Hubbry Logo
Fizi TerritoryFizi TerritoryMain
Open search
Fizi Territory
Community hub
Fizi Territory
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Fizi Territory
Fizi Territory
from Wikipedia

Fizi Territory is a territory located in the southern part of South Kivu Province, in the eastern region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Covering an estimated area of 15,789 square kilometers,[2] it shares borders with Uvira Territory to the north, Mwenga and Shabunda territories to the west, Kalemie Territory of Tanganyika Province to the south, and Lake Tanganyika to the east, beyond the Ubwari Peninsula.[3][4]

Key Information

The Bembe people predominantly inhabit the territory, though it is also characterized by considerable ethnocultural diversity, with smaller ethnic groups such as the Babuyu, Babwari, and Bazoba residing in various villages throughout the area.[5] Administratively, Fizi Territory is subdivided into four sectors: Lulenge, Mutambala, Ngandja, and Tanganyika.[3][6] Its economy is primarily driven by agriculture, fishing, livestock farming, and artisanal mineral extraction.[7] The Kyimbi (also known as Bendera) hydroelectric plant serves as a key source of power generation, although the territory's energy infrastructure remains limited.[2] Other facilities, such as the Magembe and Nundu stations, ceased operation during the Second Congo War, whereas a small hydroelectric unit in Malikya, close to Baraka, remains active.[2]

Geography

[edit]

Terrain and climate

[edit]

Fizi Territory landscape is dominated by mountainous terrain and a coastal plain along the eastern edge bordering Lake Tanganyika.[6] This plain averages about two kilometers in width but widens significantly in the southern region, known as Kenya, where it reaches roughly twelve kilometers.[2] In certain stretches, such as near Pemba and Luanga, the plain disappears entirely, leaving the lake's waters to crash directly against steep escarpments.[2] The coastal belt extends from the Kambakulu River up to the Lweka River, which serves as the natural border between the Tanganyika and Mutambala sectors.[2]

Inland, toward the center, south, and north of the territory, rises a vast plateau framed by parallel mountain chains oriented in a south–north direction. The highest peaks of these mountains exceed 2,500 meters in altitude and form part of the larger Mitumba range.[2] The plateau descends abruptly to the east, overlooking Lake Tanganyika. The Lukongo summit, located near the administrative headquarters of the territory, stands at about 1,400 meters above sea level.[2] The Baraka–Fizi road, which connects the lakeside city of Baraka to the interior, crosses a steep rocky escarpment reminiscent of the Nyangezi escarpment found in the neighboring Walungu Territory. Toward the west, the plateau inclines gently from east to west, a gradient that is mirrored by the flow of local rivers.[2]

Major rivers and their corresponding sectors

Lulenge Mutambala Ngandja Tanganyika Ref.
Mayi-Moto Mutambala Kilombwe Lubumba [6]
Malonge Misha Nemba Lweba [6]
Kalumya Katenga Kasandjala Lusenda [6]
Kabi Kivundje Mocha Sandja [6]
Lulenge Mukera Kilitcha Kabumbe [6]
Kama Lubilu Kabandja Ngovi [6]
Kabunga Luke Namatungulu Mukunga [6]
Lubongo Lwindi Butungu Lusuku [6]
Ikandja Kanguti Nakatete Kakenge [6]
Luhemba Bengechiba Mwenya Acobwe [6]
Kichinja Lokela Butungu Kabengwa [6]
Kawela Ambulu Ichuku Kalungasandje [6]
Kamabila kichula Muchobwe Kabembwo [6]
Ilambo Tulembo Lubichako Kabondozi [6]
Kakungwe Kibila Kimbi - [6]
Elecha - Lwuko - [6]
Matenganya - - - [6]
Kalicha - - - [6]

The territory experiences varied climatic conditions influenced by altitude. The low-lying coastal plains are generally hot, with average temperatures around 35°C, while the middle and high plateaus are significantly cooler, averaging 24°C.[6] Altitude in the territory ranges from approximately 750 meters near the lakeshore to 1,300 meters and up to 1,700 meters inland toward the highlands.[6]

Administration and governance

[edit]
A panoramic view of Fizi Territory near Sebele in the foreground, with the expansive Lake Tanganyika and the Ubwari Peninsula visible in the background.

Administratively, Fizi Territory was established under the Belgian colonial ordinance-law of 8 August 1935.[7] The original administrative center was located in Kalembelembe before being relocated to a settlement named Fishi—a name derived from the Kibembe language, later modified by colonial authorities to Fizi. The territory takes its name from this administrative center.[7]

Fizi Territory is subdivided into four sectors: Lulenge, Mutambala, Ngandja, and Tanganyika. These are further divided into 18 groupements (groupings) and 132 localités (villages).[7] The territory serves as an administrative unit responsible for the coordination, supervision, and support of state and provincial functions. Governance at the territorial level is overseen by a Territorial Administrator, who is supported by two Assistant Territorial Administrators.[8][9] These officials are appointed by the President of the Republic upon recommendation from the Minister of the Interior and Security, Decentralization, and Customary Affairs, following proposals by the Provincial Governor.[8] The Territorial Administrator acts as the representative of both the State and the Province, ensuring the operation of public services within the jurisdiction. Additionally, the Territorial Administrator and their assistants hold the status of judicial police officers with general jurisdiction and are empowered to requisition state services when required for the public interest.[8] Regular administrative reports are submitted to the Provincial Governor and forwarded to the national Ministry of the Interior and Security, Decentralization, and Customary Affairs.[8]

Subdivisions

Sectors Groupements Basic activities Ref.
Lulenge Basimimbi Agriculture [7]
Basimunyaka-Sud Agriculture [7]
Basikasingo Agriculture [7]
Basombo [7]
Obekulu [7]
Mutambala Basimukindji Fishing and breeding [7]
Balala-Sud Agriculture [7]
Basimukuma-Sud Agriculture [7]
Botombwe Agriculture and fishing [7]
Babwari Fishing [7]
Ngandja Basikalangwa Agriculture [7]
Basikasilu Mine [7]
Babungwe Agriculture and Mining [7]
Tanganyika Babungwe-Nord Agriculture [10]
Balala-Nord Agriculture [10]
Basimunyaka-Nord Agriculture [10]
Basimukuma-Nord Agriculture [10]
Basilotcha Agriculture [10][11][12]

In terms of political representation, Fizi Territory is represented in the 2024–2029 National Assembly by four deputies: Théophile Basoshi Lubwe (A/A-UNC), Janvier Msenyibwa Apele (2A/TDC)—who replaced Jean-Jacques Myewa Elakano—Obedi Nyamangyoku Ishibwela (AFDC-A), and Th Tchakubuta Mufaume (AAAP).[13]

History

[edit]

The region has a long history of independence from Kinshasa. It was the location of the maquis set up by Laurent-Désiré Kabila in 1967,[14] as well as the place where Laurent-Désiré Kabila raised his son, the former president Joseph Kabila, in 1973.[15]

Regional conflicts and wars

[edit]

First Congo War

[edit]
A 1996 aerial photograph showing the Mihanda refugee camp in Zaire, situated within the Mitumba Mountains. The camp is densely populated, with over 500 tents set up across the landscape. The tents are arranged in clusters, covering a significant area amidst the rugged terrain of the mountains.

The eruption of the First Congo War (1996–1997), precipitated by the fallout of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, drastically destabilized the region. Following the genocide, the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), under the leadership of Paul Kagame, ousted the Hutu-led regime of President Juvénal Habyarimana. However, the RPF's military incursions extended into eastern Zaire (present-day Democratic Republic of the Congo), targeting not only Hutu insurgent factions but also perpetrating extensive violence against Hutu civilians.[16][17][18] United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) consultant Robert Gersony documented these atrocities, estimating that between 5,000 and 10,000 individuals were killed monthly during mid-1994. The influx of over two million Rwandan Hutu refugees into eastern Zaire exacerbated tensions in provinces such as South Kivu.[19][20][21] The Zairean government under President Mobutu Sese Seko was unable to adequately address the humanitarian and security crises resulting from this influx.[22] By 1996, the Rwandan Patriotic Army (RPA), along with Ugandan forces and the Burundian Forces Armées Burundaises (FAB), began supporting Banyamulenge and other Tutsi militias operating in eastern Zaire.[22] Belgian legal and political scholar Filip Reyntjens characterizes the First Congo War as the intersection of two concurrent agendas: a legitimate resistance movement by Congolese Tutsi fearing retaliation, and the strategic use of this struggle by the Rwandan government to justify the RPA's military intervention in Zaire.[23] On 12 September 1996, Banyamulenge militias launched attacks in the Itombwe Sector of Mwenga Territory, specifically in the villages of Kanyura and Makutano.[24] Nine civilians, including prominent local leaders and their families, were executed. The casualties included a Rega ethnic administrator and the chief of the Basimunyaka II groupement, a Bembe from Fizi Territory, along with two of his relatives. These killings were widely perceived by local communities as the onset of a systematic campaign of ethnically targeted violence.[24]

MONUSCO peacekeepers and a FARDC Navy sailor in a village of Fizi Territory

As the Alliance des Forces Démocratiques pour la Libération du Congo (AFDL), supported by the RPA and Burundian forces, advanced through South Kivu, they were implicated in multiple massacres within Fizi Territory. Beginning in October 1996, AFDL and RPA units also initiated the conscription of child soldiers in the territories of Uvira, Fizi, and the city of Bukavu.[24] In Bukavu, recruitment operations were carried out from the AFDL headquarters situated in the Lolango Building on Avenue Maniema. The recruited children underwent rudimentary military training in the village of Kidoti before being deployed to active combat zones.[24] In late October 1996, AFDL and RPA forces killed 27 civilians, primarily women and children, in the village of Mboko, located approximately 52 kilometers south of Uvira. Victims attempting to escape across Lake Tanganyika to Tanzania were either shot or drowned.[24] On 28 October 1996, another massacre occurred in Abala-Ngulube, a village situated at the junction of the Moyen Plateau and Haut Plateau near Minembwe. In this attack, 101 civilians belonging to the Bembe ethnic group and members of the Third Malikia wa Ubembe Church were killed by AFDL and RPA forces.[24] Many victims were burned alive inside the church after refusing to evacuate the village. This attack followed an ambush in which Bembe fighters reportedly killed two AFDL and RPA soldiers in the surrounding area.[24] Since then, the Third Malikia wa Ubembe Church has observed an annual commemoration on 28 October to honor the victims.[24]

The violence of this period ultimately contributed to the fall of Kinshasa in May 1997, which led to the overthrow of Mobutu and the rise of Laurent-Désiré Kabila as the new head of state. Subsequently, the country was renamed the Democratic Republic of the Congo.[25][26] Despite the Congolese facade of the AFDL movement, a significant number of its officials were, in fact, members of the RPF.[27] As a result, numerous Rwandan nationals occupied prominent positions within the new Congolese administration.[27] The Congolese armed forces came under the de facto leadership of Rwandan General James Kabarebe, who was appointed Chief of Staff.[27]

Second Congo War

[edit]

During the Second Congo War, which erupted in 1998, Fizi Territory was plunged into intense insecurity and conflict. The war was triggered by deteriorating relations between President Laurent-Désiré Kabila and his former allies in Rwanda and Uganda, whom he accused of harboring coup d'état ambitions and of interfering in Congolese sovereignty.[28][29] Allegations also surfaced that the United States provided indirect support to Rwanda during this period, including military training by the Rwanda Interagency Assessment Team (RIAT), reportedly to secure access to the DRC's rich mineral resources.[30][31] Additional reports implicated American officials and organizations, such as Roger Winter of the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, in fueling insurgent activities.[32] In turn, Kabila dismissed Rwandan General James Kabarebe from his post as Chief of Staff and ordered all Rwandan troops to leave the country.[28][29] This action triggered a swift and violent response, as Rwanda and Uganda backed a new rebel movement, the Rassemblement Congolais pour la Démocratie (RCD). On 2 August 1998, mutinous elements within the Congolese army, alongside Rwandan, Ugandan, and Burundian forces, declared their rebellion from Goma.[33] The RCD and its allies rapidly seized control of key areas across eastern and northern DRC, including parts of North and South Kivu, Orientale Province, North Katanga, and Équateur Province.[33] However, their push toward the capital, Kinshasa, and the western province of Bas-Congo was thwarted by military reinforcements from Angola and Zimbabwe, who intervened in support of Kabila.[33]

This military and political fragmentation resulted in the de facto partition of the country. Kabila's regime, bolstered by Zimbabwean, Angolan, Namibian, Chadian, and Sudanese troops, maintained control over the western and central regions.[33] Conversely, the eastern regions fell under the authority of the RCD's armed wing, the Armée Nationale Congolaise (ANC), supported by Rwandan, Ugandan, and Burundian forces.[33] In an attempt to push back against this eastern coalition, Kabila allied with local militias, most notably the Mayi-Mayi, and with Burundian and Rwandan Hutu rebel groups, including the Forces pour la Défense de la Démocratie (FDD) and the Armée de Libération du Rwanda (ALiR), which included elements of the former Rwandan army and Interahamwe militia.[33] Simultaneously, Uganda, while holding significant portions of Orientale Province, sponsored the formation of a rival rebel group, the Mouvement pour la Libération du Congo (MLC), led by Jean-Pierre Bemba, to govern its occupied territories in Équateur.[33] Strategic and ideological disagreements between Uganda and Rwanda eventually caused a schism within the RCD itself, leading to the emergence of two rival factions: Rassemblement Congolais pour la Démocratie–Goma (RCD-Goma), aligned with Rwanda, and RCD-ML, aligned with Uganda.[33] The security environment in eastern DRC remained highly volatile following the occupation of urban centers in South Kivu by the RCD-Goma and its allied military forces, ANC, RPA, and FAB.[34] While these forces succeeded in asserting authority over major towns, they struggled to establish effective control in rural territories, where resistance from local militias, endemic mistrust, and ethnic tensions undercut their efforts.[34]

The RCD-Goma's dependence on the Banyamulenge and its overt reliance on Rwandan military support fostered deep resentment among other ethnic groups. Accusations of brutality, forced recruitment, looting, and summary executions by ANC and allied troops further alienated the local population.[34] In response, communities increasingly turned to self-defense militias, primarily Mayi-Mayi groups, whose decentralized and often ethnically-based structure enabled them to resist external forces.[34] One such group, Mudundu 40, emerged in Walungu Territory as a reaction to the abuses committed by occupying forces. Some Mayi-Mayi factions aligned themselves with Hutu militias, including ex-FAR/Interahamwe remnants and ALiR, as well as the Burundian Conseil National pour la Défense de la Démocratie–Forces de Défense de la Démocratie (CNDD-FDD).[34] These alliances, though often opportunistic and fluid, signaled the convergence of local defense efforts with broader regional dynamics. While Kinshasa occasionally supplied arms and logistical support to certain Mayi-Mayi leaders, such as General Padiri in Bunyakiri and Colonel Dunia's Forces d'Autodéfense Populaires (FAP) in Shabunda Territory, the majority of these militias operated autonomously, driven by local grievances rather than coordinated national strategy.[34] In retaliation for increasing attacks from Mayi-Mayi and allied forces, troops from the ANC, RPA, and FAB intensified forceful search operations, during which they carried out widespread sexual violence and deliberately targeted civilians.[34]

A view of Makobola village in 1954, before the massacre that would later occur there from 30 December 1998 to 2 January 1999.

In October and November 1998, the villages of Swima and Lusambo in the Tanganyika Sector were the sites of deliberate massacres, where 22 civilians were killed during a market day. ANC and FAB troops opened fire on unarmed residents, accusing them of supporting local militias.[34] The situation deteriorated further after a Burundian rebel combatant wounded an allied soldier, prompting indiscriminate retaliation against the civilian population.[34] A pattern of violent reprisal continued into December 1998. On the 21st of that month, joint forces of the ANC, RPA, and FAB executed nine civilians in the village of Mboko following the expulsion of Mayi-Mayi fighters.[34] These operations involved systematic house-to-house searches, during which civilians were summarily executed, either by gunfire or by edged weapons. The brutality culminated in the Makobola massacre, one of the conflict's most heinous attacks.[34] From 30 December 1998 to 2 January 1999, soldiers rampaged through the villages of Makobola II, Bangwe, Katuta, Mikunga, and Kashekezi, killing more than 800 civilians. Witness accounts describe horrific scenes of victims burned alive in their homes, looting on a large scale, and the widespread destruction of property.[34]

The violence persisted in subsequent months. In March 1999, FAB troops in Kazimia, also in Fizi Territory, burned six fishermen alive shortly after fresh fighting with Mayi-Mayi and CNDD-FDD militias.[34] In May of the same year, following the retaking of Baraka, ANC troops massacred 28 civilians in the village of Mwandiga. The victims, including entire families, had sought refuge and were lured into a gathering under the false pretense of a community meeting, only to be set ablaze.[34] Further atrocities occurred on 30 June 2000, when ANC and RPA troops attacked Lulinda and nearby localities including Mwachata and Icwa. At least 29 civilians were killed in this operation, which also featured acts of rape and the burning of homes.[34]

Transition of power, political upheaval, and diplomatic engagement

[edit]

Following the assassination of President Laurent-Désiré Kabila on 16 January 2001, Fizi Territory entered a new phase in its prolonged conflict. His successor and son, Joseph Kabila, assumed the presidency and began to shift the country's political trajectory by promoting diplomacy and dialogue. Joseph Kabila's administration prioritized de-escalation and initiated preparations for the Inter-Congolese Dialogue (ICD), a national reconciliation framework designed to bring together government representatives, rebel factions, political opposition, and civil society.[35] In March 2001, the United Nations Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC) deployed personnel along major frontlines to monitor the implementation of the Lusaka Ceasefire Agreement. Despite these peacebuilding measures, hostilities persisted, especially in the eastern provinces of North and South Kivu, where violence remained endemic due to ongoing confrontations between Mayi-Mayi militias, the FDD, the ALiR, and the RCD-Goma's military wing, ANC, backed by the RPA.[36] In September 2001, RCD-Goma attempted to assert greater control over South Kivu by organizing the inter-Kivu dialogue, a regional peace initiative aimed at brokering localized agreements with Mayi-Mayi groups.[37] However, the effort largely failed. Most Mayi-Mayi factions, many of which had the tacit or open support of the Kinshasa government, rejected the initiative. Only the Mudundu 40 faction agreed to participate, while a broad spectrum of civil society organizations boycotted the talks.[37]

The failure of local peace efforts fueled continued violence into 2002. In a particularly brutal episode, between 17 and 20 civilians, including a baby and two minors, were killed in the village of Kaboke II, located in the Tanganyika Sector. These atrocities, carried out by ANC and RPA troops, involved shooting, burning victims alive, and killing those in hiding.[37] During the same period, a rebellion emerged within the Banyamulenge community of Minembwe. Led by Patrick Masunzu, a former ANC commander, the Forces Républicaines et Fédéralistes (FRF) broke away from RCD-Goma and formed alliances with Mayi-Mayi groups in the territories of Mwenga, Uvira, and Fizi.[38] With clandestine support from the Kinshasa-based central government, this alliance launched coordinated attacks against ANC and RPA positions.[38] Despite these challenges, the formal Inter-Congolese Dialogue opened on 25 February 2002 in Sun City, South Africa. On 19 April, a preliminary power-sharing agreement was announced by President Joseph Kabila and Jean-Pierre Bemba. Although the deal was welcomed by some stakeholders, it faced resistance from RCD-Goma and key political parties such as the Union for Democracy and Social Progress (UDPS).[36] Nevertheless, an important breakthrough occurred on 30 July 2002, when the governments of Rwanda and the DRC signed a peace agreement in Pretoria. This agreement stipulated the withdrawal of Rwandan forces in exchange for the disarmament of the FDLR and other Hutu militias operating in Congolese territory. A similar bilateral accord was reached with Uganda in Luanda on 6 September 2002, aimed at ending its military involvement and stabilizing the conflict-ridden Ituri Province.[36] By the end of 2002, the phased withdrawal of foreign military forces from Congolese territory had commenced. Troops from Rwanda, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Angola, and Namibia began to exit the country.[36] However, the departure of RDF created a power vacuum in South Kivu, which allowed Mayi-Mayi militias and the FDLR to regain control over their previously lost areas. In response, the ANC and RDF launched renewed military operations to reclaim strategic positions.[37]

Efforts to resolve the conflict culminated in the Global and All-Inclusive Agreement signed in Pretoria on 17 December 2002, which proposed a power-sharing arrangement and the integration of armed groups into a unified national army.[36] Nevertheless, the fragile peace was repeatedly undermined. In a bid to consolidate its influence, the RCD-Goma initiated talks with the political wing of Mudundu 40, offering political appointments, including that of Patient Mwendanga as Governor of South Kivu, in return for the withdrawal of RDF from Walungu Territory.[37] This overture failed to bring lasting stability, as the military wing of Mudundu 40, led by Albert Kahasha (alias Foka Mike) and aligned with Padiri's Mayi-Mayi forces, refused to disarm and instead fortified its positions in the Burhale area.[37] By March 2003, with negotiations collapsing, Mwendanga was dismissed, and RCD-Goma's military wing, the ANC, supported by RDF reinforcements, launched a renewed offensive in Walungu Territory.[37] Parallel to these developments, other regions such as North Katanga and Ituri were also engulfed in militia-driven violence.[36]

The conflict's toll on civilians in Fizi Territory was severe, particularly between 1998 and 2003. During this period, the region experienced widespread sexual violence and systematic looting.[37] At least 1,660 cases of rape were documented across three major localities, though the true extent of the abuse is believed to be much higher due to underreporting, social stigma, and the remoteness of many affected areas.[37] All major armed factions operating in the territory, including foreign and domestic forces, were implicated in these violations. Among the recorded sexual violence cases, 89 involved male victims.[37] Kalundja village emerged as a symbol of the brutality inflicted on the territory's civilian population. The village earned the grim nickname "Dubai" from residents, a sardonic reference to the frequency and scale of pillaging, in sharp contrast to the prosperity typically associated with the Emirati city.[37]

Despite these ongoing challenges, participants in the Inter-Congolese Dialogue ratified the Global and All-Inclusive Agreement on 1 April 2003 in Sun City. An accompanying memorandum outlined plans for the integration of armed groups into the national army and the establishment of transitional governance structures.[36] On 30 June 2003, these transitional institutions were formally inaugurated.[39]

Interethnic and territorial disputes

[edit]

Babembe and Babuyu

[edit]
Bembe women participating in the Uhulana ceremony, circa 1950s. Photographed by Daniel P. Biebuyck, the scene depicts women standing outdoors in traditional attire, some holding ritual objects or carrying children
An elderly Bembe man seated indoors, dressed in traditional attire, engaged in a cultural and spiritual practice. In front of him are several carved wooden figures, likely representing ancestors or spirits, with which he appears to be interacting or presenting. The setting features a thatched roof and a modest interior. Photographed by Daniel P. Biebuyck, circa 1950s.

The Babembe and Babuyu communities are considered indigenous to the region but have distinct cultural, linguistic, and historical identities. The Babembe, who trace their ancestry to a common forebear named M'Mbondo, are organized into six major clans and traditionally engage in agriculture in the Mutambala plain, hunting in the Itombwe forest, and fishing on Lake Tanganyika.[40] The Babuyu, by contrast, are organized into eight clans and primarily inhabit the Lwama plain, where they practice fishing and hunting. They claim kinship ties with the Baluba of Katanga and are believed to have settled in the region during the 17th century.[40] Before colonial intervention, Babembe and Babuyu lived in relative harmony, operating within mobile chiefdoms and engaging in social exchanges, including intermarriage and trade.[40] However, colonial administration restructured these communities into fixed territorial sectors within the newly defined Fizi Territory. These administrative changes laid the groundwork for later disputes by imposing rigid boundaries and redefining identities.[40]

In 1997, these tensions erupted into open conflict in the Lulenge sector, centered around contested land rights and competing claims of indigeneity. The conflict is particularly acute in the Basikasingo groupement, where the Babuyu, who form the majority, assert ancestral ownership of the Lwama plain and claim that Babembe are recent arrivals, brought in during the 1950s under Belgian colonial policies to cultivate cotton.[40] The Babuyu contend that the Lulenge sector should be annexed to Maniema Province as their ethnic homeland, a proposal strongly opposed by the Babembe. The Babuyu also argue that Babembe communities in the groupements of Basimimbi, Basombo, and Obekulu should recognize their authority and pay tributes as symbolic acknowledgment of Babuyu ownership of the land.[40] Conversely, the Babembe reject these claims, asserting their equal indigeneity and emphasizing their demographic and educational ascendancy in the postcolonial period. By the late 20th century, Babembe held the majority of strategic positions in local administration, education, healthcare, and the palm oil economy in Lulenge.[40] They resisted any efforts to redefine administrative boundaries or to impose Babuyu leadership, viewing such moves as a regression to colonial power structures. They also opposed the colonial-era principle of rotating traditional authority, which they believed had been co-opted by the less-educated Babuyu minority to their detriment.[40] These grievances culminated in a series of violent clashes in 1997 across several areas, including Bibwe, Kilembwe, Kimanu II, Kolo Maindombe, Kukwe, Penemende, and Sakya.[40] The violence was further fueled by conflicting understandings of "ethnic" versus "state" territory, the politicization of ethnicity by local leaders, and historical resentments. The involvement of external actors, including Banyamulenge allies who encouraged the Babuyu to assert their rights in the face of perceived Babembe dominance, intensified the conflict.[40] This led to the militarization of both sides, with the formation of Mayi-Mayi militias by the Babembe and "Audacious" militias by the Babuyu.[40]

A key turning point came during and after the First Congo War in the late 1990s. According to field interviews conducted in 2009 and 2010, three major factors reignited conflict between the two communities: the Babuyu's demand for territorial autonomy, the Babembe's increasing dominance of the local economy, and disruptions caused by the war. Many Babuyu families had fled to Kabambare Territory in the neighboring Maniema Province during the war.[40] Upon their return, they found that their ancestral lands and villages had been occupied by Babembe families who refused to relinquish control. This fueled bitter disputes framed around the opposing identities of "natives" versus "non-natives". The demographic imbalance in the Lulenge sector, where the Babembe make up roughly three-quarters of the population, also intensified these tensions.[40] Land is a particularly sensitive issue for the Babuyu, who follow a matrilineal system of inheritance and regard land and its associated resources as central to their cultural and religious identity.[40] Many of these palm groves, crucial for producing palm wine, are often exploited by the Babembe, without compensating the Babuyu. Some Babembe dignitaries also used their administrative influence to secure land concessions in the Lulenge sector, actions perceived by the Babuyu as further encroachment and domination.[40] In response to this marginalization, some Babuyu leaders have advocated for the annexation of Babuyu groupements in Lulenge to the Babuyu Kabeya sector in Kabambare Territory. This proposal has reinforced the ethnic divide and deepened the conflict over territorial control.[40] The historical roots of these tensions trace back to colonial governance, when, as scholar Bruno Thembo Amundala notes, the Belgian administration sought to manage ethnic relations by preserving tribute payments and establishing a power-sharing arrangement between the Babembe and Babuyu. However, in the post-colonial era, this system was challenged by Babembe communities, especially those in the Basimimbi, Basombo, and Obekulu groupements, who rejected leadership by members of what they considered a minority ethnic group. The proposed annexation of the Basikasingo groupement to the Babuyu sector in Kabambare Territory was also firmly opposed.[40]

Numerous efforts have been made to mediate the conflict, albeit with limited success. Dialogues were organized by territorial administrators from Fizi Territory and Kabambare Territory, including a key meeting on 27 December 1996 in Kolomwanamuke, and later on 27 October 1997 by the National Pacification Commission chaired by General Lwecha Sylvestre and Mawazo Mahango. Both initiatives failed, largely due to a lack of neutrality and an inability to address the underlying issue of boundary demarcation.[40] A further attempt in 1998 by groupement chiefs in Lwiku collapsed due to the same shortcomings. Civil society actors, including the Catholic Church through its Diocesan Commission for Justice and Peace led by Abbé Alexis, also attempted to facilitate dialogue, but again with no tangible outcome.[40] In recent years, local leaders and youth have attempted to bridge the ethnic divide by organizing joint markets and peace-building sports events aimed at fostering coexistence. These efforts have had mixed results. While they have contributed to a period of relative calm, the underlying tensions remain unresolved.[40]

Babembe and Banyamulenge

[edit]
A village of the Bembe people located in the Itombwe plateau. The village features traditional round huts with thatched roofs.

The ethnic conflict involving the Banyamulenge and Babembe is deeply rooted in historical migrations, colonial-era perceptions, and post-independence political and military developments. The Banyamulenge are an ethnically Tutsi population whose presence in the highlands of South Kivu, particularly the Itombwe Plateau, can be traced to early migrations from Rwanda, with documented settlement as early as 1881 according to geographer George Weis.[41][42] These early settlers were few in number and remained largely autonomous from both pre-colonial and colonial political structures. However, the largest waves of Banyamulenge migration occurred between 1959 and 1974, largely as a result of regional instability and ethnic persecution in Rwanda.[41] Many initially settled in the Bafuliiru Chiefdom of Uvira Territory, particularly in areas like Bwegera and Mulenge, before moving into the higher plateaus of Fizi Territory and Itombwe.[41] Tensions between the Banyamulenge and indigenous groups, particularly the Babembe and Bafuliiru, predated Congolese independence. By 1952, Fizi and Mwenga territories had a Babembe population of approximately 60,000, though many had migrated elsewhere due to internal rivalries and economic opportunities in urban centers.[43] Belgian anthropologist Daniel P. Biebuyck noted in his 1952 study that the Babembe were generally hostile toward the Banyamulenge and avoided intermarriage with them.[43]

The 1964 Simba Rebellion, intensified local animosities. When the Armee Populaire de Libération (APL) retreated into areas settled by the Banyamulenge, the local population suffered from widespread cattle raiding and forced taxation.[44][45] In response, the Banyamulenge formed self-defense militias, initially known as les Guerriers, and later aligned with Mobutu Sese Seko's national army, the Armée Nationale Congolaise (ANC), to repel the APL.[44] Their collaboration with Mobutu's forces won them military success but also deepened their alienation from other ethnic groups like the Babembe and Bafuliiru, who had supported the rebellion and now viewed the Banyamulenge as traitors and foreign collaborators.[44] Legal and political developments further complicated the status of the Banyamulenge. Under Mobutu's 1981 nationality law, they were officially recognized as Zairean nationals due to their presence in the country before 1885.[44] Nevertheless, tensions persisted, culminating in episodes of electoral violence in the 1980s. In 1982 and 1987, elections in Uvira Territory and Fizi Territory were marred by violent disruptions, with reports of ballot boxes being destroyed and election officials tortured or killed, incidents attributed to armed Banyamulenge factions.[46]

By the early 1990s, the Banyamulenge's ties to the RPF added another dimension to the conflict as young Banyamulenge men were increasingly recruited into the RPF, acting as both soldiers and emissaries to their communities in South Kivu.[44] This external alliance heightened fears among local populations, particularly the Babembe, who began to organize militias to block the southward advance of Banyamulenge forces aligned with the AFDL.[47] While the AFDL campaign aimed to unseat Mobutu, many in the region, especially the Babembe, viewed it as a Rwandan-backed incursion. Prominent figures such as Célestin Anzuluni Bembe Isilonyonyi led anti-Banyamulenge campaigns, reinforcing local resistance.[47] Some Babembe, former allies of Laurent-Désiré Kabila during his time in the maquis, turned against him upon perceiving his growing reliance on Banyamulenge forces.[47] Reports from Zairean refugees in Tanzania, published by La Libre Belgique in December 1996, described Babembe efforts to block the AFDL's advance toward Kalemie in the neighboring Shaba region.[47]

Having actively participated in the First Congo War, and then in the Second Congo War, given their modern weaponry supplied by Rwanda, the Banyamulenge initiated a process of expropriating the traditional land holdings of the indigenous ethnic groups in the middle and high plateaus of Fizi Territory, Uvira Territory and Mwenga Territory (Itombwe).[46] This expropriation process was notably supported by the pro-Rwandan RCD administration. The RCD facilitated the proliferation of unauthorized politico-administrative structures, which served to formalize the Banyamulenge's territorial claims.[46] In September 1999, the RCD, through its head of the territorial administration department, Maître Mudumbi, issued Decree No. 001/MJ/DAT/ROUTE/MB/1999, establishing provisional territories in Minembwe and Bunyakiri. These measures were followed by Ministerial Order No. 056/ADM-TER-MPJSL/2000, which approved the creation of 35 new groupements explicitly designated for the Tutsi population, despite the lack of feasibility studies or consultations with existing administrative authorities.[46] The establishment of these new entities was highly irregular. The RCD-appointed administrator for Minembwe reportedly lacked both effective control and basic information, such as the names of local chiefs.[46] Many of these groupements operated independently of the recognized traditional collectivités, leading to administrative fragmentation and legal ambiguity.[46] Compounding the situation was the alleged assassination of local customary leaders, including Chief Munyaka and his relatives in June 1998, acts attributed to armed Banyamulenge factions. These incidents provoked retaliatory mobilization among Babembe militias, which further escalated the conflict in Itombwe and surrounding areas.[46]

The formalization of Minembwe as a territory, rather than mitigating tensions, significantly worsened security conditions. The Minembwe Territory Report of 2000 acknowledged severe instability, with roads rendered impassable by hostile actors and a general breakdown of order.[46] Indigenous communities found themselves subjected to exploitation and repression by Banyamulenge-dominated security services rather than protected by them. This state of insecurity fueled armed resistance among local groups, who viewed the new administrative order as an imposition favoring one ethnic group at the expense of others.[46] Criticism of the territorial reorganization was widespread, with many local actors and observers advocating for the repeal of the decree that established the Minembwe Territory.[46] Eventually, the entity was formally dissolved following the 2002 Sun City Accords.[48] Despite this reversal, tensions reignited in 2013 when a decree (13-029) attempted to formally establish Minembwe as a commune, though the decree was never implemented. The local situation continued to deteriorate, with ongoing clashes involving Burundian and Rwandan rebel groups as well as Mayi-Mayi and Banyamulenge self-defense forces, often resulting in violence against civilians and the forced displacement of populations.[48] The formal visit of Banyamulenge politician Azarias Ruberwa to Minembwe in September 2020, to announce the commune's creation, sparked widespread outrage.[48] Critics viewed the move as an effort to institutionalize what they perceived as an expansionist agenda supported by Rwanda. Legal objections included claims about the area's insufficient population, dubious boundary demarcations, and procedural irregularities.[48] The growing perception of the Banyamulenge as proxies of Rwandan geopolitical interests, a so-called "fifth column", inflamed nationalist sentiment and fueled fears of foreign annexation. These fears, often stoked by political leaders invoking historical secessionist crises such as Katanga's breakaway in the 1960s, turned the issue of Minembwe into a national flashpoint.[48] In response to the uproar, President Félix Tshisekedi annulled the 2013 decree in October 2020 and appointed a neutral scientific committee to reassess the matter.[48]

Ongoing conflict

[edit]

Ethnic militias and intercommunal clashes

[edit]

Since the end of the Second Congo War in 2003, Fizi Territory has remained a hotspot of chronic insecurity, driven largely by persistent intercommunal violence and the proliferation of armed groups rooted in ethnic and regional grievances. A complex web of local and foreign militias, along with political and identity-based tensions, has sustained a protracted conflict with significant humanitarian and security consequences. The conflict has been characterized by recurring clashes between predominantly Banyamulenge militias, particularly the Twirwaneho group and its allies, such as Gumino, and various Mayi-Mayi factions representing the Babembe, Bafuliiru, and Banyindu communities.[49] The Mayi-Mayi Mutetezi militia, in particular, has frequently engaged in hostilities with Twirwaneho forces. Armed confrontations have occurred regularly along key routes, especially the corridor between Baraka and Bibokoboko.[50] Violence escalated in the Itombwe highlands around 2015, intensified by the involvement of foreign armed groups from neighboring Burundi and Rwanda. These include RED-Tabara, FOREBU, FNL-PALIPEHUTU, and FDLR, which have allied with local militias on both sides of the ethnic divide.[51] The middle and high plateaus of Fizi, Mwenga, and Uvira territories have emerged as the epicenter of identity-driven violence involving multiple ethnic groups, including the Babembe, Bavira, Bafuliiru, Banyindu, Banyamulenge, and Batwa.[52] This fragmentation has led to the proliferation of ethnically affiliated armed groups, such as Twirwaneho and Gumino among the Banyamulenge, and Biloze Bishambuke among the Babembe, Bafuliiru, and Banyindu. These groups operate with varying degrees of organization and frequently engage in retaliatory violence.[52]

Rise of Twirwaneho and Makanika's defection

[edit]

A significant escalation occurred in 2019 with the rise of Twirwaneho, a Banyamulenge rebel group composed of local fighters, former Gumino combatants, and diaspora recruits, some nicknamed "Androids".[53] Twirwaneho received material and financial backing from transnational Banyamulenge networks.[53] In early 2020, the movement was further strengthened by the defection of Colonel Michel Rukunda, also known as Makanika, a former officer of the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (FARDC). Under his command, Twirwaneho developed a more cohesive military structure, with centralized leadership and expanded recruitment from local and international Banyamulenge communities.[53] The United Nations Group of Experts reported that some of these recruitments were forced.[53] In addition to building a clandestine airstrip for arms logistics, later dismantled by FARDC forces, Twirwaneho maintained a network of armed civilian supporters in surrounding villages.[54][53] From mid-2020 onwards, the region witnessed a marked intensification in violence. Twirwaneho engaged in combat with Mayi-Mayi and FARDC units and local civilian populations.[55] The United Nations Security Council documented multiple instances of human rights violations attributed to Twirwaneho fighters, including acts of sexual violence such as gang rapes, abductions, and assaults primarily targeting Babembe and Bafuliiru women.[56] Seven women from these communities reported being raped by one to three armed assailants in locations including Kamambo, Mikalati, Kitasha, and Marunde. During the assaults, perpetrators reportedly made ethnic slurs and, in some cases, explicitly threatened victims and their communities, instructing them to vacate the area.[56] Other testimonies indicated knowledge of at least 12 additional similar incidents. More allegations included the abduction, sexual abuse, and killing of internally displaced persons from Mikenge and the Bijombo camp. At least one survivor reported having witnessed children aged over 16 participating in acts of sexual violence.[56]

In response to Twirwaneho's growing strength, prominent Mayi-Mayi leaders, such as William Yakutumba and Trésor Ebuela wa Seba, began forming a coalition of armed groups toward the end of 2020.[55] This informal alliance included factions such as the National Coalition of the People for the Sovereignty of Congo (CNPSC), the Forces des Patriotes pour la Défense du CongoMouvement de Libération (FPDC-ML), the Forces Armées "Biloze Bishambuke" (FABB), among others.[55] Though lacking a centralized command, the coalition allowed for increased operational coordination, joint attacks, and mutual reinforcement. From late 2019 to 2020, both the Twirwaneho and Mayi-Mayi militias actively engaged in armed operations, sustaining their efforts through attacks on positions held by the FARDC and via support from sympathetic communities.[55] The United Nations Group of Experts reported that during this period, at least 46 FARDC personnel, particularly from the 12th Rapid Reaction Brigade stationed in the Hauts-Plateaux, were arrested on charges related to arms trafficking.[55] The Twirwaneho militia further consolidated its strength following the defection of high-ranking FARDC officers, most notably Colonel Charles Sematama in February 2021.[55] The militia reportedly coerced members of the Banyamulenge community to contribute recruits under threat of violence.[57] Between September 2021 and early 2022, at least three Banyamulenge leaders, including local authorities in Minembwe, were assassinated for resisting recruitment efforts or for their perceived support of rival factions, such as Gumino.[57] The leader of the IDP camp in Mikenge was also abducted in October 2021.[57]

M23 resurgence

[edit]

The resurgence of the Rwandan-backed rebel group March 23 Movement (M23) in late 2021 resulted in significant territorial gains in North Kivu Province, prompting President Félix Tshisekedi in November 2022 to call for the formation of civilian "vigilance groups" to counter what he characterized as M23's "expansionist ambitions".[58][59] On 6 March 2023, Minister of Higher Education Butondo Muhindo Nzangi announced that local armed groups would be mobilized as reservists for the national army. A new law passed by Parliament on 4 May 2023 formalized this arrangement, leading to the emergence of several new militias collectively referred to as wazalendo (Swahili for "patriots").[60] These groups formed near active conflict zones in North Kivu and in more remote territories such as Beni and Lubero.[60] Existing armed entities, including the Hutu-led Collectif des Mouvements pour le Changement (CMC) and Guidon Shimiray's Nduma Défense du Congo-Rénové (NDC-R), were also brought under the wazalendo umbrella.[60] Private military companies reportedly bolstered the FARDC's capabilities by deploying approximately 900 personnel to North Kivu and conducting training exercises at the Mubambiro military base near Goma.[60]

By the end of 2024, M23 had consolidated control over five of North Kivu's six territories: Rutshuru, Nyiragongo, Beni, Masisi, and Walikale.[61] In early 2025, the group expanded operations into South Kivu, capturing Goma on 28 January and Bukavu on 15 February.[62][63] In parallel, Twirwaneho maintained its operations, often in alliance with other armed groups such as RED-Tabara and the Android coalition, which aligned with M23. On 19 February 2025, a significant blow was dealt to the group when Twirwaneho leader Michel Rukunda (alias Makanika) was killed by a Congolese military drone strike in Minembwe.[64][65] Despite this, Twirwaneho captured Minembwe and its airfield two days later.[66] On 1 March, a coalition including Twirwaneho, RED-Tabara, and Android, aligned with M23, targeted Wazalendo positions in Bilalombili, a village housing displaced residents from Mikenge and its surroundings.[67] Several homes were set on fire, but the full extent of the destruction remained uncertain.[67] On 15 March, Wazalendo faction leader Trésor Ebuela wa Seba (alias Ebuela Mtetezi) was killed in an internal confrontation, with intelligence sources suggesting he may have been facilitating M23's expansion in the region, a claim denied by his supporters.[68][69] Fighting intensified in mid-March 2025 as Wazalendo units under General Kakobanya Nakalambi clashed with the Twirwaneho-RED-Tabara-Android coalition in Mikenge (Mwenga Territory) and Kawera village (Fizi Territory). Between 19 and 21 March, Wazalendo launched a counteroffensive, retaking Kawera and advancing toward Minembwe. They succeeded in reclaiming strategic villages including Kivumu, Irumba, and Nyagishasha.[70][71][72]

Economy

[edit]

Agriculture and fishing

[edit]
A white pigeon with light brown and yellowish markings perched on a wooden structure made of twigs and dried grass in a rural village setting outside of the city of Baraka, where pigeons are being kept.

Fizi Territory's economy is primarily based on agriculture, livestock breeding, and fishing, all of which are supported by the region's expansive landmass and diverse eco-climatic zones.[73] The territory benefits from a prolonged rainy season lasting over nine months, making it particularly favorable for farming and animal husbandry.[73] However, agricultural productivity is often undermined by several structural and socio-political challenges, including ongoing insecurity and repeated cycles of armed conflict that have forced much of the rural population to flee their homes, which then disrupts farming activities and destabilizes local livelihoods.[73] The degradation of road infrastructure also complicates the transportation of goods, limiting access to local and regional markets.[73]

Sectors Agricultural activities Ref.
Food plants Industrial plants Breeding Other activities
Lulenge [73]
Mutambala
  • Peanut
  • Banana
  • Bean
  • Cassava
  • Corn
  • Paddy
  • Fishing
  • Artisanal mining of gold and silver
[73]
Ngandja
  • Peanut
  • Banana
  • Bean
  • Cassava
  • Corn
  • Paddy
  • Fishing
  • Artisanal mining of gold and silver
[73]
Tanganyika
  • Cassava
  • Corn
  • Paddy
  • Coffea robusta
  • Cotton
  • Oil palm
  • Large cattle
  • Small livestock
  • Poultry
Fishing [73]

Two principal types of fishing are practiced: traditional fishing using rudimentary tools such as canoes, small nets, and lines; and artisanal fishing, which represents a modest technological advancement.[73] Artisanal fishing typically involves two or three canoes linked by poles, nets, and a lighting system for night operations.[73]

Local microfinance

[edit]

Efforts to stimulate the economy at the grassroots level are visible in the growing presence of local savings and credit initiatives. Encouraged by various non-governmental development organizations, communities are increasingly engaging with microfinance through cooperative structures.[73] Notable examples include the Baraka and Kazimia Savings and Credit Cooperatives.[73] As of 2010, more than 250 development actors, including local, national, and international NGOs, United Nations agencies, bilateral and multilateral partners, and local development initiatives, were active in the territory.[73] That same year, the city of Baraka hosted over 64 registered local non-profit associations and dozens of individual beneficiaries involved in development programs.[73]

Protected areas

[edit]

The territory is home to several protected areas, including two forest reserves, the Lolemba-Ngoma Forest Reserve and the Kifumbwe Island Forest Reserve, as well as the Itombwe Nature Reserve.[73] The latter is of particular ecological significance, renowned for its rich biodiversity, including rare bird species, endemic flora, and the presence of white gorillas.[73] Itombwe is considered one of the natural marvels of the region and holds considerable potential as a destination for eco-tourism.[73]

Demographics

[edit]

Ethnic composition

[edit]

Bembe people

[edit]
An elderly Bembe man from Fizi Territory, with a deeply wrinkled face and a thoughtful, serious expression.

Fizi Territory is predominantly inhabited by Babembe, who constitute the demographic majority. The traditional Bembe homeland spans approximately 19,050 square kilometers, encompassing the entire Fizi Territory and the Itombwe sector of Mwenga Territory.[74] According to oral tradition preserved by Bembe griots, Babembe trace their lineage to a common ancestor named Mbondo (also rendered M'mbondo).[74] They are believed to have migrated alongside the Barega (Balega) from the northeast, via Urega, before settling in the Itombwe Mountains.[74] There, the two groups are said to have separated: Mbondo's descendants, the Babembe, spread toward Lake Tanganyika, while his brother Leka returned to Ulega, becoming the progenitor of the Barega.[74] Another sibling, Bangu, married in Maniema and gave rise to the Bangubangu ethnic group.[74]

According to early colonial sources such as Alfred Moeller de Laddersous and Gaston Van Bulck, Babembe historically occupied the mountainous regions of Fizi Territory and gradually moved downhill toward Lake Tanganyika, displacing earlier lakeside inhabitants, including Sanze and Bwari fishing communities.[74] These sources also describe Babembe as closely related to Barega, forming an extension of this ethnolinguistic lineage toward the southeast.[74]

Babuyu, Basanze, Babwari, Banyindu, Bazoba, and others

[edit]

Among the earliest known inhabitants of the region are the Babuyu, Basanze, Babwari, Banyindu, Bazoba, Bagoma, Bakalangwa, Bakeci, Basikamanya and others. These groups were established in the territory prior to the arrival of Babembe and were concentrated along the shores of Lake Tanganyika and its hinterland.[75][76] The Babwari form the majority population on the Ubwari Peninsula, where they live alongside the Bazoba, engaging primarily in fishing and subsistence farming.[75] The Banyindu, though fewer in number, inhabit the Lulenge and Ngandja sectors, particularly the upland areas such as Luekya, where they practice farming and livestock husbandry.[75] These indigenous groups, though significantly diminished over time due to the impact of 19th-century East African slave raids, sleeping sickness epidemics, and interethnic conflicts, including those involving newly arriving groups such as the Bembe and others like the Luba, maintained settlements in coastal villages and adjacent inland zones.[76] Many of these communities had cultural and historical affiliations with the Boyo, Holoholo, northeastern Luba, and Lunda peoples. Among them were the Basikasingo and Basilugezi, some of whom were organized into compact settlements and maintained close ties with Boyo-related groups.[76] Over time, increasing portions of this territory came under the influence and settlement of migratory groups that are now collectively identified as Bembe. These included the Basi'alangwa (also known as Bakalangwa), who were linked to certain Boyo groups, and the Basim'minje of Lwindi origin.[76] Both groups incorporated strong Twa (Pygmy) elements, referred to in Bembe territory as Basi'asumba and Bahonga. These earlier waves were succeeded, possibly from the late 18th century onward, by the arrival of the so-called "true" Bembe, including clans such as the Babungwe, Balala, Basim'muma, and Basimnyaka, all of whom traced their lineage to the Lega ancestor Ikama.[76]

Gradually, segments of these Bembe populations moved from the mountainous interior toward the shores of Lake Tanganyika and its surrounding lowlands. Their increasing demographic and political dominance generated tensions with earlier inhabitants, particularly as colonial authorities granted administrative authority to Bembe chiefs, headmen, and judges.[76] A 1918 colonial report noted the institutional structures brought by these Bembe migrants, including the Lega-derived Bwami association, a complex initiatory society, along with its female counterpart Buhumbwa, the boys' circumcision rite Butende, the Elanda association, and the children's Atende.[76] At the time of research conducted between 1949 and 1951, the Bwami society maintained a dual hierarchy: junior initiates (bami ba banu'e) who passed through stages like bukila or bukabo, and senior initiates (bami ba ngoma), who achieved progressively higher ranks called itembu, (m)pinji, and biciba, the latter being associated with the prestigious title of mwami wangwe or mwami wengwe (initiates of the leopard).[76]

Banyamulenge

[edit]

Banyamulenge are an ethnically Tutsi population whose presence in the highlands of South Kivu, particularly in the Itombwe Plateau, stems from early migrations and more recent waves of displacement.[41] According to geographer George Weis, a small Rwandan Tutsi community was already present in the Itombwe region by 1881, although their numbers were limited and their political organization remained largely autonomous from colonial rule.[41][42] The major waves of the Banyamulenge settlement occurred between 1959 and 1974 when thousands of Tutsi refugees fled Hutu Revolution and ethnic persecution in Rwanda.[41] These migrants often first settled in localities such as Bwegera and Mulenge in the Bafuliiru Chiefdom of Uvira Territory before dispersing into the high plateaus of Fizi Territory and Itombwe.[41]

The historian Birakaheka Njinga and others emphasize that this migration was gradual and multifaceted, involving numerous small groups over time rather than a single mass movement.[41] Further inflows were facilitated by colonial-era labor policies, particularly the Banyarwanda immigration program established in 1937.[41]

Bavira, Bafuliiru, and Barundi (Hutu refugees)

[edit]
A Fuliru herdsman standing on a grassy hillside at the Mitambo market in Bijombo groupement of Bavira Chiefdom, Uvira Territory.

The Bavira and Bafuliiru, originally from neighboring Uvira Territory, began settling in Fizi Territory around 1955 in search of fertile land and grazing grounds for their livestock.[75] The Bavira established communities in areas such as Nemba, Sebelle (south of Baraka), and Kenya and Mboko (north of Baraka, in the Tanganyika sector).[75] The Bafuliiru similarly migrated into various parts of Fizi Territory, where they raised both small and large livestock, often alongside Banyarwanda settlers.[75]

The Barundi are predominantly Hutu refugees who fled Burundi in 1972 following the ethnic massacres of that year. According to a census carried out by the local administration in December 1972, approximately 12,685 Barundi had sought refuge in the Mutambala and Tanganyika sectors.[75] The majority sustained themselves through farming and fishing.[75] However, the onset of the First and Second Congo Wars (1996 and 1998) led to widespread instability, prompting many Barundi refugees or their descendants to either repatriate to Burundi or seek asylum in Tanzania.[75]

Education

[edit]

The educational system follows the national structure of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, comprising both public and private institutions. Public schools are either directly managed by the State or administered by religious organizations in accordance with the School Convention signed on 26 February 1977.[77] These institutions fall into five categories: non-conventional schools operated solely by the State; Catholic convention schools under the administration of the Catholic Church; Protestant convention schools managed by various Protestant communities; Kimbanguist convention schools governed by the Kimbanguist Church; and Islamic accredited schools overseen by the Islamic Community of the DRC.[77] In addition to these public institutions, there are approved private schools established and operated by individuals or legal entities, commonly referred to as "promoters".[77]

University students heading home after a day of classes at Eben-Ezer University of Minembwe
Children participating in a community school rehabilitation project in Minembwe

Education in the territory is organized into three main levels. The kindergarten level serves children aged 3 to 5 and functions as an extension of family upbringing.[77] It emphasizes the holistic development of a child's personality through early learning that integrates sensory, motor, aesthetic, and moral dimensions, while also preparing them for entry into primary education.[77]

The primary level addresses the basic educational needs of children, including foundational literacy, numeracy, oral expression, and problem-solving skills.[77] It also introduces essential knowledge, skills, values, and attitudes necessary for personal development and social participation.[77] Primary education is designed to reflect and respond to the local environment and community context, while also preparing students for progression to secondary education.[77]

Secondary education aims to equip students with practical knowledge and skills that enable them to contribute meaningfully to society. It also lays the groundwork for access to higher and university education.[77]

Higher and university education has been present in the territory since 2009.[77] Two prominent institutions serve the population: the Institut Supérieur Pédagogique de Baraka (ISP-Baraka), which specializes in teacher training, and the Institut Supérieur de Développement Rural de Fizi (ISDR-Fizi), which focuses on rural development and applied sciences.[77]

Infrastructure

[edit]

Transport

[edit]

The main overland route is the unpaved National Road No. 5, which links Fizi Territory to Uvira Territory. This road, although critical, remains in poor condition, especially during the rainy season.[73]

Agricultural service roads

Road axis Km Ref.
Mutambala–Kinkonde–Kazimia 68 [73]
Zero–Minembwe–Kazadi 35 [73]
Mushimbaka–Bibokoboko 50 [73]
Lusenda–Kilubi–Nakile-Kanguli 30 [73]
Kilembwe–Bif-Shabunda 36 [73]
Kilembwe–Kobokobo 25 [73]
Kilembwe–Hewa Bora 80 [73]
Kabala–Simbi 30 [73]
Sebele–Nemba 15 [73]
Ingomba–Kampu–Khungwe 25 [73]
Bwala–Malicha 8 [73]
Nkudu–Kenya 5 [73]
Ehibe–Simbi 30 [73]
Kamanda–Ibindi 60 [73]
Atonga–Wenga 20 [73]
Total 517 [73]
Baraka Airfield in 2014

In addition to road transport, Lake Tanganyika serves as a crucial corridor for domestic and regional trade. Waterways connect Fizi Territory to Uvira, Kalemie, Bujumbura in Burundi, Kigoma in Tanzania, and Mpulungu in Zambia.[73] These lake routes support the importation and distribution of goods using boats capable of carrying between 50 and 300 tonnes, making lake transport one of the more efficient modes of freight movement in the region.[73]

Air transport is minimal, with no international airport available. However, a number of private airstrips—mostly unpaved and maintained to varying degrees—serve small aircraft,[73] including the Minembwe airstrip, which is under the management of the local Transport Division and is considered to be in good condition; the Baraka airstrip, also in good condition but rarely used; and the Nundu airstrip, which is operated by Protestant organizations.[73]

Communication, media, telecommunication, and energy

[edit]

Fizi Territory is served by several community radio stations. These include Radio Baraka, Radio Amani, and Radio Umoja, all broadcasting from Baraka; and Radio Muungano and the national broadcaster Radio-Télévision Nationale Congolaise (RTNC), which transmit from Fizi Territory.[73] These stations operate on FM frequencies and reach only limited areas within the territory.[73] The more remote localities rely on international radio broadcasts due to the absence of local signals.[73]

Telecommunications services are similarly unevenly distributed. Major providers such as Airtel and Vodacom offer mobile network coverage in Fizi, Baraka, and Mississi.[73] However, other areas such as Mboko, Lweba, and Nundu rely on U-COM, a telecommunications operator from neighboring Burundi. Several parts of the territory remain completely unconnected.[73]

The territory hosts the Kyimbi hydroelectric power station, also known as the Bendera plant, which remains operational. In addition, a small hydroelectric plant named Magembe, located near Fizi, has been abandoned, while other facilities, such as the Nundu power station, were dismantled and removed during the Second Congo War.[2] Another hydroelectric installation is situated in Malikya, near Baraka.[2]

Housing and water supply

[edit]
A group of women and children gathered around a water fountain in Fizi Territory.
Traditional round huts with thatched roofs in Kamombo village, located in the Balala-Nord groupement of the Tanganyika sector in Fizi Territory.

Housing conditions across Fizi remain divided between rural and urban areas. In villages, dwellings are largely traditional, constructed with non-durable materials and offering minimal comfort or hygiene.[73] In Baraka, some modern housing exists, though many structures remain informal, built with sun-dried adobe bricks, lacking courtyards, and developed outside any formal urban planning framework.[73]

Access to clean water remains a critical issue. Most of the population relies on untreated river water for domestic and hygiene purposes, due to the absence of a centralized water distribution network.[73] According to Congolese writer Maluxes Malumbe M'mangwa, neither REGIDESO (Régie de Distribution d'Eau) nor the National Service for Rural Hydraulics (SNHR) has ever implemented water infrastructure projects in the territory.[73] The only access to potable water comes through NGO-led initiatives that have installed limited water supply systems in certain localities.[73] However, much of the population still lacks reliable access to clean drinking water.[73]

Notes and references

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia

Fizi Territory is an administrative division in the southern part of South Kivu Province, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, encompassing a vast rural area of approximately 22,000 square kilometers with a population of around one million inhabitants. The territory features rugged highland terrain, including the Itombwe Plateau, and borders Lake Tanganyika to the east, supporting limited agriculture, fishing, and artisanal mining amid challenging infrastructure. Predominantly inhabited by Bantu ethnic groups such as the Bembe, Fuliiru, and Vira, Fizi has been marked by persistent ethnic tensions and armed violence since the 1990s, involving local self-defense militias like Twirwaneho and interactions with larger rebel coalitions including M23, resulting in recurrent displacements and humanitarian crises. Recent clashes, including those in 2025, have displaced tens of thousands, with over 84,000 reported in early 2025 alone, underscoring the territory's role in broader eastern DRC instability driven by competition over land, resources, and political influence.

Geography

Physical Features and Climate

Fizi Territory occupies the southern portion of Province in the , bordering to the east and Tanzania's . The terrain features a narrow along the lake's western shore, transitioning inland to rugged mountainous landscapes dominated by the Mitumba Mountains, part of the western branch of the System. Elevations rise sharply from near sea level at the lakeshore to peaks exceeding 2,500 meters, with average elevations around 1,170 meters in central areas like Fizi town. Major rivers including the Mutambala, Lweba, Sundja, Mulambala, Nemba, and Kananda drain the territory, forming wetlands in northern sectors and contributing to . The climate in Fizi Territory is tropical with variations driven by altitude and proximity to , classified primarily as Aw (tropical with wet summers). Lowland areas along the coast experience hot conditions with average annual temperatures around 25°C, while higher elevations in the Mitumba ranges are cooler, dropping to 15-20°C. Annual totals approximately 1,296 mm, distributed over 232 rainy days, with two wet seasons from to May and a drier period from June to September influenced by orographic effects from the mountains. Heavy rainfall in upland areas supports dense forests and fertile plains, though flooding risks persist in riverine zones.

Administrative Organization

Fizi Territory constitutes a second-level within Province of the , governed by a territorial administrator appointed by provincial authorities. As of October 2025, the position is held by Samy Kalonji Badibanga. The territory is subdivided into four sectors—Lulenge, Mutambala, Ngandja, and Tanganyika—each further organized into chiefdoms (chefferies) and groupings (groupements) that integrate customary authorities with state administration. This structure, inherited from colonial-era divisions established in 1937 (with subsequent adjustments, such as the transfer of Itombwe Sector to Mwenga Territory), facilitates local amid ongoing challenges.

History

Pre-Independence and Early Post-Colonial Period

During the Belgian colonial period, Fizi formed part of the Ruzizi-Kivu District, established in 1902 under to govern heterogeneous populations including the Batembo and Bahavu groups. Following pacification campaigns from 1901 to 1912, Belgian authorities created chiefdoms tied to ethnic customs and mapped territories, as per the 1891 decree and 1906 policy of fixing borders along tribal lines. In , early 20th-century reforms introduced petites chefferies to territorialize ethnic structures, integrating customary chiefs into the administration while marginalizing migrant pastoralists like groups in areas such as Itombwe. The , predominant in Fizi, maintained clan-based societies led by recognized chiefs, with colonial policies granting administrative authority to local headmen amid regrouping of villages in the for control. Land disputes emerged from pastoral incursions, such as settlements clashing with agrarian communities; for instance, Fuliiru resistance to Barundi authority arose after the 1928 creation of the Collectivité de la Plaine de la Ruzizi. Resistance to colonial exactions included the 1931 Binji-Binji revolt near Nduba over forced labor. After Congolese independence on June 30, 1960, Fizi experienced rapid destabilization amid national chaos. The 1964 , inspired by Patrice Lumumba's assassination and led by Gaston Soumialot, captured Fizi as a stronghold, drawing support from Bembe leaders like Jérôme Mutshungu and Fuliiru figures such as Louis Bidalira and Musa Marandura. Rebels raided cattle on the Hauts Plateaux, prompting the latter to form the Abagiriye militia in 1965. The uprising, blending and , endured until 1967, with forces retreating to Hewa Bora and resisting state authority into the 1980s, hardening ethnic divisions between local groups and highland pastoralists. This era of rebellion from 1963 to 1968 entrenched patterns of interethnic conflict over territory and resources.

Involvement in the Congo Wars (1996–2003)

During the First Congo War, Fizi Territory served as an early operational zone for the Alliance of Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Congo-Zaire (AFDL), a rebel coalition backed by Rwandan Patriotic Army (RPA) forces, which launched incursions into eastern Zaire starting in October 1996 to dismantle Hutu refugee camps harboring Interahamwe militias and advance against President Mobutu Sese Seko's regime. AFDL and RPA units conducted forced recruitment drives in Fizi and neighboring Uvira territories, conscripting hundreds of children as young as 10 into combat roles, often under threats of execution for refusal. These operations contributed to widespread civilian displacement and targeted killings, including an AFDL/APR attack on October 28, 1996, in Abala-Ngulube village on the Moyen Plateau of South Kivu, near Fizi's highlands, where 101 Zairian civilians were massacred amid efforts to secure territory and pursue Hutu extremists. By early 1997, AFDL advances through Fizi facilitated the coalition's southward push along Lake Tanganyika, enabling control over coastal towns like Baraka and integrating local recruits into the offensive that toppled Mobutu in May 1997. The Second Congo War erupted in August 1998 after expelled Rwandan troops, prompting to back the Rally for Congolese Democracy-Goma (RCD-Goma) rebels, who seized control of significant portions of , including areas within Fizi Territory such as Lusenda, where RCD forces established bases and conducted operations against government loyalists. In response, local self-defense militias known as emerged in Fizi's rural highlands and plateaus, drawing primarily from Bembe, Fuliiru, and other indigenous ethnic groups, to wage against RCD incursions perceived as extensions of Rwandan aggression and aligned with interests. These units, often loosely coordinated with Kabila's army, employed ambushes and tactics, exploiting Fizi's rugged terrain to disrupt RCD supply lines and protect communities from and ethnic-targeted , though they also committed reprisal attacks on suspected collaborators. Throughout the conflict, Fizi's strategic position along the Rwandan and Burundian borders intensified cross-border dynamics, with RCD-Rwandan forces using the territory for logistics and groups forming ad hoc alliances with militias like the and Burundian FDD rebels to counter Tutsi-led factions, resulting in fragmented frontlines and chronic insecurity. By 2003, when the war formally ended via the Sun City Agreement, Fizi had suffered extensive population displacement—estimated at over 100,000 from South Kivu's southern territories alone—and infrastructural devastation, with persistence laying groundwork for post-war fragmentation as some groups rejected under the transitional government. Reports from organizations documented mutual atrocities, including RCD executions of suspected sympathizers in Fizi villages and raids on settlements, underscoring the territory's role as a microcosm of the war's ethnic and proxy dimensions without resolution.

Post-War Reconstruction and Rising Instabilities (2003–2015)

Following the 2003 Sun City Agreement that ended the Second Congo War, Fizi Territory saw limited reconstruction efforts amid entrenched insecurity, with the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUC) focusing primarily on facilitating the national transitional government and 2006 elections rather than localized infrastructure projects in remote areas like Fizi. Disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) programs initiated post-2003 failed to fully integrate local militias, leading to their persistence and proliferation, as many fighters rejected absorption into the fragmented Forces Armées de la République Démocratique du Congo (FARDC) due to distrust of central authority and ethnic imbalances within the army. Humanitarian initiatives, including MONUC/MONUSCO stabilization operations, provided sporadic support such as civilian protection patrols in coastal towns like Baraka, but these were hampered by rugged terrain and ongoing violence, resulting in minimal gains in road repair or economic recovery. Rising instabilities in Fizi from 2007 onward were driven by the emergence of the Yakutumba group, founded by William Amuri Yakutumba (also known as Kakobanya) to defend the Babembe ethnic community against perceived threats from Rwandan-linked militias like the Forces Démocratiques de Libération du Rwanda (FDLR) and rival Congolese factions. Comprising 2,000 to 4,000 fighters by 2014, the group controlled highlands (hauts plateaux), the Ubwari Peninsula, and lakeshore areas, imposing taxes on markets, mining sites, and transit points such as Sebele and Lulimba to fund operations and provide parallel governance including dispute resolution. Ethnic land conflicts intensified, particularly between sedentary Babembe farmers and pastoralist (Congolese ) herders during seasonal , exacerbating tensions rooted in post-war population displacements and competition over fertile plateaus. The group's 2008 formation of the Reformé coalition further consolidated local armed resistance, rejecting FARDC integration and contributing to a cycle of ambushes and retaliatory attacks that undermined state authority. By 2011, the influx of Raia Mutomboki militias into , including Fizi peripheries, fragmented the armed landscape, as these groups targeted FDLR remnants but splintered into factions engaging in intra-local violence and resource predation by 2014. Clashes involving Mai-Mai Yakutumba and Federalist Republican Forces (FRF), representing interests, highlighted regional dynamics, with UN facilitation attempts in areas like Kamombo yielding temporary ceasefires but failing to address underlying grievances over and . These developments perpetuated displacement, with internally displaced persons camps like Mihanda emerging as focal points for , though persistent taxation and rackets by armed groups deterred sustainable recovery, reflecting a broader failure of extension into Fizi's ethnic strongholds. Overall, the period marked a shift from wartime chaos to localized, economically motivated insurgencies that prioritized community defense and revenue extraction over national reconciliation.

Escalating Conflicts and Regional Dynamics (2016–Present)

Since 2016, conflicts in Fizi Territory have escalated due to the persistent operations of local Mai-Mai militias, particularly the Mai-Mai Yakutumba group led by William Amuri Yakutumba, which has maintained control over significant rural areas and imposed illegal taxation on economic activities such as gold mining. These groups, often rooted in ethnic self-defense among the Bembe and Fuliiru communities, have clashed repeatedly with the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (FARDC) and the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO), refusing integration into state structures and contributing to cycles of violence and displacement. Intercommunal tensions, exacerbated by land disputes and competition over resources, have fueled sporadic attacks, with armed groups recruiting child soldiers—a practice documented in Fizi as late as 2020, when Mai-Mai Yakutumba released children following military pressure. By 2021–2023, the security landscape in Fizi intertwined with broader regional instabilities, as coalitions like Yakutumba allied variably with FARDC against foreign-linked threats such as the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), while maintaining autonomous extortion rackets that hindered civilian movement and trade along . Cross-border dynamics with intensified, with Fizi's proximity to the border enabling flows of arms and fighters, including alleged ties between local militias and Burundian rebel elements, though primary drivers remained internal ethnic power struggles rather than direct state interventions. UN reports highlighted ongoing summary executions and by armed groups in , including Fizi, attributing over 180 civilian killings in 2023 to such actors amid failed disarmament efforts. The period from 2024 onward saw a sharp escalation linked to the M23 rebellion's southward expansion from , with direct clashes erupting in Fizi Territory by April 2025 between M23 fighters—accused by Congolese authorities of Rwandan backing—and local armed groups alongside FARDC-aligned Wazalendo militias. This fighting displaced thousands, compounding humanitarian crises as Wazalendo forces, including Yakutumba elements, committed abuses such as arbitrary arrests and extortion against civilians suspected of M23 sympathies, particularly targeting communities. Regional tensions heightened risks of wider involvement, with deploying troops near the border in response to spillover threats, while Rwanda's alleged support for M23 drew international condemnation but little effective , perpetuating a proxy-like dynamic that amplified local conflicts over strategic and routes. Despite MONUSCO's aerial and logistical support in areas like Baraka, the mission's phased withdrawal by late 2025 left FARDC ill-equipped against hybrid threats, underscoring the territory's vulnerability to sustained instability.

Governance and Politics

Territorial Administration and Local Authority

Fizi Territory, as a second-level within Province, is headed by a Territory Administrator appointed by the central government in , who serves as the primary local representative of state authority. The administrator oversees implementation of national and provincial policies, coordinates public services, tax collection, and security coordination with the Congolese National Police and armed forces, while reporting to the provincial . As of June 2025, the position is held by Samy Kalonji Badibanga, who has publicly addressed issues such as decay and rebel exploitation of minerals. The territory is subdivided into four main sectors—Lulenge, Mutambala, Ngandja, and Tanganyika—each further divided into chiefdoms (chefferies), groupements, and villages, reflecting a hybrid system blending modern administrative units with customary structures. These sectors, established during the colonial era and adjusted post-independence, facilitate decentralized governance, with chiefdoms often led by traditional chiefs who exercise authority over land allocation, , and community dispute resolution, particularly among ethnic groups such as the Bembe and Fuliiru. Traditional authorities maintain significant influence in rural areas, where state presence is limited, collaborating with or sometimes superseding formal officials in matters like resource management and social cohesion. In practice, territorial administration faces substantial constraints due to ongoing insecurity and the proliferation of groups, which erode central control and create parallel power structures. Local authorities, including sector chiefs and village headmen, often mediate interethnic tensions and land disputes but lack resources for effective enforcement, relying on ad hoc support from UN peacekeeping missions like for capacity-building initiatives. Corruption and resource scarcity further undermine administrative efficacy, with reports indicating irregular funding and logistical challenges impeding service delivery as of 2024. Despite these issues, efforts to strengthen local governance include community dialogues facilitated by NGOs to bolster customary leaders' roles in stabilizing highland and lakeside communities.

Central Government Influence and Corruption Challenges

The central government in maintains nominal control over Fizi Territory through the appointment of territorial administrators and sector chiefs, who are tasked with implementing national policies on taxation, , and . However, effective influence is severely constrained by the territory's remote location, inadequate , and pervasive insecurity, which limit the deployment of central institutions such as the Forces Armées de la République Démocratique du Congo (FARDC). Armed groups, including those operating in the Fizi highlands, have established parallel administrative and judicial structures, conducting informal trials and governance activities that undermine state authority. Corruption exacerbates these challenges, with local officials and FARDC elements frequently engaging in and illicit revenue collection, particularly in the sector. In Fizi, FARDC units have controlled sites such as the Kachanga mine, imposing daily entry fees on miners and diverting proceeds from state oversight. This pattern extends to smuggling networks in , where undisciplined FARDC members and corrupt state agents facilitate fraudulent exports, bypassing requirements and central tax mechanisms. Such practices contribute to a broader erosion of central governance, as embezzled funds from —estimated to involve over 1,600 illegal operations province-wide—fuel networks rather than public services, perpetuating dependency on informal economies and armed actors. The DRC's systemic , reflected in its 2023 score of 20 out of 100, further hampers Kinshasa's ability to enforce reforms or deploy anti-corruption measures effectively in peripheral territories like Fizi.

Ethnic Political Mobilization and Power Struggles

Ethnic political mobilization in Fizi Territory centers on competition among the Bembe majority and minority groups including the Fuliiru and Banyamulenge for control over land, chieftainships, and administrative posts, often escalating into armed confrontations due to disputes over citizenship status and resource access. The Bembe, dominant in the territory, have mobilized against Banyamulenge claims to autochthony, contesting their Congolese identity and leading to exclusionary politics that prioritize local ethnic hierarchies. Power struggles intensified during the 1990s, with Bembe militias targeting communities; on September 26, 1996, Bembe armed units killed approximately 200 in Baraka town, supported by government soldiers who executed another 152. These events reflected broader ethnic mobilization framing as foreign intruders, a persisting in local and militia recruitment. Fuliiru and Bembe communities have formed self-defense groups to counter perceived encroachments, particularly cattle herding by pastoralists, which symbolizes territorial disputes and has fueled cycles of violence in the Itombwe highlands since the early . Groups like Yakutumba engage in ongoing rivalries with Bembe factions over fishing rights and trade routes, blending ethnic solidarity with economic incentives. In response, Banyamulenge elites have pursued armed mobilization under umbrellas like Ngumino since around 2020, seeking to assert amid marginalization in territorial . Local political settlements exacerbate these divides, as ethnic entrepreneurs leverage claims and customary chiefdoms to challenge state-recognized authorities, perpetuating instability through patronage networks tied to groups. Interethnic dialogues, such as those facilitated by in 2019, have seen Fuliiru, Bembe, and other communities condemn violence in Fizi but fail to resolve underlying power asymmetries, with mobilizations often reverting to alliances during electoral periods or resource scarcities.

Conflicts and Security

Interethnic Disputes and Land Conflicts

Interethnic disputes in Fizi Territory primarily pit pastoralists against predominantly agriculturalist groups such as the Bembe and Fuliru, often manifesting as competition over land access, grazing rights, and corridors. These tensions stem from overlapping claims to highland plateaus, where , returns, and unclear titles exacerbate resource scarcity, with Banyamulenge herders frequently accused by locals of crop damage and encroachment viewed as foreign influence linked to . and retaliatory violence further entrench divisions, as herders arm to protect while farmers form militias to safeguard fields, intertwining local grievances with broader dynamics. Land conflicts intensified around the September 2020 administrative elevation of Minembwe—a Banyamulenge-majority highland area in Fizi's Lulenge sector—to rural commune status, which Bembe and Fuliru leaders contested as diluting their influence and enabling perceived favoring pastoralists. This decision, enacted despite local opposition, heightened fears of land reallocation favoring transhumant herders and triggered sporadic clashes over pastoral corridors. In parallel, farmer-herder frictions in Fizi's lowlands involve Fuliru and Bembe cultivators blocking seasonal migrations, leading to crop destruction claims and vigilante enforcement by groups like Biloze, which align with autochthonous communities against expansion. Notable escalations include the July 2020 Twirwaneho militia assault on Kipupu village following cattle thefts, resulting in 15 civilian deaths, and the September 2020 Mai-Mai Mutetezi raid on Banyamulenge sites, killing 18 fighters and seizing 800 head of cattle. By March 2021, Gumino militias clashed with Mai-Mai coalitions in Itombwe Sector, displacing approximately 174 households amid disputes over grazing lands. June-July 2022 saw Twirwaneho-aligned forces battle Mai-Mai Biloze in Fizi, blending land defense with ethnic mobilization. Most recently, on March 3, 2025, Wazalendo fighters—backed by Congolese army logistics—targeted Banyamulenge villages near Bibokoboko, killing seven residents, razing homes, schools, and clinics while labeling victims as non-Congolese infiltrators, underscoring how state-aligned militias amplify interethnic targeting under land conflict pretexts. These disputes perpetuate a cycle where militias like Twirwaneho (defending interests) and variants (protecting Bembe/Fuliru claims) exploit land grievances for recruitment, with over 120 armed groups active in by 2022, many rooted in such local animosities rather than solely mineral exploitation. Resolution efforts, including community mediation by NGOs like UJEOPAD-RDC since 2009, have mediated some intra- and inter-ethnic land cases in Fizi but falter against armed entrenchment and weak state adjudication. Empirical patterns indicate mutual violence, though reports document disproportionate infrastructure losses and displacements in areas since 2019, displacing up to 120,000 by mid-2021.

Role of Armed Groups and Militias

Armed groups and militias play a central role in Fizi Territory's security landscape, often emerging as ethnic forces but frequently engaging in resource exploitation, territorial control, and civilian abuses that perpetuate instability. Local factions, such as the Mai-Mai Yakutumba group founded in 2007 by Padiri Zakaria Luyingu in Fizi's southern areas, primarily draw from the Babembe ethnic community and position themselves against perceived foreign threats like Rwandan-backed insurgents, while imposing taxes on , , and routes that fund their operations and exacerbate local economic burdens. These groups have fragmented into numerous splinter factions, with over a dozen Mai-Mai entities active in Fizi and adjacent Itombwe plateau by the late , controlling highland grazing areas and clashing over land amid interethnic tensions involving Bembe, Fuliiru, and communities. The Forces Républicaines et Fédéralistes (FRF), led by Patrick Masunzu since breaking from the Rally for Congolese Democracy-Goma around 2001, have operated in Fizi's Hauts Plateaux, including Kamombo and Mibunda, forming opportunistic alliances with and even the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) to counter Tutsi-led threats, though a 2007 ceasefire allowed limited control until renewed splinter activities by 2011. The FDLR, a foreign militia with roots in the 1994 perpetrators, maintains presence in Fizi's forested highlands, engaging in protection rackets, illegal , and forced , with estimates of up to 2,000 combatants across eastern DRC contributing to cross-border dynamics that draw in local militias. By 2022, clashes in Fizi's Hauts Plateaux between groups and the Burundian Red Tabara (Twigwaneho) faction highlighted ongoing proxy involvements, while the Wazalendo coalition—comprising FARDC-aligned —has committed widespread rapes, lootings, and killings in since 2023, including Fizi areas, undermining state authority despite nominal government backing. These entities' roles extend to blocking state administration in remote enclaves like Minembwe, where groups have forcibly confined thousands of civilians conditions as of 2025, facilitating parallel governance through ethnic and resource rackets rather than ideological coherence. Recent escalations, including April 2025 clashes in Fizi between local armed groups and M23-affiliated forces amid broader offensives, have displaced thousands and intensified humanitarian crises, with militias exploiting ungoverned spaces to sustain cycles of violence rooted in land scarcity, mineral wealth, and ethnic patronage networks. Despite occasional integrations into the Congolese army, high desertion rates—exemplified by Yakutumba's racketeering persistence post-brassage attempts—reveal structural failures in demobilization, allowing groups to retain and leverage over local power structures.

Foreign Involvement and Border Dynamics

Fizi Territory's proximity to along the southeastern border of Province has facilitated cross-border operations by Burundian forces targeting anti-government rebels, notably the Twirwaneho wing of the RED-Tabara group, which maintains bases in Fizi and adjacent Territory. In May 2025, reports indicated large-scale deployments of Burundian troops into Fizi to halt Twirwaneho advances toward the border and to counter potential spillover from the Rwanda-backed M23 rebellion further north. These incursions reflect Burundi's strategy to neutralize threats from exile-based insurgents, exacerbating local insecurity and displacing communities amid joint operations with Congolese forces. Regional tensions extend to alleged Rwandan involvement through support for Tutsi-linked militias, influencing ethnic dynamics in Fizi's highlands where Banyamulenge communities—Congolese of Rwandan Tutsi descent—clash with groups like the Babembe over land and resources. United Nations reports document persistent violence in Fizi between these factions, often intertwined with broader Kivu conflicts involving Rwanda Defence Forces (RDF) alongside M23 in northern areas, though direct RDF presence in Fizi remains unconfirmed in recent assessments. Border dynamics include fluid movements of combatants, refugees fleeing into Burundi—over 100,000 from South Kivu since 2022—and illicit cross-border trade in minerals and arms, undermining state control. The Organization Stabilization Mission in the () maintains a significant presence in Fizi, conducting joint patrols and rapid response operations with the Congolese Armed Forces (FARDC) to protect civilians from armed group incursions and intercommunal violence. In coordination efforts, has demonstrated intervention capabilities in Fizi and territories, including aerial support from bases like Baraka, amid ongoing withdrawals planned for 2025 despite deteriorating security. These activities highlight international efforts to stabilize areas, though criticisms persist regarding 's effectiveness against foreign-backed threats and local militias like the .

Humanitarian Impacts and Local Resilience Efforts

Ongoing conflicts in Fizi Territory have led to significant humanitarian challenges, including mass displacement. Since April 2024, clashes have displaced nearly 30,000 individuals within the territory. As of June 2025, Fizi accounts for 25% of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in province, with many residing in host families or spontaneous sites amid limited formal camps. Security incidents have surged since January 2023, particularly in the Hauts-Plateaux and Moyens-Plateaux areas, exacerbating vulnerabilities to food insecurity and disease outbreaks. Access to health services remains severely restricted, with over 80% of facilities in the Kivus unsupported by humanitarian partners as of 2025, relying on local resources strained by conflict. epidemics have intensified in the Fizi health zone, where partner involvement is minimal, contributing to broader crises. Natural disasters compound these issues; floods in Kasaba village along affected communities in early 2025, while 2020 events in Fizi and claimed 43 lives and injured over 140. Local resilience efforts focus on community-driven adaptations and targeted programs. Health districts in Fizi, despite chronic from armed groups, employ coping mechanisms to sustain basic services, as documented in studies of inherent district-level resilience. Initiatives by organizations like UNHCR have registered over 900 births in Baraka since recent years, aiding legal identity and protection for vulnerable populations. Agricultural programs promote self-sufficiency; for instance, women in , including Fizi areas, cultivate beans through resilience-building projects amid inaccessible territories. Non-governmental efforts include road rehabilitation in Misisi village, enhancing access for Pygmy communities via non-violent advocacy. Joint UNICEF-WFP-FAO programs since 2020 support families in with nutrition and livelihoods, while emergency responses address displacement in Fizi. Despite these, humanitarian access constraints persist, limiting scale and effectiveness of interventions.

Economy

Agricultural and Subsistence Activities

Agriculture in Fizi Territory relies predominantly on subsistence smallholder farming, characterized by family labor on small plots averaging 3 hectares per household, with practices including , (such as with ), and minimal use of modern inputs due to limited access to seeds, tools, and credit. Staple crops cultivated include , which thrives in nutrient-depleted soils and accounts for significant self-consumption (around 45% of production), beans as a primary protein source, , bananas, and to a lesser extent yam, , and sweet potatoes, supporting security amid low productivity. Livestock activities, integral to agropastoral livelihoods in the highlands, involve rearing small ruminants, poultry, and occasionally larger animals, though systematic looting during conflicts has sharply reduced herds and output. These pursuits generate about 91% of rural household income, averaging USD 488 annually, but remain insufficient for poverty alleviation due to soil degradation, demographic pressures fragmenting land, and rudimentary techniques yielding low yields (e.g., bean seed savings via system of rice intensification adapted for other crops, reducing inputs from 120 kg/ha to 10 kg/ha in some cases). Ongoing conflicts exacerbate vulnerabilities, with inaccessibility in areas like Fizi hindering seed distribution and harvest ; initiatives such as the Beans for Women project have produced 5,200 kg of basic in , including Fizi, promoting resilience through replanting harvested and local transport networks despite looting risks. Market gardening in highlands supplements subsistence, focusing on for local consumption, though overall agricultural output faces seasonal deficits from below-average production in conflict zones.

Mining, Fishing, and Resource Extraction

Artisanal mining dominates resource extraction in Fizi Territory, focusing on , cassiterite, coltan, and wolframite, with operations often informal and controlled by local cooperatives or armed actors. Gold extraction occurs at sites including the Makungu Mine and areas around Minembwe, Kilembwe, Baraka, and Dine, where native is mined manually or with basic mechanization. Coltan, a source of tantalum, is extracted and frequently smuggled northward to Rwanda via routes originating in South Kivu territories like Fizi, evading formal taxation and traceability. Fishing provides a vital along Fizi's eastern border with , where Baraka serves as a major southern fishing hub contributing significantly to the lake's production. Small-scale operations rely on canoes and target like sardines and clupeids, supporting over 100,000 lake-dependent communities across bordering countries, though catches have declined by up to 20% lake-wide between 2020 and 2024 due to and pressures. In Fizi, unregulated exploitation exacerbates environmental strain, with illegal practices threatening long-term despite the lake's role as a key protein source for local populations. Other resources, such as timber and hydroelectric potential from rivers like the Kyimbi, see limited extraction, overshadowed by minerals and fisheries amid gaps that enable and underreporting. Artisanal in Fizi, while employing thousands regionally, perpetuates underdevelopment through low yields, mercury use, and rather than broad economic benefits.

Economic Challenges, Informal Sectors, and Development Initiatives

The economy of Fizi Territory is hampered by ongoing insecurity, which limits and formal opportunities, resulting in widespread reliance on subsistence activities and informal resource extraction. A 2019 USAID survey indicated that armed conflict has significantly reduced average monthly household incomes in the territory, exacerbating poverty levels consistent with South Kivu's broader rate of over 70% living below the national poverty line of approximately $1.90 per day as of recent World Bank estimates for eastern DRC. Poor , including impassable roads during rainy seasons, further isolates markets and hinders agricultural surplus sales, while at checkpoints imposes unofficial taxes that inflate costs for traders. Informal sectors, particularly artisanal and small-scale (ASGM) in sites like Misisi, employ thousands as a primary coping mechanism amid economic distress, with surveys estimating over 126,000 miners across South Kivu's 278 mapped sites between 2016 and 2018. These operations, often paid in minerals (34% of gold sites), generate local income but face high armed interference, including control by groups like Yakutumba through profit-sharing arrangements with state forces, leading to exploitative taxation and reduced miner revenues. and fishing along persist as informal mainstays, though livestock rearing has declined sharply due to systematic looting during conflicts, forcing diversification into riskier activities that contribute to without formal oversight. Cooperatives, required since DRC's 2010 code, operate at 74% of sites but frequently benefit elites rather than workers, with low membership rates undermining . Development initiatives focus on socio-economic stabilization and responsible resource management to mitigate conflict-driven vulnerabilities. In 2024, the (IOM) engaged 3,600 vulnerable individuals and former combatants in high-intensity labor programs across , including Fizi, to foster social cohesion and long-term recovery through infrastructure and agricultural support. COOPAC-FIZI has implemented five community projects and two program-related investments since the , targeting , enhancement, and in the territory. Efforts by IPIS and partners promote responsible sourcing in ASGM, assessing validation potential in sites to reduce armed interference, though impacts remain limited in remote Fizi areas where 39% of mines require over two hours' walk from roads. Oxfam's gravity-fed water systems, spanning 96 kilometers in Fizi since the early , aim to bolster agricultural productivity and health, indirectly supporting informal livelihoods. These programs, often NGO-led due to weak central , prioritize conflict-sensitive approaches but face challenges from persistent activity and .

Demographics

Population Estimates and Distribution

The population of Fizi Territory is estimated at approximately 1 million inhabitants across its vast rural expanse of about 22,000 km². This figure reflects projections accounting for high rural densities in a conflict-affected region lacking recent national data, with earlier administrative estimates suggesting lower totals around 400,000 as of 2018 before adjustments for growth and displacement. Population density remains low, averaging around 45 inhabitants per km² in sectors like Lulenge, due to rugged highland terrain and dispersed settlements. Distribution is predominantly rural, with concentrations along Lake Tanganyika's shores in areas like Baraka—the territory's socio-economic hub—and Fizi town, where fishing communities and trade nodes support denser clusters. Highland plateaus, such as Itombwe and Ngandja sectors, host scattered agrarian villages amid forests and mountains, while inland areas like Minembwe see nomadic pastoralist groups. Ongoing interethnic conflicts and activity have disrupted patterns, driving internal displacement: as of September 2024, IOM's Displacement Tracking Matrix recorded 48,833 internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Fizi Territory, primarily in Fizi, Nundu, and Kimbi Lulenge health zones, representing a significant portion of South Kivu's 25% IDP share in Fizi. These movements concentrate vulnerable populations in peri-urban camps and host communities, exacerbating strains on local resources without reversing overall rural dispersion. ![Lamba village, Fizi, South Kivu Province.jpg][float-right] Health zone-level data from IOM multi-site tracking underscores uneven distribution, with Fizi health zone alone enumerating around 139,000 residents as a baseline in 2023 assessments, amid broader territorial sectors totaling higher aggregates. Natural growth rates of 3-4% annually in eastern DRC, combined with returns and conflict-induced migrations, likely push current totals toward 1.2-1.5 million by 2025, though verifiable figures remain elusive due to insecurity hindering surveys. Humanitarian agencies like IOM prioritize these zones for monitoring, as displacement flows—such as 40,000 fleeing Fizi in early 2024—transiently inflate local densities before dispersal.

Ethnic Composition and Diversity

Fizi Territory is predominantly inhabited by the Bembe (Babembe) ethnic group, who are Bantu-speaking peoples historically concentrated in the highlands and coastal areas of Province. The Bembe maintain traditional livelihoods centered on and , with social structures organized around clans and chiefdoms that trace lineage to pre-colonial kingdoms. Significant populations of the Fuliru (Bafuliiru or Fuliiru) reside in Fizi, particularly in highland sectors such as Lulenge and Itombwe, where they engage in and farming adapted to the rugged terrain. The Fuliru, also Bantu, share linguistic and cultural affinities with neighboring groups but maintain distinct dialects and customary practices, including herding that underscores their semi-nomadic heritage. Ethnic diversity in Fizi includes minority communities such as the , a Tutsi-descended group affiliated with Rwandan and an pastoralists, who settled in the region during colonial migrations and face ongoing integration challenges. Other groups encompass the Vira (Bavira), Nyindu (Banyindu), and smaller numbers of Barundi refugees from , alongside subgroups like the Buyu (Babuyu), Sanze (Basanze), and Wari (Babwari). This mosaic of over a dozen ethnicities reflects historical migrations, colonial administrative divisions, and post-independence displacements, contributing to a complex social fabric without precise data on due to persistent insecurity hindering demographic surveys.

Education, Literacy, and Social Indicators

Education in Fizi Territory is severely hampered by ongoing armed conflict, which has led to widespread attacks on schools and education personnel. Over 59% of schools in Fizi have experienced violent incidents since 1990, with 20% affected between 2017 and 2018, contributing to closures, displacement of teachers, and reduced access for children. In one documented case, seven education workers from the ethnic group were killed near Fizi in October 2011 by Yakutumba fighters en route to a teacher training program. These disruptions are compounded by the territory's remote highland geography and limited , resulting in lower enrollment compared to national averages. Primary and secondary enrollment rates in Province, which includes Fizi, reflect these challenges, with approximately 30.3% of school-aged children (ages 5-17) out of school as of 2012, exceeding the national average of 28.9%. Accelerated education programs, such as the DRC's Programme National de Rattrapage Scolaire, aim to reintegrate overage and out-of-school children by condensing the primary cycle, though implementation in conflict zones like Fizi remains inconsistent due to insecurity. Higher education is represented by institutions like University in Minembwe, which offers programs in education sciences, health sciences, and , targeting rural youth for ; it includes affiliated primary and secondary schools established in 2014 and 2015. Literacy rates specific to Fizi are unavailable due to data scarcity in conflict areas, but national adult stands at 80.54% as of 2022, with (ages 15-24) at around 85% in eastern conflict provinces like those neighboring . Rural and displaced populations in Fizi likely face lower rates, exacerbated by interrupted schooling and gender disparities, where female enrollment and completion lag behind males. Social indicators in Fizi underscore broader vulnerabilities: affects the majority of households in , with deteriorating incomes and most living below the poverty line as of recent assessments. access is limited, with studies in Fizi health zone revealing high prevalence and poor service delivery amid chronic ; for instance, a 2021 population study across zones including Fizi reported elevated functional limitations linked to conflict trauma. and epidemics persist, with national human capital metrics indicating a born in the DRC achieves only 37% of potential productivity due to inadequate and . These factors perpetuate cycles of low human development, though local resilience efforts, such as community-based initiatives, provide partial mitigation.

Infrastructure

Transportation Networks and Accessibility

The transportation infrastructure in Fizi Territory remains underdeveloped, characterized by a sparse network of unpaved roads susceptible to seasonal flooding and degradation. Primary routes, such as the Baraka-Fizi road linking the lakeside town of Baraka to the territorial center of Fizi, facilitate limited local movement but are frequently interrupted by over 100 illegal roadblocks in South Kivu province, where armed groups impose extortionate tolls averaging $10-50 per vehicle, exacerbating accessibility challenges. These conditions, compounded by the territory's mountainous terrain including the Itombwe Plateau, render overland travel unreliable, with 59% of priority roads nationwide in poor condition as of recent assessments. Air transport provides sporadic access via rudimentary airstrips, notably in Baraka, which supports UN Humanitarian Air Service (UNHAS) flights and helicopter operations for humanitarian and security purposes, though no paved runways or commercial services exist. Flights to Baraka from hubs like or occur irregularly, primarily for aid delivery amid ongoing insecurity, with no in the territory. Waterborne along offers an alternative for coastal sectors like Baraka and Tanganyika, utilizing small motorized boats for fishing, trade, and passenger movement to or cross-border points in and , though limited to shallow drafts and vulnerable to risks. Overall accessibility is severely constrained by persistent armed conflict, with groups like the FDLR and controlling segments of routes, leading to restricted humanitarian convoys and high risks for civilians; for instance, South Kivu's Fizi experienced ongoing insecurity as of 2020, hindering reliable supply chains. No rail or major serves the territory, forcing dependence on these precarious networks, which prioritize subsistence over commercial viability.

Communications, Energy, and Basic Services

Telecommunications infrastructure in Fizi Territory remains severely limited due to its remote, mountainous geography and ongoing insecurity, with mobile network coverage primarily confined to urban centers such as Fizi, Baraka, and Misisi. Major operators including Vodacom and Airtel provide 2G and limited 3G services in these areas, but signal strength is unreliable and extends minimally to rural zones like Mboko and Lweba, where access drops to near zero. Fixed-line telephony is effectively nonexistent, and internet penetration is negligible, reliant on sporadic satellite or mobile data connections that are hampered by power shortages and high costs. Radio remains the dominant medium for information dissemination, with community stations playing a role in conflict alerts and local news, though broadcast reach is constrained by terrain and equipment failures. Electricity access in Fizi Territory is among the lowest in the , mirroring national rural rates of approximately 1.1%, with most households depending on lamps, , or small solar kits for basic lighting. The territory's hydroelectric potential, including the Kyimbi plant on the Bendera River, generates limited power for nearby communities, but distribution networks are dilapidated and serve only a fraction of the population, often interrupted by maintenance issues and conflict-related damage. Diesel generators are used in administrative centers and sites, but scarcity and high prices—exacerbated by poor road access—render them unsustainable for widespread use. National efforts, such as mini-grids in eastern DRC, have not yet prioritized Fizi, leaving over 90% of residents without grid connection as of 2024. Basic services like and are critically underdeveloped, contributing to recurrent outbreaks of waterborne diseases such as . The majority of the draws untreated from rivers and for and , with no centralized distribution system in place, leading to contamination risks heightened by flooding and displacement. facilities are rudimentary, with prevalent in rural areas due to the lack of latrines and infrastructure. Humanitarian interventions provide partial relief: for instance, Oxfam's project, completed in phases through 2023, supplies safe to over 80,000 people across Fizi and adjacent sites like Sebele and Malinde. Similarly, a 2025 initiative in Munene village constructed 22 standpipes linked to a 120 m³ tank, aiming to serve local needs amid chronic shortages. World Vision's efforts have targeted improvements for up to 47,200 conflict-affected individuals in Fizi since 2015, installing boreholes and education programs, though coverage remains patchwork and vulnerable to . Nationally, 65% of DRC's lacks basic access and 84% basic , figures likely worse in Fizi given its isolation.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.