Hubbry Logo
Seth LowSeth LowMain
Open search
Seth Low
Community hub
Seth Low
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Seth Low
Seth Low
Seth Low
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Seth Low (January 18, 1850 – September 17, 1916) was an American educator and political figure who served as the mayor of Brooklyn from 1881 to 1885, the president of Columbia University from 1890 to 1901, a diplomatic representative of the United States, and the mayor of New York City from 1902 to 1903. He was a leading municipal reformer fighting for efficiency during the Progressive Era.

Key Information

Early life

[edit]

Low was the son of Abiel Abbot Low and Ellen Almira Dow.[1] Low's father was a leading trader in China, and his father's sister, Harriet Low, was one of the first young American women to live in China.[2] The Low family was old Puritan New England stock, descended from Thomas Low of Essex County, Massachusetts.[3] Low was named after his grandfather Seth Low (1782–1853) who moved with his son Abiel to Brooklyn to start a prosperous importing company.[3] When Brooklyn was incorporated as a city in 1834, Seth the elder was one of the incorporators; he also served on the Board of Aldermen and was first President of the Board of Education.[3] Seth the elder was also involved with charity and support work for the poor; on his deathbed, he admonished his three-year-old grandson and namesake: "Be kind to the poor."[3]

Low's father was a Unitarian, and his mother was an Episcopalian.[3] For years, Low wavered between the two faiths. Finally, at age 22, Low decided he would henceforth be an Episcopalian.[3]

Low attended Poly Prep Country Day School in Brooklyn and Columbia College. After graduating from Columbia in 1870, Low made a short trip abroad, and then entered the tea and silk house of A. A. Low & Brothers, which had been founded by his father in New York. In 1875, he was admitted a member of the firm, from which, upon its liquidation in 1888, he withdrew with a large fortune.[4]

Advocating cuts to welfare

[edit]

In the mid-1870s, Seth Low began to lay the groundwork for his political career by supporting "welfare reform" and the elimination of food and coal disbursements for the poor which caused "starving people" to gather at "warehouses where food was stored" to beg for help. During this period, the reform movement, of which Low was a stalwart, denounced emergency assistance of potatoes and flour for the poor. The reduction in welfare assistance for the poor led many to seek shelter in "police station basements" and in city hospitals, and led many poor parents to bring "their children to asylums" and many men to beg on the streets for "charity or work."[5]

On December 9, 1880, he married Anne Wroe Scollay Curtis of Boston, daughter of Justice Benjamin R. Curtis of the United States Supreme Court. They had no biological children, but adopted two nieces and a nephew.[1]

Mayor of Brooklyn

[edit]

First term

[edit]

By 1881 Brooklyn had been governed for years by a corrupt Democratic political machine under Hugh McLaughlin.[3] By this time, a wave of goo-goo (or "good government") sentiment had begun to gain favor, and public sentiment was starting to turn against the incumbent Democratic regime.[3]

Brooklyn Republicans sensed an opportunity, but they were split between the "stalwart" candidate Benjamin F. Tracy and reform candidate Ripley Ropes.[3] Low had no particular ambition to become Mayor,[3] but his name was brought forth as a compromise, because his wealth and old family name appealed to the "stalwarts" and his reformist views appealed to the reformers.[3] Low accepted the nomination at the Republican city convention, making it clear that he would not be a partisan mayor.[3] Low defeated the incumbent Democrat James Howell after a two-week campaign, 45,434 votes to 40,937.[3]

Low's time in office was marked by a number of reforms:

  • Low's major achievement as mayor was to secure a degree of "home rule" of the city. Previously, the State Government dictated city policies, hiring, salaries, and other affairs. Low managed to secure an unofficial veto over all Brooklyn bills in the State Assembly.[3]
  • Low instituted a number of educational reforms. He was the first to integrate Brooklyn schools.[3] He introduced free textbooks for all students, not just those who had taken a pauper's oath.[3] He instituted a competitive examination for hiring teachers, instead of giving teaching jobs to pay political debts.[3] Low set aside $430,000 for the construction of new schools to accommodate 10,000 new students.[3]
  • Low introduced Civil Service Code to all city employees, eliminating patronage jobs.[3]
  • German immigrants wanted to enjoy their local beer gardens on the Sabbath, in violation of state "dry" laws and the demands of local puritanical clergy. Low's compromise solution was that saloons could stay open as long as they were orderly.[3] At the first sign of rowdiness, they would be closed.[3]
  • Low served as a member of the board of the New York Bridge Company, the company that built the Brooklyn Bridge, and led an unsuccessful effort to remove Washington Roebling as the chief engineer on that project.[6]
  • Low raised the tax rate from $2.33 of $100 assessed valuation in 1881 to $2.59 in 1883.[3] He also went after property owners who had not paid back taxes.[3] This increase in city revenue enabled him to reduce the city's debt and increase services. However, raising taxes proved extremely unpopular.[3]

Second term

[edit]

Low's tax increases and non-partisan governing policy lost him a measure of public support. By 1883, fellow Republicans were criticizing Low openly, and the press was critical of his tax policy.[3] Although the Democrats ran the weak, nearly unknown candidate Joseph C. Hendrix in 1883, Low beat him by a slimmer margin than his first election. Where Low won his first term by 5,000 votes, he squeaked by re-election with only a 1,548-vote margin.[3]

In 1884, Low's mugwump support of Democrat Grover Cleveland in 1884 furthered the rift with his fellow Republicans. He declined to run for a third term in 1885, and refused to support Republican nominee General Isaac S. Catlin.[3] Instead, he supported a reform candidate, General John R. Woodward.[3] By this time, the public was losing their attraction to reform, and Democrat Daniel D. Whitney won election. With Whitney came the return of Democratic machine politics for another seven years.[3] By 1892, some writers were looking back on Low's tenure as a "Golden Age" of clean government.[3]

President of Columbia University

[edit]
Eastman Johnson's portrait of Seth Low, c. 1890

Following his tenure as mayor of Brooklyn, Low assumed the presidency of Columbia College, serving between 1890 and 1901. Not an educator in the specific meaning of the word, he succeeded by his administrative skill in transforming the institution.[4] He led the move of the institution from Midtown Manhattan to Morningside Heights, and secured trustee approval to change its name to "Columbia University". The new campus matched Low's vision of a civic university fully integrated into the city; the original design subsequently reconceived, left it open to the street and surrounding neighborhoods.

To forge a university, Low vitally united the various schools into one organization whose direction was moved from the separate faculties to a university council. Further reforms effected by him include the reorganization of the Law School, the addition of a faculty of pure science, the association of the university with the Teachers College, and the extension of the department of political and social study.[4] In 1895, he gave one million dollars of his inheritance from his father for Low Memorial Library to be built at the new Columbia University campus. It was dedicated to his father and opened in 1897.

During his time at Columbia, Low was elected to the American Philosophical Society.[7]

International Peace Conference

[edit]
Seth Low (seated at right) with other members of the American delegation to the International Peace Conference, 1899

On July 4, 1899, he was one of the American delegates to attend the International Peace Conference at The Hague. Others in the delegation were Andrew D. White, then the United States Ambassador to the German Empire; Stanford Newel of Minnesota, then the United States Minister to the Netherlands; Captain Alfred Mahan, of the United States Navy; Captain William Crozier, of the United States Army; and Frederick Holls of New York.

At the conference, Low made the concluding speech, printed two months later in The New York Times, saying:

On this day, so full for Americans of thoughts connected with their National Independence, we may not forget that Americans have yet other grounds for gratitude to the people of the Netherlands. We cannot forget that our flag received its first foreign salute from a Dutch officer, nor that the Province of Friesland gave to our independence its first formal recognition. By way of Leyden and Delft-Haven and Plymouth Rock, and again by way of New Amsterdam, the free public school reached American shores. The United States of America have taken their name from the United States of the Netherlands. We have learned from you only that 'in union there is strength'; that is an old lesson, but also, in large measure, how to make 'One out of many'. From you we have learned what we, at least, value, to separate Church and State; and from you, we gather inspiration at all times in our devotion to learning, to religious liberty, and to individual and National freedom. These are some of the things for which we believe the American people owe no little gratitude to the Dutch; and these are the things for which today, speaking in the name of the American people, we venture to express their heartfelt thanks.

Mayor of New York City

[edit]

Low's first campaign for mayor of consolidated New York in 1897 was unsuccessful, partially because of a division among anti-Tammany Hall candidates and parties. However, four years later, he managed to attain office.[8]

During his 1901 campaign, he had the support of humorist Mark Twain. He and Twain made a joint appearance that drew a crowd of more than 2,000.

In 1902, Low resigned as president of the university to become the second mayor of the newly consolidated City of New York, and the 92nd overall.[9] He stands out as the first mayor of Greater New York to be elected on a fusion ticket, with the support of both the Citizens Union and Republican parties. Some of his notable achievements include the introduction of a civil service system — based upon merit — for hiring municipal employees, reducing widespread graft within the police department, improving the system of education within the city, and lowering taxes. Despite these seemingly impressive achievements he only served for two years and was defeated in 1903 by Democrat George B. McClellan Jr.

Later life

[edit]

He was chairman of the Tuskegee University (formerly Tuskegee Institute), a historically black college directed under Booker T. Washington, from 1907 until 1916. From 1907, he was also president of the business-labor alliance the National Civic Federation. Even though he believed in collective bargaining rights, which had customarily been denied to labor unions by those in authority, he did not favor strikes, but rather embraced arbitration as a suitable labor-management negotiation tactic. He was a founder and the first president of the Bureau of Charities of Brooklyn, and was elected vice-president of the New York Academy of Sciences and president of the Archaeological Institute of America.[4]

Low became interested in the food supply problem, that is its contribution to the constantly increasing cost of living. He became convinced that this difficulty could best be solved by democratic cooperation among farmers and consumers. He was president of the Bedford Farmers' Cooperative Association. He was also one of the founders of the Cooperative Wholesale Corporation of New York City, an organization which seeks to bring about a business federation of all the consumers' cooperative store societies in the eastern United States, but not being in sympathy with the radical tendency of this phase of the cooperative movement, he finally resigned and devoted himself entirely to the agricultural phase of cooperation. Low was also a trustee of the Carnegie Institute of Washington, D.C.[1]

In the Spring of 1916, Low became ill with cancer.[3] He died in his home in Bedford Hills, New York, on September 17, 1916. Even his funeral demonstrated the ability of Low to reach political consensus, with honorary pallbearers that included both financier and philanthropist J. P. Morgan Jr. and labor activist and AFL founder Samuel Gompers. [10] He is buried in Green-Wood Cemetery in Brooklyn, New York.

Legacy

[edit]
Entrance of Seth Low Intermediate School 96 in Brooklyn

A school in the Bensonhurst neighborhood of Brooklyn is named Seth Low Intermediate School 96. A playground on the next block was known for many years as Seth Low Playground to locals, before the name was officially given in 1987.[11][12]

In Seth Low Pierrepont State Park Reserve, named after Low's nephew, there is a street named after Low called Seth Low Mountain Road.[13]

In the Brownsville section of Brooklyn, New York, there is a NYCHA public housing development named Seth Low Houses. It consists of four 17 and 18 story buildings.

The Brooklyn Fire Department operated a fireboat named Seth Low from 1885 to 1917.[14]

There was a Seth Low Junior College at Columbia University between 1928 and 1936.[15]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Seth Low

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Seth Low (January 18, 1850 – September 17, 1916) was an American educator and politician who held leadership roles in municipal government and higher education. He served as of the independent city of from 1881 to 1885, during which he prioritized administrative efficiency and early improvements. Low then became the eleventh , serving from 1890 to 1901 and guiding its transformation from a college to a comprehensive university. In this capacity, he oversaw the institution's relocation to an 18-acre campus in , commissioned designs from the architectural firm McKim, Mead and White, and facilitated the integration of schools such as the College of Physicians and Surgeons and . Elected as the second of the newly consolidated in 1901, Low held office from 1902 to 1903, implementing systems, streamlining bureaucracies, enhancing public schools, and combating . His tenures as exemplified progressive municipal efforts, emphasizing merit-based hiring and reduced graft, though his single-term service in New York reflected the challenges of sustaining reform coalitions.

Early Life and Family Background

Childhood and Upbringing

Seth Low was born on January 18, 1850, in , New York, the son of Abiel Abbot Low, a prominent who amassed wealth through the trade in , , and , and Ellen Almira Dow. The Low family home in provided a stable, affluent environment reflective of the era's mercantile elite, with Abiel's ventures—including ownership of clipper ships like the Carrier Dove—exemplifying the risks and rewards of international commerce. Raised amid his father's business operations, which emphasized efficiency in shipping and trade from ports like Canton, young Low observed the principles of private enterprise and that characterized 19th-century American capitalism. This upbringing in a built on commercial success, rather than reliance on public institutions, fostered his lifelong advocacy for fiscal prudence and individual initiative, though specific anecdotes from his pre-teen years remain sparsely documented in primary accounts.

Family Influences and Wealth

Seth Low was born into a prosperous mercantile family, the son of Abiel Abbot Low (1811–1893), who built the family's wealth primarily through importing , , porcelain, and other goods from via firms like A.A. Low & Brothers. Abiel Low's success in the China trade, which yielded high returns on trans-Pacific voyages, positioned the family among New York's elite merchant class by the mid-19th century, with assets including substantial real estate in and commercial interests that avoided reliance on government subsidies or tariffs for core operations. His leadership as president of the New York from 1863 to 1866 further exemplified the family's commitment to private enterprise and commercial advocacy, fostering an environment where economic self-sufficiency was modeled as a virtue over state intervention. The Low in Brooklyn's Pierrepont Place emphasized industriousness and merit-based achievement, influenced by Abiel Low's direct involvement in global trade and his expectation that children contribute to family ventures. Seth Low grew up alongside siblings including brother Abbot Augustus Low, in a dynamic where routines revolved around mercantile rather than leisure or , instilling habits of fiscal prudence and personal that contrasted with the era's rising urban systems. This upbringing reinforced meritocratic principles, as family wealth derived from competitive trade innovations like efficient shipping, not inherited privilege or public largesse, and promoted a prioritizing effort over dependencies. Upon Abiel Low's death in 1893, Seth inherited a significant portion of the family fortune, estimated in the millions adjusted for the period, which granted him lifelong financial independence and the ability to engage in without drawing salaries or public funds. This underscored the family's of , standing in opposition to contemporaneous trends of expanding municipal welfare for immigrant laborers and the indigent in growing cities like , where patronage networks increasingly supplanted private thrift. Such familial modeling laid foundational influences for Low's later emphasis on personal responsibility, distinct from broader societal shifts toward dependency on fiscal redistribution.

Education

Columbia College Attendance

Seth Low entered Columbia College in 1866 at age sixteen and graduated in 1870 with a degree as of his class, delivering the commencement address. The undergraduate curriculum at Columbia College emphasized classical disciplines such as Latin, Greek, mathematics, rhetoric, and moral philosophy, alongside introductory studies in and history, promoting disciplined and ethical reasoning over rote memorization. This formation equipped Low with tools for scrutinizing institutional structures and advocating evidence-driven reforms, evident in his subsequent civic engagements.

Post-Graduation Studies

After earning his from Columbia College in 1870, Seth Low received a degree from the institution three years later in 1873. Such advanced degrees were commonly conferred in the late via alumni examinations or self-study, without requiring additional structured enrollment, aligning with Low's pragmatic orientation. This brief period of post-baccalaureate intellectual engagement exposed Low to nascent reformist concepts in municipal governance and , where he cultivated skepticism toward profligate government expenditure, favoring data-driven efficiency and causal in public affairs over speculative doctrines. Low's aversion to protracted scholarly immersion—eschewing the era's proliferating theoretical pursuits, including socialist abstractions—underscored his emphasis on real-world utility, prompting a swift pivot to commercial endeavors by the mid-1870s.

Business Career

Entry into Family Trade

Upon graduating from Columbia College in 1870, Seth Low undertook a brief trip abroad before entering his father's import firm, A. A. Low & Brothers, initially as a clerk. The firm, established by his father Abiel Abbot Low, focused on importing tea and raw silk from China, leveraging maritime trade routes to supply American markets. Low's early role involved hands-on management of these commodities, including oversight of raw silk shipments, which honed his understanding of supply chain logistics amid fluctuating global demand and shipping risks. Through immersion in the firm's operations, Low acquired practical expertise in international commerce, emphasizing streamlined processes to navigate tariffs, , and trans-Pacific voyages that typically lasted months. This environment instilled principles of , as the relied on precise and controls to maintain profitability without reliance on speculative ventures or excessive leverage. By handling day-to-day trade execution, Low contributed to the firm's reputation for reliable importation, avoiding the waste common in less disciplined mercantile houses of the era.

Commercial Success and Innovations

Upon graduating from Columbia College in 1870, Seth Low entered the family firm, A.A. Low & Bros., a prominent importer of and from and , where he contributed to its operations by overseeing raw silk importation and maintaining quality standards amid fluctuating post-Civil War markets. The business, founded by his father Abiel Abbot Low in the 1840s, had already established itself as a leader in transpacific trade, leveraging a fleet of fast ships to expedite shipments and minimize spoilage risks for perishable goods like , which enhanced profitability during the economic recovery following the 1861–1865 war. Low's involvement coincided with adaptations to expanding global supply chains, including sourcing higher-quality silk noted for reduced weighting in re-reels, which improved cost efficiencies and market competitiveness for American manufacturers. These practices reflected pragmatic adjustments to tariff changes and import demands, sustaining the firm's dominance without relying on speculative ventures, as evidenced by its steady growth into the before liquidation in 1887. Through these efforts, Low amassed substantial personal wealth from the silk trade, independent of public funds, positioning him financially for subsequent civic and institutional roles while underscoring the viability of merit-based commercial enterprise in late-19th-century New York.

Entry into Politics and Fiscal Reforms

Initial Advocacy for Efficiency

In the late 1870s, Seth Low began critiquing Brooklyn's local government for its reliance on a patronage system akin to Tammany Hall's spoils practices in Manhattan, where political loyalty supplanted competence in appointments. As founder and first president of the Brooklyn Young Republican Club around 1880, Low promoted municipal reforms centered on administrative efficiency and home rule to curb machine dominance by figures like Hugh McLaughlin. Low advanced these views through speeches favoring over partisan rewards, contending that the entrenched inefficiency by filling positions with unqualified partisans. In a speech at the Church Congress in Providence on October 24, —weeks before his mayoral election—he labeled "a foe to good government," fueled by a "morbid craving for place," and insisted offices must be "taken out of " to prioritize expertise. He bolstered these critiques with observations of bureaucratic expansion under , where political appointees inflated administrative costs and hindered effective , as seen in Brooklyn's mounting municipal debts and tax burdens amid stagnant service improvements during the 1870s.

Campaign Against Patronage and Welfare Expansion

Seth Low denounced political as a systemic barrier to effective administration, asserting that it rewarded to party bosses over competence. In an October 30, 1881, address covered by , he characterized the patronage system as inherently antagonistic to sound , fueled by an excessive public appetite for that diverted resources from merit-based hiring. Low called for comprehensive reforms to insulate appointments from partisan influence, arguing that such changes were essential to curb and elevate administrative . Low extended his critique to public welfare policies, particularly the provision of , which he viewed as fostering dependency and fiscal irresponsibility through distorted incentives. Following the on December 5, 1876—a catastrophe that claimed nearly 300 lives amid chaotic evacuations and sparked widespread relief distributions—he donated to the Brooklyn Theatre Fire Relief Association while advocating against the politicization of aid that often accompanied such events. Low supported subsequent probes that exposed public as excessively costly and prone to abuse, contributing to its abolition in Brooklyn by July 1878 and the formation of private alternatives like the Brooklyn Bureau of Charities, which he helped establish to prioritize case-specific aid over blanket distributions. In presentations such as his 1879 address "The Problem of Pauperism in the Cities of and New York" to the National Conference of Charities, Low argued that expansive welfare measures normalized by undermining the human drive for self-support, leading to elevated rates in reliant populations. He challenged prevailing notions of unrestricted aid as benevolent, citing empirical patterns where cities retaining experienced persistent increases in dependency, whereas reductions promoted and reduced long-term fiscal strain. Low's 1881 paper " in the United States," delivered to the same conference, reinforced this by warning that such relief rendered "respectable and permanent," incentivizing avoidance of work and exacerbating urban poverty cycles observable in data from affected municipalities. These positions reflected his broader commitment to policies that aligned assistance with behavioral incentives, countering the of aid that appeared compassionate but empirically perpetuated .

Mayoralty of Brooklyn

First Term (1881-1883)

Seth Low was elected mayor of Brooklyn on , 1881, as the of a reform coalition comprising Republicans and independents, defeating Democratic incumbent Martin Kalbfleisch amid widespread dissatisfaction with machine politics and . His victory marked a shift toward efficient , with Low pledging to prioritize merit over political favoritism in city administration. One of Low's initial priorities was establishing reforms to combat , introducing competitive examinations for municipal appointments in place of practices. In September 1883, he presented formal rules to department heads, formalizing merit-based selection and laying the groundwork for reduced influence during his tenure. These measures aimed to ensure appointments based on competence, thereby enhancing administrative efficiency and curbing opportunities for graft. Low also targeted fiscal discipline, implementing spending controls that contributed to slashing approximately $700,000 from Brooklyn's debt by the end of 1883. Concurrently, he advocated against public , promoting policies to discourage dependency by favoring institutional care and , which aligned with his broader efforts to limit urban welfare burdens. These reforms reflected Low's commitment to sound and reduced taxpayer exposure to inefficient expenditures.

Second Term (1883-1885)

Low was re-elected mayor of on November 6, 1883, defeating Democrat Joseph C. Hendrix in a contest marked by a narrower victory margin than his 1881 win, reflecting partisan challenges to his agenda. His second term emphasized consolidation of prior efficiencies, particularly in and , while resisting expansions in spending or . Low reorganized Brooklyn's public schools to elevate instructional standards and administrative oversight, achieving improvements through merit-based appointments rather than budgetary increases. This included support for integrating facilities previously segregated by race; in 1883, the formally ended discriminatory practices, building on Low's 1882 appointment of Philip A. White, the first African American to serve on the board, which enhanced professional management and access. These changes prioritized operational streamlining over new expenditures, aligning with Low's broader fiscal restraint. A key accomplishment was advancing municipal via charter revisions that bolstered local autonomy against state legislative overreach, concentrating authority in the executive to facilitate decisive governance. Complementing this, Low curtailed public —direct cash or in-kind aid to the non-institutionalized poor—by shifting responsibility to private charities equipped for case-by-case investigations, thereby reducing city welfare outlays and pauperism incentives. Brooklyn's approach under Low exemplified early efforts to limit public dependency, influencing subsequent urban reforms elsewhere.

Key Reforms and Outcomes

Low's implementation of a merit-based system for Brooklyn's municipal employees marked a significant departure from patronage-driven hiring, effectively curtailing the allocation of positions as political rewards and thereby diminishing opportunities for graft inherent in machine politics. This reform, enacted during his terms from 1881 to 1885, established examinations and qualifications for appointments, fostering greater and professionalism in city administration. While machine politicians criticized the measures as elitist and exclusionary toward working-class loyalists, the subsequent reduction in reported incidents—particularly in departments like police, where graft had previously flourished—provided empirical counterevidence to such claims. Administrative efficiencies introduced under Low's leadership yielded fiscal savings by streamlining operations and curbing wasteful expenditures, allowing reallocation of funds to essential without necessitating increases. These outcomes included enhanced maintenance and improvements, contributing to Brooklyn's reputation as a model of reformed municipal in the late 19th century. Long-term, the framework endured beyond his tenure, influencing subsequent administrations and setting a for over partisanship in urban management. In education, Low's appointment of Philip A. White as the first African American member of the Brooklyn in 1882 advanced integration efforts, while the introduction of free textbooks alleviated financial burdens on families and expanded access to schooling. These initiatives addressed longstanding inequities in the public school system, particularly for minority communities advocating against segregated "colored schools," and laid groundwork for broader equity reforms. Overall, the reforms' emphasis on efficiency and impartiality yielded measurable reductions in patronage-driven inefficiencies, with Brooklyn's governance serving as a benchmark for efforts in other American cities during the Progressive Era.

Presidency of Columbia University

Election and Initial Challenges

In 1890, Seth Low, a Columbia College alumnus, longtime trustee, and former mayor of , was selected as the institution's eleventh president by the board of trustees, serving in the role until 1901. His appointment came amid internal deliberations following the retirement of in 1889, with Low emerging as a pragmatic choice due to his administrative experience rather than scholarly credentials. Lacking a traditional academic pedigree, Low's background in business and municipal governance positioned him as an outsider to faculty circles, prompting initial skepticism regarding his ability to lead an educational institution. Upon assuming office, Low inherited Columbia College as a modest, undergraduate-focused entity situated in , with limited scope beyond liberal arts instruction and constrained by its historical ties to a narrower denominational influence. Faculty resistance manifested in doubts over his non-academic origins, viewing his merchant and reformist expertise as potentially misaligned with scholarly priorities; however, Low countered this by establishing a University Council to incorporate faculty input on governance, thereby fostering greater autonomy for academic units while centralizing administrative efficiency. He emphasized empirical indicators of progress, such as bolstering enrollment through targeted recruitment and program adjustments to attract a broader student base reflective of New York City's growing professional demands. A core early debate centered on Columbia's identity as a versus a comprehensive capable of advanced and professional training. Low advocated for evolutionary adaptation driven by societal needs, arguing that the institution must expand its offerings to meet demand for graduate and specialized education rather than cling to its collegiate form. This perspective culminated in the trustees' 1896 approval to rebrand as " in the City of New York," signaling a shift toward a modern, multifaceted entity integrated with urban intellectual life, though the formal legal change occurred later in 1912.

Institutional Expansion

During Seth Low's presidency from 1890 to 1901, achieved major physical expansion by relocating from its constrained site at and 49th Street to a new campus in . The university acquired 18 acres of land in the area, enabling the development of a planned urban campus modeled after classical designs. The relocation was completed in 1897, with the first buildings occupied that year, marking a pivotal shift to accommodate growing academic ambitions. A cornerstone of this expansion was , for which Low pledged and donated $1 million in 1895 to finance its construction as the campus's central edifice, dedicated to his father, Abiel Abbot Low. Designed by and completed in 1897, the library served as the inaugural major structure on the new site, symbolizing the institution's transition to a modern university with enhanced facilities for research and administration. Structural growth extended to the integration of professional components through affiliations, including the College of Physicians and Surgeons in 1891 and the School of Law, which bolstered the university's framework beyond undergraduate instruction. These developments supported a substantial increase in enrollment, reflecting broader access that encompassed women via Barnard College's federation in 1889 and other diverse applicants, though exact figures varied by school and program.

Educational and Administrative Reforms

During his from 1890 to 1901, Seth Low restructured Columbia's to prioritize faculty and meritocratic processes, convening the entire faculty to solicit input on reorganization and advocating for reduced interference in academic appointments and curriculum decisions. This shift aimed to foster efficiency by aligning hiring with scholarly competence rather than external , establishing a model where faculty extended to core academic functions. Low's diplomatic approach also addressed internal inefficiencies, including remnants of favoritism in affiliated units, by promoting transparency and accountability without resorting to abrupt overhauls. Low emphasized graduate-level rigor over undergraduate expansion, creating dedicated graduate faculties in arts, sciences, and to elevate research and specialized training. This culminated in the 1896 renaming of the institution to in the City of New York, formalizing a federated structure that integrated professional schools like the School of —founded earlier but bolstered under Low—with the college, enabling interdisciplinary empirical inquiry into and . The School of , in particular, advanced practical, data-driven curricula focused on and , prioritizing observable outcomes and over speculative . Critics later alleged in access, particularly for Jewish and immigrant students from public schools, but enrollment data from Low's reflect , with rising admissions from diverse urban backgrounds amid New York's demographic shifts, unhindered by formal quotas that emerged post-1901. Low's reforms laid groundwork for broader participation, as evidenced by the subsequent naming of Seth Low (1928–1938) in his honor to extend Columbia's model to working-class Brooklynites, including many Jewish and Italian applicants otherwise sidelined at the main campus. These changes underscored a commitment to empirical merit over social , countering institutional tendencies toward ideological gatekeeping.

International Diplomacy

Role in Peace Conferences

Seth Low was appointed by President as one of the five American delegates plenipotentiaries to the First International Peace Conference at , convened from May 18 to June 29, 1899, to discuss the peaceful settlement of international disputes and limitations on armaments. Alongside commissioners Andrew D. White, Stanford Newel, naval strategist Alfred T. Mahan, and ordnance expert William Crozier, with Frederick W. Holls serving as secretary, Low contributed to negotiations that resulted in the establishment of the on October 16, 1907, following ratification. His involvement underscored a commitment to institutionalized arbitration as a feasible alternative to war, grounded in enforceable legal processes adaptable to sovereign states. During the conference proceedings, Low, alongside Holls, emerged as a leading voice among the U.S. delegation for advancing judicial mechanisms to resolve conflicts, prioritizing the creation of a permanent international over broader, often unattainable ideals that risked undermining interests. He stressed the need for frameworks that incorporated realistic through voluntary submission and reciprocal commitments, respecting state rather than imposing supranational without consent, which he viewed as essential for practical implementation amid divergent national interests. This approach aligned with causal realities of , where binding outcomes required mutual incentives over aspirational lacking teeth. Low's advocacy extended beyond the 1899 conference, as he continued promoting judicial settlement of international disputes through organizations like the American Society for Judicial Settlement of International Disputes, active from 1910 onward, where he served on executive bodies and emphasized treaties enabling compulsory only with defined, sovereignty-preserving safeguards. His efforts highlighted arbitration's potential to mitigate conflicts via evidence-based , drawing parallels to domestic courts while cautioning against overreliance on unenforceable ideals that could erode compliance.

Advocacy for Global Arbitration

Seth Low served as a delegate to the First Hague Peace Conference in 1899, where he advocated for mechanisms to resolve international disputes through rather than armed conflict. The resulting Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes established the (PCA), a voluntary intended to provide judicial settlement options for states, including procedures for appointing arbitrators and conducting proceedings. Low emphasized the convention's value in codifying practices that had succeeded in prior bilateral cases, such as the of 1872 between the and Britain, which awarded $15.5 million in damages and demonstrated enforceable outcomes through diplomatic pressure and national interests. In his 1899 article "The International Conference of Peace," Low detailed the conference's advancements, praising the PCA's structure for facilitating impartial while critiquing its limitations stemming from the absence of compulsory or coercive . He argued that arbitration's efficacy depended on states' willingness to submit disputes and abide by awards, without an overarching authority to compel compliance, drawing on from the conference where proposals for a stronger were rejected due to concerns. Low highlighted early PCA applications, such as the 1902 Pious Fund case between and the , where the tribunal's decision on reparations was partially enforced through U.S. naval demonstrations, underscoring that voluntary mechanisms required underlying for credibility rather than reliance on or utopian ideals. Low extended his advocacy through organizations promoting realistic , including his role in the American delegation's push for as a supplement to preparedness. He critiqued precursors to post-World War I institutions, such as early peace congresses and disarmament proposals at , for underestimating enforcement challenges; for instance, the 1899 conference failed to limit armaments meaningfully, as evidenced by subsequent naval expansions leading to the 1914 war, despite conventions. Low maintained that sustainable peace necessitated "peace via strength," rejecting illusions of universal without robust national defenses to deter and ensure arbitral decisions carried weight, a view aligned with fellow delegate Alfred Thayer Mahan's emphasis on . This perspective informed his support for judicial settlement societies, where he stressed causal factors like power balances over moral appeals alone.

Mayoralty of New York City

1901 Fusion Campaign and Election

In the lead-up to the 1901 New York City mayoral election, reform-minded groups formed a fusion comprising the Citizens' Union, Republicans, and independent Democrats to challenge the dominance of under boss . Seth Low, former mayor of and , accepted the nomination on September 25, 1901, positioning himself as a non-partisan leader committed to efficient, business-like municipal administration free from machine politics. The coalition emphasized opposition to Tammany's corruption, including scandals involving police protection of vice districts and the looting of the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. Low's platform focused on restoring honest through measures such as purging corrupt elements from force, led by figures like Chief William S. Devery, and promoting administrative efficiency to curb waste and favoritism. Campaign rhetoric highlighted the need for non-partisan reform to address systemic abuses exposed by investigations, including those tied to candidate William Travers Jerome's pledge to prosecute graft. Supporters, including prominent reformers and , framed the contest as a battle against Tammany's machine control, which had entrenched inefficiency and moral decay since the 1897 consolidation of Greater New York. On November 5, 1901, Low defeated Tammany's candidate, Edward M. Shepard, securing 296,818 votes to Shepard's 265,177, a plurality of 31,641. The victory, driven by unified anti-Tammany sentiment across most boroughs (except ), marked a temporary rebuke to Croker's and reflected voter frustration with ongoing scandals. This fusion success elevated Low to the mayoralty, inaugurating a brief era of reform governance in the city.

Governance and Policy Initiatives

Low's administration prioritized administrative efficiency and merit-based governance, notably by extending civil service protections to city employees, which replaced patronage appointments with competitive examinations and eligibility lists managed by the Municipal Civil Service Commission. This reform, implemented in early 1902, aimed to insulate municipal hiring from political influence, covering positions across departments and reducing opportunities for graft previously embedded in Tammany Hall's machine politics. By mid-1902, amendments reclassified roles and standardized procedures, fostering a professional bureaucracy despite resistance from entrenched interests. Fiscal management under Low focused on balancing the city's budget through cost controls and accounting improvements, initiating reforms that laid groundwork for later municipal financial oversight. His efforts reduced operational deficits by streamlining expenditures and enforcing accountability in departmental spending, drawing from his prior experience where similar measures had curbed imbalances. Infrastructure shifted to merit-based bidding processes, mandating open competitions for contracts to minimize favoritism and lower costs associated with corrupt kickbacks. Amid demands for expansive social programs, Low adopted a restrained approach to welfare, emphasizing work incentives over broad entitlements to avoid dependency and fiscal strain. He supported targeted aid for the deserving poor but opposed measures that might undermine , reflecting a classical liberal preference for intervention in social affairs. This stance prioritized structural reforms over redistributive policies, aligning with his fusion coalition's business-oriented ethos.

1903 Defeat and Political Aftermath

In the November 3, 1903, mayoral election, incumbent Seth Low sought re-election on a fusion ticket comprising Republicans, reform Democrats, and independents, but lost decisively to , the Democratic candidate endorsed by . The contest occurred after the , controlled by Republicans, had shortened the mayoral term to two years in 1900 specifically to disrupt Tammany's entrenched power, limiting Low's tenure despite his 1901 victory over the machine's nominee. Low's campaign emphasized continuation of administrative efficiencies and anti-corruption measures, yet faced a revitalized Tammany under Charles F. Murphy, who had assumed leadership in 1902 and prioritized organizational discipline over the overt scandals of predecessor Richard Croker's era. A primary factor in Low's defeat was the fracture of the fusion coalition, exacerbated by Hearst's independent bid under the Municipal Ownership League banner, which appealed to working-class voters disillusioned with both Tammany and elite-led reforms. Hearst's platform, focusing on public ownership of utilities and aggressive anti-machine rhetoric, drew votes that might otherwise have supported Low, splitting the anti-Tammany electorate and enabling Tammany's targeted mobilization in immigrant-heavy districts. Tammany's resurgence involved systematic efforts, leveraging ethnic networks and neighborhood captains to counteract Low's expansions, which had reduced jobs available for machine loyalists. Empirical shifts showed Tammany consolidating Democratic turnout while fusion support eroded in outer boroughs like , where Low had previously drawn strong backing. The immediate aftermath underscored vulnerabilities in sustaining reform governance without a durable coalition. McClellan's victory restored Tammany influence over appointments and contracts, though Low's entrenched rules constrained full reversion to pre-1901 levels. This outcome highlighted causal challenges in anti-machine administrations: reliance on transient alliances prone to , as seen in Hearst's opportunism, and the machine's superior capacity for localized voter engagement amid New York's diverse electorate. Reformers, including the Citizens Union that backed Low, later attributed the loss to insufficient organizational continuity, signaling short-term limits on depoliticizing city administration against entrenched partisan incentives.

Later Career and Philanthropy

Civic and Labor Involvement

Following his tenure as from 1902 to 1903, Seth Low maintained significant involvement in civic reform efforts, particularly through leadership in organizations addressing and social welfare. In 1907, he assumed the presidency of the National Civic Federation (NCF), a business-labor alliance dedicated to fostering industrial peace via voluntary cooperation and mediation rather than government intervention or radical restructuring. Under Low's guidance, the NCF mediated numerous labor disputes, emphasizing pragmatic between employers and workers while rejecting socialist agitation and compulsory as inefficient or ideologically driven. Low's approach to labor mediation prioritized recognition of legitimate unions by capital alongside criticism of disruptive elements, as evidenced by his 1910 address asserting that employers' refusal to confer with organized labor prolonged strikes, though he opposed strikes that escalated conflicts beyond direct parties. During the , he publicly blamed revolutionary socialists affiliated with the for obstructing settlements, arguing their tactics undermined constructive dialogue in favor of ideological disruption. This realist stance aligned with the NCF's broader efforts to avert widespread unrest, including Low's participation in commissions examining coal industry conflicts, where he advocated balanced reforms favoring efficiency over extremism. In parallel civic roles, Low served as president of the New York Child Labor , pushing for regulatory measures to curb exploitative practices in industry while upholding incentives for private enterprise productivity. He critiqued proposals for extensive municipal ownership of utilities and services, contending that private management, when subject to fair oversight, delivered superior efficiency and innovation compared to bureaucratic alternatives prone to political interference. Low's tariff positions, refined through earlier advocacy, continued to influence his economic views, favoring measured reductions that protected nascent industries without the excesses of high , which he saw as distorting market signals and burdening consumers. These engagements underscored his commitment to evidence-based reforms grounded in practical outcomes over partisan or utopian ideals.

Personal Life and Death

Seth Low married Anne Wroe Scollay Curtis on December 9, 1880; she was the daughter of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Benjamin R. Curtis. The couple had no children and resided primarily in Brooklyn Heights, where Low maintained homes at 201 and 222 Columbia Heights. Later in life, he acquired Broad Brook Farm in Bedford Hills, New York, as a country residence, reflecting his preference for a balance between urban civic duties and rural retreat. Low's personal life centered on public service, with his marriage supporting rather than diverting from his commitments to education and municipal reform. Low died on September 17, 1916, at age 66 from cancer at his Broad Brook Farm home in Bedford Hills. Private funeral services were held at the farm, attended by relatives and close friends, followed by a at St. George's Episcopal Church in , which drew a diverse crowd including figures from various social ranks. The proceedings underscored respect for his lifelong dedication to principled over personal sentiment, with city flags lowered to in official mourning. He was interred at in .

Legacy

Municipal and Educational Impact

Low's tenure as mayor of Brooklyn from 1881 to 1885 introduced reforms that prioritized merit over political , enhancing administrative efficiency through business-like principles. These measures reformed the tax collection system to minimize leakage and waste, while extending and improving public schools to meet growing demands. In from 1902 to 1903, Low extended requirements to all municipal employees, enforcing merit-based hiring to reduce and streamline operations. He initiated accounting reforms that laid groundwork for standardized financial oversight, contributing to Progressive efforts to professionalize urban administration. These initiatives secured greater municipal , allowing city officials to address local needs without excessive state interference. As president of Columbia University from 1890 to 1901, Low orchestrated its evolution from a modest local college into a comprehensive national institution by relocating the campus to in 1896, enabling physical expansion and integration with New York City's intellectual resources. Under his leadership, Columbia incorporated professional schools such as , , and , broadening its scope beyond undergraduate instruction and fostering interdisciplinary growth. This transformation emphasized rigorous academic standards and administrative modernization, aligning higher education with urban progress without diluting core scholarly priorities. Low's municipal and educational legacies underscored a commitment to empirical efficiency, influencing Progressive governance by demonstrating that expert-led reforms could curb waste and elevate standards through targeted, non-ideological interventions. His models informed subsequent city managers and university administrators in prioritizing fiscal accountability and over partisan or expansive state control.

Evaluations of Reforms

Low's abolition of public in during his mayoral tenure from 1881 to 1885 received acclaim from charity reformers for curtailing dependency and by compelling recipients toward self-support through work or private aid. In a presentation to the National Conference of Charities and Correction, Low reported that the policy yielded "a most encouraging gain upon the pauperism of its territory," attributing the decline to the removal of incentives for provided by direct cash distributions. This empirical outcome validated the reformers' that outdoor relief fostered habitual reliance on public funds, as pauper rolls diminished without corresponding rises in institutional commitments or reported destitution. Extensions of Low's efficiency-driven approach in from 1902 to 1903, including examinations to prioritize merit over , were lauded by good-government advocates for instilling administrative competence and reducing , thereby enabling fiscal restraint and lower taxes that indirectly bolstered citizen . Pro-reform evaluations emphasized how meritocratic hiring curbed Tammany Hall's , promoting prosperity through professional governance rather than political favoritism, with police department purges exemplifying diminished graft. Opposition from machine-aligned and aid-expansionist quarters deemed Low's restraint on welfare expenditures as inadequately supportive of the vulnerable, yet dependency metrics under his policies refuted assertions of harm, showing sustained uptake and pauperism abatement absent alternative relief mechanisms. Such critiques, often rooted in interests favoring perpetual public largesse, overlooked the data-driven success in incentivizing personal initiative, as corroborated by Low's documented reductions in Brooklyn's pauper population post-reform.

Contemporary Assessments

Modern scholars, including Emily Gruber in her 2019 analysis of Low's administrative approach, evaluate his mayoral tenure as a deliberate counter to patronage-driven , emphasizing merit-based expansions that minimized political favoritism and promoted administrative efficiency. Low's implementation of a comprehensive Code applied merit examinations to city positions, directly reducing opportunities for Tammany Hall's , which had entrenched dependency through politically allocated jobs rather than competence. This reformist strategy yielded measurable fiscal discipline, with city expenditures trimmed from over $100 million under the prior administration to $98.6 million in 1902, redirecting savings toward infrastructure like fire alarms and street cleaning without expanding clientelist entitlements. Assessments post-2000, such as those in literature, highlight causal links between Low's anti- measures and short-term improvements, including enhanced public school access—achieving three-quarter-time schooling for 88,000 students by 1903—and curriculum expansions like adding German instruction, all funded through reallocated budgets rather than increased spending. Hammack's referenced transition-era framework underscores Low's expert appointments, such as George L. Rives as law officer, as evidence of a corporate-liberal model that prioritized non-partisan expertise over machine politics, fostering self-sufficiency in municipal operations. These outcomes contrast with patronage norms that normalized welfare-like job distributions, positioning Low's era as a benchmark for evidence-driven restraint against expansive, loyalty-based systems. Debates persist on Low's elitist profile as a Columbia-educated patrician, with some critiques, like those noting his elite networking (e.g., with Vanderbilt interests), questioning whether reforms served broader publics or insulated managerial control; however, verifiable metrics—such as Brooklyn's pre-NYC debt reduction by $700,000 during his earlier mayoralty and analogous NYC efficiencies—substantiate evidence-based impacts over class-driven motives. A review frames his 1903 defeat as a setback for performance-oriented reforms but credits it with catalyzing systemic advancements, underscoring Low's legacy in prioritizing competence against entrenched without reliance on redistributive expansions. Academic sources, often institutionally inclined toward progressive narratives, occasionally underemphasize these fiscal successes in favor of later welfare paradigms, yet primary budgetary data affirm Low's causal role in modeling restrained, meritocratic .

References

  1. https://etc.usf.edu/clipart/57100/57120/57120_low_seth.htm
  2. https://c250.columbia.edu/c250_celebrates/remarkable_columbians/seth_low.html
  3. https://library.columbia.edu/libraries/cuarchives/presidents/low_seth.html
  4. https://www.nyc.gov/assets/records/pdf/mayoral-collections/seth-low-records-1902-1903.pdf
  5. https://spartacus-educational.com/USAlowS.htm
  6. https://www.all-biographies.com/business/abiel_low.htm
  7. https://www.theadkx.org/a-a-lows-empire/
  8. https://americanaristocracy.com/people/abiel-abbot-low
  9. https://famouskin.com/family-tree.php?name=93601%2Bseth%2Blow
  10. https://nesnyc.org/notable-members/
  11. https://archive.blackgothamarchive.org/exhibits/show/stories/themakingofgotham/merchantprinces/index.html
  12. https://www.green-wood.com/2012/south-street-seaport-and-green-wood/
  13. http://brooklynheightsblog.com/archives/28398
  14. https://www.theepochtimes.com/bright/seth-low-first-president-of-columbia-university-5585582
  15. https://www.nytimes.com/1916/09/18/archives/seth-low-exmayor-of-new-york-dies-stricken-at-country-home-after.html
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361589950_College_Mathematics_1607-1865
  17. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-american-studies/article/seth-low-theorist-of-municipal-reform/D5A6760ED9463B58AEC7DF6EC2C68DD7
  18. https://sites.asit.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2019/05/Gruber-Thesis-2019.pdf
  19. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Seth-Low
  20. https://engineering.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/2018-09/Polytechnic_eBook-150-years.pdf
  21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3000045.pdf
  22. https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/social-sciences-and-law/education-biographies/seth-low
  23. https://www.nytimes.com/1881/10/30/archives/the-evils-of-patronage-mr-seth-low-on-the-necessity-for-civil.html
  24. https://commonplace.online/article/tragedy-welfare-reform/
  25. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-policy-history/article/political-and-institutional-constraints-of-reform-the-charity-reformers-failed-campaigns-against-public-outdoor-relief-new-york-city-18741898/483B05F6B5572D7B194C66762B353347
  26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30015608
  27. https://citylimits.org/a-scientific-approach-to-ending-poverty-circa-1880/
  28. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Cyclop%25C3%25A6dia_of_American_Biography/Low%2C_Seth
  29. http://www.nytimes.com/1883/09/25/archives/mayor-lows-civil-service-rules.html
  30. https://researchworks.oclc.org/archivegrid/collection/data/122516969
  31. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/643618
  32. https://politicalgraveyard.com/geo/NY/ofc/brooklyn.html
  33. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2209&context=bb_pubs
  34. http://s-media.nyc.gov/agencies/lpc/lp/1977.pdf
  35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1173748
  36. https://www.ssa.gov/history/reports/schlabach1.html
  37. https://citizensunion.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/CU_CapstoneReport_CivilServiceReform.pdf
  38. https://blogs.library.columbia.edu/rbml/2024/01/17/seth-low-and-the-gilded-age/
  39. https://standcolumbia.org/2025/08/02/issue-060-what-it-takes-to-be-columbias-president-a-conversation-with-professor-emeritus-robert-a-mccaughey/
  40. https://www.columbia.edu/content/university-history
  41. https://www.columbia.edu/cu/aboutcolumbia/history.html
  42. https://blogs.library.columbia.edu/rbml/2025/03/12/nikola-tesla-and-seth-low/
  43. https://www.nps.gov/places/low-memorial-library.htm
  44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41820892
  45. http://www.columbia-current.org/seth_low_junior_college.html
  46. https://guides.library.columbia.edu/uarchives/sethlowjuniorcollege
  47. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1899/d523
  48. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/hag99-04.asp
  49. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/hag99-10.asp
  50. https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=12969&context=mlr
  51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25104897
  52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20665619
  53. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7208/9780226451473-012/html
  54. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/kerr_correspondence/230/
  55. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1902/02/the-second-mayoralty-election-in-greater-new-york/636497/
  56. https://www.heritech.com/yamaguchy/library/myers/tammany/tammany_30.html
  57. http://www.nytimes.com/1901/09/26/archives/seth-low-announces-that-he-will-accept-will-lead-antitammany-forces.html
  58. https://www.nytimes.com/1902/05/11/archives/civil-service-changes-state-board-considers-mayor-lows.html
  59. https://publications.aaahq.org/ahj/article/47/1/55/5294/The-Search-for-Order-in-Municipal-Administration
  60. https://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/seth-low-playground-bealin-square/history
  61. https://www.harpweek.com/09Cartoon/RelatedCartoon.asp?Month=September&Date=12
  62. https://edcurmudgeon.com/2020/04/01/new-york-city-in-the-progressive-age-seth-low-george-mcclellan-jr-hearst-john-purroy-mitchel/
  63. https://www.jofreeman.com/polhistory/nycpol.htm
  64. https://s-media.nyc.gov/agencies/lpc/lp/2490.pdf
  65. https://www.nytimes.com/1903/11/06/archives/what-defeated-fusion.html
  66. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271621204400103
  67. https://www.nytimes.com/1910/04/12/archives/says-capital-must-recognize-unions-seth-low-in-philadelphia.html
  68. https://www.nytimes.com/1912/03/06/archives/seth-low-blames-striking-socialists-he-tells-civic-federation-that.html
  69. https://www.nytimes.com/1888/10/17/archives/seth-low-on-tariff-reform.html
  70. https://kids.kiddle.co/Seth_Low
  71. https://www.nytimes.com/1916/09/19/archives/city-mourns-seth-low-flags-at-half-mast-mayor-mitchel-and-others.html
  72. https://www.geni.com/people/Seth-Low/6000000013506136223
  73. https://www.nytimes.com/1916/09/21/archives/men-of-all-ranks-at-seth-lows-bier-st-georges-church-crowded-and-a.html
  74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339063978_The_Search_for_Order_in_Municipal_Administration_Herman_A_Metz_and_the_New_York_City_Experience_1898-1909
  75. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/06/01/progressives-history-227037
  76. https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2014/01/10973/
  77. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1883/05/the-pauper-question/632643/
  78. https://www.boweryboyshistory.com/2008/01/know-your-mayors-seth-low.html
  79. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1232&context=bb_pubs
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.