Hubbry Logo
HypergiantHypergiantMain
Open search
Hypergiant
Community hub
Hypergiant
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Hypergiant
Hypergiant
Hypergiant
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

A hypergiant (luminosity class 0, Ia-0 or Ia+)[1] is a very rare type of star that has an extremely high luminosity, mass, size and mass loss because of its extreme stellar winds. The term hypergiant is defined as luminosity class 0 (zero) in the MKK system. However, this is rarely seen in literature or in published spectral classifications, except for specific well-defined groups such as the yellow hypergiants, RSG (red supergiants), or blue B(e) supergiants with emission spectra. More commonly, hypergiants are classed as Ia-0 or Ia+, but red supergiants are rarely assigned these spectral classifications. Astronomers are interested in these stars because they relate to understanding stellar evolution, especially star formation, stability, and their expected demise as supernovae. Notable examples of hypergiants include the Pistol Star, a blue hypergiant located close to the Galactic Center and one of the most luminous stars known; Rho Cassiopeiae, a yellow hypergiant that is one of the brightest to the naked eye; and Mu Cephei (Herschel's "Garnet Star"), one of the largest and brightest stars known.

Origin and definition

[edit]

In 1956, the astronomers Feast and Thackeray used the term super-supergiant (later changed into hypergiant) for stars with an absolute magnitude brighter than MV = −7 (MBol will be larger for very cool and very hot stars, for example at least −9.7 for a B0 hypergiant). In 1971, Keenan suggested that the term would be used only for supergiants showing at least one broad emission component in Hα, indicating an extended stellar atmosphere or a relatively large mass loss rate. The Keenan criterion is the one most commonly used by scientists today;[2] hence it is possible for a supergiant star to have a higher luminosity than a hypergiant of the same spectral class.

Hypergiants are expected to have a characteristic broadening and red-shifting of their spectral lines, producing a distinctive spectral shape known as a P Cygni profile. The use of hydrogen emission lines is not helpful for defining the coolest hypergiants, and these are largely classified by luminosity since mass loss is almost inevitable for the class.[citation needed]

Formation

[edit]
Comparison of (from left to right) the Pistol Star, Rho Cassiopeiae, Betelgeuse, and VY Canis Majoris superimposed on an outline of the Solar System. The blue half-ring centered near the left edge represents the orbit of Neptune, the outermost planet of the Solar System.

Stars with an initial mass above about 25 M☉ quickly move away from the main sequence and increase somewhat in luminosity to become blue supergiants. They cool and enlarge at approximately constant luminosity to become a red supergiant, then contract and increase in temperature as the outer layers are blown away. They may "bounce" backwards and forwards executing one or more "blue loops", still at a fairly steady luminosity, until they explode as a supernova or completely shed their outer layers to become a Wolf–Rayet star. Stars with an initial mass above about 40 M☉ are simply too luminous to develop a stable extended atmosphere and so they never cool sufficiently to become red supergiants. The most massive stars, especially rapidly rotating stars with enhanced convection and mixing, may skip these steps and move directly to the Wolf–Rayet stage.

This means that stars at the top of the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram where hypergiants are found may be newly evolved from the main sequence and still with high mass, or much more evolved post-red supergiant stars that have lost a significant fraction of their initial mass, and these objects cannot be distinguished simply on the basis of their luminosity and temperature. High-mass stars with a high proportion of remaining hydrogen are more stable, while older stars with lower masses and a higher proportion of heavy elements have less stable atmospheres due to increased radiation pressure and decreased gravitational attraction. These are thought to be the hypergiants, near the Eddington limit and rapidly losing mass.

The yellow hypergiants are thought to be generally post-red supergiant stars that have already lost most of their atmospheres and hydrogen. A few more stable high mass yellow supergiants with approximately the same luminosity are known and thought to be evolving towards the red supergiant phase, but these are rare as this is expected to be a rapid transition. Because yellow hypergiants are post-red supergiant stars, there is a fairly hard upper limit to their luminosity at around 500,000–750,000 L☉, but blue hypergiants can be much more luminous, sometimes several million L☉.

Almost all hypergiants exhibit variations in luminosity over time due to instabilities within their interiors, but these are small except for two distinct instability regions where luminous blue variables (LBVs) and yellow hypergiants are found. Because of their high masses, the lifetime of a hypergiant is very short in astronomical timescales: only a few million years compared to around 10 billion years for stars like the Sun. Hypergiants are only created in the largest and densest areas of star formation and because of their short lives, only a small number are known despite their extreme luminosity that allows them to be identified even in neighbouring galaxies. The time spent in some phases such as LBVs can be as short as a few thousand years.[3][4]

Stability

[edit]
Great nebula in Carina, surrounding Eta Carinae

As the luminosity of stars increases greatly with mass, the luminosity of hypergiants often lies very close to the Eddington limit, which is the luminosity at which the radiation pressure expanding the star outward equals the force of the star's gravity collapsing the star inward. This means that the radiative flux passing through the photosphere of a hypergiant may be nearly strong enough to lift off the photosphere. Above the Eddington limit, the star would generate so much radiation that parts of its outer layers would be thrown off in massive outbursts; this would effectively restrict the star from shining at higher luminosities for longer periods.

A good candidate for hosting a continuum-driven wind is Eta Carinae, one of the most massive stars ever observed. With an estimated mass of around 130 solar masses and a luminosity four million times that of the Sun, astrophysicists speculate that Eta Carinae may occasionally exceed the Eddington limit.[5] The last time might have been a series of outbursts observed in 1840–1860, reaching mass loss rates much higher than our current understanding of what stellar winds would allow.[6]

As opposed to line-driven stellar winds (that is, ones driven by absorbing light from the star in huge numbers of narrow spectral lines), continuum driving does not require the presence of "metallic" atoms — atoms other than hydrogen and helium, which have few such lines — in the photosphere. This is important, since most massive stars also are very metal-poor, which means that the effect must work independently of the metallicity. In the same line of reasoning, the continuum driving may also contribute to an upper mass limit even for the first generation of stars right after the Big Bang, which did not contain any metals at all.

Another theory to explain the massive outbursts of, for example, Eta Carinae is the idea of a deeply situated hydrodynamic explosion, blasting off parts of the star's outer layers. The idea is that the star, even at luminosities below the Eddington limit, would have insufficient heat convection in the inner layers, resulting in a density inversion potentially leading to a massive explosion. The theory has, however, not been explored very much, and it is uncertain whether this really can happen.[7]

Another theory associated with hypergiant stars is the potential to form a pseudo-photosphere, that is a spherical optically dense surface that is actually formed by the stellar wind rather than being the true surface of the star. Such a pseudo-photosphere would be significantly cooler than the deeper surface below the outward-moving dense wind. This has been hypothesized to account for the "missing" intermediate-luminosity LBVs and the presence of yellow hypergiants at approximately the same luminosity and cooler temperatures. The yellow hypergiants are actually the LBVs having formed a pseudo-photosphere and so apparently having a lower temperature.[8]

Relationships with Ofpe, WNL, LBV, and other supergiant stars

[edit]

Hypergiants are evolved, high luminosity, high-mass stars that occur in the same or similar regions of the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram as some stars with different classifications. It is not always clear whether the different classifications represent stars with different initial conditions, stars at different stages of an evolutionary track, or is just an artifact of our observations. Astrophysical models explaining the phenomena[9][10] show many areas of agreement. Yet there are some distinctions that are not necessarily helpful in establishing relationships between different types of stars.[citation needed]

Although most supergiant stars are less luminous than hypergiants of similar temperature, a few fall within the same luminosity range.[11] Ordinary supergiants compared to hypergiants often lack the strong hydrogen emissions whose broadened spectral lines indicate significant mass loss. Evolved lower mass supergiants do not return from the red supergiant phase, either exploding as supernovae or leaving behind a white dwarf.[citation needed]

Upper portion of H-R Diagram showing the location of the S Doradus instability strip and the location of LBV outbursts. Main sequence is the thin sloping line on the lower left.

Luminous blue variables are a class of highly luminous hot stars that display characteristic spectral variation. They often lie in a "quiescent" zone with hotter stars generally being more luminous, but periodically undergo large surface eruptions and move to a narrow zone where stars of all luminosities have approximately the same temperature, around 8,000 K (13,940 °F; 7,730 °C).[12] This "active" zone is near the hot edge of the unstable "void" where yellow hypergiants are found, with some overlap. It is not clear whether yellow hypergiants ever manage to get past the instability void to become LBVs or explode as a supernova.[13][14]

Blue hypergiants are found in the same parts of the HR diagram as LBVs but do not necessarily show the LBV variations. Some but not all LBVs show the characteristics of hypergiant spectra at least some of the time,[15][16] but many authors would exclude all LBVs from the hypergiant class and treat them separately.[17] Blue hypergiants that do not show LBV characteristics may be progenitors of LBVs, or vice versa, or both.[18] Lower mass LBVs may be a transitional stage to or from cool hypergiants or are different type of object.[18][19]

Wolf–Rayet stars are extremely hot stars that have lost much or all of their outer layers. WNL is a term used for late stage (i.e. cooler) Wolf–Rayet stars with spectra dominated by nitrogen. Although these are generally thought to be the stage reached by hypergiant stars after sufficient mass loss, it is possible that a small group of hydrogen-rich WNL stars are actually progenitors of blue hypergiants or LBVs. These are the closely related Ofpe (O-type spectra plus H, He, and N emission lines, and other peculiarities) and WN9 (the coolest nitrogen Wolf–Rayet stars) which may be a brief intermediate stage between high mass main-sequence stars and hypergiants or LBVs. Quiescent LBVs have been observed with WNL spectra and apparent Ofpe/WNL stars have changed to show blue hypergiant spectra. High rotation rates cause massive stars to shed their atmospheres quickly and prevent the passage from main sequence to supergiant, so these directly become Wolf–Rayet stars. Wolf Rayet stars, slash stars, cool slash stars (aka WN10/11), Ofpe, Of+, and Of* stars are not considered hypergiants. Although they are luminous and often have strong emission lines, they have characteristic spectra of their own.[20]

Known hypergiants

[edit]
Very Large Telescope image of the surroundings of VY Canis Majoris

Hypergiants are difficult to study due to their rarity. Many hypergiants have highly variable spectra, but they are grouped here into broad spectral classes.

Luminous blue variables

[edit]

Some luminous blue variables are classified as hypergiants, during at least part of their cycle of variation:

Blue hypergiants

[edit]
A hypergiant star and its proplyd proto-planetary disk compared to the size of the Solar System

Usually B-class, occasionally late O or early A:

In Galactic Center Region:[31]

In Westerlund 1:[32]

  • W5 (possible Wolf–Rayet)[24]
  • W7
  • W13 (binary?)
  • W16a[24]
  • W27[24]
  • W30[24]
  • W33
  • W42a

Yellow hypergiants

[edit]
Field surrounding the yellow hypergiant star HR 5171

Yellow hypergiants typically have late A to early K spectra. However, A-type hypergiants can also be called white hypergiants.[14]

In the Large Magellanic Cloud

In Westerlund 1:[32]

In the Sextans galaxy:

In the LS1 galaxy/globular cluster:

Plus at least two probable cool hypergiants in the recently discovered Scutum Red Supergiant Clusters: F15 and possibly F13 in RSGC1 and Star 49 in RSGC2.

Red hypergiants

[edit]
Size comparison between the diameter of the Sun and VY Canis Majoris, a hypergiant which is among the largest known stars (possibly the largest in the Milky Way).

K to M type spectra, the largest known stars by radius. Hypergiant luminosity classes are rarely applied to red supergiants, although the term red hypergiant is sometimes applied to the most extended and unstable red supergiants, with radii on the order of 1,000 to 2,000 R☉.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Hypergiant

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
A hypergiant is a rare type of massive, evolved star classified in luminosity class 0, characterized by extreme luminosity on the order of 10^5 to 10^6 times that of the Sun, vast size, high mass, and pronounced instability due to proximity to the Eddington limit. Only a handful are known in the . These stars, which typically have initial masses exceeding 20–25 solar masses, represent a brief and volatile phase in the late evolution of very massive stars. Hypergiants exhibit spectral types ranging from late A to M and are known for their high rates of mass loss, driven by intense stellar winds and episodic eruptions that can eject material at rates up to 10^{-3} solar masses per year. This mass loss creates complex circumstellar nebulae, dusty envelopes, and asymmetric structures, with some showing evidence of in their ejecta measuring 200–400 gauss. Their short lifespans, lasting only a few million years, end in core-collapse supernovae, sometimes highly energetic hypernovae, leaving behind black holes or neutron stars. Notable examples include the red hypergiant , one of the largest known stars with an extended atmosphere spanning over 1,400 solar radii, and the , a system with a primary star exceeding 100 solar masses that has undergone major eruptive outbursts. Yellow hypergiants like IRC +10420 demonstrate rapid spectral evolution and episodic mass ejections, highlighting the dynamic nature of this class. Hypergiants play a crucial role in galactic chemical enrichment, dispersing heavy elements through their explosive deaths.

Definition and Properties

Definition

A hypergiant is a rare class of extremely luminous massive star, first proposed in the 1970s by Roberta M. Humphreys and Kris Davidson to describe stars exhibiting luminosities exceeding 10^5 to 10^6 solar luminosities (L⊙), placing them near the empirical upper limit of stellar brightness in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. This classification extends beyond ordinary supergiants, recognizing their exceptional energy output that approaches theoretical maximums for stable stellar structures. The precise definition of a hypergiant encompasses stars with bolometric luminosities greater than 10^6 , frequently reaching 10^7 or higher, and assigned to luminosity class 0 (Ia0) within the Morgan-Keenan (MK) spectral classification system. These stars represent the pinnacle of luminosity classes, surpassing standard supergiants (class Ia) in both total radiated energy and atmospheric instability. Key spectral indicators include prominent P Cygni profiles in emission lines, such as those of and , which arise from high-velocity outflows and indicate mass loss rates exceeding 10^{-5} yr^{-1}. Luminosity thresholds for hypergiants are often quantified by absolute visual magnitudes brighter than -9, corresponding to their immense total energy output that renders them detectable across vast galactic distances, even through interstellar dust. This extreme brightness underscores their role as benchmarks for the upper bounds of , driven by intense and atmospheric dynamics.

Physical Characteristics

Hypergiants possess extraordinary physical dimensions, with typical radii spanning 700 to 2,500 solar radii (R⊙). Red hypergiants typically have radii exceeding 1,000–2,000 R⊙, corresponding to billions of kilometers (approximately 700 million to 1.4 billion km), exemplified by at approximately 1,420 ± 120 R⊙ and at around 1,650 R⊙. Their outer envelopes are notably diffuse, with densities lower than those achievable in laboratory vacuums (around 10^{-10} g/cm³). Recent estimates for other red hypergiants, such as , reach up to around 900–1,000 R⊙ (uncertain due to distance revisions as of 2024). Their surface temperatures vary widely according to spectral type, ranging from about 3,500 K in cool red hypergiants to 15,000–40,000 K in hot blue examples, though effective temperatures for yellow and red hypergiants often fall below 10,000 K due to the influence of bloated, extended atmospheres that cool the observable surface. For instance, red hypergiants like those in the exhibit effective temperatures around 3,600 K, while early-B hypergiants maintain hotter surfaces near 13,000–18,000 K. Initial masses for hypergiants generally lie between 20 and 100 M⊙ or higher, but significant mass loss during post-main-sequence often reduces current masses to 10–50 M⊙, as seen in yellow hypergiants with estimates of 19–50 M⊙ and red examples around 25–30 M⊙. This mass reduction underscores their dynamic nature, with ongoing stellar winds playing a key role. The atmospheres of hypergiants are notably extended, featuring pseudophotospheres that can reach 100–200 R⊙ in radius, formed by regions of high opacity from dense winds and episodic mass ejections that obscure the true stellar surface and alter derived parameters like temperature and radius. These structures arise from extreme mass-loss rates, up to 10^{-6} M⊙ yr^{-1} or higher, creating optically thick envelopes that contribute to the stars' apparent instability and variability.

Luminosity and Spectral Classification

Hypergiants are distinguished by their assignment to 0 in the Morgan- (MK) classification system, a category introduced by Keenan in 1942 to describe stars exceeding the luminosity of (class Ia), such as the RW Cephei. This class was later formalized and termed "hypergiants" by de Jager in 1980 to encompass the most extreme luminosities, often denoted as Ia+ or 0 in modern usage. The designation reflects bolometric luminosities exceeding 106L⊙10^6 L_\odot, where Lbol=4πR2σTeff4L_\mathrm{bol} = 4\pi R^2 \sigma T_\mathrm{eff}^4 and significant bolometric corrections are applied to account for excess emission from circumstellar dust shells. Absolute visual magnitudes for hypergiants are typically brighter than MV<−9.5M_V < -9.5, establishing their scale as the most luminous known stars. Spectral classification of hypergiants extends the MK system with subtypes primarily in the B0–B5 range for blue hypergiants, F–G for yellow hypergiants, and M for red hypergiants, reflecting their effective temperatures from hot O/B-like to cool M-type atmospheres. These stars commonly display emission-line spectra, particularly P Cygni profiles in Balmer series and helium lines, characterized by broad wings indicating high-velocity outflows greater than 100 km/s due to intense stellar winds. Such features differentiate hypergiants from less luminous supergiants and highlight their dynamic s. Classifying hypergiants presents observational challenges owing to spectral variability driven by episodic eruptions and mass ejections, which alter line profiles and strengths over time. Accurate identification thus requires multi-epoch spectroscopy to capture these changes and apply extended MK criteria, including luminosity class Ia+ notations for extreme cases. Bolometric corrections are particularly crucial for yellow and red hypergiants, where dust-driven infrared excess can contribute substantially to the total luminosity, necessitating integration across ultraviolet to far-infrared wavelengths for reliable LbolL_\mathrm{bol} estimates.

Formation and Evolution

Formation Processes

Hypergiant stars originate from the most massive progenitors, which form through the gravitational collapse of dense cores within giant molecular clouds exceeding 10^4 solar masses (M⊙). These clouds, often part of star-forming clusters, provide the high-density environments necessary for the accretion of enormous amounts of material, leading to protostars with initial masses exceeding approximately 20–40 M⊙, with the most luminous examples reaching up to 100–150 M⊙. The process begins with turbulent fragmentation of the molecular cloud, followed by the rapid infall of gas onto central cores, which are shielded by accretion disks and outflows that regulate the buildup of mass. This core-collapse mechanism occurs predominantly in young massive clusters, where competitive accretion and dynamical interactions among multiple protostars further concentrate material toward the most dominant ones. The role of metallicity is crucial in favoring the formation of hypergiant progenitors, as environments with lower metallicity—such as those in the —experience reduced radiative line-driven mass loss during the early phases. This allows the stars to retain a larger fraction of their initial mass, enabling them to evolve into the extreme luminosity class characteristic of hypergiants. In contrast, higher metallicity regions promote stronger stellar winds, which strip away envelope material and limit the attainment of hypergiant luminosities. While single-star accretion models dominate explanations for these progenitors, binary interactions can contribute to achieving extreme masses through mechanisms like mergers or mass transfer. Approximately 70% of massive stars form in binary systems, where close encounters may lead to the coalescence of companions, boosting the primary's mass beyond what isolated collapse might achieve; however, such events are supplementary to the primary single-star formation pathway. The entire formation process, from protostellar collapse to reaching the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS), unfolds on timescales of 1–2 million years, driven by the high accretion rates that allow these stars to ignite hydrogen fusion rapidly. This swift timeline results in extreme luminosities exceeding 10^6 L⊙, a direct consequence of their substantial initial masses.

Evolutionary Pathways

Hypergiant stars, originating from progenitors with initial masses exceeding approximately 20–40 solar masses, with extreme cases up to 100+ M⊙, rapidly cross the main sequence on the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram within 1–3 million years due to their high nuclear fusion rates. Following this brief phase, they transition into blue supergiant stages, where intense mass loss—driven by radiation pressure on stellar winds—causes their evolutionary tracks to loop toward the yellow and red supergiant regions of the HR diagram. This looping reflects the star's expansion and cooling as it sheds significant envelope mass, often exceeding 10–50 solar masses over the post-main-sequence phases. The core evolution of hypergiants proceeds through successive shell-burning phases, beginning with hydrogen shell ignition after core exhaustion, followed by helium shell burning, and extending to advanced stages like carbon burning. These phases are characterized by the total stellar lifetime remaining under 5 million years, with the shortest durations for the most massive examples around 3 million years to core collapse. The rapid progression is governed by nuclear burning rates that scale roughly as the cube of the initial mass (L ∝ M³), leading to exponentially higher energy output and faster fuel consumption in more massive stars. At their endpoints, hypergiants with initial masses exceeding approximately 130 solar masses typically undergo either direct collapse to a black hole or a pair-instability supernova, depending on the precise mass and metallicity; for instance, stars in the 140–260 solar mass initial mass range explode completely as pair-instability supernovae, leaving no remnant. Rotation plays a key role in these outcomes by enhancing internal mixing, which can alter nucleosynthetic yields and lower the mass threshold for pair-instability events while favoring blueward evolution over red supergiant phases. Stellar evolution models, particularly the Geneva grids and those incorporating rotation, accurately predict the extreme luminosities of hypergiants—often reaching 10⁶–10⁷ solar luminosities—during these shell-burning episodes, as the star's envelope expands dramatically while the core contracts. These models demonstrate how rotational mixing sustains higher surface luminosities and influences the overall HR track by preventing excessive envelope loss in early phases.

Role in Stellar Populations

Hypergiants represent an exceedingly rare phase in the evolution of massive stars, with only a few blue hypergiants (around 10–20) and about 20 yellow hypergiants identified in the Milky Way. These stars are concentrated in dense, young massive clusters where high-mass star formation occurs, such as Westerlund 1 in the Milky Way, which hosts evolved hypergiants among its population of Wolf-Rayet stars and luminous blue variables, and R136 in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), a central hub of ongoing massive star birth. Despite their scarcity, hypergiants exert profound influence on galactic ecosystems through energetic feedback processes. Their extreme luminosities produce powerful ionizing radiation that excavates and structures H II regions, while their intense stellar winds—reaching mass-loss rates far exceeding those of typical supergiants—compress surrounding gas and can trigger the formation of new stars in nearby molecular clouds. At the end of their lives, hypergiants explode as core-collapse supernovae, injecting heavy elements like oxygen and iron into the interstellar medium (ISM), thereby driving chemical enrichment that fuels subsequent generations of star formation. Observationally, hypergiants trace regions of active star formation, showing a preferential distribution along spiral arms in galaxies like the Milky Way and in low-metallicity satellites such as the , where recent bursts of massive star birth are prominent. Recent surveys, including those using Gaia DR3 and observations of dense star-forming regions as of 2025, have identified additional candidates, including dust-obscured examples, suggesting the total population may number in the dozens to low hundreds. These studies highlight how hypergiants, though transient, contribute disproportionately to the dynamical and chemical evolution of stellar populations.

Stability and Dynamics

Instability Mechanisms

Hypergiants exhibit profound instabilities primarily due to their extreme luminosity-to-mass ratios, which push stellar envelopes toward dynamical disruption. A key mechanism is the exceedance of the Eddington limit, where outward radiation pressure overcomes gravitational binding. This limit is quantified by the Eddington factor Γ=κL4πcGM\Gamma = \frac{\kappa L}{4\pi c G M}, with κ\kappa as the opacity, LL the luminosity, MM the stellar mass, cc the speed of light, and GG the gravitational constant. The derivation arises from equating the radiative acceleration on a surface layer element, grad=κFc=κL4πr2cg_{\rm rad} = \frac{\kappa F}{c} = \frac{\kappa L}{4\pi r^2 c}, to gravitational acceleration g=GMr2g = \frac{G M}{r^2}, yielding Γ=1\Gamma = 1 at balance; for Γ>1\Gamma > 1, the envelope becomes unbound, promoting ejection. In hypergiants, high luminosities (L≳105L⊙L \gtrsim 10^5 L_\odot) and reduced effective masses due to prior mass loss often drive local Γ>1\Gamma > 1 near the surface, especially in where envelopes approach this threshold, fostering turbulent and convective instabilities. Another critical instability involves strange modes, which manifest as non-adiabatic pulsations in the extended, radiation-pressure-dominated s of hypergiants. These modes arise from short timescales and linear growth in non-adiabatic analyses, persisting across effective temperatures from 4000 K to 8000 K in post-red phases. Growth rates enter the dynamical regime when the luminosity-to-mass ratio surpasses ≈104\approx 10^4 in solar units, with periods typically spanning 10–300 days, as identified in stability calculations for models mimicking yellow hypergiants like ρ\rho Cas. Unlike adiabatic pulsations, strange modes are driven by radiative and imbalances, amplifying small perturbations into large-scale envelope motions without reliance on opacity variations. Pair-instability represents a catastrophic mechanism for the most massive hypergiants (M≳140M⊙M \gtrsim 140 M_\odot), particularly those with low . At core temperatures exceeding 10910^9 K, high-energy gamma photons convert into electron-positron (e+e−e^+ e^-) pairs via γ→e++e−\gamma \to e^+ + e^-, absorbing energy and sharply reducing that supports the core against . This sudden pressure drop triggers adiabatic collapse, potentially leading to explosive oxygen burning and total disruption rather than gradual evolution. Linear theory and stellar models confirm this threshold, with becoming significant above ∼109\sim 10^9 K, rendering such stars prone to pair-instability supernovae during advanced nuclear burning phases. Opacity-driven instabilities, particularly the κ\kappa-mechanism, play a prominent role in yellow hypergiants during transitional evolutionary loops. The mechanism operates where opacity variations, driven by iron-group peaks (Z-bump) at temperatures ∼[2×](/page/2Times)105\sim [2 \times](/page/2_Times) 10^5 , cause periodic compression and expansion: during compression, rising temperature increases opacity, trapping heat and enhancing pulsation ; expansion then cools the layer, reducing opacity and releasing . In models of 65–90 M⊙M_\odot stars, this drives radial pulsations with periods ≤200\leq 200 days during expansion phases (Teff>6700T_{\rm eff} > 6700 ) and ≤130\leq 130 days during contraction, shifting from to fundamental modes as rises. zones contribute at lower temperatures, sustaining instability until radiative damping dominates below ∼6800\sim 6800 .

Mass Loss and Variability

Hypergiants experience significantly enhanced mass loss compared to less evolved massive stars, with rates during eruptive phases typically ranging from 10−410^{-4} to 10−110^{-1} M⊙_\odot/yr. These high rates are primarily driven by continuum-driven , where on opacity accelerates the outflow, rather than the line-driven dominant in main-sequence O stars, as line opacities become saturated during these unstable episodes. Observations of spectral lines and circumstellar support these estimates, highlighting the role of such in stripping outer envelopes and shaping evolutionary paths. Wind clumping, characterized by density inhomogeneities with typical clumping factors of 4 to 16, substantially affects derived mass loss rates by overestimating them in diagnostics sensitive to density squared, such as electron scattering or recombination lines. Accounting for clumping reduces these rates by factors of 2 to 4, providing a more accurate picture of the true mass ejection and its impact on . This effect is particularly pronounced in the optically thick winds of hypergiants and , where structured outflows lead to lower effective mass loss than initially inferred from smooth-wind models. Variability in hypergiants encompasses photometric fluctuations exceeding 1 magnitude over years, often linked to pulsational instabilities, alongside spectroscopic changes including evolving line profiles in Balmer and lines that reflect atmospheric dynamics. Eruptive events, lasting several months, involve rapid brightness increases and enhanced ejection, contributing to the irregular light curves observed in these stars. Long-term photometric monitoring, such as data from the All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN) extending through 2025, has revealed quasi-periodic oscillations with periods of hundreds of days, attributable to radial or non-radial pulsations that drive these variability patterns. Shell ejections during intense variability phases form expansive circumstellar nebulae, as seen in the bipolar surrounding η Carinae, a prototypical hypergiant eruption remnant. These structures arise from discrete mass outbursts and expand at velocities of 500–1,000 km/s, tracing the of the ejected material and providing key insights into the episodic nature of hypergiant mass loss.

Observational Evidence of Instabilities

High-resolution of hypergiants, including observations with instruments like VLT/UVES, reveals prominent expanding P Cygni profiles in Balmer and lines, signifying high-velocity outflows (up to several hundred km/s) driven by envelope instabilities and extreme mass loss rates exceeding 10−510^{-5} M⊙M_\odot yr−1^{-1}. These profiles feature deep blue-shifted absorption troughs overlaid on broad emissions, reflecting the interaction between the stellar and accelerating winds. Forbidden emission lines, such as [Fe II] and [N II], often display flat-topped morphologies with abrupt edges, diagnostic of shock-heated gas in the circumstellar medium where velocities reach ∼\sim100 km/s. Imaging surveys using the (HST) and (JWST) have resolved intricate nebular structures and bipolar outflows around hypergiants, providing direct visual confirmation of episodic ejections linked to dynamical instabilities. HST data typically show asymmetric shells extending to arcseconds, while post-2022 JWST mid-infrared observations, with resolutions down to ∼\sim0.1 arcsec, have revealed previously undetected clumpy features and expanding lobes in the environs of red hypergiants, indicating multiple mass-loss episodes over centuries. These structures exhibit velocities of 20–50 km/s, consistent with cool, dense material from unstable phases. Recent JWST observations in 2025 of the progenitor of SN 2025pht, a dust-enshrouded , indicate carbon-rich dust formation and heightened mass loss prior to explosion, supporting models of late-stage instabilities. Photometric light curves of hypergiants, derived from long-term monitoring with telescopes like and ground-based arrays, exhibit irregular variability punctuated by giant eruptions that release total radiative energies of 104910^{49}–105010^{50} erg over months to years. These events manifest as rapid brightenings by 2–5 magnitudes in optical bands, followed by slow fades, with peak luminosities approaching 104010^{40} erg s−1^{-1}. Such eruptions underscore non-terminal instabilities, often tied to pulsational or thermal processes in the outer layers. Multi-wavelength analyses further corroborate these instabilities through infrared excesses attributed to dust condensation in cool, ejected material, as observed by Spitzer and Herschel, where mid- to far-IR fluxes exceed blackbody predictions by factors of 10–100 due to amorphous silicates forming at ∼\sim1000 K. Complementarily, Chandra X-ray observations detect soft to hard emission (0.5–8 keV) from intrawind shocks and colliding flows, with luminosities up to 103310^{33} erg s−1^{-1} and plasma temperatures of 1–10 MK, indicating embedded hot gas from velocity instabilities in the stellar winds.

Classification and Relationships

Distinction from Supergiants

Hypergiants are distinguished from supergiants primarily through luminosity class in the , with hypergiants in class 0 (or Ia+) reflecting their extreme brightness, instability, and mass loss, while supergiants occupy class Ia. Hypergiants are among the most luminous stars, typically with luminosities exceeding ~3 × 10^5 L_⊙, while supergiants generally range up to ~10^5–10^6 L_⊙, with some overlap in the upper end. The key distinction involves spectral indicators of extreme instability, such as extended envelopes and high mass ejection rates, rather than a strict cutoff. In terms of physical structure, hypergiants feature expanded envelopes with radii often surpassing 1000 R⊙R_\odot and atmospheric densities around 10−1010^{-10} g cm−3^{-3}, fostering unique dynamics such as enhanced turbulence and mass ejection not as pronounced in supergiants, which have smaller radii up to approximately 1000 R⊙R_\odot and higher densities. These properties arise from the hypergiants' more intense radiation pressure and instability, leading to greater envelope extension compared to the relatively stable supergiant phase. Evolutionarily, supergiants embody a stable post-main-sequence stage for stars of 8–40 M⊙M_\odot, whereas hypergiants represent brief, unstable transitional phases near evolutionary endpoints for the most massive stars (>30 M⊙M_\odot), characterized by accelerated mass loss and structural instability. Both classes share origins in massive progenitors, but hypergiants' proximity to core collapse amplifies their dynamical differences. The Ia class emerged in the 1940s as part of the MK system to categorize highly luminous stars, but hypergiants were recognized later to describe outliers with exceptional variability and luminosity, first noted as "super-supergiants" in the 1950s and formalized in the 1980s for cases like ρ Cas. Hypergiants exhibit close evolutionary and observational ties to (LBVs), often manifesting as quiescent phases of these eruptive stars. In their non-eruptive states, blue hypergiants display spectral characteristics akin to LBVs at rest, such as broad emission lines and luminosities of ~10^5–10^6 L⊙L_\odot, reflecting a shared driven by proximity to the Eddington limit. Eruptions in hypergiants mirror the S Doradus variability seen in LBVs, where temporary increases in mass-loss rates by factors of 10–100 lead to spectroscopic pseudo-photospheres that mimic cooler supergiants, followed by recovery to hotter states. Both classes sustain extreme mass loss, typically 10−510^{-5} to 10−4M⊙10^{-4} M_\odot yr−1^{-1}, which strips outer envelopes and facilitates progression through post-main-sequence evolution. Wolf-Rayet nitrogen-rich stars of the late WN subclass (WNL) represent a further stripped phase potentially descended from hypergiants, characterized by luminosities above 106L⊙10^6 L_\odot and prominent and emission lines indicating incomplete envelope removal. These stars bridge hypergiants and more advanced Wolf-Rayet types, emerging after intense mass loss exposes helium-burning cores while retaining some . Evolutionary loops, where massive stars cycle from phases back to blue regions during core burning, position WNL stars as transitional objects following blue hypergiant instability, with observed examples showing similarities to quiescent hypergiants. Ofpe stars overlap significantly with blue hypergiants, displaying transitional spectra that blend O-type absorption lines with strong emission from , , and , indicative of high mass loss and envelope expansion. This subclass, defined by peculiar emission features (p) and enhanced lines (e), often resides at luminosities comparable to hypergiants (L>105L⊙L > 10^5 L_\odot), serving as an intermediate between O supergiants and early WN types. For instance, HD 96548 exhibits hybrid Ofpe/WN characteristics, including broad He I lines and N III emission, aligning it spectrally with blue hypergiants and suggesting a common evolutionary pathway marked by dynamical instabilities. Theoretical single-star models predict that blue hypergiants evolve into WNL stars via enhanced mass loss in the LBV phase, subsequently progressing to carbon-rich WC stars before core-collapse supernovae, with LBVs acting as unstable interludes that accelerate envelope stripping. For progenitors of 40–85 M⊙M_\odot, evolution proceeds from O supergiants through a brief blue hypergiant stage (∼\sim0.1 Myr), intense LBV-like outbursts removing ∼\sim10–15 M⊙M_\odot, and a WNL phase (∼\sim0.05 Myr) before WC formation and explosion as type Ib/c supernovae. These pathways, computed with and opacity enhancements near the iron bump, underscore hypergiants' role in sculpting the final fates of very massive stars without invoking binary interactions.

Transitional Phases

Hypergiants experience dynamic transitional phases characterized by blue-to-red loops in the Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram, where stars evolve from hotter stages toward cooler territories before potentially looping back. These loops arise primarily from variations in atmospheric opacity, which alter the star's , coupled with intense mass loss that strips outer layers and drives structural changes. The process enables hypergiants to bypass extended residence in the yellow evolutionary void—a sparsely populated region between blue and red phases—by accelerating evolution through rapid atmospheric adjustments. Such loops typically occur over timescales of 10410^4 to 10510^5 years, reflecting the brief post-main-sequence lifetimes of these massive objects. Spectral evolution during these transitions begins with hot O- or B-type supergiants expanding into hypergiant luminosities, marked by the development of extended envelopes that shift spectral classifications toward intermediate types. As mass ejection intensifies, the atmospheres cool, progressing to G- or K-type spectra indicative of or hypergiants, with emission lines from ionized metals signaling ongoing dynamical instability. This evolution has been closely monitored in notable cases, such as A, a observed to increase in radius by over 50% and cool from approximately 5000 K since the 1970s, capturing the expansion phase in real time through spectroscopic and interferometric data. Rotation plays a pivotal role in shaping these transitional phases, particularly through enhanced equatorial mass loss that produces asymmetric outflows and disk-like structures. In hotter yellow hypergiants, rotational velocities of 15–40 km/s drive axisymmetric ejection, as evidenced by single-peaked forbidden lines like [Ca II] and [O I] indicating Keplerian disks, which contrast with more spherical losses in cooler phases. This equatorial preference influences the observed spectral shifts and photometric variability, potentially prolonging or altering the loop trajectories by redistributing in the . Recent observations have begun addressing longstanding gaps in understanding these rapid dynamics, with (TESS) data from 2024 revealing photometric phase shifts in candidates like V509 Cassiopeiae, where brightness variations align with smoothed light curves to an accuracy of 0.013 magnitudes, suggesting short-term instabilities on days-to-weeks scales. These findings, building on 2025 spectroscopic analyses of outbursting yellow hypergiants such as ρ Cassiopeiae, provide empirical constraints that refine evolutionary models by illustrating how episodic ejections fill voids in the HR diagram. Such phases occasionally culminate in overlaps with Wolf-Rayet nitrogen-rich (WNL) stars or luminous blue variables (LBVs) as potential endpoints.

Notable Examples

Blue Hypergiants

Blue hypergiants represent the hottest and most luminous phase among hypergiants, characterized by surface temperatures typically ranging from 20,000 to 30,000 , which impart a striking spectral appearance. These stars exhibit exceptionally strong stellar winds, driven by their high , leading to mass-loss rates that can exceed 10^{-5} solar masses per year. A defining feature is their propensity for episodic brightenings akin to S Doradus-type variability, where the star temporarily increases in by factors of up to 100 due to changes in wind opacity, without altering their fundamental spectral type. One of the most prominent examples is ζ¹ Sco (also known as ), a B1.5 Iab star with a bolometric luminosity approaching 10⁶ solar luminosities (L⊙) and a radius estimated at around 100 solar radii (R⊙). Discovered as a hypergiant through early 20th-century spectroscopic surveys that revealed its extreme line broadening indicative of high velocity winds, ζ¹ Sco displays irregular photometric variability with amplitudes up to 0.5 magnitudes in the visual band. Recent Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) parallaxes have refined its distance to approximately 1,700 parsecs, confirming its intrinsic brightness and placing it firmly in the category of blue hypergiants. In the (LMC), R71 serves as a benchmark blue hypergiant, classified as B3 Iab with temperatures around 25,000 K and strong He II absorption lines. data underscore R71's role in probing mass loss in low-metallicity environments. Blue hypergiants like these occasionally show spectral similarities to Ofpe/WNL transition objects, bridging hot supergiants and Wolf-Rayet stars.

Yellow Hypergiants

Yellow hypergiants are massive stars in an unstable evolutionary phase, displaying F and G spectral types with luminosities often exceeding 106L⊙10^6 L_\odot. These stars feature highly turbulent atmospheres, leading to large pulsation amplitudes where the radius can vary by more than 100 R⊙R_\odot, and periodic episodes of enhanced mass loss that result in dust shell formation around the star. A prototypical example is ρ\rho Cassiopeiae, which has undergone major eruptions, including significant dimming events in 1946 and 2000 that were attributed to the ejection of cool, optically thick material from its atmosphere. During quiescence, ρ\rho Cas maintains a greater than 106L⊙10^6 L_\odot and a radius approaching 1,000 R⊙R_\odot, though these parameters fluctuate with its semi-regular pulsations on timescales of 320–500 days. These outbursts are cyclical, occurring every 10 to 40 years, and have been linked to the formation of multiple concentric dust shells observable in infrared imaging. HR 5171A stands out as the largest known , with a measured radius of 1,315 ±\pm 260 R⊙R_\odot and a in the range log⁡(L/L⊙)≈5.7\log(L/L_\odot) \approx 5.7–6. Its spectrum varies between G8Ia+^+ and K3Ia+^+, showing strong emission in Na I and CO features indicative of its extended, interacting envelope. As part of a , HR 5171A exhibits photometric variability and significant excess from circumstellar dust. The class of hypergiants was first in the through early spectroscopic surveys of luminous variable supergiants, with ongoing monitoring revealing their persistent instabilities. As of 2025, American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) data continue to document brightness variations in stars like ρ\rho Cas, confirming semiregular pulsations and precursor signs of potential new outbursts. These stars traverse the "yellow void"—a sparsely populated region in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram—via rapid evolutionary loops, bypassing the more stable yellow supergiant phase due to enhanced mass loss and structural instabilities. Yellow hypergiants play a transitional role between hotter and cooler phases in the lives of very massive stars.

Red Hypergiants

Red hypergiants represent the coolest and most extended phase of massive star evolution, characterized by enormous stellar radii and envelopes that extend far beyond typical s. These stars exhibit M-type spectra with effective temperatures below 4,000 , often ranging from 3,000 to 3,500 , and luminosities exceeding 300,000 solar luminosities. Their radii surpass 1,500 solar radii, with some estimates reaching up to 2,000 solar radii or more, leading to surface gravities as low as log g ≈ 0. Their extended atmospheres facilitate intense mass loss through asymmetric ejections, forming complex circumstellar shells and nebulae driven by episodic convective activity and stellar winds. A prototypical example is (VY CMa), a hypergiant undergoing extreme mass loss at rates approaching 10^{-3} M_⊙ yr^{-1}, accompanied by irregular photometric variability with deep minima lasting years. This star's ejecta include discrete knots and arcs, indicative of high-velocity outflows up to 100 km/s, resolved through high-resolution imaging that reveals a history of violent ejections over the past few centuries. Similarly, NML Cygni serves as an obscured prototype, heavily shrouded in circumstellar dust that renders it invisible at optical wavelengths but prominent in the , with a mass-loss rate of approximately 10^{-4} M_⊙ yr^{-1} and a estimated at over 1,600 solar radii. The discovery of red hypergiants like NML Cygni occurred in the mid-20th century through pioneering surveys, such as the 1965 observations by Neugebauer, Martz, and Leighton that identified its thermal excess; strong OH maser emission was later detected in 1968. VY CMa, known since the as a , was classified as a hypergiant in the 1970s based on photometry revealing its extreme size and mass loss. These detections were enabled by the advent of astronomy, which pierced the obscuration hiding these cool giants from optical telescopes. Recent millimeter-wave imaging, including 2025 observations of NML Cygni's circumstellar environment at 1.3 mm resolution, has resolved bipolar outflows extending up to 11 arcseconds with velocities reaching 65 km/s, showcasing hypergiant-scale asymmetries akin to those in but amplified by orders of magnitude in extent and complexity. These structures include arcs and blobs of CO emission, confirming episodic mass ejection rather than steady winds. For VY CMa, complementary ALMA data from prior cycles highlight similar clumpy outflows, underscoring the role of surface hotspots in driving these phenomena. Cool dust shrouds envelop these stars, formed from condensed silicates and carbon grains in the outflows, leading to high visual extinction (A_V > 30 mag) that dominates their signatures. This dust reprocesses stellar radiation, creating thick OH/IR envelopes and contributing to the stars' apparent variability. Red hypergiants are considered proximate to their evolutionary endpoints, potentially transitioning to supernovae within the next few thousand years.

Luminous Blue Variables

(LBVs) represent a distinctive subclass of hypergiants characterized by their highly unstable and eruptive behavior, distinguishing them from more steady blue hypergiants through dramatic photometric and spectroscopic variability. These massive stars, typically with initial masses exceeding 50 M⊙ and luminosities around 10^6 L⊙, exhibit B-type spectra during quiescence but undergo extreme eruptions where the luminosity can increase by more than 10^4 L⊙, often accompanied by significant mass ejections totaling over 10 M⊙ across their lifetimes. This eruptive instability is thought to arise from instabilities near the Eddington limit, leading to enhanced mass loss rates of 10^{-5} to 10^{-4} M⊙ yr^{-1} during active phases. The discovery of LBVs dates back to the 17th through 19th centuries, when they were observed as "nova-like" variables due to sudden brightenings. P Cygni, the prototype, was first noted in 1600 for a major eruption that brought it to third magnitude, followed by another in 1655, and it has remained relatively stable near fifth magnitude since then; its spectral features, including broad emission and absorption lines, gave rise to P Cygni profiles as a diagnostic tool for outflows in . η Carinae similarly drew attention in the 1840s for its Great Eruption, which expelled approximately 10 M⊙ of material and released a total of about 10^{50} erg over a few years, forming the iconic . These early observations were reinterpreted in the 1980s, when the class was formally classified as (or hypergiants in eruptive states) based on their position in the upper Hertzsprung-Russell diagram and shared instabilities, with seminal work highlighting their role as evolved massive stars. The is a candidate LBV with an extreme luminosity of ~1.6 × 10^6 L⊙. A hallmark of LBVs is their non-terminal explosions, which do not lead to immediate core collapse but instead represent phases of intense mass shedding that may prevent or delay events, potentially linking to scenarios where the star survives as a lower-mass remnant. Observations of pre- outbursts in objects like SN 2009ip suggest LBVs can mimic supernova-like events without destruction, underscoring their role in sculpting circumstellar environments. In low-metallicity galaxies, such as the or NGC 2366, LBVs serve as prototypes for understanding massive star evolution under reduced metal content, where their eruptions may dominate feedback processes due to less efficient line-driven winds. These stars occasionally exhibit spectral similarities to Wolf-Rayet nitrogen-rich (WNL) phases during recovery from eruptions.

References

  1. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110810105119925
  2. https://etacar.umn.edu/stellar_eruptions/hypergiants.html
  3. https://www.thoughtco.com/hypergiant-stars-behemoths-of-the-galaxy-3073593
  4. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...232..409H/abstract
  5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s001590050009
  6. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4434/13/2/43
  7. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.5194
  8. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2012/08/aa19587-12/aa19587-12.html
  9. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A%26A...679A..50A/abstract
  10. https://armaghplanet.com/the-largest-stars-in-the-universe.html
  11. https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1093&context=scs_articles
  12. http://www2.lowell.edu/users/massey/tennmasseyp.pdf
  13. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.14315
  14. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2023/01/aa43394-22/aa43394-22.html
  15. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2012/05/aa17472-11.pdf
  16. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.06970
  17. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2009.05153
  18. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1942ApJ....95..461K
  19. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-9030-2_2
  20. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.06970.pdf
  21. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/51
  22. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/physics-and-astronomy/massive-star
  23. https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.2590
  24. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/28
  25. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2009.0253
  26. https://arxiv.org/abs/0709.1886
  27. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2020/06/aa37694-20/aa37694-20.html
  28. https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0206003
  29. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/07/aa33720-18/aa33720-18.html
  30. https://www.unige.ch/sciences/astro/evolution/en/research/geneva-grids-stellar-evolution-models
  31. https://www.physics.mcgill.ca/~cumming/teaching/643/hotstars.pdf
  32. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/44/pdf
  33. https://science.nasa.gov/missions/hubble/hubble-homes-in-on-a-hypergiants-home/
  34. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ac9f3d
  35. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aaa024
  36. https://www.bartol.udel.edu/~owocki/preprints/IAUS212_owocki.pdf
  37. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/374713
  38. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.14315
  39. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/44
  40. https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.3810
  41. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/506523/pdf
  42. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2016.0269
  43. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/11/aa34358-18/aa34358-18.html
  44. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full/2004/08/aa0306/aa0306.html
  45. https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0607613
  46. http://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991A&A...244..467S/abstract
  47. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2025/01/aa52150-24/aa52150-24.html
  48. https://www.space.com/astronomy/james-webb-space-telescope/jwst-spots-dust-cloaked-red-supergiant-star-just-before-it-went-supernova
  49. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abd032
  50. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ace9d6
  51. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2012/10/aa17166-11/aa17166-11.html
  52. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2014/03/aa22421-13/aa22421-13.html
  53. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.456.1424A/abstract
  54. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...671.2059D/abstract
  55. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2024/06/aa48775-23/aa48775-23.html
  56. https://phys.org/news/2025-02-rho-cas-kin-insights-mysterious.html
  57. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.09387
  58. https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/483/3/3792/5238742
  59. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ad6b2b
  60. https://www.astro.oma.be/en/new-insights-into-the-mysterious-yellow-hypergiant-stars-outbursts/
  61. https://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1409/
  62. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20010083764/downloads/20010083764.pdf
  63. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2025/02/aa49384-24/aa49384-24.html
  64. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.08550
  65. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2023/01/aa44396-22/aa44396-22.html
  66. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1423
  67. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968AJS....73R.209W/abstract
  68. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2025/06/aa54748-25/aa54748-25.html
  69. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/133478
  70. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/physics-and-astronomy/luminous-blue-variable-stars
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5620488/
  72. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1005223314464
  73. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2018/01/aa29920-16/aa29920-16.html
  74. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4434/8/1/20
  75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344176040_Luminous_Blue_Variables
  76. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22990
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.