Hubbry Logo
LibertasLibertasMain
Open search
Libertas
Community hub
Libertas
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Libertas
Libertas
Libertas
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Libertas
Goddess of liberty
Libertas with her attributes, on an aureus of Trajan
SymbolPileus, rod (vindicta or festuca)
Equivalents
GreekArtemis Eleutheria
Denarius (42 BC) issued by Cassius Longinus and Lentulus Spinther, depicting the crowned head of Libertas, with a sacrificial jug and lituus on the reverse

Libertas (Latin for 'liberty' or 'freedom', pronounced [liːˈbɛrt̪aːs̠]) is the Roman goddess and personification of liberty. She became a politicised figure in the late republic. She sometimes also appeared on coins from the imperial period, such as Galba's "Freedom of the People" coins during his short reign after the death of Nero.[1] She is usually portrayed with two accoutrements: the spear; and pileus, a cap commonly worn by freed slaves, which she holds out in her right hand rather than wears on her head.

The Greek equivalent of the goddess Libertas is Eleutheria, the personification of liberty. There are many post-classical depictions of liberty as a person which often retain some of the iconography of the Roman goddess.

Etymology

[edit]

The noun lībertās 'freedom', on which the name of the deity is based, is a derivation from Latin līber 'free', stemming from Proto-Italic *leuþero-, and ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *h₁leudʰero- 'belonging to the people', hence 'free'.[2]

Attributes

[edit]

Libertas was associated with the pileus, a cap commonly worn by freed slaves:[3]

Among the Romans the cap of felt was the emblem of liberty. When a slave obtained his freedom he had his head shaved, and wore instead of his hair an undyed pileus (πίλεον λευκόν, Diodorus Siculus Exc. Leg. 22 p625, ed. Wess.; Plaut. Amphit. I.1.306; Persius, V.82). Hence the phrase servos ad pileum vocare is a summons to liberty, by which slaves were frequently called upon to take up arms with a promise of liberty (Liv. XXIV.32). "The figure of Liberty on some of the coins of Antoninus Pius, struck A.D. 145, holds this cap in the right hand".[4]

Libertas was also recognized in ancient Rome by the rod (vindicta or festuca),[3] used ceremonially in the act of Manumissio vindicta, Latin for 'freedom by the rod' (emphasis added):

The master brought his slave before the magistratus, and stated the grounds (causa) of the intended manumission. "The lictor of the magistratus laid a rod (festuca) on the head of the slave, accompanied with certain formal words, in which he declared that he was a free man ex Jure Quiritium", that is, "vindicavit in libertatem". The master in the meantime held the slave, and after he had pronounced the words "hunc hominem liberum volo," he turned him round (momento turbinis exit Marcus Dama, Persius, Sat. V.78) and let him go (emisit e manu, or misit manu, Plaut. Capt. II.3.48), whence the general name of the act of manumission. The magistratus then declared him to be free [...][5]

Temples

[edit]

The Roman Republic was established simultaneously with the creation of Libertas and is associated with the overthrow of the Tarquin kings. She was worshiped by the Junii, the family of Marcus Junius Brutus.[6] In 238 BC, before the Second Punic War, Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus built a temple to Libertas on the Aventine Hill.[7] Census tables were stored inside the temple's atrium. A subsequent temple was built (58–57 BC) on Palatine Hill, another of the Seven hills of Rome, by Publius Clodius Pulcher. By building and consecrating the temple on the site of the former house of then-exiled Cicero, Clodius ensured that the land was legally uninhabitable. Upon his return, Cicero successfully argued that the consecration was invalid and thus managed to reclaim the land and destroy the temple. In 46 BC, the Roman Senate voted to build and dedicate a shrine to Libertas in recognition of Julius Caesar, but no temple was built; instead, a small statue of the goddess stood in the Roman Forum.[8]

Post-classical

[edit]
The Statue of Liberty in New York, United States of America
The Statue of Liberty (Liberty Enlightening the World) in New York derives from the ancient goddess Libertas.

The goddess Libertas is also depicted on the Great Seal of France, created in 1848. This is the image which later influenced French sculptor Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi in the creation of his statue of Liberty Enlightening the World.

Libertas, along with other Roman goddesses, has served as the inspiration for many modern-day personifications, including the Statue of Liberty on Liberty Island in the United States. According to the National Park Service, the Statue's Roman robe is the main feature that invokes Libertas and the symbol of Liberty from which the statue derives its name.[9]

In addition, money throughout history has borne the name or image of Libertas. As "Liberty", Libertas was depicted on the obverse (heads side) of most coinage in the U.S. into the twentieth century – and the image is still used for the American Gold Eagle gold bullion coin. The University of North Carolina records two instances of private banks in its state depicting Libertas on their banknotes;[10][11] Libertas is depicted on the 5, 10 and 20 Rappen denomination coins of Switzerland.

The symbolic characters Columbia who represents the United States and Marianne, who represents France, the Statue of Liberty (Liberty Enlightening the World) in New York Harbor, and many other characters and concepts of the modern age were created, and are seen, as embodiments of Libertas.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Libertas

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Libertas was the Roman goddess who personified liberty, personal freedom, and emancipation from servitude. Depicted as a mature woman clad in a long robe, she typically held aloft a pileus—the felt cap bestowed upon freed slaves—in her right hand and grasped a scepter or vindicta rod in her left, symbols evoking and civic . Her cult featured temples such as the one on the associated with Iuppiter Libertas, established by the mid-Republic era, where rituals underscored freedom as a core Roman value tied to republican governance rather than universal equality. In the late Republic, Libertas became a potent political , minted on coins by figures like the populares advocates and the assassins of , who styled themselves liberators restoring senatorial liberty against perceived monarchical overreach. This imagery persisted into imperial coinage, often denoting tax relief or imperial benevolence, reflecting how libertas evolved from anti-tyrannical ideal to state-sanctioned virtue under autocracy.

Etymology and Conceptual Foundations

Linguistic Origins

The Latin noun libertas, denoting "liberty" or "freedom," derives from the adjective liber ("free"), which originates in the Proto-Indo-European root leudh- , meaning "to grow up" or "to rise to maturity," connoting independence as a state achieved beyond dependency or subjugation. This etymon evolved through Proto-Italic louðeros into Classical Latin, where liber specifically described individuals unbound by servitude, as opposed to servus ("slave"), rooted in a separate Indo-European stem implying preservation or service. In linguistic usage, libertas thus emphasized a relational status of non-subjection, distinct from servitus ("slavery" or "servitude"), framing freedom as the negation of coercive dominion rather than an affirmative grant of equality or communal rights. Early attestations of libertas appear in texts from the third and second centuries BCE, such as the comedies of (c. 254–184 BCE), where it refers to from personal bondage or social constraint, reflecting its core semantic opposition to enslavement. Legal inscriptions from the , including fragments alluding to debt-related freedoms in the (c. 451–450 BCE), provide contextual precursors, though the precise term libertas solidifies in literary and epigraphic records by the mid-Republic, underscoring its evolution from kinship-based to a formalized condition exempt from arbitrary mastery.

Roman Understanding of Liberty

In ancient Roman conceptualizations, libertas primarily signified the status of non-slavery, encompassing the absence of subjection to a master (dominus) and the possession of basic that slaves lacked, such as the capacity to own and enter contracts under the ius civile. This status applied most fully to ingenui, freeborn citizens who inherited autonomy from birth, distinguishing them from libertini (freed slaves) who, despite , retained marks of former servitude like restricted eligibility for certain priesthoods and intermarriage limitations with ingenui. formed a core element, as libertas enabled citizens to hold and defend estates against arbitrary seizure, reinforced by legal remedies like the actio furti for , which underscored causal protections against domination rather than egalitarian redistribution. Civic libertas extended beyond personal status to institutional safeguards within the , where mechanisms like the Senate's advisory role and popular assemblies curbed magisterial power, preventing the return to monarchical regnum that Romans equated with enslavement. Tribunes of the plebs, elected annually from 367 BCE onward, wielded intercessio () to intercede against or actions deemed tyrannical, directly linking libertas to collective resistance against overreach—as when tribunes halted debt collections or executions without trial, preserving citizen agency. , in (composed ca. 51 BCE), framed this as integral to a mixed , where libertas thrived through balanced powers ensuring no single office dominated, equating true with rule-bound equity () over unchecked will. Empirically, Roman libertas diverged from Greek eleutheria by prioritizing individual autonomy from arbitrary internal power—rooted in status hierarchies and legal vetoes—over the latter's emphasis on communal self-rule and equality among citizens in the polis, as seen in Athenian defenses against Persian subjugation where freedom connoted collective independence rather than personal non-domination. This Roman focus on causal institutional checks, evidenced in Livy's histories of plebeian secessions (e.g., 494 BCE), reflected a pragmatic realism: liberty as preserved through veto and defense, not abstract harmony, enabling expansionist governance without dissolving into factional stasis.

Iconography and Attributes

Core Symbols

The pileus, a soft conical cap of felt traditionally presented to manumitted slaves as a mark of their , constitutes the foremost symbol of Libertas, embodying release from servitude and its broader connotation of civic and personal . Numismatic evidence from the late , such as denarii issued by moneyers invoking libertas, routinely shows Libertas extending the pileus in her raised right hand, a motif persisting into imperial coinage. Complementing the pileus, Libertas is frequently depicted grasping a vindicta—a slender rod utilized in rituals to symbolically confer —or a scepter signifying authoritative command over and restraint. This attribute appears in her left hand alongside the pileus on coins from the , including issues under figures like Q. Cassius Longinus in 55 BC, underscoring the instrument's role in both private liberation and public assertions of . In rarer instances, scales accompany these elements, denoting the equitable inherent to true . Depictions of Libertas portray a robed female figure in dynamic standing pose, often with unbound hair evoking vitality and freedom from constraint, motifs traceable to consistent iconographic conventions in and coinage from the 3rd century BC. These attributes collectively emphasize unhindered agency, distinguishing Libertas from more static divinities.

Depictions in Art and Coinage

![Gaius Cassius Longinus and Lentulus Spinther. 42 BC. AR Denarius][float-right] The earliest numismatic depictions of Libertas appear on silver denarii issued by Marcus Junius Brutus as triumvir monetalis around 54 BC, featuring a bust of the goddess on the obverse inscribed LIBERTAS, paired with an image of his consular ancestor Lucius Junius Brutus on the reverse to evoke republican traditions. These coins underscored Brutus's alignment with anti-tyrannical sentiments, prefiguring his role in the assassination of Julius Caesar a decade later. Following Caesar's death, assassins including Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus issued denarii in 42 BC bearing symbols of Libertas, such as the pileus (a conical cap denoting manumission and freedom) flanked by daggers on the reverse with the inscription EID MAR (Ides of March), explicitly commemorating the act as tyrannicide in defense of liberty. Libertas was frequently portrayed on late Republican coinage by populares advocates, often as a draped female figure with attributes like the pileus or a scepter, to legitimize claims of restoring popular freedoms against oligarchic or monarchical overreach. In sculptural art, Libertas was rendered as a mature woman in classical robes, typically holding a pileus in one hand and a vindicta (rod used in manumission ceremonies) or scepter in the other, with variations including a on her head symbolizing emancipation. A bronze statue of her, likely from the Republican era, is described in ancient sources as extending an arm in a gesture of liberation, influencing later iconography. Under the Empire, depictions on coinage evolved to align with imperial ideology; for instance, issued aes coins around AD 42–43 showing Libertas Augusta standing with pileus and extended hand, framing the emperor's rule as a restoration of ordered following the chaotic reign of . Subsequent emperors, such as those emerging from , invoked Libertas on issues to assert legitimacy by contrasting their stability with prior "tyranny," shifting the symbol from republican contention to monarchical endorsement.

Cult and Worship Practices

Temples and Sanctuaries

The Temple of Libertas, the primary sanctuary dedicated to the goddess, was located on the Aventine Hill in Rome and dedicated in 238 BC by consul Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus using proceeds from fines imposed on individuals for illegally occupying public land during a period of sedition. This structure, built amid tensions preceding the Second Punic War, included an atrium that housed census tabulae, underscoring its administrative ties to civic records of status and citizenship. Additional shrines to Libertas or syncretic forms existed in , including the nearby Temple of Libertas on the Aventine, originally dedicated on April 13 and later rededicated on September 1, possibly reflecting combined worship of liberty under Jupiter's auspices. Archaeological remains of these sites are minimal, with no substantial temple architecture surviving, though epigraphic evidence from the documents dedications invoking Libertas in contexts of and freedom grants, confirming ongoing veneration into the Imperial period.

Rituals, Festivals, and Priesthoods

rituals invoking Libertas centered on the manumissio vindicta, a where the master presented the slave before a or , who touched the slave with a rod (vindicta or ) to declare freedom, thereby conferring on the freedperson. This rod symbolized Libertas's dominion over personal , and upon completion, the freed individual adopted the pileus cap and , attributes directly tied to the in Roman and legal tradition. Performed publicly to affirm the act's validity under ius civile, these ceremonies occurred as early as the mid-Republic, with epigraphic records attesting to their frequency in integrating slaves—estimated at up to 30-50% manumission rates in urban households—into the citizen body. Libertas held associations with the Liberalia festival on March 17, a plebeian observance honoring Liber Pater (god of wine, fertility, and freedom) and his consort Libera, where participants offered cakes (liba) on altars and paraded oversized phallic symbols to invoke growth and autonomy. Primary accounts, such as Ovid's Fasti, describe processions led by elderly women as temporary priestesses, focusing on rites for male coming-of-age (toga virilis assumption) and liberation from dependency, thematically aligning with Libertas's domain of individual libertas distinct from imperial or patrician cults. Unlike state festivals like the Ludi Romani, Liberalia emphasized rustic, communal sacrifices without fixed state funding, underscoring localized veneration for personal freedoms. No specialized priesthood or flamen collegium dedicated to Libertas is attested in literary or epigraphic evidence; her cult rites fell under general oversight by plebeian aediles or tribunes, who managed Aventine sanctuaries tied to popular assemblies rather than aristocratic boards like the pontifices. This structure mirrored the goddess's emergence amid plebeian demands in the early , prioritizing ad hoc civic validation over hereditary or state-maintained clergy, as seen in the absence of her name in lists of or augurs from sources like or Varro.

Historical Role in Roman Society

Emergence in the Early Republic

The overthrow of the last Roman king, , in 509 BC, led by , marked the foundational moment for Libertas as a symbol of freedom from monarchical tyranny, with the new republican order explicitly framed in historical tradition as the restoration of libertas to the people. Brutus, whose descendants in the plebeian gens Junia later invoked her imagery on coinage to emphasize their ancestral role in liberating from regal oppression, positioned Libertas as a divine guarantor of collective autonomy against arbitrary rule. This association rooted her early veneration in the patrician-led expulsion of the Tarquins, precipitated by and subsequent oath against kingship, as recounted in primary historiographical accounts emphasizing causal links between tyranny's abuses and the imperative for institutionalized liberty. Amid ensuing patricio-plebeian conflicts, Libertas gained traction as a rallying ideal during the first plebeian secession to the Sacred Mount in 494 BC, where indebted withdrew from the city, demanding safeguards against patrician exploitation and (), which effectively equated citizens to slaves under harsh repayment terms. This event, driven by empirical pressures of and land concentration post-monarchy, compelled the patricians to concede the office of , endowed with veto power (intercessio) to protect individual and collective libertas from magisterial . Tribunes' , justified explicitly as a defense of , integrated Libertas into civic , with plebeian assemblies invoking her to legitimize resistance against perceived aristocratic overreach. Further entrenchment occurred through legislative responses to debt crises, as the of c. 450 BC codified regulations on to curb abuses like bodily seizure of debtors, reflecting causal pressures from secessions where plebeians claimed libertas precluded enslavement for civic debts. The eventual Lex Poetelia Papiria in 326 BC abolished nexum outright, prohibiting the imprisonment or sale of defaulting citizens into bondage, a reform attributable to sustained plebeian agitation that amplified Libertas' cultic resonance among lower strata as protector against economic subjugation. These measures, empirically tied to reduced debt enslavement rates among freeborn Romans, fostered her institutionalization in popular religion, distinct from elite patron deities, by framing liberty as a tangible bulwark for the non-elite against both regal and oligarchic threats.

Politicization in the Late Republic

In the late Roman Republic, Libertas emerged as a highly contested ideological tool in the factional conflicts between optimates and populares, with each side invoking it to legitimize their vision of republican governance. The populares, advocating reforms through popular assemblies and tribunician vetoes, portrayed senatorial authority as oligarchic tyranny that subverted citizen freedoms, emphasizing Libertas as political equality and protection from elite dominance. This rhetoric framed measures like land redistribution as restorations of plebeian rights, countering what they deemed arbitrary senatorial encroachments on the res publica. Conversely, optimates such as defended Libertas as embedded in the mixed constitution, where senatorial oversight preserved law against demagogic excesses and mob rule. In works like , Cicero argued that true freedom entailed non-subjection to arbitrary power, achievable only through balanced institutions that restrained popular passions, critiquing populares tactics as veiled assaults on ancestral liberties. 's further illuminated these dynamics, depicting Libertas as vulnerable to both oligarchic avarice and conspiratorial ambition; Catiline exploited real grievances over lost freedoms to rally supporters, yet Sallust portrayed his movement as a perversion that endangered the more profoundly than elite corruption. This politicization manifested in numismatic propaganda, particularly after Julius Caesar's assassination on 15 March 44 BC. and , key conspirators, issued denarii in 42 BC featuring Libertas personified alongside the pileus (cap of liberty) and daggers, explicitly linking to the recovery of republican freedoms from dictatorial rule. Such tied Libertas to anti-monarchical resistance, reflecting a conceptual evolution where the goddess symbolized not mere absence of servitude but active defense against personal , though contested by Caesar's heirs as subversive . Over time, these debates revealed Libertas' malleability, serving causal manipulations by elites and agitators alike to mask power grabs under the guise of constitutional fidelity.

Post-Roman Legacy

Medieval and Renaissance Revivals

In the medieval period, allusions to the Roman concept of libertas surfaced sporadically in ecclesiastical contexts, particularly amid debates over church autonomy from secular interference. The , initiated by (r. 1073–1085), centralized libertas ecclesiae—the freedom of the church—as a core principle to resist lay and imperial control, drawing implicit parallels to classical Roman notions of civic liberty against arbitrary authority, though reframed through Christian scriptural authority rather than pagan iconography. This usage preserved libertas as a rhetorical tool in elite clerical circles, where classical texts like Cicero's writings on republican freedom were studied in monastic scriptoria, but subordinated to theological priorities such as divine order over individual or civic . Renaissance humanists, recovering Roman sources amid Florence's republican struggles, repurposed Libertas more explicitly to champion anti-monarchical governance. , in his (composed ca. 1513–1517), invoked Roman libertas as the safeguard of republics against tyrannical decay, asserting that free peoples, not princes, best maintain and resist through participatory institutions modeled on early . This aligned with Florentine civic , where Libertas symbolized resistance to Medici dominance, as seen in medals like those inscribed Libertas Que Publica Florentia, depicting a seated holding an orb and olive branches to evoke public liberty over princely rule (e.g., examples cataloged from the late ). Such revivals remained confined to intellectual and artistic elites, with Libertas' symbols—like the pileus cap—integrated into anti-tyranny motifs in paintings and emblems, yet often veiled or hybridized with Christian virtues such as under providence to circumvent accusations of amid dominant oversight. This continuity reflected causal persistence of Roman ideals in contexts of power imbalance, but without widespread cultic restoration, prioritizing pragmatic republican critique over mythological devotion.

Enlightenment and Revolutionary Symbolism

Enlightenment philosophers drew upon the Roman concept of libertas—defined as protection against arbitrary power and domination—as a foundation for theories of negative liberty, emphasizing individual rights insulated from monarchical overreach. John Locke's Two Treatises of Government (1689) articulated natural rights to life, liberty, and property as pre-political entitlements that governments must safeguard rather than infringe, reflecting Roman libertas's orientation toward shielding citizens from unchecked authority rather than guaranteeing positive capacities for self-realization. Montesquieu, in The Spirit of the Laws (1748), contrasted republican liberty, rooted in Roman models of balanced institutions, with the moderated freedoms possible under monarchy, arguing that separation of powers prevented the concentration of authority that eroded libertas in late republican Rome. These ideas privileged empirical observation of historical tyrannies, positing causal links between institutional design and sustained freedom, without reliance on egalitarian redistribution. The (1789–1799) repurposed Libertas iconography to symbolize emancipation from aristocratic and absolutist rule, adapting Roman motifs to critique feudal hierarchies akin to late republican oligarchies. The , traditionally associated with Libertas as the emblem of manumitted slaves' freedom from servitude, appeared on revolutionary seals, flags, and the figure of , who embodied liberté in official emblems from 1792 onward. This symbolism blended classical anti-aristocratic parallels—evoking Cicero's defenses of senatorial libertas against demagogues—with revolutionary rhetoric, though it often prioritized collective over individual negative rights, leading to tensions evident in the of Terror's (1793–1794) suppression of dissent. American revolutionaries similarly invoked Libertas for iconographic legitimacy, portraying British monarchical overreach as a modern Caesarism threatening colonial autonomies modeled on republican virtues. Early proposals for the of the United States (1776) featured the liberty cap atop a pole, directly echoing Libertas' attributes in Roman coinage and sculpture to signify emancipation from tyranny. Founders like referenced classical liberty in correspondence, such as his 1787 letter asserting the need to refresh "the tree of liberty" through periodic resistance, grounding revolutionary action in historical precedents of restoring libertas against encroaching powers. This transmission prioritized causal realism, viewing institutional safeguards—like federalism and enumerated powers—as bulwarks against the arbitrary rule that Roman sources documented as liberty's chief foe.

Modern Appropriations and Debates

Influence on Western Symbols of Freedom

The , dedicated on , 1886, in , directly embodies the Roman goddess Libertas through its sculptural design by , featuring a robed female figure with a radiant crown and elevated torch symbolizing enlightenment, adapting Libertas's traditional attributes of the on a pole and occasional scepter for a modern emblem of emancipation from tyranny. The pedestal's cornerstone was laid in a Masonic ceremony on August 5, 1884, reflecting Enlightenment-era appropriations of classical liberty motifs by fraternal organizations emphasizing . In American , Libertas influenced the Seated Liberty coin series minted by the U.S. Mint from 1839 to 1891 across denominations including half dimes, dimes, quarters, and half dollars, depicting the goddess seated beside a inscribed "," extending an while resting on , with a atop a staff to denote and constitutional order. Similar appears in U.S. state seals, such as Virginia's adopted in 1776 and refined post-1830, portraying Libertas holding a and liberty to signify eternal and restraint on executive power. European 19th-century independence movements also invoked Libertas visually, as seen in the Brabant Revolution's provisional coinage of 1830 during Belgium's secession from the , where shields bore "LIBERTAS" alongside lions and arms, underscoring claims to amid revolutionary fervor. These artifacts trace a continuous adoption of Libertas's form—crown, cap, and emblems of release—from Roman coinage into symbols of and individual autonomy in transatlantic constitutional traditions.

Contemporary Interpretations and Critiques

In neo-republican political philosophy, Libertas is interpreted as embodying freedom as non-domination, a concept where individuals are free insofar as they are not subject to arbitrary interference by others, including the state or powerful elites. This view, advanced by , draws directly from Roman republican sources emphasizing libertas as protection against domination rather than mere absence of interference, aligning with empirical depictions in Cicero's where liberty requires institutional checks on power to prevent subjection. Roman data, such as temple inscriptions and senatorial debates from the late (e.g., 63 BCE Catilinarian ), underscore libertas as a status tied to civic equality among free citizens, excluding slaves and dependents, thus prioritizing causal over egalitarian outcomes. Libertarian thinkers invoke Libertas as an enduring symbol of —freedom from coercion—opposing expansive state roles that encroach on personal agency and property rights, preconditions for Roman civic freedom evidenced by the Lex Hortensia (287 BCE) linking plebeian liberty to land ownership. This interpretation critiques modern regulatory expansions, arguing they replicate the patron-client dependencies that eroded republican libertas by 27 BCE. Critics from progressive perspectives, however, reinterpret liberty through Libertas to justify entitlements to social goods, framing state provision as essential for "real" freedom, a positive liberty model diverging from Roman empirical focus on non-subjection and self-reliance, as seen in Sallust's Bellum Catilinae (40 BCE) decrying dependency as antithetical to true libertas. Such views, prevalent in welfare-state advocacy since the 20th century, ignore property's causal role in enabling agency, per Roman agrarian laws like the Licinian-Sextian Rogations (367 BCE), and risk conflating equity with non-domination. Academic sources advancing these expansions often reflect institutional biases toward collectivist frameworks, underweighting primary Roman texts that privilege individual status over redistribution. Debates persist among right-leaning scholars reclaiming Libertas for , citing Cicero's warnings in In Catilinam (63 BCE) against demagoguery that manipulates popular assemblies to subvert constitutional balances, as occurred under tribunes like Clodius Pulcher (58 BCE), contributing to the Republic's populist destabilization. While acknowledging these internal threats, proponents argue institutional safeguards, not equity mandates, preserve non-domination, countering anachronistic grafts of modern ideology onto Roman precedents.

References

  1. https://worldhistoryedu.com/depictions-and-meanings-of-the-roman-deities-libertas-and-sol/
  2. https://romanempirehistory.com/roman-gods/libertas-goddess/
  3. https://www.forumancientcoins.com/numiswiki/view.asp?key=LIBERTAS
  4. https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-roman-pileus.357989/
  5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41587324
  6. https://www.forumancientcoins.com/catalog/roman-and-greek-coins.asp?vpar=1651
  7. https://static-prod.lib.princeton.edu/capping-liberty/case/6/index.html
  8. https://academic.sun.ac.za/antieke/coins/muntwerf/perslibtas.html
  9. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004441699/BP000009.xml
  10. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004441699/BP000011.xml
  11. https://lrc.la.utexas.edu/lex/master/1190
  12. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/libertas-and-the-practice-of-politics-in-the-late-roman-republic/roman-libertas/86354844B6449DFA505DC6AAEE1AB45E
  13. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6049&context=penn_law_review
  14. https://lawliberty.org/forum/learning-from-roman-libertas/
  15. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/libertas-and-the-practice-of-politics-in-the-late-roman-republic/citizens-political-liberty/40D560F8614D67EDF2ECBA7E46CD1C83
  16. https://academic.oup.com/book/32001/chapter/267770804
  17. https://www.livius.org/articles/concept/tribune/
  18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01916599.2018.1513705
  19. https://academic.oup.com/book/55272/chapter/428663731
  20. https://brill.com/view/journals/agpt/37/1/article-p72_6.xml
  21. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01916599.2023.2203575
  22. https://study.com/academy/lesson/libertas-roman-goddess-liberty-mythology-history-depictions.html
  23. https://collections.mfa.org/objects/99440
  24. https://www.mq.edu.au/research/research-centres-groups-and-facilities/resilient-societies/centres/australian-centre-for-ancient-numismatic-studies/exhibitions/the-coinage-of-julius-caesar/the-civil-wars/libertas-the-coins-of-brutus
  25. https://weirditaly.com/2022/09/30/libertas/
  26. https://sites.rhodes.edu/coins/coinage-four-emperors-analysis
  27. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Gazetteer/Places/Europe/Italy/Lazio/Roma/Rome/_Texts/PLATOP%2A/Jupiter_Libertas.html
  28. https://cil.bbaw.de/ace/id/295
  29. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3061&context=gc_etds
  30. https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004441699/BP000012.xml
  31. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10094497/3/Arena_CHAPTER%25206._submitted.pdf
  32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24433640
  33. https://brewminate.com/lucius-tarquinius-superbus-the-overthrow-and-exile-of-romes-last-king/
  34. https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=classtudent
  35. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-13260-5_5
  36. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/libertas-as-a-political-idea-at-rome-during-the-late-republic-and-early-principate/civil-discord-optimates-and-populares/EBD0235B25CE3D5843EB80941B09FEF4
  37. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/808183/summary
  38. https://ancienthistorybulletin.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/AHBReviews201314.RoselaarOnArena.pdf
  39. https://www.academia.edu/1804863/Cicero_Roman_Republicanism_and_the_Contested_Meaning_of_Libertas
  40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260736662_Cicero_Roman_Republicanism_and_the_Contested_Meaning_of_Libertas
  41. https://www.artsofliberty.org/lifelong-learners/master-teacher-thoughts/moral-and-civic-liberty-in-sallusts-bella-and-history-as-an-education-in-virtue/
  42. https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/download/4952/5243
  43. https://coinweek.com/the-coins-of-caesars-killers/
  44. https://www.ashmolean.org/article/an-ides-of-march-coin
  45. https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2013/2013.08.51/
  46. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-roman-studies/article/v-arena-libertas-and-the-practice-of-politics-in-the-late-roman-republic-cambridgenew-york-cambridge-university-press-2012-pp-ix-324-illus-isbn9781107028173-6000us9900/12FAC1F2395406D2F25C5E779EC74306
  47. https://scholarship.law.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1962&context=scholar
  48. https://www.britannica.com/topic/canon-law/Development-of-canon-law-in-the-West
  49. https://scholarworks.smith.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1043&context=gov_facpubs
  50. https://www.mortonandeden.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/41.pdf
  51. https://assets.cambridge.org/97805215/81066/excerpt/9780521581066_excerpt.pdf
  52. https://fee.org/resources/john-locke-natural-rights-to-life-liberty-and-property/
  53. https://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/gffstraumannpaper0607.pdf
  54. https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/montesquieu-complete-works-vol-1-the-spirit-of-laws
  55. https://www.thelocal.fr/20231107/marianne-5-things-to-know-about-the-symbol-of-france
  56. https://frenchmoments.eu/marianne-and-the-french-republic/
  57. https://www.aoc.gov/explore-capitol-campus/blog/liberty-cap-symbol-american-freedom
  58. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/story-behind-forgotten-symbol-american-revolution-liberty-tree-180959162/
  59. https://www.nps.gov/museum/exhibits/statue_liberty/exb/Imagining_Liberty/Bartholdi_Designing_Liberty/LA-100-103.html
  60. https://www.freemason.com/freemasons-cornerstone-statue-of-liberty/
  61. https://www.ngccoin.com/coin-explorer/united-states/half-dollars/seated-liberty-half-dollars-1839-1891/
  62. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/seal-of-the-commonwealth-of-virginia/
  63. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/on-the-peoples-terms/freedom-as-nondomination/B76498C1A553E2713A9443ABE2AFD4E7
  64. https://academic.oup.com/book/39178/chapter/338650581
  65. https://www.cato.org/policy-report/march/april-2007/roots-modern-libertarian-ideas
  66. https://www.cato.org/commentary/key-concepts-libertarianism
  67. https://lawliberty.org/ancient-liberty-modern-divisions/
  68. https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/conflicting-ideas-of-liberty/
  69. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/persuasion-rhetoric-and-roman-poetry/epic-demagoguery/3188D8DF9F3B22E591F5A5128FDB5091
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.