Hubbry Logo
Primitive IrishPrimitive IrishMain
Open search
Primitive Irish
Community hub
Primitive Irish
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Primitive Irish
Primitive Irish
Primitive Irish
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Primitive Irish
Archaic Irish
Proto-Goidelic
Ogham stone from Ratass Church, 6th century AD. It reads: [A]NM SILLANN MAQ VATTILLOGG
("[in the] name of Sílán son of Fáithloga")
Native toIreland, Isle of Man, western coast of Britain
RegionIreland and Britain
EraEvolved into Old Irish about the 6th century AD
Ogham
Language codes
ISO 639-3pgl
pgl
Glottologprim1243
Map of locations where Orthodox Ogham inscriptions have been found.

Primitive Irish or Archaic Irish[1] (Irish: Gaeilge Ársa, Gaeilge Chianach), also called Proto-Goidelic,[2][3][4][5] is the oldest known form of the Goidelic languages, and the ancestor of all languages within this family.

This phase of the language is known only from fragments, mostly personal names, inscribed on stone in the Ogham alphabet in Ireland and western Great Britain between the 4th and the 6th century AD,[6] before the advent of Old Irish. These inscriptions are referred to as Orthodox Ogham, although scholastic use of the script continued residually until the early 19th century.

Written records

[edit]

Primitive Irish is the oldest recorded form of the Goidelic languages. It was written in the Ogham alphabet, the usage of which can be divided into two phases, Orthodox Ogham and Scholastic Ogham.

The former represents the earlier tradition of inscriptions recording an individual's name, optionally with parentage, perhaps as a memorial or indicator of land ownership,[7] whereas the latter resulted from a tradition of scholarly restoration of the writing system as part of the development of a Celtic style of Catholic art, in parallel with the use of the Latin alphabet in ordinary writing.[8] Primitive Irish is known only from Ogham fragments, usually personal names, the earliest being dated by academics to the 4th century, although some estimates for the earliest inscriptions range between the 1st and 5th centuries. Scholars agree that the orthodox written tradition is older than the surviving inscriptions.[9][10][11] The latest inscriptions of the orthodox tradition appear to come from the 6th century.[12] The scholastic use of Ogham continued until the early 19th century, the last inscription being found on the tomb of Mary Dempsey at Ahenny in County Tipperary, which is written in both Irish and English.[13]

Transcribed Ogham inscriptions, which lack a letter for /p/, show Primitive Irish to be similar in morphology and inflections to Gaulish, Latin, Classical Greek and Sanskrit. Many of the characteristics of modern (and medieval) Irish, such as initial mutations, distinct "broad" and "slender" consonants and consonant clusters, are not yet apparent.

More than 300 Ogham inscriptions are known in Ireland, including 121 in County Kerry and 81 in County Cork, and more than 75 found outside Ireland in western Britain and the Isle of Man, including more than 40 in Wales, where Irish colonists settled in the 3rd century, and about 30 in Scotland, although some of these are in Pictish. Many of the British inscriptions are bilingual in Irish and Latin; however, none show any sign of the influence of Christianity or Christian epigraphic tradition, suggesting they date from before 391, when Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire. Only about a dozen of the Irish inscriptions show any such sign.[14] There is speculation about the orthodoxy of one inscription in Hampshire and two in Scotland, but there is no academic consensus on the matter.[15]

The majority of ogham inscriptions are memorials, consisting of the name of the deceased in the genitive case, followed by MAQI, MAQQI, "[the stone] of the son" (Modern Irish mic), and the name of his father, or AVI, AVVI, "[the stone] of the grandson", (Modern Irish uí) and the name of his grandfather, e.g. DALAGNI MAQI DALI, "[the stone] of Dalagnos son of Dalos". Sometimes the phrase MAQQI MUCOI, "of the son of the tribe", is used to show tribal affiliation. Inscriptions demonstrating additional information are rare, such as QRIMTIR RON[A]NN MAQ COMOGANN, "[the stone] of the priest Ronán son of Comgán".[16] Some inscriptions appear to be border markers.[17]

Grammar

[edit]

The brevity of most orthodox ogham inscriptions makes it difficult to analyse the archaic Irish language in depth, but it is possible to understand the basis of its phonology and the rudiments of its nominal morphology.[16]

Morphology

[edit]

Surviving Ogham inscriptions are written exclusively with nouns. It is possible to deduce some morphological features of Primitive Irish nouns from these inscriptions. With the exception of a few inscriptions in the singular dative case, two in the plural genitive case and one in the singular nominative case, most known inscriptions of nouns in orthodox Ogham are found in the singular genitive, so it is difficult to fully describe their morphology. The German philologist Sabine Ziegler, however, drawing parallels with reconstructions of the Proto-Celtic language's morphology (whose nouns are classified according to the vowels that characterize their endings), limited the archaic Irish endings of the singular genitive case to -I, -AS, -OS and -AIS.[18]

The first ending, -I, is found in words equivalent to the so-called Proto-Celtic category of *o-stem nouns. This category was also recorded in the dative case using -U, with an inscription possibly in the nominative case also using -U. -OS, in turn, is equivalent to Proto-Celtic *i-stems and *u-stems, while -AS corresponds to *ā-stems. The exact function of -AIS remains unclear.[19]

Furthermore, according to Damian McManus, Proto-Celtic nasal, dental, and velar stems also correspond to the Primitive Irish -AS genitive, attested in names such as GLASICONAS,[20] CATTUBUTTAS,[21] and LUGUDECCAS.[22]

Phonology

[edit]

It is possible, through comparisons with other languages, to reconstruct a phonemic inventory for the properly attested stages of the language using the names used in the scholastic tradition for each letter of the Ogham alphabet, which are recorded in the Latin alphabet in later manuscripts.[16][23]

Vowels

[edit]
Monophthongs Diphthongs
Close i i: u u:
Mid e e: o o: oĭ
Open a a: aĭ

There is a certain amount of obscurity in the vowel inventory of Primitive Irish: while the letters Ailm, Onn and Úr are recognized by modern scholars as representing /a(:)/, /o(:)/ and /u(:)/ respectively, there is some difficulty in reconstructing the values of Edad and Idad.[24] They are poorly attested, and scholars believe the distinction between them might be arbitrary, in the same way as the runes peorð and cweorð in the Anglo-Saxon alphabet, but they are transcribed as E and O, respectively, and probably had the respective pronunciations of /e(:)/ and /o(:)/.[25][26] There were also two diphthongs, transcribed as AI and OI.[26]

In later stages of the language, scholastic Oghamist traditions incorporated five new letters for vowels, called forfeda (supplementary), corresponding to digraphs of the orthodox spelling, but these no longer corresponded to Primitive Irish sounds.[27]

Consonants

[edit]

The consonant inventory of Primitive Irish is reconstructed by Celticist Damian McManus as follows:[28][26]

Consonants of Primitive Irish in IPA
Bilabial Alveolar Palatal Velar Labiovelar[a]
Nasal m n
Stop p[b] b t d k ɡ kʷ ɡʷ
Fricative[c] s, sᵗ[d]
Approximant j[e] ʍ w
Lateral l
Trill ɾ

The letters Cért, Gétal and Straif, transliterated as Q, NG (or GG) and Z, respectively, were known by the ancient scholastic Oghamists as foilceasta (questions) due to the obsolescence of their original pronunciations: the first two, /kʷ/ and /ɡʷ/, had merged with plain velars in Old Irish, and the third, probably /st/, merged with /s/.[29][30] However, evidence of the original distinction between straif and sail was still present into the Old Irish period, as the séimhiú (lenition) of /s/ produced /f/ (< Primitive Irish /w/) for lexemes originally represented by Straif but /h/ for lexemes originally represented by Sail.[31]

The letter Úath or hÚath (transliterated as H), although not counted among the foilceasta, also presented particular difficulties due to apparently being a silent letter. It was probably pronounced as /j/ in an early stage of Primitive Irish, disappearing before the transition to Old Irish.[32]

Consonant lenition and palatalisation, which feature heavily in later stages of the language, may already have existed in an allophonic form, i.e., they were not phonemically contrastive yet.

Internal history

[edit]

McManus describes the following sound shifts from Proto-Celtic as being attested in the earliest Primitive Irish inscriptions:[33]

  • A loss of /n/ before /t/ and /k/, resulting in the gemination of the following sound: *nt, *nk > tː, kː
  • Loss of intervocalic *sː /s/ > Ø / V _ V
  • Monophthongization of *ouː /ou/ > /oː/
  • Unrounding of *o in final unstressed syllables

Transition to Old Irish

[edit]
Folio of Auraicept na n-Éces contrasting Ogham and Latin scripts.

Old Irish, written in the Latin alphabet, has its earliest recorded texts possibly in the late 6th century; this is the traditional date of composition for the Amra Coluim Chille, a poetic elegy to St Columba of Iona by St Dallán Forgaill, the first identifiable author in the Irish language. This work, however, survives only in heavily annotated manuscripts from a later time, in an old-fashioned form of the Irish language bearing little similarity to formal Old Irish.[34][35] The first texts which are widely accepted to have been written in Old Irish date from the 7th century, at the inception of a national textual tradition which was cultivated alongside that of Latin by the Catholic Church in Ireland, and which supplanted the archaic literary traditions.[36]

The radical changes that characterize the transition from Primitive Irish to Old Irish are not uncommon in the development of other languages, but appear to have occurred rapidly in the case of Irish. John T. Koch, an American Celticist, theorized that these changes coincide with the conversion of the island to Christianity and the introduction of Latin as a literary language. The Irish language would then have derogated from the formal register of the language used by druids in their ceremonies and teachings. Koch believed that with the decline of paganism and the corresponding loss of influence by the druids, the language of the Irish Christian nobility would have supplanted the ancient Primitive Irish register of the pagan priests, eclipsing it completely in the 7th century. This would give the impression of rapid linguistic development, while actually representing a shift in literature to a vernacular register which had previously been obscured by the conservative influence of the druidic language.[36][37] This new phase of the language shows influence from Latin, the latter having been introduced to pre-Christian Ireland, which influence became more pronounced following St Patrick's ministry.

Features

[edit]

Primitive Irish has a morphology similar to other Indo-European languages, however it did not display the most distinctive characteristics of other phases of the language including velarized ("broad") and palatalized ("slender") consonants (such consonant alterations may have existed, but they would have been allophonic), initial mutations, some loss of inflectional endings, but not of case marking, and consonant clusters.[38] Old Irish does carry with it these distinctive features, as well as the loss of grammatical suffixes, the introduction of the letter p through loanwords and proper names,[39][40] the simplification of the inflectional system,[41] the alteration of some short vowels through vowel harmony,[42] and, most notably, vowel elisions which resulted in distinctive consonant clusters.[42][43]

This last phenomenon, especially marked in the genesis of Old Irish proper, began with an application of secondary stress to the third syllable of most words with four or more syllables, and also to the fifth syllable of words with six or more, in addition to the primary stress, which fell on the first syllable, as is typical of Celtic languages.[42][44] This caused apocope of (final) syllables, syncope of stressless (internal) syllables, and the shortening of all long vowels in non-initial syllables, around 500 AD and the middle of the 6th century, respectively.[42][45][46] This loss of vowels caused consonant clusters to develop.

As an example, a 5th-century king of Leinster, whose name is recorded in Old Irish king-lists and annals as Mac Caírthinn Uí Enechglaiss, is memorialised on an Ogham stone near where he died. This gives the late Primitive Irish version of his name (in the genitive case), as MAQI CAIRATINI AVI INEQAGLAS.[47] Similarly, the Corcu Duibne, a people of County Kerry known from Old Irish sources, are memorialised on a number of stones in their territory as DOVINIAS.[48] Old Irish filed, "poet (gen.)", appears in ogham as VELITAS.[49] In each case the development of Primitive to Old Irish shows the loss of unstressed syllables and certain consonant changes.

Gradually, the grammaticalization of consonant mutations introduced a new characteristic that Irish would eventually share with all other modern Celtic languages.[50] Old Irish phonetic conditions generated different allophonic mutations over time, and with the diachronic loss of the conditions which caused the mutations, those mutations became the only way to distinguish between different grammatical forms. Thus, the mutations became differentiated phonemes with their own morphosyntactic functions. For example, in the Primitive Irish phrase SINDHI MAQQI ("of the son", SINDHI being a form of the definite article), originally pronounced ˈsɪndiː ˈmakʷiː, the initial M would have lenited to /β̃/ due to the influence of the -I ending of the preceding word. The variation in the pronunciation of the word would not have caused a difference in meaning; it would be allophonic. In a later stage of the language, the Primitive Irish word SINDHI became Old Irish in, losing the final vowel which caused the lenition. However, in the Old Irish phrase in maicc ("of the son"), the m is still lenited, so the pronunciation would be /ɪn β̃ak/. The lenition was 'reinterpreted' as being caused by the fact that maicc follows the definite article in, a rule of morphosyntax (grammar) rather than phonology. What was originally a phonological feature of the language therefore became grammaticalized.[41][51]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Primitive Irish

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Primitive Irish, also known as Archaic Irish or Proto-Goidelic, is the oldest attested stage of the , representing the earliest form of what would become the and its sister tongues, such as and Manx. It was spoken in Ireland during the 4th to 6th centuries AD, a period that overlaps with the early stages of Christianity's adoption and the introduction of Latin literacy on the island. The language is documented exclusively through the script, an inventive early medieval characterized by straight lines, notches, and strokes incised along the edges of standing stones, likely developed in the early . Approximately 400 such inscriptions survive, with the majority—around 330—discovered in Ireland, and the rest scattered across Britain, , , and the Isle of Man; these texts typically commemorate individuals, often with names and terms, providing a glimpse into early Irish society and . Linguistically, Primitive Irish exhibits a highly inflected structure with overt case endings and verb conjugations reminiscent of ancient , including a system that lacks a for /p/ and features like initial consonant mutations that foreshadow developments in later Irish. Phonological traits include preserved syllable-final s and a system undergoing early changes, such as the distinction between short and long vowels, though the script's limitations—20 basic characters divided into four aicmí (groups)—often obscure full details. By the mid-6th to 7th centuries, amid the Christian conversion of (ca. AD 367–637), Primitive Irish transitioned into Archaic , influenced by Latin and leading to innovations like (loss of final syllables) and syncope (loss of medial unstressed vowels). As the foundational phase of Irish linguistic history, Primitive Irish offers critical evidence for reconstructing prehistoric Celtic sound changes and cultural practices, underscoring the Goidelic branch's divergence from the Brittonic Celtic languages spoken in Britain. Its study, advanced by scholars through epigraphic analysis, highlights the script's possible mnemonic or ritual origins before its decline with the rise of .

Introduction and Historical Context

Definition and Time Period

Primitive Irish, also referred to as Proto-Goidelic in some linguistic classifications, constitutes the earliest attested stage of the within the Goidelic (Q-Celtic) branch of the Celtic language family. As the direct ancestor of , it is characterized by phonological and morphological features that differentiate it from the contemporaneous Brythonic (P-Celtic) languages spoken in Britain and , such as the preservation of certain Indo-European sounds and the development of distinctive verbal and nominal inflections unique to the Goidelic lineage. The time period of Primitive Irish is primarily confined to the 4th through 6th centuries AD, as established by archaeological dating of the stone monuments bearing its inscriptions, which provide the sole direct evidence of the language. These "Orthodox Ogham" inscriptions represent authentic contemporary usage of the script and language during this era, in contrast to "Scholastic Ogham," which denotes later medieval and post-medieval imitations of the script—often for or decorative purposes—that persisted residually up to the early but do not reflect the living Primitive Irish stage. The surviving corpus comprises over 400 inscriptions, the vast majority discovered in Ireland (with concentrations in counties Kerry and Cork), and consisting almost exclusively of concise memorial formulas that record personal names, patronymics, and tribal affiliations. This linguistic phase is associated with the societal structures of early medieval , encompassing a period of cultural transition from potentially pre-Christian pagan traditions to the increasing influence of , which began to permeate Irish society around the 5th century AD through missionary activities and the establishment of monastic centers.

Origins and Relation to Other Celtic Languages

Primitive Irish descends from Proto-Celtic, the common ancestor of all , which is reconstructed to have been spoken approximately between 1000 and 500 BCE. This proto-language emerged from the broader Indo-European family during the late , spreading across parts of through migrations of Celtic-speaking peoples. Within the Celtic branch, Primitive Irish represents the earliest attested stage of the Goidelic (or Q-Celtic) languages, diverging alongside the Brittonic (or P-Celtic) branch, which includes Welsh, Breton, and Cornish. The split between Goidelic and Brittonic likely occurred in the early centuries BCE, though the exact timing remains debated due to limited direct evidence. Key shared features among Celtic languages, including Primitive Irish, stem from Proto-Celtic innovations such as the partial loss and simplification of Indo-European labiovelar sounds, where *kʷ often merged with *k in certain positions. However, Goidelic languages like Primitive Irish exhibit specific traits distinguishing them from Brittonic, notably the retention of Proto-Celtic *kʷ as /k/ rather than shifting to /p/. For instance, the Proto-Indo-European word for "five," *pénkʷe, evolved through Proto-Celtic *kénkʷe into Primitive Irish *cóic, preserving the velar quality, whereas in Brittonic it became *pump with a labial /p/ in Welsh. Morphologically, Primitive Irish shows close parallels to the continental Gaulish language, particularly in nominal case endings; the genitive singular for o-stem nouns ended in -o in Primitive Irish (e.g., *dubni "of Dubnos"), mirroring Gaulish -os or -i forms derived from the same Proto-Celtic *-os. In contrast, Brittonic languages developed distinct innovations, such as the /p/-shift and loss of certain inflectional contrasts, leading to differences like the absence of initial /p/ developments in Primitive Irish where Welsh exhibits them prominently. The linguistic profile of Primitive Irish also reflects potential influences from pre-Celtic substrates in Ireland, hypothesized to include non-Indo-European languages spoken by earlier inhabitants, which may have contributed to unique phonological and lexical elements. These substrates are evident in certain Irish words lacking clear Indo-European cognates, suggesting borrowing or interference during the Celtic settlement of the island around the 1st millennium BCE, though direct impact on Primitive Irish morphology appears limited. At this early stage, external contacts with Latin or later Norse were negligible, as Primitive Irish predates significant Roman or Viking influences. Recent scholarship has further illuminated the divergence of Goidelic from other Celtic branches through analyses of phonological processes like initial consonant . In a 2020 study, Joseph F. Eska examines interarticulatory timing in Celtic , arguing that differences in the realization of nasal and between Goidelic (including Primitive Irish) and Brittonic reflect early articulatory distinctions that solidified the branches' separation. This work underscores how such timing variations, preserved in Primitive Irish orthography, highlight Goidelic's independent evolution within the Celtic family.

Sources and Decipherment

Ogham Inscriptions

The primary textual sources for Primitive Irish are the ogham inscriptions, with approximately 400 surviving examples known from stone monuments, of which around 350 are located in Ireland. The majority are concentrated in the southwest of Ireland, particularly in counties Kerry and Cork, which together account for over 200 inscriptions; for instance, County Kerry hosts about 121, while County Cork has 101. Outside Ireland, more than 75 inscriptions have been recorded in Britain and the Isle of Man, including around 35 in Wales, over 30 in Scotland, and a handful in England and the Isle of Man. This distribution, with a heavy focus on southwest Ireland and scattered occurrences abroad, points to origins in Ireland followed by migration or cultural exchange across the Irish Sea. The inscriptions typically consist of short texts featuring personal names in , often structured as memorials using formulas such as MAQI (meaning "son of") or AVI (meaning "grandson of"). A representative example is the inscription DALAGNI MAQI DALI, translating to "of Dallán, son of Dall," found on a stone in that served as a in an early medieval structure. Another common pattern involves tribal affiliation, as in MAQI MUCOI DUMELEDONAS ("of the son of the of the Dumnonii"), which appears on a stone from and highlights kinship or lineage ties. These formulas dominate the corpus, with fewer than 10% of inscriptions containing additional phrases or non-personal elements, emphasizing commemorative or proprietary purposes. Archaeologically, the inscriptions are almost exclusively carved on pillar stones, averaging 1.5–2 meters in height, often positioned upright as boundary markers or grave memorials in rural settings. Dating relies on linguistic analysis and associated artifacts, placing most in the 4th to 6th centuries CE, though precise chronology is challenging due to limited stratigraphic context for many stones. Recent excavations have added nuance; for example, the Pool Stone in , , was discovered in 1984 during excavations at Pool, from a secure early medieval context. Recent 2024 analysis, including and review of excavation archives, places it in a 6th-century structure, with the inscription possibly from the early 9th century. Advancements in have enhanced access to the corpus, with projects like in 3D providing 3D models and transcriptions of over 160 Irish stones, enabling non-invasive study and global dissemination. The ongoing OG(H)AM initiative at the further compiles a comprehensive online database of all known inscriptions, incorporating high-resolution imaging to address and fragmentation issues. Post-2020 discoveries, such as a 4th-century inscribed stone unearthed in a garden in 2020 (reported in 2024), underscore continued potential for new finds in contexts.

History of Decipherment

The of Primitive Irish through inscriptions began in the 17th century amid growing antiquarian interest in Irish manuscripts. Sir James Ware, an early collector of Irish historical texts, documented in his 1658 work De Hibernia et Antiquitatibus eius, marking the first systematic reference to in printed scholarship, though interpretations remained speculative and tied to medieval keys. Breakthroughs occurred in the 19th century when George Petrie, in a 1837 address to the Royal Irish Academy, conclusively identified as an indigenous Irish writing system rather than a foreign import like Punic or runic, linking it to early Christian-era monuments. John O'Donovan advanced this work in the 1840s through detailed analyses in the letters and contributions to Petrie's Christian Inscriptions in the , employing bilingual inscriptions and cognates with known personal names to propose readings. By the mid-1840s, recurring formulas such as MAQI (interpreted as "son of") and MAQI MAQIRE ("of the son of a devotee") were confirmed as standard commemorative phrases, establishing a foundational grammar for Primitive Irish. In the 20th century, R.A.S. Macalister provided refinements through his comprehensive cataloging and chronological framework in Corpus Inscriptionum Insularum Celticarum (1945), sequencing inscriptions based on linguistic evolution and archaeological context to date them primarily from the 4th to 6th centuries CE. Modern scholarship incorporates , as seen in Kevin P. Scannell's 2020 study applying models to predict Celtic initial , which helps model phonetic and morphological variations in texts. Ongoing debates persist over ambiguous letters, such as Edad/Idad, whose exact phonetic value (potentially /e/ or /i/) affects readings of certain inscriptions. Challenges in decipherment stem from the brevity of most texts, often limited to names and kinship terms, which restricts syntactic analysis and invites interpretive uncertainty; additionally, some British Ogham inscriptions may reflect non-Irish languages like Pictish, complicating uniform application of Irish readings.

Writing System and Orthography

Ogham Alphabet Structure

The Ogham alphabet, employed to record , comprises 20 base letters constructed from groups of one to five linear strokes or notches aligned relative to a central stem-line, which serves as the baseline for the . These letters are systematically organized into four categories, termed aicmí (singular: aicme), each encompassing five letters distinguished by the orientation and position of their strokes. The first aicme, known as Aicme Beithe (named after its initial letter ), consists of strokes extending downward on the right side of the stem-line; the second, Aicme Húatha (after Húath), features strokes extending upward on the left side; the third, Aicme Muine (after Muin), includes strokes that cross transversely over or under the stem-line; and the fourth, Aicme Ailme (after Ailm), utilizes short notches or, in some representations, dots incised directly into the stem-line. This modular design, with strokes increasing sequentially from one to five within each aicme, allows for efficient carving while maintaining a consistent structural framework. Subsequent developments introduced extensions to the core alphabet, known as the forfeda, adding five additional letters to address sounds absent in the original set, such as the consonant /p/ (represented by the letter for Pín or Ea). However, these forfeda are not attested in Primitive Irish inscriptions and appear primarily in later medieval contexts, extending the total to 25 letters. The script's inherent adaptability is evident in its avoidance of curves, facilitating inscription on irregular surfaces without specialized tools. Ogham inscriptions for Primitive Irish are characteristically formatted vertically along the natural edges or angles of standing stones, with the text read from bottom to top to align with the stone's upright orientation. In rarer horizontal arrangements, the direction proceeds from left to right, though some examples exhibit reading—alternating directions per line—to accommodate space constraints. The stem-line often coincides with the stone's edge, minimizing the need for additional guidelines and enhancing durability against weathering. Although the vast majority of surviving Primitive Irish examples are monumental inscriptions on ogham stones—pillar-like monuments typically of local or —contemporary and medieval Irish literary sources, such as the , indicate that the script was also applied to perishable materials like wood and metal, suggesting broader practical use in non-monumental contexts. This versatility underscores Ogham's role as a functional tailored to early medieval Irish society.

Representation of Sounds

The Ogham script encodes the consonants of Primitive Irish primarily through 15 core letters organized into the first three aicmí, corresponding to phonemes including /b/ (ᚁ beith), /l/ (ᚂ luis), /f/ (ᚃ fearn), /s/ (ᚄ sail), /n/ (ᚅ nion), /h/ (ᚆ úath, rare), /d/ (ᚇ dair), /t/ (ᚈ tinne), /c/ or /k/ (ᚉ coll), /q/ or /kʷ/ (ᚊ quert), /m/ (ᚋ muin), /g/ (ᚌ gort), /ŋ/ or /ŋg/ (ᚍ ngéadal), /st/ or /z/ (ᚎ straif), and /r/ (ᚏ ruis). Additional letters from the forfeda extension represent /z/ (ᚕ ifín), /oi/ (ᚖ eamh), /ui/ (ᚗ oidheadh), and /ea/ (ᚘ eda), while geminate forms (e.g., double strokes for /bb/, /ll/) distinguish long consonants from short ones, possibly indicating non-lenited variants. Notably, there is no dedicated letter for /p/, reflecting the absence of this phoneme in Primitive Irish, which retained the Proto-Celtic loss of initial /p/ in most positions. Vowel notation in Ogham is handled by a single aicme (vowel group) with five letters: /a/ (ᚐ ailm), /o/ (ᚑ onn), /u/ (ᚒ úr), /e/ (ᚓ edhadh), and /i/ (ᚔ iodhadh), represented as straight notches along the stemline without marking length distinctions between short and long vowels (e.g., /a/ vs. /aː/). Diphthongs such as /oi/, /ui/, and /ea/ are not directly marked in the core alphabet but appear via forfeda letters in later or extended inscriptions, implying an indirect encoding through approximate vowel sequences. This system prioritizes simplicity for carving but often merges diphthongs into monophthongs over time, as seen in evolving forms like Early Primitive Irish /au̯/ reducing to /o/. Inscriptions frequently employ alliterative conventions, particularly in formulas where personal names or kin terms begin with the same initial consonant (e.g., sequences like "CUNAMAQQI" linking alliterative patronymics), echoing oral poetic structures adapted to the script's linear form. Dots occasionally appear between letters to denote vowels, separate words, or clarify ambiguities in dense carvings, though their use is inconsistent and not standardized. These practices suit the script's primary role in commemorative stones, emphasizing mnemonic clarity over complex syntax. The Ogham orthography exhibits several limitations, including ambiguities in consonant-vowel interactions, such as sequences interpretable as long vowels or clusters (e.g., "EDAD" potentially rendering /eːd/ or /ɛdað/ based on context). It provides no mechanism to distinguish palatal from non-palatal consonants, a contrast that was nascent or absent in Primitive Irish but became phonemic later, leaving early inscriptions under-equipped for such nuances. The script's alphabetic yet notch-based design shows a bias toward syllabic units (consonant-vowel pairs in short names like "LUGUDEC"), effectively obscuring grammatical inflections and morphological details in longer expressions. These constraints reflect 's adaptation for monumental, non-literary use rather than full phonetic transcription.

Linguistic Features

Phonology

The phonological system of Primitive Irish, the earliest attested stage of the Goidelic branch of (c. 4th–6th centuries AD), is primarily reconstructed from the orthographic evidence of inscriptions combined with comparative analysis from later and other . This reconstruction reveals a relatively simple inventory of sounds, reflecting inheritance from Proto-Celtic with some early innovations, such as the loss of the Proto-Celtic labial stop /p/ and the emergence of allophonic . The system lacks the palatal/non-palatal consonant distinctions that become phonemic in , and and quality play a key role in morphological contrasts preserved in inscriptions. The vowel system comprised five short monophthongs (/a/, /e/, /i/, /o/, /u/) and their long counterparts (/aː/, /eː/, /iː/, /oː/, /uː/), with length arising either from Proto-Celtic inheritance or compensatory lengthening after consonant loss. These vowels were represented in Ogham by a limited set of symbols (A, O, U, E, I), without initial graphic distinction for length, though long vowels often resulted from the monophthongization of earlier diphthongs in stressed positions. Diphthongs included /ai/ and /oi/, as seen in forms like *BIVAIDONAS (from Proto-Celtic *bi-weyd-on-s 'living'), and /au/ (from /ou/ or /eu/, e.g., in *GOSSUCTTIAS < Proto-Celtic *gʰew-s- 'choice'), which began to simplify in later Primitive Irish stages. Vowel quality in unstressed syllables was subject to reduction and affection, where short vowels assimilated toward the quality of following syllables (e.g., Proto-Celtic *wiros > Primitive Irish *wiros 'man', with /i/ affecting preceding vowels). The consonant system featured voiced and voiceless stops (/b/, /d/, /g/, /t/, /k/), with a notable absence of /p/ inherited from Proto-Celtic (where it merged with /kʷ/ or was lost), (/f/, /s/, /x/ from velar fricative developments), nasals (/m/, /n/, /ŋ/), liquids (/l/, /r/), and a /w/ (retained initially and post-consonantally, e.g., VORGOS 'over'). Labiovelars /kʷ/ and /gʷ/ were distinct phonemes in Primitive Irish, represented by ceirt and getal in , before simplifying to /k/ and /g/ in later stages. Early appears allophonic, with stops weakening to s between vowels or in specific environments (e.g., /d/ > [ð] intervocalically), without dedicated orthographic markers in early ; this process is analyzed as arising from interarticulatory timing constraints in the Celtic phonological system. Nasal + voiceless stop clusters underwent voicing, such as *nt > *nd or *nk > *ŋg (e.g., Proto-Celtic *sentus > Primitive Irish *sindus, later Old Irish sét 'path'). Stress was likely fixed on the initial , a Proto-Celtic retention that drove prosodic processes like (loss of unstressed final vowels) and syncope (loss of unstressed internal vowels), leading to in non-initial positions (e.g., final /o/ > /a/ in -OS > -AS endings). This initial stress pattern influenced the overall prosody, creating rhythmic contrasts in inscriptions and setting the stage for the synthetic morphology of . Recent scholarship, such as Eska's analysis of phonological timing, refines the understanding of how these prosodic features interacted with emerging in early Celtic, including Primitive Irish.

Morphology

Primitive Irish morphology is attested almost exclusively through Ogham inscriptions, which predominantly feature genitive singular noun phrases in formulas expressing kinship, tribal affiliation, and possession, such as X MAQQI Y ("X, son of Y"). This limited corpus reveals a richly inflected system inherited from Proto-Celtic, with noun declension paradigms showing stem-class distinctions similar to those in other early Celtic languages. Damian McManus's analysis of these inscriptions highlights the systematic variation in genitive endings, which reflect both phonological and morphological patterns, and often appear in compound personal names derived from descriptive or epithet elements. Noun morphology centers on the genitive singular, the most common case in the inscriptions, with endings varying by stem class. For o-stem nouns, typically masculine, the genitive ending is -i, as in MAQI ("of the son"), from Proto-Celtic *makʷi, or occasionally -os, seen in names like Cunagnos. A-stem nouns, often feminine, employ -as or -os, exemplified by CUNNETAS ("of the little hound," from *kʷeneto-) and anmas ("of the name"); ya-stem variants use -eas, as in MAQI-RITEAS ("son of the star"). I- and u-stem nouns share -os, such as BRUSCCOS ("of the heather"); consonantal stems take -as, as in ERCAVICCAS ("of the white horse"); and certain feminine forms end in -ais, like VLAMATTIAS ("of the enemy"). Kinship terms illustrate these patterns vividly: maqi ("son") appears in genitive MAQI or MAQQI in patronymics like CUNAMAQQI ("hound-son"), while avi ("grandson" or "descendant") is attested as AVI or AWIAS, as in AVI TURANIAS ("descendant of the lord"). McManus derives many such names from Proto-Celtic roots, noting compounds like QRIMITIR ("priest," possibly from *kʷrī-mi-tiro-) that blend nominal elements without verbal inflection. Verb forms are rare and unattested in fully inflected paradigms, with inscriptions favoring nominal constructions over predicates; potential verbal derivations appear only in frozen forms within names, such as TOGITTACC (genitive of toicthech "leader," implying a root *tegu- "lead"). Adjectives and pronouns are similarly limited, with adjectives surfacing as descriptive modifiers in compounds, like INEQAGLAS ("white-grey," combining etne "face" and glas "grey") or ERCA ("white" in ERCAVICCA). No independent pronouns are clearly attested, though possessive implications arise in genitive phrases. The case system emphasizes the genitive for expressing possession and relation, as in tribal affiliations like MAQQI MUCOI DOVINIA ("son of the tribe of the Devonian"); accusative and dative forms are absent or unidentifiable, with rare nominatives like ENI (a-stem "bird") and datives such as AMADU ("hound") or BIGU ("victory") appearing in isolated contexts. This genitive dominance underscores the formulaic, commemorative nature of Ogham texts, where morphological complexity serves relational encoding rather than narrative elaboration.

Syntax

The syntax of Primitive Irish remains largely unattainable due to the brevity and formulaic nature of the surviving inscriptions, which number around 400 and primarily consist of personal names in the genitive singular used for commemorative or proprietary purposes. These texts offer no evidence of verbs, complex clauses, or full sentences, limiting analysis to simple nominal phrases and inferences drawn from comparative . As a result, reconstructions rely heavily on patterns observed in later and shared Goidelic features, such as the assumption of verb-initial . Word order in Primitive Irish is inferred to be verb-subject-object (VSO), aligning with the canonical structure of later Irish and other , though no verbal elements appear in the inscriptions to confirm this directly. Nominal phrases, the dominant structure attested, follow a head-initial pattern where genitives are consistently postposed to the governing noun, as seen in typical patronymic formulae like "MAQI MAQI" (of the son, of the son). For example, the inscription "CUNAMAQQI AVI CORBBI" translates to "of Cunam, grandson of Corbb," illustrating a chain of genitive dependencies without prepositions or adjectives. This Noun-Genitive order prefigures the possessive constructions in , where relationships are expressed through juxtaposition rather than inflected articles. Agreement features, including early forms of initial consonant , are suggested by comparative evidence but not graphically attested in due to the script's limitations in representing or . In Primitive Irish, such likely originated as external effects in compounds and phrases, functioning allophonically before the loss of unstressed syllables elevated them to morphological markers, as reconstructed from transitions to . For instance, or may have applied in genitive chains like "MAQI CORBBI" (son of Corbb), anticipating the agreement patterns in later Goidelic syntax. Recent computational models of Celtic , while focused on modern varieties, highlight the syntactic predictability of these phenomena across Goidelic stages, supporting inferences for Primitive Irish phrase-level interactions.

Internal Development

Phonological Shifts from Proto-Celtic

Primitive Irish, the earliest attested stage of the , underwent several key phonological changes from its Proto-Celtic ancestor, primarily between the 1st millennium BCE and the early CE. These shifts, evidenced mainly through inscriptions containing personal names and etymologies, distinguish Insular Celtic innovations and set the stage for later developments. Major changes include the reduction of syllable structure, consonant cluster simplifications, and vowel system reorganizations, with many occurring prior to the CE when the earliest monuments appear. A distinctive Goidelic feature was the loss of the phoneme /p/, absent in Primitive Irish unlike other Celtic branches, as seen in loanwords and etymologies where Latin p- remains p- in Irish (e.g., no native words with /p/). Consonant changes included the simplification of labiovelars from Proto-Celtic *kw to /k/ before front vowels (Q-Celtic), contrasting with /p/ in P-Celtic; for instance, *penkʷe 'five' > Primitive Irish *cóic with /k/. Loss of /n/ before /s/ or /l/ in clusters occurred, as in *gnātos 'known' > *gātos > gāt (attested in compounds like GAT-). Initial /s/ often became /h/ in certain environments (e.g., *sindos > *hinda(s)), and broader began, with stops weakening to fricatives intervocalically (e.g., *tegos 'house' > *thegos). These pre-4th century changes are preserved in names like LUGUDECCAS (from *Lugudekkos), without later simplifications. Word-final nasals were lost, with (e.g., *ismū 'below' > *īsu). Vowel shifts reshaped the pre-Ogham. Monophthongization of Proto-Celtic diphthongs proceeded as *oi > /e:/ and *au > /o:/, contributing to a uniform inventory; for example, *moi-s 'delay' > *mēs (later més), and *tauros 'bull' > *toros (later tarus). Raising of /e/ to /i/ before nasals or in hiatus occurred in some cases. from fricative deletion before sonorants appeared in late pre-Ogham stages (e.g., *maglos 'prince' > *máglos > *mál). These adjustments, alongside earlier nasal losses, resulted in a distinct from Proto-Celtic, confirmed through etymologies like *nevā 'holy' > *neba. The script's limitations obscure some details, but the attested forms show a balanced consonant-vowel distribution.

Morphological Evolution

The morphological evolution of Primitive Irish from Proto-Celtic shows continuity with gradual simplification, driven by early phonological reductions like nasal losses and cluster simplifications, though fuller inflectional erosion occurred later. Proto-Celtic nouns had up to eight cases—nominative, accusative, genitive, dative, ablative, locative, instrumental, and vocative—plus three genders, but Primitive Irish, as seen in 4th-6th century inscriptions, preserved overt case endings in limited forms, mainly genitive singular -i, due to the formulaic nature of texts rather than complete loss. This is evident in inscriptions like CUNAMAQQI AVI CORBBI ("of Cunamaccus, grandson of Corbus"), where -i derives from Proto-Celtic -osio. Rare dative forms like BIGU MAQI LAG[I], and genitive plurals such as TRIA MAQA, indicate other cases persisted, with neuter gender hinted at but scarce in the male-dominated naming. Early mergers aligned some forms toward masculine/feminine patterns. Kinship terminology illustrates continuity from Proto-Celtic, adapted for memorial contexts. ("son," genitive of *makʷos) is common, as in MAQI MUCOI LLAITAN ("son of the tribe of the Laigin"), reflecting patronymics. Avi (from *awī-os, "grandfather/descendant") denoted "grandson" or lineage, e.g., AVI INEQAGLAS ("grandson of Inequaglas"). These genitive forms show preserved core semantics despite early shortening. Derivational morphology used Proto-Celtic suffixes, with agentive -gnos productive in names like DALAGNI ("of Dalagnos," "holder of the assembly"), appearing in over 50 Ogham examples for relational designations. Overall, Primitive Irish shifted toward reliance on prepositions and mutations, but major simplifications like case loss were post-Ogham. Evidence from ~400 inscriptions, focused on names, limits full insights, supplemented by parallels (e.g., genitive -i). These confirm shared origins, with Insular accelerations.

Transition to Old Irish

Key Linguistic Changes

The transition from Primitive Irish to involved profound phonological transformations that reshaped the sound system, making it more distinct from its Proto-Celtic roots. A central development was the establishment of a full system, where initial consonants underwent systematic weakening in specific grammatical contexts, evolving from allophonic variations triggered by lost phonetic environments into phonemic alternations. This , including the fricativization of stops like *t > [θ] and *k > , became a core feature by the , as evidenced in early manuscripts. Vowel elisions and syncope further streamlined the language: eliminated unstressed final syllables after approximately 300 AD, while syncope reduced medial unstressed vowels, often merging them into or geminates, which contributed to morphological simplification. For instance, the Primitive Irish /ai/ monophthongized to /eː/ in stressed syllables, as seen in forms like Primitive *taikos > té 'poet (dative)'. Morphologically, the period marked the erosion of inflectional complexity inherited from earlier stages, with the loss of case suffixes due to and syncope, which stripped nouns of distinct endings for nominative, accusative, and dative cases, shifting reliance to prepositional phrases and . This led to the rise of prepositional pronouns, where prepositions fused with personal pronouns to form inflected units like Old Irish dom ('to me') from do + mo, enabling concise expression of possession and relations without separate case markers. Concurrently, initial mutations grammaticalized as primary indicators of grammatical function: signaled feminine gender or , while marked plurality or possession, compensating for the diminished suffix system and integrating into the core morphology by the Old Irish period. Syntactically, Old Irish solidified a verb-subject-object (VSO) order as the default clausal structure, departing from more flexible Primitive Irish arrangements and aligning with Insular Celtic patterns, where the verb's initial position facilitated the conjunct-absolute distinction in inflection. This VSO rigidity is attested from the earliest 7th-century texts, such as glosses in Latin manuscripts, and supported the emergence of the definite article in, which first appears around the same time as a reduced form of an earlier , marking specificity and triggering on following nouns. Sociolinguistic factors, particularly the Christianization of Ireland from the 5th to 7th centuries, accelerated these changes by introducing Latin literacy, which supplanted the Ogham script and prompted the adaptation of the Latin alphabet for Irish orthography around 600 AD. This shift, driven by monastic scriptoria, facilitated the recording of Old Irish in glosses and poetry, embedding mutations more firmly as grammatical tools amid the cultural emphasis on Latin-Irish bilingualism. Recent analyses, including 2020 studies on mutation prediction models, underscore how these innovations stabilized by the 7th century, reflecting adaptive responses to phonological erosion.

Illustrative Examples

To illustrate the linguistic evolution from Primitive Irish to , inscriptions provide concrete evidence when paired with later textual attestations in medieval manuscripts, , and glosses. These examples demonstrate systematic changes, including the loss of inflectional endings (), consonant and palatalization, vowel shifts, and simplification of genitive forms common in Primitive Irish commemorative phrases. Example 1: Painestown Ogham Stone (CIIC 40) This late Primitive Irish inscription from , dated to the first half of the , reads MAQI CAIRATINI AVI INEQAGLAS. It commemorates a Leinster king whose name appears in Old Irish annals and king-lists as Mac Caírthinn Uí Enechglaiss, reflecting a memorial formula "of the son/descendant of [name], grandson/descendant of [name]". The following table aligns the forms and highlights key phonological and morphological shifts:
Primitive IrishOld IrishKey Changes
MAQIMacLoss of final -i (apocope); retention of stem *mag- "son"; lenition of following consonant in context (not shown in isolation).
CAIRATINICaírthinnVowel raising and i-mutation (a > á, i remains); syncope of medial -t- in cluster; palatalization of n to nn; lenition of th.
AVIUíVowel shift (a > ú); loss of intervocalic v (to /f/, then lenited and dropped); semantic shift from "grandson" to "descendant of" (genitive marker).
INEQAGLASEnechglaissLoss of initial nasal i-?; /kw/ (from q) > /x/ (ch); /g/ > /ɣ/ > /x/ (ch); retention of s > ss; overall palatalization and vowel adjustment.
These changes exemplify the transition's core developments, where Primitive Irish preserved more archaic Indo-European case endings and consonants, while underwent around the 6th century, leading to analytic structures and initial . Example 2: Monataggart II Ogham Stone (CIIC 119) This Primitive Irish inscription from , likely pre-6th century, reads DALAGNI MAQI DALI. It translates to "of Dalagnos son of Dalos," with parallels in personal names like Dalláin maic Daill, as seen in glosses and poetry (e.g., , a 7th-century ). The names derive from *dal- "blind" with diminutive -agn(i), showing and genitive forms. The following table aligns the forms and highlights key shifts:
Primitive IrishOld IrishKey Changes
DALAGNIDalláin of /g/ to /ŋ/ > to ll; insertion of epenthetic a; loss of final -i (); -agn(i) > -án.
MAQImaicLoss of final -i; vocalic shift to /aɪ/ in genitive; of following d to ḋ (not shown here).
DALIDaillLoss of final -i; after l (/l/ > /l:/ or ll in compounds); retention of stem *dal- with in context.
This example underscores genitive simplification, where Primitive Irish's synthetic case markers yield to Old Irish's reliance on prepositions and , alongside nasal assimilation in consonant clusters.

References

  1. https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/id/eprint/14583/1/DS_Ogam.pdf
  2. https://www.academia.edu/7012591/The_Conversion_of_Ireland_and_the_Emergence_of_the_Old_Irish_Language_AD_367_637
  3. https://ifc.dpz.es/recursos/publicaciones/38/77/24stifter.pdf
  4. https://www.academia.edu/11351096/History_of_the_Irish_language
  5. https://ogham.glasgow.ac.uk/index.php/2023/12/20/the-periods-of-ogam-usage/
  6. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.312.5770.31a
  7. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/studies-in-church-history/article/wild-and-woolly-west-early-irish-christianity-and-latin-orthodoxy/34D7C69195BBA65A30F29573E15F95A9
  8. https://www.jolr.ru/files/%28100%29jlr2012-8%28153-159%29.pdf
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385138781_6_Prehistoric_layers_of_loanwords_in_Old_Irish
  10. https://www.rte.ie/news/2013/0508/391157-ogham-stones-website/
  11. https://www.heritagecouncil.ie/content/files/Ogham-Stones.pdf
  12. https://www.corkcoco.ie/sites/default/files/2023-06/archaeological-heritage-of-county-cork-2020.pdf
  13. https://www.babelstone.co.uk/Blog/2010/03/ogham-stones-of-wales.html
  14. https://www.babelstone.co.uk/Blog/2011/06/ogham-stones-of-isle-of-man.html
  15. https://ogham.glasgow.ac.uk/index.php/ogham-of-the-month/
  16. https://blogs.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/taylorian/2018/02/19/ancient-scripts-ogham-old-irish-inscriptions/
  17. https://www.ogham.academy/blog/ogham-stones
  18. https://ogham.celt.dias.ie/version2013/menu.php?lang=en&menuitem=05
  19. https://ogham.glasgow.ac.uk/index.php/2025/02/07/digging-into-the-archaeological-context-of-the-pool-ogham-stone-s-ork-008/
  20. https://ogham.glasgow.ac.uk/
  21. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c14kywyk0vro
  22. https://books.google.com/books?id=t7RQAAAAcAAJ
  23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20520262
  24. https://books.google.com/books?id=RCdAAAAAYAAJ
  25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20489945
  26. https://ogham.celt.dias.ie/
  27. https://ogham.glasgow.ac.uk/index.php/2023/07/06/r-a-s-macalister-a-life/
  28. https://kevinscannell.com/files/lrec2020.pdf
  29. https://ogham.celt.dias.ie/version2013/menu.php?lang=en&menuitem=03
  30. https://faculty.ucr.edu/~legneref/bronze/ogamscri.htm
  31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1993.tb01067.x
  32. https://ifc-ojs.es/index.php/palaeohispanica/article/download/381/357/2147
  33. https://gaelic.co/ogham/
  34. https://www.academia.edu/31192329/Some_Problems_in_Deciphering_the_Early_Irish_Ogam_Alphabet
  35. http://library.pyramidal-foundational-information.com/books//A%20Guide%20To%20Ogam.pdf
  36. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/uwp/jcl/2020/00000021/00000001/art00007
  37. https://digi20.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/fs1/object/display/bsb00040667_00001.html
  38. https://aclanthology.org/2020.sltu-1.1.pdf
  39. https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/id/eprint/12890/1/Stifter%20Encyc.pdf
  40. https://www.kul.pl/files/30/Celtologia/Jaskula.pdf
  41. http://wa.amu.edu.pl/plm_old/2010/files/Abstracts/PLM2010_Abstract_Jaskula_2.pdf
  42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30007732
  43. https://www.academia.edu/28506957/Old_Irish_phonology
  44. https://www.academia.edu/91958284/ROP_T%C3%9A_MO_BAILE_GRADIENT_RECURRENT_APOCOPE_AND_SYNCOPE_IN_THE_DEVELOPMENT_OF_IRISH
  45. https://www.dias.ie/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Thurneysen-A-Grammar-of-Old-Irish.pdf
  46. https://www.academia.edu/5509513/The_development_and_loss_of_the_Old_Irish_double_system_of_verbal_inflection
  47. https://www.academia.edu/92101396/Sound_change_and_typological_shift_Initial_mutation_in_Celtic
  48. https://historicalsyntax.org/hs/index.php/hs/article/view/195/140
  49. https://davidgoldstein.netlify.app/publication/2022-old-irish-article/2022-old-irish-article.pdf
  50. https://ogham.celt.dias.ie/stone.php?site=National_Museum&stone=40._Painestown&stoneinfo=inscription&lang=en
  51. https://ogham.celt.dias.ie/stone.php?lang=en&site=National_Museum&stone=119._Monataggart_II
  52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286680633_A_fragment_of_an_Iron-Age_quern_and_an_ogham_stone
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.