petroleum gas cylinders sold by state-owned oil companies,[45] as well as through piped natural gas supplied by Mahanagar Gas Limited.[46]

There are settlement houses that still do not have legal connections to the utility service and thus rely on illegal connection to the water and power supply which means a water and power shortage for the residents in Dharavi.[citation needed]

Sanitation issues

[edit]
Inside Dharavi
Mosque in Dharavi

Dharavi has severe problems with public health. Water access derives from public standpipes stationed throughout the slum. Additionally, with the limited lavatories they have, they are extremely filthy and broken down to the point of being unsafe. Mahim Creek is a local river that is widely used by local residents for urination and defecation causing the spread of contagious diseases.[11] The open sewers in the city drain to the creek causing a spike in water pollutants, septic conditions, and foul odours. Due to the air pollutants, diseases such as lung cancer, tuberculosis, and asthma are common among residents. There are government proposals in regards to improving Dharavi's sanitation issues. The residents have a section where they wash their clothes in water that people defecate in. This spreads the amount of disease as doctors have to deal with over 4,000 cases of typhoid a day. In a 2006 Human Development Report by the UN, they estimated there was an average of 1 toilet for every 1,440 people.[47]

Epidemics and other disasters

[edit]

Dharavi has experienced a long history of epidemics and natural disasters, sometimes with significant loss of lives. The first plague to devastate Dharavi, along with other settlements of Mumbai, happened in 1896, when nearly half of the population died. A series of plagues and other epidemics continued to affect Dharavi, and Mumbai in general, for the next 25 years, with high rates of mortality.[48][49] Dysentery epidemics have been common throughout the years and explained by the high population density of Dharavi. Other reported epidemics include typhoid, cholera, leprosy, amoebiasis and polio.[8][50] For example, in 1986, a cholera epidemic was reported, where most patients were children of Dharavi. Typical patients to arrive in hospitals were in late and critical care condition, and the mortality rates were abnormally high.[51] In recent years, cases of drug resistant tuberculosis have been reported in Dharavi.[52][53]

Fires and other disasters are common. For example, in January 2013, a fire destroyed many slum properties and caused injuries.[54] In 2005, massive floods caused deaths and extensive property damage.[55]

The COVID-19 pandemic also affected the slum. The first case was reported in April 2020.[56]

In the media

[edit]

From the main road leading through Dharavi, the place makes a desperate impression. However, once having entered the narrow lanes Dharavi proves that the prejudice of slums as dirty, underdeveloped, and criminal places does not fit real living conditions. Sure, communal sanitation blocks that are mostly in a miserable condition and overcrowded space do not comfort the living. Inside the huts, it is, however, very clean, and some huts share some elements of beauty. Nice curtains at the windows and balconies covered by flowers and plants indicate that people try to arrange their homes as cosy and comfortable as possible.

— Denis Gruber et al. (2005)[57]

In the West, Dharavi was most notably used as the backdrop in the British film Slumdog Millionaire (2008).[58] It has also been depicted in a number of Indian films, including Deewaar (1975), Nayakan (1987), Salaam Bombay! (1988), Parinda (1989), Dharavi (1991), Bombay (1995), Ram Gopal Varma's "Indian Gangster Trilogy" (1998–2005), the Sarkar series (2005–2017), Footpath (2003), Black Friday (2004), Mumbai Xpress (2005), No Smoking (2007), Traffic Signal (2007), Aamir (2008), Mankatha (2011), Thalaivaa (2013), Bhoothnath Returns (2014), Kaala (2018) and Gully Boy (2019).

Dharavi, Slum for Sale (2009) by Lutz Konermann and Rob Appleby is a German documentary.[59] In a programme aired in the United Kingdom in January 2010, Kevin McCloud and Channel 4 aired a two-part series titled Slumming It[60] which centered around Dharavi and its inhabitants. The poem "Blessing" by Imtiaz Dharker is about Dharavi not having enough water. For The Win, by Cory Doctorow, is partially set in Dharavi. In 2014, Belgian researcher Katrien Vankrunkelsven made a 22-minute film on Dharavi which is entitled The Way of Dharavi.[61]

Hitman 2, a video game released in 2018, featured the slums of Mumbai in one of its missions.[62][63] The Mumbai based video game Mumbai Gullies is expected to feature the slums of Dharavi in the fictional map.[64][65][needs update]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Dharavi is a densely populated informal settlement situated in central , , spanning roughly 2.1 square kilometers and accommodating approximately one million residents from varied ethnic and occupational backgrounds, yielding densities exceeding 400,000 per square kilometer. Emerging from 19th-century origins as a and tanning outpost on former marshland, it has expanded into Asia's largest such enclave through waves of rural-to-urban migration driven by industrial opportunities. Beyond its rudimentary housing and sanitation challenges, Dharavi operates as a self-sustaining economic powerhouse, with small-scale enterprises in , processing, textiles, , and garment production collectively generating an estimated annual turnover surpassing US$1 billion and up to 80% of Mumbai's municipal . This informal sector underscores Dharavi's role in Mumbai's supply chains, though initiatives have sparked disputes over livelihood preservation versus modernization.

Geography and Location

Physical Layout and Environmental Features

Dharavi occupies approximately 2.1 square kilometers (520 acres) of low-lying reclaimed marshland in central , originally comprising swamps and serving as a sparsely populated in the . The settlement's layout features a labyrinthine network of narrow , frequently under one meter wide, interspersed with multi-story buildings constructed from corrugated sheets, brick, and recycled materials. These structures house intertwined residential and industrial functions, including leather processing, pottery kilns, and garment workshops clustered in distinct zones such as the Kumbharwada pottery area and the 13th Compound recycling hub. Environmentally, the area's flat, swamp-derived terrain promotes waterlogging and flooding during monsoons, as heavy rainfall elevates the shallow and overflows open sewers integrated into the street layout. Industrial activities discharge effluents into adjacent water bodies like Mahim Creek, exacerbating pollution, while and unmanaged waste contribute to soil and contamination. is irregular, with many households receiving municipal water for only a few hours daily via communal taps, supplemented by private tankers, heightening vulnerability to microbial contamination and scarcity. Air quality suffers from emissions of unregulated small-scale industries and biomass burning, with studies indicating elevated particulate levels in enclosed workspaces and homes.

Urban Integration and Boundaries

Dharavi spans approximately 520 acres in central , positioned strategically between the city's Western and Central railway commuter lines, which form natural boundaries separating it from neighboring formal developments. To the south, it abuts and the Mahim Creek, while to the north and east, it interfaces with , Sion, and expanding commercial zones near the Bandra-Kurla Complex. These boundaries, often marked by highways like the and informal extensions, highlight Dharavi's compact footprint amid Mumbai's heterogeneous urban landscape. The settlement's urban integration stems from its central location, enabling residents and businesses to access Mumbai's broader infrastructure, including nearby stations like Junction and , as well as arterial roads such as 90 Feet Road that link it to commercial hubs and the . This connectivity supports daily commutes and economic exchanges, with Dharavi's informal pathways and lanes feeding into the city's formal road and rail networks despite inadequate internal provisioning. Economically, Dharavi functions as an embedded component of Mumbai's urban economy, with its clusters of manufacturing—such as leather tanning, , and —directly supplying raw materials and to formal markets across the city, fostering a symbiotic yet unequal relationship characterized by high productivity amid infrastructural deficits. This integration underscores Dharavi's role as a industrial suburb, where spatial proximity to affluent areas like Bandra-Kurla Complex amplifies its contributions to Mumbai's globalized supply chains, even as boundary demarcations remain contested in ongoing discourses.

Historical Development

Pre-Colonial and Early Colonial Origins

The area now occupied by Dharavi originated as a sparsely populated swamp and in pre-colonial , primarily inhabited by the indigenous Koli community at the northern tip of island, one of the seven islands comprising early Bombay. The Kolis, traditional fisherfolk, established a settlement known as , deriving their sustenance from the adjacent Creek, which served as a vital waterway for fishing and navigation. This is recorded in historical accounts, such as the Bombay Gazetteers, as one of the six principal Koli settlements in the region, reflecting the community's longstanding presence tied to coastal resources. During the early colonial era, Portuguese control over the Bombay islands from the introduced limited nearby, including a fort and church at across from Dharavi, but without substantial disruption to the Koli village. After the British East India Company acquired Bombay from in 1661, initial colonial activities focused on consolidation rather than transformation of peripheral areas like Dharavi; however, early 18th-century swamp reclamation efforts to unify the islands accelerated, causing Mahim Creek to silt up and undermine the Kolis' fishing economy, leading to their gradual displacement. In 1737, the British constructed Riwa Fort—also called Kala Qila—in Dharavi as a strategic to counter threats from Portuguese forces and Maratha expansions, marking one of the earliest permanent colonial structures in the area. A survey map by Captain Thomas Dickinson, prepared between 1812 and 1816, illustrates the persisting amid rural surroundings, underscoring Dharavi's character as an underdeveloped outpost rather than an urban settlement at the onset of the .

Expansion Under British Rule

Dharavi began forming as a distinct settlement in the marshy lands south of in the , during the height of British colonial administration in Bombay, when urban expansion and industrial policies displaced polluting trades from the city center. British municipal authorities, aiming to improve sanitation in the densely packed southern wards, relocated tanneries, potteries, and other odoriferous industries to peripheral swamps like Dharavi, which had previously served as fishing grounds for local Koli communities. This relocation, starting in the mid-19th century amid Bombay's rapid urbanization, attracted migrant artisans barred from central areas due to caste-based occupational restrictions and hygiene regulations enforced under colonial governance. The settlement's expansion accelerated with waves of rural migration driven by economic opportunities in Bombay's burgeoning textile and port sectors, particularly after the establishment of cotton mills in the 1850s, which swelled the city's population to approximately 500,000 by that decade. Famines in the Deccan regions, such as the widespread scarcity of 1876–1878, pushed laborers from Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Tamil Nadu toward the city, where Dharavi offered affordable, unregulated space for informal housing and workshops. Potters from Saurashtra and Muslim leather tanners from southern India formed early enclaves, establishing Kumbharwada as a pottery hub by relocating kilns from overcrowded urban fringes, while the absence of formal planning allowed haphazard growth across the swampy terrain. By the late , Dharavi had evolved into a sprawling hub, incorporating diverse trades like and , sustained by the colonial economy's demand for cheap labor but unchecked by investments that prioritized the European-dominated Fort area. The 1896–1897 epidemic prompted British clearances in central Bombay, further funneling displaced residents and small-scale manufacturers into Dharavi, where lax enforcement of building codes enabled vertical expansion and densification without municipal oversight. This pattern reflected broader colonial priorities favoring commercial zones over proletarian housing, resulting in Dharavi's transformation from isolated potter and tanner colonies into a consolidated shanty network by the early .

Post-Independence Evolution to 2000

Following India's independence in 1947, Dharavi experienced accelerated expansion driven by sustained rural-to-urban migration, as economic opportunities in Bombay's textile mills, docks, and emerging industries attracted laborers from across the country, particularly from , , and . Although already the largest in the city by that time, its footprint grew on former swampland and marshy areas, with informal settlements densifying around key sectors like leather tanning, which diversified into , garment manufacturing, and small-scale to accommodate the influx. This organic growth reflected broader Mumbai trends, where the squatter population surged post-1947, eventually comprising about 63% of the city's residents by the early , occupying just 8% of land at extreme densities exceeding 18,000 persons per square kilometer. In the and , municipal and state authorities pursued clearance under acts like the Bombay Slum Clearance Act of 1956, aiming to demolish hutments and relocate residents to on the city's periphery; however, these efforts largely failed in Dharavi, as evicted dwellers quickly reoccupied sites due to proximity to employment hubs and the impracticality of distant relocations amid ongoing migration. By the 1961 census, Mumbai's population stood at around 12% of the total urban populace, with Dharavi—spanning approximately 330 acres—solidifying as the preeminent informal settlement, its persistence underscoring the limitations of clearance-focused policies that ignored economic embeddedness and land scarcity. The 1970s marked a policy pivot toward in-situ improvement, exemplified by the national Slum Improvement Programme, which introduced basic amenities like water taps, community latrines, roads, drainage, and street lighting to and similar areas, though coverage remained uneven due to funding constraints and rapid densification. In 1971, the Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act formally recognized as a area, granting eligible residents provisional tenure rights and facilitating incremental upgrades rather than wholesale , which stabilized some tenancies while enabling further industrial clustering in and textiles. By the and , approaches evolved to incorporate market mechanisms, with pilot projects testing cross-subsidized where private developers built replacement housing in exchange for saleable floor space on upper floors; yet, in Dharavi, implementation lagged owing to land title disputes, resident resistance to relocation, and the area's entrenched . of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority in 1995 under the Shiv Sena-BJP administration introduced a structured scheme with incentives for developers, setting a January 1, 1995, cut-off for eligibility to curb post-policy encroachments, though actual rehousing in Dharavi remained minimal by 2000, preserving its status as a dense, self-sustaining enclave amid Mumbai's metropolitan boom.

Redevelopment Efforts from 2000 to 2025

In 2004, the Maharashtra state government approved the Dharavi Redevelopment Project (DRP), appointing the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to oversee the transformation of the informal settlement into planned housing and infrastructure, with an initial focus on rehabilitating eligible residents through public-private partnerships. Early efforts included surveys conducted between 2007 and 2008 to identify pre-2000 residents eligible for free rehabilitation housing, typically 350 square feet per family, while developers would fund the project by selling a portion of the redeveloped land commercially. The project faced repeated delays through the due to legal challenges, tender disputes, and allegations of irregularities in the bidding process, including a involving the previous tender winner, which led to its cancellation. In , the state issued a new tender for a seven-year redevelopment timeline under a model allocating 20% of land for government use and 80% for private development to cross-subsidize rehabilitation costs. Dubai-based initially secured the bid but faced court challenges from competitors, stalling progress until 2022, when the Adani Group's consortium, Navbharat Mega Developers Private Limited, emerged as the winning bidder with a commitment to invest over ₹20,000 in rehabilitation alone. From 2022 onward, implementation accelerated under the Adani-led plan, valued at approximately ₹3 lakh crore overall, with rehabilitation targeted for completion in seven years and full development spanning up to 17 years by 2032 or later. Key milestones included ongoing resident surveys to verify eligibility—limited to those settled before January 1, 2000—and the release of the first eligibility list on July 2, 2025, covering thousands of households. The master plan, incorporating upgraded , commercial spaces, and skill-training centers, was nearing final approval by mid-2025, though post-2000 migrants—estimated to comprise a significant portion of the —faced relocation risks without guaranteed in-situ . Controversies persisted, with opposition parties, including Congress leaders like Prithviraj Chavan and Varsha Gaikwad, labeling the project a "scam" involving undervalued land allocation to Adani and potential displacement of ineligible residents, claims the state government dismissed as politically motivated ahead of the 2024 Maharashtra elections. Resident groups expressed concerns over transparency in surveys and the adequacy of 350-square-foot units for preserving small-scale industries, while the ruling Mahayuti alliance's 2024 election victory facilitated renewed momentum, including land reallocations like the transfer of 43% of project land for free sale to offset costs. Adani executives described the initiative as their "most transformative" endeavor, emphasizing social impact through infrastructure like roads, water supply, and economic hubs, though independent verification of long-term viability remains pending as construction phases commence.

Demographics

Population Estimates and Density

Estimates of Dharavi's population vary due to the absence of formal census data in this informal settlement, with figures commonly ranging from 700,000 to over 1 million as of 2025. Recent reports tied to redevelopment planning assess the current population at nearly 1 million residents. The area encompasses approximately 2.39 square kilometers. Alternative measurements cite 2.1 square kilometers. , derived from these estimates, reaches over 400,000 persons per square kilometer when using the higher figure and larger area, marking it among the world's most densely populated urban zones. A 2021 analysis reported a density of 340,000 per square kilometer based on an 850,000 in 2.16 square kilometers. projections anticipate reducing the to around 485,000, thereby lowering significantly.

Socioeconomic and Migration Profiles

Dharavi's residents face low socioeconomic standing, characterized by limited access to formal employment and basic amenities, with most households reporting monthly incomes below 5,000 Indian rupees (approximately 60 USD), far undercutting Mumbai's citywide average exceeding 20,000 rupees. Per capita annual income estimates range from 500 to 2,000 USD, reflecting reliance on informal labor in small-scale industries where unskilled workers earn around 12,500 rupees monthly and skilled ones up to 30,000 rupees. A majority of the working-age population—predominantly aged 18-45—participates in the informal economy, with employment dynamics varying by sector but often involving long hours in household-based enterprises that yield variable and low wages. Migration drives Dharavi's demographic composition, with residents primarily consisting of internal migrants from rural seeking urban job prospects amid limited opportunities in home regions. Key origins include for garment and embroidery trades, for leather tanning and pottery, and for general labor, and for pottery, alongside smaller inflows from . This pattern aligns with Mumbai's broader influx, where 1971 data showed 57% of the population born outside the city, fueling growth through chains of and skill-based networks rather than random settlement. Recent increases in migrants from and have sustained despite redevelopment pressures.

Ethnic, Religious, and Linguistic Diversity

Dharavi's ethnic composition reflects India's patterns, with residents primarily from southern, western, and northern states, including significant Tamil communities engaged in and tanning, Gujarati potters, and migrants in and garment work. A 2009 survey indicated comprising about 55% of the population, Marathi speakers around 20%, and Gujaratis a notable minority, though these proportions may have shifted with ongoing migration. The area hosts diverse castes, with a substantial proportion of Scheduled Castes and other backward classes, including many Dalits who faced exclusion in rural areas. Religiously, Dharavi exhibits pluralism, with Hindus forming the majority at approximately 60-63%, Muslims around 30-33%, Christians about 6-9%, and smaller Buddhist and other groups. These estimates derive from local surveys and redevelopment studies, though exact figures vary due to informal settlement challenges in census enumeration; historical data from the 1990s suggested higher Muslim proportions near 40% amid communal tensions. Coexistence occurs amid shared economic spaces, with temples, mosques, and churches integrated into neighborhoods. Linguistically, over 30 languages are spoken, underscoring the settlement's role as a pan-Indian , with Tamil, Marathi, , and Gujarati predominant alongside regional dialects from migrants' origins. facilitates trade but also reinforces ethnic enclaves within sub-areas like Kumbharwada (potters) or Muslim-dominated tanning zones. This diversity stems from post-independence rural-to-urban flows, enabling cultural festivals and hybrid practices across groups.

Economic Dynamics

Key Industries in the Informal Sector


Dharavi's informal sector features a proliferation of small-scale, household-based enterprises focused on and processing, including , goods, textiles, and , often operating in single-room factories estimated at 15,000 units. These activities leverage low-cost labor and proximity to raw materials, fostering interlinked supply chains where waste from one industry fuels another, such as leather scraps used to power kilns. in tailoring, textiles, and related trades accounts for a significant portion of local livelihoods, with surveys indicating 48% of residents engaged in such independent work.
Recycling stands out as a dominant industry, with operations around 60% of Mumbai's through manual sorting, shredding, and resale to formal manufacturers, employing 10,000 to 12,000 workers in collection and roles. This sector handles diverse materials like , metals, and paper, contributing to Mumbai's overall by diverting landfill-bound refuse into reusable commodities. Leather processing, including tanning and crafting of bags, shoes, and apparel, occupies dedicated areas and supports markets, with businesses enduring challenges like fires while maintaining operations in cramped workshops. These units rely on imported hides and local , integrating with global supply chains despite regulatory hurdles on . Textile production encompasses , , , and garment assembly, with thousands of workers producing items for domestic retail and international brands in informal clusters that emphasize speed and customization. Pottery manufacturing, centered in Kumbharwada, involves artisan communities shaping clay into utilitarian and decorative items using traditional wheel-throwing and kiln-firing methods, sustained by intergenerational skills. These industries collectively underscore Dharavi's role as a hub of adaptive, resource-efficient production amid urban constraints.

Annual Turnover and Broader Contributions

Dharavi's generates an annual turnover exceeding $1 billion, driven primarily by small-scale in sectors such as goods, textiles, , , and . This figure, equivalent to roughly ₹8,000–9,000 at current exchange rates, reflects the aggregate value of goods produced and traded, though estimates vary due to the unorganized nature of the sector; one 2025 assessment placed it higher at ₹25,000 , potentially encompassing broader supply chain activities. These operations contribute to Mumbai's overall by supplying affordable inputs to formal industries, including recycled materials and semi-processed goods like tanned exported globally. Informal estimates suggest Dharavi accounts for 1–3% of Mumbai's GDP, underscoring its role as a low-cost production hub that supports the city's without relying on heavy . Beyond direct output, Dharavi's recycling enterprises process up to 60% of Mumbai's municipal , diverting thousands of tons annually from landfills and employing 10,000–12,000 workers in sorting, , and resale of plastics, metals, and organics. This circular model reduces environmental costs for the city while providing entry-level jobs to rural migrants, fostering self-employment in home-based units like garment stitching and firing that sustain family livelihoods amid limited formal opportunities.

Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Self-Reliance

Dharavi's residents demonstrate through a proliferation of micro-enterprises in the informal sector, where individuals and families operate small-scale units in leather goods, textiles, , and without reliance on formal financing or . These businesses, often home-based, employ local labor and utilize scavenged materials, enabling economic activity in densely packed environments. For instance, over 200 small and medium enterprises from Dharavi began selling products online via platforms like as of 2015, expanding market access beyond local networks. Innovation in Dharavi manifests in resource-efficient processes, particularly in recycling, where informal networks handle approximately 80% of Mumbai's solid , processing nearly 19,870 tons daily through manual sorting, , and repurposing of plastics, metals, and oils into sellable goods. This circular model, driven by low-capital techniques like repolishing paint cans for resale, achieves high efficiency comparable to formal industries while employing hundreds of thousands in segmented supply chains. Women-led initiatives, such as embroidery workshops and cooperatives, further exemplify adaptive innovation, producing goods for domestic and markets using traditional skills scaled to industrial volumes. Self-reliance in Dharavi stems from community-driven economic structures that prioritize internal job creation over external aid, with residents forming cooperatives and kinship-based enterprises to navigate regulatory voids and infrastructural deficits. This autonomy has sustained livelihoods for migrants from rural , fostering resilience through —frugal improvisation—that turns constraints into competitive advantages, as seen in the area's estimated 6,000 and units supporting 250,000 workers. Such patterns underscore a causal link between minimal state intervention and emergent entrepreneurial vitality, contrasting with top-down risks that could disrupt proven self-sustaining models.

Infrastructure and Services

Housing Conditions and Urban Density

Dharavi's urban density ranks among the highest globally, with recent estimates indicating a population of approximately 1.1 million residents confined to about 2.2 square kilometers, resulting in a density of over 500,000 persons per square kilometer. Earlier assessments from 2021 pegged the figure at around 850,000 people across 2.16 square kilometers (535 acres), yielding a density of 340,000 per square kilometer, though variations arise from differing census methodologies and informal settlement boundaries. This extreme concentration, far exceeding Mumbai's citywide average of about 21,000 per square kilometer, stems from historical land reclamation on swampy terrain and ongoing rural-to-urban migration, fostering layered vertical expansion rather than sprawl. Housing in Dharavi predominantly features informal, incrementally built structures that evolve from rudimentary shanties to semi-permanent multi-story units, typically 1 to 3 stories high, constructed with locally sourced materials including clay bricks, frameworks, wooden beams, , and rusted corrugated metal sheets for roofing. These dwellings, often spanning 10 to 20 square meters per family unit, lack standardized planning, leading to narrow alleys averaging 2-3 meters wide that impede emergency access and exacerbate fire risks, as evidenced by recurrent blazes such as the 2012 fire that displaced hundreds. Shared walls and ad-hoc additions prioritize space maximization over structural integrity or ventilation, with many units featuring open sewers adjacent to living areas, heightening vulnerability to monsoonal flooding in the low-lying . The prevalence of overcrowding—averaging 4-6 occupants per small room—intensifies health and safety hazards, including inadequate natural light, poor air circulation, and exposure to contaminants from adjacent informal industries like leather tanning and recycling. Despite incremental improvements through community-led reinforcements, such as brick infills over initial bamboo bases, formal building codes remain unenforced, perpetuating a patchwork urban fabric where residential spaces double as workshops, underscoring the adaptive resilience amid chronic resource scarcity. This density-driven morphology not only constrains mobility but also amplifies seismic and infrastructural strains, as noted in vulnerability assessments highlighting Dharavi's exposure relative to Mumbai's formal districts.

Access to Water, Electricity, and Sanitation

Residents of Dharavi face chronic water shortages, with supply provided once daily from the Bhandup reservoir via the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), though timings are unpredictable and coverage is inconsistent across the area's seven wards. Civic estimates indicate 30-40% of water is lost to leaks and illegal tapping, exacerbating scarcity for the nearly one million inhabitants who often rely on private tankers at inflated prices. In broader Mumbai slums, including Dharavi, average per capita consumption falls below the United Nations' recommended 20 liters per day for many households, with citywide supply averaging just 5.37 hours daily in 2024 and a 15% overall shortfall due to transmission losses nearing 9%. Electricity access in Dharavi is near-universal through informal grid connections, but reliability is low due to overloaded , frequent outages from feeder trippings, and widespread illegal tapping that strains the system. For instance, a tripping at the Dharavi receiving station caused a near-hour-long blackout in adjacent areas in 2025, highlighting vulnerabilities in the local distribution network. facilities, such as toilet blocks, often lack consistent power, with 60% reported without in slums per a 2025 assessment, forcing reliance on generators or candles during disruptions. Sanitation infrastructure remains inadequate, with approximately 65% of Dharavi uncovered by municipal sewerage lines, leading to open drainage and reliance on community toilet blocks that serve disproportionate populations. In Mumbai slums, 69% of these 6,800 blocks lack water supply, and only 25% of seats are allocated for women, contributing to health risks from improper waste disposal. The Slum Sanitation Program has installed blocks connected to sewers where feasible, but maintenance issues and overcrowding persist, with historical data indicating ratios as extreme as one toilet per 1,440 people in parts of Dharavi.

Transportation, Waste Management, and Utilities

Dharavi's internal transportation is characterized by a dense web of narrow lanes, typically 2-3 meters wide, which restrict access to pedestrians, bicycles, hand carts, and small auto-rickshaws while posing significant barriers to larger vehicles and emergency services. This layout, shaped by organic growth in a high-density environment exceeding 400,000 people per square kilometer, prioritizes informal mobility over formalized networks, contributing to congestion and limited vehicular throughput. Despite these constraints, the area's central position in provides robust external connectivity, with proximity to key suburban railway stations such as Sion, , Chunabhatti, and GTB Nagar, enabling residents to integrate into the city's rail-based commuter system that handles millions daily. Waste management in Dharavi operates predominantly through informal networks that handle a substantial share of Mumbai's refuse, up to 80% of the city's solid waste—approximately 19,870 tons per day—via manual sorting, processing, and of materials like plastics, metals, and textiles. These operations, centered in small-scale units, generate an estimated $1 billion in annual economic value, underscoring the slum's role as a hub for the metropolitan area's , though they often involve hazardous conditions without formal oversight or protective equipment. Formal municipal collection remains limited, with much of the waste arriving informally from across , highlighting a reliance on unregulated labor that efficiently diverts landfill-bound refuse but evades standardized environmental controls. Utilities provision, particularly , grapples with widespread informal and illegal connections due to barriers in formal regularization, such as insufficient residency , resulting in a scenario where over 70% of households may access power but face chronic instability. These unauthorized taps contribute to frequent short circuits, accounting for 70% of Mumbai's incidents linked to electrical faults, exacerbating risks in densely packed structures. proposals aim to introduce metered, reliable supply alongside other services like piped gas, but current deficiencies perpetuate vulnerabilities amid the area's industrial demands.

Public Health and Social Challenges

Historical Epidemics and Disease Outbreaks

The outbreak in Bombay, beginning in September 1896, devastated densely populated swampy areas like Dharavi, where poor and proximity to rat-infested docks facilitated rapid spread via vectors carrying . Municipal records document the establishment of Dharavi Hospital (Private Hospital No. 25) specifically to isolate and treat plague cases from the locality, reflecting the epidemic's intensity in such informal settlements amid the city's overall death toll exceeding 50,000 in the initial waves. The epidemic persisted in recurrent waves through , claiming an estimated 184,000 lives in Bombay alone, with Dharavi's marshland conditions exacerbating vulnerability to the rodent-borne . Cholera epidemics have recurrently struck Dharavi due to contaminated water sources and inadequate systems, with a notable outbreak in primarily affecting children, who comprised most admissions from the area. This vibrio cholerae-driven event underscored the slum's reliance on open drains and shared wells, fostering fecal-oral transmission in high-density environments lacking formal infrastructure. Similar waterborne outbreaks of typhoid and have been documented historically, often peaking during monsoons when flooding mixes with drinking supplies. Tuberculosis remains a persistent endemic threat in Dharavi, with elevated incidence rates linked to , , and poor ventilation; by 2012, cases of totally drug-resistant TB (TDR-TB) emerged from the , including three confirmed patients who succumbed despite treatment attempts.60085-3.pdf) Leprosy outbreaks have also been reported, tied to similar socioeconomic factors, though national elimination efforts reduced overt epidemics by the late . These patterns illustrate how Dharavi's informal urban form—characterized by substandard housing and limited access—has amplified disease transmission historically, independent of modern interventions.

Crime Rates, Social Cohesion, and Community Structures

Dharavi experiences crime rates lower than anticipated given its of over 277,000 people per square kilometer, with reports attributing relative safety to robust informal social controls rather than formal policing alone. Gang-related incidents, such as shootings tied to rivalries within groups like the 'K' Company, have occurred, including a 2022 of an auto-rickshaw driver that prompted invocation of the Control of Organised Act (MCOCA) against seven suspects. However, overall remains subdued compared to other slums like , and historical notoriety from the 1970s-1980s has diminished due to community vigilance. , including domestic , persists at rates reflective of broader Indian urban patterns, though underreporting is common owing to limited service access. Social cohesion in Dharavi stems from and shared cultural ties among diverse migrant groups, fostering mutual reliance that mitigates conflict despite ethnic heterogeneity. This manifested during the , where community-led surveillance reduced daily cases from 43 in May 2020 to six by December, and deaths from 10 to zero, through voluntary quarantines and aid distribution. Political engagement and high —69% as of 2022—further bolster unity, enabling residents to advocate for without relying solely on state intervention. Such cohesion counters slum stereotypes of , as interpersonal networks enforce norms via reputation and collective enforcement, reducing petty through dense social oversight. Community structures operate via informal bodies and NGOs that fill gaps in state services. The People's Responsible Organization for United Dharavi (PROUD), founded in 1979, coordinates issue-based committees for , , and dispute resolution, exemplifying resident-led initiatives. In areas like Dharavi , the Koli Jamaat serves as a traditional self-governing addressing developmental needs for the fishing community. Women's groups, such as those providing rations and hygiene aid during crises, enhance resilience, while sector-specific hubs—like pottery guilds with community centers established 70 years ago—promote cooperative oversight. These layered structures prioritize consensus over hierarchy, sustaining order amid rapid urbanization.

Education and Skill Development Gaps

In Dharavi, primary school enrollment is near universal for young children, but retention rates plummet due to socioeconomic pressures, with over 40% of students dropping out before completing and an additional 20% exiting between classes 6 and 8. These high dropout rates are exacerbated by , where families prioritize immediate income over long-term schooling, often compelling children—particularly girls—into informal labor such as household work or low-wage jobs in local industries like leather tanning or . School infrastructure challenges, including and inadequate facilities in municipal schools serving the slum's estimated 1 million residents, further contribute to disengagement, as do cultural norms in migrant-heavy communities from rural that undervalue formal beyond basic literacy. Literacy among adults remains below Mumbai's urban average, estimated at around 69% in older surveys, reflecting intergenerational gaps where parents' limited hinders support for children's learning. Child labor persists as a key barrier, with historical data from Dharavi indicating that a significant portion of working —up to 68% in small samples—enter the as early as age 10, primarily in service roles like hotel assistance, diverting them from schooling and perpetuating low-skill cycles. Economic vulnerability in the informal sector amplifies this, as families facing irregular incomes view as a luxury amid needs, leading to generational where uneducated replicate parental trajectories in unregulated workshops. Skill development in Dharavi relies heavily on informal apprenticeships within or networks, fostering practical abilities in trades like , garment stitching, and metalwork, but exposing gaps in formal vocational training essential for higher productivity or formal employment. These on-the-job learnings build through dense local networks, yet lack , , or exposure to modern technologies such as digital tools or systems, confining workers to low-value-added roles amid India's shifting economy toward formalized . Government initiatives like skill centers under the have limited penetration in Dharavi due to issues and of external programs, resulting in a persistent mismatch where informal workers' artisanal expertise does not translate to scalable, competitive skills, thus hindering broader .

Redevelopment Initiatives and Debates

Failures of Government-Led Sectoral Plans

Government-led redevelopment efforts for Dharavi, initiated under the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) framework established in 1995, have consistently underperformed, rehabilitating only about 10% of Mumbai's estimated 40 lakh slum dwellers over two decades despite promises to the contrary. Early proposals dating back to the 1964 Development Plan for Greater Bombay envisioned organized housing but faltered due to inadequate funding mechanisms and failure to integrate the area's informal economic activities, leading to repeated shelving of sectoral plans. A 1985 comprehensive survey under the Mumbai Urban Development Project proposed high-rise rehabilitation but collapsed amid land acquisition disputes and resident resistance to relocation, as top-down designs ignored community-embedded livelihoods like leather tanning and that generate over ₹15,000 annually. The 2004 M.M. Mitra Committee report recommended a phased into five sectors with free for eligible residents, yet implementation stalled under subsequent administrations due to bureaucratic inertia and unaddressed concerns over disruption, leaving the plan unexecuted. In 2006, a tender awarded to Seclink Technologies for ₹92,000 worth of development was cancelled in following allegations of irregularities and developer , exemplifying how financial non-viability and oversight lapses derailed SRA-linked initiatives. The 2011 master plan resolution aimed at holistic but yielded minimal progress, with over 500 SRA projects citywide—including those in Dharavi—failing to launch due to developer defaults, corruption in allotments, and understaffing that hampered verification processes. These sectoral plans' shortcomings stem from a disconnect between imposed formalization and Dharavi's self-sustaining , where fragmented, piecemeal approaches—like the 2016 five-segment proposal—exacerbated displacement fears without preserving on-site employment for over one million workers. Lack of resident consultation and transparency fueled opposition, as seen in stalled 2018 tenders cancelled over eligibility disputes, while systemic SRA issues such as shoddy post-rehabilitation housing and illegal encroachments further eroded trust. Urban planners have critiqued the absence of visionary integration of economic productivity, arguing that government-centric models prioritize revenue-generating over sustainable community relocation.

Private Sector Involvement: Adani's 2023 Bid and Progress

In November 2022, Adani Properties Private Limited, a of the , emerged as the highest bidder for the Dharavi Redevelopment Project (DRP), offering Rs 5,069 to develop approximately 259 hectares of land in . The state government formalized the award in July 2023 through a government resolution, marking a shift toward leadership in what had been repeated government-led failures since initial plans in 2004. Under the bid terms, Adani committed to providing free rehabilitation units of at least 300 square feet to eligible residents who could prove occupancy before January 1, 2000, while retaining development rights for the remaining land to fund the project through commercial sales, with an estimated total cost exceeding Rs 95,000 . The project faced immediate legal scrutiny from Dubai-based Seclink Technologies Corporation, a rival bidder alleging irregularities in the tender process and eligibility criteria. The Bombay High Court dismissed Seclink's petition in December 2024, upholding the award to Adani, and the Supreme Court of India refused a stay on the project in March 2025 despite further challenges on procedural grounds. Additional resident-led petitions in the Bombay High Court in July 2025 contested land ownership proofs and consent mechanisms, but these have not halted core activities. Progress advanced with ground surveys commencing in March 2024, assigning unique ID numbers to over 90,000 structures to verify eligibility. By July 2025, the first eligibility list was released, qualifying more than 75% of surveyed tenement holders for new housing, with the project timeline set for construction commencement in January 2025 and phased completion by 2032. Adani Group officials have emphasized a "human-centric" approach, integrating informal economy preservation through skill training and commercial zones, though critics, including some residents and opposition politicians, argue the process risks displacing ineligible dwellers without adequate alternatives. As of October 2025, preparatory works continue amid ongoing verifications, positioning the DRP as Adani's flagship urban renewal effort in Mumbai.

Economic Risks of Displacement vs. Modernization Gains

Dharavi's generates an annual turnover estimated at over $1 billion, equivalent to approximately ₹10,000 , primarily through small-scale industries including leather tanning, , , and garment production that employ around 250,000 workers. These activities form dense, interdependent supply chains reliant on the slum's low-cost spatial clustering and social networks, contributing up to 1-2% of Mumbai's tax base despite minimal formal . Displacement under redevelopment plans risks fragmenting these networks, as workers in micro-enterprises—often tenants without land rights—face exclusion from rehabilitation, potentially resulting in mass job losses and a plunge in local economic output. The Adani-led Dharavi Redevelopment Project, initiated in 2023 with a projected investment of ₹2.5 , aims to rehouse eligible residents in high-rise units while developing commercial spaces to formalize economic activity. Proponents argue that modernization could yield gains through enhanced , such as reliable utilities and transport links, enabling higher productivity and integration into 's formal markets, where informal sectors currently face barriers like credit access and regulatory evasion costs. However, empirical evidence from prior Mumbai slum redevelopments indicates frequent mismatches, with relocated workers experiencing 20-30% income drops due to disrupted proximity to clients and suppliers, compounded by higher living costs in peripheral sites. Balancing these trade-offs requires preserving informal economic resilience; unchecked displacement could exacerbate urban poverty, as seen in cases where post-redevelopment vacancy rates exceed 50% in commercial zones due to unaffordability for original tenants. Conversely, targeted modernization—retaining industrial clusters and providing skill transitions—might amplify Dharavi's output by leveraging its labor-intensive base in a formalized setting, though historical data suggests net gains accrue more to developers than without enforceable safeguards. This tension underscores the causal link between spatial continuity and informal productivity, where abrupt relocation often yields short-term losses outweighing uncertain long-term efficiencies.

Policy Lessons: Informal Economy Preservation vs. Formalization

Dharavi's , encompassing sectors like leather tanning, , garment stitching, and , generates an estimated annual turnover exceeding $1 billion, underscoring its role as a vital engine for employment and urban productivity in . This output rivals that of formal industrial zones, with approximately 1,700 small- and medium-scale manufacturing units employing hundreds of thousands, including migrant workers absorbed into low-barrier entry activities that formal sectors often overlook. Preservation advocates argue that such dynamism arises from spatial integration of living and working spaces, as seen in areas like Kumbharwada, where potter households operate kilns and wheels within residences, enabling efficient resource use and adaptation to market demands without regulatory overhead. Disruptions through wholesale formalization risk severing these causal links, potentially elevating as workers lose proximity to supply chains and clients, a pattern observed in prior Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) projects where relocated residents faced 20-30% income drops due to costs and skill mismatches. Formalization efforts, such as the ongoing Dharavi Redevelopment Project (DRP) initiated in 2004 and advanced via private bids like Adani Group's 2022-2023 tender, prioritize infrastructure upgrades—modern housing, sanitation, and utilities—to mitigate health hazards and integrate the area into Mumbai's formal tax base. Proponents cite potential gains in worker from reliable and , which currently constrain operations; for instance, informal units 60% of Mumbai's , employing 10,000-12,000 but hampered by inconsistent power leading to output losses. Yet from similar initiatives reveals pitfalls: top-down models often prioritize high-rise residential blocks over commercial space, displacing productive activities and fostering that benefits developers more than residents, as informal economies thrive on land-intensive, low-rent models incompatible with standardized formal layouts. Studies emphasize that formalization without tenure security or economic erodes circular , where informal feeds formal industries, potentially increasing Mumbai's costs by billions annually if Dharavi's capacity diminishes. Key policy lessons pivot on hybrid strategies over binary choices. Preservation succeeds when policies recognize informal sectors' causal efficiencies—high labor absorption (up to 40% of Mumbai's jobs) and under constraints—by granting legal and incremental , as partial upgrades in Kumbharwada have sustained output worth millions without full displacement. Formalization yields net gains only via bottom-up integration, such as allocating 30-50% of redeveloped space for commercial use and skill retraining tied to preserved clusters, averting the shocks from past SRA failures where 70% of beneficiaries reported worsened economic conditions post-relocation. Overly rigid formal models, often critiqued for ignoring ground-level data in favor of profit-driven blueprints, amplify biases in toward elite interests, neglecting how informal resilience buffers economic downturns, as during when Dharavi's networks sustained 80% of businesses versus formal sector layoffs. Ultimately, evidence favors policies that formalize essentials (utilities, ) while preserving economic cores, ensuring amplifies rather than supplants the informal productivity that underpins Dharavi's $1 billion contribution.

Cultural Impact and Perceptions

Representation in Media and Film

Dharavi has been prominently featured in international and Indian cinema, often serving as a backdrop for narratives of , resilience, and aspiration amid . The 2008 film , directed by , includes key childhood scenes filmed directly in Dharavi's alleys and shanties, depicting the protagonist Jamal Malik's early life marked by , crime, and survival in the slum's chaotic environment. The film's global success, including eight , amplified Dharavi's image as a site of extreme deprivation juxtaposed with rags-to-riches potential, though critics noted its blend of realism with dramatic sensationalism drawn from Mumbai's underbelly. In Bollywood, (2019), directed by and starring , is explicitly set in Dharavi, portraying the rise of a fictional rapper inspired by real Mumbai street artists like Divine and . Shooting occurred on location in Dharavi's narrow lanes, foot-over bridges, and residential clusters, emphasizing themes of hip-hop emergence from informal settlements while highlighting family pressures, bootlegging, and . The production designer integrated sets seamlessly into the slum's fabric to capture its vibrancy, countering purely negative stereotypes by showcasing cultural innovation. Other films like Dhobi Ghat (2010), directed by , intersect Dharavi's periphery with broader narratives, focusing on class divides through characters navigating laundry workers and slum migrants. Documentaries have provided non-fictional lenses, often scrutinizing socioeconomic dynamics over dramatized tales. Dharavi, Slum for Sale (2010) examines pressures on the area's 1 million across 535 acres, portraying it as a migrant-driven squeezed by urban expansion. Dharavi Hustle (2016) spotlights the slum's burgeoning rap scene on 90 Feet Road, framing hip-hop as an outlet for youth amid industries and units that generate substantial informal revenue. Mainstream media coverage, including outlets like the and , frequently emphasizes woes and overcrowding—such as during the 2010 Slumming It series—but underrepresents Dharavi's estimated $1 billion annual economic output from leather goods, textiles, and waste processing, leading to perceptions skewed toward victimhood rather than entrepreneurial adaptation.

Slum Tourism: Economic Role and Ethical Critiques

Slum tourism in Dharavi emerged prominently in the early , with operators like Reality Tours and Travel pioneering guided visits that emphasize the area's informal industries such as leather tanning, , and , rather than solely its deprivation. These tours attract around 15,000 visitors annually through Reality Tours alone, generating an estimated $240,000 in yearly turnover from guided experiences as of 2016, a figure that supports local employment for community-based guides and boosts small businesses catering to tourists. Operators claim 80% of profits are reinvested into Dharavi via affiliated NGOs like Reality Gives, funding education programs and skill training for over 2,000 children since 2009, thereby channeling revenue into development amid the slum's broader $650 million annual economic output from micro-enterprises. This economic role counters narratives of idleness by showcasing resident productivity, with surveys indicating 86% of participants report shifted perceptions toward viewing Dharavi as a site of rather than despair. Critics argue that slum tourism fosters voyeurism and commodifies poverty, turning residents' daily struggles into spectacles for affluent outsiders, often labeled "poverty porn" for prioritizing aesthetic encounters over substantive engagement with structural inequalities like inadequate sanitation affecting 80% of the area. Ethical concerns include privacy invasions—despite no-photo policies in some tours—and the reinforcement of stereotypes, as visits rarely address policy failures in housing or migration drivers, instead depoliticizing poverty by highlighting individual resilience and informal economies without critiquing government inaction. Academic analyses, such as those examining tour reviews, reveal a tendency to romanticize conditions, ignoring health risks from open sewers and industrial pollution that contribute to disease outbreaks, while benefits accrue unevenly, primarily to tour operators rather than broadly alleviating the 60% informal workforce's precarity. Proponents counter that ethical tours mitigate exploitation by employing locals and fostering empathy, with community perception studies showing majority resident approval for the visibility and supplemental income it provides, though such self-reported data from operator-commissioned research warrants scrutiny for potential bias. Ultimately, while tourism injects modest funds into an economy dwarfed by Dharavi's internal productivity, its net ethical value hinges on whether it catalyzes advocacy for systemic reforms or merely sustains a gaze that exoticizes hardship without addressing root causes like land tenure insecurity.

Global Narratives: Victimhood vs. Productivity Realities

Global media and advocacy narratives often frame Dharavi as an emblem of abject victimhood, emphasizing overcrowding, , and disease prevalence to underscore systemic failures in urban governance and the need for charitable intervention. Such depictions, prevalent in outlets like the and , prioritize images of squalor over economic agency, portraying residents primarily as dependents on rather than contributors to Mumbai's growth. This perspective aligns with broader institutional biases in Western and NGOs, which tend to amplify deprivation narratives to justify funding appeals, sometimes overlooking self-sustaining community dynamics. In contrast, empirical assessments reveal Dharavi's robust productivity, with an estimated 15,000 small businesses and workshops driving an valued at over $1 billion annually. This output supports approximately 250,000 workers across diverse sectors, including leather processing—which accounts for up to 17% of India's leather product exports—garment manufacturing, , and operations that handle a substantial portion of Mumbai's . These activities demonstrate causal resilience: migrants from rural leverage low in informal to achieve upward mobility, generating value through rather than formal . Recycling enterprises, for instance, employ 10,000–12,000 individuals and process up to 60% of the city's recyclable , turning refuse into raw materials for global supply chains and mitigating environmental burdens that formalized systems struggle to address. This productivity challenges victimhood tropes by evidencing how dense, adaptive networks foster economic multipliers, with resident entrepreneurs exporting goods worth hundreds of millions while sustaining local consumption. The disconnect arises partly from selective sourcing: victimhood accounts draw from anecdotal hardship stories amplified by films like (2008), which grossed over $378 million worldwide while reinforcing stereotypes of criminality and despair, whereas productivity data emerges from economic surveys highlighting enterprise density and trade volumes. Prioritizing the latter aligns with observable outcomes, such as Dharavi's role in Mumbai's 6–7% contribution to India's GDP, where informal labor fills gaps left by rigid regulations and provides a buffer against spikes, as seen during economic downturns.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.