Hubbry Logo
GodparentGodparentMain
Open search
Godparent
Community hub
Godparent
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Godparent
Godparent
Godparent
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Detail from the "Baptism Window" at St. Mary's Episcopal Cathedral in Memphis, Tennessee, showing godparents from the mid-20th century
A Catholic priest baptizing a child

Within Christianity, a godparent or sponsor is someone who bears witness to a child's baptism (christening) and later is willing to help in their catechesis, as well as their lifelong spiritual formation.[1] In both religious and civil views, a godparent tends to be an individual chosen by the parents to take an interest in the child's upbringing and personal development, and to offer mentorship.[2][3] A male godparent is a godfather, and a female godparent is a godmother. The child is a godchild (i.e., godson for boys and goddaughter for girls).

Christianity

[edit]

Origins and history

[edit]
The baptismal font at the Cathedral of Magdeburg

As early as the 2nd century AD, infant baptism had begun to gain acceptance among Christians for the spiritual purification and social initiation of infants.[4]

Normally, these sponsors were the birth parents of a child, as emphasized in 408 by St. Augustine who suggested that the sponsors could be other individuals in exceptional circumstances.[5] Within a century, the Corpus Juris Civilis indicates that parents had been replaced in this role almost completely by those who were not the child's birth parents.[6] This was clarified in 813 when the Synod of Mainz prohibited natural parents from acting as godparents to their own children.[7]

By the 5th century, male sponsors were referred to as "spiritual fathers", and by the end of the 6th century, they were being referred to as "compaters" and "commaters", suggesting that these were being seen as spiritual co-parents.[8]

Around the same time, laws intended to prevent marriage between family members were extended to include marriage between god-parents and god-children. A decree of Justinian, dated to 530, outlawed marriage between a godfather and his goddaughter, and these barriers continued to multiply until the 11th century, forbidding marriage between natural and spiritual parents, or those directly related to them.[9] As confirmation emerged as a separate rite from baptism from the 8th century, a second set of sponsors, with similar prohibitions, also emerged.[10] The exact extent of these spiritual relationships as a bar to marriage in Catholicism was unclear until the Council of Trent, which limited it to relationships between the godparents, the child, and the parents.[11]

According to historian John Bossy, by the Middle Ages it was "a means of transcending natural kinship alliances and creating wider relationships of protection, support and friendship in a feuding society: the sacrament of baptism established a network of relationship which disarmed hostility and brought unity and peace."[12]: 61 

During the Reformation

[edit]

Luther, Zwingli, and Calvin preserved infant baptism (and the accompanying baptismal sponsors) in their respective Protestant denominations despite opposition from more radical reformers such as Anabaptists.[13] Their respective visions of the role played by godparents differed from mainstream Catholicism. Luther was opposed to the prohibition of marriage between god-parents and -children, Zwingli placed more emphasis on the role played by the parents and pastors, and Calvin preferred the birth parents serving as sponsors.[14] Among French Calvinists and the residents of Geneva, it became the norm to have one godparent; other Calvinists, most notably in Scotland and the English colonies in America, did away with them entirely.[15]

The customary obligation of godfathers for Catholics (at least in Scotland) was stated in Nicol Burne's Of the praying in Latine (1581) in relation to Latin public prayers in church:

...if any man pray in any other tongue (i.e. than his own), it is also expedient that he understand the meaning of the words at the least. For the which cause in the catholic church the parents or godfathers are obliged to learn them (i.e. to make sure they have learned) whom they held in baptism the forms of prayers and belief, and instruct them sufficiently therein, so that they understand the same:[16]

Numbers of sponsors

[edit]

In the early church, one sponsor seems to have been the norm, but in the early Middle Ages, there seems to have been two, one of each sex, and this practice has been largely maintained in Orthodox Christianity.[17] In 888, the Catholic Council of Metz attempted to limit the number to one, but this limit seems not to have been observed.[18] In early 14th-century Spain, as many as 20 godparents were being chosen for a single child.[19] In England, the Synod of Worcester (1240) stipulated three sponsors (two of the same sex and one of the opposite), and this has remained the norm in the Church of England.[20] The Council of Trent attempted to limit the numbers of godparents to one or two, but practice has differed across the Catholic world.[21]

Modern practices

[edit]

Anglican Communion

[edit]

The Church of England, the mother Church of the Anglican Communion, retained godparents in baptism, formally removing the marriage barriers in 1540, but the issue of the role and status of godparents continued to be debated in the English Church.[22] They were abolished in 1644 by the Directory of Public Worship promulgated by the English Civil War Parliamentary regime, but continued to be used in some parishes in the north of England.[23] After the Restoration in 1660, they were reintroduced to Anglicanism, with occasional objections, but dropped by almost every dissenting church.[24] There is some evidence that the restored institution had lost some of its social importance as well as its universality.[25]

At present, in the Church of England, relatives can stand as godparents, and although it is not clear that parents can be godparents, they sometimes are. Godparents should be both baptised and confirmed (although it is not clear in which Church), but the requirement for confirmation can be waived. There is no requirement for clergy to baptise those from outside their parishes, and baptism can be reasonably delayed so that the conditions, including suitable godparents, can be met. As a result, individual clergy have considerable discretion over the qualifications of godparents.[26] Many "contemporary Anglican rites likewise require parents and godparents to respond on behalf of infant [baptismal] candidates."[27]

Lutheran churches

[edit]

Lutherans follow a similar theology of godparents as Catholics. They believe that godparents "help [children] with their Christian upbringing, especially if they should lose their parents".[28] Lutherans, like Catholics, believe that a godparent must be both a baptized and confirmed Christian.[28] Some Lutherans also follow the Catholic tradition that a Christian who is not affiliated with the Lutheran denomination may serve as a witness rather than a godparent.[29]

Methodist Church

[edit]

The Book of Discipline stipulates that it is the duty of a godparent, also known as a sponsor, "to provide training for the children of the Church throughout their childhood that will lead to a personal commitment to Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, to an understanding of the Christian faith, and to an appreciation of the privileges and obligations of baptism and membership (¶ 225.4)." John Wesley, the founder of the Methodist Church, wrote a homily titled "Serious Thoughts Concerning Godfathers and Godmothers" in which he stated that godparents are "spiritual parents to the baptized, whether they were infants or [adults]; and were expected to supply whatever spiritual helps were wanting either through the death or neglect of the natural parents."[30] He described the role of godparents, instructing that they should call upon their godchild "to hear sermons, and shall provide that he(/she) may learn the Creed, the Lord's Prayer, and the Ten Commandments, and all other things which a Christian ought to know and believe to his soul's health; and that this child be virtuously brought up, to lead a godly and a Christian life."[30] As such, the Book of Worship states that godparents/sponsors should be "selected carefully" and "should be members of Christ's holy Church; and it is the duty of pastors to instruct them concerning the significance of Holy Baptism, their responsibilities for the Christian training of the baptized child, and how these obligations may be fulfilled."[31]

Orthodox Church

[edit]
Main article: Kum (godfather)

The Orthodox institution of godparenthood has been the least affected of the major traditions by change. In some Orthodox churches (Serbian, Greek) usually the best man (kum, кум, koumbaros) or bridesmaid (kuma, кума, koumbara) at a couple's wedding act as a godparent to the first or all children of the marriage. In some instances, the godfather is responsible for naming the child. A godparent to a child will then act as a sponsor at the child's wedding.[32] Godparents are expected to be in good standing in the Orthodox church, including its rulings on divorce, and aware of the meaning and responsibilities of their role.[33]

Reformed Churches

[edit]

In the Reformed tradition that includes the Continental Reformed, Congregationalist and Presbyterian Churches, the godparents are more often referred to as sponsors, who have the role of standing with the child during infant baptism and pledging to instruct the child in the faith.[34] In the baptismal liturgy of Reformed Geneva, "the traditional presence of godparents was retained".[35] John Calvin, the progenitor of the Reformed tradition, himself served as a godparent during forty-seven baptisms.[35] The Reformed Church in Geneva, in order to ensure confessional orthodoxy, "expected parents to select Reformed godparents."[36] Today, many Reformed churches invite parents to select godparents for their prospective neophyte, while other parishes entrust this responsibility to the whole congregation.[37][38]

Catholic Church

[edit]
A child being baptized with her parents and godparents

The Catholic institution of godparenthood survived the Reformation largely unchanged. A godparent must normally be an appropriate person, at least sixteen years of age, a confirmed Catholic who has received the Eucharist, not under any canonical penalty, and may not be the parent of the child. Someone who belongs to another Christian church cannot become a godparent but can be a 'witness' in conjunction with a Catholic sponsor. A witness does not have any religious role recognized by the Church.[39]

In some Medieval confession manuals, the priest was encouraged to check that a godparent was fulfilling their duty to teach the Creed and the Lord's Prayer.[40]

In 2015, the Vatican declared that transgender Catholics cannot become godparents, stating in response to a transgender man's query that transgender status "reveals in a public way an attitude opposite to the moral imperative of solving the problem of sexual identity according to the truth of one's own sexuality" and that "[t]herefore it is evident that this person does not possess the requirement of leading a life according to the faith and in the position of godfather and is therefore unable to be admitted to the position of godfather or godmother."[41] The Vatican reversed this stance in 2023, noting, however, that a transgender person may still be denied godparenthood if "there is a danger of scandal, undue legitimisation or disorientation in the educational sphere of the church community".[42]

Spiritual kinship

[edit]
See also: Compadre

In some Catholic and Orthodox countries, particularly in southern Europe, Latin America, and the Philippines, the relationship between parents and godparents or co-godparents has been seen as particularly important and distinctive.[43] These relationships create mutual obligations and responsibilities that may be socially useful for participants. The Portuguese and Spanish compadre (literally, "co-father") and comadre ("co-mother"), the French marraine and parrain, and the archaic meaning of the English word gossip (from godsib, "godsibling"), describe these relationships.[44]

The Spanish and Portuguese words for the godparent roles are used for members of the wedding party—padrino/padrinho meaning "godfather" or "best man" and madrina/madrinha meaning "godmother" or "matron of honor", reflecting the custom of baptismal sponsors acting in this role in a couple's wedding.[45]

Literature and folklore

[edit]
See also: Fairy godmother

Godparents are noted features of fairy tales and folklore written from the 17th century onwards, and by extension, have found their way into many modern works of fiction. In Godfather Death, presented by the Brothers Grimm, the archetype is, unusually, a supernatural godfather. However, most are a fairy godmother as in versions of Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, and The Blue Bird. This feature may simply reflect the Catholic milieu in which most fairy tales were created, or at least recorded, and the accepted role of godparents as helpers from outside the family, but English historian Marina Warner suggests that they may be a form of wish fulfilment by female narrators.[46]

Non-Christian traditions

[edit]

Santería

[edit]

In the Yoruba-derived Santería from Cuba, godparents must have completed their santo or their Ifá. A person gets his Madrina and Yubona (co-godmother) or his Padrino and Yubon (co-godfather). A santero, aside from his co-godparents, may have an oluo (babalawo, initiate of ifa) who consults him with an ekuele (divining chain).

Judaism

[edit]
Brit milah—the sandek holds the baby boy.

There are two roles in the Jewish circumcision ceremony that are sometimes translated as godparent. The sandek, in Orthodox Judaism a man, sits on a specially designated chair, and holds the baby boy while he is circumcised.

Among Orthodox Ashkenazi, the kvater is the married couple who bring the child from his mother to where the circumcision is performed. The mother gives the baby to the woman, who gives the baby to her husband, who then carries the baby the rest of the way. The announcement "Kvatter" is the signal for the man to walk to where he will get the baby, and also for that man's wife to walk to the lady holding the baby (usually the mother), if she is not already standing there.

Kvater is etymologically derived from the archaic German Gevatter ("godfather"). Historically, the Jewish ‘Godfather’ bears responsibility for seeing that the child is properly raised, if both parents die young. Amongst the Kvater's many responsibilities, he is also obligated to ensure that the Godmother (should one be appointed) is fully capable of discharging her duties. Should he deem her irresponsible, he can revoke her status as Godmother by proclamation.

Chinese traditions

[edit]

Some Chinese communities practise the custom of matching a child with a relative or family friend who becomes the voluntary/"dry" mother (yimu / ganma 義母/乾媽) or voluntary/"dry" father (yifu / gandie 義父/乾爹). This practice is largely non-religious in nature, but commonly done to strengthen ties or to fulfil the wish of a childless adult to have a "son/daughter". In most circumstances, an auspicious day is selected on which a ceremony takes place, involving the godchild paying his/her respects to his new godfather/godmother in the presence of relatives or friends.[47]

Alternatively, as it is already common in Chinese kinship to use kinship terms among people that are not related (e.g. addressing a respected coworker as "brother" or one's father's friend may be referred to as "uncle"), an older friend or family friend with a deep friendship and a sufficient age gap will also informally address the other as his godparent or godchild, a gesture often initiated by the older person.[citation needed]

Kirvelik

[edit]

In Kurdistan, a kind of fictive kinship relationship called kirîvatî exists connected with the Islamic ritual of circumcision. The man who holds a male child who is being circumcised becomes the kirîv of the child; at the same time, the kirîv and the boy's parents become kirîvs in relation to each other. Kirvelik / kirîvahî comes with particular duties, responsibilities and traditions. It has been compared to compadrazgo in Latin America and kumstvo in the Balkans.[48]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Godparent

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

A godparent is a person who serves as a sponsor during a child's baptism in Christian traditions, publicly professing faith on the child's behalf and committing to support their religious formation and moral development. This role emphasizes spiritual kinship, with the term "godparent" deriving from the Old English prefix god- affixed to familial relations to denote a sacred, proxy relationship to God in the child's upbringing. The institution traces its roots to the early , where sponsors—known as susceptores—vouched for adult catechumens undergoing , ensuring their commitment amid and integrating them into the . As became prevalent from the second century onward, the sponsor's duty shifted to guiding the child toward personal , a practice formalized in by the ninth century with terms like Latin patrinus for godfather. Denominational variations persist: Catholicism typically requires one godfather and one godmother of the same , while Protestant traditions may emphasize familial or communal oversight without strict gender pairings. Though godparents hold no automatic legal over the child—such as custody or , which require explicit designation in a will—the role carries enduring cultural weight, sometimes extending to non-religious or, in certain societies, compadrazgo networks influencing social alliances. Misconceptions about inherent guardianship have led to disputes, underscoring the distinction between vows and civil obligations. In contemporary practice, selection often prioritizes trusted relatives or friends capable of modeling ethical conduct, reflecting the original intent of fostering resilience in faith transmission across generations.

Definition and Traditional Role

Etymological and Conceptual Foundations

The term godparent derives from the compounding of "god," signifying a spiritual or divine affiliation, with "," ultimately from Latin parens ("one who begets" or "guardian"). This English formation, appearing by the , modeled itself on earlier terms like godfather (from godfæder, circa 1000 CE, denoting a male baptismal sponsor) and godmother, which emphasized a role in religious initiation rather than biological descent. The underlying Latin sponsor ("" or "guarantor"), entering usage by the 1650s in English contexts, originally connoted one who pledges responsibility for another's during . Conceptually, the godparent embodies a covenantal sponsorship rooted in early Christian baptismal rites, where the sponsor publicly affirms the candidate's of and commitment to on their behalf, particularly for infants incapable of verbal profession. This practice emerged as a mechanism for oversight, binding the sponsor—distinct from biological kin—to instruct and model orthodox doctrine, thereby distributing parental duties across the community to mitigate risks of or neglect. By the third century, as proliferated amid persecution, sponsors evolved into de facto spiritual progenitors, vowing to rear the child in piety should parents falter, a role alluded to in his circa 200 CE De Baptismo by invoking witnesses who underwrite the rite's solemnity. This framework underscores causal accountability: the godparent's oath creates a triadic bond—child, family, church—prioritizing empirical fidelity to creedal tenets over mere ceremonial presence, as evidenced in patristic emphases on post-baptismal nurture to sustain conversion's against . Historical variances, such as the Latin patrinus (yielding "godfather" by 800 CE for infant sponsors), reflect adaptive linguistic shifts while preserving the core imperative of guaranteed .

Canonical Duties and Spiritual Sponsorship

In the , the Code of outlines the godparent's role as a sponsor who assists parents in the Christian initiation of the child, requiring the sponsor to be a baptized and confirmed Catholic leading a life of in harmony with Church doctrine, free from canonical penalties, and not the child's parent. Only one godparent is canonically required (Canon 873), though two—one male and one female—are permitted to provide complementary in faith formation. During the baptismal rite, the godparent publicly renounces and affirms the on the infant's behalf, vowing to help the parents raise the child according to and Church teachings, thereby assuming a spiritual surety for the child's perseverance in . This sponsorship extends beyond the ceremony to lifelong duties, including modeling orthodox Christian practice, providing catechetical guidance, and intervening if necessary to ensure the godchild receives religious instruction, as the godparent represents the broader faith community in supporting the child's path to . Canon law emphasizes that godparents must be "firm believers, able and ready to help the newly baptized on the road of the Christian life," underscoring a commitment to active involvement rather than mere honorary status. In the Eastern Orthodox tradition, godparents—often termed spiritual parents—fulfill analogous canonical and liturgical duties, renouncing , confessing the , and pledging during and to guide the child toward the Kingdom of Heaven through example and instruction. They must be practicing Orthodox Christians in , committed to regular participation, and bear responsibility for the godchild's moral and doctrinal upbringing, including regular visits, against , and fostering Orthodox irrespective of parental lapses. This role, rooted in early patristic practice, positions the godparent as a co-educator in , praying for the child and exemplifying ascetic and communal Christian life to aid spiritual growth.

Historical Origins and Evolution

Early Christian Development

The institution of baptismal sponsorship in originated within the catechumenate, the preparatory process for adult converts seeking initiation into the faith. Sponsors, tasked with attesting to the candidate's ethical conduct and doctrinal readiness, played a critical role amid Roman persecutions, where clandestine baptisms necessitated reliable guarantors to affirm sincerity and prevent infiltration by insincere seekers. This practice ensured communal accountability, as the sponsor assumed responsibility for the neophyte's post-baptismal perseverance. By the early third century, textual evidence confirms the established presence of sponsors. , in De Baptismo (c. 200 AD), acknowledges sponsors for baptisms, cautioning against hasty administration due to the spiritual peril it imposed on both the child and the sponsor, who bore vicarious accountability for the rite's efficacy. Similarly, the ascribed to (c. 215 AD) mandates scrutiny of candidates' prior lives as catechumens, with sponsors—often relatives or associates—explicitly required to present or those unable to self-advocate, pledging oversight of their formation. These documents reflect a causal linkage between sponsorship and the Church's emphasis on moral probation, extending from adult converts to emerging practices as paedobaptism gained traction from the late second century. The role evolved with Christianity's legalization under Constantine in 313 AD, reducing persecution-driven secrecy but preserving sponsorship's instructional dimension. Sponsors professed creedal formulas on behalf of non-speaking recipients and committed to catechetical rearing, addressing the practical challenge of infants' incapacity for personal renunciation of sin. By the late fourth century, (354–430 AD) refined the custom, recommending non-parental sponsors to furnish detached spiritual mentorship, thereby mitigating parental biases in faith transmission and enhancing the child's prospects for orthodox upbringing. This development underscored sponsorship's foundational purpose: not mere ceremonial witness, but enforceable aid in countering risks inherent to early Christian life.

Medieval Expansion and Reformation Shifts

During the early medieval period, spanning roughly the third to ninth centuries, godparenthood developed into spiritual kinship, a relational framework that paralleled blood ties and alliances within emerging Christian communities across . Originating from baptismal sponsorship in , this system positioned godparents as co-responsible for a child's religious formation, creating bonds that extended familial obligations beyond biological limits and included prohibitions on intermarriage between spiritual kin, treated equivalently to under . By the Carolingian era (circa 750–900 CE), these ties facilitated social and political networks, enabling alliances that supported conversion efforts and communal stability amid feudal fragmentation, as godparents often bridged classes or regions. Carolingian reforms, including synodal decrees from the ninth century, sought to regulate expansion by restricting the number of godparents—typically to one or two of each sex per —to prevent exploitative multiple sponsorships for or influence. This institutionalization reinforced godparents' vows to instruct in faith and intervene if parents failed, embedding the practice deeply in parish life and contributing to the of by distributing catechetical duties across extended spiritual families. The Protestant Reformation of the sixteenth century introduced targeted adjustments to godparenthood, primarily among magisterial reformers who upheld infant baptism. Martin Luther and John Calvin preserved sponsors as baptismal witnesses and guarantors of the child's doctrinal nurture, rejecting Anabaptist calls to abolish the rite for believers only. Calvin specifically urged selection of godparents from relatives or trusted associates in Geneva's ordinances (circa 1541), aiming to curtail the expansive Catholic spiritual kinship webs that fostered clientelism and canon law entanglements, while emphasizing parental primacy in vows. Lutheran churches retained multiple godparents with duties akin to medieval norms, including post-baptismal oversight, though without binding spiritual impediments to . Reformed and Anglican traditions similarly adapted the role, requiring godparents to publicly renounce sin and affirm creeds like the during ceremonies, shifting focus from alliance-building to personal piety and covenantal accountability. These modifications aligned with critiques of sacramental accretions, prioritizing scriptural warrant over late medieval elaborations, yet maintained the core sponsorship to ensure communal faith transmission in infant-inclusive denominations.

Practices in Major Christian Traditions

Catholic Church Protocols

In the , godparents, formally termed baptismal sponsors, fulfill a designated spiritual role in the sacrament of as outlined in the . Canon 872 specifies that a sponsor assists the person being baptized—whether an presented by parents or an —in Christian and supports them in leading a life consonant with , including fulfilling associated obligations. This role extends beyond the ceremony to ongoing guidance in faith formation, emphasizing the sponsor's commitment to model Catholic doctrine and practice. Eligibility for sponsorship is strictly regulated by Canon 874, §1, requiring candidates to meet multiple criteria: designation by the baptized individual, parents, or , with the intention and capacity to perform the function; attainment of at least 16 years of age (unless the local ordinary permits otherwise); membership in the through , , and reception of the ; a life of aligned with the sponsor's duties; freedom from any canonical penalties that prohibit the role; and exclusion of the child's biological or adoptive parents. Sponsors must not be in irregular marital situations, such as civil unions outside Church recognition, as this would contradict the faith-life requirement. A non-Catholic baptized Christian may serve only as a "Christian " alongside a qualified Catholic sponsor, not independently, per Canon 874, §2, to ensure the preservation of Catholic doctrinal integrity in the sponsorship. The number of sponsors is limited by Canon 873 to one male, one female, or one of each, with a minimum of one required where feasible; two same-sex sponsors are not canonically standard, though pastoral discretion may apply in limited cases without altering the preference for complementary genders mirroring parental roles. Selection typically involves parental choice, subject to pastoral verification, often requiring a sponsor certificate from the individual's home attesting to active practice, as implemented in many dioceses to enforce Canon 874 standards. Liturgically, sponsors participate in the Rite of Baptism by accompanying parents to present the child, responding to on the child's behalf if needed, and holding the child during the baptismal pouring or immersion. They also light the baptismal candle from the , symbolizing enlightenment by Christ, and may assist in with sacred . Post-baptism, protocols encourage sponsors to maintain contact for , particularly preparing the godchild for future sacraments like first and , where the baptismal sponsor ideally continues as sponsor to sacramental continuity. Parishes often mandate preparation sessions for sponsors to these enduring responsibilities, rooted in the emphasis on communal accountability for transmission.

Eastern Orthodox Customs

In the , the godparent, also known as the sponsor, plays a central role in the sacrament of baptism, receiving the newly baptized infant in their arms immediately after immersion and assuming responsibility for the child's . The godparent publicly renounces on behalf of the infant, recites the , and anoints the child with holy oil as directed by the during the preparatory rites. Traditionally, a single godparent of the same sex as the child is selected, though multiple sponsors may participate with the primary one bearing the core duties; this practice underscores the godparent's role as a spiritual parent akin to but distinct from biological parenthood. Eligibility for godparenthood requires the sponsor to be an Orthodox Christian in , actively participating in life, receiving the sacraments regularly, and demonstrating moral uprightness; if married, the union must have been blessed by the Church. The godparent provides essential items for the rite, including a baptismal symbolizing Christ's light, a bottle of for , and often a white garment representing purity, which the sponsor dresses upon the post-immersion. This involvement extends to chrismation, where the godparent holds the as the priest seals them with the gift of the . Beyond the ceremony, the godparent bears lifelong spiritual obligations, including instructing the child in Orthodox doctrine, ensuring regular and sacramental participation, and modeling faithful Christian living to guide the godchild toward . This relationship creates a spiritual bond prohibiting between godparent and godchild, emphasizing its gravity as a familial tie in the ecclesial sense. In many Orthodox jurisdictions, such as the Orthodox Archdiocese, "" is observed on the Sunday following the of the of Christ in the Temple on , prompting godparents to reflect on their vows and renew commitment to the godchild's upbringing. Failure to fulfill these duties, such as through neglect of the child's , contravenes the sponsor's sacred promise made before the Church.

Protestant Variations

In Lutheran traditions, which retain the practice of , godparents—often termed baptismal sponsors—play a supportive role in the child's , including praying for the child, aiding in , and encouraging participation in worship such as reciting the and learning . This aligns with Martin Luther's retention of sponsors during the to affirm vows on behalf of the infant, though stripped of medieval excesses like multiple godparents or perceived magical protections. The emphasizes that godparents must be baptized Christians committed to modeling faith, with duties extending beyond the baptismal rite to ongoing nurture. Anglican and Episcopal churches similarly incorporate godparents in baptismal liturgies, where they vow alongside parents to guide the child toward Christian maturity, including instruction in and moral living if parents are unable. The specifies that godparents should be baptized and confirmed members capable of fulfilling promises to foster faith growth, reflecting a communal yet personal sponsorship rooted in the Book of Common Prayer's rubrics. This role evolved from early practices, emphasizing parental primacy while allowing godparents as secondary exemplars, without implying co-parental custody or salvific efficacy. In Reformed and Presbyterian denominations practicing , the concept of designated godparents is often minimized or reframed as "sponsors" or diffused across the congregation, underscoring covenantal community responsibility over individual proxies. The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) explicitly avoids elevating godparents to a special lifelong role, viewing baptismal promises as binding the entire church body to nurture the child in faith. Some Reformed bodies, like certain Associate Reformed Presbyterian churches, outright reject the custom, citing scriptural emphasis on parental duty in Deuteronomy 6:6-7 and :4 without intermediary sponsors. This stems from Calvinist critiques of Catholic sacramentalism, prioritizing divine sovereignty in over human guarantors. Credobaptist groups such as eschew godparents entirely, as follows personal rather than infancy, rendering sponsors unnecessary for vow affirmation. Instead, parental accountability is central, often marked by ceremonies where the congregation pledges collective support, as seen in Baptist confessions like the 1689 London Baptist Confession affirming family-led discipleship. This rejection traces to Anabaptist influences during the , which viewed —and attendant sponsorship—as unbiblical accretions lacking precedent.

Analogues in Non-Christian Contexts

Syncretic and Afro-Caribbean Traditions

In syncretic Afro-Caribbean religions, which emerged from the fusion of West African Yoruba, Fon, and Ewe spiritual systems with Catholicism during the transatlantic slave trade, godparent figures serve as spiritual mentors and initiators, preserving African ritual lineages while adapting Christian baptismal sponsorship. These traditions, including () in and Haitian Vodou, emphasize hierarchical transmission of esoteric knowledge through godparents, who assume responsibilities akin to parental oversight in religious progression, often forming extended ritual families that enforce communal obligations and protect against spiritual vulnerabilities. In , the padrino (godfather) or madrina (godmother)—fully initiated santeros or santeras—guides the iyawó (initiate) through the kariocha or asiento ceremony, a multi-day rite culminating in the "seating" of an on the initiate's head via incisions, herbal baths, and animal sacrifices to establish divine possession capacity. The godparent shaves the initiate's head, performs ritual cuts for orisha assimilation, and imparts foundational secrets of and offerings, with the initiate remaining under their protection and instruction for at least a year post-initiation to avoid taboos that could provoke orisha retribution. This bond extends to controlling the godchild's interactions within the ilé (house temple) network, ensuring fidelity to Yoruba-derived protocols syncretized with Catholic saint iconography, such as equating orishas like Changó with Santa Bárbara. Haitian Vodou employs comparable parin (godfather) and marin (godmother) roles, typically houngans or mambos, in baptismal rites (baptem) and kanzo initiations, where they sponsor entry into mysteries by blessing the initiate's union with specific spirits through veves (sacred symbols), offerings, and communal parades. During these ceremonies, godparents parade the newly baptized—often infants or adults—with the lwa's colors and objects, formalizing spiritual kinship that mandates ongoing guidance in rituals and protection from malevolent forces. This structure counters historical Catholic prohibitions by embedding African ancestor within godparent-mediated hierarchies, fostering resilience in communities. Parallel practices appear in related traditions like Brazilian , where padrinhos and madrinhas oversee initiations (feitura or toques) involving , , and orixá "making," though documentation emphasizes the initiator's authority in animal symbolism and possession training over explicit godparent terminology. These roles underscore causal continuity from African priesthoods, prioritizing empirical ritual efficacy—such as successful embodiment—over doctrinal orthodoxy, with godparents enforcing taboos to avert misfortune evidenced in historical accounts of community cohesion amid .

Jewish and Other Abrahamic Parallels

In , no formal institution of godparents exists akin to the of spiritual sponsors who vow to guide a child's in the event of parental or neglect. The primary rite marking male infant entry into the covenant is the , or ritual circumcision, performed on the eighth day after birth as mandated in Genesis 17:12. During this ceremony, specific honorific roles include the sandek, who holds the infant on his lap or a symbolizing the Prophet while the (circumciser) performs the procedure; this role derives etymologically from syndikos () and is often accorded to a scholar or as a one-time distinction, without implying lifelong religious oversight or proxy parental duties. Similarly, the kvater (male) and kvaterin (female) bear the child into the room, a custom rooted in adaptations of German Gevatter (co-parent), but these functions remain ceremonial and communal rather than establishing enduring spiritual kinship or guarantees, emphasizing instead the father's direct agency in fulfilling the . Rabbinic sources underscore that religious education and covenantal obligations fall squarely on biological parents, rendering external sponsorship superfluous to halakhic (Jewish legal) requirements. While some contemporary Jewish families, particularly in Reform or interfaith contexts, informally designate "godparents" for emotional support or bar/bat mitzvah mentorship, this practice lacks canonical basis and stems from cultural borrowing rather than indigenous tradition; Orthodox authorities view it as incompatible with Judaism's parental-centric model of transmission. Female infants receive no equivalent ritual, though a simchat bat (welcoming ceremony) may occur, often without assigned roles beyond family. These elements highlight a structural divergence: Jewish rites prioritize covenantal continuity through physical markers and paternal command (al tid'ach et ha-yeled, "do not neglect the child" in ethical teachings), absent the baptismal proxy vow central to godparenthood. In Islam, the absence of godparent analogues is even more pronounced, as no sacramental initiation rite analogous to exists, and parental responsibility for a child's (monotheistic ) is non-delegable under . The —a recommended sunnah practice involving , typically two goats for a and one for a girl, performed ideally on the seventh postnatal day—serves to express gratitude to and protect the child from harm, coinciding with and naming but executed solely by the father or his agent without communal sponsors or vows of spiritual guidance. Hadith narrations, such as those in (Book 76, Hadith 540), attribute the practice to the Prophet Muhammad sacrificing for his grandsons al-Hasan and al-Husayn, yet emphasize familial piety over external mentorship; meat distribution to kin and the poor reinforces social bonds but imposes no ongoing doctrinal role on participants. Naming (tasmiyah) follows immediately or soon after birth, drawn from Quranic exemplars (e.g., avoiding polytheistic connotations per 7:180), but remains a parental prerogative without ritual proxies. Cultural variations in regions like may involve communal feasts, yet doctrinal sources from major madhabs (schools of ) confirm no institutionalized equivalent to godparental sponsorship, reflecting Islam's direct parent-to-child transmission of iman (). Among other Abrahamic faiths, such as —a schismatic Israelite preserving Mosaic law—circumcision rites mirror Jewish on the eighth day but similarly lack godparent-like figures, focusing on priestly oversight without spiritual proxies. Bahá'í and communities, sometimes grouped under broader Abrahamic umbrellas, emphasize progressive revelation and communal upbringing but eschew infant-specific sponsorship roles, prioritizing parental and institutional . These parallels, where present, underscore ceremonial honors over the Christian model's explicit faith-endorsement commitments, rooted in differing causal views of covenantal entry: physical/ritual in and versus initiatory in .

East Asian and Indigenous Equivalents

In , roles such as gāndìe (干爹, "dry father") and gānmǔ (干妈, "dry mother") function as analogues to godparents, where unrelated adults form parent-like bonds with a to provide guidance, support, and social connections, often without religious connotations. These relationships, prevalent in some communities including , emphasize mutual obligations and can include financial or emotional aid, mirroring the secondary parental duties of godparents, though they carry variable cultural interpretations ranging from benevolent to pragmatic alliances. In Confucian frameworks across , extends through hierarchical ties akin to , such as teacher-student relations modeled on father-son dynamics, fostering moral and practical development from youth, but lacking the formalized ritual selection of godparents. Direct parallels in Japanese Shinto naming ceremonies (miyamairi) or Korean traditions remain absent, with primary involvement limited to biological kin and no designated non-familial sponsors. Indigenous Australian kinship systems integrate into child-rearing as an innate, experiential process, where extended kin and community custodians—often elders or moiety relatives—guide youth in cultural knowledge, , and social responsibilities from , embedding support within communal obligations rather than individual selection. This contrasts with godparentage by distributing roles across networks to ensure collective accountability and transmission of lore, with grandparents frequently assuming pivotal advisory functions in line with totemic and skin-group ties. Among Native American groups, equivalents vary tribally; in Yaqui ceremonies, ceremonial godparents bless ritual items like garments for children, aiding spiritual integration in syncretic practices that retain indigenous elements of communal oversight. Hopi traditions feature "ceremonial mothers" (wimyu'at) who mentor initiates into sacred domains, providing custodial guidance parallel to godparent spiritual sponsorship, though rooted in clan-based reciprocity rather than . In Igbo African indigenous contexts, communal parenting extends godparent-like bonds through village networks, where non-biological adults reinforce moral formation and crisis support, prioritizing group welfare over nuclear isolation. These roles, empirically tied to higher resilience in extended kin systems, underscore causal links between multi-adult involvement and cultural continuity, distinct from formalized Christian compadrazgo yet functionally supportive.

Modern Adaptations and Secular Shifts

Humanist and Non-Religious Interpretations

In , the traditional role of a godparent is reinterpreted as a supportive focused on ethical development, rational , and personal growth, devoid of any supernatural or doctrinal commitments. Humanist organizations, such as , describe this as appointing "guideparents" during naming ceremonies, where individuals pledge to assist the child in navigating life through evidence-based reasoning and humanistic values like and , rather than religious instruction. These ceremonies, which emerged prominently in the UK from the onward, mirror baptismal structures but substitute invocations of deity with affirmations of family bonds and , often including promises from guideparents to offer guidance in and moral dilemmas. Terminology varies across non-religious contexts, with alternatives like "mentor," "guardian," or "oddparent" used to emphasize practical roles over ceremonial ones; for instance, Humanist Society Scotland equates guideparents to godparents but specifies their duty as fostering independence and without faith-based elements. In practice, these roles provide an extended support network, potentially involving educational encouragement or emotional backing during family crises, as evidenced by celebrant reports of guideparents stepping in for tutoring or life advice. Unlike religious godparenthood, which historically ties to accountability, secular versions impose no enforceable spiritual oversight, relying instead on voluntary relational ties that may wane over time absent institutional . Empirical assessments of these adaptations are limited, but surveys by humanist groups indicate high parental satisfaction with naming ceremonies—over 90% in data from 2020-2023—for creating community without dogma, though critics argue the roles risk diluting into symbolic gestures lacking the binding social pressures of religious traditions. , similar secular mentorships appear in atheist and freethinker communities via organizations like for Inquiry, where "guideparents" focus on promoting and resilience against , reflecting a causal emphasis on environmental influences over predestined moral salvation. Overall, these interpretations prioritize observable interpersonal benefits, such as expanded familial resources, over unverifiable eschatological promises.

Cultural Dilution in Contemporary Society

In societies, the traditional religious role of godparents as spiritual sponsors responsible for a child's Christian formation has diluted amid widespread and declining religious observance. Catholic mandates that godparents be confirmed Catholics who lead lives of faith in harmony with Church teachings and receive the , yet empirical analyses of selection practices in indicate that religious duties are rarely prioritized, with kin-based choices dominating over spiritual qualifications. This erosion parallels broader declines in baptismal practices, which directly underpin godparent appointments. Globally, the number of Catholic baptisms dropped from 17,932,891 in 1998 to 13,327,037 in 2022, driven by falling birth rates and reduced religiosity. In the United States, Christian affiliation has waned, with regular church attendance falling from 42% in the late 20th century to 30% by 2024, correlating with fewer infant baptisms and diminished emphasis on godparental faith transmission. Similarly, in the United Kingdom, baptisms represented only 10% of births in 2017, reflecting a trend where even performed ceremonies often involve non-practicing or non-religious godparents. Modern adaptations frequently recast godparents as honorary mentors focused on emotional support, practical guidance, or financial aid, stripping away the canonical obligation to model and instill Christian doctrine. For instance, selections increasingly favor close friends or relatives irrespective of faith adherence, transforming the role into a secular bond that provides intergenerational connections but neglects spiritual accountability. This shift, while adapting to familial fragmentation and lower religiosity—such as among millennials where weekly service attendance is under one-third—undermines the institution's core purpose of safeguarding the child's eternal welfare through faith. The rise of non-religious equivalents exacerbates this dilution, with secular naming ceremonies incorporating "guideparents" for ethical rather than doctrinal guidance; in the UK, such humanist events surged 60% over five years preceding 2019. Absent verifiable surveys quantifying fulfillment rates, anecdotal and structural evidence from declining sacraments suggests many godparents default to nominal involvement, such as occasional gifts, rather than active religious nurturing, rendering the tradition a vestige of cultural formality over substantive commitment.

Criticisms, Controversies, and Empirical Assessments

Erosion of Original Intent

In , godparents—known as sponsors—assumed a vital responsibility for the of the baptized, particularly infants, by vouching for their , instructing them in core doctrines such as the and , and ensuring their upbringing in the faith if parents were unable or unwilling. This role, formalized by the and emphasized during periods of , positioned godparents as essential community safeguards against or neglect, with duties extending to lifelong moral guidance and protection. Contemporary practices have largely decoupled this commitment from its religious core, transforming godparenthood into a ceremonial honor or social affiliation with minimal ongoing spiritual involvement. Surveys among Catholics indicate that a majority remain unaware of these traditional obligations, often selecting godparents based on personal ties rather than doctrinal fitness, resulting in infrequent contact post-baptism—many godchildren report not knowing their godparents' identities or locations. In Protestant contexts, the role has further atrophied, with post-1969 Catholic liturgical reforms shifting primary catechetical emphasis to parents, exacerbating the disconnect. This erosion correlates with broader , as evidenced by Pew Research data showing a decline in U.S. Christian identification from 78% in 2007 to 65% in , prompting adaptations where godparents function as secular mentors focused on emotional or financial support rather than faith . , familial dispersion, and insufficient guidance compound the issue, rendering the original intent—a binding pledge for religious continuity—largely symbolic in Western societies, though residual spiritual elements persist in traditions like Latin American Catholicism or .

Sociological Impacts and Empirical Evidence

Godparenthood establishes fictive kinship relations that augment biological family structures by incorporating non-kin or distant relatives into supportive networks, often facilitating resource sharing, moral guidance, and emergency caregiving. In pre-modern European societies, such as eighteenth-century Dubrovnik, godparent selection among 110 baptisms demonstrated deliberate networking, with parents choosing higher-status individuals to enable social advancement and interfamily alliances. Similarly, in early modern Venice, spiritual kinship via godparents reinforced political and social ties amid demographic pressures. Empirical assessments of godparent involvement reveal inconsistent fulfillment of intended roles. A 2015 Irish survey of 695 parents reported that 60% of godfathers and 63% of godmothers were members, primarily siblings or in-laws, selected for alignment, shared values, and deputy-parent potential; godmothers exhibited higher engagement, with 70% maintaining regular contact versus 52% for godfathers, and 43% perceived as significantly aiding and formation compared to 26%. Yet, parental expectations for educational support often outpaced observed contributions, particularly among younger or less religious respondents, where baptisms served pragmatic aims like school enrollment (67% among low-religiosity parents). Direct effects on outcomes show limited . In rural Bolivian communities, of non-kin alloparents found no association between godparent presence and educational metrics—such as years of schooling, high school completion, or postsecondary pursuit—while older siblings positively predicted these. U.S.-based examinations of fictive kin similarly detected only marginal increases (1-3%) in educational years linked to godparent count, attributable to variability rather than robust intervention. In Latin American compadrazgo traditions, godparents provide ritual and moral reciprocity during life events, sustaining extended networks, but quantitative evidence tying this to enhanced welfare or development remains anecdotal rather than systematic. These patterns indicate godparenthood's primary sociological function lies in relational expansion and cultural continuity, with empirical support for tangible benefits constrained by ceremonial dilution in secularizing contexts and absence of legal enforceability, as godparents hold no automatic custody absent parental designation.

Debates on Efficacy and Alternatives

Empirical assessments of godparent efficacy reveal limited causal impact on outcomes. A 2023 study in a rural Peruvian context analyzed non-kin alloparents, finding that while older siblings predicted higher , godparents showed no such association, suggesting their involvement does not systematically enhance cognitive or academic development. Similarly, an Irish doctoral surveying parental perceptions indicated that only 43% viewed godmothers as playing a significant role in their child's and formation, with even lower active engagement reported for godfathers, highlighting a gap between symbolic designation and substantive influence. Critics argue that the traditional godparent role—intended to ensure religious continuity and guidance in cases of parental absence—often devolves into ceremonial honor without ongoing commitment, particularly in secularizing societies where transmission rates remain low regardless of godparent selection. Proponents counter that informal can still provide relational benefits, though quantifiable for improved spiritual adherence or behavioral outcomes is sparse, with roles frequently unfulfilled due to geographic distance or familial drift. This discrepancy fuels debates on whether the merits retention or , as causal links to long-term child resilience or ethical formation lack robust support beyond anecdotal accounts. Alternatives emphasize practical or non-religious equivalents. Legal guardianship, established through wills or court designations, offers enforceable authority for in parental emergencies, unlike godparent status which carries no inherent legal weight and requires explicit nomination to activate. Secular adaptations, such as "guideparents" or mentors in humanist naming ceremonies, focus on ethical guidance without theological vows, allowing families to select supporters based on shared values rather than religious affiliation. These options prioritize verifiable involvement, such as regular contact or educational support, over ritualistic bonds, appealing to those skeptical of godparenting's diluted efficacy in diverse, non-ecclesiastical contexts.

References

  1. https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=1465
  2. https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/481226/why-god-in-godparent
  3. https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2021/1125/1045428-why-do-we-have-godparents/
  4. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-08-18/changing-role-of-godparents-since-ancient-christian-times/11400580
  5. https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/what-exactly-is-a-godparent/
  6. https://fwlls.com/the-scary-truth-why-naming-godparents-doesnt-legally-protect-your-kids-or-create-legal-guardians/
  7. https://www.etymonline.com/word/godparent
  8. https://www.etymonline.com/word/godfather
  9. https://www.etymonline.com/word/sponsor
  10. https://ebible.com/questions/6347-where-did-the-term-godparent-came-from
  11. https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-origin-of-the-practice-of-having-Godfathers-and-Godmothers-What-is-the-practical-purpose-of-this
  12. https://godparentguide.com/history
  13. https://www.franciscanmedia.org/ask-a-franciscan/what-is-required-of-godparents/
  14. https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/godparenting-for-dummies
  15. https://sjcatholicchurch.org/role-of-godparents
  16. http://orthodoxinfo.com/praxis/godparenting101.aspx
  17. https://saintseraphim.com/pdf/catechumens/2.8-Godparents.pdf
  18. https://catalog.obitel-minsk.com/blog/2017/10/a-list-of-responsibilities-of-godparent
  19. https://aleteia.org/2020/01/10/the-essential-role-of-godparents-in-the-early-church/
  20. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0321.htm
  21. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/61614/61614-h/61614-h.htm
  22. https://www.oursundayvisitor.com/understanding-the-essential-role-of-godparents-and-sponsors/
  23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvct001m
  24. https://religionunplugged.com/news/2023/6/13/was-it-early-medieval-catholic-family-law-that-made-the-western-world-unique
  25. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780691196237_A35795997/preview-9780691196237_A35795997.pdf
  26. https://philarchive.org/archive/DINBSK
  27. https://opc.org/qa.html?question_id=513
  28. http://www.faqs.org/childhood/Pa-Re/Protestant-Reformation.html
  29. http://revbanjionamuti.blogspot.com/2015/06/godparenting-in-anglican-church.html
  30. https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib4-cann834-878_en.html
  31. https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/baptism-sponsors-10381
  32. https://orthodoxwiki.org/Godparent
  33. https://www.goarch.org/-/the-service-of-holy-baptism
  34. https://www.stvladimirs.ca/choosing-a-godparent/
  35. https://agoc.ut.goarch.org/sacramental-guidelines
  36. https://www.stgeorge.nh.goarch.org/orthodox-resources/sacraments/baptismal-guidelines/
  37. https://www.agoc.org/our-faith/godparents-in-the-orthodox-church
  38. https://steleftherios.ny.goarch.org/sacraments/wedding.html
  39. https://www.oca.org/the-hub/projects/honoring-the-role-of-godparent-in-your-parish-with-a-godparent-sunday-celeb
  40. https://ctshbg.org/files/Sacraments-Folder/Responsibilities-of-the-Godparent.pdf
  41. https://witness.lcms.org/2007/godparenting-for-dummies-a-practical-guide-1-2007/
  42. https://lea.org/great-responsibility-the-role-of-the-godparent/
  43. https://www.churchofengland.org/life-events/christenings/guide-godparents/role-godparent
  44. https://anglicancompass.com/what-are-godparents-a-rookie-anglican-guide/
  45. https://pcusa.org/sacraments-baptism-faqs
  46. https://puritanboard.com/threads/god-parents.42654/
  47. https://www.gotquestions.org/God-parent.html
  48. https://boards.straightdope.com/t/baptists-and-godparents/825628
  49. https://www.bop.gov/foia/docs/orishamanual.pdf
  50. https://oxfordre.com/latinamericanhistory/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.001.0001/acrefore-9780199366439-e-721
  51. https://hwpi.harvard.edu/files/pluralism/files/santeria-the_lucumi_way_0.pdf
  52. https://journals.openedition.org/assr/pdf/2491
  53. https://emcalister.faculty.wesleyan.edu/files/2008/06/the-rite-of-baptism-in-haitian-vodou.pdf
  54. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?params=/context/etd/article/1696/&path_info=FI12050106.pdf
  55. https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/blackclassicisms/wp-content/uploads/sites/468/2017/03/Creole-Religions-of-the-Caribbean.pdf
  56. https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.14506/ca29.3.04
  57. https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/144125/jewish/The-One-Who-Holds-the-Baby-The-Sandek.htm
  58. https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/ask-the-expert-whats-a-jewish-godparent/
  59. https://reformjudaism.org/glossary/sandek
  60. https://www.jewishboston.com/read/i-know-that-the-concept-of-godparents-is-originally-a-christian-one-but-is-it-ok-for-jews-to-be-godparents-too-what-is-the-jewish-view-on-godparents/
  61. https://studioarabiya.com/the-aqiqah-ceremony-in-islam/
  62. https://aboutislam.net/counseling/ask-the-scholar/food-slaughter/procedures-rulings-aqeeqah/
  63. https://iqranetwork.com/blog/new-parents-guide-to-aqiqah-celebrating-your-childs-arrival-with-gratitude/
  64. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/circumcision-brit-milah
  65. https://www.chinese-forums.com/forums/topic/12941-does-china-have-a-godparent-custom/
  66. https://www.godmotherplace.com/allsorts-of-godmothers/chinese-godmothers/
  67. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/A-Confucian-model-of-mentoring-relationships-in-China_fig1_327211817
  68. https://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2056.html
  69. https://researchers.westernsydney.edu.au/files/210894435/We_are_born_mentors.pdf
  70. https://aifs.gov.au/research/family-matters/no-35/first-australians-kinship-family-and-identity
  71. https://open.uapress.arizona.edu/read/with-good-heart/section/f5a1eb68-7b0b-4f0c-a278-f5b4fbb215ab
  72. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1612&context=jcihe
  73. https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=2917&context=sot_papers
  74. https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1520&context=lawreview
  75. https://humanists.uk/ceremonies/namings/blog/what-is-a-guide-parent-and-what-is-their-role/
  76. https://humanists.uk/ceremonies/humanist-namings/faqs/
  77. https://www.humanism.scot/ceremonies-blog/guideparents-and-guardians/
  78. https://www.megsenior.com/post/godparent-alternatives-for-naming-ceremonies
  79. https://ceremoniesuponthames.co.uk/the-role-of-guideparents-in-a-naming-ceremony/
  80. https://forum.centerforinquiry.org/t/non-religious-alternative-to-baptism-ceremony/6405
  81. https://canonlawmadeeasy.com/2017/01/05/can-a-lapsed-catholic-be-a-godparent/
  82. http://paa2012.popconf.org/papers/120280
  83. https://www.cathstan.org/voices/vatican-statistics-show-decline-in-baptisms-clergy-religious-worldwide
  84. https://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/
  85. https://news.gallup.com/poll/642548/church-attendance-declined-religious-groups.aspx
  86. https://theoutline.com/post/8274/godparents-with-or-without-god
  87. https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2019/05/godparents-can-be-nonreligious/589885/
  88. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-rise-of-the-secular-godparent/
  89. https://www.pewforum.org/2015/11/03/u-s-public-becoming-less-religious/
  90. https://wordandworld.luthersem.edu/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/14-1_Baptism/Rethinking%2520the%2520Role%2520of%2520Godparents.pdf
  91. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199730414/obo-9780199730414-0259.xml
  92. https://www.academia.edu/17970530/Godparenthood_in_eighteenth_century_Dubrovnik_children_parents_and_godparents_as_knots_of_social_networks
  93. https://brill.com/view/journals/jemh/26/5/article-p429_3.xml?language=en
  94. https://doras.dcu.ie/21362/1/Final_E-Thesis_Bernadette_Sweetman_53104161_EdD_2016.pdf
  95. https://www.socialitylab.org/2023/09/15/godparents.html
  96. https://rex.libraries.wsu.edu/esploro/outputs/graduate/ALLOPARENTING-AMONG-FICTIVE-KIN-AN-EXAMINATION/99900882027701842
  97. https://www.anthropology-news.org/articles/the-continuing-relevance-of-compadrazgo-spiritual-kinship-in-latin-america/
  98. https://www.chmlaw.com/godparents-legal-rights-child-custody/
  99. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375039961_Non-kin_alloparents_and_child_outcomes_Older_siblings_but_not_godparents_predict_educational_attainment_in_a_rural_context
  100. https://lambroslawllc.com/godparents-lack-legal-rights-if-not-named-as-guardians-for-minor-children/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.