Hubbry Logo
RussophiliaRussophiliaMain
Open search
Russophilia
Community hub
Russophilia
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Russophilia
Russophilia
Russophilia
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Flag of Russia
Saint Basil's Cathedral on Red Square in Moscow

Russophilia is the identification or solidarity with, appreciation of, or support for the country, people, language, and history of Russia. One who espouses Russophilia is called a russophile. Its antonym is Russophobia.[1][2] In the 19th century, Russophilia was often linked to variants of pan-Slavism, since the Russian Empire and autonomous Serbia were the only two Slavic sovereign states during and after the Springtime of Nations.

In politics, the term has been used to describe political actors who support closer relations with the Russian government or support its policies. Particularly in the Post-Soviet states, Russophile politicians may also support maintaining or increasing Russification policies, such as Alexander Lukashenko.[3][4][5]

By country

[edit]

Armenia

[edit]
Further information: Russia–Armenia relations and List of pro-Russian political parties § Armenia

The Armenian Revolutionary Federation, Republican Party of Armenia, and Prosperous Armenia are the main Pro-Russian political parties in Armenia.[6][7][8][9]

Belarus

[edit]

Belarus has close political and economic ties with Russia, both being part of the Union State, the Collective Security Treaty Organization, the Commonwealth of Independent States, and the Eurasian Economic Union, due to their shared Soviet heritage.

Following the 2020–2021 Belarusian protests and the Russian invasion of Ukraine, many observers have described Belarus as a Russian puppet state or a satellite state.[10][11][12][13][14][15]

China

[edit]
Chinese leader Xi Jinping with Russian president Vladimir Putin at the 2025 China Victory Day Parade

The People's Republic of China under the leadership of General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party Xi Jinping has supported the Russian Federation closely following international sanctions after Russia invaded Ukraine.[16][17][18] China had close ties with the Soviet Union prior to the Sino-Soviet split, owing to ideological kinship between the two communist states.[19]

Previous anti-Russian sentiment in China has greatly downgraded, due to perceived common anti-Western sentiment among Russian and Chinese nationalists.[20][21] Ethnic Russians are one of the 56 ethnic groups officially recognized by the People's Republic of China.[22]

According to a 2019 survey by the Pew Research Center, 71% of Russians have a favourable view of China.[23] A YouGov survey conducted in the same year found that 71% of the Chinese think Russia has a positive effect on world affairs.[24]

During the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, many social media users in China showed sympathy for Russian narratives due in part to distrust of US foreign policy.[25][26] According to a survey conducted by the Carter Center China Focus in April 2022, approximately 75% of respondents agreed that supporting Russia in the war in Ukraine was in China's best interest.[27] In the first days of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the nationalistic Little Pink movement drew international attention for their role in contributing to the mostly pro-war, pro-Russia sentiments on the Chinese internet.[28]

Finland

[edit]
Further information: Russia–Finland relations

The Communist movement in Finland during the Cold War inclined towards pro-Soviet tendencies, of which the Taistoist movement was especially pro-Soviet.[29][30][clarification needed]In more recent years, Russophilic sentiment in Finland has persisted in various forms. In 2023, former Social Democrat representative Mikko Elo, together with Mauno Saari, founded the Russophilic organization Naapuriseura (“Neighbour Society”), which promotes closer ties and cultural exchange with Russia.[31]

The modern Finnish political landscape has also seen some pro-Russian political parties. The party Power Belongs to the People (VKK) was notable for being the only political party in Finland with a strong, openly pro-Russian platform in 2022. VKK opposed economic sanctions imposed on Russia and expressed support for the Russian invasion of Ukraine.[32][33] However, the party has since dissasociated from the connections to Russia after Ano Turtiainen was replaced by Antti Asikainen.[34][35] Nevertheless, other political entities have also since echoed pro-Russian positions to varying degrees. The Truth Party in Finland, had also refused to condemn Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine and advocates for stronger bilateral relations with Russia.[36][37] And some who have promoted pro-Russian sentiment have also been found in the Freedom Alliance party of Finland, as a former National Coalition member who argued that Ukraine should be Russian territory was allowed to be among the candidates of the Freedom Alliance party in the 2025 Finnish municipal elections.[38]

Certain individual political activists in Finland have also been prominent for their support of Russia. Johan Bäckman is widely recognized for his pro-Russian views and has actively recruited Finnish volunteers to participate in the conflict in Ukraine on Russia’s side, even for a time joining the VKK party, led by Ano Turtiainen.[39][40] Similarly to Bäckman, another Finnish influencer Janus Putkonen is known for pro-Russian rhetoric, and maintains the extremely pro-Russian Finnish language MV-media website from Russian occupied Donbas, which is known for sharing pro-Kremlin rhetoric.[41]

Some members of the Finns Party also held pro-Russian views in the past.[42]

Germany

[edit]
Members of the "Reichsbürger movement" protesting in Berlin, featuring flags of the Ribbon of Saint George, of the Donetsk People's Republic and of the Federal State of New Russia, 2014

German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche described Russia as "the only power that has durability in it, which can wait, which can still produce something... the antithesis of that pitiable European petty-state politics and nervousness, with which the foundation of the German Reich has entered its crucial phase..." in his 1895 book The Antichrist.[43]

Many members of the far-right political party Alternative for Germany (AfD) have expressed pro-Russian or pro-Kremlin sentiments on various issues.[44][45] The left-populist party Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance has expressed pro-Russian sentiments and opinions.[45]

India

[edit]

A poll conducted in summer 2022 shows that Indians most frequently named Russia their most trusted partner, with 43% naming Russia as such compared to 27% who named the US.[46]

Indonesia

[edit]

Some Indonesians have positively compared support for Russian president Vladimir Putin in the Russo-Ukrainian War to support for former president Suharto in the Indonesian invasion of East Timor.[47] Russophiles are also found among the political left, who support Russia due to inaugural Indonesian president Sukarno's closeness to the Soviet Union. Pro-Russian sentiment is especially strong among members of the governing Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle, led by Sukarno's daughter Megawati Sukarnoputri, who publicly criticized Ukraine and president Volodymyr Zelenskyy.[48]

Romania

[edit]
Further information: Accusations of Russian interference in the 2024 Romanian presidential election

Traditionally, relations between Romania and Russia were shaped by the political system applied in both countries. Relations were cordial prior to the 19th century, and Russia helped Romania achieving its independence from the Ottoman Empire, the royal families of both countries later being allied. Relations developed after the Second World War, when Romania fell under the communist umbrella led by the Soviet Union, becoming a satellite state of the USSR. However, after Ceaușescu's rise to power in 1965, relations became strained; Romania became the first country to free itself fully from the Soviet Union, and relations were mostly only cordial, as Ceaușescu promoted its own view of communism rather, inspired by the Chinese and North Korean systems, than the Soviet vision.

After the fall of the Eastern Bloc, Romania became an ally of the United States, joining both NATO and the European Union, which faced criticism from Moscow. Romania's strategic position in NATO was seen undesirable by Russia. As nationalist movements grew in Romania during the early 2020's, parties such as the Alliance for the Union of Romanians or S.O.S. Romania, parties seeking closer ties with Russia, rose to power, inadvertly dragging Romania back to a potential Russian influence zone.[49]

In 2024, presidential elections in Romania were marked by accusations of Russian involvement, after pro-Russian far-right candidate Călin Georgescu won the first round of elections through supposed corrupt means, such as falsifying his budget for the electoral campaign. Due to those accusations, the first round was canceled, and a full investigation is ongoing as of 2025.

Serbia

[edit]
Further information: Russia–Serbia relations

Russia is popular in Serbia, and many Serbs have traditionally seen Russia as a close ally due to shared Slavic heritage, culture, and the Orthodox faith.[50] According to the European Council on Foreign Relations, 54% of Serbians see Russia as an ally. In comparison, 11% see the European Union as an ally, and only 6% see the United States in the same manner.[51]

During the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, People's Patrol, a far-right group, organized pro-Russian rallies in Belgrade, which were attended by 4,000 people.[52][53][54]

In 2017, the inhabitants of the Serbian village of Adžinci renamed their village Putinovo, in honor of Vladimir Putin.[55][56]

Turkey

[edit]

Ukraine

[edit]
See also: Galician Russophilia
Map showing the Russian Federation in dark red with Russian-occupied territories in Europe in light red
Pro-russian rally in Donetsk, Eastern Ukraine, April 2014

Following Ukrainian independence in 1991, in the 1991 Ukrainian independence referendum 92% (including 55% of ethnic Russians) voted for independence from Soviet Union,[57] but some Ukrainians, mostly in the east and south of the country, voted to see a more Russophile attitude of the government, ranging from closer economic partnership to full national union.[58] Russia and Ukraine had especially close economic ties, and the Russophilic political party, the Party of Regions, became the largest party in the Verkhovna Rada in the 2006 Ukrainian parliamentary election, receiving 33% of the votes. It would remain a dominant force in Ukrainian politics, until the 2014 Revolution of Dignity. Following the 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine, the overall attitude of Ukrainians towards Russia and Russians has become much more negative,[59] with most Ukrainians favoring NATO[60] and European Union membership.[61] Their views on Russia would further deteriorate following the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.

A survey by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology in 2016 found that 67% of Ukrainians had a positive attitude to Russians, but that only 8% had a positive attitude to the Russian government.[62]

According to an October 2021 poll of the country's population, 41% of Ukrainians had a "good" attitude towards Russians (42% negatively), while in general 54% of Russians had a positive attitude towards Ukraine.[63]

In 2022, following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the pro-Russian sentiment that formerly dominated Ukraine's south and east collapsed. According to polls conducted by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, those with positive attitudes towards Russia plunged from 53% to 4% in the East, and from 45% to just 1% in the south.[64][65] Conversely, support for Ukrainian membership in NATO skyrocketed, from 36% to 69% in the country's east, and from 48% to 81% in the south.[66] As a result, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace announced that regardless how the war ends, pro-Russian parties and sentiments in Ukraine are "firmly in the past".[67]

Main article: Derussification in Ukraine

Besides politics, there is also increasing support for the removal of symbols of Russian culture in Ukraine, including monuments[68] and streets[69] named after notable Russians,[70] along with limiting Russian literature and music.[71] Massive decommunization campaigns coupled with intensive derussification have been carried out since 2014, most notably the toppling of several statues of Vladimir Lenin (termed Leninfall) and renaming of many places with Soviet-associated names.[72] Since the invasion, Ukrainian cities demolished monuments to Russian writer Alexander Pushkin across the country,[73] and there are also hundreds of renamed placenames due to their affiliation with Russia.[74]

United Kingdom

[edit]

According to an interview made by the Ukrainian "Rada" TV channel, former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Boris Johnson is a Russophile, admiring Russian language and culture, even after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.[75] Leader of Reform UK and current MP for Clacton Nigel Farage has made multiple comments praising Russian president Vladimir Putin[76][77] and pushing pro-Russian sentiments and occasionally misinformation[78] since the Russo-Ukrainian War since 2014, even before the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022.[79][80]

United States

[edit]

Many members of the Republican Party in the United States express positive views on Russia. A 2017 poll highlighted that around 32% of respondents had favorable views of Russian president Vladimir Putin.[81] Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, these numbers surged. A YouGov poll found nearly 62% of Republicans preferred Vladimir Putin over Joe Biden, noting that the former was a stronger leader than the latter.[82] Many notable Republicans and conservatives, including President Donald Trump, politicial commentator and live streamer Nick Fuentes, television presenter Tucker Carlson, and incumbent Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene have all expressed admiration for Russia and its leaders.[83][84]

Vietnam

[edit]
Russian president Vladimir Putin visiting Vietnam in 2024

Favorable perceptions of Russia in Vietnam have 83% of Vietnamese people viewing Russia's influence positively in 2017.[85] This stems from historic Soviet support for North Vietnam and the Viet Cong during the Vietnam War. As well as support for Vietnam since 1975 by both the Soviet Union and Russia.[86]

See also

[edit]

Media related to Russophiles at Wikimedia Commons

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Russophilia

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia

Russophilia denotes admiration for or affinity with Russia, its people, culture, language, history, and institutions, often manifesting as support for Russian customs and geopolitical positions. This sentiment has historical roots in 19th-century pan-Slavic movements, where Slavic intellectuals in regions like Galicia and Serbia viewed Russia as a protector against Ottoman or Austro-Hungarian dominance, fostering cultural and political solidarity. In Europe, it evolved through influences such as Soviet-era communism, which attracted leftist sympathizers via ideological appeals and propaganda, alongside appreciation for Russian literary giants like Tolstoy and Dostoevsky, whose works emphasized spiritual depth and critique of Western materialism. Defining characteristics include Orthodox Christian shared heritage in Eastern Orthodox nations, resistance to perceived Western cultural hegemony, and empirical assessments of Russia's resilience against invasions or sanctions, contrasting with Russophobia driven by fears of expansionism. Notable examples persist in countries like Serbia and Greece, where public opinion polls indicate sustained favorability towards Russia due to historical alliances and skepticism of NATO interventions, despite post-2014 geopolitical tensions. Controversies arise in contemporary discourse, with Russophilia critiqued as susceptibility to disinformation, yet proponents ground it in causal analyses of events like the 1990s Balkans conflicts or energy dependencies revealing Western policy inconsistencies.

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Etymology

Russophilia denotes , affinity, or support for , its people, culture, history, , or policies. The term encompasses sentiments ranging from cultural appreciation to political alignment, often contrasting with Russophobia, its antonym denoting hostility or prejudice against . The word "Russophilia" is formed from the combining form "Russo-", derived from the Latinized name for , and the suffix "-philia", from the φιλία (philía), meaning love, fondness, or affinity. Its earliest recorded use in English dates to , appearing in a Methodist publication, though related terms like "Russophile" (referring to an admirer of ) emerged earlier in the . The term gained traction in the late amid European intellectual and political discourses on Slavic identity and Russian influence. Russophilia denotes a specific affinity for the Russian state, its , , and geopolitical role, often held by individuals or groups outside without necessitating a broader ethnic or ideological commitment to Slavic unity. In contrast, emerged as a 19th-century intellectual movement within , led by figures such as Aleksei Khomyakov and Ivan Kireevsky, which advocated for 's development based on indigenous Slavic institutions like the peasant commune () and Orthodox Christian principles of communal harmony (), explicitly rejecting the Westernizing reforms initiated by in the early 18th century. While Slavophiles positioned Russia as the authentic embodiment of Slavic spiritual superiority, emphasizing its historical divergence from Catholic through autocracy and folk traditions, Russophilia lacks this prescriptive ideological framework and can manifest as pragmatic admiration for Russian achievements in areas like (e.g., Tchaikovsky's compositions) or military prowess, irrespective of the admirer's . Slavophilia's internal Russian focus on anti-Western organicism thus differs from Russophilia's potential external, non-doctrinal endorsements, such as those seen in 19th-century European sympathizers drawn to Russia's without invoking Slavic exceptionalism. Pan-Slavism, a related political gaining traction in the mid-19th century among Slavic intellectuals, sought cultural and eventual political confederation of all Slavic peoples under presumed Russian leadership, as evidenced by support for Serbia's autonomy from Ottoman rule during the 1870s Eastern Crisis; Russophilia may overlap with this in Slavic contexts but does not inherently prioritize inter-Slavic federation, allowing for isolated pro-Russian stances detached from pan-ethnic solidarity. , originating among Russian émigrés in the 1920s, further diverges by conceptualizing Russia not as a Slavic heartland but as a hybrid Eurasian civilization integrating Mongol-Turkic influences and rejecting pan-Slavic ethnic in favor of a multi-ethnic imperial space bridging and , a view articulated by thinkers like . This contrasts with both Slavophilia's Orthodox-Slavic purity and Russophilia's narrower cultural focus, highlighting Russophilia's flexibility unbound by 's civilizational geopolitics or Slavophilia's romantic communalism.

Historical Development

Pre-Modern and Orthodox Influences

The adoption of Orthodox Christianity by Kievan Rus' in 988 under Prince Vladimir the Great established deep religious ties between and the , fostering a shared liturgical, doctrinal, and cultural framework that later underpinned affinities for Russian Orthodoxy among Eastern Christians. This heritage emphasized monastic traditions, , and icon veneration, distinguishing from Western Catholicism and creating a sense of communal identity across Orthodox realms. As the weakened under external pressures, Russian principalities, particularly Muscovy, preserved and adapted these practices, positioning themselves as custodians of unaltered faith amid Mongol domination from the 13th to 15th centuries. Following the fall of to the Ottomans in 1453, the asserted greater independence, achieving in 1448 with the election of Metropolitan Jonas without 's approval, a move ratified by subsequent ecumenical patriarchs. This shift culminated in the "Third Rome" doctrine, articulated by the Pskov monk Philotheus in epistles to Vasily III around 1510–1521, proclaiming as the successor to and —the final bastion of true , with no fourth Rome to follow. The doctrine framed as bearing a messianic responsibility to safeguard against Islamic expansion, Catholic proselytism in , and internal schisms, thereby elevating its spiritual prestige in the eyes of other Orthodox communities. In Orthodox regions under foreign rule, such as the and among , this perception translated into early appeals to Muscovy for protection and cultural solidarity, viewing Russian rulers as during Ottoman subjugation and Polish-Lithuanian pressures on Ruthenian Orthodox. For instance, Serbian and Greek Orthodox monks and hierarchs occasionally sought refuge or patronage in from the onward, drawn by its uncompromised adherence to pre-Nikonian rites and resistance to Western influences. These pre-modern dynamics, rooted in ecclesiastical interdependence rather than , laid the causal foundation for later Russophilia by associating with the preservation of Orthodox purity and .

19th-Century Romanticism and Intellectual Movements

In the 1830s, Slavophilism emerged as a key intellectual movement among Russian thinkers, deeply influenced by European Romanticism's valorization of national uniqueness, organic social bonds, and spiritual depth over rationalist individualism. Proponents such as Aleksey Khomyakov and Ivan Kireevsky critiqued Peter the Great's Westernizing reforms, arguing that Russia's path lay in its pre-Petrine traditions of Orthodox Christianity, communal landholding (mir), and collective harmony (sobornost), which they saw as embodying a superior, faith-based communalism absent in the atomized West. This romantic idealization positioned Russia not as a backward periphery but as a civilizational alternative, with its vast steppes and folk customs evoking a primordial authenticity romanticized in works by poets like Fyodor Tyutchev, who in 1830 praised Russia's "inexplicable" soul as a mystical force unbound by Western logic. Slavophiles contrasted sharply with the Westernizer faction, led by figures like Timofey Granovsky and , who advocated emulating European Enlightenment models for Russia's modernization. Yet Slavophilism's resonated amid the 1848 European revolutions, fostering a defensive pride in Russia's autocratic stability and imperial expanse, which by 1850 encompassed over 120 million subjects across . Khomyakov's 1854 poem "Russia," written during the , exemplified this by portraying the nation as a divine guardian against Western , blending romantic with Orthodox to inspire loyalty to Russian distinctiveness. The movement's ideas extended beyond Russia through , which romanticized Slavic unity under Russian leadership as a counter to Germanic and Latin dominance. Thinkers like Yuri Samarin applied Slavophile principles to advocate for Russia's protective role over fellow , influencing mid-century stirrings in the ; for instance, Serbian intellectuals drew on Russian models during their 1876–1878 uprisings against Ottoman rule, viewing Moscow's interventions as fraternal liberation rooted in shared Orthodox heritage. While harbored tensions—evident in the 1848 Congress's wary reception of Russian delegates—it amplified Russophile sentiments by framing Russia as the Slavic world's romantic vanguard, preserving communal ethos against liberal individualism. This intellectual current, peaking in the before evolving under censorship, laid groundwork for later nationalist ideologies by embedding admiration for Russia's spiritual and imperial essence within a broader romantic critique of modernity.

Soviet Era and Ideological Export

The Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 and the subsequent formation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in 1922 initiated a phase of Russophilia intertwined with Marxist-Leninist ideology, as the Soviet regime positioned itself as the epicenter of global proletarian struggle. The (Comintern), established on March 2, 1919, in , served as the primary vehicle for ideological export, directing communist parties in dozens of countries to foment revolution and align with Soviet directives. By the mid-1920s, the Comintern had organized affiliates in over 60 nations, funding , strikes, and insurrections—such as the failed German uprisings of 1923—while subordinating foreign communists to Moscow's tactical shifts, including the abandonment of "" in favor of "" under by 1924. This centralization, though nominally internationalist, reinforced perceptions of Russian-dominated leadership, drawing sympathizers who viewed Soviet resilience against internal chaos and Western intervention (e.g., the 1918–1920 Allied blockade) as evidence of inherent Russian fortitude. Under Stalin's rule from 1924 to 1953, ideological export intensified through forced collectivization, rapid industrialization (e.g., the Five-Year Plans starting in 1928, which boosted steel production from 4 million tons in 1928 to 18 million by 1937), and masked as anti-fascist unity. The Comintern's strategy, adopted at its Seventh Congress in July 1935, urged alliances with bourgeois democrats against , influencing events like the (1936–1939), where Soviet arms and advisors supported Republican forces, eliciting admiration from leftist intellectuals despite purges that claimed an estimated 700,000 lives in the Great Terror of 1937–1938. Internally, policies shifted from early 1920s korenizatsiya (indigenization promoting non-Russian languages) to de facto by the 1930s, elevating Russian as the of administration and education across the USSR's 15 republics, which indirectly bolstered Russian cultural prestige abroad among fellow travelers. Western visitors, including Sidney and , who in their 1935 book Soviet Communism: A New Civilization? praised the system while downplaying evidence of engineered famines like the (1932–1933, killing 3–5 million ), exemplified selective Russophilia rooted in ideological affinity rather than empirical scrutiny of Soviet . Post-World War II, with the Comintern dissolved on May 15, 1943, to appease wartime allies, the USSR pivoted to bilateral support, proxy conflicts, and state-sponsored propaganda via entities like the (founded 1949). Aid to newly independent states—totaling over $10 billion in loans and technical assistance by the to countries like and —framed the Soviet model as an alternative to Western imperialism, cultivating pro-Soviet elites in the Global South who associated Moscow's patronage with Russian strategic acumen. Cultural exports, including tours by the Bolshoi Ballet (e.g., its 1959 U.S. visit drawing 100,000 attendees) and broadcasts via (reaching 100 million listeners by 1960), highlighted achievements like Yuri Gagarin's April 12, 1961, spaceflight, inspiring pockets of admiration amid rivalries. However, this Russophilia often overlooked the regime's suppression of dissent, as documented in declassified archives revealing systematic censorship and the export of show trials' logic to satellite states. Such sentiments persisted among some Western academics and activists into the , influenced by narratives minimizing Soviet human costs in favor of anti-capitalist critique, though empirical data from defectors and émigrés increasingly eroded uncritical support.

Post-Cold War Revival and Contemporary Shifts

Following the Soviet Union's dissolution on , , Russophilia waned in amid disillusionment with communism's collapse and Russia's economic turmoil, yet it persisted and revived in Eastern Orthodox nations due to shared religious and historical bonds. In post-communist states like and , where Soviet-era legacies intertwined with anti-Western sentiments, admiration for re-emerged as stabilized under Vladimir Putin's presidency from 2000 onward, positioning itself as a defender of traditional values against liberal globalism. Economic ties, including energy dependencies, further bolstered pro-Russian orientations; for example, maintained gas supply agreements with despite pressures. The 2000s and 2010s saw a notable revival through cultural and political channels, particularly among European far-right intellectuals who found ideological kinship with Russian Eurasianist thinkers like Alexander Dugin, obscured during the but rekindled post-1991 via conferences and publications. In , this manifested in mass public support for Russian leaders; Putin's January 17, 2019, visit to drew approximately 120,000 attendees, reflecting solidarity over issues like Kosovo's 2008 independence. Similarly, in , Kremlin-aligned actors amplified Russophile narratives within nationalist circles, privatizing patriotic to counter EU integration. Orthodox Church networks, including joint events and media, reinforced civilizational affinity, with Russia's intervention in initially enhancing its image as a sovereign power among skeptics of expansion. Contemporary shifts accelerated after Russia's February 24, 2022, of , intensifying Russophobia across much of while sustaining Russophilia in select regions viewing the conflict through lenses of anti-hegemonic resistance. surveys from 2023-2025 indicate median unfavorable views of exceeding 80% in , with confidence in Putin below 20% in countries like and , yet pockets of support endured in , where polls showed over 50% opposing sanctions on in 2022. In , hard Russophilia—embracing over Western alliances—gained traction amid economic grievances, though soft variants emphasizing cultural ties faced scrutiny from EU-aligned institutions. Far-right parties in largely maintained prior pro-Russian stances without abrupt pivots, prioritizing narrative consistency over invasion fallout, as evidenced by continued engagements despite sanctions. These dynamics highlight causal factors like geopolitical autonomy and cultural realism over transient media-driven condemnation, with Western academic and media sources often exhibiting in framing such sentiments as fringe aberrations rather than empirically rooted affinities.

Underlying Motivations

Cultural and Civilizational Affinity

Cultural and civilizational affinity contributes to Russophilia through shared Orthodox Christian heritage, particularly among Slavic and Balkan populations where religious identity intertwines with national consciousness. In Serbia, this manifests as a perceived kinship rooted in common Orthodox faith and historical struggles, fostering solidarity with Russia as a protective elder brother in the Orthodox world. The Serbian Orthodox Church emphasizes spiritual ties predating modern politics, based on joint heritage and faith, which underpin enduring fraternal sentiments. Similarly, Russian religious influence in the Western Balkans leverages these shared cultural and religious bonds among Orthodox communities, constituting significant demographic shares in countries like Serbia and Montenegro. Russia's promotion of itself as a guardian of traditional values—encompassing family structures, opposition to liberal , and preservation of norms derived from —resonates with global conservatives disillusioned by Western . This narrative positions as a civilizational alternative, distinct from the liberal West, appealing to those viewing it as a against perceived decay. The "Russkiy Mir" (Russian World) concept, advanced by the , frames Russian identity as a unique civilizational space centered on Orthodox spirituality and culture, extending affinity beyond ethnic to broader Orthodox and traditionalist circles. Academic analyses affirm as foundational to Russia's self-perceived civilizational distinctiveness, differentiating it from Western paradigms through emphasis on communal and spiritual over individualistic values. Such affinities are evident in Russia's projection via the Orthodox Church, which provides a framework aligning state policy with traditionalism, attracting sympathy in regions sharing Byzantine-Orthodox legacies like and . However, while these cultural ties bolster Russophilia, they coexist with critiques that Russia's traditionalism serves geopolitical aims rather than pure ideological consistency.

Political Resistance to Western Liberalism

Russophilia manifests politically as a form of opposition to the perceived excesses of Western , with admirers viewing as a defender of national , traditional social values, and multipolarity against U.S.-led . Since Putin's 2012 return to the presidency, Russian state has emphasized resistance to liberal , promoting instead a conservative model that prioritizes family, , and state authority over and . This stance resonates with groups disillusioned by liberal policies on migration, , and supranational institutions like the . In Europe, populist parties such as Austria's Freedom Party (FPÖ) and Germany's (AfD) have expressed sympathy for , citing shared critiques of cosmopolitanism, , and . These parties often frame as an ally in rejecting globalization and political correctness, with leaders like FPÖ's maintaining ties to before 2019. Post-2022 Ukraine polls showed initial hesitation among some populist voters to fully align against , reflecting underlying anti-Western sentiments rooted in nativism and authoritarian preferences. In , historical grievances against NATO's 1999 intervention fuel Russophilia as a bulwark against Western interventionism, evident in public displays supporting 's actions in . Among American conservatives, admiration for Putin stems from his projection of strong leadership and defense of against perceived moral decay in the West, including restrictions on traditional structures and promotion of secular ideologies. Figures in evangelical circles and paleoconservatives praise Russia's bans on "gay propaganda" since and emphasis on demographic preservation, contrasting it with U.S. cultural shifts. This affinity intensified around 2016, with some Republican commentators lauding Putin's as a model against globalist elites, though mainstream GOP support waned after the 2022 invasion. Polls from 2022 indicated 20-30% of Republicans viewed Putin favorably pre-invasion, often linking it to opposition to endless wars and .

Economic and Strategic Pragmatism

Economic pragmatism underpins Russophilia in contexts where engagement with yields tangible benefits, particularly in and commodities . Nations facing high global prices have capitalized on 's discounted exports following Western sanctions after the 2022 invasion of , viewing sustained ties as a hedge against and supply disruptions. For instance, imported Russian crude at discounts, saving refiners approximately $17 billion between April 2022 and June 2025 compared to alternative sources. This economic windfall, estimated at up to $12.6 billion over 39 months in direct import cost reductions, has reinforced perceptions of as a reliable, cost-effective partner amid volatile markets. In , Hungary exemplifies energy-driven pragmatism, increasing its reliance on Russian crude from 61% pre-invasion to 86% by 2024, prioritizing affordability over alignment with sanctions. This dependence, coupled with long-term contracts supplying 4.5 billion cubic meters annually through 2036, motivates resistance to broader decoupling, as alternatives would elevate costs without immediate substitutes. similarly benefits from preferential Russian gas pricing and has avoided sanctions to maintain , leveraging these ties to offset Western integration pressures. Strategically, Russophilia arises from Russia's utility as a to Western dominance and provider of capabilities. India's enduring defense partnerships, including discounted arms and fertilizers post-2022, reflect pragmatic continuity in bilateral "guns and oil" exchanges, enabling diversification from U.S. or Chinese suppliers. Serbia's procurement of Russian weaponry, such as MiG-29 jets and S-300 systems, alongside Moscow's veto power at the UN Security Council on recognition, sustains a that bolsters Belgrade's non-aligned posture. In and , disillusionment with perceived Western inconsistencies further cements pro-Russian orientations, framing as a pragmatic ally for preservation amid EU/NATO expansion. China's deepening with , marked by record trade volumes exceeding $200 billion in 2023, underscores strategic pragmatism in Eurasian dominance, with deals insulating both from U.S. pressures. These motivations prioritize causal benefits—affordable resources and geopolitical leverage—over ideological affinity, though they cultivate favorable views of Russian reliability in multipolar competition.

Manifestations in Society

Intellectual and Artistic Expressions

In the early , British literary circles demonstrated Russophilia through extensive critical engagement with Russian novels, particularly during the "Russian vogue" of the 1910s and 1920s, when translations of works by , , and proliferated. , a central modernist figure, expressed admiration for the Russians' psychological acuity and narrative innovation, arguing in essays like "The Russian Point of View" (1925) that their literature achieved unparalleled sincerity by delving into characters' inner lives without superficial moralizing. This influence shaped Woolf's own techniques, such as stream-of-consciousness, as she internalized Russian methods during her key developmental period from 1917 to 1922, viewing them as superior to prevailing English conventions for capturing human complexity. Philosophically, German historian articulated Russophile sentiments in (1918–1922), depicting Russian civilization as a vital, emerging force distinct from the senescent Western (Faustian) culture. Spengler characterized as shaped by the Eurasian steppe's vastness, inherently anti-technological, deeply agrarian, and oriented toward mystical, apocalyptic rather than rational , positioning as a potential bearer of a new cultural morphology. His analysis countered prevailing European Russophobia by emphasizing Russia's organic rootedness and resilience against modernization's alienating effects, ideas that resonated in interwar conservative intellectual debates. Artistic expressions of Russophilia appeared in Western adaptations of Russian motifs, notably through Sergei Diaghilev's (1909–1929), which fused Russian folklore, Orthodox iconography, and imperial splendor to enthrall Parisian and audiences, prompting collaborations with non-Russian creators like and . This vogue extended to music, where European orchestras championed Russian composers such as and for their exotic harmonies and narrative depth, as seen in the 1890s premieres that elevated Russian symphonies as antidotes to Wagnerian heaviness. In , "sentimental Russophilia" persisted into the late , manifesting in literary and operatic revivals that prized Russia's purported emotional authenticity over Western rationalism, though often detached from political endorsement.

Political Organizations and Public Figures

The International Russophile Movement, founded to promote Russian culture abroad, combat Russophobia, and oppose Western sanctions, held its second congress in in late February 2024, drawing over 350 delegates from 130 countries. Russian President commended the group for undermining efforts to isolate diplomatically. The organization has organized international conferences, including one in , , in November 2024, attended by political scientists, academics, and public figures advocating closer ties with . In European politics, leaders of Slovakia's Direction – Social Democracy party, including Prime Minister Robert Fico and President Peter Pellegrini, have voiced opposition to EU sanctions on Russia and military support for Ukraine, prioritizing direct negotiations with Moscow as a path to resolving the conflict. Fico, returning to power in October 2023 after a prior term from 2006 to 2010, has argued that Western policies risk escalating tensions unnecessarily. Public figures beyond traditional politicians have also embraced Russophilia. American actor , naturalized as a Russian citizen in 2016, declared himself "100% Russophile" at a 2023 Moscow gathering of the International Russophile Movement, aligning with its goals of cultural promotion and geopolitical advocacy. has appeared in Russian supporting 's positions on international affairs. In Western countries, public opinion toward has trended sharply negative since the 2022 invasion of , with favorable views reaching historic lows. A survey conducted in 2025 across 25 countries found a of 19% expressing favorable views of , contrasted with 79% unfavorable, largely stable from post-invasion levels in 2022. , Gallup polling from 2025 reported 17% favorable views (3% very favorable and 14% mostly favorable), down from 51% in 2011 and continuing a decline accelerated by geopolitical tensions. Similar patterns appear in , where data from 2025 highlighted 93% unfavorable views in and , reflecting broad alignment with positions. Conversely, pockets of sustained or relatively high favorability persist in regions linked to Russophilia, particularly among Orthodox Christian nations and parts of the Global South. In , multiple polls underscore strong pro-Russian sentiment: a 2023 survey cited 83% viewing Russia favorably as Serbia's key international partner and friend, with 51% naming it the most important ally despite EU integration pressures. 's 2025 data showed elevated favorability in non-Western countries, including 64% in and 49% in , where views of outpace those of the in some metrics. Trends indicate modest upticks in select European nations—favorable views rose year-over-year in , , , , and per Pew—potentially tied to skepticism of Western policies or cultural affinities, though absolute levels remain below 30% in most cases.
CountryFavorable Views (%)Unfavorable Views (%)YearSource
64Not specified2025Pew Research Center
49212025Pew Research Center
83Not specified2023Various polls
17782025Gallup
7932025Statista/Pew-derived
These disparities highlight how Russophilia manifests in amid broader global polarization, with higher approval in BRICS-aligned or historically sympathetic states often correlating with resistance to Western sanctions or narratives, as evidenced by Gallup's 2023 findings of Russia's leadership approval near lows in post-Soviet spaces but resilient in select contexts. Polling methodologies, such as those from and Gallup, rely on representative samples but may undercapture nuances in authoritarian-leaning societies due to response biases.

Russophilia by Region

In Europe

Russophilia in manifests most prominently in countries with shared Orthodox Christian heritage, Slavic ethnicity, or historical alliances with , particularly in the and . stands out as a focal point, where public sentiment views as the primary ally, with surveys indicating that a plurality of Serbs regard as brothers and oppose Western sanctions against . This affinity stems from Russia's historical support during conflicts like the , , and opposition to Kosovo's independence in 2008, reinforced by cultural and religious ties through the Orthodox Church. In Serbia, manifestations include widespread displays of support for Russia's actions in , such as murals featuring the "Z" symbol alongside slogans affirming Russo-Serbian brotherhood, and reluctance to impose sanctions, with 44% of respondents in a 2022 poll explicitly opposing them. Serbian public opinion largely attributes the Ukraine conflict's origins to expansion rather than Russian aggression, mirroring Moscow's narrative. Political figures and media amplify this, with Serbia maintaining economic ties like gas imports and hosting Russian cultural centers that promote . Hungary under Prime Minister exemplifies Russophilia at the governmental level, prioritizing energy deals with and blocking sanctions expansions, despite broader European opposition. Orbán's administration has framed relations with Russia as pragmatic sovereignty against ' overreach, sustaining imports of Russian oil and gas post-2022 invasion. Public support aligns with voters, though overall favorable views of Russia remain low at around 20% per 2024 surveys, reflecting elite-driven rather than mass sentiment. In other Eastern European states like , , and , pro-Russian leanings appear in political parties and pockets of public opinion, often tied to Orthodox identity or skepticism of . 's Smer-SD party under halted military aid to upon taking power in 2023, citing risks of escalation. Across the , Pew Research data from 2024 shows median unfavorable views of at 65-79%, with higher approval in and but negligible in , where Russophilia is confined to fringe far-right or anti-globalist groups.

In Asia

In India, Russophilia is rooted in historical alliances forged during the , including Soviet military aid during the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War and subsequent arms transfers that now account for over 50 percent of India's in-service military platforms. This affinity persists through economic ties, such as India's purchase of discounted Russian oil post-2022, and strategic autonomy in , evidenced by India's abstentions in UN votes condemning 's actions in . Public opinion reflects this enduring support, with 56 percent of Indians holding favorable views of in 2022 surveys and a majority expressing positivity in 2023 Pew data, the only surveyed country with such a tilt amid global negativity. Indian public discourse often frames as a reliable counterweight to Western pressures, with polls indicating broad backing for deepened economic relations despite geopolitical shifts. In China, pro-Russian sentiment arises from a strategic "no-limits" partnership announced in February 2022, driven by mutual economic interdependence—Russian exports to China surged over 70 percent from 2021 to 2024—and shared resistance to U.S.-led sanctions and alliances. Public polls underscore this, with 83 percent of Chinese respondents in 2025 viewing Russia as a close friend, the highest rating among tested nations, and consistent high favorability in 2024 surveys linking positivity to perceptions of Russia as a bulwark against Western hegemony. State-influenced media reinforces these views, portraying bilateral ties as a model of multipolar cooperation, though underlying border history tempers pure cultural admiration into pragmatic alignment. Vietnam exhibits Russophilia through Soviet-era support during the Vietnam War, including arms and training that aided North Vietnamese victory, evolving into post-1991 defense pacts and Russia's role as a key supplier of submarines and missiles. Favorability remains high, with 83 percent of Vietnamese expressing positive views in 2017 Pew surveys, sustained by balanced diplomacy like Vietnam's neutral stance on Ukraine, praised by Vladimir Putin during his June 2024 Hanoi visit. This manifests in public interest in Russian politics and culture, though divided opinions on the Ukraine conflict reflect wariness of great-power dynamics. In , Russophilia lingers via Soviet legacies like widespread proficiency—serving as a tool in , , and —and resurgent cultural affinity bolstered by Moscow's policies amid declining influence post-Ukraine . Southeast Asian nations like show notable positivity, leading 35-country Pew polls in 2024 with high favorable ratings toward , attributed to non-aligned foreign policies and economic pragmatism. Overall, Asian Russophilia blends historical gratitude, strategic utility against Western , and empirical polling data indicating resilience despite global isolation of .

In the Americas and Elsewhere

In , public favorability toward remains low. A survey conducted in early 2025 found that only 13% of viewed favorably, with 85% holding unfavorable opinions, reflecting broad disapproval amid ongoing geopolitical tensions. In , sentiment is similarly negative, with 62% of respondents expressing unfavorable views of as of late 2020, a trend persisting amid government sanctions and counter-disinformation efforts. However, pockets of sympathy exist among certain conservative circles in the United States, where some right-wing commentators and podcasters have amplified narratives portraying as a bulwark against progressive Western policies, contributing to partisan divides on Ukraine aid, with 43% of Republicans in a 2024 poll deeming U.S. support excessive. In , Russophilia manifests more prominently through state-level alliances and media influence, particularly in countries opposing U.S. . , , and maintain close ties with , hosting military facilities and receiving economic and technical assistance since the early 2000s, which bolsters regime stability amid sanctions. and have adopted neutral positions on the - conflict, with leaders like echoing Russian claims of provocation, as noted in diplomatic statements and joint peace initiatives criticized by Ukraine in 2024. has expanded via outlets like RT and Sputnik, which enjoy wide reach; for instance, a 2023 analysis identified high engagement in and , where state media partnerships amplify anti-Western narratives. Disinformation campaigns, funded by Russian entities and targeting Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking audiences, have promoted pro-Russia views on platforms across , , , , and others since 2022. Elsewhere, particularly in , Russian affinity has grown through pragmatic security partnerships and anti-colonial rhetoric. In the , junta-led governments in , , and expelled Western forces post-2020 coups and signed defense pacts with , deploying Africa Corps mercenaries for by 2024, which has fostered public support via resource-for-protection deals. movements, often leveraging , have organized pro-Russia rallies and narratives framing as an alternative to exploitative Western aid, evident in countries like the and . The International Russophile Movement held its first African conference in on November 13, 2024, drawing participants to promote cultural and political solidarity. These developments stem from empirical grievances over Western interventions rather than ideological alignment, though critics attribute gains partly to opaque influence operations.

Criticisms and Counterarguments

Allegations of Foreign Influence and

Russian state media outlets RT and Sputnik have been accused of systematically disseminating content designed to cultivate positive perceptions of abroad, including narratives emphasizing its , military strength, and opposition to Western . These outlets, funded by the Russian , operate in multiple languages and target international audiences to amplify pro-Kremlin viewpoints, often blending factual reporting with selective emphasis on 's achievements and grievances against and the EU. U.S. and EU authorities have documented their role in influence campaigns, such as efforts to sway on by portraying as a victim of Western aggression, which indirectly fosters Russophilic sentiments among receptive groups. In , allegations center on Kremlin-linked funding of networks that promote Russophilia through media and political channels, particularly targeting far-right and nationalist parties sympathetic to Russia's anti-globalist stance. The 2024 Voice of Europe scandal involved the disruption of a Prague-based outlet accused of funneling hundreds of thousands of euros from to European politicians for spreading pro-Russia , including content praising Russia's and critiquing EU policies. Czech authorities identified this as part of broader operations supporting Moscow's foreign policy, with frozen assets and sanctions imposed on involved individuals. Similar claims have targeted parties like Germany's AfD and France's , with reports of ideological alignment amplified by Russian support, though direct financial ties remain contested in some cases. Serbia stands out as a regional hub for alleged Russian hybrid operations, where state media like RT Balkan tailor narratives to local Orthodox and anti-Western sentiments, contributing to murals and public displays endorsing Russia's actions in . Investigations highlight Russian-funded portals and amplifying pro-Russia views, with serving as a conduit for into the via migrant networks and local outlets. resolutions have condemned these efforts as attempts to undermine cohesion, noting 's media environment as fertile ground for such influence despite lacking direct evidence of universal causation for all pro-Russia attitudes. Critics argue that while exists, historical Slavic ties and shared geopolitical frustrations provide independent bases for Russophilia, challenging claims of predominant foreign orchestration.

Associations with Authoritarianism

Critics of Russophilia contend that it frequently correlates with endorsement of authoritarian governance models, particularly admiration for the centralized power structures under President Vladimir Putin, who has consolidated control since 2000 through measures including the suppression of independent media and opposition figures. This association stems from observations that Russophile sentiments among Western populists overlap with praise for Putin's resistance to liberal internationalism, traditional social policies, and decisive leadership amid perceived Western decadence. For instance, European populist leaders have explicitly commended Putin's approach to maintaining national sovereignty and internal stability, viewing it as a counter to multiculturalism and supranational entities like the European Union. Empirical studies reinforce this link by identifying personality and ideological alignments. Research from the indicates that support for Putin appeals to individuals with more close-minded traits, traditionalist values, and preferences for hierarchical authority, traits that mirror authoritarian inclinations. Similarly, analyses of radical right-wing movements in highlight shared affinities in nativism and , where admiration for Russia's regime is framed as a model for enforcing cultural homogeneity and state control over dissent. In the United States, segments of conservative have expressed affinity for Putin's promotion of "Christian nationalism" and familial policies, interpreting his governance as a bulwark against progressive ideologies, though such views often overlook documented electoral manipulations and curtailments in . Regional manifestations, such as in , exemplify how Russophilia intertwines with cult-of-personality dynamics around Putin, fostering tolerance for authoritarian tactics like media censorship and protest crackdowns as necessary for ethnic and anti-Western resilience. Polling data from post-Soviet neighbors further suggests that pro-Putin endorsements correlate with lower democratic values and higher acceptance of rule, though causation remains debated amid cultural and historical ties. These patterns prompt concerns that Russophilia may normalize authoritarian practices by prioritizing geopolitical realism over institutional pluralism, yet proponents argue such admiration reflects pragmatic recognition of power dynamics rather than ideological endorsement.

Defenses Based on Empirical Realities and Shared Values

Proponents of Russophilia argue that Russia's adherence to traditional social structures aligns with empirical observations of demographic decline in liberal Western societies, where rates have fallen below replacement levels—1.3 in the as of 2023—prompting admiration for Russia's pronatalist policies. Introduced in , Russia's maternity capital program provided financial incentives for second and subsequent children, contributing to a rate rise from 1.16 in 1999 to 1.78 by , with particular gains in second births among women over 30. Model estimates attribute approximately 0.15 additional children per woman to the policy in the long term, alongside broader measures like extended and housing subsidies, which have sustained higher birth rates relative to pre-policy lows despite recent declines to around 1.5. These outcomes are cited as evidence of causal efficacy in countering depopulation through state-supported family incentives, contrasting with Western reliance on amid eroding native birth rates. Russia's legal framework, including 2013 restrictions on public advocacy of non-traditional sexual relations to minors, reflects a commitment to and cultural continuity, resonating with traditionalists who view such measures as empirically grounded responses to correlations between liberal family policies and rising youth issues in the West, such as doubled suicide rates among gender-dysphoric adolescents in countries like the from 2010 to 2020. Admirers highlight Russia's 2020 constitutional amendments prioritizing as a union of man and woman, alongside bans on and for foreigners, as defenses of natural family units that align with historical data showing stable societies prioritize biological reproduction over . This stance positions Russia as a bulwark against perceived Western cultural erosion, evidenced by its 2024 decree expediting residency for foreigners rejecting "destructive neoliberal " in favor of traditional values like and . Economically, Russia's adaptation to Western sanctions since 2014 and intensified post-2022 demonstrates resilience, with GDP growth of 3.6% in 2023 and 4.1% in 2024, driven by redirected energy exports to and domestic import substitution, outperforming initial forecasts of . Oil revenues, while capped by measures, stabilized through shadow fleet shipping and partnerships with and , maintaining fiscal buffers like the National Wealth Fund at over 5% of GDP in 2024. Such performance is defended as empirical validation of strategic autonomy over integration into volatile global financial systems, appealing to those skeptical of sanctions' given Russia's pre-2022 diversification reduced dollar dependency to under 50% of reserves. Geopolitically, Russophiles point to NATO's eastward expansion—adding 14 members since 1999 despite informal assurances to Gorbachev in 1990 against such moves—as a breach eroding Russia's security buffer, with empirical precedents like the 2008 summit's promise of membership to and Georgia heightening border tensions. Russia's advocacy for multipolar order, evidenced by expansion to nine members by 2024, counters U.S.-led unipolarity, aligning with shared values of national among non-Western and Western voices who cite declassified documents showing early post-Cold War understandings limited alliance growth. These realities underpin defenses framing Russophilia not as naivety but as recognition of causal alignments in preserving civilizational distinctiveness against homogenizing pressures.

References

  1. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/russophile
  2. https://www.eminak.net.ua/index.php/eminak/article/view/661
  3. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375623143_The_Historical_Evolution_of_Russophilia_in_Europe_a_Study_of_the_Development_and_Transformation_of_Positive_Attitudes_Towards_Russia
  4. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14683857.2021.1873578
  5. https://ridl.io/german-sentimental-russophilia/
  6. https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/russophile
  7. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Russophil
  8. https://www.yourdictionary.com/russophilia
  9. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Russophilia
  10. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/russophilia_n
  11. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/russophile_adj
  12. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hccc-worldhistory2/chapter/the-westerners-and-the-slavophiles/
  13. https://sarahjyoung.com/site/2012/10/24/russian-thought-lecture-2-the-slavophiles-and-russian-communality/
  14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3483821
  15. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nationalities-papers/article/revisiting-panslavism-in-the-contemporary-perspective/4EA532EFCBF0F66ACBBE6EBEF34B374C
  16. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/russian-eurasianism-ideology-empire
  17. https://daily.jstor.org/eurasianism-a-primer/
  18. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Eastern-Orthodoxy/The-church-of-Russia-1448-1800
  19. https://people.bu.edu/wwildman/bce/russianorthodoxchurchto19thcentury.htm
  20. http://web-static.nypl.org/exhibitions/russia/themes/thirdrome.html
  21. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7312/petr93420-003/html
  22. https://academic.oup.com/book/11837/chapter/160923923
  23. https://orthochristian.com/111566.html
  24. http://personal.kent.edu/~swestga1/SlavophilismWesternism19century.pdf
  25. https://engelsbergideas.com/essays/between-westernisers-and-slavophiles-the-search-for-russias-soul/
  26. https://geohistory.today/state-society-russia-slavophiles/
  27. https://soviethistory.msu.edu/1921-2/comintern/
  28. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/comintern
  29. https://www.international-communist-party.org/English/Texts/46CominTact.htm
  30. https://cla.purdue.edu/academic/history/documents/directory-documents/smith-hegemony-of-content.pdf
  31. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/the-soviet-side-the-cultural-cold-war
  32. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382905760_Cultural_Diplomacy_and_the_Cold_War_Period
  33. https://revistascientificas.us.es/index.php/araucaria/article/view/23675
  34. https://lseideas.medium.com/from-russia-with-love-serbias-lukewarm-reception-of-russian-aid-and-its-geopolitical-implications-a911b3ec09a7
  35. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/9049330.pdf
  36. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/06/23/views-of-russia-and-putin-2025/
  37. https://ruomoplus.lib.uom.gr/bitstream/8000/1610/1/00.1%2520Rev%2520RR%2520Soft%2520and%2520Hard%2520Russophilia%2520v7.0%2520221220.pdf
  38. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40417648/
  39. https://integralworld.net/visser429.html
  40. https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/responses/religion-as-a-political-vehicle-an-examination-of-the-influence-of-orthodoxy-in-serbia-by-russia
  41. https://orthodoxtimes.com/patriarch-porfirije-spoke-of-shared-victories-that-unite-serbia-and-russia/
  42. https://s3.amazonaws.com/berkley-center/230717KarcicSerbsRussiansBrothersForeverRussianReligiousInfluenceWesternBalkans.pdf
  43. https://www.codastory.com/polarization/kristina-stoeckl-russia-traditional-values/
  44. https://humanrightsfirst.org/library/russias-traditional-values-leadership/
  45. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2544&context=ree
  46. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/edcoll/9789004432543/BP000030.pdf
  47. https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/media/article/russias-orthodox-soft-power
  48. https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/russias-conservative-power/
  49. https://ecfr.eu/article/conservatism-by-decree-putin-as-a-figurehead-for-the-global-far-right/
  50. https://ecfr.eu/publication/fellow_travellers_russia_anti_westernism_and_europes_political_parties_7213/
  51. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14651165251321802
  52. https://www.balkancrossroads.com/russophilia-north-kosovo-serbs
  53. https://thomaszimmer.substack.com/p/why-the-american-right-admires-putins
  54. https://www.abc.net.au/religion/michael-bird-why-american-evangelicals-venerate-putin/103550090
  55. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/mar/01/why-does-putin-have-superfans-among-the-us-right-wing
  56. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/india-russian-oil-imports-savings-17-billion-dollars-us-trump-tariffs-trade-war-economy-data-explained-2780603-2025-09-02
  57. https://thecsrjournal.in/how-russian-oil-kept-indias-energy-costs-down-saving-12-6-billion-dollars/
  58. https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/24/europe/hungary-orban-russia-oil-sanctions-intl
  59. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2025/10/02/russian-gas-dependent-hungary-signs-supply-deal-with-france-s-engie_6746018_4.html
  60. https://www.hungarianconservative.com/articles/politics/strategic-alliances-energy-dependencies-serbia-eu-russia/
  61. https://www.csis.org/analysis/guns-and-oil-continuity-and-change-russia-india-relations
  62. https://www.cirsd.org/en/horizons/horizons-winter-2025-issue-no-29/is-russian-%25E2%2580%2598malign-influence-in-serbia-a-myth
  63. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/why-still-pro-russia-making-sense-of-hungarys-and-serbias-pro-russia-stance/
  64. https://russiamatters.org/news/russia-analytical-report/russia-analytical-report-aug-25-sept-2-2025
  65. https://360info.org/rational-alignment-in-multipolar-competition-india-and-russias-strategic-pull-toward-china/
  66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/jmodelite.36.1.150
  67. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/494257/summary
  68. https://www.pravoslavie.ru/81421.html
  69. https://orthochristian.com/81421.html
  70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351432834_Russophobic_Stereotypes_of_Oswald_Spengler
  71. https://www.kharon.com/brief/moscow-rebukes-isolation-with-second-congress-of-the-russophile-group
  72. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/putin-says-russophile-movement-counters-western-efforts-to-isolate-russia/3148876
  73. https://russianembassyza.mid.ru/en/press-centre/news/the_international_russophile_movement_hosted_a_number_of_events_in_johannesburg/
  74. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/robert-fico-pro-russian-slovak-political-heavyweight-wins-another-election-2023-10-01/
  75. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68754112
  76. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/16/italian-princess-conspiracy-theorists-and-steven-seagal-meet-russias-friends-overseas
  77. https://news.gallup.com/poll/1642/russia.aspx
  78. https://www.statista.com/statistics/457552/global-public-confidence-in-russia/
  79. https://debuglies.com/2025/08/26/russia-serbia-diplomacy-kosovo-and-bosnia-tensions-in-2025/
  80. https://news.gallup.com/poll/644795/russia-image-remains-tarnished-own-backyard.aspx
  81. https://www.intellinews.com/serbs-see-russians-as-main-ally-us-as-biggest-threat-323659/
  82. https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2023/01/untarnished-by-war-why-russias-soft-power-is-so-resilient-in-serbia?lang=en
  83. https://bezbednost.org/en/publication/public-perception-of-serbian-foreign-policy-in-the-midst-of-the-war-in-ukraine/
  84. https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/russia-serbia-relations-true-friends-or-pragmatic-players/
  85. https://www.politico.eu/article/kremlin-russia-hungary-viktor-orban-oil-gazprom-media-gabor-kubatov-fidesz-party/
  86. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2024/07/02/views-of-russia-and-putin-july-24/
  87. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2023/2/6/why-some-eu-countries-still-harbour-pro-russian-sentiments
  88. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/10/india-russia-relations
  89. https://globalaffairs.org/commentary-and-analysis/blogs/globally-negative-views-russia-predominate
  90. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2023/08/29/indians-views-of-other-countries/
  91. https://www.theweek.in/news/defence/2025/08/13/opinion-india-russia-relations-run-deeper-than-just-oil-and-weapon-sales-lt-gen-philip-campose-retd.html
  92. https://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/analysis/dependence-gap-russia-china-relations
  93. https://globalaffairs.org/research/public-opinion-survey/friends-benefits-chinese-see-russia-and-north-korea-beijings-closest
  94. https://ciss.tsinghua.edu.cn/upload_files/atta/1727662169826_AD.pdf
  95. https://thediplomat.com/2025/07/chinas-enduring-trust-in-russia-the-public-sentiment-behind-an-unlikely-partnership/
  96. https://therussiaprogram.org/vietnam_russia
  97. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2017/08/16/publics-worldwide-unfavorable-toward-putin-russia/
  98. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/russias-putin-praises-vietnam-its-stance-ukraine-2024-06-19/
  99. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cw44z3k997do
  100. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392026623_Russian_Soft_Power_in_Central_Asia_Government_Policy_Helped_by_Resurgent_Russophilia
  101. https://www.eurac.edu/en/blogs/mobile-people-and-diverse-societies/echoes-of-empire-the-resilience-of-russian-in-central-asia
  102. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/malaysia-leads-35-countries-in-percentage-of-people-with-favourable-view-on-russia-pew-survey
  103. https://www.pewresearch.org/2025/04/17/how-americans-view-russia-and-putin/
  104. https://kyivindependent.com/how-us-right-wing-podcasters-shape-pro-russia-anti-ukraine-sentiments/
  105. https://www.newstatesman.com/international-politics/2025/03/strange-rise-of-pro-russia-right-trump-vance
  106. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/russias-changing-latin-america-strategy/
  107. https://www.csis.org/analysis/how-does-latin-america-and-caribbean-view-ukraine-conflict-after-three-years-war
  108. https://ukrainian-studies.ca/2024/11/04/latin-america-and-the-russo-ukrainian-war-a-complex-and-diverse-response/
  109. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/latin-america-loves-russia-today-publication
  110. https://www.usip.org/publications/2023/10/russian-influence-campaigns-latin-america
  111. https://dfrlab.org/2024/02/21/pro-russia-network-spreads-propaganda-and-disinfo-in-latin-america/
  112. https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/18/africa/russia-expanding-influence-in-africa-intl-cmd
  113. https://disinfo.africa/grassroot-movements-entrenching-russias-position-in-africa-73aa9e60a711
  114. https://africacenter.org/in-focus/russia-in-africa/
  115. https://2021-2025.state.gov/report-rt-and-sputniks-role-in-russias-disinformation-and-propaganda-ecosystem/
  116. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/13/magazine/rt-sputnik-and-russias-new-theory-of-war.html
  117. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-disrupts-covert-russian-government-sponsored-foreign-malign-influence
  118. https://www.politico.eu/article/voice-of-europe-russia-influence-scandal-election/
  119. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/06/03/russia-europe-far-right-espionage/
  120. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/29/world/europe/czech-republic-sanctions-russian-influence-europe.html
  121. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0079_EN.html
  122. https://rsf.org/en/russia-serbia-how-rt-spreads-kremlin-s-propaganda-balkans-despite-eu-sanctions
  123. https://www.voanews.com/a/report-focuses-attention-on-serbia-s-spread-of-russian-propaganda/7819500.html
  124. https://www.clingendael.org/pub/2023/little-substance-considerable-impact/russian-sources-of-influence-in-serbia-montenegro-and-bosnia-and-herzegovina/
  125. https://octopusinstitute.org/serbia-as-a-hub-for-russian-hybrid-operations-in-europe-five-documented-cases/
  126. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-10-2025-0006_EN.html
  127. https://demostat.rs/en/vesti/analize/serbia-fertile-ground-for-foreign-propaganda-influence/2161
  128. https://www.populismstudies.org/Vocabulary/russophile-populism/
  129. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00396338.2017.1282669
  130. https://www.populismstudies.org/introduction-to-the-report-on-the-impact-of-the-russia-ukraine-war-on-right-wing-populism-in-europe/
  131. https://www.colorado.edu/today/2023/11/30/who-supports-putin-men-older-generations-and-traditionalists-study-shows
  132. https://cssh.northeastern.edu/ethics/crisis-of-masculinity-the-american-rights-bromance-with-vladimir-putin/
  133. https://neweasterneurope.eu/2022/12/07/the-whirlpool-of-belgrades-europride-russophilia-and-russian-influence-in-serbia/
  134. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0962629823001920
  135. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/16/authoritarian-world-leaders-putin/
  136. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstreams/ca6edb53-b8f8-508b-93e7-d45c773bd25b/download
  137. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0927537114000232
  138. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/11/10/245
  139. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1060586X.2024.2429307
  140. https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/conservative-bridge/
  141. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2024/08/19/putin-signs-decree-granting-residency-to-foreigners-who-share-traditional-russian-values-a86074
  142. https://www.csis.org/analysis/down-not-out-russian-economy-under-western-sanctions
  143. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/russia-disposable-goods-war-economy-210624996.html
  144. https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/three-years-war-ukraine-are-sanctions-against-russia-making-difference
  145. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/09/fortress-russia-economy-has-adapted-well-pressure-stagflation-presents-opportunity-west
  146. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/12/russias-belief-in-nato-betrayal-and-why-it-matters-today
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.