Hubbry Logo
Electroweak interactionElectroweak interactionMain
Open search
Electroweak interaction
Community hub
Electroweak interaction
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Electroweak interaction
Electroweak interaction
from Wikipedia

In particle physics, the electroweak interaction or electroweak force is the unified description of two of the fundamental interactions of nature: electromagnetism (electromagnetic interaction) and the weak interaction. Although these two forces appear very different at everyday low energies, the theory models them as two different aspects of the same force. Above the unification energy, on the order of 246 GeV,[a] they would merge into a single force. Thus, if the temperature is high enough – approximately 1015 K – then the electromagnetic force and weak force merge into a combined electroweak force.

During the quark epoch (shortly after the Big Bang), the electroweak force split into the electromagnetic and weak force. It is thought that the required temperature of 1015 K has not been seen widely throughout the universe since before the quark epoch, and currently the highest human-made temperature in thermal equilibrium is around 5.5×1012 K (from the Large Hadron Collider).

Sheldon Glashow,[1] Abdus Salam,[2] and Steven Weinberg[3] were awarded the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physics for their contributions to the unification of the weak and electromagnetic interaction between elementary particles, known as the Weinberg–Salam theory.[4][5] The existence of the electroweak interactions was experimentally established in two stages, the first being the discovery of neutral currents in neutrino scattering by the Gargamelle collaboration in 1973, and the second in 1983 by the UA1 and the UA2 collaborations that involved the discovery of the W and Z gauge bosons in proton–antiproton collisions at the converted Super Proton Synchrotron. In 1999, Gerardus 't Hooft and Martinus Veltman were awarded the Nobel prize for showing that the electroweak theory is renormalizable.

History

[edit]

After the Wu experiment in 1956 discovered parity violation in the weak interaction, a search began for a way to relate the weak and electromagnetic interactions. Extending his doctoral advisor Julian Schwinger's work, Sheldon Glashow first experimented with introducing two different symmetries, one chiral and one achiral, and combined them such that their overall symmetry was unbroken. This did not yield a renormalizable theory, and its gauge symmetry had to be broken by hand as no spontaneous mechanism was known, but it predicted a new particle, the Z boson. This received little notice, as it matched no experimental finding.

In 1964, Salam and John Clive Ward[6] had the same idea, but predicted a massless photon and three massive gauge bosons with a manually broken symmetry. Later around 1967, while investigating spontaneous symmetry breaking, Weinberg found a set of symmetries predicting a massless, neutral gauge boson. Initially rejecting such a particle as useless, he later realized his symmetries produced the electroweak force, and he proceeded to predict rough masses for the W and Z bosons. Significantly, he suggested this new theory was renormalizable.[3] In 1971, Gerard 't Hooft proved that spontaneously broken gauge symmetries are renormalizable even with massive gauge bosons.

Formulation

[edit]
Weinberg's weak mixing angle θW, and relation between coupling constants g, g′, and e. Adapted from Lee (1981).[7]
The pattern of weak isospin, T3, and weak hypercharge, YW, of the known elementary particles, showing the electric charge, Q, along the weak mixing angle. The neutral Higgs field (circled) breaks the electroweak symmetry and interacts with other particles to give them mass. Three components of the Higgs field become part of the massive W and Z bosons.

Mathematically, electromagnetism is unified with the weak interactions as a Yang–Mills field with an SU(2) × U(1) gauge group, which describes the formal operations that can be applied to the electroweak gauge fields without changing the dynamics of the system. These fields are the weak isospin fields W1, W2, and W3, and the weak hypercharge field B. This invariance is known as electroweak symmetry.

The generators of SU(2) and U(1) are given the name weak isospin (labeled T) and weak hypercharge (labeled Y) respectively. These then give rise to the gauge bosons that mediate the electroweak interactions – the three W bosons of weak isospin (W1, W2, and W3), and the B boson of weak hypercharge, respectively, all of which are "initially" massless. These are not physical fields yet, before spontaneous symmetry breaking and the associated Higgs mechanism.

In the Standard Model, the observed physical particles, the W±
and Z0
bosons
, and the photon, are produced through the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the electroweak symmetry SU(2) × U(1)Y to U(1)em,[b] effected by the Higgs mechanism (see also Higgs boson), an elaborate quantum-field-theoretic phenomenon that "spontaneously" alters the realization of the symmetry and rearranges degrees of freedom.[8][9][10][11]

The electric charge arises as the particular linear combination (nontrivial) of YW (weak hypercharge) and the T3 component of weak isospin () that does not couple to the Higgs boson. That is to say: the Higgs and the electromagnetic field have no effect on each other, at the level of the fundamental forces ("tree level"), while any other combination of the hypercharge and the weak isospin must interact with the Higgs. This causes an apparent separation between the weak force, which interacts with the Higgs, and electromagnetism, which does not. Mathematically, the electric charge is a specific combination of the hypercharge and T3 outlined in the figure.

U(1)em (the symmetry group of electromagnetism only) is defined to be the group generated by this special linear combination, and the symmetry described by the U(1)em group is unbroken, since it does not directly interact with the Higgs.[c]

The above spontaneous symmetry breaking makes the W3 and B bosons coalesce into two different physical bosons with different masses – the Z0
boson, and the photon (γ),

where θW is the weak mixing angle. The axes representing the particles have essentially just been rotated, in the (W3, B) plane, by the angle θW. This also introduces a mismatch between the mass of the Z0
and the mass of the W±
particles (denoted as mZ and mW, respectively),

The W1 and W2 bosons, in turn, combine to produce the charged massive bosons W±
:[12]

Lagrangian

[edit]

Before electroweak symmetry breaking

[edit]

The Lagrangian for the electroweak interactions is divided into four parts before electroweak symmetry breaking manifests,

The term describes the interaction between the three W vector bosons and the B vector boson,

where () and are the field strength tensors for the weak isospin and weak hypercharge gauge fields.

is the kinetic term for the Standard Model fermions. The interaction of the gauge bosons and the fermions are through the gauge covariant derivative,

where the subscript j sums over the three generations of fermions; Q, u, and d are the left-handed doublet, right-handed singlet up, and right handed singlet down quark fields; and L and e are the left-handed doublet and right-handed singlet electron fields. The Feynman slash means the contraction of the 4-gradient with the Dirac matrices, defined as

and the covariant derivative (excluding the gluon gauge field for the strong interaction) is defined as

Here is the weak hypercharge and the are the components of the weak isospin.

The term describes the Higgs field and its interactions with itself and the gauge bosons,

where is the vacuum expectation value.

The term describes the Yukawa interaction with the fermions,

and generates their masses, manifest when the Higgs field acquires a nonzero vacuum expectation value, discussed next. The for are matrices of Yukawa couplings.

After electroweak symmetry breaking

[edit]

The Lagrangian reorganizes itself as the Higgs field acquires a non-vanishing vacuum expectation value dictated by the potential of the previous section. As a result of this rewriting, the symmetry breaking becomes manifest. In the history of the universe, this is believed to have happened shortly after the hot big bang, when the universe was at a temperature 159.5±1.5 GeV[13] (assuming the Standard Model of particle physics).

Due to its complexity, this Lagrangian is best described by breaking it up into several parts as follows.

The kinetic term contains all the quadratic terms of the Lagrangian, which include the dynamic terms (the partial derivatives) and the mass terms (conspicuously absent from the Lagrangian before symmetry breaking)

where the sum runs over all the fermions of the theory (quarks and leptons), and the fields and are given as

with to be replaced by the relevant field ( ) and f abc by the structure constants of the appropriate gauge group.

The neutral current and charged current components of the Lagrangian contain the interactions between the fermions and gauge bosons,

where The electromagnetic current is

where is the fermions' electric charges. The neutral weak current is

where is the fermions' weak isospin.[d]

The charged current part of the Lagrangian is given by

where is the right-handed singlet neutrino field, and the CKM matrix determines the mixing between mass and weak eigenstates of the quarks.[d]

contains the Higgs three-point and four-point self interaction terms,

contains the Higgs interactions with gauge vector bosons,

contains the gauge three-point self interactions,

contains the gauge four-point self interactions,

contains the Yukawa interactions between the fermions and the Higgs field,

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The electroweak interaction is a fundamental interaction in particle physics that unifies the electromagnetic force, responsible for phenomena such as light and electricity, with the weak nuclear force, which governs processes like beta decay and neutrino interactions. Developed as part of the Standard Model of particle physics, the electroweak theory describes these forces as manifestations of a single underlying symmetry at high energies, broken at lower energies to yield the distinct electromagnetic and weak interactions observed today. The theoretical framework was pioneered by in 1961 with a gauge model based on the SU(2) × U(1), which incorporated both charged and neutral weak currents alongside . Independently, and extended this in 1967–1968 by incorporating via the , allowing the mediating bosons to acquire mass while preserving gauge invariance and renormalizability. This mechanism, originally proposed by , , Robert Brout, and others in 1964, introduces a scalar Higgs field whose breaks the electroweak symmetry, generating masses for the W⁺, W⁻, and Z⁰ bosons (approximately 80 GeV/c² and 91 GeV/c², respectively) while leaving the massless. Experimental confirmation began with the discovery of weak neutral currents in 1973 by the experiment at , providing direct evidence for the Z⁰-mediated interaction predicted by the theory. The W and Z bosons were subsequently discovered in 1983 at CERN's by the UA1 and UA2 collaborations, with masses and properties matching theoretical predictions to high precision. The crowning achievement came in 2012 with the observation of the at the by the ATLAS and CMS experiments, confirming the mechanism responsible for electroweak symmetry breaking and particle masses. The electroweak theory has withstood rigorous tests through precision electroweak measurements at facilities like LEP and the LHC, which constrain parameters such as the weak mixing angle (sin²θ_W ≈ 0.231) and verify the 's predictions to better than 0.1% accuracy in many observables. No significant deviations have been observed, underscoring its success, though ongoing research probes for subtle effects or extensions beyond the , such as in rare decays or high-energy scattering.

Historical development

Early theoretical motivations

The weak interaction was first theoretically described by in 1933 through a four-fermion contact interaction model, which posited a point-like coupling between neutrons, protons, electrons, and neutrinos to explain processes. This theory successfully accounted for the basic kinematics of but suffered from fundamental limitations, notably its non-renormalizability, which led to unphysical infinities in higher-order calculations and prevented reliable predictions at high energies. A major empirical challenge to early weak interaction theories emerged in 1957 with the , which demonstrated parity violation in the of nuclei by observing an asymmetric emission of electrons preferentially in the direction opposite to the nuclear spin. This result implied that the weak force distinguishes between left-handed and right-handed chiralities, or "handedness," fundamentally breaking mirror and necessitating a revision of symmetry assumptions in weak processes. Early attempts to unify electromagnetism with other forces, including precursors to the weak interaction, included Oskar Klein's 1926 extension of Theodor Kaluza's five-dimensional framework, which compactified an extra spatial dimension to recover four-dimensional alongside . Independently, in 1954, Chen Ning Yang and Robert Mills developed non-Abelian gauge theories based on isotopic spin , providing a for local gauge invariance that extended beyond the Abelian U(1) of and laid groundwork for mediating interactions via vector bosons. Building on these insights, and proposed in that weak currents exhibit a universal vector-axial vector (V-A) structure, where the charged weak current couples to left-handed fermions with equal vector and axial-vector components, unifying leptonic and hadronic weak decays under a single framework. This V-A theory resolved discrepancies in decay rates and incorporated parity violation naturally, motivating further exploration of gauge symmetries as a pathway to broader unification.

Unification by Glashow, Weinberg, and Salam

In 1961, Sheldon L. Glashow proposed a unifying the weak and electromagnetic interactions under the structure group SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y, where SU(2)_L acts on left-handed doublets and U(1)_Y on . This framework introduced four massless gauge bosons in the unbroken phase: the SU(2)_L triplet W^1, W^2, W^3 and the U(1)_Y singlet B. The charged weak bosons W^± arise from linear combinations of W^1 and W^2, while the neutral sector involves mixing between W^3 and B to produce the and a would-be massive neutral boson. To account for the observed short range of weak interactions, Glashow initially assigned masses to the weak bosons through explicit terms in the Lagrangian, though this approach compromised the gauge invariance of the theory. Subsequent developments by Glashow, Weinberg, and Salam addressed the mass issue by incorporating via the , first proposed in 1964, without explicit violation of gauge invariance. In particular, they introduced a complex scalar Higgs doublet transforming as (2, 1) under SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y to generate the necessary mass terms through its . This innovation ensured renormalizability and preserved the underlying symmetries at high energies. In 1967, Steven Weinberg formulated a complete electroweak model for leptons using this setup, predicting massive charged W^± bosons and a neutral Z boson, alongside the massless photon emerging from the unbroken U(1)_EM subgroup after symmetry breaking. The model naturally incorporated parity-violating neutral weak currents mediated by the Z, a feature absent in purely vector-like theories. Independently, Abdus Salam developed an equivalent theory in 1968, emphasizing its unification of weak and electromagnetic forces and predicting the same neutral current interactions. These works collectively established the Glashow-Weinberg-Salam (GWS) model as the cornerstone of electroweak theory. The orthogonal mixing in the neutral sector is governed by the θW\theta_W, defined by tanθW=g/g\tan \theta_W = g'/g, where gg and gg' are the coupling constants for SU(2)_L and U(1)_Y, respectively; this angle determines the relative strengths of the weak and electromagnetic interactions, with the coupling e=gsinθW=gcosθWe = g \sin \theta_W = g' \cos \theta_W. The GWS framework was driven empirically by observations of parity violation in , such as the 1957 , highlighting the chiral nature of weak interactions.

Experimental confirmations and Nobel recognition

The detection of weak neutral currents provided the first major experimental confirmation of the electroweak unification theory. In 1973, the Gargamelle bubble chamber experiment at CERN's Proton Synchrotron observed neutrino-induced hadronic showers without accompanying charged leptons, indicating neutral current interactions mediated by the predicted Z boson. This discovery, announced in a CERN seminar in July 1973, ruled out alternative models lacking neutral currents and aligned with the theory's prediction of purely left-handed weak interactions, resolving concerns about the absence of right-handed currents in weak processes. Further validation came with the discovery of the W and Z bosons at CERN's (SPS) collider in 1983. The UA1 and UA2 collaborations detected W bosons through their decay into electron-neutrino pairs, confirming a mass of approximately 80 GeV/c², while Z bosons were identified via pair decays with a mass around 90 GeV/c². These observations, achieved using proton-antiproton collisions at center-of-mass energies up to 540 GeV, precisely matched the electroweak model's predictions for the intermediate vector bosons responsible for weak interactions. The theoretical contributions underpinning these discoveries were recognized with the 1979 Nobel Prize in Physics, awarded to , , and for their unified electroweak theory that incorporated both electromagnetic and weak forces under a single SU(2) × U(1) gauge symmetry. Subsequent early precision tests at the Large Electron-Positron (LEP) collider and the Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) in the late 1980s and early 1990s refined measurements of the weak mixing angle, yielding sin²θ_W ≈ 0.23, consistent with the model's radiative corrections and further confirming the absence of right-handed neutral currents through asymmetry analyses in Z decays.

Theoretical foundations

Gauge group and symmetries

The electroweak interaction is described by a gauge theory based on the local SU(2)L×U(1)YSU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y, where SU(2)LSU(2)_L is the associated with left-handed and U(1)YU(1)_Y is the corresponding to . This structure unifies the weak and electromagnetic forces at high energies, with the SU(2)LSU(2)_L sector capturing the charged and neutral weak interactions through its three generators, while U(1)YU(1)_Y accounts for the quantum number that, when combined, yields conservation. The nature of SU(2)LSU(2)_L implies self-interactions among its gauge fields, leading to nontrivial dynamics absent in the purely Abelian U(1)YU(1)_Y. The gauge bosons of the theory consist of three massive vector fields from the SU(2)LSU(2)_L triplet, denoted Wμ1W^1_\mu, Wμ2W^2_\mu, and Wμ3W^3_\mu, which mediate the weak interactions, and a single massless BμB_\mu from the U(1)YU(1)_Y singlet, associated with . In the low-energy limit, after electroweak , the neutral bosons mix to form the physical AμA_\mu and ZμZ_\mu through the θW\theta_W, defined such that sinθW=g/g2+g2\sin \theta_W = g' / \sqrt{g^2 + g'^2}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.