Hubbry Logo
Lord President of the Court of SessionLord President of the Court of SessionMain
Open search
Lord President of the Court of Session
Community hub
Lord President of the Court of Session
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Lord President of the Court of Session
Lord President of the Court of Session
Lord President of the Court of Session
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Lord President of the
Court of Session
and
Lord Justice General
of Scotland
Scottish Gaelic: Àrd-mhorair Cùirt an t-Seisein
Logo of the Lord President of the Court of Session
Incumbent
Lord Pentland
since 3 February 2025
StyleThe Right Honourable
AppointerMonarch on the advice of the First Minister
Term lengthLife tenure with compulsory retirement at 75
Inaugural holderAlexander Mylne, Abbot of Cambuskenneth
Formation1532
DeputyLord Justice Clerk
Salary£222,862 (Salary Group 1.1)
WebsiteRoles and Jurisdiction | Judicial Office for Scotland

The Lord President of the Court of Session and Lord Justice General (Scottish Gaelic: Àrd-mhorair Cùirt an t-Seisein) is the most senior judge in Scotland, the head of the judiciary, and the presiding judge of the College of Justice, the Court of Session, and the High Court of Justiciary. The Lord President holds the title of Lord Justice General of Scotland and the head of the High Court of Justiciary ex officio, as the two offices were combined in 1836. The Lord President has authority over any court established under Scots law, except for the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and the Court of the Lord Lyon.

The current Lord President of the Court of Session is Lord Pentland, who was appointed to the position on 3 February 2025 succeeding Lord Carloway They are paid according to salary group 1.1 of the Judicial Salaries Scale, which in 2016 was £222,862.

Remit and jurisdiction

[edit]

Head of the judiciary

[edit]

As Lord President of the Court of Session and is the most senior judge in Scotland, the head of the judiciary, and the presiding judge of the College of Justice, and the Court of Session.[1]: Section 2(1)  Under Section 2(6) of the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008, the Lord President has authority over the judiciary of any court established under Scots law, except for the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and the Court of the Lord Lyon.

References in this section to the Scottish judiciary are references to the judiciary of any court established under the law of Scotland (other than the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom).

— Section 2(5), Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008[1]: Section 2(5) 

The Scottish Land Court, which until 1 April 2017 was administered separately, was transferred to the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service.[2] The 2008 act states:

The Lord President is the Head of the Scottish Judiciary.

— Section 2(1), Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008[1]: Section 2(1) 

The Lord President is supported by the Judicial Office for Scotland which was established on 1 April 2010 as a result of the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008, and the Lord President chairs the corporate board of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service.[1]: Schedule 3  The Lord President, and the wider judiciary, is advised on matters relating to the administration of justice by the Judicial Council for Scotland, which is a non-statutory body established in 2007. There had been plans for a statutory judges' council but these plans were abandoned in favour of a non-statutory council convened by the Lord President.[3][4][5]

Inner House

[edit]

The Lord President presides over the 1st Division of the Inner House of the Court of Session.[6] The Inner House is the part of the Court of Session which acts as a court of appeal for cases decided the Outer House and Sheriff Appeal Court, and hearing appeals on questions of law from the Sheriff Appeal Court, Scottish Land Court, Court of the Lord Lyon, and the Lands Tribunal for Scotland.[7][8]

Official Oath

[edit]

In Scotland the Official Oath is taken before the Lord President of the Court of Session.[9]

Lord Justice General

[edit]

The Lord President is also the Lord Justice General of Scotland and the head of the High Court of Justiciary ex officio, with the two offices having been combined in 1836.The office of Lord Justice General is derived from the justiciars who were appointed from at least the twelfth century. From around 1567 onwards it was held heritably by the Earl of Argyll until the heritability was resigned to the Crown in 1607.[10]

Officeholders

[edit]
Part of a series on
Scots law
Administration
Civil courts
Criminal courts
Special courts
Criminal prosecution
Legal profession

Justiciars

[edit]
See also: Justiciar of Scotia and Justiciar of Lothian

(called Lord Chief Justices by Scot of Scotstarvet).

Lord Justice-General

[edit]
From Until Remarks
William Graham, 1st Earl of Airth, 7th Earl of Menteith 11 July 1628 8 November 1633
Sir William Elphinstone 23 December 1635 13 November 1641
Sir Thomas Hope, younger of Kerse 18 November 1641 23 August 1643
William Cunningham, 8th Earl of Glencairn 13 November 1646 15 February 1649
John Kennedy, 6th Earl of Cassilis 15 March 1649 9 August 1651
John Murray, 2nd Earl of Atholl 16 August 1661 21 May 1675
Alexander Stuart, 5th Earl of Moray 21 May 1675 5 May 1676
Archibald Primrose, Lord Carrington 5 May 1676 30 September 1678
George Mackenzie, Lord Tarbat 30 September 1678 1 June 1680
William Douglas, 3rd Earl of Queensberry 1 June 1680 1 March 1682
James Drummond, 4th Earl of Perth 1 March 1682 13 June 1684
George Livingston, 3rd Earl of Linlithgow 13 June 1684 3 August 1689
Robert Ker, 4th Earl of Lothian 3 August 1689 15 February 1703
George Mackenzie, 1st Earl of Cromartie 17 October 1704 23 October 1710
Archibald Campbell, 3rd Duke of Argyll 23 October 1710 15 April 1761
John Hay, 4th Marquess of Tweeddale 27 June 1761 9 December 1762
Charles Douglas, 3rd Duke of Queensberry 15 April 1763 22 October 1778
David Murray, 2nd Earl of Mansfield 23 October 1778 1794
James Graham, 3rd Duke of Montrose 14 January 1795 30 December 1836

Lord President

[edit]
From Until Remarks
Alexander Mylne, Abbot of Cambuskenneth 1532 1543 Abbot of Cambuskenneth (1519–1548)
Robert Reid, Bishop of Orkney 1543 1558 Abbot of Kinloss (1528–1553);
Commendator of Beauly (1531–1553);
Bishop of Orkney (1541–1558)
Henry Sinclair, Bishop of Ross 1558 1565 Commendator of Kilwinning (1541–1550);
Dean of Glasgow (1550–1561);
Bishop of Ross (1558–1565)
John Sinclair, Bishop of Brechin 1565 1566 Appointed a Lord of Session, 1540;
Bishop of Brechin (1565–1566)
William Baillie, Lord Provand 1566 1567
James Balfour, Lord Pittendreich 1567 1593 Appointed a Lord of Session, 1561
Alexander Seton, 1st Lord Fyvie 1593 1604 Appointed a Lord of Session, 1586;
Provost of Edinburgh (1598–1608);
Lord Chancellor of Scotland (1604–1622);
Lord High Commissioner to the Parliament of Scotland (1612–1621)
James Elphinstone, 1st Lord Balmerino 1605 1609 Appointed a Lord of Session, 1587;
Secretary of State (1598–1609)
John Preston of Fenton Barns, Lord Fentonbarns 1609 1616 Appointed a Lord of Session, 1595
Thomas Hamilton, 1st Earl of Melrose 1616 1625 Appointed a Lord of Session, 1592;
Lord Advocate (1595–1596 and 1596–1612);
Lord Clerk Register (1612)
Sir James Skene of Curriehill 1626 1633 Lord Clerk Register (1594–1612);
Appointed a Lord of Session, 1594
Robert Spottiswood, Lord Newabbey 1633 1646 Appointed a Lord of Session, 1622
Sir John Gilmour of Craigmillar 1661 1671 Commissioner for Edinburghshire (1661–1671)
James Dalrymple, 1st Viscount Stair 1671 1681 Appointed a Lord of Session, 1661;
Commissioner for Wigtownshire (1672–1674, 1678 and 1681–1682)
George Gordon, 1st Earl of Aberdeen 1681 1682 Commissioner for Aberdeenshire (1669–1674, 1678 and 1681–1682);
Appointed a Lord of Session, 1680;
Lord Chancellor of Scotland (1682–1684)
Sir David Falconer of Newton 1682 1685 Appointed a Lord of Session, 1676;
Commissioner for Forfarshire (1685)
Sir George Lockhart of Carnwath 1685 31 March 1689 Appointed Dean of the Faculty of Advocates, 1672;
Commissioner for Lanarkshire (1681–1682 and 1685–1686)
James Dalrymple, 1st Viscount Stair 28 October 1689 25 November 1695 Appointed a Lord of Session, 1661;
Commissioner for Wigtownshire (1672–1674, 1678 and 1681–1682)
Hew Dalrymple, Lord North Berwick 17 March 1698 20 June 1737 Commissioner for New Galloway (1690–1702);
Dean of the Faculty of Advocates (1695–1698);
Commissioner for North Berwick (1702–1707)
Duncan Forbes, Lord Culloden 20 June 1737 4 June 1748 MP for Ayr Burghs (1721–1722);
MP for Inverness Burghs (1722–1737);
Lord Advocate (1725–1737)
Robert Dundas, Lord Arniston, the Elder 4 June 1748 26 August 1753 Solicitor General for Scotland (1717–1720);
Lord Advocate (1720–1725);
MP for Midlothian (1722–1737);
Senator of the College of Justice (1737–1753)
Robert Craigie of Glendoick, Lord Craigie 22 January 1754 10 March 1760

MP for Tain Burghs (1742–1747);
Lord Advocate (1742–1746)

Robert Dundas, Lord Arniston, the Younger 30 April 1760 13 December 1787 Solicitor General for Scotland (1742–1746);
Dean of the Faculty of Advocates (1746–1760)
Lord Advocate (1754–1760);
MP for Midlothian (1754–1760)
Thomas Miller, Lord Glenlee 22 December 1787 27 September 1789 MP for Dumfries Burghs (1761–1766);
Solicitor General for Scotland (1759–1760);
Lord Advocate (1760–1766);
Lord Justice Clerk (1766–1787)
Ilay Campbell, Lord Succoth 26 October 1789 31 August 1808 Solicitor General for Scotland (1783–1784);
MP for Clyde Burghs (1784–1790);
Lord Advocate (1784–1789)
Robert Blair, Lord Avontoun 31 August 1808 20 May 1811 Solicitor General for Scotland (1789–1806);
Dean of the Faculty of Advocates (1801–1808)
Charles Hope, Lord Granton 10 October 1811 20 July 1841 Lord Advocate (1801–1804);
MP for Dumfries Burghs (1802);
MP for Edinburgh (1803–1805);
Lord Justice Clerk (1804–1811)
David Boyle, Lord Boyle 7 October 1841 5 May 1852 MP for Ayrshire (1807–1811);
Solicitor General for Scotland (1807–1811);
Lord Justice Clerk (1811–1841)
Duncan McNeill, 1st Baron Colonsay 14 May 1852 25 February 1867 MP for Argyllshire (1843–1851);
Solicitor General for Scotland (1834–1835 & 1841–1842);
Lord Advocate (1842–1846)
John Inglis, Lord Glencorse 25 February 1867 20 August 1891 MP for Stamford (1858); Solicitor General for Scotland (1852);
Lord Advocate (1852 & 1858);
Lord Justice Clerk (1858–1867)
James Robertson, Baron Robertson 21 September 1891 21 November 1899 MP for Buteshire (1885–1891);
Solicitor General for Scotland (1885–1886 & 1886–1888);
Lord Advocate (1888–1891); Lord of Appeal in Ordinary (1899–1909)
John Balfour, 1st Baron Kinross 21 November 1899 22 January 1905 MP for Clackmannan and Kinross (1880–1899);
Solicitor General for Scotland (1880–1881);
Lord Advocate (1881–1885, 1886 & 1892–1895)
Andrew Murray, 1st Baron Dunedin 4 February 1905 14 October 1913 MP for Buteshire (1891–1905);
Solicitor General for Scotland (1905–1909);
Lord Advocate (1909–1913);
Secretary for Scotland (1903–1905);
Lord of Appeal in Ordinary (1913–1932)
Alexander Ure, 1st Baron Strathclyde 14 October 1913 1 April 1920 MP for Linlithgowshire (1895–1913);
Solicitor General for Scotland (1891–1892 & 1895–1896);
Lord Advocate (1896–1903)
James Avon Clyde, Lord Clyde 1 April 1920 1 April 1935 Solicitor General for Scotland (1905);
MP for Edinburgh West (1909–1918)
and Edinburgh North (1918–1920); Lord Advocate (1916–1920)
Wilfrid Normand, Baron Normand 1 April 1935 6 January 1947 MP for Edinburgh West (1931–1935);
Solicitor General for Scotland (1929 & 1931–1933);
Lord Advocate (1933–1935); Lord of Appeal in Ordinary (1947–1953)
Thomas Cooper, 1st Baron Cooper of Culross[12] 6 January 1947 23 December 1954 MP for Edinburgh West (1935–1941);
Solicitor General for Scotland (1935);
Lord Advocate (1935–1941);
Senator of the College of Justice (1941–1954);
Lord Justice Clerk (1941-1947);
Lord President of the Court of Session (1947–1954)
James Latham Clyde, Lord Clyde[13] 23 December 1954 25 April 1972 MP for Edinburgh North (1950–1954); Lord Advocate (1951–1954);
Senator of the College of Justice (1954–1972)
George Emslie, Baron Emslie[14] 25 April 1972 27 September 1989 Dean of the Faculty of Advocates (1965–1970);
Senator of the College of Justice (1970–1989)
David Hope, Baron Hope of Craighead 27 September 1989 1 October 1996 Dean of the Faculty of Advocates (1986–1989);
Senator of the College of Justice (1989–1996);
Lord of Appeal in Ordinary (1996–2009);
Second Senior Law Lord (2009);
Deputy President of the Supreme Court (2009–2013)
Alan Rodger, Baron Rodger of Earlsferry 1 October 1996 13 November 2002 Solicitor General for Scotland (1989–1992);
Lord Advocate (1992–1995);
Senator of the College of Justice (1995–2001);
Lord of Appeal in Ordinary (2001–2009);
Justice of the Supreme Court (2009–2011)
William Cullen, Baron Cullen of Whitekirk 13 November 2002 2 December 2005 Chairman of the Medical Appeals Tribunals (1977–1986);
Senator of the College of Justice (1986–2005);
Lord Justice Clerk (1997–2002)
Arthur Hamilton, Lord Hamilton 2 December 2005 8 June 2012 Chairman of the Medical Appeals Tribunals (1989–1992);
President of the Pensions Appeal Tribunal in Scotland (1992–1995);
Senator of the College of Justice (1995–2012)
Brian Gill, Lord Gill 8 June 2012 31 May 2015 Senator of the College of Justice (1994–2015);
Lord Justice Clerk (2001–2012)
Colin Sutherland, Lord Carloway 18 December 2015 3 February 2025[15] Senator of the College of Justice (2000–3 February 2025);
Lord Justice Clerk (2012–2015)
Paul Cullen, Lord Pentland 3 February 2025 Incumbent[15] Senator of the College of Justice (5 November 2008–present)

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Lord President of the Court of Session

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Lord President of the Court of Session is the presiding judge of Scotland's supreme civil court, the Court of Session, which has operated continuously since its establishment by the Parliament of Scotland in 1532, and concurrently serves as the Lord Justice General, the highest authority in the country's criminal courts. This dual role positions the Lord President as the head of the Scottish judiciary, with overarching responsibility for the administration of justice across both civil and criminal jurisdictions, excluding the UK Supreme Court. The office holder supervises the efficient disposal of business in Scottish courts, chairs the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service Board, and represents the in interactions with and other entities. Additionally, the Lord President exercises regulatory functions over the legal profession in on behalf of the , including oversight of admission, discipline, and standards for solicitors and advocates. Appointments to the position are made by the on the recommendation of the , following consultation with the Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland, ensuring selection from experienced Senators of the . The current incumbent, Lord Pentland, assumed office on 3 February 2025, succeeding Lord Carloway after a tenure marked by judicial reforms amid evolving caseloads and administrative challenges.

Historical Development

Origins in Medieval Justiciars

The justiciars emerged as royal officials in 12th-century Scotland, serving as itinerant judges appointed by the king to administer both civil and across the . This institution was introduced during the reign of David I (r. 1124–1153), who implemented Anglo-Norman administrative reforms to strengthen central authority, including the establishment of traveling courts that drew from English eyre practices. Charters and attributed to David I provide evidence of these early judicial circuits, which aimed to enforce royal law uniformly rather than relying on fragmented local customs. Justiciars conducted periodic visitations, holding courts in fixed locations to hear cases, supervise sheriffs, and collect revenues, thereby extending the king's oversight into regions previously dominated by baronial or thanage jurisdictions. By the late , under William I (r. 1165–1214), the system formalized with designated justiciars for (north of the Forth), (south of the Forth), and occasionally , reflecting territorial divisions that facilitated biannual perambulations from north to south. This structure consolidated royal power by standardizing legal procedures, curbing aristocratic autonomy, and integrating peripheral areas into a nascent state framework, as evidenced by records of justiciars reporting directly to on sheriffdom activities. The justiciarial system addressed the limitations of feudal fragmentation amid Scotland's expanding kingdom, but pressures for further centralization arose in the due to persistent border warfare with and internal Highland conflicts, which strained itinerant mechanisms. Hereditary appointments of justiciars, which had become entrenched, were ultimately abolished by the Heritable Jurisdictions (Scotland) Act 1746 (effective 1747), enacted in the wake of the to dismantle feudal power structures and affirm parliamentary sovereignty over local jurisdictions.

Transition to Lord Justice-General

The office of Lord Justice-General evolved from the medieval justiciars, transitioning toward a permanent central authority over by the late , when it was recognized as the supreme judge in such cases, distinct from emerging civil structures. This shift addressed the limitations of itinerant regional courts, which had fragmented enforcement under feudal lords, by vesting appellate and oversight powers in a singular royal appointee to enforce statutes uniformly across . Under James V, who assumed personal rule in 1528, the role was integrated into broader efforts to centralize justice amid royal assertions against noble autonomy, including punitive measures in the Borders and Highlands to curb local disorders. The king's parliaments reinforced this by statutes enhancing precedence, empirically reducing reliance on ad hoc feudal tribunals through mandated appeals to the Justice-General. The 1532 Act establishing the College of Justice formalized civil proceedings under dedicated senators, leaving criminal jurisdiction to the Justice-General's oversight, which included reviewing circuit judgments and high treason cases, thus professionalizing apex criminal adjudication separate from civil specialization. Subsequent enactments, such as those expanding judicial funding and personnel in the 1540s, further centralized enforcement by directing revenues toward salaried officials rather than noble retinues, diminishing fragmented local customs. Initially paired with the Lord Justice-Clerk as deputy for operational duties, the offices diverged in the through reforms like the 1672 statute, which abolished deputes and incorporated Lords of Session into the under the Justice-General's presidency, marking institutional permanence ahead of the Lord President's later assumption of the title.

Establishment and Evolution of the Lord President Title

The office of Lord President crystallized as the unified head of the Scottish judiciary in the aftermath of the 1707 Act of Union, which explicitly preserved the and as distinct from English systems, ensuring the continuation of the President's role without structural assimilation. This retention of autonomy refuted contemporary concerns over diminishment, as the under the Lord President's presidency maintained exclusive jurisdiction over civil matters, processing the bulk of Scotland's high-level disputes independently of Westminster's influence. A pivotal evolution occurred through the Court of Session Act 1830, which vested the longstanding duties of the Lord Justice General—previously a separate hereditary overseeing —in the Lord President, thereby merging civil and criminal leadership under one figure for the first time. This reform, debated in as a means to streamline administration and eliminate divided authority, standardized selection by prioritizing seniority among experienced senators of the , fostering a merit-based progression that prioritized judicial tenure over political favoritism. The change enhanced operational efficiency, allowing the Lord President to preside cohesively over both the 's Inner and Outer Houses and the . Further refinements in the bolstered the office's appellate oversight, with post-World War II adjustments to the Inner House's structure amplifying the Lord President's influence in reviewing decisions and ensuring doctrinal consistency in civil appeals. These developments underscored the title's enduring adaptation to caseload demands while preserving its foundational 17th-century emphasis on centralized, impartial amid Scotland's evolving union with .

Role and Responsibilities

Head of the Scottish Judiciary

The Lord President of the Court of Session is designated as the head of the Scottish judiciary under section 2 of the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008, which formalizes overarching leadership to promote the efficient disposal of business across devolved Scottish courts. This mandate includes superintendence over the Court of Session, High Court of Justiciary, sheriff courts, justice of the peace courts, and specified tribunals, with authority to issue binding administrative directions to sheriff principals and the President of the Sheriff Appeal Court for consistent legal application. The scope explicitly excludes the UK Supreme Court, preserving reserved appellate oversight within the UK's constitutional structure as shaped by devolution under the Scotland Act 1998. Key functions encompass arranging welfare provisions, requirements, and professional guidance for judicial office holders, including the power to mandate attendance at specified programs to uphold competence and uniformity. The Lord President also represents judicial perspectives to the and ministers, and may lay written representations before concerning the or justice system administration, facilitating accountability while insulating judicial operations from undue executive interference. This framework, bolstered by section 1 of the Act's prohibition on ministerial influence over judicial decisions, causally supports by prioritizing operational autonomy grounded in statutory safeguards rather than political directives. As chair of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) board, established under the same Act, the Lord President contributes to annual reports laid before the , evaluating judicial performance metrics, resource allocation efficiency, and systemic improvements per section 67 requirements. These reports provide empirical data on caseload management, judicial output, and budgetary utilization, enabling parliamentary scrutiny without compromising core decision-making autonomy. Authority does not extend to the , a specialized heraldic body outside the standard judicial superintendence defined in the Act, nor to pre-devolution reserved elements like ultimate appeals.

Presidency of the Court of Session's Inner House

The Lord President chairs the First Division of the Inner House, the appellate arm of the responsible for reviewing civil decisions from the Outer House and courts. This leadership role involves presiding over hearings, guiding judicial deliberations, and ensuring procedural consistency in appeals that shape Scottish civil . The Inner House operates in two fixed divisions, with the Lord President directing the allocation of judges and cases within the First Division to maintain efficiency amid varying workloads. Substantive appeals require a of three judges per division, as stipulated by the Court of Session Act 1988, fostering rigorous scrutiny through oral arguments and written submissions. Decisions emerge from majority consensus, with judgments articulating binding precedents for lower courts; dissenting views, while not dispositive, often signal evolving interpretations that influence subsequent rulings and statutory developments. Procedural applications, such as permissions to or case management, may proceed before a single judge to expedite non-substantive matters. Following the , the Inner House holds primary authority over civil s, excluding direct criminal jurisdiction and permitting onward s to the UK Supreme Court solely on devolved matters of . Annual initiations have ranged from 124 to 235 in recent reporting periods (2013–2022), reflecting targeted caseloads focused on high-value or complex disputes rather than volume-driven processing. This structure underscores the Lord President's pivotal function in upholding appellate standards, with Inner House rulings establishing authoritative precedents that bind inferior tribunals unless overturned.

Functions as Lord Justice General

The Lord Justice General presides over the , 's for criminal matters, which adjudicates trials for serious offenses such as , , drug trafficking, and . This role encompasses both first-instance trials in the most grave cases and oversight of the court's appellate functions, where convictions from lower courts are reviewed for errors in law, procedure, or evidence. The , under the Lord Justice General's leadership, sets binding precedents that promote uniformity in criminal across , including standards for jury instructions on verdicts and evidential burdens. Held concurrently by the Lord President of the Court of Session—a unification formalized in the early —the position underscores the integrated structure of Scots law's dual civil and criminal jurisdictions. In appellate proceedings, the Lord Justice General typically chairs panels in high-profile or legally complex appeals, ensuring consistent application of procedural rules derived from statutes like the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995. This authority extends to state-initiated prosecutions of exceptional gravity, such as historical cases under special commissions, exemplified by the 1820 trials at , , , Paisley, and for radical agitation following the Peterloo Massacre. Through these functions, the Lord Justice General maintains the High Court's role as the final arbiter in Scottish criminal appeals short of potential references to the UK Supreme Court on matters, thereby upholding causal accountability in outcomes tied to and rather than discretionary variance.

Administrative and Ceremonial Duties

The Lord President holds primary responsibility for the administrative oversight of Scotland's , including the allocation of judicial resources and the scheduling of court sittings to ensure efficient case management. This involves weekly meetings with the Keeper of the Rolls to review and direct the business of the and , as well as issuing directives to lower court judges, such as sheriffs, on operational priorities. In practice, these duties extend to addressing systemic challenges like the post-COVID backlog of cases; under recent leadership, criminal courts have successfully reduced pending trials to levels below those prevailing during the , through targeted directives on trial prioritization and resource deployment, avoiding delays that could otherwise extend into years. As chair of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS), the Lord President also provides strategic direction for an annual budget exceeding £160 million, funding court operations, staff, and infrastructure amid demand-led pressures from rising caseloads. In a representational capacity, the Lord President serves as the public face of the , delivering addresses on key principles such as the and . For instance, on 22 September 2025, Lord Pentland, in his opening of the speech, underscored the judiciary's freedom from external pressures and the enduring need for systemic investment to sustain impartial delivery. These speeches, delivered at annual ceremonies marking the legal year's commencement, highlight ongoing reforms and efficiency metrics, including backlog clearance rates that have outperformed pre-pandemic expectations in some areas. Ceremonial duties include presiding over formal installations and oaths, as seen in Lord Pentland's swearing-in on 3 February 2025 at Parliament House, where the office's authority is symbolically affirmed before the full bench. The Lord President dons traditional judicial robes—typically scarlet for proceedings and black for civil—during these events, a practice tracing to the Court of Session's establishment in 1532 and symbolizing continuity with early modern Scottish legal traditions. These elements reinforce the office's role in upholding ceremonial precedents that distinguish the head of the in public and institutional settings.

Jurisdiction and Powers

Authority Over Civil Proceedings

The Lord President holds supreme authority over civil proceedings in as the presiding judge of the , established by the Act 1532 to centralize the administration of justice in civil matters such as , , and disputes. This jurisdiction encompasses original proceedings in the Outer House for complex or high-value cases, where individual Lords Ordinary adjudicate under the Lord President's overall supervision of court business and case allocation. The maintains exclusive competence for certain civil actions, including those exceeding £100,000 in value or involving specialized matters like , while sheriff courts handle simpler claims up to £5,000 under the simple procedure. In the Inner House, the Lord President leads the appellate division, reviewing decisions from the Outer House and sheriff courts to establish binding precedents that govern Scottish civil law. This appellate oversight ensures uniformity in civil , with the Lord President directing hearings in the First Division and exercising regulatory influence over procedural rules via Acts of Sederunt. The Lord President also approves schemes regulating and conduct in civil litigation, drawing on statutes such as the Solicitors () Act 1980 and the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) () Act 1990, to maintain procedural integrity in Outer House practices. The , under the Lord President's authority, possesses powers to grant interim remedies in civil proceedings, such as interdicts to prevent harm or suspensions of administrative decisions, enabling swift preservation of parties' positions before substantive resolution. These mechanisms, rooted in the court's equitable nobile officium , apply to urgent civil disputes and underscore the Lord President's role in balancing efficiency with substantive justice in non-criminal matters.

Oversight in Criminal Appeals

The Lord President, in the capacity of Lord Justice General, oversees the of Justiciary's Court of Criminal , which adjudicates appeals against convictions and sentences from and courts in solemn proceedings, as well as certain summary cases not diverted to the Sheriff Court. These appeals typically involve panels of three or more judges, with the Lord Justice General or Lord Justice Clerk chairing significant hearings, ensuring consistent application of legal to maintain procedural integrity and evidentiary standards. The process excludes juries, focusing instead on legal errors, insufficient evidence, or miscarriages of justice, thereby prioritizing over retrial of facts to uphold deterrence through reliable . This oversight extends to guidelines on evidence admissibility, exemplified by the 2010 Cadder v HM Advocate ruling, where the UK Supreme Court invalidated convictions reliant on statements taken without during detention, spurring reforms under the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2016 that codified prompt access to solicitors and prompted appeals contesting prior admissions as unfair. The High Court's role as the final domestic arbiter—barring or compatibility issues referred to the UK Supreme Court—allows quashing of unsafe convictions, with the Lord Justice General influencing outcomes in high-stakes cases to reinforce causal links between evidential rigor and public confidence in justice. Debates over the corroboration rule, requiring independent evidence supporting key facts for conviction, have featured prominently under Lord Presidential guidance, as former incumbent Lord Gill cautioned in 2013 that its removal risked elevating wrongful convictions by diluting proof thresholds, a position echoed in judicial resistance to legislative abolition attempts. Such precedents, shaped by the Lord Justice General's appellate leadership, deter miscarriages by mandating robust verification, with post-2014 Courts Reform diversions to the Sheriff Appeal Court reducing solemn caseloads and streamlining oversight on complex evidentiary disputes.

Relations with Higher and Specialized Courts

The Lord President acknowledges the appellate authority of the over final decisions of the Court of Session's Inner House in civil matters, a pathway formalized since 1 October 2009 following the replacement of the Appellate Committee by the under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Permission to appeal is typically sought first from the Inner House, with the granting leave if the Inner House refuses and the case raises a point of law of general public importance. This structure reflects the integrated judicial framework of the , yet preserves the distinctiveness of as enshrined in Article XIX of the 1707, which maintained the as Scotland's central civil court without implying full subordination. On devolution and human rights issues, the Lord President defers to the Supreme Court's exclusive jurisdiction under the , particularly Schedule 6, which defines devolution matters—including whether Scottish legislation exceeds competence—and routes them for determination in , often via reference by the . This mechanism, unaltered by devolution's emphasis on Scottish autonomy, ensures uniformity in interpreting , with the adjudicating 15 devolution cases from between 2010 and , underscoring procedural rather than hierarchical dominance. Joint sittings remain exceptional; for instance, Lord Carloway participated in only three hearings since , typically in complex Scottish or constitutional disputes, highlighting aligned yet infrequent collaboration over routine oversight. Relations with specialized courts emphasize coordination without direct command. Appeals from sheriff courts, which handle the bulk of civil claims (over 90% by volume in 2022-23), flow to the 's Outer House for review, fostering procedural consistency through shared rules on evidence and remedies under the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014. The , governing under statutes of 1587, 1592, and 1672, maintains operational independence, exempt from the Lord President's disciplinary purview, though subject to in the Court of Session for procedural errors rather than heraldic merits. This arrangement debunks notions of blanket subordination, affirming treaty-preserved autonomy tempered by union-level appeals.

Limitations on Authority

The authority of the Lord President is fundamentally limited by the of the UK Parliament, which retains exclusive legislative competence over reserved matters as defined in the , including the constitution, foreign affairs, and defence; consequently, the , under the Lord President's presidency, possesses no to adjudicate or interfere with such matters. This framework ensures that Scottish judicial power operates within boundaries set by Westminster, preventing encroachment on national-level governance. Additionally, following the UK's exit from the on 31 January 2020, the is no longer bound by the supremacy of EU or the interpretive authority of the Court of Justice of the European Union, with retained EU law subject to domestic statutory reinterpretation and potential divergence. Decisions emanating from the Court of Session, including those presided over by the Lord President, remain subject to appeal to the UK Supreme Court on points of law, providing a critical check against overreach in civil and certain criminal matters; this appellate oversight underscores the Lord President's subordination to the ultimate judicial authority in the . Furthermore, while the Lord President holds administrative oversight of the , this role does not extend to directing individual judges' judicial decisions, as the office lacks employer-like authority over them, thereby preserving as a structural limitation on centralized control. Historically, the Heritable Jurisdictions () Act abolished private feudal courts and jurisdictions held by landowners, vesting them in and centralizing judicial administration under royal courts like the to curb fragmented power and enforce uniform ; this implicitly bounded the emerging of figures such as the Lord President by embedding statutory oversight and eliminating hereditary overreach. On matters of personal , Scottish judges, including the Lord President, benefit from immunity against private claims for acts performed in their judicial capacity, even where malice is alleged, as in foundational precedents establishing this protection to enable unfettered decision-making while subjecting errors to appellate correction rather than personal liability. Parliamentary scrutiny further constrains the Lord President's administrative functions, such as through the requirement to lay certain judicial guidance or regulations before the for review, ensuring legislative input on procedural rules without compromising core judicial autonomy. These mechanisms collectively enforce first-principles , aligning judicial power with statutory limits and higher oversight to mitigate risks of arbitrary exercise.

Appointment and Tenure

Eligibility and Selection Criteria

Eligibility for appointment as Lord President requires an individual to satisfy the criteria for a of the , namely membership of the Faculty of Advocates or the Law Society of Scotland for a minimum of 10 years. Serving Senators of the — of the —are typically considered, with the role demanding substantial judicial experience, often exceeding 10 years on the bench to demonstrate requisite expertise in civil and criminal matters. No statutory minimum age applies, though officeholders must retire mandatorily at age 75, as established for judicial roles under Scottish law. Selection criteria prioritize merit, encompassing exceptional legal ability, judicial standing, and proven capacity for leadership within the , as mandated by the Judiciary and Courts () Act 2008. This framework, enacted to supplant historical systems, explicitly requires appointments on merit alone, eschewing automatic deference to pure while favoring candidates with empirical records of seniority-informed competence, such as extensive Inner House appellate work. Conventions involve consultations with the Lord Justice Clerk and other senior figures to assess suitability, ensuring alignment with institutional norms over extraneous influences. Post-2008 reforms have verifiable shifted emphasis toward transparent merit evaluation, reducing politicized favoritism evident in pre-devolution eras.

Royal Appointment Process

The appointment of the Lord President occurs through a formal process whereby the acts on the nomination of the , advised by the Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland (JABS). Under the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008, JABS advertises vacancies, evaluates applications based on merit, and recommends candidates to Scottish Ministers, who consult before the submits the name to the for approval via royal warrant. This structure, independent of direct parliamentary vote, integrates devolved selection with the Crown's , serving as a constitutional mechanism to align judicial leadership with the UK's unified while mitigating risks of partisan capture in 's executive. In practice, the royal warrant formalizes the appointment following JABS's rigorous assessment, which includes interviews and evaluations of judicial experience and leadership suitability. For instance, on 9 January 2025, announced His Majesty the King's appointment of the Right Honourable Lord Pentland (Paul Cullen) as Lord President, effective upon the retirement of Lord Carloway on 3 February 2025. This issuance of the warrant by the monarch underscores a final layer of executive oversight external to Holyrood, theoretically checking devolved political pressures through the Crown's non-partisan authority, though bound by convention to ministerial advice. Transparency in the process is maintained through public announcements on official government and websites, alongside parliamentary notifications, ensuring empirical accountability without compromising confidentiality in candidate deliberations. Protocols emphasizing , refined post-devolution to prioritize merit over political affiliation, have been in place since the JABS framework's evolution, with key updates reinforcing separation from executive influence around 2008-2010. Such measures empirically reduce risks, as evidenced by consistent appointments of serving senators with established records, rather than external political figures.

Oath, Installation, and Term Conditions

Upon appointment, the Lord President of the takes the oath of allegiance to the Sovereign and the judicial oath at a sitting of the in . The judicial oath commits the officeholder to "do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of , without fear or favour, affection or ill-will," thereby affirming impartiality and fidelity to Scottish law. These oaths are administered under the provisions of the Promissory Oaths Act 1868, which specifies the form and procedure for judicial oaths in . The installation ceremony involves the reading of the royal warrant of appointment by court officials, followed immediately by the swearing of the oaths in open court. This formal process symbolizes the transition of authority and upholds the office's ceremonial traditions. For instance, on 3 February 2025, Paul Cullen, Lord Pentland, was installed as Lord President succeeding Lord Carloway, with the event livestreamed to ensure public transparency. The tenure of the Lord President has no fixed duration, extending until the age of 75 or earlier voluntary resignation, which fosters institutional stability through extended service and experienced leadership. commences well in advance of anticipated vacancies to minimize disruptions, as evidenced by the initiation of the appointment in September 2024 for the February 2025 transition. This structure ensures continuity in the , with brief interim periods managed by the Lord Justice Clerk if necessary.

Modern Developments and Challenges

Key Reforms in Judicial Administration

The and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008 established the Lord President as the Head of the Scottish , centralizing responsibility for court administration, including arrangements for the welfare, training, and guidance of judicial office holders, as well as handling complaints against them. This reform shifted oversight from fragmented administrative bodies to a unified structure under the Lord President, aiming to enhance while streamlining operational management across Scotland's courts. The Act also enabled the appointment of qualifying former judges to act in the , providing flexibility to address temporary shortages without compromising case throughput. Building on this, the Courts Reform (Scotland) Act 2014, informed by the 2009 Scottish Civil Courts Review's 206 recommendations, restructured civil court operations to address inefficiencies in the pre-existing system. Key changes included the introduction of a national jurisdiction, allowing cases to be heard anywhere in for consistency and resource allocation, and the Simple Procedure for claims under £5,000 to expedite low-value disputes through streamlined processes without full pleadings. These measures, phased in from September 2016, sought to reduce procedural delays and costs, particularly in cases, by improving internal administration and allocating business based on complexity rather than geography. Post-2020 digital initiatives, accelerated by the , further advanced efficiency under the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service's 2018-2023 Digital Strategy, which achieved virtual hearings, electronic document submission, and e-motions ahead of schedule. By November 2023, legislative proposals aimed to make these changes permanent, including electronic signing of criminal documents and remote evidence procedures, reducing physical court attendance and backlog accumulation. Devolution since 1999 has contributed to pressures through increased judicial reviews of legislative competence, prompting these structural adaptations to manage rising caseload without proportional expansion. Empirical data post-reform indicate in civil case disposal rates, though high-volume criminal backlogs persist, highlighting ongoing challenges in fully realizing efficiency gains.

Recent Officeholders and Transitions

The Rt Hon Lord Carloway served as Lord President from 23 December 2015 until his retirement on 3 February 2025. During his tenure, the Court of Session managed elevated caseloads from judicial reviews and devolution disputes following the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, including challenges to legislative competence under the Scotland Act 1998. Lord Carloway announced his retirement intention to His Majesty the King in June 2024, facilitating a planned succession. The Rt Hon Lord Pentland succeeded Lord Carloway upon the latter's retirement, with his appointment by His Majesty the King announced on 9 January 2025. Lord Pentland was sworn in during a ceremony at the on 3 February 2025, marking a seamless transition without interruptions to ongoing judicial business. In his installation address and subsequent Opening of the Legal Year speech on 22 September 2025, Lord Pentland underscored the as foundational to judicial functions, stressing its role in protecting rights and ensuring decisions grounded in evidence and precedent. As of October 2025, Lord Pentland continues in office, overseeing the senior civil court amid stable administrative continuity.

Criticisms Regarding Transparency and Efficiency

Criticisms of the Lord President's role have centered on perceived resistance to greater transparency in judicial operations and persistent inefficiencies in case management. During Lord Brian 's tenure as Lord President from 2012 to 2015, tensions arose with the over proposals for a judicial register of interests and expanded media access to proceedings. refused to provide oral evidence to a parliamentary committee in , citing judicial , which prompted accusations of evading accountability despite MSPs' inability to compel attendance. In response to media inquiries on document access, 's office threatened potential , intensifying debates on openness without leading to formal prosecutions, though it spurred ongoing parliamentary scrutiny. These clashes highlighted concerns that the Lord President's authority could prioritize institutional autonomy over public disclosure, even as later testified in 2015 on the register issue post-retirement. Efficiency critiques have focused on protracted case backlogs under the Lord President's administrative oversight, particularly following the disruptions. By January 2022, the criminal trial backlog peaked at 43,606 cases, with solemn (serious) trials facing waits exceeding pre-pandemic norms; although reduced to 28,029 by February 2023 through expanded capacity, high-profile cases continued to lag, with projections for clearance not until March 2026. Lord Colin Sutherland (Lord Carloway), Gill's successor until 2025, acknowledged in public statements the structural challenges, including limited judicial resources, but faced criticism for insufficient proactive reforms amid rising delays for trials, potentially reaching two years by 2030. Parliamentary questions have persisted without resolution, underscoring inefficiencies in the Court of Session's disposal of business despite the Lord President's statutory duty. Defenders of the office argue that transparency demands must not undermine , essential for the , as articulated in official statements emphasizing separation from political interference. On , innovations under Carloway, such as remote centers and digital tools, contributed to backlog reductions, halving summary case waits by 2023 and avoiding total system collapse. These measures, including technology-enabled remote hearings, demonstrate adaptive progress, though critics contend they fall short of addressing root capacity limits without broader structural changes.

References

  1. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/courts-and-tribunals/the-supreme-courts/the-court-of-session/
  2. https://judiciary.scot/home/judiciary/the-lord-president
  3. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2008/6/notes/division/2/2
  4. https://judiciary.scot/home/judiciary/regulating-legal-professions
  5. https://judiciary.scot/home/media-information/media-hub-news/2025/01/09/lord-president-appointed
  6. https://judiciary.scot/home/media-information/media-hub-news/2025/02/03/the-right-honourable-lord-pentland-sworn-in-as-lord-president
  7. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/ocw/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=72111&section=1
  8. https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/10.3366/shr.2012.0100
  9. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43773916
  10. https://www.academia.edu/13440981/The_Shape_of_the_State_in_Medieval_Scotland_1124_1290
  11. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/display/book/9789004683761/BP000015.pdf
  12. https://frh3.org.uk/redist/pdf/Carpenter_Scottish_Royal_Govt.pdf
  13. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-british-studies/article/under-ye-lash-of-ye-law-the-state-and-the-law-in-the-postculloden-scottish-highlands/B37B753BC1C8A0E55863C5CC2FB2E495
  14. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100115610
  15. https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/c.php?g=365487&p=2469135
  16. https://www.archontology.org/nations/uk/scotland/stuart1/james5.php
  17. https://tudortimes.co.uk/people/james-v-life-story/james-as-king
  18. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aosp/1532/2
  19. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aosp/1540/SessMar14/10/introduction
  20. http://electricscotland.com/history/law/justiciary.htm
  21. https://historyworld.net/history/GreatBritain/93
  22. https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/1830-04-01/debates/8ccdf6bc-afe1-4a78-b1c7-d8829a197648/TrialByJuryInScotland
  23. https://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/scottish_legal_history1.html
  24. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2008/6/section/2
  25. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/46
  26. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2008/6/section/1
  27. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/media/2pzbansr/scts-ara-2024-25-published-version.pdf
  28. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/36
  29. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/ocw/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=68104&section=1.4
  30. https://www.scottishciviljusticecouncil.gov.uk/docs/default-source/rules-and-practice/practice-notes/court-of-session/pn3of2011.pdf?sfvrsn=12
  31. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/courts-and-tribunals/the-supreme-courts/the-high-court-of-justiciary/
  32. https://judiciary.scot/home/judiciary/judicial-office-holders/court-titles-robes/addressing-a-judge
  33. http://www.tradeshouselibrary.org/uploads/4/7/7/2/47723681/trials_for_high_treason_in_scotland_under_a_special_commission_held_at_stirling_glasgow_dumbarton_paisley_and_ayr_in_the_year_1820_~_1825.pdf
  34. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c776j1r8lj8o
  35. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/media/bq4hxibv/scts-business-plan-2024-25.pdf
  36. https://judiciary.scot/home/media-information/media-hub-news/2025/09/22/lord-president-highlights-the-importance-of-the-rule-of-law-during-opening-of-the-legal-year-speech
  37. https://www.lawscot.org.uk/news-and-events/legal-news/lord-president-reviews-covid-recovery-in-annual-address/
  38. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/livestream/ceremonies/installation-of-the-lord-president/
  39. https://judiciary.scot/home/judiciary/judicial-office-holders/senators-of-the-college-of-justice
  40. https://www.gov.scot/publications/civil-justice-statistics-scotland-2017-18/pages/2/
  41. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/taking-action/small-claims/
  42. https://judiciary.scot/docs/librariesprovider3/judiciarydocuments/regulatory-role-page/regulatory-functions-of-the-lord-president-and-the-court-of-session.pdf?sfvrsn=9a2cc25b_2
  43. https://journals.tulane.edu/teclf/article/view/1659/1500
  44. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/appeals/criminal-appeals/high-court-criminal-appeals/
  45. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-11631779
  46. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-25013883
  47. https://www.gov.scot/publications/civil-justice-statistics-scotland-2015-16/pages/6/
  48. https://supremecourt.uk/how-to-appeal/guide-to-bring-a-case-to-uksc
  49. https://www.historyextra.com/period/stuart/the-acts-of-union-1707/
  50. https://www.supremecourt.uk/uploads/speech_lord_reed_141124_74ae8569d6.pdf
  51. https://supremecourt.uk/uploads/speech_lord_reed_141124_74ae8569d6.pdf
  52. https://www.gov.scot/publications/civil-justice-statistics-scotland-2022-23/pages/4/
  53. https://www.heraldica.org/topics/britain/lyondocs.htm
  54. https://www.parliament.scot/-/media/files/committees/finance-and-public-administration-committee/correspondence/2025/publicinquiries_lordpresidenttoconvener_14aug25.pdf
  55. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/apgb/Geo2/20/43/introduction
  56. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff8c560d03e7f57ecd018
  57. https://www.lawscot.org.uk/members/journal-hub/articles/could-you-be-the-next-lord-president/
  58. https://www.judicialappointments.scot/process/am-i-eligible
  59. https://judiciary.scot/home/media-information/media-hub-news/2024/09/09/process-of-appointing-a-new-lord-president-has-begun
  60. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/about-us/news/news/2025/january/lord-president-appointed-by-his-majesty-the-king/
  61. https://www.gov.scot/news/lord-president-appointed/
  62. https://judiciary.scot/home/judiciary/judicial-office-holders/senators-of-the-college-of-justice/judicial-appointments---senators
  63. https://judiciary.scot/docs/librariesprovider3/judiciarydocuments/guidance-to-johs-on-judicial-ethics.pdf?sfvrsn=25f075aa_0
  64. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/31-32/72/part/1/crossheading/oath-of-allegiance-official-and-judicial-oaths
  65. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2008/6/section/28
  66. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2014/18/notes
  67. https://www.lawscot.org.uk/news-and-events/legal-news/court-reforms-to-come-in-with-new-legal-year/
  68. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/media/vmgfucjs/scts-digital-strategy.pdf
  69. https://www.lawscot.org.uk/news-and-events/legal-news/ministers-propose-permanent-digital-justice-changes/
  70. https://supremecourt.uk/uploads/speech_190227_3c34f7973e.pdf
  71. https://audit.scot/news/significant-progress-on-courts-backlog
  72. https://www.scottishlegal.com/articles/lecture-to-reflect-on-tenure-of-lord-carloway
  73. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9104/CBP-9104.pdf
  74. https://www.scottishlegal.com/articles/lord-president-lord-carloway-to-retire-next-year
  75. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/about-us/news/news/2025/january/lord-president-installation-to-be-livestreamed/
  76. https://www.judiciary.scot/docs/librariesprovider3/judiciarydocuments/judiciary/lp-installation-speech.pdf?sfvrsn=844a2291_1
  77. https://judiciary.scot/home/judiciary/judicial-office-holders/senators-of-the-college-of-justice/lord-pentland
  78. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13164349.holyrood-boss-row-judge-transparency/
  79. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13143575.scotlands-top-judge-offers-tiny-concession-calls-grow-judicial-transparency/
  80. http://petercherbi.blogspot.com/2014/08/court-secrets-scotlands-anti.html
  81. https://www.scottishlegal.com/articles/lord-gill-to-give-evidence-on-judicial-register-of-interests-to-holyrood
  82. https://audit.scot/uploads/docs/report/2023/nr_230525_criminal_courts_backlog.pdf
  83. https://www.lawscot.org.uk/news-and-events/legal-news/solemn-trial-waiting-times-stay-high-as-jp-court-falls/
  84. https://judiciary.scot/docs/librariesprovider3/judiciarydocuments/judicial-independence-amended-2024%282%29.pdf?sfvrsn=53f83ebb_0
  85. https://www.gov.scot/publications/justice-vision-priorities-closing-down-report/pages/6/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.