Hubbry Logo
PaleopathologyPaleopathologyMain
Open search
Paleopathology
Community hub
Paleopathology
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Paleopathology
Paleopathology
Paleopathology
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Part of a series on
Paleontology
Fossils
Geology
Extinction
Evolution
History
Applications
Cultural impact
Fractured Allosaurus scapula

Paleopathology, also spelled palaeopathology, is the study of ancient diseases and injuries in organisms through the examination of fossils, mummified tissue, skeletal remains, and analysis of coprolites. Specific sources in the study of ancient human diseases may include early documents, illustrations from early books, painting and sculpture from the past. All these objects provide information on the evolution of diseases as well as how past civilizations treated conditions. Studies have historically focused on humans, although there is no evidence that humans are more prone to pathologies than any other animal.[1]

The word paleopathology is derived from the Ancient Greek roots of palaios (παλαιός) meaning "old", pathos (πάθος) meaning "experience" or "suffering", and -logia (-λογία), "study".[2][page needed]

Paleopathology is an interdisciplinary science, meaning it involves knowledge from many sectors including (but not limited to) "clinical pathology, human osteology, epidemiology, social anthropology, and archaeology".[3] It is unlikely that one person can be fluent in all necessary sciences. Therefore, those trained in each are important and make up a collective study. Training in anthropology and archaeology is arguably most important, because the analysis of human remains and ancient artifacts are paramount to the discovery of early disease.

History

[edit]

Historical evidence shows that deviations from good health have long been an interest to humans. Although the content that makes up this study can be traced through ancient texts, the term "paleopathology" did not have much traction until the 20th century. This time period saw an increase in case studies and "published reports on ancient diseases".[4] Ancient texts that are thousands of years old record instances of diseases such as leprosy.

From the Renaissance to the mid-nineteenth century, there was increasing reference to ancient disease, initially within prehistoric animals although later the importance of studying the antiquity of human disease began to be emphasized. Some historians and anthropologists theorize that "Johann Friederich Esper, a German naturalist...heralds the birth of paleopathology."[5] Although it wasn't until between the mid nineteenth century and World War I that the field of human paleopathology is generally considered to have come about. During this period, a number of pioneering physicians and anthropologists, such as Marc Armand Ruffer, G. Elliot Smith, Frederic Wood Jones, Douglas E. Derry, and Samuel George Shattock, clarified the medical nature of ancient skeletal pathologies.[6] This work was consolidated between the world wars with methods such as radiology, histology and serology being applied more frequently, improving diagnosis and accuracy with the introduction of statistical analysis. It was at this point that paleopathology can truly be considered to have become a scientific discipline.[7] Today, the use of biomedical technology like DNA and isotopic analysis are major developments for pathological knowledge.[8]

After World War II paleopathology began to be viewed in a different way: as an important tool for the understanding of past populations, and it was at this stage that the discipline began to be related to epidemiology and demography.

New techniques in molecular biology also began to add new information to what was already known about ancient disease,[7] as it became possible to retrieve DNA from samples that were centuries or millennia old.

Methods and techniques

[edit]

To analyze human remains of the past, different techniques are used depending on the type of remains that are found. For example, "the approach to palaeopathological samples depends on the nature of the sample itself (e.g. bone, soft tissue or hair), its size (from minimal fragments to full bodies), the degree of preservation and, very importantly, the manipulation allowed (from intact sample ready for display to absolute access and freedom to undertake any kind of valuable destructive analysis including a full autopsy study)."[9] Much research done by archaeologists and paleopathologists is on bones. The basic nature of bones allows them to not degrade over time like other human remains would, making osteopathology important in studying ancient disease. Human osteopathology is classified into several general groups:

Whilst traumatic injuries such as broken and malformed bones can be easy to spot, evidence of other conditions, for example infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and syphilis, can also be found in bones. Arthropathies, that is joint diseases such as osteoarthritis and gout, are also not uncommon.

Human femurs and humerus (right) from Roman Period

The first exhaustive reference of human paleopathology evidence in skeletal tissue was published in 1976 by Ortner & Putschar.[10] In identifying pathologies, physical anthropologists rely heavily on good archaeological documentation regarding location, age of site and other environmental factors. These provide the foundation on which further analysis is built and are required for accurate populations studies. From there, the paleopathology researcher determines a number of key biological indicators on the specimen including age and sex. These provide a foundation for further analysis of bone material and evaluation of lesions or other anomalies identified.

Archaeologists increasingly use paleopathology as an important main tool for understanding the lives of ancient peoples. For example, cranial deformation is evident in the skulls of the Maya, where a straight line between nose and forehead may have been preferred over an angle or slope. There is also evidence for trepanation, or drilling holes in the cranium, either singly or several times in a single individual. Partially or completely healed trepanations indicate that this procedure was often survived. The 10,000 year-old human remains discovered at the site of Nataruk in Turkana, Kenya, reportedly show extreme traumatic lesions to the head, neck, ribs, knees and hands, including embedded stone projectiles, and they may represent the earliest evidence of inter-group conflict between hunter-gatherers in the past.[11][12]

Trauma analysis in paleopathology

[edit]

Few diseases leave evidence on skeletal remains, however, osteological analysis of remains has the benefit of being able to describe and diagnose skeletal remains without the presence of soft tissue. [13] Paleopathologies are divided into seven suggested categories for analysis:[14]

  • Anomalies
  • Trauma repair
  • Inflammatory/Immune
  • Circulatory
  • Metabolic
  • Neuromechanical
  • Cancers

Skeletal trauma

[edit]

Skeletal analysis of one of these main categories, trauma repair, is broken down further by into the types of trauma present:[15]

  • Partial or complete break
  • Abnormal displacement or dislocation
  • Disruption of blood supply
  • Artificially induced abnormal shape or contouring

All these different types of trauma may be the result of accident, interpersonal violence, cultural practice or therapeutic treatment.

Fractures are the result of enough force being applied to bone to mechanically alter it. Tension, compression, torsion, and bending or shearing each leave its own characteristics on skeletal remains. The type, severity, number, timing and location of fractures are important for delineating between accidental and violent trauma and the data recovered from analysis reveal the meaning of that violence.[16] Fractures present substantial problems for the skeletal areas located around the point of initial trauma and may leave accompanying secondary pathological evidence due to tissue death, deformity, and arthritis.[17]

Types of trauma encountered during analysis might include blunt force trauma (BFT), sharp force trauma (SFT), projectile, heat, and chemical. Evidence of trauma in skeletal remains can vary depending on the type of bone affected; for example, blunt force trauma from a club will present differently than sharp force trauma inflicted by a sword. [13]

During analysis, evidence of antemortem (before death) healing of a fracture allows it to be compared with both perimortem (around time of death) and postmortem (after death) trauma. Antemortem healing will present as a callus at the location of the fracture. As White notes, “The rate of fracture repair depends on alignment, amount of movement at the site of fracture and the health, age, diet, and blood supply of the individual.”[13]

Evidence of skeletal trauma from violence

Violence

[edit]

Differentiating skeletal trauma as the result of violence compared to that caused by accidental or other causes is achieved by integrating the skeletal analysis of mechanical injury to bone with the sociocultural context.[18] Intertwining the biological analysis with the sociocultural factors presented by not just the individual but also the larger group context has allowed bioarchaeology to identify numerous types of violence including, as The Routledge Handbook of Paleopathology notes,“warfare, ritualized combat, hand to hand fighting, raids and ransacking, massacres, torture, executions, witchcraft, captive taking, slavery, anthropophagy, intimate partner and child abuse, scalping and human sacrifice."[16] Without this synthesis of the biological analysis and social theory, Klaus notes that trauma studies are reduced to “simply descriptions of trauma found on bone.”[19]

Archaeological infectious diseases

[edit]

Several diseases are present in the archaeological record. Through archaeological evaluation these diseases can be identified and sometimes can explain the cause of death for certain individuals. Aside from looking at sex, age, etc. of a skeleton, a paleopathologist may analyze the condition of the bones to determine what sort of diseases the individual may have had. The goal of a forensic anthropologist looking at the paleopathology of certain diseases is to determine if the disease they are researching are still present over time, with the occurrence of certain events, or if this disease still exists today and why this disease may not exist today.[20] Diseases identifiable from changes in bone include:

Apart from bones, molecular biology has also been used as a tool of paleopathology over the last few decades, as DNA can be recovered from human remains that are hundreds of years old. Since techniques such as PCR are highly sensitive to contamination, meticulous laboratory set-ups and protocols such as "suicide" PCR are necessary to ensure that false positive results from other materials in the laboratory do not occur.

For example, the long-held assumption that bubonic plague was the cause of the Justinian plague and the Black Death has been strongly supported by finding Yersinia pestis DNA in mass graves,[21][22] whereas another proposed cause, anthrax, was not found.[21]

Black Death

[edit]
The Black Plague, Florence 1348

The Black Death pandemic occurred between 1347 and 1351.[23] It is believed that the cause of the Black Death was bubonic plague,[23] whose symptoms include swollen lymph nodes, fever, headache, fatigue, and muscle aches,[24] and in some cases swellings from which blood and pus seeped.[25] The Black Death originated in China and spread along trade routes and ports affecting many countries including North Africa and many European countries such as Italy, Spain, France, Germany, Switzerland, and Hungary.[23] It is estimated that the Black Death killed up to 200 million people.[26]

In 2013 an excavation at Thornton Abbey in North Lincolnshire uncovered a mass grave of 48 people, including 27 children.[27] Radiocarbon dating and artifacts found in the mass grave showed that the bodies were from the time of the Black Death.[27] The wide range of ages of the remains, from one to 45 years, led archaeologists to infer that something devastating most likely caused their deaths.[27] Typically, mass graves contain remains from either the very young or the very old; this was not the case here. Because all ages were being buried here, archaeologists inferred that, although Thornton Abbey was adjacent to a small town, it was consumed by the plague to the extent in which a mass grave was needed. Until this discovery, known mass graves were very rare because small towns seemed to bury their dead in usual ways.[28] It is believed that mass burials were used in Europe during this time because of the overwhelming number of deaths caused by the Black Plague.[26]

Teeth samples from the remains revealed the presence of plague bacteria.[27] These samples showed the presence of Y. pestis DNA, the bacterial cause of the plague. "Molecular identification by 'suicide PCR' of Yersinia pestis in the pulp tissue of teeth" and other forms of analysis on ancient DNA has become progressively more common with modern advancements.[29]

Tuberculosis

[edit]

Some diseases are difficult to evaluate in the archaeology, however, tuberculosis can be found and dates as far back as the Neolithic period. Tuberculosis is presumed to have been transmitted from domesticated cattle to humans through ingestion of contaminated meats and the drinking of contaminated milk.[30] It is also possible to contract tuberculosis through contact with infected persons. When an infected person coughs, they eject infected mucus from their body which can possibly infect those close by.[31] There are several types of tuberculosis: the kind that affects cold-blooded animals, the kind that affects birds, and the bovine type that causes disease in humans. Because bovine tuberculosis is often found in children, it may be that the disease is spread through the consumption of contaminated milk.[32]

Tuberculosis manifests itself in the archaeological record through DNA extraction from the skeletal remains of people. Tuberculosis rarely manifests itself in the skeleton of individuals and when it does, it is usually only in advanced stages of the disease.[33] The tuberculosis bacteria stays in the growth centers and spongy areas of the bone.[32] Tuberculosis can lie dormant for long periods of time; because of the long period of development in the body, tuberculosis damages the body and then the body has time to repair itself. The evidence of the disease in bones can be seen in the destruction and healing of the bone structures especially in joints. Tuberculosis therefore appears in the archaeology record in the knee and hip joints and also the spine.[31]

It was thought that there was no tuberculosis infection in North America before the arrival of Europeans, but findings from the 1980s and 1990s have overturned that idea.[34] Through extraction of DNA within the bone tuberculosis was not only found, but also dated to have been present in the Americas since 800 BC. Tuberculosis is a disease that thrives in dense populations; the implication of finding tuberculosis in pre-Columbian society is that there was a large thriving community at the time.[35] The earliest evidence of tuberculosis has been found in Italy dating to the 4th millennium BC. Evidence of tuberculosis has also been found in mummies from ancient Egypt dating to the same period. There is however, a lack of medical texts from ancient European and Mediterranean regions describing diseases that are identifiable as tuberculosis but the bones show that there was a disease of this type.[36]

Syphilis

[edit]
Paleopathologies in bones of a Dilophosaurus specimen, plotted onto a life restoration

Syphilis is a disease classified in a category of treponemal disease. This group includes diseases like pinta, yaws, endemic syphilis and venereal syphilis. These diseases have symptoms that include inflammatory changes in tissues throughout the body. Initially the infected person may notice an area of inflammation at the site where the bacteria entered the body. Then the individual can expect more widespread soft tissue changes and lastly the diseases start to affect the bones. However, Only 10-20 percent of people infected with venereal syphilis show bone changes.[37] Venereal syphilis has more severe symptoms than the other types of treponemal disease. Nervous system and circulatory disruption are unique to venereal syphilis and are not seen in yaws, endemic syphilis or pinta.

Bone changes can be seen in the archaeological record through lesions on the surface on the bone. In venereal syphilis the bone change is characterized by damage to the knees and joints. The damaged joints could be the source of infection or they could be damaged because of disruption in the nervous systems and ability to feel.[38] In the beginning stages of the disease, the bone forms small lesions on the skull and tibiae. These lesions are caused mostly by inflammation of the marrow. In the final stages of the disease the bones start to be destroyed. Lesions that are formed tend to look similar to "worm holes" in the bone and are seen in the skull as well as large bones in the body.[32] Most of the bone that is destroyed is due to secondary infections.

Syphilis has been seen in the Americas and Europe alike but there is debate as to what the origin of the disease is. Columbus and his sailors were said to have brought it to the Americas, however, Europeans blame Columbus for bringing the disease to Europe. There has not been any evidence of bone lesions associated with the disease that Columbus and the Europeans describe.[39] The debate on the origins of venereal syphilis has been the subject of scientific discussions for hundreds of years and has recently been discussed and debated. At the first International Congress on the Evolution and Paleoepidemiology the subject was examined and debated by scholars from all over the world. There was no conclusive decision made as to the origin of venereal syphilis.

See also

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Paleopathology

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Paleopathology is the of ancient s and pathological conditions in and remains, including skeletal elements, mummified tissues, and other archaeological evidence from to the recent past. This interdisciplinary field integrates , , , and to reconstruct the , patterns, and biological stresses experienced by past populations. By examining such as bone lesions and indirect sources like ancient texts or artwork, paleopathologists identify conditions ranging from infectious s like and to non-infectious ailments such as and nutritional deficiencies. The origins of paleopathology trace back to the late 18th century, with early observations of pathological changes in fossils, such as Johann Friedrich Esper's 1774 identification of in a cave bear bone. The term "paleopathology" was formally coined in 1892 by American physician R.W. Shufeldt, building on foundational work by figures like and , who applied pathological to ancient remains in the mid-19th century. Pioneers such as Armand Ruffer advanced the field in the early through systematic studies of mummified tissues, publishing the first paleopathological article in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology in 1920. The establishment of the Paleopathology Association in 1974 marked a key milestone, fostering global collaboration and standardizing research practices. Modern paleopathology employs advanced multidisciplinary methods to overcome challenges like the incomplete preservation of remains and diagnostic biases. Techniques include macroscopic and microscopic analysis of skeletal lesions, imaging technologies such as computed tomography (CT) scans for non-destructive examination, and molecular approaches like () sequencing to detect pathogens, as demonstrated in the 1998 identification of in medieval plague victims. Stable isotope analysis reveals dietary and mobility patterns influencing health, while paleomicrobiology and trace over time. These innovations have shifted the field from descriptive case studies to biocultural interpretations, incorporating social factors like gender, inequality, and caregiving behaviors. The significance of paleopathology extends beyond historical reconstruction, offering insights into human adaptation, the origins of modern diseases, and predictive models for contemporary health challenges under the "" framework. It addresses ethical considerations, prioritizing non-invasive methods and respecting laws, which vary by region. Despite limitations like the "osteological paradox"—where skeletal evidence primarily reflects terminal conditions rather than —ongoing refinements in methodology continue to enhance its reliability and impact.

History

Early Observations and Pioneering Work

The earliest recognition of pathological conditions in ancient human remains can be traced to descriptions in classical texts, where physicians noted skeletal deformities without direct examination of preserved bodies. (c. 460–370 BCE) described conditions like in works such as On the Articulations and in his corpus, attributing them to imbalances in bodily humors and providing foundational observations on joint and bone abnormalities that later informed paleopathological interpretations. Similar insights appear in ancient Egyptian medical papyri, such as the (c. 1550 BCE), which documents symptoms of diseases including potential urinary (haematuria) and bone-related afflictions, suggesting awareness of chronic conditions through clinical cases rather than archaeological evidence. These textual accounts, while not systematic paleopathology, highlighted the persistence of diseases across time and influenced later antiquarian interests. In the 18th and 19th centuries, studies and collections began to systematically document pathologies in excavated remains, marking the transition to empirical paleopathology. Johann Friedrich Esper's 1774 publication described the first known pathological fossil, in a femur from , establishing the precedent for recognizing trauma and tumors in ancient specimens. By the mid-19th century, advanced the field through pathological analysis of human fossils; in 1878, he identified and rickets-like changes in the skeleton from the Dusseldorf Museum, demonstrating degenerative joint disease in early hominins and emphasizing the value of . Museums played a crucial role in these efforts, with collections like those in the and housing Egyptian and Peruvian artifacts where curators noted abnormalities; for instance, early 19th-century examinations of Peruvian mummies revealed treponemal-like lesions suggestive of , fueling debates on the disease's New World origins and prompting descriptions in reports by explorers and archaeologists. These observations, often anecdotal, relied on macroscopic inspection and integrated findings from global excavations. Pioneering systematic work emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with Sir Marc Armand Ruffer establishing paleopathology as a distinct discipline. Ruffer developed innovative histological techniques to rehydrate and examine mummified tissues, allowing microscopic identification of ancient diseases. His seminal 1913 publication, Studies in the Palaeopathology of , analyzed over 100 Egyptian mummies and skeletons from predynastic to Coptic periods (c. 5000 BCE–500 CE), documenting cases of (e.g., deformans in a Third Dynasty noble's vertebrae, causing spinal rigidity) and (calcified Bilharzia haematobia eggs in Twentieth Dynasty kidneys, dating to c. 1200 BCE). Ruffer also conducted experiments in 1913, artificially mummifying infected animal tissues to study disease preservation, which validated his methods for detecting and in royal mummies like that of Ramses II. Building on Ruffer's work, Roy Lee Moodie compiled and edited key publications, including Ruffer's collected studies in 1921, further systematizing the field. These efforts shifted the field from descriptive antiquarianism to scientific analysis, emphasizing interdisciplinary approaches with and .

Development in the 20th and 21st Centuries

The establishment of paleopathology as a distinct field in the early was advanced by pioneering researchers such as Calvin Wells, whose work on pathological conditions in archaeological skeletal remains, including those from indigenous populations, laid foundational methodologies for systematic analysis. In the mid-, Saul Jarcho contributed significantly through his compilations and editorial efforts on human paleopathology, including organizing key symposia that synthesized global evidence of ancient diseases and stimulated interdisciplinary dialogue. These efforts marked a shift from anecdotal observations to rigorous, evidence-based scholarship, integrating medical with archaeological contexts. The professionalization of the discipline accelerated in the 1970s with the formation of the Paleopathology Association in 1973, founded by Aidan and Eve Cockburn to foster international collaboration among researchers in , , and . This organization promoted standardized reporting and ethical guidelines for studying human remains, culminating in the launch of its official journal, the International Journal of Paleopathology, in 2011, which provided a dedicated platform for peer-reviewed advancements in the field. A major theoretical shift occurred in the 1980s and 1990s with the emergence of the biocultural approach, championed by Jane Buikstra, who emphasized interpreting pathological evidence within broader social, environmental, and cultural contexts rather than isolated biological anomalies. Buikstra's framework, building on her 1977 work on biocultural dimensions in archaeological studies, encouraged analyses that linked disease patterns to factors like subsistence strategies and inequality, transforming paleopathology into a holistic subfield of . In the , paleopathology gained further institutional legitimacy through initiatives like the UNESCO-supported program on studying origins in archaeological remains, which highlighted its role in bioarchaeological and global heritage preservation. Post-2000 developments have increasingly emphasized large-scale global datasets, facilitated by digital archives and international consortia, enabling comparative analyses of health trends across regions and time periods to address contemporary issues like emerging infectious s.

Methods and Techniques

Macroscopic and Microscopic Analysis

Macroscopic analysis in paleopathology begins with the direct visual examination of skeletal and mummified remains to identify pathological changes, focusing on surface features such as lesions, remodeling patterns, and enthesopathies that indicate stress or processes. This gross inspection often employs low-magnification tools like hand lenses (5-10x) and oblique lighting to enhance visibility of subtle alterations, such as the porous texture of porotic hyperostosis on cranial vaults, which may suggest or nutritional deficiencies. For internal assessment, plays a key role by revealing hidden fractures, lytic areas, or degeneration without destructive sampling, allowing differentiation of acute versus chronic conditions through patterns of . Microscopic analysis complements macroscopic findings through histological examination of bone thin sections, which provides insights into cellular-level responses to pathology, such as the presence of woven bone indicative of rapid repair from infection or mechanical stress. Preparation typically involves grinding undecalcified bone samples into thin sections (around 50-100 μm thick) using diamond saws and abrasives, preserving the mineralized matrix for polarized light microscopy to distinguish pathological remodeling from normal lamellar bone. This technique is particularly valuable for detecting subtle infectious processes, like periostitis, where microscopic periosteal reactions show layered new bone deposition not always apparent macroscopically. Differential diagnosis relies on established criteria to distinguish pathological s from non-pathological variants or postmortem damage, with Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín's 1998 standards providing guidelines for evaluating features like lesion margins, , and associated skeletal involvement to separate trauma from infectious or metabolic pathologies. Preservation factors significantly influence these analyses, as taphonomic changes—such as soil-induced erosion, root etching, or insect activity—can mimic antemortem s like pitting or notching, necessitating careful documentation of context to avoid misinterpretation. While macroscopic and microscopic methods form the foundation of paleopathological , they can be complemented by molecular approaches for confirmatory evidence in ambiguous cases.

Biochemical and Molecular Approaches

Biochemical and molecular approaches in paleopathology leverage advanced techniques to extract and analyze chemical signatures and genetic from ancient remains, providing insights into past s and physiological conditions that are often undetectable through visual examination alone. These methods, which typically involve destructive sampling, enable the identification of ancient pathogens, dietary patterns indicative of nutritional stress, protein biomarkers of , and microbial communities, complementing macroscopic observations by offering molecular-level evidence of and . Ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis has revolutionized the detection of infectious diseases in skeletal remains through extraction from bone or dental pulp followed by (PCR) amplification of pathogen-specific sequences. A seminal application involved the use of "suicide PCR," a contamination-controlled technique, to confirm as the causative agent of the 14th-century in European plague victims, marking one of the first molecular verifications of a historical . Subsequent studies have refined aDNA protocols, incorporating targeted enrichment to reconstruct full pathogen genomes from low-yield samples, as demonstrated in analyses of Black Death cemeteries revealing strain variations absent in modern Y. pestis. Stable isotope analysis of from bones and teeth measures ratios of carbon (δ¹³C) and (δ¹⁵N) to reconstruct diet and infer metabolic disorders linked to nutritional deficiencies, such as or . Elevated δ¹⁵N values often signal protein or physiological stress, while δ¹³C indicates reliance on C3 (e.g., temperate ) versus C4 (e.g., ) resources. Trophic level shifts are quantified using the enrichment factor: δ15Nconsumer=δ15Ndiet+3−5‰\delta^{15}N_{consumer} = \delta^{15}N_{diet} + 3-5‰ This equation, applied in paleopathological contexts, has revealed famine-induced stress in medieval populations through incremental dentine sampling showing progressive isotopic enrichment toward death. via , particularly time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF), identifies ancient proteins as biomarkers for sex determination and inflammatory conditions. For instance, peptides from distinguish male (AMELY) from female (AMELX) individuals in fragmented remains, aiding demographic reconstructions in paleopathology. In disease contexts, MALDI-TOF has been used to identify mycobacterial proteins, such as catalase-peroxidase (KatG), in ancient samples as direct evidence of without relying on genetic material. Recent advancements as of 2025 include refined next-generation sequencing (NGS) protocols for ancient pathogen genomes and expanded proteomic profiling for disease biomarkers. Metagenomics, advanced by post-2010 next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, enables reconstruction of ancient microbiomes from and paleofeces, shedding light on gastrointestinal pathogens and dietary health. of coprolite DNA has identified host-specific microbial signatures, such as Helicobacter pylori strains in pre-Columbian , confirming regional disease transmission. Tools like CoproID further authenticate human-origin samples by predicting fecal sources from metagenomic data, enhancing interpretations of parasitic infections and in past populations.

Trauma Analysis

Skeletal Trauma

Skeletal trauma in paleopathology refers to non-violent injuries to the bony skeleton preserved in ancient human remains, providing insights into accidental events, occupational hazards, and daily biomechanical stresses experienced by past populations. These injuries, distinct from intentional violence, often exhibit evidence of healing, allowing researchers to reconstruct the circumstances of injury and the individual's survival and adaptation. Analysis focuses on fracture morphology, joint disruptions, and associated pathological changes, using macroscopic examination, radiography, and advanced imaging to differentiate antemortem (healed or healing) from perimortem (around death) trauma. Common types of fractures identified in paleopathological contexts include comminuted fractures, where the bone shatters into multiple fragments often from high-impact accidents; greenstick fractures, incomplete breaks common in subadult remains due to the flexibility of immature under bending forces; and stress fractures, resulting from repetitive low-level loading that exceeds bone tolerance over time. progresses through distinct stages: initial formation with inflammation, followed by soft callus development via and , then hard callus formation, and finally remodeling to restore original structure and strength. These stages are assessed in ancient skeletons using radiogrammetry, which measures cortical bone thickness and on radiographs to evaluate healing progress and bone quality. Dislocations and joint injuries, such as anterior shoulder dislocations, are also documented, frequently leading to as a due to chronic instability and altered joint mechanics. Occupational and accidental patterns emerge in agricultural communities, exemplified by vertebral compression fractures in early farming populations reflecting repetitive heavy lifting and spinal loading. Biomechanical modeling enhances interpretations by reconstructing the forces involved in these injuries; finite element analysis (FEA) simulates stress distributions and force vectors on digitized skeletal models from ancient remains. This approach distinguishes accidental trauma patterns, such as those from environmental falls, from other causes, aiding in reconstructions.

Interpersonal Violence

Interpersonal violence in paleopathology is evidenced through skeletal remains exhibiting deliberate injuries, such as perimortem trauma from weapons, which provide insights into conflict, warfare, and in past populations. Perimortem trauma occurs at or near the time of death and is distinguished from antemortem trauma by the absence of or , often showing fresh fractures with radiating cracks, plastic deformation in blunt force cases, or clean incisions in sharp force injuries. Sharp force trauma, for instance, results from bladed or pointed implements like arrowheads embedded in or causing deep cuts without signs of recovery. Blunt force trauma, similarly identified by unhealed depressed fractures or vault shattering without remodeling, reflects impacts from clubs or stones, with plastic deformation of the signaling high-energy, intentional strikes. In the prehistoric , evidence of interpersonal includes trophy-taking practices, such as and head removal, marked by perimortem cut marks around the cranium and facial defleshing. During the Archaic period in the Eastern Woodlands, particularly along the and Green Rivers around 1000 BCE, archaeological sites reveal trophy elements like modified skulls with incisions, suggesting ritualized conflict indicating organized raids or warfare. In the later Ohio Hopewell culture (circa 50 BCE–350 CE), trophy skulls from mound sites exhibit cut marks consistent with and , often associated with competition and status display among Middle Woodland societies. Mass violence events further highlight the scale of interpersonal conflict, as exemplified by the Crow Creek massacre in around 1325 CE, where at least 486 individuals—representing about 60% of a village population—were killed, showing widespread perimortem trauma including decapitations, , and cut marks on over 90% of the remains, buried in a communal within a defensive ditch. This event underscores intergroup warfare among Native American populations, with evidence of dismemberment and possible cannibalistic modification on bones. Gender and age patterns in violence are evident in (circa 2300–1100 BCE), where cranial trauma prevalence reaches up to 13% in southern Swedish populations, predominantly affecting males through unhealed blunt force injuries to the skull, interpreted as indicators of interpersonal or organized warfare rather than isolated incidents. These patterns suggest male involvement in raiding or battles, with lower rates among females and subadults, reflecting social structures that channeled aggression toward adult males.

Infectious Diseases

Bacterial Infections

Bacterial infections represent a significant category of pathologies identified in paleopathological studies, manifesting primarily through skeletal changes resulting from pyogenic processes that affect and, less frequently, preserved soft tissues. These infections often arise from opportunistic entering through wounds, dental issues, or systemic spread in environments with compromised , leading to localized and . In ancient populations, such conditions were exacerbated by factors like dense living arrangements and limited medical interventions, with evidence drawn from macroscopic lesions and advanced molecular techniques. Osteomyelitis, a hallmark of bacterial bone infection, is characterized by the formation of cloacae—draining sinuses through the cortex—and sequestra, which are necrotic bone fragments isolated by reactive new bone (involucrum). These features typically occur in the medullary cavities of long bones, such as the or , reflecting chronic suppuration from like . In ancient Egyptian remains from the Old Kingdom period (circa 2500 BCE), nonspecific has been documented in skeletal assemblages from sites like Dahshur-South, where poor sanitation in urbanizing Nile Valley communities likely facilitated bacterial entry via minor injuries or contaminated water sources. Such cases highlight how socioeconomic stressors amplified rates in early complex societies. Molecular analyses of mummified soft tissues have further illuminated bacterial involvement, revealing direct evidence of pathogens in non-skeletal contexts. For instance, applied to 500-year-old Inca mummies from the (circa 1500 CE) detected proteins consistent with a severe pulmonary bacterial infection involving sp. from the avium-bovis-tuberculosis complex at the time of death; this approach, developed in the , underscores the potential of to identify active infections in desiccated tissues without DNA preservation. At the population level, bacterial infections show patterns tied to subsistence shifts, with increased prevalence in urbanizing communities of the around 7000 BCE. In Syrian sites like Tell Aswad during the Pottery Neolithic (7,350–6,000 cal. BC), dental abscesses—a common bacterial complication—affected approximately 1.67% of tooth sockets, linked to dietary changes introducing fermentable carbohydrates and worsened amid and animal proximity. These abscesses often stemmed from untreated caries, propagating bacteria like species into periapical regions. Differentiating bacterial infections from trauma in paleopathology relies on morphology, particularly periosteal reactions, which appear as layered new bone deposition along the . Infectious typically produces smooth, continuous, and symmetrical reactions encircling the bone, often with cloacae or lytic areas indicating suppuration, whereas traumatic responses show irregular, localized, or lamellar patterns aligned with injury sites and may heal without involucrum formation. This distinction is crucial for accurate , as overlapping features can mimic each other in fragmented remains.

Treponemal and Mycobacterial Diseases

Treponemal diseases, caused by bacteria of the genus , particularly subspecies pallidum responsible for venereal , manifest in paleopathological records through chronic skeletal changes that reflect the disease's tertiary stage. Diagnostic criteria include proliferative leading to sabre shin of the tibiae, caries sicca (nodular, destructive lesions on the ), and erosion of the orbital roof, often observed in pre-Columbian American populations where the pathogen circulated endemically. These lesions indicate long-term infection, with historical prevalence evidenced by high rates in densely populated sites, suggesting transmission via close contact in non-venereal forms like bejel or before evolving into venereal . The debate over syphilis's origins—whether it arose in the Old World, New World, or both—persisted for centuries, with early evidence of treponemal infections in both hemispheres fueling controversy. Genomic studies in the 2010s, analyzing ancient DNA from skeletal remains, resolved this by demonstrating that distinct T. pallidum strains existed in the prior to 1492 CE, supporting the Columbian hypothesis where European contact facilitated global spread of the venereal form while local variants persisted. For instance, in pre-Columbian sites like those in around 1300 CE, such as the Animas-La Plata archaeological context, remains exhibit classic treponemal pathology including sabre shins and caries sicca, confirming endemic presence without post-contact influence. Mycobacterial diseases, including tuberculosis (Mycobacterium tuberculosis) and leprosy (Mycobacterium leprae), are identified in paleopathology by specific osteological signatures of chronic granulomatous infection. Tuberculosis often presents as , characterized by vertebral body collapse and due to spinal involvement, with prevalence linked to urban crowding and nutritional stress in ancient populations. confirmation from an 8000-year-old skeleton at , , revealed M. tuberculosis in a young adult with vertebral lesions, marking one of the earliest verified cases and indicating origins in the . Leprosy, a slowly progressing neuropathy, is diagnosed via rhinomaxillary syndrome, featuring resorption of the nasal aperture margins, anterior nasal spine atrophy, and expansion from repeated facial infections. In medieval , evidence appears in burials reflecting community integration rather than isolation, with historical prevalence rising alongside monastic communities. At Whithorn Priory, , early medieval (ca. 8th century CE) skeletons show rhinomaxillary lesions consistent with , including nasal spine resorption and palatal porosity, in individuals buried in standard ecclesiastical contexts without stigma indicators.

Non-Infectious Pathologies

Metabolic and Nutritional Disorders

Metabolic and nutritional disorders in paleopathology reveal how ancient populations coped with dietary deficiencies arising from environmental constraints, subsistence strategies, and social factors, often manifesting as skeletal alterations that reflect on and growth. These conditions, primarily linked to and shortages, provide insights into past lifestyles, such as reliance on monotonous diets or limited sunlight exposure, without direct evidence of . Key indicators include changes in , , and density, analyzed through macroscopic examination and corroborated by biochemical methods like isotope analysis. Scurvy, resulting from vitamin C deficiency, is identified in skeletal remains by subperiosteal hemorrhages that cause new bone formation along diaphyses and porous lesions on the cranium and , particularly in juveniles where may also appear due to disrupted tooth development during acute episodes. In Inuit populations, such as those from 18th-century sites around , these features are evident in remains showing proliferative responses at muscle attachments and cranial , attributed to seasonal food scarcity and reliance on preserved meats lacking fresh sources of . Diagnosis relies on the co-occurrence of multiple lesions, as isolated signs can mimic other pathologies, emphasizing the need for contextual dietary reconstruction. Rickets and osteomalacia, both stemming from , produce characteristic skeletal deformities including bowed long bones like the femora and widened, frayed metaphyses in growing individuals, while adults exhibit softened bones leading to pseudofractures and pelvic distortions. In Britain around 500 BCE, evidence from rural sites shows these changes linked to reduced sunlight exposure in northern latitudes and diets low in vitamin D-rich foods, with affected subadults displaying flared rib ends and cranial thinning. Such findings highlight how urbanization precursors and agricultural intensification may have exacerbated deficiencies, though prevalence remains low compared to later industrial periods. Anemia, often nutritional in origin from iron-poor diets, is inferred from cribra orbitalia—porous pitting in the eye orbits—and porotic hyperostosis on the , representing marrow expansion to compensate for reduced production. In Mississippian mound-building societies around 1000 CE, of these lesions spiked to over 30% in some assemblages, correlated with heavy dependence on , a staple low in bioavailable iron and high in phytates that inhibit absorption, compounded by and resource strain. These markers overlap briefly with infectious causes of , such as parasitic loads, but nutritional factors dominate in maize-reliant contexts. Stable isotope analysis complements these observations by correlating nutritional stress with elevated δ¹⁵N values in bone collagen, indicating protein catabolism during deficiency periods as the body breaks down tissues for energy. In deficient populations, such as those experiencing famine or monotonous diets, δ¹⁵N enrichment of 2–3‰ above baseline signals prolonged stress, often aligning with skeletal evidence of anemia or growth faltering. This approach, applied to serial sampling of dentin or bone, reveals temporal patterns of deficiency, enhancing interpretations of how environmental and cultural factors influenced metabolic health.

Neoplastic and Congenital Conditions

Neoplastic conditions in paleopathology encompass both benign and malignant tumors identified in ancient remains, often through macroscopic lesions, radiographic , and histological . Benign neoplasms, such as osteomas, are among the more frequently documented, appearing as dense, bony protuberances on cranial or postcranial elements. Malignant neoplasms, including , exhibit aggressive production and destruction, with examples including a probable parosteal osteosarcoma on the of an Iron Age individual from (c. 800–400 BCE), characterized by a lobulated exophytic mass and periosteal reaction visible on radiographs. Metastatic carcinomas, secondary malignancies spreading to , are rarer but significant; an early case involves lytic on a from , , dating to the Old Kingdom period (c. 3000 BCE), interpreted as metastatic carcinoma likely originating from a nasopharyngeal based on distribution and morphology. Histological confirmation of in such cases relies on thin-section revealing irregular woven formation, trabecular , and cellular patterns, distinguishing tumors from infectious or traumatic lesions. Congenital conditions in paleopathology refer to structural anomalies present at birth, detectable in skeletal remains through deviations in bone morphology and growth. , a resulting in incomplete vertebral arch fusion, has been reported in European contexts, such as incomplete sacral closures in remains from sites in and (c. 5000–3000 BCE), where the anomaly is identified macroscopically as a widened defect in the posterior elements without associated soft tissue preservation. , the most common form of characterized by rhizomelic limb shortening, frontal bossing, and relative , is evidenced in ancient European samples; a notable early case is from the Late site of Grotta del Romito in (c. 10,000 BCE), where an adolescent male exhibited disproportionate short stature (estimated at 130 cm) and diagnostic cranial features, though closer to periods, a mesomelic dysplasia variant—featuring mid-limb shortening—was documented in a subadult from a burial in northern (c. 4000 BCE), confirmed by limb proportions and epiphyseal morphology. These anomalies highlight genetic or developmental origins, occasionally influenced by nutritional factors during gestation, but distinct from acquired deficiencies. The prevalence of neoplastic conditions in paleopathological assemblages is notably low, typically less than 1% of examined skeletons, as evidenced by systematic reviews of over 150 sites yielding only 272 cancer cases across millennia, attributed to shorter lifespans in ancient populations (average age at death 30–40 years) reducing exposure to age-related carcinogens compared to modern rates exceeding 40%. Congenital anomalies are similarly infrequent, with and comprising under 0.5% of European samples, reflecting their rarity (modern incidence ~1 in 10,000 for ) and challenges in preservation of or subadult remains. Diagnostic hurdles persist due to taphonomic damage and mimicry, but advanced techniques like micro-CT enhance identification, underscoring neoplasms and congenital conditions as indicators of ancient health disparities and genetic diversity.

Challenges and Future Directions

Diagnostic Limitations

Paleopathology faces significant challenges from taphonomic biases, which alter the skeletal record through differential preservation processes after death. Robust, dense bones such as long bones and crania tend to preserve better than fragile, cancellous structures like those in the vertebrae or ribs, leading to an overrepresentation of certain skeletal elements in archaeological assemblages. This selective preservation results in the underrepresentation of diseases that primarily affect soft tissues or produce subtle bony changes, as these pathologies often leave minimal or no skeletal evidence that survives burial environments. For instance, in acidic soils with pH levels around 5-6, overall bone mass can decrease by as much as 35.8% within the first month of burial. Such environmental factors further skew interpretations of population health. Sampling issues compound these taphonomic effects, introducing biases in the skeletal samples available for analysis. assemblages often overrepresent non- individuals, as burials may have been in separate, less excavated locations or used perishable materials that do not preserve, leading to skewed estimates of s associated with . Incomplete excavations exacerbate this, with only portions of sites recovered, particularly in urban settings where development disturbs remains unevenly, resulting in disparities between urban and rural profiles—urban samples frequently show higher frequencies of stress markers like periosteal reactions due to denser populations and poorer , while rural ones reflect more activity-related pathologies. These biases mean that paleopathologists must account for incomplete demographic representation, as skeletal samples reflect the dead rather than the living population, potentially inflating estimates of frailty in marginalized groups. Pseudopathology presents another diagnostic hurdle, where postmortem damage mimics antemortem , complicating accurate identification. For example, gnawing can produce irregular, destructive marks on surfaces that resemble the caries-like or lytic associated with treponemal diseases such as , particularly on cranial or elements. Such artifacts often include polishing, cracking, or pitting that, without contextual analysis like radiologic examination, may be misattributed to infectious processes, leading to erroneous reconstructions of disease history. Distinguishing these requires evaluating factors like edges, coloration differences between damaged and intact , and associated taphonomic signatures, but small or fragmented remains heighten the risk of misdiagnosis. Statistical challenges arise from the typically small sample sizes in paleopathological studies, necessitating advanced modeling to estimate disease reliably. With assemblages often comprising fewer than 100 individuals, traditional frequentist approaches yield wide confidence intervals and low power, biasing results toward over- or underestimation of conditions like infectious diseases. models address this by incorporating from ethnographic or , updating them with observed evidence via : the of disease given lesions, P(disease∣lesions)P(\text{disease} \mid \text{lesions}), equals the prior probability of disease times the likelihood of lesions given disease, divided by the marginal probability of lesions. This approach has been applied to paleodemographic , such as estimating age-at-death distributions in nomadic populations, to derive more robust rates despite sparse .

Emerging Applications in One Health

Paleopathology integrates with the framework by offering long-term insights into the interplay between human, animal, and , particularly through the study of ancient zoonotic diseases. This deep-time perspective reveals how pathogens like (TB) originated and evolved, aiding modern efforts to combat emerging threats such as antibiotic resistance. For instance, analyses have traced to African origins around 6,000 years ago, with subsequent spillovers to animals including , goats, and pinnipeds, as evidenced in pre-Columbian South American remains showing human-to-seal transmission before 1000 CE. Recent 2020s studies, including those on medieval leprosy reservoirs in red squirrels and Neolithic in goats, underscore how historical animal management practices facilitated zoonotic jumps, informing current surveillance of strains like that contribute to drug-resistant TB in and humans. Paleopathological evidence from periods of rapid highlights health inequalities driven by , paralleling contemporary challenges like epidemics. In 19th-century industrial , skeletal remains from urban sites reveal elevated prevalence among non-adult paupers, linked to deficiencies from monotonous diets of preserved foods amid overcrowded living conditions and exploitative labor. These findings, combined with markers of and infectious diseases, demonstrate how socioeconomic disparities amplified nutritional stress in dense settlements, much as modern urban environments foster through access to energy-dense processed foods and unequal resource distribution, increasing risks for metabolic disorders. analyses of such industrial-era assemblages emphasize that urbanization historically intensified density-related pathologies, providing analogs for addressing inequities in today's global cities. Isotope analyses in paleopathology have illuminated links between ancient events, migration, and health vulnerabilities, offering predictive models for global warming impacts. Post-2015 research on drought-stressed populations, such as those in the during the Late Classic period (ca. 800–900 CE), uses stable carbon and oxygen from skeletal remains to show dietary shifts toward less nutritious C4 plants during prolonged dry spells, correlating with increased and reduced stature as indicators. These data reveal how environmental stressors exacerbated nutritional deficiencies and population declines, with migration patterns inferred from indicating failed adaptations to . Similar Holocene-wide studies integrate isotope evidence of physiological stress with paleopathological lesions, predicting that contemporary warming-induced droughts could heighten risks in vulnerable agrarian societies, much like ancient cases where resource scarcity amplified disease susceptibility. Ethical advancements in paleopathology have progressed significantly since the 1990 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), which established protocols for consulting indigenous groups and repatriating ancestral remains and cultural items from federal collections. As of 2025, NAGPRA has facilitated the repatriation of approximately 135,000 individuals and over 2 million objects, promoting collaborative research frameworks that prioritize community consent and incorporate traditional knowledge into health studies. These protocols have extended globally, influencing ethical guidelines for non-Native contexts and ensuring paleopathological inquiries respect descendant rights while advancing One Health applications. In the 2020s, interdisciplinary tools like AI for processing large skeletal datasets are emerging to support non-invasive analyses, aiding repatriation by accelerating lesion documentation without prolonged handling of remains, though implementation remains in early stages within bioarchaeological practice. Recent developments include the conceptualization of "One Paleopathology," a holistic approach integrating paleopathological data with One Health to examine long-term human-animal-environment interactions, particularly in the context of climate and environmental change.

References

  1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9936186/
  2. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/microbiolspec.poh-0014-2015
  3. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajpa.23366
  4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2654856/
  5. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4509874/
  6. https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/chungara/v32n2/art09.pdf
  7. https://hekint.org/2023/01/12/marc-ruffer-founder-of-paleopathology/
  8. https://blog.archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/2018/10/01/the-calvin-wells-palaeopathology-archive/
  9. https://findingaids.nlm.nih.gov/repositories/ammp/resources/jarcho
  10. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1879981711000039
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251719077_Welcome_to_the_International_Journal_of_Paleopathology
  12. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=DexghF0AAAAJ&hl=en
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255723475_Palaeopathology_studying_the_origin_evolution_and_frequency_of_disease_in_human_remains_from_archaeological_sites
  14. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003130994-3/macroscopic-study-human-skeletal-paleopathology-simon-mays
  15. https://www.monument.ufg.uni-kiel.de/en/the-projects/hessisch-westfaelische-megalithik/forschungsziele-und-methoden/beispiele-fuer-methoden-in-der-palaeopathologie/index.html
  16. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2600025/
  17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11786993/
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366273738_Preparation_of_thin_histological_sections_from_archaeological_bone_and_tooth_samples
  19. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajpa.10024
  20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44571739_Issues_in_Paleopathology_and_Possible_Strategies_for_Dealing_With_Them
  21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440310003183
  22. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04800-3
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8629122/
  24. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/oa.3337
  25. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1879981718301876
  26. https://oxfordre.com/anthropology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.001.0001/acrefore-9780190854584-e-641
  27. https://www.academia.edu/3325282/Archaic_Trophy_Taking_in_the_Eastern_Woodlands
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271762235_Ohio_Hopewell_Trophy-Skull_Artifacts_as_Evidence_for_Competition_in_Middle_Woodland_Societies_Circa_50_BC_AD_350
  29. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4035/
  30. https://portal.research.lu.se/files/125047363/Tornberg_NBAS.pdf
  31. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/OutputFile/1369643
  32. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/palaeopathology/infectious-diseases/A8C128858D2F25790EC8D202FDF9FF27
  33. https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/ijae/article/view/13735
  34. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9248241/
  35. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3405130/
  36. https://journals.openedition.org/paleorient/921
  37. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1879981716301267
  38. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3413456/
  39. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08515-5
  40. https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/136/2014/08/Harper11.pdf
  41. https://anthropology.unm.edu/people/faculty/profile/stodder-cv-april-2021.doc
  42. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2565837/
  43. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/oa.1250
  44. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/14018/2/Filipek_-_PhD.pdf
  45. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6282809/
  46. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajpa.23699
  47. https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/files/34505972/530114_vol1.pdf
  48. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30061000/
  49. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440311004705
  50. https://www.museum.state.il.us/RiverWeb/landings/Ambot/prehistory/mississippian/economy/health-analysis.html
  51. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-antiquity/article/parasites-porotic-hyperostosis-and-the-implications-of-changing-perspectives/6900636C86E37AED1974962775B3E76F
  52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19280675/
  53. https://sharondewitte.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/walter-et-al-2020-assessment-of-nutritional-stress-in-famine-burials-using-stable-isotope-analysis.pdf
  54. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/oa.2760
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879981723000244
  56. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3956457/
  57. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3670395/
  58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259540884_A_Neolithic_Case_of_Mesomelic_Dysplasia_from_Northern_Switzerland
  59. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29773338/
  60. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-022-01616-0
  61. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/23492/5/02whole.pdf
  62. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0151854
  63. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25000392
  64. https://sharondewitte.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/dewitte-and-stojanowski-2015-the-osteological-paradox-20-years-later-past-perspectives-future-directions.pdf
  65. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/previewfile/1671474/6160.pdf
  66. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359256322_Taphonomic_bias_in_preservation_and_representativeness_of_skeletal_samples_a_case_of_Gonur_Depe
  67. https://oxfordre.com/anthropology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.001.0001/acrefore-9780190854584-e-639
  68. https://www.scribd.com/document/348745827/Bayes-theorem-in-paleopathological-diagnosis-2-pdf
  69. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajpa.24211
  70. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8392/5/1/13
  71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.04.006
  72. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.2837
  73. https://journals.upress.ufl.edu/bioarchaeology/article/view/680/724
  74. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/OutputFile/1329807
  75. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5428467/
  76. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/690046
  77. https://creor-ejournal.library.mcgill.ca/article/download/36/23/95
  78. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9942907/
  79. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-anthro-010220-075435
  80. https://www.propublica.org/article/native-american-remains-returned-repatriation-nagpra
  81. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/biosci/biaf115/8198379
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.