Hubbry Logo
Gilbert SimondonGilbert SimondonMain
Open search
Gilbert Simondon
Community hub
Gilbert Simondon
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Gilbert Simondon
Gilbert Simondon
Gilbert Simondon
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Gilbert Simondon (French: [simɔ̃dɔ̃]; 2 October 1924 – 7 February 1989) was a French philosopher best known for his theory of individuation and his work on the field of philosophy of technology. Simondon's work is characterized by his philosophical approach on information theory, communication studies, technology and the natural sciences. Although largely overlooked in his lifetime, the advent of the Information Age has resulted in a reappraisal and increased interest in Simondon's books. He is now seen as someone who precisely predicted and described the social effects and paradigms technical objects and technology itself have offered in the 21st century.

Key Information

Despite Simondon's thought having remained largely alienated amidst the effervescent wave of post-structuralism of his age in his homeland of France and Europe in general, a few colleagues have been pioneers in praising Simondon's writings and demonstrating the influence and weight of his intellectual work in their own, the most notable being Gilles Deleuze, whose The Logic of Sense is heavily influenced by Simondon's theory of individuation, and Herbert Marcuse, who takes inspiration from Simondon's notions of the effects of technological alienation in society in his book One-Dimensional Man. Today, Simondon's work influence can most clearly be seen in the works of Bruno Latour, Bernard Stiegler and Yuk Hui.

Career

[edit]

Born in Saint-Étienne, Simondon was a student of philosopher of science Georges Canguilhem, philosopher Martial Guéroult, and phenomenologist Maurice Merleau-Ponty. He studied at the Ecole Normale Supérieure and the Sorbonne. He defended his doctoral dissertations in 1958 at the University of Paris. His main thesis, L'individuation à la lumière des notions de Forme et d'Information (Individuation in the light of the notions of Form and Information), was published in two parts, the first in 1964 under the title L'individu et sa génèse physico-biologique (Individuation and its physical-biological genesis) at the Presses Universitaires de France, although the second part, L'individuation psychique et collective (Psychic and collective individuation) was only published by Aubier in 1989. While his main thesis, which laid the foundations of his thinking, was not widely read until it was commented upon by Gilles Deleuze and, more recently, Bruno Latour and Bernard Stiegler, his complementary thesis, Du mode d'existence des objets techniques (On the mode of existence of technical objects) was published by Aubier immediately after being completed (in 1958) and had an instant impact on a wide audience. It was only in 2005 that Jérôme Millon published a complete edition of the main thesis.

Thought

[edit]

In L'individuation psychique et collective, Simondon developed a theory of individual and collective individuation, in which the individual subject is considered as an effect of individuation, rather than as a cause. Thus the individual atom is replaced by the never-ending process of individuation. Simondon also conceived of "pre-individual fields" as the resources making individuation itself possible. Individuation is an always incomplete process, always leaving a "pre-individual" left-over, itself making possible future individuations. Furthermore, psychic individuation always creates both an individual and a collective subject, which individuate themselves together. Simondon criticized Norbert Wiener's theory of cybernetics, arguing that "Right from the start, Cybernetics has accepted what all theory of technology must refuse: a classification of technological objects conducted by means of established criteria and following genera and species." Simondon aimed to overcome the shortcomings of cybernetics by developing a "general phenomenology" of machines.

Influence

[edit]

Simondon's theory of individuation through transduction in a metastable environment was an important influence on the thought of Gilles Deleuze, whose Différence et répétition (1968), Logique du sens (1969) and L'île déserte (2002) make explicit reference to Simondon's work. Gilbert Simondon: une pensée de l'individuation et de la technique (1994), the proceedings of the first conference devoted to Simondon's work, further charts his influence on thinkers such as François Laruelle, Gilles Châtelet, Anne Fagot-Largeau, Yves Deforge, René Thom, and Bernard Stiegler (the latter having placed Simondon's theory of individuation at the very heart of his multi-volume philosophical project). Another contributor to Gilbert Simondon: une pensée de l'individuation et de la technique, Simondon's friend John Hart, was the instigator of the very first translation—from French into English c.1980—of Simondon's work (this at University of Western Ontario in Canada where Hart had founded both a Department of Computer Science and a Simondon-inspired network: the ATN, or Audio Tactile Network in 1964[1]). Jean-Hugues Barthélémy edited the Cahiers Simondon from 2009 to 2015 with a total of six issues. Currently, Simondon can be seen as a major influence on the work of scholars such as Paolo Virno, Jean-Hugues Barthélémy, Thierry Bardini, Luciana Parisi, Brian Massumi, Adrian Mackenzie, Muriel Combes, Carl Mitcham, Andrew Feenberg, Yuk Hui, Isabelle Stengers, Thomas Lamarre, Bruno Latour and Anne Sauvagnargues.

Bibliography

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Gilbert Simondon

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
(2 October 1924 – 7 February 1989) was a French philosopher whose work centered on the processes of and the of technical objects. Born in and educated at the , Simondon developed his ideas under the influence of and , earning his in philosophy in 1948. His main doctoral thesis, L'individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d'information (defended in 1958 and published in 1964), posits as an ongoing operation resolving in a pre-individual field, applicable across physical, vital, psychic, and transindividual domains, thereby challenging hylomorphic schemas of substance and form. Complementarily, Du mode d'existence des objets techniques (1958) examines technical objects as evolving entities with their own reality, advancing from abstract elemental stages to concretized forms adapted to environments, and critiques the cultural estrangement from technics that treats them as mere tools rather than mediators of human becoming. Simondon's framework emphasizes the primacy of relation and becoming over fixed essences, influencing thinkers such as and in their ontologies of difference and technics.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Initial Interests

Gilbert Simondon was born on October 2, 1924, in , a city in central renowned for its mining and manufacturing industries. His father, Hyppolite Simondon, originated from Tence in and sustained severe injuries at during at age 19, subsequently training at a school for the disabled before working as a postal employee in . His mother, Nathalie Giraud, came from a farming background in Issoire, , providing a contrast between rural agrarian roots and the urban industrial setting of his upbringing. From an early age, Simondon displayed attentiveness to the technological and human challenges arising from in both industrial and agricultural contexts, shaped by his immersion in Saint-Étienne's environment. This exposure to operational technical processes fostered nascent speculative inquiries grounded in direct observation of machinery and production systems, rather than abstract theorizing or external ideological frameworks. His initial intellectual pursuits reflected a broad curiosity spanning , , and , with an empirical orientation toward understanding the functional realities of technical objects in everyday life.

Formal Education and Influences

Simondon entered the (ENS) in in 1944, commencing his studies at the institution during the final years of . He remained at ENS until 1948, where his curriculum emphasized an interdisciplinary integration of philosophy with scientific disciplines, including physics and . This exposure to technical and empirical methods contrasted with more abstract philosophical traditions, fostering Simondon's later preference for analyzing causal processes through concrete, observable mechanisms rather than idealized forms. In 1947, while at ENS, Simondon deepened his scientific training by studying physics and earning a certificate in from the Faculty of Sciences at the . He completed a Licence de Philosophie in 1948 and a Licence de Psychologie in 1950, both from ENS, which provided a foundation in rational inquiry informed by experimental validation over speculative metaphysics. These qualifications underscored his commitment to bridging humanistic and technical domains, evident in his early explorations of how physical and principles could inform philosophical without reliance on preformed essences. Simondon's formative influences included the epistemological rationalism prevalent at ENS, shaped by figures like , whose emphasis on scientific and epistemological breaks encouraged a break from hylomorphic dualisms toward dynamic, process-oriented analysis. This environment privileged hands-on technical reasoning, as seen in Simondon's preparatory work in the early 1950s, where he linked educational insights to empirical studies of technical operations, anticipating his doctoral research at the Sorbonne.

Academic Career

Teaching Roles and Institutions

Simondon began his academic career teaching and preparatory courses at the Lycée Descartes de Tours from 1948 to 1955. Concurrently, he served as a lecturer in at the Institut de from 1950 to 1963, an institution that evolved into the Collège littéraire de Tours. In 1955, he joined the as an assistant professor in the Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, later advancing to full professor around 1960, where he directed certificates in and founded an experimental laboratory that same year. During this period, he also taught social and industrial at the from 1961 to 1963, alongside shorter appointments at the University of in 1961–1962. Simondon's career progressed to the Sorbonne (University of Paris), where he was appointed associate in 1963 and elevated to holding Chair B of in 1965, a position he maintained until his retirement in 1983. In this role, he directed the general psychology course and established the Laboratory of General Psychology and , reflecting his integration of psychological instruction with technical applications drawn from student empirical observations. He further taught agrégation preparation seminars at the in 1968, and held visiting positions at the Universities of Nice in 1969 and in 1970. These extensive teaching responsibilities across multiple institutions, spanning and related empirical domains, constrained his output of published works, as administrative and instructional duties predominated over dedicated time.

Major Publications and Theses

Simondon's earliest significant publication, Du mode d'existence des objets techniques, appeared in and originated as a report drawing on empirical examinations of concrete machines, including the , to delineate stages of technical evolution from rudimentary mechanisms to advanced systems characterized by increasing integration and efficiency. This work emphasized verifiable processes of concretization in historical and operational developments of machinery, such as the transition from disparate components to unified functional ensembles. In 1958, Simondon defended his dual doctoral theses at the : the principal L'individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d'information, which integrated concepts from to analyze metastable systems and genesis through potentiality and actualization, and the complementary L'individuation psychique et collective. A partial version of the principal thesis, retitled L'individu et sa genèse physico-biologique, was issued in 1964, focusing on individuation processes in physical and biological domains grounded in observable phenomena like crystal formation and cellular organization. The complementary thesis, L'individuation psychique et collective, remained unpublished until 1989, when it detailed the extension of individuation principles to human and social structures, employing causal applications of dynamics to explain relational emergences without reducing them to preformed substances. Similarly, the complete principal thesis saw its final unpublished sections released in 1989, completing the framework's exposition on form, , and technical mediation in ontogenetic terms. These delayed publications underscored Simondon's reliance on precise, empirically anchored delineations of technical and informational operations, often derived from contemporaneous scientific advancements in physics and engineering.

Core Philosophical Concepts

Critique of Traditional Metaphysics

Simondon rejected the Aristotelian hylomorphic scheme, which posits the individual as arising from the union of pre-existing form and passive matter, as fundamentally inadequate for explaining the empirical reality of genesis. In this model, form acts as an organizing principle imposed externally, while matter serves as inert potential, but Simondon argued that such a dualism abstracts from the internal dynamics and energies driving actual processes, treating becoming as a mere assembly rather than an irreducible operation. This critique, central to his 1958 doctoral thesis L'individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d'information, underscores how hylomorphism privileges static substances over relational and causal mechanisms, failing to capture the primacy of process in ontological reality. Central to Simondon's objection is the scheme's empirical inadequacy when confronted with physical phenomena, such as the formation of from a supersaturated solution, which exemplifies a resolving internal incompatibilities. Here, the pre-individual medium—charged with potentials in a state of provisional equilibrium—undergoes transduction upon , propagating ordered structure through physical propagation rather than by form being stamped onto undifferentiated matter. Traditional metaphysics, by contrast, overlooks this causal realism, deriving from observable physical and informational interactions, in favor of idealistic preconceptions that render genesis secondary to already individuated terms. Simondon thus advocated reconceiving through the lens of metastable systems, where pre-individual harbors unresolved tensions amenable to causal resolution, dismantling the form-matter binary as a socially conditioned that obscures the primacy of becoming. This shift prioritizes first-principles analysis grounded in verifiable physical operations, exposing classical philosophy's neglect of how individuals emerge as phases within ongoing processes rather than as finalized composites.

Principle of Individuation

Simondon's reframes by conceiving the individual not as a pre-existing substance or hylomorphic composite of form and matter, but as the outcome of an ongoing operational process that resolves inherent tensions within a pre-individual metastable . This pre-individual state constitutes a dynamic system charged with potentials, akin to a supersaturated solution or where equilibrium is provisional and pregnant with incompatibilities across scales of magnitude, such as molecular and macroscopic levels. Rejecting substantialist traditions that posit as secondary to a unified being, Simondon argues that is primordial, generating both the individual and its defining traits through of these tensions. The process unfolds via transduction, an amplification of structure from an initial —such as a —propagating information and resolving the disequilibrium in successive phases, thereby organizing energy and establishing relative compatibilities. This operation does not exhaust the system's potentials; the resulting individual remains a theater for further , retaining residual as a source of ongoing becoming rather than achieving final stability. Simondon emphasizes relational dynamics over isolated entities, where individuation emerges immanently from the system's internal resonances without reliance on external substantial principles. Centrally, Simondon distinguishes genetic —the causal genesis through which propagates and tensions resolve—from mere chronological sequencing, prioritizing the former's empirical verifiability in physical analogies like phase transitions. For instance, in , a metastable supersaturated medium undergoes transduction upon perturbation, yielding a structured lattice that manifests the resolution of energetic incompatibilities without presupposing a prior individuated form. Such examples underscore a causal realism grounded in physical mechanisms, where operates as a verifiable operation bridging disparate magnitudes through propagated compatibility.

Philosophy of Technology

Existence and Evolution of Technical Objects

In Du mode d'existence des objets techniques (1958), Gilbert Simondon posits that technical objects possess an autonomous mode of , distinct from mere human artifacts or extensions of vital impulses, characterized by their capacity for self-coherent through interaction with a technical milieu. These objects emerge as solutions to needs but gain intrinsic reality via a phylogenetic lineage, progressing from initial abstract schemas—disunified assemblies of disparate elements—to concretized forms where components integrate multiple functions for enhanced efficacy. This is not anthropocentric projection but a causal driven by empirical and , privileging the object's functional unity over subjective interpretations. The developmental trajectory of technical objects unfolds in verifiable historical stages, beginning with primitive tools that impose form on raw matter in a hylomorphic manner, yielding rudimentary efficacy limited by external dependencies. Subsequent phases yield associated technical objects, such as early machines, where elements begin converging toward systemic coherence; for instance, the Newcomen atmospheric engine of 1712 operated as a segmented system reliant on separate boilers and condensers, achieving basic pumping but lacking internal harmony. Concretization advances this toward modernity, as seen in James Watt's 1769 separate condenser design, which unified thermal cycles into a more self-sustaining operation, reducing energy loss and amplifying output through multifunctional components compatible with industrial milieus. Analogous progress marks transitions from manual forges to automated steel production, where iterative refinements embed sensing, regulation, and amplification within the object itself, fostering autonomy without romanticizing pre-technical simplicity. Simondon counters alienation narratives—prevalent in cultural critiques that portray machines as dehumanizing s—by emphasizing the causal of technical lineages, wherein manifests genuine rather than imposed estrangement. Alienation arises not from the objects' inherent nature but from a cultural to grasp their genesis and operational logic, mistaking dynamic systems for static tools devoid of vitality. This perspective underscores functional efficacy as the metric of progress: concretized objects, like the Guimbal turbine, achieve equilibrium by aligning internal structures with environmental demands, yielding reliable performance metrics—such as sustained hydraulic output under variable loads—over ideological tropes of technological rupture. Thus, technical demands recognition of the object's milieu-embedded reality, enabling informed mediation rather than defensive .

Concretization and Technical Milieu

Simondon described concretization as the maturation process of technical objects, wherein initially abstract and heterogeneous elements—unified only through external human intervention—progress toward internal coherence, with structure and function becoming increasingly unified to resolve inherent tensions and incompatibilities. This evolution is not teleological but arises causally from the progressive integration of scientific principles into technics, narrowing the gap between theoretical abstraction and practical operation, as seen in the transition from primitive artisanal tools to industrialized machinery where disparate components, such as mechanical linkages and energy sources, consolidate into self-regulating systems. For instance, Simondon analyzed the concretization of the , where early designs relied on separate boilers, cylinders, and condensers with manual adjustments, eventually evolving through iterative inventions to integrated assemblies that minimized energy loss and maximized operational unity by the mid-19th century. The technical milieu, or associated milieu, functions as the co-individuating environment projected by the technical object itself, comprising a techno-natural nexus that sustains and is sustained by the object's operation, rather than a pre-existing backdrop. This milieu rejects anthropocentric dualisms positing tools as mere extensions of human agency, emphasizing instead reciprocal causality where the object conditions its milieu through operational necessities, such as the heat dissipation and material synergies required for a turbine's function, which in turn shape surrounding infrastructural elements like cooling systems and supplies. Empirical of industrial evolutions, such as the refinement of milling machines from 18th-century wooden frames to 20th-century alloy-integrated units, verifies this dynamic: inventions resolve structural incompatibilities by aligning the object with its emergent milieu, enhancing efficiency without presupposing external . In Simondon's framework, concretization advances through phases of that address metastable tensions within the technical lineage, verifiable via historical case studies of machinery where initial over-determination by abstract schemata gives way to empirical convergence, yielding objects that operate as unified individuals in with their milieus. This process underscores causal realism in technics, prioritizing the object's internal logic over hylomorphic impositions, as evidenced by the progression from vacuum tubes—comprising isolated glass envelopes, filaments, and grids prone to failure—to transistors by the 1950s, which internalized amplification functions into a singular crystalline structure, drastically reducing externalities like vacuum maintenance.

Extensions to Other Domains

Individuation in Nature and Biology

Simondon theorizes physical as emerging from a pre-individual metastable equilibrium, where a system harbors latent potentials and incompatibilities that propel transduction—a propagative resolution of tensions—toward partial structuration without achieving full stability. This process manifests empirically in phenomena like phase transitions, such as the of below 0°C, where molecular incompatibilities trigger and into ice, propagating order through the medium as of 1850 experiments by François Monge confirmed metastable states in liquids. Electromagnetic similarly arises in fields, where potential gradients resolve into polarized structures, as observed in 19th-century electrostatic experiments yielding formations from uniform charge distributions. In biological systems, extends physical transduction into vital regimes, characterized by recurrent and sustained that amplifies resolution across scales, such as in plasma membranes where bilayers maintain voltage gradients—typically -70 mV in resting neurons—facilitating selective permeability and signaling cascades. exemplifies this, as totipotent embryonic cells in metastable states, driven by gradients (e.g., Bicoid protein concentrations in embryos, peaking at 10-100 nM), undergo asymmetric divisions resolving into , , and lineages by resolving informational tensions without hylomorphic pre-formation, as evidenced by 1980s lineage-tracing studies in C. elegans revealing 959 somatic cells from invariant cleavages. Simondon critiques causally, rejecting irreducible as ; instead, vitality intensifies physical through topological continuity, where life's unity stems from perpetual resolution of pre-individual charges rather than a discontinuous leap, aligning with empirical observations like ATP-driven proton pumps in mitochondria (yielding 3-4 ATP per NADH oxidation) that sustain dissipative equilibria without invoking non-physical forces. functions here not as static code but as dynamic modulation resolving metastable incompatibilities, preserving ontological parity between physical crystals and biological organisms by treating both as genesis events, thus evading reductionist while grounding claims in observable transduction phases.

Psychic and Collective Individuation

In Simondon's framework, psychic individuation extends the ontogenetic process beyond the biological individual, resolving persistent pre-individual metastabilities through the of an interior polarity that distinguishes subject from . This phase arises when the vital being confronts unresolved tensions from prior individuations, necessitating a transduction that integrates perception and affectivity to perpetuate becoming. Unlike substantialist views of the psyche as a preformed , Simondon posits it as a dynamic resolution, where the pre-individual charge—energetic potentials inherited from physical and vital phases—demands causal propagation via relational operations rather than static unity. Emotion plays a central causal in psychic , functioning as a that discloses and structures pre-individual tensions, such as anxiety or , into coherent phases of subjectivity. Far from epiphenomenal reactions, emotions signal metastabilities requiring resolution, enabling the psyche to reflexively intervene in its own ontogenesis and link the individual to broader relational fields, including rudimentary technical engagements that amplify perceptual structuration. This process avoids reduction to isolated mental states, emphasizing transduction's empirical propagation: emotions propagate changes across the subject's interior-exterior relations, fostering a non-substantialist unity grounded in ongoing crisis resolution rather than predefined . Collective individuation operates concomitantly with the , forming transductive ensembles where multiple psychic individuals converge on shared pre-individual potentials, yielding a transindividual dimension that exceeds solitary subjectivity. These groups emerge through mutual causal interactions, propagating resolutions across participants and sustaining via functional compatibilities, often mediated by technical objects that align human operations with environmental demands. Simondon identifies the collective as ontogenetically anterior in process, not as a subsuming totality but as a relational becoming that individuates through dephasing—disclosing tensions for collective transduction—thus critiquing ideologies of atomized or homogenized collectivism as failures to engage this dynamic. In contrast to mass society's alienation, where individuals devolve into interchangeable elements disconnected from causal , Simondon affirms as metastable systems—such as institutions—that channel technical and social mediations for ongoing ontogenesis, prioritizing functional hierarchies rooted in transduction over egalitarian abstractions or power critiques detached from empirical resolution. Institutions, as ensembles of compatible operations, resolve pre-individual incompatibilities by propagating technical norms that enhance vitality, ensuring hierarchies serve causal perpetuation rather than arbitrary domination. This transindividual relation underscores that full demands both interiority and exteriority, rejecting normalized views of social forms as mere aggregations in favor of their role in perpetual becoming.

Reception and Influence

Posthumous Recognition

Simondon's on February 11, 1989, coincided with the of the previously unpublished concluding section of his 1958 doctoral thesis L'individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d'information, addressing and , which had remained in form. This 1989 edition, facilitated by his son Michel Simondon, served as a catalyst for broader scholarly discovery of his corpus, previously limited by sparse dissemination during his lifetime. Subsequent republications in the and revived key texts, including the complete version of L'individu et sa genèse physico-biologique in 1995 by Éditions Millon, expanding on the incomplete 1964 Presses Universitaires de France edition. The and section saw reissue in 2007, further consolidating access to his framework. These efforts addressed the fragmentation of his oeuvre, with additional posthumous materials such as courses on imagination and invention emerging from archives. The 2010s marked a surge in translations and reprints, enhancing accessibility beyond French academia. Du mode d'existence des objets techniques (1958) received a 2012 French reprint by Éditions Jérôme Millon and an English in 2017 by Cecile Malaspina and John Rogove for Univocal. This period also saw dedicated English-language volumes, such as Gilbert Simondon: Being and Technology (2012), the first solely on his . Archival openings and interest in his technical analyses contributed to this momentum, evidenced by rising scholarly engagements without reliance on transient ideological currents.

Impact on Contemporary Thought

Simondon's theory of individuation exerted a significant influence on Gilles Deleuze, who drew upon it to develop concepts of the virtual and modulation, integrating Simondon's emphasis on pre-individual metastable states into his ontology of difference and becoming. Deleuze explicitly referenced Simondon's originality in establishing new concepts of individuation, applying them to rethink subjectivity and relational ontology in works like Difference and Repetition (1968). This causal link manifests in Deleuze's adoption of transduction as a process of ontogenetic resolution, extending Simondon's framework to critique hylomorphic models of form-matter duality. In , Simondon's ontogenesis informs debates, where his processual account of technical objects' concretization provides a realist to static object relations, prioritizing causal over speculative post-humanist abstractions. Thinkers like Graham Harman engage Simondon's metastable systems to analogize laws of with technical evolution, grounding object in empirical transduction rather than withdrawn essences. This application underscores Simondon's causal realism, focusing on verifiable phases of technical becoming—from to milieu integration—over interpretive excesses in relational ontologies. Empirical uptake in and applies Simondon's to analyze the genesis of complex computational models, treating AI systems as undergoing transduction within technical milieus akin to physical objects' . A 2024 study frames AI's technicity through Simondon's mechanology, positing as key to resolving metastable tensions in model training and deployment, with phases mirroring concretization from rudimentary to allied machine ensembles. Similarly, 2025 analyses reinterpret AI lifecycles via Simondon's formalism, emphasizing iterative resolution of incompatibilities to yield functional coherence, distinct from anthropocentric projections. Post-2010 developments integrate Simondon into studies and informational , as in the 2022 English translation of Imagination and (originally 1965–66 lectures), which elucidates transduction's role in creative technical genesis through case studies of crystal formation and machine design. Monographs like Cecile Malaspina's An Introduction to Gilbert Simondon (2015) extend this to informational realism, positing pre-individual fields as causal substrates for digital and biological , influencing systems-theoretic models of . These texts verify Simondon's framework in contemporary ontogenesis, linking metastable to empirical processes without diluting into vitalist indeterminacy.

Criticisms and Philosophical Debates

Key Objections to His Framework

Critics have argued that Simondon's conception of concretization in technical objects posits an overly autonomous, quasi-biological evolutionary driven by internal functional logic, neglecting the of socio-economic and political contingencies that empirically derail . For instance, historical cases of obsolete technologies, such as the decline of airships in favor of airplanes due to regulatory and economic pressures rather than inherent technical inferiority, illustrate how external "capture" by institutional interests interrupts the purported inevitability of concretization toward optimal forms. This , rooted in viewing as a "pure beginning" stimulating neutral , is challenged by evidence from economic histories showing technical lineages shaped by class struggles and market dominance, as in Marx's of machinery as a tool of labor exploitation rather than pure functional advance. Simondon's extension of the individuation process across domains—from physical crystals to psychic and collective systems—has drawn objections for analogical overreach, risking anthropomorphic projections that impose human-like emergent properties onto non-biological entities without cross-domain empirical validation. Scholars note that applying individuation to technical or computational objects, such as deep neural networks, may conflate genuine ontological emergence with mere functional evolution, lacking rigorous data to bridge disparate scales and avoid reducing complex systems to a unified paradigm implicitly modeled on vital processes. This critique echoes Simondon's own caution against anthropomorphic pitfalls in hylomorphic traditions but highlights the absence of quantitative metrics or experimental protocols to substantiate the universality of metastable pre-individual fields in non-technical realms. Further logical challenges target Simondon's integration of into , which posits metastable tensions resolving via transduction but potentially underplays irreducible physical contingencies, such as quantum indeterminacy, where probabilistic outcomes defy deterministic informational resolution. While Simondon draws on quantum discontinuity for his metastable systems, detractors argue this framework inherits cybernetic limitations, treating as a neutral operator across scales without accounting for causal breaks in subatomic regimes that empirical physics deems non-reducible to higher-order organizational principles. Such objections underscore a first-principles tension: Simondon's privileges systemic compatibility over granular causal realism, as evidenced by discrepancies between his transductive models and quantum field theory's handling of fluctuations.

Debates on Interpretation and Application

Scholars debate whether Simondon's ontology of technical objects promotes an anti-Heideggerian technophilia that risks endorsing technocratic determinism, particularly when contrasted with Herbert Marcuse's critical theory of technology. Simondon critiques Heidegger's Gestell as an overly abstract enframing that neglects the concrete evolution of technical ensembles, instead emphasizing technology's capacity for increasing coherence through concretization and alliance with natural milieus. This positions Simondon as advocating a realist affirmation of technical becoming, yet interpreters caution that his internal logic of technological progress—wherein objects evolve toward optimal functional unity—mirrors deterministic tendencies Marcuse attributed to advanced industrial society, where technology ostensibly liberates but enforces one-dimensional conformity unless subordinated to human ends. Unlike Marcuse's Hegelian-Marxist framework, which prioritizes social praxis to redeem technology from capitalist alienation, Simondon's causal emphasis on pre-individual potentials resists such anthropocentric overrides, fueling disputes over whether his view invites unchecked technocratic optimism or provides tools to mitigate it via attuned human-technical relations. Post-structuralist appropriations, notably Gilles Deleuze's, have sparked contention for allegedly diluting Simondon's empirical and physicalist focus on with vitalist interpretations. Deleuze draws on Simondon's rejection of hylomorphic substantialism to theorize metastable processes and metastable fields in works like , yet reframes through a Spinozist lens of differential becoming and intensive multiplicities, subordinating technical causality to a broader ontological flux. Critics argue this vitalist spin—evident in Deleuze's transcendental —misaligns with Simondon's insistence on the primacy of physical and technical transduction over purely differential or virtual potentials, transforming a causal theory of concretization into a metaphysical apparatus that obscures empirical verifiability. Realist readings, prioritizing Simondon's alignment with scientific processes like formation and feedback loops, counter that such post-structuralist adaptations, prevalent in academia despite their departure from source texts, undermine his intent to ground in ontogenetic mechanisms rather than speculative intensities. In contemporary applications to , Simondon's framework generates tensions between debunking alienation myths and cautioning against ungrounded utopian tech critiques. His theory of technical posits AI systems as metastable ensembles requiring progressive concretization—via integration with operational milieus—to achieve functional unity, challenging narratives of inherent human-machine estrangement by revealing alienation as a of transduction rather than essence. Applications in AI design invoke this to advocate for "techno-aesthetic" alignments that foster reciprocal between human and machine, as in models where AI evolves through iterative information processing akin to Simondon's guimbal turbine example. However, debates persist over risks of technocratic overreach, where unexamined concretization in opaque algorithms could entrench deterministic control structures, echoing Simondon's warnings against abstract technical objects divorced from and collective —thus critiquing both alienation fears and naive accelerationist optimism in AI .

References

  1. http://gilbert.simondon.fr/content/biography
  2. https://www.radicalphilosophy.com/article/introduction-to-simondon
  3. https://monoskop.org/Gilbert_Simondon
  4. http://www.omecaphes.ens.fr/s/georges-canguilhem/item/3160
  5. http://monoskop.org/Gilbert_Simondon
  6. https://parrhesiajournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/parrhesia31.pdf
  7. https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/821610/gilbert-simondon-causality-ontogenesis-technology
  8. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004405516/BP000006.xml
  9. https://s3.amazonaws.com/arena-attachments/713785/829efb5c05fe1e5eabc9d9069580e32d.pdf
  10. http://gilbert.simondon.fr/content/publications-et-%25C5%2593uvres
  11. https://mediarep.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/e2c0ea24-8a09-4d8b-b702-a1b60367b1b0/content
  12. https://monoskop.org/images/f/f6/Barthelemy_Jean-Hugues_2012_Glossary_Fifty_Key_Terms_in_the_Works_of_Gilbert_Simondon.pdf
  13. https://monoskop.org/images/b/bc/Simondon_Gilbert_1964_1992_The_Genesis_of_the_Individual.pdf
  14. https://philarchive.org/archive/BOUSCO-5
  15. https://www.parrhesiajournal.org/parrhesia07/parrhesia07_simondon1.pdf
  16. https://epochemagazine.org/34/gilbert-simondon-and-the-process-of-individuation/
  17. https://livingindigitalarchives.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/gilbert-simondon-on-the-mode-of-existence-of-technical-objects.pdf
  18. https://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/simondon%281%29.pdf
  19. https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v13n1/pdf/bontems.pdf
  20. https://www.academia.edu/4184556/Gilbert_Simondon_On_the_Mode_of_Existence_of_Technical_Objects
  21. https://blog.christianperone.com/2025/01/notes-on-gilbert-simondons-on-the-mode-of-existence-of-technical-objects-and-artificial-intelligence/
  22. https://monoskop.org/images/2/20/Simondon_Gilbert_On_the_Mode_of_Existence_of_Technical_Objects_Part_I_alt.pdf
  23. http://topologicalmedialab.net/xinwei/classes/readings/Simondon/OnTheModeOfExistenceTechnicalObjects/Simondon_METO_Introduction%2BCh1_TechnicalObjectConcretization.pdf
  24. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11007-019-09466-9
  25. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15693430701628355
  26. https://www.rybn.org/ANTI/ADMXI/documentation/ADMXI/II._ALGORITHM_ENGINEERING/1958/Simondon_On_the_Mode_of_Existence_of_Technical_Objects.pdf
  27. http://parrhesiajournal.org/parrhesia12/parrhesia12_atamer.pdf
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0079610716300803
  29. https://epochemagazine.org/40/on-psychic-and-collective-individuation-from-simondon-to-stiegler/
  30. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10699-025-09980-5
  31. https://openpublishing.library.umass.edu/cpo/article/42/galley/42/download/
  32. https://simondongilbert.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/scott-gilbert-simondons-psychic-and-collective-individuation-introduction.pdf
  33. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/gilbert-simondon-s-psychic-and-collective-individuation-a-critical-introduction-and-guide/
  34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281161416_Gilbert_Simondon_and_the_Philosophy_of_Information_An_Interview_with_Jean-Hugues_Barthelemy
  35. https://parrhesiajournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/9.-Daniela-Voss-A-New-Notion-of-the-Image-Gilbert-Simondon-Imagination-and-Invention.pdf
  36. https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-gilbert-simondon.html
  37. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/full/10.3366/dls.2017.0285
  38. https://read.dukeupress.edu/differences/article/20/2-3/179/8064/Monstrous-Individuations-Deleuze-Simondon-and
  39. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/organismoriented-ontology/gilbert-simondon-from-ontology-to-ontogenesis/D16F302046FA7395B158C7E07BC4E580
  40. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-024-02152-2
  41. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.15680
  42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379638569_Gilbert_Simondon_Imagination_and_Invention
  43. https://dokumen.pub/gilbert-simondon-information-technology-and-media-1783481501-9781783481507.html
  44. https://www.uni-hildesheim.de/media/fb2/philosophie/Mitarbeiter_innen/Voss/Voss_Nov19/Invention_and_Capture_A_Critique_of_Simo.pdf
  45. https://journal.ifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/download/1492/1226/1968
  46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314406949_Concretizing_Simondon_and_Constructivism
  47. https://www.academia.edu/17169960/Simondon_and_Constructivism
  48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261948932_Meaning_Being_and_Technology_in_Heidegger_and_Marcuse
  49. https://www.uni-hildesheim.de/media/fb2/philosophie/Mitarbeiter_innen/Voss/dlgs.2020.0392.pdf
  50. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319982618_Differences_in_Becoming_in_advance_Gilbert_Simondon_and_Gilles_Deleuze_on_Individuation
  51. https://philpapers.org/rec/SCOHDW
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386900413_On_the_individuation_of_complex_computational_models_Gilbert_Simondon_and_the_technicity_of_AI
  53. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02632764231201337
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.