Hubbry Logo
RagweedRagweedMain
Open search
Ragweed
Community hub
Ragweed
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ragweed
Ragweed
Ragweed
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Ragweed
Ambrosia psilostachya
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Clade: Eudicots
Clade: Asterids
Order: Asterales
Family: Asteraceae
Subfamily: Asteroideae
Tribe: Heliantheae
Subtribe: Ambrosiinae
Genus: Ambrosia
L.
Synonyms[1]
  • Acanthambrosia Rydb.
  • Franseria Cav.
  • Hymenoclea Torr. & A.Gray ex Torr. & A.Gray
  • Xanthidium Delpino
  • Gaertneria Medik.
  • Hemiambrosia Delpino
  • Hemixanthidium Delpino

Ragweeds are flowering plants in the genus Ambrosia in the aster family, Asteraceae. They are distributed in the tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas, especially North America,[2] where the origin and center of diversity of the genus are in the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico.[3] Several species have been introduced to the Old World and some have naturalized and have become invasive species.[2] In Europe, this spread is expected to continue, due to ongoing climate change.[4]

The name "ragweed" is derived from "ragged" + "weed," coming from the ragged appearance of the plant's leaves.[5] Other common names include bursages[6] and burrobrushes.[7] The genus name is from the Greek ambrosia, meaning "food or drink of immortality".[2]

Ragweed pollen is notorious for causing allergic reactions in humans, specifically allergic rhinitis. Up to half of all cases of pollen-related allergic rhinitis in North America are caused by ragweeds.[8]

The most widespread species of the genus in North America is Ambrosia artemisiifolia.

Description and ecology

[edit]

Ragweeds are annual and perennial herbs and shrubs. Species may grow just a few centimeters tall or exceed four meters in height. The stems are erect, decumbent or prostrate, and many grow from rhizomes. The leaves may be arranged alternately, oppositely, or both. The leaf blades come in many shapes, sometimes divided pinnately or palmately into lobes. The edges are smooth or toothed. Some are hairy, and most are glandular.[2]

Ragweeds are monoecious, most producing inflorescences that contain both staminate and pistillate flowers. Inflorescences are often in the form of a spike or raceme made up mostly of staminate flowers with some pistillate clusters around the base. Staminate flower heads have stamens surrounded by whitish or purplish florets. Pistillate flower heads have fruit-yielding ovules surrounded by many phyllaries and fewer, smaller florets.[2] The pistillate flowers are wind pollinated,[9][10] and the fruits develop. They are burs, sometimes adorned with knobs, wings, or spines.[2]

Many Ambrosia species occur in desert and semi-desert areas, and many are ruderal species that grow in disturbed habitat types.[3]

Allergy

[edit]
Ambrosia artemisiifolia pollen

Ragweed pollen is a common allergen. A single plant may produce about a billion grains of pollen per season,[11][12] and the pollen is transported on the wind. It causes about half of all cases of pollen-associated allergic rhinitis in North America, where ragweeds are most abundant and diverse.[8] Common culprits are common ragweed (A. artemisiifolia) and great ragweed (A. trifida).[13]

Concentration of ragweed pollen—in the absence of significant rainfall, which removes pollen from the air- is the lowest in the early morning hours (6:00 AM), when emissions starts. Pollen concentration peaks at midday.[14] Ragweed pollen can remain airborne for days and travel great distances, and can even be carried 300–400 miles (500–600 km) out to sea.[12] Ragweeds native to the Americas have been introduced to Europe starting in the nineteenth century and especially during World War I, and have spread rapidly since the 1950s.[15] Eastern Europe, particularly Hungary, has been badly affected by ragweed since the early 1990s, when the dismantling of Communist collective agriculture led to large-scale abandonment of agricultural land, and new building projects also resulted in disturbed, un-landscaped areas.[16]

The major allergenic compound in the pollen has been identified as Amb a 1, a 38 kDa nonglycosylated protein composed of two subunits. It also contains other allergenic components, such as profilin and calcium-binding proteins.[17]

Ragweed allergy sufferers may show signs of oral allergy syndrome, a food allergy classified by a cluster of allergic reactions in the mouth in response to the consumption of certain fruits, vegetables, and nuts.[18] Foods commonly involved include beans, celery, cumin, hazelnuts, kiwifruit, parsley, potatoes, bananas, melons, cucumbers, and zucchini. Because cooking usually denatures the proteins that cause the reaction, the foods are more allergenic when eaten raw; exceptions are celery and nuts, which may not be safe even when cooked. Signs of reaction can include itching, burning, and swelling of the mouth and throat, runny eyes and nose, hives, and, less commonly, vomiting, diarrhea, asthma, and anaphylaxis. These symptoms are due to the abnormal increase of IgE antibodies which attach to a type of immune cell called mast cells. When the ragweed antigen then attaches to these antibodies the mast cells release histamine and other symptom-evoking chemicals.[19]

Merck & Co, under license from allergy immunotherapy (AIT) company ALK, has launched a ragweed allergy immunotherapy treatment in sublingual tablet form in the US and Canada.[citation needed]

As of 2006, research into allergy immunotherapy treatment involved administering doses of the allergen to accustom the body to induce specific long-term tolerance.[20]

Control and eradication

[edit]

Where herbicides cannot be used, mowing may be repeated about every three weeks, as it grows back rapidly. In the past, ragweed was usually cut down, left to dry, and then burned.[21] This method is used less often now, because of the pollution caused by smoke. Manually uprooting ragweed is generally ineffective, and skin contact can cause allergic reaction. If uprooting is the method of choice, it should be performed before flowering. There is evidence that mechanical and chemical control methods are actually no more effective in the long run than leaving the weed in place.[21]

Fungal rusts and the leaf-eating beetle Ophraella communa have been proposed as agents of biological pest control of ragweeds, but the latter may also attack sunflowers, and applications for permits and funding to test these controls have been unsuccessful.[22] The beetle has, however, appeared in Europe, either on its own or as an uncontrolled introduction, and it has started making a dent into Ambrosia populations there.[23][24][25][26]

Species

[edit]
Ambrosia dumosa
Ambrosia chamissonis
Ambrosia ambrosioides
Botanical illustration of Ambrosia trifida

There are about 50 species in genus Ambrosia. Species include:[27]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ragweed

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Ragweed encompasses the genus within the family, comprising approximately 40 to 43 species of and perennial herbaceous , most native to . These species typically feature deeply lobed or dissected leaves, inconspicuous greenish flowers arranged in racemes or panicles, and fruits with spiny or hooked projections that aid in dispersal. Dioecious or monoecious, they rely on wind , producing lightweight grains in enormous quantities—up to one billion per plant annually for common ragweed ()—which disperses widely and persists in the air. Notable for their role in human health impacts, ragweeds are primary culprits in seasonal , or hay fever, affecting over 23 million people in the United States alone, with symptoms including sneezing, , itchy eyes, and exacerbated . Pollen release peaks from late summer through autumn, coinciding with the plant's reproductive cycle in temperate regions. Common ragweed (A. artemisiifolia) and giant ragweed (A. trifida), which can reach heights of 3 to 16 feet, dominate as allergens and agricultural pests, competing with crops like soybeans and corn while reducing quality in pastures. Introduced to and , ragweed has become invasive in over 30 countries, forming dense stands that diminish , impair crop yields, and impose substantial economic burdens—estimated at €1.8 billion annually in the from health and agricultural losses. Its success as an invader stems from prolific seed production, long seedbank viability, and to disturbed habitats, though biological controls like stem-boring moths are under exploration to mitigate spread without broad chemical reliance. Climate shifts may further expand its range, intensifying pollen seasons and allergenicity.

Taxonomy and Species

Genus Overview

Ambrosia is a of perennial and annual herbaceous plants in the family, encompassing approximately 46 accepted species, the majority of which are native to with a center of diversity in the region. The genus belongs to the tribe Ambrosiieae and is characterized by wind-pollinated, monoecious inflorescences, distinguishing it from related genera like , its closest phylogenetic relative based on molecular analyses of herbarium and seed bank specimens. Phylogenetic studies utilizing DNA sequences have clarified intra-generic relationships, revealing clades that align with morphological traits such as bur-like fruits and adaptation to arid environments, while underscoring the genus's evolutionary radiation across diverse habitats from deserts to prairies. The etymology of traces to the Greek ambrosia, denoting the mythical food or drink conferring to the gods, though the precise botanical allusion remains obscure and may reflect early perceptions of the plants' resilience or aromatic qualities. Common names such as "ragweed" derive from the deeply lobed, ragged appearance of the leaves in many species, a feature consistent across the but varying in dissection depth. Genetic diversity within Ambrosia varies by species but often supports ecological opportunism, with invasive taxa exhibiting elevated variability in introduced ranges due to multiple founding sources and admixture, facilitating without substantial native-range bottlenecks. This genomic foundation, evidenced in studies of markers transferable across Ambrosia species, underscores the genus's propensity for range expansion beyond its primarily North American origins.

Key Species Profiles

, known as common ragweed, is an annual herbaceous species native to temperate regions of , including the and . Plants typically grow 0.3 to 2 meters tall, with branched stems and deeply lobed leaves, producing around 3,000 seeds per mature individual under optimal conditions. This species has invaded parts of and , where its wind-dispersed, highly allergenic serves as a primary cause of hay fever and related respiratory issues. Ambrosia trifida, or giant ragweed, is an also native to , often reaching heights of 1 to 5 meters with robust, three-lobed leaves. It generates 500 to 5,000 per plant, exhibiting high competitiveness in agricultural settings within its native range, where it reduces crop yields through shading and resource competition. While invasive tendencies occur in disturbed habitats, its spread outside remains limited compared to A. artemisiifolia; its contributes to allergenicity but to a lesser extent than common ragweed. Ambrosia psilostachya, referred to as perennial or western ragweed, is a rhizomatous perennial native to , spreading vegetatively via alongside . Stems grow erect to about 1 meter, forming colonies in disturbed soils; seed production is variable and secondary to clonal propagation. It has established invasive populations in , , , and , persisting in roadside and wasteland areas. Its is allergenic, particularly in central U.S. regions where it ranks as a principal aeroallergen source, though less airborne than that of annual congeners.
SpeciesMaximum HeightLife FormEstimated Seeds per PlantNative RangeNotable Invasiveness and Allergenicity Traits
A. artemisiifolia2 mAnnual~3,000Widespread invasions in /; primary ic source
A. trifida5 mAnnual500–5,000Crop-competitive in native habitats; secondary
A. psilostachya1 mVariable (secondary)Rhizomatous persistence; invasive in multiple continents, regional

Botanical Description and Biology

Morphological Features

Ragweeds in the Ambrosia are herbaceous , predominantly annuals with some , distinguished by erect, branched stems that are pubescent and frequently exhibit reddish hues. Stem heights vary by , typically ranging from 0.5 to 3 meters or more; common ragweed (A. artemisiifolia) attains 0.5–2 meters, while giant ragweed (A. trifida) can reach up to 5 meters. Leaves emerge oppositely at the lower stem and alternately above, often pinnatifid or lobed with a textured, hairy surface. In A. artemisiifolia, blades are ovate to lanceolate, 3–12 cm long, twice-pinnately divided into fine, linear segments resembling fronds, and bear short, white hairs imparting a grayish cast. A. trifida features larger, coarsely toothed leaves divided into three to five palmate lobes, with rough pubescence. Inflorescences form terminal racemes or of inconspicuous greenish-yellow florets, monoecious with staminate flowers predominant in upper portions and pistillate in lower axils or basal clusters. These wind-pollinated structures yield abundant lightweight , with one mature plant producing up to 1 billion grains. Fruits consist of small (2–4 mm), ovoid achenes enclosed in persistent, spiny or tuberculate involucres that facilitate adhesion to vectors. Seeds are enclosed within these durable structures, exhibiting morphological adaptations for persistence.

Reproduction and Life Cycle

Ragweed species in the genus Ambrosia exhibit diverse reproductive strategies, with annual taxa such as A. artemisiifolia and A. trifida completing their life cycle within a single , typically 115–183 days, while some species like A. psilostachya persist via rhizomes or overwintering structures alongside production. Annuals germinate primarily in spring when temperatures rise above 10–15°C, often triggered by disturbance that exposes buried to light and reduces competition, favoring rapid establishment in open, nutrient-enriched, and sunny microsites where high availability supports vegetative growth rates up to 5–10 cm per day under optimal conditions. This disturbance-dependent germination, combined with the plant's opportunistic exploitation of nitrogen-rich soils from or fertilization, underlies boom-bust , as cohorts emerge en masse following events like or , leading to dense stands that senesce after set. Reproduction is monoecious and anemophilous, with male (staminate) inflorescences producing vast quantities of lightweight from mid-summer through autumn, peaking in –September in temperate regions, while pistillate flowers develop lower on the and mature into bur-like fruits containing single seeds. remains viable for hours to days post-dispersal, facilitating long-distance transport and high fertilization success in sparse , with a single capable of releasing up to 1 billion grains over its flowering period. Seed production is highly fecund, with mature A. artemisiifolia individuals yielding 3,000–60,000 seeds under favorable conditions, a trait causally linked to persistence through overcompensation for high mortality rates exceeding 90% in competitive environments. Fresh seeds enter primary , requiring 4–12 weeks of moist stratification at 0–5°C to break, enabling staggered and longevity of 5–40 years with viability rates of 30–90% after a of , which sustains recolonization potential despite annual die-off. Self-incompatibility mechanisms in species like A. artemisiifolia enforce by rejecting self- via sporophytic recognition systems, promoting essential for adapting to variable habitats and resisting localized stressors such as pathogens or selection. This gametophytic barrier, while reducing selfing rates below 10% in open-pollinated arrays, does not preclude occasional self-fertilization under pollen limitation, balancing diversity with reproductive assurance in colonizing fronts. Perennial species supplement with vegetative , but seed-mediated dispersal remains the primary vector for range expansion, with high ensuring that even low establishment probabilities—often <1% from dispersed propagules—yield net population growth via sheer numerical output.

Native Ecology and Global Distribution

Role in Native Ecosystems

Ragweed species (Ambrosia spp.), native to North American prairies, floodplains, riparian zones, and other disturbance-prone habitats, primarily serve as pioneer plants in early successional stages following natural disruptions such as wildfires, flooding, or large . Their rapid from shallow depths and efficient resource acquisition under variable light and moisture conditions enable quick colonization of bare or eroded ground, where root systems bind particles to mitigate and facilitate habitat recovery. Seeds of ragweed provide a high-volume, nutrient-rich source for wildlife, including upland game birds (e.g., , pheasants) and small mammals (e.g., mice, voles), comprising a dietary staple during late summer and persisting into winter as elevated accessible above . For instance, (giant ragweed) supports autumn bird foraging at natural sites, with observations confirming and seed consumption by species like sparrows and finches. In nutrient dynamics, ragweed's fast accumulation captures leached nutrients, reducing losses during disturbance recovery and promoting cycling through rapid litter decomposition, which enriches microbial activity and supports subsequent establishment in successional sequences. While primarily wind-pollinated with limited direct support, the structural complexity of ragweed patches offers incidental for ground-nesting insects and small vertebrates, bolstering transient in dynamic ecosystems.

Historical Introduction and Invasiveness

Ragweed species of the genus Ambrosia, primarily A. artemisiifolia (common ragweed) and A. trifida (giant ragweed), are native to temperate regions of , where they evolved in disturbed habitats such as floodplains and prairies. Their introduction to occurred in the mid-19th century through contaminated agricultural imports, including red clover and cereal seeds from ; the earliest verified record is from in 1863, with subsequent detections in botanical gardens and fields by the 1870s. Spread accelerated during via contaminated horse fodder shipped to European ports, facilitating establishment in disturbed soils along transport routes and military sites. In , the first records date to 1918 near ports, likely from similar fodder and grain trade vectors. By the mid-20th century, ragweed had dispersed eastward into through international ; in , it appeared on the southeast coast in the 1930s, with early specimens collected in , Province, via imports from the and other exporters. saw introductions around the same period, often linked to contaminated shipments from or indirect vectors from and . Today, invasion hotspots concentrate in , including the (, , ), parts of and , the Valley in , and , where suitable climates and anthropogenic disturbances promote dense stands exceeding 100 plants per square meter in unmanaged areas. Ragweed's invasiveness stems from traits adapted for rapid of disturbed environments: prolific seed production, with a single yielding up to 5,000 viable seeds that persist in seedbanks for over 40 years, enabling long-distance dispersal via wind, water, and human activity. Allelopathic compounds in residues and exudates inhibit germination and growth of competing native and crops, such as and soybeans, by up to 50% in lab assays, suppressing in invaded fields. Additionally, tolerance to nutrient-poor, compacted, and saline-disturbed s—common in roadsides and post-agricultural lands—allows outcompetition of less resilient natives, particularly in warmer, drier conditions projected to expand under shifts. These attributes, combined with minimal dependence on specialized pollinators for reproduction, underpin its success as a ruderal in non-native ranges.

Allergenic Properties

Pollen Characteristics and Allergy Mechanisms

Ragweed grains are anemophilous, measuring approximately 15-25 μm in , with a spherical to shape and a distinctive echinate exine surface featuring short spines that enhance aerodynamic and facilitate dispersal. These spines contribute to the pollen's low settling velocity, allowing individual grains to remain airborne for extended periods and travel distances exceeding 400 km under favorable conditions. The primary allergenic component is Amb a 1, a pectate lyase protein comprising multiple isoforms, which elicits IgE-mediated reactions in sensitized individuals by binding to high-affinity IgE receptors on mast cells and , triggering and release of and other mediators. Amb a 1 accounts for over 90% of IgE reactivity in ragweed-allergic patients, with its proteolytic processing in endolysosomes influencing allergenicity and T-cell responses. release peaks from to October in temperate regions, aligning with the plant's flowering period and maximizing exposure during late summer and early autumn. Cross-reactivity occurs with other family members, such as () and sunflower, due to shared and other pan-allergens, potentially broadening sensitization profiles in polysensitive patients. This molecular homology underscores the immunological overlap but varies by individual IgE recognition.

Health Impacts and Epidemiology

Ragweed primarily induces , characterized by symptoms such as sneezing, , runny nose, and itchy or watery eyes, alongside potential exacerbation of through coughing, wheezing, and throat irritation. These reactions occur due to individual , with symptom severity varying based on exposure levels, prior sensitization, and personal factors like , rather than uniform population-wide effects. In sensitized individuals, high pollen exposure can trigger acute episodes, but not all exposed persons develop symptoms, highlighting variability in immune responses. Epidemiologically, ragweed sensitization affects approximately 10-50% of atopic populations in endemic areas, with clinical symptoms reported in up to 23% of during peak season, impacting nearly 50 million people annually in the United States alone. In , current sensitization stands at around 33 million individuals, concentrated in invaded regions like where rates exceed 50% in high-infestation zones such as parts of . Projections under medium emissions scenarios indicate this could double to 77 million sensitized by the 2050s, driven by range expansion into urban and temperate areas, though actual symptomatic cases depend on local pollen thresholds and co-factors like . High ragweed concentrations correlate with elevated respiratory mortality risks, particularly among the elderly, as evidenced by a study (2006-2017) showing increased of death from chronic and infectious respiratory causes at peak exposure levels. This association persists after adjusting for confounders like temperature and pollution, with ragweed implicated alongside tree and grass pollens in short-term spikes contributing to breathing-related fatalities in older adults. Such links underscore 's role as an exacerbating factor in vulnerable subgroups, though causation remains probabilistic and modulated by comorbidities like preexisting or .

Agricultural and Economic Effects

Competition with Crops and Biodiversity Loss

Ambrosia artemisiifolia, commonly known as ragweed, exerts competitive pressure on primarily through rapid resource acquisition and allelopathic inhibition. In agroecosystems, a single ragweed per square meter can reduce yields by 42-54%, equivalent to losses of 0.235 tons per , due to preemption of light, water, and nutrients. yields suffer similarly, with infestations causing up to 84% reduction relative to weed-free controls, as ragweed's fast growth synchronizes with crop emergence and outcompetes for essential resources. Sunflower crops experience comparable suppression, with yield declines reaching 30% under ragweed , exacerbated by the weed's ability to tolerate disturbances common in tillage-based farming. Allelopathic compounds released by ragweed further amplify these effects, inhibiting seed germination and root development in susceptible crops. Phenolic and substances from ragweed residues alter chemistry, reducing biomass accumulation in soybeans and sunflowers by disrupting microbial symbioses, such as those with Bradyrhizobium japonicum essential for . Extracts from ragweed shoots and roots, when incorporated into , decrease crop production and overall vigor, providing a chemical barrier that complements physical resource competition. In disturbed habitats integral to agroecosystems, ragweed dominance leads to erosion by monopolizing resources and shading out co-occurring species. Its prolific seed production and shade intolerance favor establishment in open, tilled fields, where it displaces native and less competitive through superior light interception and nutrient uptake. This resource preemption reduces floral diversity in field margins and fallows, with empirical observations in invaded European agro-landscapes showing decreased abundance of native forbs and grasses under ragweed canopies. While impacts in undisturbed natural ecosystems appear muted, the weed's proliferation in anthropogenically altered sites underscores its role in homogenizing plant communities via competitive exclusion.

Quantified Economic Costs

In , common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) induces allergies in an estimated 13.5 million individuals annually, generating direct and indirect costs of €7.4 billion, including medical treatments, lost productivity, and . Reduced agricultural production from ragweed competition with crops, such as decreased yields in and sunflower fields, resulted in EU-wide losses of €1.846 billion in 2011, with ongoing annual impacts in similar ranges due to persistent infestation. Control efforts, encompassing mechanical, chemical, and labor-intensive removal, add approximately €4.5 billion yearly across the continent, reflecting expenditures by farmers and public agencies to mitigate spread. These costs vary regionally, with Eastern and Central Europe bearing disproportionately higher burdens owing to denser ragweed populations; for instance, allergy-related expenses in heavily infested areas like and the exceed those in by factors linked to pollen exposure intensity and lower mitigation resources. In the agricultural sector, ragweed seed contamination in exported grains, such as soybeans, imposes additional trade barriers and cleaning costs, as seen in requirements for zero-tolerance inspections to markets like , potentially delaying shipments and increasing handling expenses by millions per export cycle. In the United States, quantified ragweed-specific economic data focuses more on agricultural yield reductions than allergies, with isolated infestations causing up to 13% corn yield losses from just two plants per 110 square feet and comparable impacts, translating to localized farm revenue shortfalls in the tens of millions annually in Midwest states. Forage quality for remains marginally affected, as ragweed provides early-season protein but displaces higher-value grasses, yielding no net economic gain and potential minor losses in animal performance where dominance exceeds 20-30% of cover. Overall U.S. hay fever costs, where accounts for a substantial seasonal share, surpass $11 billion yearly in medical and terms, though ragweed-attributable portions are not disaggregated in national estimates.

Management and Control

Conventional Control Methods

Mechanical control methods for ragweed, primarily mowing and , target early growth stages to disrupt reproductive cycles and reduce production. Mowing multiple times per season, especially before flowering, limits dispersal and set, with field trials indicating substantial reductions in ragweed density when combined with competitive crops. , applied aggressively in late spring prior to crop planting, uproots seedlings and buries seeds deeper in soil, promoting weed-free conditions for establishment, though repeated operations are required to deplete the persistent seedbank. These approaches are most effective during the cotyledon-to-two-leaf stage (BBCH 10-12), where vulnerability to physical disruption is highest. Chemical control relies on postemergence herbicides such as , which provide broad-spectrum efficacy against ragweed when applied to small plants, though multiple applications may be needed in glyphosate-tolerant crops. Timing applications to the rosette stage in spring optimizes uptake and control, with burndown programs targeting pre-stem elongation for consistent results across winter annuals and early perennials like ragweed. However, resistance has emerged in common ragweed populations since the early 2010s, confirmed in multiple U.S. states, necessitating with alternatives like or PPO-inhibitors for sustained efficacy in resistant fields. Mechanical methods offer targeted intervention with minimal non-target effects on soil biota or adjacent vegetation but demand high labor inputs and , potentially increasing risk under frequent . In contrast, chemical herbicides deliver rapid, scalable control where mechanical options falter, yet pose risks of off-site drift, , and selection for further resistance, with documented non-target impacts on pollinators and residues. Field evaluations underscore that integrating timing precision—such as spring rosette targeting—yields 70-90% reductions in ragweed across methods, though long-term success hinges on preventing return via consistent application.

Biological and Integrated Approaches

Biological control of ragweed primarily involves the introduction of specialist herbivores, such as the leaf beetle Ophraella communa, which has demonstrated substantial efficacy in suppressing Ambrosia artemisiifolia populations. Native to North America, O. communa was accidentally introduced to China in the early 1980s and has since established as a highly effective agent, defoliating and often killing ragweed plants across large areas, with field observations indicating near-complete suppression in infested regions. In controlled trials and modeling for Europe, O. communa has been projected to reduce ragweed biomass and pollen production by up to 50%, potentially alleviating allergy symptoms for millions by decreasing symptomatic pollen days. Host-range studies confirm its specificity to Ambrosia species, posing low risk to non-target European flora, though establishment rates vary with local climate and predator pressures. Fungal pathogens, including species like Septoria ambrosiae, have been evaluated as potential mycoherbicides for ragweed, with laboratory and small-scale field tests showing infection rates leading to leaf and reduced production. However, empirical field successes remain limited due to environmental constraints such as requirements and inconsistent viability, resulting in incomplete suppression compared to agents. Integrated approaches often incorporate these bioagents into broader frameworks to enhance reliability. Integrated pest management (IPM) for ragweed emphasizes synergistic tactics, combining biological agents with cultural practices like , cover cropping, and delayed planting to disrupt weed life cycles while minimizing chemical inputs. For instance, winter cover crops followed by late-season planting and harvest weed seed control have reduced ragweed densities by over 90% in multi-year field trials on row crops, amplifying the impact of introduced herbivores like O. communa. Monitoring via pollen traps or aids in timing interventions, ensuring bioagents are deployed when ragweed is most vulnerable. Despite these advances, biological and integrated methods face challenges, including incomplete suppression in heterogeneous landscapes where ragweed seedbanks persist for years, and potential non-target effects on native relatives, though documented cases remain rare and minor in global reviews of weed biocontrol. Variability in agent performance due to temperature and predation further necessitates adaptive monitoring, limiting standalone reliance on biocontrol without complementary IPM elements.

Environmental Influences and Projections

Climate Change Effects on Spread and Potency

Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations have been shown to enhance ragweed pollen production, with experimental studies indicating increases ranging from 61% under doubled CO2 levels relative to ambient conditions. Other research demonstrates that future projected CO2 levels could boost pollen output by approximately 80-90% compared to current levels, based on growth chamber experiments comparing pre-industrial, current, and elevated CO2 exposures. Additionally, pollen from ragweed grown under elevated CO2 elicits stronger allergic responses in animal models, suggesting increased allergenicity beyond mere quantity. Warmer temperatures associated with are projected to extend ragweed pollen seasons, with models estimating extensions of 10-20 days in parts of due to earlier onset and delayed driven by prolonged frost-free periods. In , milder winters facilitate northward expansion, enabling ragweed to invade previously unsuitable northern and eastern regions, potentially doubling the sensitized to its —from 33 million to 77 million—by the 2041-2060 period under moderate emissions scenarios. However, these effects are not uniform across populations or regions, as local genetic adaptation and interactions with other factors like and introduce variability; some studies find only modest or species-specific responses to elevated CO2, challenging assumptions of consistent "supercharging" of ragweed traits. Empirical emphasize that while causal links exist via direct physiological responses to CO2 fertilization and thresholds for and flowering, realized spread depends on dispersal limitations and management, rather than deterministic inevitability.

Recent Empirical Studies (2020-2025)

A 2024 study analyzing ragweed exposure in relation to sleep metrics found that intense seasonal levels exacerbate sleepiness, particularly at short exposure lags of 0-2 days, based on data from allergic individuals monitored via and questionnaires during peak periods. This effect persisted after adjusting for confounders like and , suggesting -induced disrupts restorative independently of other environmental factors. Research published in early 2025 linked elevated ragweed concentrations to heightened respiratory mortality risks among older adults in from 2006-2017, with short-term exposures (lags up to 14 days) increasing chronic and infectious respiratory death rates by up to 1.5-2% per increment in pollen counts. The association was strongest for ragweed compared to other taxa, highlighting vulnerability in populations over 65, though the study's reliance on historical data tempers direct attribution to recent trends. Experiments conducted in demonstrated that ragweed plants grown under elevated CO2 levels (700 ppm, approximating RCP4.5 scenarios) produced eliciting stronger allergic in models and cell lines, with increased pro-inflammatory release and IgE responses compared to ambient CO2 controls. from these plants showed upregulated allergenicity without changes in quantity, indicating CO2-driven biochemical shifts enhance potency rather than abundance alone. Follow-up analyses in 2023-2025 reviews corroborated this, noting consistent Amb a 1 protein increases under doubled CO2, though field validation remains limited. Modeling efforts from 2022 projected 16-40% annual increases in ragweed pollen emissions across under warming scenarios, driven by extended seasons and higher daily maxima, with hotspots emerging in central and eastern regions like and . A 2023 data-driven reconstruction of European ragweed datasets revealed spatiotemporal variability, with urban areas amplifying concentrations via islands and reduced deposition, though rural stasis in some western locales challenged uniform expansion assumptions. In , a seven-year Beijing field study (2015-2022, analyzed 2025) documented rising sensitization rates tied to urban pollen hotspots, projecting further spread via trade-mediated despite local control efforts. Field observations in 2024-2025 indicated that while warming favors ragweed in temperate zones, events like droughts and floods have induced stasis or declines in established populations in parts of and , questioning strictly linear climate-response models. These findings underscore the role of non-temperature factors, such as variability, in modulating spread, with empirical data from monitoring networks showing no net increase in loads in select Mediterranean sites over the 2020-2024 period.

References

  1. https://fsus.ncbg.unc.edu/main.php?pg=show-taxon-detail.php&taxonid=63993
  2. http://www.anses.fr/en/content/ragweed-invasive-plant-problematic-both-health-and-agriculture
  3. https://plants.ces.ncsu.edu/plants/ambrosia-artemisiifolia/
  4. https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?tid=805
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6069153/
  6. https://gobotany.nativeplanttrust.org/species/ambrosia/artemisiifolia/
  7. https://allergyasthmanetwork.org/allergies/pollen-allergy/ragweed-allergy/
  8. https://www.thermofisher.com/phadia/us/en/resources/allergen-encyclopedia/w1.html
  9. https://utia.tennessee.edu/publications/wp-content/uploads/sites/269/2023/10/W119.pdf
  10. https://extension.sdstate.edu/sites/default/files/2025-01/P-00318.pdf
  11. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7174423/
  12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969719322545
  13. https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:327075-2
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S1055790317301823
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321991764_Herbarium_collection-based_phylogenetics_of_the_ragweeds_Ambrosia_Asteraceae
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1055790317301823
  17. http://floranorthamerica.org/Ambrosia
  18. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16313592/
  19. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176197
  20. https://hgic.clemson.edu/weed-of-the-month-common-ragweed/
  21. https://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=1125
  22. https://ag.purdue.edu/btny/purdueweedscience/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/gwc-14.pdf
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9133841/
  24. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6482493/
  25. https://bmcecolevol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-021-01908-4
  26. https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/123363/
  27. https://growiwm.org/weeds/giant-ragweed/
  28. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/14/12/2868
  29. https://www.cal-ipc.org/plants/risk/ambrosia-trifida-risk/
  30. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.4693
  31. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.4692
  32. https://hal.science/hal-03530509/document
  33. http://www.hear.org/pier/wra/pacific/ambrosia_psilostachya_htmlwra.htm
  34. https://seedidguide.idseed.org/fact_sheets/ambrosia-psilostachya/
  35. https://warcapps.usgs.gov/PlantID/Species/Details/2406
  36. https://weeds.org.au/profiles/perennial-ragweed-dunbible/
  37. https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/encyclopedia/common-ragweed
  38. http://www.ontario.ca/document/weed-identification-guide-ontario-crops/giant-ragweed
  39. https://cals.cornell.edu/weed-science/weed-profiles/common-ragweed
  40. https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-ragweed-pollen-season
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4861741/
  42. https://seedidguide.idseed.org/fact_sheets/ambrosia-artemisiifolia-l/
  43. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2745.12424
  44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0254629918312869
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4480049/
  46. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80420520/FullTextPublicationspdf/publications/ziska/establishmentandpersistenceofcommonragweedindisturbedsoilasafunctionofanurbanruralmacroenvironment.pdf
  47. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/14/3/497
  48. https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/66915/
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1619003324001002
  50. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2710250/
  51. https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/forb/ambpsi/all.html
  52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1934623
  53. https://www.bellarmine.edu/faculty/drobinson/Ragweed.asp
  54. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1546&context=ontario_birds
  55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2425044
  56. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.4691
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5920306/
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326537659_History_of_introduction_and_distribution_of_common_ragweed_Ambrosia_artemisiifolia_L_in_the_European_part_of_the_Russian_Federation_and_in_the_Ukraine
  59. https://zin.ru/labs/expent/pdfs/Reznik_2009_Ambrosia.pdf
  60. https://medwinpublishers.com/IZAB/a-review-on-the-biological-control-of-common-ragweed-ambrosia-artemisiifolia-asteraceae.pdf
  61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10590438/
  62. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31176820/
  63. https://internationalragweedsociety.org/
  64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277418826_Allelopathic_effects_of_Ambrosia_artemisiifolia_L_in_the_invasive_process
  65. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10180818/
  66. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10453-021-09702-x
  67. https://www.jacionline.org/article/0021-8707%2849%2990059-3/pdf
  68. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/25/10/5175
  69. https://www.thermofisher.com/phadia/us/en/resources/allergen-encyclopedia/w3/w230.html
  70. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4933224/
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9962666/
  72. https://www.thermofisher.com/phadia/us/en/resources/allergen-encyclopedia/w2.html
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11433692/
  74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/ragweed
  75. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/ragweed-allergy
  76. https://acaai.org/allergies/allergic-conditions/ragweed-allergy/
  77. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-20069-y
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5391486/
  79. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1014107108
  80. https://aafa.org/allergies/types-of-allergies/pollen-allergy/ragweed-pollen/
  81. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969723057224
  82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24001512_Ragweed_Sensitization_in_Europe_GA2LEN_study_suggests_increasing_prevalence
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11737261/
  84. https://sph.umich.edu/news/2025posts/rising-pollen-levels-pose-deadly-risk-for-older-adults.html
  85. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/208663
  86. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/250010062_Competition_between_sunflower_and_Ambrosia_artemisiifolia_in_additive_experiments
  87. https://sciendo.com/2/v2/download/article/10.2478/agri-2022-0010.pdf
  88. https://www.unifr.ch/bio/en/assets/public/Research/Heinz-Mueller-Schaerer/publications/2021/wre.12479%5B1%5D.pdf
  89. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/cabicompendium.4691
  90. https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/23562/
  91. https://www.cabi.org/news-article/managing-the-invasive-allergen-ragweed/
  92. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2664.12156
  93. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/domestic/downloads/xpm.pdf
  94. https://www.agriculture.com/crops/soybeans/weed-seeds-can-impact-soybean-exports
  95. https://enewsletters.k-state.edu/beeftips/2024/04/30/how-does-western-ragweed-impact-pasture-production/
  96. https://cusjc.ca/catalyst/project/the-cost-of-more-ragweed/
  97. https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/83e41fef-da32-4063-9bdb-5911c36efbdc/C%2520Mowing%2520and%2520hoeing.pdf
  98. https://growiwm.org/weeds/common-ragweed/
  99. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/8/1765
  100. https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/post/considerations-spring-burndown-programs-weed-control
  101. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5563374/
  102. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/60663500/Publications/Nandula/2017/Nandula%2520et%2520al_2018_WBM_17-45-53.pdf
  103. https://bioone.org/journals/natural-areas-journal/volume-42/issue-2/21-20/A-Comparison-of-Mechanical-Versus-Chemical-Control-of-the-Invasive/10.3375/21-20.full
  104. https://ohiostate.pressbooks.pub/crpsoil2422t/chapter/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-chemical-weed-control/
  105. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310481354_Control_of_common_ragweed_by_mowing_and_hoeing
  106. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/wre.12072
  107. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1439179118300616
  108. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-15586-1
  109. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11598483/
  110. https://www.cabi.org/news-article/study-shows-low-risk-of-non-target-attack-of-european-plant-species-by-hay-fever-causing-ragweed-bug/
  111. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366064485_The_Role_of_Fungi_in_Weed_Biocontrol_A_Review
  112. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/agronomy/articles/10.3389/fagro.2020.598426/full
  113. https://blog.invasive-species.org/2022/02/15/satellite-data-offers-alternative-in-predicting-impact-of-biological-control-for-hay-fever-causing-ragweed/
  114. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214574520300092
  115. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/702340
  116. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049964421002462
  117. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1081120610620091
  118. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262995535_Rising_CO2_and_pollen_production_of_common_ragweed_Ambrosia_artemisiifolia_L_a_known_allergy-inducing_species_implications_for_public_health
  119. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33037672/
  120. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28764-0
  121. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5357339/
  122. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-63967-z
  123. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11657151/
  124. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388069773_Chronic_and_infectious_respiratory_mortality_and_short-term_exposures_to_four_types_of_pollen_taxa_in_older_adults_in_Michigan_2006-2017
  125. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/all.14618
  126. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278254974_Rising_CO2_and_pollen_production_of_common_ragweed_Ambrosia_artemisiifolia_a_known_allergy-inducing_species_Implications_for_public_health
  127. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11911648/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.