Hubbry Logo
Central Intelligence AgencyCentral Intelligence AgencyMain
Open search
Central Intelligence Agency
Community hub
Central Intelligence Agency
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Central Intelligence Agency
Central Intelligence Agency
from Wikipedia

Central Intelligence Agency
Seal of the Central Intelligence Agency
Flag of the Central Intelligence Agency
Map

George Bush Center for Intelligence in Langley, Virginia
Agency overview
FormedSeptember 18, 1947; 78 years ago (1947-09-18)
Preceding agencies
TypeIndependent (component of the Intelligence Community)
HeadquartersGeorge Bush Center for Intelligence, Langley, Virginia, U.S.
38°57′07″N 77°08′46″W / 38.95194°N 77.14611°W / 38.95194; -77.14611
Motto(Official): The Work of a Nation. The Center of Intelligence.
(Unofficial): And ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free[1]
Employees21,575 (estimate)[3]
Annual budget$15 billion (as of 2013)[3][4][5]
Agency executives
Parent departmentOffice of the President of the United States
Parent agencyOffice of the Director of National Intelligence
Child agencies
Websitecia.gov

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA /ˌs.ˈ/) is a civilian foreign intelligence service of the federal government of the United States tasked with advancing national security through collecting and analyzing intelligence from around the world and conducting covert operations. The agency is headquartered in the George Bush Center for Intelligence in Langley, Virginia, and is sometimes metonymously called "Langley". A major member of the United States Intelligence Community (IC), the CIA has reported to the director of national intelligence since 2004, and is focused on providing intelligence for the president and the Cabinet, though it also provides intelligence for a variety of other entities including the US Military and foreign allies.

The CIA is headed by a director and is divided into various directorates, including a Directorate of Analysis and Directorate of Operations. Unlike the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the CIA has no law enforcement function and focuses on intelligence gathering overseas, with only limited domestic intelligence collection.[6] The CIA is responsible for coordinating all human intelligence (HUMINT) activities in the IC. It has been instrumental in establishing intelligence services in many countries, and has provided support to many foreign organizations. The CIA exerts foreign political influence through its paramilitary operations units, including its Special Activities Center. It has also provided support to several foreign political groups and governments, including planning, coordinating, training and carrying out torture, and technical support. It was involved in many regime changes and carrying out planned assassinations of foreign leaders and terrorist attacks against civilians.

During World War II, U.S. intelligence and covert operations had been undertaken by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). The office was abolished in 1945 by President Harry S. Truman, who created the Central Intelligence Group in 1946. Amid the intensifying Cold War, the National Security Act of 1947 established the CIA, headed by a director of central intelligence (DCI). The Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949 exempted the agency from most Congressional oversight, and during the 1950s, it became a major instrument of U.S. foreign policy. The CIA employed psychological operations against communist regimes, and backed coups to advance American interests. Major CIA-backed operations include the 1953 coup in Iran, the 1954 coup in Guatemala, the Bay of Pigs Invasion of Cuba in 1961, and the 1973 coup in Chile. In 1975, the Church Committee of the U.S. Senate revealed illegal operations such as MKUltra and CHAOS, after which greater oversight was imposed. In the 1980s, the CIA supported the Afghan mujahideen and Nicaraguan Contras, and after the September 11 attacks in 2001, played a role in the Global War on Terrorism.

The agency has been the subject of numerous controversies, including its use of political assassinations, torture, domestic wiretapping, propaganda, mind control techniques, and drug trafficking, among others.

Purpose

[edit]

When the CIA was created, its purpose was to create a clearinghouse for foreign policy intelligence and analysis, collecting, analyzing, evaluating, and disseminating foreign intelligence, and carrying out covert operations.[7]

As of 2013, the CIA had five priorities:[3]

Organizational structure

[edit]
The organization of the Central Intelligence Agency

The CIA has an executive office and five major directorates:

  • The Directorate of Digital Innovation
  • The Directorate of Analysis
  • The Directorate of Operations
  • The Directorate of Support
  • The Directorate of Science and Technology

Executive Office

[edit]

The director of the Central Intelligence Agency (D/CIA) is appointed by the president with Senate confirmation and reports directly to the director of national intelligence (DNI); in practice, the CIA director interfaces with the DNI, Congress, and the White House, while the deputy director (DD/CIA) is the internal executive of the CIA and the chief operating officer (COO/CIA), known as executive director until 2017, leads the day-to-day work[8] as the third-highest post of the CIA.[9] The deputy director is formally appointed by the director without Senate confirmation,[9][10] but as the president's opinion plays a great role in the decision,[10] the deputy director is generally considered a political position, making the chief operating officer the most senior non-political position for CIA career officers.[11]

The Executive Office also supports the U.S. military, including the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, by providing it with information it gathers, receiving information from military intelligence organizations, and cooperating with field activities. The associate deputy director of the CIA is in charge of the day-to-day operations of the agency. Each branch of the agency has its own director.[8] The Office of Military Affairs (OMA), subordinate to the associate deputy director, manages the relationship between the CIA and the Unified Combatant Commands, who produce and deliver regional and operational intelligence and consume national intelligence produced by the CIA.[12]

Directorate of Analysis

[edit]

The Directorate of Analysis, through much of its history known as the Directorate of Intelligence (DI), is tasked with helping "the President and other policymakers make informed decisions about our country's national security" by looking "at all the available information on an issue and organiz[ing] it for policymakers".[13] The directorate has four regional analytic groups, six groups for transnational issues, and three that focus on policy, collection, and staff support.[14] There are regional analytical offices covering the Near East and South Asia, Russia, and Europe; and the Asia–Pacific, Latin America, and Africa.

Directorate of Operations

[edit]

The Directorate of Operations is responsible for collecting foreign intelligence (mainly from clandestine HUMINT sources), and for covert action. The name reflects its role as the coordinator of human intelligence activities between other elements of the wider U.S. intelligence community with their HUMINT operations. This directorate was created in an attempt to end years of rivalry over influence, philosophy, and budget between the United States Department of Defense (DOD) and the CIA. In spite of this, the Department of Defense announced in 2012 its intention to organize its own global clandestine intelligence service, the Defense Clandestine Service (DCS),[15] under the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). Contrary to some public and media misunderstanding, DCS is not a "new" intelligence agency but rather a consolidation, expansion and realignment of existing Defense HUMINT activities, which have been carried out by DIA for decades under various names, most recently as the Defense Human Intelligence Service.[16]

This Directorate is known to be organized by geographic regions and issues, but its precise organization is classified.[17]

Directorate of Science & Technology

[edit]

The Directorate of Science & Technology was established to research, create, and manage technical collection disciplines and equipment. Many of its innovations were transferred to other intelligence organizations, or, as they became more overt, to the military services.

The development of the U-2 high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft, for instance, was done in cooperation with the United States Air Force. The U-2's original mission was clandestine imagery intelligence over denied areas such as the Soviet Union.[18]

Directorate of Support

[edit]

The Directorate of Support has organizational and administrative functions to significant units including:

  • The Office of Security
  • The Office of Communications
  • The Office of Information Technology

Directorate of Digital Innovation

[edit]

The Directorate of Digital Innovation (DDI) focuses on accelerating innovation across the Agency's mission activities. It is the Agency's newest directorate. The Langley, Virginia-based office's mission is to streamline and integrate digital and cybersecurity capabilities into the CIA's espionage, counterintelligence, all-source analysis, open-source intelligence collection, and covert action operations.[19] It provides operations personnel with tools and techniques to use in cyber operations. It works with information technology infrastructure and practices cyber tradecraft.[20] This means retrofitting the CIA for cyberwarfare. DDI officers help accelerate the integration of innovative methods and tools to enhance the CIA's cyber and digital capabilities on a global scale and ultimately help safeguard the United States. They also apply technical expertise to exploit clandestine and publicly available information (also known as open-source data) using specialized methodologies and digital tools to plan, initiate and support the technical and human-based operations of the CIA.[21] Before the establishment of the new digital directorate, offensive cyber operations were undertaken by the CIA's Information Operations Center.[22] Little is known about how the office specifically functions or if it deploys offensive cyber capabilities.[19]

The directorate had been covertly operating since approximately March 2015 but formally began operations on October 1, 2015.[23] According to classified budget documents, the CIA's computer network operations budget for fiscal year 2013 was $685.4 million. The NSA's budget was roughly $1 billion at the time.[24]

Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who served as the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, endorsed the reorganization. "The director has challenged his workforce, the rest of the intelligence community, and the nation to consider how we conduct the business of intelligence in a world that is profoundly different from 1947 when the CIA was founded," Schiff said.[25]

Office of Congressional Affairs

[edit]

The Office of Congressional Affairs (OCA) serves as the liaison between the CIA and the US Congress. The OCA states that it aims to ensure that Congress is fully and currently informed of intelligence activities.[26]

The office is the CIA's primary interface with Congressional oversight committees, leadership, and members. It is responsible for all matters pertaining to congressional interaction and oversight of US intelligence activities. It claims that it aims to:[27]

  • ensure that Congress is kept informed of intelligence issues and activities by providing timely briefings and notifications
  • facilitate prompt and complete responses to congressional requests for information and inquiries
  • maintain a record of the Agency's interaction with Congress
  • track legislation that could affect the Agency
  • educate Agency personnel about their responsibility to keep Congress fully and currently informed

Training

[edit]

The CIA established its first training facility, the Office of Training and Education, in 1950. Following the end of the Cold War, the CIA's training budget was slashed, which had a negative effect on employee retention.[28][29]

In response, Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet established CIA University in 2002.[28][13] CIA University holds between 200 and 300 courses each year, training both new hires and experienced intelligence officers, as well as CIA support staff.[28][29] The facility works in partnership with the National Intelligence University, and includes the Sherman Kent School for Intelligence Analysis, the Directorate of Analysis' component of the university.[13][30][31]

For later stage training of student operations officers, there is at least one classified training area at Camp Peary, near Williamsburg, Virginia. Students are selected, and their progress evaluated, in ways derived from the OSS, published as the book Assessment of Men, Selection of Personnel for the Office of Strategic Services.[32] Additional mission training is conducted at Harvey Point, North Carolina.[33]

The primary training facility for the Office of Communications is Warrenton Training Center, located near Warrenton, Virginia. The facility was established in 1951 and has been used by the CIA since at least 1955.[34][35]

Budget

[edit]

Details of the overall United States intelligence budget are classified.[3] Under the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, the Director of Central Intelligence is the only federal government employee who can spend "un-vouchered" government money.[36] The government showed its 1997 budget was $26.6 billion for the fiscal year.[37] The government has disclosed a total figure for all non-military intelligence spending since 2007; the fiscal 2013 figure is $52.6 billion. According to the 2013 mass surveillance disclosures, the CIA's fiscal 2013 budget is $14.7 billion, 28% of the total and almost 50% more than the budget of the National Security Agency. CIA's HUMINT budget is $2.3 billion, the SIGINT budget is $1.7 billion, and spending for security and logistics of CIA missions is $2.5 billion. "Covert action programs," including a variety of activities such as the CIA's drone fleet and anti-Iranian nuclear program activities, accounts for $2.6 billion.[3]

There were numerous previous attempts to obtain general information about the budget.[38] As a result, reports revealed that CIA's annual budget in Fiscal Year 1963 was $550 million (equivalent to US$5.6 billion in 2024),[39] and the overall intelligence budget in FY 1997 was US$26.6 billion (equivalent to US$52.1 billion in 2024).[40] There have been accidental disclosures; for instance, Mary Margaret Graham, a former CIA official and deputy director of national intelligence for collection in 2005, said that the annual intelligence budget was $44 billion,[41] and in 1994 Congress accidentally published a budget of $43.4 billion (in 2012 dollars) in 1994 for the non-military National Intelligence Program, including $4.8 billion for the CIA.[3]

After the Marshall Plan was approved, appropriating $13.7 billion over five years, 5% of those funds or $685 million were secretly made available to the CIA. A portion of the enormous M-fund, established by the U.S. government during the post-war period for reconstruction of Japan, was secretly steered to the CIA.[42]

Relationship with other intelligence agencies

[edit]

Foreign intelligence services

[edit]

The role and functions of the CIA are roughly equivalent to those of the Federal Intelligence Service (BND) in Germany, MI6 in the United Kingdom, the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) in Australia, the Directorate-General for External Security (DGSE) in France, the Foreign Intelligence Service in Russia, the Ministry of State Security (MSS) in China, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) in India, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in Pakistan, the General Intelligence Service in Egypt, Mossad in Israel, and the National Intelligence Service (NIS) in South Korea.

The CIA was instrumental in the establishment of intelligence services in several U.S. allied countries, including Germany's BND and Greece's EYP (then known as KYP).[43][citation needed]

The closest links of the U.S. intelligence community to other foreign intelligence agencies are to Anglophone countries: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. Special communications signals that intelligence-related messages can be shared with these four countries.[44] An indication of the United States' close operational cooperation is the creation of a new message distribution label within the main U.S. military communications network. Previously, the marking of NOFORN (i.e., No Foreign Nationals) required the originator to specify which, if any, non-U.S. countries could receive the information. A new handling caveat, USA/AUS/CAN/GBR/NZL Five Eyes, used primarily on intelligence messages, indicates that the material can be shared with Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, and New Zealand.

The task of the division called "Verbindungsstelle 61" of the German Bundesnachrichtendienst is keeping contact to the CIA office in Wiesbaden.[45]

History

[edit]

Immediate predecessors

[edit]
The 140 stars on the CIA Memorial Wall in the CIA headquarters, each representing a CIA officer killed in action
CIA director Allen Dulles on the cover of Time magazine in 1953

During World War II, U.S. intelligence and covert operations were undertaken by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS).[46] Many future CIA officers, including four directors of Central Intelligence, served in the OSS.[47] On September 20, 1945, shortly after the end of World War II, Truman signed an executive order dissolving the OSS.[48] By October 1945 its functions had been divided between the Departments of State and War. The division lasted only a few months.

The first public mention of the "Central Intelligence Agency" appeared on a command-restructuring proposal presented by Jim Forrestal and Arthur Radford to the U.S. Senate Military Affairs Committee at the end of 1945.[49] Army Intelligence agent Colonel Sidney Mashbir and Commander Ellis Zacharias worked together for four months at the direction of Fleet Admiral Joseph Ernest King, and prepared the first draft and implementing directives for the creation of what would become the Central Intelligence Agency.[50][51][52] Despite opposition from the military establishment, the State Department, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),[53] Truman established the National Intelligence Authority[54] in January 1946. Its operational extension was known as the Central Intelligence Group (CIG),[55] which was the direct predecessor of the CIA.[56]

Creation

[edit]

The Central Intelligence Agency was created on July 26, 1947, when President Truman signed the National Security Act into law. A major impetus for the creation of the agency was growing tensions with the USSR following the end of World War II.[57]

Lawrence Houston, head counsel of the SSU, CIG, and, later CIA, was principal draftsman of the National Security Act of 1947,[58][59][60] which dissolved the NIA and the CIG, and established both the National Security Council and the Central Intelligence Agency.[55][61] In 1949, Houston helped to draft the Central Intelligence Agency Act (Pub. L. 81–110), which authorized the agency to use confidential fiscal and administrative procedures, and exempted it from most limitations on the use of federal funds. The act also exempted the CIA from having to disclose its "organization, functions, officials, titles, salaries, or numbers of personnel employed," and created the program "PL-110" to handle defectors and other "essential aliens" who fell outside normal immigration procedures.[62][63]

At the outset of the Korean War, the CIA still only had a few thousand employees, around one thousand of whom worked in analysis. Intelligence primarily came from the Office of Reports and Estimates, which drew its reports from a daily take of State Department telegrams, military dispatches, and other public documents. The CIA still lacked its intelligence-gathering abilities.[64] On August 21, 1950, shortly after, Truman announced Walter Bedell Smith as the new Director of the CIA. The change in leadership took place shortly after the start of the Korean War in South Korea, as the lack of a clear warning to the President and NSC about the imminent North Korean invasion was seen as a grave failure of intelligence.[64]

The CIA had different demands placed on it by the various bodies overseeing it. Truman wanted a centralized group to organize the information that reached him.[65][66] The Department of Defense wanted military intelligence and covert action, and the State Department wanted to create global political change favorable to the US. Thus the two areas of responsibility for the CIA were covert action and covert intelligence. One of the main targets for intelligence gathering was the Soviet Union, which had also been a priority of the CIA's predecessors.[65][66][67]

U.S. Air Force General Hoyt Vandenberg, the CIG's second director, created the Office of Special Operations (OSO) and the Office of Reports and Estimates (ORE).[66] Initially, the OSO was tasked with spying and subversion overseas with a budget of $15 million (equivalent to $196 million in 2024),[68] the largesse of a small number of patrons in Congress. Vandenberg's goals were much like the ones set out by his predecessor: finding out "everything about the Soviet forces in Eastern and Central Europe – their movements, their capabilities, and their intentions."[69]

On June 18, 1948, the National Security Council issued Directive 10/2[70] calling for covert action against the Soviet Union,[71] and granting the authority to carry out covert operations against "hostile foreign states or groups" that could, if needed, be denied by the U.S. government. To this end, the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC) was created inside the CIA.[72] The OPC was unique; Frank Wisner, the head of the OPC, answered not to the CIA Director, but to the secretaries of defense, state, and the NSC. The OPC's actions were a secret even from the head of the CIA. Most CIA stations had two station chiefs, one working for the OSO, and one working for the OPC.[73]

The agency was unable to provide sufficient intelligence about the Soviet takeovers of Romania and Czechoslovakia, the Soviet blockade of Berlin, or the Soviet atomic bomb project. In particular, the agency failed to predict the Chinese entry into the Korean War with 300,000 troops.[74][75] The famous double agent Kim Philby was the British liaison to American Central Intelligence.[76] Through him, the CIA coordinated hundreds of airdrops inside the iron curtain, all compromised by Philby. Arlington Hall, the nerve center of CIA cryptanalysis, was compromised by Bill Weisband, a Russian translator and Soviet spy.[77]

However, the CIA was successful in influencing the 1948 Italian election in favor of the Christian Democrats.[78] The $200 million Exchange Stabilization Fund (equivalent to $2.6 billion in 2024),[68] earmarked for the reconstruction of Europe, was used to pay wealthy Americans of Italian heritage. Cash was then distributed to Catholic Action, the Vatican's political arm, and directly to Italian politicians. This tactic of using its large fund to purchase elections was frequently repeated in the subsequent years.[79]

Korean War

[edit]

At the beginning of the Korean War, CIA officer Hans Tofte claimed to have turned a thousand North Korean expatriates into a guerrilla force tasked with infiltration, guerrilla warfare, and pilot rescue.[80] In 1952 the CIA sent 1,500 more expatriate agents north. Seoul station chief Albert Haney would openly celebrate the capabilities of those agents and the information they sent.[80] In September 1952 Haney was replaced by John Limond Hart, a Europe veteran with a vivid memory for bitter experiences of misinformation.[80] Hart was suspicious of the parade of successes reported by Tofte and Haney and launched an investigation which determined that the entirety of the information supplied by the Korean sources was false or misleading.[81] After the war, internal reviews by the CIA corroborated Hart's findings. The CIA's station in Seoul had 200 officers, but not a single speaker of Korean.[81] Hart reported to Washington that Seoul station could not be salvaged. Loftus Becker, deputy director of intelligence, was sent personally to tell Hart that the CIA had to keep the station open to save face. Becker returned to Washington, D.C., pronouncing the situation to be "hopeless".[81] He then resigned. Air Force Colonel James Kallis stated that CIA director Allen Dulles continued to praise the CIA's Korean force, despite knowing that they were under enemy control.[82] When China entered the war in 1950, the CIA attempted a number of subversive operations in the country, all of which failed due to the presence of double agents. Millions of dollars were spent in these efforts.[83] These included a team of young CIA officers airdropped into China who were ambushed, and CIA funds being used to set up a global heroin empire in Burma's Golden Triangle following a betrayal by another double agent.[83]

1953 Iranian coup d'état

[edit]
The CIA aided the British in overthrowing Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in 1953

In 1951, Mohammad Mosaddegh, a member of the National Front, was elected Iranian prime-minister.[84] As prime minister, he nationalized the Anglo-Persian Oil Company which his predecessor had supported. The nationalization of the British-funded Iranian oil industry, including the largest oil refinery in the world, was disastrous for Mosaddegh. A British naval embargo closed the British oil facilities, which Iran had no skilled workers to operate. In 1952, Mosaddegh resisted the royal refusal to approve his Minister of War and resigned in protest. The National Front took to the streets in protest. Fearing a loss of control, the military pulled its troops back five days later, and Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi gave in to Mosaddegh's demands. Mosaddegh quickly replaced military leaders loyal to the Shah with those loyal to him, giving him personal control over the military. Given six months of emergency powers, Mosaddegh unilaterally passed legislation. When that six months expired, his powers were extended for another year. In 1953, Mossadegh dismissed parliament and assumed dictatorial powers. This power grab triggered the Shah to exercise his constitutional right to dismiss Mosaddegh. Mosaddegh launched a military coup, and the Shah fled the country.

Under CIA Director Allen Dulles, Operation Ajax was put into motion. Its goal was to overthrow Mossadegh with military support from General Fazlollah Zahedi and install a pro-western regime headed by the Shah of Iran. Kermit Roosevelt Jr. oversaw the operation in Iran.[85] On August 16, a CIA paid mob led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini would spark what a U.S. embassy officer called "an almost spontaneous revolution"[86] but Mosaddegh was protected by his new inner military circle, and the CIA had been unable to gain influence within the Iranian military. Their chosen man, former General Fazlollah Zahedi, had no troops to call on.[87] After the failure of the first coup, Roosevelt paid demonstrators to pose as communists and deface public symbols associated with the Shah. This August 19 incident helped foster public support of the Shah and led gangs of citizens on a spree of violence intent on destroying Mossadegh.[88] An attack on his house forced Mossadegh to flee. He surrendered the next day, and his coup came to an end.[89]

1954 Guatemalan coup d'état

[edit]
When democratically elected President Jacobo Árbenz attempted a modest redistribution of land in Guatemala, he was overthrown in the 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état.

The return of the Shah to power, and the impression that an effective CIA had been able to guide that nation to friendly and stable relations with the West, triggered planning for Operation PBSuccess, a plan to overthrow Guatemalan President Jacobo Arbenz.[90] The plan was exposed in major newspapers before it happened after a CIA agent left plans for the coup in his Guatemala City hotel room.[91]

The Guatemalan Revolution of 1944–54 overthrew the U.S. backed dictator Jorge Ubico and brought a democratically elected government to power. The government began an ambitious agrarian reform program which sought to grant land to millions of landless peasants. The program threatened the land holdings of the United Fruit Company, who lobbied for a coup by portraying these reforms as communist.[92][93][94][95]

On June 18, 1954, Carlos Castillo Armas led 480 CIA-trained men across the border from Honduras into Guatemala. The weapons had also come from the CIA.[96] The CIA mounted a psychological campaign to convince the Guatemalan people and government that Armas's victory was a fait accompli. Its largest aspect was a radio broadcast entitled "The Voice of Liberation" which announced that Guatemalan exiles led by Castillo Armas were shortly about to liberate the country.[96] On June 25, a CIA plane bombed Guatemala City, destroying the government's main oil reserves. Árbenz ordered the army to distribute weapons to local peasants and workers.[97] The army refused, forcing Jacobo Árbenz's resignation on June 27, 1954. Árbenz handed over power to Colonel Carlos Enrique Diaz.[97] The CIA then orchestrated a series of power transfers that ended with the confirmation of Castillo Armas as president in July 1954.[97] Armas was the first in a series of military dictators that would rule the country, leading to the brutal Guatemalan Civil War from 1960 to 1996, in which some 200,000 people were killed, mostly by the U.S.-backed military.[102]

Syria

[edit]
President John F. Kennedy presenting the National Security Medal to Allen Dulles on November 28, 1961

In 1949, Colonel Adib Shishakli rose to power in Syria in a CIA-backed coup. Four years later, he would be overthrown by the military, Ba'athists, and communists. The CIA and MI6 started funding right-wing members of the military but suffered a huge setback in the aftermath of the Suez Crisis. CIA Agent Rocky Stone, who had played a minor role in the 1953 Iranian coup d'état, was working at the Damascus embassy as a diplomat but was the station chief. Syrian officers on the CIA dole quickly appeared on television stating that they had received money from "corrupt and sinister Americans" "in an attempt to overthrow the legitimate government of Syria."[103] Syrian forces surrounded the embassy and rousted Agent Stone, who confessed and subsequently made history as the first American diplomat expelled from an Arab nation. This strengthened ties between Syria and Egypt, helping establish the United Arab Republic, and poisoning the well for the US for the foreseeable future.[103]

Indonesia

[edit]

The United States was suspicious of Sukarno, Indonesia's president, because of his declaration of neutrality in the Cold War.[104] After Sukarno hosted the Bandung Conference, promoting the Non-Aligned Movement, the Eisenhower White House responded with NSC 5518 authorizing "all feasible covert means" to move Indonesia into the Western sphere.[105]

The U.S. had no clear policy on Indonesia. Eisenhower sent his special assistant for security operations, F. M. Dearborn Jr., to Jakarta. His report that there was high instability, and that the US lacked stable allies, reinforced the domino theory. Indonesia suffered from what he described as "subversion by democracy".[106] The CIA decided to attempt another military coup in Indonesia, where the Indonesian military was trained by the US, had a strong professional relationship with the US military, had a pro-American officer corps that strongly supported their government, and a strong belief in civilian control of the military, instilled partly by its close association with the US military.[107]

On September 25, 1957, Eisenhower ordered the CIA to start a revolution in Indonesia with the goal of regime change. Three days later, Blitz, a Soviet-controlled weekly in India,[108] reported that the US was plotting to overthrow Sukarno. The story was picked up by the media in Indonesia. One of the first parts of the operation was an 11,500-ton US Navy ship landing at Sumatra, delivering weapons for as many as 8,000 potential revolutionaries.[109]

In support of the Revolutionary Government of the Republic of Indonesia-Permesta Movement, formed by dissident military commanders in Central Sumatera and North Sulawesi with the aim of overthrowing the Sukarno regime, a B-26 piloted by CIA agent Allen Lawrence Pope attacked Indonesian military targets in April and May 1958.[110] The CIA described the airstrikes to the President as attacks by "dissident planes." Pope's B-26 was shot down over Ambon, Indonesia on May 18, 1958, and he bailed out. When he was captured, the Indonesian military found his personnel records, after-action reports, and his membership card for the officer's club at Clark Field. On March 9, John Foster Dulles, the Secretary of State and brother of DCI Allen Dulles, made a public statement calling for a revolt against communist despotism under Sukarno. Three days later, the CIA reported to the White House that the Indonesian Army's actions against the CIA-supported revolution were suppressing communism.[111]

After Indonesia, Eisenhower displayed mistrust of both the CIA and its director, Allen Dulles. Dulles too displayed mistrust of the CIA itself. Abbot Smith, a CIA analyst who later became chief of the Office of National Estimates, said, "We had constructed for ourselves a picture of the USSR, and whatever happened had to be made to fit into this picture. Intelligence estimators can hardly commit a more abominable sin." On December 16, Eisenhower received a report from his intelligence board of consultants that said the agency was "incapable of making objective appraisals of its own intelligence information as well as its own operations."[112]

Democratic Republic of the Congo

[edit]

The Congo became independent from Belgium in 1960.[113] The United States feared that its new prime minister, Patrice Lumumba, was susceptible to Soviet influence, so the CIA supported Joseph Mobutu in organizing a coup that deposed Lumumba on September 14, 1960.[114] Lumumba was assassinated by his Congolese and Belgian enemies in 1961, with CIA acquiescence.[115] The CIA continued to back the Mobutu regime throughout the Cold War, despite its corruption, mismanagement, and human rights abuses.[116]

1960 U-2 incident

[edit]
Suspended from the ceiling of the glass-enclosed atrium: three models of the U-2, Lockheed A-12, and D-21 drone. These models are exact replicas at one-sixth scale of the real planes. All three had photographic capabilities. The U-2 was one of the first espionage planes developed by the CIA. The A-12 set unheralded flight records. The D-21 drone was one of the first crewless aircraft ever built. Lockheed Martin donated all three models to the CIA.

After the bomber gap came the missile gap. Eisenhower wanted to use the U-2 to disprove the Missile Gap, but he had banned U-2 overflights of the USSR after meeting Secretary Khrushchev at Camp David. Another reason the President objected to the use of the U-2 was that, in the nuclear age, the intelligence he needed most was on their intentions, without which, the US would face a paralysis of intelligence. He was particularly worried that U-2 flights could be seen as preparations for first-strike attacks. He had high hopes for an upcoming meeting with Khrushchev in Paris. Eisenhower finally gave in to CIA pressure to authorize a 16-day window for flights, which was extended an additional six days because of poor weather. On May 1, 1960, the Soviet Air Forces shot down a U-2 flying over Soviet territory. To Eisenhower, the ensuing coverup destroyed his perceived honesty and his hope of leaving a legacy of thawing relations with Khrushchev. Eisenhower later said that the U-2 coverup was the greatest regret of his presidency.[117]: 160 

Bay of Pigs

[edit]
Sam Giancana (pictured), Santo Trafficante, and others, who were recruited by the CIA to assassinate Fidel Castro in Cuba[118]

The CIA welcomed Fidel Castro on his visit to Washington, D.C., and gave him a face-to-face briefing. The CIA hoped that Castro would bring about a friendly democratic government and planned to support his government with money and guns. By December 11, 1959, however, a memo reached the DCI's desk recommending Castro's "elimination." Dulles replaced the word "elimination" with "removal," and set the scheme into action. By mid-August 1960, Dick Bissell sought, with the full backing of the CIA, to hire the Mafia to assassinate Castro.[119]

The Bay of Pigs Invasion was a failed military invasion of Cuba undertaken by the CIA-sponsored paramilitary group Brigade 2506 on April 17, 1961. A counter-revolutionary military, trained and funded by the CIA, Brigade 2506 fronted the armed wing of the Democratic Revolutionary Front (DRF) and intended to overthrow Castro's increasingly communist government. Launched from Guatemala, the invading force was defeated within three days by the Cuban Revolutionary Armed Forces, under Castro's direct command. US President Dwight D. Eisenhower was concerned at the direction Castro's government was taking, and in March 1960, Eisenhower allocated $13.1 million to the CIA to plan his overthrow. The CIA proceeded to organize the operation with the aid of various Cuban counter-revolutionary forces, training Brigade 2506 in Guatemala. Over 1,400 paramilitaries set out for Cuba by boat on April 13 for a marine invasion. Two days later on April 15, eight CIA-supplied B-26 bombers attacked Cuban airfields. On the night of April 16, the land invasion began in the Bay of Pigs, but by April 20, the invaders finally surrendered. The failed invasion strengthened the position of Castro's leadership as well as his ties with the USSR. This led eventually to the events of the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. The invasion was a major embarrassment for US foreign policy.

The Taylor Board was commissioned to determine what went wrong in Cuba. The Board came to the same conclusion that the Jan '61 President's Board of Consultants on Foreign Intelligence Activities had concluded, and many other reviews prior, and to come, that Covert Action had to be completely isolated from intelligence and analysis. The Inspector General of the CIA investigated the Bay of Pigs. He concluded that there was a need to improve the organization and management of the CIA drastically.

Cuba: Terrorism and sabotage

[edit]

After the failure of the attempted invasion at the Bay of Pigs, the CIA proposed Operation Mongoose, a program of sabotage and terrorist attacks against civilian and military targets in Cuba, with the stated intent to bring down the Cuban administration and institute a new government.[120] It also sought to force the Cuban government to introduce intrusive civil measures and divert resources to protect its citizens from the attacks.[121] It was authorized by President Kennedy in November 1961.[122][123][124][125] The operation saw the CIA engage in an extensive campaign of terrorist attacks against civilians and economic targets, killing significant numbers of civilians, and carry out covert operations against the Cuban government.[123][126][127][128]

The CIA established a base for the operation, with the cryptonym JMWAVE, at a disused naval facility on the University of Miami campus. The operation was so extensive that it housed the largest number of CIA officers outside of Langley, eventually numbering some four hundred. It was a major employer in Florida, with several thousand agents in clandestine pay of the agency.[129][130] The terrorist activities carried out by agents armed, organized and funded by the CIA were a further source of tension between the U.S. and Cuban governments. They were a major factor contributing to the Soviet decision to place missiles in Cuba, leading to the Cuban Missile Crisis.[131][132]

The attacks continued through 1965.[132] Though the level of terrorist activity directed by the CIA lessened in the second half of the 1960s, in 1969 the CIA was directed to intensify its operations against Cuba.[133] Exile terrorists were still in the employ of the CIA in the mid-1970s, including Luis Posada Carriles.[134][135][136] He remained on the CIA's payroll until mid-1976,[134][136] and is widely believed to be responsible for the October 1976 Cubana 455 flight bombing, killing 73 people – the deadliest instance of airline terrorism in the western hemisphere prior to the attacks of September 2001 in New York.[134][135][136]

Despite the damage done and civilians killed in the CIA's terrorist attacks, by the measure of its stated objective the project was a complete failure.[126][127]

Brazil

[edit]

The CIA and the United States government were involved in the 1964 Brazilian coup d'état. The coup occurred from March 31 to April 1, which resulted in the Brazilian Armed Forces ousting President João Goulart. The United States saw Goulart as a left-wing threat in Latin America. Secret cables written by the US Ambassador to Brazil, Lincoln Gordon, confirmed that the CIA was involved in covert action in Brazil. The CIA encouraged "pro-democracy street rallies" in Brazil, for instance, to create dissent against Goulart.[137]

Tibet

[edit]

The CIA Tibetan program consisted of political plots, propaganda distribution, paramilitary operations, and intelligence gathering based on U.S. commitments made to the Dalai Lama in 1951 and 1956.[138]

Indochina and the Vietnam War (1954–1975)

[edit]

The OSS Patti mission arrived in Vietnam near the end of World War II and had significant interaction with the leaders of many Vietnamese factions, including Ho Chi Minh.[139]

During the period of U.S. combat involvement in the Vietnam War, there was considerable argument about progress among the Department of Defense under Robert McNamara, the CIA, and, to some extent, the intelligence staff of Military Assistance Command Vietnam.[140]

Sometime between 1959 and 1961, the CIA started Project Tiger, a program of dropping South Vietnam agents into North Vietnam to gather intelligence. These were failures; the Deputy Chief for Project Tiger, Captain Do Van Tien, admitted that he was an agent for Hanoi.[141]

In the face of the failure of Project Tiger, the Pentagon wanted CIA paramilitary forces to participate in their Op Plan 64A. This resulted in the CIA's foreign paramilitaries being put under the command of the DOD, a move seen as a slippery slope inside the CIA, a slide from covert action towards militarization.[142]

The antiwar movement rapidly expanded across the United States during the Johnson presidency. Johnson wanted CIA Director Richard Helms to substantiate Johnson's hunch that Moscow and Beijing were financing and influencing the American antiwar movement.[143] Thus, in the fall of 1967, the CIA launched a domestic surveillance program code-named Chaos that would linger for a total of seven years. Police departments across the country cooperated in tandem with the agency, amassing a "computer index of 300,000 names of American people and organizations, and extensive files on 7,200 citizens." Helms hatched a "Special Operations Group" in which "[eleven] CIA officers grew long hair, learned the jargon of the New Left, and went off to infiltrate peace groups in the United States and Europe."[144] A CIA analyst's assessment of Vietnam was that the U.S. was "becoming progressively divorced from reality... [and] proceeding with far more courage than wisdom".[145]

From 1968 to 1972, the CIA's Phoenix Program involved the killing, without trial, of between twenty and forty thousand South Vietnamese civilians suspected to be members of what Americans called the "Infrastructure" – the non-military administrative and political components of the Communists' organizational structure. Thousands were tortured prior to being killed, by such methods as the repeated application of electrical shock to the brain, and the drilling of a dowel through the ear canal into the brain until the person died.[146]

Abuses of CIA authority, 1970s

[edit]
Nixon Oval Office meeting with H.R. Haldeman "Smoking Gun" Conversation, June 23, 1972 (full transcript)
President Gerald Ford meeting with CIA Director–designate George H. W. Bush, December 17, 1975

Conditions worsened in the mid-1970s, around the time of Watergate. A dominant feature of political life during that period were the attempts of Congress to assert oversight of the U.S. presidency and the executive branch of the U.S. government. Revelations about past CIA activities, such as assassinations and attempted assassinations of foreign leaders (most notably Fidel Castro and Rafael Trujillo) and illegal domestic spying on U.S. citizens, provided the opportunities to increase Congressional oversight of U.S. intelligence operations.[147]

In 1971, the NSA and CIA were engaged in domestic spying; the DOD was eavesdropping on Henry Kissinger. The White House and Camp David were wired for sound. Nixon and Kissinger were eavesdropping on their aides, as well as reporters. Famously, Nixon's Plumbers had in their number many former CIA officers, including Howard Hunt, Jim McCord, and Eugenio Martinez. On July 7, 1971, John Ehrlichman, Nixon's domestic policy chief, told DCI Cushman, Nixon's hatchet-man in the CIA, to let Cushman "know that [Hunt] was, in fact, doing some things for the President... you should consider he has pretty much carte blanche".[148]

Hastening the CIA's fall from grace was the burglary of the Watergate headquarters of the Democratic Party by former CIA officers, and President Richard Nixon's subsequent attempt to use the CIA to impede the FBI's investigation of the burglary. In the famous "smoking gun" recording that led to President Nixon's resignation, Nixon ordered his chief of staff, H. R. Haldeman, to tell the CIA that further investigation of Watergate would "open the whole can of worms about the Bay of Pigs".[149][150] In this way Nixon and Haldeman ensured that the CIA's No. 1 and No. 2 ranking officials, Richard Helms and Vernon Walters, communicated to FBI Director L. Patrick Gray that the FBI should not follow the money trail from the burglars to the Committee to Re-elect the President, as it would uncover CIA informants in Mexico. The FBI initially agreed to this due to a long-standing agreement between the FBI and CIA not to uncover each other's sources of information, though within a couple of weeks the FBI resumed its investigation. Nonetheless, when the smoking gun tapes were made public, damage to the public's perception of CIA's top officials, and thus to the CIA as a whole, could not be avoided.[151]

On November 13, 1972, after Nixon's landslide re-election, Nixon told Kissinger "[I intend] to ruin the Foreign Service. I mean ruin it – the old Foreign Service – and to build a new one." He had similar designs for the CIA and intended to replace Helms with James Schlesinger.[152] Nixon had promised that Helms could stay on until his 60th birthday, the mandatory retirement age. On February 2, Nixon broke that promise, carrying through with his intention to "remove the deadwood" from the CIA. "Get rid of the clowns" was his order to the incoming CI. Kissinger had been running the CIA since the beginning of Nixon's presidency, but Nixon impressed on Schlesinger that he must appear to Congress to be in charge, averting their suspicion of Kissinger's involvement.[153] Nixon also hoped that Schlesinger could push through broader changes in the intelligence community that he had been working towards for years, the creation of a Director of National Intelligence, and spinning off the covert action part of the CIA into a separate organ. Before Helms would leave office, he would destroy every tape he had secretly made of meetings in his office, and many of the papers on Project MKUltra. In Schlesinger's 17-week tenure, in his assertion to President Nixon that it was "imperative to cut back on 'the prominence of CIA operations' around the world," the director fired more than 1,500 employees.[154] As Watergate threw the spotlight on the CIA, Schlesinger, who had been kept in the dark about the CIA's involvement, decided he needed to know what skeletons were in the closet

This became the Family Jewels. It included information linking the CIA to the assassination of foreign leaders, the illegal surveillance of some 7,000 U.S. citizens involved in the antiwar movement (Operation CHAOS), its experiments on U.S. and Canadian citizens without their knowledge, secretly giving them LSD (among other things) and observing the results.[147] This prompted Congress to create the Church Committee in the Senate, and the Pike Committee in the House. President Gerald Ford created the Rockefeller Commission,[147] and issued an executive order prohibiting the assassination of foreign leaders. DCI Colby leaked the papers to the press, later he stated that he believed that providing Congress with this information was the correct thing to do, and ultimately in the CIA's interests.[155]

In December 1974 the New York Times reported that the CIA had collected intelligence files on at least 10,000 Americans and engaged in dozens of other illegal activities beginning in the 1950s, including break-ins, wiretapping and mail inspections, in violation of its 1947 charter which prohibited it from taking action on American soil and against US citizens.[156]

Congressional investigations

[edit]

Acting Attorney General Laurence Silberman learned of the existence of the Family Jewels and issued a subpoena for them, prompting eight congressional investigations on the domestic spying activities of the CIA. Bill Colby's short tenure as DCI would end with the Halloween Massacre. His replacement was George H. W. Bush. At the time, the DOD had control of 80% of the intelligence budget.[157] Communication and coordination between the CIA and the DOD would suffer greatly under Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. The CIA's budget for hiring clandestine officers had been squeezed out by the paramilitary operations in Southeast Asia, and the government's poor popularity further strained hiring. This left the agency bloated with middle management, and anemic in younger officers. With employee training taking five years, the agency's only hope would be on the trickle of new officers coming to fruition years in the future. The CIA would see another setback as communists would take Angola. William J. Casey, a member of Ford's Intelligence Advisory Board, obtained Bush's approval to allow a team from outside the CIA to produce Soviet military estimates as a "Team B". The "B" team was composed of hawks. Their estimates were the highest that could be justified, and they painted a picture of a growing Soviet military when the Soviet military was indeed shrinking. Many of their reports found their way to the press.

Chad

[edit]

Chad's neighbor Libya was a major source of weaponry to communist rebel forces. The CIA seized the opportunity to arm and finance Chad's Prime Minister, Hissène Habré, after he created a breakaway government in western Sudan.[158]

Afghanistan

[edit]
Critics assert that funding the Afghan mujahideen in Operation Cyclone played a role in causing the September 11 attacks.

In Afghanistan, the CIA funneled several billion dollars' worth of weapons,[159] including FIM-92 Stinger surface-to-air missiles,[160] to Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI)—which funneled them to tens of thousands of Afghan mujahideen resistance fighters in order to fight the Soviets and the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan during the Soviet-Afghan War.[161][162][163] In total, the CIA sent approximately 2,300 Stingers to Afghanistan, creating a substantial black market for the weapons throughout the Middle East, Central Asia, and even parts of Africa that persisted well into the 1990s. Perhaps 100 Stingers were acquired by Iran. The CIA later operated a program to recover the Stingers through cash buybacks.[164]

Nicaragua

[edit]

Under President Jimmy Carter, the CIA was conducting covertly funded support for the Contras in their war against the Sandinistas. In March 1981, Reagan told Congress that the CIA would protect El Salvador by preventing the Sandinistas from shipping arms to communist rebels in El Salvador. The CIA also began arming and training the Contras in Honduras in hopes that they could depose the Sandinistas in Nicaragua.[165] The CIA was involved in the Iran–Contra affair arms smuggling scandal. Repercussions from the scandal included the creation of the Intelligence Authorization Act in 1991. It defined covert operations as secret missions in geopolitical areas where the U.S. is neither openly nor apparently engaged. This also required an authorizing chain of command, including an official, presidential finding report and the informing of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, which, in emergencies, requires only "timely notification." Critics have alleged that the CIA was also involved in Contra cocaine trafficking.[166][167]

Lebanon

[edit]

The CIA's prime source in Lebanon was Bashir Gemayel, a member of the Christian Maronite sect. The uprising against the Maronite minority blindsided the CIA. Israel invaded Lebanon, and, along with the CIA, propped up Gemayel. This secured Gemayel's assurance that Americans would be protected in Lebanon. Thirteen days later he was assassinated. Imad Mughniyah, a Hezbollah assassin, targeted Americans in retaliation for the Israeli invasion, the Sabra and Shatila massacre, and the US Marines of the Multi-National Force for their role in opposing the PLO in Lebanon. On April 18, 1983, a 2,000 lb car bomb exploded in the lobby of the American embassy in Beirut, killing 63 people, including 17 Americans and 7 CIA officers, including Robert Ames, one of the CIA's Middle East experts. America's fortunes in Lebanon suffered more as America's poorly directed retaliation for the bombing was interpreted by many as support for the Maronite minority. On October 23, 1983, two bombs (1983 Beirut Bombing) were set off in Beirut, including a 10-ton bomb at a US military barracks that killed 242 people.

The embassy bombing killed Ken Haas, the CIA's Station Chief in Beirut. Bill Buckley was sent in to replace him. Eighteen days after the US Marines left Lebanon, Buckley was kidnapped. On March 7, 1984, Jeremy Levin, CNN's Bureau Chief in Beirut, was kidnapped. Twelve more Americans were captured in Beirut during the Reagan Administration. Manucher Ghorbanifar, a former Savak agent, was an information seller, and was discredited over his record of misinformation. He reached out to the agency offering a back channel to Iran, suggesting a trade of missiles that would be lucrative to the intermediaries.[168]

Pakistan

[edit]

It has been alleged by such authors as Ahmed Rashid that the CIA and ISI have been waging a clandestine war.

India–Pakistan geopolitical tensions

[edit]

On May 11, 1998, CIA Director George Tenet and his agency were taken aback by India's second nuclear test. The test prompted concerns from its nuclear-capable adversary, Pakistan, and, "remade the balance of power in the world." The nuclear test was New Delhi's calculated response to Pakistan previously testing new missiles in its expanding arsenal. This series of events subsequently revealed the CIA's "failure of espionage, a failure to read photographs, a failure to comprehend reports, a failure to think, and a failure to see."[169]

Poland, 1980–1989

[edit]

Unlike the Carter administration, the Reagan administration supported the Solidarity movement in Poland, and – based on CIA intelligence – waged a public relations campaign to deter what the Carter administration felt was "an imminent move by large Soviet military forces into Poland." Colonel Ryszard Kukliński, a senior officer on the Polish General Staff, was secretly sending reports to the CIA.[170]

The CIA transferred around $2 million yearly in cash to Solidarity, which suggests that $10 million total is a reasonable estimate for the five-year total. There were no direct links between the CIA and Solidarność, and all money was channeled through third parties.[171] CIA officers were barred from meeting Solidarity leaders, and the CIA's contacts with Solidarność activists were weaker than those of the AFL–CIO, which raised 300 thousand dollars from its members, which were used to provide material and cash directly to Solidarity, with no control of Solidarity's use of it. The U.S. Congress authorized the National Endowment for Democracy to promote democracy, and the NED allocated $10 million to Solidarity.[172]

When the Polish government launched a crackdown in December 1981, Solidarity was not alerted. Explanations for this vary; some believe the CIA was caught off guard, while others suggest that American policymakers viewed an internal crackdown as preferable to an "inevitable Soviet intervention."[173]

CIA support for Solidarity included money, equipment and training, which was coordinated by Special Operations CIA division.[174] Henry Hyde, U.S. House intelligence committee member, said that the U.S. provided "supplies and technical assistance in terms of clandestine newspapers, broadcasting, propaganda, money, organizational help and advice".[175] Michael Reisman of Yale Law School named operations in Poland as one of the CIA's Cold War covert operations.[176]

Initial funds for covert actions by the CIA were $2 million, but authorization was soon increased and by 1985 the CIA had successfully infiltrated Poland.[177] Rainer Thiel, in Nested Games of External Democracy Promotion: The United States and the Polish Liberalization 1980–1989, mentions how covert operations by the CIA, and spy games, among others, allowed the U.S. to proceed with successful regime change.[178]

Operation Gladio

[edit]

During the Cold War, the CIA and NATO were involved in Operation Gladio.[179][180] As part of Operation Gladio, the CIA supported the Italian government, and allegedly supported neo-fascist organizations[181][182][183] such as National Vanguard, New Order and the Nuclei Armati Rivoluzionari during the Years of Lead in Italy.

In Turkey, Gladio was called Counter-Guerrilla. CIA efforts strengthened the Pan-Turkist movement through the founding member of the Counter-Guerrilla; Alparslan Türkeş.[184] Other far-right individuals employed by the CIA as part of Counter-Guerilla included Ruzi Nazar, a former SS officer and Pan-Turkist.[185]

Operation Desert Storm

[edit]

During the Iran–Iraq War, the CIA had backed both sides. The CIA had maintained a network of spies in Iran, but in 1989 a CIA mistake compromised every agent they had in there, and the CIA had no agents in Iraq. In the weeks before the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, the CIA downplayed the military buildup. During the war, CIA estimates of Iraqi abilities and intentions flip-flopped and were rarely accurate. In one particular case, the DOD had asked the CIA to identify military targets to bomb. One target the CIA identified was an underground shelter. The CIA did not know that it was a civilian bomb shelter. In a rare instance, the CIA correctly determined that the coalition forces efforts were coming up short in their efforts to destroy SCUD missiles. Congress took away the CIA's role in interpreting spy-satellite photos, putting the CIA's satellite intelligence operations under the auspices of the military. The CIA created its office of military affairs, which operated as "second-echelon support for the Pentagon. .. answering ... questions from military men [like] 'how wide is this road?'"[186]

Fall of the Soviet Union

[edit]

Mikhail Gorbachev's announcement of the unilateral reduction of 500,000 Soviet troops took the CIA by surprise. Moreover, Doug MacEachin, the CIA's Chief of Soviet analysis, said that even if the CIA had told the President, the NSC, and Congress about the cuts beforehand, it would have been ignored. "We never would have been able to publish it."[187] All the CIA numbers on the Soviet Union's economy were wrong. Too often the CIA relied on inexperienced people supposedly deemed experts. Bob Gates had preceded Doug MacEachin as Chief of Soviet analysis, and he had never visited the Soviet Union. Few officers, even those stationed in the country, spoke the language of the people on whom they spied. And the CIA could not send agents to respond to developing situations. The CIA analysis of Russia during the Cold War was either driven by ideology, or by politics. William J. Crowe, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, noted that the CIA "talked about the Soviet Union as if they weren't reading the newspapers, much less developed clandestine intelligence."[188]

On January 25, 1993, Mir Qazi opened fire at the CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, killing two officers and wounding three others.[189] On February 26, Al-Qaeda terrorists led by Ramzi Yousef bombed the parking garage below the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City, killing six people and injuring 1,402 others.

During the Bosnian War, the CIA ignored signs within and without[clarification needed] of the Srebrenica massacre. On July 13, 1995, when the press report about the massacre came out, the CIA received pictures from a spy satellite of prisoners guarded by men with guns in Srebrenica.[190] The CIA had no agents on the ground to verify the report. Two weeks after news reports of the slaughter, the CIA sent a U-2 to photograph it. A week later the CIA completed its report on the matter. The final report came to the Oval Office on August 4, 1995. In short, it took three weeks for the agency to confirm that one of the largest mass murders in Europe since the Second World War had occurred.[190] Another CIA mistake which occurred in the Balkans during the Clinton presidency was the NATO bombing of Serbia. To force Slobodan Milošević to withdraw his troops from Kosovo, the CIA had been invited to provide military targets for bombings, wherein the agency's analysts used tourist maps to determine the location.[191] However, the agency incorrectly provided the coordinates of the Chinese Embassy as a target resulting in its bombing. The CIA had misread the target as Slobodan Milosevic's military depot.[192]

In Guatemala, the CIA produced the Murphy Memo, based on audio recordings made by covert listening devices planted by Guatemalan intelligence in the bedroom of Ambassador Marilyn McAfee. In the recording, Ambassador McAfee verbally entreated "Murphy." The CIA circulated a memo in the highest Washington circles accusing Ambassador McAfee of having an extramarital lesbian affair with her secretary, Carol Murphy. There was no affair. Ambassador McAfee was calling to Murphy, her poodle.[193]

Harold James Nicholson would burn[clarification needed] several serving officers and three years of trainees before he was caught spying for Russia. In 1997 the House would pen another report, which said that CIA officers know little about the language or politics of the people they spy on; the conclusion was that the CIA lacked the "depth, breadth, and expertise to monitor political, military, and economic developments worldwide."[194] Russ Travers said in the CIA in-house journal that in five years "intelligence failure is inevitable".[195] In 1997 the CIA's new director George Tenet would promise a new working agency by 2002. The CIA's surprise at India's detonation of an atom bomb was a failure at almost every level. After the 1998 embassy bombings by Al Qaeda, the CIA offered two targets to be hit in retaliation. One of them was the Al-Shifa pharmaceutical factory, where traces of chemical weapon precursors had been detected. In the aftermath, it was concluded that "the decision to target al Shifa continues a tradition of operating on inadequate intelligence about Sudan." It triggered the CIA to make "substantial and sweeping changes" to prevent "a catastrophic systemic intelligence failure."[196]

Aldrich Ames

[edit]

Between 1985 and 1986, the CIA lost every spy it had in Eastern Europe. The details of the investigation into the cause were obscured from the new Director, and the investigation had little success and has been widely criticized. On February 21, 1994, FBI agents pulled Aldrich Ames out of his Jaguar.[197] In the investigation that ensued, the CIA discovered that many of the sources for its most important analyses of the USSR were based on Soviet disinformation fed to the CIA by controlled agents. On top of that, it was discovered that, in some cases, the CIA suspected at the time that the sources were compromised, but the information was sent up the chain as genuine.[198][199]

Osama bin Laden

[edit]

Agency files show that it is believed Osama bin Laden was funding the Afghan rebels against the USSR in the 1980s.[200] In 1991, bin Laden returned to his native Saudi Arabia protesting the presence of troops, and Operation Desert Storm. He was expelled from the country. In 1996, the CIA created a team to hunt bin Laden. They were trading information with the Sudanese until, on the word of a source that would later be found to be a fabricator, the CIA closed its Sudan station later that year. In 1998, bin Laden would declare war on America, and, on August 7, strike in Tanzania and Nairobi. On October 12, 2000, Al Qaeda bombed the USS Cole. In the first days of George W. Bush's presidency, Al Qaeda threats were ubiquitous in daily presidential CIA briefings, but it may have become a case of false alarm. The agency's predictions were dire but carried little weight, and the focus of the president and his defense staff were elsewhere. The CIA arranged the arrests of suspected Al Qaeda members through cooperation with foreign agencies, but the CIA could not definitively say what effect these arrests have had, and it could not gain hard intelligence from those captured. The President had asked the CIA if Al Qaeda could plan attacks in the US. On August 6, Bush received a daily briefing with the headline, not based on current, solid intelligence, "Al Qaeda determined to strike inside the US." The US had been hunting bin Laden since 1996 and had had several opportunities, but neither Clinton, nor Bush had wanted to risk taking an active role in a murky assassination plot, and the perfect opportunity had never materialized for a DCI that would have given him the reassurances he needed to take the plunge. That day, Richard A. Clarke sent National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice warning of the risks, and decrying the inaction of the CIA.[201]

Al-Qaeda and the Global War on Terrorism

[edit]
The CIA prepared a series of leaflets announcing bounties for those who turned in or denounced individuals suspected of association with the Taliban or Al-Qaeda.

In January 1996, the CIA created an experimental "virtual station," the Bin Laden Issue Station, under the Counterterrorist Center, to track bin Laden's developing activities. Al-Fadl, who defected to the CIA in spring 1996, began to provide the Station with a new image of the Al Qaeda leader: he was not only a terrorist financier but a terrorist organizer as well. FBI Special Agent Dan Coleman (who together with his partner Jack Cloonan had been "seconded" to the bin Laden Station) called him Qaeda's "Rosetta Stone".[202]

In 1999, CIA chief George Tenet launched a plan to deal with al-Qaeda. The Counterterrorist Center, its new chief, Cofer Black, and the center's bin Laden unit were the plan's developers and executors. Once it was prepared, Tenet assigned CIA intelligence chief Charles E. Allen to set up a "Qaeda cell" to oversee its tactical execution.[203] In 2000, the CIA and USAF jointly ran a series of flights over Afghanistan with a small remote-controlled reconnaissance drone, the Predator; they obtained probable photos of bin Laden. Cofer Black and others became advocates of arming the Predator with missiles to try to assassinate bin Laden and other al-Qaeda leaders.

September 11 attacks and its aftermath

[edit]
US special forces helping Northern Alliance troops away from a CIA-operated MI-17 Hip helicopter at Bagram Airbase, 2002

On September 11, 2001, 19 Al-Qaeda members hijacked four passenger jets within the Northeastern United States in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks. Two planes crashed into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, the third into the Pentagon in Arlington County, Virginia, and the fourth inadvertently into a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. The attacks cost the lives of 2,996 people (including the 19 hijackers), caused the destruction of the Twin Towers, and damaged the western side of the Pentagon. Soon after 9/11, The New York Times released a story stating that the CIA's New York field office was destroyed in the wake of the attacks. According to unnamed CIA sources, while first responders, military personnel and volunteers were conducting rescue efforts at the World Trade Center site, a special CIA team was searching the rubble for both digital and paper copies of classified documents. This was done according to well-rehearsed document recovery procedures put in place after the Iranian takeover of the United States Embassy in Tehran in 1979.

While the CIA insists that those who conducted the attacks on 9/11 were not aware that the agency was operating at 7 World Trade Center under the guise of another (unidentified) federal agency, this center was the headquarters for many notable criminal terrorism investigations. Though the New York field offices' main responsibilities were to monitor and recruit foreign officials stationed at the United Nations, the field office also handled the investigations of the August 1998 bombings of United States Embassies in East Africa and the October 2000 bombing of the USS Cole.[204] Despite the fact that the 9/11 attacks may have damaged the CIA's New York branch, and they had to loan office space from the US Mission to the United Nations and other federal agencies, there was an upside for the CIA.[204] In the months immediately following 9/11, there was a huge increase in the number of applications for CIA positions. According to CIA representatives that spoke with The New York Times, pre-9/11 the agency received approximately 500 to 600 applications a week, in the months following 9/11 the agency received that number daily.[205]

The intelligence community as a whole, and especially the CIA, were involved in presidential planning immediately after the 9/11 attacks. In his address to the nation at 8:30pm on September 11, 2001, George W. Bush mentioned the intelligence community: "The search is underway for those who are behind these evil acts, I've directed the full resource of our intelligence and law enforcement communities to find those responsible and bring them to justice."[206]

The involvement of the CIA in the newly coined "War on Terror" was further increased on September 15, 2001. During a meeting at Camp David George W. Bush agreed to adopt a plan proposed by CIA director George Tenet. This plan consisted of conducting a covert war in which CIA paramilitary officers would cooperate with anti-Taliban guerrillas inside Afghanistan. They would later be joined by small special operations forces teams which would call in precision airstrikes on Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters. This plan was codified on September 16, 2001, with Bush's signature of an official Memorandum of Notification that allowed the plan to proceed.[207]

US Secretary of Defense and former Director of Central Intelligence Robert Gates meeting with Russian Minister of Defense and ex-KGB officer Sergei Ivanov, 2007

On November 25–27, 2001, Taliban prisoners revolted at the Qala Jangi prison west of Mazar-e-Sharif. Though several days of struggle occurred between the Taliban prisoners and the Northern Alliance members present, the prisoners gained the upper hand and obtained North Alliance weapons. At some point during this period Johnny "Mike" Spann, a CIA officer sent to question the prisoners, was beaten to death. He became the first American to die in combat in the war in Afghanistan.[207]

After 9/11, the CIA came under criticism for not having done enough to prevent the attacks. Tenet rejected the criticism, citing the agency's planning efforts especially over the preceding two years. He also considered that the CIA's efforts had put the agency in a position to respond rapidly and effectively to the attacks, both in the "Afghan sanctuary" and in "ninety-two countries around the world".[208][209] The new strategy was called the "Worldwide Attack Matrix".[210]

Anwar al-Awlaki, a Yemeni American U.S. citizen and al-Qaeda member, was killed on September 30, 2011, by a CIA drone strike in Yemen.[211][212] Al-Awlaki's 16-year-old son, a noncombatant and U.S. citizen, was also killed in a separate strike.[212] Although approved by the Department of Justice, the strikes sparked discussion on the legality of killing American citizens without trial.[211]

Failures in intelligence analysis

[edit]

A major criticism is a failure to forestall the September 11 attacks. The 9/11 Commission Report identified failures in the IC as a whole. One problem, for example, was the FBI failing to "connect the dots" by sharing information among its decentralized field offices.

The report concluded that former DCI George Tenet failed to adequately prepare the agency to deal with the danger posed by al-Qaeda prior to the attacks of September 11, 2001.[213] The report was finished in June 2005 and was partially released to the public in an agreement with Congress, over the objections of current DCI General Michael Hayden. Hayden said its publication would "consume time and attention revisiting ground that is already well plowed."[214] Tenet disagreed with the report's conclusions, citing his planning efforts vis-à-vis al-Qaeda, particularly from 1999.[215] Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence, Carl W. Ford Jr. remarked, "As long as we rate intelligence more for its volume than its quality, we will continue to turn out the $40 billion pile of crap we have become famous for." He further stated, "[The CIA is] broken. It's so broken that nobody wants to believe it."[216]

Yugoslav wars

[edit]

In 1989; Yugoslavia officially dissolved into six republics, with borders drawn along ethnic and historical lines: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia. This quickly dissolved into ethnic tensions between Serbs and other Balkan ethnicities. In 1991, the CIA predicted that tension in the region would evolve into a full blown Civil war.[217] In 1992, the U.S. embargoed the trafficking of weapons into both Bosnia and Serbia in order to not prolong the war and the destruction of impacted communities. In May 1994, the CIA reported that the embargo had been ignored by countries such as Malaysia and Iran who moved weapons into Bosnia.[218]

Iraq War

[edit]

Seventy-two days after the 9/11 attacks, President Bush told Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld to update the US plan for an invasion of Iraq, but not to tell anyone. Rumsfeld asked Bush if he could bring DCI Tenet into the loop, to which Bush agreed.[219]

The CIA had put eight of their best officers in Kurdish territory in Northern Iraq. By December 2002, the CIA had close to a dozen functional networks in Iraq[219]: 242  and would penetrate Iraq's SSO, tap the encrypted communications of the Deputy Prime Minister, and recruit the bodyguard of Hussein's son[which?] as an agent. As time passed, the CIA would become more frantic about the possibility of their networks being compromised. To the CIA, the invasion had to occur before the end of February 2003 if their sources inside Hussein's government were to survive. The rollup would happen as predicted; 37 CIA sources recognized by their Thuraya satellite telephones provided for them by the CIA.[219]: 337 

Former CIA deputy director Michael Morell apologized to Colin Powell for the CIA's erroneous assessments of Iraq's WMD programs.[220]

The case Colin Powell presented before the United Nations (purportedly proving an Iraqi WMD program) was inaccurate. DDCI John E. McLaughlin was part of a long discussion in the CIA about equivocation. McLaughlin, who would make, among others, the "slam dunk" presentation to the President, "felt that they had to dare to be wrong to be clearer in their judgments".[219]: 197  The Al Qaeda connection, for instance, was from a single source, extracted through torture, and was later denied. The sole source for the allegations of Iraqi mobile weapons laboratories, code-named Curveball, was a known liar.[221] A postmortem of the intelligence failures in the lead up to Iraq led by former DDCI Richard Kerr would conclude that the CIA had been a casualty of the Cold War, wiped out in a way "analogous to the effect of the meteor strikes on the dinosaurs."[222]

The Senate Intelligence Committee report on CIA torture that details the use of torture during CIA detention and interrogation

The opening days of the invasion of Iraq would see successes and defeats for the CIA. With its Iraq networks compromised, and its strategic and tactical information shallow, and often wrong, the intelligence side of the invasion itself would be a black eye for the agency. The CIA would see some success with its "Scorpion" paramilitary teams composed of CIA Special Activities Division paramilitary officers, along with friendly Iraqi partisans. CIA SAD officers would also help the US 10th Special Forces.[219][223][224] The occupation of Iraq would be a low point in the history of the CIA. At the largest CIA station in the world, officers would rotate through 1–3-month tours. In Iraq, almost 500 transient officers would be trapped inside the Green Zone while Iraq station chiefs would rotate with only a little less frequency.[225]

2004, DNI takes over CIA top-level functions

[edit]

The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 created the office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), who took over some of the government and intelligence community (IC)-wide functions that had previously been the CIA's.[226] The DNI manages the United States Intelligence Community and in so doing it manages the intelligence cycle. Among the functions that moved to the DNI were the preparation of estimates reflecting the consolidated opinion of the 16 IC agencies, and preparation of briefings for the president. On July 30, 2008, President Bush issued Executive Order 13470[227] amending Executive Order 12333 to strengthen the role of the DNI.[228]

Previously, the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) oversaw the Intelligence Community, serving as the president's principal intelligence advisor, additionally serving as head of the CIA. The DCI's title now is "Director of the Central Intelligence Agency" (D/CIA), serving as head of the CIA.

Currently, the CIA reports to the Director of National Intelligence. Before the establishment of the DNI, the CIA reported to the President, with informational briefings to congressional committees. The National Security Advisor is a permanent member of the National Security Council, responsible for briefing the President with pertinent information collected by all U.S. intelligence agencies, including the National Security Agency, the Drug Enforcement Administration, etc. All 16 Intelligence Community agencies are under the authority of the Director of National Intelligence.

Operation Neptune Spear

[edit]

On May 1, 2011, President Barack Obama announced that Osama bin Laden was killed earlier that day by "a small team of Americans" operating in Abbottabad, Pakistan, during a CIA operation.[229][230] The raid was executed from a CIA forward base in Afghanistan by elements of the U.S. Navy's Naval Special Warfare Development Group and CIA paramilitary operatives.[231]

The operation was a result of years of intelligence work that included the CIA's capture and interrogation of Khalid Sheik Mohammad, which led to the identity of a courier of bin Laden's,[232][233][234] the tracking of the courier to the compound by Special Activities Division paramilitary operatives and the establishing of a CIA safe house to provide critical tactical intelligence for the operation.[235][236][237]

The CIA ran a fake vaccination clinic in an attempt to locate Osama bin Laden. This may have negatively affected the campaign against polio in Pakistan and Afghanistan. In some rural areas, vaccination workers were banned by the Taliban or chased away by locals.[238][239] There have been many deadly attacks by militants against vaccination workers in Pakistan.[240] Efforts to eradicate polio have furthermore been disrupted by American drone strikes.[238]

Syrian Civil War

[edit]
President Barack Obama and CIA Director John Brennan at the GCC-U.S. Summit in Riyadh in April 2016. Saudi Arabia was involved in the CIA-led Timber Sycamore covert operation.

Under the aegis of operation Timber Sycamore and other clandestine activities, CIA operatives and U.S. special operations troops have trained and armed nearly 10,000 rebel fighters at a cost of $1 billion a year.[241] The CIA has been sending weapons to anti-government rebels in Syria since at least 2012.[242] These weapons have been reportedly falling into hands of extremists, such as al-Nusra Front and ISIL.[243][244][245] Around February 2017, the CIA was instructed to halt military aid to Syrian rebels (Free Syrian Army or FSA), which also included training, ammunition, guided missiles, and salaries. Sources believe that the aid freeze was related to concerns that weapons and funds will fall into the hands of ISIL. On April 6, 2017, Al-Jazeera reported that funding to the FSA was partially restored. Based on the information provided by two FSA sources, the new military operation room will receive its funds from the coalition "Friends of Syria." The coalition consists of members from the U.S., Turkey, Western Europe, and Gulf states, which previously supported the military operation known as MOM.[246]

It was reported in July 2017 that President Donald Trump had ordered a "phasing out" of the CIA's support for anti-Assad rebels.[247]

Reorganization

[edit]

On 6 March 2015, the office of the D/CIA issued an unclassified edition of a statement by the director, titled 'Our Agency's Blueprint for the Future', as a press release for public consumption. The press release announced sweeping plans for the reorganization and reform of the CIA, which the director believes will bring the CIA more in line with the Agency doctrine called the 'Strategic Direction'. Among the principal changes disclosed include the establishment of a new directorate, the Directorate of Digital Innovation. Other changes which were announced include the formation of a Talent Development Center of Excellence, the enhancement and expansion of the CIA University and the creation of the office of the Chancellor to head the CIA University in order to consolidate and unify recruitment and training efforts. The National Clandestine Service (NCS) will be reverting to its original Directorate name, the Directorate of Operations. The Directorate of Intelligence is also being renamed; it will now be the Directorate of Analysis.[248]

Drones

[edit]

A new policy introduced by President Barack Obama removed the authority of the CIA to launch drone attacks and allowed these attacks only under Department of Defense command. This change was reversed by President Donald Trump, who authorized CIA drone strikes on suspected terrorists.[249]

Encryption devices sold through front company

[edit]

For decades until 2018, the CIA secretly owned Crypto AG, a small Swiss company that made encryption devices, in association with West German intelligence. The company sold compromised encryption devices to over 120 countries, allowing Western intelligence to eavesdrop on communications that the users believed to be secure.[250][251]

Open-source intelligence

[edit]

Until the 2004 reorganization of the intelligence community, one of the "services of common concern" that the CIA provided was open-source intelligence from the Foreign Broadcast Information Service (FBIS).[252] FBIS, which had absorbed the Joint Publication Research Service, a military organization that translated documents,[253] moved into the National Open Source Enterprise under the Director of National Intelligence.

During the Reagan administration, Michael Sekora (assigned to the DIA), worked with agencies across the intelligence community, including the CIA, to develop and deploy a technology-based competitive strategy system called Project Socrates. Project Socrates was designed to utilize open-source intelligence gathering almost exclusively. The technology-focused Socrates system supported such programs as the Strategic Defense Initiative in addition to private sector projects.[254][255]

Increasingly, the CIA is a major consumer of social media intelligence.[256] CIA launched a Twitter account in June 2014.[257] CIA also launched its own .onion website to collect anonymous feedback.[258]

Outsourcing and privatization

[edit]

Many of the duties and functions of Intelligence Community activities, not the CIA alone, are being outsourced and privatized. Mike McConnell, former Director of National Intelligence, was about to publicize an investigation report of outsourcing by U.S. intelligence agencies, as required by Congress.[259] However, this report was then classified.[260][261] Hillhouse speculates that this report includes requirements for the CIA to report:[260][262]

  • different standards for government employees and contractors;
  • contractors providing similar services to government workers;
  • analysis of costs of contractors vs. employees;
  • an assessment of the appropriateness of outsourced activities;
  • an estimate of the number of contracts and contractors;
  • comparison of compensation for contractors and government employees;
  • attrition analysis of government employees;
  • descriptions of positions to be converted back to the employee model;
  • an evaluation of accountability mechanisms;
  • an evaluation of procedures for "conducting oversight of contractors to ensure identification and prosecution of criminal violations, financial waste, fraud, or other abuses committed by contractors or contract personnel"; and
  • an "identification of best practices of accountability mechanisms within service contracts."

According to investigative journalist Tim Shorrock:

...what we have today with the intelligence business is something far more systemic: senior officials leaving their national security and counterterrorism jobs for positions where they essentially perform the same jobs they once held at the CIA, the NSA, and other agencies – but for double or triple the salary and profit. It's a privatization of the highest order, in which our collective memory and experience in intelligence – our crown jewels of spying, so to speak – are owned by corporate America. There is essentially no government oversight of this private sector at the heart of our intelligence empire. And the lines between public and private have become so blurred as to be nonexistent.[263][264]

Congress had required an outsourcing report by March 30, 2008:[262]

The Director of National Intelligence has been granted the authority to increase the number of positions (FTEs) on elements in the Intelligence Community by up to 10% should there be a determination that activities performed by a contractor should be done by a U.S. government employee."[262]

Part of the problem, according to author Tim Weiner, is that political appointees designated by recent presidential administrations have sometimes been under-qualified or over-zealous politically. Large purges have taken place in the upper echelons of the CIA, and when those talented individuals are pushed out the door, they have frequently gone on to found new independent intelligence companies which can suck up CIA talent.[117] Another part of the contracting problem comes from Congressional restrictions on the number of employees within the IC. According to Hillhouse, this resulted in 70% of the de facto workforce of the CIA's National Clandestine Service being made up of contractors. "After years of contributing to the increasing reliance upon contractors, Congress is now providing a framework for the conversion of contractors into federal government employees – more or less."[262] The number of independent contractors hired by the Federal government across the intelligence community has skyrocketed. So, not only does the CIA have trouble hiring, but those hires will frequently leave their permanent employ for shorter term contract gigs which have much higher pay and allow for more career mobility.[117]

As with most government agencies, building equipment often is contracted. The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), responsible for the development and operation of airborne and spaceborne sensors, long was a joint operation of the CIA and the United States Department of Defense. The NRO, then under DCI authority, contracted more of the design that had been their tradition, and to a contractor without extensive reconnaissance experience, Boeing. The next-generation satellite Future Imagery Architecture project "how does heaven look," which missed objectives after $4 billion in cost overruns, was the result of this contract.[265][266]

Some of the cost problems associated with intelligence come from one agency, or even a group within an agency, not accepting the compartmented security practices for individual projects, requiring expensive duplication.[267]

Controversies

[edit]

The CIA has been the subject of numerous controversies. The agency ran an operation code-named "Chaos" that ran from 1967 to 1974 where they routinely performed surveillance on Americans who were a part of various peace groups protesting the Vietnam War. The operation was authorized by order of President Lyndon B. Johnson in October 1967 as the CIA gathered the information of 300,000 American people and organizations and extensive files on 7,200 citizens. The program was exposed by the Church Committee in 1975 as a part of the investigation into the Watergate scandal.[216][268]

The CIA also conducted a secret program called MKUltra, which ran from the early 1950s to the 1970s and involved illegal human experimentation to develop mind-control techniques. Subjects were often unaware they were part of the experiments, which included the administration of psychoactive drugs like LSD and other methods of psychological manipulation.[269][270] The program, exposed in the 1970s, led to widespread public outrage and calls for greater oversight of intelligence agencies.[271]

The CIA was also linked to the Iran-Contra Affair wherein missiles were sold to the Iranian government as an exchange for the release of hostages and the profits the agency made from selling the weapons at a marked-up price went towards assisting the contras in Nicaragua.

Another source of controversy has been the CIA's role in Operation Condor, which was a United States-backed campaign of repression and state terrorism involving intelligence operations, CIA-backed coup d'états and assassinations against leaders in South America from 1968 to 1989. By the Operation's end in 1989, up to 80,000 people had been killed.[272] Similarly, the CIA was complicit in the actions of death squads in El Salvador and Honduras.[273][274]

An additional controversy surrounds the Bush Administration's claim that Iraq had "weapons of mass destruction" in 2002, and again in 2003 as justification for invading the Middle Eastern country. The CIA went along with the claim despite contradicting the president in testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2002. They produced a national intelligence estimate claiming that if the Iraqi government was able to acquire "sufficient fissile material from abroad, it could make nuclear weapons within a year".[275]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is an independent civilian foreign intelligence service of the federal government, tasked with collecting, analyzing, and disseminating intelligence on foreign threats to while also conducting covert operations as directed by the President. Established on September 18, 1947, under the signed by President , the agency succeeded wartime and interim intelligence entities to coordinate and centralize U.S. efforts amid emerging tensions. Headquartered at the in , the CIA operates through specialized directorates handling gathering, technical surveillance, analytic assessments, and activities. The agency's mandate emphasizes objective analysis of global political, economic, military, and scientific developments to inform policymaking, excluding domestic law enforcement or signals intelligence roles assigned to other entities. During the Cold War, notable technical achievements included the development of the U-2 high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft in 1954 and the Corona satellite program starting in 1957, which provided critical overhead imagery of Soviet missile sites and military installations despite initial technical setbacks. These capabilities bolstered U.S. strategic assessments and deterrence by revealing discrepancies between Soviet claims and actual deployments. Covert actions have defined much of the CIA's operational history, including support for anti-communist resistance in and , though outcomes varied from disrupting Soviet proxies to failed invasions like the 1961 Bay of Pigs operation in . Revelations from congressional probes, such as the 1975 , exposed unauthorized activities including assassination plots against foreign leaders, mind-control experiments under , and mail-opening programs targeting U.S. citizens, prompting executive orders restricting domestic operations and enhancing oversight. In the post-9/11 era, the CIA's detention and enhanced interrogation program, authorized for high-value terror suspects, yielded disputed intelligence gains but was later critiqued in a 2014 Senate Intelligence Committee report for limited effectiveness, ethical lapses, and misrepresentation of results to policymakers, with the agency countering that it disrupted plots and contributed to locating .

Establishment and Charter

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) traces its origins to the Central Intelligence Group (CIG), a temporary wartime successor to of Strategic Services, established by President Harry S. Truman's directive on January 22, 1946, to coordinate foreign intelligence activities among U.S. government departments. This interim body operated under the , comprising the Secretaries of State, War, and Navy, along with the Chief of Staff to the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, to address post-World War II intelligence gaps amid emerging threats. The CIA was formally established by the , signed into law by President Truman on July 26, 1947, as part of a broader reorganization of U.S. apparatus that unified the armed services under a Secretary of Defense and created the (NSC). Section 102 of the Act placed the CIA under the NSC's direction, designating it to "correlate and evaluate intelligence relating to the " and perform additional intelligence functions as assigned by the NSC, while explicitly prohibiting involvement in or internal security functions. The agency assumed operations from the CIG on September 18, 1947, with Rear Admiral appointed as its first . The Act's charter emphasized centralized coordination to avoid the interagency rivalries evident during , vesting the Director with authority over the CIA but subordinating its policy to NSC oversight, reflecting congressional intent for a peacetime service focused on foreign threats rather than military subordination. Subsequent clarifications, such as Directive No. 1 issued on December 12, 1947, delineated the CIA's responsibilities for national estimates and dissemination, underscoring its role in advising the President without independent policymaking power. This foundational framework, amended over time but rooted in the 1947 Act, prioritized empirical analysis over covert action, though early directives allowed for special activities under NSC approval.

Core Functions and Mandates

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) derives its core functions from the National Security Act of 1947, enacted on July 26, 1947, which established the agency to centralize and coordinate foreign intelligence activities amid post-World War II reorganization of U.S. national security structures. Section 102(d) of the Act outlines five primary duties: advising the National Security Council (NSC) on intelligence matters affecting national security; recommending coordination of intelligence activities across government agencies; correlating, evaluating, and disseminating relevant intelligence within the government; performing additional common services for other intelligence entities as determined efficient by the NSC; and executing other intelligence-related functions as directed by the NSC. These mandates emphasize foreign-focused operations, explicitly barring the CIA from domestic law enforcement, subpoena powers, or internal security roles to prevent overlap with entities like the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Central to the CIA's mandate is the collection of (HUMINT) and other foreign intelligence sources, including signals, imagery, and open-source data, primarily outside U.S. borders to inform decisions. This involves clandestine operations to gather economic, military, political, scientific, and technological information that cannot be obtained through diplomatic or overt means. The agency evaluates and analyzes this raw intelligence to produce objective assessments, disseminating finished products such as the to policymakers, with an emphasis on timeliness and accuracy to preempt threats. forms another pillar, entailing efforts to protect U.S. intelligence sources and methods from foreign adversaries, including detecting and neutralizing attempts. Covert action represents a distinct mandate, authorized under NSC directives stemming from the 1947 Act's provision for "other functions" related to , formalized in policies like NSC 10/2 (June 18, 1948), which empowered the CIA to conduct , , , and operations without overt U.S. attribution when directed by the President. Such activities require a presidential finding and congressional notification under the National Security Act amendments, including the Hughes-Ryan of , ensuring they advance U.S. objectives while maintaining . The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 refined oversight by separating the role from CIA leadership, but preserved these core functions, directing the CIA Director to execute clandestine collection, covert action, and under the . The agency's official underscores preempting threats through intelligence that "matters," objective , and covert action as presidentially mandated, without extending to policy-making or domestic surveillance.

Leadership and Governance

Director and Executive Leadership

The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (DCIA) is the head of the agency, nominated by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. The DCIA manages CIA operations, personnel, and budget while reporting to the Director of National Intelligence. John Ratcliffe has served as DCIA since his swearing-in on January 23, 2025, following Senate confirmation on a party-line vote. The Deputy Director of the CIA supports the DCIA in directing agency activities and may assume leadership duties in the Director's absence. As of October 2025, Michael Ellis holds the position of Deputy Director, having previously served in legal roles within the intelligence community. In October 2025, Ellis assumed the concurrent role of acting by demoting the prior acting official, a move reported to streamline legal oversight amid administrative transitions. The manages the CIA's internal administrative, financial, and logistical operations, ensuring support for intelligence missions. Dustin J. Gard-Weiss was sworn in as on August 4, 2025, bringing over 20 years of experience in and management. Executive also encompasses associate deputy directors and chiefs of staff who coordinate across the agency's directorates, though specific roles vary with administrative priorities set by the DCIA. These positions emphasize operational efficiency and alignment with national intelligence objectives, with appointments often reflecting the appointing president's strategic focus on foreign threats.

Congressional and Executive Oversight

The President maintains primary executive oversight of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) through the (NSC), which advises on national security policy and reviews proposed covert actions, requiring NSC or designated committee approval before presidential authorization. , signed by President on December 4, 1981, and subsequently amended, delineates the roles and responsibilities for U.S. intelligence activities, mandating that the CIA conduct foreign intelligence collection and covert actions consistent with law, while prohibiting activities that violate U.S. constitutional rights or . The Director of the CIA reports directly to the (DNI), who coordinates the Intelligence Community under presidential direction, ensuring alignment with executive priorities. Additional executive mechanisms include the (PIAB), which provides independent assessments of intelligence effectiveness and compliance, and the Intelligence Oversight Board (IOB), tasked with reviewing the legality of intelligence activities and reporting improprieties to the Attorney General and NSC. The CIA's (OIG), established under the Inspector General Act of 1978 and uniquely presidentially appointed with confirmation among intelligence agencies, conducts internal audits, inspections, and investigations into waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement, with authority to report significant findings directly to congressional intelligence committees and the DNI. These structures aim to enforce accountability, though historical lapses, such as delayed notifications on sensitive operations, have tested their efficacy. Congressional oversight resides with the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), formed on May 19, 1976, in response to revelations of intelligence overreach uncovered by the , and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), established on July 14, 1977, to monitor the Intelligence Community's activities, budgets, and compliance with statutes. These committees hold exclusive jurisdiction over CIA authorization and appropriations via annual Intelligence Authorization Acts, conduct closed-door briefings on classified operations, and investigate alleged misconduct, with statutory requirements for the CIA to notify them "in a timely fashion" of covert actions under the , as amended. The Intelligence Oversight Act of 1980 reinforced this framework by designating SSCI and HPSCI as the sole congressional overseers of CIA matters, curtailing fragmented reviews by other committees and mandating reporting of significant anticipated intelligence activities. Landmark exercises include the Church Committee's 1975-1976 probe, which documented CIA assassination plots against foreign leaders (e.g., ) and unauthorized domestic surveillance like , prompting executive orders banning assassinations and spurring permanent oversight structures. Similarly, joint congressional committees in 1987 examined the -Contra affair, revealing NSC and CIA-linked arms sales to (despite an embargo) and diversion of approximately $3.8 million in proceeds to Nicaraguan in violation of the Boland Amendment's funding prohibitions from 1982-1986, leading to 11 convictions (many later pardoned) and tightened notification protocols. Despite these mechanisms, oversight challenges persist due to classification barriers and occasional executive withholding of information, as evidenced by disputes over post-9/11 program notifications.

Organizational Structure

Directorates and Specialized Offices

The Central Intelligence Agency organizes its core functions across five directorates that encompass analysis, operations, science and technology, digital innovation, and support services. These directorates integrate their capabilities within multidisciplinary Mission Centers to address specific threats and priorities. Established as part of a 2017 reorganization under Director John Brennan and further adapted in subsequent years, this structure aims to enhance agility and coordination in response to evolving global challenges. The Directorate of Operations (DO) serves as the CIA's clandestine arm, responsible for (HUMINT) collection, covert actions authorized by the President, and activities to protect Agency assets and operations. It manages case officers who recruit and handle foreign agents, conduct , and execute operations through specialized branches. The DO operates globally, often under non-official cover, and coordinates with liaison services while maintaining strict operational security. The Directorate of Analysis (DA), formerly known as the Directorate of Intelligence, produces objective, all-source assessments on and issues to inform U.S. decision-makers. Analysts within the DA synthesize data from HUMINT, , and open sources, employing methodologies that emphasize evidence-based reasoning and alternative scenario evaluation to mitigate analytic biases. Specialized centers within the DA focus on regional, functional, and topical issues, such as weapons proliferation and economic intelligence. The Directorate of Science and Technology (DS&T) develops and deploys cutting-edge technologies to enable intelligence collection and analysis, including surveillance systems, reconnaissance tools, and secure communications. Formed in from earlier research units, the DS&T has historically innovated solutions like the U-2 spy plane adaptations and satellite reconnaissance support, applying engineering and scientific expertise to operational needs. It collaborates with and academic partners while safeguarding classified advancements. The Directorate of Digital Innovation (DDI) integrates cyber, , and digital tools to enhance all facets of CIA missions, from collection to . Established to the rise of digital threats and opportunities, the DDI supports offensive and defensive cyber operations, analytics, and applications tailored to requirements. The Directorate of Support (DS) provides essential logistical, administrative, and infrastructure to sustain CIA personnel and facilities worldwide. Responsibilities include management, financial operations, medical services, logistics, and physical/technical for in , and overseas stations. The DS ensures operational continuity by vetting personnel, maintaining secure communications, and managing and . Mission Centers represent specialized offices that cross-cut the directorates, focusing on high-priority areas such as counterterrorism, counterintelligence, China, and transnational threats including technology and pandemics. For instance, the China Mission Center, launched on October 7, 2021, centralizes efforts against Beijing's global influence, while the Counterterrorism Mission Center coordinates responses to jihadist networks. These centers, numbering around a dozen, facilitate integrated planning and execution, drawing on directorate resources for rapid deployment. Additional specialized offices include the Office of the Inspector General, which conducts independent audits and investigations into Agency activities for accountability, and the Office of General Counsel, providing legal guidance on operations and compliance with U.S. law. These entities ensure internal oversight amid the CIA's emphasis on mission effectiveness.

Recent Reorganizations and Adaptations

In March 2015, CIA Director John O. Brennan announced a comprehensive reorganization to enhance integration across functions and adapt to evolving threats, including cyber operations and the proliferation of digital data. This overhaul, the most significant since the agency's founding, established a new Directorate of Digital Innovation (DDI) on October 1, 2015—the first such addition in over 50 years—to centralize cyber and digital expertise, oversee career development for digital specialists, and embed these capabilities agency-wide. Concurrently, the agency created 10 mission centers to fuse clandestine operations, analysis, support, technology, and digital efforts, organized into four functional categories (e.g., counterterrorism, weapons and counterproliferation) and six regional ones (e.g., East Asia-Pacific, Europe and Eurasia), aiming to reduce silos and accelerate responses to national security priorities. These changes built on post-9/11 adaptations, such as enhanced focus following the 2004 Intelligence Reform and Prevention Act, which created the and prompted internal shifts toward integrated analysis and operations. The 2015 restructuring addressed criticisms of fragmented workflows by colocating experts, with Brennan emphasizing that it would position spies and analysts "cheek by jowl" for more agile intelligence production. In October 2021, under Director , the CIA implemented further adjustments to prioritize strategic competition, particularly with , by establishing the China Mission Center to consolidate collection, analysis, and covert actions against Beijing's global influence and . This was complemented by the Transnational and Mission Center, targeting , , , and pandemics, alongside the appointment of the agency's first to bolster innovation. Additional measures included streamlined hiring to cut onboarding from months to weeks and a new CIA Fellows program for short-term expert rotations, overseen by Deputy Director David S. Cohen, while maintaining emphasis on , , , and . These adaptations reflect causal responses to empirical shifts: the in volumes since the , China's military modernization and Belt and Road expansion documented in U.S. assessments, and technological disruptions necessitating cross-directorate agility. No major structural overhauls occurred under Directors (2017–2018) or (2018–2021), though operational emphases shifted toward countering Russian election interference and , leveraging the 2015 framework.

Personnel and Operations Support

Recruitment, Vetting, and Training

The Central Intelligence Agency recruits personnel through a structured emphasizing U.S. , relevant skills, and suitability for roles. Applicants must submit a resume via the agency's portal, after which selected candidates receive invitations to apply for specific positions. The targets individuals with backgrounds in areas such as foreign languages, , STEM fields, and experience, with targeted outreach to campuses, career fairs, and professional networks. programs, including internships and co-op opportunities, provide entry points for undergraduates and graduates, focusing on hands-on exposure to agency operations. For clandestine roles within the Directorate of Operations, often involves identifying potential assets with aptitude, though public details remain limited due to operational security. Vetting entails rigorous security and suitability assessments to mitigate risks of , divided loyalties, or personal vulnerabilities. Candidates undergo comprehensive background investigations covering criminal, financial, and foreign contacts histories, conducted by agency investigators and federal partners. A mandatory examination evaluates truthfulness regarding past behaviors, affiliations, and potential risks, with failure rates high due to its reliability in detecting . Medical, psychological, and physical evaluations follow, ensuring fitness for demanding fieldwork; dual U.S. citizens face additional scrutiny of foreign ties. The entire vetting phase can extend months to over a year, with retesting required periodically for incumbents, reflecting the agency's emphasis on absolute trustworthiness amid historical threats like the case in 1994. Training programs vary by role, combining formal instruction, on-the-job mentoring, and specialized courses to build expertise in disciplines. New hires participate in orientation covering agency history, , and core functions, followed by directorate-specific training such as analytic methods for the Directorate of Analysis or for operations officers. The Career Training Program, established for high-potential junior officers, selects up to 50 candidates annually for a multi-year regimen integrating learning, , and practical exercises to prepare for mid-level leadership. Clandestine trainees undergo and instruction at facilities like , Virginia—known internally as "The Farm"—where curricula from the 1950s onward have included surveillance detection, weapons handling, covert communications, and simulated operations in hostile environments, lasting approximately six months for initial qualification. Advanced courses address evolving threats, such as cyber , with ongoing mandatory to maintain operational proficiency.

Budget, Funding, and Resource Allocation

The Central Intelligence Agency's funding is provided solely through congressional appropriations within the National Intelligence Program (NIP), a classified component of the federal that supports civilian intelligence activities across the U.S. Intelligence Community. Under the , the CIA is barred from receiving funds from any source other than those specifically appropriated by and approved by the President, a provision designed to maintain fiscal control while enabling covert secrecy by concealing detailed expenditures within broader lines, such as those in the Department of Defense appropriations. Exact figures for the CIA's budget are classified to safeguard sources and methods, with disclosures limited to aggregate NIP totals released by the Office of the (ODNI). For 2025, the NIP request amounted to $73.4 billion, following $71.7 billion appropriated for 2023. The CIA historically accounts for a major portion of NIP funding; a classified document leaked in 2013 via revealed the agency requested $14.7 billion for that , representing about 28% of the $52.6 billion NIP and exceeding allocations to other agencies like the . Internally, resources are allocated across the agency's five directorates to support its mandated functions: the Directorate of Operations receives substantial funding for collection, clandestine , and covert actions; the Directorate of for evaluating raw intelligence into actionable assessments; the Directorate of Science and Technology for developing surveillance technologies and tools; the Directorate of Digital Innovation for cyber operations and data analytics; and the Directorate of Support for logistics, security, finance, and personnel services. The 2013 leak highlighted heavy emphasis on (with $2.3 billion requested for related programs) and within the CIA's overall request, underscoring priorities in field operations over purely technical collection, though post-9/11 shifts have increased investments in digital and capabilities without public quantification. Budget requests originate from the CIA Director and are submitted to the ODNI for integration into the President's annual proposal, followed by review in classified sessions by the congressional intelligence committees via the annual Intelligence Authorization Act. This process enforces prioritization based on threats, with historical trends showing growth from $43.5 billion in 2007 amid expansions, though classification limits external scrutiny of or potential waste.

Intelligence Collection and Analysis

Human Intelligence and Clandestine Operations

The CIA's (HUMINT) collection is managed by the Directorate of Operations (DO), the agency's clandestine component tasked with recruiting and handling foreign human sources to acquire sensitive information unattainable through other means. This directorate coordinates de-confliction and evaluation of clandestine activities across the U.S. intelligence community, operating in denied environments where officers often use non-official cover to conceal their affiliations. HUMINT emphasizes direct access to adversarial decision-makers, defectors, and insiders, providing insights into intentions and capabilities that technical collection cannot replicate. Clandestine operations under the DO involve techniques designed to evade detection, including countermeasures, secure dead drops for material exchanges, brush-pass contacts for brief handoffs, and coded signals for agent communication. typically follows a phased approach: spotting individuals with access to , assessing vulnerabilities and motivations (such as financial need, ideological dissatisfaction, or personal compromise), developing through elicitation and , and pitching collaboration with incentives tailored to the asset's profile. Complementing these traditional methods, the CIA has conducted overt recruitment efforts, such as posting Mandarin-language videos on social media platforms like X in 2024 and 2025, targeting disgruntled Chinese officials and providing secure contact instructions via Tor and public sites to encourage potential collaboration. Once recruited, handlers manage agents via compartmentalized meetings, validations, and motivational reinforcement to ensure reliability, while terminating relationships if risks outweigh benefits. DO officers undergo rigorous training at facilities like "the Farm" in , covering paramilitary skills, , and psychological operations to support HUMINT in hostile territories. These efforts have yielded critical penetrations, such as Soviet-era assets providing early warnings on missile deployments, though declassified records reveal vulnerabilities like the 1985 loss of multiple agents due to internal compromises. integration within the DO mitigates double-agent risks, but historical penetrations—exemplified by Aldrich Ames's betrayal of over 100 operations between 1985 and 1994—underscore persistent challenges from adversarial mole hunts and technical surveillance. Empirical assessments indicate HUMINT's value persists despite digital shifts, as human sources offer causal insights into regime stability and leadership deliberations unavailable via .

Technical and Open-Source Intelligence Methods

The Central Intelligence Agency's technical intelligence methods are primarily advanced through the Directorate of Science and Technology (DS&T), which designs, builds, and operates specialized collection systems while applying enabling technologies to the gathering, processing, and analysis of intelligence data. Established on August 6, 1963, by Director John McCone in response to Cold War imperatives like Soviet atomic advancements, the DS&T integrated scientific expertise to counter threats from peer competitors and later adapted to non-state actors such as terrorists. Key historical examples include the CORONA satellite program, initiated in the late 1950s for overhead photographic reconnaissance; the U-2 spy plane, deployed for high-altitude imaging during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis; the A-12 Oxcart aircraft, operational from 1967 for advanced reconnaissance; and Project AZORIAN in 1974, which successfully recovered a portion of the sunken Soviet submarine K-129 from the Pacific Ocean floor to extract technological intelligence. In the digital era, the CIA's Directorate of Digital Innovation (DDI), created on October 1, 2015, extends technical methods into cyber domains via the Center for Cyber Intelligence, which conducts offensive and defensive cyber operations to support activities and protect agency networks against advanced persistent threats. The DS&T and DDI collaborate with partners in the Intelligence Community, military, academia, and to exploit , ensuring competitive edges in areas like signals processing and imagery analysis, though core collection remains largely under purview with CIA providing operational support. Open-source intelligence (OSINT) methods at the CIA center on the (OSE), housed within the DDI and tracing origins to the 1941 Foreign Broadcast Monitoring Service, which evolved to monitor and translate foreign media broadcasts. The OSE collects, processes, and analyzes publicly available information from sources including foreign , digital platforms, and print/broadcast media, leveraging , , and automated tools to identify patterns and generate actionable insights for the broader Intelligence Community. As the functional manager for IC-wide OSINT, the OSE coordinates a federated network of contributors, emphasizing , collection management, and integration with classified intelligence to enhance . On March 8, 2024, the CIA and issued the Intelligence Community OSINT Strategy for 2024-2026, outlining priorities to professionalize the discipline through standardized training, technological investments, and ethical guidelines for handling vast volumes, aiming to position OSINT as a foundational element of analysis amid proliferating public information sources. This strategy addresses historical challenges in OSINT scalability, such as bureaucratic silos, by promoting cross-agency collaboration and innovation in tools like the platform, recognized in December 2024 for advancing OSINT capabilities.

Covert Action and Paramilitary Capabilities

Covert operations by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) are governed primarily by Title 50 of the , which establishes the statutory framework for intelligence activities distinct from traditional military operations under Title 10. The provided the CIA with broad authority under Section 102(d)(5) to perform "other such functions and duties related to intelligence affecting the national security as the may from time to time direct," a provision that has been interpreted to encompass covert actions, though it did not explicitly define or authorize them. This authority was expanded and clarified through subsequent legislation, including requirements for presidential approval and to prevent unchecked executive discretion following revelations of unauthorized activities in the 1970s. Under 50 U.S.C. § 3093, covert action is defined as "an activity or activities of the to influence political, economic, or military conditions abroad, where it is intended that the role of the will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly," excluding activities that are primarily diplomatic or part of traditional military operations, as well as routine support to the military. The President may not authorize any department, agency, or entity, including the CIA, to conduct such actions without first issuing a written "presidential finding" that determines the action is necessary to support "identifiable objectives" and is important to . This finding must specify the departments or agencies involved and, for new undertakings, generally be provided to congressional intelligence committees prior to implementation; significant anticipated actions require notification beforehand, while others must be reported "in a timely fashion" afterward. The Hughes-Ryan Amendment of 1974, enacted as part of the , initially mandated reporting of covert actions to eight congressional committees before expending funds, aiming to impose oversight after investigations into CIA activities like those in . This was later refined by the National Security Act amendments in 1980 and subsequent intelligence authorization acts, limiting notifications to the Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) and Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), with provisions for broader reporting if the action affects other committees' jurisdictions. , issued in 1981 and amended thereafter, further delineates CIA responsibilities, authorizing it to "conduct covert action activities approved by the President" while prohibiting such actions intended to influence U.S. domestic political processes directly or indirectly. Distinctions between covert action and clandestine activities are critical: clandestine operations, often involving human or collection, maintain for operational but do not inherently deny U.S. sponsorship if exposed, whereas covert actions require non-attribution as a core intent. The CIA, operating under Title 50 authorities, is the primary agency for covert action, though coordination with Department of Defense elements may occur for components, provided they align with the non-attributable intent. Legal parameters emphasize presidential , with findings subject to only in limited circumstances, and ongoing debates persist regarding the balance between executive flexibility and congressional checks, particularly in scenarios involving lethal actions or influence campaigns.

Historical and Ongoing Paramilitary Engagements

The Central Intelligence Agency's operations, executed primarily through the Special Activities Center's Special Operations Group, involve , , , and support to proxy forces, often in denied areas where conventional is infeasible. These activities trace back to the agency's early mandate under the , which authorized covert actions to advance U.S. interests without overt attribution. Paramilitary engagements have included training insurgents, conducting raids, and providing logistical support, with operations authorized by presidential findings and overseen by congressional committees post-1970s reforms. A pivotal early example was the 1961 in , where CIA-trained and -equipped Cuban exiles numbering approximately 1,400 attempted to overthrow Fidel Castro's regime via amphibious assault and air support. The operation, planned under Director , collapsed within three days due to insufficient U.S. air cover after President Kennedy withheld promised strikes, resulting in over 100 exile deaths, 1,200 captures, and the exposure of U.S. involvement, which damaged CIA credibility and prompted internal reviews. In during the era (1960s–1970s), CIA paramilitary efforts supported Hmong tribesmen and other irregular forces against communists, involving aerial resupply via , ground reconnaissance, and combat advising, with U.S. funding sustaining forces estimated at 30,000 fighters by 1971; these operations contributed to a prolonged "secret war" but ended in Hmong defeat after U.S. withdrawal. During the Soviet-Afghan War (1979–1989), the CIA orchestrated , channeling over $3 billion in aid—including missiles—to guerrillas through Pakistan's ISI, enabling effective anti-aircraft and ambush tactics that inflicted significant Soviet losses, with estimates of 15,000 Soviet deaths partly attributable to U.S.-supplied weapons. CIA officers and paramilitary specialists coordinated training camps in , though direct combat involvement was limited to advisory roles. (Note: While primary declassified details emphasize logistics, secondary analyses from state-affiliated reviews confirm paramilitary facilitation.) In the post-9/11 invasion of Afghanistan (2001), CIA paramilitary teams, including Ground Branch operators, inserted with fighters, leveraging laser designators and intelligence to direct U.S. airstrikes that routed forces; , a CIA officer, became the first U.S. casualty on November 25, 2001, during interrogation at fortress. Ongoing engagements remain heavily classified but include advisory and direct-action roles in , such as in through 2021, where CIA-backed militias conducted raids and intelligence-driven captures, though reports highlight accountability gaps and civilian casualties from unchecked proxy forces. In the , SAC elements have supported lethal operations in conflict zones like , providing intelligence for strikes against Russian targets under authorization, marking a shift toward integration without formal troop commitments. These activities underscore the CIA's "third option" between and invasion, though declassified accounts reveal persistent risks of blowback, as seen in mujahideen aid contributing to al-Qaeda's origins.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Cold War Era (1947–1960)

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was established by the National Security Act of 1947, signed into law by President Harry S. Truman on July 26, 1947, which reorganized the U.S. national security apparatus amid rising tensions with the Soviet Union. The Act created the CIA as an independent civilian agency within the executive branch, tasked primarily with coordinating intelligence activities among U.S. government departments, correlating and evaluating intelligence on foreign countries, and disseminating such information to appropriate officials. It also authorized the CIA to perform "other such functions and duties related to intelligence affecting the national security as the National Security Council may from time to time direct," laying the groundwork for covert operations. The CIA's immediate predecessor was the Central Intelligence Group (CIG), formed in January 1946 as a temporary interagency body to centralize intelligence analysis following the dissolution of the World War II-era (OSS), which had conducted espionage and sabotage against . , previously deputy director of the CIG, was appointed the first (DCI) on May 1, 1947, overseeing an initial staff drawn largely from naval and , with about one-third of personnel transferred from the CIG. Early organizational efforts focused on building analytical capabilities, including the Office of Reports and Estimates, while lacking a statutory mandate for independent covert action until Directive 10/2 in 1948 explicitly authorized "covert operations" to counter Soviet subversion. In its inaugural covert operation, the CIA provided financial and support to anti-communist parties during Italy's April 18, 1948, , fearing a victory by the communist-socialist Popular Democratic Front would align the country with the Soviet bloc; U.S. aid, averaging $5 million annually in subsequent years, helped secure a narrow win for the Christian Democrats. Under Hillenkoetter's successor, General (appointed October 1950), the agency expanded its clandestine capabilities, but significant growth occurred after Allen W. Dulles assumed the DCI role on February 26, 1953, bringing prior OSS experience and a focus on aggressive anti-communist actions. Dulles oversaw high-profile interventions, including Operation Ajax in August 1953, a joint CIA-MI6 effort that orchestrated the overthrow of Iranian Prime Minister after his nationalization of British oil assets threatened Western interests; CIA-funded mobs and military units reinstated , securing U.S. access to Iranian . Similarly, Operation PBSUCCESS in 1954 deposed Guatemalan President Jacobo Árbenz Guzmán, whose land reforms expropriated holdings; with a $2.7 million budget for and subversion, CIA-backed rebels under prompted Árbenz's resignation on June 27, 1954, installing a pro-U.S. regime. Technological advancements complemented these paramilitary efforts, as the CIA initiated the U-2 high-altitude program in 1954, with first test flights in 1955 and operational overflights of Soviet territory beginning July 4, 1956, providing unprecedented photographic intelligence on military installations amid the . By 1960, the CIA had evolved from a coordinating body into a multifaceted conducting , covert action, and technical collection, though its operations often prioritized short-term geopolitical gains over long-term stability, as evidenced by the coups' mixed legacies in fostering authoritarian rule.

Escalation and Crises in the Cold War (1961–1979)

The , launched on April 17, 1961, represented a major early escalation in CIA covert operations against communist expansion, involving approximately 1,400 Cuban exiles trained and supported by the agency to overthrow Fidel Castro's regime. The operation failed within three days due to inadequate air support, overestimation of popular uprising potential, and Castro's rapid mobilization of 20,000 troops, resulting in over 100 exile deaths, 1,200 captures, and the agency's public exposure. This debacle prompted President Kennedy to demand CIA Director Allen Dulles's resignation in November 1961, leading to internal probes that highlighted planning flaws and excessive optimism in intelligence assessments. In the , the CIA intensified clandestine efforts to exploit East German defections and undermine Soviet control, including broadcasts and support for refugee escapes amid the construction of the on August 13, which sealed off over 3.5 million East Berliners from the West. Agency operations focused on gathering on Soviet troop movements—estimated at 40 divisions in —and assessing Khrushchev's ultimatums, though estimates varied on the likelihood of direct confrontation, with some analysts predicting a 50% chance of war by year's end. These activities underscored the CIA's pivot toward and border probing as proxies for superpower tensions. During the Cuban Missile Crisis in , CIA U-2 reconnaissance flights confirmed Soviet deployments in on October 14, providing photographic evidence of sites capable of striking the U.S. mainland within minutes, which informed President Kennedy's quarantine decision. National Intelligence Estimates had initially downplayed offensive missile risks, but post-crisis reviews revealed gaps in detecting SA-2 antiaircraft systems, contributing to the downing of a U-2 on October 27. The agency's networks, including Cuban refugees and defectors, supplemented to track 42 Soviet missiles and 24 launchers, averting escalation through verified withdrawal by November 20. CIA involvement in expanded amid escalation, with the agency directing the from 1967 to 1972, which neutralized an estimated 81,740 infrastructure members through capture, defection, or assassination, often via provincial interrogation centers. In , CIA operations from 1961 onward supported Hmong tribesmen under General , deploying up to 30,000 guerrillas against the and North Vietnamese supply lines along the , involving airstrikes that dropped over 2 million tons of ordnance by 1974. These efforts, budgeted at $500 million annually by the mid-1960s, prioritized over conventional warfare but faced criticism for civilian casualties and limited strategic impact, as North Vietnamese infiltration continued unabated. In , the CIA allocated over $8 million from 1970 to 1973 to destabilize Salvador Allende's government in through propaganda, economic disruption, and support for opposition media and strikes, though declassified records indicate no direct orchestration of the , 1973, coup led by . Agency contacts with Chilean plotters provided intelligence on coup planning, but post-coup assessments noted unintended abuses under the ensuing regime, which executed or detained tens of thousands. Similar interventions included backing anti-communist factions in and , reflecting a of preemptive action against perceived Soviet footholds. African operations highlighted proxy conflicts, with the CIA conducting multifaceted covert actions in the Congo from 1960 to 1968, including $10 million in aid to Joseph Mobutu's forces and assassination plots against , executed in 1961 amid fears of communist alignment. In Angola's 1975 civil war, the agency funneled $32 million to the FNLA and factions against the Soviet- and Cuban-backed , deploying 12,000 Cuban troops by late 1975 and marking the CIA's first major post-Vietnam paramilitary commitment before congressional cutoff in December. These efforts aimed to counter Soviet influence but often prolonged instability, as evidenced by Angola's descent into decades-long conflict. The period culminated in revelations of overreach, as the 1975 uncovered CIA assassination plots against foreign leaders like Castro (via explosive cigars and poisoned wetsuits) and domestic programs such as , which tested on unwitting subjects from 1953 to 1973, affecting over 1,000 individuals. The committee's findings, based on 800 interviews and 50,000 documents, exposed illegal mail openings, wiretaps on 7,000 Americans, and family jewels files detailing 700 covert actions, prompting reforms including the of 1978 to curb warrantless surveillance. These disclosures reflected systemic lack of oversight, with directors like withholding information from presidents, eroding public trust amid post-Watergate scrutiny.

Late Cold War Victories and Challenges (1980–1991)

During the administration of President Ronald Reagan, the CIA, under Director William Casey from 1981 to 1987, pursued an aggressive strategy to counter Soviet influence, emphasizing covert operations and intelligence support for anti-communist forces worldwide. This period marked a shift toward "rollback" rather than mere containment, with increased funding for the agency rising from $1.2 billion in 1980 to over $3 billion by 1987. Casey's tenure focused on exploiting Soviet vulnerabilities, including economic strains and military overextension, through operations in key theaters like Afghanistan and Central America. A major victory was Operation Cyclone, the CIA's program to arm and finance Afghan mujahideen rebels fighting the Soviet occupation that began in December 1979. By 1980, the CIA had escalated non-lethal aid, but under Reagan, it expanded to include Stinger anti-aircraft missiles in 1986, which proved decisive in neutralizing Soviet air superiority and contributing to the Red Army's withdrawal in February 1989 after over nine years of conflict that cost the Soviets approximately 15,000 lives and billions in resources. The operation, coordinated with Pakistan's ISI and funded at around $3 billion by the U.S. (with additional Saudi matching), inflicted unsustainable losses on Soviet forces and eroded morale, accelerating internal pressures on the USSR. CIA analysis also played a role in highlighting Soviet economic and systemic weaknesses, with reports from the mid-1980s assessing declining productivity and technological lags that informed U.S. policy to pressure the regime through defense spending and arms control negotiations. While some critiques later argued the agency underestimated the speed of collapse, declassified assessments from 1985 onward noted deepening crises in the Soviet bloc, supporting Reagan's strategy of economic warfare via sanctions and support for dissidents, such as funding for Poland's Solidarity movement. These efforts contributed to the broader unraveling of Soviet control in Eastern Europe by 1989 and the USSR's dissolution in December 1991. Challenges emerged prominently with the Iran-Contra affair, revealed in November 1986, where CIA assets facilitated arms sales to —despite an embargo—to secure hostage releases, with proceeds illegally diverted to fund Nicaraguan in violation of the Boland Amendments (1982–1984) that prohibited U.S. aid to the rebels after congressional cuts. Director Casey was implicated in knowledge of the scheme, though he died in 1987 before full testimony; the scandal led to convictions of figures like (later overturned) and damaged agency credibility, prompting investigations that exposed lax oversight in covert funding. Under successor William Webster (1987–1991), the CIA navigated espionage setbacks, including undetected Soviet penetrations like , who began spying for the in 1985 and compromised numerous operations until his 1994 arrest, revealing systemic counterintelligence failures during the period. Despite these, the agency provided critical intelligence for operations like the 1986 U.S. airstrikes on following the Berlin discotheque bombing, where CIA tracking of terrorist networks enabled precise targeting. Overall, the era's successes in weakening the Soviet empire outweighed operational lapses, though scandals underscored ongoing tensions between executive covert actions and .

Post-Cold War Realignments (1992–2000)

Following the in 1991, the CIA underwent significant realignments to address the absence of a singular superpower adversary, shifting focus toward regional conflicts, weapons proliferation, and emerging non-state threats amid substantial budget reductions known as the "." The agency's overall budget declined by approximately 20-25% during the , starting under the administration and continuing under President Clinton, which necessitated workforce reductions and curtailed clandestine operations. , who served as (DCI) from November 1991 to January 1993, initiated efforts to streamline the intelligence community while confronting the loss of Soviet-related missions. His successor, R. James Woolsey (DCI from February 1993 to January 1995), emphasized integration across U.S. intelligence agencies but faced criticism for inadequate adaptation to post-Cold War realities, including underestimating proliferation risks from rogue states. A profound internal crisis erupted with the 1994 arrest of CIA counterintelligence officer , who had spied for the and since 1985, compromising at least 10 U.S. assets—leading to their executions or imprisonments—and exposing over 100 operations. The , uncovered through joint CIA-FBI efforts, revealed systemic vulnerabilities in vetting and processes, eroding trust in (HUMINT) capabilities and prompting congressional scrutiny via the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Ames's betrayal, motivated by financial gain from payments exceeding $2.5 million, exacerbated the agency's post-Cold War HUMINT drought, as many Soviet-era sources dried up or proved unreliable. John Deutch, DCI from May 1995 to December 1996, inherited these issues and pushed for technological investments to offset HUMINT shortfalls, but his tenure ended abruptly amid personal controversies over mishandling classified materials on personal computers. In regional operations, the CIA contributed intelligence assessments predicting Yugoslavia's violent fragmentation, with a 1990 National Intelligence Estimate foreseeing dissolution within two years and the establishment of an Interagency Balkan Task Force in June 1992 to monitor Bosnia's escalating civil war. Despite accurate early warnings of ethnic conflict involving Serbian forces, U.S. policy delays limited CIA influence until NATO interventions in Bosnia (1995) and Kosovo (1999), where the agency supported targeting intelligence for airstrikes against Yugoslav military assets. In Somalia, CIA human intelligence aided the 1992-1993 humanitarian intervention under Operation Restore Hope, but intelligence gaps on warlord dynamics contributed to the October 1993 Battle of Mogadishu, resulting in 18 U.S. deaths and a policy retreat that fostered the "Somalia Syndrome" of aversion to nation-building. Similar challenges arose in Haiti, where CIA-backed assessments informed the 1994 U.S.-led restoration of President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, though covert support for anti-Duvalier elements in prior decades had yielded mixed results. George Tenet, appointed DCI in July 1997 after serving as acting DCI, prioritized rebuilding analytical capabilities and focus amid ongoing realignments, warning of al-Qaeda's growing threat despite resource constraints. Non-proliferation efforts intensified, with CIA operations targeting Iraq's suspected weapons programs post-Gulf War, including defectors like Kamel who revealed dismantled programs in 1995. However, budget pressures and the Ames fallout hampered , leaving the agency vulnerable to asymmetric threats by 2000. These years marked a transitional vulnerability, as empirical data from declassified estimates underscored accurate foresight on state failures but causal limitations in influencing policy amid fiscal austerity.

Global War on Terrorism (2001–2020)

Following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks orchestrated by al-Qa'ida, which killed nearly 3,000 people, President George W. Bush directed CIA Director George Tenet to initiate operations against al-Qa'ida and the Taliban regime harboring them in Afghanistan. On September 26, 2001, a CIA paramilitary team known as Jawbreaker deployed to the Panjshir Valley to coordinate with Northern Alliance forces, providing intelligence, cash incentives, and air support coordination that facilitated the rapid collapse of Taliban control in northern Afghanistan by November 2001. The CIA's Counterterrorism Center (CTC) expanded significantly, leading global efforts to dismantle al-Qa'ida networks through , signals intercepts, and partnerships with foreign services. Key captures included in on March 28, 2002, and , the principal architect of 9/11, in on March 1, 2003; these operations relied on CIA-led renditions and interrogations. The agency established a network of secret detention facilities, or black sites, in countries including , , and , where detainees underwent approved by the Department of Justice in August 2002, such as , , and stress positions, which CIA officials argued yielded actionable intelligence on al-Qa'ida plots despite subsequent investigations questioning their efficacy and legality. In the hunt for , the CIA invested over a decade in tracking couriers and analyzing detainee reporting, culminating in the identification of the compound in by late 2010; on May 2, 2011 (local time), a joint CIA-led operation with U.S. Navy SEALs resulted in bin Laden's death, disrupting al-Qa'ida's command structure. Paralleling ground efforts, the CIA pioneered targeted killings via unmanned aerial vehicles, conducting its first drone strike in on June 18, 2004, against Nek Muhammad; by 2020, CIA drone operations in , , and had eliminated hundreds of militants, including in on September 30, 2011, though they drew criticism for civilian casualties estimated at 10-20% of total deaths by independent monitors. The agency's pre-invasion intelligence on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs, detailed in the October 2002 , asserted with high confidence that possessed active chemical, biological, and nuclear efforts, influencing the March 2003 invasion; post-war investigations, including the 2004 Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report, revealed these assessments stemmed from flawed sourcing, , and overreliance on defectors like , constituting a major analytic failure as no stockpiles were found. By the mid-2010s, CIA units shifted focus to combating the in and , supporting Kurdish forces and conducting raids, while rendition programs waned under President Obama's 2009 closing black sites, though targeted operations persisted until the U.S. withdrawal from in 2020.

Contemporary Operations and Strategic Shifts (2021–Present)

Under Director William Burns, who assumed leadership on March 19, 2021, the CIA prioritized adapting to great power competition, particularly with and , marking a departure from the post-9/11 emphasis on . Burns established the China Mission Center in October 2021 to enhance analytic and operational focus on Beijing's military, technological, and economic ambitions, reflecting a broader intelligence community reassessment of peer adversaries as the primary long-term threats. This shift aligned with Burns' stated priorities of bolstering capabilities, forging international partnerships, countering Chinese influence, and advancing technological edges in and cyber domains. In response to Russia's February 2022 of , the CIA intensified covert sharing and operational support to , maintaining at least 12 secret bases near the Russian border for training, surveillance, and data relay as of early 2024. Agency assessments in late 2021 provided early warnings of Vladimir Putin's plans, enabling U.S. allies to prepare defenses and complicating 's initial assumptions of rapid success. Burns conducted multiple clandestine visits to , including one in early 2024, to coordinate with Ukrainian counterparts and brief President on Russian troop movements and intentions, underscoring the CIA's role in real-time battlefield without direct combat involvement. This partnership, built over years, emphasized , human sources, and drone feeds to target Russian assets, though it drew criticism for escalating tensions with . China emerged as the CIA's paramount strategic concern, with operations targeting espionage networks linked to the and state-sponsored hacking groups responsible for a 150% surge in cyber intrusions since 2021. The agency expanded efforts to recruit assets within Chinese institutions and disrupt theft, amid revelations of Beijing's use of honey traps and tactics against U.S. tech sectors. Burns highlighted 's systemic challenge to U.S. primacy, including military modernization and Belt and Road influence operations, prompting investments in Mandarin-speaking officers and AI-driven analytics to counter Beijing's opacity. By Burns' departure in January 2025, the CIA had navigated internal challenges like shortfalls and politicization risks, with the director warning of erosion in analytic amid domestic pressures. Ongoing operations emphasized hybrid threats, including Russian election interference and Chinese economic coercion, while adapting to technological disruptions like generative AI for both offensive and defensive purposes. These shifts positioned the agency for sustained competition with authoritarian powers, though resource constraints and interagency rivalries persisted.

Interagency and International Relations

Coordination with U.S. Intelligence Community

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) operates within the broader U.S. Intelligence Community (IC), a federation of 18 agencies and organizations coordinated under the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) since the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, which aimed to centralize leadership and reduce pre-9/11 silos among agencies. Prior to 2004, the CIA director concurrently served as Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), holding primary responsibility for coordinating national intelligence estimates, resource allocation, and interagency activities across the IC, a role established by the National Security Act of 1947 to unify disparate World War II-era efforts from entities like the Office of Strategic Services, Army G-2, and Navy ONI. This dual-hat arrangement positioned the CIA as the de facto hub for all-source analysis and human intelligence (HUMINT) integration until reforms shifted oversight to the independent Office of the DNI (ODNI), allowing the CIA to focus on clandestine collection, covert action, and objective analysis while still contributing to community-wide products. Under DNI direction, the CIA manages national HUMINT efforts, deconflicting operations with military and diplomatic collectors to avoid redundancies, and serves as the primary liaison for foreign intelligence partnerships, channeling insights to IC partners like the (NSA) for (SIGINT) fusion and the (DIA) for defense-specific HUMINT validation. For instance, the CIA-NSA relationship involves routine SIGINT support to CIA field operations, including real-time intercepts aiding HUMINT recruitment and covert actions, as documented in declassified exchanges from the onward where NSA provided tailored cryptologic assistance to CIA stations. Similarly, coordination with the (FBI) emphasizes counterintelligence referrals and joint threat assessments; post-2001 reforms mandated information-sharing protocols under the USA PATRIOT Act, enabling CIA leads on foreign-originated domestic plots to flow to FBI field offices, exemplified by collaborative takedowns of cells involving shared HUMINT-SIGINT packages. Interagency mechanisms facilitate this coordination, including the National Intelligence Council (NIC)—housed at the CIA but drawing analysts from across the IC to produce consensus National Intelligence Estimates (NIEs)—and ad hoc working groups like the Joint Intelligence Committee for military-civilian alignment. The CIA also contributes to community-wide analytic products, such as the President's Daily Brief, integrating inputs from NSA's technical collection, DIA's tactical military intelligence, and FBI's law enforcement-derived leads to deliver fused assessments to policymakers. Despite structural improvements, empirical reviews, including congressional inquiries, have highlighted persistent challenges in deconflicting priorities—such as CIA's foreign focus clashing with FBI's domestic mandate—necessitating ongoing DNI-enforced protocols to mitigate overlaps, as seen in 2010s counterterrorism fusion centers where CIA HUMINT validated NSA drone-strike nominations in coordination with DIA targeting data. These arrangements underscore the CIA's role not as supreme coordinator but as a specialized HUMINT and analysis node within a decentralized IC, prioritizing empirical integration over unilateral dominance.

Partnerships with Foreign Intelligence Services

The Central Intelligence Agency maintains liaison relationships with numerous foreign intelligence services to exchange , coordinate covert operations, and address shared threats such as and state-sponsored aggression. These partnerships often involve embedded CIA officers in host countries' agencies, reciprocal training programs, and joint task forces, enabling access to regional insights beyond unilateral U.S. capabilities. Such collaborations have been formalized through bilateral agreements and multilateral frameworks, with the CIA prioritizing allies sharing democratic values and strategic interests, though arrangements with non-allied services have occurred for tactical gains during conflicts like the and the Global War on Terrorism. A foundational partnership exists with the United Kingdom's Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), originating from World War II-era cooperation between the U.S. and British intelligence entities, which facilitated joint espionage against and transitioned into efforts against Soviet influence. This alliance has encompassed shared operations in the and , including the 1953 coup in (Operation Ajax) alongside MI6, where both services orchestrated the overthrow of through propaganda, , and paramilitary support to restore Shah . The relationship remains robust, involving routine intelligence swaps on and cyber threats, underpinned by cultural affinities and the broader UKUSA Agreement's extensions to . Cooperation with Israel's has been exceptionally intensive since Israel's independence, marked by CIA provision of training, technical aid, and operational support in exchange for Mossad's expertise in Middle Eastern networks. Declassified assessments indicate the partnership's depth allowed mutual reliance without routine against one another, exemplified by joint efforts against Iraq's nuclear program in the and post-9/11 targeting of affiliates. However, tensions have arisen over divergent priorities, such as Israel's independent strikes on Iranian assets, prompting periodic U.S. frustrations with Mossad's unilateral actions despite overall alignment on threats like and . In , the CIA forged ties with West German intelligence through the , a postwar network of former officers led by that provided anti-Soviet intelligence from ; the CIA funded and directed this group from 1949 until its integration into the (BND) in 1956, absorbing approximately 4,000 ex-Nazis into the structure despite ethical concerns over their wartime records. Similar pragmatic liaisons extended to services in , , and Latin American nations during the to counter communism, including close coordination with Mexican intelligence on activities and narcotics in the 1960s. Post-Cold War partnerships shifted toward , with the CIA embedding officers in Pakistan's (ISI) after September 11, 2001, to facilitate drone strikes and captures in , yielding over 600 high-value targets by 2011 but strained by ISI's documented sheltering of leaders and divergent views on regional militants. In the , alliances with Jordan's General Intelligence Directorate and Saudi Arabia's supported rendition programs and Afghan mujahideen training in the , evolving into sustained intelligence fusion centers for monitoring and Iranian proxies. These relationships, while operationally effective, have faced scrutiny for enabling host services' abuses or double-dealing, as evidenced by declassified reports on ISI's selective .

Achievements and Strategic Impacts

Countering Ideological and Terrorist Threats

The CIA conducted extensive covert operations during the to undermine communist ideology, including funding anti-communist , cultural programs, and political movements in and elsewhere to counter Soviet influence and appeal. These efforts involved supporting center-left alternatives, former communists, and labor unions as bulwarks against party dominance by groups like the French and Italian Communist Parties, thereby reducing ideological inroads in Western democracies. The agency's operations, such as those amplifying anti-communist narratives through media and intellectual networks, contributed to eroding the perceived legitimacy of Marxist-Leninist regimes over decades. In parallel, the CIA provided material and intelligence support to insurgent groups opposing communist expansions, exemplified by its backing of Afghan mujahideen fighters from 1979 onward, which inflicted heavy casualties on Soviet forces—estimated at over 15,000 killed—and accelerated the USSR's withdrawal by 1989, weakening the broader communist bloc. This operation, involving billions in aid funneled through Pakistan's ISI, not only bled Soviet resources but also fostered internal dissent that hastened the Soviet collapse in 1991. Similar interventions, including intelligence operations in that amplified nationalist and religious sentiments, further destabilized communist control without direct U.S. military engagement. Post-9/11, the CIA shifted focus to terrorist threats, expanding its Counterterrorism Center (CTC), established in , into a hub for fusing intelligence and disrupting networks. The agency led the decade-long , culminating in the provision of precise compound location intelligence in , , that enabled U.S. SEALs to kill him on May 2, 2011, decapitating al-Qaeda's leadership and disrupting its operational command. The CIA's drone strike program, initiated in 2002 under its authority in , , and , targeted high-value terrorists, eliminating figures like al-Qaeda's in 2011 and reducing the incidence and lethality of attacks; empirical analysis of conflict data shows strikes correlated with a 10-20% drop in terrorist violence in affected regions by degrading and . Captured al-Qaeda documents further indicate that these operations sowed fear and operational paralysis among militants, with internal correspondence revealing concerns over recruitment and mobility disruptions. By 2015, the program had neutralized over 3,000 militants, including core and elements, contributing to the degradation of their safe havens. These efforts, combined with renditions and interrogations yielding plot-disrupting intelligence, prevented numerous attacks on U.S. interests, as evidenced by CTC-led disruptions of over 50 major operations between 2002 and 2010. ![A bounty leaflet prepared by the USA for use in Afghanistan (front)](./assets/A_bounty_leaflect_prepared_by_the_USA_for_use_in_Afghanistan_%28front%29[float-right]

Technological and Analytical Contributions

The CIA spearheaded the development of the U-2 high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft through Project Aquatone, covertly funding Lockheed's prototype in 1954, with the first test flight occurring on August 4, 1955. This platform, capable of operating above 70,000 feet, facilitated the collection of photographic intelligence over Soviet territory starting in July 1956, yielding detailed imagery of military installations that informed U.S. strategic assessments until its vulnerabilities were exposed in 1960. The program's success prompted the CIA to oversee the A-12 OXCART, a Mach 3+ successor tested from , which enhanced speed and evasion capabilities for subsequent reconnaissance missions. In satellite reconnaissance, the agency managed the Corona program (1959–1972), achieving the first successful film capsule recovery on August 19, 1960, after 12 prior failures; over its lifespan, Corona returned 144 capsules containing 2.1 million feet of film, covering 1.65 million square miles and imaging nearly every Soviet site. This breakthrough validated orbital photographic , reducing reliance on risky overflights and providing empirical data that verified Soviet missile gaps as exaggerated, thus shaping negotiations. Complementing imagery, the CIA's GRAB satellite, launched June 22, 1960, pioneered orbital by intercepting Soviet radar signals, delivering 50 reports on air defense systems that confirmed vulnerabilities in tracking. Analytical advancements stemmed from these collections, with the CIA pioneering stereoscopic photo interpretation techniques using U-2 and Corona imagery, enabling three-dimensional mapping of terrain and structures for precise targeting; declassified datasets from these efforts later supported civilian applications, including geological surveys and enhancements transferred in 1994. To adapt commercial tools, the agency founded in 1999 as a nonprofit venture firm, investing over $1 billion by 2024 in startups developing geospatial analytics (e.g., Keyhole software acquired by in 2004 as ) and data fusion platforms like Palantir, which processed petabytes for in . In response to digital proliferation, the CIA established the Directorate of Digital Innovation in 2015, integrating for automated threat detection and cloud-based analysis of open-source exabytes to forecast adversary movements with reduced human bias in pattern identification. These efforts, grounded in empirical validation from field deployments, have sustained analytical edge amid exponential data growth, though reliant on interagency sharing for full efficacy.

Role in National Security Preservation

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) preserves U.S. primarily through the collection, analysis, and dissemination of foreign to senior policymakers, enabling proactive threat mitigation and informed decision-making to avert crises. As the nation's premier civilian agency, the CIA conducts (HUMINT), signals support, and technological reconnaissance to detect foreign military, technological, and subversive activities that could endanger the . It also executes covert actions and operations authorized by the President and , focusing on neutralizing and attempts by adversarial powers. These functions, rooted in the , emphasize preemptive to prevent strategic surprises, as evidenced by declassified programs that dispelled exaggerated threat assessments during the . Technological intelligence initiatives, such as the CORONA satellite program launched in 1959, provided over 800,000 images of denied areas, revealing Soviet missile deployments and debunking the "missile gap" myth that had fueled unnecessary U.S. defense escalations in the late 1950s. This overhead reconnaissance, declassified in 1995, supported arms control negotiations and stable deterrence by offering verifiable data on adversary capabilities, reducing the risk of miscalculation leading to conflict. Similarly, during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, CIA-backed HUMINT networks detected Soviet nuclear deployments on Cuba before U-2 overflights confirmed missile sites on October 14, providing President Kennedy with timely evidence to impose a naval quarantine and compel withdrawal, thereby averting potential nuclear exchange. Counterintelligence efforts further safeguard by identifying and disrupting foreign penetrations of U.S. institutions and CIA operations. The Staff, established in under James Angleton, amassed extensive files on adversarial networks, while the Counterintelligence Center, formed in 1988 amid heightened spy scandals, enhanced detection protocols that contributed to the 1994 arrest of , a CIA officer who compromised dozens of assets to the and , potentially saving classified programs and lives. In , CIA operations have disrupted WMD programs abroad; for instance, Chang Hsien-yi supplied critical details on Taiwan's secret nuclear weapons effort in the 1980s, prompting U.S. pressure that led Taiwan to dismantle the program by 1988 under international scrutiny. These targeted interventions, often in coordination with allies, have forestalled the spread of destabilizing technologies to rogue actors.

Controversies and Criticisms

Intelligence Failures and Analytic Shortcomings

The Central Intelligence Agency has encountered recurrent intelligence failures and analytic shortcomings, often involving failures to anticipate strategic surprises, overreliance on flawed sources, and institutional barriers to objective assessment. These issues have been documented in declassified government reports and internal reviews, highlighting problems such as , inadequate collection, interagency information silos, and occasional undue influence from policymakers on analysis. While some failures reflect broader systemic challenges in the U.S. intelligence community, the CIA's role as the primary analytic hub has drawn particular scrutiny for lapses in estimative judgment. A prominent early case was the on April 17, 1961, where CIA planners underestimated Fidel Castro's military resilience and overestimated domestic Cuban support for the invading exile brigade, leading to the rapid defeat of approximately 1,400 invaders within 72 hours. Internal CIA Inspector General Lyman Kirkpatrick's 1961 probe attributed the debacle to analytic overoptimism, dismissal of contrary indicators from (such as unspotted coral reefs hindering landings), and a lack of rigorous devil's advocacy in assessments that assumed popular uprising would materialize without sufficient evidence. The operation's failure, which resulted in over 100 deaths and 1,200 captures, prompted congressional criticism and internal reforms, though Kirkpatrick's report itself faced accusations of operational officers to shield higher leadership. The 1979 Iranian Revolution exemplified a failure to foresee regime collapse, as CIA assessments until late 1978 largely downplayed the Shah's vulnerability despite reporting on mounting protests and clerical influence under Khomeini. Declassified documents reveal that while some CIA station reporting noted unrest, analytic products overemphasized the Shah's security forces—estimated at 400,000 strong—and mirrored U.S. policy optimism, failing to integrate dissident sources or predict the revolutionary coalition's cohesion that toppled the by , 1979. This lapse, involving the loss of a key U.S. ally and the rise of an anti-Western , was later deemed one of the agency's most significant estimative errors, rooted in overdependence on elite regime contacts and neglect of societal indicators like networks mobilizing millions. The September 11, 2001, attacks underscored analytic and sharing deficiencies, with the CIA identifying operatives like and as early as January 2000 but failing to ensure their placement on no-fly lists or full dissemination to the FBI until August 2001. The cited CIA-FBI , where analysts handled over 40 threat reports in summer 2001 but did not synthesize warnings—like the August 6 Presidential Daily Brief on bin Laden's intent to strike U.S. soil—into actionable alerts, contributing to the deaths of 2,977 people. Declassified Joint Inquiry findings further highlighted the CIA's Center's limited name searches and risk-averse culture, which delayed integration of Malaysian summit intelligence showing the hijackers' U.S. travel plans. In the lead-up to the 2003 Iraq War, CIA-led National Intelligence Estimates erroneously asserted Saddam Hussein's possession of active weapons of mass destruction programs, including 500 metric tons of chemical agents and reconstituted nuclear efforts, based on uncorroborated defector reports like those from "" (later discredited). The 2005 Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction faulted CIA analysts for —favoring intelligence aligning with post-9/11 threat perceptions—and insufficient vetting of single-source , despite dissenting views from technical experts on aluminum tubes and mobile labs. No stockpiles were found postwar, eroding credibility and fueling debates over whether analytic flaws stemmed from inherent uncertainties or subtle pressures, though the commission emphasized community-wide shortcomings in over direct politicization. Persistent analytic shortcomings include "mirror-imaging"—projecting U.S. rationales onto adversaries—and in closed analytic loops, as analyzed in CIA studies of historical cases. Post-failure reforms, such as the 2004 Intelligence Reform Act mandating analytic standards and , aimed to mitigate these, yet critiques persist of overreliance on technical collection amid HUMINT gaps and vulnerability to adversarial deception. Such lapses have not only incurred strategic costs but also prompted external reviews questioning the agency's incentives for contrarian analysis amid leadership turnover and resource constraints.

Allegations of Domestic Overreach and Politicization

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has faced longstanding allegations of conducting unauthorized domestic intelligence activities, contravening its 1947 charter prohibiting operations targeting U.S. citizens or activities within the . These claims gained prominence through the 1975 investigation by the Senate Select Committee on Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, which uncovered evidence of CIA programs involving , infiltration, and experimentation on American soil. The committee's reports detailed how the agency amassed files on over 300,000 individuals and organizations, including mail-opening projects like HTLINGUAL (1952–1973), which intercepted and photographed an estimated 215,000 pieces of domestic and international mail annually without judicial oversight. Such activities were justified internally as countermeasures to perceived foreign influences but extended to monitoring lawful dissent, raising concerns over executive overreach and erosion of . One prominent example was , initiated in 1967 at the direction of Presidents and to uncover foreign backing for domestic anti-Vietnam War protests. Despite CIA objections citing legal constraints, the program expanded to include physical surveillance, of informants, and creation of dossiers on approximately 7,200 , including students and activists, with no proven foreign ties in most cases. By 1974, had generated over 13,000 pages of reports forwarded to the , illustrating politicized misuse for tracking political opposition rather than foreign threats. Declassified documents confirm the operation's illegality under the National Security Act, leading to its termination and contributing to post-Church Committee reforms like Executive Order 11905, which banned political assassinations and domestic spying. Project MKUltra, authorized in 1953 under CIA Director , involved covert experiments on unwitting U.S. and Canadian citizens to develop mind-control techniques, including administration of , , and . Over 149 subprojects, often conducted via front organizations at universities, hospitals, and prisons, affected thousands, resulting in at least one confirmed death—that of CIA scientist in 1953 after unwitting dosing. Senate hearings in 1977 revealed the destruction of most records in 1973 on orders from Director , but surviving documents exposed ethical violations and lack of , with funding exceeding $10 million by 1964. Critics, including the , argued these efforts reflected a broader pattern of unchecked experimentation prioritizing pretexts over constitutional protections. In the post-9/11 era, allegations shifted toward politicization of influencing domestic discourse. A 2025 CIA internal review of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment on Russian election interference criticized agency leaders for rushing the process and sidelining dissenting analysts, potentially to align with anti-Trump narratives amid Russiagate investigations. Separately, in October 2020, 51 former intelligence officials, including several ex-CIA directors and operatives, signed a public letter dismissing New York Post reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop as bearing "all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation," despite later FBI confirmation of the device's authenticity. Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence findings revealed coordination with the Biden campaign and that at least five signatories were active CIA contractors at the time, prompting claims of institutional bias in suppressing politically damaging information during an election. These incidents have fueled debates over the CIA's insulation from , with proponents of reform arguing that blurred lines between foreign and domestic intelligence—exacerbated by fusion centers and data-sharing post-Patriot Act—enable indirect overreach. Defenders maintain such actions were exceptional responses to genuine threats, but declassified records and congressional probes substantiate patterns of and selective application of intelligence to domestic political ends, underscoring tensions between imperatives and democratic safeguards.

Foreign Interventions and Regime Influence Operations

The Central Intelligence Agency has conducted numerous covert operations aimed at influencing or changing foreign regimes, primarily during the era to counter perceived communist threats and protect U.S. strategic interests. These actions, often authorized by U.S. presidents, involved , funding opposition groups, and supporting military coups. Declassified documents reveal at least 16 major interventions between the and , employing tactics such as and subversion. In 1953, the CIA, in collaboration with British intelligence, executed Operation Ajax to overthrow Iranian Prime Minister after he nationalized the oil industry, threatening Western economic interests. The operation, completed in six days from August 16 to 22, involved bribing military officers, organizing street protests, and installing General as leader, restoring Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi's power. This marked the CIA's first successful orchestration of a coup against a democratically elected government. Operation PBSUCCESS in followed in 1954, targeting President Jacobo Árbenz Guzmán over land reforms affecting holdings. Authorized by President Eisenhower with a $2.7 million budget for and , the CIA trained exiles, conducted radio propaganda, and supported Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas's invasion, leading to Árbenz's resignation on June 27 and the installation of a pro-U.S. regime. The 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion represented a failed attempt to remove from . The CIA trained and equipped 1,400 Cuban exiles for a landing on April 17 at the , expecting popular uprising support, but Cuban forces crushed the operation within days, resulting in over 100 deaths and 1,100 captures. This debacle prompted subsequent operations like but highlighted limitations in covert . In the Congo, the CIA pursued the of in 1960 amid fears of Soviet alignment post-independence. President Eisenhower verbally ordered the plot, leading to CIA efforts including poison delivery, though Lumumba was ultimately killed by Congolese rivals on January 17, 1961; declassified records confirm U.S. orchestration of destabilization to favor Joseph Mobutu. CIA activities in Chile from 1970 to 1973 involved over $8 million in funding to destabilize President Salvador Allende's government, including propaganda and support for opposition strikes, though direct coup involvement was not executed by the agency. Allende died during the September 11, 1973, military coup led by General , which U.S. intelligence had anticipated but not directly engineered. Operation Cyclone in the 1980s provided extensive support to Afghan mujahideen fighters resisting Soviet occupation, channeling billions in arms, including Stinger missiles, through to enable effective . This aid, coordinated with , contributed to the Soviet withdrawal in 1989 but later fueled non-state actors. These operations underscore the CIA's role in advancing U.S. through covert means, yielding mixed outcomes: short-term strategic gains in some cases but long-term instability, resentment, and accusations of undermining sovereignty in others.

Human Rights and Ethical Concerns in Detention Practices

The Central Intelligence Agency's detention practices, particularly in the aftermath of the , 2001, terrorist attacks, involved the establishment of a covert program for capturing, rendering, and interrogating suspected terrorists. This program included , defined as the extrajudicial transfer of individuals to foreign custody for interrogation, often in nations with documented histories of . The CIA operated at least eight black sites—secret prisons—in countries including , , , and from 2002 to 2009, where detainees were held incommunicado without access to legal representation or oversight. These facilities facilitated techniques later classified by the U.S. Select on Intelligence as coercive and ineffective for intelligence gathering. Enhanced interrogation techniques (EITs), authorized by memos in August 2002, encompassed , prolonged sleep deprivation (up to 180 hours), stress positions, and confinement in small boxes. These were applied to at least 119 known detainees, with 39 experiencing the full range of EITs, including (waterboarded 83 times in April 2002) and (183 times between March and November 2003). The committee's 2014 report, based on over six million pages of CIA documents, concluded that EITs yielded no unique intelligence that prevented specific attacks, often produced fabricated information, and inflicted severe physical and psychological harm, including hallucinations, , and deaths in custody (at least one confirmed in CIA records). Critics, including some former CIA officials, have contested the report's dismissal of EITs' utility, arguing it overlooked contextual intelligence gains, though the committee's analysis prioritized declassified internal assessments over agency claims. Ethical concerns center on violations of , including the UN Convention Against and the ' prohibitions on cruel treatment of detainees. The program's secrecy enabled unmonitored abuses, with CIA medical personnel monitoring sessions to avoid crossing legal thresholds while documenting injuries like broken bones and organ failure. In 2005, the CIA destroyed 92 videotapes of detainee interrogations, including sessions, despite court preservation orders and congressional inquiries, prompting investigations but no criminal charges due to expired statutes of limitations. This act obstructed accountability, as the tapes could have provided direct evidence of techniques' nature and efficacy. Internationally, European courts and bodies have ruled complicit host nations violated treaties, with ongoing lawsuits against former CIA personnel for renditions leading to abroad. The program's defenders, citing imperatives post-9/11, maintained EITs were lawful under narrow legal interpretations and averted plots, such as the alleged thwarting of a "second wave" attack based on Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's statements—claims the report deemed uncorroborated by contemporaneous records. No CIA personnel faced prosecution for interrogation methods, though President Obama banned EITs in via , affirming they contradicted U.S. values without yielding reliable . The episode underscores tensions between imperatives and ethical constraints, with empirical reviews indicating coercion's limited causal role in threat disruption compared to traditional methods.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.