Hubbry Logo
NeolithicNeolithicMain
Open search
Neolithic
Community hub
Neolithic
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Neolithic
Neolithic
from Wikipedia
Neolithic
Reconstruction of Pre-Pottery Neolithic B housing in Aşıklı Höyük, modern Turkey
PeriodFinal period of Stone Age
Datesc. 10,000 BCE to c. 2,000 BCE
Preceded byMesolithic, Epipalaeolithic
Followed byChalcolithic
Reconstruction of a Neolithic farmstead, Irish National Heritage Park. The Neolithic saw the invention of agriculture.

The Neolithic or New Stone Age (from Greek νέος néos 'new' and λίθος líthos 'stone') is an archaeological period, the final division of the Stone Age in Mesopotamia, Asia, Europe and Africa (c. 10,000 BCE to c. 2,000 BCE). It saw the Neolithic Revolution, a wide-ranging set of developments that appear to have arisen independently in several parts of the world. This "Neolithic package" included the introduction of farming, domestication of animals, and change from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to one of settlement. The term 'Neolithic' was coined by John Lubbock in 1865 as a refinement of the three-age system.[1]

The Neolithic began about 12,000 years ago, when farming appeared in the Epipalaeolithic Near East and Mesopotamia, and later in other parts of the world. It lasted in the Near East until the transitional period of the Chalcolithic (Copper Age) from about 6,500 years ago (4500 BCE), marked by the development of metallurgy, leading up to the Bronze Age and Iron Age.

In other places, the Neolithic followed the Mesolithic (Middle Stone Age) and then lasted until later. In Ancient Egypt, the Neolithic lasted until the Protodynastic period, c. 3150 BCE.[2][3][4] In China, it lasted until circa 2000 BCE with the rise of the pre-Shang Erlitou culture,[5] as it did in Scandinavia.[6][7][8]

Origin

[edit]
Approximate centers of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic Revolution and its spread in prehistory: the Fertile Crescent (12,000 BP), the Yangtze river and Yellow River basins (9,000 BP) and the New Guinea Highlands (9,000–6,000 BP), Central Mexico (5,000–4,000 BP), Northern South America (5,000–4,000 BP), sub-Saharan Africa (5,000–4,000 BP, exact location unknown), eastern North America (4,000–3,000 BP).[9]

Following the ASPRO chronology, the Neolithic started in around 10,200 BC in the Levant, arising from the Natufian culture, when pioneering use of wild cereals evolved into early farming. The Natufian period or "proto-Neolithic" lasted from 12,500 to 9,500 BC, and is taken to overlap with the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) of 10,200–8800 BC. As the Natufians had become dependent on wild cereals in their diet, and a sedentary way of life had begun among them, the climatic changes associated with the Younger Dryas (about 10,000 BC) are thought to have forced people to develop farming.

The founder crops of the Fertile Crescent were wheat, lentil, pea, chickpea, bitter vetch, and flax. Among the other major crops to be domesticated were rice and millet. Crops were usually domesticated in a single location and ancestral wild species are still found.[10]

Early Neolithic age farming was limited to a narrow range of plants, both wild and domesticated, which included einkorn wheat, millet and spelt, and the keeping of dogs. By about 8000 BC, it included domesticated sheep and goats, cattle and pigs.

Not all of these cultural elements characteristic of the Neolithic appeared everywhere in the same order: the earliest farming societies in the Near East did not use pottery. In other parts of the world, such as Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia, independent domestication events led to their own regionally distinctive Neolithic cultures, which arose completely independently of those in Europe and Southwest Asia. Early Japanese societies and other East Asian cultures used pottery before developing agriculture.[11][12]

Periods by region

[edit]

Southwest Asia

[edit]
An array of Neolithic artifacts, including bracelets, axe heads, chisels, and polishing tools

In the Middle East, cultures identified as Neolithic began appearing in the 10th millennium BC.[13] Early development occurred in the Levant (e.g. Pre-Pottery Neolithic A and Pre-Pottery Neolithic B) and from there spread eastwards and westwards. Neolithic cultures are also attested in southeastern Anatolia and northern Mesopotamia by around 8000 BC.[citation needed]

Anatolian Neolithic farmers derived a significant portion of their ancestry from the Anatolian hunter-gatherers (AHG), suggesting that agriculture was adopted in site by these hunter-gatherers and not spread by demic diffusion into the region.[14]

Pre-Pottery Neolithic A

[edit]
The Urfa Man c. 9000 BC.[15][16][17] Şanlıurfa Archaeology and Mosaic Museum.

The Neolithic 1 (PPNA) period began around 10,000 BC in the Levant.[13] A temple area in southeastern Turkey at Göbekli Tepe, dated to around 9500 BC, may be regarded as the beginning of the period. This site was developed by nomadic hunter-gatherer tribes, as shown by the absence of permanent housing nearby, and may be the oldest known human-made place of worship.[18] At least seven stone circles, covering 25 acres (10 ha), contain limestone pillars carved with animals, insects, and birds. Stone tools were used by perhaps as many as hundreds of people to create the pillars, which might have supported roofs. Other early PPNA sites dating to around 9500–9000 BC have been found in Palestine, notably in Tell es-Sultan (ancient Jericho) and Gilgal in the Jordan Valley; Israel (notably Ain Mallaha, Nahal Oren, and Kfar HaHoresh); and in Byblos, Lebanon. The start of Neolithic 1 overlaps the Tahunian and Heavy Neolithic periods to some degree.[citation needed]

The major advance of Neolithic 1 was true farming. In the proto-Neolithic Natufian cultures, wild cereals were harvested, and perhaps early seed selection and re-seeding occurred. The grain was ground into flour. Emmer wheat was domesticated, and animals were herded and domesticated (animal husbandry and selective breeding).[citation needed]

In 2006, remains of figs were discovered in a house in Jericho dated to 9400 BC. The figs are of a mutant variety that cannot be pollinated by insects, and therefore the trees can only reproduce from cuttings. This evidence suggests that figs were the first cultivated crop and mark the invention of the technology of farming. This occurred centuries before the first cultivation of grains.[19]

Settlements became more permanent, with circular houses, much like those of the Natufians, with single rooms. However, these houses were for the first time made of mudbrick. The settlement had a surrounding stone wall and perhaps a stone tower (as in Jericho). The wall served as protection from nearby groups, as protection from floods, or to keep animals penned. Some of the enclosures also suggest grain and meat storage.[20]

Pre-Pottery Neolithic B

[edit]
Female and male figurines; 9000–7000 BC; gypsum with bitumen and stone inlays; from Tell Fekheriye (Al-Hasakah Governorate of Syria); University of Chicago Oriental Institute (USA)

The Neolithic 2 (PPNB) began around 8800 BC according to the ASPRO chronology in the Levant (Jericho, West Bank).[13] As with the PPNA dates, there are two versions from the same laboratories noted above. This system of terminology, however, is not convenient for southeast Anatolia and settlements of the middle Anatolia basin.[citation needed] A settlement of 3,000 inhabitants called 'Ain Ghazal was found in the outskirts of Amman, Jordan. Considered to be one of the largest prehistoric settlements in the Near East, it was continuously inhabited from approximately 7250 BC to approximately 5000 BC.[21]

Settlements have rectangular mud-brick houses where the family lived together in single or multiple rooms. Burial findings suggest an ancestor cult where people preserved skulls of the dead, which were plastered with mud to make facial features. The rest of the corpse could have been left outside the settlement to decay until only the bones were left, then the bones were buried inside the settlement underneath the floor or between houses.[citation needed]

Pre-Pottery Neolithic C

[edit]

Work at the site of 'Ain Ghazal in Jordan has indicated a later Pre-Pottery Neolithic C period. Juris Zarins has proposed that a Circum Arabian Nomadic Pastoral Complex developed in the period from the climatic crisis of 6200 BC, partly as a result of an increasing emphasis in PPNB cultures upon domesticated animals, and a fusion with Harifian hunter gatherers in the Southern Levant, with affiliate connections with the cultures of Fayyum and the Eastern Desert of Egypt. Cultures practicing this lifestyle spread down the Red Sea shoreline and moved east from Syria into southern Iraq.[22]

Late Neolithic

[edit]

The Late Neolithic began around 6,400 BC in the Fertile Crescent.[13] By then distinctive cultures emerged, with pottery like the Halafian (Turkey, Syria, Northern Mesopotamia) and Ubaid (Southern Mesopotamia). This period has been further divided into PNA (Pottery Neolithic A) and PNB (Pottery Neolithic B) at some sites.[23]

The Chalcolithic (Stone-Bronze) period began about 4500 BC, then the Bronze Age began about 3500 BC, replacing the Neolithic cultures.[citation needed]

Fertile Crescent

[edit]
'Ain Ghazal Statues, found at 'Ain Ghazal in Jordan, are considered to be one of the earliest large-scale representations of the human form dating back to around 7250 BC.
Neolithic wall painting from Tell Bouqras at the Deir ez-Zor Museum, Syria

Around 10,000 BC the first fully developed Neolithic cultures belonging to the phase Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) appeared in the Fertile Crescent.[13] Around 10,700–9400 BC a settlement was established in Tell Qaramel, 10 miles (16 km) north of Aleppo. The settlement included two temples dating to 9650 BC.[24] Around 9000 BC during the PPNA, one of the world's first towns, Jericho, appeared in the Levant. It was surrounded by a stone wall, may have contained a population of up to 2,000–3,000 people, and contained a massive stone tower.[25] Around 6400 BC the Halaf culture appeared in Syria and Northern Mesopotamia.

In 1981, a team of researchers from the Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée, including Jacques Cauvin and Oliver Aurenche, divided Near East Neolithic chronology into ten periods (0 to 9) based on social, economic and cultural characteristics.[26] In 2002, Danielle Stordeur and Frédéric Abbès advanced this system with a division into five periods.

  1. Natufian between 12,000 and 10,200 BC,
  2. Khiamian between 10,200 and 8800 BC, PPNA: Sultanian (Jericho), Mureybetian,
  3. Early PPNB (PPNB ancien) between 8800 and 7600 BC, middle PPNB (PPNB moyen) between 7600 and 6900 BC,
  4. Late PPNB (PPNB récent) between 7500 and 7000 BC,
  5. A PPNB (sometimes called PPNC) transitional stage (PPNB final) in which Halaf and dark faced burnished ware begin to emerge between 6900 and 6400 BC.[27]

They also advanced the idea of a transitional stage between the PPNA and PPNB between 8800 and 8600 BC at sites like Jerf el Ahmar and Tell Aswad.[28]

Southern Mesopotamia

[edit]

Alluvial plains (Sumer/Elam). Low rainfall makes irrigation systems necessary. Ubaid culture originated from 6200 BC.[29]

Northeastern Africa

[edit]
Algerian cave paintings depicting hunting scenes
Megaliths from Nabta Playa displayed in the Aswan Nubian museum

The earliest evidence of Neolithic culture in northeast Africa was found in the archaeological sites of Bir Kiseiba and Nabta Playa in what is now southwest Egypt.[30] Domestication of sheep and goats reached Egypt from the Near East possibly as early as 6000 BC.[31][32] Graeme Barker states "The first indisputable evidence for domestic plants and animals in the Nile valley is not until the early fifth millennium BC in northern Egypt and a thousand years later further south, in both cases as part of strategies that still relied heavily on fishing, hunting, and the gathering of wild plants" and suggests that these subsistence changes were not due to farmers migrating from the Near East but was an indigenous development, with cereals either indigenous or obtained through exchange.[33] Other scholars argue that the primary stimulus for agriculture and domesticated animals (as well as mud-brick architecture and other Neolithic cultural features) in Egypt was from the Middle East.[34][35][36]

Northwestern Africa

[edit]
The neolithization of Northwestern Africa corresponded to the arrival of European migration circa 5500 BCE (), and a wace of Levantine migration circa 5000 BCE (), with some local admixture ().[37]

The neolithization of Northwestern Africa was initiated by Iberian, Levantine (and perhaps Sicilian) migrants around 5500–5300 BC.[38] During the Early Neolithic period, farming was introduced by Europeans and was subsequently adopted by the locals.[38] During the Middle Neolithic period, an influx of ancestry from the Levant appeared in Northwestern Africa, coinciding with the arrival of pastoralism in the region.[38] The earliest evidence for pottery, domestic cereals and animal husbandry is found in Morocco, specifically at Kaf el-Ghar.[38]

Sub-Saharan Africa

[edit]

The Pastoral Neolithic was a period in Africa's prehistory marking the beginning of food production on the continent following the Later Stone Age. In contrast to the Neolithic in other parts of the world, which saw the development of farming societies, the first form of African food production was mobile pastoralism,[39][40] or ways of life centered on the herding and management of livestock. The term "Pastoral Neolithic" is used most often by archaeologists to describe early pastoralist periods in the Sahara,[41] as well as in eastern Africa.[42]

The Savanna Pastoral Neolithic or SPN (formerly known as the Stone Bowl Culture) is a collection of ancient societies that appeared in the Rift Valley of East Africa and surrounding areas during a time period known as the Pastoral Neolithic. They were South Cushitic speaking pastoralists, who tended to bury their dead in cairns whilst their toolkit was characterized by stone bowls, pestles, grindstones and earthenware pots.[43] Through archaeology, historical linguistics and archaeogenetics, they conventionally have been identified with the area's first Afroasiatic-speaking settlers. Archaeological dating of livestock bones and burial cairns has also established the cultural complex as the earliest center of pastoralism and stone construction in the region.[44]

Europe

[edit]
Female figure from Tumba Madžari, North Macedonia
Map showing distribution of some of the main culture complexes in Neolithic Europe, c. 3500 BC
Skara Brae, Scotland. Evidence of home furnishings (shelves)

In southeast Europe agrarian societies first appeared in the 7th millennium BC, attested by one of the earliest farming sites of Europe, discovered in Vashtëmi, southeastern Albania and dating back to 6500 BC.[45][46] In most of Western Europe in followed over the next two thousand years, but in some parts of Northwest Europe it is much later, lasting just under 3,000 years from c. 4500 BC–1700 BC. Recent advances in archaeogenetics have confirmed that the spread of agriculture from the Middle East to Europe was strongly correlated with the migration of early farmers from Anatolia about 9,000 years ago, and was not just a cultural exchange.[47][48]

Anthropomorphic figurines have been found in the Balkans from 6000 BC,[49] and in Central Europe by around 5800 BC (La Hoguette). Among the earliest cultural complexes of this area are the Sesklo culture in Thessaly, which later expanded in the Balkans giving rise to Starčevo-Körös (Cris), Linearbandkeramik, and Vinča. Through a combination of cultural diffusion and migration of peoples, the Neolithic traditions spread west and northwards to reach northwestern Europe by around 4500 BC. The Vinča culture may have created the earliest system of writing, the Vinča signs, though archaeologist Shan Winn believes they most likely represented pictograms and ideograms rather than a truly developed form of writing.[50]

The Cucuteni-Trypillian culture built enormous settlements in Romania, Moldova and Ukraine from 5300 to 2300 BC. The megalithic temple complexes of Ġgantija on the Mediterranean island of Gozo (in the Maltese archipelago) and of Mnajdra (Malta) are notable for their gigantic Neolithic structures, the oldest of which date back to around 3600 BC. The Hypogeum of Ħal-Saflieni, Paola, Malta, is a subterranean structure excavated around 2500 BC; originally a sanctuary, it became a necropolis, the only prehistoric underground temple in the world, and shows a degree of artistry in stone sculpture unique in prehistory to the Maltese islands. After 2500 BC, these islands were depopulated for several decades until the arrival of a new influx of Bronze Age immigrants, a culture that cremated its dead and introduced smaller megalithic structures called dolmens to Malta.[51] In most cases there are small chambers here, with the cover made of a large slab placed on upright stones. They are claimed to belong to a population different from that which built the previous megalithic temples. It is presumed the population arrived from Sicily because of the similarity of Maltese dolmens to some small constructions found there.[52]

With some exceptions, population levels rose rapidly at the beginning of the Neolithic until they reached the carrying capacity.[53] This was followed by a population crash of "enormous magnitude" after 5000 BC, with levels remaining low during the next 1,500 years.[53] Populations began to rise after 3500 BC, with further dips and rises occurring between 3000 and 2500 BC but varying in date between regions.[53] Around this time is the Neolithic decline, when populations collapsed across most of Europe, possibly caused by climatic conditions, plague, or mass migration.[54]

South and East Asia

[edit]

Settled life, encompassing the transition from foraging to farming and pastoralism, began in South Asia in the region of Balochistan, Pakistan, around 7,000 BC.[55][56][57] At the site of Mehrgarh, Balochistan, presence can be documented of the domestication of wheat and barley, rapidly followed by that of goats, sheep, and cattle.[58] In April 2006, it was announced in the scientific journal Nature that the oldest (and first Early Neolithic) evidence for the drilling of teeth in vivo (using bow drills and flint tips) was found in Mehrgarh.[59]

In South India, the Neolithic began by 3000 BC and lasted until around 1400 BC when the Megalithic transition period began. South Indian Neolithic is characterized by Ash mounds (created from ritual burning of wood, dung and animal matter) from 2500 BC in Karnataka region, expanded later to Tamil Nadu.[60]

Neolithic artifacts from China

In East Asia, the earliest sites include the Nanzhuangtou culture around 9500–9000 BC,[61] Pengtoushan culture around 7500–6100 BC, and Peiligang culture around 7000–5000 BC. The prehistoric Beifudi site near Yixian in Hebei Province, China, contains relics of a culture contemporaneous with the Cishan and Xinglongwa cultures of about 6000–5000 BC, Neolithic cultures east of the Taihang Mountains, filling in an archaeological gap between the two Northern Chinese cultures. The total excavated area is more than 1,200 square yards (1,000 m2; 0.10 ha), and the collection of Neolithic findings at the site encompasses two phases.[62] Between 3000 and 1900 BC, the Longshan culture existed in the middle and lower Yellow River valley areas of northern China. Towards the end of the 3rd millennium BC, the population decreased sharply in most of the region and many of the larger centres were abandoned, possibly due to environmental change linked to the end of the Holocene Climatic Optimum.[63]

The 'Neolithic' (defined in this paragraph as using polished stone implements) remains a living tradition in small and extremely remote and inaccessible pockets of West Papua. Polished stone adze and axes are used in the present day (as of 2008) in areas where the availability of metal implements is limited. This is likely to cease altogether in the next few years as the older generation die off and steel blades and chainsaws prevail.[citation needed]

In 2012, news was released about a new farming site discovered in Munam-ri, Goseong, Gangwon Province, South Korea, which may be the earliest farmland known to date in east Asia.[64] "No remains of an agricultural field from the Neolithic period have been found in any East Asian country before, the institute said, adding that the discovery reveals that the history of agricultural cultivation at least began during the period on the Korean Peninsula". The farm was dated between 3600 and 3000 BC. Pottery, stone projectile points, and possible houses were also found. "In 2002, researchers discovered prehistoric earthenware, jade earrings, among other items in the area". The research team will perform accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) dating to retrieve a more precise date for the site.[65]

The Americas

[edit]

In Mesoamerica, a similar set of events (i.e., crop domestication and sedentary lifestyles) occurred by around 4500 BC in South America, but possibly as early as 11,000–10,000 BC. These cultures are usually not referred to as belonging to the Neolithic; in North America, different terms are used such as Formative stage instead of mid-late Neolithic, Archaic Era instead of Early Neolithic, and Paleo-Indian for the preceding period.[66]

The Formative stage is equivalent to the Neolithic Revolution period in Europe, Asia, and Africa. In the southwestern United States it occurred from 500 to 1200 AD when there was a dramatic increase in population and development of large villages supported by agriculture based on dryland farming of corn (maize), and later, beans, squash, and domesticated turkeys. During this period the bow and arrow and ceramic pottery were also introduced.[67] In later periods cities of considerable size developed, and some metallurgy by 700 BC.[68]

Australia

[edit]

Australia, in contrast to New Guinea, has generally been held not to have had a Neolithic period, with a hunter-gatherer lifestyle continuing until the arrival of Europeans. This view can be challenged in terms of the definition of agriculture, but "Neolithic" remains a rarely used and not very useful concept in discussing Australian prehistory.[69]

Cultural characteristics

[edit]

Social organization

[edit]
Model of a Linear Pottery culture settlement, showing longhouses, circular enclosures, and fields
Anthropomorphic Neolithic ceramic figurine

During most of the Neolithic age of Eurasia, people lived in small tribes composed of multiple bands or lineages.[70] There is little scientific evidence of developed social stratification in most Neolithic societies; social stratification is more associated with the later Bronze Age.[71] Although some late Eurasian Neolithic societies formed complex stratified chiefdoms or even states, generally states evolved in Eurasia only with the rise of metallurgy, and most Neolithic societies on the whole were relatively simple and egalitarian.[70] Beyond Eurasia, however, states were formed during the local Neolithic in three areas, namely in the Preceramic Andes with the Caral-Supe Civilization,[72][73] Formative Mesoamerica and Ancient Hawaiʻi.[74] However, most Neolithic societies were noticeably more hierarchical than the Upper Paleolithic cultures that preceded them and hunter-gatherer cultures in general.[75][76]

Clay human figurine (Fertility goddess) Tappeh Sarab, Kermanshah c. 7000–6100 BC, National Museum of Iran

The domestication of large animals (c. 8000 BC) resulted in a dramatic increase in social inequality in most of the areas where it occurred; New Guinea being a notable exception.[77] Possession of livestock allowed competition between households and resulted in inherited inequalities of wealth. Neolithic pastoralists who controlled large herds gradually acquired more livestock, and this made economic inequalities more pronounced.[78] However, evidence of social inequality is still disputed, as settlements such as Çatalhöyük reveal a lack of difference in the size of homes and burial sites, suggesting a more egalitarian society with no evidence of the concept of capital, although some homes do appear slightly larger or more elaborately decorated than others.[79]

Families and households were still largely independent economically, and the household was probably the center of life.[80][81] However, excavations in Central Europe have revealed that early Neolithic Linear Ceramic cultures ("Linearbandkeramik") were building large arrangements of circular ditches between 4800 and 4600 BC. These structures (and their later counterparts such as causewayed enclosures, burial mounds, and henge) required considerable time and labour to construct, which suggests that some influential individuals were able to organise and direct human labour – though non-hierarchical and voluntary work remain possibilities.

There is a large body of evidence for fortified settlements at Linearbandkeramik sites along the Rhine, as at least some villages were fortified for some time with a palisade and an outer ditch.[82][83] Settlements with palisades and weapon-traumatized bones, such as those found at the Talheim Death Pit, have been discovered and demonstrate that "...systematic violence between groups" and warfare was probably much more common during the Neolithic than in the preceding Paleolithic period.[76] This supplanted an earlier view of the Linear Pottery Culture as living a "peaceful, unfortified lifestyle".[84] Violence increased toward the end of this culture which existed at 5500–4500 BCE.[85] In 2024, a study suggested a peaceful explanation to the reduction in the size of male population observed worldwide 5000–3000 years ago.[86]

Control of labour and inter-group conflict is characteristic of tribal groups with social rank that are headed by a charismatic individual – either a 'big man' or a proto-chief – functioning as a lineage-group head. Whether a non-hierarchical system of organization existed is debatable, and there is no evidence that explicitly suggests that Neolithic societies functioned under any dominating class or individual, as was the case in the chiefdoms of the European Early Bronze Age.[87] Possible exceptions to this include Iraq during the Ubaid period and England beginning in the Early Neolithic (4100–3000 BC).[88][89] Theories to explain the apparent implied egalitarianism of Neolithic (and Paleolithic) societies have arisen, notably the Marxist concept of primitive communism.[citation needed]

Phylogenies reconstructed from modern genetic data indicates an extreme drop in Y-chromosomal diversity occurred during the Neolithic, with effective population size for the mitochondria up to 17 times higher than for the Y-chromosomes during this period.[90] The causes of this bottleneck remain poorly understood. At a basic level, it can likely be attributed to a culture-induced change in the distribution of male reproductive success, with possible explanations ranging from an increased incidence of violence and male mortality during the Neolithic [91] to the rise of patrilineal segmentary groups with varying reproductive success due to polygyny.[92]

Shelter and sedentism

[edit]
Reconstruction of Neolithic house in Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina

The shelter of early people changed dramatically from the Upper Paleolithic to the Neolithic era. In the Paleolithic, people did not normally live in permanent constructions. In the Neolithic, mud brick houses started appearing that were coated with plaster.[93] This increased use of clay for building, along with the development of pottery and other clay-based artifacts, has led some to refer to the Neolithic period as the Age of Clay.[94] The growth of agriculture made permanent houses far more common. At Çatalhöyük 9,000 years ago, doorways were made on the roof, with ladders positioned both on the inside and outside of the houses.[93] Stilt-house settlements were common in the Alpine and Pianura Padana (Terramare) region.[95] Remains have been found in the Ljubljana Marsh in Slovenia and at the Mondsee and Attersee lakes in Upper Austria, for example.

Agriculture

[edit]
A Cucuteni-Trypillian culture deer antler plough
Food and cooking items retrieved at a European Neolithic site: millstones, charred bread, grains and small apples, a clay cooking pot, and containers made of antlers and wood

A significant and far-reaching shift in human subsistence and lifestyle was to be brought about in areas where crop farming and cultivation were first developed: the previous reliance on an essentially nomadic hunter-gatherer subsistence technique or pastoral transhumance was at first supplemented, and then increasingly replaced by, a reliance upon the foods produced from cultivated lands. These developments are also believed to have greatly encouraged the growth of settlements, since it may be supposed that the increased need to spend more time and labor in tending crop fields required more localized dwellings. This trend would continue into the Bronze Age, eventually giving rise to permanently settled farming towns, and later cities and states whose larger populations could be sustained by the increased productivity from cultivated lands.

The profound differences in human interactions and subsistence methods associated with the onset of early agricultural practices in the Neolithic have been called the Neolithic Revolution, a term coined in the 1920s by the Australian archaeologist Vere Gordon Childe.

One potential benefit of the development and increasing sophistication of farming technology was the possibility of producing surplus crop yields, in other words, food supplies in excess of the immediate needs of the community. Surpluses could be stored for later use, or possibly traded for other necessities or luxuries. Agricultural life afforded securities that nomadic life could not, and sedentary farming populations grew faster than nomadic.

However, early farmers were also adversely affected in times of famine, such as may be caused by drought or pests. In instances where agriculture had become the predominant way of life, the sensitivity to these shortages could be particularly acute, affecting agrarian populations to an extent that otherwise may not have been routinely experienced by prior hunter-gatherer communities.[78] Nevertheless, agrarian communities generally proved successful, and their growth and the expansion of territory under cultivation continued.

Another significant change undergone by many of these newly agrarian communities was one of diet. Pre-agrarian diets varied by region, season, available local plant and animal resources and degree of pastoralism and hunting. Post-agrarian diet was restricted to a limited package of successfully cultivated cereal grains, plants and to a variable extent domesticated animals and animal products. Supplementation of diet by hunting and gathering was to variable degrees precluded by the increase in population above the carrying capacity of the land and a high sedentary local population concentration. In some cultures, there would have been a significant shift toward increased starch and plant protein. The relative nutritional benefits and drawbacks of these dietary changes and their overall impact on early societal development are still debated.

In addition, increased population density, decreased population mobility, increased continuous proximity to domesticated animals, and continuous occupation of comparatively population-dense sites would have altered sanitation needs and patterns of disease.

Lithic technology

[edit]

The identifying characteristic of Neolithic technology is the use of polished or ground stone tools, in contrast to the flaked stone tools used during the Paleolithic era.

Neolithic people were skilled farmers, manufacturing a range of tools necessary for the tending, harvesting and processing of crops (such as sickle blades and grinding stones) and food production (e.g. pottery, bone implements). They were also skilled manufacturers of a range of other types of stone tools and ornaments, including projectile points, beads, and statuettes. But what allowed forest clearance on a large scale was the polished stone axe above all other tools. Together with the adze, fashioning wood for shelter, structures and canoes for example, this enabled them to exploit the newly developed farmland.

Neolithic peoples in the Levant, Anatolia, Syria, northern Mesopotamia and Central Asia were also accomplished builders, utilizing mud-brick to construct houses and villages. At Çatalhöyük, houses were plastered and painted with elaborate scenes of humans and animals. In Europe, long houses built from wattle and daub were constructed. Elaborate tombs were built for the dead. These tombs are particularly numerous in Ireland, where there are many thousand still in existence. Neolithic people in the British Isles built long barrows and chamber tombs for their dead and causewayed camps, henges, flint mines and cursus monuments. It was also important to figure out ways of preserving food for future months, such as fashioning relatively airtight containers, and using substances like salt as preservatives.

The peoples of the Americas and the Pacific mostly retained the Neolithic level of tool technology until the time of European contact. Exceptions include copper hatchets and spearheads in the Great Lakes region.

Clothing

[edit]

Most clothing appears to have been made of animal skins, as indicated by finds of large numbers of bone and antler pins that are ideal for fastening leather. Wool cloth and linen might have become available during the later Neolithic,[96][97] as suggested by finds of perforated stones that (depending on size) may have served as spindle whorls or loom weights.[98][99][100]

List of early settlements

[edit]
Reconstruction of a Cucuteni-Trypillian hut, in the Tripillian Museum, Ukraine
archaeological site of Çatalhöyük in the Konya Plain in Turkey

Neolithic human settlements include:

name location early date (BC) late date (BC) comments
Tell Qaramel Syria 10,700[101] 9400
Franchthi Cave Greece 10,000 reoccupied between 7500 and 6000 BC
Göbekli Tepe Turkey 9600 8000
Nanzhuangtou Hebei, China 9500 9000
Byblos Lebanon 8800 7000[102]
Jericho (Tell es-Sultan) West Bank 9500 arising from the earlier Epipaleolithic Natufian culture
Pulli settlement Estonia 8500 5000 oldest known settlement of Kunda culture
Aşıklı Höyük Central Anatolia, Turkey, an Aceramic Neolithic period settlement 8200 7400 correlating with the E/MPPNB in the Levant
Nevali Cori Turkey 8000
Bhirrana India 7600 7200 Hakra ware
Pengtoushan culture China 7500 6100 rice residues were carbon-14 dated to 8200–7800 BC
Çatalhöyük Turkey 7500 5700
Mentesh Tepe and Kamiltepe Azerbaijan 7000 3000[103]
'Ain Ghazal Jordan 7250 5000
Chogha Bonut Iran 7200
Jhusi India 7100
Motza Israel 7000
Ganj Dareh Iran 7000
Lahuradewa India 7000[104] presence of rice cultivation, ceramics etc.
Jiahu China 7000 5800
Knossos Crete 7000
Khirokitia Cyprus 7000 4000
Mehrgarh Pakistan 7000 5500 aceramic but elaborate culture including mud brick, houses, agriculture etc.
Sesklo Greece 6850 with a 660-year margin of error
Horton Plains Sri Lanka 6700 cultivation of oats and barley as early as 11,000 BC
Porodin North Macedonia 6500[105]
Padah-Lin Caves Burma 6000
Petnica Serbia 6000
Vinča-Belo Brdo Serbia 5700
Pločnik (archaeological site) Serbia 5500 4700 Earliest known copper tools in Europe, dated 5500 BC.
Stara Zagora Bulgaria 5500
Cucuteni-Trypillian culture Ukraine, Moldova and Romania 5500 2750
Tell Zeidan northern Syria 5500 4000
Tabon Cave Complex Quezon, Palawan, Philippines 5000 2000[106][107]
Hemudu culture, large-scale rice plantation China 5000 4500
The Megalithic Temples of Malta Malta 3600
Knap of Howar and Skara Brae Orkney, Scotland 3500 3100
Brú na Bóinne Ireland 3500
Lough Gur Ireland 3000
Shengavit Settlement Armenia 3000 2200
Norte Chico civilization, 30 aceramic Neolithic period settlements northern coastal Peru 3000 1700
Tichit Neolithic village on the Tagant Plateau central southern Mauritania 2000 500
Oaxaca, state Southwestern Mexico 2000 by 2000 BC Neolithic sedentary villages had been established in the Central Valleys region of this state.
Lajia China 2000
Mumun pottery period Korean Peninsula 1800 1500
Neolithic revolution Japan 500 300

The world's oldest known engineered roadway, the Post Track in England, dates from 3838 BC and the world's oldest freestanding structure is the Neolithic temple of Ġgantija in Gozo, Malta.

List of cultures and sites

[edit]

Note: Dates are very approximate, and are only given for a rough estimate; consult each culture for specific time periods.

Early Neolithic
Periodization: The Levant: 9500–8000 BC; Europe: 7000–4000 BC; Elsewhere: varies greatly, depending on region.

Middle Neolithic
Periodization: The Levant: 8000–6500 BC; Europe: 5500–3500 BC; Elsewhere: varies greatly, depending on region.

Later Neolithic
Periodization[broken anchor]: 6500–4500 BC; Europe: 5000–3000 BC; Elsewhere: varies greatly, depending on region.

Chalcolithic

Periodization: Near East: 6000–3500 BC; Europe: 5000–2000 BC; Elsewhere: varies greatly, depending on region. In the Americas, the Chalcolithic ended as late as the 19th century AD for some peoples.

Comparative chronology

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Neolithic period, also known as the New Stone Age, represents a transformative era in human prehistory marked by the transition from nomadic hunter-gatherer societies to settled agricultural communities, beginning around 12,000 years ago (circa 10,000 BCE) in the and independently in other regions worldwide. This shift, often termed the , fundamentally altered human economies, social structures, and technologies, enabling population growth and the development of complex societies. The period generally spanned until approximately 4,500–3,000 BCE in many areas, giving way to the or as emerged. Key innovations of the Neolithic included the of and animals, which provided reliable food sources and surplus production. In the of southwest , early domestications around 11,500–10,000 years ago involved wild cereals like and , alongside such as peas and lentils, while animals like sheep, , cattle, and pigs were selectively bred for traits suited to human needs. Similar processes occurred independently in regions like the and River valleys of (millet and , starting around 9,000–8,000 BCE), (maize, beans, and squash by 7,000 BCE), and sub- (sorghum and yams, around 5,000–3,000 BCE). These advancements were supported by the use of polished stone tools, groundstone implements for processing grains, and the invention of for storage and cooking, which facilitated a more . The establishment of permanent villages was a hallmark of Neolithic societies, with early examples including in the (dating to 9,600–8,300 BCE), in modern-day (7,200–6,000 BCE), and (circa 9,500 BCE), which featured monumental architecture predating full . These settlements, often housing hundreds to thousands of people, reflected increased social organization, trade networks (e.g., for tools), and symbolic practices, including art and ritual structures that hinted at emerging beliefs. Regionally, the Neolithic unfolded asynchronously: in , it spread from via farming dispersals around 7,000 BCE, while in the and , it emphasized different crops and timelines suited to local environments. This era laid the groundwork for subsequent civilizations by fostering surplus economies, specialization of labor, and cultural complexity.

Overview and Definition

Chronology and Terminology

The Neolithic period represents the final subdivision of the within the of , characterized primarily by the emergence of , production, and permanent settlements, spanning approximately 10,000 to 2,000 BCE on a global scale, though with significant regional variations in timing and duration. This era marks a pivotal transition from predominantly mobile lifestyles to more sedentary agrarian societies, enabling and . The three-age system, which structures prehistoric chronology into the Stone, Bronze, and Iron Ages based on predominant tool materials, was first formalized by Danish antiquarian Christian Jürgensen Thomsen in 1836 while curating artifacts for the National Museum of Denmark. Within the Stone Age, further subdivisions include the Paleolithic (Old Stone Age), focused on early stone tools and foraging; the Mesolithic (Middle Stone Age), a transitional phase with microliths and intensified hunting; and the Neolithic (New Stone Age), defined by ground stone tools, domestication, and ceramic technologies. The Neolithic's onset is often framed as the "Neolithic Revolution," a term coined by archaeologist V. Gordon Childe in his 1936 work Man Makes Himself, to describe the profound economic and social upheavals driven by food production innovations. Key terminologies within the Neolithic include the (PPN), divided into (Pre-Pottery Neolithic A, c. 10,000–8,800 BCE) and (Pre-Pottery Neolithic B, c. 8,800–6,500 BCE), phases distinguished by the absence of ceramics but presence of early architecture and plant domestication in . These precede the Pottery Neolithic, when vessel production became widespread, signaling further technological maturation. Chronological frameworks vary regionally due to independent or diffused adoptions of Neolithic traits: in the , it spans roughly 9,500–4,500 BCE; in , from about 7,000 BCE in the southeast to 1,700 BCE in the north; and in the , emerging around 3,000 BCE in select areas. Some classifications employ a tripartite division into Early, Middle, and based on ceramic styles, settlement expansion, or metal introductions, though this is not universally applied and depends on local archaeological sequences.

Significance and Characteristics

The Neolithic era marked a pivotal transition characterized by , where human communities shifted from nomadic to establishing permanent settlements, enabled by the of plants and animals around 11,500 years ago under stabilizing post-glacial climates. This fundamental change facilitated the production of food surpluses, which supported sustained and allowed for labor specialization beyond immediate subsistence needs, such as crafting and activities. The represented a profound societal transformation from hunter-gatherer economies to agriculture-based systems, fundamentally altering human organization by enabling the formation of complex societies with emergent trade networks, property concepts, and social hierarchies, including inequalities tied to resource control. This shift not only increased economic productivity but also fostered innovations in social structures that laid the groundwork for later urban civilizations. Environmentally, the era coincided with adaptations to post-Ice Age warming around 10,000 BCE following the , which provided favorable conditions for cultivation but also introduced challenges like from clearing land for farming and the development of early techniques to maintain fertility amid expanding . These human activities began altering landscapes on a scale previously unseen, contributing to long-term ecological shifts such as reduced woodland cover in settled regions. Demographically, the period saw explosive population growth, rising from an estimated 5 million people globally at its onset to approximately 50 million by its conclusion, driven by higher birth rates and reduced mobility, as indicated by increased settlement densities and archaeological evidence of larger communities. Culturally, this era witnessed the emergence of villages as central hubs, alongside ritual sites and symbolic practices, including structured burial rites that reflected growing beliefs in the afterlife and social cohesion.

Origins and Early Developments

Initial Transition in Southwest Asia

The initial transition to the Neolithic in Southwest Asia occurred during the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA), spanning approximately 10,000–8500 BCE, as communities shifted from the late Epipaleolithic Natufian culture toward more sedentary lifestyles and early plant management. The Natufian period (ca. 12,500–9600 BCE) provided key precursors, with evidence of semi-sedentary settlements, intensive wild cereal harvesting using sickles, and groundstone tools for processing, laying the groundwork for Neolithic innovations in the Fertile Crescent. Early sedentism is evident at sites like Jericho in the Jordan Valley, where PPNA layers reveal settlements covering up to 2.5 hectares, including round houses and a monumental stone wall estimated to require significant communal labor, suggesting organized social structures. Similarly, Göbekli Tepe in southeastern Turkey features large oval enclosures with T-shaped limestone pillars up to 5 meters high, often decorated with animal reliefs such as foxes and snakes, dated to ca. 9600–8500 BCE and interpreted as ritual or communal centers built by hunter-gatherers during the early Neolithic shift. In 2025, the discovery of the Masiyun site in Saudi Arabia revealed a PPNA settlement dating to 11,000–10,300 years ago, extending the early Neolithic presence southward. The subsequent (PPNB), from about 8500–7000 BCE, marked a broader adoption of farming and architectural advancements across the region. Widespread cultivation of cereals like emmer wheat and transitioned from wild harvesting to , with morphological changes such as non-shattering rachises appearing around 8700–8200 BCE at sites like Tell Aswad in the Early PPNB, supported by systematic planting on alluvial soils. Animal herding emerged, particularly of goats and sheep, with early management signatures including age-specific culling and corralling evident by around 8500 BCE in the Zagros region, expanding to the during PPNB to form mixed agropastoral economies. Settlements grew larger and more structured, featuring rectangular or sub-rectangular houses with lime-plaster floors, as seen at 'Ain Ghazal in (ca. 7250 BCE), where communities reached up to 50,000 m². in central exemplifies this phase, with densely packed mud-brick houses, plastered interiors, and evidence of domesticated cereals and herd animals integrated into daily life from ca. 7400 BCE. By the Pottery Neolithic period (ca. 7000–5000 BCE), ceramic technologies were introduced, facilitating storage and cooking of farmed produce, with early fired clay vessels appearing at sites like Boncuklu Höyük in around 8300 BCE. This phase saw expansion into southern , where pottery-bearing settlements like Tell Hassuna in adopted these innovations, likely through from northern regions, enabling denser populations and further agricultural intensification. Monumental , such as the T-shaped pillars at , underscores early symbolic complexity, potentially linking ritual practices to emerging social hierarchies during the PPNA-PPNB continuum. Recent excavations and analyses up to 2025 confirm local population continuity from Epipaleolithic Natufian groups to Neolithic farmers in the , with from Mesopotamian sites showing that populations derived primarily from local Epipaleolithic ancestry admixed with minor regional inputs, without major external migrations until the Pottery Neolithic. For instance, genomes from in (ca. 8500–7500 BCE) reveal stable mixtures of Anatolian, Levantine, and Zagros ancestries over centuries, supporting development of Neolithic traits from Natufian forebears.

Factors Driving the Revolution

The transition to Neolithic lifestyles was profoundly influenced by climatic shifts at the end of the Pleistocene epoch. The , a period of abrupt cooling from approximately 12,900 to 11,700 years ago, concluded around 9600 BCE, ushering in the warmer and more stable epoch. This warming facilitated the expansion of wild plant distributions, particularly in regions like the , where increased temperatures and supported denser and opened migration corridors for humans and animals, setting for intensified resource exploitation. Cognitive and behavioral advancements in late Paleolithic societies also played a pivotal role in driving the . Groups during the Epipaleolithic period, such as the Natufians in the , exhibited heightened through the construction of semi-permanent settlements and the use of storage facilities for gathered resources, indicating a shift toward and foresight beyond immediate needs. Concurrently, ritual complexity emerged, evidenced by elaborate burial practices and symbolic artifacts, which fostered social cohesion and cultural transmission essential for the cooperative labor required in early experimentation with plant cultivation. These developments reflect an evolving cognitive framework that enabled populations to adapt to environmental variability by prioritizing long-term strategies over opportunistic hunting and gathering. Population pressure emerged as a key explaining the intensification of resource use leading to . During the , especially in refugia like the amid stresses, growing human densities depleted local wild resources, compelling groups to adopt more intensive techniques and experiment with resource enhancement. This pressure, exacerbated by climatic instability, is posited to have accelerated the shift from broad-spectrum to targeted management of high-yield , as populations sought to sustain expanding numbers in constrained environments. V. Gordon Childe's Oasis Theory provides a foundational explanation for post-Ice Age dynamics. Proposed in the 1920s and refined in subsequent works, the theory argues that retreating glaciers and increasing aridity around 10,000 BCE forced human and animal populations to cluster near reliable water sources, such as oases or river valleys, promoting symbiotic relationships that inadvertently led to the taming and of . In these concentrated settings, reduced mobility and heightened interaction between humans and fauna facilitated the gradual of animals and protection of wild plants, marking a critical step toward sedentary agricultural communities. Recent genetic studies from the 2020s underscore the biological adaptations that supported Neolithic dietary shifts. Analyses of reveal that early farmers in and the rapidly evolved alleles, enabling adult digestion of milk from domesticated animals, with selection pressures evident by around 5000 BCE in pastoralist groups. Similarly, copy number variations in the AMY1 gene, which encodes salivary for starch breakdown, increased significantly in farming populations over the past 12,000 years, enhancing the efficiency of digesting carbohydrate-rich crops like and and providing a selective advantage in staple-dependent diets. These adaptations highlight how genetic changes intertwined with cultural innovations to sustain the nutritional demands of emerging agricultural societies.

Regional Variations

Southwest Asia and Near East

The Late Neolithic period in Southwest Asia, spanning approximately 6000–4500 BCE, witnessed significant expansions of settled communities across the , with the Ubaid culture emerging as a pivotal development in southern around 6500 BCE and extending northward by the mid-6th millennium BCE. This phase marked a transition toward greater , characterized by settlement hierarchies and communal architecture that foreshadowed , such as the multi-tiered platforms at in western and temple sequences at in southern . Ubaid influences spread through peaceful diffusion, incorporating local traditions and fostering over a vast area from the to southeast . Trade networks during this era connected Ubaid communities to , facilitating the exchange of from and other materials, which supported craft specialization and long-distance interactions as early as the 6th millennium BCE. These networks extended supra-regionally, linking southern Mesopotamian polities with peripheral areas through asymmetrical exchanges that enhanced socioeconomic differentiation and laid groundwork for later urban centers like . Regional variations distinguished Levantine traditions, which emphasized rain-fed agriculture and shared ceramic motifs with earlier Pre-Pottery Neolithic phases, from Mesopotamian ones focused on and stratified societies. In northern Mesopotamia, the Hassuna-Samarra ceramic traditions (ca. 6000–4800 BCE) exemplified these differences, with Hassuna featuring coarse painted wares in small villages suited to dry farming, while Samarra introduced finer geometric designs on buff pottery alongside T-shaped ritual buildings indicating emerging social hierarchies. Prominent sites illustrate these developments, including 'Ain Ghazal in the , where lime-plaster statues dating to around 6500 BCE—constructed over reed armatures and depicting human figures up to 1 meter tall—suggest ritual or communal significance, possibly as ancestral representations displayed in public spaces. At Tell Halula on the Middle , carbon of seeds from the 10th millennium BCE reveals elevated water inputs (over 110 mm for ), at least five times modern rainfall, pointing to early water management practices like alluvial planting or rudimentary that supported sustained . The diffusion of Neolithic practices to neighboring regions occurred through a combination of demic migration—evidenced by genetic and archaeobotanical continuity from Levantine —and cultural exchange via routes that carried ideas, technologies, and materials across the by the 7th–6th millennia BCE. Recent post-2020 archaeological surveys in the , including underwater reconnaissance in the Sharjah Emirate, have identified submerged coastal landscapes potentially preserving Neolithic adaptations, such as maritime resource exploitation and early seafaring networks linking the Gulf to around 7000–5000 BCE. These findings underscore the role of now-flooded lowlands as hubs for human mobility and economic innovation during environmental shifts.

Europe

The Neolithic period in Europe began around 6200 BCE in the southeastern with the , characterized by early farming settlements and pottery production that marked the transition from foraging economies. This culture, centered in present-day and , featured dispersed villages with pit-houses and evidence of domesticated plants and animals introduced from adjacent regions. By approximately 6000 BCE, Neolithic practices spread northward through the , reaching around 5500 BCE with the emergence of the (LBK) in the River valley and surrounding areas of modern-day , , and . The LBK is noted for its settlements, linear-decorated ceramics, and agricultural expansion into soils, representing a rapid dissemination of farming that covered vast territories within a few centuries. Genetic and archaeological evidence indicates that the spread of in primarily involved migrations of Anatolian farmers traveling via the corridor, where they encountered and admixed with local Western populations. analyses reveal that carried substantial ancestry from Anatolian Neolithic groups, with admixture rates varying from 10-30% local DNA in LBK individuals, facilitating cultural and genetic hybridization. This model contrasts with purely cultural transmission hypotheses, as isotopic and genomic data from LBK burials show mobility patterns consistent with movements from the southeast. In the Mediterranean, the Cardial Ware culture emerged around 6000 BCE along coastal regions from to the Adriatic, distinguished by impressed pottery shells and maritime-oriented settlements that adapted Near Eastern domesticated crops like and to local environments. Further west, along the Atlantic facade, megalithic tomb construction began circa 4500 BCE, with monumental structures like passage graves in Ireland and serving as communal ritual centers that emphasized collective ancestry and landscape integration. Key Neolithic sites illustrate these regional adaptations, such as in , , dating to 6500-5500 BCE, where multi-room houses and painted pottery reflect early sedentary life and symbolic art. In , on , , occupied from 3100-2500 BCE, preserves a clustered village of stone longhouses with integrated storage and drainage, evidencing communal living and possible ritual feasting areas marked by hearths and ceramics. LBK longhouses in , often 20-40 meters long, housed extended families and symbolized social organization, while megalithic sites like those in the Atlantic region incorporated communal rituals inferred from aligned burials and astronomical orientations. The in , around 2500 BCE, saw the rise of the , which spanned from Iberia to the , characterized by distinctive inverted-bell , equipment, and single burials indicating increased and mobility. This phenomenon signals precursors to , with early ornaments and alloys appearing in graves, alongside evidence of long-distance trade networks that connected diverse regions.

Africa

In northeastern Africa, the Neolithic period began around 6000 BCE in the Valley with the A culture, where communities transitioned to sedentary farming influenced by Near Eastern agricultural practices, including the cultivation of emmer wheat and , alongside local exploitation of wild resources. This culture featured semi-permanent settlements with storage pits for grains and evidence of early , such as domesticated sheep and goats, marking a key adaptation to the 's floodplains despite ongoing . Local domestication efforts included (Sorghum bicolor), with archaeobotanical remains from nearby sites like indicating human-mediated selection of wild varieties by the late sixth millennium BCE, though full domestication occurred later in the fourth millennium BCE in eastern . These developments highlight a blend of imported technologies and indigenous plant management suited to the region's semi-arid . In northwestern Africa, the Capsian tradition, evolving into a Neolithic phase around 6000 BCE, supported the emergence of in the through the introduction of domesticated sheep and goats, likely via interactions with Levantine populations. This shift is evident in sites across and , where economies incorporated , microlithic tools, and early ceramics, fostering mobile communities adapted to Mediterranean and n fringes. Rock art at in southern vividly documents this era, with scenes depicting , activities, and ritual dances from approximately 6000 to 4000 BCE, reflecting a cultural emphasis on amid a greener . Sub-Saharan Africa's Neolithic developments started later, around 3000 BCE, in the zone, where (Pennisetum glaucum) was domesticated independently as a drought-resistant staple, with earliest evidence from pottery impressions at sites like in dating to 2500–1900 BCE. At , agropastoral villages featured stone-walled enclosures and millet cultivation integrated with cattle herding, representing early complex societies in the region. Oil palm () also played a role in West African Neolithic economies, with managed groves providing oil and nuts from around 3000 BCE in forested zones like central , supporting alongside . Distinctive features of African Neolithic societies included cattle cults, where livestock symbolized wealth and ritual significance, as seen in Saharan rock art and Egyptian predynastic burials emphasizing cattle sacrifices and iconography from the sixth millennium BCE. Early trans-Saharan networks facilitated exchange of obsidian, shells, and livestock between North and sub-Saharan groups by the fourth millennium BCE, promoting cultural diffusion without large-scale urbanization. In tropical zones, resistance to full sedentism persisted due to environmental challenges like tsetse fly infestation and soil leaching, favoring mobile pastoralism and agro-pastoral hybrids over intensive farming. Recent ancient DNA analyses from the 2020s reveal back-migrations from into during the Neolithic, introducing farmer-related ancestry that admixed with local forager populations, as evidenced in genomes from Moroccan and Algerian sites dating to 7000–5000 BCE. This , peaking around 5500 BCE in the , contributed to and likely aided the spread of pastoral technologies, with sub-Saharan admixture remaining minimal until later periods.

East and South Asia

In , the Neolithic period began around 8000 BCE along the River, where the provides evidence of early cultivation, marking one of the independent centers of in the region. Archaeobotanical remains from Pengtoushan sites indicate that domesticated was integrated into subsistence strategies, alongside wild resources, in a wet-rice farming system adapted to the riverine environment. Concurrently, in the basin, the , dating to approximately 9000–7000 cal BP, focused on millet domestication, with italica and miliaceum as primary crops, supported by charred seed evidence from settlements. These parallel developments highlight the region's diverse agricultural adaptations, with rice in the south and millet in the north forming the basis for later expansions. In , Neolithic practices emerged around 7000 BCE at in present-day , where and were cultivated, likely introduced from Southwest Asian sources, while local domestication of cattle (Bos indicus) occurred independently. Zooarchaeological analysis at confirms as the dominant livestock, with morphological traits distinguishing it from cattle, underscoring a hybrid agro-pastoral economy blending western crops with indigenous animal management. This site represents an early bridge between Near Eastern influences and South Asian innovations, with multi-crop systems including pulses emerging by the mid-Neolithic. Distinct phases characterize the Neolithic across East and South Asia, including the Jomon period in from approximately 14,000 to 300 BCE, which featured semi-sedentary communities reliant on , gathering, and , yet renowned for some of the world's earliest production. Jomon pottery, often cord-impressed and used for storage and cooking, supported a mobile yet village-based lifestyle without full . In , the around 3000 BCE marked a transition to proto-urbanism, with walled settlements like and Pingliangtai exhibiting planned layouts, rammed-earth walls, and evidence of through elite burials and craft specialization. Key sites further illustrate these developments, such as Hemudu in China's (circa 5000–3300 BCE), where lacquer ware artifacts, including a red-painted wooden bowl dated to about 7000 years ago, demonstrate advanced and preservative techniques integrated with rice-based economies. In , the Burzahom site in (circa 3000–1000 BCE) reveals pit dwellings—subterranean structures up to 6 meters deep, accessed by steps and lined with wood—used by aceramic Neolithic communities for year-round habitation amid and early . These features, including postholes and hearths within pits, indicate adaptive to the region's cold climate. Neolithic interactions between East and South Asia involved precursors to overland trade networks, akin to early routes, facilitating the exchange of crops, pottery styles, and technologies from the to the Indus by the late third millennium BCE. Additionally, Austroasiatic migrations from southern into around 4000–3000 BCE carried farming practices, contributing to genetic and linguistic links across the region. These movements underscore the interconnectedness of Asian Neolithic sequences, blending local innovations with diffused elements.

The Americas

The Neolithic in the developed independently from processes, beginning later due to the timing of across around 15,000–20,000 years ago. In , early plant management emerged during the Archaic period, with domestication of squash (Cucurbita pepo) around 10,000 years ago (approximately 8000 BCE) in regions like , based on archaeobotanical remains indicating morphological changes from wild to cultivated forms. (Zea mays) precursors followed, with genetic and archaeological evidence placing initial in the Balsas River valley of southwestern at about 9000 calendar years (cal BP, or roughly 7000 BCE), where teosinte was selectively bred for larger kernels and reduced glumes. This transition marked a shift from to , with sites showing managed fields rather than intensive plowing. In the Andean region, Neolithic developments centered on highland adaptations, with potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) domesticated around 7000 years ago (5000 BCE) and (Chenopodium quinoa) cultivated by approximately 5000 BCE, as evidenced by macroremains and phytoliths from early sites. Key evidence comes from Guitarrero Cave in Peru's Callejón de Huaylas, where dates on artifacts and plant remains confirm occupation and cultivation of beans, squash, and other tubers from the eighth millennium BCE (around 8000–7000 BCE), representing an early phase of the Archaic period leading into the Formative around 3000 BCE. These phases involved gradual intensification, transitioning from seasonal camps to more permanent settlements focused on tuber and crops suited to diverse altitudes. Regional variations highlight the ' ecological diversity, with Amazonian groups domesticating manioc (Manihot esculenta) around 10,350 years ago (8350 BCE) in southwestern Amazonia, as analysis from forest islands in Bolivia's Llanos de Moxos reveals early garden cultivation alongside squash by 10,250 years ago (8250 BCE). In the , adoption occurred around 2100 BCE, spreading via from , with radiocarbon-dated cobs from sites like McEuen confirming its integration into local economies by that time. Unlike patterns, American Neolithic traits emphasized —intensive plant management without widespread animal or plowing—over full-scale , and appeared late, with the earliest examples in the northern Peruvian highlands dating to around 2500 BCE, while Amazonian ceramics emerged earlier at about 6000–5000 BCE. Recent archaeobotanical and genomic studies from the 2020s have confirmed multiple centers of maize domestication and early dispersal, challenging a single-origin model; for instance, ancient DNA from Central American rockshelters shows divergent lineages by 4000 BCE, and 2024 findings of partially domesticated cobs in Brazilian caves indicate independent selection in around 5000–3000 BCE. These developments supported emerging sedentary villages, such as those in the Tehuacán Valley, where horticultural surpluses enabled year-round habitation by the late Archaic.

Oceania and Australia

In Australia, the Neolithic period is not characterized by the adoption of agriculture or significant technological shifts seen elsewhere, with Indigenous populations maintaining a foraging-based lifestyle supported by microlithic tools until European contact in the late 18th century. Microlithic technologies, including small stone tools hafted onto spears and other implements, persisted as a continuation from Paleolithic traditions without the emergence of polished stone axes or ceramic production. Evidence from rock shelters, such as Madjedbebe in northern Australia, reveals continuous use of grinding stones for processing seeds, ochre, and other materials dating back over 65,000 years, indicating long-term reliance on wild plant resources rather than domestication. Early environmental management practices, including fire-stick farming—systematic low-intensity burning to promote grassland regrowth and attract game—likely began around 40,000 years ago, enhancing foraging efficiency without transitioning to full cultivation. In contrast, parts of witnessed Neolithic-like developments through the independent emergence of in Near Oceania and the later Austronesian expansion. At Kuk Swamp in the highlands of , archaeological evidence shows wetland drainage and mounding for cultivating , bananas, and starting around 7000 BCE, with initial plant exploitation possibly extending to 10,000 BCE, marking one of the world's earliest agricultural systems outside Southwest Asia. The , emerging around 1500 BCE in Near Oceania (including the ), introduced dentate-stamped pottery, horticulture focused on root crops like and yams, and canoes that facilitated rapid Austronesian migrations into , such as and , by 1200 BCE. These developments faced unique constraints due to island biogeography, including limited , soil nutrient depletion from volcanic origins, and high dependence on like and , which supplemented rather than replaced in many island societies. Recent isotopic analyses of human remains from Lapita and post-Lapita sites in indicate gradual dietary shifts toward greater reliance on cultivated plants, with carbon and ratios showing increased C3 consumption (e.g., ) over marine proteins between 1500 BCE and 1000 BCE, highlighting the adaptive integration of farming in resource-scarce environments.

Technological Innovations

Agriculture and Domestication

The Neolithic period marked a pivotal shift toward through the of plants and animals, transforming societies from mobile hunter-gatherers to sedentary communities reliant on cultivated resources. This process involved selective management of wild , leading to genetic modifications that enhanced yield, edibility, and utility, primarily occurring between approximately 10,000 and 4,000 BCE across multiple global regions. was not instantaneous but a gradual coevolutionary interaction between humans and , driven by pre-domestication cultivation and harvesting practices that favored desirable traits over generations. Plant began with cereals and pulses in the , where (Triticum dicoccum) and ( vulgare) were among the earliest , cultivated from wild progenitors around 10,000 BCE in the . Key genetic changes included the evolution of non-shattering rachises in cereals, preventing and facilitating human harvesting, a trait under strong selection pressure after approximately 10,000 years ago. In , () occurred in the Yangtze River basin around 9,000–8,000 BCE, involving similar adaptations like reduced shattering and larger grains from wild . In the , (Zea mays) emerged from teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) in southern by about 9,000 years ago, with genetic shifts such as increased kernel row number and reduction making it more palatable and productive. These transformations were evidenced by archaeobotanical remains showing morphological distinctions from wild forms. Nikolai Vavilov identified eight primary centers of plant origin based on patterns of genetic diversity, proposing that domestication hotspots concentrated related crops in specific regions. These centers include:
  • Chinese Center: Rice, soybean, millet, peach.
  • Indian Center (including Indo-Malayan): Rice, mung bean, cotton, sugarcane, banana.
  • Central Asian Center: Wheat, apple, walnut.
  • Near Eastern Center: Emmer wheat, barley, lentil, chickpea.
  • Mediterranean Center: Olive, grape, fig.
  • Ethiopian Center: Sorghum, teff, coffee.
  • Central American Center: Maize, squash, common bean.
  • South American Center (Andean): Potato, quinoa, lima bean.
This framework highlights how geographic isolation fostered parallel domestication events, with crops like and radiating from the to influence Eurasian . Animal domestication complemented plant cultivation, providing protein, labor, and materials, with early efforts focusing on ungulates in the around 9,000 BCE. Sheep (Ovis aries) and goats (Capra hircus) were domesticated from wild Ovis orientalis and Capra aegagrus in the , selected initially for and milk but later for through traits like increased fleece density and reduced shedding. In , pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) were independently domesticated from around 8,000 BCE in central China, valued for and scavenging waste. In the Andes, llamas (Lama glama) were domesticated from guanaco (Lama guanicoe) approximately 7,000 years ago, bred for , pack-carrying, and in highland environments. intensified traits such as quality in sheep and goats, evident in genetic markers for finer fibers by the late Neolithic. Agricultural techniques evolved to sustain these domesticated species, including slash-and-burn practices where forests were cleared by and burning to create fertile ash-enriched plots for initial cultivation. Early water management, including wells, emerged in the , with a notable example at Sha'ar Hagolan around 6,400 BCE. Irrigation systems developed later in the Neolithic, with evidence from around 6,000 BCE in the region, facilitating water access for crops in arid zones. Precursors to appeared as fallowing systems, where fields were left uncultivated periodically to restore through natural regeneration, a practice inferred from weed assemblages and profiles at Neolithic sites. The adoption of induced significant impacts, including nutritional shifts toward carbohydrate-heavy diets from cereals, leading to increased dental caries and stature reduction in early farmers compared to hunter-gatherers. Labor demands intensified, particularly for women, whose manual workloads in grinding and field preparation exceeded those of modern athletes, as shown by musculoskeletal stress markers in skeletal remains. This labor division contributed to evolving roles, with agricultural societies exhibiting greater patriarchal structures and reduced female in resource control, a persisting in regions with deep Neolithic farming histories.

Tool and Lithic Technologies

The Neolithic period marked a significant evolution in lithic technologies, shifting from primarily flaked stone tools of the Paleolithic to more refined ground and polished implements that enhanced efficiency in woodworking, hunting, and early agricultural tasks. These advancements, evident across regions like the Near East and Europe, facilitated forest clearance and resource processing, supporting sedentary lifestyles. Ground stone tools, in particular, emerged as key innovations, produced through pecking, grinding, and polishing techniques applied to hard stones such as granite or flint. Polished axes and adzes represented a hallmark of Neolithic toolmaking, enabling effective and woodworking essential for land clearance. In the southern Levant during the Early (ca. 8600–8200 cal B.C.), small flint axes and chisels, often polished, weighed under 40 grams and were used for , while heavier ground stone variants supported broader exploitation amid the Levantine Moist Period. By the Pottery Neolithic (6600–4500 cal B.C.), adzes became prevalent, hafted perpendicularly like hoes for versatile tasks including firewood gathering. In , such as (ca. 4000–2000 B.C.), ground stone axes required additional 4–9 hours of grinding and polishing with water and flat stones, producing for deforestation and elite status symbols in burials. These tools, like shaft-hole axes from , were shaped using sticks, water, and , underscoring labor-intensive craftsmanship. The transition from microliths—small, geometrically shaped flaked tools used in composite s during the —to larger macroliths in the Neolithic reflected adaptations to new subsistence needs, including and harvesting. Microliths persisted early in the Neolithic but gave way to macrolithic forms like robust points and bifacial tools by ca. 8000 cal B.C. in the , aligning with increased mobility and resource diversity. blades, often exhibiting a distinctive silica sheen from contact with stems, indicate specialized harvesting tools; glossed flint inserts on these implements, dated to the , show microscopic wear patterns consistent with cutting wild and domesticated grasses. In Southwest Asia, such sickles facilitated early collection, with texture analysis of gloss revealing shifts in plant processing intensity over time. Composite tools, integrating stone elements with organic handles via , revolutionized Neolithic efficiency in and farming. with natural adhesives like pitch or beeswax-resin mixtures allowed secure attachment of blades to wooden shafts, evident from ca. 40,000 B.P. residues but widespread in the Neolithic for spears, harpoons, and arrows. In , Border Cave artifacts (ca. 44,000–24,000 B.P., with Neolithic continuity) include bone arrowheads with ochre-filled grooves for and wooden applicators, suggesting composite bow-and-arrow systems for . By the Neolithic in and (ca. 10,000–6000 B.C.), such technologies extended to farming tools, enhancing range and cutting precision without metal. Beyond lithics, Neolithic communities utilized bone and antler for complementary tools, exploiting organic materials for precision work. Bone awls, fashioned from animal long bones, served for piercing hides, sewing, and plant processing, appearing widely in Near Eastern and European sites from ca. 9000 B.C. Antler picks, derived from deer or elk, functioned as digging tools for soil preparation or mining, with examples from Late Mesolithic-Neolithic transitions in coastal zones showing use-wear from scraping and wedging. In late Neolithic contexts (ca. 5000–3000 B.C.), early copper incorporation via cold-hammering of native ores marked a transitional phase; in the Balkans and northeastern Europe, pure copper awls and axes were shaped without smelting, originating around 6200 B.C. and spreading northward by 4000 B.C., as seen in Fennoscandian finds. These non-lithic tools diversified Neolithic kits, bridging stone-based traditions to metallurgical innovations. Technological played a crucial role in Neolithic lithic advancements, with techniques like pressure flaking spreading across continents. Originating in during the (ca. 20,000 B.C.), pressure for microblades—using tools to detach precise flakes—facilitated efficient blade production and diffused to via Beringian migrations by ca. 15,000 B.C., influencing Clovis and later projectile technologies. In the Northern Levant (ca. 8000–6000 B.C.), this method supported specialized elements and micro-drills, evidencing adoption from Asian innovations amid Neolithic expansions. Such transmissions highlight interconnected networks, adapting core technologies to regional needs like hunting in the or farming in .

Pottery and Ceramics

The invention of pottery marked a transformative development in Neolithic societies, facilitating the storage, cooking, and transport of food and liquids in ways that supported sedentary lifestyles and surplus management. The earliest pottery appeared in during the late Pleistocene, predating widespread agriculture and linked to adaptations to colder climates for processing aquatic resources. In , Incipient Jōmon vessels from sites like Odai I date to approximately 14,000 BCE, featuring simple cord-marked surfaces formed from locally sourced clays. In southern , sherds from Yuchanyan provide evidence of pottery production around 18,000–16,000 BCE, though fuller integration into Neolithic farming contexts occurred by 10,000 BCE. In the , pottery emerged later, around 7000–6800 BCE, during the transition from the Pre-Pottery to Pottery Neolithic, with initial vessels at sites like Tell Sabi Abyad in used for everyday domestic activities. Neolithic potters relied on hand-building techniques, most commonly , in which elongated clay ropes were stacked, joined, and smoothed to construct vessel forms ranging from to jars. To improve plasticity and prevent warping, clay was tempered with inorganic materials like grit or crushed shells, or organics such as fibers that burned out during firing, leaving porous structures ideal for permeability. Firing took place in open pits or rudimentary fueled by wood, achieving temperatures of 600–900°C to vitrify the clay and enhance durability; early slow-wheel devices for turning vessels appeared sporadically in the by 6000 BCE but remained exceptional. Pottery's utilitarian roles centered on supporting agricultural economies, with large storage jars designed for holding grains like or , and globular cooking pots suited for boiling or stewing over hearths. Organic residue analysis, including lipid biomarkers and ancient proteins, has confirmed exploitation in many Neolithic vessels, such as curd-enriched products from cow, sheep, and in central European Funnel Beaker dated 3650–3100 BCE, indicating specialized processing like cheesemaking to manage . residues, including malt and starches, reveal brewing of beer-like beverages in East Asian from sites like around 7000 BCE, likely for communal consumption. Select vessels, often finely crafted and deposited in burials, served ritual functions, as seen in a 7200-year-old Syrian example with symbolic engravings suggesting ceremonial libations. Regional styles diversified pottery's aesthetic and cultural expressions, with decorative techniques reflecting local resources and traditions. In the Mediterranean, Cardial ware from circa 6000 BCE featured shell-impressed patterns mimicking waves or nets, produced by pressing cockle shells into wet clay before firing. Near Eastern Ubaid pottery, dating 5500–4000 BCE, showcased painted designs in black or red slips with geometric, floral, and zoomorphic motifs applied via brushing or stamping, denoting or regional affiliations. In Europe, black-burnished wares from the , such as those in around 5300–4300 BCE, were polished to a lustrous finish using stones, emphasizing surface sheen over bold decoration. Beyond functionality, bore symbolic weight through motifs that encoded cosmological or social meanings, with incised spirals, chevrons, and meanders possibly evoking , water, or ancestral narratives. These designs spread via routes, as similar impressed and painted styles appear across the Mediterranean and into , linking distant communities through exchanged ideas and materials. While adoption timelines varied regionally, pottery's versatility underscored its role in Neolithic innovation.

Social and Cultural Aspects

Settlements and Architecture

The Neolithic era witnessed the emergence of permanent settlements, driven by the adoption of and enabling early sedentism in the during the (PPNA) phase, approximately 9500–8500 BCE. At () in the , one of the earliest documented sites, communities constructed circular houses from mud bricks with domed roofs, forming a large settlement protected by massive stone walls up to 3.6 meters high and an adjacent tower over 8 meters tall, likely for defensive or observational purposes. This agricultural surplus from domesticated plants facilitated such sedentary lifestyles and architectural stability. As societies advanced into the (PPNB) phase around 8500–7000 BCE, house forms transitioned from circular or oval plans to rectangular structures, reflecting changes in spatial organization and household activities. This evolution is evident at sites like Aşıklı Höyük in central , where semi-subterranean circular dwellings gave way to above-ground rectangular buildings between 8350 and 7350 BCE, allowing for more defined room divisions and integrated storage spaces. Village layouts varied by region but emphasized communal clustering and functionality. At in southern , occupied from about 7400 to 6200 BCE, mud-brick houses were densely packed in a streetless pattern, accessed through rooftops, and built across 18 superimposed occupation levels on a 13-hectare mound. Fortified designs, such as those at , incorporated encircling walls to safeguard growing populations and resources. Monumental architecture emerged early in the Neolithic, predating domestic villages in some cases. in southeastern features large circular enclosures dating to 9600–7000 BCE, constructed with massive T-shaped limestone pillars up to 5.5 meters tall arranged in rings, some adorned with animal carvings, suggesting communal gathering spaces built by pre-agricultural groups. In , megalithic constructions appeared later, with precursors to involving arranged standing stones around 3100 BCE in Britain, marking the onset of large-scale stone monuments during the . Building materials adapted to local environments, with wattle-and-daub—woven wooden lattices coated in clay—common for walls in fertile lowlands, while stone prevailed in rugged highlands for durability. Storage was essential, including subterranean and above-ground granaries for , as seen in PPNA facilities at sites like Dhra' in the southern Levant around 11,500 years ago, which supported surplus management and population growth. Urban precursors developed in northern by the late fifth millennium BCE, exemplified by , where settlements expanded to over 55 hectares around 4000 BCE, featuring high population density and dedicated zones for craft specialization, such as processing and production, laying groundwork for complex urbanism.

Social Organization and Economy

Neolithic social organization was initially characterized by kinship-based structures and relative , particularly in early farming villages where communal labor supported collective activities such as crop cultivation and resource sharing. Archaeological evidence from sites like those in the indicates that these communities operated through networks, with likely distributed among kin groups rather than centralized authority. As populations grew and agricultural surpluses accumulated in the mid-Neolithic, social structures began to evolve toward more hierarchical forms, including proto-chiefdoms in regions like the eastern , where leaders may have coordinated labor for larger-scale projects. The Neolithic economy relied on agricultural surpluses that enabled trade networks extending hundreds of kilometers, facilitating the exchange of materials like from Anatolian sources and marine shells such as from the Aegean, which served as status symbols in and the . specialization emerged alongside this, with dedicated production centers like the Grimes Graves flint mine in , where deep shafts and galleries were excavated around 3000 BCE to supply high-quality tools for regional distribution. These developments indicate a shift from subsistence to managed resource extraction and inter-community , supporting and settlement expansion as economic hubs. Gender roles in Neolithic societies showed a division of labor, with evidence from and skeletal remains suggesting women primarily engaged in tasks like grinding grains and textiles, while men focused on and larger game. Bioarchaeological analysis of skeletal stress markers, such as muscle attachments on upper limbs, reveals that women experienced repetitive strain from grinding activities, whereas men's skeletons indicate greater involvement in load-bearing tasks like herding. This specialization likely complemented agricultural demands but began to rigidify social expectations by the . Signs of emerging inequality appeared in the , marked by variations in house sizes—ranging from modest dwellings to larger structures up to twice the average—and the accumulation of prestige goods like polished axes imported from alpine regions. In the of around 4500 BCE, elite burials containing thousands of artifacts highlight the concentration of among a few individuals, signaling the transition from egalitarian to ranked societies with inherited status. Such disparities, evidenced across European sites, reflect growing economic differentiation tied to control over trade and surplus. Recent economic models from the employ network analysis and sourcing to map Neolithic trade routes, revealing interconnected systems where and flint moved along predictable paths from extraction sites to consumption areas in and . Strontium and oxygen studies of artifacts, such as chert tools from Çukuriçi Höyük, demonstrate procurement radii exceeding 200 kilometers, underscoring the role of specialized intermediaries in sustaining regional economies. These approaches highlight how fostered without assuming centralized control.

Art, Symbolism, and Religion

Neolithic often manifested through small-scale figurines crafted from clay, bone, or stone, serving as potent symbols of fertility and possibly divine or ancestral figures. At in , numerous anthropomorphic figurines, including seated female forms, have been interpreted by scholars as representations of older women of status or icons rather than a singular "," challenging earlier matriarchal theories. These objects, frequently found in domestic contexts, suggest integration of symbolic practices into everyday life, with examples like the leopard-flanked seated figure emphasizing themes of protection and abundance. Similar symbols appear across , such as clay and bone carvings depicting exaggerated female forms, indicating widespread cultural motifs linked to and sustenance in early farming communities. Rock art provides another key medium for Neolithic symbolic expression, particularly in the Levant and , where depictions captured communal activities and cosmological beliefs. In the Spanish Levant, hunting scenes dominate panels from the Neolithic period (ca. 6th–3rd millennium BCE), portraying dynamic groups of archers pursuing deer and other game, likely reflecting ritualized narratives of survival and social cooperation rather than mere documentation. These schematic figures, often in red ochre, underscore the transition from to agrarian ideologies, with motifs emphasizing human-animal interactions. In , passage tombs like in Ireland (ca. 3200 BCE) feature intricate kerbstone carvings of spirals, chevrons, and lozenges, interpreted as symbolic pathways to the or celestial alignments, aligning with solstice light phenomena during rituals. Such , concentrated at monumental sites, highlights a shared symbolic language across regions, focusing on cycles of life, death, and renewal. Burial practices in the Neolithic reveal deep dimensions, blending reverence for the dead with symbolic manipulation of remains to invoke ancestral presence. In the (PPNB) of the (ca. 8500–7000 BCE), plastered skulls—human crania coated in with shell eyes—exemplify a "skull cult," where selected individuals' heads were modeled post-mortem and possibly displayed in homes, suggesting beliefs in ancestor veneration or necromantic communication. Sites like Yiftahel and 'Ain Ghazal yield examples oriented westward, implying orientations tied to solar or funerary cycles. In Iberia, collective tombs from the (ca. 4000–3000 BCE), such as those at Les Llometes, housed multiple interments with successive bone depositions and minimal , indicating communal mourning s that reinforced social bonds through shared ancestry. These practices, varying by region, point to emerging ideologies of immortality and group identity without overt hierarchies. Ritual sites stand as monumental testaments to organized Neolithic , predating settled villages in some cases and centering on symbolic architecture. in southeastern (ca. 9600–7000 BCE), a complex of circular enclosures with T-shaped pillars, functioned as a pre-agricultural temple hub for feasting and ceremonies, evidenced by animal bones and lack of domestic refuse, suggesting pilgrimage-driven focused on cosmic or totemic forces. Modified crania found there further link the site to skull cults, extending Levantine traditions. In Britain, stone circles like those at or Stonehenge's precursors (ca. 3000 BCE) served as arenas, with alignments to solstices implying calendrical observances and communal gatherings for seasonal rites, as inferred from associated deposits of tools and bones. These locales, built with immense labor, underscore religion's role in unifying dispersed groups through shared symbolism. Symbolism in Neolithic wove anthropomorphic and celestial motifs into narratives of shamanistic or cosmological import, bridging human and supernatural realms. At , anthropomorphic pillars—limestone monoliths with carved arms, belts, and fox pelts—likely embodied deified ancestors or totems, their animal reliefs (vultures, snakes) evoking predatory or transformative spirits in contexts. motifs across sites, including concentric circles and lunar sequences on pillars, suggest early lunar calendars tracking seasonal changes for or rites, as seen in Göbekli's V-shaped symbols possibly denoting nights or months. Shamanistic elements emerge in these designs, with ecstatic visions inferred from animal-human hybrids and pillar , indicating practitioners mediated between worlds via or performance, a hypothesis supported by comparative and site distributions. Such symbols, devoid of writing, conveyed beliefs in cyclical time and spiritual agency central to Neolithic worldview.

Legacy and Transitions

Transition to Chalcolithic and Bronze Age

The transition from the Neolithic to the Chalcolithic period in the Near East began around 4500 BCE, marked by the initial use of copper alongside stone tools, representing a gradual shift toward metallurgy without abrupt cultural rupture. In the southern Levant, this phase involved the emergence of specialized copper production sites, where native copper was smelted and shaped through techniques like cold-working and annealing to enhance durability. A key example is the Nahal Mishmar hoard, discovered in a Judean Desert cave and dated to approximately 3500 BCE, which contains over 400 copper artifacts including scepters and crowns, demonstrating advanced lost-wax casting precursors and symbolic elite use of metal. These innovations bridged Neolithic lithic traditions—such as polished stone tools—with emerging metalworking, as evidenced by arsenical copper alloys in the Jordan Valley that combined smelting with annealing for functional weapons and ornaments. In Europe, the Bronze Age commenced later, around 2500 BCE, with the introduction of tin-bronze alloys via trade networks, transitioning from Chalcolithic copper use in regions like the Iberian Peninsula. Cultural transformations during this period included heightened , reflected in burials containing metal goods and the of fortifications signaling increased warfare. In Iberia, sites like Valencina de la Concepción feature large enclosures and distinguished tombs with artifacts, indicating emerging polities and ritual emphasis on metal prestige. Similarly, in the southern Levant, ossuaries and cave burials with items suggest control over resources, alongside evidence of conflict such as defended settlements in the . These changes point to a shift from egalitarian Neolithic communities toward hierarchical structures, where metals served as status symbols and possibly diplomatic tools. Regional variations in the transition were pronounced, with rapid adoption in facilitated by extensive trade routes connecting the to and , enabling the spread of metallurgical knowledge by 2500 BCE. In contrast, and the experienced slower integration of metal technologies; North African Neolithic societies, influenced by Iberian migrations around 5500 BCE, retained stone-based economies with limited copper use until the , while American indigenous cultures developed independently by 5000 BCE but lacked widespread until post-1000 CE due to isolation from Eurasian networks. Scholars debate the nature of this transition as either a continuum of Neolithic practices or a disruptive break, with evidence for both gradual evolution in and settlement patterns in the and abrupt collapses linked to the 4.2 kiloyear aridification event around 2200 BCE. This climate episode, characterized by prolonged , contributed to societal stress in the and , prompting migrations and the intensification of metal production as adaptive responses, though continuity is evident in persistent agricultural and symbolic traditions.

Modern Interpretations and Discoveries

Recent advances in ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis have profoundly reshaped understandings of Neolithic population dynamics, particularly the migrations of early farmers from Anatolia into Europe. Studies from the early 2020s, including a 2020 bioRxiv preprint, demonstrate that European and Anatolian early farmers descended from a merger of European hunter-gatherers and Near Eastern groups, likely occurring in the Near East before dispersal. A 2022 paper in Science further reveals distinct Pre-Pottery and Pottery Neolithic migrations into Anatolia from Mesopotamia, highlighting genetic continuity with Anatolian origins while showing admixture with local populations. By 2025, research published in Nature Communications confirmed that farming spread primarily through migration rather than local adoption, with Anatolian farmers contributing up to 80% of early European agriculturalists' ancestry in some regions. Regarding later interactions, genetic evidence links Yamnaya steppe pastoralists—emerging around 3300 BCE—to Neolithic Europe via admixture; a 2025 Nature study traces Yamnaya ancestry, including Anatolian Neolithic components mediated through Caucasus populations, to Indo-European expansions that overlaid earlier farmer genomes. Climatic reconstructions using speleothems and records have illuminated environmental challenges during Neolithic expansions, notably the (ca. 6200 BCE), a abrupt cooling episode lasting 150–300 years. This event, evidenced by δ¹⁸O anomalies in European and Mediterranean speleothems, correlated with reduced and halted agricultural dispersals, as seen in data showing declines and increases in Iberia around 8.2 ka. In the , the cooling exacerbated aridity, prompting adaptive shifts in Neolithic communities from to mixed economies, per multiproxy analyses of lake sediments and cores. Human responses included site abandonments in , where forager-farmer transitions stalled, as documented in 2022 Philosophical Transactions syntheses linking the event to broader climate variability. Excavations from 2023 to 2025 have expanded knowledge of Neolithic complexity at key sites. At in , ongoing digs uncovered a life-size human statue in 2025, alongside domestic structures and cereal processing evidence from layers dating to 9500–8000 BCE, suggesting prolonged settlement rather than purely use. The 2025 season also revealed additional T-shaped pillars and water management features, reinforcing interpretations of organized labor in phases. In the , analogous to Neolithic developments, surveys have exposed over 10,000 pre-Columbian earthworks, including Acre geoglyphs constructed around 500 BCE with evidence of human land use dating back ~10,000 years, indicating complex societies with geometric enclosures for land management and s amid climate shifts. The 2023 study highlights these structures, supporting prior estimates of pre-Columbian Amazon populations up to 10 million, challenging views of sparse Amazonian . Contemporary debates critique oversimplified narratives of the Neolithic, emphasizing gradualism over revolutionary rupture. The "" concept, coined by , faces scrutiny for portraying a sudden shift; 2017 analyses in Journal of History and Archaeology of Ancient Societies argue it unfolded over with mixed foraging-farming economies, varying by region. Similarly, myths of universal Neolithic —popularized in 1970s feminist scholarship—have been debunked by and isotopic data showing diverse roles, with no evidence of female-dominated power structures; a 2024 analysis highlights in some groups but rejects systemic . Conversely, 2025 studies from sites like indicate matrilineal descent and female-centered social structures in certain Neolithic societies, highlighting regional diversity in dynamics. A 2025 review integrates to affirm egalitarian or patrilineal patterns in many sites, emphasizing contextual variability over idealized prehistoric . Methodological innovations have accelerated discoveries, with enabling detection of hidden settlements under vegetation. In , 2025 LiDAR scans revealed a 5000-year-old fortified Neolithic enclosure in , complete with ditches spanning 10 hectares, indicating defensive architecture at the cusp of transitions. AI applications in artifact have similarly transformed ; a 2024 study using clustering on Pre-Pottery Neolithic lithics from Israeli sites identified technological groups, aiding rapid dataset creation from heterogeneous collections. Convolutional neural networks applied to stone tools, as in a 2022 PLOS ONE paper, automate identification of reduction sequences, enhancing studies across Eurasian Neolithic assemblages.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.