Q star

Q starMain

Community hub

Q star

7 pages, 0 posts

0 subscribers

Recent from talks

Be the first to start a discussion here.

Recent from talks

Be the first to start a discussion here.

Contribute something

About hubMembersContent overviewUpdatesRules

Main reference articles

Q star

View on Wikipedia

from Wikipedia

A Q-star, also known as a grey hole, is a hypothetical type of compact, heavy neutron star with an exotic state of matter. Such a star can be smaller than the progenitor star's Schwarzschild radius and have a gravitational pull so strong that some light, but not all light, can escape.^[1] Light going in the opposite direction of the star’s center would be the most likely to escape from it, while light going in a direction almost parallel to its surface is the most likely not to escape. The Q stands for a conserved particle number. A Q-star may be mistaken for a stellar black hole.^[2] Some stellar black holes might be grey holes, two of which are V404 Cygni and Cygnus X-1. ^[1]

Types of Q-stars

[edit]

Q-ball^[3]
B-ball, stable Q-balls with a large baryon number B. They may exist in neutron stars that have absorbed Q-ball(s).^[3]

References

[edit]

^ ^a ^b Brecher, K. (1993-05-01). "Gray Holes". American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #182. 182: 55.07. Bibcode:1993AAS...182.5507B.
^ *Miller, J. C.; Shahbaz, T.; Nolan, L. A. (1998). "Are Q-stars a serious threat for stellar-mass black hole candidates?". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 294 (2): L25 – L29. arXiv:astro-ph/9708065. Bibcode:1998MNRAS.294L..25M. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01384.x.
^ ^a ^b Kusenko, Alexander (2006). Properties and signatures of supersymmetric Q-balls. workshop on Exotic Physics with Neutrino Telescopes. Uppsala, Sweden. arXiv:hep-ph/0612159. Bibcode:2006hep.ph...12159K.

View on Grokipedia

from Grokipedia

A Q star, also known as a strange star or grey hole, is a hypothetical type of compact star composed of strange quark matter, an exotic state where up, down, and strange quarks are deconfined under extreme densities.^[1] Predicted by the strange quark matter hypothesis, Q stars could form through the conversion of a neutron star core when densities exceed about 5–10 times nuclear density, leading to a phase transition from hadronic to quark matter.^[2] Unlike neutron stars, which are supported against gravitational collapse by neutron degeneracy pressure, Q stars are self-bound by the strong nuclear force, resulting in greater compactness (radii potentially below 10 km for solar masses around 1.4 M⊙) and stability up to higher masses (possibly exceeding 2 M⊙) without forming black holes.^[3] Their surfaces would consist of bare quark matter, potentially explaining observed anomalies in some pulsars, such as rapid cooling or high densities, though no conclusive evidence exists as of November 2025.^[4]

Theoretical Foundations

Quark Matter Basics

Quark matter represents a distinct phase of matter within quantum chromodynamics (QCD), characterized by the deconfinement of quarks and gluons from their usual hadronic bound states. In this phase, quarks and gluons behave as asymptotically free quasiparticles, forming a plasma-like state under extreme conditions of density exceeding approximately

10^{15}

g/cm³, which is several times the nuclear saturation density of ordinary matter. This deconfinement transition occurs when the energy scales overcome the strong force's confining potential, allowing collective excitations of quarks and gluons to dominate the thermodynamics.^[5]^[6] A key feature enabling this deconfined state is asymptotic freedom, a fundamental property of QCD where the strong coupling constant

\alpha_s

diminishes at high momentum transfers or short distances. At the ultra-high densities relevant to quark matter, this weakening of interactions permits quarks to propagate with perturbative accuracy, approximating an ideal Fermi gas of massless or lightly massive quarks. This contrasts with the non-perturbative regime at lower densities, where confinement binds quarks into color-neutral hadrons like protons and neutrons.^[7] The MIT bag model provides a phenomenological framework to model quark matter by treating the deconfined region as a "bag" with an additional energy term accounting for the vacuum's confinement pressure. The energy density

\varepsilon

in this model, for thermal quark matter, is expressed as

\varepsilon = \frac{\pi^2}{30} g T^4 + B,

where

g

denotes the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom (e.g., approximately 37 for two light quark flavors including gluons),

T

is the temperature, and

B

is the bag constant, typically valued between 50 and 100 MeV/fm³, representing the non-perturbative energy difference between the perturbative and true QCD vacua. This simple addition captures the essence of confinement without solving full QCD dynamics. Compared to hadronic matter, the equation of state (EOS) of quark matter—relating pressure

P

to energy density

\varepsilon

via

P = P(\varepsilon)

—is notably softer, implying a lower pressure for a given

\varepsilon

. This softness stems from the increased number of degrees of freedom in the deconfined phase and its near-conformal behavior at high densities, governed by asymptotic freedom, in contrast to the stiffer hadronic EOS dominated by fewer interacting baryons. Consequently, quark matter supports more compact configurations in stellar objects, enhancing mass-to-radius ratios.

Strange Quark Matter Hypothesis

The strange quark matter hypothesis posits that a phase of matter consisting of roughly equal numbers of up, down, and strange quarks could represent the absolute ground state of baryonic matter, potentially more stable than ordinary nuclear matter composed of protons and neutrons. This idea builds on the earlier suggestion by A. R. Bodmer in 1971, who proposed that deconfined quark matter in collapsed nuclear configurations might be stable if it possesses a lower energy per baryon than atomic nuclei. However, it was Edward Witten who, in 1984, specifically advocated for the inclusion of strange quarks to achieve this stability, arguing that three-flavor quark matter (u, d, s) minimizes the Fermi energy through balanced flavor populations, thereby reducing the overall energy compared to two-flavor (u, d) quark matter or iron-56 nuclei, which have an energy per baryon of approximately 930 MeV.^[8] The Bodmer-Witten hypothesis implies absolute stability of strange quark matter if its energy per baryon falls below that of the most stable atomic nuclei, a condition met when the strange quark mass allows for sufficient binding. Calculations indicate that this energy per baryon can be as low as 100-200 MeV below the nuclear threshold under favorable parameters. A key quantity in these assessments is Ω, defined as the difference in energy per baryon relative to the neutron mass, approximated for the rest mass contribution as Ω = (m_u n_u + m_d n_d + m_s n_s)/n_B - m_N, where m_u, m_d, and m_s are the quark masses, n_u, n_d, and n_s are the respective quark number densities (with n_u ≈ n_d ≈ n_s ≈ n_B/3 for equal flavor content), n_B is the baryon number density, and m_N ≈ 939 MeV is the nucleon mass. With m_s ≈ 150 MeV and assuming massless up and down quarks, this yields Ω < 930 MeV, confirming the potential for strange quark matter to be more stable than iron-56. Theoretical modeling of strange quark matter often employs the Fermi gas approximation for non-interacting quarks to estimate the kinetic energy contributions from the degenerate quark Fermi seas, which dominate at high densities. This approximation treats the quarks as a free Fermi liquid, with the total energy per baryon including both kinetic terms (proportional to the Fermi momentum cubed) and the strange quark mass effects that suppress the Fermi level compared to lighter flavors. To account for strong interactions, perturbative quantum chromodynamics (QCD) corrections are incorporated, primarily through one-gluon exchange potentials that introduce attractive and repulsive components, further lowering the energy per baryon and supporting the stability hypothesis for a range of bag model parameters. These corrections ensure consistency with asymptotic QCD freedom at ultra-high densities while respecting confinement at lower scales.

Physical Properties

Density and Structure

Q-stars, hypothetical compact objects composed primarily of deconfined quark matter, exhibit central densities ranging from approximately

10^{15}

10^{16}

g/cm³, significantly exceeding the core densities of typical neutron stars, which are around

10^{14}

10^{15}

g/cm³. This ultra-high density regime arises from the equation of state (EOS) of quark matter, often modeled using frameworks like the MIT bag model or Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model, where quarks are treated as nearly free particles confined by a phenomenological bag constant. At these densities, a quark-hadron phase transition surface may form within the star, marking the boundary where hadronic matter transitions to the quark phase, influencing the overall density profile and potentially leading to mixed phases in hybrid configurations.^[9]^[10] The internal structure of Q-stars is determined by solving the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) equation, which governs hydrostatic equilibrium in general relativity for spherically symmetric, static configurations. The TOV equation is expressed as:

\frac{dP}{dr} = -\frac{G m(r) \varepsilon(r)}{r^2} \left(1 + \frac{P}{\varepsilon}\right) \left(1 + \frac{4\pi r^3 P}{m(r)}\right) \left(1 - \frac{2 G m(r)}{r c^2}\right)^{-1},

where

P

is the pressure,

\varepsilon

the energy density,

m(r)

the enclosed mass,

G

the gravitational constant, and

c

the speed of light. This differential equation is numerically integrated using a quark matter EOS, yielding mass-radius (M-R) relations that characterize the star's structure. For instance, Q-stars support stable configurations up to masses of about 2 M_

\odot

with corresponding radii around 10-12 km, depending on the specific EOS parameters.^[11]^[12] The compactness parameter for Q-stars, defined as

R/M

(with

R

in km and

M

in solar masses), typically ranges from approximately 5-7 km/M_

\odot

for a 1.4 M_

\odot

object, indicating greater compactness compared to neutron stars due to the stiffer EOS of quark matter at ultra-high densities, which resists compression more effectively beyond nuclear saturation. This stiffness allows Q-stars to achieve higher maximum masses while maintaining smaller radii relative to softer EOS models. At the surface, Q-stars feature a sharp transition either to a thin hadronic crust (if present) or a bare quark surface, where the density drops abruptly from quark matter levels to near-zero, potentially leading to emissions such as pions from the exposed quark layer due to strong interactions at the interface.^[13]^[14]

Stability Conditions

The maximum mass of Q-stars, determined by solving the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) equation for the equation of state (EOS) of quark matter, typically ranges from 1.5 to 2.0

M_\odot

, depending on the bag constant

B

in the MIT bag model, comparable to observed neutron star masses.^[15]^[16] Lower values of

B

(e.g.,

B^{1/4} \approx 145-170

MeV) yield higher maximum masses approaching 2

M_\odot

or more, while higher

B

reduces the limit to around 1.5

M_\odot

or below.^[17]^[16] Stability against radial oscillations requires the adiabatic index

\Gamma

of quark matter to exceed

4/3

everywhere in the star, preventing dynamical collapse; the relativistic degenerate EOS of strange quark matter satisfies this criterion, ensuring configurations up to the maximum mass remain stable.^[18]^[19] A Chandrasekhar-like mass limit for Q-stars arises from the TOV structure equations, with

M_\mathrm{max} \propto \frac{(\hbar c / G)^{3/2}}{\mu^2},

where

\mu

is the quark chemical potential, which depends on the baryon density and

B

.^[17] This scaling reflects the balance between gravitational binding and the Fermi energy of quarks, analogous to white dwarf limits but adapted for self-bound quark matter. Color superconductivity further stabilizes Q-stars by inducing quark pairing that stiffens the EOS at high densities, potentially increasing

M_\mathrm{max}

by 10-20% relative to unpaired quark matter through enhanced pressure support.^[16]^[20]

Formation and Evolution

Gravitational Collapse Pathways

Q stars primarily form through the core-collapse process in massive stars with zero-age main sequence masses greater than 8 M_⊙, where the collapse surpasses the neutron degeneracy pressure limit, reaching densities exceeding 5 × 10^{14} g/cm³ and triggering quark deconfinement to form stable quark matter. In this scenario, the failure of neutron support leads directly to a transition from hadronic to deconfined quark matter, supported by the stiff quark matter equation of state at supranuclear densities.^[21] The dynamics of this phase transition are characterized by a first-order process featuring a mixed phase of coexisting hadronic and quark matter, during which latent heat is released, potentially causing a temporary halt in the collapse and enabling a rebound that contributes to the supernova explosion mechanism.^[22] This rebound occurs at densities around 3–7 × 10^{14} g/cm³, depending on the bag constant parameter in the quark equation of state, with the transition altering the adiabatic index and facilitating shock propagation.^[21] An alternative formation pathway involves the gradual conversion of preexisting neutron stars into Q stars via strangeness production in their dense cores, driven by spin-down over timescales of approximately 10^5 years for typical magnetic fields and initial rotation periods.^[23] This process requires the core density to exceed the deconfinement threshold through gradual compression, leading to a metastable transition without explosive dynamics. Recent theoretical studies as of 2025 suggest additional pathways, such as the formation of strange quark stars from supernova explosions in compact star binaries involving evolved companions like carbon-oxygen or Wolf-Rayet stars.^[24]

Evolutionary Differences from Neutron Stars

Q stars, composed of deconfined quark matter, exhibit distinct evolutionary trajectories compared to neutron stars due to their unique internal composition and interaction mechanisms. One key difference lies in their cooling processes. In Q stars, neutrino emission is dominated by the quark direct Urca process, which proceeds via quark flavor conversions (e.g.,

d + u \to u + e + \bar{\nu}_e

) and results in an emissivity

\epsilon_\nu \propto T^6

, where

T

is the temperature.^[25] This contrasts with neutron stars, where the slower modified Urca process governs cooling in the absence of direct Urca, yielding

\epsilon_\nu \propto T^8

.^[26] Consequently, Q stars cool more rapidly in their early phases, achieving surface temperatures significantly lower than those of neutron stars after approximately

10^3

years, often by factors of 10 or more, due to the enhanced neutrino luminosity.^[27] This faster thermal evolution can lead to Q stars appearing as relatively cold objects in X-ray observations even at young ages.^[28] Another evolutionary distinction arises in spin evolution and magnetic field dynamics. Q stars may generate stronger magnetic fields, potentially reaching surface strengths of

\sim 10^{15}

G, through dynamo processes driven by turbulent convection in the quark matter core during the post-formation deleptonization phase.^[29] These fields, amplified by the high electrical conductivity of quark matter, exceed typical neutron star dipolar fields (

\sim 10^{12}

G) and resemble those in magnetars.^[30] The resultant magnetic torque accelerates spin-down, but the smaller moment of inertia of Q stars—arising from their higher compactness—allows them to support faster initial rotations. This enables Q stars to evolve into pulsars with periods below 1 ms, faster than the

\sim 1

ms limit for most neutron stars, particularly in low-mass configurations.^[31] Such rapid rotators provide a potential observational signature, as millisecond pulsars with periods under 1 ms could indicate quark matter interiors.^[32] The outcomes of binary mergers further highlight evolutionary divergences. When two Q stars merge, the combined system may directly collapse into a black hole composed of quark matter, bypassing intermediate hadronic phases, or trigger ignition of burning fronts that propagate through any admixed nuclear material, converting it to stable strange quark matter.^[33] This differs from neutron star mergers, where the post-merger remnant often undergoes a phase transition to hyperonic matter before collapsing, potentially delaying black hole formation or producing distinct gravitational wave signatures.^[34] These processes in Q star binaries can release energy through quark recombination or deflagration waves, influencing ejecta dynamics and electromagnetic counterparts.^[35] Finally, Q stars may have shorter overall lifetimes compared to neutron stars, primarily due to dynamical instabilities at high masses. For masses exceeding

\sim 2 M_\odot

, certain equations of state predict mechanical instability, leading to collapse on timescales of seconds to minutes under perturbations.^[36] In principle, if strangeness fraction decreases via diffusion or weak interactions in marginally stable configurations, a Q star could revert to a neutron star state, though this process remains theoretically debated and unobserved.^[37] These instabilities contrast with the longer-term stability of neutron stars up to similar masses, underscoring the precarious equilibrium of quark matter.^[38]

Types and Variants

Strange Stars

Strange stars represent the canonical form of quark stars, consisting entirely of bulk strange quark matter (SQM) in which up, down, and strange quarks coexist in roughly equal proportions without any overlying hadronic crust.^[2] These self-bound objects arise under the hypothesis that SQM is the absolute ground state of baryonic matter, more stable than nuclear matter at zero pressure.^[39] For a typical mass of 1

M_\odot

, strange stars have compact radii of approximately 10 km, comparable to those of neutron stars but distinguished by their uniform quark composition throughout.^[40] The equation of state (EOS) for strange stars is commonly described using the MIT bag model, treating quarks as non-interacting fermions confined within a phenomenological "bag" to account for confinement. In the limit of equal or massless up, down, and strange quarks, the EOS takes the simple form:

P = \frac{1}{3} (\epsilon - 4B),

where

P

is the pressure,

\epsilon

is the energy density, and

B

is the bag constant (typically 50–100 MeV/fm³).^[41] This ultrarelativistic EOS implies a speed of sound

v_s = c / \sqrt{3}

vs=c/3

, saturating the causal limit and yielding a particularly stiff behavior at high densities.^[42] Such properties ensure stability provided the general conditions for SQM stability are met, as outlined in foundational quark matter theory.^[43] A defining feature of strange stars is their bare quark surface, lacking the extended neutron-rich crust of ordinary neutron stars; instead, a thin electron layer (~10–100 fm thick) forms to achieve local charge neutrality, creating a strong electric dipole field (~10¹⁷–10¹⁹ V/cm) at the interface.^[44] This configuration may enable the ejection of strangelets—small, stable nuggets of SQM—from the surface, particularly under dynamical perturbations or magnetic influences.^[45] The mass-radius (M-R) curve for strange stars exhibits a steeper slope compared to neutron stars, with no low-mass turnover and radii that remain nearly constant (~8–12 km) up to near the maximum mass before a sharp decline.^[46] The maximum mass, typically 1.5–2 $M_\odot$ depending on model parameters, is highly sensitive to the strange quark mass $m_s$ ; higher $m_s$ values soften the EOS at moderate densities, reducing both the maximum mass and stellar radii.^[47]

Hybrid Quark Stars

Hybrid quark stars represent a class of compact objects where deconfined quark matter coexists with hadronic matter in distinct phases, forming a structured interior that transitions from a high-density quark core to outer hadronic layers. The central region consists of a pure quark core at densities exceeding

\rho > 2 \times 10^{15}

g/cm³, beyond which the deconfinement of quarks into a quark-gluon plasma occurs, surrounded by a mixed phase of quark and hadronic matter, and capped by a hadronic envelope resembling the outer layers of neutron stars. This layered configuration arises from the application of the Glendenning construction, which permits global charge neutrality throughout the star while allowing local charge imbalances between phases, thereby enabling a spatially extended mixed phase without invoking mechanical instabilities.^[48] The phase transition from hadronic to quark matter in hybrid stars adheres to the Gibbs conditions for thermodynamic equilibrium at zero temperature, requiring equal baryon chemical potentials (

\mu_B

) and pressures in both phases, alongside mechanical stability. This ensures that the two phases can coexist in the mixed region without violating the conditions of chemical and thermal equilibrium, leading to structured interfaces rather than sharp boundaries. The fundamental equation governing the transition is the pressure continuity condition:

P_{\text{quark}}(\mu_B) = P_{\text{hadron}}(\mu_B)

where

P

denotes pressure as a function of the baryon chemical potential. This relation defines the coexistence pressures and densities, resulting in stable hybrid star sequences with maximum masses typically spanning 1.8 to 2.2

M_\odot

, compatible with observed high-mass pulsars while accommodating softer equations of state in the quark phase. In contrast to pure strange stars, which lack a substantial hadronic component and thus have no traditional crust, hybrid quark stars feature a thicker outer crust of hadronic matter, approximately 100 meters in thickness, supported by the pressure balance at lower densities. This crust, formed from neutron-rich nuclei embedded in a degenerate electron gas, can influence surface emission properties and may produce observable effects in X-ray spectra, such as modified thermal radiation or absorption features arising from the compositional gradient at the core-crust interface.^[49]

Observational Aspects

Detection Challenges

Direct detection of Q stars, hypothetical compact objects composed primarily of deconfined quark matter, remains elusive due to their observational similarities with neutron stars in many electromagnetic spectra. In particular, the radio emission from rotating Q stars, manifesting as pulsar signals, is largely indistinguishable from that of neutron stars, as both arise from similar magnetospheric processes involving pair production and coherent curvature radiation. However, potential anomalies in glitch rates—sudden spin-ups attributed to angular momentum transfer in the stellar interior—could arise from quark superfluidity in Q stars. Gravitational wave observations from binary mergers offer a promising avenue to probe Q stars, though distinguishing them requires detecting subtle post-merger signatures. During the ringdown phase following a Q star merger, the emitted waves may exhibit characteristic frequencies around 2 kHz, influenced by the equation of state of quark matter, differing from the higher or more varied modes in neutron star remnants. These signatures, potentially including damped oscillations tied to quark deconfinement, could be detectable by advanced observatories like LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA, but current signals from events like GW170817 lack sufficient post-merger detail to confirm such distinctions. In X-ray binaries, Q stars hosting accreting companions display modified burster behavior due to their unique surface composition. The thin, positively charged quark crust imposes a higher Coulomb barrier, inhibiting the ignition of thermonuclear runaway processes in accumulated hydrogen/helium layers and resulting in fewer or absent type I X-ray bursts compared to neutron star systems. This reduced burst frequency provides an indirect diagnostic, observable in low-mass X-ray binaries where neutron stars routinely exhibit recurrent bursts. Indirect evidence may also emerge from thermal evolution studies, where Q stars predict steeper cooling curves than standard neutron star models owing to enhanced neutrino emission from quark matter. These rapid declines in surface temperature, driven by direct Urca processes in deconfined quarks, contrast with the slower cooling of neutron stars and can be tested against X-ray luminosity measurements of isolated compact objects using telescopes like Chandra and XMM-Newton. For instance, young pulsars like Cas A show cooling rates that challenge hadronic models but align better with quark matter predictions in some scenarios.

Constraints from Observations

Observations of massive pulsars impose stringent limits on the equation of state (EOS) for quark matter in Q stars. The pulsar PSR J0740+6620 has a precisely measured mass of 2.08 ± 0.07 M_⊙, establishing a lower bound on the maximum mass supported by any EOS for compact objects. This observation rules out soft EOS models for quark matter, as they would not sustain such high masses without collapsing. In the MIT bag model, this constrains the bag constant B to values that yield a sufficiently stiff EOS, with studies indicating consistency with mass measurements of multiple pulsars while predicting consistent radii.^[50]^[51]^[52] Recent Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER) observations provide a radius of 12.33^{+0.76}_{-0.78} km for PSR J0740+6620, further tightening constraints on quark matter EOS by favoring stiffer models.^[53] Binary pulsar timing observations further limit the presence of quark matter in compact stars. The orbital decay of PSR B1913+16, the first discovered binary pulsar, matches general relativity predictions to within 0.2% precision over decades of monitoring. This agreement constrains hybrid star models with significant quark cores, as a large quark matter fraction could alter the post-Keplerian parameters through changes in the internal structure or energy loss mechanisms. Specific analyses suggest that the quark matter fraction must be less than 10% in such models to remain consistent with the observed timing data.^[54] The gravitational wave event GW170817 and its associated kilonova AT 2017gfo offer key empirical constraints on stable Q stars. The merger's tidal deformability constrains the compactness and EOS of compact objects, disfavoring some soft quark matter scenarios but allowing stiffer Q star models consistent with observations.^[55]^[56] Cosmic ray observations provide additional limits on strangelets, hypothetical nuggets of strange quark matter that could be ejected from Q stars or produced in high-energy processes. The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS-02) on the International Space Station has searched for strangelets in the cosmic ray flux but detected none, setting stringent upper limits and limiting the abundance of stable strange quark matter in the galaxy.^[57]^[58]

Astrophysical Implications

Role in Compact Object Populations

Q-stars, hypothetical compact objects composed of deconfined quark matter, are predicted to represent a minor component of the galactic compact object population, comprising less than 1% of the roughly 3,700 known pulsars as of 2025. This low fraction arises from glitch statistics, as quark matter lacks the substantial nuclear crust and superfluid neutron component characteristic of neutron stars, which are responsible for the large observed glitches (ΔΩ/Ω ∼ 10^{-6} to 10^{-4}) in about 5-10% of radio pulsars; models indicate that Q-stars would exhibit significantly fewer or no such large glitches due to their thin or absent crust, limiting their identification as glitching pulsars.^[59] In binary systems, Q-stars may form pairs with white dwarfs, where accretion of hadronic matter from the companion onto the Q-star surface can lead to conversion (ignition) of the accreted layer into quark matter, potentially powering X-ray transients through explosive energy release or sustained accretion luminosity. Such systems are rare in population synthesis models, with Q-stars constituting only 1-4% of compact objects in binaries overall and 3-18% in low-mass X-ray binaries, often resulting from the accretion-induced phase transition in neutron star progenitors. These binaries contribute to transient phenomena but remain undetected, distinguishing Q-stars from the more common neutron star-white dwarf pairs observed in radio surveys.^[60] Galactically, Q-stars are expected to be preferentially distributed in young stellar populations originating from high-mass star clusters, as their formation requires progenitors more massive than typical neutron star precursors (above ∼2 M_⊙ at core collapse) to achieve the densities for quark deconfinement, unlike the broader, older field distribution of neutron stars shaped by prolonged cooling and binary interactions. Population synthesis simulations incorporating these evolutionary pathways predict a total of 10-100 Q-stars in the Milky Way, a modest number testable through enhanced pulsar timing and radio surveys with facilities like the Square Kilometre Array (SKA), which could detect isolated or binary Q-stars via their distinct spin-down rates or lack of glitches.^[60]

Connections to Gamma-Ray Bursts

One proposed mechanism linking Q-stars to gamma-ray bursts involves the coalescence of binary Q-stars, during which tidal disruption ejects deconfined quark matter that can power relativistic jets through rapid neutron-capture (r-process) nucleosynthesis, yielding element abundances enhanced by the incorporation of strange quarks compared to standard neutron star merger scenarios.^[61] The energy budget for such events derives primarily from quark deconfinement during the merger, releasing approximately

10^{50}

erg in electromagnetic radiation, which aligns with the isotropic fluences observed in short gamma-ray bursts (sGRBs), while the subsequent afterglow arises from the conversion of ejected quark matter back to hadronic states, producing extended emission.^[62] A foundational model for this connection was advanced by Haensel, Paczyński, and Amsterdamski in 1991, positing that strange star mergers serve as progenitors for sGRBs and impart higher natal kick velocities of around 1000 km/s to the remnant due to asymmetric mass loss in the quark ejecta.^[62] Observational support for quark matter involvement emerges from analyses showing that certain GRB light curves, such as the X-ray afterglow of GRB 170714A, are more consistently modeled by scenarios incorporating a quark star phase transition than by purely hadronic neutron star mergers.^[63]

v t e Black holes
Outline
Types	BTZ black hole Schwarzschild Rotating Charged Virtual Kugelblitz Supermassive Primordial Direct collapse Rogue Malament–Hogarth spacetime
Size	Micro Extremal Electron Stellar Microquasar Intermediate-mass Supermassive Active galactic nucleus Quasar LQG Blazar OVV
Formation	Stellar evolution Gravitational collapse Neutron star Related links Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff limit White dwarf Related links Supernova Micronova Hypernova Related links Gamma-ray burst Binary black hole Quark star Supermassive star Quasi-star Supermassive dark star X-ray binary
Properties	Astrophysical jet Gravitational singularity Ring singularity BKL singularity Shock singularity Theorems Event horizon Photon sphere Innermost stable circular orbit Ergosphere Penrose process Blandford–Znajek process Accretion disk Hawking radiation Gravitational lens Microlens Cauchy horizon Mass inflation Bondi accretion M–sigma relation Quasi-periodic oscillation Thermodynamics Bekenstein bound Bousso's holographic bound Immirzi parameter Schwarzschild radius Spaghettification
Issues	Information paradox Complementarity Soft hair Cosmic censorship ER = EPR Final parsec problem Firewall (physics) Holographic principle No-hair theorem
Metrics	Schwarzschild (Derivation) Kerr Reissner–Nordström Kerr–Newman Hayward
Alternatives	Nonsingular black hole models Black star Dark star Dark-energy star Gravastar Magnetospheric eternally collapsing object Planck star Q star Fuzzball Geon
Analogs	Optical black hole Sonic black hole
Lists	Black holes Most massive Nearest Quasars Microquasars
Related	Outline of black holes Black Hole Initiative Black hole starship Black holes in fiction Big Bang Big Bounce Compact star Exotic star Quark star Preon star Gravitational waves Gamma-ray burst progenitors Gravity well Hypercompact stellar system Membrane paradigm Naked singularity Population III star Supermassive star Quasi-star Supermassive dark star Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer Superluminal motion Timeline of black hole physics White hole Wormhole Tidal disruption event Planet Nine
Notable	Cygnus X-1 XTE J1650-500 XTE J1118+480 A0620-00 Sagittarius A* Centaurus A Phoenix Cluster PKS 1302-102 OJ 287 SDSS J0849+1114 TON 618 MS 0735.6+7421 NeVe 1 Hercules A 3C 273 Q0906+6930 Markarian 501 ULAS J1342+0928 PSO J030947.49+271757.31 AT2018hyz Swift J1644+57 1ES 1927+654
Category Commons

History

Q star

Recent from talks

Recent from talks

Contribute something

Contribute something

Media Pages

Timelines

Articles

Notes collections

Notes

Notes

Days in Chronicle

Q star

Types of Q-stars

See also

References

Further reading

Q star

Theoretical Foundations

Quark Matter Basics

Strange Quark Matter Hypothesis

Physical Properties

Density and Structure

Stability Conditions

Formation and Evolution

Gravitational Collapse Pathways

Evolutionary Differences from Neutron Stars

Types and Variants

Strange Stars

Add your contribution

Related Hubs

Contribute something