Hubbry Logo
Memory improvementMemory improvementMain
Open search
Memory improvement
Community hub
Memory improvement
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Memory improvement
Memory improvement
Memory improvement
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
The hippocampus regulates memory function.

Memory improvement is the act of enhancing one's memory. Factors motivating research on improving memory include conditions such as amnesia, age-related memory loss, people’s desire to enhance their memory, and the search to determine factors that impact memory and cognition. There are different techniques to improve memory, some of which include cognitive training, psychopharmacology, diet, stress management, and exercise. Each technique can improve memory in different ways.

Memory function factors

[edit]

Neuroplasticity

[edit]

Neuroplasticity is the mechanism by which the brain encodes experience, learns new behaviors, and can relearn behaviors lost due to brain damage.[1]

London Taxicab

Experience-dependent neuroplasticity suggests that the brain changes in response to experiences. A study done on London taxicab drivers, who memorize maps of the city while studying to drive taxis, found that the grey matter volume increased in the posterior hippocampus, an area in the brain involved heavily in memory. The longer taxi drivers navigated the streets of London, the higher the volume of the gray matter in their posterior hippocampus. This suggests a correlation between mental training and the brain's capacity. Which can lead to greater volume and more complex information. The increase in volume led to a decrease in the taxi drivers' ability to acquire new visuo-spatial information.[2]

Stress

[edit]

Research has found that chronic and acute stress have adverse effects on memory processing systems

Chronic Stress

This type of stress has been shown to have negative impacts on the brain, especially in memory processing systems.[3] The hippocampus is vulnerable to repeated stress due to adrenal steroid stress hormones.[4] One class of adrenal steroid hormones is known as elevated glucocorticoids, which can result in increased cortisol. This is a well-known stress response hormone in the brain[5] and can affect memory.[6] Results in prolonged high cortisol levels have been associated with reduced hippocampal volume and deficits in hippocampal-dependent memory. This is also shown in impaired declarative, episodic, spatial, and contextual memory performance.[6] Chronic, long-term high cortisol levels affect the degree of hippocampal atrophy, resulting in as much as a 14% hippocampal volume reduction and impaired hippocampus-dependent memory when compared to elderly subjects with decreased or moderate cortisol levels.[6][7][8] Relative to other brain regions, the hippocampus has a high concentration of glucocorticoid receptors. The anterior hippocampus of London taxi drivers was hypothesized to decrease in volume as a result of elevated cortisol levels from stress.[2][nb 1]

Acute Stress

A more common form of stress, results in the release of adrenal steroids resulting in impaired short-term and working memory processes such as selective attention, memory consolidation, as well as long-term potentiation.[9][10] The human brain has a limited short-term memory capacity to process information, which results in constant competition between stimuli to become processed. Cognitive control processes such as selective attention reduce this competition by prioritizing where attention is distributed. In memory processing, attention enhances encoding and strength of memory traces.[11] Memory is best when relevant information is attended to and irrelevant information is ignored.[12]

Animal and human studies report that acute stress impairs the maintenance of short-term memory and working memory and aggravates neuropsychiatric disorders involved in short-term and working memory such as depression and schizophrenia.[3] Studies with rats have also shown that exposure to acute stress reduces the survival of hippocampal neurons.[13]
One of the roles of the central nervous system (CNS) is to help adapt to stressful environments.[3] It has been suggested that acute stress may have a protective function for individuals more vulnerable to their own stress hormones. Some individuals, for example, are not able to decrease or habituate their cortisol elevation, which plays a major role in hippocampal atrophy.[14] This over-response of the central nervous system to stress therefore causes maladaptive chronic stress-like effects to memory processing systems.[3]

Strategies

[edit]

Cognitive training

[edit]

Discovering that the brain can change as a result of experience has resulted in the development of cognitive training. Cognitive training improves cognitive functioning, which can increase working memory capacity, as well as cognitive skills and functions in clinical populations with working memory deficiencies.[15] Cognitive training may focus on factors such as attention, speed of processing, neurofeedback, dual-tasking and perceptual training.[15]

Cognitive training has been shown to improve cognitive abilities for up to five years. One study focused on how the cognitive functions of older adults were impacted by cognitive training involving memory, reasoning, and speed of processing, it was found that improvements in cognitive ability were maintained over time. This had a positive transfer effect on everyday functioning. The results indicate that each type of cognitive training can produce immediate and lasting improvements in each kind of cognitive ability, thus suggesting that training can be beneficial to improving memory.[16]

Cognitive training in areas other than memory has been seen to generalize and transfer to memory systems. The Improvement in Memory with Plasticity-based Adaptive Cognitive Training (IMPACT) study by the American Geriatrics Society in 2009 demonstrated that cognitive training designed to improve the accuracy and speed of the auditory system also improved memory and attention system functioning.[17]

Human Brain

Cognitive training can be categorized as strategy training or core training:

  • Strategy training is used to help individuals remember larger amounts of information of a particular type. It involves teaching approaches to encoding, maintaining, and recalling memories. The main goal of strategy training is to increase performance in tasks requiring retention of information. Studies strongly support the claim that the amount of information remembered can be increased by rehearsing out loud, telling a story with stimuli, or using imagery to make stimuli stand out. Strategy training has been used for children with Down syndrome and in older adult populations.[15]
  • Core training involves the repetition of demanding working memory tasks. Some core training programs involve a combination of several tasks with widely varying stimulus types. The diversity of exercises increases the chance that they will produce desired training-related gains. A goal of cognitive training is to impact the ease and success of cognitive performance in one's daily life. Core training can reduce the symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and improve the quality of life of patients who have had conditions such as multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, and strokes.[15]

The manner in which a training study is conducted may affect outcomes or perceptions of them. Expectancy and effort effects occur when the experimenter subconsciously influences the participants to perform a desired result. One form of expectancy bias is the placebo effect, which is caused by the expectation that a training will have a positive influence on cognition. Control groups may be used to eliminate this bias because participants in them would not expect to benefit from the training. Researchers sometimes generalize their results, which can be misleading. An example is to generalize findings of a single task and interpret the observed improvements as a broadly defined cognitive ability. The study may result in inconsistency if there are a variety of comparison groups used in working memory training, which is impacted by training and assessment timeline, assessment conditions, training setting and control group selection.[15]

The Five x Five System is a set of memory enhancement tools that are scientifically validated. The system was created by Dr. Peter Marshall for research purposes at Royal Holloway, University of London. The system involves five groups of five tactics designed to maximize storage and recall at each stage of the process of registering, short-term storage, long-term storage, consolidation and retrieval and was designed to test efficacy of memory training in school curricula. Each section is of equal text length so that it can be taught verbatim in the same amount of time by all competent teachers.[18]

Personal application and intellectual conception

[edit]

Generation effect

The generation effect relies on the involvement of the individual in creating their own study materials in order to enhance encoding and long-term retrieval.[19] This effect has a relationship between generating and reading. Many studies have researched this relationship as to how applying a word rather than merely reading it will impact memory. An example of this effect would be memorizing and practicing multiplication sums.[20] Though the underlying mechanisms of the generation effect are not fully understood, an analysis concluded that the effect is real.[21]

Testing effect

The testing effect is a derivative of the generation effect as it involves generating the self-testing material. Moreover, it is known that repeatedly testing oneself enhances encoding, thus improving memory.[19] The testing effect happens when most of the learning is allocated to declarative knowledge and long term memory is enhanced.[22] Practice is necessary for retrieving memories.[23]  The more frequently that a person practices memorization, the more capable they are of remembering it later.[23] The development of a retrieval structure that makes it easier to access long-term memories is facilitated by using repeated retrieval practice.[22] The testing effect occurs because of the development of an adequate retrieval structure.[22] The testing effect is different from re-reading because the information being learned is being practiced and tested, forcing the information to be drawn from memory to recall.[23] The testing effect allows for information to be recalled over a longer period, as it is used as a self-testing tool, and aids in recalling information in the future.[24] This strategy is effective when using memory recall for information such as that being tested on and needing to be in long-term memory.[22]

Spacing effect

Taking scheduled breaks and having short study sessions has proven to be more effective for memory compared to one long study session. It is also known that memory can be improved by sleeping after learning.[19][25] Longer breaks between study sessions have been associated with better learning and retention. Encountering previously learned information after a break helps improve long- and short-term retention.[26]

Illusion of learning

Illusions of learning should be avoided when improving memory. Some learning and studying strategies people use may seem more effective than they actually are. This creates a problem where the individual thinks they know the material, when they don't necessarily. This could be caused by fluency and the familiarity effect. As people reread the material over and over, it becomes easier to read, creating a sense of fluency. However, this fluency does not indicate that encoding or retrieval of the material is being enhanced. The familiarity effect creates an illusion of learning; when the individual recognizes a word or concept to be familiar, they may interpret that as knowing and understanding the material.[19]

State-dependent learning

Retrieval is known to be improved when the environment/mood state that the encoding happened in, matches the environment/mood state at the time of retrieval. [27]

Concept Maps “are diagrams that link word concepts in a fluid manner to central key concepts.” [22] They center around a main topic or idea, with lines protruding from the center with related information.[28] Other concepts and ideas are then written at the end of each of the lines with new, related information. These related ideas are usually one or two words in length, giving only the essence of what is needed for memory retrieval.[22] Related ideas can also be drawn at the ends of the lines. This may be especially useful, given the drawing effect (people remember images better than words).[29] These diagrams are beneficial because they require the creator to link and integrate different ideas, which improve critical thinking and leads to more meaningful learning.[30] Concept maps also help to facilitate the storage of material in long term memory, as well as help to show visually any knowledge gaps that may be present.[22] Concept maps have been shown to improve people's ability to complete novel problem solving tasks.[31]

The Drawing Effect is another way to improve memory. Studies show that images are better remembered than words, something that is now known as the picture-superiority effect.[29] Furthermore, another study found that when people are studying vocabulary, they remember more when they draw the definition, in comparison to writing it.[32] This is thought to be because drawing uses 3 different types of memory- elaborative, motor, and pictorial.[33] The benefit of using pictures to enhance memory is even seen at an older age, including in dementia patients.[33]

Method of loci and visual memory

[edit]

The method of loci is a technique utilized for memory recall when items to be remembered are associated with different locations that are well known to the learner.[22] Method of loci is one of the oldest and most effective mnemonics based on visual imagery.[22] The more that visual memory is exercised through using objects to recall information, the higher the memory recall.[34] The locations that are utilized when using the method of loci aid in the effectiveness of memory recall.[22] Using the location of a driving route to work is more effective than using a room within a home because items in a room can be moved around while a route to work is more constant without items being moved around.[22] There are limitations when using method of loci, since it is difficult to recall any given item without working one's way through the list sequence, which can be time consuming.[22] Another limitation is that it is not useful when an individual is trying to learn and remember the real world.[22] This and other mnemonic techniques are effective because they allow the learner to apply their own knowledge to increase their memory recall.[22]

Psychopharmacology

[edit]
Further information: Nootropics

Psychopharmacology is the scientific study of the actions of drugs and their effects on mood, sensation, thought, and behavior.

There is evidence that aspects of memory can be improved by action on selective neurotransmitter systems, such as the cholinergic system, which releases acetylcholine, which may have therapeutic benefits for patients with cognitive disorders.[35]

Findings from studies have indicated that acute administration of nicotine can improve cognitive performance (particularly for tasks that require attention), short-term episodic memory and prospective memory task performance. Chronic usage of low-dose nicotine in animals has been found to increase the number of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and improve performance on learning and memory tasks.[36]

Short-term nicotine treatment, utilizing nicotine skin patches, have shown that it may be possible to improve cognitive performance in a variety of groups such as normal non-smoking adults, Alzheimer's disease patients, schizophrenics, and adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.[37] Similarly, evidence suggests that smoking improves visuospatial working memory impairments in schizophrenic patients, which may explain the high rate of tobacco smoking found in people with schizophrenia.[38]

Stress management

[edit]
Meditation:attending to a flame

Meditation, a form of mental training to focus attention,[12] has been shown to increase the control over brain resource distribution, improving both attention and self-regulation.[13] The changes are potentially long-lasting, as meditation may be able to strengthen neuronal circuits as selective attention improves.[39] Meditation may also increase cognitive limited capacity, affecting the way in which stimuli are processed.[12]

Meditation practice has also been associated with physical changes in brain structure. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of Buddhist insight meditation practitioners who practiced mindfulness meditation found that they had an increase in cortical thickness and hippocampus volume compared to the control group.[40] This research provides evidence that practicing meditation promotes neural plasticity and experience-dependent cortical plasticity.[41] Mindfulness, which is also known to increase openness to experiences out of curiosity, interest and acceptance,[42] can increase one's capacity to focus and their awareness momentarily. Research shows that mindfulness can improve memory, which influences stress processing pathways in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex.[43] Mindfulness meditation works in association with the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) to regulate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) system and the sympathomedullary pathway (SAM) to maintain homeostasis on stress-reactive physiology.[44]

Exercise

[edit]
Main article: Neurobiological effects of physical exercise § Long-term effects

In both human and animal studies, exercise has been shown to improve cognitive performance on encoding and retrieval tasks. The Morris water maze and radial arm water maze studies of rodents found that, when compared to sedentary animals, exercised mice showed improved performance traversing the water maze and improved memory of the location of an escape platform.[45] Human studies have shown that cognitive performance is improved due to physiological arousal, which made mental processes faster and improved memory storage and retrieval.[46] Ongoing exercise interventions have been found to favorably impact memory processes in older adults[47] and children.[48]

Exercise has been found to positively regulate hippocampal neurogenesis,[49] which is considered an explanation for the positive influence of physical activities on memory performance. Hippocampus-dependent learning can promote the survival of newborn neurons, which may serve as a foundation for the formation of new memories.[50] Exercise has been found to increase the level of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) protein in rats, with elevated BDNF levels corresponding with strengthened performance on memory tasks. Data also suggests that BDNF availability at the beginning of cognitive testing is related to the overall acquisition of a new cognitive task and may be important in determining the strength of recall in memory tasks.[45]

A meta-analysis concluded that resistance training, as compared to cardiovascular exercise, had no measurable effect on working memory.[51]

Some evidence shows that the amount of effort put into exercising is positively correlated with the level of cognitive performance after working out in the short term and long term.[52]

Mental exercise

[edit]

Aristotle wrote a treatise about memory: De memoria et reminiscentia. To improve recollection, he advised that a systematic search should be made and that practice was helpful. He suggested grouping the items to be remembered in threes and then concentrating upon the central member of each triad.[53]

Playing music has recently gained attention as a possible way to promote brain plasticity. Results that have been found suggest that learning music can improve different aspects of memory. Children who participated in one year of instrumental musical training showed improved verbal memory, whereas no such improvement was shown in children who discontinued musical training.[54] Similarly, adults with no previous musical training who participated in individualized piano instruction showed improved performance on tasks designed to test attention and working memory compared to a healthy control group.[55] Evidence suggests that the improvements to verbal, working and long-term memory associated to musical training are a result of the enhanced verbal rehearsal mechanisms musicians possess.[56]

Another study tested how learning a new activity impacts the memory and mental control of elderly patients.[57] The patients were divided into five groups that each spent 15 hours a week doing one of five different activities: learning digital photography, quilting, learning both digital photography and quilting, socializing with others, or doing solitary activities by themselves. It was found that all groups improved with regard to mental control and that learning new skills led to improved episodic memory.[57]

Memory aids

[edit]
String around finger used as a memory aid

Physical memory aids, which are typically worn on the wrist or finger, can help the user remember something they might otherwise forget. Aids can be used by people with memory loss. Typical memory aids for people with Alzheimer's include sticky notes and color-coded memory aids.[58] Tying a string around one's finger is used to remember things.[59][60] One school yearbook from 1849 suggested that a string tied around a finger or a knot tied in the corner of a handkerchief were used to remember something important for a student.[61] The oldest documented legend of a string used as a memory aid was in the myth Ariadne's thread, which describes Ariadne presenting a thread to her lover, Theseus, so that he could find his way out of the Minotaur's labyrinth. The knot-in-the-handkerchief memory aid was used by German philosopher Martin Heidegger.[62]

Memory clamp in use to remember a small child in the back seat of a car on a hot day.

A memory clamp (also called a "reality clamp") is a generic name for a type of physical memory aid worn on the wrist or finger to help the user remember something they might otherwise forget. It was originally invented by physicist Rick Yukon, who used visuals that were difficult to ignore with a deliberately intrusive shape and size.[63][64] Memory clamps are designed to be difficult to ignore visually, typically with bright colors and sometimes contrasting base colors, to cause a slight amount of visual and physical discomfort, so that the user maintains at least partial awareness of the intrusion. It is designed to be worn intermittently, so that the user doesn't become accustomed to it.[63]

Other methods for remembering things include writing on one's own hand, sending a text message to oneself, or using sticky notes.[65] Wrist-worn, finger-worn and ankle-worn memory aids have been used for hundreds of years.[66]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Memory improvement

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Memory improvement refers to the application of evidence-based techniques and strategies to enhance an individual's capacity for encoding, storing, and retrieving information, thereby supporting better learning, , and cognitive performance across various life stages. These methods draw from , , and research, addressing both everyday memory challenges and age-related decline without relying on unproven supplements or devices. Key approaches emphasize active engagement over passive review, leveraging brain plasticity to foster long-term retention. Central to memory improvement are cognitive strategies such as retrieval practice, where individuals actively recall information through self-quizzing or summarizing, which strengthens neural connections and outperforms passive rereading for conceptual understanding and exam performance. Spaced practice involves distributing study sessions over time, while interleaved practice mixes different topics to improve discrimination and application, both shown to boost retention in educational settings through increased cognitive effort. Additionally, techniques like the —visualizing information in familiar spatial environments—enhance recall speed and accuracy, with studies demonstrating its efficacy in older adults by promoting hippocampal engagement and cortical thickening. For individuals experiencing slow memory recall that impacts daily life, it is advisable to consult a doctor or neuropsychologist to rule out underlying medical issues, while techniques such as mnemonics, spaced repetition, and cognitive exercises can improve retrieval speed regardless of IQ. Lifestyle factors play a foundational role in sustaining memory health, with regular physical activity—such as 150 minutes of moderate weekly—increasing cerebral blood flow and to sharpen mnemonic discrimination and . Adequate sleep (7-9 hours nightly) supports by allowing the to process and stabilize daily experiences, while a nutrient-rich diet featuring omega-3 fatty acids, fruits, , and whole grains protects against cognitive decline through anti-inflammatory effects and gut- axis modulation. Social and further mitigate memory impairment by reducing cortisol-related interference, as evidenced in longitudinal health studies. Emerging interventions target neurobiological mechanisms for more targeted enhancement, including pharmacological agents like (EPO), which improves by increasing hippocampal volume in healthy individuals and those with neuropsychiatric conditions. Behavioral therapies such as promote psychological well-being and cognitive function in aging populations by leveraging positive memory recall. Overall, integrating these multifaceted approaches yields the most robust outcomes, with ongoing research emphasizing personalized, non-invasive methods to delay memory decline.

Fundamentals of Memory

Types of Memory

Human memory is broadly classified into three primary systems: , , and . These systems, as outlined in the multi-store model, represent distinct stages of information processing, each with unique capacities, durations, and functions in and . serves as the initial, fleeting repository for raw sensory input, allowing brief retention of information from the environment before it is either transferred or discarded. It includes subtypes such as iconic memory for visual stimuli, which holds images for approximately 250-500 milliseconds, enabling the of motion and continuity in visual scenes, as demonstrated by partial report experiments where participants recalled more letters from briefly flashed arrays when cued promptly. , the auditory counterpart, persists for about 3-4 seconds, facilitating the processing of spoken language by retaining sound traces long enough to comprehend sequential words. This ultra-short-term storage plays a crucial role in initial sensory , filtering relevant details for further attention. Short-term memory, often interchangeable with working memory, temporarily holds and manipulates a limited amount of for immediate use, such as mental arithmetic or following directions. Its capacity is typically around 7 ± 2 items, a limit identified through tasks involving the serial of digits or words. Without active , decays rapidly, with accuracy dropping to near zero after 20-30 seconds, as shown in experiments using distractor tasks like serial subtraction to prevent repetition. This system supports ongoing cognitive operations but is constrained by both capacity and time, necessitating strategies to offload or consolidate data. Long-term memory provides enduring storage for knowledge and experiences, with virtually unlimited capacity, though retrieval can be effortful or context-dependent. It divides into explicit (declarative) memory, which involves conscious recollection, and implicit (non-declarative) memory, which operates unconsciously through performance. Explicit memory encompasses for personal events, such as recalling the details of a birthday celebration, and for factual knowledge, like knowing that is the capital of . Implicit memory includes for skills and habits, enabling automatic actions like riding a without deliberate thought. These subsystems allow for the flexible retention of diverse information over lifetimes. From an evolutionary perspective, these memory systems developed as adaptive mechanisms to enhance by learning from past experiences, such as remembering safe food sources or social alliances, thereby enabling predictive planning and behavioral adjustment in dynamic environments.

Mechanisms of Memory Formation

Memory formation involves a series of interconnected stages: encoding, storage and consolidation, and retrieval. Encoding transforms sensory input into a form that can be stored, relying on attention and perception to create initial neural traces in the brain. Storage and consolidation stabilize these traces over time, often through synaptic strengthening mechanisms that convert short-term memories into long-term ones. Retrieval then accesses stored information, either through cue-dependent recall, where specific prompts trigger memory reactivation, or recognition, which involves identifying familiar stimuli. Key neural structures underpin these processes. The hippocampus plays a central role in the initial consolidation of declarative memories, such as facts and events, as evidenced by profound following bilateral hippocampal damage in patient . The contributes by providing emotional tagging, enhancing the salience and consolidation of emotionally charged memories through interactions with other brain regions. Meanwhile, the supports and , including the organization and manipulation of information during encoding and retrieval. At the cellular level, enables memory formation, with the Hebbian rule positing that "cells that fire together wire together," leading to strengthened connections between co-active neurons. A primary mechanism of this plasticity is (LTP), a persistent enhancement of synaptic efficacy following high-frequency stimulation, first demonstrated in the hippocampus. LTP involves the glutamate, which binds to NMDA receptors to trigger calcium influx and downstream signaling cascades that modify synaptic strength. Memories are not static; occurs rapidly after learning, commonly approximated by an model inspired by Ebbinghaus's 1885 experiments on nonsense syllables. This model approximates retention as R=e−t/SR = e^{-t/S} where RR is the retention ratio, tt is the time elapsed since learning, and SS represents the relative strength of the memory trace. Initial is steep, with much of new information lost within hours, though stronger or more rehearsed memories decay more slowly. Upon retrieval, memories enter a state of reconsolidation, becoming temporarily labile and susceptible to modification or disruption, requiring new protein synthesis—particularly in the for fear memories—to restabilize. This process allows memories to incorporate updated information but also renders them vulnerable to interference.

Factors Affecting Memory Performance

Biological and Neurological Factors

Neuroplasticity refers to the brain's capacity to reorganize synaptic connections and neural pathways in response to experience, learning, or injury, serving as a foundational mechanism for formation and adaptation throughout life. This process is particularly pronounced during critical developmental periods, such as childhood, when and strengthening establish core networks. Lifelong neuroplasticity is mediated by proteins like (BDNF), which promotes neuronal survival, dendritic growth, and essential for encoding and retrieving memories. BDNF levels influence hippocampal function, where reduced expression has been linked to impaired (LTP), a cellular basis of . Aging profoundly impacts through structural changes in the , notably a progressive reduction in hippocampal volume, which averages 0.3% to 1% annually after age 60 in healthy individuals, accelerating cognitive decline. This atrophy disrupts and spatial navigation, as the hippocampus is central to . In pathological aging, such as , amyloid-beta plaques accumulate extracellularly, disrupting neuronal communication, while intracellular tangles destabilize microtubules, leading to neuronal death and severe loss. These hallmarks correlate with substantial hippocampal volume loss in advanced stages, underscoring their role in age-related impairment. Genetic factors significantly modulate memory capacity and vulnerability to decline, with heritability estimates for cognitive functions like ranging from 40% to 60%. The apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 variant, present in 15-25% of the population, elevates Alzheimer's risk by 3-15 times in a dose-dependent manner, promoting aggregation and that impair circuits. Hormonal influences further shape these trajectories; exerts neuroprotective effects in premenopausal women by enhancing and hippocampal . In contrast, baseline levels, the primary , can exert neurotoxic effects on hippocampal neurons even at physiological concentrations, potentially shrinking dendritic arborization and impairing retrieval. Recent advances in 2025 have demonstrated the potential to counteract age-related deficits through targeted interventions. Studies using CRISPR-dCas13 in animal models have reversed impairments by downregulating RNA-binding proteins that drive polyubiquitination in the aging hippocampus, restoring synaptic function and improving performance in tasks without altering DNA. These findings highlight RNA-level modifications as a promising avenue for addressing innate biological barriers to maintenance.

Psychological and Environmental Factors

Psychological factors such as stress significantly influence memory performance, with distinctions between acute and chronic forms. Acute stress can temporarily enhance through moderate activation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, leading to release that supports encoding in the hippocampus. In contrast, dysregulates the HPA axis, resulting in persistently elevated glucocorticoids that impair hippocampal function, reduce dendritic complexity, and diminish declarative memory retrieval. The Yerkes-Dodson law further elucidates this by positing an inverted-U relationship between levels and performance, where optimal moderate stress improves memory tasks, but excessive —common in —leads to impairments, particularly in complex cognitive operations. Cognitive overload from environmental and attentional demands also hampers memory efficiency. Multitasking, for instance, imposes switching costs that reduce capacity by up to 40% due to the mental blocks required for task transitions, thereby increasing errors in information processing and retention. Similarly, environmental distractions like noise elevate , decreasing performance and accuracy in tasks such as , as the brain diverts resources to filter irrelevant stimuli. Emotional states play a pivotal role in modulating memory through neural connectivity and associative processes. Anxiety and depression are associated with diminished prefrontal-hippocampal connectivity, which disrupts and episodic recall by weakening the integration of contextual details. Conversely, positive moods facilitate memory by broadening semantic associations, enabling stronger relational binding between stimuli and enhancing overall association-memory formation. Socioeconomic factors, particularly education level, contribute to cognitive reserve, which buffers age-related memory decline. Higher builds neural efficiency and compensatory mechanisms, correlating with a delay in cognitive impairment onset by approximately 5-10 years compared to lower education levels. Cultural influences, such as bilingualism, offer advantages in executive memory control. Bilingual individuals exhibit enhanced and through constant language switching, which strengthens prefrontal networks involved in allocation and memory updating. This dual-language processing fosters greater , reducing susceptibility to interference in memory tasks.

Lifestyle Interventions

Physical Exercise and Diet

Physical exercise, particularly aerobic activities, significantly enhances by inducing physiological changes in the brain. Engaging in moderate-intensity , such as brisk walking or for at least 150 minutes per week, increases hippocampal volume by approximately 2%, reversing 1-2 years of age-related and improving spatial and . These benefits arise from mechanisms including elevated (BDNF) levels, which promote neuronal survival and , as confirmed by meta-analyses showing both acute and chronic exercise raise circulating BDNF. Exercise also boosts cerebral blood flow to memory centers and stimulates hippocampal , fostering new neuron formation essential for learning and recall. Comparisons of exercise types reveal nuanced impacts on memory. (HIIT) outperforms moderate continuous in enhancing memory performance among older adults, with superior gains in episodic linked to greater BDNF upregulation and hippocampal . Endurance activities like running specifically improve , as demonstrated in studies where voluntary wheel running enhanced and pattern separation, with parallel effects observed in trials on spatial learning tasks. Dietary choices complement exercise by providing nutrients that support neural structure and function. The , rich in fruits, vegetables, fish, and , slows cognitive decline through its high content of omega-3 fatty acids like (DHA) and (EPA), which integrate into synaptic membranes to enhance and reduce . Antioxidants such as in berries counteract , a contributor to loss, with higher berry intake associated with reduced rates of cognitive decline in longitudinal studies of older adults. Micronutrients are critical for preventing memory impairments tied to neural damage. Vitamin B12 deficiency disrupts homocysteine metabolism, leading to memory fog, cognitive slowing, and myelin demyelination that impairs information processing. Folate supports methylation processes vital for myelin sheath integrity during brain development and maintenance, while iron facilitates oligodendrocyte function and lipid synthesis for myelination; deficiencies in either compromise these processes and contribute to memory deficits. Integrating exercise and diet yields synergistic effects on memory preservation. Meta-analyses of lifestyle interventions show that combining aerobic exercise with nutrient-dense diets like the Mediterranean pattern reduces cognitive decline by 20-30% in older adults, with high physical activity paired with elevated fruit and vegetable intake lowering impairment risk by up to 63%. Greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet alone decreases dementia risk by 15-18%, amplified when combined with regular exercise to enhance neuroprotection. Recent large-scale randomized controlled trials have further validated the synergistic benefits of integrating exercise and diet with other lifestyle factors. The U.S. POINTER study, published in 2025, involved 2,111 older adults (aged 60-79) at risk for cognitive decline and found that a structured multidomain intervention—including aerobic and resistance exercise, a (rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and healthy fats), cognitive training, and —improved global by 0.029 standard deviations per year and executive function by 0.037 standard deviations per year compared to self-guided approaches, with overall cognitive equivalent to slowing aging by 1-2 years. While direct improvements were not significantly different between groups, the findings underscore the value of comprehensive programs for preserving .

Sleep and Stress Management

Sleep plays a pivotal role in memory improvement through its distinct stages, particularly rapid eye movement () sleep and (SWS), which facilitate the processing and consolidation of different memory types. During sleep, emotional memories are preferentially processed and strengthened, as evidenced by enhanced recognition of emotional stimuli following REM-rich periods compared to SWS-dominant sleep. In contrast, SWS supports the consolidation of declarative memories, such as facts and events, by promoting the transfer of from short-term to long-term storage via reduced acetylcholine levels in the hippocampus, which enhances . Optimal duration of 7-9 hours per night is associated with improved memory recall, while can reduce retention by approximately 40%, underscoring the need for consistent to maintain cognitive performance. Specific mechanisms within sleep stages further contribute to memory enhancement. The , a brain-wide waste clearance pathway, becomes highly active during sleep, particularly SWS, doubling the clearance of beta-amyloid proteins implicated in cognitive decline and thereby protecting integrity. Additionally, sleep spindles—brief bursts of brain activity during stage 2 non-REM sleep—facilitate the dialogue between the hippocampus and , aiding the transfer of hippocampal-dependent memories to neocortical storage for enduring retention. Recent advancements, such as targeted memory reactivation (TMR), involve presenting sensory cues during sleep to replay learning-associated stimuli, enhancing consolidation in settings by strengthening neural traces of encoded . Effective stress management complements sleep's benefits by mitigating cortisol's detrimental effects on the hippocampus, a key region for formation. An 8-week mindfulness meditation program has been shown to increase gray matter density in the hippocampus, correlating with improved function and emotional . Techniques like (PMR) lower cortisol secretion by 8-10%, reducing physiological stress responses and indirectly supporting by preserving hippocampal volume. methods, such as (HRV) training, enhance control, leading to better performance and , as demonstrated in short-term interventions that boost attention and recall.

Cognitive Strategies

These cognitive strategies are particularly effective for addressing slow memory recall. Techniques such as mnemonic devices and spaced repetition can enhance retrieval speed, independent of an individual's IQ level. If slow recall significantly impacts daily life, consulting a doctor or neuropsychologist is recommended to rule out underlying medical issues.

Mnemonic Techniques

Mnemonic techniques, also known as mnemonics, are cognitive strategies that enhance by organizing and encoding information through associations, , and patterns, leveraging the brain's natural aptitude for spatial, visual, and verbal . These methods transform abstract or arbitrary data into memorable structures, facilitating easier retrieval during recall. Originating from ancient practices, mnemonics have been refined through and are widely used in educational and competitive settings to improve retention of , facts, and sequences. The , often called , is one of the oldest and most effective mnemonic devices, dating back to around 500 BCE, where it was attributed to the poet after he reconstructed a banquet hall's seating arrangement following a collapse. This technique involves associating items to be remembered with specific locations along a familiar spatial route, such as rooms in one's home, creating vivid mental images at each "locus" to cue recall. For instance, to memorize a , one might imagine milk spilling dramatically in the front hallway, eggs cracking on the living room couch, and bread rising uncontrollably in the kitchen. Modern memory champions, such as those competing in the , routinely employ this method to recall hundreds of digits or decks of cards in minutes, with studies demonstrating its superiority over rote repetition for ordered lists. Visual and peg systems build on imagery by linking new information to pre-established "pegs," such as rhyming words or numbers, to create durable associations. In the peg system, users memorize a fixed list of pegs—like "one is a , two is a shoe, three is a tree"—and then attach target items via exaggerated visual stories; for example, to remember "apple" as the first item, one visualizes an apple exploding inside a giant . This approach aids sequential recall and is particularly useful for concrete nouns. Chunking, a related visual strategy, groups information into meaningful units, such as organizing a phone number (e.g., 123-456-7890) into three chunks rather than ten digits, reducing cognitive load and improving short-term memory capacity. Empirical evidence from educational psychology supports these systems, showing enhancements in list learning in student populations when compared to unstructured memorization. Acronyms and acrostics simplify recall by condensing information into initials or sentences, promoting where users connect items semantically or narratively. A classic is ROY G. BIV, representing the rainbow colors (, Orange, , , , , Violet), while an acrostic might use "Every Good Boy Does Fine" for musical notes on treble lines. These techniques encourage deeper processing by linking isolated facts into cohesive wholes, such as crafting a story around letters for historical dates. Research in confirms their efficacy for factual recall, with studies indicating improved retention of ordered lists over passive reading in classroom applications. Dual-coding theory, proposed by Allan Paivio in 1971, underpins many mnemonic techniques by positing that information is processed through interconnected verbal and nonverbal (visual/imagery) systems, leading to stronger memory traces when both are engaged. For example, pairing a word like "" with a mental image of a specific in action activates dual pathways, enhancing encoding and retrieval. Experimental studies applying this theory, such as those in , have shown that dual-coded materials improve comprehension and long-term retention compared to verbal-only methods, as measured by post-tests in quasi-experimental designs. This multimodal approach is especially beneficial for abstract concepts, where visuals provide concrete anchors. Mnemonic techniques find practical applications in learning languages and memorizing lists, where they accelerate vocabulary acquisition and sequence retention. In education, the keyword method—a mnemonic variant—links unfamiliar words to similar-sounding native keywords with images, such as associating Spanish "gato" (cat) with an English "gate" covered in cat , yielding substantially better recall than rote methods in controlled trials. For lists, such as or historical events, mnemonics organize items hierarchically, reducing forgetting rates. , a core mnemonic process, demonstrates benefits for student recall; prompting students to generate explanatory sentences or drawings during encoding can improve free-recall performance on science concepts. Emerging research on elaborative techniques integrated into AI-assisted mnemonics has shown enhancements in retention of complex information through personalized visual-verbal cues. These findings underscore mnemonics' role in educational settings, particularly for diverse learners facing memory challenges.

Training and Practice Methods

Structured cognitive exercises and repetition schedules form the core of training and practice methods for memory improvement, focusing on building endurance through deliberate, evidence-based protocols rather than one-off techniques. These methods leverage principles of to strengthen neural pathways associated with retention and retrieval, often integrating elements like self-testing to reinforce consolidation. Seminal work by demonstrated that without intervention, information decays rapidly according to a , but systematic practice can counteract this by optimizing review timing and effortful engagement. Spaced repetition involves scheduling reviews of material at progressively increasing intervals to combat , a technique inspired by Ebbinghaus's experiments showing that significantly enhances retention compared to massed learning. In practice, algorithms like that used in Anki calculate the next review interval as the current interval multiplied by an ease factor—typically starting at 2.5 and adjusted based on user performance ratings (e.g., "hard" reduces ease, shortening intervals, while "easy" lengthens them)—allowing personalized spacing that adapts to individual mastery. Studies confirm that this approach flattens the , enabling learners to retain a high percentage of information over extended periods versus lower retention with cramming, by reinforcing traces just before they weaken. Active recall, the practice of actively retrieving information from memory through self-testing rather than passive re-reading, has been shown to double long-term retention rates in educational settings. For instance, a landmark study found that students using retrieval practice remembered 80% of material after one week, compared to 35% for those who re-studied, due to the strengthening of retrieval pathways during testing. Complementing this, interleaving—mixing different topics or problem types within a session—improves discrimination between concepts by forcing the to identify subtle differences and similarities, leading to better performance on final assessments than blocked practice. These techniques can be combined with mnemonic strategies for encoding, as detailed in related sections on cognitive aids. Brain training games, such as the dual task, target by requiring simultaneous monitoring and updating of spatial and auditory stimuli at increasing levels of difficulty (n), with evidence indicating improvements in capacity after 20 sessions of 25 minutes each. A 2021 study demonstrated that dual n-back training enhanced transfer to untrained tasks, though evidence for gains in fluid intelligence is mixed compared to single n-back or control groups. For older adults at risk of , recent game-based interventions have proven particularly effective; a 2025 trial involving exergames (combining cognitive challenges with light movement) slowed memory loss progression in mild neurocognitive disorder patients, improving verbal recall and inducing structural changes after 12 weeks. Building through activities, such as regular reading, solving puzzles, or learning new skills like a foreign language or playing a musical instrument, accumulates neural resources that buffer against age-related decline, with meta-analyses linking consistent engagement to reduced risk of onset. These practices foster resilience by enhancing synaptic density and connectivity, particularly in the , and longitudinal data suggest they correlate with benefits to cognitive function over decades of adherence through promoted neuroplasticity and sustained cognitive engagement. Unlike short-term drills, this approach emphasizes sustained, varied intellectual stimulation to promote adaptive brain plasticity. Personalization tailors these methods to individual factors like age, baseline , and goals, maximizing ; for example, older adults derive greater benefits from strategy-focused training emphasizing external aids and categorization, with a 2023 study showing sustained improvements up to 11 months post-intervention in episodic recall tasks. Profiles of high responders often include those with moderate baseline deficits and high , achieving moderate to large effect sizes on standardized tests, underscoring the need for adaptive protocols over generic ones.

Medical and Technological Approaches

Pharmacological Interventions

Pharmacological interventions for memory improvement primarily involve substances that modulate neurotransmitter systems, such as acetylcholine and glutamate, to enhance cognitive processes. These include prescription drugs, nootropics, and supplements, often studied in contexts like Alzheimer's disease (AD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), though their use in healthy individuals remains controversial due to limited evidence and regulatory restrictions. While some agents show promise in pathological conditions, efficacy in normal cognition is generally modest, and long-term safety concerns persist. Nootropics, often termed "smart drugs," encompass compounds like , , and that aim to boost alertness and without significant sedation. , commonly consumed via , enhances alertness and concentration, with studies indicating improvements in and physical performance among healthy users, particularly students seeking cognitive enhancement. , approved for , promotes and has demonstrated benefits in , including pattern recognition and digit span recall, in controlled trials on healthy individuals. , a racetam-class nootropic, is thought to enhance glutamate transmission at receptors, potentially improving learning and ; however, evidence is mixed, with most supportive data from animal models showing gains, while human studies yield inconsistent results for cognitive enhancement. Cholinesterase inhibitors, such as donepezil, are FDA-approved for treating cognitive symptoms in AD by inhibiting , thereby increasing availability in the —a critical for and learning. In AD patients, donepezil at doses of 5-10 mg/day has been shown to modestly improve cognitive function, with evidence suggesting it elevates levels to support reasoning and retention, though it does not alter disease progression. These effects are most pronounced in mild to moderate AD, where clinical trials report sustained benefits over 6-12 months. Over-the-counter supplements like and omega-3 fatty acids are popular for purported memory benefits, but evidence varies by population. extracts, often dosed at 120-240 mg/day, have inconclusive effects on memory in healthy adults, with systematic reviews finding no convincing improvements in cognitive performance among those without impairment, despite claims of enhanced blood flow to the . In contrast, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (e.g., DHA and EPA) at 1-2 g/day show mild benefits for memory in aging populations; meta-analyses indicate they may mitigate cognitive decline and support brain volume preservation in older adults with MCI, particularly when baseline levels are low. Despite potential benefits, pharmacological interventions carry risks including dependency, adverse interactions, and side effects like gastrointestinal issues or headaches. For instance, and can lead to tolerance with prolonged use, while cholinesterase inhibitors may cause or . FDA approvals are largely confined to pathological conditions like , with donepezil and endorsed for symptoms but not for healthy cognitive enhancement; in non-clinical populations lacks robust safety data and may exacerbate underlying vulnerabilities. Ongoing research on , an , aims to protect against in conditions like MCI. Studies report modest gains in , such as improved performance in sleep-deprived models simulating , though results in PD-MCI patients show limited visuospatial benefits, highlighting the need for targeted applications.

Emerging Technologies

Emerging technologies in memory improvement encompass innovative non-invasive and molecular approaches that leverage , , and genetic tools to enhance cognitive functions beyond traditional methods. These advancements, particularly those gaining traction in 2024 and 2025, focus on real-time brain modulation, immersive simulations, and targeted genetic interventions to address age-related decline and learning inefficiencies. Research in this area emphasizes personalized, technology-driven solutions that show promise in clinical and everyday applications, with ongoing trials demonstrating measurable gains in recall and retention. Neurofeedback and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) represent cutting-edge methods for modulating brain activity to bolster memory. uses (EEG) to provide real-time feedback on brain waves, enabling users to train self-regulation of neural patterns associated with focus and . A 2025 pilot study on older adults demonstrated that neurofeedback-enhanced training reversed age-related neural slowing, leading to improved performance in memory tasks through visual feedback on EEG-based brainwave patterns. Similarly, BCIs facilitate direct interaction between the brain and external devices, with EEG-based protocols showing efficacy in enhancing cognitive functions in healthy older individuals by targeting oscillatory brain activity during training sessions. These technologies improve focus and by rewarding desired brain states, such as increased alpha-band activity, which correlates with better outcomes. Brain stimulation techniques, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), offer non-invasive ways to target memory-related brain regions like the hippocampus. In 2025, the University of Chicago received a $2.3 million NIH grant under the BRAIN Initiative to investigate TMS for improving memory deficits, focusing on non-invasive modulation that enhances hippocampal connectivity and supports memory formation in aging populations. A meta-analysis from the same year confirmed that hippocampal indirectly targeted stimulation (HITS) via TMS boosts memory performance by strengthening neural circuits involved in episodic recall. Meanwhile, tDCS applies low-intensity electrical currents to modulate cortical excitability, yielding 10-20% improvements in recall accuracy in studies on episodic and working memory enhancement. For instance, multisession tDCS protocols have been shown to increase auditory-verbal memory span and maintenance efficiency, particularly when applied to prefrontal areas during cognitive tasks. Digital applications and (VR) systems are transforming mnemonic strategies into interactive, adaptive tools for enhancement. VR enables the creation of immersive memory palaces, where users navigate virtual environments to encode and retrieve information spatially, leading to superior compared to traditional methods. A 2025 study on cognitive load-driven VR memory palaces personalized environments to individual users, optimizing focus and recall by adjusting complexity based on real-time cognitive demands, with participants showing enhanced memorization in educational simulations. Complementing this, AI-driven apps algorithmically schedule reviews to reinforce long-term retention, adapting to user performance for efficient learning. Tools like those incorporating AI-generated flashcards in 2025 have demonstrated boosted study efficiency by automating and timing, making them accessible for diverse learning needs. While digital apps and tools show some promise, traditional methods like sleep, exercise, a healthy diet, mnemonics, and spaced repetition have stronger, more established evidence based on longitudinal studies and meta-analyses from sources such as the NIH and Mayo Clinic. At the molecular level, genetic editing technologies like are pioneering memory reversal in aging models. In 2025, researchers at utilized the CRISPR-dCas13 RNA editing system to target and reduce elevated RNA levels in the hippocampus and of older rats, successfully restoring performance to levels observed in younger animals by addressing age-related disruptions in . This approach reactivated silenced genes involved in , highlighting the potential for precise molecular interventions to counteract cognitive decline without altering DNA sequences. Targeted memory reactivation (TMR) employs auditory or olfactory cues during to strengthen encoded , building on the brain's natural consolidation processes. Human trials from 2024-2025 have shown TMR delivering task-relevant sounds during enhances consolidation, with personalized protocols yielding significant improvements in retention for neutral stimuli. This method, which briefly references 's role in offline processing, has been effective in augmenting for object-location associations when cues are timed to spindle activity, offering a low-risk enhancement strategy integrable with daily routines.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4278520/
  2. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/healthy-aging/in-depth/memory-loss/art-20046518
  3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3527655/
  4. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-020-0697-x
  5. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/alzheimers-disease/in-depth/memory-loss/art-20046326
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5439266/
  7. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1070012/full
  8. https://app.nova.edu/toolbox/instructionalproducts/edd8124/articles/1968-Atkinson_and_Shiffrin.pdf
  9. https://sites.socsci.uci.edu/~whipl/staff/sperling/PDFs/Sperling_PsychMonogr_1960.pdf
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079742108604223
  11. https://labs.la.utexas.edu/gilden/files/2016/04/MagicNumberSeven-Miller1956.pdf
  12. https://labs.la.utexas.edu/gilden/files/2016/03/1545ca4cdad4f480f2fab8fd505a5b7f7603.pdf
  13. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1973-08477-007
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Daniel-Schacter/publication/243785521_The_Evolution_of_Multiple_Memory_Systems/links/00b7d537dd29023b6e000000/The-Evolution-of-Multiple-Memory-Systems.pdf
  15. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8611531/
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4246028/
  17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14629927/
  18. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41386-021-01132-0
  19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/hebbian-theory
  20. https://supermemo.guru/wiki/Exponential_nature_of_forgetting
  21. https://www.nature.com/articles/35021052
  22. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fncel.2019.00363/full
  23. https://translationalneurodegeneration.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40035-022-00279-0
  24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0197458020303213
  25. https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/alzheimers-causes-and-risk-factors/what-happens-brain-alzheimers-disease
  26. https://www.nature.com/articles/mp2014105
  27. https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/alzheimers-causes-and-risk-factors/alzheimers-disease-genetics-fact-sheet
  28. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8970832/
  29. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/11/251105050720.htm
  30. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4462413/
  31. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4561403/
  32. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3059694/
  33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563211002044
  34. https://www.apa.org/topics/research/multitasking
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6901841/
  36. https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15081014
  37. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-40997-001
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10523883/
  39. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4341987/
  40. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4442091/
  41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3041121/
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4314337/
  43. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00373/full
  44. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/100483/1/apnm-2019-0495.pdf
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3794481/
  46. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0911725107
  47. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/aging-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00132/full
  48. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4537710/
  49. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3582325/
  50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266645932500040X
  51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6520042/
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6540800/
  53. https://alzres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13195-025-01806-7
  54. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-14219-5
  55. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1973798X251360765
  56. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2837046
  57. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4182440/
  58. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0305404101
  59. https://jcsm.aasm.org/doi/10.5664/jcsm.5.2S.S20
  60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24199995/
  61. https://elifesciences.org/articles/57011
  62. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41539-024-00244-8
  63. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3004979/
  64. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26130387/
  65. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38366274/
  66. https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/6-things-to-know-about-seeing-a-neuropsychologist
  67. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/mild-cognitive-impairment/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20354583
  68. https://faqs.ankiweb.net/what-spaced-repetition-algorithm
  69. https://ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2025/09/press-release-training-to-improve-memory.html
  70. https://www.health.harvard.edu/mind-and-mood/tips-to-leverage-neuroplasticity-to-maintain-cognitive-fitness-as-you-age
  71. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9415189/
  72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8000838/
  73. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12466949/
  74. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7516264/
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8629054/
  76. https://www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/treatments/medications-for-memory
  77. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2024.1398952/full
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4052996/
  79. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK74901/
  80. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/185120
  81. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-16129-8
  82. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9641984/
  83. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12446084/
  84. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35562711/
  85. https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/healthy-aging/in-depth/memory-loss/art-20046518/
  86. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9090458/
  87. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12280145/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.