Hubbry Logo
Eutectic systemEutectic systemMain
Open search
Eutectic system
Community hub
Eutectic system
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Eutectic system
Eutectic system
from Wikipedia
A phase diagram for a fictitious binary chemical mixture (with the two components denoted by A and B) used to depict the eutectic composition, temperature, and point. (L denotes the liquid state.)

A eutectic system or eutectic mixture (/jˈtɛktɪk/ yoo-TEK-tik)[1] is a type of a homogeneous mixture that has a melting point lower than those of the constituents.[2] The lowest possible melting point over all of the mixing ratios of the constituents is called the eutectic temperature. On a phase diagram, the eutectic temperature is seen as the eutectic point (see plot).[3]

Non-eutectic mixture ratios have different melting temperatures for their different constituents, since one component's lattice will melt at a lower temperature than the other's. Conversely, as a non-eutectic mixture cools down, each of its components solidifies into a lattice at a different temperature, until the entire mass is solid. A non-eutectic mixture thus does not have a single melting/freezing point temperature at which it changes phase, but rather a temperature at which it changes between liquid and slush (known as the liquidus) and a lower temperature at which it changes between slush and solid (the solidus).

In the real world, eutectic properties can be used to advantage in such processes as eutectic bonding, where silicon chips are bonded to gold-plated substrates with ultrasound, and eutectic alloys prove valuable in such diverse applications as soldering, brazing, metal casting, electrical protection, fire sprinkler systems, and nontoxic mercury substitutes.

The term eutectic was coined in 1884 by British physicist and chemist Frederick Guthrie (1833–1886). The word originates from Greek εὐ- (eû) 'well' and τῆξῐς (têxis) 'melting'.[2] Before his studies, chemists assumed "that the alloy of minimum fusing point must have its constituents in some simple atomic proportions", which was indeed proven to be not always the case.[4]

Eutectic phase transition

[edit]
Four eutectic structures: A) lamellar B) rod-like C) globular D) acicular.

The eutectic solidification is defined as follows:[5]

This type of reaction is an invariant reaction, because it is in thermal equilibrium; another way to define this is the change in Gibbs free energy equals zero. Tangibly, this means the liquid and two solid solutions all coexist at the same time and are in chemical equilibrium. There is also a thermal arrest for the duration of the phase change during which the temperature of the system does not change.[5]

The resulting solid macrostructure from a eutectic reaction depends on a few factors, with the most important factor being how the two solid solutions nucleate and grow. The most common structure is a lamellar structure, but other possible structures include rodlike, globular, and acicular.[6]

Non-eutectic compositions

[edit]

Compositions of eutectic systems that are not at the eutectic point can be classified as hypoeutectic or hypereutectic:

  • Hypoeutectic compositions are those with a greater composition of species α and a smaller percent composition of species β than the eutectic composition (E)
  • Hypereutectic compositions are characterized as those with a higher composition of species β and a lower composition of species α than the eutectic composition.

As the temperature of a non-eutectic composition is lowered the liquid mixture will precipitate one component of the mixture before the other. In a hypereutectic solution, there will be a proeutectoid phase of species β whereas a hypoeutectic solution will have a proeutectic α phase.[5]

Types

[edit]

Alloys

[edit]

Eutectic alloys have two or more materials and have a eutectic composition. When a non-eutectic alloy solidifies, its components solidify at different temperatures, exhibiting a plastic melting range. Conversely, when a well-mixed, eutectic alloy melts, it does so at a single, sharp temperature. The various phase transformations that occur during the solidification of a particular alloy composition can be understood by drawing a vertical line from the liquid phase to the solid phase on the phase diagram for that alloy.

Some uses for eutectic alloys include:

Others

[edit]
Solid–liquid phase change of ethanol–water mixtures
  • Sodium chloride and water form a eutectic mixture whose eutectic point is −21.2 °C[8] and 23.3% salt by mass.[9] The eutectic nature of salt and water is exploited when salt is spread on roads to aid snow removal, or mixed with ice to produce low temperatures (for example, in traditional ice cream making).
  • Ethanol–water has an unusually biased eutectic point, i.e. it is close to pure ethanol, which sets the maximum proof obtainable by fractional freezing.
  • "Solar salt", 60% NaNO3 and 40% KNO3, forms a eutectic molten salt mixture which is used for thermal energy storage in concentrated solar power plants.[10] To reduce the eutectic melting point in the solar molten salts, calcium nitrate is used in the following proportion: 42% Ca(NO3)2, 43% KNO3, and 15% NaNO3.
  • Lidocaine and prilocaine—both are solids at room temperature—form a eutectic that is an oil with a 16 °C (61 °F) melting point that is used in eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (EMLA) preparations.
  • Menthol and camphor, both solids at room temperature, form a eutectic that is a liquid at room temperature in the following proportions: 8:2, 7:3, 6:4, and 5:5. Both substances are common ingredients in pharmacy extemporaneous preparations.[11]
  • Minerals may form eutectic mixtures in igneous rocks, giving rise to characteristic intergrowth textures exhibited, for example, by granophyre.[12]
  • Some inks are eutectic mixtures, allowing inkjet printers to operate at lower temperatures.[13]
  • Choline chloride produces eutectic mixtures with many natural products such as citric acid, malic acid and sugars. These liquid mixtures can be used, for example, to obtain antioxidant and antidiabetic extracts from natural products.[14]

Strengthening mechanisms

[edit]

Alloys

[edit]

The primary strengthening mechanism of the eutectic structure in metals is composite strengthening (See strengthening mechanisms of materials). This deformation mechanism works through load transfer between the two constituent phases where the more compliant phase transfers stress to the stiffer phase.[15] By taking advantage of the strength of the stiff phase and the ductility of the compliant phase, the overall toughness of the material increases. As the composition is varied to either hypoeutectic or hypereutectic formations, the load transfer mechanism becomes more complex as there is a load transfer between the eutectic phase and the secondary phase as well as the load transfer within the eutectic phase itself.

A second tunable strengthening mechanism of eutectic structures is the spacing of the secondary phase. By changing the spacing of the secondary phase, the fraction of contact between the two phases through shared phase boundaries is also changed. By decreasing the spacing of the eutectic phase, creating a fine eutectic structure, more surface area is shared between the two constituent phases resulting in more effective load transfer.[16] On the micro-scale, the additional boundary area acts as a barrier to dislocations further strengthening the material. As a result of this strengthening mechanism, coarse eutectic structures tend to be less stiff but more ductile while fine eutectic structures are stiffer but more brittle.[16] The spacing of the eutectic phase can be controlled during processing as it is directly related to the cooling rate during solidification of the eutectic structure. For example, for a simple lamellar eutectic structure, the minimal lamellae spacing  is:[17]

Where  is is the surface energy of the two-phase boundary,  is the molar volume of the eutectic phase,   is the solidification temperature of the eutectic phase,  is the enthalpy of formation of the eutectic phase, and  is the undercooling of the material. So, by altering the undercooling, and by extension the cooling rate, the minimal achievable spacing of the secondary phase is controlled.

Strengthening metallic eutectic phases to resist deformation at high temperatures (see creep deformation) is more convoluted as the primary deformation mechanism changes depending on the level of stress applied. At high temperatures where deformation is dominated by dislocation movement, the strengthening from load transfer and secondary phase spacing remain as they continue to resist dislocation motion. At lower strains where Nabarro-Herring creep is dominant, the shape and size of the eutectic phase structure plays a significant role in material deformation as it affects the available boundary area for vacancy diffusion to occur.[18]

Other critical points

[edit]
Iron–carbon phase diagram, showing the eutectoid transformation between austenite (γ) and pearlite.

Eutectoid

[edit]

When the solution above the transformation point is solid, rather than liquid, an analogous eutectoid transformation can occur. For instance, in the iron-carbon system, the austenite phase can undergo a eutectoid transformation to produce ferrite and cementite, often in lamellar structures such as pearlite and bainite. This eutectoid point occurs at 723 °C (1,333 °F) and 0.76 wt% carbon.[19]

Peritectoid

[edit]

A peritectoid transformation is a type of isothermal reversible reaction that has two solid phases reacting with each other upon cooling of a binary, ternary, ..., n-ary alloy to create a completely different and single solid phase.[20] The reaction plays a key role in the order and decomposition of quasicrystalline phases in several alloy types.[21] A similar structural transition is also predicted for rotating columnar crystals.

Peritectic

[edit]
Gold–aluminium phase diagram

Peritectic transformations are also similar to eutectic reactions. Here, a liquid and solid phase of fixed proportions react at a fixed temperature to yield a single solid phase. Since the solid product forms at the interface between the two reactants, it can form a diffusion barrier and generally causes such reactions to proceed much more slowly than eutectic or eutectoid transformations. Because of this, when a peritectic composition solidifies it does not show the lamellar structure that is found with eutectic solidification.

Such a transformation exists in the iron-carbon system, as seen near the upper-left corner of the figure. It resembles an inverted eutectic, with the δ phase combining with the liquid to produce pure austenite at 1,495 °C (2,723 °F) and 0.17% carbon.

At the peritectic decomposition temperature the compound, rather than melting, decomposes into another solid compound and a liquid. The proportion of each is determined by the lever rule. In the Al-Au phase diagram, for example, it can be seen that only two of the phases melt congruently, AuAl2 and Au2Al, while the rest peritectically decompose.

"Bad solid solution"

[edit]

Not all minimum melting point systems are "eutectic". The alternative of "poor solid solution" can be illustrated by comparing the common precious metal systems Cu-Ag and Cu-Au. Cu-Ag, source for example https://himikatus.ru/art/phase-diagr1/Ag-Cu.php, is a true eutectic system. The eutectic melting point is at 780 °C, with solid solubility limits at fineness 80 and 912 by weight, and eutectic at 719. Since Cu-Ag is a true eutectic, any silver with fineness anywhere between 80 and 912 will reach solidus line, and therefore melt at least partly, at exactly 780 °C. The eutectic alloy with fineness exactly 719 will reach liquidus line, and therefore melt entirely, at that exact temperature without any further rise of temperature till all of the alloy has melted. Any silver with fineness between 80 and 912 but not exactly 719 will also reach the solidus line at exactly 780 °C, but will melt partly. It will leave a solid residue with fineness of either exactly 912 or exactly 80, but never some of both. It will melt at constant temperature without further rise of temperature until the exact amount of eutectic (fineness 719) alloy has melted off to divide the alloy into eutectic melt and solid solution residue. On further heating, the solid solution residue dissolves in the melt and changes its composition until the liquidus line is reached and the whole residue has dissolved away. Cu-Au source for example https://himikatus.ru/art/phase-diagr1/Au-Cu.php does display a melting point minimum at 910 °C and given as 44 atom % Cu, which converts to about 20 weight percent Cu - about 800 fineness of gold. But this is not a true eutectic. 800 fine gold melts at 910 °C, to a melt of exact same composition, and the whole alloy will melt at exact same temperature. But the differences happen away from the minimum composition. Unlike silver with fineness other than 719 (which melts partly at exactly 780 °C through a wide fineness range), gold with fineness other than 800 will reach solidus and start partial melting at a temperature different from and higher than 910 °C, depending on the alloy fineness. The partial melting does cause some composition changes - the liquid will be closer in fineness towards 800 than the remaining solid, but the liquid will not have fineness of exactly 800 and the fineness of the remaining solid will depend on the fineness of the liquid. The underlying reason is that for an eutectic system like Cu-Ag, the solubility in liquid phase is good but solubility in solid phase is limited. Therefore when a silver-copper alloy is frozen, it actually separates into crystals of 912 fineness silver and 80 fineness silver - both are saturated and always have the same composition at the freezing point of 780 °C. Thus the alloy just below 780 °C consists of two types of crystals of exactly the same composition regardless of the total alloy composition, only the relative amount of each type of crystals differs. Therefore they always melt at 780 °C until one or other type of crystals, or both, will be exhausted. In contrast, in Cu-Au system the components are miscible at the melting point in all compositions even in solid. There can be crystals of any composition, which will melt at different temperatures depending on composition. However, Cu-Au system is a "poor" solid solution. There is a substantial misfit between the atoms in solid which, however, near the melting point is overcome by entropy of thermal motion mixing the atoms. That misfit, however, disfavours the Cu-Au solution relative to phases in which the atoms are better fitted, such as the melt, and causes the melting point to fall below the melting point of components.

Eutectic calculation

[edit]

The composition and temperature of a eutectic can be calculated from enthalpy and entropy of fusion of each components.[22]

The Gibbs free energy G depends on its own differential:

Thus, the G/T derivative at constant pressure is calculated by the following equation:

The chemical potential is calculated if we assume that the activity is equal to the concentration:

At the equilibrium, , thus is obtained as

Using[clarification needed] and integrating gives

The integration constant K may be determined for a pure component with a melting temperature and an enthalpy of fusion :

We obtain a relation that determines the molar fraction as a function of the temperature for each component:

The mixture of n components is described by the system

which can be solved by

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
A eutectic system is a of two or more substances that exhibits a specific composition, known as the eutectic composition, at which the mixture melts or solidifies congruently at a single temperature lower than the melting points of the individual components, without forming intermediate compounds or segregating into phases during the transition. In a binary eutectic phase diagram, the eutectic point represents the lowest temperature at which the liquid phase is in equilibrium with two phases, marking the of the liquidus curves where the transitions directly from liquid to a lamellar or rod-like microstructure of the two solids upon cooling. Eutectic s are fundamental in for controlling solidification behavior, enabling the design of alloys with enhanced castability, mechanical properties, and thermal characteristics; notable examples include the lead-tin (Pb-Sn) used in solders, which has a eutectic at 61.9 wt% Sn and 183°C, and multicomponent eutectics in phase change materials for applications.

Fundamentals

Definition and Characteristics

A eutectic system refers to a homogeneous of two or more substances that exhibits a distinct or solidification lower than that of any of its individual components, achieved specifically at the eutectic composition. This phenomenon arises in multi-component systems where the interaction between the substances leads to a lowered , allowing the mixture to transition directly from to (or vice versa) at a single without an intermediate mushy state. In binary systems, comprising two components, this defines a foundational type of phase equilibrium commonly observed in alloys, salts, and other materials. Key characteristics of a eutectic system include its representation as an invariant point on the , where the phase coexists in equilibrium with multiple distinct solid phases. Upon cooling the eutectic composition, these solid phases crystallize simultaneously from the , resulting in a microstructure composed of intergrown crystals. This point marks the minimum melting within the system for binary or ternary mixtures, distinguishing it from other compositions that melt over a temperature range. The invariance ensures that neither nor composition can vary without disrupting the equilibrium under fixed pressure conditions. The behavior at the eutectic point is governed by the Gibbs , expressed as F=CP+2F = C - P + 2, where FF is the , CC is the number of components, and PP is the number of phases. For a binary eutectic system (C=2C = 2), three phases coexist at the eutectic (P=3P = 3: liquid and two solids), yielding F=23+2=1F = 2 - 3 + 2 = 1. With pressure held constant in typical phase diagrams, this reduces to an effective invariance (F=0F = 0), fixing both the eutectic temperature and composition uniquely. The term "eutectic" was coined in 1884 by British physicist and chemist Frederick Guthrie, derived from the Greek words eu- (good or well) and têxis (melting), reflecting its property of easy melting. This nomenclature built on pioneering work in phase diagrams by Dutch chemist Hendrik Willem Bakhuis Roozeboom in the late , which laid the groundwork for understanding such equilibria.

Thermodynamic Principles

The eutectic point in a arises from the thermodynamic condition where the of the phase becomes equal to the weighted sum of the Gibbs free energies of the two coexisting solid phases at the lowest possible for that composition range. This intersection represents the minimum free energy state, stabilizing the liquid phase below the melting points of the pure components. The , defined as G=HTSG = H - TS, where HH is , TT is , and SS is , governs phase stability; at equilibrium, the minimizes GG. In eutectic systems, this minimization occurs because the liquid's free energy curve touches the common tangent connecting the free energies of the two solid phases, ensuring no lower energy configuration exists. At the eutectic point, equilibrium is achieved through the equality of s for each component across phases: μiliquid=μisolid α=μisolid β\mu_i^\text{liquid} = \mu_i^{\text{solid } \alpha} = \mu_i^{\text{solid } \beta} for components i=1,2i = 1, 2, where μi\mu_i is the partial molar . This condition implies that the liquid composition is simultaneously in equilibrium with both solid phases, forming an invariant point with zero under the for binary systems at constant . The equality ensures that infinitesimal transfers of components between phases do not change the overall free energy, maintaining stability. The depression of the melting temperature in eutectic systems stems from the interplay of and . The for pure components is positive, requiring energy input to melt solids into ordered ; however, mixing in the phase introduces a favorable , ΔSmix=R(x1lnx1+x2lnx2)\Delta S_\text{mix} = -R (x_1 \ln x_1 + x_2 \ln x_2) for ideal solutions, where RR is the and xix_i are mole fractions. This entropic gain lowers the overall of the more than that of the solids (which often exhibit limited and thus lower mixing ), offsetting the enthalpic cost and stabilizing the at reduced temperatures. In non-ideal systems, enthalpic interactions can further enhance this effect if mixing is exothermic. While the principles are most straightforward in binary systems, they extend to multi-component cases, such as ternary eutectics, which represent four-phase invariants (liquid equilibrating with three solid phases) at a fixed and composition. Here, chemical potential equality holds for all three components across the four phases, leading to even more complex free energy surfaces but following the same minimization logic.

Phase Behavior

Eutectic Point and Transition

In a binary eutectic system, the eutectic point represents the specific composition and at which the phase of fixed composition undergoes a direct and invariant transformation into two distinct solid phases upon cooling, without passing through intermediate solid solutions. This point occurs at the intersection of the liquidus curves for the two solid phases, marking the lowest at which the can exist in equilibrium with both solids. The at the eutectic point is isothermal, occurring precisely at the eutectic temperature TeT_e, and resembles a congruent transformation in its reversibility but involves the simultaneous formation of multiple solid phases from the , rather than a single phase. During solidification, the of eutectic composition decomposes into a mechanical mixture of the two solid phases in a fixed ratio determined by the applied to their compositions. Upon , the reverse process occurs, with the two solids combining to form the at TeT_e. This invariant nature stems from the , where for a under isobaric conditions, three phases coexist at a single point, fixing both temperature and composition. In a typical binary phase diagram for a eutectic system, the eutectic point is depicted where the two liquidus lines (bounding the single-phase liquid region) converge downward with the solidus lines, forming a characteristic "V" shape at the base. Above the liquidus lines lies the fully liquid region, while below the eutectic temperature, the diagram features two-phase regions consisting of one solid solution and the eutectic mixture, separated by solvus lines that delineate limited solid solubility. The solidus at the eutectic point is horizontal, emphasizing the invariant isothermal reaction, with labels indicating regions such as liquid (L), solid α (one terminal phase), solid β (the other terminal phase), α + L, β + L, and α + β. The kinetics of the eutectic transition involve of the coupled phases from the undercooled followed by their cooperative growth. Initial typically occurs heterogeneously at impurities or container walls, with the undercooling below TeT_e driving the process; once nucleated, the two phases grow side-by-side in a coupled manner to maintain the eutectic composition at the solid- interface. This growth is diffusion-controlled, where solute rejection ahead of the advancing front leads to constitutional undercooling, but the coupled eutectic front remains stable under moderate velocities. The seminal Jackson-Hunt model describes this as lamellar or rod-like growth, where the interlamellar spacing balances undercooling due to and diffusion, enabling rapid solidification without decoupling into primary phases.

Non-Eutectic Compositions

In binary eutectic systems, compositions that deviate from the exact eutectic point exhibit sequential solidification involving a primary (proeutectic) phase followed by the eutectic reaction. Hypoeutectic alloys, which contain a lower concentration of the solute component than the eutectic composition, begin solidification with the formation of the primary solvent-rich phase upon crossing the liquidus line during cooling. This primary phase, often appearing as dendrites, precipitates from the liquid, enriching the remaining melt in solute until the eutectic temperature is reached, at which point the liquid transforms into the eutectic mixture of the two solid phases. For instance, in the Al-Si system, hypoeutectic alloys with less than 12.6 wt% Si first form primary aluminum dendrites before the eutectic solidification occurs. Hypereutectic compositions, symmetrically opposite to hypoeutectic ones, have a higher solute content than the eutectic point and initiate solidification with the primary solute-rich phase. Upon cooling past the liquidus, this primary phase forms, depleting the liquid of solute and shifting its composition toward the eutectic point, leading eventually to the eutectic transformation at the invariant temperature. An example is seen in hypereutectic Al-Si alloys exceeding 12.6 wt% Si, where primary silicon particles precipitate first, followed by the aluminum-silicon eutectic. During the solidification of these non-eutectic compositions, phase diagrams employ horizontal tie-lines in two-phase regions to delineate the equilibrium compositions of coexisting phases, such as and solid. These tie-lines, drawn at a given , connect the boundaries of the phase fields and allow determination of the relative fractions of phases present, providing insight into the evolving proportions as solidification progresses from the primary phase to the eutectic. The resulting microstructure in non-eutectic alloys typically consists of proeutectic dendrites or particles of the primary phase distributed within a matrix of the eutectic structure. This composite arrangement arises because the primary phase grows ahead of the eutectic front, often leading to a cored dendritic morphology due to solute partitioning, with the finer eutectic lamellae or rods filling the interdendritic spaces upon completion of solidification.

Types and Examples

Eutectic Alloys

Eutectic alloys refer to metallic systems, typically binary or multi-component mixtures of metals, that feature a specific composition and temperature at which the liquid phase simultaneously solidifies into two distinct solid phases without an intermediate temperature range. This invariant reaction occurs at the eutectic point, resulting in a mixture with the lowest possible melting temperature for that system, which distinguishes it from non-eutectic compositions that solidify over a temperature interval. In metallic alloys, these systems are particularly valuable in materials engineering due to their predictable phase behavior during solidification, enabling control over microstructure and properties through composition adjustments. For instance, the lead-tin (Pb-Sn) binary system exemplifies this, with its eutectic at 61.9 wt% Sn and a melting temperature of 183°C, forming a lamellar structure of α-Pb and β-Sn phases upon cooling. Prominent examples of eutectic alloys include the iron-carbon (Fe-C) system, where the eutectic point is at 4.3 wt% carbon and 1148°C, leading to the formation of —a of and (Fe₃C)—in white cast irons. This composition is critical for producing high-strength, hard castings used in industrial machinery. Similarly, the aluminum-silicon (Al-Si) system has a eutectic at 12.6 wt% Si and 577°C, resulting in a microstructure of primary aluminum dendrites and a fine eutectic of aluminum and particles, which enhances fluidity during casting. These examples highlight how eutectic points in metallic systems allow for tailored solidification paths that influence mechanical properties like and . In industrial applications, eutectic and near-eutectic alloys are extensively employed for their processing advantages. The Pb-Sn eutectic composition serves as the basis for traditional solders in electronics assembly, providing reliable joints due to its low melting point and excellent wettability on metal surfaces, though lead-free alternatives like Sn-Ag-Cu are increasingly adopted for environmental reasons. Near-eutectic Fe-C alloys, such as those in gray and white cast irons, are cast into components like engine blocks and machine bases, leveraging the eutectic's low shrinkage and high fluidity for complex shapes. Hypoeutectic Al-Si alloys, with silicon contents below 12.6 wt% (e.g., 7-9 wt% Si in alloys like A356), are widely used for automotive engine blocks, offering a balance of lightweight design, good thermal conductivity, and machinability while avoiding the brittleness of primary silicon in hypereutectic variants. Bearing alloys, exemplified by Cu-Sn bronzes with 5-10 wt% Sn, utilize the hypoeutectic region's delta phase (Cu₄₁Sn₁₁) for enhanced wear resistance and embeddability in lubricated contacts, such as in bushings and thrust washers. The primary advantages of eutectic alloys stem from their phase behavior, including minimized melting ranges that facilitate uniform heating and cooling in manufacturing processes, superior castability from reduced in the state, and enhanced wettability that promotes in joining applications like . These properties not only lower requirements for but also improve defect-free solidification, contributing to reliable performance in demanding environments such as high-temperature automotive parts and precision electronics.

Non-Metallic Eutectics

Non-metallic eutectics encompass a wide range of systems, including ceramics, ionic salts, and organic compounds, where the eutectic point enables lowered temperatures and tailored phase behaviors for applications in thermal management, processing, and preservation. Unlike metallic systems, these often exhibit brittle microstructures and are leveraged for their insulating properties, , and ability to form glassy or composite phases at high or low temperatures. In ceramic systems, the Al₂O₃-SiO₂ binary eutectic, occurring at approximately 1590°C with a composition of about 6-8 wt% Al₂O₃, is utilized to produce high-temperature composites and refractories. This eutectic facilitates the formation of and phases, enabling directionally solidified s with enhanced thermal stability and creep resistance for and applications. Ionic salt eutectics, such as the NaCl-KCl system, form at a near-equimolar composition (approximately 50 mol% each, or 43 wt% NaCl) with a of 657°C, making them suitable as phase-change materials (PCMs) for high-temperature in plants. These salts offer high (around 280 J/g) and good thermal stability up to 800°C, though mitigation is required for long-term use. Organic and polymer eutectics, particularly binary mixtures of fatty acids like capric-myristic acid (CA-MA) or lauric-palmitic acid (LA-PA), exhibit low melting points (18-44°C) and latent heats of 150-200 J/g, ideal for low-temperature heat storage in building envelopes or electronics cooling. These bio-based PCMs demonstrate thermal reliability over thousands of cycles with minimal . In pharmaceuticals, eutectic co-crystals—distinguished from simple mixtures by molecular interactions—improve drug and , as seen in systems like carbamazepine-saccharin, without altering the eutectic phase behavior. Key applications of non-metallic eutectics include fluxes in glassmaking, where the CaO-SiO₂ eutectic (around 50 mol% each, at 1544°C) lowers and promotes homogeneous in soda-lime-silica glasses. In geothermal brines, eutectic freeze processes target salt recovery from multicomponent solutions, reducing waste and enabling zero-liquid-discharge operations at temperatures below -20°C. For , natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES), such as trehalose-glucose-sorbitol-water mixtures, serve as non-toxic cryoprotectants, maintaining cell viability above 80% by depressing freezing points and stabilizing biomolecular structures during .

Microstructure and Properties

Eutectic Microstructures

In eutectic solidification, the microstructure forms through coupled growth, where the two solid phases nucleate and advance simultaneously from the liquid-solid interface in a diffusion-controlled manner, maintaining a cooperative relationship to accommodate the eutectic composition. This process ensures that solute diffusion in the liquid ahead of the interface balances the compositional differences between the phases, preventing the formation of a single-phase dendrite and promoting a fine-scale interpenetrating structure. Eutectic microstructures exhibit distinct morphologies depending on the relative volume fractions of the phases and growth conditions. Lamellar structures consist of alternating parallel plates of the two phases, often observed when the phases have similar volume fractions. Rod-like morphologies feature cylindrical rods of the minority phase embedded in a matrix of the majority phase, typically when one phase constitutes less than about 30% of the volume. Irregular morphologies arise when at least one phase is faceted, leading to non-planar interfaces and disordered arrangements without the regularity of lamellar or rod patterns. The structure of these microstructures is influenced by growth rate, undercooling, and between the phases and liquid. Higher growth rates generally refine the microstructure by reducing spacing, while increased undercooling promotes finer features to minimize the driving force for . Interfacial energy dictates the preferred morphology, with lower energies favoring lamellar arrangements for stability. The Jackson-Hunt theory provides a foundational model for regular eutectics, predicting that the eutectic spacing λ\lambda scales with growth velocity VV as λV1/2\lambda \propto V^{-1/2}, derived from balancing solute and undercooling contributions during steady-state growth. Eutectic colonies, which are oriented groups of aligned lamellae or rods, are commonly observed and characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which reveals the fine-scale arrangement and orientation within the solidified material.

Strengthening Mechanisms

In eutectic alloys, dispersion strengthening arises from the fine distribution of second-phase lamellae or particles that obstruct dislocation glide. These phases force dislocations to bypass them through the Orowan bowing mechanism, where the critical stress required for looping around the obstacles scales with the inverse of the interphase spacing. This effect is particularly pronounced in rapidly solidified eutectic aluminum alloys, such as Al-Si systems, where nanoscale eutectic silicon particles elevate yield strengths to over 400 MPa compared to coarser microstructures. Load partitioning contributes to enhanced mechanical performance in eutectic systems featuring a ductile matrix reinforced by a harder phase, mimicking composite . In NiAl-Cr eutectics, for instance, the brittle NiAl matrix transfers stress to the more ductile Cr fibers during deformation, improving while maintaining high strength levels above 1000 MPa at elevated temperatures. This mechanism relies on coherent or semi-coherent interfaces that facilitate efficient load sharing without premature interface decohesion. Refinement of the eutectic microstructure further bolsters strength via the Hall-Petch relation, where smaller lamellar spacings increase the density of barriers to motion. Experimental studies on Fe-C-Cr-Ni eutectic alloys demonstrate this dependency, with yield strength increasing linearly with λ1/2\lambda^{-1/2}, where λ\lambda is the lamellar spacing; for spacings reduced to below 1 μ\mum through rapid solidification, strengths exceed 1.5 GPa. This relationship holds across various metallic eutectics, emphasizing the role of growth kinetics in optimizing properties. Despite these benefits, eutectic strengthening has limitations, including potential when the volume fraction of hard phases exceeds 50%, as seen in high-entropy eutectics where cracking dominates . Heat treatments can induce coarsening of lamellae, diminishing refinement effects and reducing yield strength by up to 30% in Al-based systems. These challenges underscore the need for controlled processing to balance strength and .

Eutectoid Reaction

The eutectoid reaction is an invariant, isothermal phase transformation in the solid state, where a single phase decomposes into two distinct solid phases upon cooling through the eutectoid temperature. This reaction occurs in binary or multicomponent systems and is analogous to the eutectic reaction but confined to the solid region of the . In phase diagrams, the eutectoid point is marked by a horizontal line, termed the eutectoid isotherm, at which the parent solid phase and the two product phases coexist in equilibrium, with the composition of the parent phase fixed at the eutectoid composition. The transformation is a process driven by the redistribution of solute atoms between the emerging phases, often resulting in cooperative growth mechanisms that produce fine, interleaved microstructures such as lamellae or . Kinetics of the eutectoid reaction are typically analyzed using time-temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams, which plot the start and finish times of the transformation as a function of temperature below the eutectoid isotherm. These diagrams reveal a characteristic "C-shaped" curve for many systems, reflecting the competing effects of thermodynamic driving force (increasing with undercooling) and atomic rates (decreasing at lower temperatures), with the minimum transformation time occurring at the "nose" of the curve. Under practical cooling conditions, the reaction is often undercooled, leading to refined microstructures that influence material properties like strength and . A prominent example of the eutectoid reaction occurs in the iron-carbon (Fe-C) system, particularly in hypoeutectoid steels, where austenite (γ-Fe) decomposes into ferrite (α-Fe) and cementite (Fe₃C) at the eutectoid temperature of 727°C and eutectoid composition of 0.77 wt% carbon. The reaction is expressed as:
γ (0.77 wt% C) ⇌ α (0.02 wt% C) + Fe₃C (6.70 wt% C),
producing a lamellar microstructure known as pearlite. In the TTT diagram for eutectoid Fe-C alloys, the nose is located around 550°C, where transformation completes in approximately 1 second under isothermal conditions. Another example is found in copper-aluminum (Cu-Al) alloys, where the β phase (AlCu₃) transforms into α-Cu and Al₄Cu₉ at the eutectoid temperature of 565°C and composition of approximately 24 at.% Al, often forming rod-like or lamellar structures depending on growth conditions.

Peritectic Reaction

A peritectic reaction is an invariant phase transformation occurring at a specific temperature and composition in a binary system, where a liquid phase reacts with a primary solid phase to produce a new solid phase of different composition, typically represented as L+αβL + \alpha \rightarrow \beta, with LL denoting the liquid, α\alpha the primary solid, and β\beta the peritectic solid. This reaction contrasts with eutectic transformations by involving the consumption of a pre-existing solid rather than simultaneous precipitation from the liquid. In diagrams featuring a peritectic reaction, the peritectic point marks an invariant horizontal platform at the reaction temperature, positioned above any associated eutectic point, where the liquidus curve of the higher-melting component intersects the solidus line of the peritectic phase. Upon reaching this temperature during cooling, the system achieves equilibrium among the three phases—liquid, primary , and peritectic —allowing the reaction to proceed along the platform until completion under ideal conditions. The solidification behavior during a peritectic reaction is often partial, as the reaction rate is limited by across the solid-liquid interface, resulting in incomplete transformation and the persistence of primary solid remnants enveloped by the peritectic phase, which forms characteristic cored structures with compositional gradients. These cores arise because the peritectic solid nucleates and grows around the primary phase, but kinetic constraints prevent full dissolution of the latter, influencing the final microstructure and properties. Prominent examples include the Fe-Ni system, where the peritectic reaction δ\delta (delta ferrite) + LγL \rightarrow \gamma () occurs at approximately 1500°C, critical for understanding solidification. In the Cu-Sn system, phases like Cu₃Sn form through a series of peritectic reactions, starting with L + (Cu) → β at approximately 796°C, which influences the microstructure in Cu-rich alloys; in s, Cu₃Sn growth occurs via diffusion at lower temperatures, affecting joint reliability. Similarly, in Cu-Zn brasses, the reaction Zn+Lϵ\mathrm{Zn} + L \rightarrow \epsilon (CuZn5\mathrm{CuZn_5}) takes place at 425°C, influencing phase stability in these alloys.

Peritectoid and Degenerate Reactions

The peritectoid reaction represents the solid-state counterpart to the peritectic reaction, occurring as an invariant three-phase transformation where two solid phases isothermally combine to form a third distinct solid phase upon cooling, without involvement of a phase. This reaction is denoted generally as α+βγ\alpha + \beta \rightleftharpoons \gamma, where α\alpha, β\beta, and γ\gamma are solid phases, and it takes place at a specific and composition in the , leading to the growth of the γ\gamma phase at the interface between α\alpha and β\beta. In the Ti-Al system, a notable peritectoid reaction involves the transformation β+αα2\beta + \alpha \rightleftharpoons \alpha_2 (where α2\alpha_2 is Ti₃Al), occurring at approximately 1200°C, which influences the formation of phases critical for high-temperature alloys. Degenerate reactions encompass irregular variants of eutectic or peritectic behaviors, often arising in systems with limited or immiscibility, where standard three-phase equilibria are modified such that one phase has negligible composition range, effectively degenerating the reaction type. A prominent example is the monotectic reaction, a degenerate eutectic where, upon cooling, a single phase decomposes into a phase and a second immiscible phase: L1S+L2L_1 \rightleftharpoons S + L_2. In the Ag-Pb system, this occurs at 304°C with the Ag-rich (L1L_1) transforming into nearly pure Ag (SS) and a Pb-rich (L2L_2), resulting in a microstructure with dispersed liquid Pb droplets that provide , making Ag-Pb alloys suitable for bearings and electrical contacts. The metatectic reaction, conversely, is the heating counterpart or degenerate peritectic, where a phase decomposes into another and a : S1S2+LS_1 \rightleftharpoons S_2 + L, as seen in certain or metallic systems with partial . In systems exhibiting "bad solid solutions"—characterized by the widest gaps in the solid state—phase separation dominates without forming a clear eutectic or peritectoid invariant, leading to extensive decomposition and microstructural instability upon cooling or processing. These gaps arise from highly positive enthalpies of mixing, promoting spinodal or nucleation-and-growth separation into compositionally distinct domains, akin to oil-water immiscibility but in . Degenerate cases are prevalent in blends, such as polystyrene-poly() mixtures, where near-complete immiscibility results in coarse phase-separated morphologies rather than fine eutectic-like structures, impacting mechanical properties like and often requiring compatibilizers to stabilize interfaces.

Modeling and Calculations

Lever Rule Applications

The provides a method to calculate the relative proportions of phases present in the two-phase regions of a diagram, based on the principle of . In a two-phase field at a fixed , the weight fraction of phase α, denoted WαW_\alpha, is determined by the formula Wα=CCβCαCβW_\alpha = \frac{C - C_\beta}{C_\alpha - C_\beta}, where CC is the overall composition, and CαC_\alpha and CβC_\beta are the equilibrium compositions of phases α and β, respectively. Similarly, the fraction of phase β is Wβ=CαCCαCβW_\beta = \frac{C_\alpha - C}{C_\alpha - C_\beta}, ensuring Wα+Wβ=1W_\alpha + W_\beta = 1. This approach treats the tie-line connecting the phase boundaries as a , with the overall composition acting as the fulcrum, where the lengths of the segments are inversely proportional to the phase amounts. Graphically, the lever rule is applied by constructing a horizontal tie-line at the temperature of interest across the two-phase region of the , intersecting the boundaries of the coexisting phases. The position of the overall composition along this tie-line directly yields the phase fractions: the of the distance from the overall composition to the β boundary over the total tie-line length gives WαW_\alpha, and vice versa for WβW_\beta. This visual method is particularly straightforward for binary eutectic phase diagrams, where it facilitates quick estimates without explicit computation. In eutectic systems, the is essential for quantifying the amount of primary phase formed during the cooling of non-eutectic compositions. For a hypoeutectic (composition between pure α and the eutectic point), upon crossing the line, primary α phase nucleates, and the determines its fraction in the liquid + α region by using the tie-line between the liquid composition (at the liquidus) and the α phase composition (at the solidus). For instance, just above the eutectic , the primary α fraction approaches Wα=CLC0CLCαEW_\alpha = \frac{C_L - C_0}{C_L - C_{\alpha E}}, where CLC_L is the liquid composition at the eutectic, C0C_0 is the overall composition, and CαEC_{\alpha E} is the α composition at the eutectic; the remaining liquid then solidifies into the eutectic at the eutectic . In hypereutectic alloys, the rule analogously calculates the primary β phase fraction in the liquid + β region. These calculations guide predictions of solidification behavior and phase distributions in alloys like the lead-tin system. The assumes , requiring infinite time for to achieve uniform phase compositions as dictated by the phase boundaries. It thus ignores kinetic effects, such as limited during rapid cooling, which can result in non-equilibrium structures like solute trapping or dendritic growth without full . Additionally, it applies only to two-phase regions and binary systems with straight tie-lines, becoming more complex in multicomponent or non-isothermal conditions.

Thermodynamic Modeling

The (Calculation of Phase Diagrams) approach provides a systematic method for predicting eutectic points and phase behaviors in binary and ternary systems by constructing thermodynamic databases of Gibbs free energies for individual phases. These databases are developed through critical assessment of experimental data, enabling the minimization of total Gibbs energy to determine stable phase equilibria, including the invariant eutectic reaction where a liquid transforms directly into two solid phases. In modeling liquid phases for eutectic systems, the ideal solution model assumes random mixing with zero excess Gibbs energy (Gex=0G^{ex} = 0), leading to predictions based solely on the ideal entropy of mixing and enthalpies of fusion. However, real systems often deviate from ideality, and the regular solution model addresses this by incorporating a simple excess Gibbs energy term: Gex=Ωx(1x)G^{ex} = \Omega x(1 - x) where Ω\Omega is a temperature-dependent interaction parameter fitted to experimental data, and xx is the mole fraction of one component. This model captures pairwise interactions to estimate liquidus depression and eutectic shifts, as demonstrated in systems like Pb-Sn solders. Software implementations such as Thermo-Calc and FactSage leverage databases to perform automated calculations of eutectic temperatures and compositions across multicomponent systems, often integrating algorithms for locating invariant points on liquidus surfaces. For instance, FactSage employs direct search methods to identify eutectics in complex systems, while Thermo-Calc supports solidification simulations that predict phase fractions during cooling. Validation of these models typically involves comparing predicted eutectic invariants with experimental measurements from (DTA), which detects thermal arrests corresponding to phase transformations. Discrepancies are refined by adjusting parameters to account for non-idealities, such as the formation of intermediate compounds that stabilize certain phases and alter eutectic locations, ensuring reliable predictions for design.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.