Hubbry Logo
Ilbe StorehouseIlbe StorehouseMain
Open search
Ilbe Storehouse
Community hub
Ilbe Storehouse
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Ilbe Storehouse
Ilbe Storehouse
Ilbe Storehouse
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Daily-Best Archive (Korean: 일간베스트 저장소; Hanja: 日刊베스트 貯藏所; RR: Ilganbeseuteu Jeojangso) or Ilbe Storehouse (일베저장소; 日베貯藏所; Ilbe Jeojangso; lit. "Daily Best Archive"), also known as Ilbe, is a South Korean Internet forum that has a predominantly far-right userbase. The site was created in April 2010 and started as an archive of the daily best posts from the forum DC Inside.[citation needed]

Key Information

The site's userbase is often described as having an alt-right, anti-feminist, anti-immigrant, and anti-LGBT stance,[1][2][3] with elements of manosphere culture.[4] Due to its vocal users and strong political and cultural influence, the forum has gained widespread attention from social critics, with some labeling it a social phenomenon.[5][6][7] Some critics consider the site a Korean analogue of 4chan and 2channel.[8]

History

[edit]

Ilbe, short for Ilgan Best (일간 베스트; 日刊 베스트; lit. Daily Best), is a term for sections on the Internet forum DC Inside showing the most popular threads of the day. Ilbe was among several archive websites that aggregated deleted threads. In November 2016, the sections were removed from DC Inside after the media started claiming that the Ilbe Archive was the original website while DC Inside branched off of it.[citation needed]

The original website called Ilbe was launched by Moe-myeongsu (모에명수; 모에名手) in July 2009 as an archive of the DC Inside TV comedies gallery. In 2016, he attempted to sue the owners of a new Ilbe site, claiming they had mimicked his website while it was offline for maintenance.[9]

In April 2010, another website with the same name was created by a user with the nickname SAD from the LG Twins gallery. In November, he retired from running the site and left it to the users active at the time: Bucheo (부처) and Sae-bu (새부, from 새침부끄; Saechim-bukkeu). Bucheo would later also leave the site due to military conscription, while Sae-bu would hire operators, programmers, and other staff to run the site. A year later, it was reorganized as an independent forum.[10]

In December 2012, the site had over one million registered users. In April 2015, it reached over 2 million accounts. In September 2016, it had over 20,000 viewers at peak hours. Even in the mornings, when the number of viewers was minimal, the viewer count exceeded 10,000 people. According to the website administration, this data did not include mobile users, who made up 65% of total traffic.[11][12]

In 2016, when the Park Geun-Hye scandal happened, the site's audience reduced significantly, going from 700,000 daily viewers in September to 520,000 in December. Concurrent views at peak hours also decreased to 10,000 views.[13][12]

Structure

[edit]

The website has very few rules, but it does prohibit users from mentioning each other by their username or getting too close to each other to prevent new users or dissenters from being down-voted indiscriminately by existing users.[clarification needed] This policy promotes anonymity and equality. In contrast, on other popular Korean forums, older users are respected more and hold greater authority during discussions. The site is largely unmoderated, with an exception for cases that may result in litigation or cases in response to complaints.[citation needed]

An account can be created with just an email address; the site doesn't require any documents or an ID number for registration, unlike other Korean websites. Users begin with a reputation of one, but can descend to zero as a result of downvoting by other users. Registration is required to post but not to view the boards, except for the NSFW boards. An exception is the Random chat (잡담) board, which doesn't require an account—users are named "Anonym" followed by a random number. It was created for users who were tired of the Jjalbang board's obsession with politics, but it's not nearly as popular.[citation needed]

Jjalbang (짤방-유머; jjalbang-yumeo, Memes and Humor) is the most active board on Ilbe. Popular posts are featured on the Daily Best (일간베스트) boards, but may return to Jjalbang if they receive too many dislikes. Like and dislike buttons on the board are named to the daily best! (일베로; ilbe-ro) and democratization (민주화; 民主化; minjuhwa). Only registered users can vote, and users with a high reputation can vote twice.[14]

The Politics board was created to separate serious political posts from general forums, but it later became a distinct community, often antagonizing the Jjalbang board, which often features political memes. Politics favors Park Geun-hye, while in Jjalbang, Lee Myung-bak is preferred. In 2020, a core of long-time users migrated to DC Inside, initially to the Wuhan Minor gallery, and then to the US Politics Minor gallery.[citation needed]

The Animation board is often described as the center of Ilbe. Its main topic is Japanese anime, but other topics are discussed, and the board is often compared to the Random board. Users on the Animation board tend to socialize more than other users; they gather in KakaoTalk chats to talk and play games, despite moderator efforts to prevent this. The board antagonizes the Girl groups and artists (걸그룹/연예인) board, not only because it is considered a 3D reservation, but also due to the gap between Japanese and Korean pop culture.[citation needed]

Subculture

[edit]

A large part of Ilbe's subculture comes from the users' collective identity as losers: until the founding of the site, most of the large Korean forums were left-leaning and hostile to moderate right-wing opinions.[15] Thus, its userbase has embraced many of the derogatory terms used to refer to them, such as Ilgay (일게이).[citation needed]

The site inherited a large part of its subculture from DC Inside. Many controversial memes originate from DC Inside, including Roh Moo-hyun memes from DC Inside's Happhil gallery, as well as hong'eo (홍어; 䱋魚; lit. skates, a slur targeting Jeolla people) and eomuk (어묵, derogatory term used to refer to Sewol ferry disaster victims) from the Basketball gallery.[citation needed]

Users are known for redacting well-known logos of organizations like universities, government structures, large private companies, as well as movie posters, and then adding tiny hints consisting of Ilbe's initials, Roh Moo-hyun's face, and other memes. Occasionally the media pick up such images and use them in reports. Evidence of such uses is recorded on the site in a distinct genre of posts called Broadcast proofs (방송 인증).[citation needed]

Another type of popular post is Dongmuljup (동물줍; lit. animal picker). It features users picking up street animals, usually birds and cats, but sometimes strange and exotic animals. The ironic term Saramjup (사람줍) describes reporting drunk people who have fainted on the streets to the police. The users who do that are termed Haeng-gays (행게이, from 행동하는 회원; lit. members in action).[citation needed]

Sniper posts (저격글) are also common on the site. They discuss posts on the site or other websites to analyze them or expose their flaws. They often feature investigations of posted photos and clues to determine where and how they were taken.[citation needed]

The site has been compared to 4chan and 2channel.[8]

Political stance

[edit]

Background

[edit]

The site's userbase is often described as having an alt-right, anti-feminist, anti-immigrant, and anti-LGBT stance.[1][2][3]

Ilbe's users generally lean to the conservative right politically,[16] and their opinions and behavior have attracted significant controversy, from both the mainstream media and the political left.[17]

Prior to the 2008 US beef protest in South Korea, opinions of right-wing supporters were mostly disregarded or criticized, because most South Korean websites at the time were dominated by left-wing users. Out of 12 major community websites in South Korea, only Ilbe and DC Inside possessed a right-wing political leaning.[15] After the protest, many right-wing internet users began to express their opinions on the internet. DC Inside and Ilbe grew quickly as myriads of new right-wing users registered.[citation needed]

As Ilbe was one of the first major online communities in South Korea with a distinctively right-wing tone, it has been noted as a haven for the right-wing on the internet.[18] The site's ideology is sometimes described as "rationalism" by its proponents, treated as a countermeasure against alleged left-wing propaganda,[19] specifically false information about the right.[20][21]

Criticism of Korean leaders

[edit]

The Ilbe community achieved notoriety among Koreans making fun of the late former president Roh Moo-hyun. The political parties have criticized Roh and other political leaders through many forms of media, such as comedy, parody music, and spreading rumors on social media. Users make an Ilbe "theme song" every year, and they regularly parody popular songs with lyrics that criticize leaders. Users compose their parody songs as propaganda to attract people to join the community. The songs contain exaggerated expressions of political leaders and colloquially refer to them as MC Muhyeon (Roh), DJ Daejung (Kim Dae-jung), MC Jong-Un (Kim Jong Un), and MC Geunhye (Park Geun-hye). Users also call 23 May "The day of Gravity", making fun of Roh's death by claiming that gravity killed him. One of their notable[according to whom?] memes is the "Noala", an image of Roh with a photoshopped koala face. Users also created the label Unji (운지; 隕地, composed of hanja characters meaning 'to fall' and 'ground', a reference to Unjicheon [ko] beverage promotion clips). A distinct part of the site's slang is the -no (노) verb ending, referencing Roh's surname.[14][22][23][24]

On January 25, 2018, a poster showing Roh making the Ilbe hand sign appeared in Times Square, New York. Users claimed to have posted the advertisement to commemorate the birthday of then-president Moon Jae-in. The advertisement also featured Noala and Unji memes.[25][26][3]

On November 7, 2013, former first lady Lee Hee-ho, whose husband was former president Kim Dae-jung, accused some users of degrading deceased president Kim by spreading false information.[27]

Presidents with popular support on the site are called gakha (가카, corrupted from 閣下 각하; lit. Your Excellency, an obsolete title associated with dictatorship). It was initially used to refer to Lee Myung-bak, who purportedly planned to restore the title, and then it was used for Park Chung Hee (원조가카; 元祖閣下; wonjogaka; lit. original gakha) and his daughter Park Geun-hye (레카; leka, short for 레이디 가카; leidi gaka, i.e. "Lady Gakha"). The term 갓카; gaska, with 갓 being the Korean transliteration of the English word God, is also used to imply the president possesses omnipotence. Like most South Korean right-wing political communities, former right-wing presidents Syngman Rhee, Park Chung-hee, and Chun Doo-hwan are heavily praised by users.[citation needed]

Denial of Gwangju Uprising

[edit]

Despite the South Korean government's official recognition of the Gwangju Uprising as a democratic movement, Ilbe's userbase is extremely critical of it.[citation needed]

The May 18 Memorial Foundation, one of the memorial organizations for the uprising, announced that the site was spreading conspiracy theories, such as North Korean special forces being involved in the uprising; that the uprising was a heavily armed riot; that military suppression against citizens was justifiable; and that the 5.18 Special Law (5.18특별법), which pays respect to the uprising, is unconstitutional.[28] Users label some journalists, like Monthly Chosun's former chief editor Cho Gap-je, as jwappal (좌빨; '[pro-North Korea] leftist') due to their support of the uprising.[29][30]

Hatred towards the Honam region

[edit]

Most Ilbe users have an intense dislike for the Honam region, historically known as Jeolla, in southwestern South Korea. Reasons cited include the fact that Honam had a 98% vote for a regional left-wing party candidate Kim Dae-jung, and the belief that the Gwangju Uprising has been glorified by those living there, to the extent that all other moments in the history of Korean democratization are overlooked, and the belief that it was a riot instead of a democratization uprising or movement. The intense dislike manifests as verbal attacks against Jeolla and related political figures.[31][32]

Misogyny

[edit]

Ilbe users think that women should be deferential to men. They take a hostile attitude toward types of South Korean women that they deem undesirable, and express antipathy towards them.[33] Users label women who do not conform to such gender norms with the derogatory term gimchinyeo (김치녀; lit. kimchi woman), which is a reference to their national food, kimchi.[34] Anna Louie Sussman of The Atlantic noted that the community contained many elements of manosphere culture.[4]

Criticism

[edit]

Shin Hye-sik, a representative of the right-wing Dokrip Newspaper said that "[Ilbe users] should apologize for their problematic claims". Kim Young-hwan, a former pro-North activist,[clarification needed] said "Right-wing is an attitude to inherit conservative awareness, but in this criteria Ilbe is not right-wing. Ilbe's radical argument will escalate social chaos". Yoon Pyong-joong, professor of Hanshin University, defined Ilbe's far-right extremism as "not worth discussing at all". They all believed Ilbe should be criticized by public argument instead of by legal action.[35] In 2013 conservative magazine Shindonga released a special section to criticize Ilbe, describing it as "close to fascism rather than normal right-wing" and "antisocial".[36] Japanese journalist Yasuda Goichi, the author of The Internet and Patriotism (Netto to Aikoku), viewed Ilbe as similar to Zaitokukai, a Japanese anti-Zainichi far-right online community.[37]

One sexual assault counsellor said, "It is the combination of [the] commodification of women and peer culture which lies beneath Korean society", and women's organization activist Lee Yoon-so said, "Ilbe seems to express misogyny behind anonymity, and enjoying its propagation". Misogyny is expressed through Ilbe's subculture, including slang.[38]

The lack of moderation sometimes results in illegal and harmful behavior, including defamation and harassment. The users' actions are routinely disapproved of by Korean officials. A notable case was when the Korea Communications Standards Commission (KCSC) requested that Ilbe regulate its problematic content that was "harmful for teenagers".[39] On the other hand, the site has been praised for its anonymity and open expression of right-wing opinions: Ahn Hyung-Hwan, a spokesman for the right-wing Saenuri Party mentioned Ilbe as a "free space where innocent people can speak their minds freely".[40] In a parliamentary inspection held in October 2013, a member of the Democratic Party, Yu Seung-hui, described Ilbe as "antisocial". He released information from the KCSC, including hundreds of submitted complaints about harmful content on the site promoting suicide, crime, drug usage, sexism, and violence, as well as defamation and discrimination against left-wing politicians and the Jeolla region.[41]

As some of the users engage in harmful behavior both online and offline, the site has acquired a generally negative image.[42][43] Thus, users tend to not reveal they are an Ilbe user in the real world to avoid ostracization. Users devised a hand sign that represents the Korean initials of the site's name to discretely indicate they use Ilbe.[44]

At times, Korean celebrities have accidentally used Ilbe terminology on social media, leading people to think they are site members. To avoid being misunderstood as a site member, artists and companies add disclaimers to their products and publicly deny their affiliation. For example, the agency of K-pop dance group Crayon Pop described the site as "antisocial" while denying alleged involvement with it. Despite that, Crayon Pop artists became icons on the site, and its users started massively purchasing their albums.[45][46] Korean professional gamer Hong Jin-ho denied his alleged involvement with the site, writing "I have never visited Ilbe. I heard about Ilbe and it is disagreeable. Such allegations are disgusting." on his Twitter account.[47] Conservative Saenuri Party member Kim Jin-tae raised controversy when he accessed the site with his laptop during a parliamentary inspection at the National Assembly.[48]

Controversies

[edit]

Ilbe users have organized mass protests that included singing Ilbe songs in city squares, and as a result, many users were tried for degrading the public order. On 28 November 2013, the first trial was conducted for defamation committed by a user who injured the honor of a Gwangju Uprising victim by describing a photo of his coffin as a "cash delivery".[49] The offender said that he felt sorry for his actions and had sent an apology to the victims by phone call, but the organization related to Gwangju Uprising victims said there was no such apology. He requested the jurisdictional transfer of his case from Gwangju District Court to Daegu District Court and it was accepted.[50]

The site also caused controversy for mocking the death of boy-band singer Lim Yoon-taek.[51]

In April 2013, after Anonymous Korea released the membership list of Uriminzokkiri, Ilbe users engaged in a witch-hunt of many people from the list, decrying them as "communists" and "North Korean spies".[citation needed]

After the Seoul National University Student Council's declaration of protest against the 2013 South Korea election meddling scandal, a user released photos of some council members and stated, "I don't care whether you guys lynch them or not".[52] The council stated that they were considering a lawsuit against the site.[citation needed]

On 30 September 2013, a 32-year-old male Ilbe user protested in front of Ewha Womans University. He hung a cardboard sign around his neck with derogatory messages written about Ewha University students, comfort women, and other Korean women. Some comments related to women's genitalia while others stated that such women were "communist" and "pro-North Korea". He was fined ₩1,500,000 by the Seoul West Prosecutor's Office, but he blamed this on "false accusation".[53][54]

On 7 November 2013, former first lady Lee Hee-ho, whose husband was former president Kim Dae-jung, accused some Ilbe users of defaming deceased president Kim by spreading false information.[55]

On 10 December 2013, an Ilbe user claiming to be an employee of the Comotomo feeding bottle company alleged that he interrupted the manufacturing process by sucking on feeding bottles. He confirmed his employment at the company by uploading his photo on Ilbe under the title "Titty Party" and commented, "Sometimes I suck this feeding bottle when I miss female breasts so much". His post raised outrage in the childcare community, for his vulgarism and hygiene concerns. Comotomo Korea released an official apology for the controversy and mentioned their employment of the individual was a mistake.[56] The employee's accident report was revealed, in which he confessed: "I submitted vulgar contents on Ilbe. I caused economic and mental damage to the company and consumers for my own entertainment. The feeding bottle controversy that I created is totally false and I will take any legal responsibility."[57]

The Seoul Central District Court accepted a provisional injunction against Ilbe. It was petitioned by a critic of the site who was degraded and threatened by its users.[58] As a result, the site was forced to delete some offending content.[citation needed]

Some police officers and soldiers publicly described former presidents Chun Doo-hwan and Park Chung Hee as "patriotic" on Ilbe, which caused controversy because they violated the political neutrality required for public officers.[59] In another instance, a police officer described left-wing protesters as "rioters" on the site. He was sent to the Yongsan police office disciplinary committee.[60]

Some Ilbe members allegedly registered on K-pop band SHINee's official fan site, Shinee World, to post defamatory comments about Jonghyun after he voiced his support for a student cause in support of gay rights.[61] Moreover, they posted obscene photos with offensive captions related to women's bodies on the fan site.[62]

In 2016, after the femicide incident at Gangnam Station, Ilbe Storehouse users have confronted the mourners, carrying anti-mourner or misogynist messages. One of the users held a sign saying "Carnivores aren't the problem—animals that commit crimes are the problem... A Zootopia Korea without prejudice or bias. Currently ranked number one in the world for public safety, but let's make an even safer Korea together—men and women alike."[63]

In August 2017, Gi Maeng-gi, author of the Naver webtoon My ID is Gangnam Beauty, filed a misdemeanor complaint against an Ilbe member for making malicious posts about her and her feminist views on the site. The offending individual later posted a copy of the complaint on Ilbe under the title "I was sued by a webtoon writer", and he accused the prosecutor of being biased.[citation needed]

Poster vandalism

[edit]

In December 2013, some Ilbe users vandalized hand-written posters in universities and colleges around South Korea which criticized political indifference, social disharmony, inequality, South Korea spy allegations, an ongoing rail strike, and other political and social issues. The posters originated from Korea University and spread among some other Korean universities.[64] The posters were seen as far-left, communistic, and pro-North Korea by the users involved.[65]

The posters on the Korea University campus were vandalized by Ilbe users.[66] A user confirmed his participation in the vandalism by uploading his photo online with sexually degrading comments against the original writer of the poster. After it became controversial, he revealed his identity and uploaded an apology for his actions, but also announced that he would accuse people who degraded him and his actions.[67]

Similar vandalism is ongoing nationwide[needs update] such as at Busan University,[68] Hannam University in Daejeon,[69] and Sogang University.[70]

Ha Tae-keung, at the time a member of the conservative Saenuri Party, described Ilbe users who committed such vandalism as "losers".[71]

Hacking cases

[edit]

In 2012, some anonymous Ilbe users attempted an XSS attack against Todayhumor, a website with a left-wing stance. The administrator of Todayhumor announced that he would consider legal action against Ilbe.[72]

An unknown hacker group made a distributed denial-of-service attack on Ilbe on 7 April 2013.[73] The attack was reported as possible revenge by Anonymous for Ilbe's vandalism in the #OpIsrael IRC. Anonymous Korea claimed on its Twitter account that it was not involved with the attack on Ilbe, but mentioned that the site's members entered the chatroom used by Anonymous hackers, used insulting language, and spammed the chatroom. The relationship between Anonymous Korea and Anonymous remains ambiguous.[74]

Sewol ferry victims defamation

[edit]

In September 2014, when the parents of the victims of Sewol ferry disaster protested with public hunger strikes, over 100 Ilbe users went on "binge eating" events in front of them.[23][75]

In January 2015, an Ilbe user posted a photo of himself in a Danwon High School uniform eating eomuk fish cakes. He was demonstrating the Ilbe hand sign and titled the post "I have eaten my friend!" (implying the fish which ate the corpses of Sewol victims was now in the eomuk). The post was disseminated on social media, and the victims of the Sewol disaster were labelled eomuks and odengthang (eomuk soup). The police arrested a 21-year-old person surnamed Kim, and his mother publicly apologized. The words eomuk and odengthang were banned on the site.[76][1]

Harassment cases

[edit]

Ilbe users have posted pornographic images of middle school and high school girls, including their family members, to the website.[77][78]

A pre-service elementary teacher depicted female elementary school students as lolini (로린이, 'Lolita girl') and wrote associated sexual content on the site. This caused controversy and ended with him resigning.[79]

On 22 November 2013, a student of Kangwon Provincial College and self-proclaimed Ilbe user, sexually harassed a female Buddhist monk on Twitter with comments about her virginity. Three days later, the monk Hyo-jeon asked for follow-up action from the president of the college, but the user didn't apologize and continued to insult her. Following the controversy, he deleted his Twitter account and the president of the college gave an official apology.[80][81]

In 2017, JYP Entertainment took legal action against an Ilbe user after they threatened to kill TWICE member Mina.[82]

In October 2018, an Ilbe user uploaded a photo of an elderly naked woman in a post titled "32-year-old Ilgay saved his pocket money and ate 74-year-old Bacchus grandma" (32살 일게이 용돈 아껴서 74살 바카스 할매 먹고 왓다).[83] This post contained a story of a visit to a prostitute.[84] It was revealed that the story was fictitious. The first person to post this picture online was a 46-year-old Seocho District Office employee.[85]

In November 2018, an Ilbe user uploaded erotic photos of a girl in a post titled "Girlfriend proof" (여친인증; 女親認證; yeochin-injeung). A series of similar posts followed it. The police investigated and identified fifteen posters, thirteen of which were arrested. Six of them confessed to posting their real girlfriends, while the rest posted images found on the Internet.[86][87][88]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Ilbe Storehouse

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Ilbe Storehouse (Korean: 일간베스트 저장소; abbreviated as Ilbe) is a South Korean launched in 2010 as a digital archive for the most popular user posts, known as "daily best," from the DCInside . It has evolved into a platform dominated by anonymous users producing content characterized by right-wing political views, , anti-feminism, and satirical memes that critique progressive policies and cultural norms. The site's culture emphasizes irreverent humor and opposition to perceived leftist dominance in media and academia, often employing exaggerated rhetoric to challenge establishment narratives. The community gained prominence in the early 2010s amid South Korea's polarized online discourse, functioning as a counter-space to progressive forums and influencing public opinion through viral campaigns during elections and social debates. Its users, largely young males, have been credited with mobilizing conservative sentiment but criticized for fostering divisive content, including instances of targeted harassment and inflammatory commentary on historical figures and policies. Despite regulatory scrutiny and declining traffic in recent years, Ilbe's legacy persists in shaping "manosphere" dynamics and alternative media ecosystems in Korea, where empirical analyses highlight its role in amplifying grassroots reactions against institutional biases.

History

Origins and Formation (2010)

Ilbe Storehouse, or Ilbe Jeojangso, began as an online repository designed to preserve from the DC Inside forum, particularly its "Ilgan Best" (daily best) posts, which aggregated highly recommended entries from various galleries starting around 2005. These selections often included humorous, satirical, or controversial anonymous submissions prone to moderation and deletion by DC Inside administrators, prompting the need for an external archive. The platform's name directly reflects this archival function, with "Ilbe" deriving from "Ilgan Best." The initial iteration was launched in July 2009 by a DC Inside user pseudonymously known as "Moe Myung Su" (real name withheld in reports), utilizing a free domain (ilbe.co.cc) to mirror and store deleted or at-risk posts from DC Inside's Comedy Program Gallery and similar sections. By February 2010, the site had attracted peak daily traffic of 8,500 to 14,000 visitors, establishing it as a niche hub for conserving transient digital content that resonated with DC Inside's user base. Operations involved manual and automated crawling of popular threads, focusing on preserving the raw, unfiltered nature of these posts before platform-wide cleanups. In April , the original site underwent a temporary shutdown for server upgrades and enhancements, marking a transitional phase in its formation. This period saw the emergence of a successor, Ilbe Garage, initiated later in by another user called "SAD," who aimed to continue the archiving mission amid growing demand. By November , "SAD" delegated to two users, setting the stage for further , though the core purpose remained tied to DC Inside's without yet developing independent community features. Early iterations operated on limited resources, emphasizing utility over ideology, though content preservation inherently favored provocative material that evaded mainstream moderation.

Expansion and Independence from DC Inside

Ilbe Storehouse initially functioned as a repository for aggregating and preserving high-engagement posts from DC Inside's galleries, particularly those at risk of deletion due to their provocative or unmoderated nature, drawing users who valued such content. Founded around July 2009 by a DC Inside user known as "moemyeongsu," the site quickly gained traction among DC Inside participants seeking a space for edgier humor and commentary, leading to rapid user growth in its early months. Following a shutdown in April 2010 by its creator, a revival under user "SAD" further accelerated expansion, as the platform attracted migrants frustrated with DC Inside's increasing moderation and content restrictions. Tensions with DC Inside escalated over Ilbe's reliance on scraping and mirroring DC posts, which strained server resources and prompted formal protests from DC administrators. In response, Ilbe transitioned to independent operations around 2011, procuring its own servers and discontinuing direct content pulls from DC Inside to avoid dependency and legal friction. This shift enabled the development of an autonomous "Ilbe" ranking system for original user submissions, fostering a self-sustaining ecosystem of posts focused on , memes, and community-driven best-of selections, which broadened its appeal beyond mere archiving. The independence solidified Ilbe's expansion into a standalone , with daily surging as it positioned itself as a haven for right-leaning, male-skewed discourse unbound by DC Inside's gallery-specific rules. By late 2011, the platform had cultivated a distinct identity, incorporating features like user voting and viral post amplification that encouraged higher participation rates, reportedly reaching tens of thousands of unique visitors monthly by 2012 amid growing . This separation from DC Inside not only resolved operational conflicts but also allowed Ilbe to scale independently, setting the stage for its role in broader online cultural dynamics.

Evolution Through Political Events (2010s–Present)

Ilbe Storehouse emerged as a politically vocal platform during the , where users actively supported conservative candidate of the Saenuri Party through memes, commentary, and mobilization efforts that amplified nationalist and anti-progressive sentiments. This alignment marked an early shift from its origins as a content archive to a hub for right-wing , with users criticizing opposition figures and promoting Park's campaign narrative of continuity with her father's authoritarian legacy. The 2014 Sewol ferry disaster, which claimed 304 lives primarily among high school students, intensified Ilbe's controversies as users posted content defaming victims' families and ers demanding government accountability, including slurs portraying bereaved relatives as politically motivated agitators. In response, approximately 100 Ilbe-affiliated individuals staged a "binge-eating " near Gwanghwamun Square on , 2014, consuming food like and kimbap to mock hunger-striking families, framing the event as resistance against perceived left-wing exploitation of the tragedy. This drew widespread condemnation, including calls for site shutdowns, but reinforced Ilbe's defensive posture toward the Park administration, alienating mainstream audiences while solidifying its base among conservatives skeptical of liberal media narratives. Amid rising gender tensions in the mid-2010s, Ilbe evolved into a central node for anti-feminist discourse, with users propagating memes and rhetoric decrying policies, exemptions for women, and perceived societal privileges, contributing to the 2015 "gender wars" that polarized online spaces. This period saw Ilbe's traffic peak, as it attracted disaffected young men who viewed as a causal factor in economic and social stagnation, fostering terms like "reverse discrimination" that influenced broader conservative critiques. By 2016, such content intersected with political events, including isolated offline actions like an Ilbe user's at a progressive event on grounds of alleged pro-North Korean sympathies. During the 2016–2017 impeachment crisis over Park's influence-peddling , Ilbe users mobilized against the candlelight vigils, organizing counter-rallies and online campaigns portraying the movement as a leftist coup backed by and North Korean sympathizers. Participation in pro-Park demonstrations, including taegukgi-waving gatherings, highlighted Ilbe's role in sustaining conservative resistance, though the site's internal fractures emerged as Park's conviction eroded user morale. Under subsequent President (2017–2022), Ilbe intensified anti-left critiques, targeting policies on inter-Korean relations and gender quotas, but traffic declined amid platform moderation pressures and migration to less regulated sites. In the 2022 presidential election, Ilbe's anti-feminist ideology indirectly bolstered Yoon Suk-yeol's narrow victory by resonating with young male voters alienated by the Democratic Party's progressive gender stance, as memes and from the site permeated broader online without direct organizational endorsement. Yoon's self-described "anti-feminist" positioning echoed Ilbe narratives on inequality and cultural backlash. By 2024–2025, amid Yoon's administration facing scandals like investigations into first lady Kim Keon-hee's stock manipulations, Ilbe maintained niche activity critiquing opposition figures, though its influence had diffused to and Telegram, reflecting a post-peak evolution toward fragmented, ideology-driven subcultures rather than centralized mobilization.

Platform Structure and Features

Technical Design and Archiving Mechanics

Ilbe Storehouse operates as a web forum with a multi-board structure, including categories such as "Daily Best" for curated popular content, "Memes" (짤방) for image-based posts, and specialized boards for topics like idols and celebrities. The platform supports anonymous user posting of text, images, and links within threads, with real-time features like connected user counts (typically 10,000–12,000 concurrent users) and trending search terms displayed on the homepage to aid and content discovery. Launched in 2010, the site's core archiving mechanics were designed to preserve "daily best" selections from DC Inside galleries by employing mirroring techniques to copy posts before potential moderator deletions on the source platform. This preservation focus, reflected in the "Storehouse" , allowed aggregation of high-engagement content into a centralized repository, transitioning from external crawling to independent user-generated threads post-2011 separation from DC Inside influences. Unlike purely ephemeral imageboards, retained posts contribute to a cumulative , though specific retention policies or automated deletion thresholds remain undocumented in public sources.

Community Governance and Moderation

Ilbe Storehouse operates under a decentralized model heavily reliant on user-driven mechanisms rather than centralized administrative oversight. Posts gain prominence through a recommendation system where users upvote content with the term "Ilbe-ro," elevating high-scoring items to dedicated boards like "Ilbe-Ilganbest," while downvotes labeled "democratization" (a satirical jab at ) can demote or bury material if they exceed 1.5 times the upvote count. This voting dynamic enforces norms organically, favoring irreverent, nationalist, and anti-progressive humor while marginalizing dissenting views, though it permits rapid virality of extreme content. Administrative moderation is managed by a small team under 주식회사 아이비 (IB Co.), with operators changing periodically; for instance, "운영마스터" acquired and ran the site from to 2019 after purchasing it for 1.2 billion KRW (approximately $1.1 million USD at the time). Official rules, outlined in the site's guidelines, prohibit content such as arousal-focused lewd images ("야짤"), spam flooding, excessive , and organized cliques ("친목 모임"), aiming to maintain a raw, anti-hierarchical akin to high banter. Enforcement, however, remains minimal and reactive, with administrators intervening sporadically—often only for egregious violations—allowing anonymous posting of misogynistic, xenophobic, and politically inflammatory material that aligns with the community's alt-right leanings. This permissive approach has drawn external scrutiny, as Ilbe consistently tops lists for content removals by South Korea's Korea Communications Commission (KCC), with thousands of illegal posts—ranging from to —flagged annually since 2013, except in 2016. Rather than proactive internal filtering, much moderation occurs via government intervention under laws targeting over 70% illegal uploads, prompting petitions for site shutdowns, such as one exceeding 200,000 signatures in citing rampant . Community rules against "clique-forming" further discourage moderated subgroups, perpetuating a free-for-all environment where user consensus, not top-down control, shapes visibility and tolerance for boundary-pushing discourse.

User Interaction and Content Formats

Ilbe Storehouse employs an anonymous posting framework typical of Korean online forums, allowing users to create threads without registration or identifiable accounts, thereby enabling untraceable contributions focused on content over identity. Threads typically include a subject line, brief textual , and optional attachments such as static images, GIFs, or embedded videos, with a character limit on text to promote succinctness. User engagement centers on a recommendation system where visitors upvote posts via clicks, accumulating points that determine visibility and archival status; posts exceeding a threshold of recommendations qualify for the site's core "daily best" compilations, originally designed to preserve high-performing content from parent platforms like DC Inside. This mechanic incentivizes competitive content creation, as promoted posts gain exponential exposure across boards, fostering rapid consensus on favored narratives through numerical endorsement rather than debate. Down-recommendations or reports can bury or remove dissenting material, amplifying echo effects within the user base. Comments function as threaded replies to main posts, also anonymous and votable via the same recommendation protocol, with top-scoring ones elevated as "best" or "real" comments for highlighted display. This layered interaction supports pile-on dynamics, where clusters of users reinforce or escalate original posts through chained replies, often deploying templated phrases, emojis, or linked memes for efficiency. Community norms discourage overt self-promotion or digressions, enforced via collective reporting, which delegates to participants and sustains high-velocity turnover of threads. Prevailing content formats prioritize visual and formulaic elements over extended prose, including image macros with overlaid text in Korean slang, Photoshop alterations of public figures or events, and repurposed video snippets for parody. Hyperlinks to external media or archives extend discussions, while serialized "drip" posts—incremental updates to ongoing sagas—build sustained engagement. The format's brevity suits mobile access, predominant among users, and facilitates cross-posting to affiliated channels, though persistent anonymity correlates with escalated rhetoric unbound by real-world repercussions.

Subculture and Online Practices

Memes, Slang, and Humor Styles

Ilbe Storehouse users cultivate a humor style rooted in anonymous, irreverent that targets leftist political figures, feminist movements, and regional groups perceived as aligned with progressive ideologies, often employing crude, exaggerated mockery to subvert mainstream narratives. This approach mirrors the provocative, boundary-pushing tone of Western anonymous boards like , where content prioritizes shock value and ideological critique over conventional decorum. Initially established as a humor-focused , the platform evolved to feature "spurious posts" blending absurdity with political commentary, fostering a that values unfiltered expression as a counter to perceived institutional biases in Korean media and academia. Memes on Ilbe typically consist of image collages, edited videos, and textual overlays that amplify sentiments, with users creating content to ridicule opponents through repetitive, viral formats. Borrowings from international sources, such as the meme adapted for local contexts, illustrate how Ilbe integrates global to localize critiques of and sympathizers. One prominent example involves edits portraying deceased former President as "MC Muhyeon," a dancing or caricature set to hip-hop beats, used to lampoon his legacy and associated left-wing policies through absurd, posthumous depictions that challenge hagiographic portrayals in progressive discourse. Slang within Ilbe reinforces in-group identity and derision of outsiders, with terms like "Ilbe-chung" (Ilbe worms) applied self-referentially to members, evoking resilience amid external criticism, while derogatory neologisms target feminists, urban liberals, and Jeolla province residents linked to opposition politics. These linguistic innovations, often abbreviated or distorted for brevity (e.g., regional insults tied to dialect mockery), serve as shibboleths that encapsulate the community's anti-elite stance, prioritizing causal critiques of policy failures over empathetic framing favored in biased academic sources.

User Demographics and Participation Patterns

The user base of Ilbe Storehouse is overwhelmingly -dominated, with traffic analytics indicating approximately 81.5% and 18.5% visitors as of recent measurements. This gender skew aligns with characterizations of the platform as a "male-centric" or ""-influenced space, where content often revolves around anti-feminist themes and male grievances. Surveys and estimates suggest a concentration among younger adults, with 35% of users falling between 21 and 25 years old based on self-reported polls, though the largest visiting age group is 25-34. Broader assessments place the majority in their late teens to 30s, reflecting a generational focus on and younger cohorts disillusioned with perceived societal shifts. Older users, up to their 40s, participate but represent a minority, contributing to a youth-heavy dynamic distinct from older conservative groups. Participation patterns emphasize anonymous, high-volume posting in a forum-style structure reminiscent of imageboards like , fostering rapid content cycles of memes, slang-laden commentary, and . Users engage intensively during political events, such as elections, where mobilization spikes through coordinated threads mocking left-leaning figures or amplifying nationalist sentiments, though overall active user numbers have declined from peaks in the mid-2010s—dropping significantly by 2017 amid scandals and competition from other platforms. Daily interactions favor short-form, provocative uploads over sustained , with "best" or viral posts archived and recirculated to sustain engagement, but retention is low due to the site's reputation for , leading to episodic surges rather than steady growth. This results in a core of dedicated posters driving echo-chamber effects, while casual visitors browse passively, contributing to polarized but influential subcultural output.

Daily Operations and Viral Content Creation

Daily operations on Ilbe Storehouse revolve around anonymous user postings across specialized boards dedicated to topics such as , humor, , and commentary. Users, predominantly young males aged 21-25, engage routinely by submitting text, images, videos, and altered graphics, with a recommendation system—termed "Ilbe numbers"—elevating highly endorsed content for greater visibility within the forum. The site sustains high traffic, recording approximately 30.8 million monthly visits as of , supported by banner advertisements and administrative oversight including monitoring and technical maintenance. Viral content creation emphasizes satirical memes, photoshopped images, and provocative language variants like "No-Che" derivations mocking leftist figures or events. These elements gain traction through internal upvoting and external dissemination to platforms, often leveraging to provoke reactions and amplify reach beyond the site. For instance, in , a post featuring a user in a uniform captioned "I Have Eaten My Friends" alongside eomuk skewers—implying tied to the Sewol Ferry disaster—spread rapidly, resulting in the poster's arrest amid widespread outrage. Similarly, memes such as "kimchi bitch" targeting women or minorities propagate via derogatory humor, fostering bonding while frequently igniting external controversies. Community-driven stunts complement online activity, such as coordinated offline actions like deliveries to controversial sites or public binge-eating during hunger strikes by Sewol victims' families, which users document and recirculate to sustain momentum. This interplay of anonymous ideation, rapid endorsement, and cross-platform sharing underscores Ilbe's mechanism for virality, often prioritizing unfiltered critique over conventional decorum.

Ideological Positions

Nationalism and Anti-Left Conservatism

Ilbe Storehouse (일베 저장소) emerged in 2010 as an online forum that quickly developed a user base aligned with neo-right ideologies, emphasizing through expressions of patriotism and defense of national sovereignty against perceived internal and external threats. Users frequently invoke "Gukppong" (국뽕), a term denoting intense national pride often manifested in memes and commentary celebrating South Korea's economic achievements, strength, and cultural superiority while deriding foreign influences or domestic critics seen as undermining these. This positions Ilbe as a counter to what participants view as overly conciliatory policies toward , framing such approaches as betrayals of South Korean identity forged through decades of anti-communist resistance. Central to Ilbe's anti-left conservatism is a vehement rejection of progressive and leftist politics, which users routinely label as "commie" (공산주의자) or "leftist zombies" (좌빨), associating them with pro-North Korean sympathies and ideological infiltration. This stance draws from South Korea's historical context of Cold War-era , but Ilbe amplifies it through satirical attacks on left-leaning figures, policies, and institutions, portraying them as existential threats to and traditional values. Community discourse often praises conservative leaders like for upholding anti-communist legacies, while mobilizing against electoral support for progressive candidates perceived as softening toward . Unlike traditional Korean conservatism, which operates through established political channels, Ilbe's variant employs irreverent online tactics—such as image macros and —to foster anti-left , claiming to represent "true " against elite-driven narratives. Participants argue this approach exposes hypocrisies in leftist rhetoric, particularly on issues like inter-Korean relations, where Ilbe users advocate uncompromising stances to preserve South Korea's democratic separation from communist influences. Such positions have influenced broader conservative online ecosystems, though critics from academic and media outlets often attribute them to reactionary rather than reasoned .

Critiques of Feminism and Gender Dynamics

Ilbe community members argue that South Korean exacerbates imbalances by advocating policies that confer undue advantages to women while ignoring male-specific burdens, such as mandatory military conscription. Men aged 19-28 must serve 18-21 months in , during which they forgo education and career opportunities, whereas women face no equivalent obligation, leading users to view this as institutionalized reverse that undermines merit-based equality. A focal point of contention is the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family, which Ilbe participants cite as emblematic of state-sponsored favoritism toward women, allocating resources like subsidies and programs perceived to address non-existent or exaggerated female disadvantages while neglecting male issues such as higher rates—peaking at 45.7 per 100,000 for men in 2022 compared to 15.2 for women—and occupational hazards disproportionately affecting male workers in industries like and . Users contend that feminist-driven initiatives, including in and , distort labor markets by prioritizing gender quotas over competence, contributing to and declining marriage rates—South Korea's rate hit 0.72 births per woman in 2023, the world's lowest— as men increasingly opt out of relationships burdened by perceived legal and social penalties under expanded and harassment laws. These critiques extend to cultural dynamics, where Ilbe members assert that fosters entitlement among women, eroding traditional roles and male solidarity forged through shared , while amplifying narratives of victimhood that overlook empirical gaps in (women outlive men by 6.6 years) and (women comprising 58% of university students by 2020).

Historical Interpretations and Revisionism

Ilbe users have expressed skepticism toward the official South Korean government narrative framing the May 18, 1980, as a pivotal movement, instead portraying it as a violent involving armed civilians and potential North Korean infiltration. Participants in Ilbe discussions have claimed the events included executions of South Korean paratroopers by local militants and exaggerated victim counts to bolster political myths, drawing on declassified documents and eyewitness accounts that highlight civilian arming and internal killings, though mainstream historians attribute such actions to chaotic against military suppression. This interpretation aligns with broader Ilbe critiques of post-1948 Korean history, where users challenge narratives emphasizing leftist or regional heroism, often linking to pro-North sympathies due to Kim Dae-jung's regional ties and alleged covert support networks. Such views have manifested in derogatory memes and posts, including references to Gwangju victims' coffins as "skate parcels" (hongeo bait), a slur evoking the Jeolla region's fermented fish delicacy to imply foulness and tying into Ilbe's regional animus toward province, where the uprising occurred. Ilbe contributors have also mocked commemorations by altering images or text to depict as a "seasoned skate riot," rejecting the state's 1988 designation of it as a democratic milestone and instead emphasizing order-restoration by military forces under . These portrayals, while condemned as denialism by Gwangju memorial foundations and left-leaning media, reflect Ilbe's preference for causal accounts prioritizing anti-communist security imperatives over victim-centered retrospectives, citing instances of citizen-led documented in records from the era. Beyond , Ilbe discourse extends revisionist lenses to other modern events, such as downplaying the democratic credentials of figures like and through satirical edits questioning their anti-dictatorship roles amid alleged corruption or ideological alignments. Users have contested narratives of Japanese colonial-era victimhood when invoked in contemporary leftist rhetoric, arguing that perpetual emphasis on or independence sacrifices serves geopolitical agendas rather than empirical reckoning, though Ilbe maintains staunch against perceived Japanese revisionism abroad. This approach privileges first-hand military reports and economic data over oral histories, fostering debates where Ilbe positions itself as countering state-sanctioned , even as critics from academia and outlets like Hankyoreh decry it as unsubstantiated amplified by anonymous posting. Empirical challenges persist, with no conclusive archival proof of large-scale North Korean troop involvement despite Ilbe citations of defector testimonies and signal intercepts, underscoring ongoing historiographical tensions between regional memory politics and national security rationales.

Regionalism, Dialects, and Inter-Regional Tensions

Ilbe Storehouse users frequently engage in "regional drip" (지역 드립), a style of online humor that exploits stereotypes, dialects, and historical animosities between South Korea's major regions, particularly pitting the conservative-leaning (Gyeongsang) provinces against the liberal-leaning (Jeolla) provinces. This practice amplifies longstanding inter-regional tensions rooted in 20th-century political history, including the favoritism shown to under military dictatorships like Park Chung-hee's regime (1963–1979), which marginalized and fueled resentment over events such as the 1980 . Ilbe content often portrays Jeolla residents as politically naive or ideologically extreme, using memes and posts to mock their association with progressive parties like the Democratic Party of Korea. Dialect mockery forms a core element of Ilbe's regional humor, with users parodying Jeolla dialect (Honam 사투리) through exaggerated phonetic twists like "eop-dang-kkae" (없당께, imitating "there isn't" in a Jeolla accent) and "mot-cham-jae" (못참제, parodying "can't endure") to deride perceived emotional volatility or leftist sympathies. Recent speech styles continue to feature dialect parodies, including the "~노" ending imitating former President Roh Moo-hyun's Gyeongsang dialect for mockery, along with variations like "~누". These persist in online discourse, as seen in 2023–2025 controversies over public figures using such terms, but no major new trends have emerged post-2023. Similarly, terms such as "전라디언" (Jeolla-dian, blending Jeolla with "alien" or "radian" to imply otherworldliness) dehumanize natives, originating as Ilbe slang but leaking into mainstream media gaffes, as seen in a 2019 TV Chosun broadcast that prompted public apologies for using it as a subtitle. These linguistic barbs extend to portraying Jeolla areas as "foreign," with slang like "여권" (passport) or "비자" (visa) applied to Gwangju visitors, equating Honam to an exotic or hostile territory. While Gyeongsang dialects receive less ridicule within Ilbe—often invoked nostalgically or neutrally due to the community's conservative demographic skew—mockery targets other regions like Chungcheong or Gangwon, though Jeolla remains the primary focus amid political polarization. Such practices intensify online inter-regional conflicts, with Ilbe posts framing dialect speakers as symbols of resistance, thereby reinforcing users' nationalist conservatism against perceived regional parochialism. Critics argue this fosters , as evidenced by incidents where Ilbe-derived dialect parodies in public figures' comments spark boycotts or apologies, such as a 2023 K-pop idol's use of similar terms leading to fan backlash. Proponents within Ilbe defend it as satirical pushback against -dominated narratives in academia and media, which they claim overlook Yeongnam's economic contributions post-1960s industrialization. However, empirical data from Korean social surveys indicate mutual regional biases persist across society, with Ilbe accelerating digital amplification rather than originating the divide.

Cultural and Societal Impact

Influence on Broader Korean Online Discourse

Ilbe Storehouse's memes and , originating from its emphasis on provocative humor, have disseminated widely across Korean platforms, embedding satirical critiques of progressive narratives into everyday digital vernacular. Terms like "skate parcel," mocking the 1980 victims, and "odeng," referencing the 2014 Sewol ferry disaster casualties, exemplify Ilbe's style of blending dark irony with political commentary, which users adapted in forums such as DCInside and . This spread occurred as disaffected netizens, often excluded from left-leaning communities for deviating from , migrated to Ilbe and carried its rhetorical tools back to broader spaces, sharpening ideological divides in online debates on history and current events. The community's evolution from a DCInside offshoot in 2010 to a high-traffic hub—recording 22.7 million visits from January to June 2018 and ranking among Korea's top websites—facilitated the mainstreaming of Ilbe-originated content like adaptations and "Happy Un-ji Day" jabs at former President . These elements influenced conservative-leaning discourse by promoting anti-leftist and anti-feminist framings, such as portraying certain social groups as "free-riders," which echoed in responses to gender activism and electoral mobilization, including support for in the 2012 presidential race. Ilbe's and trolling tactics encouraged similar irreverence elsewhere, countering perceived dominance of views in media and academia. By fostering user-driven actions, such as rapid counter-campaigns on platforms like against progressive ads (e.g., a 2018 Times Square response to a birthday promotion), Ilbe extended its discourse into real-world contention, polarizing Korean netizens and amplifying nationalist sentiments across interconnected sites. This influence persisted into the late , with Ilbe's narratives on economic grievances and cultural revisionism informing youth-led online pushback against neoliberal critiques, though often filtered through mainstream outlets that highlighted controversies over substance.

Role in Political Mobilization and Elections

Ilbe Storehouse emerged as a significant platform for conservative political mobilization during the , where users actively supported candidate through forum discussions, memes, and targeted criticisms of liberal opponents such as . This online advocacy amplified pro-Park narratives, portraying her as a stabilizing force against perceived leftist threats, and contributed to heightened visibility for conservative viewpoints among young male netizens. The community's emphasis on anti-communist rhetoric and nationalistic themes aligned with Park's campaign, fostering a digital that reinforced voter turnout among its demographic. In the ensuing 2016–2017 crisis, Ilbe functioned as a counter-mobilization hub, with users generating content that defended against allegations and framed the candlelight protests as manipulated by progressive forces. This included satirical attacks on impeachment supporters and calls for resistance, sustaining pro-Park loyalty amid widespread public opposition and helping to organize online defenses that paralleled physical counter-demonstrations by conservative groups. The platform's role highlighted its capacity for rapid narrative dissemination, though it faced internal fractures as Park's removal progressed, underscoring the community's deep ideological investment in conservative leadership. Ilbe's influence extended to the 2022 presidential election, where its entrenched anti-feminist and male grievance discourses mobilized young men toward conservative candidate Yoon Suk-yeol, who pledged to abolish the Ministry of Equality and Family as a symbol of reverse . By promoting narratives of male victimhood in , , and , the community exacerbated a voting gap, with men aged 18–29 supporting Yoon at rates exceeding 58% compared to under 35% for opponent Lee Jae-myung. This digital , rooted in Ilbe's humor-laced critiques of progressive policies, demonstrated the site's ongoing efficacy in shaping electoral outcomes through ideological priming rather than traditional organizing.

Contributions to Counter-Narratives Against

Ilbe Storehouse has played a role in disseminating alternative interpretations of political and social events, often positioning itself against perceived biases in mainstream Korean media outlets, which users view as disproportionately favorable to progressive or left-leaning perspectives. Emerging in the aftermath of the 2008 U.S. beef import protests—where left-wing activism dominated public discourse and media coverage—Ilbe provided a refuge for conservative-leaning netizens to satirize and deconstruct narratives that aligned with anti-government sentiments amplified by broadcasters like MBC and KBS. This counter-framing emphasized government competence and mocked protesters' tactics, fostering memes and posts that gained traction on platforms like DC Inside before Ilbe's formal launch in April 2010. A notable instance occurred during the 2012 presidential election, where Ilbe's over one million users coordinated efforts to upvote news articles favorable to conservative candidate and downvote those supporting liberal rival , thereby influencing online visibility and public perception of media reports. Participants argued this countered selective reporting that downplayed Park's policy achievements while highlighting Moon's flaws, drawing from primary sources like unedited speeches and data on economic indicators under prior conservative administrations. Such activities extended to broader critiques of media handling of liberal figures, including compilations of alleged inconsistencies in coverage of past presidents like , where Ilbe users shared archival footage and documents to challenge hagiographic portrayals. In social domains, Ilbe has advanced narratives underscoring imbalances overlooked by mainstream outlets, such as the disproportionate impact of mandatory on young men—requiring 18-21 months of enlistment amid high rates exceeding 10% in the early —contrasting with media emphasis on equity initiatives. Users frequently cite statistics from the Korean Statistical Information Service, including male suicide rates roughly twice that of females (28.7 per 100,000 vs. 13.8 in 2019 data), to argue against framings that prioritize female-specific grievances without addressing causal factors like economic pressures and exemptions for women. This has amplified discussions on reforms, influencing conservative political by 2017. While these efforts often employ hyperbolic , they have sustained discourse on empirical disparities, prompting responses from outlets like that acknowledge rising conservative sentiment among youth.

Reception and Debates

Supporter Perspectives and Self-Defenses

Supporters of Ilbe Storehouse characterize the community as a vital space for unfiltered in a landscape dominated by left-leaning and online platforms, where conservative viewpoints were historically marginalized or ridiculed. They argue that Ilbe provides a counterbalance, allowing users to challenge perceived hypocrisies in progressive narratives through and memes, often framing their content as exaggerated humor rather than literal advocacy. This perspective gained traction around 2012–2013, when older conservatives reportedly joined en masse during protests against a left-leaning government, seeking "solace" in threads that critiqued opponents without . In defense against accusations of , Ilbe users emphasize an unwavering commitment to absolute , contending that legal restrictions or shutdown petitions—such as the 2018 Blue House petition garnering over 200,000 signatures—represent authoritarian overreach and politically motivated suppression akin to "" run amok. They posit that the site's provocative style, including memes targeting feminists or regional dialects, serves as a release valve for frustrations among young men facing , mandatory , and perceived gender imbalances in policies, rather than organized malice. Participants often describe early Ilbe (launched in 2010 as an for a defunct forum) as a neutral repository of user-generated humor that organically evolved into a hub for right-wing , rejecting claims of inherent by highlighting self-moderation through community upvotes and downvotes. Ilbe advocates further self-defend by attributing external criticisms to elite bias in academia and media, which they claim amplify isolated incidents while ignoring the community's role in exposing or mobilizing for conservative candidates, as seen in the 2012 presidential election where users allegedly influenced online sentiment against liberal frontrunners. They maintain that such actions embody democratic participation, not , and warn that demonizing Ilbe stifles in a where left-wing groups face fewer repercussions for similar . This framing portrays supporters not as villains but as "fervent netizens" safeguarding pluralistic debate against institutional conformity.

Academic and Analytical Views

Scholars have characterized Ilbe Storehouse as an exemplar of South Korea's alt-right online , evolving from a digital archive of provocative content into a hub for nationalist mobilization and anti-progressive rhetoric. This transformation, per textual analyses, reflects a shift toward fervent , where users engage in "relentless villainy" against perceived ideological foes, including feminists and multiculturalists, while framing themselves as defenders of traditional Korean identity. Quantitative studies of post content across platforms, including Ilbe, indicate high incidences of hateful speech targeting women and regional dialects, positioning it within broader patterns of intergroup antagonism rather than isolated . Discourse analyses of Ilbe's user-generated content reveal strategic misogyny as a response to socioeconomic pressures on young males, such as employment instability and shifting gender norms, manifesting in narratives of ressentiment that recast personal failures as systemic victimhood. Korean-language scholarship, drawing on Foucault's discourse theory, interprets Ilbe's masculinity performances as relational constructs that reproduce hierarchies through mockery of "feminized" left-wing politics and regional "inferiors," yet notes internal contradictions where users' enthusiasm for hate coexists with self-aware irony. Empirical probes into emotional dynamics highlight cycles of hatred and exhilaration, where collective derision fosters community bonds but amplifies toxicity, challenging views of Ilbe as mere subculture by linking it to real-world political polarization. Critiques in peer-reviewed works often emphasize Ilbe's role in neo-right activism, distinguishing it from traditional through its law-abiding yet hardcore online , which mobilizes users against and without overt illegality. However, these analyses, predominantly from journals, tend to frame Ilbe's counter-narratives as reactive rather than principled, attributing its appeal to backlash against academic and media dominance of progressive frames, though empirical data on user demographics—largely young, urban males—supports causal links to economic grievances over ideological purity. Comparative studies with communities like underscore Ilbe's discursive practices as mirroring yet inverting feminist strategies, revealing a cultural politics of hate under neoliberal .

Media and Public Perceptions

South Korean mainstream media outlets have consistently portrayed Ilbe Storehouse as a hub for , , and attacks on social minorities. A 2014 article highlighted the community's content as shocking the public with vitriolic assaults on women and minorities, emphasizing its elitist and contradictory user dynamics. Similarly, in 2018, reported on government considerations to restrict access to the site due to its notoriety for hatred toward liberals and minorities, though such measures sparked debate over free speech. International coverage reinforces this narrative, often linking Ilbe to broader trends in online and gender polarization. A 2024 Politico analysis described it as an for misogynistic views that mobilized young male voters toward conservative candidates like Yoon Suk-yeol. in 2025 framed Ilbe as a cautionary example of fringe platforms mainstreaming anti-feminist sentiment through nihilistic humor targeting women perceived as societal "free-riders." These depictions prioritize scandalous episodes, such as user-generated mockery of public figures and tragedies, over the site's role in challenging dominant progressive discourses. Public perceptions mirror media framing, associating Ilbe with toxicity and social deviance, though its influence persists among demographics feeling alienated by mainstream narratives on and . Koreaboo in 2021 noted the site's evolution into a "safe haven" for right-leaning humor against left-wing orthodoxy, attracting users disillusioned with perceived cultural overreach, yet this has cemented its reputation as one of South Korea's most reviled spaces. and institutional responses, including 2018 proposals for shutdowns, reflect widespread condemnation, but the platform's sustained traffic—peaking during elections—indicates a subset of users view it as a bulwark against elite-driven opinion control, despite the dominant societal stigma. Mainstream media's focus on its excesses, amid acknowledged left-leaning institutional biases in coverage of social issues, may underrepresent these counter-grievances rooted in economic pressures on young men.

Allegations of Hate Speech and Toxicity

Ilbe Storage has faced widespread accusations of promoting , particularly targeting women, regional identities, and political adversaries, with content often manifesting as derogatory memes, slurs, and mockery of tragedies. Critics, including Korean regulatory bodies and progressive media outlets, have highlighted the site's role in normalizing expressions deemed , such as terms like "femi" used pejoratively against feminists and regional slurs against province residents associated with left-leaning politics. A 2016 report by the Korea Press Foundation noted Ilbe as the leading site for discrimination and belittlement expressions, amid a 300-fold increase in related corrective requests from 2011 to 2015. Prominent allegations center on , with users frequently posting content deriding women drivers, feminists, and gender-related issues through exaggerated stereotypes and insults, contributing to broader online campaigns. For instance, Ilbe memes have propagated myths like "women cannot drive," framing routine accidents as evidence of inherent female incompetence, which escalated into targeted vitriol following high-profile incidents. Regional includes anti-Honam , linking the Jeolla region's populace to historical leftist sympathies and portraying them as inferior or disloyal, often intertwined with mockery of events like the 1980 . Such content has been cited in analyses as fostering and inter-regional animosity, though Ilbe participants often frame it as satirical pushback against perceived progressive overreach. Tragedy exploitation allegations peaked during the 2014 Sewol ferry disaster, where users referred to child victims as "odeng" (fishcake skewers) in posts mimicking school uniforms to trivialize drownings, prompting public outrage and calls for site shutdowns. Similar patterns emerged in deriding deceased progressive figures, including former presidents and , with posts alleging conspiracies or using vulgar insults, as flagged in 2013 regulatory scrutiny. A 2020 analysis by the National Human Rights Commission identified Ilbe as the top platform for inciting social hatred over five years, based on complaint volumes for bias against gender, region, and ideology. These claims, predominantly from left-leaning advocacy groups and media, argue that Ilbe's amplifies , though empirical causation linking site content directly to offline harm remains debated in neutral academic reviews.

Responses from Affected Groups and Institutions

Feminist organizations and online communities, such as established in 2015, responded to Ilbe Storehouse's misogynistic content by employing tactics that inverted Ilbe's derogatory language toward men to underscore perceived hypocrisies in discourse. These groups attributed rising online antagonism to Ilbe's portrayal of women as entitled and anti-male, leading to counter-campaigns that amplified feminist narratives on platforms like DC Inside and social media. Following the May 17, 2016, stabbing death of a at Gangnam Station, which activists framed as gender-motivated , Ilbe users mocked the victim and confronted mourners with signs denying and blaming mental illness instead. advocates, including those from the Korea Cyber Response Center, condemned Ilbe's posts as exacerbating victim-blaming and normalizing hostility toward women, organizing vigils and public statements to demand accountability for online . Government institutions have addressed Ilbe's content through regulatory scrutiny; on March 26, 2018, the Blue House indicated that sites like Ilbe could be shut down or blocked if over 70% of uploads constituted illegal material, such as hate speech or defamation, under the Korea Communications Commission's guidelines. Affected entities, including entertainment firms, pursued legal recourse: JYP Entertainment filed charges in 2017 against an Ilbe user for death threats targeting TWICE member Mina, resulting in prosecution. LGBT advocacy groups highlighted Ilbe's posts linking homosexuality to diseases like AIDS as inflammatory, with the Korea Institute of Criminology noting in a 2020 report that such rhetoric in Ilbe fostered discriminatory attitudes absent in mainstream forums, prompting calls for enhanced monitoring. Victims of targeted from Ilbe, including public figures and private individuals, reported incidents to police, leading to arrests in cases of doxxing and threats, though enforcement challenges persisted due to anonymous posting.

Empirical Data on Community Effects

Quantitative analysis of online content from 2015 to 2022 across 11 South Korean platforms revealed that Ilbe Storage accounted for 25% of all detected hateful posts, totaling 99,124 instances out of 396,496, with a disproportionate emphasis on race-based comprising 26.5% of its hateful content—higher than on comparable sites. This skew toward marginalizing specific groups, rather than broad polarization, underscores Ilbe's role in amplifying targeted animosities, particularly among its core demographic of men in their 20s who exhibit political . User demographics further indicate Ilbe's concentrated influence: surveys and polls describe a majority-male base, with 35% of users aged 21-25, positioning it as a hub for young men's grievances against and perceived societal inequities. of 50 Ilbe posts from 2022 showed 32% referencing or narratives, 94% of which blamed women, while 18% invoked conscription as a source of victimhood, fostering with an average of 1.74 markers of per post. Parallel qualitative surveys of 12 young South Korean men (under 40) linked similar frustrations to Ilbe-like discourses, with 50% attributing personal failures to feminists or women, reinforcing narratives of powerlessness and injustice. On political effects, Ilbe's anti-feminist correlates with shifts in young male voting: in the 2022 , 62.9% of men in their 20s supported conservative candidate Yoon Suk-yeol, compared to stark gender divides of 15-30 percentage points in subsequent elections, where online communities like Ilbe served as amplifiers for male disenfranchisement sentiments. These patterns suggest Ilbe contributes to electoral polarization by channeling economic and social resentments into conservative mobilization, though causal links remain inferred from attitudinal overlaps rather than direct tracking. Historical reach metrics highlight Ilbe's discursive footprint: as of October 2013, it averaged 103,640 daily PC visitors and 217,453 mobile users, ranking among Korea's top sites and enabling widespread dissemination of counter-mainstream views before regulatory pressures reduced activity. Overall, points to Ilbe exacerbating and ideological divides through high-volume hate propagation and victimhood framing, with lasting effects on political alignment amid broader societal tensions over equality policies.

Major Controversies

Vandalism and Defacement Incidents

In May 2014, two individuals self-identifying as Ilbe members posted online footage of themselves defacing a yellow poster affixed to a wall, an act tied to public displays of mourning for the Sewol ferry disaster victims, prompting widespread condemnation for disrespecting the tragedy. On May 23, 2016, a suspected Ilbe member was observed in removing and defacing sticky notes placed by citizens as a to the victim of the station , an incident interpreted by critics as an attempt to undermine sympathy for the case amid Ilbe's broader online defenses of misogynistic viewpoints. In a notable counter-incident on June 1, 2016, opponents vandalized a temporary outdoor at depicting the hand gesture associated with Ilbe symbolism, toppling and damaging it in the early morning hours; Mapo Police Station subsequently booked two university students and one public service worker without detention on charges of property destruction.

Hacking and Cybersecurity Breaches

In June 2013, the Ilbe Storehouse website experienced a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack that rendered it inaccessible, as confirmed by South Korean government officials who noted the site was among targets hit in coordinated cyber operations. Earlier that year, in , security analysts speculated that the international hacking collective Anonymous may have targeted Ilbe following its own attacks on North Korean sites, though no definitive attribution was established. A prominent incident involving Ilbe members as perpetrators occurred on October 20, 2014, when users from the community hacked the website of Jeonrado.com, a publication focused on culture and history, altering content and deleting articles perceived as unfavorable. Police investigations identified 18 suspects, primarily minors including middle and high school students, college students, unemployed individuals, and one active-duty soldier, who were referred to prosecutors without detention for charges related to unauthorized access and tampering. This event exemplified a shift among some Ilbe participants from online to direct cyber intrusions against regional media outlets. Such actions by Ilbe affiliates extended to other manipulations, including attempts to delete Sewol ferry disaster coverage from news sites, though specific breach details beyond Jeonrado.com remain limited in verified reports. No major data breaches exposing Ilbe user information have been publicly documented, with the site's cybersecurity issues primarily manifesting as availability disruptions rather than compromises of internal systems.

Defamation Cases Involving Public Tragedies

In the aftermath of the Sewol ferry disaster on April 16, 2014, which resulted in 304 deaths, primarily schoolchildren, members of Ilbe Storehouse posted content defaming the victims, including obscene depictions portraying them engaging in sexual acts amid the sinking, such as claims of group intercourse in oxygen-deprived conditions. One prominent case involved a 28-year-old man who uploaded such material to Ilbe on April 17, 2014, shortly after the sinking, leading to his arrest by police for violating the Information and Communications Network Act on and the Criminal Act on insult. The Central District Court initially sentenced him to one year in prison, a ruling upheld on appeal and confirmed by the on March 20, 2015, rejecting defenses that the posts were satirical or not intended to harm specific individuals. Separate incidents included Ilbe users uploading and promoting images mocking victims as "fish cakes" (a derogatory term referencing processed seafood shapes resembling bodies), with one such post achieving "best" status on the site in January 2015, prompting further investigations for collective and under Criminal Act Articles 308 and 311. These actions drew widespread condemnation, with courts emphasizing the posts' potential to publicly the deceased and exacerbate grief for families, despite arguments from defendants that Ilbe's anonymous, hyperbolic style constituted protected expression rather than targeted libel. Later probes extended to related behaviors, such as the 2014 "gorging struggle" where Ilbe participants ate lavishly near Sewol bereaved families in Gwanghwamun Square, investigated in 2019 for potential and , though prosecutions focused more on direct online insults than this offline act. No acquittals were reported in these Sewol-related Ilbe cases, reflecting South Korea's strict cyber standards, which criminalize even truthful statements if deemed harmful to , though critics argue such rulings prioritize emotional sensitivity over free speech in contexts.

Harassment and Targeted Campaigns

Ilbe Storehouse users have conducted targeted campaigns against perceived ideological opponents, including feminists, public figures, and tragedy victims, often employing tactics such as mass derogatory commenting, image manipulation into explicit content, and dissemination of personal details to incite and online . These efforts typically frame targets as symbols of "" or "," with users justifying actions as satirical resistance rather than malice, though legal repercussions have followed in several cases. A notable instance involved the 2014 Sewol ferry disaster, where over 300 people, mostly high school students, perished. Ilbe members posted mocking memes and sexually explicit comments sexualizing the female victims, including superimposing their faces on and ridiculing rituals like yellow ribbons. In April 2014, one user was arrested and indicted for four specific sexually harassing posts against the victims, marking an early legal response to such content. Prosecutors highlighted the posts' intent to defame and distress grieving families, amid broader criticism of Ilbe's role in amplifying division during national . Harassment has also focused on female public entertainers, particularly , whom users deride as exemplars of superficiality or feminist influence in media. On December 10, 2018, a post targeting underage cheerleader Hwang Da-geon with sexual content sparked widespread condemnation, contributing to protests by cheerleaders against Ilbe's pattern of objectifying and threatening women in visible roles. Similar campaigns have included non-consensual sharing of of minors and relatives, escalating to real-world fears among targets. Korean media reports, while critical of Ilbe, document these via user screenshots and victim statements, underscoring the site's facilitation of anonymous escalation. In the context of the site's rivalry with feminist communities like , Ilbe campaigns generalized attacks on women as "femi-nazis," involving coordinated raids on and forums to drown out opposing voices with slurs and fabricated scandals. This "gender war" dynamic, peaking around 2015-2016, led to mutual accusations of toxicity, but Ilbe's scale—bolstered by its user base—enabled sustained pressure, including against celebrities perceived as supportive of . Empirical tracking by advocacy groups notes spikes in reported tied to these efforts, though Ilbe adherents counter that mainstream coverage exaggerates for political gain.

References

  1. https://iafor.org/archives/journals/iafor-journal-of-media-communication-and-film/10.22492.ijmcf.6.1.01.pdf
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296699133_Hardcore_Subcultures_for_Law-Abiding_Citizens_and_Online_Nationalism_Case_Study_on_the_Korean_Internet_Community_ILBE_Jeojangso
  3. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/24701475.2021.1953756
  4. https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/downloads/1r66j5187?locale=en
  5. https://voxpol.eu/file/relentless-villains-or-fervent-netizens-the-alt-right-community-in-korea-ilbe/
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11073691/
  7. https://aurora.ajou.ac.kr/bitstream/2018.oak/34187/2/2-s2.0-85192285461.pdf
  8. https://www.koreaboo.com/news/ilbe-korean-online-community-website-history/
  9. https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/691420.html
  10. https://www.gjdream.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=463194
  11. https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/691488.html
  12. https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20130429006500315
  13. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5759&context=lkcsb_research
  14. https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/654589.html
  15. https://www.koreaherald.com/article/1622498
  16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539524000530
  17. https://utsynergyjournal.org/2024/12/24/hate-in-the-gender-war-in-south-korea/
  18. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/sep/20/inside-saturday-south-korea-gender-war
  19. https://www.bohrium.com/paper-details/relentless-villains-or-fervent-netizens-the-alt-right-community-in-korea-ilbe/811998250440589313-54226
  20. https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/04/the-fight-over-gender-equality-in-south-korea?lang=en
  21. https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/07/09/gender-is-reshaping-south-koreas-electoral-landscape/
  22. https://www.ilbe.com/
  23. https://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/View/at_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0002138082
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353423031_Relentless_villains_or_fervent_netizens_The_alt-right_community_in_Korea_Ilbe
  25. http://ilbeofficial.blogspot.com/2017/11/blog-post_65.html
  26. https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/9724220
  27. https://globalvoices.org/2018/04/03/why-over-200000-koreans-petitioned-to-shutter-a-popular-website/
  28. https://www.khan.co.kr/article/201306042218575
  29. https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2016/1208/As-South-Korean-women-fight-for-their-rights-the-gloves-come-off
  30. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Content-analysis-on-comments-of-posted-articles-in-non-mainstream-media_tbl2_272366834
  31. https://www.mic.com/articles/184477/inside-ilbe-how-south-koreas-angry-young-men-formed-a-powerful-new-alt-right-movement
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323145974_Misogyny_for_Male_Solidarity_Online_Hate_Discourse_Against_Women_in_South_Korea
  33. https://m.ilbe.com/view/10274290497?_top_=tomobile
  34. https://www.donga.com/en/article/all/20121214/405296/1
  35. https://www.similarweb.com/website/ilbe.com/
  36. https://www.khan.co.kr/article/201306042217105
  37. https://www.reddit.com/r/korea/comments/inb0co/how_influential_and_relevant_is_ilbe_storehouse/
  38. https://www.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2017/01/26/2017012601653.html
  39. https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/security/ilbe-storehouse-is-the-south-korean-website-that-is-home-to-the-countrys-altright-movement/news-story/f798acd948fada2dd032c31674851a93
  40. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstreams/61b16910-2285-48e0-ab80-d792b7038e43/download
  41. https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_entertainment/894499.html
  42. https://www.codastory.com/rewriting-history/conspiracy-protest-south-korea/
  43. https://www.khan.co.kr/article/201305221617407
  44. https://igg-geo.org/en/2021/03/25/the-comfort-women-a-cumbersome-colonial-taboo-and-a-weapon-of-geopolitical-destabilization-between-south-korea-and-japan/
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340870780_The_Contested_Political_Remembrance_of_the_Kwangju_Uprising_and_Presidential_Speeches_in_South_Korea
  46. https://www.allkpop.com/article/2023/08/zerobaseones-kim-gyu-vin-apologizes-for-using-ilbe-terms-when-responding-to-fans-comments
  47. https://namu.wiki/w/%EB%85%B8(%EC%9C%A0%ED%96%89%EC%96%B4)
  48. https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/899350.html
  49. https://www.nocutnews.co.kr/news/5172759
  50. https://www.ntoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=26413
  51. https://www.koreaboo.com/news/nct-127-doyoung-sends-long-heartfelt-message-after-allegations-used-ilbe-slang/
  52. https://www.reddit.com/r/korea/comments/39i49x/regionalism_in_korean_society_and_politics/
  53. http://askakorean.blogspot.com/2017/10/koreas-alt-right-and-how-to-fight-ones.html
  54. https://catalystmcgill.com/south-korean-election-rise-to-anti-feminism-and-incel-culture/
  55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361010786_The_2022_South_Korean_Presidential_Election_and_the_Gender_Divide_among_the_Youth
  56. https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/why-south-korea-s-young-men-are-turning-conservative
  57. http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20141216000655
  58. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24701475.2021.1953756
  59. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0300530
  60. https://research.birmingham.ac.uk/en/publications/narratives-of-success-and-failure-in-ressentiment-assuming-victim
  61. https://wstudies.ewha.ac.kr/wstudies/thesis/masters-thesis.do?mode=view&articleNo=585723
  62. https://s-space.snu.ac.kr/handle/10371/134439
  63. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14672715.2019.1689832
  64. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE11312321
  65. https://www.koreaherald.com/article/3631154
  66. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/07/01/south-korea-gender-divide-feminism-00155207
  67. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-south-korea-politics-fringe-mainstream-sexism-anti-feminist-canada/
  68. https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/1048368.html
  69. https://www.khan.co.kr/article/201609061041001
  70. https://www.koreaherald.com/article/3826309
  71. https://cjdproject.web.nycu.edu.tw/2020/06/21/cyber-harassment-misogyny-and-south-korean-online-sphere/
  72. https://www.ildaro.com/6987
  73. https://www.khan.co.kr/article/201305242227415
  74. https://www.hkbs.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=607647
  75. https://herald.kaist.ac.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=505
  76. https://montrealethics.ai/digital-sex-crime-online-misogyny-and-digital-feminism-in-south-korea/
  77. http://www.futurekorea.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=31820&replyAll=&reply_sc_order_by=C
  78. https://www.kicj.re.kr/board.es?mid=a20201000000&bid=0029&list_no=12448&act=view
  79. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/5/259
  80. https://academic.oup.com/sp/advance-article/doi/10.1093/sp/jxae016/7826751
  81. https://www.opb.org/article/2024/04/10/elections-reveal-a-growing-gender-divide-across-south-korea/
  82. https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/745029.html
  83. https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20160601000729
  84. https://www.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2016/06/01/2016060101084.html
  85. https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20130625219000017
  86. https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_northkorea/581971.html
  87. https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20141020129000054
  88. https://www.khan.co.kr/article/201410201607221
  89. https://m.boannews.com/html/detail.html?idx=43598
  90. https://www.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2014/10/20/2014102002905.html
  91. https://www.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2015/03/20/2015032003064.html
  92. https://twitter.com/polinlove/status/458121375635341312
  93. https://www.lawtimes.co.kr/news/87017
  94. https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20141114121300004
  95. https://en.namu.wiki/w/%25EC%259D%25BC%25EB%25B2%25A0%25EC%25A0%2580%25EC%259E%25A5%25EC%2586%258C%2520%25EC%2584%25B8%25EC%259B%2594%25ED%2598%25B8%2520%25ED%259D%25AC%25EC%2583%259D%25EC%259E%2590%2520%25EC%2596%25B4%25EB%25AC%25B5%2520%25EB%25B9%2584%25ED%2595%2598%2520%25EC%2582%25AC%25EA%25B1%25B4
  96. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2fCiQfzRFA
  97. https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/23507532
  98. https://www.asiae.co.kr/article/2015032017392532850&mobile=Y
  99. https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20181212000824
  100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332936632_The_Globalization_of_the_Me_Too_Movement_The_Case_Study_of_South_Korea
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.