Hubbry Logo
SenateSenateMain
Open search
Senate
Community hub
Senate
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Senate
Senate
Senate
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Legislature
Chambers
Parliament
Parliamentary procedure
Types
Legislatures by country
Part of a series on
Politics
Primary topics
Systems
Academic disciplines
Public administration
Policy
Government branches
Related topics
Subseries
icon Politics portal
Cicero addressing the Catilinarian conspiracy in the Roman Senate
The debating chamber of the Senate of the Czech Republic in the Wallenstein Palace

A senate is a deliberative assembly, often the upper house or chamber of a bicameral legislature. The name comes from the ancient Roman Senate (Latin: Senatus), so-called as an assembly of the senior (Latin: senex meaning "the elder" or "old man") and therefore considered wiser and more experienced members of the society or ruling class. However the Roman Senate was not the ancestor or predecessor of modern parliamentarism in any sense, because the Roman senate was not a de jure legislative body.[1]

Many countries have an assembly named a senate, composed of senators who may be elected, appointed, have inherited the title, or gained membership by other methods, depending on the country. Modern senates typically serve to provide a chamber of "sober second thought" to consider legislation passed by a lower house, whose members are usually elected. Most senates have asymmetrical duties and powers compared with their respective lower house meaning they have special duties, for example to fill important political positions or to pass special laws. Conversely many senates have limited powers in changing or stopping bills under consideration and efforts to stall or veto a bill may be bypassed by the lower house or another branch of government.[2]

Overview

[edit]

The modern word senate is derived from the Latin word senātus (senate), which comes from senex, 'elder man'.[3] A member or legislator of a senate is called senator. The Latin word senator was adopted into English with no change in spelling. Its meaning is derived from a very ancient form of social organization, in which advisory or decision-making powers are reserved for the eldest men. For the same reason, the word senate is correctly used when referring to any powerful authority characteristically composed by the eldest members of a community, as a deliberative body of a faculty in an institution of higher learning is often called a senate. This form of adaptation was used to show the power of those in body and for the decision-making process to be thorough, which could take a long period of time. The original senate was the Roman Senate, which lasted until at least CE 603,[4] although various efforts to revive it were made in Medieval Rome. In the Eastern Roman Empire, the Byzantine Senate continued until the Fourth Crusade, circa 1202–1204. The female form senatrix also existed.

The Senate of the United States in session

Modern democratic states with bicameral parliamentary systems are sometimes equipped with a senate, often distinguished from an ordinary parallel lower house, known variously as the "House of Representatives", "House of Commons", "Chamber of Deputies", "National Assembly", "Legislative Assembly", or "House of Assembly", by electoral rules. This may include minimum age required for voters and candidates, one house employing a proportional voting system and the other being elected on a majoritarian or plurality basis, and an electoral basis or collegium. Typically, the senate is referred to as the upper house and has a smaller membership than the lower house. In some federal states senates also exist at the subnational level. In the United States, most states and territories have senates, with the exception of Nebraska, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands (whose legislatures are unicameral bodies called the "Legislature" but whose members refer to themselves as "senators") and the District of Columbia (whose unicameral legislature is called the Council). There is also the US Senate at the federal level. Similarly in Argentina, in addition to the Senate at federal level, eight of the country's provinces, Buenos Aires, Catamarca, Corrientes, Entre Ríos, Mendoza, Salta, San Luis (since 1987) and Santa Fe, have bicameral legislatures with a Senate. Córdoba and Tucumán changed to unicameral systems in 2001 and 2003 respectively.

In Australia and Canada, only the upper house of the federal parliament is known as the Senate. All Australian states other than Queensland have an upper house known as a Legislative council. Several Canadian provinces also once had a Legislative Council, but these have all been abolished, the last being Quebec's Legislative council in 1968.

In Germany, the last senate of a state parliament, the Bavarian Senate, was abolished in 2000.[5]

Senate membership can be determined either through elections or appointments. For example, elections are held every three years for half the membership of the Senate of the Philippines, the term of a senator being six years.[6] In contrast, members of the Canadian Senate are appointed by the Governor General upon the recommendation of the Prime Minister of Canada, holding the office until they resign, are removed, or retire at the mandatory age of 75.

Alternative meanings

[edit]

The terms senate and senator, however, do not necessarily refer to a second chamber of a legislature:

List of national senates

[edit]

Defunct and unestablished senates

[edit]
See also: List of abolished upper houses
Abolished in favor of
unicameral system
Legislature disbanded
  • 603 Roman Republic/Empire
  • 1204 Byzantine Empire
  • 1865 Confederate States of America
  • 1831–1879 Montenegro
  • 1931–1941 Yugoslavia
  • 1939 Czechoslovakia
  • 1947 British Burma
  • 1958 Cuba
  • 1959 Iraq
  • 1961 South Korea
  • 1969 Libya
  • 1972 Northern Ireland
  • 1972 Philippines (restored in 1987)[Note 5]
  • 1974 Ethiopia
  • 1975 South Vietnam
  • 1979 Rhodesia
    • New constitution adopted
  • 1847 Costa Rica[Note 6]
  • 1866 Sweden
  • 1871 Costa Rica[Note 6]
  • 1886 El Salvador[Note 7]
  • 1890 Japan
  • 1901–1903 Serbia
  • 1917 Russia
  • 1919 Costa Rica[Note 6]
  • 1919 Finland
  • 1926 Portugal
  • 1928 Albania
  • 1930 Bahia, Brazil
  • 1930 Ceará, Brazil
  • 1930 Pernambuco, Brazil
  • 1930 São Paulo, Brazil
  • 1935 Philippines (restored in 1945)[Note 5]
  • 1937 Ireland
  • 1949 Malta
  • 1950 Indonesia (restored in 2001 as Regional Representative Council)
  • 1964 British Guiana (now Guyana)
  • 1970 Ceylon
  • 1978 Ecuador
  • 1978 Philippines (restored in 1987)[Note 5]
  • 1979 Iran
  • 1979 Nicaragua
  • 1982 Turkey[Note 8]
  • 1993 Peru
  • 2000 Venezuela
  • 2012 Senegal
  • 2013 Fiji
    • Senate unestablished, though foreseen by the Constitution
  • 1989 Lebanon
  • 1994 Malawi
  • 1995 Georgia
  • 2004 Iraq
  • 2012 Burkina Faso
  • 2015 Central African Republic
  • 2023 Mali
  • 2025 Guinea

    • See also

    [edit]

    Notes

    [edit]

    References

    [edit]
    [edit]
    Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

    Senate

    View on Grokipedia
    from Grokipedia
    A senate is the upper chamber of a bicameral legislature in various governmental systems, comprising members known as senators who deliberate on legislation, often with powers to amend or veto bills from the lower house. The term originates from the Latin senatus, meaning "council of elders," derived from senex ("old man"), reflecting its ancient roots as an assembly of senior advisors. In ancient Rome, the Senate began as a 100-member advisory group to the kings around the city's founding in 753 BC, evolving into a central institution during the Republic (509–27 BC) that controlled foreign policy, finances, and military commands, despite lacking formal legislative authority. In modern democracies, senates typically ensure representation of territorial units or provide institutional continuity through longer terms and or appointment, counterbalancing the more populous, directly elected lower houses to foster over impulsive . This structure, inspired partly by Roman precedents and Enlightenment ideas of , aims to prevent factional dominance and promote federal balance, as seen in the United States Senate's equal allocation of two seats per state since 1789, enabling of treaties and of executive appointments. Notable characteristics include procedural tools like extended debate, which can lead to consensus but also legislative deadlock, exemplified by the filibuster's role in blocking measures without support. Countries employing senates include federations like , , and (where the upper house, the Bundesrat, represents states directly), alongside unitary states such as and , where they serve revising functions. Defining controversies often center on their perceived undemocratic elements, such as malapportionment favoring smaller regions, which critics argue entrenches minority rule, though proponents cite of reduced policy volatility in bicameral systems.

    Etymology and Definition

    Origins of the Term

    The term "senate" derives from the Latin senātus, signifying a " of elders," which originated in as the name for its premier advisory and governing assembly. This nomenclature stems from senex, the Latin word for "old man" or "elder," underscoring the body's initial composition of senior patricians and selected for their age and wisdom. The 's establishment traces to the legendary in 753 BCE by , who purportedly appointed 100 senators as heads of the original gentes, later expanded under subsequent kings. In linguistic evolution, senātus entered as senat before appearing in around 1275, initially denoting the Roman institution but gradually applied to analogous deliberative councils in other polities. The connotation of an "assembly of elders" persisted, influencing the adoption of "senate" for upper legislative houses in modern bicameral systems, such as those (established 1789) and (post-Revolution), where the emphasis on experienced legislators echoed the Roman model. This etymological root highlights the senate's historical role as a stabilizing body of seasoned advisors, distinct from more populist lower chambers.

    Core Functions as a Deliberative Body

    The senate functions as a deliberative body by assembling experienced members to engage in structured debate, analysis, and counsel on governance issues, prioritizing reasoned discussion over rapid decision-making. Originating in , the Senate served as the state's primary , where magistrates summoned senators—typically numbering 300 to 600 patricians and of high status—to discuss and resolve matters such as , , provincial administration, and public finances. This process generated senatus consulta, advisory decrees that, while non-binding, exerted immense influence due to the senators' collective expertise and the assembly's prestige, often guiding executive actions effectively. The Roman model's emphasis on stemmed from the senators' role as elders (senex), selected for wisdom accumulated through prior magistracies, ensuring decisions reflected long-term stability rather than transient popular pressures. In practice, senatorial deliberation involved sequential speeches, where members proposed motions, debated alternatives, and voted via division or , fostering consensus through iterative argument rather than imposition. This mechanism allowed for oversight of magistrates' proposals, of policies, and restraint on hasty wars or expenditures, as evidenced by the Senate's control over treasury allocations and treaty s from the Republic's founding circa 509 BCE through the . Unlike popular assemblies focused on , the Senate's closed sessions enabled candid exchange among elites, mitigating factionalism and promoting pragmatic outcomes, though vulnerabilities to and oligarchic capture emerged over time. Modern senates, modeled partly on Roman precedents, retain this deliberative essence in bicameral legislatures, where the reviews lower chamber bills through extended to provide "sober second thought." Rules in such bodies often permit unlimited individual speeches and thresholds to end debate, compelling compromise and thorough scrutiny, as seen in provisions against simple-majority closures to preserve minority input. This function extends to advisory roles on executive nominations and international agreements, where senators' longer terms and broader constituencies—representing states or regions—enable representation of diffuse interests overlooked in populist lower houses. Empirical analysis of legislative processes shows that such correlates with more stable policies, reducing enactment of short-term measures by approximately 20-30% in systems with strong upper houses compared to unicameral ones, based on cross-national studies of bill passage rates.

    Historical Evolution

    Ancient Foundations

    The Roman Senate originated during the monarchy period of Rome's traditional founding, circa 753 BC, when Romulus purportedly established a council of 100 patrician elders, termed patres or "fathers," to counsel the king on matters of state. This body derived its name from the Latin senatus, rooted in senex meaning "old man," underscoring its composition of senior heads of leading families who provided continuity and wisdom amid royal succession. Under the kings, the Senate lacked codified legislative authority but exerted influence through advisory roles in religious rites, financial oversight, and military deliberations, reflecting a patrician aristocracy's emergent control over nascent Roman governance. With the Republic's inception in 509 BC, following the expulsion of the last king Tarquinius Superbus, the Senate evolved into a pivotal institution, its membership stabilized around by the mid-Republic through selection by censors from ex-magistrates of senatorial rank. Though formally advisory, its senatus consulta resolutions directed , allocated provincial governorships, and managed the treasury, effectively steering the state's expansion from to the Mediterranean by the . Patrician exclusivity yielded to plebeian inclusion after conflicts like the Licinian-Sextian Laws of 367 BC, broadening representation while preserving elite dominance via lifetime tenure and wealth requirements. The Senate's foundational design emphasized deliberation over , prioritizing experienced aristocrats to mitigate impulsive popular assemblies, a structure that sustained Rome's republican stability for over four centuries until internal strife eroded its preeminence. This ancient model, devoid of electoral mandates, influenced subsequent deliberative bodies by exemplifying how a small cadre of lifelong experts could coordinate complex state functions without monarchical or plebeian overreach.

    Medieval and Enlightenment Transitions

    In the , the Roman Senate's legacy reemerged in Italian communes amid efforts to assert secular authority against ecclesiastical dominance. In , the reconstituted a senate in 1143, electing 56 senators (four from each of the city's 14 ) under a patrician leader to govern independently of the papacy, though this body proved unstable and dissolved by the early 13th century due to internal conflicts and papal interventions. Similar revivals occurred in city-states; the established a senate in the as part of its consular , evolving into an oligarchic advising magistrates on and defense. The formalized a Senate in 1229, comprising around 60 to 300 nobles elected by the Great Council, functioning as the primary executive and legislative body for , taxation, and military affairs within its mercantile . This institution drew nominal inspiration from Roman precedents but adapted to Venetian patrician exclusivity, emphasizing deliberation to balance the Doge's power and prevent factionalism, enduring until the Republic's fall in 1797. In Northern Europe, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth developed a Senate by the late , explicitly modeled on the as the upper house of the , representing nobility and clergy to advise the king on legislation and veto popular assembly decisions, reflecting a mixed blending with aristocratic checks. During the , humanist scholarship revived classical texts, reinterpreting the as a stabilizing aristocratic counterweight in mixed governments, as analyzed by in (1531), who praised its role in channeling ambitions productively while critiquing its vulnerability to . This intellectual resurgence influenced early modern theorists; in Six Livres de la République (1576) reconceived the Senate as a consultative body subordinate to sovereign authority, yet Jan Zamojski's De Senatu Romano (1607) linked its historical size fluctuations (from 300 to 900 under Caesar) to Polish reforms for deliberative efficacy. Enlightenment political philosophy further abstracted these models into principles of for safeguarding against transient majorities. , in The Spirit of the Laws (1748), advocated dividing the legislature into an aristocratic upper chamber for sober review—implicitly echoing Roman and Venetian examples—to mitigate democratic excesses, influencing subsequent constitutional designs by prioritizing institutional balance over direct emulation. later synthesized these ideas in Thoughts on Government (1776), proposing senatorial bodies of "wise and good men" for permanence, bridging historical precedents to emerging federal systems.

    Establishment in Modern Nation-States

    The was established through the U.S. , drafted during the Constitutional Convention in from May to September 1787 and signed by 39 delegates on September 17, 1787. Article I, Section 3 specifies a composition of two Senators from each state, initially selected by state legislatures for six-year terms, reflecting the Great Compromise that granted equal state representation in the to counterbalance in the based on population. This structure addressed concerns, particularly from smaller states fearing dominance by larger ones, and the first Senate session began on March 4, 1789, after by nine states. The U.S. model profoundly shaped Senates in other federal systems emerging in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. 's Senate, for instance, was instituted by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act of 1900, which took effect on January 1, 1901, upon of the six colonies; it provided for six Senators per state, elected directly, to safeguard regional interests against a population-based , mirroring American equal principles while adapting to parliamentary traditions. Similarly, Canada's Senate was created under the Act of 1867 (now the Constitution Act), effective July 1, 1867, with appointed members representing provinces by regional divisions to ensure territorial balance in the Dominion's bicameral Parliament. In unitary republics, Senates arose to promote and territorial representation amid or republican reforms. France's modern Sénat was founded by the of the Fifth Republic, promulgated on October 4, 1958, as an indirectly elected upper chamber representing departments and overseas territories, replacing earlier assemblies and emphasizing oversight over the more directly elected . Italy's Senate of the was established by the 1948 , effective January 1, 1948, with members elected concurrently with the but including life senators for continuity. These establishments often prioritized bicameral checks to mitigate hasty legislation, drawing from Enlightenment ideas of divided powers refined through federal experiments.

    Institutional Design and Powers

    Role in Bicameral Systems

    In bicameral legislative systems, the Senate functions as the upper chamber, designed to balance the more populous and directly representative , such as a House of Representatives or assembly. This structure, rooted in principles of , ensures that legislation undergoes scrutiny from multiple perspectives, mitigating the risks of hasty or majoritarian decisions. The framers of the U.S. Constitution, for instance, viewed as essential for republican stability, with the Senate acting as a deliberative counterweight to the House's responsiveness to public sentiment. The Senate's role emphasizes federal or territorial representation, often granting equal voting power to subnational units regardless of , which protects smaller states or regions from dominance by larger ones. , each state elects two senators, fostering negotiation and compromise in a chamber where terms are longer—six years versus two for House members—to promote continuity and insulation from transient passions. This setup compels bills to pass both houses identically before enactment, enforcing revisions and preventing legislative overreach; for example, revenue bills originate in the lower house, but the Senate can amend them, subject to . Globally, in federal systems like or , senates similarly safeguard regional interests, though powers vary—some upper houses ordinary laws, while others focus on constitutional matters. Beyond legislation, senates in bicameral systems exercise oversight functions, such as approving executive appointments, ratifying treaties, and conducting trials in proceedings, roles that enhance without duplicating the 's initiation of spending measures. In perfect , as in the U.S., both chambers hold symmetrical authority, promoting thorough debate; data from U.S. ional sessions show that Senate filibusters and holds have delayed or altered over 20% of major bills since 2000, illustrating its braking mechanism on impulses. This design, while criticized for in polarized eras, empirically correlates with more enduring laws, as evidenced by comparative studies of unicameral versus bicameral outcomes in policy durability.

    Legislative and Oversight Authorities

    The senate, as an upper chamber in bicameral legislatures, shares core legislative authority with the to enact , typically through debating, amending, and voting on bills to ensure deliberate review and federal balance. In federal systems, this includes powers to regulate commerce, levy taxes, and declare war, as delineated in foundational documents like Article I of the U.S. Constitution, which vests "all legislative Powers" in a bicameral comprising the Senate and . Upper houses often cannot initiate revenue bills but possess or suspensive powers over , protecting regional or state interests against hasty majoritarian decisions. Exclusive legislative authorities distinguish senates in many systems, such as approving international treaties, confirming high-level appointments, and conducting impeachment trials. In the United States, the Senate holds sole power under Article I, Section 3 to try federal , having conducted 20 such trials since 1789, functioning as both and without appeal except in cases of removal. Article II, Section 2 further empowers the Senate to provide "" on treaties (requiring a two-thirds vote) and nominations to executive and judicial offices, including ambassadors, cabinet secretaries, and justices, thereby checking executive overreach. These mechanisms, rooted in , ensure senatorial bodies serve as stabilizing forces in structures. Oversight functions enable senates to scrutinize executive actions, primarily through specialized committees that hold hearings, witnesses, and issue reports to inform future or expose malfeasance. The U.S. Senate, for instance, operates 20 permanent committees—such as the and Foreign Relations Committees—that conduct thousands of oversight hearings annually, deriving authority from the implied legislative power to investigate matters within Congress's jurisdiction. This includes probing executive compliance with s, as affirmed in precedents like Watkins v. United States (1957), where the upheld congressional inquiries as essential to legislative oversight, though bounded by relevance to legislative ends. In broader bicameral contexts, upper houses extend oversight to executive and , often via joint or select committees, fostering accountability without direct enforcement powers. Such roles underscore the senate's function as a deliberative counterweight, prioritizing long-term stability over immediate responsiveness.

    Differences from Lower Houses

    Upper houses, commonly known as senates, typically provide equal representation to subnational units such as states or provinces, contrasting with lower houses that apportion seats based on population to reflect demographic majorities. This design in federal systems aims to protect minority regional interests against the potential dominance of populous areas in the lower chamber. For instance, in the United States, each state elects two senators regardless of population, while House seats are distributed proportionally among districts averaging about 761,000 residents as of the 2020 census apportionment. Senates generally feature smaller memberships, longer terms, and higher qualifications than s, fostering and continuity over responsiveness to short-term . Upper chamber members often serve six-year terms with (one-third up for renewal every two years in the U.S. Senate), compared to two-year terms for House representatives, reducing turnover and enhancing . Minimum age requirements are elevated—30 years for U.S. senators versus 25 for representatives—and residency demands are stricter (nine years versus seven). These elements slow legislative momentum, as upper houses prioritize review and amendment of bills passed by the more numerous and rapidly elected . In terms of powers, lower houses usually initiate and appropriations bills, while senates exercise veto-like checks, of treaties, and of executive appointments, emphasizing oversight in federal balances. The U.S. , for example, mandates that bills for raising originate in the , but the Senate can propose amendments, and it holds exclusive authority to try impeachments initiated by the . Procedurally, senates often permit extended debate, such as unlimited filibusters unless is invoked, enabling minority obstruction absent in more rule-bound lower chambers. These asymmetries promote bicameral compromise, though upper houses may wield diminished influence on fiscal matters in some systems to align with popular accountability. Variations exist—some senates are appointed rather than elected—but the core distinction lies in tempering majoritarian impulses with federal or elite restraint.

    Composition and Representation

    Election Mechanisms and Term Lengths

    In the United States Senate, members are elected directly by popular vote in each state, with two senators per state serving staggered six-year terms, such that approximately one-third of the 100 seats are contested every two years during even-numbered federal election cycles. This structure, established by Article I, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, originally provided for selection by state legislatures to insulate the body from transient public opinion, but the Seventeenth Amendment, ratified on April 8, 1913, mandated direct election by the people to enhance democratic responsiveness. Elections occur statewide using a first-past-the-post system in most states, though some employ runoffs or other variants if no secures a ; primary elections precede general elections to select nominees. Vacancies are filled by gubernatorial appointment pending special elections, ensuring continuity while maintaining electoral accountability. The six-year term length, longer than the ' two years, promotes deliberation and expertise, with no term limits imposed. Internationally, senate election mechanisms and term lengths vary to balance regional representation, stability, and proportionality. In , the Senate's 76 members are directly elected via , with each state allocated 12 seats and territories fewer; senators serve six-year terms, with half renewed every three years. Italy's Senate employs a system combining majoritarian and proportional elements for 315 elected members serving five-year terms aligned with the . In contrast, some upper houses use indirect election: France's 348 senators are chosen by electoral colleges comprising local officials and parliamentarians using a two-round majority or proportional system, with six-year terms and half elected every three years. Austria's Federal Council features indirect election by state assemblies via proportional representation for terms of five or six years, reflecting state sizes. Appointed systems, like Canada's Senate where 105 members are named by the prime minister until age 75, prioritize expertise over election but face criticism for lacking democratic legitimacy.
    CountryElection MechanismTerm LengthStaggering
    Direct popular (FPTP)6 yearsOne-third every 2 years
    Direct (STV PR)6 yearsHalf every 3 years
    Indirect (electoral college)6 yearsHalf every 3 years
    Direct (parallel)5 yearsFull renewal
    Indirect (state parliaments)5-6 yearsVaries by state

    Apportionment and Federal Balance

    In federal systems, senates are typically apportioned to grant equal or near-equal representation to each constituent state or , safeguarding the and interests of smaller subnational units against domination by more populous ones. This structure embodies the federal principle of compact among equals, where states join the union not as subordinates but as co-sovereigns, necessitating mechanisms to prevent population-based majorities from overriding regional minorities. Such contrasts sharply with lower houses, which allocate seats proportionally to population, thereby institutionalizing a deliberate check on raw demographic power. The archetype emerged in the United States through the , adopted on July 16, 1787, during the Constitutional Convention. Facing impasse between large states favoring (Virginia Plan) and small states demanding equality (New Jersey Plan), delegates agreed to a bicameral : the apportioned by population and the Senate granting two seats per state, as enshrined in Article I, Section 3, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution. This yielded 100 senators today across 50 states, with Wyoming's two senators representing about 580,000 people each versus California's roughly 39 million—disparities exceeding 60-fold—yet ensuring Wyoming's influence matches California's in Senate votes. Australia mirrors this model in its Senate, established under the 1901 Constitution, assigning 12 senators per state regardless of population, for a total of 72 from the six original states plus territory representatives. This equal state allocation, elected via , compels national legislation to accommodate diverse regional priorities, such as rural versus urban divides, and has sustained federal cohesion amid varying state sizes from (about 570,000 people) to (over 8 million). Canada's Senate, while appointed rather than elected, pursues regional balance through fixed allocations totaling 105 seats: 24 each for and , 24 collectively for the four Maritime provinces, 24 for the four Western provinces, six for , and one each for the territories. This formula, rooted in the 1867 Constitution Act's sectional equality principle, aims to equalize influence across geographic divisions rather than strict per-state parity, though critics note its underrepresentation of faster-growing Western provinces relative to population shifts since . Variations exist, as in Germany's Bundesrat, where seats and votes (3 to 6 per state) are weighted by population—smaller states like receive three votes for 700,000 residents, while larger ones like get six for 18 million—offering a that tempers but does not eliminate demographic sway. Overall, senate enforces federal balance by vesting subnational governments with or powers over laws affecting their jurisdictions, empirically correlating with more dispersed policy outcomes and reduced central overreach in federations compared to unitary systems.

    Qualifications and Privileges

    Qualifications for membership in a senate, as the in bicameral legislatures, typically include a minimum age threshold higher than that for the to ensure maturity and experience, alongside requirements for citizenship and residency to align representation with federal or regional interests. , Article I, Section 3 of the mandates that senators be at least 30 years old, U.S. citizens for no fewer than nine years, and inhabitants of the state they represent at the time of election. Similar criteria appear in other federal systems; for instance, in , candidates must be at least 18 years old, Australian citizens, and free from disqualifications such as foreign allegiance, conviction under sentence for serious offenses, or bankruptcy. These provisions aim to filter for individuals with established ties to the , though enforcement varies—U.S. courts have upheld that qualifications are met upon taking the , allowing pre-oath residency lapses in some cases. In appointed senates, such as Canada's, eligibility emphasizes property ownership and regional residency alongside age limits (30 to 75 years) to promote independence and geographic balance, reflecting a design for sober second thought rather than direct popular election. State-level upper houses in the U.S. often lower the age to 25 or even 21, with residency in the district for one year, illustrating how subnational senates adapt federal models for smaller scales. Disqualifications commonly extend to felons, dual citizens in some jurisdictions (e.g., Australia's resolution of foreign citizenship cases via high court rulings), or those holding incompatible offices, ensuring undivided loyalty. Privileges accorded to senators safeguard legislative independence and functionality, rooted in historical protections against executive or judicial interference. Core among these is , granting within proceedings—such that statements cannot be challenged in courts—along with immunity from in civil matters during sessions and exemptions from jury service to prevent coercion. In the U.S., the explicitly shields senators from liability for legislative acts, extending to committee work but not extraneous activities, as affirmed in precedents balancing accountability. Senators also receive fixed compensation from public funds—currently $174,000 annually in the U.S., adjusted for inflation—to insulate against , though floor access privileges exclude lobbyists to maintain deliberation integrity. These privileges, while essential for candid debate, are not absolute; expulsion requires a two-thirds vote in bodies like the U.S. Senate for , and privileges do not cover criminal acts. Internationally, equivalents persist, such as in the UK's where peers enjoy analogous immunities, underscoring a shared prioritizing legislative over personal . Variations reflect institutional design: elected senates emphasize electoral safeguards, while appointed ones incorporate tenure limits to avert entrenchment.

    Global Examples and Variations

    Prominent National Senates

    The , the upper chamber of the U.S. , consists of 100 members, with two senators from each of the 50 states serving staggered six-year terms, one-third of which are elected every two years. This equal state representation ensures smaller states hold disproportionate influence compared to population-based lower houses. The Senate possesses exclusive powers to confirm presidential nominees for high offices, including justices and cabinet secretaries, and to ratify international treaties by a two-thirds vote. It also conducts impeachment trials for federal officials impeached by the . Canada's Senate, comprising 105 appointed members selected by the on the advice of the , represents regional and provincial interests in a federal system. Senators serve until age 75, providing continuity and expertise in legislative review, often acting as a chamber for "sober second thought" by amending or delaying bills from the elected without the power to money bills. Appointments aim to reflect Canada's geographic, linguistic, and , though critics note potential partisanship in selections. Australia's Senate features 76 members: 12 elected from each of the six states via and two from each mainland territory, with six-year terms where half the state seats are contested at each federal election alongside House terms of up to three years. Designed to protect state interests in a , it holds equal legislative powers with the except for initiating revenue bills, and its rejection of supply in led to a resolved by the dismissal of Gough . In Brazil, the Federal Senate includes 81 members, three from each state and the , elected for eight-year terms with renewals every four years, emphasizing federal equality akin to the U.S. model. It shares legislative authority with the but has sole responsibility for approving justices and trying impeached officials. France's Senate, with 348 seats filled by from municipal and departmental councilors for six-year terms, primarily represents territorial collectivities and provides a check on the directly elected . While it can propose amendments, the Assembly holds precedence in most legislation, reflecting a weaker upper house role post-1958 Fifth Republic constitution. Italy's Senate consists of 200 elected members plus life senators, with regional and a minimum age of 40 for election, contrasting the ' lower threshold. It enjoys near-equal powers, requiring joint approval for most laws, though perfect has contributed to legislative in recent decades.

    Subnational and Historical Instances

    The Roman Senate represents the archetypal historical instance of a senatorial body, tracing its origins to the in the , with formalized structure emerging in the founded on September 13, 509 BC following the overthrow of , Tarquinius Superbus. Composed initially of approximately 100 patrician members divided into ten decuries, the Senate functioned primarily as an advisory to magistrates, exerting control over state finances, foreign relations, and religious matters without direct legislative authority. Its membership expanded over time, reaching 300 under the and up to 600 under in 27 BC, though its influence waned during the as emperors centralized power while maintaining the institution for symbolic continuity. Other ancient examples include the Carthaginian Adirim, or senate, which served as the primary governing council in the from at least the , advising the two annually elected suffetes (chief magistrates) on declarations of war, , and domestic laws. This body, drawn from aristocratic families and numbering around 300 members, balanced oligarchic control with input from a citizen assembly, contributing to Carthage's expansion across the western Mediterranean until its defeat by in 146 BC. In subnational contexts, the provides the most extensive modern examples, where 49 states operate bicameral legislatures with a senate as the , except for Nebraska's unicameral system adopted in to streamline and reduce costs. These state senates vary in size from 20 members in to 67 in , with senators typically elected to four-year terms in single-member districts apportioned by population, enabling representation of broader regional interests compared to the more populous lower houses. State senates exercise powers including bill origination for revenue measures in some cases, confirmation of gubernatorial appointees, and trials, mirroring federal structures while adapting to local needs.

    Defunct or Transitional Senates

    Defunct senates comprise upper legislative or advisory bodies dissolved upon the termination of empires, republics, or confederations through , , or republican transitions. These institutions often represented elite or regional interests but were eliminated as new governance models prioritized or restructured bicameral systems. Transitional senates, conversely, emerge temporarily during coups or shifts to maintain continuity and draft interim constitutions, typically lacking permanence. The , originating in the early Republic circa 509 BC as a patrician council, evolved into an advisory organ under the yet retained nominal existence into ; its final documented reference dates to 580 AD amid Byzantine oversight in , after which it faded without formal abolition. The Senate of the , functioning from the 13th century as a 60- to 300-member executive-legislative entity dominated by noble families, was disbanded in 1797 following Napoleon's invasion and the , ending the Serenissima's independence. In imperial Russia, the , created by in 1711 as the empire's highest administrative and judicial authority, oversaw law codification and provincial until the 1917 dismantled the , rendering it obsolete alongside the tsarist order. The Ottoman Senate (Meclis-i Ayan), introduced in the 1876 Constitution as an appointed balancing the elected , was suspended in 1920 during the and formally eliminated with the sultanate's abolition on November 1, 1922, by the . The Confederate States Senate, modeled on the U.S. counterpart with two members per seceded state, convened its first session on February 18, 1862, in , and operated through two congresses until the Confederacy's collapse in April 1865, after which it dissolved without reconstitution. Brazil's Imperial Senate, established under the 1824 Constitution as a life-appointed chamber representing provinces, was abolished on November 15, 1889, via military coup that overthrew Emperor Pedro II and inaugurated the republic. Contemporary transitional examples include Gabon's Transitional Senate, formed September 2023 post-coup against President , comprising 70 members—37 from parties, 27 from , and 6 from security forces—to shepherd electoral reforms and civilian rule restoration by 2025. Such bodies underscore senates' adaptability in flux, though many transition to permanent forms or yield to unicameral assemblies amid efficiency drives.

    Debates on Effectiveness

    Advantages of Senate Structures

    Senate structures in bicameral legislatures serve as a deliberative check on the , enabling revision of legislation to mitigate hasty or poorly considered measures. This second chamber allows for independent scrutiny, often resulting in amendments that enhance policy coherence and reduce errors from rapid passage in the more representative . For instance, upper houses frequently identify technical flaws or overlooked in initial drafts, fostering higher legislative quality through iterative review. In federal systems, senates equalize representation among subnational units, safeguarding smaller or less populous states against dominance by larger ones in the . This —such as equal votes per state regardless of population—preserves regional interests and prevents centralized overreach, as evidenced in the U.S. Senate where it has blocked policies disproportionately favoring populous states since 1789. Empirical analyses indicate this structure promotes by encouraging balanced resource allocation across regions, reducing inter-state conflicts. Longer terms and smaller memberships in senates cultivate expertise and stability, diminishing short-term prevalent in lower houses with frequent elections. Senators, serving six years in the U.S. case, accumulate institutional knowledge, leading to more informed debates on complex issues like or budgeting. Studies of bicameral systems show this yields policies with greater longevity and lower reversal rates compared to unicameral outputs, as the upper house filters transient majorities. By representing diverse constituencies—such as ethnic groups, professions, or regions—senates broaden input into lawmaking, countering lower-house . This inclusivity has empirically correlated with reduced policy volatility in federations, where upper houses extreme proposals, as seen in Australia's state senates maintaining equilibrium amid lower-house swings. Overall, these features enhance democratic legitimacy without sacrificing efficiency, provided the senate wields suspensive rather than absolute powers.

    Criticisms and Gridlock Concerns

    The equal representation of states in the U.S. Senate, granting two senators per state regardless of population, has been criticized for enabling minority rule, as it allows senators from low-population states to wield disproportionate influence over national policy. For instance, the 14 smallest states, comprising less than 3% of the U.S. population, hold 28 Senate seats, equivalent to those from the nine largest states representing over 50% of the population. This malapportionment, rooted in the of 1787, is argued to distort democratic majorities and favor rural, less populous interests, impeding legislation responsive to the broader electorate. The Senate's filibuster rule, requiring a 60-vote to invoke and end debate, exacerbates by allowing a minority to block bills even when a simple majority exists. motions have surged from an average of 13 per in the 1970s to 168 in the 115th (2017–2018), with over 2,000 since 1917, half occurring in the dozen years prior to 2021. This procedural hurdle has delayed or derailed major initiatives, such as judicial nominations—where all prior presidents combined faced 244 votes, but the Trump administration alone encountered over 300—and contributed to legislative stagnation during unified government periods. Critics, including legal scholars, contend this entrenches partisan obstruction, as evidenced by the inverse relationship between ideological distance in bicameral chambers and policy output. Bicameralism itself, combining the Senate's state-equal structure with the House's population-based , amplifies through divergent incentives and points. Empirical models of legislative dynamics from 1947–1996 show that unified partisan control reduces but does not eliminate stasis, with intervals widening under polarization and institutional es like the . In practice, this has led to chronic underproductivity, such as the failure to pass comprehensive despite repeated House action, or prolonged appropriations battles forcing reliance on omnibus bills and continuing resolutions. While proponents view such delays as safeguards against impulsive governance, detractors argue they undermine responsiveness to empirical needs, like fiscal cliffs or infrastructure decay, fostering public disillusionment with efficacy. Sources attributing primarily to partisan , often from academia with noted left-leaning institutional biases, may underemphasize how Senate rules formalize minority leverage beyond mere polarization.

    Empirical Evidence on Bicameral Outcomes

    Empirical studies indicate that bicameral legislatures correlate with lower levels among elected officials. Analysis of cross-country data shows bicameral systems exhibit reduced corruption perceptions, as the dual-chamber structure enhances by requiring concurrence across independently elected bodies, particularly when the same party does not dominate both houses. This effect stems from the serving as an additional veto point that constrains behavior observable in unicameral setups. In , is associated with more restrained and deficits. Cross-national regressions on democratic countries from 1960 to 1998 reveal that parliaments produce lower expenditure as a share of GDP—approximately 5-10 percentage points less—due to the need for intercameral , which dilutes chamber-specific incentives for expansive . Complementary links structures to smaller budget deficits, as the upper house's distinct composition often prioritizes long-term fiscal prudence over short-term . Bicameral systems also promote policy stability by filtering transient majorities. Theoretical models, validated through simulations of legislative , demonstrate that upper houses generate equilibrium policies resistant to single-chamber shifts, leading to more predictable outcomes in volatile environments. In practice, this manifests as reduced policy volatility, with bicameral legislatures enacting laws that better align with enduring voter preferences rather than episodic pressures. Critics highlight as a drawback, where vetoes delay or block . In the U.S. , examination of bills from 1981 to 2020 found the Senate approved only 54% of measures backed by majorities, contrasting with higher passage rates in the , suggesting bicameral friction impedes responsiveness to voter demands. Nonetheless, such delays empirically correlate with higher-quality outputs, as bicameral review mitigates hasty or low-information laws, outperforming unicameral speed in long-run policy efficacy.

    Reforms and Contemporary Challenges

    Historical Reforms

    In the Roman Republic, significant reforms to the Senate occurred under Lucius Cornelius Sulla following his dictatorship from 88 to 81 BC. Sulla increased the Senate's membership from approximately 300 to 600 by admitting equites (knights) and restored its dominance over popular assemblies and tribunes by curtailing the latter's veto powers and legislative initiatives, aiming to centralize authority in senatorial hands after decades of populist challenges. These changes prioritized patrician and oligarchic control, reflecting a causal shift toward elite stability amid civil strife, though they ultimately sowed seeds for further power struggles. Later, Augustus' constitutional settlements in 27 BC and 23 BC nominally preserved the Senate's advisory role while subordinating it to imperial veto, legislative proposal rights, and treaty powers vested in the princeps, reducing its effective autonomy to a ceremonial body by the early Empire. In the United States, the Senate underwent transformative structural reform with the ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment on April 8, 1913, which mandated direct popular election of senators, replacing the original constitutional provision for selection by state legislatures. This shift, driven by concerns over legislative deadlocks and corruption—such as bribery scandals in states like and —enhanced democratic accountability but arguably diminished states' federal representation as intended by the framers to check transient majorities. Procedurally, the Senate adopted its first rule on March 8, 1917, allowing filibusters to be ended by a two-thirds vote of members present, in response to obstruction during debates, marking an early empirical adjustment to balance against . Post-World War II reforms further modernized operations. The Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 consolidated the Senate's 33 standing committees into 16, delegated subcommittees for specialized oversight, and imposed recording requirements for executive sessions to curb unchecked power and improve efficiency amid expanding federal responsibilities. The 1970 Act built on this by mandating public committee hearings, strengthening staff resources for investigations, and reforming seniority-based leadership to foster competition, addressing criticisms of entrenched interests that had slowed legislative output during the mid-20th century. These changes, informed by empirical reviews of congressional bottlenecks, prioritized transparency and specialization without altering core constitutional powers.

    Ongoing Debates and Proposals

    In the United States Senate, a central ongoing revolves around reforming or eliminating the , a procedural tactic allowing senators to prolong debate and block legislation unless 60 votes invoke . Proponents of reform argue that the current 60-vote threshold exacerbates , preventing majority-supported policies on issues like voting rights and from advancing, as evidenced by repeated failures to pass such bills despite slim majorities. Critics, including many Republicans, contend that the safeguards and fosters bipartisan compromise, noting its role in blocking extreme measures historically, though empirical analyses show it has extended from rare use to routine obstruction since the rule changes. In October 2025, amid a triggered by spending disagreements, Senate Republicans intensified discussions on modifications, such as lowering the threshold or requiring "talking filibusters" where senators must hold the floor continuously, to force Democrats to end the impasse without concessions. Proposed reforms include partial elimination for specific legislation, as outlined by Senate Majority Leader in August 2024 planning for a potential 2025 Democratic agenda, targeting voting rights and labor protections via a simple-majority vote carve-out. Advocates cite data from the Brennan Center indicating over 160 prior modifications to rules, suggesting further tweaks could restore deliberative function without abolishing extended debate entirely. Opponents warn of , such as retaliatory changes under future majorities leading to policy volatility, supported by historical precedents like the 2013 and 2017 "nuclear option" invocations that lowered thresholds but preserved the filibuster for . These debates persist amid broader process uses, where bills bypass the filibuster, as in 2025 proposals adding immigration enforcement funding without 60-vote hurdles. Internationally, Senate reform proposals are less acute but notable in , where the appointed faces criticism for lacking democratic legitimacy despite Trudeau-era shifts toward independent appointments since 2014. Calls for elected senators or term limits, echoed in historical failed accords like Meech Lake (1987), have waned but resurface in analyses advocating to better reflect regional interests, though no active legislation advanced by October 2025. In , post-2016 electoral reforms introducing optional preferential voting reduced micro-party dominance in the Senate, prompting evaluations of further tweaks to enhance proportionality without undermining federal balance, as debated in parliamentary reviews. These examples highlight a tension between preserving senatorial checks on lower houses and adapting to modern demands for efficiency, with empirical studies on bicameral systems showing mixed outcomes: stronger upper houses correlate with slower but more stable policy in federal nations, per cross-national comparisons.

    Recent Developments (Post-2020)

    In the United States, the Senate achieved a narrow Democratic in January 2021 after runoff elections in Georgia on January 5 and 6, where Democrats and defeated Republican incumbents, yielding a 50-50 partisan balance resolved by Kamala Harris's tie-breaking votes. This configuration enabled passage of major legislation via budget reconciliation, bypassing the , including the American Rescue Plan Act in March 2021 for relief and the in August 2022 addressing climate and health provisions. Democrats retained a slim 51-seat after the 2022 midterms, despite Republican gains in the House. However, Republicans secured a 53-47 following the 2024 elections, flipping key seats in , , , and amid voter shifts toward and border security concerns. Debates over Senate rules intensified post-2020, particularly around the , with Democrats in 2021 and 2022 proposing modifications to advance voting rights and access bills but ultimately shelving reforms due to opposition from Senators and , who argued that altering thresholds would erode minority protections without bipartisan consensus. Republicans, upon assuming majority in 2025, faced internal divisions on further changes, such as limiting post-cloture debate time, while advancing bipartisan measures like repealing 1991 and 2002 authorizations for use of military force in the on October 9, 2025, to refocus executive war powers. Public sentiment in the U.S. reflected broader dissatisfaction, with Pew Research indicating in 2021 that about two-thirds of Americans viewed the , including bicameral structures, as needing major reforms to address . Internationally, upper houses faced structural shifts amid political turbulence. In , a new Senate was inaugurated in July 2024 following elections dominated by military-aligned candidates, entrenching conservative influence and blocking progressive initiatives, as evidenced by the chamber's composition of over 200 former officials out of 500 seats. In , France's Senate maintained a center-right post-2020 regional elections, consistently amending or rejecting Macron administration bills on pension reform and , highlighting persistent bicameral tensions in semi-presidential systems. These developments underscore ongoing challenges in senatorial bodies balancing deliberation with responsiveness in polarized environments.

    References

    1. https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution.htm
    2. https://www.etymonline.com/word/senate
    3. https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/senate-stories/constitution-day-2021-mixed-government-bicameralism.htm
    4. https://electoral-reform.org.uk/how-are-the-members-of-upper-houses-chosen-around-the-world/
    5. https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/word-histories-from-congress
    6. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/senate_n
    7. https://www.britannica.com/place/ancient-Rome/The-Senate
    8. https://acoup.blog/2023/09/22/collections-how-to-roman-republic-part-iv-the-senate/
    9. https://www.thecollector.com/roman-senate/
    10. https://www.senate.gov/history/IdeaOfTheSenate.htm
    11. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/96-548
    12. https://ballotpedia.org/Upper_house
    13. https://www.livius.org/articles/concept/senate/
    14. https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2020/09/the-roman-senate-as-precursor-of-the-u-s-senate/
    15. https://pressbooks.nvcc.edu/wcchv1/chapter/volume-1-chapter-8-the-roman-republic/
    16. https://constitutingamerica.org/90day-aer-five-hundred-years-of-the-republic-of-venice-what-went-wrong-guest-essayist-joerg-knipprath/
    17. https://oll.libertyfund.org/publications/liberty-matters/the-roman-senate-in-early-modern-europe
    18. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34508/chapter/292807957
    19. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/montesquieu/
    20. https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-1/
    21. https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Senate_Created.htm
    22. https://www.aph.gov.au/about_parliament/senate/about_the_senate
    23. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-1/origin-of-a-bicameral-congress
    24. https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/idea-of-the-senate/1787Federalist62.htm
    25. https://www.congress.gov/legislative-process
    26. https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/default/files/document/files/2022/07/undplegislativechambers-unicameralorbicameral2013.pdf
    27. https://constitution.findlaw.com/article1/annotation02.html
    28. https://fiveable.me/congress/unit-1/bicameral-structure-senate-house-representatives/study-guide/NdHVTCDVvh6fl9QM
    29. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S1-3-4/ALDE_00013293/
    30. https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures.htm
    31. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C2-3-1/ALDE_00013092/
    32. https://www.senate.gov/committees/committees_home.htm
    33. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-8/clause-18/overview-of-investigation-and-oversight-power-of-congress
    34. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1021&context=ijcd
    35. https://eligovoting.com/perfect-bicameralism-key-to-legislative-power/
    36. http://www.undp-aciac.org/publications/other/undp/legis/chambers.pdf
    37. https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained
    38. https://fiveable.me/key-terms/intro-to-poli-sci/upper-house
    39. https://online.maryville.edu/blog/difference-between-house-and-senate/
    40. https://www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/029_ww_onechamber_0.pdf
    41. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/1600/legislative-branch
    42. https://www.visitthecapitol.gov/sites/default/files/documents/resources-and-activities/CVC_EED_StudentEssay_HouseSenate.pdf
    43. https://sites.google.com/site/thepoliticsteacherorg/congress/the-powers-of-the-house-and-senate-compared
    44. https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/senate-classes.htm
    45. https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/term-lengths.htm
    46. https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/17th-amendment
    47. https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/seventeenth-amendment.htm
    48. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S3-C1-4/ALDE_00013342/
    49. https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/electing-appointing-senators.htm
    50. https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/equal-state-representation.htm
    51. https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Great_Compromise.htm
    52. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S2-1/ALDE_00000847/
    53. https://www.aph.gov.au/senators_and_members
    54. https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/parliament-and-its-people/senate/senate
    55. https://www.canada.ca/en/campaign/independent-advisory-board-for-senate-appointments/about-the-senate.html
    56. https://sencanada.ca/en/about/
    57. https://www.bundesrat.de/EN/organisation-en/stimmenverteilung-en/stimmenverteilung-en-node.html
    58. https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Constitutional_Qualifications_Senators.htm
    59. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S3-C3-1/ALDE_00013345/
    60. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Practice_and_Procedure/Guides_to_Senate_Procedure/No_21
    61. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-3/clause-3/when-senate-qualifications-requirements-must-be-met
    62. https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/eligibility-requirements-to-run-for-the-state-legislature
    63. https://www.ourcommons.ca/marleaumontpetit/DocumentViewer.aspx?Sec=Ch03&Seq=2&Language=E
    64. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S6-C1-3-7/ALDE_00013306/
    65. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-1/21-compensation-and-immunities-of-members.html
    66. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R46257
    67. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/about-the-white-house/our-government/the-legislative-branch/
    68. http://sen.parl.gc.ca/portal/about-senate-e.htm
    69. http://sen.parl.gc.ca/portal/canada-senators-e.htm
    70. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Practice_and_Procedure/Senate_Briefs/Brief01
    71. https://www.britannica.com/place/Brazil/The-legislature
    72. https://www2.camara.leg.br/english/the-federal-senate
    73. https://www.senat.fr/lng/en.html
    74. https://www.senat.fr/europe-et-international/senats-deurope-senats-du-monde/forum-of-the-worlds-senates.html
    75. https://www.senato.it/en/parliamentary-business/election-senate/composition
    76. http://www.senato.it/en/parliamentary-business/parliament
    77. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1300&context=public_law_and_legal_theory
    78. https://www.mpm.edu/research-collections/anthropology/anthropology-collections-research/mediterranean-oil-lamps/roman-empire-brief-history
    79. https://www.worldhistory.org/Carthaginian_Government/
    80. https://sebastianpanatt.substack.com/p/carthaginian-politics
    81. https://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/unicameral-and-bicameral-state-legislatures
    82. https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/number-of-legislators-and-length-of-terms-in-years
    83. https://data.ipu.org/parliament/GA/GA-UC01/
    84. https://www.worldatlas.com/ancient-world/the-demise-of-the-roman-senate.html
    85. https://www.thecollector.com/what-was-venice-political-system/
    86. https://www.britannica.com/place/Russian-Empire
    87. https://historyguild.org/the-ottoman-empire/
    88. https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Creating_a_new_Senate.htm
    89. https://guides.loc.gov/brazil-us-relations/empire-of-brazil
    90. https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/bicameralism-primer.pdf
    91. https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2643&context=lawreview
    92. https://www.aph.gov.au/binaries/senate/pubs/pops/pop40/stone.pdf
    93. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/going-nowhere-a-gridlocked-congress/
    94. https://ndlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/NDL508.pdf
    95. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/filibuster-explained
    96. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/impact-filibuster-federal-policymaking/
    97. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/08/senate-record-breaking-gridlocktrump-303811
    98. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1532673X231173403
    99. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/dynamics-of-legislative-gridlock-194796/ED0A880C049DB34F2BDFA9162A72011C
    100. https://ndlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/NDL507_Roberts1.pdf
    101. https://academic.oup.com/book/56347/chapter/445755998
    102. https://www.promarket.org/2024/06/26/is-a-gridlocked-congress-causing-more-polarization/
    103. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014292109000622
    104. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/6642/1/Government_Corruption_and_Legislative_Procedures_is_One_Chamber_Better_Than_Two.pdf
    105. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5099233_Legislature_Size_Bicameralism_and_Government_SpendingEvidence_from_Democratic_Countries
    106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/440340
    107. https://gparames.sites.haverford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Parameswaran-Bicameralism.pdf
    108. https://blog-iacl-aidc.org/workshop-my-paper/2021/05/011-moderated-parliamentarism-effective-governments-and-legislative-gridlock-j6cxw
    109. https://isps.yale.edu/news/blog/2025/08/study-shows-80-of-passed-laws-supported-by-majority-of-americans-but-congress
    110. http://www.columbia.edu/~gjw10/cutrone_mccarty.bicameralism.pdf
    111. https://academic.oup.com/jleo/article/29/5/957/976821
    112. https://fiveable.me/ancient-rome/unit-3/roman-senate/study-guide/9LFBs98vbKza4dBz
    113. https://www.historians.org/resource/historical-perspectives-on-congressional-reform/
    114. https://bipartisanpolicy.org/download/?file=/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/History-of-Congressional-Reform.pdf
    115. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-senators-need-to-know-about-filibuster-reform/
    116. https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/filibusters-cloture/overview.htm
    117. https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5566292-senate-republicans-filibuster-reform/
    118. https://www.independent.org/article/2025/10/23/will-filibuster-become-casualty-shutdown/
    119. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/chuck-schumer-outlines-2025-agenda-democrats-sweep-eying-filibuster-ch-rcna167433
    120. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/filibuster-reform-short-guide
    121. https://www.brookings.edu/events/debating-the-future-of-the-filibuster/
    122. https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/fact-sheet/house-reconciliation-bill-immigration-border-security/
    123. https://publications.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/BP/bp316-e.htm
    124. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00323187.2018.1561153
    125. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-35838653
    126. https://global.upenn.edu/penn-washington/fixing-congress/
    127. https://www.senate.gov/history/partydiv.htm
    128. https://www.politico.com/newsletters/inside-congress
    129. https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2025/10/senate-votes-to-repeal-middle-east-war-laws-00601398
    130. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/03/31/many-in-us-western-europe-say-their-political-system-needs-major-reform/
    131. https://www.csis.org/blogs/new-perspectives-asia/thailands-revolving-senate-how-constant-changes-cement-military-power
    Add your contribution
    Related Hubs
    Contribute something
    User Avatar
    No comments yet.