Hubbry Logo
9K35 Strela-109K35 Strela-10Main
Open search
9K35 Strela-10
Community hub
9K35 Strela-10
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
9K35 Strela-10
9K35 Strela-10
9K35 Strela-10
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The 9K35 Strela-10 (Russian: 9К35 «Стрела-10»; English: arrow) is a Soviet highly mobile, short-range surface-to-air missile system. It is visually aimed, and utilizes optical/infrared-guidance. The system is primarily intended to engage low-altitude threats, such as helicopters. "9K35" is its GRAU designation; its NATO reporting name is SA-13 "Gopher".

Key Information

Development

[edit]

The 9K35 is the successor of the 9K31 Strela-1 and can also use the Strela-1's missiles in place of the 9M37.

Development of the 9K37 Strela-10SV system was initiated July 24, 1969. The decision to begin the development of a new non-all-weather system was taken despite the simultaneous development of an all-weather hybrid gun/missile system 2K22 "Tunguska" mainly as an economical measure. It was also seen as advantageous to have a system capable of fast reaction times and immunity to heavy radio-frequency jamming.[2]

Rather than being mounted on an amphibious but lightly armoured BRDM-2 chassis like the 9K31, the 9K35 is mounted on a more mobile tracked, modified MT-LB, with more room for equipment and missile reloads. Provision for amphibious capability is provided in some variants in the form of polyurethane-filled floats.

The Strela-10SV system and its 9M37 missile were tested in Donguzkom range from 1973 to 1974, but the results were disappointing: the system was found deficient in terms of missile probability of kill, vehicle reliability, among other things. Acceptance to service was thus delayed until May 16, 1976, by which time improvements had been introduced to the system.[2]

Development of the system continued throughout the years through Strela-10M, -10M2 and -10M3 variants introducing among other things improved radio communications and provision for better integration to the Soviet integrated air defence system air picture data.[2] Also improved missiles (9M37M and 9M333) have been developed and by September 2007 the 9K35M3-K Kolchan variant, mounted on a BTR-60 wheeled chassis, was displayed for the first time at the Moscow Air Show MAKS 2007.[1]

The Russian Armed Forces will receive 72 advanced mobile "night" short-range anti-aircraft missile complexes "Strela-10M4" by 2016. In 2014, the Russian Airborne Troops received the first batch of 18 "Strela-10M4" vehicles. This modernization is intended to extend the service life of the system for 3–5 years.[3]

The Strela-10M is expected to be replaced by the Sosna anti-aircraft missile system. The system is based on the MT-LB chassis consisting of 12 Sosna-R 9M337 beam rider missiles with a range of 10 km and altitude of 5 km.[4]

Description

[edit]

Associated systems and vehicles

[edit]

The 9K35 is a SAM system with electro-optical guidance. It has the capability to use radars for target acquisition and range. Some vehicles have a pintle-mounted PKT 7.62 mm machine gun in front of the forward hatch for local protection. Other vehicles have been seen with additional support railings for the system on the rear deck. The following is a list of associated equipment:

  • 9A34M2, 9A34M3-K: launcher vehicle with 9S86 (NATO designation "SNAP SHOT") range only radar located between the two pairs of missile canisters on the transporter erector launcher and radar (TELAR) (maximum radar range is 450 to 10,000 m).
  • 9A35M2, 9A35M3-K: launcher vehicle with 9S16 (NATO designation "Flat Box-B") passive radar detection system that gives a 360° azimuth and minimum 40° elevation coverage
  • 9F624 and 9F624M training simulator
  • 9S482M7 Control Post.
  • 9U111: a 1,950 kg trailer-mounted 12 kW generator unit, designed to feed power to up to four 9A35M2, 9A35M3-K or 9A34M2, 9A34M3-K launcher vehicles at a distance of up to 30 m by cable while conducting maintenance or training operations.
  • 9V839M: system checkout vehicle
  • 9V915M, 9V915M-1: technical maintenance vehicle
  • MT-LBU with 9S80 (NATO designation "DOG EAR") F/G-band target acquisition radar (maximum range 80 km (50 miles))
  • Ranzhir-M 9S737М (GRAU designation 9S737); is a mobile command center for a mixed grouping of air defense forces, such as the Tor, Tunguska, Strela-10, and Igla.[5]

Missiles

[edit]
9M37
TypeSurface-to-air missile
Place of originSoviet Union
Service history
In service1976–present
Used bySee Operators
Production history
DesignerKB Tochmash Design Bureau
Designed1969–1976
ManufacturerDegtyarev plant
Produced1976–present
Variants9M37, 9M37M, 9M37MD, 9M333
Specifications (9M333[1])
Mass41 kg
Length2190 mm
Diameter120 mm
Wingspan360 mm
WarheadFrag-HE
Warhead weight5 kg
Detonation
mechanism
contact and laser proximity fuzes
Propellantsingle-stage solid propellant rocket motor
Operational
range
5 kilometres (3.1 mi)
Flight altitude3,500 metres (11,500 ft)
Maximum speed550 m/s
Guidance
system
dual-mode passive 'photocontrast'/IR seeker
The 9M37 guided missile

The Strela-10 system was originally designed to use the 9M37 missile as its primary weapon, but its launch system was designed to be also backwards compatible with the 9M31M missile of the earlier 9K31 Strela-1.

Each 9M37 missile is 2,200 mm (7.2 ft) long, weighs 40 kg (88 pounds) and carries a 3.5 kg (7–15 pound) warhead. The maximum speed of the missile is near Mach 2, engagement range is from 800 to 5000 m (0.3–3 miles) and engagement altitude is between 10 and 3500 m (33-11,500 ft). (The ranges define the zone of target intercept, minimum and maximum launch distances are longer for approaching and shorter for receding targets, depending on the target's speed, altitude and flight direction.)

Four missiles are mounted on the turret in boxes, ready to launch, and eight more are carried inside the vehicle as reloads. Reloading takes around 3 minutes.

The 9M37 was quickly replaced with a slightly improved 9M37M (main improvement was in more efficient autopilot system for missile flight path control), and later the more significantly upgraded 9M333, which introduced:[2]

  • heavier warhead of improved expanding-rod design and larger HE content
  • new proximity fuzing with 8-ray laser to improve probability of fuzing on near misses of very small targets such as cruise missiles or UAVs
  • triple-channel guidance system for more robust countermeasure rejection
  • improved engine to provide similar performance despite the slight increase in missile length and weight.

All missiles—9M31M, 9M37, 9M37M and 9M333—are equipped with optical homing heads utilizing reticle-based photocontrast and/or infrared homing. 9M333 is said to have particularly good countermeasures resistance due to its triple-channel homing head, while the photocontrast channel of 9M37/9M37M is described as back-up method to the IR channel.[2]

All main variants—Strela-10SV, Strela-10M, Strela-10M2 and Strela-10M3—can use all aforementioned missile types.[6]

The main characteristics of the missiles are listed in the table below, based on source number,[6] unless otherwise noted. For comparison purposes data for nearest western equivalent, the somewhat larger and heavier MIM-72 Chaparral, is also provided.

As the photocontrast channel provides effective head-on engagement ability, firing range against an approaching target can be considerably longer than the maximum ranges listed above, likewise maximum firing range would be considerably less than the maximum range of target destruction against a receding target. Definition of range and effective ceiling for MIM-72 is unknown and the figures are therefore not directly comparable.

System 9K31 Strela-1M 9K35 Strela-10 9K35M Strela-10M3-K 9K35M Strela-10M4 MIM-72A Chaparral MIM-72G Chaparral
Missile 9M31M 9M37 9M37M 9M333 MIM-72A MIM-72G
year of
introduction		 1971[7] 1976 1981 1989 1967[8] 1982/1990(*)
diameter [mm] 120 120 120 120 127[9] 127[9]
length [mm] 1803 2190 2190 2230 2900[9] 2900[9]
weight [kg] 32 40 40 42 86[9] 86[9]
warhead (HE) [kg] 2.6 3 3 5 11[9] 12.6[9]
fuze impact and proximity proximity + impact proximity + impact 8-ray laser proximity + impact impact + radar proximity impact + directional doppler radar proximity
seeker head AM-modulated photocontrast (uncooled PbS detector element[7]) Two-channel:
1) AM-modulated photocontrast (cooled[2] PbS),
2) FM-modulated uncooled[2] IR		 Two-channel:
1) AM-modulated photocontrast (cooled[2] PbS),
2) FM-modulated uncooled[2] IR		 Three-channel:
1) photocontrast,
2) IR,
3) IRCCM channel		 cooled IR of AIM-9D (limited[10]/no[9] forward hemisphere capability) two-channel:
1) cooled all-aspect IR,
2) UV (forward-hemisphere / long-range homing + IRCCM)[9]
Min. range of target destruction [km] 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 ? ?
Max. range of target destruction [km] 4.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 6..9 (sources vary) 6..9 (sources vary)
Min. intercept altitude [m] 30 25 25 10 15[9] 15[9]
Max. intercept altitude [m] 3000 3500 3500 3500 3000[9] 3000[9]
speed [m/s] 420[7] 517 517 517 515 (Mach 1.5)[9] 515 (Mach 1.5)[9]
target max speed [m/s]: approaching / receding ? 415/310 415/310 415/310 ? ?

(*) Contract for production of MIM-72G by retrofitting new components was awarded in late 1982, with all missile in US service upgraded by the late 1980s. New production of MIM-72G missiles started in 1990.

Combat use

[edit]

Angolan Civil War

[edit]

On February 20, 1988, 31-year-old Major Edward Richard Every from 1 Squadron SAAF, was killed in action when his Mirage F1AZ (serial 245) was shot down by a Cuban Strela-10 surface-to-air missile in Cuatir (near Menongue) while on an attack mission over Southern Angola.[11]

Operation Desert Storm

[edit]

Iraq had several operational Strela-10 systems at the beginning of the 1991 operation to liberate Kuwait from Iraqi occupation, most if not all of which were organized as part of the battlefield air defence systems of the Republican Guard divisions.

During the operation, 27 coalition aircraft are believed to have been hit by Iraqi IR-homing SAMs, resulting in 14 losses. Some of the losses were shot down on the spot, while others, such as OA-10A 77-0197, returned to base only to be lost in a crash landing.[12] Others landed safely, but were written off as total losses.[citation needed]

At least two losses are believed to have been due to Strela-10s: On February 15 an A-10A (78-0722) of 353rd TFS/354th TFW was hit by a SAM believed to be a Strela-10, some 100 km north west of Kuwait City, while attacking Republican Guard targets. Pilot Lt Robert Sweet ejected and was made a prisoner of war. While attempting to protect Sweet on the ground, his wingman Steven Phyllis flying an A-10A 79-0130 was also hit by what is believed to have been a Strela-10. Phyllis was killed in the incident.[12]

Kosovo War

[edit]

During NATO bombing campaign against FR Yugoslavia, a Strela-10 managed to hit an A-10 of United States Air Force on 11 May 1999.[13]

Syrian Civil War

[edit]

On April 14, 2018, American, British, and French forces launched a barrage of 105 air-to-surface and cruise missiles targeting eight sites in Syria. According to a Russian source, five Strela-10 missiles launched in response destroyed three incoming missiles,[14] However, the American Department of Defense stated in a daily press briefing that no Allied missiles were shot down.[15]

2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

[edit]

The Armenian Air Defense employed Strela-10 missile systems during the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. During the opening days of the war, several videos released by the Azerbaijani military showed several Armenian 9K33 Osa and Strela-10 vehicles destroyed by Bayraktar TB2 armed drones.[16][17]

Russian invasion of Ukraine

[edit]

A Strela-10 from the Ukrainian Armed Forces was recorded running over a civilian car in the opening weeks of the war. The driver of the car was uninjured.[18] A Russian Strela-10M guarding Snake Island was destroyed by a Bayraktar TB2 on 30 April 2022.[19] A Ukrainian Strela-10M system was reported destroyed by the Russian Air Force near Lisichansk on 17 June 2022.[20] A Russian source claimed in September 2023 that Russia uses the 9M333 missile in Ukraine.[21]

Wagner Group rebellion

[edit]

A video of a Strela-10 targeting and almost hitting a Russian Army Ka-52 helicopter near Voronezh has been published.[22] The missile was decoyed by flares.[23]

Operators

[edit]
Operators
  Current
  Former

Current operators

[edit]

Former operators

[edit]
[edit]
  • Strela-10 of Russian 4th Guards Tank Division.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

9K35 Strela-10

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The 9K35 Strela-10 ( SA-13 Gopher) is a Soviet-designed mobile short-range system intended for engaging low-altitude aerial threats such as helicopters and in support of ground forces. Development of the system began in 1969 under the GRAU index 9K35, with initial operational capability achieved in 1976 following trials that addressed limitations in earlier optically guided systems like the 9K31 Strela-1. Mounted on an tracked chassis for high mobility and amphibious operation, the 9A35 TELAR carries four ready-to-fire 9M37 missiles employing passive with electro-optical tracking for visual-range engagements up to 5 kilometers. Later variants, including the 9K35M (Strela-10M) introduced in 1979 and the 9K35M3 with enhanced dual-mode seekers, extended capabilities against countermeasures and improved night performance. Widely exported to over 20 nations, primarily former Soviet allies and third-world militaries, the Strela-10 has been employed in conflicts across the , , and , demonstrating reliability in mobile air defense roles despite vulnerabilities to electronic warfare.

Development

Origins in Soviet Doctrine

The 9K35 Strela-10 emerged from Soviet ground forces air defense doctrine, which prioritized integrated, multi-layered protection for maneuvering units against low-altitude air threats capable of evading high- and medium-range radar-guided SAMs due to terrain clutter and limitations. In the late , amid preparations for potential high-intensity conventional war in , Soviet planners identified vulnerabilities in protecting massed armored formations from NATO's anticipated use of attack helicopters and low-level fixed-wing strikes, which could disrupt deep battle advances. Short-range, vehicle-mounted systems like the Strela-10 were conceived to fill gaps in regimental and divisional defenses, providing passive infrared-guided interception without dependence on easily jammed radars, thus enabling sustained operational tempo under contested . Development was formally initiated on July 24, 1969, under a decree from the CPSU Central Committee and USSR Council of Ministers, targeting replacement of the obsolescent (NATO SA-9 Gaskin) introduced in the early , whose command-guided missiles lacked sufficient autonomy and low-altitude performance against agile targets. Assigned to A.E. Nudelman's design bureau, the program emphasized a tracked, amphibious launcher carrying 9M37 missiles with improved seeker heads for heat-seeking acquisition of hovering or maneuvering at ranges up to 5 km and altitudes below 3.5 km, directly addressing doctrinal needs for rapid, visual-aimed engagements in forward areas. This evolution underscored Soviet causal emphasis on empirical lessons from proxy conflicts, such as the 1967 , where low-flying raids exposed limitations of radar-centric defenses, prompting investment in optical/IR systems for point defense that complemented all-weather assets like the while minimizing electronic signatures in electronic warfare environments. The Strela-10's non-all-weather design, despite concurrent advances in radar SAMs, reflected pragmatic realism: for very short-range threats, simplicity and mobility trumped universality to ensure proliferation across motorized rifle and tank divisions.

Initial Deployment and Early Iterations

Development of the 9K35 Strela-10 system began on July 24, 1969, under the designation 9K37 Strela-10SV, as a mobile short-range platform intended to supplement and eventually replace the earlier in protecting Soviet motorized rifle and tank divisions from low-altitude aircraft and helicopters. Following initial testing at the Donguzkom range from 1973 to 1974, which revealed deficiencies in reliability and performance, substantial redesigns were undertaken, delaying full operational capability. The system achieved acceptance into service on May 16, 1976, marking its initial deployment within the USSR's ground forces. The baseline 9K35 variant, mounted on an tracked chassis derived from the armored personnel carrier, featured four 9M37 missiles in ready-to-fire canisters, an optical-electronic sight for manual , and an infrared seeker for passive homing against heat signatures. This early iteration emphasized high mobility and amphibious capability to accompany forward maneuver units, with a maximum engagement range of approximately 5 kilometers and altitude up to 3.5 kilometers, prioritizing defense against threats over all-weather operation. Initial production focused on equipping air defense batteries within Soviet divisions, with the system's non-all-weather limitations reflecting doctrinal trade-offs for simplicity and rapid response in visual conditions. Subsequent early improvements led to the 9K37M Strela-10M variant, whose development commenced in 1977 and achieved initial operational capability in 1979, incorporating an upgraded 9E47M seeker for enhanced target and resistance to countermeasures. This iteration retained compatibility with the 9M37 but improved overall effectiveness through better stabilization and tracking on the 9A35M launcher . Deployment of the Strela-10M expanded its integration into forces by the early , though the core architecture remained consistent with the 1976 baseline, prioritizing incremental seeker and fuse refinements over radical redesigns.

Post-Cold War Modernizations

The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 prompted upgrades to the 9K35 Strela-10 to counter evolving aerial threats, including precision-guided munitions and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), while maintaining the system's mobility and low-altitude engagement role. Russian efforts focused on missile enhancements and sensor improvements, with the Strela-10M3 variant introducing the 9M333 guided missile, designed for better performance against low-flying targets under enemy electronic warfare conditions and with increased resistance to infrared flares. The 9M333 missile entered serial production in late 2020 under Kalashnikov Concern, featuring a dual-band infrared seeker for reduced susceptibility to decoys and a range extended to approximately 5 km. Deliveries of 9M333 missiles to Russian forces continued into 2024, replenishing stockpiles for Strela-10M3 units amid ongoing conflicts. Further refinements include the Strela-10MN, a modernization of the M3 variant unveiled in , incorporating night-capable optics and automated target tracking to enable 24-hour operations without significant platform redesign. proposed export upgrade packages in the , offering operators such as the option to elevate existing Strela-10M3 systems to M4 or MN standards, including digital fire control and compatibility with the 9M333 missile, though adoption details remain limited. These upgrades prioritize cost-effective integration over wholesale replacement, leveraging the chassis for sustained field relevance. In , post-2022 conflict necessities drove independent modernizations, with upgraded Strela-10 complexes tested in March 2024 successfully intercepting five Russian UAVs of Zala, , and Supercam types during live-fire trials, demonstrating improved seeker algorithms against small, low-signature targets. These enhancements, reportedly involving local electronics and software updates, extend the system's viability against modern drone swarms without altering core hardware.

Technical Design

Core System Architecture

The core architecture of the 9K35 Strela-10 revolves around the 9A35 transporter-erector-launcher and radar (TELAR) mounted on the tracked, amphibious chassis, enabling high mobility and integration with forward mechanized forces. This baseline configuration supports low-altitude air defense through a self-contained unit that combines detection, tracking, and launch capabilities without reliance on external radars for primary operation. The launcher subsystem features four ready-to-fire 9M37 missiles housed in hermetically sealed, vertical launch tubes arranged in two pairs on a rotating turret atop the hull, allowing 360-degree traversal and elevation from -5° to +80°. Eight additional missiles serve as internal reloads, facilitating rapid replenishment by a two-person despite manual handling requirements. The tubes double as transport containers, preserving missile integrity during movement. Target acquisition and guidance employ an electro-optical system centered on the 9Sh127 sighting station, which includes wide-field-of-view (WFOV) and narrow-field-of-view (NFOV) optics for manual or semi-automatic tracking of low-flying threats. Once locked, the system generates commands transmitted via radio link to the missile's control surfaces, implementing command line-of-sight (CLOS) guidance without an onboard terminal seeker. Supporting sensors comprise four 'Flat Box-B' passive radio-frequency (RF) detection antennas for threat warning and the optional 9S86 "Snap Shot" millimeter-wave for range and velocity data, enhancing engagement accuracy up to 5 km. Auxiliary subsystems include an Azovsky L-136 MAK-F (IRST) with 10-15 km detection range, liquid nitrogen-cooled elements for seeker stability in variants, and a for independent power, ensuring operational autonomy in contested environments. The architecture prioritizes simplicity and resistance to electronic countermeasures, with protection and amphibious propulsion derived from the MT-LB's 240 hp YaMZ-238V .

Missile Variants and Guidance Systems

The 9K35 Strela-10 employs passive (IR) homing guidance for its , supplemented by an optical for and designation. The operator uses a stabilized electro-optical sight, such as the 9Sh112 or upgraded 9Sh127M, to visually track low-flying targets and initiate launch. Upon firing, the missile's seeker activates after a short boost phase, autonomously homing onto the target's heat signature without radio command links, though later variants incorporate multi-spectral seekers for improved discrimination against countermeasures. Primary missile variants include the 9M37 series for early models and the 9M333 for upgraded systems. The baseline , introduced with the 9K35, features a 9E47 two-color IR seeker combined with visible light channels for enhanced target contrast, a 3 kg expanding rod/fragmentation , and a maximum speed of 517 m/s, achieving effective ranges of 0.8–5 km against targets at altitudes up to 3.5 km. The 9M37M variant, used in 9K35M and 9K35M2 systems adopted in 1979 and 1981 respectively, refines the seeker with better interference rejection while retaining similar performance parameters. The 9K35M3 upgrade, fielded in 1989, integrates the 9M333 missile with a three-channel seeker encompassing IR, visible TV photocontrast, and passive homing on jamming sources, alongside a larger 5 kg and slightly higher speed of 550 m/s for better engagement of agile targets like cruise missiles down to 10 m altitude. This seeker rejects IR background clutter and operates in adverse weather, with proximity fuzing for reliable . Both 9M37M and 9M333 missiles maintain compatibility across Strela-10 platforms, enabling retrofits.
Missile VariantSeeker TypeWarhead (kg)Speed (m/s)Range (km)Key Improvements
9M37Two-color IR/visible35170.8–5Baseline passive homing
9M37MImproved IR with interference rejection35170.8–5Enhanced selectivity for M/M2 variants
9M333Three-channel (IR, TV contrast, anti-jam)55500.8–5Multi-spectral for M3, better low-altitude/low-speed targets

Integrated Platforms and Mobility Features

The 9K35 Strela-10 is mounted on a modified multi-purpose tracked chassis, which serves as the primary transporter-erector-launcher (TEL) platform for the system's launcher vehicles, designated 9A35 and its variants. This amphibious, armored chassis replaces the less mobile wheeled platform of the predecessor SA-9 Gaskin, enabling integration with mechanized forces for rapid deployment in diverse terrains. The MT-LB's design supports both the basic 9A35 TEL and command variants like 9A34, with later models such as 9A35M incorporating upgraded electronics while retaining the core chassis. Mobility is enhanced by the MT-LB's 240 hp , achieving road speeds of up to 62 km/h and operational ranges exceeding 500 km on internal fuel. The tracked configuration, supported by , provides superior cross-country performance compared to wheeled systems, with full amphibious capability for water obstacles up to 1.8 m/s swim speed. Nuclear, biological, and chemical () protection is standard, allowing operations in contaminated environments without crew exposure. Variants like the 9A35M2 add detection (9S16 Flat Box-B) but maintain the chassis derivative for consistent mobility profiles across upgrades. No significant alternative integrations are documented in standard deployments, emphasizing the MT-LB's role in ensuring the system's high tactical mobility for low-altitude air defense accompaniment of forward units.

Operational Doctrine

Tactical Employment Principles

The 9K35 Strela-10 is employed primarily for point air defense of forward maneuver elements, groups, and command posts against low-altitude threats including , helicopters, cruise missiles, and unmanned aerial vehicles, emphasizing mobility to accompany advancing motorized rifle or tank formations during offensive or defensive operations. In Soviet and Russian doctrine, it fills a critical gap in tactical air defense by providing close-range protection within or regimental structures, integrated into a layered system that coordinates with longer-range assets like the or 9K37 Buk to deny enemy air superiority and disrupt . This approach prioritizes rapid response over extended coverage, with systems positioned 3-4 km forward along the front or in depth to achieve interlocking fires, typically spaced 8 km apart between batteries to maximize survivability against . Deployment tactics focus on task-organizing batteries—usually comprising 4 to 6 MT-LB-mounted launchers—within Tactical Groups or anti-aircraft missile-artillery battalions, attaching them to high-value units like Groups for on-the-march protection. Launchers are concealed using features to low-flying targets approaching at speeds up to 415 m/s, exploiting the system's amphibious and NBC-protected mobility for repositioning under . Integration with command posts like the and acquisition radars such as the 9S80 Ovod enables networked operations, though the Strela-10's passive infrared guidance and visual-optical sighting allow autonomous engagements in jammed environments, reducing vulnerability to electronic warfare. Engagement principles stress short reaction times of 6.5-8.5 seconds, with operators using for at ranges of 800-5,000 m and altitudes from 25 m to 3,500 m, launching up to four infrared-homing missiles per salvo to achieve a single-shot kill probability of 0.3-0.6 against fighters. Salvo fire and multi-channel seekers enhance effectiveness against maneuvering threats, while coordination with MANPADS like the provides overlapping low-level coverage in security zones. Doctrine mandates firing from defilade positions to minimize exposure, prioritizing threats to ground forces over distant intercepts, thereby supporting maneuver by neutralizing immediate or strikes.

Detection, Acquisition, and Engagement Processes

The 9K35 Strela-10 employs a combination of passive sensors for initial target detection to minimize emissions and enhance survivability against electronic countermeasures. Primary detection relies on the 9S16 "Flat Box" passive radio-frequency (RF) detection system, which identifies enemy emissions from airborne targets such as fighters at ranges up to 10-15 km, providing azimuthal cues without active transmission. Some variants, including the 9A34A, integrate the Azovsky L-136 MAK-F (IRST) for passive day/night detection of low-altitude threats like helicopters at similar 10-15 km ranges. Battery-level support from command posts equipped with the X-band 9S80 "Ovod" or 9S80M s can extend acquisition cues, though the TELAR itself avoids active emissions during standalone operations to maintain radar-warning receiver (RWR) silence. The 9S16 antennas, mounted on the vehicle's rear, offer 360° coverage with at least 40° . ![9A35 Strela-10 combat vehicle][float-right] Target acquisition transitions from detection cues to operator-designated tracking via the electro-optical fire control system. The operator, positioned in the TELAR's fighting compartment, uses the 9Sh127 optical sighting station with wide-field-of-view (WFOV) and narrow-field-of-view (NFOV) modes for visual or infrared designation of targets within the system's engagement envelope of 800-5,000 m slant range and 25-3,500 m altitude. Range and radial velocity data are provided by the 9S86 "Snap Shot" millimeter-wave coherent pulse-Doppler radar, enabling precise acquisition while the "HAT Box" range-only radar prevents wasteful launches beyond effective missile reach. Upgraded variants like the 9K35M3 incorporate digital fire control with a focal plane array (FPA) uncooled optical sensor (12° x 16° field of view) for automated tracking assistance, improving accuracy against maneuvering targets at speeds up to 415 m/s closing velocity. The operator maintains line-of-sight (LOS) lock through a reticle with superimposed symbology, designating the target for missile guidance initialization. Engagement follows semi-automatic command to line-of-sight (SACLOS) principles, where the tracked LOS serves as the guidance reference. Upon launch from the ready quadruple rail (four 9M37-series missiles), the system transmits commands via a ground-to-missile radio link, adjusting the missile's control surfaces to align it with the predicted intercept point on the optical LOS. The 9M37 integrates a Geofizika 9E47M two-color /visible seeker, cryogenically cooled for enhanced discrimination, which supports terminal corrections but relies primarily on command inputs for mid-course flight. Later variants like the 9M333 add multi-channel seekers (, TV contrast, and anti-jamming modes) with proximity fuzing for improved hit probability (Pk 0.3-0.6 per single shot). Total reaction time from detection to launch averages 6.5-8.5 seconds, with the crew of three handling reloads (up to eight additional missiles) in approximately via manual elevation of the launcher. This process prioritizes low-altitude, high-mobility threats, with the system's amphibious chassis enabling rapid repositioning post-engagement.

Performance Characteristics

Key Capabilities and Specifications

The 9K35 Strela-10 (NATO: SA-13 Gopher) is a short-range system designed for low-altitude air defense, with an range of 500 to 5,000 meters and an operational altitude envelope from 10 to 3,500 meters. The primary , 9M37, measures approximately 2.2 meters in length, with a of 0.12 meters and a of 0.4 meters, achieving a maximum speed near Mach 2 (around 550–680 m/s). It employs passive guidance for all-aspect capability in upgraded variants, targeting low-flying , helicopters, and cruise missiles within its envelope. The launcher, typically mounted on an MT-LB tracked chassis, carries 4 ready-to-fire missiles in canisters, with an additional 4 in reserve for a total of 8, enabling rapid response with elevation from -5° to +80° and full 360° traverse. The system is amphibious, with road speeds up to 60 km/h, and integrates optical and acquisition for visual aiming without reliance on external for , though some variants include a range-only for support. The 9M37 is armed with a 5 kg high-explosive fragmentation , optimized for proximity detonation against agile low-altitude threats.
ParameterSpecification
Engagement Range500–5,000 m
Engagement Altitude10–3,500 m
Missile Speed~Mach 2 (550–680 m/s)
Warhead Weight5 kg
GuidancePassive IR homing
Missiles per Launcher4 ready, 8 total
Later modernizations, such as the Strela-10M, extend capabilities with improved resistant to countermeasures and slightly enhanced ranges up to 5–10 km in some configurations, though core parameters remain focused on short-range, high-mobility defense.

Strengths in Low-Altitude Defense

The 9K35 Strela-10 system excels in low-altitude air defense due to its specialized design for engaging targets at heights from 10 meters to 3,500 meters, making it particularly suited for countering helicopters, low-flying , and cruise missiles that exploit masking. This operational envelope addresses vulnerabilities in forward troop dispositions where higher-altitude systems like the SA-6 may struggle with clutter or minimum engagement thresholds. Its infrared-homing missiles, such as the 9M37 variant, achieve speeds of up to 550 m/s (approximately Mach 1.6), enabling rapid intercepts of inbound threats traveling at closing speeds of 415 m/s or receding at 310 m/s within a 5 km . The passive optical and IR guidance system requires no active emissions during terminal homing, reducing detectability and allowing ambushes against low-level attackers reliant on surprise. A proximity-fuzed enhances against maneuvering targets at low altitudes, where direct hits are challenging due to evasive maneuvers or ground clutter. Mounted on the amphibious chassis, the system's high mobility—capable of road speeds over 60 km/h and cross-country traversal—facilitates rapid repositioning to cover low-altitude approach vectors, such as valleys or forward edges of battle areas. This integration with mechanized units provides organic protection against assaults, a primary threat scenario, outperforming predecessor systems like the SA-9 Gaskin in reaction time and engagement envelope. In essence, these attributes position the Strela-10 as a robust point-defense asset for denying low-level to adversaries without compromising unit maneuverability.

Limitations and Vulnerabilities

The 9K35 Strela-10 operates within a limited engagement envelope, with effective ranges spanning 500 to 5,000 meters and altitudes from 10 to 3,500 meters, which confines its utility to short-range, low-altitude intercepts and precludes engagement of higher-flying or standoff threats. Missile speed reaches approximately Mach 2, but relies on optical sighting supplemented by short-range radars like the 9S86, imposing line-of-sight constraints that degrade performance in adverse weather, terrain-masked approaches, or low-light conditions without upgrades. Infrared homing guidance on the 9M37-series missiles exposes the system to countermeasures such as pyrotechnic , which serve as high-temperature decoys to divert heat-seeking away from the actual target. This vulnerability is pronounced against employing defensive maneuvering combined with flare dispensation, reducing single-shot kill probabilities, particularly for legacy IR lacking advanced rejection algorithms. Operational deployment reveals further platform weaknesses: the system's mobility on tracked chassis, while enabling tactical repositioning, requires forward positioning due to range limits, heightening exposure to enemy reconnaissance drones, precision-guided munitions, and , as evidenced by Ukrainian HIMARS strikes destroying Russian Strela-10 units in 2023-2024. In the , visual acquisition has proven inadequate against small, low-signature UAVs, with instances of failed intercepts reported alongside other legacy systems. Economic factors compound these issues, as the cost of 9M37 missiles—far exceeding that of commercial quadcopters or FPV drones—renders sustained engagements against massed low-value aerial threats inefficient, prompting Russian forces to adapt with auxiliary drone spotters for cueing but still incurring disproportionate losses.

Combat Record

Conflicts from 1970s to 1990s

The 9K35 Strela-10 achieved its first confirmed combat success during the on 20 February 1988, when a Cuban-operated battery near Menongue (Cuatir) downed a Mirage F1AZ fighter-bomber shortly after the aircraft released its bombs on Angolan convoys along the Menongue-Cuito Cuanavale road. This engagement highlighted the system's capability against low-altitude jet attackers in operational environments, though overall employment by Angolan and Cuban forces remained limited amid South African air superiority and the broader ground stalemate at Cuito Cuanavale. In the early 1990s, Iraqi forces deployed Strela-10 systems during Operation Desert Storm, attempting to counter coalition low-level strikes, but achieved no verified aircraft kills amid overwhelming suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) operations that neutralized many launchers. By the late 1990s, during the intervention in , Serbian operators claimed at least one U.S. A-10 Thunderbolt II downed on 11 May 1999, with additional strikes believed to have damaged others, demonstrating persistent vulnerability of the system to electronic countermeasures and precision munitions despite its mobility. These instances underscored the Strela-10's niche role in divisional air defense against helicopters and slow fixed-wing threats, but revealed challenges against advanced tactical aircraft in high-intensity conflicts.

Middle East and African Engagements

The 9K35 Strela-10 entered combat operations with Angolan government forces during the , with initial deployments recorded in the late amid escalating clashes involving South African and UNITA-supported elements. First documented combat usage occurred in 1988, supporting ground maneuvers against low-altitude aerial threats in a theater characterized by and fixed-wing sorties. Angolan operators integrated the system into motorized rifle and armored formations, leveraging its mobility on chassis for point defense during offensives and defensive stands, though specific shootdown tallies remain unverified in open sources due to the conflict's opaque reporting. In the , the system proliferated among Soviet-aligned states, including , where it supplemented short-range air defenses from the early onward. Syrian inventories retained operational 9K35 batteries into the 2000s, positioned for tactical protection of forward units, but pre-2010 engagements—potentially in proxy actions or skirmishes—lack detailed public confirmation, reflecting limited declassified data on regional Soviet-export hardware performance. Overall, and African uses validated the system's role in countering low-flying threats in environments, though without the high-intensity air campaigns that highlighted its limitations elsewhere.

Post-2010 Wars Including Ukraine

In the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War from September to November 2020, Armenian forces integrated the 9K35 Strela-10 into their layered air defense array alongside systems like the and , primarily to counter Azerbaijani fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters at low altitudes. However, Azerbaijani Bayraktar TB2 unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAVs) systematically targeted and destroyed multiple Strela-10 units through persistent surveillance and precision-guided munitions, with confirming at least three launchers visually destroyed by TB2 strikes. This vulnerability stemmed from the system's limited and reliance on optical/ guidance, which struggled against high-altitude drones operating beyond effective engagement envelopes, contributing to the overall degradation of Armenia's short-range (SAM) capabilities early in the conflict. Syrian government forces retained operational Strela-10 batteries throughout the after 2011, positioning them for defense against low-flying opposition aircraft and improvised drones in contested airspace. Despite their deployment, documented intercepts remain sparse, with no verified claims of significant engagements against advanced threats like Turkish Bayraktar drones or Israeli airstrikes, underscoring the system's challenges in dense electronic warfare environments and against standoff munitions. Syrian air defense units, including Strela-10 operators, faced repeated attrition from precision strikes, though specific losses to this variant were not independently tallied in open sources. The Russo-Ukrainian War, escalating in 2022, marked extensive use of the Strela-10 by both belligerents for tactical air defense against unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and cruise missiles, adapting its infrared-homing missiles to drone threats via manual optical tracking and auxiliary reconnaissance feeds. Russian units, such as those in the Battlegroup South, employed the system to neutralize Ukrainian Furia reconnaissance UAVs, with crews reporting successful engagements during frontline operations as of mid-2023. Ukrainian forces modernized inherited Strela-10M variants, integrating them with Western-compatible targeting data to down Russian Zala, Lancet, and Supercam loitering munitions, achieving multiple intercepts in tests and combat by June 2024. Reconnaissance drones extended the system's detection range, enabling proactive engagements against Russian UAVs and transforming the aging platform into a cost-effective countermeasure despite its analog guidance limitations. Nonetheless, Strela-10 launchers on both sides suffered high attrition rates from first-person-view (FPV) kamikaze drones and artillery spotting, with Ukrainian FPV strikes destroying Russian 9A35 TELs in July 2025, exposing persistent mobility and camouflage shortcomings in peer contested environments.

Analytical Assessment

Proven Effectiveness Against Traditional Threats

The 9K35 Strela-10 demonstrated tangible success against low-altitude manned fixed-wing aircraft during the 1991 , when Iraqi forces employed the system to down two U.S. Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II jets operating over . These engagements occurred amid coalition air operations targeting Republican Guard positions, with the A-10s flying at low altitudes vulnerable to the Strela-10's infrared-homing missiles and short-range optical acquisition. One confirmed loss on February 15, 1991, involved an A-10A (serial 78-0722) from the 353rd Tactical Fighter Squadron, struck by an SA-13 missile, killing pilot Captain Steven Phyllis as he maneuvered to protect a downed . The second A-10 destruction underscored the system's potency against subsonic, non-maneuvering targets within its 5 km range and 3.5 km altitude ceiling, exploiting the jets' exposed engine heat signatures despite their armored design. This combat validation aligns with the Strela-10's core attributes for countering traditional threats: a tracked chassis enabling rapid deployment with motorized rifle units, passive IR seekers for all-aspect attacks on helicopters and ground-attack planes, and manual optical tracking for quick engagements against pop-up low-level raids. In environments without pervasive electronic countermeasures or standoff munitions, the system's four ready-to-fire 9M37 missiles per launcher provided layered point defense, achieving intercepts where visual confirmation mitigated false targets from chaff or flares. Soviet doctrinal use in the late emphasized its role in denying enemy to advancing mechanized forces, a niche it filled reliably against unescorted, low-speed assets like the A-10. Empirical outcomes from such engagements affirm the Strela-10's reliability for its intended spectrum of traditional aerial threats—rotary-wing gunships and tactical jets below radar coverage—prior to the dominance of precision-guided standoff weapons and networked aviation tactics. Its success rate in these scenarios stems from causal factors like the missile's uncooling lead sulfide seeker head's sensitivity to turbine exhaust, coupled with the launcher's low electromagnetic signature reducing preemptive detection risks. While aggregate kill tallies remain sparse due to classified records and asymmetric conflict dynamics, the Gulf War instances represent verified, high-value attributions against peer-level opponents, validating the platform's foundational engineering for short-range, visual-horizon intercepts.

Adaptations and Shortcomings in Drone Era

In the context of modern conflicts featuring widespread (UAV) proliferation, such as the , the 9K35 Strela-10 has undergone tactical adaptations to counter drone threats. Russian operators have paired the system with drones to extend detection ranges and provide real-time targeting data, compensating for the Strela-10's limited onboard sensors and enabling engagement of low-altitude UAVs that might otherwise evade visual or acquisition. This integration has reportedly allowed the system to neutralize specific drone models, including the Ukrainian Furia UAV, by leveraging external spotting for the missile's optical/ guidance. Physical modifications have also been implemented, including the addition of protective "cope cages" or anti-drone netting on Strela-10 launch vehicles to mitigate attacks from first-person-view (FPV) kamikaze drones, which have repeatedly targeted and destroyed exposed systems. Later variants, such as those modernized for post-2022 operations, incorporate enhanced seeker sensitivity and faster response times to address low-speed, small-signature targets, with Russian military sources claiming effectiveness against tactical UAVs in direct cover roles. These upgrades build on the system's inherent mobility and rapid launch capability, achieving speeds up to 550 m/s for quick intercepts. However, inherent shortcomings limit the Strela-10's efficacy against drone swarms and low-cost UAVs. The system's passive guidance struggles with the minimal signatures of small commercial-grade drones, often failing to achieve reliable lock-on due to design parameters optimized for larger, hotter engines rather than diffuse or battery-powered heat sources. Economic disparities exacerbate this, as expending missiles costing thousands of dollars per shot against drones valued at under $1,000 renders operations inefficient, particularly in sustained attritional warfare where UAVs are expendable. Vulnerability to counter-detection further compounds these issues; Strela-10 units have been repeatedly neutralized by incoming FPV drones exploiting the system's emission signatures or visual profiles, as evidenced by multiple Ukrainian strikes destroying launchers despite proximity fuse attempts. Without active integration or advanced electronic warfare countermeasures, the platform remains susceptible to saturation tactics, where massed low-end drones overwhelm its four-missile capacity and manual aiming constraints. Overall, while adaptations extend utility in hybrid threat environments, the Strela-10's Cold War-era architecture underscores broader challenges for legacy man-portable air-defense systems against asymmetric drone dominance.

Comparative Analysis with Peer Systems

The 9K35 Strela-10 functions as a mobile, short-range system optimized for low-altitude defense of forward ground forces, bearing close operational parallels to the U.S. M48 system, which similarly employs infrared-guided missiles from a tracked chassis to counter aircraft and helicopters in tactical environments. Both systems prioritize visual/optical target acquisition and passive to evade detection, reflecting Cold War-era doctrines emphasizing protection against low-flying threats without reliance on active emissions. However, the Strela-10's Soviet design incorporated amphibious capability via the chassis and a range-only for initial cueing, enhancing deployability in varied compared to the Chaparral's M113-based platform, which lacked inherent amphibious features. Key technical parameters reveal overlapping but distinct profiles:
Parameter9K35 Strela-10 (9M37 missile)M48 (MIM-72 missile)
600–5,000 m500–5,000 m (effective; max potential 9 km)
Maximum altitude3,500 m4,000 m
Missile speedMach 2Mach 1.75
5 kg high-explosive9.4 kg high-explosive
Ready missiles4–64
GuidanceCooled IR seeker with optical trackerPassive IR seeker (initially rear-aspect; improved variants all-aspect)
The Strela-10's employs a direct intercept profile suited to engaging hovering or slow-moving helicopters at low altitudes, a capability rooted in its purpose-built seeker and for Soviet anticipated tactics involving flights. In contrast, the 's adaptation of the often required a lofted launch path, limiting effectiveness against stationary or very low targets due to line-of-sight constraints in the seeker's . Upgrades to the Strela-10, such as the 9M333 variant introduced in the , enhanced counter-countermeasures (IRCCM) and warhead proximity fuzing, extending viability against decoy flares, while the Chaparral faced obsolescence by the 1990s owing to inadequate ECM resistance and lack of automation. Compared to radar-guided Western peers like the Franco-German system, the Strela-10 trades all-weather precision for simplicity and low observability; Roland's command-link guidance via enables engagements in degraded visibility up to 8 km but exposes the launcher to anti-radiation threats and electronic jamming, vulnerabilities less pronounced in the Strela-10's passive mode. Operationally, the Strela-10's emphasis on rapid reaction—achievable in under 10 seconds from acquisition to launch—aligns with massed Soviet divisional defenses, whereas systems like integrated into more networked forward air defense but suffered higher per-unit costs and maintenance demands. Persistent use of upgraded Strela-10 variants in conflicts post-1990 underscores its adaptability over retired equivalents like , though both reveal inherent limits against high-speed jets or saturation attacks without layered integration.

Operators and Proliferation

Current Users and Inventory Estimates

Russia operates the 9K35 Strela-10 in significant numbers, with state-owned enterprises delivering batches of 9M333 missiles for the modernized Strela-10M3 variant as part of 2024 state defense orders, indicating sustained maintenance despite combat losses. employs the system actively against low-flying threats, including drones and cruise missiles, with footage confirming launches in frontline areas like Pokrovsk as late as September 2024. maintains upgraded variants, having integrated enhancements for small drone defense on Strela-10 platforms by 2019, with no reported retirement. retains the SA-13 designation in service, with systems observed operational as of December 2023. lists the Strela-10 among its very short-range air defense assets, integrated into layered defenses alongside systems like the . Other confirmed current users include and , where Soviet-era exports persist in active , though detailed recent confirmations are limited. Precise global estimates remain classified or unreported in open sources, but pre-2022 assessments placed 's holdings at around 350 launchers, subject to attrition in estimated at over 25 systems by mid-2023. 's pre-invasion stock likely numbered in the dozens to low hundreds, inherited from Soviet dissolution, with operational units depleted by losses and supplemented by wartime adaptations. No comprehensive public tallies exist for secondary operators like or , where numbers are typically below 50 per nation based on export patterns.

Former Operators and Transfers

Poland retired its 9K35 Strela-10 systems in the early 2000s as part of broader modernization efforts away from Soviet-era equipment. The , inheriting units from , recently decommissioned the Strela-10M2 variant and transferred six 9K35 Strela-10M systems to between March and April 2022 to support its defense against Russian invasion. , also a successor to , has withdrawn the Strela-10 from active service. The German Democratic Republic operated the Strela-10M during the but decommissioned the systems following in 1990, with no continued use by the unified German armed forces. Yugoslavia's inventory passed to successor states upon its dissolution, though some remnants were likely retired without transfer. These retirements reflect a shift among former nations toward NATO-compatible air defense solutions.

References

  1. https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.php?armor_id=315
  2. https://weaponsystems.net/system/54-9K35%2BStrela-10
  3. https://www.ausairpower.net/APA-9K35-Strela-10.html
  4. https://tank-afv.com/coldwar/ussr/9k35-strela-10.php
  5. https://odin.tradoc.army.mil/WEG/Asset/9K35_Strela-10_
  6. https://en.missilery.info/missile/strela10sv
  7. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/sam.htm
  8. https://www.astronautix.com/s/strela-10sam.html
  9. https://irp.fas.org/dia/product/ssdp.htm
  10. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/sa-13.htm
  11. http://www.astronautix.com/s/strela-10sam.html
  12. http://www.balkanwarhistory.com/2017/01/the-soviet-9k35-strela-10.html
  13. https://www.armyrecognition.com/archives/archives-land-defense/land-defense-2024/russia-receive-from-kalachnikov-new-batch-of-9m333-flares-resistant-air-defense-missile
  14. https://tass.com/defense/1792723
  15. https://www.armyrecognition.com/archives/archives-land-defense/land-defense-2024/russia-replenishes-9m333-missile-reserves-for-strela-10m3-air-defense-systems
  16. https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2018-09-12/russia-unveils-new-and-upgraded-sam-systems
  17. https://defensemirror.com/news/12987/Russia_Offers_To_Upgrade_India_s_Strela_Missile_System
  18. https://en.topwar.ru/230744-strela-10-protiv-bpla-armija-moderniziruet-vojskovuju-pvo.html
  19. https://defence-blog.com/ukraine-upgrades-cold-war-era-air-defense-systems/
  20. https://armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/conflicts-in-the-world/russia-ukraine-war-2022/ukraine-successfully-target-russian-drones-using-upgraded-sa-13-air-defense-system
  21. https://en.missilery.info/missile/strela10m
  22. https://armyrecognition.com/military-products/army/air-defense-systems/air-defense-vehicles/sa-13-gopher-russia-uk
  23. https://g2webcontent.z2.web.core.usgovcloudapi.net/OEE/Russia%20Landing%20Zone/Russian%20Tactics-ATP_7-100.1-Feb2024.pdf
  24. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/portals/7/hot%20spots/documents/russia/2017-07-the-russian-way-of-war-grau-bartles.pdf
  25. https://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Legacy-SAM-Upgrades.html
  26. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/flares.htm
  27. https://www.quora.com/How-effective-are-flares-at-confusing-inbound-enemy-missiles
  28. https://www.technology.org/2024/01/08/himars-in-ukraine-destroyed-russian-strela-10/
  29. https://vpk.name/en/1003526_the-main-vulnerability-of-the-russian-s-400-has-been-revealed-business-insider-germany.html
  30. https://armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/conflicts-in-the-world/ukraine-russia-conflict/economic-inefficiency-of-using-russian-strela-10-air-defense-system-against-ukrainian-reconnaissance-drones
  31. https://armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/conflicts-in-the-world/russia-ukraine-war-2022/analysis-how-reconnaissance-drones-turned-the-outdated-strela-10-air-defense-system-into-a-key-asset-in-ukraine
  32. https://theaviationgeekclub.com/mig-23-vs-mirage-f-1-when-cuban-flown-angolan-floggers-clashed-with-south-african-mirages/
  33. https://www.keymilitary.com/article/clash-armour-ii
  34. https://x.com/HammerOfWar5/status/1977457614549336501
  35. https://old-wiki.warthunder.com/Strela-10M2
  36. https://www.super-hobby.com/products/Strela-10SV-Soviet-Mobile-SA-Missile-System.html
  37. https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2016/08/photo-report-syrian-arab-air-defence.html
  38. https://nuou.org.ua/en/9p34-strla-10.html
  39. https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2020/09/the-fight-for-nagorno-karabakh.html
  40. https://www.csis.org/analysis/air-and-missile-war-nagorno-karabakh-lessons-future-strike-and-defense
  41. https://tass.com/politics/2032709
  42. https://united24media.com/latest-news/ukrainian-drones-neutralize-strela-10-a-key-element-of-russias-frontline-air-defense-video-9777
  43. https://www.dafhistory.af.mil/Portals/16/documents/Studies/AFD-070912-043.pdf
  44. https://www.2951clss-gulfwar.com/gulf-war-a10-loses.html
  45. https://warhistory.org/%40msw/article/iraqi-air-defense-missiles
  46. https://www.armyrecognition.com/military-products/army/air-defense-systems/air-defense-vehicles/sa-13-gopher-russia-uk
  47. https://armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/conflicts-in-the-world/ukraine-russia-conflict/russian-strela-10-air-defense-system-upgraded-with-anti-drone-cage-for-ukraine-conflict
  48. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2023/12/06/russian-report-explains-why-air-defenses-cannot-shoot-down-drones/
  49. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoSzbMC-Xxg
  50. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/chaparral.htm
  51. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/sa-13-specs.htm
  52. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/chaparral-specs.htm
  53. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/m730.htm
  54. https://tanknutdave.com/the-us-mim-72-chaparral-sam-system/
  55. https://defensemirror.com/news/36868/Kalashnikov_Ships_Large_Batch_of_9M333_Missiles_for_Strela_Anti_Aircraft_System
  56. https://www.technology.org/2024/02/05/ukraine-showed-the-strela-10-defending-its-skies-from-russian-cruise-missiles-and-drones/
  57. https://tass.com/defense/1054947
  58. https://armyrecognition.com/archives/archives-land-defense/land-defense-2023/vietnamese-army-keeps-sa-13-gopher-strela-10-air-defense-missile-in-service
  59. https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/complete-list-of-indian-air-defence-system-1746352839-1
  60. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/137906/ricerche.07-RussiasMilitary.pdf
  61. https://www.csis.org/analysis/will-russia-control-skies-over-ukraine
  62. https://en.topwar.ru/198270-polskie-zenitnye-raketnye-kompleksy-vojskovoj-pvo.html
  63. https://www.czdefence.com/article/air-defence-of-the-czech-armed-forces-a-shield-not-only-against-the-threat-of-drones-and-missiles
  64. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/czechs-ship-tanks-rocket-launchers-artillery-ukraine-2022-04-08/
  65. https://wiki.warthunder.com/unit/germ_9a35_m
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.