Hubbry Logo
Jonathan Sacks, Baron SacksJonathan Sacks, Baron SacksMain
Open search
Jonathan Sacks, Baron Sacks
Community hub
Jonathan Sacks, Baron Sacks
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Jonathan Sacks, Baron Sacks
Jonathan Sacks, Baron Sacks
from Wikipedia

Jonathan Henry Sacks, Baron Sacks (8 March 1948 – 7 November 2020) was an English Orthodox rabbi, philosopher, theologian, and author. Sacks served as the Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth from 1991 to 2013. As the spiritual head of the United Synagogue, the largest synagogue body in the United Kingdom, he was the Chief Rabbi of those Orthodox synagogues but was not recognized as the religious authority for the Haredi Union of Orthodox Hebrew Congregations or for the progressive movements such as Conservative, Reform, and Liberal Judaism.[2][3] As Chief Rabbi, he formally carried the title of Av Beit Din (head) of the London Beth Din. At the time of his death, he was the Chief Rabbi Emeritus.[4]

Key Information

After stepping down as Chief Rabbi, in addition to his international travelling and speaking engagements and prolific writing, Sacks served as the Ingeborg and Ira Rennert Global Distinguished Professor of Judaic Thought at New York University and as the Kressel and Ephrat Family University Professor of Jewish Thought at Yeshiva University. He was also appointed Professor of Law, Ethics, and the Bible at King's College London.[5] He won the Templeton Prize (awarded for work affirming life's spiritual dimension) in 2016.[6] He was also a Senior Fellow to the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights.

Early life

[edit]

Jonathan Henry Sacks was born in the Lambeth district of London on 8 March 1948,[7] the son of Ashkenazi Jewish textile seller Louis David Sacks (died 1996)[8] and his wife Louisa (née Frumkin; 1919–2010),[9][10] who came from a family of leading Jewish wine merchants.[11][12][13] He had three brothers named Brian, Alan, and Eliot, all of whom eventually made aliyah.[14] He said that his father did not have "much Jewish education".[15]

Sacks commenced his formal education at St Mary's Primary School and at Christ's College, Finchley, his local schools.[7][16] He completed his higher education at Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, where he gained a first-class honours degree (MA) in Philosophy.

While a student at Cambridge, he travelled to New York City, where he met with rabbis Joseph Soloveitchik and Menachem Mendel Schneerson to discuss a variety of issues relating to religion, faith, and philosophy. He later wrote, "Rabbi Soloveitchik had challenged me to think, Rabbi Schneerson had challenged me to lead."[14] Schneerson urged Sacks to seek rabbinic ordination and enter the rabbinate.[17]

Sacks subsequently continued his postgraduate studies at New College, Oxford,[7] and King's College London, completing a PhD which the University of London awarded him in 1982.[18] He received his rabbinic ordination from the London School of Jewish Studies and London's Etz Chaim Yeshiva,[19] with semikhah respectively from Rabbis Nahum Rabinovitch and Noson Ordman.

Career

[edit]

Sacks's first rabbinic appointment (1978–1982) was as the Rabbi for the Golders Green synagogue in London. In 1983, he became Rabbi of the Western Marble Arch Synagogue in Central London, a position he held until 1990. Between 1984 and 1990, Sacks also served as Principal of Jews' College (now London School of Jewish Studies), the United Synagogue's rabbinical seminary.[20] Dr. Sacks was inducted to serve as Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth on 1 September 1991, a position he held until 1 September 2013.

Sacks became a Knight Bachelor in the 2005 Birthday Honours "for services to the Community and to Inter-faith Relations".[21][22] He was made an Honorary Freeman of the London Borough of Barnet in September 2006.[23] On 13 July 2009 the House of Lords Appointments Commission announced that Sacks was recommended for a life peerage with a seat in the House of Lords.[24][25] He took the title "Baron Sacks of Aldgate in the City of London"[26] and sat as a crossbencher.

A visiting professor at several universities in Britain, the United States, and Israel, Sacks held 16 honorary degrees, including a doctorate of divinity conferred on him in September 2001 by the then Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, to mark his first ten years in office as Chief Rabbi. In recognition of his work, Sacks won several international awards, including the Jerusalem Prize in 1995 for his contribution to diaspora Jewish life and The Ladislaus Laszt Ecumenical and Social Concern Award from Ben Gurion University in Israel in 2011.[5]

The author of 25 books, Sacks published commentaries on the siddur (daily prayerbook) and completed commentaries to the machzorim (festival prayerbook) for the Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur and Pesach. His other books include, Not in God's Name: Confronting Religious Violence, and The Great Partnership: God, Science and the Search for Meaning. His books won literary awards, including the Grawemeyer Prize for Religion in 2004 for The Dignity of Difference, and a National Jewish Book Award in 2000 for A Letter in the Scroll.[5][27] Koren Publishers Jerusalem published The Koren Sacks Siddur in 2006, and is described by Koren as the "first new Orthodox Hebrew/English siddur in a generation".[28] Covenant & Conversation: Genesis was awarded a National Jewish Book Award in 2009,[29] and his commentary to the Passivor mahzor book won the 2013 Modern Jewish Thought and Experience Dorot Foundation Award from the Jewish Book Council[29] in the United States.[30] His Covenant & Conversation commentaries on the weekly Torah portion are read by thousands of people in Jewish communities around the world.[31] In September of 2025, Koren posthumously published a one-volume Torah with Masoretic Text and translation alongside his commentary as well as those commentators he had selected, including Rashi.[32]

Sacks' contributions to wider British society have also been recognized. A regular contributor to national media, frequently appearing on BBC Radio 4's Thought for the Day or writing the Credo column or opinion pieces in The Times, Sacks was awarded The Sanford St Martin's Trust Personal Award for 2013 for "his advocacy of Judaism and religion in general". He was invited to the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton as a representative of the Jewish community.[33]

At a Gala Dinner held in Central London in May 2013 to mark the completion of the Chief Rabbi's time in office, Charles III, at the time Prince of Wales, called Sacks a "light unto this nation", "a steadfast friend" and "a valued adviser" whose "guidance on any given issue has never failed to be of practical value and deeply grounded in the kind of wisdom that is increasingly hard to come by".[34]

Chief Rabbi

[edit]

In his installation address upon succeeding Immanuel Jakobovits as Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth in September 1991, Sacks called for a Decade of Renewal which would "revitalize British Jewry's great powers of creativity".[35] He said this renewal should be based on five central values: "love of every Jew, love of learning, love of God, a profound contribution to British society and an unequivocal attachment to Israel."[35] Sacks said he wanted to be "a catalyst for creativity, to encourage leadership in others, and to let in the fresh air of initiative and imagination".[35] This led to a series of innovative communal projects including Jewish Continuity, a national foundation for Jewish educational programmes and outreach; the Association of Jewish Business Ethics; the Chief Rabbinate Awards for Excellence; the Chief Rabbinate Bursaries, and Community Development, a national scheme to enhance Jewish community life. The Chief Rabbi began his second decade of office with a call to 'Jewish Responsibility' and a renewed commitment to the ethical dimension of Judaism.[36] He was succeeded as Chief Rabbi by Ephraim Mirvis on 1 September 2013.

Appointments held

[edit]

In addition to serving as Chief Rabbi, Sacks held numerous appointments during his career including:

Sacks was also a frequent guest on both television and radio, and regularly contributed to the national press. He delivered the 1990 BBC Reith Lectures on The Persistence of Faith.[38]

Awards and honours

[edit]

Sacks was awarded numerous prizes, including:[37]

  • 1995: Jerusalem Prize (Israel)
  • 2000: American National Jewish Book for A Letter in the Scroll
  • 2004: The Grawemeyer Prize for Religion (USA)
  • 2009: American National Jewish Book Award for Covenant & Conversation Genesis: The Book of Beginnings
  • 2010: The Norman Lamm Prize, Yeshiva University (USA)
  • 2010: The Abraham Kuyper Prize, Princeton Theological Seminary (USA)
  • 2011: The Ladislaus Laszt Ecumenical and Social Concern Award, Ben Gurion University (Israel)
  • 2011: Keter Torah Award, Open University (Israel)
  • 2013: The Sanford St Martin's Trust Personal Award for Excellence in Religious Broadcasting
  • 2013: American National Jewish Book Award for The Koren Sacks Pesah Mahzor
  • 2015: American National Jewish Book Award for Not in God's Name: Confronting Religious Violence
  • 2016: Templeton Prize, "has spent decades bringing spiritual insight to the public conversation through mass media, popular lectures and more than two dozen books"[39]
  • 2021: Genesis Prize Lifetime Achievement Award, awarded posthumously by Israeli President Isaac Herzog.[40]

Philosophy and views

[edit]

Much has been written about Sacks' philosophical contribution to Judaism and beyond. These include: (1) a volume on his work entitled Universalizing Particularity that forms part of The Library of Contemporary Jewish Philosophers series, edited by Hava Tirosh-Samuelson and Aaron W. Hughes;[41] (2) a book entitled Radical Responsibility edited by Michael J. Harris, Daniel Rynhold and Tamra Wright;[42] and (3) a book entitled Morasha Kehillat Yaakov edited by Rabbi Michael Pollak and Dayan Shmuel Simons.[43]

Early influences

[edit]

In a pamphlet written to mark the completion of his time as Chief Rabbi entitled "A Judaism Engaged with the World",[44] Sacks cites three individuals who have had a profound impact on his own philosophical thinking.

The first figure was the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson who "was fully aware of the problem of the missing Jews... inventing the idea, revolutionary in its time, of Jewish outreach... [He] challenged me to lead."[44]: 10  Indeed, Sacks called him "one of the greatest Jewish leaders, not just of our time, but of all time".[45]

The second was Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik whom Sacks described as "the greatest Orthodox thinker of the time [who] challenged me to think."[44]: 10–11  Sacks argued that for Rav Soloveichik "Jewish philosophy, he said, had to emerge from halakhah, Jewish law. Jewish thought and Jewish practice were not two different things but the same thing seen from different perspectives. Halakhah was a way of living a way of thinking about the world – taking abstract ideas and making them real in everyday life."[44]: 11 

The third figure was Rabbi Nahum Rabinovitch, a former principal of the London School of Jewish Studies. Sacks called Rabinovitch "One of the great Maimonidean scholars of our time, [who] taught us, his students, that Torah leadership demands the highest intellectual and moral courage. He did this in the best way possible: by personal example. The following thoughts, which are his, are a small indication of what I learned from him – not least that Torah is, among other things, a refusal to give easy answers to difficult questions."[46]

Universalism vs particularism

[edit]

Writing of Sacks as a rabbi, social philosopher, proponent of interfaith dialogue and a public intellectual, Tirosh-Samuelson and Hughes note that "[Sacks's] vision—informed as it is by the concerns of modern Orthodoxy—is paradoxically one of the most universalizing voices within contemporary Judaism. Sacks possesses a rare ability to hold in delicate balance the universal demands of the modern, multicultural world with the particularism associated with Judaism."[47]: 1  This is a view supported by Rabbi Nathan Lopez Cardozo, who wrote in The Jerusalem Post that Sacks's "confidence in the power of Judaism and its infinite wisdom enabled him to enter the lion's den, taking on famous philosophers, scientists, religious thinkers and sociologists and showing them that Judaism had something to teach that they couldn't afford to miss if they wanted to be at the forefront of philosophy and science."[48] Harris and Rynhold, in their introduction to Radical Responsibility, argued: "The special contribution made by the thought of Chief Rabbi Sacks is that it not only continues the venerable Jewish philosophical tradition of maintaining traditional faith in the face of external intellectual challenges, but also moves beyond this tradition by showing how core Jewish teachings can address the dilemmas of the secular world itself. What make Lord Sacks' approach so effective is that he is able to do so without any exception of the wider world taking on Judaism's theological beliefs."[42]: xvi 

Torah v'Chokhma

[edit]

The framework for Sacks' philosophical approach and his interaction between the universal and the particular is not too dissimilar from those positions adopted by other leading Orthodox thinkers of recent times. The favoured phrase of Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch was Torah im derekh eretz, 'Torah with general culture'; for Rabbi Norman Lamm it was Torah u-mada, 'Torah and Science'. For Sacks, his favoured phrase was Torah vehokhmah, 'Torah and Wisdom'. As noted in the introduction to Radical Responsibility: "Torah, for Jonathan Sacks represents the particularistic, inherited teachings of Judaism, while hokhmah (wisdom) refers to the universal realm of the sciences and humanities."[42]: xviii  Framed in religious terms, as Sacks sets out in his book Future Tense:

"Chokhmah is the truth we discover; Torah is the truth we inherit. Chokhmah is the universal language of humankind; Torah is the specific heritage of Israel. Chokhmah is what we attain by being in the image of God; Torah is what guides Jews as the people of God. Chokhmah is acquired by seeing and reasoning; Torah is received by listening and responding. Chokhmah tells us what is; Torah tells us what ought to be."[49]

Tirosh-Samuelson and Hughes are of the opinion that whilst Torah v'Chokhmah is certainly a valid overarching framework, they note that Sacks' perspective is one rooted in modern orthodoxy: "Although he will try to understand various denominations of Judaism, he is always quick to point out that Orthodoxy cannot recognize the legitimacy of interpretations of Judaism that abandon fundamental beliefs of halakhic (Jewish law) authority. Judaism that departs from the truth and acceptance of the halakha is a departure from authentic Judaism and, he reasons, is tantamount to the accommodation of secularism. So, while Sacks will develop a highly inclusive account of the world's religions, there were times when he was critical of the denominations within Judaism."[50]

"No one creed has a monopoly on spiritual truth"

[edit]

After the publication of his book The Dignity of Difference, a group of Haredi rabbis, most notably Rabbis Yosef Shalom Elyashiv and Bezalel Rakow, accused Sacks of heresy against what they consider the traditional Orthodox viewpoint. According to them, some words seemed to imply an endorsement of pure relativism between religions, and that Judaism is not the sole true religion, e.g. "No one creed has a monopoly on spiritual truth." This led him to rephrase more clearly some sentences in the book for its second edition, though he refused to recall books already in the stores.[51]

In his "Preface to the Second Edition" of the book, Sacks wrote that certain passages in the book had been misconstrued: He had already explicitly criticised cultural and religious relativism in his book, and he did not deny Judaism's uniqueness. He also stressed, however, that mainstream rabbinic teachings teach that wisdom, righteousness, and the possibility of a true relationship with God are all available in non-Jewish cultures and religions as an ongoing heritage from the covenant that God made with Noah and all his descendants, so the tradition teaches that one does not need to be Jewish to know God or truth, or to attain salvation.[52][53] As this diversity of covenantal bonds implies, however, traditional Jewish sources do clearly deny that any one creed has a monopoly on spiritual truth. Monopolistic and simplistic claims of universal truth he has characterized as imperialistic, pagan and Platonic, and not Jewish at all.[54] The book received international acclaim, winning the Grawemeyer Award for Religion in 2004.[55]

Efforts to accommodate Haredi Jews

[edit]

A book by the British historian and journalist Meir Persoff, Another Way, Another Time, has argued that "Sacks's top priority has been staying in the good graces of the Haredi, or strictly Orthodox, faction, whose high birthrate has made it the fastest-growing component of British Jewry."[56][57]

Relationship with the non-Orthodox denominations

[edit]

In 1990, when he was Chief Rabbi-elect, he wrote to Sidney Brichto, a Liberal rabbi, about Brichto's 1987 proposals. Brichto had advocated for a historical compromise between the Orthodox rabbinate and the non-Orthodox denominations. Among the proposals were radical changes to the conversion process for prospective converts in the non-Orthodox streams. These streams would stop processing their own conversions to Judaism. Instead, their prospective converts would have their status conferred on them by an Orthodox Beit Din. The Beit Din would be expected to show more leniency than usual, only expecting that those before them demonstrate knowledge of Orthodox practice rather than observance.[58]

The proposal had been rejected by the incumbent Chief Rabbi, Immanuel Jakobovits, Baron Jakobovits. However, in his letter to Brichto, Sacks wrote: "As soon as I read your article. ... I called it publicly 'the most courageous statement by a non-Orthodox Jew this century'. I felt it was a genuine way forward. Others turned out not to share my view." He continued: "It will be a while—18 months—before I take up office. But I believe we can still explore that way forward together. For if we do not move forward, I fear greatly for our community and for Am Yisrael."[58]

Sacks provoked considerable controversy in the Anglo-Jewish community in 1996 when he refused to attend the funeral service of the late Reform Rabbi Hugo Gryn and for a private letter he had written in Hebrew, which (in translation) asserted that Auschwitz survivor Gryn was "among those who destroy the faith", was leaked and published. He wrote further that he was an "enemy" of the Reform, Liberal and Masorti movements, leading some to reject the notion that he was "Chief Rabbi" for all Jews in Britain. He attended a memorial meeting for Gryn, a move that brought the wrath of some in the ultra-Orthodox community.[59][60] Rabbi Dow Marmur, a Canada-based progressive Rabbi, argued that after attending the memorial service, Sacks then attempted to placate the ultra-Orthodox community, an attempt which Marmur has described as "neurotic and cowardly."[61]

Later, in a letter to The Jewish Chronicle in May 2013, Jackie Gryn, the widow of Rabbi Hugo Gryn, wrote: "I feel the time has come for me to lay to rest, once and for all , the idea … that there ever was a 'Hugo Gryn Affair', as far as I am concerned, regarding the absence of the Chief Rabbi at the funeral of my late husband, Hugo… From the beginning, relations were cordial and sympathetic and have remained so", she wrote. "There has never been any personal grievance between us concerning his non-attendance at the funeral, which promoted such venomous and divisive comments and regrettably continues to do so."[62]

Sacks responded to the incident by rethinking his relationship with the non-Orthodox movements, eventually developing what he called the "two principles". Responding to an interview shortly before his retirement, he wrote that "You try and make things better in the future. As a result of the turbulence at that time, I was forced to think this whole issue through and I came up with these two principles; on all matters that affect us as Jews regardless of our religious differences we work together regardless of our religious differences, and on all things that touch our religious differences we agree to differ, but with respect. As a result of those two principles, relations between Reform and Orthodox have got much better and are actually a model for the rest of the Jewish world. Progressive rabbis sit with me on the top table of the Council of Christians and Jews, we stand together for Israel. All of this flowed from those two principles. Until then there had been a view never to do anything with the non-Orthodox movements but once you thought it through you saw that there were all sorts of opportunities."[63]

Sacks years earlier (2004) drew some criticism when he and his beit din prevented the retired Rabbi Louis Jacobs, who had helped establish the British branch of the Masorti movement, from being called up for the reading of the Torah on the Saturday before his granddaughter's wedding.[64]

Secularism and Europe's changing demographics

[edit]

Sacks expressed concern at what he regarded as the negative effects of materialism and secularism in European society, arguing that they undermined the basic values of family life and lead to selfishness. In 2009, Sacks gave an address claiming that Europeans have chosen consumerism over the self-sacrifice of parenting children, and that "the major assault on religion today comes from the neo-Darwinians". He argued that Europe is in population decline "because non-believers lack shared values of family and community that religion has".[65][66]

Consumerism and Steve Jobs

[edit]

Sacks made remarks at an inter-faith reception attended by the Queen, in November 2011, in which he criticised what he believed to be the selfish consumer culture that has only brought unhappiness. "The consumer society was laid down by the late Steve Jobs coming down the mountain with two tablets, iPad one and iPad two, and the result is that we now have a culture of iPod, iPhone, iTune, i, i, i. When you're an individualist, egocentric culture and you only care about 'I', you don't do terribly well."[67][68] In a later statement, the Chief Rabbi's office said "The Chief Rabbi meant no criticism of either Steve Jobs personally or the contribution Apple has made to the development of technology in the 21st century."[69]

Position on gay marriage

[edit]

In July 2012 a group of prominent British Jews criticised Sacks for opposing plans to allow civil marriage for gays and lesbians.[70] He said that he understood "the fear that gays have of prejudice and persecution"[71] and went on to say, in a lecture on the institution of marriage, that a world that persecutes homosexuals is one "to which we should never return."[72]

I fully understood... that gays, not just Jews, were sent to the concentration camps, and I did not want to become a voice that would be caught up in a very polarised debate and be seen to be heartless towards the gays in our own community. I am not heartless towards them, I really seek to understand them and they seek to understand where I am coming from. – Rabbi Jonathan Sacks[71]

Interfaith dialogue

[edit]
Jonathan Sacks (second from left) with George Carey, Mustafa Cerić, and Jim Wallis at the 2009 World Economic Forum

Sacks was an advocate of interfaith dialogue and sat on the Board of World Religious Leaders for the Elijah Interfaith Institute.[73]

Politics in the United States

[edit]

In October 2017, Jonathan Sacks inveighed against a "politics of anger" he said was corroding the fabric of U.S. society. "The politics of anger that's emerged in our time is full of danger," Sacks said. He decried the breakdown of American society into narrower and narrower identities that nurtured a "culture of grievances." Sacks warned that "The social contract is still there, but the social covenant is being lost."[74]

On antisemitism

[edit]

In a June 2019 debate on anti-Semitism in the House of Lords, Sacks stated that "there is hardly a country in the world, certainly not a single country in Europe, where Jews feel safe" and that societies tolerating anti-Semitism had "forfeited all moral credibility".[75] Additionally, Sacks equated anti-Semitism to a "mutating virus".[76]

Public lectures

[edit]

In 2013, Sacks delivered the twenty-sixth Erasmus Lecture, titled On Creative Minorities, hosted by First Things magazine and the Institute on Religion and Public Life. In his lecture, Sacks discussed the role of faith communities as “creative minorities” that sustain moral and cultural vitality in societies experiencing secularization and fragmentation. Drawing on historical, theological, and sociological insights, he urged religious groups to engage the public sphere constructively while remaining faithful to their traditions.[77]

Publications

[edit]
As author
  • The Koren Shalem Humash (Koren, 2025) ISBN 9789657765173
  • I Believe: A Weekly reading of the Jewish Bible (Koren, 2022) ISBN 9781592645961
  • Studies in Spirituality: A Weekly reading of the Jewish Bible (Koren, 2021) ISBN 9781592645763
  • Judaism's Life-Changing Ideas: A Weekly reading of the Jewish Bible (Koren, 2020) ISBN 9781592645527
  • Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times (Hodder & Stoughton, 2020) ISBN 9781473617315
  • Covenant & Conversation: Deuteronomy: Renewal of the Sinai Covenant (Koren, 2019) ISBN 9781592640232
  • Covenant & Conversation: Numbers: the Wilderness Years (Koren, 2017) ISBN 9781592640232
  • Essays on Ethics: A Weekly Reading of the Jewish Bible (Koren, 2016) ISBN 9781592644490
  • Lessons in Leadership: A Weekly Reading of the Jewish Bible (Koren, 2015) ISBN 9781592644322
  • Not in God's Name: Confronting Religious Violence (Hodder & Stoughton, 2015) ISBN 9781473616516
  • Covenant & Conversation: Leviticus, the Book of Holiness (Koren, 2015) ISBN 9781592640225
  • The Koren Sacks Pesach Mahzor (Koren, 2013) ISBN 9789653013179
  • The Koren Sacks Yom Kippur Mahzor (Koren, 2012) ISBN 9789653013469
  • The Koren Sacks Rosh Hashana Mahzor (Koren, 2011) ISBN 9789653013421
  • The Great Partnership: God Science and the Search for Meaning (Hodder & Stoughton, 2011) ISBN 9780340995259
  • Covenant and Conversation: Exodus (Koren, Jerusalem, 2010) ISBN 9781592640218
  • Future Tense (Hodder & Stoughton, 2009) ISBN 9780340979853
  • Covenant and Conversation: Genesis (Koren, 2009) ISBN 9781592640201
  • The Koren (Sacks) Siddur (Koren, 2009) ISBN 9789653012172
  • The Home We Build Together (Continuum, 2007) ISBN 9780826423498
  • Authorised Daily Prayer Book (HarperCollins, 2006) ISBN 9780007200917
  • To Heal a Fractured World (Continuum, 2005) ISBN 9780826480392
  • From Optimism to Hope (Continuum, 2004) ISBN 9780826474810
  • Rabbi Jonathan Sacks's Haggadah (Harper Collins, 2003) ISBN 9789653013421
  • The Dignity of Difference (Continuum, 2002) ISBN 9780826468505
  • Radical Then, Radical Now (published in the US as A Letter in the Scroll) (Continuum, 2001) ISBN 9780826473363
  • Celebrating Life (Continuum, 2006) ISBN 9780826473370
  • Morals and Markets (Occasional Paper 108) (Institute of Economic Affairs, 1998) ISBN 0255364245
  • The Politics of Hope (Vintage, 2000) ISBN 9780224043298
  • The Persistence of Faith (Continuum, 2005) - based on his BBC Reith Lectures series ISBN 9780297820857
  • One People: Tradition, Modernity and Jewish Unity (The Littman Library, 1993) ISBN 9781874774013
  • Community of Faith (Peter Halban, 1995) ISBN 9781870015592
  • Faith in the Future (Darton, Longman and Todd, 1995) ISBN 9780232520989
  • Will We Have Jewish Grandchildren? (Vallentine Mitchell, 1994) ISBN 9780853032823
  • Crisis and Covenant (Manchester University Press, 1992) ISBN 0719033004
  • Arguments for the Sake of Heaven (Jason Aronson, 1991) ISBN 0876687834
  • Tradition in an Untraditional Age (Vallentine Mitchell, 1990) ISBN 0853032394
As editor

Festschrift

[edit]
  • Pollak, Michael; Simons, Shmuel, eds. (2014). Morasha kehillat Yaakov : essays in honour of Chief Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks. London: London Beth Din. ISBN 9781592643905.

Personal life

[edit]

Sacks married Elaine Taylor in 1970,[7] and together they had three children: Joshua, Dina and Gila.[7] He was a vegetarian.[78]

Death

[edit]

Sacks died in London on 7 November 2020, at the age of 72.[79][80] He had been diagnosed with cancer a month earlier, having been twice previously treated for the disease.[81]

Prime Minister Boris Johnson said that Sacks' leadership had a "profound impact on our whole country and across the world".[82] Rabbi Meir Soloveichik wrote a tribute piece in the Wall Street Journal entitled "What Gentiles can Learn from Lord Sacks".[83] Awarding the Genesis Prize Lifetime Achievement Award to Rabbi Sacks posthumously in late 2021, Israeli President Isaac Herzog paid tribute to him and praised him as "a master articulator of the Jewish foundation of universal values" who "unapologetically verbalized a proud, dignified Jewish identity."[84]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Jonathan Henry Sacks, Baron Sacks (8 March 1948 – 7 November 2020), was a British Orthodox rabbi, philosopher, and author who served as of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth from 1991 to 2013. Sacks was renowned for his extensive writings on , , and the role of in contemporary society, authoring over 25 books that defended traditional moral frameworks against secular fragmentation and emphasized the necessity of shared values for social cohesion. His highlighted Judaism's contributions to universal human and covenantal relationships, as explored in works like The Dignity of Difference (2002), which earned the Grawemeyer Prize in , and Morality: Restoring the in Divided Times (2020), a advocating for virtue-based over unchecked . In public discourse, Sacks critiqued for fostering segregation rather than integration, arguing it undermined and democratic cohesion by prioritizing group differences over common civic bonds—a view he articulated in speeches and books like The Home We Build Together (2009), where he called for a renewed emphasis on shared British values informed by . He received the in 2016 for advancing spiritual insights into human affairs and was knighted in 2005 before being elevated to the as a in 2009, from which platform he influenced debates on faith's public role.

Early Life and Education

Family Background and Upbringing

Jonathan Henry Sacks was born on 8 March 1948 in the district of to Louis David Sacks and Louisa Frumkin. As the eldest of four brothers, he grew up in a family of modest means within 's Jewish community. His father, Louis Sacks (died 1996), had immigrated to Britain from as a at the age of six in the early twentieth century and later worked as a textile merchant in a small shop in London's East End, leaving school at 14 to join the family business. His mother, known as (died 2010), was born in Britain to parents who had emigrated from ; she assisted in the family's wine business. The family maintained Ashkenazi Jewish heritage, with roots tracing to Eastern European immigration waves. Sacks was raised in a traditional Jewish that emphasized attendance, education, and a balance between religious observance and secular engagement with British society, though the home was not strictly observant in an ultra-Orthodox sense. His parents instilled values of devotion to alongside broader societal involvement, fostering an environment where intellectual curiosity coexisted with familial and communal responsibilities. This upbringing, marked by post-war Jewish immigrant resilience in , shaped his early exposure to both faith and the challenges of assimilation in a modern context.

Academic Pursuits and Rabbinic Ordination

Sacks matriculated at Gonville and Caius College, , in 1966, initially intending to study before switching to ; he graduated in 1969 with a first-class honours degree in moral sciences, specializing in . He subsequently pursued postgraduate studies, earning a in moral from New College, , in 1972 under the supervision of philosopher . During this period, Sacks underwent a profound intellectual and spiritual transformation, shifting from secular philosophical inquiry toward Orthodox Judaism; this led him to rabbinic training, including studies at Yeshivat Tomhei Temimim in Kfar Habad, Israel. He received semicha (rabbinic ordination) from Jews' College in London—later renamed the London School of Jewish Studies—and from Yeshivat Etz Chaim in Jerusalem. Sacks continued academic pursuits alongside his rabbinic formation, completing a PhD in moral philosophy at King's College London in 1981, with his thesis examining the concept of dignity in Jewish and Western thought. These credentials positioned him to bridge rigorous philosophical analysis with traditional Jewish scholarship, as evidenced by his 1973 appointment as a lecturer in Jewish philosophy at Jews' College.

Rabbinic and Leadership Career

Initial Synagogue Roles and Academic Positions

Sacks's initial rabbinic role was as rabbi of Golders Green Synagogue, a Modern Orthodox congregation in northwest London, from 1978 to 1982. During this time, he lectured in Jewish philosophy and Talmud at Jews' College, the rabbinical seminary of the United Synagogue, from 1973 to 1982. In 1983, Sacks assumed the position of rabbi at the Western Marble Arch Synagogue in , a prominent community in the West End, where he served until 1990. Concurrently, from 1984 to 1990, he held the role of Principal of Jews' College, during which he introduced a "practical rabbinics" program emphasizing pastoral support and professional development for rabbis. These positions allowed Sacks to balance congregational leadership with academic contributions to Orthodox rabbinic training in the .

Chief Rabbinate of the United Hebrew Congregations (1991–2013)

Jonathan Sacks was installed as Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth on 1 September 1991, succeeding Immanuel Jakobovits as the sixth incumbent since the office's formalization in 1845. In this role, he served as the spiritual leader of Orthodox Jewish communities across the United Kingdom and the broader Commonwealth, overseeing the United Synagogue and holding the title of Av Beit Din of the London Beth Din. His tenure, spanning 22 years until 1 September 2013, emphasized revitalizing Jewish life amid challenges like assimilation, financial strains in synagogue institutions, and intra-communal polarization between centrist Orthodoxy and Haredi factions. Upon assuming office, Sacks launched the "Decade of Renewal" initiative to strengthen British Jewry, promoting five core values: love of and , learning , serving through mitzvot, contributing to British society, and supporting . This program included founding the Jewish Association for to integrate into commerce and the Jewish Continuity organization to bolster education and cultural identity preservation. In 1991, he also established the Women’s Review to examine and advance women's participation in synagogue , divorce proceedings, and leadership roles, addressing longstanding gender dynamics within Orthodox practice. By 2001, Sacks articulated a vision of "Jewish responsibility," expanding outreach through regular BBC Radio 4 "Thought for the Day" broadcasts and a weekly column in , thereby engaging broader society on moral and faith-based issues. Sacks further developed intellectual resources for the community, initiating the Covenant & Conversation series in 2004—a weekly commentary that grew to nearly 40,000 subscribers worldwide by the end of his tenure. His leadership drew recognition, including a honor from the in 2001 marking his first decade, alongside 20 other honorary doctorates. Knighted in 2005 and elevated to the as a in 2009, Sacks influenced policy and , though his tenure faced criticisms for perceived divisiveness, such as tensions with ultra-Orthodox groups and revisions to his 2002 book The Dignity of Difference following rabbinic objections to its theological pluralism. Upon retirement in 2013, he was honored at a gala attended by HRH The Prince of and former prime ministers, reflecting his impact on elevating Jewish visibility and ethical discourse in public life.

Subsequent Appointments and Global Influence

Following his retirement as Chief Rabbi on 1 September 2013, Sacks was appointed Ingeborg and Global Distinguished Professor of Judaic Thought at , a position he held from 2013 to 2018, during which he taught courses on and . Concurrently, he received a joint appointment as Kressel and Efrat Family University Professor of Jewish Thought at , enabling him to deliver lectures across both institutions for approximately three months annually. These roles allowed Sacks to extend his teachings on Judaism's intersection with contemporary moral challenges to American academic audiences, emphasizing themes of covenantal and religious responses to . As Baron Sacks, a life granted in 2009, he remained active in the , contributing to debates on , integration, and religious until his death in 2020, often drawing on Jewish textual sources to advocate for the renewal of ethical frameworks in . Sacks also held visiting or advisory positions at institutions such as , furthering his influence in bridging religious thought with global intellectual discourse. Sacks's global influence expanded through prolific authorship, delivering over 100 public lectures annually worldwide, including TED Talks on humanity's moral imagination and addresses at forums like the . His post-retirement books, such as Not in God's Name (2015) and (2020), critiqued and defended religion's role in sustaining civilized societies, reaching audiences beyond Jewish communities and influencing discussions on and ethical . In 2016, he received the , recognizing his efforts to articulate spiritual dimensions of human progress, with the award citing his integration of faith and reason to address universal crises like moral fragmentation. These endeavors solidified Sacks's reputation as a transnational voice for values amid rising secular and interfaith tensions.

Core Philosophical and Theological Ideas

Foundational Influences from Judaism and Philosophy

Sacks' intellectual foundations were rooted in classical Jewish texts and rabbinic authorities who emphasized the synthesis of faith, ethics, and reason. Central to his Jewish influences was , the 12th-century philosopher and codifier of Jewish law, whose Guide for the Perplexed modeled the reconciliation of with Aristotelian , informing Sacks' own efforts to harmonize religious tradition with empirical knowledge. Similarly, , the 19th-century architect of modern , shaped Sacks' commitment to preserving Jewish particularism amid universal ethical principles, as seen in Hirsch's Nineteen Letters, which advocated 's compatibility with secular learning. The Lubavitcher Rebbe, , exerted a personal and transformative influence, counseling Sacks during his university years in 1965 to abandon plans for a secular philosophical career and pursue rabbinic instead, a pivot Sacks credited with defining his . Schneerson's emphasis on and intellectual dissemination of Jewish teachings further molded Sacks' approach to leadership, prompting repeated consultations on major life decisions through the 1980s and beyond. Rabbi , encountered by Sacks in discussions on faith and Jewish destiny, exemplified the rigorous dialectical method that challenged Sacks to engage modernity without compromising halakhic integrity. Philosophically, Sacks' first-class honors degree in moral philosophy from , in 1970 exposed him to Western traditions that he later critiqued and integrated into Jewish thought. Plato's rationalism influenced Sacks' emphasis on transcendent truths underlying ethical systems, while Alasdair MacIntyre's communitarian critique of individualism in (1981) reinforced Sacks' advocacy for covenantal bonds over atomized autonomy. Friedrich Nietzsche's diagnosis of post-God informed Sacks' warnings about secularism's moral voids, though Sacks countered with 's ethic of responsibility derived from divine command. These strands converged in Sacks' view of as a counter to philosophical , privileging objective grounded in .

Balancing Universalism with Jewish Particularism

Sacks contended that uniquely synthesizes and particularism, wherein the Jewish covenant represents a specific divine election that nonetheless advances for all peoples. He articulated this in his Covenant & Conversation series, emphasizing that the Torah's revelation at Sinai imposed particular obligations on Jews—such as the —while endorsing universal principles like the seven Noahide laws for non-Jews, thereby preserving distinct identities without endorsing . Central to Sacks' framework was the notion that particularity serves universality: "By being what only I am, I contribute to the common good what only I can give," he stated in a 2010 interview, arguing that Jewish distinctiveness models how individual or group uniqueness enriches collective humanity rather than fragmenting it. This view countered monolithic universalism, which he critiqued as eroding cultural diversity and fostering homogenization, as seen in historical ideologies like imperialism or certain strains of secular humanism that demand conformity over covenantal fidelity. In The Dignity of Difference (2002), Sacks elaborated that commanded the "to be different in order to teach humanity the dignity of difference," positioning Jewish particularism not as ethnocentric but as a pedagogical tool for global pluralism, where shared belief in one coexists with manifold paths to righteousness. He drew on biblical precedents, such as Abraham's universal hospitality alongside his family's insular covenant, to illustrate how avoids the extremes of tribal particularism—lacking moral accountability to outsiders—and absorptive , which dissolves identity into sameness. Sacks applied this balance to contemporary challenges, warning that unchecked threatens Jewish survival by diluting particular commitments, as evidenced by assimilation trends in communities, while insisting that robust particularism fuels universal contributions, such as Judaism's historical role in advancing and ethical frameworks. His thus framed Jewish loyalty as a prerequisite for broader moral influence, rejecting both relativistic and hegemonic in favor of covenantal differentiation.

Torah v'Chokhma: Harmonizing Faith and Empirical Knowledge

Sacks advocated for an integrative approach to Torah v'Chokhma, viewing study and empirical knowledge as complementary pursuits that together illuminate human understanding of the divine creation. He argued that inherently encourages engagement with secular wisdom, drawing on biblical imperatives such as the command in Deuteronomy 4:6 to acquire knowledge, which he interpreted as encompassing scientific inquiry. This framework positioned faith not as antagonistic to evidence-based reasoning but as its moral and teleological counterpart, where provides the "why" of existence—purpose, ethics, and covenantal relationship with —while elucidates the "how" through observation and experimentation. Central to Sacks' philosophy was the assertion that and operate in distinct domains without inherent conflict, as the who revealed also designed the rational order of the universe amenable to empirical discovery. In his 2011 book The Great Partnership: Science, Religion, and the Search for Happiness, he contended that scientific excels at deconstructing phenomena to reveal mechanisms, such as evolutionary processes, but fails to address ultimate questions of meaning, which synthesizes holistically. Sacks reconciled doctrines like creation with evolutionary theory by positing that biological adaptation represents God's deliberate method for life's development, citing ' medieval harmonization of Aristotelian with Jewish as a . He warned against , the isolation of faith from evidence, and , the elevation of empirical method to the exclusion of transcendent truths, both of which he saw as distortions of their respective integrities. Sacks exemplified this harmony in public discourse, such as his 2012 lecture "Science versus Religion," where he critiqued the false popularized by figures like , emphasizing Judaism's historical embrace of , medicine, and mathematics—from the Talmudic-era academies to modern Orthodox institutions. He promoted educational models blending rigor with university-level , influencing Modern Orthodox thought akin to the tradition, though he tailored it to emphasize ethical discernment in applying knowledge. Empirical advancements, in Sacks' view, affirm rather than undermine , as the universe's intelligibility reflects divine rationality; he illustrated this with the fine-tuning argument, where constants permitting life suggest purposeful design discernible through . Critics within more insular Orthodox circles occasionally faulted his openness to secular sources as diluting primacy, yet Sacks maintained that authentic thrives on intellectual courage, not retreat.

Critiques of Secular Modernity

Erosion of Judeo-Christian Ethics in the West

Sacks contended that Western civilization's moral framework, historically anchored in emphasizing covenantal responsibility, dignity of the individual, and collective welfare, has eroded under the pressures of secular individualism and . In his 2020 book Morality: Restoring the in Divided Times, he diagnosed this decline as a transition from a "We" culture—sustained by shared religious narratives and communal bonds—to an "I" culture prioritizing personal autonomy and market-driven choices, resulting in fragmented social cohesion. This shift, he argued, stems from the Enlightenment's of knowledge, power, and morality, which severed ethics from transcendent sources, leaving societies vulnerable to . Central to Sacks' critique was the phenomenon of "cultural climate change," where hyper-individualism, amplified by social media and phenomena like , undermines collective morality and fosters over universal values. He warned that this manifests in the breakdown of foundational institutions such as and , which he viewed as embodiments of sanctity and mutual obligation, replaced by a ethos fixated on choice without constraint. Drawing on biblical precedents like Deuteronomy 8:11-19, Sacks highlighted how prosperity induces forgetfulness of divine origins, leading to spiritual complacency; in modern terms, affluence breeds self-indulgence among the wealthy and exclusion among the marginalized, echoing historical cycles described by thinkers like (1332–1406), who linked civilizational decay to lost social cohesion (asabiyah), and Giambattista Vico (1668–1744), who traced decline to luxury-induced dissolution. Sacks prescribed renewal through rediscovering covenantal ethics, balancing individual rights with communal duties—a "tightrope walk" exemplified in Judaism between the "I" and the "We"—to counteract the moral vacuum. He emphasized that without this restoration, the West risks deepened divisions and a return to pre-modern barbarism, as secular alternatives fail to provide the binding moral code once derived from Judeo-Christian monotheism. This perspective, articulated in essays and speeches from the early 2000s onward, positioned religious traditions not as relics but as vital counterforces to postmodern fragmentation.

Demographic Decline and Islamist Demographic Pressures in Europe

Sacks identified Europe's rates as a symptom of deeper spiritual and cultural malaise, arguing that had eroded the necessary for family formation and renewal. In a 2009 address, he stated that is the world's only region undergoing , with no member state achieving the 2.1 children per woman required for demographic stability. He attributed this "birth dearth" to a culture prioritizing , instant gratification, and individual over covenantal commitments like and parenthood, which demand sacrifice and a transcendent purpose. Sacks contrasted this with religious communities, noting that higher correlates with elevated birth rates, as instills about the and the value of generational continuity. This demographic contraction, Sacks warned, compels to depend on for economic viability, particularly from Muslim-majority regions where rates remain above replacement levels and secularization is less advanced. In his 2011 lecture "Cultural Climate Change," he observed that is Europe's sole counter to ageing populations, yet cautioned that unintegrated inflows risk cultural transformation if newcomers reject host-society norms. He critiqued multiculturalism's policy of , which he deemed a failure for fostering rather than cohesion, allowing Islamist ideologies to gain footholds through non-assimilation and demands for separate legal spheres. Sacks highlighted how this dynamic exacerbates pressures, as higher Muslim birth rates—coupled with chain migration and welfare incentives—could shift Europe's religious and ethical landscape within generations, absent robust integration enforcing liberal democratic values. Sacks drew parallels to historical precedents, such as the decline of Christian populations in the from 20% to 4% under Islamist dominance, urging to recognize analogous risks from demographic disequilibrium and ideological intransigence. He advocated revitalizing to restore birth rates and cultural confidence, insisting that without a renewed of covenantal identity, courts self-erasure amid assertive minority growth. In his view, causal realism demands acknowledging that fertility differentials, when paired with resistance to secular norms, generate inexorable pressures on pluralistic societies, not mere but foreseeable outcomes of choices favoring tolerance over transmission of core values.

Consumerism's Spiritual Vacuity and the Moral Role of Capitalism

Rabbi Sacks critiqued as a force that fosters spiritual emptiness by prioritizing instant gratification over deeper human fulfillment, leading to an infantilized where individuals "I want it all and I want it now." He argued that this materialistic focus exacerbates demographic declines in the West, as people prioritize and personal consumption over family and spiritual commitments, contributing to falling birth rates and a secularized culture disconnected from transcendent values. In contrast to the disciplined ethos of historical movements like , which channeled spiritual discipline into productive work and thrift, modern undermines the impulse control essential for long-term success and moral character, as evidenced by studies like the showing that children who achieved greater life outcomes. Sacks viewed not as inherently amoral but as capable of playing a profound moral role when embedded in an ethical framework, serving as "the greatest stimulus we know to human creativity and progress" by generating wealth, reducing poverty, and affirming human dignity through productive labor. Drawing from Jewish teachings, he emphasized that markets foster economic liberty, which correlates with political tolerance and peace—as noted, offers an alternative to —and enable the highest form of charity: job creation over mere handouts, aligning with ' hierarchy of giving. However, he warned that unregulated self-interest in markets erodes integrity, as seen in the where homes were treated as speculative assets rather than sanctuaries of value, normalizing greed and blurring the distinction between price and intrinsic worth. To counter consumerism's vacuity, Sacks advocated a "compassionate capitalism" infused with morality, where spiritual values—such as debt forgiveness every seventh year, for the vulnerable, and prioritizing covenantal responsibility over short-term gains—ensure and human flourishing. He contended that markets alone cannot produce the morals they require for survival, which must instead be cultivated through , , and role models to prevent the collapse of trust and fairness. This moral capitalism, rooted in the biblical vision of work as a divine calling rather than mere acquisition, contrasts sharply with consumerist excess by promoting virtues like thrift, innovation, and communal welfare, as exemplified by Puritan-driven economic revolutions that built enduring prosperity without spiritual bankruptcy.

Stances on Key Social and Religious Debates

Defense of Covenantal Marriage Against Redefinition

Jonathan Sacks characterized as a covenant rather than a mere , defining it as "a mutual pledge of and trust between two or more , each respecting the and of the other." This covenantal framework, rooted in Jewish tradition, binds participants in a relationship of identity and mutual responsibility, transcending individual interests to foster communal stability and the transmission of values across generations. Sacks argued that such covenants, exemplified by heterosexual , enable the pair-bonding essential for human , given the prolonged dependency of infants compared to other mammals—a biological reality demanding complementary roles between men and women. In opposition to efforts to redefine to include same-sex unions, Sacks maintained that does not recognize such arrangements, stating unequivocally, "In , we don’t do it." During the United Kingdom's 2012 consultation on , he submitted to the that "any attempt to redefine this sacred institution would be to undermine the concept of ," warning that severing from its biological and procreative foundations erodes its societal purpose. He contended that 's enduring appeal lies in its capacity to unite "the love that brings new life into the world," a complementarity of sexes that no alternative arrangement replicates, and described the traditional family—man, woman, and child—as "not one lifestyle choice among many." Sacks linked redefinition to broader cultural fragmentation, citing empirical trends such as the 47.5% of children born outside in Britain by 2012 and a 42% rate, which he attributed to weakened covenantal commitments amid rising . In his 2020 book Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times, he framed traditional marriage as a bulwark against the "spiritual vacuity" of consumerist societies, arguing that its redefinition prioritizes personal autonomy over collective moral goods like child welfare and social cohesion. This stance drew criticism from progressive Jewish groups but aligned with Orthodox teachings emphasizing marriage's role in fulfilling the divine command to "."

Tensions with Non-Orthodox Movements and Haredi Insularity

Sacks, as of the United Hebrew Congregations of the from 1991 to 2013, upheld strict adherence to Orthodox , viewing non-Orthodox movements such as and as deviations from authentic Jewish law. In a 1997 private letter to Haredi leader Dayan Chanoch Padwa, leaked to the press, Sacks described the movement as a "false grouping" that "destroy the faith" by altering core rituals and theology, intensifying divisions within British Jewry. This stance led to public feuds, including his 1996 refusal to attend the funeral of prominent rabbi Hugo Gryn, a survivor, on grounds that participating in a non-Orthodox service would violate principles of separation. Such positions drew accusations from non-Orthodox leaders of intolerance, with critics arguing that Sacks prioritized doctrinal purity over communal unity, exacerbating the between Orthodox and progressive streams in Britain, where non-Orthodox synagogues outnumbered Orthodox ones by the early . Sacks maintained that recognizing non-Orthodox conversions or authority would undermine the covenantal integrity of , a view rooted in traditional rabbinic sources emphasizing halakhic continuity over egalitarian adaptations. Despite occasional efforts, such as dialogues on shared concerns like assimilation, he consistently rejected joint religious platforms that implied equivalence between streams. On the other flank, Sacks critiqued Haredi insularity as a parallel threat to Jewish vitality, advocating Modern Orthodoxy's synthesis of observance with secular engagement. In his July 2013 retirement dinner address, he warned that "those who embrace and reject the world" foster isolation detrimental to 's adaptive progress, equating it with the assimilationist rejection of by the worldly. This drew sharp rebuke from , an ultra-Orthodox body, which demanded an apology, viewing his remarks as an attack on their insulated communities' preservation of piety amid secular pressures. Haredi critics further faulted Sacks for diluting Orthodoxy through intellectual openness to and , accusing him of insufficient rigor on issues like women's roles or , where his positions aligned more with centrist than stringent interpretations. Sacks countered that insularity risks spiritual stagnation, citing historical precedents where Jewish communities thrived by engaging yet transcending host cultures, as in the Babylonian Talmud's era. These tensions underscored his role in defending a dynamic against both liberal dilution and ultra-conservative withdrawal, though they alienated extremes within Anglo-Jewry.

Interfaith Engagement Without Syncretism

Sacks developed a framework for interfaith engagement emphasizing the "dignity of difference," wherein fosters peace by honoring each faith's unique divine mandate rather than diluting distinctions through or . In his 2002 book The Dignity of Difference: How to Avoid the Clash of Civilizations, written amid post-9/11 tensions and the 2001 UN Year of Dialogue Among Civilizations, he contended that exacerbates conflicts when faiths seek dominance or uniformity, advocating instead for reframing differences as complementary contributions to God's multifaceted . This approach draws on biblical precedents, such as the dispersion at Babel followed by Abraham's covenant, to argue that God intentionally creates cultural and religious diversity, akin to , without endorsing a single imperial path to truth. Central to Sacks' position was the rejection of , which he viewed as a threat to authentic religious particularity; , for instance, remains a covenantal of one for a countercultural mission, not a universal creed open to blending with others. He maintained that interfaith respect requires preserving doctrinal boundaries, as merging faiths undermines the integrity of each tradition's truth claims and risks fostering superficial tolerance over genuine coexistence. In practice, this manifested in his preference for "side-by-side" collaborations on shared societal goods—such as ethical initiatives or civic projects—over "face-to-face" theological dialogues that might imply equivalence, ensuring Orthodox halakhic fidelity while engaging non-Jews. Following initial Orthodox critiques that the original edition veered toward universalism, Sacks issued a revised preface in 2003 explicitly denouncing relativism, affirming that objective moral truths exist within particular religious frameworks and that interfaith engagement must not equate all paths as equally valid. He exemplified this in public addresses, including a 2011 House of Lords debate on enhancing interfaith dialogue in multicultural Britain, where he urged recognizing differences as assets for the common good without compromising faith commitments. During Interfaith Week events, Sacks highlighted post-Holocaust shifts enabling respectful conversation among faiths, grounded in mutual recognition of distinct identities rather than ecumenical fusion. This stance aligned with traditional Jewish sources on gentile righteousness, permitting cooperation while upholding Judaism's non-proselytizing particularism.

Examination of Antisemitism

Causal Mechanisms and Historical Mutations

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks characterized antisemitism as a persistent "virus" that mutates to evade societal defenses against hatred, adapting to prevailing cultural and intellectual paradigms rather than stemming from inherent Jewish traits. He argued that its core mechanism involves scapegoating, whereby societies in malaise project internal failures onto Jews to avoid self-accountability, fueled by a "flight from responsibility into victimhood." This process is exacerbated by dualistic thinking, which divides humanity into absolute good and evil, dehumanizing the targeted group and enabling otherwise moral individuals to justify violence. Sacks emphasized that antisemitism originates not in Jewish actions but in the antisemites' psychological and cultural pathologies, stating, "Jews cannot cure anti-Semitism. Only anti-Semites can do that, together with the society to which they belong." Historically, Sacks identified antisemitism's mutations across roughly 2,000 years, each form leveraging the dominant for legitimacy while retaining its essence as denial of Jewish collective and existence. The first mutation, rooted in medieval , framed as theological enemies responsible for , justifying through religious doctrine. By the 19th and early 20th centuries, it evolved into a racial , recasting as biologically inferior or conspiratorial threats, which culminated in the Holocaust's systematic extermination policies. Sacks described a third phase as political-economic during secular , where were blamed for capitalism's ills or revolutionary disruptions. The fourth and contemporary mutation, per Sacks, targets Jews as a sovereign nation through , masquerading as advocacy by denying Israel's legitimacy while affirming for others. This form, epicentered in the but globalized via media, accuses Israel of apartheid or despite its democratic framework, yet manifests in violence against Jews, as in the 2012 Toulouse or 2015 Paris Hypercacher attack. Sacks warned that this adaptability signals broader societal decay, as "the hate that begins with Jews never ends with Jews," threatening universal freedoms when tolerated. He noted empirical indicators, such as 2013 surveys showing 46% of French Jews and 48% of Hungarian Jews contemplating emigration due to rising threats.

Anti-Zionism as a Contemporary Manifestation

Jonathan Sacks identified as the contemporary iteration of , characterizing it as a of the "world's oldest " that survives by adapting to prevailing ideologies. In his view, historically targeted for their religion in the and their supposed racial inferiority from the 19th to 20th centuries, but in the post-Holocaust era, it manifests through opposition to Israel's existence as the Jewish nation-state. He argued that this form denies the collective right to afforded to other peoples, stating, " means denying the right of to exist collectively as with the same rights as everyone else." Sacks emphasized that anti-Zionism often employs double standards, demonization, and delegitimization against , inverting Holocaust imagery by portraying " as the new Nazis" and " as the new ." He distinguished legitimate policy critique from antisemitic rhetoric, noting that accusations of practicing , apartheid, or —terms he called the " of our time"—scapegoat the Jewish state for regional complexities while ignoring comparable actions by other nations. Movements like (BDS) exemplified this for Sacks, as they seek 's delegitimization under the guise of advocacy, despite 's control of just 0.25% of Middle Eastern land. The rabbi rooted this analysis in the enduring Jewish connection to the , predating by millennia, which disregards in favor of narratives that essentialize Jewish presence there as colonial or illegitimate. Drawing on empirical indicators, Sacks cited a 2013 Agency for survey showing 33% of European contemplating due to , rising to 46% in and 48% in , linking rising anti-Zionist sentiment to heightened insecurity. He warned that this allows perpetrators to claim non-prejudice—"I'm not antisemitic, I'm just anti-Zionist"—while perpetuating exclusionary hatred against as a people. Sacks advocated vigilance, urging societies to recognize anti-Zionism's antisemitic core when it uniquely targets Jewish sovereignty, as failure to do so risks normalizing the virus's latest strain.

Prescriptions for Jewish Resilience and Societal Vigilance

Sacks emphasized the renewal of as central to Jewish survival, arguing that faith provides the courage to confront uncertainty and defeats fear, as demonstrated by Jewish persistence after and the establishment of in 1948 despite ongoing threats. He prescribed active engagement with spiritual practices—study, , and observance of mitzvot—to maintain communal morale and counter existential crises, likening spiritual health to physical maintenance amid global challenges like and noted in 2006. To foster resilience, Sacks advocated building strong communities, which he viewed as essential for and religious life, particularly in crises, drawing on psychological insights and his book to highlight their role in sustaining individuals beyond isolation. He described as characterized by "anti-fragility," where major setbacks, such as exiles or persecutions, served as catalysts for renewal and , urging to wrestle with adversity until it yields growth, emerging "stronger, better or wiser." Sacks outlined seven principles for maintaining to ensure unity amid divisions: keep talking to preserve dialogue; listen actively to others; seek understanding of disagreements without hostility; avoid seeking victory over fellow ; give respect to earn it; disagree while caring through mutual responsibility (" arevim zeh bazeh"); and recall the divine choice of as a collective under covenant. These principles, rooted in biblical examples like familial conflicts leading to , promote resilience by prioritizing collective bonds over factionalism. On societal vigilance, Sacks warned that functions as an "early warning sign of a dangerous dysfunction within a ," since hatred targeting invariably expands to broader groups, signaling threats to and stability. He prescribed habits of communal security, including enhanced patrols at Jewish sites and proactive defense, while stressing that Jews alone cannot eradicate it—anti-Semites and society must address root causes like failure to accept responsibility. Beyond defense, he recommended displaying Jewish identity proudly as a counter to prejudice, combined with eternal vigilance to prevent mutation into new forms like . Sacks urged broader societal engagement, arguing that combating requires non- to recognize it as a symptom of cultural decay, not merely a Jewish issue.

Political and Public Commentary

Interventions in British Governance and Multiculturalism

As from 1991 to 2013 and subsequently as Baron Sacks in the from 2009 until his death, Jonathan Sacks engaged in public discourse on British governance by advocating for policies that prioritized national cohesion over state-sponsored . He argued that , as practiced by successive governments, fostered segregation rather than integration, creating "inward-looking" communities with parallel legal and social structures that undermined shared . In a analysis, Sacks contended that this approach disincentivized immigrants from adopting British values, leading to where groups prioritized ethnic or religious loyalties over , a dynamic he linked to reduced social trust and increased vulnerability to . Sacks's interventions extended to critiquing specific policy failures, such as inadequate emphasis on proficiency and civic for newcomers. Upon retiring in 2013, he declared that British "has had its day," urging a shift toward active integration modeled on the Jewish community's historical while abstaining from . He praised David Cameron's 2011 Munich speech for acknowledging the failure of state but criticized governments for insufficient follow-through in promoting mutual respect rooted in in British heritage. In the , Sacks contributed to debates on , including a 2011 speech on in multicultural Britain, where he emphasized the need for dialogue grounded in universal ethical principles rather than , warning that unchecked diversity without common moral foundations erodes democratic stability. Central to Sacks's prescriptions was a "covenantal" vision of , where encourages minorities to contribute to the national good while preserving distinct identities, contrasting this with multiculturalism's tolerance of isolation that he saw as stifling free speech and promoting pressure-group politics. He drew on empirical observations, such as post-2005 London bombings analyses, to argue that fragmented communities hindered counter-radicalization efforts, advocating instead for policies fostering "we" consciousness over "I" or subgroup identities. These views influenced broader policy shifts, as evidenced by Cameron's government adopting integration-focused initiatives, though Sacks lamented persistent governmental reluctance to enforce boundaries against illiberal practices within minority groups.

Affirmation of American Exceptionalism and Moral Leadership

Rabbi Sacks frequently highlighted America's covenantal foundations as the cornerstone of its exceptionalism, distinguishing it from other Western nations by its explicit . In a 2017 address accepting the Award from the , he described America's founding as a dual structure: a social covenant articulated in of (1776), emphasizing "we hold these truths to be self-evident," and a social in the (1787). This covenant, he argued, drew from , mirroring the biblical narrative of exodus and , positioning America as a modern equivalent to ancient in its moral aspirations. Sacks affirmed America's moral leadership through its capacity for periodic covenant renewal, a practice he traced to Puritan settlers like those in the (1620) and John Winthrop's "city upon a hill" sermon (1630). Unlike secular European states, he noted, America uniquely integrates covenant language into national rituals, such as presidential inaugural addresses, where leaders invoke founding ideals of equality, liberty, and divine providence—examples include Lyndon B. Johnson's 1965 speech on the "American covenant" and John F. Kennedy's 1961 call to collective service. This renewal, akin to the Jewish hakhel assembly every seven years, fosters a culture of responsibility over entitlement, enabling America to serve as the "last best hope of freedom" globally. He urged Americans to preserve this exceptionalism by teaching their national story unapologetically to children, distinguishing patriotic pride in ideals from chauvinistic . Sacks warned that erosion of covenantal institutions—through breakdown, grievance culture, and loss of shared moral code—threatens the "American soul," potentially leading to societal fragmentation and diminished global influence. In his view, America's moral leadership stems from sustaining strong communities and ethical commitments, which have historically unified the nation amid civil strife and propelled its advancements.

Promotion of Religion's Public Relevance Against Secular Exclusivism

Sacks consistently argued that secularism's of religion undermines societal cohesion by excluding from , a stance he articulated as early as his 1990 BBC , later published as The Persistence of Faith: Religion, Morality and Society in (1991), where he contended that religions must actively contribute to national moral debates rather than retreating into isolation, as secular frameworks alone cannot sustain shared ethical norms. He emphasized empirical correlations between religious practice and , noting that declining religiosity correlates with fragile families and weakened , drawing on historical patterns observed in post-Enlightenment . In his 2011 essay and 2012 lecture "The Limits of Secularism," Sacks critiqued the notion of secular exclusivism— the exclusion of religious voices from —by invoking Alexis de Tocqueville's 1830s observations of American democracy, where , despite formal separation from state, served as "the first of its political institutions" by fostering voluntary associations and restraint. He supported this with contemporary data from Robert Putnam's American Grace (2010), which found regular religious worshippers in the United States—comprising about 40% of the population—exhibit higher rates of charitable giving, volunteering, and community involvement compared to non-attendees, paralleling high religiosity in nations like (39% weekly worship). Sacks contrasted science's analytical disassembly of phenomena with 's integrative role in conferring meaning and altruism, arguing that secularism's dismissal of the latter leaves societies vulnerable to fragmentation, as evidenced by rising in post-Mao China despite . Sacks extended this advocacy in Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times (2020), positing that religion uniquely sustains transcendent moral frameworks against secular individualism, which prioritizes autonomy over covenantal obligations and erodes trust; he cited sociological trends showing religiously affiliated individuals prioritizing collective welfare over self-interest, countering secular narratives that attribute societal ills solely to faith. While acknowledging secularism's historical role in curbing religious tyranny, he warned against its overreach into "consecrating solitude" rather than "the bonds that connect us," as religion does by redeeming isolation through communal ethics—a view he reiterated in public forums, distinguishing inclusive religious pluralism from both militant atheism and theocratic overreach. This position informed his contributions to edited volumes like Religion as a Public Good: Jews and Other Americans on Religion in the Public Square (2003), where he defended faith's societal utility without endorsing dominance.

Publications and Intellectual Outreach

Major Books and Their Central Theses

Sacks's major books addressed Judaism's relevance to modern challenges, including , , science-religion tensions, and societal moral decay. His works often drew on biblical narratives and Jewish tradition to propose ethical frameworks for pluralistic societies, emphasizing covenantal responsibility over individualism or relativism. In The Dignity of Difference: How to Avoid the Clash of Civilizations (2002), Sacks contended that global harmony requires affirming the unique dignity of diverse cultures and faiths rather than imposing universal sameness or seeking only overlapping values. Written in response to 9/11, the book reframed differences as God-given opportunities for mutual enrichment, warning against both religious particularism that breeds conflict and secular that erases identity. He argued that Judaism's implies service to humanity through particularity, not superiority, citing biblical examples like the to illustrate how monistic pursuits lead to strife. The Great Partnership: Science, Religion, and the Search for Meaning (2011) advanced the thesis that and complement each other—science dissecting "how" the world works, addressing "why" and binding meaning—rejecting the New Atheist narrative of inherent conflict. Sacks invoked neuroscientific insights on brain hemispheres to argue that reductive fails to account for , , or purpose, drawing from Jewish texts to show 's role in fostering human dignity and moral order amid scientific progress. He maintained that provides the to live with , enabling achievements beyond empirical prediction. Not in God's Name: Confronting Religious Violence (2015) diagnosed religious extremism as stemming from "pathological dualism" and —projecting inner conflicts onto out-groups—rather than authentic faith. Sacks analyzed biblical sibling stories (e.g., Cain-Abel, Jacob-Esau) to argue that true rejects , promoting a covenantal ethic where divine affirms others' worth without implying rejection. He critiqued both Islamist and Western responses, advocating reconciliation through recognizing shared humanity and rejecting zero-sum . Sacks's final major work, : Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times (2020), warned of societal fragmentation from hyper-individualism, where "We" yields to "I," eroding trust via failures in (power without ), economics (markets without morals), and (identity without integration). Tracing roots from to modern , he prescribed a Judeo-Christian moral code emphasizing reciprocity, dignity, and , supported by data on rising and family breakdown. The book positioned as essential for sustaining the "Westminster model" of free societies, countering with objective truths derived from human interdependence. Other significant books included To Heal a Fractured World: The Ethics of Responsibility (2005), which urged and others to repair society through covenantal duties amid postmodern fragmentation, and The Home We Build Together (2007), critiquing state-imposed in Britain while advocating integrative patriotism rooted in shared values and voluntary bonds. These works collectively reinforced Sacks's vision of as a portable ethic for global engagement, prioritizing truth and particularity over .

Lectures, Media, and Dissemination of Ideas

Sacks delivered the in 1990, a series of six broadcasts titled "The Persistence of Faith," examining the role of and in secular society, which were later published as a book. He contributed regularly to Radio 4's segment for approximately 30 years, offering reflections on current events through a Jewish ethical lens, including discussions on , , and peace processes. In public speaking, Sacks addressed global forums such as the World Economic Forum's Global Leaders of Tomorrow Summit in on February 4, 2002, urging recognition of post-9/11 religious dimensions in . He delivered a TED Talk on April 24, 2017, titled "How We Can Face the Future Without Fear, Together," advocating collective responsibility amid technological and social disruptions, which garnered over 2 million views. Other key addresses included a 2016 keynote at the on antisemitism's mutations and a 2012 Robbins Lecture at UC Berkeley on Judaism's future. Sacks maintained a monthly "" column in from the onward, articulating beliefs on topics like reason versus revelation and living with uncertainty, ceasing as in 2013. He appeared in interviews with figures such as David Brooks at NYU in 2015 and in 2020, extending his critiques of and calls for moral renewal. Post-retirement, dissemination expanded via the Rabbi Sacks Legacy foundation, archiving over 100 videos of speeches, Torah teachings, and animated explanations on rabbisacks.org and YouTube, alongside podcasts like weekly Torah portions, reaching international audiences on religion's societal role. These efforts preserved his emphasis on Judeo-Christian ethics against relativism, influencing policy discussions and interfaith dialogues.

Personal Life and Character

Family Dynamics and Private Virtues

Jonathan Sacks married Elaine Taylor in 1970, at the age of 22, following their meeting at Cambridge University in 1968, where he was studying and she was training as a . The couple described their early courtship as , with Sacks proposing after three weeks using a modest ring purchased at Woolworths. Elaine initially served as the family's primary breadwinner during Sacks's student years and early career shifts, while he managed household duties, though he later reflected on his housekeeping skills as limited. The Sackses had three children: , , and Gila. Elaine paused her professional career to focus on raising them, providing stability amid Sacks's rising public responsibilities, particularly after his appointment as in 1991, when their eldest child was approximately 16 years old. Family dynamics shifted with the introduction of security measures due to his prominent role, yet Friday evenings remained a protected time for communal meals and observance, underscoring their commitment to as a familial anchor. Sacks exemplified private virtues through his enduring marital fidelity, spanning 50 years until his death, and his portrayal of Elaine as a complementary partner who balanced his intensity with levity, whom he termed "the world’s finest anti-depressant." He credited her unwavering support as essential to his achievements, emphasizing mutual commitment over individual pursuits in sustaining their household amid professional demands and personal crises. This devotion extended to prioritizing family resilience, as evidenced by his reflections on navigating public scrutiny's impact on his children while fostering their independence.

Health Struggles Leading to Death

Sacks had previously overcome cancer on two occasions, once in his thirties and again in his fifties, though these episodes were not widely publicized until after his final diagnosis. In October 2020, at age 72, he faced a third bout, announced by his office on October 15 as a recent diagnosis requiring treatment, during which he planned to spend time with family while remaining "positive and upbeat." The illness progressed rapidly, marking a short but ultimately fatal struggle that ended less than a month later. No specific cancer type was disclosed publicly by his office or family.

Death and Legacy

Final Illness, Passing, and Funeral

In October 2020, Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks was diagnosed with cancer, leading his office to announce on 15 October that he would pause public engagements for treatment. The illness progressed rapidly, with Sacks passing away early on 7 November 2020 at age 72, following a brief struggle with the disease. His funeral took place the following day, 8 November 2020, at a in , conducted as a modest levayah in strict adherence to restrictions limiting attendance to 30 mourners. Eulogies, or hespeidim, were delivered during the service, including one by his daughter, emphasizing his personal and intellectual legacy within the Orthodox Jewish tradition. The private nature of the event reflected both health protocols and Sacks' preference for understated observances, with broader tributes shared publicly via video and statements from Jewish communal leaders.

Posthumous Honors and Ongoing Influence

Following his death on November 7, 2020, Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks received several posthumous recognitions for his contributions to Jewish thought, , and moral philosophy. In May 2021, awarded him an honorary degree, citing his profound impact on religious and societal discourse. Later that year, on November 22, 2021, he was posthumously granted the Lifetime Achievement Award at a ceremony in , presented by Israeli President , honoring his global advocacy for Jewish values and human dignity. In January 2021, his final book, Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times (published October 2020), received the National Jewish Book Award in the American Jewish Culture category, underscoring its enduring relevance amid social fragmentation. On June 13, 2022, the conferred a posthumous honorary , acknowledging his lifelong dedication to scholarship and ethical leadership. Sacks's intellectual legacy persists through dedicated institutions and ongoing scholarly engagement. The Rabbi Sacks Legacy, founded shortly after his passing, works to disseminate his writings, lectures, and teachings worldwide, including digital archives and educational programs that emphasize his defenses of religious particularism, covenantal ethics, and critiques of secular individualism. In September 2024, was appointed chair of its Global Symposium, expanding efforts to apply Sacks's ideas to contemporary challenges like and . Posthumous publications, such as his annotated edition of the released in 2025, continue to influence biblical interpretation, notably challenging established commentaries in . Academic forums, including a July 2025 special issue of journal, analyze his original contributions to , ensuring his arguments for faith's role in public life remain central to debates on pluralism and human flourishing. These efforts sustain Sacks's influence across religious, political, and academic spheres, with his works cited by leaders addressing ethical crises post-2020.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.