Hubbry Logo
Tsiolkovsky rocket equationTsiolkovsky rocket equationMain
Open search
Tsiolkovsky rocket equation
Community hub
Tsiolkovsky rocket equation
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Tsiolkovsky rocket equation
Tsiolkovsky rocket equation
from Wikipedia
A rocket's required mass ratio as a function of effective exhaust velocity ratio

The classical rocket equation, or ideal rocket equation is a mathematical equation that describes the motion of vehicles that follow the basic principle of a rocket: a device that can apply acceleration to itself using thrust by expelling part of its mass with high velocity and can thereby move due to the conservation of momentum. It is credited to Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, who independently derived it and published it in 1903,[1][2] although it had been independently derived and published by William Moore in 1810,[3] and later published in a separate book in 1813.[4] Robert Goddard also developed it independently in 1912, and Hermann Oberth derived it independently about 1920.

The maximum change of velocity of the vehicle, (with no external forces acting) is:

where:

  • is the effective exhaust velocity (which is also equal to )
  • is the natural logarithm function;
  • is the initial total mass, including propellant, a.k.a. wet mass;
  • is the final total mass without propellant, a.k.a. dry mass.

Given the effective exhaust velocity determined by the rocket motor's design, the desired delta-v (e.g., orbital speed or escape velocity), and a given dry mass , the equation can be solved for the required wet mass : The required propellant mass is then

The necessary wet mass grows exponentially with the desired delta-v.

History

[edit]

The equation is named after Russian scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky who independently derived it and published it in his 1903 work.[1][2]

The equation had been derived earlier by the British mathematician William Moore in 1810,[3] and later published in a separate book in 1813.[4]

American Robert Goddard independently developed the equation in 1912 when he began his research to improve rocket engines for possible space flight. German engineer Hermann Oberth independently derived the equation about 1920 as he studied the feasibility of space travel.

While the derivation of the rocket equation is a straightforward calculus exercise, Tsiolkovsky is honored as being the first to apply it to the question of whether rockets could achieve speeds necessary for space travel.

Experiment of the boat

[edit]
Experiment of the boat by Tsiolkovsky.

In order to understand the principle of rocket propulsion, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky proposed the famous experiment of "the boat".[citation needed] A person is in a boat away from the shore without oars. They want to reach this shore. They notice that the boat is loaded with a certain quantity of stones and have the idea of quickly and repeatedly throwing the stones in succession in the opposite direction. Effectively, the quantity of movement of the stones thrown in one direction corresponds to an equal quantity of movement for the boat in the other direction (ignoring friction / drag).

Derivation

[edit]
[edit]

Consider the following system:

Tsiolkovsky's theoretical rocket from t = 0 to t = delta_t

In the following derivation, "the rocket" is taken to mean "the rocket and all of its unexpended propellant".

Newton's second law of motion relates external forces () to the change in linear momentum of the whole system (including rocket and exhaust) as follows: where is the momentum of the rocket at time : and is the momentum of the rocket and exhausted mass at time : and where, with respect to the observer:

  • is the velocity of the rocket at time
  • is the velocity of the rocket at time
  • is the velocity of the mass added to the exhaust (and lost by the rocket) during time
  • is the mass of the rocket at time
  • is the mass of the rocket at time

The velocity of the exhaust in the observer frame is related to the velocity of the exhaust in the rocket frame by: thus, Solving this yields: If and are opposite, have the same direction as , are negligible (since ), and using (since ejecting a positive results in a decrease in rocket mass in time),

If there are no external forces then (conservation of linear momentum) and

Assuming that is constant (known as Tsiolkovsky's hypothesis[2]), so it is not subject to integration, then the above equation may be integrated as follows:

This then yields or equivalently or or where is the initial total mass including propellant, the final mass, and the velocity of the rocket exhaust with respect to the rocket (the specific impulse, or, if measured in time, that multiplied by gravity-on-Earth acceleration). If is NOT constant, we might not have rocket equations that are as simple as the above forms. Many rocket dynamics researches were based on the Tsiolkovsky's constant hypothesis.

The value is the total working mass of propellant expended.

(delta-v) is the integration over time of the magnitude of the acceleration produced by using the rocket engine (what would be the actual acceleration if external forces were absent). In free space, for the case of acceleration in the direction of the velocity, this is the increase of the speed. In the case of an acceleration in opposite direction (deceleration) it is the decrease of the speed. Of course gravity and drag also accelerate the vehicle, and they can add or subtract to the change in velocity experienced by the vehicle. Hence delta-v may not always be the actual change in speed or velocity of the vehicle.

Other derivations

[edit]

Impulse-based

[edit]

The equation can also be derived from the basic integral of acceleration in the form of force (thrust) over mass. By representing the delta-v equation as the following:

where T is thrust, is the initial (wet) mass and is the initial mass minus the final (dry) mass,

and realising that the integral of a resultant force over time is total impulse, assuming thrust is the only force involved,

The integral is found to be:

Realising that impulse over the change in mass is equivalent to force over propellant mass flow rate (p), which is itself equivalent to exhaust velocity, the integral can be equated to

Acceleration-based

[edit]

Imagine a rocket at rest in space with no forces exerted on it (Newton's first law of motion). From the moment its engine is started (clock set to 0) the rocket expels gas mass at a constant mass flow rate R (kg/s) and at exhaust velocity relative to the rocket ve (m/s). This creates a constant force F propelling the rocket that is equal to R × ve. The rocket is subject to a constant force, but its total mass is decreasing steadily because it is expelling gas. According to Newton's second law of motion, its acceleration at any time t is its propelling force F divided by its current mass m:

Now, the mass of fuel the rocket initially has on board is equal to m0mf. For the constant mass flow rate R it will therefore take a time T = (m0mf)/R to burn all this fuel. Integrating both sides of the equation with respect to time from 0 to T (and noting that R = dm/dt allows a substitution on the right) obtains:

Limit of finite mass "pellet" expulsion

[edit]

The rocket equation can also be derived as the limiting case of the speed change for a rocket that expels its fuel in the form of pellets consecutively, as , with an effective exhaust speed such that the mechanical energy gained per unit fuel mass is given by .

In the rocket's center-of-mass frame, if a pellet of mass is ejected at speed and the remaining mass of the rocket is , the amount of energy converted to increase the rocket's and pellet's kinetic energy is

Using momentum conservation in the rocket's frame just prior to ejection, , from which we find

Let be the initial fuel mass fraction on board and the initial fueled-up mass of the rocket. Divide the total mass of fuel into discrete pellets each of mass . The remaining mass of the rocket after ejecting pellets is then . The overall speed change after ejecting pellets is the sum [5]

Notice that for large the last term in the denominator and can be neglected to give where and .

As this Riemann sum becomes the definite integral since the final remaining mass of the rocket is .

Special relativity

[edit]

If special relativity is taken into account, the following equation can be derived for a relativistic rocket,[6] with again standing for the rocket's final velocity (after expelling all its reaction mass and being reduced to a rest mass of ) in the inertial frame of reference where the rocket started at rest (with the rest mass including fuel being initially), and standing for the speed of light in vacuum:

Writing as allows this equation to be rearranged as

Then, using the identity (here "exp" denotes the exponential function; see also Natural logarithm as well as the "power" identity at logarithmic identities) and the identity (see Hyperbolic function), this is equivalent to

Terms of the equation

[edit]

Delta-v

[edit]

Delta-v (literally "change in velocity"), symbolised as Δv and pronounced delta-vee, as used in spacecraft flight dynamics, is a measure of the impulse that is needed to perform a maneuver such as launching from, or landing on a planet or moon, or an in-space orbital maneuver. It is a scalar that has the units of speed. As used in this context, it is not the same as the physical change in velocity of the vehicle.

Delta-v is produced by reaction engines, such as rocket engines, is proportional to the thrust per unit mass and burn time, and is used to determine the mass of propellant required for the given manoeuvre through the rocket equation.

For multiple manoeuvres, delta-v sums linearly.

For interplanetary missions delta-v is often plotted on a porkchop plot which displays the required mission delta-v as a function of launch date.

Mass fraction

[edit]

In aerospace engineering, the propellant mass fraction is the portion of a vehicle's mass which does not reach the destination and is instead burned as propellant, usually used as a measure of the vehicle's performance. In other words, the propellant mass fraction is the ratio between the propellant mass and the initial mass of the vehicle. In a spacecraft, the destination is usually an orbit, while for aircraft it is their landing location. A higher mass fraction represents less weight in a design. Another related measure is the payload fraction, which is the fraction of initial weight that is payload.

While the original wording of the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation does not directly use the mass fraction, the mass fraction can be derived from the used ratio of initial to final mass, or .

Effective exhaust velocity

[edit]

The effective exhaust velocity is often specified as a specific impulse and they are related to each other by: where

  • is the specific impulse in seconds,
  • is the specific impulse measured in m/s, which is the same as the effective exhaust velocity measured in m/s (or ft/s if g is in ft/s2),
  • is the standard gravity, 9.80665 m/s2 (in Imperial units 32.174 ft/s2).

Applicability

[edit]

The rocket equation captures the essentials of rocket flight physics in a single short equation. It also holds true for rocket-like reaction vehicles whenever the effective exhaust velocity is constant, and can be summed or integrated when the effective exhaust velocity varies. The rocket equation only accounts for the reaction force from the rocket engine; it does not include other forces that may act on a rocket, such as aerodynamic or gravitational forces. As such, when using it to calculate the propellant requirement for launch from (or powered descent to) a planet with an atmosphere, the effects of these forces must be included in the delta-V requirement (see Examples below). In what has been called "the tyranny of the rocket equation", there is a limit to the amount of payload that the rocket can carry, as higher amounts of propellant increment the overall weight, and thus also increase the fuel consumption.[7] The equation does not apply to non-rocket systems such as aerobraking, gun launches, space elevators, launch loops, tether propulsion or light sails.

The rocket equation can be applied to orbital maneuvers in order to determine how much propellant is needed to change to a particular new orbit, or to find the new orbit as the result of a particular propellant burn. When applying to orbital maneuvers, one assumes an impulsive maneuver, in which the propellant is discharged and delta-v applied instantaneously. This assumption is relatively accurate for short-duration burns such as for mid-course corrections and orbital insertion maneuvers. As the burn duration increases, the result is less accurate due to the effect of gravity on the vehicle over the duration of the maneuver. For low-thrust, long duration propulsion, such as electric propulsion, more complicated analysis based on the propagation of the spacecraft's state vector and the integration of thrust are used to predict orbital motion.

Examples

[edit]

Assume an exhaust velocity of 4,500 meters per second (15,000 ft/s) and a of 9,700 meters per second (32,000 ft/s) (Earth to LEO, including to overcome gravity and aerodynamic drag).

  • Single-stage-to-orbit rocket: = 0.884, therefore 88.4% of the initial total mass has to be propellant. The remaining 11.6% is for the engines, the tank, and the payload.
  • Two-stage-to-orbit: suppose that the first stage should provide a of 5,000 meters per second (16,000 ft/s); = 0.671, therefore 67.1% of the initial total mass has to be propellant to the first stage. The remaining mass is 32.9%. After disposing of the first stage, a mass remains equal to this 32.9%, minus the mass of the tank and engines of the first stage. Assume that this is 8% of the initial total mass, then 24.9% remains. The second stage should provide a of 4,700 meters per second (15,000 ft/s); = 0.648, therefore 64.8% of the remaining mass has to be propellant, which is 16.2% of the original total mass, and 8.7% remains for the tank and engines of the second stage, the payload, and in the case of a space shuttle, also the orbiter. Thus together 16.7% of the original launch mass is available for all engines, the tanks, and payload.

Stages

[edit]

In the case of sequentially thrusting rocket stages, the equation applies for each stage, where for each stage the initial mass in the equation is the total mass of the rocket after discarding the previous stage, and the final mass in the equation is the total mass of the rocket just before discarding the stage concerned. For each stage the specific impulse may be different.

For example, if 80% of the mass of a rocket is the fuel of the first stage, and 10% is the dry mass of the first stage, and 10% is the remaining rocket, then

With three similar, subsequently smaller stages with the same for each stage, gives:

and the payload is 10% × 10% × 10% = 0.1% of the initial mass.

A comparable SSTO rocket, also with a 0.1% payload, could have a mass of 11.1% for fuel tanks and engines, and 88.8% for fuel. This would give

If the motor of a new stage is ignited before the previous stage has been discarded and the simultaneously working motors have a different specific impulse (as is often the case with solid rocket boosters and a liquid-fuel stage), the situation is more complicated.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Tsiolkovsky rocket equation, also known as the classical or ideal rocket equation, is a mathematical relation in astrodynamics that calculates the change in velocity (Δv) attainable by a rocket or spacecraft through the expulsion of propellant, assuming no external forces act upon it. It expresses Δv as Δv = v_e \ln(m_0 / m_f), where v_e is the effective exhaust velocity of the propellant relative to the vehicle, m_0 is the initial total mass (including propellant), and m_f is the final mass after propellant expulsion. Named after Russian scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, who independently derived and published it in 1903, the equation forms the cornerstone of rocket propulsion theory and mission design. The derivation of the equation stems from the conservation of in a variable-mass , where the rocket's forward gain equals the backward of the expelled exhaust. Considering an mass dm ejected at -v_e relative to the (which moves at v), the balance yields m dv = -v_e dm, leading to the integrated logarithmic form upon and assuming constant v_e. This idealization neglects factors like atmospheric drag, gravity losses, or variable exhaust , but it provides the baseline for understanding propulsion efficiency in vacuum conditions. The equation's implications underscore the challenges of space travel, often termed the "tyranny of the rocket equation," as achieving significant requires a that grows exponentially, meaning most of a launch vehicle's must be propellant—for instance, approximately 90% for insertion. It guides the design of multistage rockets, where discarding empty stages reduces m_f to optimize subsequent burns, and influences propellant choices to maximize v_e, such as using high-energy fuels like and oxygen. Since its publication, the equation has been pivotal in enabling historic missions, from suborbital flights to interplanetary exploration, by quantifying the trade-offs between , , and .

Historical Background

Development and Naming

The Tsiolkovsky rocket equation originated from the work of Russian scientist , who independently derived it in 1903 as part of his pioneering studies on space travel using reactive . Tsiolkovsky, a self-taught and educator, developed the equation to quantify the change achievable by a expelling mass, laying foundational principles for . The equation first appeared in Tsiolkovsky's seminal paper titled "Exploration of Cosmic Space by Means of Reaction Devices," published in the Russian journal Nauchnoye Obozreniye (Science Review). In this work, he outlined the theoretical framework for interplanetary flight, emphasizing the need for high-efficiency propulsion to overcome Earth's gravity. Although similar concepts had been explored earlier, such as British mathematician William Moore's 1813 treatise A Treatise on the Motion of Rockets, which related rocket momentum to changing mass using Newtonian principles, Moore's analysis was more limited in scope and did not fully articulate the integrated form later attributed to Tsiolkovsky. The full equation was also independently derived around the same period by others, including French aeronautical engineer Robert Esnault-Pelterie in the 1910s, American physicist Robert Goddard in 1912, and German rocket pioneer Hermann Oberth in 1920. The equation bears Tsiolkovsky's name in recognition of his comprehensive application to , distinguishing it from prior partial derivations. Beyond the equation itself, Tsiolkovsky's broader contributions to rocketry included visionary concepts like multi-stage rockets, which he elaborated in later publications to enable cumulative velocity gains for reaching orbital and interplanetary destinations.

Early Experiments

Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, in his seminal 1903 work, illustrated the fundamental principle of rocket propulsion through a involving a closed . In this analogy, a person inside the carriage throws stones or masses backward with a certain relative to the carriage, resulting in the carriage moving forward in the opposite direction due to the conservation of momentum in the . This conceptual demonstration highlighted how a rocket could achieve motion in the vacuum of space without external forces, by expelling mass rearward. Early practical experiments with liquid-fueled rockets were conducted by American physicist Robert in the 1920s. On March 16, 1926, successfully launched the world's first , using and as fuels, which reached an altitude of approximately 12.5 meters and a speed of about 27 m/s (60 mph) over a 2.5-second flight. Although did not explicitly reference Tsiolkovsky's equation in his publications, the performance of his rocket implicitly aligned with the equation's predictions for single-stage propulsion, demonstrating the logarithmic relationship between and velocity change under ideal conditions. Subsequent tests by in the late 1920s and early 1930s, including rockets that achieved altitudes over 2 kilometers, further validated the core principles of variable mass propulsion. Post-World War II efforts provided more robust empirical verifications through the analysis of German V-2 rockets. Launched from 1944 onward, the V-2 (or A-4) was a single-stage liquid-fueled using alcohol and , capable of reaching altitudes up to 189 kilometers and speeds exceeding 1,600 meters per second. Postwar examinations by U.S. and Allied scientists, including telemetry data from over 60 V-2 launches at between 1946 and 1950, confirmed that the rocket's burnout velocity closely matched predictions from the Tsiolkovsky equation when adjusted for initial mass, exhaust velocity (around 2,000 m/s), and final mass. These tests marked the first large-scale demonstration of the equation's applicability to high-performance rocketry. However, early experiments also revealed key limitations of the ideal Tsiolkovsky equation. In Goddard's low-altitude flights, atmospheric drag significantly reduced achievable velocities compared to predictions, as the equation assumes no external forces. Similarly, V-2 data showed deviations during the initial ascent phase due to air resistance and losses, which the basic formulation does not account for, necessitating trajectory corrections in real-world applications.

Mathematical Formulation

Statement of the Equation

The Tsiolkovsky rocket equation, in its classical form, describes the change in velocity Δv\Delta v of a as it expels : Δv=veln(m0mf)\Delta v = v_e \ln \left( \frac{m_0}{m_f} \right) where vev_e is the effective exhaust velocity, m0m_0 is the initial total mass of the (including ), and mfm_f is the final mass after expulsion. This equation, first derived and published by in 1903, predicts the maximum velocity change achievable in the absence of external forces, such as or atmospheric drag, by converting the chemical or other energy of the into through expulsion at high speed. The equation employs the natural logarithm (base e2.718e \approx 2.718) and is typically expressed in SI units, with Δv\Delta v and vev_e in meters per second (m/s) and masses in kilograms (kg), yielding Δv\Delta v in m/s. The logarithmic term highlights the exponential relationship between the mass ratio m0/mfm_0 / m_f and the attainable velocity gain: even modest increases in the mass ratio can produce substantial Δv\Delta v, underscoring the efficiency challenges in rocket design where carrying excess propellant mass limits performance.

Definition of Terms

The Tsiolkovsky rocket equation relates the change in a rocket's to its effective exhaust and the of initial to final mass; its variables carry specific physical meanings central to understanding performance. denotes the total change in that a can achieve through its system, assuming no external forces such as or atmospheric drag act upon it. This quantity serves as a fundamental measure of a system's capability, quantifying the impulse delivered to the vehicle and enabling mission planning by summing required Δv budgets for maneuvers like orbit insertion, trajectory corrections, or interplanetary transfers. In practice, Δv is often decomposed into vector components corresponding to specific orbital or attitude adjustments, highlighting its role in vectorial . Mass fraction refers to the ratio of final mass to initial mass (m_f / m_0) or, equivalently, the propellant mass fraction as 1 - (m_f / m_0), which indicates the proportion of a rocket's total mass devoted to consumable propellant versus non-consumable components. A higher propellant mass fraction signifies greater efficiency in propellant utilization, as it allows for larger velocity changes within the constraints of launch vehicle capacity, directly influencing the feasibility of achieving mission objectives. Effective exhaust velocity (v_e) is the velocity of the exhaust gases relative to the , representing the speed at which is ejected to generate , and it accounts for non-ideal effects such as expansion and differences at the exit. This parameter is equivalent to the product of (I_sp) and standard (g_0 ≈ 9.81 m/s²), where I_sp measures the produced per unit of weight flow rate and serves as a key indicator of . Higher v_e values enable greater Δv for a given , underscoring its significance in optimizing systems for high-performance missions. The distinction between dry mass and wet mass is crucial for mass budgeting in design: dry mass comprises the non- components, including , structural elements, engines, and subsystems, while wet mass is the total initial mass encompassing the dry mass plus all . This separation highlights the impact of loading on overall , as wet mass determines launch requirements whereas dry mass reflects the residual vehicle after burnout, directly affecting the achievable fraction.

Derivations

Standard Momentum-Based Derivation

The standard momentum-based derivation of the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation relies on the principle of conservation of momentum applied to a variable-mass system in an inertial reference frame, where no external forces act on the . Consider a with instantaneous mm moving at vv along a straight line. In a small time interval, the expels an dmdm of rearward at a speed vev_e relative to the itself; thus, the absolute of the expelled in the inertial frame is vvev - v_e. The 's becomes mdmm - dm, and its increases by an amount dvdv. Conservation of momentum dictates that the total momentum before expulsion equals the total momentum after. The initial momentum is mvm v. The final momentum consists of the rocket's contribution, (mdm)(v+dv)(m - dm)(v + dv), plus the expelled mass's contribution, dm(v+dvve)dm (v + dv - v_e). Equating these gives: mv=(mdm)(v+dv)+dm(v+dvve)m v = (m - dm)(v + dv) + dm (v + dv - v_e) Expanding the right side yields mv+mdvdmvdmdv+dmv+dmdvdmvem v + m \, dv - dm \, v - dm \, dv + dm \, v + dm \, dv - dm v_e, or mv+mdvdmvem v + m \, dv - dm v_e after cancellation. Subtracting mvm v from both sides and neglecting the second-order infinitesimal term dmdvdm \, dv simplifies to: mdv=dmvem \, dv = dm \, v_e Rearranging provides the differential form: dv=vemdmdv = - \frac{v_e}{m} \, dm where the negative sign accounts for the decrease in mass (dm<0dm < 0 for the rocket). To obtain the finite change in velocity Δv=vfv0\Delta v = v_f - v_0, integrate the differential equation, assuming constant exhaust velocity vev_e. The limits are from initial mass m0m_0 (at v0v_0) to final mass mfm_f (at vfv_f), with mf<m0m_f < m_0: v0vfdv=vem0mfdmm\int_{v_0}^{v_f} dv = -v_e \int_{m_0}^{m_f} \frac{dm}{m} The left side integrates to Δv\Delta v, while the right side gives ve[lnm]m0mf=veln(m0/mf)-v_e [\ln m]_{m_0}^{m_f} = v_e \ln (m_0 / m_f). Thus, the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation is: Δv=veln(m0mf)\Delta v = v_e \ln \left( \frac{m_0}{m_f} \right) This result shows that the achievable velocity change depends exponentially on the mass ratio. The derivation assumes an absence of external forces (such as gravity or drag), constant exhaust velocity relative to the rocket, and one-dimensional motion, making it applicable to ideal conditions in deep space.

Alternative Classical Derivations

One alternative classical derivation of the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation employs the concept of total impulse delivered by the engine. The total impulse II is defined as the time integral of the thrust force, which, assuming constant exhaust velocity vev_e, equals I=ve(m0mf)I = v_e (m_0 - m_f), where m0m_0 is the initial mass and mfm_f is the final mass after fuel expulsion. To account for the varying mass during propulsion, the incremental change in velocity dvdv is related to the incremental impulse dI=vedmdI = v_e \, dm (with dm<0dm < 0 for mass loss) by dv=dI/mdv = dI / m, or dv=vedm/mdv = -v_e \, dm / m. Integrating this from initial mass m0m_0 to final mass mfm_f yields Δv=veln(m0/mf)\Delta v = v_e \ln(m_0 / m_f). Another approach focuses on the acceleration of the rocket due to thrust. The thrust FF is given by F=ve(dm/dt)F = v_e (-dm/dt), where dm/dt>0-dm/dt > 0 is the mass flow rate. The instantaneous acceleration aa follows from Newton's second law as a=F/m=ve(dm/dt)/ma = F / m = v_e (-dm/dt) / m. The change in velocity is then dv=adt=ve(dm/m)dv = a \, dt = v_e (-dm / m). Integrating over the burn, assuming constant vev_e, again produces Δv=veln(m0/mf)\Delta v = v_e \ln(m_0 / m_f). This method emphasizes the time-dependent dynamics under Newtonian mechanics. A third variant models fuel expulsion as a sequence of discrete pellets, providing insight into the continuum limit. Consider a rocket of initial mass m0m_0 expelling NN equal-mass pellets, each of mass ϕm0/N\phi m_0 / N (where ϕ\phi is the fuel mass fraction), at constant relative speed vev_e rearward relative to the current rocket velocity. For the jj-th pellet, momentum conservation gives an incremental velocity change Δvj=veϕ/N1jϕ/N\Delta v_j = v_e \frac{\phi / N}{1 - j \phi / N}. Summing over all pellets yields the total Δv=vej=1Nϕ/N1jϕ/N\Delta v = v_e \sum_{j=1}^N \frac{\phi / N}{1 - j \phi / N}. In the limit as NN \to \infty, this discrete sum converges to the integral form Δv=veln(1/(1ϕ))=veln(m0/mf)\Delta v = v_e \ln(1 / (1 - \phi)) = v_e \ln(m_0 / m_f). This derivation highlights the equation's origin in finite approximations approaching continuous propulsion. These derivations—impulse-based, acceleration-based, and discrete pellet—are equivalent under the shared assumptions of constant exhaust velocity, no external forces, and Newtonian physics, all recovering the identical logarithmic expression for Δv\Delta v. They offer pedagogical variety compared to the baseline momentum conservation approach, reinforcing the equation's robustness across formulations.

Relativistic Derivation

The relativistic derivation of the rocket equation extends the classical formulation to account for velocities approaching the , incorporating special relativity's effects on and addition. The relativistic of the rocket is given by p=γmvp = \gamma m v, where mm is the instantaneous rest mass, vv is the in the inertial lab frame, γ=11v2/c2\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}}
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.