Hubbry Logo
Cardiopulmonary resuscitationCardiopulmonary resuscitationMain
Open search
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Community hub
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
from Wikipedia

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
CPR being performed on a medical-training mannequin
SpecialtyCardiology, emergency medicine, critical care medicine
ICD-999.60
MeSHD016887
OPS-301 code8-771
MedlinePlus000010

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an emergency procedure used during cardiac or respiratory arrest that involves chest compressions, often combined with artificial ventilation, to preserve brain function and maintain circulation until spontaneous breathing and heartbeat can be restored. It is recommended for those who are unresponsive with no breathing or abnormal breathing, for example, agonal respirations.[1]

CPR involves chest compressions for adults between 5 cm (2.0 in) and 6 cm (2.4 in) deep and at a rate of at least 100 to 120 per minute.[2] The rescuer may also provide artificial ventilation by either exhaling air into the subject's mouth or nose (mouth-to-mouth resuscitation) or using a device that pushes air into the subject's lungs (mechanical ventilation). Current recommendations emphasize early and high-quality chest compressions over artificial ventilation; a simplified CPR method involving only chest compressions is recommended for untrained rescuers.[3] With children, however, 2015 American Heart Association guidelines indicate that doing only compressions may result in worse outcomes, because such problems in children normally arise from respiratory issues rather than from cardiac ones, given their young age.[1] Chest compression to breathing ratios are set at 30 to 2 in adults.

CPR alone is unlikely to restart the heart. Its main purpose is to restore the partial flow of oxygenated blood to the brain and heart. The objective is to delay tissue death and to extend the brief window of opportunity for a successful resuscitation without permanent brain damage. Administration of an electric shock to the subject's heart, termed defibrillation, is usually needed to restore a viable, or "perfusing", heart rhythm. Defibrillation is effective only for certain heart rhythms, namely ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia, rather than asystole or pulseless electrical activity, which usually requires the treatment of underlying conditions to restore cardiac function. Early shock, when appropriate, is recommended. CPR may succeed in inducing a heart rhythm that may be shockable. In general, CPR is continued until the person has a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or is declared dead.[4]

Welsh Government training video of how to perform CPR on a person in cardiac arrest

Medical uses

[edit]

CPR is indicated for any person unresponsive with no breathing or breathing only in occasional agonal gasps, as it is most likely that they are in cardiac arrest.[5]: S643  If a person still has a pulse but is not breathing (respiratory arrest), artificial ventilations may be more appropriate, but due to the difficulty people have in accurately assessing the presence or absence of a pulse, CPR guidelines recommend that lay persons should not be instructed to check the pulse while giving healthcare professionals the option to check a pulse.[6] In those with cardiac arrest due to trauma, CPR is considered futile but still recommended.[7] Correcting the underlying cause such as a tension pneumothorax or pericardial tamponade may help.[7]

Pathophysiology

[edit]

CPR is used on people in cardiac arrest to oxygenate the blood and maintain a cardiac output to keep vital organs alive. Blood circulation and oxygenation are required to transport oxygen to the tissues. The physiology of CPR involves generating a pressure gradient between the arterial and venous vascular beds; CPR achieves this via multiple mechanisms.[8]

The brain may sustain damage after blood flow has been stopped for about four minutes and irreversible damage after about seven minutes.[9][10][11][12][13] Typically if blood flow ceases for one to two hours, then body cells die. Therefore, in general, CPR is effective only if performed within seven minutes of the stoppage of blood flow.[14] The heart also rapidly loses the ability to maintain a normal rhythm. Low body temperatures, as sometimes seen in near-drownings, prolong the time the brain survives.

Following cardiac arrest, effective CPR enables enough oxygen to reach the brain to delay brain stem death and allows the heart to remain responsive to defibrillation attempts.[15] If an incorrect compression rate is used during CPR, going against standing American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines of 100–120 compressions per minute, this can cause a net decrease in venous return of blood, for what is required, to fill the heart.[16] For example, if a compression rate of above 120 compressions per minute is used consistently throughout the entire CPR process, this error could adversely affect survival rates and outcomes for the victim.[16]

Order of CPR in a first aid sequence

[edit]

The best position for CPR maneuvers in the sequence of first aid reactions to a cardiac arrest is a question that has been long studied.[17][18]

As a general reference, the recommended order (according to the guidelines of many related associations such as AHA and Red Cross) is:

  1. Asking for help from bystanders in case any of them have received first aid training or can perform additional tasks.
    • Variation: when the rescuer is alone and no phone is nearby, the rescuer would go first for a phone to call for emergency medical services[17] (only if the rescuer can return in very few minutes to apply CPR maneuvers to the patient, or emergency medical services will be with the patient in a few minutes).
  2. Calling by phone for emergency medical services. Also, go for an automated defibrillator (AED), but only if the AED is available within a few minutes.
  3. Attempting defibrillation with the automated external defibrillator (AED), because it is easy to use if it has been found. If not, or until it has arrived, attempting CPR maneuvers as the latest step of those possible ones.

If there are multiple rescuers, these tasks can be distributed and performed simultaneously to save time.

Exception to the main sequence

[edit]
  • If a rescuer is completely alone with a victim of drowning, or with a child who was already unconscious when the rescuer arrived, the rescuer should:
  1. First perform two minutes of CPR maneuvers.
    • Variation: when the lone rescuer does not have a phone, it is recommended to perform about two minutes of CPR maneuvers, and then go for a phone to call for emergency medical services[17] (only if the rescuer can return in very few minutes to continue the CPR maneuvers, or emergency medical services will be with the patient in a few minutes).
  2. Call by phone for emergency medical services. Also, go for an automated defibrillator (AED), but only if the AED is available within a few minutes.
  3. Attempt defibrillation with the automated external defibrillator (AED), because it is easy to use if it has been found. If not, or until it has arrived, attempt CPR maneuvers as the latest step of those possible ones.

The reason is that CPR ventilation (rescue breaths) is considered the most important action for those victims. Cardiac arrest in drowning victims originates from a lack of oxygen, and a child would probably not suffer from cardiac diseases.[19]

Methods

[edit]
CPR training: CPR is being administered while a second rescuer prepares for defibrillation.

In 2010, the AHA and International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation updated their CPR guidelines.[5]: S640 [20] The importance of high quality CPR (sufficient rate and depth without excessively ventilating) was emphasized.[5]: S640  The order of interventions was changed for all age groups except newborns from airway, breathing, chest compressions (ABC) to chest compressions, airway, breathing (CAB).[5]: S642  An exception to this recommendation is for those believed to be in a respiratory arrest (airway obstruction, drug overdose, etc.).[5]: S642 

The most important aspects of CPR are: few interruptions of chest compressions, sufficient speed and depth of compressions, completely relaxing pressure between compressions, and not ventilating too much.[21] It is unclear if a few minutes of CPR before defibrillation results in different outcomes than immediate defibrillation.[22]

Compressions with rescue breaths

[edit]

A normal CPR procedure uses chest compressions and ventilations (rescue breaths, usually mouth-to-mouth) for any victim of cardiac arrest, who would be unresponsive (usually unconscious or approximately unconscious), not breathing, or only gasping because of the lack of heartbeats.[23] But the ventilations could be omitted[24] for untrained rescuers aiding adults who suffer a cardiac arrest (if it is not an asphyxial cardiac arrest, as by drowning, which needs ventilations).[25] There has been evidence of increased affectiveness of CPR when the time between bouts of 30 compressions is limited.[26]

Chest compressions performed at 100 per minute (proper rhythm)

The patient's head is commonly tilted back (a head-tilt and chin-lift position) for improving the airflow if ventilations can be used. However, when a patient seems to have a possible serious injury in the spinal cord (in the backbone, either at the neck part or the back part), the head must not be moved except if that is completely necessary, and always very carefully, which avoids further damages for the patient's mobility in the future.[27] And, in the case of babies, the head is left straight, looking forward, which is necessary for the ventilations, because of the size of the baby's neck.[28]

Mouth-to-mouth ventilations (mouth-to-mouth rescue breaths)

In CPR, the chest compressions push on the lower half of the sternum —the bone that is along the middle of the chest from the neck to the belly— and leave it to rise up until recovering its normal position. The rescue breaths are made by pinching the victim's nose and blowing air mouth-to-mouth. This fills the lungs, which makes the chest rise up, and increases the pressure into the thoracic cavity. If the victim is a baby, the rescuer would compress the chest with only 2 fingers and would make the ventilations using their own mouth to cover the baby's mouth and nose at the same time. The recommended compression-to-ventilation ratio, for all victims of any age, is 30:2 (a cycle that alternates continually 30 rhythmic chest compressions series and 2 rescue breaths series).[29]: 8  Victims of drowning receive an initial series of 2 rescue breaths before that cycle begins.[30]

As an exception for the normal compression-to-ventilation ratio of 30:2, if at least two trained rescuers are present and the victim is a child, the preferred ratio is 15:2.[31]: 8  Equally, in newborns, the ratio is 30:2 if one rescuer is present, and 15:2 if two rescuers are present (according to the AHA 2015 Guidelines).[5]: S647  In an advanced airway treatment, such as an endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway, the artificial ventilation should occur without pauses in compressions at a rate of 1 breath every 6 to 8 seconds (8–10 ventilations per minute).

In all victims, the compression speed is at least 100 compressions per minute.[32]: 8  Recommended compression depth in adults and children is of 5 cm (2 inches), and in infants it is 4 cm (1.6 inches).[32]: 8  In adults, rescuers should use two hands for the chest compressions (one on top of the other), while in children one hand could be enough (or two, adapting the compressions to the child's constitution), and with babies the rescuer must use only two fingers.[33]

There exist some plastic shields and respirators that can be used in the rescue breaths between the mouths of the rescuer and the victim, with the purposes of sealing a better vacuum and avoiding infections.[34]

In some cases, the problem is one of the failures in the rhythm of the heart (ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia) that can be corrected with the electric shock of a defibrillator. So, if a victim is suffering a cardiac arrest, it is important that someone asks for a defibrillator nearby, to try with it a defibrillation process when the victim is already unconscious. The common model of a defibrillator (the AED) is an automatic portable machine that guides the user with recorded voice instructions along the process, analyzes the victim, and applies the correct shocks if they are needed.

The time in which a cardiopulmonary resuscitation can still work is unclear, and it depends on many factors. Many official guides recommend continuing cardiopulmonary resuscitation until emergency medical services arrive (for trying to keep the patient alive, at least).[27] The same guides also indicate asking for any emergency defibrillator (AED) near, to try an automatic defibrillation as soon as possible before considering that the patient has died.[27]

A normal cardiopulmonary resuscitation has a recommended order named 'CAB': first 'Chest' (chest compressions), followed by 'Airway' (attempt to open the airway by performing a head tilt and a chin lift), and 'Breathing' (rescue breaths).[5]: S642  As of 2010, the Resuscitation Council (UK) was still recommending an 'ABC' order, with the 'C' standing for 'Circulation' (check for a pulse), if the victim is a child.[35] It can be difficult to determine the presence or absence of a pulse, so the pulse check has been removed for common providers and should not be performed for more than 10 seconds by healthcare providers.[25]: 8 

Compression only

[edit]

For untrained rescuers helping adult victims of cardiac arrest, it is recommended to perform compression-only CPR (chest compressions hands-only or cardiocerebral resuscitation, without artificial ventilation), as it is easier to perform and instructions are easier to give over a phone.[24][5]: S643 [5]: S643 [36]: 8 [37] In adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, compression-only CPR by the average person has an equal or higher success rate than standard CPR.[37][38][39]

CPR technique as demonstrated on a dummy

The CPR 'compressions only' procedure consists only of chest compressions that push on the lower half of the bone that is in the middle of the chest (the sternum).

Compression-only CPR is not as good for children who are more likely to have cardiac arrest from respiratory causes. Two reviews have found that compression-only CPR had no more success than no CPR whatsoever.[38][5]: S646  Rescue breaths for children and especially for babies should be relatively gentle.[38] Either a ratio of compressions to breaths of 30:2 or 15:2 was found to have better results for children.[40] Both children and adults should receive 100 chest compressions per minute. Other exceptions besides children include cases of drownings and drug overdose; in both these cases, compressions, and rescue breaths are recommended if the bystander is trained and is willing to do so.[41]

As per the AHA, the beat of the Bee Gees song "Stayin' Alive" provides an ideal rhythm in terms of beats per minute to use for hands-only CPR, which is 104 beats-per-minute.[42] One can also hum Queen's "Another One Bites the Dust", which is 110 beats-per-minute[43][44] and contains a repeating drum pattern.[45] For those in cardiac arrest due to non-heart related causes and in people less than 20 years of age, standard CPR is superior to compression-only CPR.[46][47]

Prone CPR

[edit]
Supine and prone positions

Standard CPR is performed with the victim in supine position. Prone CPR, or reverse CPR, is performed on a victim in prone position, lying on the chest. This is achieved by turning the head to the side and compressing the back. Due to the head being turned, the risk of vomiting and complications caused by aspiration pneumonia may be reduced.[48]

The American Heart Association's current guidelines recommend performing CPR in the supine position and limiting prone CPR to situations where the patient cannot be turned.[49]

Pregnancy

[edit]

During pregnancy when a woman is lying on her back, the uterus may compress the inferior vena cava and thus decrease venous return.[7] It is therefore recommended that the uterus be pushed to the woman's left. This can be done by placing a pillow or towel under her right hip so that she is on an angle of 15–30 degrees, and making sure their shoulders are flat to the ground. If this is not effective, healthcare professionals should consider emergency resuscitative hysterotomy.[7]

Family presence

[edit]

Evidence generally supports family being present during CPR.[50] This includes in CPR for children.[51]

Other

[edit]

Interposed abdominal compressions may be beneficial in the hospital environment.[52] There is no evidence of benefit pre-hospital or in children.[52]

Cooling during CPR is being studied as currently, results are unclear whether or not it improves outcomes.[53]

Internal cardiac massage is the manual squeezing of the exposed heart itself carried out through a surgical incision into the chest cavity, usually when the chest is already open for cardiac surgery.

Active compression-decompression methods using mechanical decompression of the chest have not been shown to improve outcomes in cardiac arrest.[54]

Use of devices

[edit]

Defibrillators

[edit]

A defibrillator is a machine that produces defibrillation: electric shocks that can restore the normal heart function of the victim. The common model of a defibrillator out of a hospital is the automated external defibrillator (AED), a portable device that is especially easy to use because it produces recorded voice instructions.

A briefcase with a public defibrillator, at a station. Its universal symbol appears above.
Automated defibrillator (AED)

Defibrillation is only indicated for some arrhythmias (abnormal heart beatings), specifically ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT). Defibrillation is not indicated if the patient has a normal pulse or is still conscious. Also, it is not indicated in asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA), in those cases a normal CPR would be used to oxygenate the brain until the heart function can be restored. Improperly given electrical shocks can cause dangerous arrhythmias, such as the ventricular fibrillation (VF).[22]

When a patient does not have heart beatings (or they present a sort of arrhythmia that will stop the heart immediately), it is recommended that someone asks for a defibrillator (because they are quite common in the present time),[17] for trying with it a defibrillation on the already unconscious victim, in case it is successful.

Order of defibrillation in a first aid sequence

It is recommended to call for emergency medical services before a defibrillation. Afterward, a nearby AED defibrillator should be used on the patient as soon as possible. As a general reference, defibrillation is preferred to performing CPR, but only if the AED can be retrieved in a short period of time. All these tasks (calling by phone, getting an AED, and the chest compressions and rescue breaths maneuvers of CPR) can be distributed between many rescuers who make them simultaneously.[19] The defibrillator itself would indicate if more CPR maneuvers are required.

As a slight variation for that sequence, if the rescuer is completely alone with a victim of drowning, or with a child who was already unconscious when the rescuer arrived, the rescuer would do the CPR maneuvers during 2 minutes (approximately 5 cycles of ventilations and compressions); after that, the rescuer would call to emergency medical services, and then it could be tried a search for a defibrillator nearby (the CPR maneuvers are supposed to be the priority for the drowned and most of the already collapsed children).[55][19][17][18]

As another possible variation, if a rescuer is completely alone and without a phone nearby, and is aiding any other victim (not a victim of drowning, nor an already unconscious child), the rescuer would go to call by phone first. After the call, the rescuer would get a nearby defibrillator and use it, or continue the CPR (the phone call and the defibrillator are considered urgent when the problem has a cardiac origin).[17]

Defibrillation

Defibrillation: position of the electrodes of a defibrillator on the human body

The standard defibrillation device, prepared for fast use out of the medical centers, is the automated external defibrillator (AED), a portable machine of small size (similar to a briefcase) that can be used by any user with no previous training. That machine produces recorded voice instructions that guide the user along the defibrillation process. It also checks the victim's condition to automatically apply electric shocks at the correct level, if they are needed. Other models are semi-automatic and require the user to push a button before an electric shock.

A defibrillator may ask for applying CPR maneuvers, so the patient would be placed lying in a face-up position. Additionally, the patient's head would be tilted back, except in the case of babies.[28]

Water and metals transmit the electric current. This depends on the amount of water, but it is convenient to avoid starting the defibrillation on a floor with puddles and to dry the wet areas of the patient before (fast, even with any cloth, if that is enough). It is not necessary to remove the patient's jewels or piercings, but it should be avoided placing the patches of the defibrillator directly on top of them.[30] The patches with electrodes are put on the positions that appear at the right. In very small bodies: children between 1 and 8 years, and, in general, similar bodies up to 25 kg approximately, it is recommended the use of children's size patches with reduced electric doses. If that is not possible, sizes and doses for adults would be used, and, if the patches were too big, one would be placed on the chest and the other on the back (no matter which of them).

There are several devices for improving CPR, but only defibrillators (as of 2010)[56] have been found better than standard CPR for an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.[5]

When a defibrillator has been used, it should remain attached to the patient until emergency services arrive.[57]

Devices for timing CPR

[edit]

Timing devices can feature a metronome (an item carried by many ambulance crews) to assist the rescuer in achieving the correct rate. Some units can also give timing reminders for performing compressions, ventilating, and changing operators.[58]

Devices for assisting in manual CPR

[edit]

Mechanical chest compression devices are not better than standard manual compressions.[59] Their use is reasonable in situations where manual compressions are not safe to perform, such as in a moving vehicle.[59]

Audible and visual prompting may improve the quality of CPR and prevent the decrease of compression rate and depth that naturally occurs with fatigue,[60][61] and to address this potential improvement, a number of devices have been developed to help improve CPR technique.

These items can be devices to be placed on top of the chest, with the rescuer's hands going over the device, and a display or audio feedback giving information on depth, force or rate,[62] or in a wearable format such as a glove.[63] Several published evaluations show that these devices can improve the performance of chest compressions.[64][65]

As well as its use during actual CPR on a cardiac arrest victim, which relies on the rescuer carrying the device with them, these devices can also be used as part of training programs to improve basic skills in performing correct chest compressions.[66]

Devices for providing automatic CPR

[edit]

Mechanical CPR has not seen as much use as mechanical ventilation; however, use in the prehospital setting is increasing.[67] Devices on the market include the LUCAS device,[68] developed at the University Hospital of Lund,[69] and AutoPulse. Both use straps around the chest to secure the patient. The first generation of the LUCAS uses a gas-driven piston and motor-driven constricting band, while later versions are battery-operated.[70]

There are several advantages to automated devices: they allow rescuers to focus on performing other interventions; they do not fatigue and begin to perform less effective compressions, as humans do; they can perform effective compressions in limited-space environments such as air ambulances,[71] where manual compressions are difficult, and they allow ambulance workers to be strapped in safely rather than standing over a patient in a speeding vehicle.[72] However the disadvantages are cost to purchase, time to train emergency personnel to use them, interruption to CPR to implement, potential for incorrect application and the need for multiple device sizes.[73][74]

Several studies have shown little or no improvement in survival rates[75][76][77] but acknowledge the need for more study.[78]

Mobile apps for providing CPR instructions

[edit]

To support training and incident management, mobile apps have been published in the largest app markets. An evaluation of 61 available apps has revealed that a large number do not follow international guidelines for basic life support and many apps are not designed in a user-friendly way.[79] As a result, the Red Cross updated and endorsed its emergency preparedness application, which uses pictures, text, and videos to assist the user.[80] The UK Resuscitation Council has an app, called Lifesaver, which shows how to perform CPR.[81]

Effectivity rate

[edit]

CPR oxygenates the body and brain, which favors making a later defibrillation and the advanced life support. Even in the case of a "non-shockable" rhythm, such as pulseless electrical activity (PEA) where defibrillation is not indicated, effective CPR is no less important. Used alone, CPR will result in few complete recoveries, though the outcome without CPR is almost uniformly fatal.[82]

Studies have shown that immediate CPR followed by defibrillation within 3–5 minutes of sudden VF cardiac arrest dramatically improves survival. In cities such as Seattle where CPR training is widespread and defibrillation by EMS personnel follows quickly, the survival rate is about 20 percent for all causes and as high as 57 percent for a witnessed "shockable" arrest.[83] In cities such as New York, without those advantages, the survival rate is only 5 percent for witnessed shockable arrest.[84] Similarly, in-hospital CPR is more successful when arrests are witnessed, occur in the ICU, or occur in patients wearing heart monitors.[85][86]

Adults' outcomes after CPR
CPR in US hospitals USA, CPR outside hospitals[87]
Total in hospitals Source CPR where an AED was used by a bystander* All witnessed arrests with CPR, with or without bystander AED Unwitnessed arrest with CPR Total outside hospitals
Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC):
2018 49% 41.9% 20.6% 31.3%
Survival to hospital discharge:
2018 35% 16.2% 4.4% 10.4%
2017 25.6% page e381, e390, 2019 AHA[88] 33% 16.4% 4.6% 10.4%
2016 26.4% p.e365, 2018 AHA 32% 17.0% 4.7% 10.8%
2015 23.8% page e471, 2017 AHA[89] 32% 16.7% 4.6% 10.6%
2014 24.8% page e270, 2016 AHA[90] 32% 16.7% 4.9% 10.8%
2013 16.8% 4.7% 10.8%
2012
2011 22.7% p. 499, 2014 AHA[91]
2010
2009 18.6% p. 12, Girotra supplement[92]
2008 19.4% [92]

\* AED data here exclude health facilities and nursing homes, where patients are sicker than average.

In adults compression-only CPR by bystanders appears to be better than chest compressions with rescue breathing.[93] Compression-only CPR may be less effective in children than in adults, as cardiac arrest in children is more likely to have a non-cardiac cause. In a 2010 prospective study of cardiac arrest in children (age 1–17) for arrests with a non-cardiac cause, provision by bystanders of conventional CPR with rescue breathing yielded a favorable neurological outcome at one month more often than did compression-only CPR (OR 5.54). For arrests with a cardiac cause in this cohort, there was no difference between the two techniques (OR 1.20).[94] This is consistent with American Heart Association guidelines for parents.[95]

When done by trained responders, 30 compressions interrupted by two breaths appears to have a slightly better result than continuous chest compressions with breaths being delivered while compressions are ongoing.[93]

Measurement of end-tidal carbon dioxide during CPR reflects cardiac output[96] and can predict chances of ROSC.[97]

In a study of in-hospital CPR from 2000 to 2008, 59% of CPR survivors lived over a year after hospital discharge and 44% lived over 3 years.[98]

Consequences

[edit]

Survival rates: In US hospitals in 2017, 26% of patients who received CPR survived to hospital discharge.[99]: e381, e390 [100] In 2017 in the US, outside hospitals, 16% of people whose cardiac arrest was witnessed survived to hospital discharge.[101]

Since 2003, widespread cooling of patients after CPR[102] and other improvements have raised survival and reduced mental disabilities.

Organ donation

[edit]

Organ donation is usually made possible by CPR, even if CPR does not save the patient. If there is a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), all organs can be considered for donation. If the patient does not achieve ROSC, and CPR continues until an operating room is available, the kidneys and liver can still be considered for donation.[103] 1,000 organs per year in the US are transplanted from patients who had CPR.[104] Donations can be taken from 40% of patients who have ROSC and later become brain-dead.[105] Up to 8 organs can be taken from each donor,[106] and an average of 3 organs are taken from each patient who donates organs.[104]

Mental abilities

[edit]

Mental abilities are about the same for survivors before and after CPR for 89% of patients, based on before and after counts of 12,500 US patients' Cerebral-Performance Category (CPC[107]) codes in a 2000–2009 study of CPR in hospitals. 1% more survivors were in comas than before CPR. 5% more needed help with daily activities. 5% more had moderate mental problems and could still be independent.[108]

For CPR outside hospitals, a Copenhagen study of 2,504 patients in 2007-2011 found that 21% of survivors developed moderate mental problems but could still be independent, and 11% of survivors developed severe mental problems, so they needed daily help. Two patients out of 2,504 went into comas (0.1% of patients, or 2 out of 419 survivors, 0.5%), and the study did not track how long the comas lasted.[109]

Most people in comas start to recover in 2–3 weeks.[110] 2018 guidelines on disorders of consciousness say it is no longer appropriate to use the term "permanent vegetative state."[111] Mental abilities can continue to improve in the six months after discharge,[112] and in subsequent years.[110] For long-term problems, brains form new paths to replace damaged areas.[113][114]

Injuries

[edit]

Injuries from CPR vary. 87% of patients are not injured by CPR.[115] Overall, injuries are caused in 13% (2009–12 data) of patients, including broken sternum or ribs (9%), lung injuries (3%), and internal bleeding (3%).[115] The internal injuries counted here can include heart contusion,[116] hemopericardium,[117][118][119] upper airway complications, damage to the abdominal viscera − lacerations of the liver and spleen, fat emboli, pulmonary complications − pneumothorax, hemothorax, lung contusions.[120][121] Most injuries did not affect care; only 1% of those given CPR received life-threatening injuries from it.[115][121]

Broken ribs are present in 3%[115] of those who survive to hospital discharge, and 15% of those who die in the hospital, for an average rate of 9% (2009-12 data)[115] to 8% (1997–99).[122] In the 2009-12 study, 20% of survivors were older than 75.[115] A study in the 1990s found 55% of CPR patients who died before discharge had broken ribs, and a study in the 1960s found 97% did; training and experience levels have improved.[123] Lung injuries were caused in 3% of patients and other internal bleeding in 3% (2009–12).

Bones heal in 1–2 months.[124][125]

The costal cartilage also breaks in an unknown number of additional cases, which can sound like breaking bones.[126][127]

The type and frequency of injury can be affected by factors such as sex and age. A 1999 Austrian study of CPR on cadavers, using a machine that alternately compressed the chest and then pulled it outward, found a higher rate of sternal fractures in female cadavers (9 of 17) than males (2 of 20), and found the risk of rib fractures rose with age, though they did not say how much.[128] Children and infants have a low risk of rib fractures during CPR, with an incidence of less than 2%, although, when they do occur, they are usually anterior and multiple.[123][129][130]

Where CPR is performed in error by a bystander, on a person not in cardiac arrest, around 2% have injury as a result (although 12% experienced discomfort).[131]

A 2004 overview said, "Chest injury is a price worth paying to achieve optimal efficacy of chest compressions. Cautious or faint-hearted chest compression may save bones in the individual case but not the patient's life."[123]

Other side effects

[edit]

The most common side effect is vomiting, which necessitates clearing the mouth so patients do not breathe it in.[132] It happened in 16 of 35 CPR efforts in a 1989 study in King County, Washington.[133]

Survival from CPR among various groups

Survival differences, based on prior illness, age or location

[edit]

The American Heart Association guidelines say that survival rates below 1% are "futility,"[134] but all groups have better survival than that. Even among very sick patients, at least 10% survive: A study of CPR in a sample of US hospitals from 2001 to 2010,[85] where overall survival was 19%, found 10% survival among cancer patients, 12% among dialysis patients, 14% over age 80, 15% among blacks, 17% for patients who lived in nursing homes, 19% for patients with heart failure, and 25% for patients with heart monitoring outside the ICU. Another study, of advanced cancer patients, found the same 10% survival mentioned above.[135] A study of Swedish patients in 2007–2015 with ECG monitors found 40% survived at least 30 days after CPR at ages 70–79, 29% at ages 80–89, and 27% above age 90.[136]

An earlier study of Medicare patients in hospitals from 1992 to 2005, where overall survival was 18%, found 13% survival in the poorest neighborhoods, 12% survival over age 90, 15% survival among ages 85–89, and 17% survival among ages 80–84.[137] Swedish patients 90 years or older had 15% survival to hospital discharge, 80–89 had 20%, and 70–79 had 28%.[136]

A study of King County WA patients who had CPR outside hospitals in 1999–2003, where 34% survived to hospital discharge overall, found that among patients with 4 or more major medical conditions, 18% survived; with 3 major conditions 24% survived, and 33% of those with 2 major medical conditions survived.[138]

Nursing home residents' survival has been studied by several authors,[85][137][109][139][140][141][142] and is measured annually by the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES). CARES reports CPR results from a catchment area of 115 million people, including 23 state-wide registries, and individual communities in 18 other states as of 2019.[143] CARES data show that in health care facilities and nursing homes where AEDs are available and used, survival rates are double the average survival found in nursing homes overall.[101]

Geographically, there is wide variation from state to state in survival after CPR in US hospitals, from 40% in Wyoming to 20% in New York, so there is room for good practices to spread, raising the averages.[144] For CPR outside hospitals, survival varies even more across the US, from 3% in Omaha to 45% in Seattle in 2001. This study only counted heart rhythms that can respond to defibrillator shocks (tachycardia).[145] A major reason for the variation has been the delay in some areas between the call to emergency services and the departure of medics, and then arrival and treatment. Delays were caused by a lack of monitoring, and the mismatch between recruiting people as firefighters, though most emergency calls they are assigned to are medical, so staff resisted and delayed on the medical calls.[145] Building codes have cut the number of fires, but staff still think of themselves as firefighters.

CPR success varies widely, so most places can learn from the best practices.
Table Showing How Well Groups with Different Illnesses Survive to Hospital Discharge after CPR (USA national data, except where noted)
Survival Rate of Group at Left Average Survival in Study Group Rate as Fraction of Average Subgroup Sample Size Patients
Current Total, Adults Outside Hospitals 10% 10% 1.0 79,356 2018[101]
AED used by Bystanders on Adult Outside Hospitals, not in health facilities or nursing homes 35% 10% 3.3 1,349 2018
Adults Outside Hospitals, Witnessed, with or without AED 16% 10% 1.6 39,976 2018
Adults Outside Hospitals, Unwitnessed 4% 10% 0.4 39,378 2018
OUTSIDE HOSPITALS, MULTIPLE CONDITIONS, King County WA
4–8 Major health conditions 18% 34% 0.5 98 1999–2003[138]
3 Major health conditions 24% 34% 0.7 125 1999–2003
2 Major health conditions 33% 34% 1.0 211 1999–2003
1 Major health condition 35% 34% 1.0 323 1999–2003
0 Major health conditions 43% 34% 1.3 286 1999–2003
OUTSIDE HOSPITALS, NURSING HOMES
Nursing homes 4.3% 10.4% 0.4 9,105 2018[101]
Nursing homes 4.1% 10.4% 0.4 8,655 2017[101]
Nursing homes 4.4% 10.8% 0.4 6,477 2016[101]
Nursing homes 4.4% 10.6% 0.4 5,695 2015[101]
Nursing homes 4.5% 10.8% 0.4 4,786 2014[101]
Nursing homes 5.0% 10.8% 0.5 3,713 2013[101]
AED used by staff or bystander in nursing home or health facility 9.5% 10.4% 0.9 3,809 2018[101]
AED used by staff or bystander in nursing home or health facility 10.1% 10.4% 1.0 3,329 2017[101]
AED used by staff or bystander in nursing home or health facility 12.2% 10.8% 1.1 2,229 2016[101]
AED used by staff or bystander in nursing home or health facility 10.0% 10.6% 0.9 1,887 2015[101]
AED used by staff or bystander in nursing home or health facility 11.4% 10.8% 1.1 1,422 2014[101]
Nursing homes, group homes, assisted living, King Co. WA 4% na na 218 1999–2000[142]
Nursing homes, Denmark, best case, 30 days (witnessed, bystander CPR, AED before hospital) 8% 23% 0.3 135 2001–14[140]
Nursing homes in Denmark, live 30 days 2% 5% 0.4 2,516 2001–14
Nursing homes, Copenhagen 9% 17% 0.6 245 2007–11[109]
Nursing homes, Denmark, ROSC 12% 13% 0.9 2,516 2001–14[140]
Nursing homes, Rochester, ROSC 19% 20% 1.0 42 1998–2001[141]
.
Current Total, Inside Hospitals 26% 26% 1.0 26,178 2017[99]
IN HOSPITALS, NURSING HOME RESIDENTS
Nursing home residents, mental CPC=3, dependent 9% 16% 0.5 1,299 2000–08[139]
Skilled nursing facility before hospital 12% 18% 0.6 10,924 1992–2005[137]
Nursing home residents 11% 16% 0.7 2,845 2000–08[139]
Nursing home or other not home 17% 19% 0.9 34,342 2001–10[85]
IN HOSPITALS, BURDEN OF CHRONIC ILLNESS, Deyo-Charlson score
3–33 highest burden 16% 18% 0.9 94,608 1992–2005[137]
2 some burden 19% 18% 1.0 116,401 1992–2005
1 low burden 19% 18% 1.0 145,627 1992–2005
0 lowest burden 19% 18% 1.0 77,349 1992–2005
IN HOSPITALS, INDIVIDUAL CONDITIONS
Liver insufficiency/failure 10% 19% 0.5 10,154 2001–10[85]
Advanced Cancer 10% 18% 0.5 6,585 2006–10[135]
Cancer or blood disease 10% 19% 0.5 16,640 2001–10[85]
Sepsis 11% 19% 0.5 21,057 2001–10
Mental problems (CPC=3), dependent 10% 16% 0.6 4,251 2000–08[139]
Dialysis 12% 19% 0.6 5,135 2001–10[85]
Pneumonia 14% 19% 0.7 18,277 2001–10
Respiratory insufficiency 16% 19% 0.8 57,054 2001–10
Congestive heart failure 19% 19% 1.0 40,362 2001–10
Diabetes 20% 19% 1.0 41,154 2001–10
Pacemaker/ICD (implanted cardioverter defibrillator) 20% 19% 1.1 10,386 2001–10
IN HOSPITALS, LOCATION OF CARE
Unmonitored 15% 19% 0.8 22,899 2001–10[85]
Intensive care unit 18% 19% 0.9 81,176 2001–10
Monitored, other than ICU 25% 19% 1.3 30,100 2001–10
Monitored, aged 90 or older, Sweden 27% 355 2007–15[136]
Monitored, aged 80–89, Sweden 29% 2,237 2007–15
Monitored, aged 70–79, Sweden 40% 2,609 2007–15
IN HOSPITALS, PATIENT TRAITS
Patients' ages 90 or older, Sweden 15% 1,008 2007–15[136]
Patients' ages 80–89, Sweden 20% 5,156 2007–15
Patients' ages 70–79, Sweden 28% 5,232 2007–15
Patients' ages 90 or older 12% 18% 0.7 34,069 1992–2005[137]
Patients' ages 85–89 15% 18% 0.8 62,530 1992–2005
Patients' ages 80–84 17% 18% 0.9 91,471 1992–2005
Patients' ages 75–79 19% 18% 1.0 98,263 1992–2005
Patients' ages 70–74 21% 18% 1.1 84,353 1992–2005
Patients' ages 65–69 22% 18% 1.2 63,299 1992–2005
Black race 15% 19% 0.8 27,246 2001–10[85]
<$15,000 median income in patient's zip code 13% 18% 0.7 10,626 1992-2005[137]
$15–$30,000 median income in patient's zip code 18% 18% 1.0 87,164 1992–2005
IN HOSPITALS, INITIAL HEART RHYTHM BEFORE CPR
Stopped (asystole) 13% 19% 0.7 46,856 2001–10[85]
Pulseless electrical activity 14% 19% 0.7 53,965 2001–10
Other 24% 19% 1.3 7,422 2001–10
Ventricular fibrillation (quiver) / ventricular tachycardia (rapid beat) 38% 19% 2.0 27,653 2001–10
Cancer was also studied by Champigneulle et al.in Paris. In 2015 they reported survival after patients entered ICUs, not overall. Cancer ICU patients had the same ICU mortality and 6-month mortality as matched non-cancer ICU patients.[146]
Table Showing Survival Rate in Hospitals in Each US State, 2003-2011[144]
State Survival to Hospital Discharge
USA 24.7%
Wyoming 40.2%
Washington 34.7%
South Dakota 34.5%
Iowa 33.4%
Arizona 32.8%
Louisiana 32.3%
Minnesota 32.2%
Montana 31.6%
Colorado 31.5%
Wisconsin 31.5%
New Hampshire 31.3%
Maine 30.9%
Nebraska 30.7%
Mississippi 30.2%
Massachusetts 29.9%
Utah 29.5%
Ohio 29.0%
Indiana 28.7%
West Virginia 28.6%
New Mexico 28.4%
Oregon 28.3%
Pennsylvania 28.3%
Michigan 27.7%
Texas 26.9%
Oklahoma 26.6%
Virginia 26.3%
Florida 26.2%
Illinois 26.0%
Vermont 26.0%
South Carolina 25.9%
Maryland 25.8%
Kansas 25.4%
Kentucky 25.4%
California 25.1%
North Carolina 25.1%
Connecticut 25.0%
Georgia 24.9%
Missouri 24.1%
Tennessee 24.1%
Arkansas 23.8%
Hawaii 23.6%
Nevada 22.8%
Rhode Island 22.7%
New Jersey 21.3%
New York 20.4%

Dysthanasia

[edit]

In some instances, CPR can be considered a form of dysthanasia.[147][148]

Prevalence

[edit]

Chance of receiving CPR

[edit]

Various studies show that in out-of-home cardiac arrest, bystanders in the US attempt CPR in between 14%[149] and 45%[150] of the time, with a median of 32%.[151] Globally, rates of bystander CPR are reported to be as low as 1% and as high as 44%.[152] However, the effectiveness of this CPR is variable, and the studies suggest only around half of bystander CPR is performed correctly.[153][154] One study found that members of the public having received CPR training in the past lack the skills and confidence needed to save lives. The report's authors suggested that better training is needed to improve the willingness to respond to cardiac arrest.[151] Factors that influence bystander CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest include:

  • Affordable training
  • Target CPR training to family members of potential cardiac arrest
  • CPR classes should be simplified and shortened
  • Offer reassurance and education about CPR
  • Provide clearer information about legal implications for specific regions
  • Focus on reducing the stigma and fears around providing bystander CPR[155]

There is a relation between age and the chance of CPR being commenced. Younger people are far more likely to have CPR attempted on them before the arrival of emergency medical services.[149][156] Bystanders more commonly administer CPR when in public than when at the person's home, although healthcare professionals are responsible for more than half of out-of-hospital resuscitation attempts.[150] People with no connection to the person are more likely to perform CPR than family members.[157]

There is also a clear relation between the cause of arrest and the likelihood of a bystander initiating CPR. Laypersons are most likely to give CPR to younger people in cardiac arrest in a public place when it has a medical cause; those in arrest from trauma, exsanguination or intoxication are less likely to receive CPR.[157]

It is believed that there is a higher chance that CPR will be performed if the bystander is told to perform only the chest compression element of the resuscitation.[39][158]

The first formal study into gender bias in receiving CPR from the public versus professionals was conducted by the American Heart Association and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and examined nearly 20,000 cases across the U.S. The study found that women are six percent less likely than men to receive bystander CPR when in cardiac arrest in a public place, citing the disparity as "likely due to the fear of being falsely accused of sexual assault."[159][160]

Chance of receiving CPR in time

[edit]

CPR is likely to be effective only if commenced within 6 minutes after the blood flow stops[161] because permanent brain cell damage occurs when fresh blood infuses the cells after that time, since the cells of the brain become dormant in as little as 4–6 minutes in an oxygen-deprived environment and, therefore, cannot survive the reintroduction of oxygen in a traditional resuscitation. Research using cardioplegic blood infusion resulted in a 79.4% survival rate with cardiac arrest intervals of 72±43 minutes, traditional methods achieve a 15% survival rate in this scenario, by comparison. New research is currently needed to determine what role CPR, defibrillation, and new advanced gradual resuscitation techniques will have with this new knowledge.[162]

A notable exception is cardiac arrest which occurs in conjunction with exposure to very cold temperatures. Hypothermia seems to protect by slowing down metabolic and physiologic processes, greatly decreasing the tissues' need for oxygen.[163] There are cases where CPR, defibrillation, and advanced warming techniques have revived victims after substantial periods of hypothermia.[164]

Society and culture

[edit]

Portrayed effectiveness

[edit]

CPR is often severely misrepresented in movies and television as being highly effective in resuscitating a person who is not breathing and has no circulation.[165]

A 1996 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that CPR success rates in television shows were 75% for immediate circulation, and 67% survival to discharge.[165] This gives the general public an unrealistic expectation of a successful outcome.[165] When educated on the actual survival rates, the proportion of patients over 60 years of age desiring CPR should they have a cardiac arrest drops from 41% to 22%.[166]

Training and stage CPR

[edit]
US Navy sailors practice chest compressions on mannequins.

It is dangerous to perform CPR on a person who is breathing normally. These chest compressions create significant local blunt trauma, risking bruising or fracture of the sternum or ribs.[167] If a patient is not breathing, these risks still exist but are dwarfed by the immediate threat to life. For this reason, training is always done with a mannequin, such as the well-known Resusci Anne model.[168]

The portrayal of the CPR technique on television and film often is purposely incorrect. Actors simulating the performance of CPR may bend their elbows while appearing to compress, to prevent force from reaching the chest of the actor portraying the patient.[169]

Self-CPR hoax

[edit]

A form of "self-CPR" termed "cough CPR" was the subject of a hoax chain e-mail entitled "How to Survive a Heart Attack When Alone," which wrongly cited "Via Health Rochester General Hospital" as the source of the technique. Rochester General Hospital has denied any connection with the technique.[170][171]

"Cough CPR" in the sense of resuscitating oneself is impossible because a prominent symptom of cardiac arrest is unconsciousness, which makes coughing impossible.[172]

The American Heart Association (AHA) and other resuscitation bodies[173] do not endorse "cough CPR", which it terms a misnomer as it is not a form of resuscitation. The AHA does recognize a limited legitimate use of the coughing technique: "This coughing technique to maintain blood flow during brief arrhythmias has been useful in the hospital, particularly during cardiac catheterization. In such cases, the patient's ECG is monitored continuously, and a physician is present."[174] When coughing is used on trained and monitored patients in hospitals, it is effective only for 90 seconds.[173]

Learning from film

[edit]

In at least one case, it has been alleged that CPR learned from a film was used to save a person's life. In April 2011, it was claimed that nine-year-old Tristin Saghin saved his sister's life by administering CPR on her after she fell into a swimming pool, using only the knowledge of CPR that he had gleaned from a motion picture, Black Hawk Down.[175]

Hands-only CPR portrayal

[edit]

Less than 1/3 of those people who experience a cardiac arrest at home, work, or in a public location have CPR performed on them. Most bystanders are worried that they might do something wrong.[176] On October 28, 2009, the American Heart Association and the Ad Council launched a hands-only CPR public service announcement and website as a means to address this issue.[177] In July 2011, new content was added to the website including a digital app that helps a user learn how to perform hands-only CPR.[178]

History

[edit]

In the 19th century, Doctor H. R. Silvester described a method (the Silvester method) of artificial ventilation in which the patient is laid on their back, and their arms are raised above their head to aid inhalation and then pressed against their chest to aid exhalation.[179] The Holger Nielsen technique of artificial respiration, developed by Danish physician Holger Nielsen, revolutionized the field of emergency medical care. Introduced in the early 20th century, this technique involved positioning the patient in a supine position (lying flat on their back) and the performer of the technique kneeling beside or above the patient. The Holger Nielsen technique utilized a manual resuscitator, commonly referred to as the "Holger Nielsen bag," to administer rescue breaths. The performer would place a mask or the bag's mouthpiece over the patient's mouth and nose while manually compressing the bag. This action would deliver a controlled flow of air into the patient's lungs, aiding in oxygenation and facilitating the exchange of gases.[180][181]

It was not until the middle of the 20th century that the wider medical community started to recognize and promote artificial ventilation in the form of mouth-to-mouth resuscitation combined with chest compressions as a key part of resuscitation following cardiac arrest. The combination was first seen in a 1962 training video called "The Pulse of Life" created by James Jude, Guy Knickerbocker, and Peter Safar. Jude and Knickerbocker, along with William Kouwenhoven and Joseph S. Redding had recently discovered the method of external chest compressions, whereas Safar had worked with Redding and James Elam to prove the effectiveness of mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. The first effort at testing the technique was performed on a dog by Redding, Safar, and JW Pearson. Soon afterward, the technique was used to save the life of a child.[182] Their combined findings were presented at the annual Maryland Medical Society meeting on September 16, 1960, in Ocean City, and gained widespread acceptance over the following decade, helped by the video and speaking tour they undertook. Peter Safar wrote the book ABC of Resuscitation in 1957. In the U.S., it was first promoted as a technique for the public to learn in the 1970s.[183]

Mouth-to-mouth resuscitation was combined with chest compressions based on the assumption that active ventilation is necessary to keep circulating blood oxygenated, and the combination was accepted without comparing its effectiveness with chest compressions alone. However, research in the 2000s demonstrated that assumption to be in error, resulting in the American Heart Association's acknowledgment of the effectiveness of chest compressions alone (see Compression only in this article).[184]

CPR methods continued to advance, with developments in the 2010s including an emphasis on constant, rapid heart stimulation, and a de-emphasis on the respiration aspect. Studies have shown that people who had rapid, constant heart-only chest compression are 22% more likely to survive than those receiving conventional CPR that included breathing. Because people tend to be reluctant to do mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, chest-only CPR nearly doubles the chances of survival overall, by increasing the odds of receiving CPR in the first place.[185]

On animals

[edit]

It is feasible to perform CPR on animals, including cats and dogs.[186] The principles and practices are similar to CPR for humans, except that resuscitation is usually done through the animal's nose, not the mouth. CPR should only be performed on unconscious animals to avoid the risk of being bitten; a conscious animal would not require chest compressions. Animals, depending on species, may have a lower bone density than humans and so CPR can cause bones to become weakened after it is performed.[187]

Research

[edit]

Cerebral performance category (CPC scores) are used as a research tool to describe "good" and "poor" outcomes. Level 1 is conscious and alert with normal function. Level 2 is only slight disability. Level 3 is a moderate disability. Level 4 is a severe disability. Level 5 is comatose or persistent vegetative state. Level 6 is brain dead or death from other causes.[188]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when a person's heart stops beating, combining repetitive chest compressions with to manually pump blood through the body and deliver oxygen to vital organs until advanced medical care can restore spontaneous circulation. This technique is a cornerstone of , particularly for out-of-hospital , where immediate intervention is critical to prevent irreversible brain damage or death. The modern form of CPR was developed in 1960 by physicians William Kouwenhoven, , and James Jude, who integrated external chest compressions with mouth-to-mouth breathing to effectively mimic the heart's pumping action and sustain oxygenation. Earlier efforts in resuscitation date back centuries, including 18th-century mouth-to-mouth techniques and 19th-century manual chest compression methods, but it was not until the mid-20th century that standardized protocols emerged, largely through the efforts of the (AHA), which began widespread training programs in the 1970s. Today, CPR guidelines are updated periodically based on the latest , with the AHA's 2025 guidelines emphasizing high-quality performance to optimize outcomes. For adults, high-quality CPR involves chest compressions at a rate of 100 to 120 per minute and a depth of 2 to 2.4 inches (5 to 6 cm), allowing full chest recoil between compressions while minimizing interruptions. Bystanders are encouraged to perform hands-only CPR—calling emergency services first and then pushing hard and fast in the center of the chest—without rescue breaths, as this simplifies the process and is nearly as effective for witnessed arrests in adults. Conventional CPR, incorporating a 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio, is recommended for trained providers or in specific scenarios like or resuscitation. When possible, CPR is followed by using an (AED) to address shockable rhythms like . Each year in the , more than 356,000 people experience out-of-hospital , with approximately 90% resulting in death due to the rapid onset of brain hypoxia without prompt intervention. Immediate bystander CPR can double or triple survival chances, yet overall survival to discharge remains low at around 9.1% for medical services-treated cases, underscoring the need for broader public training and access to AEDs as part of the AHA's framework. Disparities persist, with men more likely to receive bystander CPR in public settings than women (45% vs. 39%).

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an emergency procedure that involves manual or mechanical interventions, primarily chest compressions combined with artificial ventilation, to restore blood circulation and oxygenation in the body when the heart and lungs cease to function effectively. This technique mimics the natural pumping action of the heart and the gas exchange of the lungs, aiming to deliver oxygen-rich blood to vital organs during cardiac arrest. Developed as a standardized lifesaving method, CPR can be performed by trained laypersons or healthcare professionals using hands-on methods or mechanical devices. The primary purpose of CPR is to maintain to critical organs, particularly the and heart, thereby preventing irreversible damage and death until advanced medical interventions, such as or pharmacological support, can be administered. It addresses various forms of , including shockable rhythms like and pulseless , as well as non-shockable rhythms such as and , where spontaneous circulation has stopped. By sustaining minimal blood flow, CPR buys critical time, with the goal of restoring a perfusing rhythm and enabling . CPR is initiated only after confirming basic prerequisites. For lay rescuers, the victim must be unresponsive to stimuli and show no normal or only gasping (agonal) respirations. For healthcare providers, also check for a detectable at a major artery, such as the carotid, within 10 seconds; if no or unsure, start CPR. The term "cardiopulmonary resuscitation" emerged in the , evolving from earlier concepts like external cardiac , following pioneering work by researchers who integrated chest compressions with mouth-to-mouth ventilation to form the modern protocol.

Pathophysiology of Cardiac Arrest

Sudden cardiac arrest occurs through two primary mechanisms: electrical disturbances leading to arrhythmias or circulatory failure resulting in inadequate pump function. Electrical causes, such as or , disrupt the heart's rhythmic contractions, preventing effective blood ejection and rapidly leading to circulatory collapse. In contrast, circulatory mechanisms involve pump failure, often manifesting as or , where the heart's mechanical output ceases despite ongoing electrical activity, resulting in immediate cessation of systemic . Common etiologies include , which accounts for approximately 70% of cases through ischemic events; trauma, which can directly impair cardiac function; and , which induces hypoxic arrest via . Following arrest, of survival breaks down rapidly due to global ischemia, initiating a cascade of cellular damage, from anaerobic glycolysis, and progressive multi-organ failure. Ischemia deprives tissues of oxygen and nutrients, leading to ATP depletion, ionic imbalances, and cellular swelling within minutes. exacerbates this by promoting further enzyme dysfunction and , while reperfusion upon restoration of flow can trigger additional injury through . Without intervention, organs like the kidneys and liver succumb to hypoperfusion-induced failure, compounding the ischemic insult. The is particularly vulnerable, with viability limited to 4-6 minutes without oxygenation before irreversible neuronal begins due to and . Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) intervenes by manually restoring coronary and cerebral pressures, targeting greater than 20 mmHg for to support myocardial recovery and greater than 30 mmHg for cerebral tissues to mitigate hypoxic injury. pressure is calculated as the difference between systolic and right atrial pressure, providing a measure of forward flow during compressions.

Indications and Procedures

Medical Indications

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is primarily indicated in cases of confirmed or suspected , characterized by the patient being unresponsive, exhibiting no normal or only gasping (agonal) respirations, and having no detectable . This recognition of cardiac arrest is essential across all age groups, as prompt initiation of CPR can significantly improve survival outcomes by maintaining circulation and oxygenation until advanced care arrives. For adults, rescuers should assess responsiveness by tapping the shoulder and shouting, followed by checking for and simultaneously if trained, with CPR starting immediately upon identification of arrest. In children and infants, the criteria are analogous, but assessment involves checking for normal patterns and a central (brachial in infants) for no more than 10 seconds; abnormal breathing such as gasping warrants immediate CPR. The context of the arrest influences the urgency and approach to CPR initiation, though the core indications remain consistent between out-of-hospital (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) settings. In OHCA, which accounts for the majority of events, bystander recognition and activation of emergency services (e.g., calling 9-1-1) followed by CPR are critical, particularly for unwitnessed arrests or those without immediate (AED) access, where survival rates are lower without intervention. Witnessed arrests in public or home settings benefit from rapid AED integration if available, emphasizing the need for layperson in arrest recognition. In IHCA scenarios, healthcare providers often detect arrest through monitoring, allowing for near-simultaneous CPR and , with a streamlined applying universally across locations and ages per the 2025 updates. Contraindications to CPR include valid do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders or other advance directives explicitly prohibiting resuscitation, as well as signs of irreversible death such as , dependent lividity, , or . Relative contraindications encompass situations of futility, like advanced where CPR would not restore meaningful , though decisions should align with ethical guidelines and patient wishes. The 2025 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines reinforce that CPR is the default for unless such risks or directives apply, while the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) 2025 guidelines similarly prioritize arrest recognition without altering core contraindications from prior versions. CPR serves as the foundational bridge in (BLS) and (ALS) protocols, sustaining vital organ until , , or other interventions can be implemented. In BLS, it focuses on high-quality compressions and ventilations for immediate response, transitioning seamlessly to ALS in settings with drugs and devices. Real-time assessment of arrest signs remains emphasized in the AHA 2025 and ERC 2025 guidelines, with no major changes to indications since prior updates, ensuring CPR's role in all viable scenarios.

Standard CPR Sequence

The standard CPR sequence for adults follows the C-A-B (compressions, airway, ) approach, prioritizing immediate chest compressions upon recognition of to restore circulation and oxygenation. The rescuer first ensures scene safety, checks for by the and shouting, and activates the emergency response system (e.g., calling 911) while obtaining an AED if available. If unresponsive, the rescuer then assesses and carotid simultaneously for no more than 10 seconds; if no normal or is detected, CPR begins immediately with compressions. Chest compressions form the foundation of the sequence, performed at a rate of 100 to 120 per minute with a depth of at least 5 cm (2 inches) but not exceeding 6 cm (2.4 inches) in the center of the chest on the lower half of the . The of one hand is placed on the with the other hand on top, using straight arms and body weight to deliver force while allowing complete chest recoil after each compression to facilitate venous return. Interruptions in compressions should be minimized to less than 10 seconds, aiming for a chest compression fraction (time spent on compressions) of at least 80% during efforts. Ventilation is integrated after the initial set of 30 compressions, using a 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio for a single rescuer or two rescuers without an advanced airway, with each breath delivered over 1 second to achieve visible chest rise while avoiding excessive volume to prevent gastric inflation or . For two rescuers, the ratio remains 30:2 unless an advanced airway is placed, in which case continuous compressions are performed with asynchronous ventilations at 10 per minute (1 every 6 seconds). Breaths are provided using a barrier device or bag-mask to reduce risk. CPR cycles consist of 5 sets of 30:2 (approximately 2 minutes) before pausing briefly to check for a or attach an AED, with rescuers rotating compression duties every 2 minutes to reduce and maintain . High-quality CPR, as defined in the 2025 guidelines, emphasizes achieving the target rate and depth, ensuring full , minimizing interruptions, and avoiding excessive ventilations, all of which improve outcomes by optimizing coronary and cerebral .

Exceptions and Variations

In cases of unwitnessed , trained rescuers should initiate chest compressions immediately without checking for a and continue CPR for approximately 2 minutes before attaching an (AED), as the unknown downtime increases the likelihood of prolonged or , where early is less beneficial. This approach aligns with recommendations for out-of-hospital settings, where lay rescuers may simply begin CPR upon finding an unresponsive victim, but professionals emphasize the initial CPR period to optimize coronary perfusion before rhythm analysis. When integrating AED use into the CPR sequence, rescuers should pause chest compressions only briefly for rhythm analysis (typically 5-10 seconds) and shock delivery if indicated, resuming compressions immediately afterward to maintain a chest compression of at least 60%, as prolonged interruptions reduce survival rates by impairing cerebral and coronary blood flow. This minimizes peri-shock pauses, with evidence showing that success drops from 93% within 6 minutes to 75% after 16 minutes if compressions are not promptly restarted. Automated prompts from modern AEDs further support this by guiding rescuers to limit downtime during application and analysis. For suspected , rescuers should start CPR if is present, while simultaneously considering administration if available, as opioids primarily cause that may progress to , but high-quality compressions take precedence to address immediate circulatory collapse. The 2025 AHA algorithm for opioid-associated emergencies instructs activating the emergency response, assessing and within 10 seconds, and initiating CPR with AED use if no is detected, followed by via intranasal, intramuscular, or intravenous routes to reverse respiratory depression without delaying compressions. The 2025 AHA and ERC guidelines reinforce administration without delaying CPR in suspected opioid overdoses and provide updated termination of resuscitation criteria for EMS, emphasizing local protocols. This integrated approach has been shown to improve outcomes in overdose scenarios by addressing both ventilatory and circulatory failure. In high-risk environments such as high-altitude or marine settings, standard CPR sequences require modifications to account for environmental factors affecting rescuer performance and victim . At high altitudes above 3,000 meters, rescuers experience increased and reduced CPR quality due to hypoxia, necessitating supplemental oxygen for both the victim and rescuer, maintaining the standard compression depth of 5 to 6 cm (which may be challenging due to ), and potentially shorter cycles to sustain effort, though core rates of 100-120 per minute are maintained unless rescuer exhaustion dictates adjustments. Prolonged CPR in these conditions demands team rotation to mitigate rescuer cardiopulmonary strain, with studies indicating a time-dependent decline in compression depth and rate during acute exposure. For marine or scenarios, in-water CPR is rarely recommended due to rescuer safety risks; instead, victims should be extracted to a stable surface as quickly as possible before initiating CPR with an emphasis on initial breaths to counter , followed by 30:2 compressions, as ventilation prioritization improves outcomes in submersion-related arrests. Rescuers must prioritize personal safety and equipment availability, such as flotation devices, when assessing feasibility of in-water interventions.

Techniques

Conventional CPR

Conventional CPR, also known as standard or traditional CPR, involves the coordinated delivery of chest compressions and rescue breaths to restore blood circulation and oxygenation in individuals experiencing . This method is recommended as the primary approach for trained rescuers in most out-of-hospital and in-hospital settings, particularly when the cause of arrest involves hypoxia or . It integrates seamlessly into the broader CPR sequence, following initial assessment and call for help. The technique begins with ensuring an open airway using the head-tilt chin-lift maneuver, which gently tilts the head back while lifting the chin to prevent tongue obstruction and align the oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes. Once the airway is clear, rescue breaths are administered either mouth-to-mouth or via a barrier device such as a face mask or bag-valve-mask to deliver a tidal volume of 500-600 mL over approximately one second per breath, sufficient to produce visible chest rise without excessive pressure that could cause gastric insufflation. Compressions follow immediately, performed with the heel of one hand placed on the center of the lower half of the sternum (between the nipples), the other hand interlocked on top, and arms extended straight to allow the rescuer's body weight to drive downward force of 5-6 cm (2-2.4 inches) in adults at a rate of 100-120 per minute. The standard for conventional CPR in adults is 30 compressions followed by 2 breaths, cycled continuously until arrives or the patient shows signs of recovery, such as or movement. This 30:2 balances circulation restoration through compressions, which generate of about 25-30% of normal, with ventilatory support to maintain . Each breath should last about one second to mimic normal respiration and avoid , which can reduce venous return and coronary pressure. For two-rescuer scenarios, one person manages ventilations while the other performs compressions, allowing uninterrupted cycles. The rationale for including ventilations in conventional CPR stems from its in addressing both circulatory and oxygen deprivation; breaths provide approximately 30-50% inspired oxygen concentration, which is critical for sustaining cerebral and myocardial viability during arrest. Without ventilations, prolonged hypoxia can exacerbate tissue damage, especially in non-cardiac etiologies. programs emphasize proper hand placement and full of the chest between compressions to optimize hemodynamic effects, with simulations showing that incorrect positioning reduces compression depth by up to 20-30%. Evidence supports conventional CPR's superiority over compression-only methods in scenarios involving prolonged arrests or hypoxic causes, such as or , where studies report 20-30% higher survival rates with ventilations due to improved oxygenation and reduced . For instance, in a large of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, inclusion of breaths in the first few minutes correlated with better neurological outcomes in hypoxic cases. However, the technique requires training to minimize risks like rib fractures (occurring in 10-30% of cases) or aspiration, underscoring the importance of barrier devices in professional settings.

Compression-Only CPR

Compression-only CPR, also known as hands-only CPR, involves performing uninterrupted chest compressions without rescue breaths, making it a simplified technique particularly suited for untrained bystanders responding to adult . This approach emphasizes rapid initiation of compressions to maintain blood flow to vital organs, differing from conventional CPR by eliminating ventilation pauses that can interrupt circulation. The execution of compression-only CPR requires the rescuer to position themselves correctly, typically beside the victim who is lying on a firm surface, and place the heel of one hand on the center of the chest (lower half of the ) with the other hand on top, interlocking fingers. Compressions are then delivered continuously at a rate of 100 to 120 per minute, with each push aiming for a depth of about 5 to 6 cm (2 to 2.4 inches) in adults, allowing full chest recoil between compressions without leaning on the chest. No pauses for breaths are included, continuing until professional help arrives or the victim shows signs of life. The rationale for this method stems from its ability to avoid risks associated with rescue ventilations, such as gastric insufflation—which can lead to and aspiration—and concerns over disease transmission during mouth-to-mouth contact, barriers that often deter bystanders from initiating CPR. It is particularly sufficient for the majority of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (approximately 80% of cases), which are of primary cardiac origin like , where oxygenation from residual lung air and circulating blood supports short-term without additional breaths.00260-0/fulltext) Promotion of compression-only CPR gained momentum with the American Heart Association's advisory statement and public campaign, which shifted emphasis toward this technique for lay rescuers to increase bystander intervention rates. Studies have shown it yields equivalent short-term survival outcomes to conventional CPR in adult out-of-hospital arrests, with neurologically intact survival rates comparable in witnessed cardiac events. Despite its benefits, compression-only CPR has limitations, as it is less effective for asphyxial arrests—such as those from , , or prolonged hypoxia—where supplemental oxygenation via ventilations improves outcomes, with survival rates notably lower (around 5%) compared to conventional methods (about 7%) in noncardiac cases. It is not recommended as the primary approach for children or infants, whose arrests are more often asphyxial. Dispatcher instructions play a crucial role in guiding compression-only CPR, as emergency call takers can provide real-time, phone-based directions to untrained bystanders, significantly increasing the likelihood of correct and prompt compressions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. International guidelines strongly recommend prioritize chest compression-only instructions for suspected adult s to maximize bystander participation and survival chances.

Alternative Positions and Methods

Alternative positions and methods for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are employed when the standard is impractical due to patient constraints, such as during ongoing , trauma immobilization, or risks associated with repositioning. These approaches prioritize initiating compressions immediately to minimize interruptions, though they generally produce lower hemodynamic efficacy compared to conventional CPR. Evidence supporting their use derives primarily from case reports, simulation studies, and systematic reviews, with limited randomized controlled trials available. Prone CPR involves delivering chest compressions directly on the patient's back, typically between the scapulae or over the (T7-T10), at a rate of 100-120 per minute and depth of approximately 5 cm in adults, while maintaining full chest recoil. This method is indicated for patients in who are already prone for reasons including surgical procedures, severe respiratory distress (e.g., ARDS in cases), or trauma where turning could exacerbate injuries or delay care. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) endorses prone CPR as a reasonable option when an advanced airway is in place and supination poses safety risks, based on very low-certainty evidence from 29 case reports and two non-randomized studies showing (ROSC) in up to 100% of adult cases and survival to discharge in 100% of reported adults. Hemodynamic outcomes, such as systolic (mean 72 mmHg prone vs. 48 mmHg in select studies) and end-tidal CO2, may approach or exceed values in some scenarios, though overall is estimated at 60-80% of efficacy due to altered thoracic mechanics. Risks include potential pressure injuries to the back, endotracheal tube dislodgement, and suboptimal ventilation without an advanced airway; rescuers should monitor invasive and ETCO2 if available. Prone defibrillation is feasible with anterior-posterior pad placement for shockable rhythms. Lateral (or side-lying) CPR is utilized in scenarios where supine positioning is hindered by airway management challenges, surgical exposure (e.g., neurosurgery or renal procedures), or patient fixation devices. Compressions are performed side-to-side on the lateral chest wall, often requiring two rescuers—one for compressions at 100-120 per minute with adequate depth and recoil, and another for back support to ensure force transmission—while an advanced airway facilitates ventilation. Evidence is anecdotal, drawn from four case reports demonstrating ROSC within 2-5 minutes without neurological deficits, and simulation studies confirming compression quality comparable to when using feedback devices. No randomized trials exist, and efficacy is reduced compared to standard methods due to inefficient force vectoring, with recommendations to revert to if initial efforts fail. uses anteroposterior pad placement (left and subscapular). This technique is rarely applied outside operating rooms, comprising less than 5% of CPR instances overall. Open-chest cardiac massage, performed via resuscitative , provides direct manual compression of the heart in surgical or severe trauma settings, such as penetrating thoracic injuries or confirmed by focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST). The procedure involves a left anterolateral incision, pericardiotomy if needed, and bimanual heart compression between palms at a rate matching standard CPR, often with internal . It is indicated for pulseless patients after brief closed-chest CPR (<15 minutes) in penetrating trauma, yielding survival rates of 7.4-8.5% overall, with higher success (up to 20-30%) in isolated penetrating cardiac wounds versus blunt trauma (1-2%). Animal models and clinical series demonstrate superior vital organ perfusion compared to closed-chest CPR, but human evidence is limited to observational data from emergency departments and operating rooms, where it is used in under 5% of arrests, primarily in military or Level 1 trauma centers. Risks include hemorrhage, infection, and iatrogenic injury, necessitating immediate surgical expertise. This method is not for routine use but serves as a bridge to definitive repair. These alternatives are employed infrequently, mainly in specialized contexts like trauma or perioperative care, due to their complexity and inferior reliability to supine CPR; training emphasizes rapid assessment for repositioning feasibility. Systematic reviews highlight the need for further high-quality research to refine techniques and quantify outcomes.

Special Circumstances

CPR in Pregnancy

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in pregnant patients requires specific adaptations to address physiological changes that can compromise maternal and fetal circulation. During pregnancy, particularly after 20 weeks of gestation, the gravid uterus can cause aortocaval compression when the patient is supine, reducing venous return and cardiac output by up to 25-30%. To mitigate this, rescuers should perform manual left uterine displacement (LUD) using a two-handed technique from the patient's left side, lifting the uterus laterally to relieve compression while maintaining high-quality chest compressions. Alternatively, a 27-30 degree left lateral tilt may be used if manual displacement is not feasible, though evidence suggests it can slightly reduce compression depth and rate compared to supine LUD. Pregnancy induces significant cardiopulmonary alterations that influence CPR efficacy. Maternal blood volume increases by 40-50% to support fetal needs, peaking at 28-34 weeks, which expands cardiac output by 30-50% but also heightens the risk of hypotension during arrest. Respiratory changes include a 20% reduction in functional residual capacity due to diaphragmatic elevation by the uterus, combined with increased oxygen consumption (up to 20% higher), leading to faster desaturation and a greater aspiration risk from relaxed lower esophageal sphincter tone. These factors necessitate prioritizing maternal oxygenation and ventilation during resuscitation. The CPR sequence for pregnant patients modifies standard protocols to account for these risks. High-quality chest compressions remain the foundation, targeting a depth of at least 5 cm at 100-120 per minute, but early advanced airway management is emphasized due to the high likelihood of difficult intubation from airway edema and breast tissue enlargement. An experienced provider should secure the airway with endotracheal intubation or a supraglottic device, delivering asynchronous ventilations at 10 breaths per minute, confirmed by waveform capnography. Intravenous access should be established above the diaphragm to avoid delayed drug delivery, and defibrillation follows standard indications without altering energy doses. For patients beyond 20 weeks gestation without return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), preparation for perimortem cesarean delivery (PMCD), also known as resuscitative hysterotomy, is critical to improve outcomes for both mother and fetus. The 2025 guidelines recommend initiating PMCD within 5 minutes of arrest onset if ROSC is not achieved, as this timing optimizes uteroplacental perfusion and maternal venous return post-delivery. This procedure involves a rapid midline incision and should be performed even if fetal viability is uncertain, as it can facilitate maternal resuscitation; neonatal teams should be alerted immediately for post-delivery care. Maternal and fetal survival rates during CPR in pregnancy remain challenging but improve with protocol adherence. In-hospital maternal survival to discharge is estimated at 25-59%, while out-of-hospital cases report lower rates around 12-29%. Fetal survival approaches 50% with prompt PMCD within 5 minutes, compared to under 20% if delayed beyond 15 minutes, underscoring the need for immediate intervention. These outcomes highlight the AHA's emphasis on multidisciplinary team activation, including obstetrics and neonatology, at the onset of arrest.

Family Presence During CPR

Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), often referred to as family-witnessed resuscitation (FWR) or family presence during resuscitation (FPDR), involves allowing immediate family members or significant others to observe resuscitation efforts in clinical settings. This practice aims to provide emotional support to families while respecting patient-centered care principles. Evidence from studies in the 2010s, including a large randomized controlled trial in France, indicates that FPDR does not detrimentally affect CPR performance, such as compression quality or resuscitation duration, and does not increase stress among healthcare providers during the procedure. Additionally, FPDR has been associated with reduced symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in family members compared to those not present, particularly in out-of-hospital settings, as endorsed by the . Effective protocols for implementing FPDR emphasize the role of a designated family supporter, typically a trained nurse or staff member not involved in the resuscitation team, to provide clear communication, emotional guidance, and explanations of procedures to family members. These protocols also include offering families the option to leave at any time if the experience becomes overwhelming, ensuring voluntary participation and minimizing distress. Such structured approaches help balance family involvement with the operational needs of the resuscitation team. The benefits of FPDR include improved grief processing and emotional closure for families, as presence allows them to comprehend the efforts made on behalf of their loved one and reduces feelings of helplessness. Surveys indicate that 70-90% of family members prefer the option to be present during resuscitation, reporting it as a source of comfort and aiding in long-term psychological adjustment. Despite these advantages, challenges persist, including perceived stress among healthcare teams in approximately 10-20% of cases, where providers report concerns about distractions or emotional interference, though objective measures often show no impact on efficacy. Addressing these requires comprehensive training for staff to build confidence and standardize responses. Major guidelines from the AHA and European Resuscitation Council (ERC) have supported FPDR since the early 2000s, with the AHA first endorsing it in its 2000 guidelines as a reasonable practice in most situations. The ERC's 2025 guidelines reinforce this by recommending hospital protocols for FPDR management and staff education, with no significant shifts from prior recommendations as of 2025.

CPR in Pediatric and Neonatal Cases

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in pediatric and neonatal cases requires modifications to account for the smaller anatomical structures, higher respiratory rates, and differing etiologies of cardiac arrest compared to adults. In children, approximately 70% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests stem from respiratory causes such as asphyxia, drowning, or airway obstruction, in contrast to adults where about 80% are primary cardiac events. These differences necessitate an initial focus on ventilation and airway management during resuscitation efforts. For pediatric patients aged 1 to 8 years (or up to puberty), high-quality CPR involves chest compressions at a rate of 100 to 120 per minute, with a depth of approximately one-third the anteroposterior chest diameter, or about 5 cm (2 inches). The compression-to-ventilation ratio is 30:2 for a single rescuer and 15:2 for two or more rescuers, allowing for coordinated efforts to optimize oxygenation. Compressions should use the heel of one or two hands, depending on the child's size, placed at the lower half of the sternum, with full chest recoil between compressions to facilitate venous return. Guidelines from the American Heart Association's Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) emphasize minimizing interruptions in compressions and achieving adequate depth to improve outcomes in asphyxial arrests. In infants under 1 year of age, techniques are further adapted due to the fragility of the rib cage and smaller chest size. Compressions are performed using the one-hand technique (for a single rescuer) or the two-thumbs-encircling hands technique (for two rescuers; switch to two-thumbs if one-hand is ineffective), targeting a depth of 4 to 5 cm (1.5 inches) at the same rate of 100 to 120 per minute. The compression-to-ventilation ratio remains 30:2 for single rescuers and 15:2 for two rescuers, with breaths delivered gently to avoid gastric insufflation. These adjustments help prevent rib fractures while ensuring effective circulation, particularly in scenarios involving respiratory distress. Neonatal resuscitation, applicable to newborns in the first minutes of life, prioritizes initial non-invasive steps before CPR. After birth, the primary actions include warming, drying, and stimulating the infant to encourage spontaneous breathing and crying. If the heart rate remains below 100 beats per minute despite positive pressure ventilation, chest compressions are initiated using the two-thumb encircling technique at a depth of one-third the chest diameter, coordinated in a 3:1 ratio with ventilations (three compressions to one breath, achieving 90 compressions and 30 breaths per minute). This ratio is tailored to the asphyxial nature of most neonatal arrests, emphasizing ventilation to correct hypoxia. The American Heart Association's Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines underscore the importance of coordinated team responses in delivery rooms to address these unique physiological needs. A key aspect of pediatric and neonatal CPR is the management of foreign body airway obstruction, a common respiratory cause. For conscious infants, rescuers deliver 5 back blows followed by 5 chest thrusts in repeated cycles until the object is expelled; for children, 5 back blows alternate with 5 abdominal thrusts. If the child becomes unresponsive, CPR begins immediately, with checks for the object in the mouth before ventilations. These protocols, integrated into AHA PALS guidelines, aim to rapidly restore airway patency and prevent progression to full arrest.

Devices and Aids

Defibrillators

Defibrillators are essential devices in (CPR) for treating shockable rhythms such as (VF) and pulseless (VT), delivering an electrical shock to restore normal heart rhythm. They function by simultaneously depolarizing a critical mass of the myocardium, extinguishing the chaotic electrical activity in VF or VT and allowing the to resume control of cardiac depolarization. This intervention is most effective when performed early, as the probability of successful defibrillation decreases by approximately 10% per minute of delay in untreated VF. Two primary types of defibrillators are used in CPR: manual defibrillators, operated by trained healthcare professionals in hospital settings, and automated external defibrillators (AEDs), designed for use by laypersons or first responders in public or out-of-hospital environments. Manual devices allow for rhythm interpretation via an attached monitor and customizable shock delivery, while AEDs automatically analyze the cardiac rhythm and advise on shock necessity, reducing user error. Regarding waveforms, biphasic defibrillators, which deliver current in two directions, are preferred over older monophasic models that use unidirectional current, as biphasic waveforms achieve defibrillation with lower energy levels (typically 120-200 J for adults) and higher efficacy, minimizing myocardial damage. In CPR protocols, defibrillators integrate with chest compressions through a cycle-based approach: after initial CPR for about 2 minutes (or immediately for witnessed arrests with a defibrillator available), the rhythm is analyzed, and a shock is delivered if VF or VT is present, followed by immediate resumption of CPR for another 2 minutes before re-analysis. For adults, the recommended initial energy is 200 J for biphasic waveforms or 360 J for monophasic; subsequent shocks may escalate if needed. In witnessed cardiac arrests, guidelines emphasize prompt defibrillation without preceding CPR to maximize survival, as per the American Heart Association (AHA) 2025 guidelines. For pediatric cases, energy doses are weight-based at 2-4 J/kg initially (up to 10 J/kg maximum), using specialized pads or attenuators with AEDs to adjust for smaller patients. The first-shock success rate for terminating VF with biphasic defibrillators ranges from 70% to 90% in restoring organized rhythm when delivered early, though overall survival to hospital discharge depends on integrated CPR quality and is around 50% or higher with rapid intervention. Safety is paramount: shocks are contraindicated for non-shockable rhythms like asystole or pulseless electrical activity (PEA), as they can induce VF without benefit and risk harm; AEDs incorporate safeguards to prevent inappropriate delivery. The AHA 2025 guidelines prioritize biphasic devices, early defibrillation for shockable rhythms, and avoidance of routine double sequential shocks due to insufficient evidence of benefit.

Feedback and Timing Devices

Feedback and timing devices are assistive tools designed to provide real-time guidance during manual (CPR), helping rescuers maintain optimal compression rates, depths, and recoil to enhance overall CPR quality. These devices typically incorporate sensors such as accelerometers to measure chest compression metrics and deliver prompts via audio, visual, or haptic cues, addressing common deviations from guideline targets like a compression rate of 100–120 compressions per minute and depth of at least 5 cm in adults. While not mandatory for all CPR scenarios, their use is endorsed by major guidelines for professional rescuers to optimize performance during both training and actual resuscitations. Common types include metronomes or audio-based systems that emit rhythmic beeps or tones at 100–120 beats per minute to guide compression timing, often integrated into automated external defibrillators (AEDs) or standalone apps. More advanced variants use accelerometers placed on the chest to monitor depth and recoil, providing corrective feedback through voice prompts (e.g., "push harder" or "allow full recoil") or visual indicators like LED lights that illuminate green for compliance and red for deviations. These systems aim to minimize interruptions and ensure complete chest wall recoil between compressions, which is critical for coronary perfusion. Prominent examples include the Philips HeartStart FR3 AED, which integrates Q-CPR technology to deliver real-time audio and visual feedback on compression depth and rate via a dashboard display and voice instructions. Similarly, Laerdal's Q-CPR system employs a sensor module attached to manikins or patients, offering LED-based visual cues and app-connected data for immediate recoil and depth guidance during training or resuscitation. These devices can function standalone or be embedded in AEDs, allowing seamless integration without replacing manual technique. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews indicates that audiovisual feedback devices significantly improve adherence to CPR guidelines, with studies showing enhanced compression depth (e.g., from subtarget to guideline-compliant levels) and rate accuracy during simulated and real arrests. For instance, real-time feedback has been associated with a 25.6% increase in in-hospital cardiac arrest survival to discharge (54% vs. 28.4%) through better overall quality, including reduced hands-off time and higher chest compression fractions exceeding 80%. In out-of-hospital settings, such devices have reduced pauses in compressions, facilitating compliance with minimal interruption protocols. In practice, these devices are recommended for use in professional training programs to build consistent skills, as they enable self-correction and objective debriefing, though they are optional in layperson scenarios. The 2025 American Heart Association guidelines classify their application as reasonable (Class 2b) for real-time optimization by trained providers, emphasizing integration into team-based resuscitations; a new recommendation includes considering augmented reality for providing real-time CPR feedback in training for lay rescuers and health care professionals (Class 2b). Standalone versions, such as pocket metronomes, are particularly useful in resource-limited environments to maintain rate without complex setup. Despite benefits, limitations include the potential for over-reliance, which may distract rescuers from patient assessment or lead to fixation on device prompts rather than adaptive technique. Feedback systems do not evaluate physiological responses like end-tidal CO2, limiting their scope to mechanical metrics alone, and evidence for consistent patient outcome improvements remains mixed, with stronger effects in controlled training than chaotic real-world arrests. Guidelines thus advise their use as adjuncts, not substitutes, for high-quality manual CPR.

Mechanical and Automated Devices

Mechanical and automated devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are designed to deliver consistent chest compressions without relying on human effort, particularly useful in scenarios where manual CPR becomes fatiguing or impractical. These devices automate the compression phase of CPR, aiming to maintain high-quality compressions over extended periods. Two primary types dominate clinical use: pneumatic piston devices, such as the LUCAS (Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System), and load-distributing band systems, like the AutoPulse. The LUCAS employs a battery-powered piston that applies force directly to the sternum, while the AutoPulse uses a circumferential band around the torso to distribute compression load more evenly across the chest. Both device types provide compressions at a consistent rate of 100-120 per minute and a depth of 5-6 cm, aligning with established resuscitation guidelines to optimize coronary and cerebral perfusion. Unlike manual , which declines in quality due to rescuer fatigue after just a few minutes, these mechanical systems sustain uninterrupted, guideline-compliant compressions for up to 30-45 minutes on a single battery charge. A key feature in many models, such as the LUCAS, is active decompression, where the device actively lifts the chest between compressions to enhance venous return and reduce intrathoracic pressure, potentially improving hemodynamic outcomes like coronary perfusion pressure by up to 20-30% compared to passive recoil in manual techniques. Indications for mechanical devices include prolonged resuscitation efforts, such as during extended patient transport or in environments with limited personnel, where consistent compressions are challenging to maintain manually. Evidence on clinical outcomes remains mixed; while these devices improve short-term metrics like return of spontaneous circulation in some out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases, multiple meta-analyses have found no significant improvement in long-term survival or neurological outcomes compared to manual CPR. For instance, a 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis of in-hospital cardiac arrests reported no difference in 1-hour survival rates between mechanical and manual methods (38% vs. 42%). Another 2024 meta-analysis of 24 studies on out-of-hospital arrests similarly showed no statistically significant differences in survival to discharge. The American Heart Association (AHA) 2025 guidelines classify mechanical devices as optional adjuncts rather than routine tools, recommending their use selectively in specific high-risk scenarios rather than as a replacement for manual CPR, and state that routine use is not recommended. Application of these devices typically requires 10-20 seconds for setup, involving patient positioning and device attachment while minimizing interruptions in compressions; for example, the LUCAS can be applied in about 12 seconds, and the AutoPulse in around 19 seconds. They are compatible with defibrillation, allowing shocks to be delivered without removal, though perishock pauses may still occur briefly (reduced to 4-10 seconds with proper integration). Costs for these units range from approximately $15,000 to $20,000 per device, reflecting their portability, durability, and integration with emergency medical systems.

Digital Tools and Apps

Digital tools and apps for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) primarily serve to guide bystanders and professionals through emergency responses using smartphones, providing real-time instructions and alerts to improve intervention timeliness and quality. These applications often integrate with emergency dispatch systems to notify nearby CPR-trained individuals of cardiac arrests, leveraging GPS for location-based alerts. For instance, the PulsePoint app, a 911-connected mobile platform, alerts registered users within a defined radius of a sudden cardiac arrest, prompting them to perform CPR and guiding them to the nearest automated external defibrillator (AED) via GPS mapping. Similarly, the American Heart Association's (AHA) Hands-Only CPR app offers video demonstrations and step-by-step audio prompts for compression-only CPR, aimed at untrained laypersons to simplify the process without requiring mouth-to-mouth ventilation. Key features of these apps include voice-guided instructions, visual tutorials, and sensor-based feedback to ensure proper technique. Many utilize the smartphone's built-in accelerometer to monitor chest compression depth and rate in real time, providing auditory or visual cues to maintain an optimal rate of 100-120 compressions per minute and depth of 5-6 cm. For example, apps like Pocket CPR employ this technology to deliver immediate feedback during performance, helping users adjust their efforts on the spot. Integration with emergency services enhances coordination; synchronizes with 911 dispatchers to send alerts only to verified CPR/AED-trained responders, potentially reducing response times by alerting crowdsourced volunteers. Evidence from randomized trials indicates these tools boost bystander CPR initiation rates, with one study reporting an increase from 48% in control groups to 62% among app-dispatched laypersons, alongside higher AED application rates. Despite their benefits, digital CPR tools have limitations, including dependency on smartphone access and varying accuracy in feedback mechanisms. Not all individuals have compatible devices or sufficient battery life during emergencies, potentially excluding vulnerable populations from app-based guidance. Accelerometer-based rate detection achieves high reliability, with errors averaging 2.7 compressions per minute and accuracy within ±10 compressions per minute in 98% of cases, but depth estimation can be less precise due to phone placement inconsistencies or user inexperience, sometimes resulting in suboptimal performance. As of 2025, emerging beta applications incorporate artificial intelligence for enhanced rhythm analysis during CPR, using machine learning to classify shockable rhythms like amid compression artifacts, though these remain in early testing phases with risks of false positives.

Effectiveness

Survival Rates

Survival rates for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remain low globally, reflecting the challenges of timely intervention and underlying cardiac arrest circumstances. According to the 2025 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, overall survival to hospital discharge for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is approximately 10.5% among adults, with neurologically intact survival rates around 8% based on registries like CARES. In contrast, in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) outcomes are better, with survival to discharge at about 23.6% for adults. Initial cardiac rhythm significantly influences prognosis, with shockable rhythms such as or pulseless ventricular tachycardia yielding higher survival rates of 25-40% to hospital discharge in OHCA cases, compared to 5-10% for non-shockable rhythms like or . Bystander-initiated substantially improves these odds, approximately doubling the likelihood of survival (odds ratio 2.0-2.5) by maintaining circulation until professional help arrives. The time to CPR initiation is critical, as survival chances halve approximately every 5 minutes without intervention due to progressive organ ischemia. These statistics, drawn from AHA reports spanning 2020-2025, show incremental improvements but no major paradigm shifts.

Influencing Factors

Several factors influence the success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), including patient demographics, arrest circumstances, and underlying health conditions, which can significantly alter survival probabilities. These variables interact in complex ways, often modeled statistically to predict outcomes, and understanding them helps tailor resuscitation strategies and public health interventions. The 2025 AHA guidelines emphasize addressing disparities to improve equity in outcomes. Age is a critical determinant of CPR outcomes, with survival rates declining markedly in older patients. For young adults aged 18-35 years, survival to one month after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) reaches approximately 21%, reflecting better physiological reserve and higher likelihood of shockable rhythms. In contrast, octogenarians and older individuals experience much lower rates; for those over 90 in OHCA scenarios, survival drops to about 2.4%, due to comorbidities and frailty that impair response to resuscitation. Pediatric cases, typically under 18 years, show survival rates around 40% to discharge in in-hospital settings as of 2025, though out-of-hospital pediatric arrests often yield 10-15% survival, influenced by etiology differences like asphyxia rather than cardiac causes. The location of the cardiac arrest profoundly affects survival, primarily through differences in witness status and access to automated external defibrillators (AEDs). Public locations yield roughly twice the survival rate compared to homes, with reported figures of 8% versus 2% to discharge in OHCA, attributed to higher rates of witnessed arrests (often 41% in public versus 22% at home) and prompt AED deployment. Home arrests, comprising about 70-75% of OHCA events, suffer from delays in bystander intervention and limited AED availability, halving the odds of favorable outcomes. Prior health conditions and arrest context further modulate CPR efficacy. In-hospital witnessed arrests achieve survival rates around 25% to discharge, benefiting from immediate monitoring and rapid response teams, with odds 2.7 times higher than unwitnessed events. Chronic diseases, such as , cancer, or renal impairment, substantially reduce survival; patients with multiple comorbidities face odds ratios as low as 0.5, effectively halving survival probabilities compared to those without, due to poorer tolerance of ischemia and resuscitation stress. Gender and racial disparities also play roles, often linked to systemic biases rather than biology alone. Females exhibit a slight survival advantage in some post-CPR analyses, with odds 9% higher for survival to 30 days after in-hospital arrest, possibly due to differences in arrest rhythms or bystander hesitation patterns. However, Black patients experience lower adjusted odds of survival to discharge (aOR 0.86 as of 2024), stemming from disparities in bystander CPR receipt, hospital quality, and socioeconomic factors, exacerbating baseline risks. These influences are frequently quantified using logistic regression models to estimate survival odds. A common formulation predicts the probability of survival as P=11+e(β0+β1age+β2bystander CPR+)P = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-(\beta_0 + \beta_1 \cdot \text{age} + \beta_2 \cdot \text{bystander CPR} + \cdots)}}, where coefficients like β1\beta_1 (negative for age) and β2\beta_2 (positive for bystander intervention) reflect factor impacts, enabling risk stratification in clinical settings.

Complications

Physical Injuries

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compressions frequently result in musculoskeletal injuries to the chest wall, with rib fractures being the most common, occurring in 30% to 80% of cases based on autopsy and imaging studies. Sternal fractures are also prevalent, affecting 20% to 30% of patients who undergo CPR. These injuries arise from the forceful application of chest compressions required to generate adequate cardiac output during resuscitation efforts. Visceral injuries, such as pneumothorax, are less frequent but can occur, with incidence rates ranging from 2.5% to 26% in post-CPR patients, particularly those with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Other rare complications include hemothorax or lung contusions, typically linked to multiple rib fractures. Autopsy studies from the 2010s, including systematic reviews of non-traumatic cardiac arrest cases, confirm these patterns, revealing that injuries are more pronounced on the anterior chest but do not correlate with increased mortality when ROSC is achieved. Risk factors for these physical injuries include advanced age, osteoporosis, and female sex, as women experience higher rates of rib (37% vs. 26%) and sternal fractures compared to men due to differences in bone density and thoracic geometry. Over-compression depth, often exceeding the recommended 5-6 cm, further elevates risk by increasing force on fragile structures. Pre-existing conditions like kyphosis or obesity can exacerbate chest wall stiffness, making fractures more likely during prolonged CPR. Prevention strategies emphasize proper technique, such as correct hand placement on the lower half of the sternum and allowing full chest recoil between compressions, which minimizes uneven force distribution. Feedback devices that monitor compression depth and rate in real-time have been shown to reduce injury risk by ensuring adherence to guidelines, with the recommending their use in training and professional settings. Post-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), routine chest imaging like CT scans aids early detection and guides care without interrupting resuscitation. Management of CPR-related physical injuries is typically conservative, focusing on pain control with analgesics, incentive spirometry to prevent atelectasis, and supplemental oxygen as needed. Surgical intervention, such as rib plating for flail chest, is rare and reserved for cases with significant instability or respiratory compromise. Most patients recover without long-term sequelae, as these injuries rarely impact overall survival outcomes.

Neurological and Psychological Outcomes

Neurological outcomes following successful (CPR) are primarily determined by the duration and severity of brain hypoxia during , which leads to anoxic-ischemic injury. This injury arises from the abrupt cessation of cerebral blood flow and oxygen delivery, causing rapid depletion of , cytotoxic edema, and neuronal death, particularly in vulnerable regions like the hippocampus and . The extent of damage is influenced by the no-flow (pre-CPR) and low-flow (during CPR) phases, with prolonged hypoxia exacerbating reperfusion injury upon return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Assessment of neurological function post-CPR commonly employs the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale, a five-point metric ranging from CPC 1 (good cerebral performance) to CPC 5 (death), where scores of 1 or 2 indicate favorable outcomes with minimal to moderate disability. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as a key tool for evaluating brain damage, revealing patterns of hypoxic-ischemic injury such as diffusion restriction in gray matter structures; elevated MRI injury scores within two weeks post-arrest correlate strongly with unfavorable outcomes like death or severe disability. Among patients with favorable neurological recovery, approximately 74% achieved ROSC within the first 10 minutes of CPR, highlighting the importance of rapid resuscitation for better outcomes. Psychological sequelae are prevalent among CPR survivors and their families, reflecting the traumatic nature of cardiac arrest. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) affects approximately 20% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors (95% CI: 3-65%), manifesting as intrusive memories, avoidance, and hyperarousal that impair daily functioning. Family members, often termed "cosurvivors," experience significant anxiety, with up to 66% reporting elevated levels shortly after the event, alongside depression in over 50% and PTSD symptoms in about 33%. Targeted temperature management (TTM), maintaining core body temperature at 32-36°C for 24 hours post-ROSC, mitigates neurological injury by reducing metabolic demand and inflammation. The Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest (HACA) trial demonstrated that TTM at 32-34°C increased favorable neurological outcomes (CPC 1-2) by 16% absolute (49% vs. 33%) compared to normothermia in comatose survivors of ventricular fibrillation arrest. Subsequent guidelines endorse TTM as a standard intervention to enhance survival with good brain function, though recent trials show no superiority of stricter hypothermia targets over milder cooling. Long-term neurological and psychological recovery varies, but approximately 56% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors achieve good functional independence (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score ≥7) at one year, with 73% living at home without formal care needs. Quality of life in these individuals often approximates population norms, though persistent cognitive deficits and emotional challenges underscore the need for ongoing rehabilitation.

Ethical and End-of-Life Issues

Dysthanasia refers to the inappropriate prolongation of the dying process through futile medical interventions, such as (CPR) in terminally ill patients where it is unlikely to achieve therapeutic goals and instead merely extends suffering. In intensive care settings, healthcare providers report encountering dysthanasia or futile care in approximately 30% of cases, highlighting the ethical burden of such practices on patients, families, and clinicians. For CPR specifically, studies indicate that in-hospital attempts are often deemed futile when survival to discharge is below 10-15%, particularly in patients with advanced terminal conditions, leading to calls for physicians to assume primary responsibility in recommending against such interventions to avoid burdening families. Ethical considerations also arise in the context of organ donation after circulatory death (DCD), where extracorporeal CPR (eCPR) can preserve organs for transplantation in cases of unsuccessful resuscitation. Protocols for eCPR-supported DCD, including normothermic regional perfusion to restore circulation post-death declaration, have been implemented in over 15 countries worldwide, such as Spain, France, the United Kingdom, and emerging programs in Italy and Portugal, to expand the donor pool while respecting ethical boundaries around death determination. These protocols typically adhere to Maastricht categories for controlled or uncontrolled DCD, ensuring a no-touch period (e.g., 5-20 minutes) before organ recovery to confirm irreversible cessation of circulation, thereby balancing the potential to save multiple lives through donation with concerns over undermining trust in end-of-life care. Decisions to withhold CPR are guided by advance directives, code status orders, and shared decision-making processes to honor patient autonomy and avoid non-beneficial treatments. Advance directives, such as Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms available in all 50 U.S. states, explicitly document preferences against CPR in scenarios of irreversible death or low likelihood of meaningful recovery, and must be respected by healthcare providers unless contradicted by a patient's current capacity to express wishes. Code status discussions, often involving do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, emphasize shared decision-making between clinicians, patients, or surrogates, incorporating prognostic information and values to determine when CPR would be inappropriate, such as in cases of terminal illness or advanced frailty. The American Heart Association (AHA) provides key ethical guidelines on CPR, with the 2020 update reinforcing patient-centered approaches to initiating or withholding resuscitation, including the use of evidence-based futility criteria to prevent harm, and the 2025 guidelines expanding on shared decision-making for advanced therapies like eCPR while addressing moral distress among providers. Cultural variations influence these practices; for instance, physicians in some regions, such as , are more likely to withhold CPR in futile scenarios compared to those in or U.S. settings, where family involvement or opt-out systems may lead to higher continuation rates, reflecting differing norms around autonomy, family roles, and death. Controversies persist regarding ageism in CPR decisions, where chronological age often serves as a proxy for futility, potentially discriminating against older adults despite evidence that frailty assessments, rather than age alone, better predict outcomes. A 2025 multicenter study in Japan revealed a sharp drop in eCPR initiation at age 70 (from 34.2% to 24.5%), uncorrelated with survival differences, underscoring implicit bias and calling for equity-focused reforms using tools like the Clinical Frailty Scale to ensure non-discriminatory access. Recent emphases in 2025 ethical discourse prioritize equity by addressing structural ageism in resuscitation protocols, advocating for individualized assessments to mitigate disparities in end-of-life care.

Epidemiology

Incidence of Cardiac Arrest

The incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) varies globally, with an estimated average of 55 cases per 100,000 person-years among adults. This rate reflects emergency medical services (EMS)-assessed events and can range from 30 to 97 per 100,000 depending on regional reporting and definitions. In the United States, approximately 350,000 OHCA cases occur annually, representing a significant public health burden. Demographically, cardiac arrest incidence rises sharply with age, peaking in the 60- to 80-year-old group, where the majority of cases are reported. Men experience cardiac arrest at approximately twice the rate of women, with a male-to-female ratio of about 2:1 across studied populations. The primary causes of cardiac arrest include cardiac etiologies, which account for approximately 80-85% of OHCA cases, with ischemic heart disease being the most common through mechanisms such as coronary artery blockage leading to arrhythmias. Non-cardiac causes such as respiratory failure contribute to about 15-20% of instances, often involving airway obstruction or pulmonary issues. In high-income countries, cardiac arrest incidence has shown a slight decline over recent decades, attributed to advancements in cardiovascular prevention such as statin use and smoking cessation programs, as documented in the 2024 American Heart Association statistics update. Although specific 2024 World Health Organization data on trends are not isolated for cardiac arrest, broader cardiovascular disease mortality has decreased in these settings. Regarding location, urban areas often report higher numbers of OHCA events than rural areas, primarily due to greater population density facilitating more events per capita.

Bystander Response Rates

Bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains a critical intervention for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), yet initiation rates vary significantly by region. In the United States, approximately 40-42% of OHCA cases receive bystander CPR, based on data from over 356,000 annual events reported in recent national registries; as of 2024 CARES data, bystander CPR was initiated in 41.5% of cases, with the 2025 AHA guidelines noting a modest increase in overall survival trends. In contrast, Scandinavian countries demonstrate higher rates, with Sweden reporting bystander CPR in up to 70-82% of cases following widespread public training campaigns over the past three decades, and Norway exceeding 70% in certain regions. These disparities underscore the impact of cultural and educational factors on response willingness. Key barriers to bystander CPR initiation include limited training coverage and psychological hurdles. Only a small proportion of U.S. adults (approximately 2.4% annually) receive CPR training, contributing to hesitation during emergencies. Fear of causing harm ranks among the most common obstacles, alongside concerns over legal repercussions and disease transmission. Since the early 2010s, campaigns promoting compression-only CPR have increased its adoption among bystanders, simplifying the process for untrained individuals. In the U.S. and Sweden, the proportion of initiated CPR that is compression-only rose from around 20-28% in the mid-2000s to 50-76% by the late 2010s, correlating with overall bystander intervention rates climbing by 10-30 percentage points. This shift has been linked to improved survival outcomes without requiring ventilations, which many lay rescuers find intimidating. Dispatcher-assisted CPR, where emergency operators provide real-time instructions, significantly boosts initiation rates to 50-75% among callers, particularly in unwitnessed arrests where bystander action might otherwise be delayed. Studies show this approach can double overall bystander CPR provision compared to non-assisted scenarios, with urban areas seeing the highest compliance at nearly 75%. Racial and ethnic disparities persist, with Black and Hispanic individuals in the U.S. facing 20-40% lower odds of receiving bystander CPR compared to White individuals, even after adjusting for location and witness status. In 2025, initiatives like the 's updated guidelines and community programs in cities such as Chicago aim to address these gaps through targeted training and equity-focused dispatcher protocols, reporting up to 14% increases in bystander CPR among underserved groups.

Access to Timely CPR

Access to timely (CPR) is critical in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), where delays significantly impact survival outcomes. Optimal bystander-initiated CPR should begin within 2 minutes of collapse to maximize neurological preservation and return of spontaneous circulation, as initiation within 1 minute has been associated with up to 22.4% survival to hospital discharge. Globally, however, the average time to bystander CPR initiation often exceeds 7 minutes in many regions, particularly in low-resource settings, due to recognition delays and limited training. These timelines form key intervals in the , which emphasizes rapid progression from early recognition and CPR to defibrillation and advanced care to improve overall outcomes. Major barriers to prompt CPR delivery include limited availability and use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs), with bystanders shocking only 3-11% of public arrests despite shockable rhythms being present in up to 25% of cases. This low utilization stems from insufficient AED placement in high-risk areas and bystander hesitation, contributing to prolonged intervals before effective intervention. In rural areas, response times are approximately 50% longer than in urban settings—often 11-13 minutes versus 7-8 minutes for emergency medical services (EMS) arrival—exacerbated by geographic isolation and fewer trained responders. Similarly, low socioeconomic status (SES) communities experience about 30% lower access to bystander CPR, linked to reduced training opportunities and AED density, resulting in worse survival disparities. Efforts to address these gaps have focused on public access defibrillation (PAD) programs, which have demonstrated effectiveness in increasing bystander AED application rates to 19% in participating communities and improving survival by up to 40% when AEDs are used within 3-5 minutes. From 2020 to 2025, drone-based AED delivery trials have shown promising results, achieving median response times under 5 minutes—often 4-5 minutes in simulations and real-world tests—outpacing traditional EMS by 2-16 minutes in suburban and rural scenarios. These innovations target chain of survival bottlenecks, particularly the early defibrillation link. The consequences of delays are stark: survival rates decline by 7-10% per minute without CPR, dropping from nearly 50% if initiated immediately to under 10% after 10 minutes, underscoring the need for systemic improvements in access.

Society and Culture

Media Portrayals and Misconceptions

Media portrayals of (CPR) often emphasize dramatic, immediate recoveries that starkly contrast with clinical reality. Analyses of popular television medical dramas, such as a 1996 study examining episodes of ER, Chicago Hope, and Rescue 911, found that CPR resulted in survival rates of approximately 75%, with patients frequently regaining consciousness within seconds of resuscitation efforts. Similarly, a 2015 review of Grey's Anatomy and House revealed survival rates near 67%, portraying CPR as a near-miraculous intervention in high-stakes scenarios. In contrast, real-world survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest hover around 10%, while in-hospital cases achieve about 25% survival to discharge. These depictions prioritize narrative tension over procedural accuracy, showing seamless team coordination and minimal physical toll on rescuers. Such portrayals foster misconceptions that CPR serves as a universal cure-all, capable of reviving individuals from various states of collapse without significant complications. Television rarely illustrates the rapid onset of rescuer fatigue after 1-2 minutes of continuous compressions or the common risks of injuries like rib fractures, which occur in 30% to 80% of cases. Instead, scenes emphasize heroic solo efforts leading to instant revival, downplaying the need for prolonged, team-based intervention and advanced life support. This idealized view ignores the labor-intensive nature of effective CPR, where compressions must maintain a depth of at least 2 inches at 100-120 per minute, often leading to exhaustion without relief. The impact of these inaccuracies extends to public behavior and decision-making. A 2015 study highlighted how inflated success rates in TV shows may mislead viewers, contributing to overestimation of CPR efficacy and influencing end-of-life care preferences toward aggressive interventions despite poor prognoses. This overoptimism can paradoxically reduce bystander willingness to perform CPR, as individuals exposed primarily to media narratives may feel unprepared for the procedure's demands or fear causing harm, leading to hesitation in real emergencies. Research from 2017 further indicated that frequent viewers of medical dramas scored lower on CPR knowledge tests, correlating with decreased confidence in initiating resuscitation. Specific examples underscore these issues in popular media. Hollywood productions frequently depict full CPR sequences incorporating mouth-to-mouth breaths, even for bystanders, whereas current guidelines from the recommend hands-only CPR—chest compressions without ventilation—for untrained lay rescuers to simplify the process and reduce barriers like infection fears. Additionally, viral videos on social media have propagated self-CPR myths, such as "cough CPR," falsely claiming that forceful coughing during a heart attack can restore rhythm; this technique, originating from outdated 1970s reports on specific arrhythmias, is not endorsed for public use and can delay calling emergency services. The has repeatedly debunked this in 2023 and 2025 statements amid resurgences on platforms like TikTok. As of 2025, trends in streaming media show mixed progress toward greater accuracy. While critiques persist regarding sensationalized outcomes in series like The Pitt and Grey's Anatomy spin-offs, some platforms have incorporated consultant input from medical experts, leading to more realistic depictions of complications and lower success expectations in select episodes, as noted in recent analyses. This shift aims to leverage streaming's educational potential, though dramatic imperatives continue to limit full realism.

Training and Public Education

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training programs, such as the 's (AHA) Heartsaver CPR AED course, are designed for laypersons with little or no prior medical experience to learn essential skills in recognizing cardiac arrest, performing high-quality CPR, and using automated external defibrillators (AEDs). The course typically lasts about 4 hours in blended or classroom formats, including online modules for theoretical knowledge followed by hands-on practice sessions to build confidence and competence. Blended options combine self-paced online learning with in-person skills verification, while fully online variants incorporate virtual simulations for broader accessibility. These programs emphasize evidence-based techniques aligned with current guidelines, culminating in a 2-year certification card upon successful completion. In the United States, public education efforts include legislative mandates to integrate CPR training into school curricula, with 40 states plus the District of Columbia requiring high school students to receive hands-on instruction before graduation to foster a culture of preparedness among youth. Workplace standards under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) further promote CPR proficiency, requiring the availability of trained first aid and CPR personnel in certain high-risk industries like logging, electrical, and confined spaces, while recommending it as a core element of first aid programs across general industry to ensure rapid emergency response. These mandates aim to increase the pool of trained individuals, who are 3.4 times more likely to initiate bystander CPR during out-of-hospital cardiac arrests compared to untrained persons, thereby improving survival outcomes. The effectiveness of such training is tempered by skill decay, with studies indicating that CPR knowledge and performance typically retain adequacy for 3-12 months post-training before significant deterioration occurs, necessitating periodic refreshers to maintain intervention rates. Community initiatives, including free or low-cost workshops through organizations like the and Red Cross, address this by offering booster sessions and targeting underserved populations to sustain bystander response levels, which remain below 50% globally (e.g., around 40% in the US as of 2025) but rise with widespread education. Innovations in training delivery, such as virtual reality (VR) simulations and gamified mobile apps launched in 2025, enhance retention and engagement by providing immersive, scenario-based practice with real-time feedback, allowing users to rehearse compressions and AED deployment without physical equipment. On a global scale, efforts align with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies' First Aid Vision 2030, which seeks universal access to training by ensuring at least one CPR-proficient individual in every home, workplace, and school to boost community resilience against cardiac emergencies. The AHA supports this through its Emergency Cardiovascular Care 2030 Impact Goal, targeting a bystander CPR rate exceeding 50% worldwide to double out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival by the decade's end via scalable education campaigns.

Myths and Hoaxes

One prominent hoax surrounding (CPR) is "cough CPR" or self-CPR, which gained traction through viral videos and social media posts in the 2010s, falsely claiming that forceful coughing could revive someone experiencing a heart attack or cardiac arrest when alone. This technique, sometimes misrepresented as a solo revival method, lacks any scientific evidence supporting its efficacy and can lead to risks such as exhaustion, aspiration, or further cardiac strain without addressing the underlying arrest. Other common myths include the belief that breaking ribs during CPR indicates failure or improper technique, whereas rib fractures are a normal occurrence in approximately 30% to 80% of cases due to the force required for effective compressions, particularly in adults with fragile bones. Similarly, the notion that mouth-to-mouth breathing is always necessary persists, but for witnessed cardiac arrest in adults, compression-only CPR is equally effective and recommended by guidelines to avoid barriers like infection fears. These misconceptions originated largely from unchecked social media dissemination, with surveys indicating that up to 20% of the public in 2022 held beliefs in self-CPR variants, contributing to widespread confusion. The American Heart Association (AHA) has actively debunked these through fact-checks, stressing that the first step in any suspected cardiac event is to call emergency services immediately rather than attempting unproven self-interventions. Such hoaxes have significant impacts, often delaying professional help and reducing survival chances, as each minute without effective CPR lowers odds by about 10%. In 2025, efforts have intensified on using artificial intelligence for misinformation detection on platforms, aiming to curb the spread of dangerous CPR fads and promote evidence-based responses.

History

Early Developments

Attempts at resuscitation date back to ancient civilizations, with records of techniques aimed at restoring life in cases of apparent death. In ancient China during the Han Dynasty (202 BC–220 AD), medical texts such as Zhang Zhongjing's Synopsis of the Golden Chamber described methods for reviving hanged victims, including positioning the body flat, opening the airway by pulling the hair, pressing the chest, massaging limbs, and compressing the abdomen for approximately 30 minutes. Similar practices appeared in the Jin Dynasty (266–420 AD), where Ge Hong's Handbook of Prescriptions for Emergencies introduced artificial respiration using a reed pipe inserted into the mouth while blocking the nostrils and elevating the feet to promote circulation. In the Western tradition, Biblical accounts from the Hebrew Bible, such as the prophet Elijah reviving a widow's son by stretching himself upon the child and warming him until breath returned (1 Kings 17:17–24), and Elisha's similar act (2 Kings 4:32–37), represent early cultural references to revival efforts, though these were miraculous rather than systematic medical procedures. By the 18th century, more formalized attempts at artificial respiration emerged, particularly for drowning victims. In 1744, Scottish surgeon William Tossach documented the first recorded successful use of mouth-to-mouth resuscitation on a suffocated coal miner in Alloa, Scotland, providing empirical evidence that inspired broader adoption. This case, published in the Edinburgh Medical Essays and Observations, highlighted the technique's potential despite initial resistance due to social taboos. The Paris Academy of Sciences endorsed mouth-to-mouth ventilation in 1740 for apparent drowning, leading to the formation of humane societies, such as London's Society for the Recovery of Persons Apparently Drowned in 1774, which promoted these methods alongside warming and bloodletting. In the 19th century, efforts shifted toward manual ventilation techniques amid growing recognition of circulation's role. English physician Henry Robert Silvester introduced the Silvester method in 1858, a non-invasive approach for resuscitating stillborn infants and drowned individuals by laying the patient supine, raising and lowering the arms to expand the chest for inspiration, and pressing the arms against the chest for expiration, repeated 15 times per minute. Building on earlier ideas from Marshall Hall's 1856 prone pressure method, Silvester's technique aimed to mimic natural breathing and induce circulation without equipment. However, it proved inadequate for effective ventilation and circulation, delivering only about 520 cc of air per cycle—insufficient for sustained oxygenation—and was later criticized for inefficiency compared to emerging alternatives. Pre-1960 resuscitation methods lacked standardization, relying on open-chest massage or manual manipulations with success rates typically below 10% for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, limited by incomplete understanding of cardiac dynamics and poor public training. The mid-20th century marked a pivotal shift toward closed-chest techniques. In 1960, Johns Hopkins researchers William B. Kouwenhoven, James R. Jude, and G. Guy Knickerbocker published their seminal work on closed-chest cardiac massage, demonstrating that rhythmic external compressions of the sternum could maintain circulation without thoracotomy, achieving a 70% survival rate in 20 clinical cases. This innovation, validated through dog experiments showing restored blood flow, addressed prior limitations by enabling non-invasive intervention. Shortly after, Peter Safar and colleagues confirmed the efficacy of mouth-to-mouth breathing, leading to the integration of ventilation and compressions into the first formal CPR protocol. The American Heart Association endorsed this combined approach in 1963, followed by the American Red Cross in 1962, standardizing training and marking the transition from ad hoc methods to a unified lifesaving technique.

Modern Guidelines and Evolution

The modern standardization of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines emerged in the 1970s, when the (AHA) established the first national standards in the United States following the National Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiac Care in 1973. These guidelines formalized techniques for chest compressions and ventilations, recommending a compression-to-ventilation ratio of 5:1 for adult CPR to balance oxygenation and circulation. From the 1980s through the 2000s, guidelines continued to evolve based on emerging evidence, shifting focus toward minimizing interruptions in chest compressions. In 2010, the AHA updated the sequence from ABC (airway, breathing, circulation) to CAB (circulation, airway, breathing) to prioritize immediate compressions and reduce delays in initiating CPR. Concurrently, there was a push for compression-only CPR for lay rescuers, introduced by the AHA in 2008 as "Hands-Only CPR," to simplify bystander intervention and increase willingness to act without ventilation training. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) was established in 1992 to promote international consensus on resuscitation science, involving major organizations like the and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC). ILCOR conducts systematic reviews every five years, leading to synchronized updates from member councils; for instance, the and ERC release revised guidelines in cycles such as 2010, 2015, 2020, and 2025. The 2020 guidelines placed greater emphasis on high-quality CPR metrics, recommending compressions at a rate of 100–120 per minute, depth of 5–6 cm in adults, complete chest recoil between compressions, and limiting pauses to under 10 seconds to optimize coronary and cerebral perfusion. The 2025 updates, released on October 22, 2025, introduced refinements based on new evidence, including revised protocols for choking response (alternating 5 back blows and 5 abdominal thrusts for adults/children, or chest thrusts for infants), guidance on naloxone use for suspected opioid overdoses, and a reversion to a single Chain of Survival for all cardiac arrests. ILCOR's consensus has facilitated global harmonization of guidelines through national resuscitation councils, though adoption faces disparities in low-income regions where limited resources hinder training and equipment access.

Applications in Animals

Veterinary CPR Techniques

Veterinary cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques are tailored to species-specific anatomy and physiology to maximize effectiveness during cardiac arrest. In small animals such as dogs and cats, thoracic compressions form the core of basic life support, utilizing the thoracic pump mechanism where external pressure on the chest wall facilitates forward blood flow through compression of the heart between the sternum and vertebral column. Compressions are typically performed over the widest part of the thorax in lateral recumbency, aiming for a depth of one-third to one-half the chest width at a rate of 100 to 120 per minute. For larger animals like horses, techniques shift toward direct cardiac or thoracic compressions, often involving manual pressure behind the elbow in lateral recumbency, with interposed abdominal compressions sometimes incorporated to augment venous return, though supporting evidence remains limited; the 2024 RECOVER guidelines now include specific recommendations for large animal CPR. The compression-to-ventilation ratio for dogs and cats follows a 30:2 pattern for single-rescuer scenarios, with two ventilations delivered immediately after every 30 compressions to maintain oxygenation without interrupting circulation. Ventilation is supported by delivering 100% fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) through an endotracheal tube, bag-valve-mask, or oxygen mask at a rate of 10 breaths per minute once the airway is secured. These protocols emphasize minimizing interruptions in compressions to less than 10 seconds and ensuring full chest recoil between compressions to optimize hemodynamic stability. In contrast, large animal ventilation may require specialized equipment due to size, but the principle of high-concentration oxygen delivery remains consistent. Cardiac arrest in veterinary patients frequently stems from anesthetic-related complications, which account for a substantial proportion of cases—up to 85% in monitored hospital settings—and trauma, representing a primary non-anesthetic etiology in approximately 30% of incidents across various studies. The 2024 RECOVER guidelines, developed using the GRADE methodology through systematic review of veterinary and human literature, standardize these techniques for dogs and cats, recommending immediate initiation of CPR upon confirming pulselessness and apnea. Success rates vary, with return of spontaneous circulation achieved in about 35% of cases, but survival to hospital discharge typically ranges from 5% to 20%, compared to 10% to 25% in human CPR scenarios, highlighting the impact of underlying etiologies and rapid intervention. Advanced tools in veterinary CPR mirror human applications but are adapted for animal sizes; automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are recommended for shockable rhythms like ventricular fibrillation, with human-designed devices proven effective in dogs when using appropriately sized pediatric paddles or pads to ensure proper energy delivery without excessive dosing. Monitoring during CPR includes end-tidal CO2 to gauge compression quality, targeting values of at least 18 mmHg as a proxy for adequate cardiac output. These adaptations underscore the need for species-specific training to address anatomical variations, such as the relatively compliant chest in small animals versus the rigid thorax in equines.

Differences from Human CPR

Veterinary cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) differs from human CPR primarily due to anatomical variations across species, which necessitate adapted techniques for chest compressions. In felines, the narrower chest configuration often requires lateral recumbency with compressions applied from the side to effectively mimic cardiac output, contrasting with the standard sternal compressions used in humans. For equines, the larger thoracic structure demands a circumferential band method, where the chest is encircled and compressed to generate intrathoracic pressure, differing from the direct manual or mechanical compressions typical in human protocols. Ventilation strategies in veterinary CPR also diverge from human practices to account for species-specific respiratory physiology. Birds require higher tidal volumes relative to body size to maintain oxygenation during resuscitation, often necessitating air sac ventilation if endotracheal intubation proves challenging due to their unique avian airway anatomy. In exotic species such as reptiles or small mammals, intubation faces additional hurdles from anatomical constraints like glottal positioning or minute airway diameters, leading to reliance on alternative methods like mask ventilation or transtracheal approaches not commonly employed in human CPR. Outcomes in veterinary CPR are generally inferior to those in human CPR, with survival-to-discharge rates ranging from 6% to 19% compared to approximately 25% in humans, largely attributable to delayed recognition of cardiac arrest in animals. Monitoring during veterinary CPR emphasizes end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) levels, targeting a minimum of 18 mmHg to indicate adequate perfusion, a threshold updated in recent guidelines to align more closely with human monitoring standards while accounting for species differences. Ethical considerations in veterinary CPR integrate decisions around euthanasia and require explicit owner consent, reflecting the surrogate role of owners in animal care unlike autonomous human patients. CPR efforts may transition to euthanasia if prognosis is poor, guided by principles of welfare and informed consent to avoid prolonging suffering without viable recovery prospects. The evidence base for veterinary CPR lags behind human research in volume and prospective studies, with guidelines relying more on consensus and retrospective data. The 2024 RECOVER guidelines, endorsed by the AVMA, partially align with human protocols by standardizing compression rates and monitoring but highlight persistent gaps in species-specific trials.

Research Directions

Current Studies

Recent clinical trials have explored innovative delivery methods for automated external defibrillators (AEDs) to enhance the chain of survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). A 2024 scoping review on drone delivery of AEDs demonstrated feasibility in real-world scenarios, with drones arriving ahead of emergency medical services (EMS) in 64-67% of cases, providing a time advantage of 1:52 to 3:14 minutes and equating to approximately 40% faster delivery compared to traditional EMS response times in urban settings. Ongoing trials also target improvements in pediatric CPR through specialized compression devices. For instance, studies on augmented reality (AR)-based feedback systems and mechanical chest compression aids have shown enhanced compression depth, rate, and recoil compliance in simulated pediatric scenarios, with a 2023 simulation-based pilot study reporting adherence to guidelines improving from 18–21% to 87–90% among trainees using AR feedback compared to standard methods. Observational research has highlighted the role of mobile applications in boosting bystander intervention. A 2025 meta-analysis of 13 studies involving over 31,000 OHCA cases found that apps providing dispatch-assisted CPR guidance increased bystander CPR initiation rates from 55.4% to 69.1%, a relative risk of 1.25 (95% CI: 1.13–1.37), thereby improving overall resuscitation outcomes. A key focus area in current studies is the integration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for refractory cardiac arrest, where conventional CPR fails. The INCEPTION trial, a multicenter randomized controlled study, reported 30-day survival with favorable neurologic outcomes at 20% in the ECMO group versus 16% in the conventional CPR group, suggesting a potential 20-30% absolute survival boost in selected patients with initial ventricular arrhythmias, though not statistically significant (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.5-3.5). Conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CPR research presents significant ethical challenges, including the necessity for pre-consent randomization due to the emergency nature of cardiac arrest and heightened risks associated with interventions like ECMO, which complicates informed consent and participant safety assessments.00305-1/fulltext) Registries such as the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), covering over 178 million people across 34 U.S. states, address these limitations by enabling large-scale observational data collection on OHCA outcomes, with 2022 data from 147,736 cases informing quality improvement efforts like bystander CPR rate benchmarking at 40%. Funding for these studies primarily comes from organizations like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the American Heart Association (AHA), which support grants such as the AHA's Cardiac Arrest Research Team (CART) Network for cross-border investigations into resuscitation gaps. Global collaboration is facilitated by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR), which coordinates evidence reviews from major councils including the AHA to standardize ongoing research and guideline development.

Emerging Innovations

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are integrating into wearable devices for real-time cardiac rhythm analysis during CPR, enabling immediate feedback on compression quality and rhythm detection to optimize resuscitation efforts. For example, AI-driven sensors in emerging CPR feedback devices analyze performance metrics and provide personalized guidance to rescuers, potentially improving survival outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Impedance threshold devices (ITDs) continue to evolve as adjuncts to standard CPR, selectively impeding airflow during the decompression phase to enhance venous return and cerebral perfusion pressure by up to 10 mmHg, thereby supporting better organ perfusion in low-flow states. Clinical studies have demonstrated that ITDs lower intracranial pressure while augmenting blood pressure, offering a non-invasive means to bolster CPR efficacy in hypoxic conditions. Emerging protocols include double sequential external defibrillation (DSED) for refractory ventricular fibrillation, where the 2020 DOSE VF randomized trial reported termination rates of 76.3% compared to 66.6% with standard single shocks, alongside improved return of spontaneous circulation in select cohorts; recent reviews (2023–2025) continue to support its use. Additionally, ultrasound-guided CPR protocols, such as the Cardiac Arrest Sonographic Assessment (CASA) approach, utilize point-of-care ultrasound during pauses in compressions to detect reversible causes like tamponade or pneumothorax, with 2025 studies showing potential to inform real-time resuscitation decisions and enhance survival. The 2025 AHA Guidelines emphasize integration of real-time feedback devices and point-of-care ultrasound, based on recent ILCOR consensus, to improve CPR quality and outcomes. Preclinical research is exploring hypoxia-resistant agents to mitigate ischemic damage during CPR, including hypoxic preconditioning strategies that induce tolerance to oxygen deprivation through controlled exposure, potentially reducing neuronal injury in cardiac arrest models. These bio-agents aim to extend the therapeutic window for resuscitation by stabilizing cellular metabolism under low-oxygen conditions, though human translation remains in early stages. By 2030, goals set by the American Heart Association target >50% bystander CPR initiation and >20% bystander AED application before EMS arrival in public cardiac arrests, supported by Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled systems like smartphone-activated first-responder networks that locate and guide users to nearby devices, thereby accelerating defibrillation times. Despite these innovations, barriers such as high development costs, stringent regulatory approvals from bodies like the FDA, and integration challenges persist, with initial 2025 pilot programs in urban settings testing AI wearables and IoT-AED networks to evaluate feasibility and scalability in high-density environments.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.