Hubbry Logo
Paid areaPaid areaMain
Open search
Paid area
Community hub
Paid area
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Paid area
Paid area
Paid area
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
"Your attention please: eating or drinking is not allowed in trains or in the paid areas of stations." (seen here behind a row of ticket gates at Tai Wai station of Hong Kong KCR before it was merged with MTR).
Ticket gate at Blok M MRT station of Jakarta MRT with paid area behind it.

In public transport operations and transport planning, the paid area is a dedicated "inner" zone in a railway station or metro station, accessible via turnstiles or other barriers, to get into which visitors or passengers require a valid ticket, checked smartcard or a pass. A system using paid areas is often called fare control. Passengers are allowed to enter or exit only through a faregate. A paid area usually exists in rapid transit railway stations for separating the train platform from the station exit, ensuring a passenger has paid or prepaid before reaching the railway platform and using any transport service. Such design requires a well-organized railway station layout. In some systems, paid areas are named differently - for example, on railways in the United Kingdom they are called compulsory ticket areas.[1]

The paid area is similar in concept to the airside at an airport. However, in most cases entrance to the paid area requires only a valid ticket or transit pass. The exception is in certain cases of international rail travel, where passengers must also pass through immigration control and customs to enter the paid area. Examples include the Eurostar international platforms at St Pancras railway station and Gare du Nord, Woodlands Train Checkpoint in Singapore, where the only departures are to neighbouring Malaysia, as well as Hung Hom station, Lo Wu station, Lok Ma Chau station and Hong Kong West Kowloon station in Hong Kong.

In some rapid transit systems, passengers are banned from eating or drinking inside the paid area of every station.

See also

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Ticket barriers.

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Paid area

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In , a paid area refers to a demarcated zone within a , metro, or station that is accessible exclusively to passengers who have validated their through turnstiles, , or other entry devices. This setup ensures is minimized by physically separating the ticketed platform and train access from public concourses and exits. The concept is integral to barrier-based collection systems worldwide, where entry requires such as tickets, smart cards, or mobile validations. The origins of paid areas trace back to the early 20th century, coinciding with the expansion of urban subway networks and the need for efficient fare enforcement. Wooden turnstiles were introduced in systems like the New York City Subway as early as 1904 to control access after validation of paper tickets by attendants, evolving from initial paper ticket inspections that proved cumbersome during peak hours. By 1921, many networks transitioned to fully coin-operated mechanical turnstiles, marking a shift toward automated, barrier-enforced paid zones that reduced staffing needs and improved throughput. This model spread globally to manage high-volume commuter traffic in major cities. Paid areas vary in design and enforcement depending on the transit authority's priorities, with some systems incorporating full-height barriers for added while others use waist-high turnstiles for faster flow. In proof-of-payment variants, such as certain lines, the paid area may lack physical gates but relies on periodic inspections to verify fares within designated zones. Modern advancements, including contactless smart cards and mobile apps, have enhanced accessibility since the 1990s. These zones not only facilitate revenue collection—accounting for approximately 35% of operating budgets for New York's MTA as of 2025—but also support seamless transfers in integrated networks by maintaining barrier-free movement once inside.

Overview

Definition

In , particularly within railway, metro, or other transit stations, a paid area refers to the designated inner zone accessible only after passengers have validated their , typically demarcated from public spaces by physical barriers such as turnstiles or gates. This zone ensures that only fare-paying individuals can reach the core transit facilities, facilitating control and in systems employing barrier-based fare collection. The key components of a paid area generally include platforms for boarding and alighting trains, waiting areas adjacent to tracks, and in some configurations, restricted retail outlets or amenities like restrooms that are available exclusively to validated passengers. These elements are positioned on the platform side of the fare-paid line, providing direct access to transit services while maintaining separation from non-revenue spaces. For instance, in barrier-free transfer systems, the entire station interior may function as a paid area to streamline movement between lines. In contrast, the unpaid area encompasses the outer, publicly accessible portions of the station, such as entrances, ticket vending machines, desks, and concourses where fare purchase or validation occurs prior to entry. This distinction allows non-paying individuals, like visitors or those seeking general , to interact with the station without accessing transit platforms, thereby balancing with fare enforcement.

Purpose and benefits

Paid areas in public transportation systems, defined as the zones accessible only after fare payment, primarily serve to protect revenue by preventing fare evasion through enforced entry requirements. They also enable controlled access to platforms, which helps reduce overcrowding by limiting unpaid entry and directing passenger flows more predictably. Additionally, these areas streamline overall passenger movement by separating fare validation from boarding processes, allowing for faster platform access and reduced dwell times at stations. The implementation of paid areas offers several key benefits, including enhanced via monitored enclosures that restrict access to ticketed individuals and authorized personnel, thereby minimizing unauthorized intrusions and improving safety perceptions for users. optimization is another major advantage, as these systems significantly curb ; without effective controls like paid zones, transit agencies report losses ranging from 3 to 15 percent of potential fare . Furthermore, paid areas contribute to a better by providing dedicated spaces that alleviate congestion in unpaid concourses and support seamless transfers within the system. Economically, paid areas bolster sustainable funding by ensuring consistent collection, which often accounts for 20 to 50 percent of operational revenues in urban networks and lessens reliance on subsidies alone. This revenue stability supports ongoing service reliability and expansion without excessive fiscal burdens on governments.

Historical development

Early origins

The origins of paid areas in public transportation trace back to the 19th-century European steam railways, where early fare collection practices laid the groundwork for later physical segregation during the 1830s and 1850s amid the rapid expansion of rail networks. The , opened in 1830 as the world's first inter-city passenger line, introduced basic fare collection through onboard conductors who manually verified payments from passengers, setting a precedent for revenue protection in an era of growing mobility. As rail lines proliferated across Britain and —reaching over 10,000 km by 1850—station-based ticket inspections became common to manage increasing volumes. This evolution was driven by the Industrial Revolution's urban growth, which swelled city populations and ridership, necessitating robust fare enforcement to prevent evasion and ensure financial viability. Factories and commerce in industrial hubs like and drew workers from surrounding areas, boosting daily passenger numbers and highlighting the limitations of open platforms prone to unauthorized entry. Railway companies responded by formalizing ticket systems, such as the standardized pre-printed Edmondson tickets introduced in the , which facilitated quicker verification. A pivotal development occurred with the opening of London's in 1863, the world's first underground passenger line, where manual ticket checks by station staff using Edmondson tickets regulated access at high-traffic sites like , addressing fare dodging in the dense urban environment. These manual systems prioritized security over convenience but did not yet feature physical barriers. The transition to physical paid areas with barriers occurred in the early 20th century, coinciding with urban subway expansions. Wooden turnstiles were introduced in the New York City Subway in 1904 to control access after coin or token payment, evolving from paper ticket inspections. In the United States, mechanical fare collection advanced on elevated railways in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, enhancing control amid surging urban ridership fueled by immigration and industrialization.

Modern advancements

Following , the widespread adoption of (AFC) systems in subway networks marked a significant shift toward more efficient management of paid areas, enabling the expansion of controlled zones beyond manual oversight. In , the introduction of the subway token in 1953 addressed the challenge of a 15-cent that could not be accommodated by existing turnstiles designed for dimes and nickels, facilitating smoother entry into expanded paid platforms and reducing reliance on booth operators. This innovation exemplified the post-war push for mechanized systems across urban transit, improving throughput in growing metropolitan areas. Key developments in the late further streamlined access to paid areas through advanced ticketing technologies. In the late 1960s and 1970s, magnetic stripe tickets were integrated into systems like the , beginning in 1968, which allowed for automated validation at turnstiles and reduced processing times compared to paper tickets. By the , contactless smart cards emerged as a breakthrough, with Hong Kong's launching in September 1997 to enable rapid, tap-based fare payment across multiple transit modes, minimizing queues at entry points. The saw the rise of mobile and app-based validation, as exemplified by Portland's introducing an e-ticket app in 2013, allowing passengers to purchase and display digital tickets via smartphones for seamless entry without physical media. Recent trends as of 2025 have incorporated biometric and AI-driven technologies to enhance entry efficiency and security in paid areas. In Moscow's Metro, the Face Pay system, introduced in 2021, uses facial recognition linked to bank cards for contactless gate access and was fully deployed across all turnstiles by October 2025, reducing physical interactions and enabling faster flow. Similarly, London's has evolved into an account-based ticketing framework since 2014, incorporating contactless bank cards for ticketless payments that eliminate the need for pre-loaded physical cards, thereby reducing physical barriers through virtual validation and open-gate options at low-evasion stations. These advancements prioritize seamless integration, with AI algorithms optimizing gate operations based on real-time passenger data to minimize disruptions in paid zones.

Design and features

Barriers and access mechanisms

Barriers in paid areas of primarily consist of physical and technological devices designed to restrict access to fare-paid zones, ensuring only validated passengers enter. Common types include turnstiles, fare gates, and , each varying in height, operation, and integration with fare collection. Waist-high turnstiles, often tripod-style with three rotating arms, are widely used in subways and allow passage after fare payment while permitting smaller items like bags to pass; these can be mechanical, requiring manual pushing, or electronic, using motorized mechanisms for controlled entry. Full-height turnstiles, resembling rotating cages, provide higher by fully enclosing the user and are typically electronic for integration with access controls, common in high-security or unmanned stations. Fare gates, also known as swinging or sliding gates, offer a less restrictive alternative to turnstiles, folding or retracting upon validation to accommodate users with luggage, wheelchairs, or bicycles; these are predominantly electronic, interfacing directly with (AFC) systems for seamless operation in busy urban rail networks. (PSDs) serve as safety barriers at the platform edge within the paid area, separating passengers from the tracks and enhancing safety by preventing falls and unauthorized track access; full-height PSDs extend from floor to ceiling, half-height versions (platform edge doors) reach waist level, and low-height platform gates use barriers like ropes or panels for partial enclosure, all electronically controlled to open only after train arrival and fare validation. Access mechanisms for these barriers rely on ticket validation to authorize entry, evolving from simple mechanical insertions to sophisticated digital interfaces. Early methods involved inserting coins or tokens into slots on mechanical turnstiles, which could jam if damaged or overloaded, leading to manual overrides; modern electronic variants use tapping contactless smart cards (e.g., RFID-enabled) on readers for near-field communication, or scanning QR codes via mobile apps, enabling rapid processing of under one second per transaction. Failure modes include card reading errors from wear or misalignment, addressed by anti-tailgating sensors that detect multiple users attempting passage (e.g., infrared beams or weight sensors triggering alarms), and jamming in mechanical arms, mitigated by emergency release levers compliant with accessibility standards. The evolution of these barriers reflects a shift from coin-operated mechanical systems in the mid-20th century to integrated AFC setups by the 1970s and beyond, driven by needs for efficiency and revenue protection; for instance, early turnstiles in systems like New York City's subway suffered from high failure rates due to coin jams, whereas token-operated mechanical turnstiles achieved up to 40,000 transactions per failure. Modern electronic AFC-integrated barriers, incorporating smart cards and networked validators since the 1990s, have substantially improved reliability, with European systems like those in demonstrating high availability, such as 98% for gates, through redundant components and , reducing and supporting high-volume urban transit.

Layout and integration

Paid areas in transit stations are typically organized into either vertical or horizontal layouts to optimize passenger movement and space utilization. Vertical layouts, common in multi-level underground or elevated stations, employ escalators, elevators, and stairs to connect the paid zone across floors from concourses to platforms, facilitating efficient vertical circulation while separating inbound and outbound flows through dedicated zoning on each level. Horizontal layouts, prevalent in single-level or at-grade stations, provide direct access to platforms via linear pathways and fare gates aligned perpendicular to the flow, minimizing transfer distances and enabling straightforward zoning to segregate entering and exiting passengers. These configurations often reference barriers like fare gates to delineate the paid zone from unpaid areas, ensuring controlled access without disrupting overall circulation. Integration of paid areas emphasizes strategic placement within station architecture to enhance connectivity and . Positioned immediately beyond fare gates and adjacent to concourses, platforms, and emergency exits, paid zones incorporate clear sightlines and unobstructed pathways to guide passengers seamlessly from entry points to boarding areas. features are integral, including wide gates with a minimum clear width of 32 inches (815 mm) to comply with standards such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in the U.S., with some systems providing 36 inches (914 mm) or more for enhanced accessibility, alongside , designated waiting areas with seating every 30 meters, and redundant elevators with maximum peak-hour wait times of 40 seconds. These elements ensure equitable access while maintaining flow in diverse station typologies, from below-grade to elevated designs. Design considerations for paid areas prioritize efficiency to accommodate peak loads and aesthetic harmony with the broader station environment. Layouts are sized to handle high-traffic volumes, such as up to 10,000 passengers per hour in major metros, through modular footprints, surge queuing spaces of at least 5 meters, and Level of Service (LOS) D standards (0.4–0.8 m² per person) during peaks or emergencies, often verified via flow modeling. To balance functionality with visual appeal, designers use consistent materials like durable glazing and , artificial skylights for orientation, and clustered amenities to avoid clutter, creating a cohesive and calming atmosphere that aligns with transit-oriented developments.

Operations and management

Passenger flow and enforcement

Passenger flow within paid areas of public transit systems is managed through a combination of physical and digital elements designed to ensure efficient movement from entry to exit. Directional , often integrated with digital displays, guides passengers to appropriate entry points and prevents bottlenecks by providing real-time information on queue lengths and gate availability. Entry points to paid areas typically feature multiple parallel lanes at fare gates to accommodate varying volumes, with wider gates for to minimize delays. During rush hours, surge handling involves dynamic adjustments such as slowing gate opening speeds to control platform crowding or deploying additional staff to direct crowds. One-way systems in some station layouts, particularly in high-density urban rail networks, direct pedestrian traffic unidirectionally through paid zones to reduce congestion and cross-flows. Enforcement of compliance in paid areas relies on a multi-layered approach to deter and detect . Staff patrols by or inspectors conduct random checks within the paid zone, issuing citations on the spot for non-payment. CCTV monitoring, with systems like the Washington Metro's network of over 20,000 cameras, provides continuous surveillance to identify evasion attempts and support investigations. Automated fines are common, with penalties reaching up to $100 in jurisdictions such as and for violations in rail and bus systems. In well-enforced systems, fare evasion rates range from 3% to 15% of potential revenue, highlighting the effectiveness of combined human and technological measures. Exit procedures in paid areas vary by system design but emphasize validation to confirm fare payment. In gated setups, passengers scan tickets or cards at egress gates, similar to entry, to unlock barriers and track journey completion. For open paid areas without full barriers, such as models in or , random inspections verify tickets upon exit or within the zone, promoting fluid movement while maintaining accountability. These methods integrate with overall layout features to facilitate seamless transitions to street level or connecting services.

Security and safety measures

Paid areas in public transit systems incorporate advanced surveillance integration to monitor activities and deter threats. Video surveillance systems (VSS), including cameras, are strategically placed at platforms, fare gates, and within enclosed zones to provide real-time oversight of passenger movements and identify potential incidents such as or unauthorized entry. intercoms and call boxes are installed at key locations, such as platform ends and within rail cars, enabling passengers to quickly alert transit staff or authorities during emergencies. Restricted access to maintenance areas adjacent to paid zones is enforced through physical barriers like and , combined with procedural controls such as identity verification, to prevent tampering or intrusion. In response to incidents like or unauthorized entry, transit agencies deploy patrols and coordinate with enforcement teams to investigate and mitigate risks, often integrating these efforts with broader fare compliance protocols. Safety protocols in paid areas prioritize rapid response to hazards, ensuring occupant protection within confined spaces. Evacuation paths are designed to guide passengers from platforms and trains to points of , adhering to standards that limit station evacuation times to under six minutes for the full occupant load. , including detection and extinguishing mechanisms, are integrated with barriers and station infrastructure to contain outbreaks and facilitate safe egress, as outlined in NFPA 130 for fixed guideway transit systems. During disruptions such as or emergencies, crowd control measures involve visible patrols, , and coordinated drills to maintain orderly flow and prevent injuries, drawing from NFPA protocols for managing assembly occupancies in transit environments. Challenges in paid areas include balancing robust with passenger , where layered defenses like access controls must avoid impeding legitimate movement. Enclosed paid zones, by concentrating crowds, heighten risks of such as compared to open unpaid sections due to the controlled environment. Agencies address this through enhanced monitoring and awareness campaigns, though trade-offs persist in maintaining open transit access while mitigating vulnerabilities.

Variations across systems

Rail and metro applications

In high-speed rail systems such as Japan's , paid areas feature fully enclosed platforms separated by dedicated fare gates, ensuring exclusive access for passengers holding valid Shinkansen tickets and preventing unauthorized entry to premium services. This design was implemented from the system's inaugural operation in 1964, with stations like featuring separate ticket gates for Shinkansen platforms distinct from local lines. In contrast, Japanese commuter rail lines often utilize semi-open paid areas where, after passing initial station fare gates, platforms remain accessible within the broader station concourse, supplemented by onboard conductor verification for fare enforcement. Metro systems adapt paid areas to the constraints of underground stations through compact layouts, with s and barriers controlling entry to platform levels while maximizing space efficiency. The exemplifies this with its expansive paid zones, which extend across interconnected platforms serving multiple lines, allowing passengers to navigate vast concourses and escalators without exiting the fare-controlled environment. These zones support high passenger volumes in a single-fare structure, where entry via grants access to the entire network for the duration of the trip. A key feature in rail and metro paid areas is the handling of interchanges, where fare-controlled zones are engineered to span multiple connected lines, eliminating the need for re-validation during transfers and thereby reducing congestion at gates. In the , for instance, passengers can switch between lines or even to integrated services like the within the paid area, incurring no additional fare for up to 90 minutes after initial entry. This integrated approach enhances operational flow in busy hubs, minimizing dwell times and improving overall system efficiency.

Bus and other transit adaptations

In bus terminals and similar surface transit hubs, paid areas are often adapted through enclosed or semi-enclosed stations with fare barriers to facilitate off-board payment and secure waiting zones, particularly in (BRT) systems designed for high-volume operations. For instance, in grade-separated BRT networks, passengers enter a paid area via turnstiles after prepaying at validators or kiosks, allowing level boarding and reducing dwell times while restricting access to ticketed riders only. This approach contrasts with traditional open bus stops by providing controlled environments that enhance security and efficiency, as seen in systems like Bogotá's , where enclosed platforms separate paid waiting spaces from public concourses. Light rail and tram systems frequently employ proof-of-payment (POP) models, where riders validate fares via mobile apps, cards, or validators before boarding, eliminating the need for full barriers in most cases to promote seamless flow in urban settings. In Portland's , for example, passengers show —such as a Hop card or app ticket—upon random inspection by fare enforcers, with no entry gates at stations to minimize delays and accommodate all-door boarding. Occasional barriers, such as visual demarcations or partial fencing at high-risk stations, may supplement POP to deter evasion without impeding , emphasizing digital validation for efficiency in variable street-level environments. Adaptations for other transit modes, such as shuttles and terminals, often incorporate hybrid paid zones that combine ticketed waiting areas with points to balance security and convenience. In operations, ticketed passengers access dedicated upstairs lounges or covered enclosures post-validation, separating them from general public spaces while allowing vehicle loading in open bays, as implemented at ' Horseshoe Bay terminal. shuttle systems similarly use pre-paid zones near terminals for grouped boarding, though these are typically less enclosed due to high turnover. These setups face unique challenges, including exposure in open or semi-open paid areas, where transit users at bus or shuttle stops endure extreme heat or precipitation without full shelter, leading to reduced ridership and health risks during prolonged waits.

References

  1. https://www.bart.gov/sites/default/files/docs/01.%2520Ordinance%2520%25232017-2%2520%2520Proof%2520of%2520Payment%2520Ordinance%2520and%2520Presentation%2520to%2520Board_0.pdf
  2. https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/RTSA1995-RG1
  3. https://www.transit.dot.gov/research-innovation/fare-collection
  4. https://www.businessinsider.com/heres-how-nyc-subway-system-looked-110-years-ago-2014-10
  5. https://www.untappedcities.com/subway-booths-ny/
  6. https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/APTA-Compendium-of-Definitions-Acronyms-for-Rail-Systems.pdf
  7. https://www.thefinancescopebyhsu.com/post/the-financial-structure-of-the-nyc-s-subway-mta
  8. https://www.mta.info/document/111531
  9. https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/Final_FTA_ADA_Circular_C_4710.1.pdf
  10. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/sr/sr195/sr195-033.pdf
  11. https://genfare.com/blog-fare-evasion-part1/
  12. https://www.adlittle.com/be-en/insights/report/public-transport-fare-models
  13. https://www.wri.org/research/fare-look-funding-urban-public-transport-operations
  14. https://www.worldhistory.org/article/2167/the-railways-in-the-british-industrial-revolution/
  15. https://www.ltmuseum.co.uk/collections/stories/transport/fares-please-ticketing-londons-public-transport-1860
  16. https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/about-tfl/culture-and-heritage/londons-transport-a-history/london-underground/a-brief-history-of-the-underground
  17. https://www.nycsubway.org/wiki/New_York_City_Subway_Tokens
  18. https://www.nyhistory.org/blogs/remember-the-nyc-subway-token
  19. https://www.iledefrance-mobilites.fr/en/actualites/125-ans-billettique-transports-en-commun
  20. https://www.octopus.com.hk/en/consumer/octopus-cards/about/index.html
  21. https://www.oregonlive.com/commuting/2013/05/trimet_unveils_e-ticket_app_fr.html
  22. https://idtechwire.com/moscow-aims-to-deploy-face-pay-at-all-metro-turnstiles-by-end-of-year/
  23. https://russoft.org/en/news/face-pay-launched-on-all-moscow-metro-stations/
  24. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/infrastructure/our-insights/redesigning-the-public-transportation-experience-londons-contactless-card-system
  25. https://www.urbantransportnews.com/news/biometric-fare-collection-revolutionizing-public-transit-with-seamless-secure-and-contactless-sol
  26. https://brtguide.itdp.org/branch/master/guide/fare-systems/gates-and-turnstiles
  27. https://www.2mtechnology.net/the-complete-guide-to-types-styles-of-turnstiles/
  28. https://www.modeshift.com/components-of-an-automated-fare-collection-system/
  29. https://trespasstoolkit.fra.dot.gov/eLib/Details/L00028
  30. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19830027681/downloads/19830027681.pdf
  31. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1980/760/760-009.pdf
  32. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/An_assessment_of_automatic_fare_collection_equipment_at_three_European_transit_properties_-_final_report_%28IA_assessmentofauto00morr%29.pdf
  33. https://assets.metrolinx.com/image/upload/v1747423857/Documents/Engineering/Subway_Station_Architecture_Design_Standard_DS-09_v2_1.pdf
  34. https://www.soundtransit.org/sites/default/files/documents/Sound-Transit-Station-Experience-Design-Guidelines-02132025.pdf
  35. https://www.bart.gov/sites/default/files/docs/20180212_BART_SEDG_Final-lowres.pdf
  36. https://www.metro-magazine.com/10210244/ctas-new-ada-fare-gates-enhances-rail-station-access
  37. https://www.access-board.gov/ada/guides/chapter-4-entrances-doors-and-gates/
  38. https://www.risevision.com/blog/how-transportation-digital-signage-improves-passenger-flow-during-peak-hours
  39. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15472450.2020.1853539
  40. https://wmata.com/about/news/Metro-enhances-safety-with-increased-police-patrols-on-trains-and-buses.cfm?alerts-widget-next-train-all=C04
  41. https://www.wmata.com/about/transit-police/body-worn-camera-program.cfm
  42. https://www.wmata.com/about/news/MTPD-to-begin-issuing-citations-under-new-law-that-toughens-enforcement-of-fare-evasion.cfm
  43. https://thesource.metro.net/tap-to-exit-returns-to-north-hollywood-and-union-station-and-launches-at-pomona-north-on-nov-17/
  44. https://ssti.us/wp-content/uploads/sites/1303/2012/03/Proof-of-payment-TRB.pdf
  45. https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/9/10/175
  46. https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/APTA-SS-ISS-RP-004-23.pdf
  47. https://www.wmata.com/rider-guide/safety/bus-rail.cfm
  48. https://www.nfpa.org/news-blogs-and-articles/blogs/2021/08/27/means-of-egress-with-nfpa-130
  49. https://www.nfpa.org/product/nfpa-130-standard/p0130code
  50. https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/TS_Problem_Coutnermeasures.pdf
  51. https://www.roughguides.com/articles/japan-bullet-trains-shinkansen/
  52. https://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2018.html
  53. https://www.seat61.com/Japan.htm
  54. https://www.mos.ru/en/news/item/136599073/
  55. https://bridgetomoscow.com/moscow-by-metro
  56. https://www.mos.ru/en/news/item/82955073/
  57. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/21947/chapter/7
  58. https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/service_design_guidelines_vta.pdf
  59. https://trimet.org/guide/max.htm
  60. https://trimet.org/pdfs/code/TriMet_Code_Chapter_29.pdf
  61. https://www.bcferries.com/travel-boarding/terminal-directions-parking-food/vancouver-horseshoe-bay/HSB
  62. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136192092500063X
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8807448/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.