Recent from talks
Nothing was collected or created yet.

In metal typesetting, a font is a particular size, weight and style of a typeface, defined as the set of fonts that share an overall design. For instance, the typeface Bauer Bodoni (shown in the figure) includes fonts "Roman" (or "regular"), "bold" and "italic"; each of these exists in a variety of sizes. In traditional printing, fonts were physically created using metal or wood type, with a font for each size.
In the digital description of fonts (computer fonts), the terms font and typeface are often used interchangeably.[1] For example, when used in computers, each style is stored in a separate digital font file. Most are scalable fonts, so all sizes of a style are encompassed in one font.
In both traditional typesetting and digital design, the term font refers to a specific style or version of a typeface.

Spelling and etymology
[edit]The word font (US) or fount (traditional UK, CAN; in any case pronounced /fɒnt/) derives from Middle French fonte, meaning "cast iron".[2] The term refers to the process of casting metal type at a type foundry.
The spelling font is mainly used in the United States, whereas fount was historically used in most Commonwealth countries.
Metal type
[edit]
In a manual printing (letterpress) house the word "font" would refer to a complete set of metal type that would be used to typeset an entire page. Upper- and lowercase letters get their names because of which case the metal type was located in for manual typesetting: the more distant upper case or the closer lower case. The same distinction is also referred to with the terms majuscule and minuscule.
Unlike a digital typeface, a metal font would not include a single definition of each character, but commonly used characters (such as vowels and periods) would have more physical type-pieces included. A font when bought new would often be sold as (for example in a Roman alphabet) 12pt 14A 34a, meaning that it would be a size 12-point font containing 14 uppercase "A"s, and 34 lowercase "a".
The rest of the characters would be provided in quantities appropriate for the distribution of letters in that language. Some metal type characters required in typesetting, such as dashes, spaces and line-height spacers, were not part of a specific font, but were generic pieces that could be used with any font.[3] Line spacing is still often called "leading", because the strips used for line spacing were made of lead (rather than the harder alloy used for other pieces). This spacing strip was made from lead because lead was a softer metal than the traditional forged metal type pieces (which was part lead, antimony and tin) and would compress more easily when "locked up" in the printing "chase" (i.e. a carrier for holding all the type together).
In the 1880s–1890s, "hot lead" typesetting was invented, in which type was cast as it was set, either piece by piece (as in the Monotype technology) or in entire lines of type at one time (as in the Linotype technology).
Characteristics
[edit]In addition to character height, when using the mechanical sense of the term, there are several other characteristics which may distinguish fonts, though they would also depend on the script(s) that the typeface supports. In European alphabetic scripts, i.e. Latin, Cyrillic, and Greek, the main such properties are the stroke width, called weight, the style or angle and the character width.
The regular or standard font is sometimes labeled roman, both to distinguish it from bold or thin and from italic or oblique. The keyword for the default, regular case is often omitted for variants and never repeated, otherwise it would be Bulmer regular italic, Bulmer bold regular and even Bulmer regular regular. Roman can also refer to the language coverage of a font, acting as a shorthand for "Western European".
Different font styles within the same typeface can be used in a single design to enhance readability and emphasis, or in a specific design to make it be of more visual interest.
Weight
[edit]The weight of a particular font is the thickness of the character outlines relative to their height.

A typeface may come in fonts of many weights, from ultra-light to extra-bold or black; four to six weights are not unusual, and a few typefaces have as many as a dozen. Many typefaces for office, web and non-professional use come with a normal and a bold weight which are linked together. If no bold weight is provided, many renderers (browsers, word processors, graphic and DTP programs) support a bolder font by rendering the outline a second time at an offset, or smearing it slightly at a diagonal angle.
The base weight differs among typefaces; that means one font may appear bolder than another font. For example, fonts intended to be used in posters are often bold by default while fonts for long runs of text are rather light. Weight designations in font names may differ in regard to the actual absolute stroke weight or density of glyphs in the font.
Attempts to systematize a range of weights led to a numerical classification first used in 1957 by Adrian Frutiger with the Univers typeface: 35 Extra Light, 45 Light, 55 Medium or Regular, 65 Bold, 75 Extra Bold, 85 Extra Bold, 95 Ultra Bold or Black. Deviants of these were the "6 series" (italics), e.g. 46 Light Italics etc., the "7 series" (condensed versions), e.g. 57 Medium Condensed etc., and the "8 series" (condensed italics), e.g. 68 Bold Condensed Italics. From this brief numerical system it is easier to determine exactly what a font's characteristics are, for instance "Helvetica 67" (HE67) translates to "Helvetica Bold Condensed".

Helvetica has a monoline design and all strokes increase in weight in bold.
Less monoline fonts like Optima and Utopia increase the weight of the thicker strokes more.
In all three designs, the curve on 'n' thins as it joins the left-hand vertical.
The first algorithmic description of fonts was made by Donald Knuth in his 1986 Metafont description language and interpreter.
The TrueType font format introduced a scale from 100 through 900, which is also used in CSS and OpenType, where 400 is regular (roman or plain).
The Mozilla Developer Network provides the following rough mapping[4] to typical font weight names:
| Names | Numerical values |
|---|---|
| Thin / Hairline | 100
|
| Ultra-light / Extra-light | 200
|
| Light | 300
|
| Normal / regular | 400
|
| Medium | 500
|
| Semi-bold / Demi-bold | 600
|
| Bold | 700
|
| Extra-bold / Ultra-bold | 800
|
| Heavy / Black | 900
|
| Extra-black / Ultra-black | 950
|
Font mapping varies by font designer. A good example is Bigelow and Holmes's Go Go font family. In this family, the "fonts have CSS numerical weights of 400, 500, and 600. Although CSS specifies 'Bold' as a 700 weight and 600 as Semibold or Demibold, the Go numerical weights match the actual progression of the ratios of stem thicknesses: Normal:Medium = 400:500; Normal:Bold = 400:600".[5]
The terms normal, regular and plain (sometimes book) are used for the standard-weight font of a typeface. Where both appear and differ, book is often lighter than regular, but in some typefaces it is bolder.
Before the arrival of computers, each weight had to be drawn manually. As a result, many older multi-weight families such as Gill Sans and Monotype Grotesque have considerable differences in weights from light to extra-bold. Since the 1980s, it has become common to use automation to construct a range of weights as points along a trend, multiple master or other parameterized font design. This means that many modern digital fonts such as Myriad and TheSans are offered in a large range of weights which offer a smooth and continuous transition from one weight to the next, although some digital fonts are created with extensive manual corrections.
As digital font design allows more variants to be created faster, a common development in professional font design is the use of "grades": slightly different weights intended for different types of paper and ink, or printing in a different region with different ambient temperature and humidity.[6][7][8] For example, a thin design printed on book paper and a thicker design printed on high-gloss magazine paper may come out looking identical, since in the former case the ink will soak and spread out more. Grades are offered with characters having the same width on all grades, so that a change of printing materials does not affect copy-fit.[9][10] Grades are common on serif fonts with their finer details.
Fonts in which the bold and non-bold letters have the same width are "duplexed".
Style
[edit]Slope
[edit]
In European typefaces, especially Roman ones, a slope or slanted style is used to emphasize important words. This is called italic type or oblique type. These designs normally slant to the right in left-to-right scripts. Oblique styles are often called italic, but differ from "true italic" styles.
Italic styles are more flowing than the normal typeface, approaching a more handwritten, cursive style, possibly using ligatures more commonly or gaining swashes. Although rarely encountered, a typographic face may be accompanied by a matching calligraphic face (cursive, script), giving an exaggeratedly italic style.
In many sans-serif and some serif typefaces, especially in those with strokes of even thickness, the characters of the italic fonts are only slanted, which is often done algorithmically, without otherwise changing their appearance. Such oblique fonts are not true italics, because lowercase letter shapes do not change, but they are often marketed as such. Fonts normally do not include both oblique and italic styles: the designer chooses to supply one or the other.
Since italic styles clearly look different than regular (roman) styles, it is possible to have "upright italic" designs that take a more cursive form but remain upright; Computer Modern is an example of a font that offers this style. In Latin-script countries, upright italics are rare but are sometimes used in mathematics or in complex documents where a section of text already in italics needs a "double italic" style to add emphasis to it. For example, the Cyrillic minuscule "т" may look like a smaller form of its majuscule "Т" or more like a roman small "m" as in its standard italic appearance; in this case, the distinction between styles is also a matter of local preference.

Other style attributes
[edit]In Frutiger's nomenclature the second digit for upright fonts is a 5, for italic fonts a 6 and for condensed italic fonts an 8.
The two Japanese syllabaries, katakana and hiragana, are sometimes seen as two styles or typographic variants of each other, but usually are considered separate character sets as a few of the characters have separate kanji origins and the scripts are used for different purposes. The gothic style of the roman script with broken letter forms, on the other hand, is usually considered a mere typographic variant.
Cursive-only scripts such as Arabic also have different styles, in this case for example Naskh and Kufic, although these often depend on application, area or era.
There are other aspects that can differ among font styles, but more often these are considered intrinsic features of the typeface.[citation needed] These include the look of digits (text figures) and the minuscules, which may be smaller versions of the capital letters (small caps) although the script has developed characteristic shapes for them. Some typefaces do not include separate glyphs for the cases at all, thereby abolishing the bicamerality. While most of these use uppercase characters only, some labeled unicase exist which choose either the majuscule or the minuscule glyph at a common height for both characters.
Titling fonts are designed for headlines and displays, and have stroke widths optimized for large sizes.
Width
[edit]
Some typefaces include fonts that vary the width of the characters (stretch), although this feature is usually rarer than weight or slope. Narrower fonts are usually labeled compressed, condensed or narrow. In Frutiger's system, the second digit of condensed fonts is a 7. Wider fonts may be called wide, extended or expanded. Both can be further classified by prepending extra, ultra or the like. Compressing a font design to a condensed weight is a complex task, requiring the strokes to be slimmed down proportionally and often making the capitals straight-sided.[a][11] It is particularly common to see condensed fonts for sans-serif and slab-serif families, since it is relatively practical to modify their structure to a condensed weight. Serif text faces are often only issued in the regular width.
These separate fonts have to be distinguished from techniques that alter the letter-spacing to achieve narrower or smaller words, especially for justified text alignment.
Most typefaces either have proportional or monospaced (for example, those resembling typewriter output) letter widths, if the script provides the possibility. Some superfamilies include both proportional and monospaced fonts. Some fonts also provide both proportional and fixed-width (tabular) digits, where the former usually coincide with lowercase text figures and the latter with uppercase lining figures.
The width of a font will depend on its intended use. Times New Roman was designed with the goal of having small width, to fit more text into a newspaper. On the other hand, Palatino has large width to increase readability. The "billing block" on a movie poster often uses extremely condensed type in order to meet union requirements on the people who must be credited and the font height relative to the rest of the poster.[12]
Optical size
[edit]
Optical sizes refer to different versions of the same typefaces optimised for specific font sizes.[13][14][15] For instance, thinner stroke weight might be used if a font style is intended for large-size display use, or ink traps might be added to the design if it is to be printed at small size on poor-quality paper.[16] This was a natural feature in the metal type period for most typefaces, since each size would be cut separately and made to its own slightly different design.[17][18][19] As an example of this, experienced Linotype designer Chauncey H. Griffith commented in 1947 that for a type he was working on intended for newspaper use, the 6 point size was not 50% as wide as the 12 point size,[b] but about 71%.[20]
Optical sizing declined in use as pantograph engraving emerged, while phototypesetting and digital fonts further made printing the same font at any size simpler. A mild revival has taken place in recent years, although typefaces with optical sizes remain rare.[21][22][23][24] The recent variable font technology further allows designers to include an optical size axis for a typeface, which means end users can manually adjust optical sizing on a continuous scale.[13] Examples of variable fonts with such an axis are Roboto Flex[25] and Helvetica Now Variable.[26]
Optical sizes are more common for serif fonts, since their typically finer detail and higher contrast benefits more from being bulked up for smaller sizes and made less overpowering at larger ones.[18] Furthermore, it is often desirable for mathematical fonts (i.e., typefaces designed for typesetting mathematical equations) to have two optical sizes below "Regular",[27] typically for higher-order superscripts and subscripts which are very small in sizes. Examples of such mathematical fonts include Minion Math[28] and MathTime 2.[29][30]
Naming convention
[edit]Naming schemes for optical sizes vary.[31] One such scheme, invented and popularised by Adobe, labels the variant designs by their typical usages (with the intended point sizes varying slightly by typefaces):
- Poster: Extremely large sizes, usually larger than 72 point
- Display: Large sizes, typically 19–72 point
- Subhead: Large text, typically about 14–18 point
- "Regular" or "Text": Usually left unnamed, typically about 10–13 point
- Small Text (SmText): Typically about 8–10 point
- Caption: Very small, typically about 4–8 point
Other type designers and publishers might use different naming schemes. For instance, the smaller optical size of Helvetica Now is labelled "Micro",[32] while the display variant of Hoefler Text is called "Titling".[33] Another example is Times, whose variants are labelled by their intended point sizes, such as Times Ten,[34] Times Eighteen,[35] and Times New Roman Seven.[36]
Variable fonts typically do not use any naming scheme, because the inclusion of an adjustable optical size axis means optical sizes are not released as separate products.
Metrics
[edit]
Font metrics refers to metadata consisting of numeric values relating to size and space in the font overall, or in its individual glyphs. Font-wide metrics include cap height (the height of the capitals), x-height (the height of the lowercase letters) and ascender height, descender depth, and the font bounding box. Glyph-level metrics include the glyph bounding box, the advance width (the proper distance between the glyph's initial pen position and the next glyph's initial pen position), and sidebearings (space that pads the glyph outline on either side). Many digital (and some metal type) fonts can be kerned so that characters can be fitted more closely; the pair "Wa" is a common example of this.

Some fonts, especially those intended for professional use, are duplexed: made with multiple weights having the same character width so that (for example) changing from regular to bold or italic does not affect word wrap.[37] Sabon as originally designed was an example of this. (This was a standard feature of the Linotype hot metal typesetting system with regular and italic being duplexed, requiring awkward design choices as italics normally are narrower than the roman.)
A particularly important basic set of fonts that became an early standard in digital printing was the Core Font Set included in the PostScript printing system developed by Apple and Adobe. To avoid paying licensing fees for this set, computer companies commissioned metrically compatible fonts with the same spacing, which could be used to display the same document without it seeming clearly different. For example, Arial and Century Gothic are functional equivalents to the PostScript standard fonts Helvetica and ITC Avant Gardem respectively.[38][39][40][41][42] Some of these sets were created in order to be freely redistributable, for example Red Hat's Liberation fonts and Google's Croscore fonts, which duplicate the PostScript set and other common fonts used in Microsoft software such as Calibri.[43][better source needed] It is not a requirement that a metrically compatible design be identical to its origin in appearance apart from width.[44]
Serifs
[edit]Although most typefaces are characterized by their use of serifs, there are superfamilies that incorporate serif (antiqua) and sans-serif (grotesque) or even intermediate slab serif (Egyptian) or semi-serif fonts with the same base outlines.
A more common font variant, especially of serif typefaces, is that of alternate capitals. They can have swashes to go with italic minuscules or they can be of a flourish design for use as initials (drop caps).
Character variants
[edit]

Typefaces may be made in variants for different uses. These may be issued as separate font files, or the different characters may be included in the same font file if the font is a modern format such as OpenType and the application used can support this.[45][46][47]
Alternative characters are often called stylistic alternates. These may be switched on to allow users more flexibility to customise the typeface to suit their needs. The practice is not new: in the 1930s, Gill Sans, a British design, was sold abroad with alternative characters to make it resemble typefaces such as Futura popular in other countries, while Bembo from the same period has two shapes of "R": one with a stretched-out leg, matching its fifteenth-century model, and one less-common shorter version.[48] With modern digital fonts, it is possible to group related alternative characters into stylistic sets, which may be turned on and off together. For example, in Williams Caslon Text, a revival of the 18th century Caslon typeface, the default italic forms have many swashes matching the original design. For a more spare appearance, these can all be turned off at once by engaging stylistic set 4.[49] Junicode, intended for academic publishing, uses ss15 to enable a variant form of "e" used in medieval Latin. A corporation commissioning a modified version of a commercial computer font for their own use, meanwhile, might request that their preferred alternates be set to default.
It is common for typefaces intended for use in books for young children to use simplified, single-storey forms of the lowercase letters a and g (sometimes also t, y, l and the digit 4); these may be called infant or schoolbook alternatives. They are traditionally believed to be easier for children to read and less confusing as they resemble the forms used in handwriting.[50] Often schoolbook characters are released as a supplement to popular families such as Akzidenz-Grotesk, Gill Sans and Bembo; a well-known font intended specifically for school use is Sassoon Sans.[51][52]
Besides alternate characters, in the metal type era The New York Times commissioned custom condensed single sorts for common long names that might often appear in news headings, such as "Eisenhower", "Chamberlain" or "Rockefeller".[53]
Digits
[edit]
Fonts can have multiple kinds of digits, including, as described above, proportional (variable width) and tabular (fixed width) as well as lining (uppercase height) and text (lowercase height) figures. They may also include separate shapes for superscript and subscript digits. Professional computer fonts may include even more complex settings for typesetting digits, such as digits intended to match the height of small caps.[54][55] In addition, some fonts such as Adobe's Acumin and Christian Schwartz's Neue Haas Grotesk digitisation offer two heights of lining (uppercase height) figures: one slightly lower than cap height, intended to blend better into continuous text, and one at exactly the cap height to look better in combination with capitals for uses such as UK postcodes.[56][57][58][59] With the OpenType format, it is possible to bundle all these into a single digital font file, but earlier font releases may have only one type per file.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ "Typefaces vs. fonts: here's how they're different". Shaping Design Blog. 2021-11-09. Archived from the original on 2023-06-29. Retrieved 2023-06-14.
- ^ Douglas Harper (2001). "font". Online Etymology Dictionary. Archived from the original on 2017-06-29. Retrieved 2013-07-19.
- ^ "Basic Letterpress Tools". Archived from the original on 2008-12-24. Retrieved 2008-12-07.
- ^ "font-weight". Mozilla Developer Network. Archived from the original on 2017-05-25. Retrieved 2017-07-04.
- ^ "Go fonts". GOLang.org (Press release). Google. Archived from the original on 14 August 2021. Retrieved 22 August 2019.
- ^ Butterick, Matthew. "Equity: specimen & manual" (PDF). MBType. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 August 2021. Retrieved 7 August 2015.
- ^ "Fancy Instagram Fonts Generator 😍(𝓬𝓸𝓹𝔂 ⒶⓃⒹ 𝓅𝒶𝓈𝓉𝑒)". SEOHorizon. Archived from the original on Feb 2, 2024.
- ^ "Benton Modern". Webtype. Font Bureau. Archived from the original on 12 August 2015. Retrieved 7 August 2015.
- ^ Porchez, Jean François (January 25, 2012). "Equity". Typographica. Archived from the original on 1 November 2021. Retrieved 13 July 2015.
- ^ Peters, Yves (April 4, 2017). "Inside the fonts: grading Bennet". Type Network. Archived from the original on 24 November 2021. Retrieved 25 September 2018.
- ^ Frere-Jones, Tobias (2015). "Typeface Mechanics: 002". Frere-Jones Type. Archived from the original on 24 September 2021. Retrieved 27 December 2017.
If we change that interval of white space without changing anything else, this doesn't add up any more. Or more accurately, it adds up to something we didn't want, if we had hoped to keep a consistent darkness. The proportion of black and white has changed, and that is where we get our sense of light and dark, not from the measure of any single element...So when we just put the weights and spaces where they look right, we create a relationship that is neither arithmetic nor geometric but somewhere between. Our eyes are perpetually tough customers, and rarely accept the simplest solution...Weight will crowd together according to the angle of intersection, with the problem getting more acute as the angle gets more acute. It's why type designers will take a deep breath before starting a Compressed Extra Bold version of something, or why they might openly swear at the capital W.
- ^ Schott, Ben (February 23, 2013). "Assembling the Billing Block". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 1, 2017. Retrieved March 1, 2017.
- ^ a b "Choosing typefaces that have optical sizes - Google Fonts". Archived from the original on 2023-05-13. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ "What is optical sizing and how can it help your brand? - Monotype". 6 April 2019. Archived from the original on 2023-05-13. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ "Identifont - Optical sizes". Archived from the original on 2023-05-13. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ Reynolds, Dan (21 May 2012). "How To Choose The Right Face For A Beautiful Body". Smashing. Archived from the original on 19 November 2021. Retrieved 13 September 2015.
- ^ Carter, Harry (1937). "Optical scale in type founding". Typography. 4. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 15 September 2019.
- ^ a b Frere-Jones, Tobias. "MicroPlus". Frere-Jones Type. Archived from the original on 25 November 2021. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
- ^ "Requiem features". Hoefler & Frere-Jones. Archived from the original on 11 July 2017. Retrieved 2 July 2015.
- ^ Tracy, Walter. Letters of Credit. pp. 52–55.
- ^ Ahrens and Mugikura. "Size-specific Adjustments to Type Designs". Just Another Foundry. Archived from the original on 2021-09-04. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ Coles, Stephen. "Book Review: Size-specific Adjustments to Type Designs". Typographica. Archived from the original on 5 December 2021. Retrieved 21 November 2014.
- ^ Kupferschmid, Indra (13 May 2012). "Multi-axes type families". kupferschrift. Archived from the original on 7 August 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2014.
- ^ "Trianon". Production Type. Archived from the original on 7 December 2021. Retrieved 2 July 2015.
- ^ "Roboto Flex – Variable Fonts". Archived from the original on 2023-05-13. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ "Helvetica Now Variable – Variable Fonts". Archived from the original on 2023-04-14. Retrieved 2023-04-14.
- ^ "Fonts for Mathematics" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2023-05-13. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ "typoma". 17 May 2018. Archived from the original on 2023-05-02. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ "mtpro2 - PCTeXWeb". Archived from the original on 2023-04-17. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ "The 68 individually designed fonts" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2023-05-13. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ Slimbach, Souser, Slye, Twardoch. "Arno Pro specimen" (PDF). Adobe. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 August 2014. Retrieved 3 July 2015.
- ^ "Helvetica Now Font". Archived from the original on 2023-05-13. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ "Hoefler Titling". Hoefler & Frere-Jones. Archived from the original on 2023-05-13. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ "Linotype Times Ten". MyFonts. Archived from the original on 2021-03-08. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ "Linotype Times Eighteen". MyFonts. Archived from the original on 2021-03-08. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ "Times New Roman Seven". Archived from the original on 2021-12-22. Retrieved 2023-05-13.
- ^ Butterick, Matthew. "Concourse specimen pdf". MBType. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 August 2021. Retrieved 7 August 2015.
- ^ Shaw, Paul. "Arial Addendum no. 3". Blue Pencil. Archived from the original on 9 December 2021. Retrieved 1 July 2015.
- ^ Shaw (& Nicholas). "Arial addendum no. 4". Blue Pencil. Archived from the original on 9 December 2021. Retrieved 1 July 2015.
- ^ McDonald, Rob. "Some history about Arial". Paul Shaw Letter Design. Archived from the original on 29 September 2021. Retrieved 22 May 2015.
- ^ Haley, Allan (May–June 2007). "Is Arial Dead Yet?". Step Inside Design. Archived from the original on July 19, 2011. Retrieved 2011-05-11.
- ^ "Type Designer Showcase: Robin Nicholas – Arial". Monotype Imaging. Archived from the original on 2011-07-14. Retrieved 2011-05-10.
- ^ "Liberation Fonts". Fedora. Archived from the original on 2017-02-15. Retrieved 2016-01-15.
- ^ Schwartz, Christian. "DB". Schwartzco. Archived from the original on 22 April 2021. Retrieved 16 July 2015.
- ^ "What's OpenType?". Hoefler & Frere-Jones. Archived from the original on 30 March 2019. Retrieved 7 August 2015.
- ^ Peters, Yves (24 October 2014). "Why a better OpenType UI matters". i love typography. Archived from the original on 14 August 2019. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
- ^ Benedek, Andy. "Calligraphic-style Fonts: Problems and Solutions" (PDF). The Edward Johnston Foundation Journal: 2–12. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 January 2021. Retrieved 21 September 2023.
- ^ "Specimen Book of Monotype Printing Types (photograph)". Flickr. 6 January 2011. Archived from the original on 28 August 2021. Retrieved 3 May 2015.
- ^ Berkson, William. "Williams Caslon Text features manual" (PDF). Font Bureau. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 7 August 2015.
- ^ Walker, Sue; Reynolds, Linda (1 January 2003). "Serifs, sans serifs and infant characters in children's reading books". Information Design Journal. 11 (3): 106–122. doi:10.1075/idj.11.2.04wal.
- ^ Coles, Stephen (20 March 2016). "Design Museum". Fonts In Use. Archived from the original on 14 August 2019. Retrieved 13 July 2016.
- ^ "Bembo Infant". MyFonts. Archived from the original on 27 October 2019. Retrieved 1 May 2016.
- ^ Dunlap, David (23 June 2016). "1952 | 'Eisenhower,' a True Campaign Logo". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 27 April 2021. Retrieved 20 August 2017.
- ^ Shinn, Nick. "Shinntype Modern Suite specification" (PDF). Shinntype. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 16 October 2015.
- ^ "Paciencias specification". Typographias. Archived from the original on 17 November 2019. Retrieved 16 October 2015.
- ^ "Neue Haas Grotesk". The Font Bureau, Inc. p. Introduction. Archived from the original on 2021-05-09. Retrieved 2015-10-16.
- ^ "Neue Haas Grotesk - Font News". Linotype.com. Archived from the original on 2015-09-05. Retrieved 2013-09-21.
- ^ "Schwartzco Inc". Christianschwartz.com. Archived from the original on 2021-04-20. Retrieved 2013-09-21.
- ^ Slimbach, Robert. "Acumin - usage". Typekit. Adobe Systems. Archived from the original on 15 January 2016. Retrieved 16 October 2015.
Notes
[edit]- ^ Simply digitally compressing the font produces ugly results, since it narrows the vertical strokes but not the horizontals.
- ^ In metal type, the point size of the font describes the height (not width) of the metal body on which the typeface's characters were cast. The typeface was the "Falcon" design by William Addison Dwiggins, ultimately never issued.
Further reading
[edit]- Blackwell, Lewis. 20th Century Type. Yale University Press: 2004. ISBN 0-300-10073-6.
- Fiedl, Frederich, Nicholas Ott and Bernard Stein. Typography: An Encyclopedic Survey of Type Design and Techniques Through History. Black Dog & Leventhal: 1998. ISBN 1-57912-023-7.
- Lupton, Ellen. Thinking with Type: A Critical Guide for Designers, Writers, Editors, & Students, Princeton Architectural Press: 2004. ISBN 1-56898-448-0.
- Headley, Gwyn. The Encyclopaedia of Fonts. Cassell Illustrated: 2005. ISBN 1-84403-206-X.
- Macmillan, Neil. An A–Z of Type Designers. Yale University Press: 2006. ISBN 0-300-11151-7.
Etymology and Terminology
Origins of the Term
The word "font" in typography derives from the Old French "fonte," denoting "a founding" or "casting," which traces back to the Latin verb "fundere," meaning "to pour" or "melt." This linguistic root directly alludes to the historical practice of type founding, in which molten metal—typically an alloy of lead, tin, and antimony—was poured into engraved matrices to produce the individual metal characters used in printing.[15] The term entered English in the late 16th century, with the Oxford English Dictionary recording its earliest use in 1578 to describe a complete assortment of printing type of a single size and style. A variant spelling, "fount," appeared alongside it, both emphasizing the cast nature of the type set. Printer Christopher Plantin employed the term (as "fonte" in French contexts) in his 1579 type specimen folio, labeling complete sets of characters for various faces, marking an early documented application in printing documentation.[16][17] By the 17th century, English-language printing literature refined the terminology. In his influential treatise Mechanick Exercises on the Whole Art of Printing (1683–1684), Joseph Moxon defined a font as the full collection of letters, figures, spaces, and other elements of one typeface design and size, distinguishing it from partial sets or individual sorts; this work provided one of the first systematic English explanations of printing practices, including type nomenclature.[18] The concept of a font persisted and adapted through technological shifts. In the 20th century, as mechanical composition gave way to phototypesetting in the 1950s and digital typography by the 1980s, the term expanded to encompass electronic character sets, retaining its connotation of a unified, reproducible collection while applying it to vector-based or rasterized designs in computing.[19]Modern Definitions and Distinctions
In contemporary typography, a font is defined as a specific variant of a typeface with attributes such as weight, style (e.g., italic or oblique), and width, for example, bold italic Times New Roman rendered at 12-point.[20] This precise instantiation allows for consistent rendering of text in design and printing applications. The term originates from historical metal type practices but has adapted to describe these digital specifics. A key distinction lies between a font and a typeface: a typeface represents the overarching design family or collection of related styles, such as Helvetica, encompassing multiple fonts like Helvetica Bold or Helvetica Italic.[20] This separation emphasizes the typeface as the artistic blueprint, while the font serves as its practical implementation tailored to project needs. In professional contexts, misusing these terms can lead to inconsistencies in design specifications. In computing, a font is formalized as a digital resource comprising glyph outlines, metrics, and other data for text rendering and interchange across systems, as outlined in the ISO/IEC 9541 standard.[21] This architecture supports scalable vector-based representations, enabling high-quality output independent of device resolution. The standard defines font resources to facilitate electronic document processing, including references in formats like RELAX NG. Industry and legal practices further differentiate full font files—complete digital assets distributed for software installation—from embedded outlines in documents. For instance, PDF files often include only font subsets, embedding solely the glyphs used to minimize file size while preserving editability, provided the font vendor permits such inclusion via embedding flags.[22] Outlining, by contrast, converts text to vector paths, eliminating font data entirely but rendering it non-searchable and non-editable; this method avoids licensing issues for distribution but sacrifices accessibility. These distinctions arose prominently in the post-1980s era of desktop publishing, when technologies like PostScript (introduced in the 1980s) and TrueType (introduced in 1991) enabled scalable digital fonts, shifting from fixed-size physical type to versatile, device-independent formats.[19][23]Historical Development
Metal Type Era
The Metal Type Era began with the invention of movable type printing by Johannes Gutenberg around 1450, revolutionizing the production of books and texts in Europe. Gutenberg, a German goldsmith, developed a system using an adjustable hand mold to cast individual metal letters from an alloy of lead, tin, and antimony, which expanded slightly upon cooling to ensure precise and durable reproductions. This alloy allowed for the mass production of type, enabling the printing of the Gutenberg Bible by 1456 and facilitating the widespread dissemination of knowledge during the Renaissance.[24] The production of fonts in this era involved a labor-intensive process of punch-cutting, matrix striking, and type casting. Punch-cutters engraved the mirror image of each letter, numeral, and punctuation mark onto the end of a hardened steel punch using fine tools. The punch was then struck into a softer copper blank to create a matrix, which served as the mold's female counterpart. Molten type metal was poured into a mold formed by the matrix and an adjustable body, producing a single piece of type that hardened almost instantly; this cycle repeated to build complete fonts. The term "font" originated from the French word fonte, referring to the casting of molten metal into these reusable pieces. Skilled artisans, often working in foundries, produced sets of type in specific sizes and styles, with each font requiring hundreds of individual sorts for efficient typesetting.[25][26][24] Key figures advanced the design and refinement of metal typefaces during the 18th century. William Caslon (1692–1766), an English type founder, created the first original English typeface in 1722, moving away from imported Dutch designs and establishing a national typographic style characterized by clarity and readability; his work was widely used in British printing and exported to the American colonies. Giambattista Bodoni (1740–1813), an Italian punchcutter and printer, developed modern styles in the late 18th century, featuring high contrast between thick and thin strokes, vertical stress, and crisp serifs, influencing European typography.[27][28] Standardization efforts addressed the inconsistencies in type sizing across foundries. In 1737, French type designer Pierre Simon Fournier introduced the point system, dividing the Paris inch (approximately 27.07 mm) into 72 points to create a uniform scale for measuring type bodies, with one cicero equaling 12 points. This was formalized in 1784 by François Ambroise Didot, who refined the system to define one point as exactly 0.376 mm (1/72 of the French pouce), enabling precise interoperability of type across printers and promoting consistency in book production.[29][29] Printers faced significant challenges with metal type, including physical wear from repeated inking and pressing, which deformed letters and required frequent replacement or recasting. Maintaining large inventories was also costly and space-intensive, as a single font in multiple sizes, styles, and quantities—often thousands of sorts per job—tied up substantial capital in metal stock, limiting scalability for complex publications.[30]Transition to Digital Typography
The transition to digital typography began in the mid-20th century with phototypesetting, which replaced hot-metal casting with photographic processes using film and light to produce reproducible fonts. Early systems in the 1950s, such as the Lumitype machine developed by René Higonnet and Louis Moyroud and commercialized by the Mergenthaler-Linotype Company, exposed characters onto film via backlit negative masters, enabling faster composition and greater flexibility compared to physical type.[31] By the 1960s, Linotype's Linofilm system advanced this technology, using electronic controls to project fonts onto photographic paper or film for high-speed typesetting.[32] In the 1970s, cathode ray tube (CRT)-based phototypesetters, like those sold under the Singer brand by Linotype, generated characters dynamically on a CRT screen and exposed them onto film, providing sharper images and support for multiple fonts and sizes without mechanical matrices.[33] The advent of personal computing in the 1970s introduced bitmap fonts, pixel-based representations suited to early raster displays. At Xerox PARC, the Alto computer (1973) pioneered high-quality bitmap typography with proportionally spaced fonts and an interactive editor, influencing subsequent systems through its bitmapped display and WYSIWYG editing capabilities.[34] This approach carried over to the Apple Macintosh, released in 1984, which featured a 72 dpi bitmap screen and custom bitmap fonts designed by Susan Kare, such as Chicago and Geneva, optimized for on-screen readability and proportional spacing.[35] These fixed-resolution bitmaps addressed the limitations of earlier text-only interfaces but were constrained by screen density, often resulting in jagged edges at different sizes. A pivotal advancement came with vector-based outlines, allowing scalable fonts independent of resolution. Adobe's PostScript page description language, introduced in 1982, enabled device-independent rendering of fonts using mathematical outlines, revolutionizing typography by supporting smooth scaling across outputs. PostScript Type 1 fonts defined glyph paths with cubic Bézier curves, which provided precise control over curves and lines for creating complex letterforms that remained sharp when rasterized at any size.[36] Key milestones accelerated the adoption of digital fonts. The Apple LaserWriter printer, launched in 1985, integrated PostScript to deliver professional-quality output at 300 dpi, storing scalable font families like Times and Helvetica internally for efficient, high-fidelity printing and sparking the desktop publishing revolution.[37] In 1991, the Unicode Consortium was incorporated to develop a universal character encoding standard, initially supporting 7,161 characters from major writing systems and enabling consistent global text representation across digital platforms.[38] This shift empowered designers by introducing accessible software tools for font creation. Fontographer, released by Altsys in 1986 (with version 2.0 in 1987), was the first program to allow vector-based font design using Bézier curves on personal computers, drastically reducing the barriers to custom typeface development and enabling independent creators to produce scalable digital fonts efficiently.[39]Classification and Types
Serif and Sans-serif Fonts
Serif fonts are characterized by small decorative strokes, known as serifs, attached to the ends of the main strokes of letters. These features originated in Roman inscriptional capitals from the 1st century AD, where chisel marks on stone carvings created subtle finishing lines that influenced later typographic designs.[40][41] A prominent example is Times New Roman, developed in 1932 specifically to enhance readability in printed newspapers like The Times of London.[42][43] In contrast, sans-serif fonts feature clean, unadorned strokes without these terminal decorations, emerging prominently in the 19th century amid modernist movements that favored simplicity and functionality. Akzidenz-Grotesk, released around 1896 by the Berthold Type Foundry, exemplifies this early sans-serif style and served as a key precursor to later designs like Helvetica, introduced in 1957 by Max Miedinger for the Haas Type Foundry.[44][45][46] Within serif classifications, subtypes include transitional serifs, which exhibit moderate contrast between thick and thin strokes with bracketed serifs, as seen in Baskerville from the 18th century; and slab serifs, featuring bold, rectangular extensions of uniform thickness, such as Rockwell developed in the early 20th century.[47][48][49] For sans-serifs, grotesque subtypes display uneven stroke widths and a mechanical feel, exemplified by Franklin Gothic from 1902; while humanist subtypes draw from classical proportions for warmer readability, like Gill Sans released in 1928.[50][51][52] Serif fonts are traditionally preferred for body text in printed books and long-form reading due to their perceived guidance of the eye along lines, whereas sans-serif fonts excel in headlines, signage, and digital screens for their clarity at smaller sizes and across varying resolutions.[10][53] The evolution of these classifications in the 20th century involved ongoing debates about legibility, with studies like Bror Zachrisson's 1965 experiment on schoolchildren showing no significant difference in word recognition between serif and sans-serif typefaces under tachistoscopic conditions.[54][55]Proportional vs Monospace Fonts
Proportional fonts, characterized by variable character widths that align with the natural shapes of letterforms—such as the narrower 'i' compared to the broader 'm'—have served as the primary choice for most printed reading materials since the mid-15th century, following Johannes Gutenberg's development of movable type printing.[19] This variability allows for more natural text flow, optimizing space usage and enhancing overall readability in books, newspapers, and documents.[56] In contrast, monospace fonts assign a uniform width to every character, a design necessitated by the mechanical constraints of early typewriters, including the IBM Electric Typewriter Model 01 introduced in 1935, which required consistent spacing for reliable operation.[57] The Courier typeface, created by Howard K. Kettler in 1955 specifically for IBM's electric typewriters, became a quintessential example of this fixed-width approach, mimicking the output of mechanical typing while ensuring precise alignment.[58] The core rationale for proportional fonts lies in their ability to promote aesthetic harmony and efficient space utilization in continuous prose, making them ideal for general-purpose typography in literature and publishing.[56] Monospace fonts, however, prioritize alignment and uniformity, proving invaluable for tabular data, financial documents, and early computing interfaces where vertical and horizontal consistency prevents misalignment.[59] With the widespread adoption of personal computers in the late 1970s and 1980s, monospace fonts gained renewed prominence in digital environments due to hardware limitations that favored fixed-width rendering for terminals and early displays.[60] Modern iterations, such as Consolas—designed by Lucas de Groot and released by Microsoft in 2007—build on this legacy by incorporating enhanced legibility features tailored for programming and code editing, while maintaining uniform widths for better character differentiation on screens.[61] From a metrics perspective, monospace fonts employ a fixed em-width for all glyphs, ensuring predictable layout in grid-based applications, whereas proportional fonts utilize variable widths with supplementary spacing adjustments to achieve balanced inter-character relationships.[62] These distinctions underscore their respective roles: proportional for fluid, space-saving text in design, and monospace for structured, alignment-dependent contexts like coding.[56]Core Design Attributes
Weight and Thickness
In typography, font weight refers to the degree of boldness or thickness of the strokes that form the glyphs in a typeface, allowing for variations within a font family to convey hierarchy, emphasis, or aesthetic tone. Weights typically range from the thinnest, such as hairline or thin (corresponding to a CSS value of 100), through regular or normal (CSS 400), to the thickest like bold (CSS 700) or black/heavy (CSS 900), with intermediate steps in increments of 100. This nine-step scale, standardized in web technologies, enables precise control over stroke thickness, though actual availability depends on the typeface's design. The design process for varying weights involves methodically adjusting the stroke width across all glyphs to maintain proportional harmony, often starting from a base outline and systematically thickening or thinning contours while preserving the typeface's character. In historical contexts, this was achieved through manual engraving for metal type; for instance, Paul Renner developed multiple weights for Futura upon its 1927 release by the Bauer Type Foundry, including light, medium, and bold variants derived from geometric forms to suit modernist printing needs.[63] Digitally, designers use vector-based software to scale outlines, applying uniform thickening to stems and curves while adjusting modulation—the variation in stroke thickness within individual letters—to avoid distortion.[64] Nomenclature for weights varies across type foundries, leading to inconsistencies; common terms include light (often 300), regular (400), and bold (700), but equivalents like "book" for regular or "extra bold" for 800 can differ, complicating cross-foundry matching. Adobe's Multiple Master font technology addresses this by defining weight as an interpolable axis between master designs—typically a light and a bold extreme—allowing software to generate intermediate weights algorithmically for seamless families.[65][66] In applications, lighter weights enhance elegance and airiness in large display sizes, such as headlines or logos, while bolder weights provide emphasis and visibility in body text or calls to action. Legibility research indicates that optimal weights differ by medium: lighter variants (e.g., 300–400) perform better on high-resolution print due to precise ink transfer, whereas screens benefit from slightly bolder weights (e.g., 500–700) to counteract pixelation and anti-aliasing effects, improving glance-based readability under suboptimal rendering.[67][68] These weights can be combined briefly with style variants, such as italics, to further modulate expressiveness without altering the core boldness. In modern digital fonts, weight variations are realized through OpenType variable font technology for interpolation along axes like weight or algorithmic outline scaling in tools like FontLab, ensuring consistent performance across devices.[69]Style Variations
Style variations in fonts encompass stylistic modifications beyond weight adjustments, primarily aimed at enhancing expressiveness while preserving legibility. These include alterations in slope, capitalization forms, and decorative flourishes that allow type designers to convey nuance, emphasis, or aesthetic flair in text composition.[70] Slope variations introduce angularity to letterforms, with italics and obliques being the most common. True italics feature redesigned, slanted glyphs that mimic cursive handwriting, often with unique curvatures and connections for a fluid appearance; this style originated in 1501 when Aldus Manutius commissioned punchcutter Francesco Griffo to create the first italic typeface for his compact editions of classical texts.[71] In contrast, obliques are generated by mechanically slanting upright roman letters without redesigning individual shapes, resulting in a simpler, less calligraphic effect typically applied to sans-serif fonts where custom italics may disrupt the geometric purity.[72] Historically, italics emerged in early printing to conserve space in pocket-sized books, enabling more text per page and reducing paper costs, a practical innovation by Manutius that contrasted with the bulkier roman types of the era.[73] Today, both italics and obliques serve for emphasis, though italics provide stronger visual distinction without relying on bolder weights, and they can combine with weights to form compound styles like bold italic.[74] Beyond slope, other stylistic attributes include small capitals and swashes, which offer subtle expressive options. Small capitals are uppercase letters scaled to approximately the height of lowercase letters, ensuring they integrate seamlessly with running text for applications like acronyms or emphasis without disrupting line flow.[75] Swashes introduce elaborate flourishes or extensions to certain glyphs, adding ornamental elegance particularly in script fonts; for instance, Zapfino, a calligraphic typeface released in 1998 by Hermann Zapf, incorporates swash capitals and ligatures in supplementary sets to evoke handwritten artistry.[76] Condensed and expanded variants adjust horizontal proportions for tighter or more open layouts, though these prioritize spatial adaptation over bold changes.[72] Designers must balance these variations with readability, as excessive slope or ornamentation can hinder legibility in extended reading. The italic companion to Claude Garamond's 16th-century roman types, cut around 1530–1545, exemplifies harmonious redesign with flowing cursives that complement the upright forms while maintaining clarity.[77] Synthetic obliques in sans-serifs, however, often rely on algorithmic slanting, which preserves the original's clean lines but may introduce minor distortions at extreme angles, necessitating careful testing for optical consistency.[78] Modern font standards facilitate these variations through OpenType features, enabling applications to access predefined stylistic sets via tags such as 'ss01' through 'ss20', which substitute default glyphs with alternate forms for customized rendering without multiple font files.[79]Sizing and Layout Features
Optical Sizing
Optical sizing involves tailoring the design of individual glyphs within a typeface family to account for how they will be viewed at different point sizes, ensuring optimal readability and aesthetic appeal. For small text sizes, such as 8 to 12 points, designers often increase the x-height relative to the cap height and simplify stroke contrasts to counteract the optical effects of reproduction and viewing distance. In contrast, for large display sizes above 24 points, finer details like subtle serifs, higher contrast, and more open counters are emphasized to prevent visual heaviness.[80][81][82] This practice originated in the metal type era, where each size required physically casting separate matrices due to the limitations of scaling uniform designs. Typefounders produced distinct variants for text composition versus headlines, adjusting proportions to maintain legibility under ink spread and paper impression; for instance, a broadsheet specimen by William Caslon from 1734 illustrates these size-specific adaptations in metal type, with bolder, condensed forms for smaller sizes and more elegant extensions for larger ones.[83][84] In the digital age, optical sizing evolved through technologies like multiple master fonts, which enable smooth interpolation between master designs optimized for specific ranges. Adobe Minion, first released in 1990 as a PostScript typeface inspired by Renaissance models, was updated in 1992 to incorporate multiple master functionality, including an optical size axis that allowed users to generate intermediate variants between text and display masters.[85][86] More recently, variable fonts have advanced this further, with the CSS font-optical-sizing property—introduced in the CSS Fonts Module Level 4 and gaining stable cross-browser support by 2022—enabling automatic activation of optical adjustments in web contexts when supported by the font file.[87] The primary benefits of optical sizing lie in improved legibility and visual harmony across usage scales, reducing the need for manual tweaks and enhancing performance in mixed-size layouts. Google's Roboto Flex, launched in 2022 as a variable adaptation of the Roboto family, exemplifies this by integrating a dedicated optical size axis alongside weight and width variations, allowing seamless adjustments that heighten text quality in hierarchical designs like app interfaces.[88] Optical variants are commonly named using descriptive terms that reflect intended use, such as "text" for body sizes around 9 to 12 points, "display" for headlines above 36 points, or more granular labels like "caption" for sub-8-point settings and "deck" for intermediate ranges. Some foundries employ numeric conventions, designating masters by target sizes like "8pt" for compact text or "72pt" for poster use, facilitating precise selection in design workflows.[82][89]Horizontal Metrics and Kerning
Horizontal metrics in typography define the spacing and positioning of glyphs along the horizontal axis to ensure even and readable text flow. The advance width represents the total horizontal space a glyph occupies, including the visible character and its surrounding margins, determining where the next glyph begins. Sidebearings, consisting of left and right margins, provide clearance around the glyph's bounding box—the rectangular outline enclosing the glyph's strokes—preventing overlaps and maintaining optical balance. These metrics are typically measured in font design units, scaled relative to the em unit, where 1 em equals the current font size, allowing consistent proportions across different sizes.[90][91][92] Kerning refines inter-character spacing by applying pair-specific adjustments to counteract uneven gaps that arise from glyph shapes, such as tightening the space between an 'A' and 'V' by 50–100 units to achieve visual harmony. These adjustments are stored in font files, often as tables containing hundreds of pairs; complex fonts may include over 500 such entries to cover common combinations. In OpenType fonts, the 'kern' table organizes these values in subtables that support horizontal and vertical adjustments, enabling precise control during rendering.[93][94][95] Historically, kerning in the metal type era involved manual modifications, such as filing or mortising the edges of type blocks to allow overlapping letters and reduce excess space, a labor-intensive process applied selectively to display type for improved readability. In digital typography, automation has streamlined this through algorithms, including Adobe InDesign's metric kerning, which applies built-in font pair data, and optical kerning, which dynamically analyzes glyph outlines for adjustments. These standards ensure kerning integrates seamlessly with text justification, where uneven spacing can otherwise disrupt rhythm; for instance, poor kerning in pairs like 'To' in certain sans-serif fonts creates distracting gaps, reducing legibility and aesthetic appeal.[96][97][98][99][100][101]Character-Specific Elements
Serifs and Terminals
Serifs are small decorative strokes or lines attached to the ends of the main strokes of characters in certain typefaces, serving as structural elements that influence the overall appearance and readability of text.[102] They are classified into several types based on their shape and transition to the stem: bracketed serifs feature a curved, gradual connection to the letter's main stroke, as seen in old-style fonts like Garamond, designed by Claude Garamond in the 16th century; unbracketed serifs provide an abrupt, straight termination, characteristic of modern didone fonts such as Bodoni, created by Giambattista Bodoni in the late 18th century; and slab serifs consist of thick, block-like extensions, exemplified by Clarendon, developed by Robert Besley in 1845.[51][103][104] The historical origins of serifs trace back to ancient Roman stone inscriptions, where chisel imperfections and brush strokes used to guide carving created incidental flared ends on letters, evolving into intentional decorative features during the Renaissance with the advent of printing.[105][106] In particular, Nicolas Jenson's roman typeface, cut around 1470 in Venice, refined these elements into balanced, bracketed serifs inspired by classical forms, establishing a model for subsequent European type design.[107] Functionally, serifs enhance readability by defining word boundaries and guiding the eye along lines of text, particularly in low-resolution print environments where they help distinguish character shapes and reduce visual ambiguity.[55] A study by E.C. Poulton in 1972 demonstrated that serifs contributed to better legibility in small type sizes, supporting faster recognition and reduced fatigue in printed materials.[55] Terminals, in contrast, refer to the endings of strokes in sans-serif fonts that lack traditional serifs, often designed as ball terminals with rounded, bulbous finishes or flat terminations to maintain visual rhythm.[102] These elements play a key role in eye flow by creating subtle horizontal emphasis and preventing abrupt stops, thereby improving the perceived smoothness of text progression in digital and print applications.[108] Design variations in serifs and terminals range from subtle, organic forms in humanist fonts like Sabon, designed by Jan Tschichold in 1967 to evoke calligraphic warmth, to more dramatic, exaggerated versions in display fonts where bold serifs or flared terminals add expressive flair for headlines.Glyph Variants and Alternates
Glyphs represent the individual visual forms of characters within a font, allowing for multiple variants to adapt to contextual, stylistic, or linguistic needs. These variants enable precise rendering, such as positional forms in cursive scripts like Arabic, where letters change shape depending on their position—initial, medial, final, or isolated—to maintain connectivity and readability. For instance, the Arabic letter "ba" (ب) adopts distinct glyphs for each position to facilitate fluid cursive flow.[109][110] Alternates extend this flexibility through specialized glyph substitutions, including ligatures, which join two or more characters into a single form for improved aesthetics or legibility, such as the "fi" ligature where the dot of the "i" overlaps the curve of the "f" to avoid collision. Originating in ancient Roman inscriptions and medieval scribal practices to save space and speed writing, ligatures evolved through early medieval scripts.[111][112][113] Swash alternates introduce decorative flourishes, often for emphasis, while stylistic sets offer broader thematic variations, such as alternate capital forms or calligraphic flourishes.[111][112][113] OpenType standards govern these features through layout tables, enabling applications to select alternates dynamically. The 'liga' tag activates standard ligatures like "ff" or "ffi" for common Latin text, while 'dlig' handles discretionary ones for ornamental use, and 'rlig' enforces required ligatures in scripts like Turkish, where certain combinations must join for orthographic accuracy, such as avoiding unintended word breaks. The 'salt' feature provides stylistic alternates, and 'calt' (contextual alternates) applies substitutions based on surrounding glyphs, such as selecting an uppercase ß (ẞ) in German all-caps settings to preserve the sharp s sound without doubling to "SS." The 'ssXX' tags define numbered stylistic sets for user-selectable variations.[114][115][116] Historically, these practices revived in digital typography with fonts like Adobe Garamond Pro, released in 2000, which includes over 500 glyphs supporting extensive alternates, ligatures, and old-style figures drawn from 16th-century sources for authentic revival. In applications, contextual alternates ensure linguistic fidelity, as in Arabic positional shifts or German ß variants, while accessibility benefits from dyslexia-friendly forms, such as weighted-bottom glyphs in fonts like OpenDyslexic to reduce letter mirroring and improve tracking for readers with dyslexia.[103][117][118]Contemporary Applications
Digital Font Formats
Digital font formats represent the technical standards governing how typeface data is stored, rendered, and scaled in computing environments, evolving from fixed-resolution representations to scalable vector-based systems that support complex typographic features. Early digital fonts relied on bitmap formats, which defined glyphs as pixel grids suitable for specific display resolutions but lacking flexibility for resizing without quality loss. These gave way to outline formats in the 1980s and 1990s, which used mathematical curves to enable scalable rendering across devices, followed by unified open standards that incorporated advanced layout capabilities and web-optimized compression. Bitmap formats, such as the Portable Compiled Format (PCF) developed for the X Window System in the 1980s, store glyphs as raster images in a binary structure comprising a header and tables for metrics, bitmaps, and properties. PCF fonts are optimized for fixed-resolution displays like early Unix workstations, offering efficient loading but limited scalability, as enlargement results in pixelation and reduction in aliasing artifacts.[119] This format's rigid grid-based approach made it ideal for low-resource systems but inadequate for high-resolution or variable-size applications. Outline formats marked a significant advancement by representing glyphs through vector paths, allowing infinite scalability. Adobe's PostScript Type 1 format, introduced in 1984, employs cubic Bézier curves to define smooth outlines, with font programs written in a subset of the PostScript language for hinting instructions that optimize rendering on raster devices.[120][121] In response, Apple and Microsoft jointly developed TrueType in 1991, utilizing quadratic Bézier curves for simpler computation and including a bytecode instruction set for precise on-screen display, particularly at small sizes.[23] These formats supported professional printing and screen display but required separate files for outlines and metrics, complicating cross-platform use. Open formats emerged to address compatibility issues, with Microsoft and Adobe releasing the OpenType specification in 1997 as a superset of TrueType that also accommodates PostScript-based Compact Font Format (CFF) outlines. OpenType enables cross-platform consistency by storing all data in a single file, supporting an extended character set via Unicode mapping and advanced typographic features like ligatures and contextual alternates.[122] For web applications, the Web Open Font Format (WOFF 1.0), standardized by the W3C in 2010, compresses OpenType or TrueType fonts using zlib compression, reducing file sizes by around 40% compared to uncompressed formats while preserving metadata and licensing information for efficient browser delivery.[123] WOFF 2.0, recommended by the W3C in 2014, uses the Brotli algorithm for further compression, achieving up to 30% smaller files than WOFF 1.0.[9] At the core of these formats, particularly OpenType, is a modular table-based structure within SFNT (Scalable Font) containers, where essential tables include 'glyf' for TrueType glyph outlines, 'CFF ' for PostScript outlines, 'hmtx' for horizontal metrics like advance widths, 'kern' for pairwise kerning adjustments, and 'GSUB'/'GPOS' for glyph substitution and positioning to handle variants such as swashes or optical alignment.[124] These tables allow fonts to encode not just shapes but also layout rules, facilitating complex scripts like Arabic or Devanagari. A key evolution in digital font technology arrived with variable fonts in 2016, jointly specified by Adobe, Apple, Google, and Microsoft as an extension to OpenType 1.8. Variable fonts use interpolation along design axes—such as weight (ranging from 100 to 900), width, or slant—within a single file, enabling continuous variation instead of discrete styles and significantly reducing the number of files required for web and app use in multi-weight families.[125] This approach, supported by tables like 'fvar' for axis definitions and 'gvar' for glyph variations, enhances performance and creative flexibility while maintaining backward compatibility with static fonts.[126] The OpenType specification continues to evolve, with version 1.9 released in December 2021 and further updates in May 2024 adding support for advanced features such as improved color font handling.[127]Licensing and Usage Rights
Fonts are governed by various licensing models that dictate their creation, distribution, and use, ranging from open-source options to proprietary agreements. The SIL Open Font License (OFL), introduced in 2005, is a prominent free license tailored for fonts, allowing users to freely use, modify, and redistribute them, as exemplified by many fonts in the Google Fonts library.[128] In contrast, proprietary licenses, such as those offered through Adobe Fonts subscriptions, restrict usage to subscribers and often limit modifications or redistribution for commercial purposes.[129] Custom End-User License Agreements (EULAs), also known as Font License Agreements, provide tailored permissions, specifying allowable uses like desktop installation or web embedding while prohibiting others, such as resale or conversion to different formats.[130] Intellectual property protections for fonts primarily cover the software code rather than the artistic design of the typeface itself. In the United States, font software qualifies for copyright protection under the 1976 Copyright Act as a computer program, enabling foundries to enforce rights against unauthorized copying.[131] Typeface names, such as "Helvetica," can be registered as trademarks, preventing their use in ways that confuse consumers about the source of the font.[132] Historically, pre-digital eras allowed relatively free sharing of physical type specimens among designers and printers, with minimal enforcement due to the tangible nature of production. The shift to digital fonts in the post-1980s period introduced stricter licensing and enforcement, as software-based fonts became easily copyable, leading to increased litigation; for instance, the 1992 U.S. Copyright Office clarification on font software protection spurred a "golden era" of enforcement by foundries.[133] Bitstream, a key player in early digital font development, was involved in disputes during the 1990s and 2000s that highlighted growing concerns over unauthorized digitization and distribution.[134][135] With the advent of PDF format in the 1990s, licenses began explicitly addressing embedding permissions to control how fonts could be included in documents without violating rights.[136] Key organizations play central roles in font licensing ecosystems. Monotype, a leading type foundry, manages extensive proprietary font libraries and provides licensing services for commercial applications across industries.[137] FontLab, primarily known for its font editing software, supports open licensing models like the OFL for its tools, facilitating font development under permissive terms.[138] Adaptations of Creative Commons licenses for fonts remain rare, largely due to technical protections in font files that complicate derivative works and enforce restrictions beyond standard CC terms.[139] In the modern digital landscape, font piracy persists through tools that extract embedded fonts from PDFs or websites, undermining licensing revenue for creators.[140] For web fonts deployed via the @font-face CSS rule, compliance with Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) policies is essential to prevent unauthorized access from external domains, ensuring licensed fonts load securely without exposing them to extraction.[141] Digital formats like OpenType enable such embedding, but only under license-specified conditions to maintain control over usage.[142]References
- https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/frequently_asked_questions