Recent from talks
Contribute something
Nothing was collected or created yet.
First Macedonian War
View on WikipediaThis article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
| First Macedonian War | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of the Macedonian Wars and Second Punic War | |||||||
The Mediterranean in 218 BC | |||||||
| |||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||
|
Roman Republic Aetolian League Pergamon Sparta Illyrians Dardania Elis Messenia |
Macedon Achaean League Acarnanian League | ||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||
|
Marcus Valerius Laevinus Scopas of Aetolia Pyrrhias of Aetolia Dorimachus Attalus I Machanidas † Scerdilaidas Longarus |
Philip V of Macedon Philopoemen Demetrius of Pharos † | ||||||
The First Macedonian War (214–205 BC) was fought by Rome, allied (after 211 BC) with the Aetolian League and Attalus I of Pergamon, against Philip V of Macedon, contemporaneously with the Second Punic War (218–201 BC) against Carthage. There were no decisive engagements, and the war ended in a stalemate.
During the war, Macedon attempted to gain control over parts of Illyria, but without success. It is commonly thought that these skirmishes in the east prevented Macedon from aiding the Carthaginian general Hannibal in the war with Rome. The Peace of Phoenice (205 BC) formally ended the war.
Demetrius urges war against Rome
[edit]Rome's preoccupation with its war against Carthage provided an opportunity for Philip V of Macedon to attempt to extend his power westward. According to the ancient Greek historian Polybius, an important factor in Philip's decision to take advantage of this opportunity was the influence of Demetrius of Pharos.
After the First Illyrian War (229–228 BC) the Romans had made Demetrius ruler of most of coastal Illyria.[1] In the decade after the war he turned against the Romans attacking their allies in Illyria and raiding their trade vessels. In 219 BC, during the Second Illyrian War he was defeated by the Romans and fled to the court of king Philip.[2]
Involved in a war with the Aetolians, Philip learned of the victory of Hannibal over the Romans, at Lake Trasimene in June 217 BC. Philip at first showed the letter only to Demetrius. Perhaps seeing a chance to recover his kingdom, Demetrius immediately advised the young king to make peace with the Aetolians and turn his attentions toward Illyria and Italy. Polybius quotes Demetrius as saying:
For Greece is already entirely obedient to you, and will remain so: the Achaeans from genuine affection; the Aetolians from the terror which their disasters in the present war have inspired them. Italy, and your crossing into it, is the first step in the acquirement of universal empire, to which no one has a better claim than yourself. And now is the moment to act when the Romans have suffered a reverse.[3]
According to Polybius, Philip was easily persuaded.[4]
Philip makes peace with Aetolia
[edit]Philip at once began negotiations with the Aetolians. At a conference on the coast near Naupactus, Philip met the Aetolian leaders and a peace treaty was concluded.[5] Polybius quotes the Aetolian Agelaus of Naupactus as having given the following speech[6] in favor of peace:


The best thing of all is that the Greeks should not go to war with each other at all, but give the gods hearty thanks if by all speaking with one voice, and joining hands like people crossing a stream, they may be able to repel the attacks of barbarians and save themselves and their cities. But if this is altogether impossible, in the present juncture at least we ought to be unanimous and on our guard, when we see the bloated armaments and the vast proportions assumed by the war in the west. For even now it is evident to any one who pays even a moderate attention to public affairs, that whether the Carthaginians conquer the Romans, or the Romans the Carthaginians, it is in every way improbable that the victors will remain contented with the empire of Sicily and Italy. They will move forward: and will extend their forces and their designs farther than we could wish. Wherefore, I beseech you all to be on your guard against the danger of the crisis, and above all you, O King. You will do this, if you abandon the policy of weakening the Greeks, and thus rendering them an easy prey to the invader; and consult on the contrary for their good as you would for your own person, and have a care for all parts of Greece alike, as part and parcel of your own domains. If you act in this spirit, the Greeks will be your warm friends and faithful coadjutors in all your undertakings; while foreigners will be less ready to form designs against you, seeing with dismay the firm loyalty of the Greeks. If you are eager for action, turn your eyes to the west, and let your thoughts dwell upon the wars in Italy. Wait with coolness the turn of events there, and seize the opportunity to strike for universal dominion. Nor is the present crisis unfavourable for such a hope. But I intreat of you to postpone your controversies and wars with the Greeks to a time of greater tranquillity; and make it your supreme aim to retain the power of making peace or war with them at your own will. For if once you allow the clouds now gathering in the west to settle upon Greece, I fear exceedingly that the power of making peace or war, and in a word all these games which we are now playing against each other, will be so completely knocked out of the hands of us all, that we shall be praying heaven to grant us only this power of making war or peace with each other at our own will and pleasure, and of settling our own disputes.[7]
Philip builds a fleet
[edit]Philip spent the winter of 217–216 BC building a fleet of 100 warships and training men to row them and, according to Polybius, it was a practice that "hardly any Macedonian king had ever done before".[8] Macedon probably lacked the resources to build and maintain the kind of fleet necessary to match the Romans.[9] Polybius says that Philip had no "hope of fighting the Romans at sea",[8] perhaps referring to a lack of experience and training.
At any rate, Philip chose to build lembi. These were the small fast galleys used by the Illyrians. They had a single bank of oars and were able to carry 50 soldiers in addition to the rowers.[10] With these, Philip could hope to avoid or evade the Roman fleet, preoccupied as he hoped it would be with Hannibal, and based as it was at Lilybaeum in western Sicily.[8]
Philip had in the meantime expanded his territories west along the Apsus and Genusus river valleys, right up to the borders of Illyria.[11] Philip's plan was, it seems, to first take the Illyrian coasts, conquer the area between the coasts and Macedon, and use the new land link to provide a rapid route for reinforcements across the narrow straits to Italy.[12]
At the beginning of summer, Philip and his fleet left Macedon, sailed through the Euripus Strait, between the island of Euboea and Boeotia on the Greek mainland, and then rounded Cape Malea, before dropping anchor off the Islands of Cephalenia and Leucas, to await word of the location of the Roman fleet. Informed that it was still at Lilybaeum, he sailed north to Apollonia in Illyria.
However, as the Macedonian fleet neared the island of Sazan, Philip heard a report that some Roman quinqueremes had been seen headed for Apollonia. Convinced that the entire Roman fleet was sailing to apprehend him, Philip ordered an immediate return to Cephalenia. Polybius speaks of "panic" and "disorder" to describe the fleet's hasty retreat and says that, in fact, the Romans had sent only a squadron of ten ships and that because of "inconsiderate alarm", Philip had missed his best chance to achieve his aims in Illyria, returning to Macedon, "without loss indeed, but with considerable dishonour".[13]
Philip allies with Carthage
[edit]After hearing of Rome's disastrous defeat at the hands of Hannibal at Cannae in 216 BC, Philip sent ambassadors to Hannibal's camp in Italy to negotiate an alliance. There they concluded in the summer of 215 BC a treaty, the text of which is given by Polybius. In it they pledge, in general terms, mutual support and defense and to be enemies to each other's enemies (excepting current allies). Specifically, they promised support against Rome and that Hannibal shall have the right to make peace with Rome, but that any peace would include Philip and that Rome would be forced to relinquish control of Corcyra, Apollonia, Epidamnus, Pharos, Dimale, Parthini, and Atintania and "to restore to Demetrius of Pharos all those of his friends now in the dominion of Rome."[14]
The treaty as set down by Polybius makes no mention of an invasion of Italy by Philip, the debacle at Sazan perhaps having soured Philip on such a venture,[15] something which in any case Hannibal may not have desired.[16]
On their way back to Macedon, Philip's emissaries, along with emissaries from Hannibal, were captured by Publius Valerius Flaccus, commander of the Roman fleet patrolling the southern Apulian coast. A letter from Hannibal to Philip and the terms of their agreement, were discovered.[17]
Philip's alliance with Carthage caused immediate dismay in Rome, hard-pressed as they already were. An additional twenty-five warships were at once outfitted and sent to join Flaccus' fleet of twenty-five warships already at Tarentum, with orders to guard the Italian Adriatic coast, to try to determine Philip's intent and, if necessary, cross over to Macedonia, keeping Philip confined there.[18]
War breaks out in Illyria
[edit]In the late summer of 214 BC, Philip again attempted an Illyrian invasion by sea, with a fleet of 120 lembi. He captured Oricum which was lightly defended, and sailing up the Aous (modern Vjosë) river he besieged Apollonia.[19]
Meanwhile, the Romans had moved the fleet from Tarentum to Brundisium to continue the watch on the movements of Philip and a legion had been sent in support, all under the command of the Roman propraetor Marcus Valerius Laevinus.[20] Upon receiving word from Oricum of events in Illyria, Laevinus crossed over with his fleet and army. Landing at Oricum, Laevinus was able to retake the town with little fighting.
In the account given by Livy,[21] Laevinus, hearing that Apollonia was under siege, sent 2000 men under the command of Quintus Naevius Crista, to the mouth of the river. Avoiding Philip's army, Crista was able to enter the city by night unobserved. The following night, catching Philip's forces by surprise, he attacked and routed their camp. Escaping to his ships in the river, Philip made his way over the mountains and back to Macedonia, having burned his fleet and leaving behind many thousands of his men that had died or been taken prisoner, along with all of his armies' possessions. Meanwhile, Laevinus and his fleet wintered at Oricum.
Twice thwarted in his attempts at invasion of Illyria by sea, and now constrained by Laevinus' fleet in the Adriatic, Philip spent the next two years (213–212 BC) making advances in Illyria by land. Keeping clear of the coast, he took Dassaretis, Atintani and Parthini, and the town of Dimale.[22]
He was finally able to gain access to the Adriatic by capturing Lissus and its seemingly impregnable citadel, after which the surrounding territories surrendered.[23] Perhaps the capture of Lissus rekindled in Philip hopes of an Italian invasion.[24] However, the loss of his fleet meant that Philip would now be dependent on Carthage for passage to and from Italy, making the prospect of invasion considerably less appealing.
Rome seeks allies in Greece
[edit]Desiring to prevent Philip from aiding Carthage in Italy and elsewhere, Rome sought out allies in Greece.
Laevinus had begun exploring the possibility of an alliance with the Aetolian League as early as 212 BC.[25] The war weary Aetolians had made peace with Philip at Naupactus in 217 BC. However, five years later the war faction was on the ascend and the Aetolians were once again considering taking up arms against their traditional enemy, Macedonia.
In 211 BC, an Aetolian assembly was convened for discussions with Rome. Laevinus pointed out the recent capture of Syracuse and Capua in the war against Carthage as evidence of Rome's rising fortunes and offered to ally with them against the Macedonians. A treaty was signed whereby the Aetolians would conduct operations on land, the Romans at sea and Rome would keep any slaves and other booty taken and Aetolia would receive control of any territory acquired. Another provision of the treaty allowed for the inclusion of certain allies of the League: Elis, Sparta, Messenia and Attalus I of Pergamon, as well as two Roman clients, the Illyrians Pleuratus and Scerdilaidas.[26]
Campaign in Greece
[edit]Later that summer, Laevinus seized the main town of Zacynthus, except for its citadel, the Acarnanian town of Oeniadae and the island of Nasos, which he handed over to the Aetolians. He then withdrew his fleet to Corcyra for the winter.[27]
Upon hearing of the Roman alliance with Aetolia, Philip's first action was to secure his northern borders. He conducted raids in Illyria at Oricum and Apollonia and seized the frontier town of Sintia in Dardania or perhaps Paionia. He then marched rapidly south through Pelagonia, Lyncestis and Bottiaea and on to Tempe which he garrisoned with 4,000 men. He turned north again into Thrace, attacking the Maedi and their chief city Iamphorynna before returning to Macedon.
No sooner had Philip arrived there when he received an urgent plea for help from his ally the Acarnanians. Scopas the Aetolian strategos (general) had mobilized the Aetolian army and was preparing to invade Acarnania. Desperate and overmatched, but determined to resist, the Acarnanians sent their women, children and old men to seek refuge in Epirus and the rest marched to the frontier, having sworn an oath to fight to the death, "invoking a terrible curse" upon any who were forsworn. Hearing of the Acarnanians' grim determination, the Aetolians hesitated then, learning of Philip's approach, finally abandoned their invasion, after which Philip retired to Pella for the winter.[28]
In the spring of 210 BC, Laevinus again sailed from Corcyra with his fleet and, together with the Aetolians, captured Phocian Anticyra. Rome enslaved the inhabitants and Aetolia took possession of the town.[29]
Although there was some fear of Rome and concern with her methods,[30] the coalition arrayed against Philip continued to grow. As allowed for by the treaty, Pergamon, Elis and Messenia, followed by Sparta, all agreed to join the alliance against Macedon.[31] The Roman fleet, together with the Pergamene fleet, controlled the sea, and Macedon and her allies were threatened on land by the rest of the coalition. The Roman strategy of encumbering Philip with a war among Greeks in Greece was succeeding, so much so that when Laevinus went to Rome to take up his consulship, he was able to report that the legion deployed against Philip could be safely withdrawn.[32]
However, the Eleans, Messenians and Spartans remained passive throughout 210 BC and Philip continued to make advances. He invested and took Echinus, using extensive siegeworks, having beaten back an attempt to relieve the town by the Aetolian strategos Dorimachus and the Roman fleet, now commanded by the proconsul Publius Sulpicius Galba.[33] Moving west, Philip probably also took Phalara the port city of Lamia, in the Maliac Gulf. Sulpicius and Dorimachus took Aegina, an island in the Saronic Gulf, which the Aetolians sold to Attalus, the Pergamene king, for thirty talents, and which he was to use as his base of operations against Macedon in the Aegean Sea.
In the spring of 209 BC, Philip received requests for help from his ally the Achaean League in the Peloponnesus who were being attacked by Sparta and the Aetolians. He also heard that Attalus had been elected one of the two supreme commanders of the Aetolian League, as well as rumors that he intended to crossover the Aegean from Asia Minor.[34] Philip marched south into Greece. At Lamia he was met by an Aetolian force, supported by Roman and Pergamene auxiliaries, under the command of Attalus' colleague as strategos, the Aetolian Pyrrhias. Philip won two battles at Lamia, inflicting heavy casualties on Pyrrhias' troops. The Aetolians and their allies were forced to retreat inside the city walls, where they remained, unwilling to give battle.
Attempt at peace fails
[edit]From Lamia, Philip went to Phalara where he met representatives from the neutral states of Egypt, Rhodes, Athens and Chios who were trying to end the war. As trading states, the war was likely hurting trade;[35] Livy says that they were concerned "not so much for the Aetolians, who were more warlike than the rest of the Greeks, as for the liberty of Greece, which would be seriously endangered if Philip and his kingdom took an active part in Greek politics." With them was Amynandor of Athamania, representing the Aetolians. A truce of thirty days and a peace conference at Achaea were arranged.
Philip marched to Chalcis in Euboea, which he garrisoned to block Attalus' landing there, then continued on to Aegium for the conference. The conference was interrupted by a report that Attalus had arrived at Aegina and the Roman fleet was at Naupactus. The Aetolian representatives, emboldened by these events, at once demanded that Philip return Pylos to the Messenians, Atintania to Rome and the Ardiaei to Scerdilaidas and Pleuratus. "Indignant", Philip quit the negotiations telling the assembly that they "might bear him witness that whilst he was seeking a basis for peace, the other side were determined to find a pretext for war".[36]
Hostilities resume
[edit]From Naupactus, Sulpicius sailed east to Corinth and Sicyon, conducting raids there. Philip, with his cavalry, caught the Romans ashore and was able to drive them back to their ships, with the Romans returning to Naupactus.
Philip then joined Cycliadas, the Achaean general, near Dyme for a joint attack on the city of Elis, the main Aetolian base of operations against Achaea.[37] However, Sulpicius had sailed into Cyllene and reinforced Elis with a force of 4,000 Roman troops. Leading a charge, Philip was thrown from his horse. Fighting on foot, Philip became the object of a fierce battle, finally escaping on another horse. The next day, Philip captured the stronghold of Phyricus, taking 4,000 prisoners and 20,000 animals. Hearing news of Illyrian incursions in the north, Philip abandoned Aetolia and returned to Demetrias in Thessaly.[38]
Meanwhile, Sulpicius sailed round into the Aegean and joined Attalus on Aegina for the winter.[39] In 208 BC, the combined fleet of thirty-five Pergamene and twenty-five Roman ships failed to take Lemnos, but occupied and plundered the countryside of the island of Peparethos (Skopelos), both Macedonian possessions.[40]
Attalus and Sulpicius then attended a meeting in Heraclea Trachinia of the Council of the Aetolians, which included representatives from Egypt and Rhodes, who were continuing to try to arrange a peace. Learning of the conference and the presence of Attalus, Philip marched rapidly south in an attempt to break up the conference and catch the enemy leaders, but arrived too late.[41]
Surrounded by foes, Philip was forced to adopt a defensive policy.[42] He distributed his commanders and forces and set up a system of beacon fires at various high places to communicate instantly any enemy movements.
After leaving Heraclea, Attalus and Sulpicius sacked both Oreus on the northern coast of Euboea, and Opus, the chief city of eastern Locris.[43] The spoils from Oreus had been reserved for Sulpicius, who returned there, while Attalus stayed to collect the spoils from Opus. However, with their forces divided, Philip, alerted by signal fire, attacked and took Opus. Attalus, caught by surprise, was barely able to escape to his ships.
The war ends
[edit]Although Philip considered Attalus' escape a bitter defeat,[44] it proved to be the turning point of the war. Attalus was forced to return to Pergamon, when he learned at Opus that, perhaps at the urging of Philip, Prusias I, king of Bithynia and related to Philip by marriage, was moving against Pergamon. Sulpicius returned to Aegina, so free from the pressure of the combined Roman and Pergamene fleets, Philip was able to resume the offensive against the Aetolians. He captured Thronium, followed by the towns of Tithronium and Drymaea north of the Cephisus, controlling all of Epicnemidian Locris,[45] and took back control of Oreus.[46]
The neutral trading powers were still trying to arrange a peace and, at Elateia, Philip met with the same would-be peacemakers from Egypt and Rhodes who had been at the previous meeting in Heraclea, and again in the spring of 207 BC, but to no avail.[47] Representatives of Egypt, Rhodes, Byzantium, Chios, Mytilene and perhaps Athens also met again with the Aetolians that spring.[48] The war was going Philip's way, but the Aetolians, although now abandoned by both Pergamon and Rome, were not yet ready to make peace on Philip's terms. However, after another season of fighting, they finally relented. In 206 BC, and without Rome's consent, the Aetolians sued for a separate peace on conditions imposed by Philip.
The following spring[49] the Romans sent the censor Publius Sempronius Tuditanus with 35 ships and 11,000 men to Dyrrachium in Illyria, where he incited the Parthini to revolt and laid siege to Dimale. However, when Philip arrived, Sempronius broke off the siege and withdrew inside the walls of Apollonia. Sempronius tried unsuccessfully to entice the Aetolians to break their peace with Philip. With no more allies in Greece, but having achieved their objective of preventing Philip from aiding Hannibal, the Romans were ready to make peace. A treaty was drawn up at Phoenice in 205 BC, the so-called "Peace of Phoenice," which formally ended the First Macedonian War.[50]
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Polybius, 2.11.
- ^ Polybius, 3.16, 3.18–19, 4.66.
- ^ Polybius, 5.101.
- ^ Polybius, 5.102.
- ^ Polybius, 5.103–-105.
- ^ Polybius, 5.103.
- ^ Polybius, 5.104. According to Walbank, p. 66, note 5, this speech, "nonwithstanding rhetorical elements … bears the mark of a true version based on contemporary record."
- ^ a b c Polybius, 5.109.
- ^ Walbank, p. 69; Polybius, 5.1, 5.95, 5.108.
- ^ Wilkes, p. 157; Polybius, 2.3.
- ^ Polybius, 5.108.
- ^ Walbank, p. 69.
- ^ Polybius, 5.110.
- ^ Polybius, 7.9.
- ^ According to Walbank, p. 71, note 1, the version of the treaty described in Livy, 23.33.9–12 which mention an Italian invasion by Philip, "are worthless annalistic fabrications".
- ^ Walbank, p. 69, note 3.
- ^ Livy, 23.34.
- ^ Livy, 23.38. Livy says that 20 ships were outfitted and, along with the five ships that transported the agents to Rome, were sent to join Flaccus' fleet of 25 ships. In the same passage he says that 30 ships left Ostia for Tarentum and talks about a combined fleet of 55. Walbank, p. 75, note 2, says that the 55 number given by Livy is a mistake, citing "Holleaux, 187, n. 1."
- ^ Walbank, p. 75; Livy, 24.40.
- ^ Livy, 24.10–11, 20.
- ^ Livy, 24.40. Livy's account is suspect, see Walbank, p. 76, note 1.
- ^ Eckstein, Arthur M. (2008). Rome Enters the Greek East From Anarchy to Hierarchy in the Hellenistic Mediterranean, 230–170 BC. Blackwell Publishing. p. 87. ISBN 978-1-4051-6072-8.
- ^ Polybius, 8.15–16.
- ^ Livy, 24.13, 25.23.
- ^ Walbank, p. 82; Livy, 25.30, 26.24.
- ^ Livy, 26.24. According to Walbank, p. 84, note 2, "Livy accidentally omits Messenia and erroneously describes Pleuratus as king of Thrace."
- ^ Livy, 26.24.
- ^ Livy, 26.25; Polybius, 9.40.
- ^ Livy, 26.26; Polybius, 9.39. Livy says that Anticyra was Locrian, but modern scholars disagree, see Walbank, p. 87, note 2.
- ^ Polybius, 9.37–39, 10.15.
- ^ Polybius, 9,30.
- ^ Livy, 26.28.
- ^ Polybius, 9.41–42.
- ^ Livy, 27.29.
- ^ Walbank, p. 89–90.
- ^ Livy, 27.30.
- ^ Livy, 27.31.
- ^ Livy, 27.32.
- ^ Livy, 27.33.
- ^ Livy, 28.5.
- ^ Polybius, 10.42; Livy, 28.5.
- ^ Polybius, 10.41; Livy, 28.5.
- ^ Livy, 28.6.
- ^ Polybius, 11.7; Livy, 28.7.
- ^ Livy, 28.7; Walbank, p. 96.
- ^ Livy, 28.8.
- ^ Livy, 28.7.
- ^ Polybius, 11.4.
- ^ According to Walbank, p. 102, note 2, Livy, 29.12 "is spoilt by annalistic contamination, which, in the interests of Roman policy, tries to run the Aetolian peace and the return of the Romans as closely together as possible".
- ^ Livy, 29.12.
References
[edit]- Hansen, Esther V., The Attalids of Pergamon, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press; London: Cornell University Press Ltd (1971). ISBN 0-8014-0615-3.
- Kleu, Michael. Die Seepolitik Philipps V. von Makedonien. Bochum, Verlag Dr. Dieter Winkler, 2015.
- Livy, From the Founding of the City, Rev. Canon Roberts (translator), Ernest Rhys (Ed.); (1905) London: J. M. Dent & Sons, Ltd.
- Polybius, Histories, Evelyn S. Shuckburgh (translator); London, New York. Macmillan (1889); Reprint Bloomington (1962).
- Walbank, F. W. (1940), Philip V of Macedon.
- Wilkes, John, The Illyrians, Blackwell Publishers (December 1, 1995). ISBN 0-631-19807-5.
First Macedonian War
View on GrokipediaBackground
Context in the Second Punic War
The Second Punic War, fought between Rome and Carthage from 218 to 201 BC, began with Hannibal's audacious invasion of Italy after crossing the Alps with his army, elephants, and supplies, aiming to break Roman alliances in the peninsula and force a decisive confrontation.[6] This campaign inflicted severe setbacks on Rome, diverting its legions and resources almost entirely to the defense of Italy against Hannibal's maneuvers, leaving the Republic unable to project significant power elsewhere in the Mediterranean.[7] The war's intensity preoccupied Roman leadership with survival in the west, creating a strategic vacuum in other regions that external powers could exploit.[8] A pivotal moment came in 217 BC with the Roman defeat at the Battle of Lake Trasimene, where Hannibal ambushed and annihilated the consular army of Gaius Flaminius, killing around 15,000 Romans and capturing thousands more, while Carthaginian losses were minimal at about 1,500.[9] This disaster, one of the worst in Roman military history, prompted the Senate to appoint Quintus Fabius Maximus as dictator to implement a defensive strategy of attrition, further tying down Roman forces and exposing vulnerabilities beyond Italy.[10] The defeat weakened Rome's overall position, eroding morale and encouraging allied defections in Italy while signaling to observers in the east that the Republic's grip on its interests was faltering.[11] Rome's client states along the Adriatic, particularly in Illyria—established as a protectorate following the Second Illyrian War (220–219 BC)—became prime targets for exploitation amid this preoccupation.[12] These coastal regions, vital for Roman grain supplies and naval access to Greece, relied on limited Roman garrisons and alliances that could not be reinforced during the Punic crisis, leaving them susceptible to incursions by ambitious neighbors. Philip V of Macedon, upon learning of the Trasimene disaster while at the Nemean Games in 217 BC, viewed it as a critical opportunity to challenge Roman influence, advised by Demetrius of Pharos to redirect efforts toward Illyria and potentially Italy itself.[13] This perception of Roman weakness, compounded by later defeats like Cannae in 216 BC, prompted Philip to briefly campaign in Illyria before Roman naval reinforcements forced a retreat, highlighting how the Punic War's demands constrained Rome's eastern responses.[14] In 215 BC, Philip formalized this opportunism by allying with Carthage through a treaty pledging mutual aid against Rome, though naval setbacks limited its impact.[15]Philip V's Expansionist Policies
Philip V acceded to the throne of Macedon in 221 BC upon the sudden death of Antigonus III Doson, his cousin and guardian who had served as regent since 229 BC following the death of Philip's father, Demetrius II.[16] At approximately 17 years old, Philip inherited a kingdom that Doson had stabilized through administrative reforms, including the establishment of a council of advisors to share governance burdens, and military reorganizations that enhanced Macedonian efficiency. Polybius describes Philip's initial consolidation as swift and effective, as he navigated early challenges such as internal plots by figures like Apelles while demonstrating personal leadership in campaigns, earning him early acclaim as a capable ruler poised to emulate the legacy of Philip II. Philip's control over Greece was firmly rooted in the Hellenic Symmachy, a confederation of states—including the Achaean League, Epirotes, Phocians, Boeotians, Acarnanians, and Thessalians—over which he assumed leadership as hegemon, a position Doson had formalized during the Cleomenic War. This alliance provided the framework for Macedonian hegemony, enabling Philip to garrison strategic sites like Corinth, Chalcis, and Demetrias to secure loyalty and deter rivals. A pivotal recent victory underpinning this structure was the Battle of Sellasia in 222 BC, where Doson's forces of about 28,000 infantry and 1,200 cavalry decisively defeated the Spartan army of Cleomenes III, numbering around 20,000, near the town of Sellasia in Laconia. The battle's success, achieved through coordinated assaults on Spartan positions atop hills Euas and Olympus, crippled Spartan ambitions and reinforced the Symmachy's dominance, allowing Philip to inherit and expand Macedonian influence across the Peloponnese without immediate Spartan resurgence. Philip's expansionist drive increasingly focused on Illyria and the Adriatic, regions he viewed as essential to extending Macedonian power westward and checking Roman advances that had begun with their 229 BC expedition against Illyrian pirates.[17] By 217 BC, following the Peace of Naupactus, he launched incursions into Dassaretia, routing Illyrian chieftain Scerdilaidas and capturing key sites like Antipatrea and Orgessus to secure inland routes.[17] Economically, Philip sought to dominate trade routes linking the Balkans to Italy, exploiting the area's fertile coastal plains, pasturage for livestock, and timber resources vital for shipbuilding and Macedonian commerce, thereby enhancing the kingdom's revenue and strategic autonomy.[17]Prelude to Conflict
Demetrius of Pharos and Incitement to War
Demetrius of Pharos initially emerged as a key ally to Rome during the First Illyrian War of 229–228 BC. As commander of the Illyrian garrison on Corcyra, he surrendered the island to Roman forces under the command of Gnaeus Fulvius Centumalus and Lucius Postumius Albinus, providing crucial guidance that facilitated Roman advances against Illyrian queen Teuta's forces. In recognition of his assistance, the Romans installed Demetrius as ruler over much of southern Illyria, including Pharos and surrounding territories, establishing him as a client potentate bound by treaty to refrain from aggression against Roman interests in the Adriatic. By 219 BC, however, Demetrius had turned adversary, violating the Roman treaty through aggressive expansion. Disregarding his obligations, he subdued Illyrian cities under Roman protection and, in collaboration with Scerdilaïdas, dispatched a fleet of fifty ships beyond the prohibited boundary of Lissus to plunder Greek islands in the Cyclades, thereby challenging Roman dominance in the region. The Roman Senate responded decisively by dispatching praetor Lucius Aemilius Paullus with a fleet and army; after a seven-day siege, Aemilius captured the fortress of Dimale, then employed a stratagem to defeat Demetrius's forces of approximately 6,000 at Pharos, forcing the Illyrian ruler to flee by small boat. With his territories lost and facing Roman occupation, Demetrius sought refuge at the court of Philip V of Macedon, where he became a influential advisor driven by personal animosity toward Rome and ambitions to reclaim his lost domains. Demetrius's incitement to war reached its peak in 215 BC, as he exploited intelligence of Rome's vulnerabilities during the Second Punic War to urge Philip toward confrontation. Earlier, in 217 BC, upon learning privately from Philip of the Roman disaster at Lake Trasimene against Hannibal, Demetrius seized the moment to counsel aggressive action: he advised the king to swiftly conclude the ongoing war with Aetolia, consolidate control over Greece and Illyria—including Demetrius's former holdings—and then launch an expedition across the Adriatic to Italy, where Rome's preoccupation would allow Macedon to vie for supremacy over the known world. This counsel, emphasizing Rome's divided attentions and weakened position, profoundly stirred Philip's ambitions, prompting him to negotiate peace with the Aetolians and redirect resources westward. Demetrius reinforced this advocacy in subsequent discussions, portraying the western campaign as an unparalleled opportunity for Philip to recover Illyrian territories and challenge Roman hegemony directly, motivated in part by his own desire for restoration. Philip, heeding Demetrius's persistent urging, initiated preparations that catalyzed the First Macedonian War, including the construction of a fleet of one hundred warships aimed at securing Illyria as a staging ground for the Italian invasion. Demetrius's role as a betrayed former ally turned provocateur thus transformed personal grievance into a broader geopolitical conflict, drawing Macedon into direct opposition with Rome.Philip's Diplomatic Maneuvers
Following the urging of his advisor Demetrius of Pharos, Philip V sought to consolidate his position in Greece and prepare for expansion westward by addressing ongoing conflicts and forging new alliances. In 217 BC, Philip concluded a peace treaty with the Aetolians, ending the Social War and freeing Macedonian forces from commitments in central Greece for potential operations in the Adriatic region.[18] That same year, Philip negotiated an alliance with Carthage through envoys to Hannibal Barca, establishing mutual aid against Rome; the treaty stipulated that Philip would assist Hannibal in Italy if he could cross, while Hannibal pledged support for Philip's conquests in Illyria, serving as a precursor to later diplomatic arrangements like the Treaty of Phoenice.[19][20] The agreement, intercepted by Roman forces, heightened tensions and prompted Rome's declaration of war.[21] To support these ambitions, Philip initiated the construction of a Macedonian fleet in 214 BC, assembling approximately 100 lembi—light, Illyrian-style warships suited for coastal raiding and troop transport—to challenge Roman naval dominance in the Adriatic.[22] This buildup marked a shift in Macedonian strategy toward maritime power projection, compensating for the kingdom's traditional land-based focus. Philip also extended diplomatic overtures to other Hellenistic rulers, dispatching envoys to Prusias I of Bithynia and seeking support from eastern kings like Antiochus III of the Seleucid Empire, though responses were limited and cautious amid regional rivalries.[23] These efforts aimed to isolate Rome but yielded few firm commitments, underscoring the fragmented alliances of the Hellenistic world.Outbreak and Early Engagements
Incursion into Illyria
In late 214 BC, Philip V of Macedon, emboldened by his alliance with Hannibal Barca and advised by the exiled Demetrius of Pharos, launched a seaborne invasion of Illyria to seize control of Roman-allied coastal territories and potentially open a second front against Rome. Commanding a fleet of 120 lembi—light, oared warships suited for coastal operations—Philip sailed across the Adriatic from the Peloponnese, rapidly capturing the lightly defended city of Oricum (modern Orikos) on the Illyrian coast. He then proceeded up the Aous River to besiege the strategically vital Apollonia, a key Roman ally and trade hub, aiming to consolidate his gains before advancing further.[24][25] The Roman response was prompt but constrained by the ongoing Second Punic War. Praetor Lucius Valerius Laevinus, patrolling the Adriatic with a squadron of 25 quinqueremes dispatched from Lilybaeum in Sicily, learned of the incursion and hurried to the Aous River mouth near Apollonia. By blockading the river estuary, Laevinus trapped Philip's fleet and army, preventing resupply or escape. Alarmed by the Roman warships, Philip's forces panicked; he ordered the destruction of his siege engines and supplies, evacuated Oricum, and withdrew his entire fleet back across the Adriatic to Corcyra and then Macedonia, abandoning the campaign after minimal territorial success.[24][2] This Illyrian incursion directly precipitated Rome's declaration of war on Macedon in the autumn of 214 BC, as the Senate perceived Philip's actions as a violation of Roman protectorate rights over Illyria, established during the Illyrian Wars of 229–219 BC, and a threat to Adriatic trade routes and allies. The declaration formalized the First Macedonian War, though Rome's divided resources—primarily committed to Hannibal's campaigns in Italy—meant initial countermeasures were limited to naval patrols rather than a full invasion. Laevinus's fleet, later reinforced to around 50 ships, maintained a vigilant presence in the region to safeguard Illyrian ports.[2][25] Undeterred, Philip shifted to opportunistic naval raids along the Italian and Greek coasts to divert Roman attention and support Carthaginian operations. In the following year, 213 BC, his forces attacked and briefly occupied Pylos in the Peloponnese, though this was later recaptured by the Aetolians with Roman backing. These raids, including probes near the Italian coastline, inflicted minor damage but were largely thwarted by Laevinus's squadron and adverse weather, which scattered Philip's lighter vessels. Meanwhile, the initial Roman naval effort under Laevinus transitioned to consul Publius Sulpicius Galba in subsequent years, who expanded patrols amid ongoing Punic War demands.[24][2]Roman Alliance-Building in Greece
Following Philip V's incursion into Illyria in 214 BC, which threatened Roman interests in the Adriatic, Rome initiated diplomatic efforts to build alliances among Greek states hostile to Macedonian expansion. In 213 BC, Roman envoys began contacting various Greek polities, including the Aetolian League, to exploit longstanding anti-Macedonian sentiments stemming from Philip's interventions in central Greece.[2] These overtures intensified in 212 BC under the propraetor Marcus Valerius Laevinus, who held private meetings with Aetolian leaders such as the chief magistrate Scopas and the general Dorimachus, emphasizing Rome's recent victories over Syracuse and Capua to demonstrate its strength against common foes.[26] Laevinus's diplomacy succeeded in securing the Aetolian League as a key partner, marking Rome's first formal coalition in Greece against Philip.[3] The alliance treaty between Rome and the Aetolian League, concluded in the autumn of 212 BC, stipulated joint military operations against Philip V, with the Aetolians committing to land campaigns and Rome providing at least twenty-five quinqueremes for naval support.[26] Under the terms, any conquered territories, cities, buildings, and walls up to the island of Corcyra would fall under Aetolian control, while Rome would claim slaves and other movable booty; Acarnania was specifically designated to enter Aetolian dominion.[26] The agreement also allowed for the inclusion of mutual allies, ensured reciprocal peace obligations, and required copies of the treaty to be deposited at Olympia and on the Capitoline Hill in Rome after a two-year interval to formalize the pact.[26] This coalition enabled immediate actions, such as Laevinus's capture of Zacynthus, Oeniadae, and Nasus, which were promptly ceded to the Aetolians.[26] In 211 BC, the alliance expanded with the involvement of Attalus I of Pergamon, who provided crucial naval support as an associate of the Aetolian League under the treaty's provisions.[27] Attalus sailed to Greece with a fleet, wintering at Aegina alongside the Roman commander Publius Sulpicius Galba, to coordinate operations against Philip and demonstrate Pergamon's commitment to countering Macedonian aggression in the Aegean.[28] His participation bolstered Roman naval capabilities and helped deter Philip from further Adriatic advances, aligning Pergamene interests with Rome's strategy to isolate Macedon.[2] Rome also recruited smaller allies such as Elis and Messene, which joined the Aetolian-led efforts and participated in engagements near Messene in 211 BC alongside Roman forces.[28] However, attempts to win over the Achaean League failed, as its leaders, closely tied to Philip through prior agreements, rejected Roman overtures and continued supporting Macedonian interests in the Peloponnese.[3] This partial success in alliance-building allowed Rome to establish a foothold in Greece but highlighted the challenges of unifying fragmented Hellenistic polities against Philip.[2]Main Military Campaigns
Land Operations in Greece
The land operations in Greece during the First Macedonian War from 211 to 206 BC were characterized by limited Roman engagement due to commitments in the Second Punic War, with primary efforts relying on the Aetolian League for terrestrial advances against Macedonian forces under King Philip V. Roman consul Marcus Valerius Laevinus, commanding a modest force of approximately 5,000–6,000 men in 211 BC, focused on supporting Aetolian incursions into Macedonian-allied territories such as Acarnania, capturing key sites including Oeniadae and Nasus, which were then transferred to Aetolian control.[2] These actions aimed to disrupt Philip's supply lines but were constrained by troop shortages, as Rome prioritized Hannibal's invasion in Italy, leaving Laevinus unable to mount large-scale offensives.[2] By 210–208 BC, Laevinus' campaigns shifted to opportunistic raids, including the capture of Anticyra in Phocis, but overall progress stalled amid logistical limitations and Philip's defensive posture.[2][29] In 207 BC, Roman and Aetolian forces achieved a notable success by capturing Oreus and Chalcis in Euboea, strategic strongholds that threatened Philip's communications with central and southern Greece. Under the command of consul Publius Sulpicius Galba, supported by Aetolian troops and the fleet of King Attalus I of Pergamon, the allies seized Oreus after a brief siege and then targeted Chalcis, exploiting its vulnerability following Philip's absence on other fronts.[3][2] These captures temporarily weakened Macedonian control over the island but were part of a broader failed attempt to isolate Philip, as his garrisons mounted resistance and Roman manpower remained insufficient for sustained occupation.[29] Philip V responded aggressively to these incursions, fortifying and defending key positions to maintain dominance in central Greece. In 210 BC, he besieged and captured Echinus in Phthiotic Achaea after a prolonged assault, repelling attempts by Aetolian and Roman reinforcements to relieve the city, thereby securing his hold on Thessaly.[2][29] The following year, in 209 BC, Philip turned to Lamia, besieging the Aetolian-held fortress in a series of engagements known as the Battles of Lamia, where his forces defeated the Aetolian defenders led by their general Pyrrhias, preventing a breakthrough into Malis.[2] These defenses preserved Macedonian influence over vital passes like Thermopylae. Macedonian counteroffensives further solidified Philip's position, particularly in Thessaly and Acarnania, where he exploited allied disunity. In 210 BC, Philip expelled Aetolian raiders from Thessaly, sacking their settlements and reclaiming territory lost earlier in the war.[29] Similarly, in Acarnania, Philip repelled Aetolian invasions supported by Roman elements, launching punitive expeditions that forced the allies onto the defensive and maintained Macedonian control over western Greece until peace negotiations in 205 BC.[2][3] At Pheneus in 206 BC, Philip's forces clashed with Aetolian remnants in Arcadia during a broader Peloponnesian campaign, defeating them and reinforcing alliances with the Achaean League against shared foes.[29]Naval and Coastal Actions
In 214 BC, Philip V of Macedon launched his initial naval offensive in the Adriatic Sea, constructing a fleet of approximately 120 light galleys known as lembi to support his alliance with Carthage and seize Roman-allied territories in Illyria. The Macedonian force quickly captured the coastal city of Oricum and advanced toward Apollonia, aiming to establish a bridgehead for further incursions into Italy. However, the Roman praetor Marcus Valerius Laevinus, stationed at Corcyra with a squadron of 25 heavy quinqueremes, rapidly intervened, landing troops to relieve Oricum and blockading the mouth of the Aous River. Caught off guard, Philip ordered the burning of his fleet to prevent its capture, marking a significant early setback for Macedonian maritime ambitions and forcing a retreat by land. Roman naval superiority, anchored in the heavier and more maneuverable quinqueremes crewed by experienced marines, allowed Laevinus to maintain control of the Adriatic throughout 214–212 BC, conducting coastal patrols and supporting allied Illyrian and Epirote forces against Macedonian raids.[30] From his base at Corcyra, Laevinus effectively blockaded key Illyrian ports, disrupting Philip's supply lines and preventing any substantial follow-up expeditions, while smaller detachments raided Macedonian-held positions along the western Greek coast. This dominance compelled Philip to shift focus to land campaigns in Greece, as repeated attempts to rebuild and deploy fleets met with interception or logistical failures due to Rome's vigilant squadrons.[31] By 207 BC, the Roman-Aetolian alliance gained a crucial ally in Attalus I of Pergamon, who dispatched a fleet of around 30 warships to the Aegean, joining Roman and Aetolian vessels in coordinated operations against Macedonian interests.[25] These combined forces established a loose blockade of Macedonia's eastern seaboard, raiding islands like Peparethos and Lemnos to interdict trade and reinforcements, while Attalus' squadron harassed Philip's coastal fortifications near Demetrias.[32] The joint effort pressured Philip into defensive postures, culminating in his narrow evasion of Attalus near Opus and a temporary withdrawal of Pergamene ships to protect Asian holdings, though the blockade persisted in limiting Macedonian naval mobility. Macedonian shipbuilding efforts during the war were severely constrained by a lack of suitable timber, skilled artisans, and dockyard infrastructure, restricting Philip to producing lightweight lembi rather than the heavy decked warships needed to challenge Roman quinqueremes effectively.[31] These limitations resulted in cumulative losses from skirmishes and retreats, further eroding his maritime capabilities.Peace Efforts and Conclusion
Failed Negotiations
In 206 BC, amid the protracted First Macedonian War, Roman and Aetolian envoys proposed peace terms to Philip V of Macedon, facilitated by mediation from neutral powers such as the Republic of Rhodes, Ptolemaic Egypt, and Athens, who sought to avert further escalation in the eastern Mediterranean.[31] These efforts reflected Rome's strategic diversion of resources to the Second Punic War against Carthage, prompting a willingness to negotiate an end to the Macedonian conflict on moderate terms.[2] Philip V responded by demanding formal recognition of his territorial acquisitions in Illyria, including key coastal cities seized from Roman allies during the war's early phases, as a precondition for any settlement.[33] In direct opposition, Roman diplomats insisted on a complete restoration of the status quo ante bellum, requiring Philip to relinquish all gains in Illyria and Greece without compensation, viewing any concession as a dangerous precedent amid their broader imperial ambitions.[33] This fundamental disagreement over territorial sovereignty highlighted the irreconcilable interests at play.[2] The talks ultimately collapsed due to pervasive mutual distrust, with both sides accusing the other of bad faith while maintaining active military operations; Roman forces continued raids along the Macedonian coast, and Philip fortified his positions in contested regions.[2] In summer 206 BC, Philip launched an offensive against the Aetolian League, invading through Athamania and advancing to the Aetolian sanctuary at Thermum, where he sacked the site and pressured the Aetolians into a separate peace due to Rome's delayed support.[2] This incursion aimed to exploit Roman distractions in the Second Punic War and weaken the anti-Macedonian coalition, as Philip's forces sacked key sites and forced the Aetolians to seek terms independently.[3] These events paved the way for intensified diplomatic efforts before a tenuous settlement was eventually forged.Resumption and Final Settlement
Rome responded by dispatching Publius Sempronius Tuditanus with an army of 10,000 infantry, 1,000 cavalry, and 35 warships to reinforce its Greek allies and maintain naval pressure in the Adriatic, while continuing diplomatic alliances with states like Pergamon and local Illyrian groups to encircle Philip strategically.[2] These efforts, combined with ongoing fleet operations that threatened Macedonian coastal positions, compelled Philip to the negotiating table, as Rome sought to redirect resources toward its campaign against Carthage without committing to a prolonged eastern conflict.[3] The resulting Peace of Phoenice, concluded in 205 BC at the Illyrian city of Phoenice, formally ended the First Macedonian War on terms largely favorable to Macedon, with Rome recognizing Philip's conquests in Illyria up to the city of Lissus and imposing no major territorial losses or reparations on him.[2] The treaty established a fragile status quo, requiring mutual non-aggression between Rome, Philip, and their respective allies, while Philip abandoned his alliance with Carthage; it was ratified by the Roman assemblies and marked the withdrawal of Roman land and naval forces from Greece.[34] This diplomatic resolution concluded the war without a decisive battle, reflecting both sides' exhaustion and Rome's strategic pivot to Africa.[3]Aftermath
Territorial and Political Outcomes
The Peace of Phoenice in 205 BC concluded the First Macedonian War with minimal territorial alterations, primarily involving a division of contested Illyrian regions between Macedon and Rome. Philip V retained control over Atintania, a border area extending influence from Epidamnus (modern Durrës) eastward to Lissus (modern Lezhë), securing Macedonian dominance in much of coastal Illyria despite Roman naval pressures during the conflict.[35][36] However, Philip experienced a loss of influence in adjacent parts of Epirus, as the treaty assigned the Parthini tribe and the fortress of Dimallum to Roman protection, effectively creating a buffer zone that curtailed Macedonian expansion westward and neutralized earlier gains in the region.[35] Politically, the Aetolian League, a key Roman ally since 211 BC, emerged strengthened in its federal structure through wartime cooperation but faced internal divisions after negotiating a separate peace with Philip in 206 BC, which ceded territories like Oeniadae and Nasus to Macedon and exposed rifts over continued Roman alignment.[2] Meanwhile, Attalus I of Pergamon gained significant prestige in Asia Minor by contributing naval forces against Philip, enhancing Pergamene influence among Hellenistic states without direct territorial acquisitions from the treaty.[37] Rome established a permanent presence in Greece by maintaining garrisons and protective oversight at Corcyra (modern Corfu), a strategic island base used throughout the war, which served as a forward station for future operations in the Adriatic.[35] Notably, the treaty imposed no financial indemnity on Philip nor required disarmament of his fleet, allowing Macedon to preserve its military capacity intact and reverting most other disputed areas to the status quo ante bellum, which favored Philip's overall position at the war's end.[2][35] This outcome reflected Rome's strategic pivot toward the Second Punic War, prioritizing de-escalation in the east over punitive measures.Strategic Implications for Rome and Macedon
The First Macedonian War concluded without a decisive victory for either side, culminating in the Treaty of Phoenice in 205 BC, which largely restored the pre-war status quo and divided influence in Illyria between Rome and Macedon. This stalemate preserved Philip V's throne and territorial integrity but left Macedonian military and financial resources significantly depleted after years of campaigning against Roman-allied forces. For Rome, preoccupied with the Second Punic War against Carthage, the conflict served as an initial foray into eastern Mediterranean politics, demonstrating the republic's capacity to project power beyond Italy despite divided attentions.[38][30] The war marked a pivotal shift in Roman foreign policy toward a more proactive stance in the East, transitioning from defensive alliances to strategic interventionism that foreshadowed deeper involvement in Hellenistic affairs. By forging and maintaining alliances with Greek states such as the Aetolian League and Pergamon, Rome established enduring footholds in the region, which not only checked Macedonian expansion but also positioned the republic to respond decisively to future threats, as seen in the Second Macedonian War (200–197 BC). These partnerships outlasted the immediate conflict, embedding Roman influence in Greek politics and commerce.[39] For Macedon, Philip V's survival came at the cost of exhausted treasuries and armies, breeding lasting resentment toward Rome that influenced subsequent diplomacy. This strain prompted Philip to pursue opportunistic alliances, most notably the 203 BC agreement with Seleucid king Antiochus III to partition Ptolemaic Egyptian territories, aiming to recover prestige and resources while indirectly challenging Roman interests. The inconclusive war thus sowed seeds of antagonism that escalated into broader Hellenistic confrontations.[40][41] Historiographically, the Greek historian Polybius, writing in the Histories, portrayed the First Macedonian War as a peripheral diversion for Rome amid the existential struggle against Hannibal in the Second Punic War, emphasizing how it tested Roman resilience without derailing their primary Carthaginian focus. Polybius' narrative underscores the conflict's role in the broader trajectory of Roman ascendancy, framing it as an early experiment in multi-theater warfare rather than a central contest.References
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/From_the_Founding_of_the_City/Book_26
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/From_the_Founding_of_the_City/Book_27
- https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/History_of_Rome_(Livy)/Book_28