Hubbry Logo
Southern TangSouthern TangMain
Open search
Southern Tang
Community hub
Southern Tang
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Southern Tang
Southern Tang
from Wikipedia

Southern Tang (Chinese: 南唐; pinyin: Nán Táng) was a dynastic state of China that existed during Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period. Located in southern China, the Southern Tang proclaimed itself to be the successor of the Tang dynasty. The capital was located at Nanjing in present-day Jiangsu Province. At its territorial peak in 951,[1] the Southern Tang controlled the whole of modern Jiangxi, and portions of Anhui, Fujian, Hubei, Hunan, and Jiangsu provinces.[4]

Key Information

The Southern Tang was founded by Li Bian in 937, when he overthrew emperor Yang Pu of Wu. He largely maintained peaceable relations with neighboring states. His son Li Jing did not follow this foreign policy, conquering the Min and Ma Chu dynasties in 945 and 951 respectively.

The Later Zhou dynasty invaded the Southern Tang domain in 956 and defeated them by 958. Li Jing was forced to become a vassal of the Emperor Shizong of Later Zhou, cede all territory north of the Yangtze River, and relinquish his title of emperor. In 960, the Southern Tang became a vassal of the newly established Northern Song dynasty. After the Emperor Taizu of Song had defeated the Later Shu and the Southern Han, he ordered the conquest of the Southern Tang, which was completed in 975.

Name

[edit]
Chess Meeting with Double Screens, depicting Li Jing playing weiqi with his brothers. Painting by Zhou Wenju (fl. 942–961)

The names and titles used by Southern Tang rulers changed several times throughout its existence. In the 930s Xu Zhigao ruled as king over a sizeable territory called Qi () that existed within Wu. After deposing the Yang Imperial family in 937 he adopted the title of emperor and announced the creation Great Qi (大齊). The Zizhi Tongjian referred to this state as Tang from its foundation,[5] while the majority of historical sources, including the Old History of the Five Dynasties,[6] New History of the Five Dynasties,[7] and the Spring and Autumn Annals of the Ten Kingdoms,[8] referred to the state as Qi. They begin to use Tang only after Xu Zhigao adopted the name Li Bian in 939.

Unlike the continual unrest and rebellions of the Central Plains, Tang rule across the Yangtze and Southern China had been generally more successful. These halcyon days had become a source of nostalgia for people in the south. This respect paid to the deposed dynasty became a useful political tool for Li Bian.[9] The Later Tang were overthrown in late 936, which opened the way for Li Bian to claim it.[10] In February 939 Li Bian renamed his realm to Great Tang (大唐).[11] Taking on the name of Tang increased his status. Such a move could be easily construed to mean "the potential unification of [Chinese] territories under one ruler."[12]

Li Jing was defeated in 958 by Later Zhou Emperor Chai Rong. The Southern Tang were forced to cede their territories north of the Yangtze and become a vassal of the Later Zhou. Li Jing additionally had to renounce claims to emperorship. The rump state was centered on Jiangnan, which was used by both the Later Zhou and the Song to refer to the Southern Tang. Later Zhou correspondence called Li Jing the "King of Jiangnan" (江南國主).[13][14] He however used the title "King of Tang" (唐國主)[15][16] and "Seal of Tang" (唐國之印) for the government.[17]

Li Yu, the third and final Southern Tang monarch, initially used the title and seal of his father. He attempted to demonstrate obeisance to Emperor Taizu after the Song conquest of Southern Han. Li Yu created a more modest "Seal of Jiangnan" (江南國印) and abandoned "Ruler of Tang" in favor of "Ruler of the State of Jiangnan", which remained used until 976 when he surrendered to the invading Song armies. Taizu gave Li Yu the humiliating title of Marquis of Disobedience (違名侯) when he arrived in Bian.[17]

Historical texts produced during the Song dynasty were named after Jiangnan, with variants of Jiangzuo (江左) and Jiangbiao (江俵) also used.[18] By not using the formal name it claimed, authors denied the Southern Tang "the status of an independent state." Reign titles of rulers were likewise seen as unacceptable and their personal names were used exclusively.[19]

Background

[edit]

Yang Xingmi was the Jiedushi of Huainan Circuit during the final years of the Tang dynasty. Throughout a series of conflicts with neighboring officials he expanded his control over most contemporary Jiangsu and Anhui, along with parts of Jiangxi and Hubei. In 902 Emperor Zhaozong recognized Yang Xingmi's conquests and granted him the title of the Prince of Wu (吳王). He ruled for three more years and died in 905. Yang Wo succeeded his father as the Prince of Wu.

In 907 the last Tang Emperor was evicted from power by Zhu Quanzhong, who declared the Later Liang dynasty. Yang Wo did not recognize this regime change as legitimate and continued to use the Tang era name of 'Tianyou'.[11] Without a reigning Tang emperor, however, he was in effect an independent ruler. In 921 Yang Longyan proclaimed his own reign title. His brother Yang Pu continued this trend of asserting ideological independence from the Kaifeng-based regimes by claiming the title of Emperor in 927. This irrevocably ended diplomatic contact with the Later Tang.[11]

During a campaign in 895 an orphaned child was captured, whom Yang Xingmi initially took into his household. However, his oldest son Yang Wo disliked the child, and so Yang decided to give the child to his lieutenant Xu Wen. The child was given the name Xu Zhigao.[20] Using the threat of Wu-Yueh raids as an excuse, Xu Wen turned Chiang-nan into his base of operations.[21] This in time would morph into the Kingdom of Qi.[22] While Xu Wen assumed a position of power over the Yang family,[21] he likely did not depose them due to unfavorable circumstances rather than the lack of will to do so.[23]

In 927 Xu Zhigao inherited Xu Wen's position of power behind the Wu monarchy and laid out the groundwork for his seizure of the throne.[21] He feared that the majority of the bureaucracy still supported the imperial Yang family.[11] The Crown Prince Yang Lian was arranged to marry one of his daughters.

In September 935 Yang Pu and Xu Zhigao settled on the territorial extent of the kingdom of Qi as having 10 of the 25 prefectures then under Wu control. [24] Yang Pu awarded Xu Zhigao the title of King of Qi (齊王) in March of 937. In May he dropped the ranking character 'zhi' from his given name to distinguish from his adopted brothers and was now known as Xu Gao. In October of the same year Yang Pu surrendered the state seal to him, ending Yang rule of Wu

Foundation

[edit]

On 11 November 937 Xu Gao formally ascended the throne. Xu Gao took inspiration from Tang governance and established two capitals.[11] Jingling was already his seat of power and became the principal location of the court. The old Wu capital of Guangling meanwhile maintained some significance as the secondary capital.[2] His reign according to Robert Krompart represented the initial rebuilding "of the social, economic, administrative, and religious forces that produce stability in China."[25]

On 12 March 939 Xu Gao took on the name of Li Bian. He additionally authorized a genealogy that claimed descent from the Tang Imperial family. Records vary about whom his supposed Tang progenitor was. Johannes L. Kurz concluded that the more reliable sources state his ancestor was either son or a younger brother of Xuanzong.[26] On 2 May 939 Li Bian performed the traditional sacrifices to Heaven. Jingnan and Wuyue sent ambassadors praising this event.[27]

Li Bian encouraged the bureaucratization of his court, taking power away from military officers. The constant turmoil of the Central Plains created a pool of experienced émigré officials that relocated to the more stable south.[28][29] Li Bian was in particular interested in men versed in Confucian rituals. Ma Ling (馬令) reported that the civilian government maintained by Li Bian "was humane and attracted men from far and near."[30][31] Among these recruits was Han Xizai, who rose in prominence during the reign of Li Jing.

The question of succession arose near the end of Li Bian's reign. He preferred his second son Li Jingda. However, his oldest son Li Jing was eventually picked as his heir. In 943 Li Bian died and Li Jing succeeded his father.[32]

Economy

[edit]

The Southern Tang and its neighbors were relatively prosperous compared to regimes successively in control of the Central Plains.[33][34][35] The greater agricultural productivity of the region created favorable conditions. Consistent tax revenues were secured with the growing disposable income of the populace. Interstate trading of specialized crafts like colored silks and salt reclaimed from the Huai River likewise was promoted by the Southern Tang.[36][37][38]

Agricultural practices along the lower Yangtze River had undergone major modifications in the final years of the Tang dynasty. Irrigation and water management systems were more complex than in previous years. Intensive cultivation of rice was conducted in lowlands and adjacent reclaimed areas from waterways. Silk production developed into a regional cottage industry as farmers planted mulberry trees alongside their cereal crop. Meanwhile, in nearby piedmont areas agriculturalists became specialized in growing tea or textile plants like hemp (麻) or ramie (苧).[39] These practices were in efflorescence during the Southern Tang, which created the most developed agricultural economy among the southern states.[37] Rice farmers had better yields and in general had more disposable income than their predecessors. This led to more state revenue by taxes on cereal and cash crops.[39]

Li Bian pursued the economic development of his realm through a number of fiscal policies.[40] Song Qiqiu drafted many initiatives that focused on tax reform that were implemented.[41] According to Sima Guang these were successful, as "the lands of Huai were fully planted, sericulture was widespread, and the [Southern Tang] state grew rich and strong."[42][43] Mulberry trees (桑樹) were planted in large numbers in the Huai and Yangtze River basins.[44] In May 939 farmers that had cultivated 3,000 or more in the past three years were given fifty bolts of silk from Li Bian's treasury. Payment of 20,000 copper cash was awarded to those that reclaimed at least 80 mu (5.33 hectares) of land. All new fields they cultivated were not taxed for 5 years. These measures have been credited with increasing agricultural production across the realm.[27]

During the reign of Li Jing he authorized several military ventures that according to He Jainming incurred heavy financial burdens that inhibited further economic development of the Southern Tang realm.[41] Tributes were paid to the Later Zhou once they defeated the Southern Tang in 958. After the Song dynasty was established in 960 these payments became exorbitant. Tribute to the Song incurred a downturn of the Southern Tang economy.[45] After forcible incorporation into the Song Empire the former southern kingdoms became the focal point of the Chinese economy. Throughout their brief period of independence they had "laid the groundwork for the great economic surge that followed."[46]

Coinage

[edit]
A Tangguo Tongbao (唐國通寶) cash coin with its inscription written in regular script.

Copper mining in the north was heavily disrupted by the constant warfare of the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms era. In consequence bronze coins became scarce. The situation became dire in northern China. In 955 the Later Zhou Emperor Chai Rong banned the possession of bronze utensils upon pain of death.[47] The Southern Tang and their neighbors minted coinage from clay, iron, or lead. These coins for domestic circulation (despite having minimal value intrinsically) and to prevent the export of precious bronze coinage to neighboring states.[48][49]

Li Bian possibly cast a coin with the inscription Daqi Tongbao (大唐通寶) while the state still had its original name of Qi. During the reign of Li Jing several cash coins were created of different commercial value. Datang Tongbao (大唐通寶) and Tangguo Tongbao (唐國通寶) coins maintained the same inscription, size, and weight but used different fonts of Chinese calligraphy Yongtong Quanhuo (永通泉貨) coins were initially valued at 10 copper coins but counterfeits were widely circulated leading to distrust of them. Copper coins were still preferred by the populace, which caused a rapid depreciation of the newer coins. Kaiyuan Tongbao (開元通寶) coins that were created during the Tang dynasty remained in circulation. Li Yu later minted coins with the same inscription in clerical and seal scripts.[50][51][52] [53]

The Southern Tang were the first in Chinese history to issue vault protector coins, which served as numismatic charms. [54] They were hung on red silk and tassels in the spirit hall of the Imperial Treasury for offerings to the gods of the Chinese pantheon, especially the Chinese God of Wealth.[55]

Culture

[edit]

Artwork

[edit]
A landscape painting made by Dong Yuan on Pure Heart Hall paper of the Buddhist Kaixian Temple (開先寺) by the order of Li Yu.[56]

The majority of Southern Tang court painters with surviving documentation were natives of Jiangnan. It is likely that the area had a potent artistic tradition before the formation of the Southern Tang. While most subjects were inherited,[57] Southern Tang painters developed relatively new genres such as "landscape, ink bamboo, and flower-and-bird painting."[58] Additionally they developed artwork focused on marine life. Their Tang predecessors apparently did not paint fish.[59] Dong Yuan and his students developed a unique style of landscape painting known as the Southern School, which influence artists in the Song and Yuan dynasties.[60] Sculptures crafted with detailed pictorial reliefs became widespread and surviving examples can be found at the Qixia Temple outside Nanjing.[61]

Night Revels of Han Xizai, first half. 12th century copy of an original by Gu Hongzhong (937–975)
Night Revels of Han Xizai, second half.

The Hanlin Academy (翰林院) was founded in 943 and had large amounts of accomplished painters. There were only two other artistic academies in operation during the period.[58] Those employed by the institution held hierarchical titles that denoted rank. The lowest ranked were likely apprentices to established artists. The Emperors of Southern Tang took part in the administration of the Hanlin Academy and oversaw the hiring of new painters.[62] Wu Daozi and Zhou Fang were among the stylistic standards for Southern Tang painters.[63][64] As successful artists took on apprenticeships the styles and genres popular with the Southern Tang court were likely transmitted to many artists outside the Hanlin Academy.[65] In 975 the Song conquered the Southern Tang. Talented painters and poets were subsequently hired and brought to the Song capital.[66][67]

Four Treasures of the Study

[edit]
Pottery Dancers. 943 CE. From the tomb of Li Bian, founder of Southern Tang dynasty
Dragon tail inkstone (龙尾砚) crafted during the Song dynasty.

The Four Treasures of the Study of the Southern Tang or Nan Tang Wenfang Sibao (南唐文房四寶) focused on brushes made by the Zhuge family, dragon tail inkstones (龙尾砚), inksticks crafted by Li Tinggui (李廷珪), and Pure Heart Hall paper (澄心堂紙).[68] By the middle of the 11th century, the Four Treasures were appreciated by Song literati who amassed private collections of them. While Song literati noted the quality of writing instruments, they did not perceive the Southern Tang regime itself as exceptional.[69]

Brushes produced by the Zhuge family of Xuanzhou were popular among the Southern Tang. Li Congqian (李從謙) of the imperial family in particular greatly cherished the brushes.[70] They later received praise from Song literati like Mei Yaochen and Ouyang Xiu. Zhuge brushes kept a position of prominence until the mid-Northern Song era. The quality of Zhuge brushes began to decline. Song scholars developed a new calligraphic style of writing frame-less characters (無骨字) which required more flexible brushes than those made by the Zhuge family. Competing brush producers from other areas, especially from Huizhou, overtook the Zhuge brushes in popularity.[71]

Dragon tail inkstones were another literary tool produced by the Southern Tang. They were made in the vicinity of Wuyuan.[72] Li Jing established the Inkstone Bureau (硯務) to set annual quotas of their production. Skilled craftsmen that worked for the bureau received monthly salaries. Efforts were overseen by an Inkstone Officer (硯官).[73][74] Dragon tail inkstones were prized possessions and offered as gifts among the Southern Tang literati,[75] a tradition that continued into the Song dynasty.[76] The most valued dragon tail inkstone contained minerals of a golden hue and were called jinxing yan (金星硯).[77]

Emperor Zhenzong had a dragon tail inkstone among his collection, which provoked further interest in them by Song literati.[76] Su Shi considered them second only to Phoenix beak inkstones (鳳咮硯), at point trading a bronze sword for a dragon tail inkstone.[78] In the 13th century Yao Mian (姚勉) wrote a poem about a dragon tail inkstone once opened by Su Shi:

Its shape is round as the moon,
And its tripod feet are like a toad's.
It was the dragon tail inkstone from the dark jade bank.
And was once appreciated by Su Shi in a snowy hall.[79]

— Yao Mian (姚勉), Longwei yan ming (龍尾硯銘), Yao Mian ji (姚勉集) vol. 42

During the late Tang dynasty Xi Nai (奚鼐) established himself as a prominent inkstick manufacturer in Hebei. His son Xi Chao (奚超) migrated to Shezhou to escape the continual instability of the period. There the family utilized Huangshan pine trees to produce huimo (徽墨) inksticks. The highest quality were produced by Xi Chao's son, Xi Tinggui, whose skill was recognized by Li Yu. The Southern Tang ruler bestowed his family name (Li) to the Xi family in honor of their craftsmanship. Now called Li Tinggui, his products became known as Li Tinggui mo (李廷珪墨 "Li Tinggui Ink"), while those made by his relatives were called Lishi mo (李氏墨 "Li Family Ink").[80]

Initial Song emperors did not value Lishi mo and used it as a source of paint for restoration projects.[81] It was not until the reign of Emperor Renzong that Lishi mo and Li Tinggui mo in particular were recognized for their quality. Emperors gave them as presents to their scholars. Cai Xiang created a collection of Lishi mo made by four generations of the Li family.[82] Emperor Shenzong rewarded the polymath Su Song with Li Tinggui mo for his scholarly pursuits.[83] Li Tinggui's ink remained the standard to which other inksticks were compared until the reign of Emperor Huizong.[84]

An important paper medium for the Southern Tang was Pure Heart Hall paper. During the Tang dynasty generations of Jiangnan craftsmen developed their skills and artistic talent in creating paper. These trends were used by their successors in the Southern Tang to create Pure Heart Hall paper. This distinctive paper became the official paper for royal proclamations. Only privileged officials were given any for use in creating government documents. Pure Heart Hall paper retained its importance throughout the Southern Tang, it was so prized that it was not sold in marketplaces.[85] After the Song defeated the Southern Tang a multitude of imitation Pure Heart Hall papers appeared as the process for creating genuine articles had become lost.[86]

Song literati began to value Pure Heart Hall paper after a gathering of notable scholars that included Liu Ban (劉攽), Mei Yaochen, Ouyang Xiu, Su Shi, noted its quality in poetic works.[87] Ouyang Xiu later gifted Mei Yaochen two scrolls of Pure Heart Hall paper for calligraphy.[88] Song painters utilized the paper for their artwork. Li Gonglin in particular only used Pure Heart Hall paper for his compositions.[89]

Cuisine

[edit]

Among the culinary options available in the Southern Tang was a pastry called yunying chao (雲英麨). It was often given as a gift during celebrations. Yunying chao was made from ground melon and a medley of flower bulbs and corms: lilies (百合), lotus (蓮), arrowhead (慈姑), fox nuts (雞頭), taro (芋), and two kinds of water chestnuts, 荸薺 and . The mixture was steamed, sweetened with honey and then sliced into pieces. The dish continued to be made during the Song Dynasty.[90][91]

Foreign relations

[edit]

The foreign policy maintained by Li Bian has been described as maintaining a "martial conservatism."[92] He recruited disaffected officials exiled from the north who found his realm to have bountiful resources. This made some of the newcomers contemplate its ability to expand territorially. The perceived need for Li Bian to prove his legitimacy through military conquest likewise motivated many Southern Tang officials.[93]

Li Bian however felt it was sensible to foster friendly relations with the other southern states.[94] [93] He dispatched ambassadors to the neighboring states of Jingnan, Min, Southern Han, and Wuyue on 21 November 937 to announce his assumption of the throne. By spring of the following year all four states had sent their own envoys to congratulate Li Bian on becoming emperor. Thus began interactions between the Southern Tang and their neighboring and often competing states.[12]

In 941 Li Bian held meetings with his officials about the geopolitical position of the Southern Tang. He felt if the Southern Tang were to invade Wuyue, then the Later Jin would surely launch a counter-attack to protect their vassal. While the Min Kingdom was much easier to conquer, it was also likely to be a financial burden and source of disorder. Both states were much more useful as buffers against the North than areas of expansion. If a propitious opportunity arose to strike the "usurpers and thieves" in control of the Central Plains he declared he would act. After their defeat the Imperial Court would relocate to Chang'an and rebuild the dilapidated city. The restored Tang Empire would then encourage the remaining Southern states to recognize their legitimate rule and submit.[95]

Officials pushed for attacking the Later Jin. Li Bian refused to engage in a conflict at that time as he felt it was inopportune:

"As a child I grew up in the army and saw the profound damage soldiers did to the people. I cannot bear to hear words about this again. When I leave other people alone and in peace, then my people will be in peace as well. Why do you ask me to start a war then!"[96]

Unlike his father Li Jing pursued territorial expansion against neighboring states.[97] [98] In 945 the Min Kingdom was conquered, although the Wuyue gained control of the prosperous port city Fuzhou. Chu was subjugated in 951 but much of the state was lost in a rebellion against the deeply unpopular Southern Tang administration.

According to Sima Guang these initially successful campaigns against Chu and Min made Li Jing grow an "ambition for the empire."[1][99] Xuan Xu recorded in the Jiangnan Lu that certain officials sent requests to the Imperial Court for the Southern Tang "to secure the four quarters" (經營四方) through military conquest. These typically disastrous schemes were formed by certain officials keen on creating opportunities for their own advancement.[100]

Five Dynasties

[edit]
Reconstruction of Bian during the Song dynasty.

The term "Five Dynasties" was coined by Song dynasty historians and reflects the view that the successive regimes based in Bian possessed the Mandate of Heaven.[101]

Compared to regimes of the Central Plains, the Southern Tang were economically prosperous. This created bottlenecks for any army advancing north as long supply trains were required. The Southern Tang military utilized a combination of infantry and naval forces, while cavalry was seldom employed. However, in the open Central Plains cavalry forces held the advantage. Peter A. Lorge concluded that these circumstances made Southern Tang campaigns into the Central Plains logisitically challenging.[102]

Hino Kaisaburō has detailed the principle routes used for inland economic and diplomatic exchanges between northern and southern Chinese states. These were the Grand Canal, Gan River, and Xiang River.[103] Control of the Grand Canal was divided between several states, therefore it was the least used route in the era.[104][105]

Later Jin

[edit]

In 936 Shi Jingtang secured an alliance with the Yelü Deguang to overthrow his brother-in-law Li Congke of the Later Tang with Khitan forces. He ceded the Sixteen Prefectures, promised annual tribute, and accepted a subordinate role to Yelü Deguang. In return the Khitan ruler appointed Shi Jingtang as Emperor of the Later Jin. Throughout his reign Shi Jingtang maintained amicable relations with his overlord, despite criticism from many officials.[106]

In the summer of 938 Song Qiqiu proposed for the assassination of a Khitan dignitary that was visiting the Southern Tang court when they returned north through Later Jin territory. He felt that the murder could provoke a war between the Later Jin and the Khitans. While successful in killing the envoy, the harmonious relations between the Later Jin and Khitan continued.[107][108]

In 940 the Southern Tang supported backed a rebellion in the Later Jin territory Anyuan. Li Bian broke his policy of maintaining peaceable relations with neighboring states in a campaign that ultimately ended in Southern Tang failure. The military commissioner of Anyuan, Li Jinquan, contacted the Southern Tang with an offer to change allegiance from the Later Jin to the Southern Tang realm. Li Bian accepted the offer and sent an army northwards.[107]

Southern Tang forces met up with Li Jinquan as planned. But against Li Bian's commands its commanders ordered the looting Anlu. Afterwards, the Southern Tang army began to return home. Later Jin forces eventually caught up to the sluggish Southern Tang army and decisively defeated them in Mahuang Valley. The disobedience of his commanders upset Li Bian greatly. In a letter to Shi Jingtang, he claimed his generals were uncontrollable, as they were keen on career advancement through combat, and pressed for amicable relations. Thus, ended Southern Tang pretensions to the Central Plains for the time being.[107]

Under the influence of Jing Yanguang, the second Later Jin Emperor Shi Chonggui pursued an antagonistic course with his overlord Yelü Deguang. This incensed the Khitan ruler who launched an invasion and defeated Shi Conggui in 946.[109]

Later Han

[edit]

By 947 Liu Zhiyuan had evicted the Khitan forces and established the Later Han dynasty.

Based in modern Yuncheng, Shanxi, the Later Han military governor of Huguo Circuit (護國]), Li Shouzhen, revolted in the summer of 948. He sent envoys to Jinling in the hopes of securing an attack on the Later Han's southern flank.[110] Li Jing was amenable to an intervention and dispatched an army under Li Jinquan from the Huai River. This force reached modern Shandong, encamping across the Yi River from Linyi. One evening Later Han forces appeared and attempted to encircle the Southern Tang base. Li Jinquan was able to lead a retreat to the port of Haizhou with his forces intact. His inaction against the Later Han perturbed Li Jing that Li Lingquan never held another active military posting.[110]

After the ignominious withdrawal Li Jing contacted Liu Chengyou calling for the resumption of trade between the Southern Tang and Later Han. This request was denied and the two states continued to clash in border conflicts throughout 949.[110] In March an army of 10,000 was sent across the border into modern Anhui. Later Han rebel groups operating there were receptive to accepting Southern Tang rule. While stationed there a Southern Tang army captured Mengcheng. The Southern Tang commander hesitated when a Later Han army arrived and called for a retreat back to the Huai River.[110] Later that year another army was sent to seize territory across the Huai River. The campaign focused on Zhengyang, a city of strategic importance due to the ease of crossing the Huai River there. As in previous attempts of expanding north the Southern Tang army suffered a defeat from Later Han forces and retreated to the Huai River.[110]

Later Zhou

[edit]

In March 951 the Later Zhou Emperor Guo Wei decreed in an edict to regulate contact with the Southern Tang:

"We have no hostile intentions towards the Tang. Both of us station troops along the Huai River, and both of us protect our border regions. We will not permit our troops and people to enter Tang territory illegally. Merchants can travel to and fro, and there will be no restrictions on trade."[111]

The Southern Tang were initially able to export their tea, salt, and silk without impediment to the Central Plains. Additionally the positive relations allowed the Southern Tang to pursue the conquest of Chu without Later Zhou interference.[111] This period of peaceable interactions quickly deteriorated as Guo Wei enforced his will over northern China.[112]

In 952 a member of the deposed Later Han imperial family, Murong Yanchao, revolted against the Later Zhou. He was able to court military intervention from the Northern Han and the Southern Tang although neither actually provided much assistance.[113] At the time the Southern Tang were experiencing great difficulty in securing their recent conquests in the kingdom of Chu. Their unpopular administration provoked provincial revolts. The Southern Han meanwhile began an invasion to secure Lingnan. These military pressures likely explain why Li Jing only sent 5,000 troops to assist Murong Yanchao.[114] The Southern Tang army reached Xiapi before Later Zhou resistance was met. Pushed south of Xuzhou, the Southern Tang lost a pitched battle and lost over 1,000 troops. Despite this failure, court officials pushed for conquering the Later Zhou. Han Xizai advised strongly against the idea as he felt Guo Wei was in a position of power. Li Jing ultimately concurred and ceased hostilities.[112]

In spring 955 Emperor Chai Rong was advised to strike the lengthy and porous Southern Tang border.[115] Simultaneously Southern Tang defensive procedures were reduced along the seasonally shallow Huai River in winter 955, leaving their border easy to cross.[116] Later Zhou forces advanced south and constructed a floating bridge to cross the Huai River at Zhengyang and began the invasion of Huainan in early 956.[117] The crucially important city of Shouchun became encircled by the Later Zhou but resisted them for 14 months. Throughout the conflict incompetent military officers made critical errors that ended in a string of costly defeats for the Southern Tang. By April 958 Shouchun had fallen and the Later Zhou were advancing upon the capital of Jinling. The Southern Tang offered to cede all territory north of the Yangtze to the Later Zhou and become a vassal.[118] The Later Zhou gained control over Huainan and almost a quarter million families.[119]

Ten Kingdoms

[edit]

Leadership across the Ten Kingdoms did not see a politically unified China under a centralized bureaucracy as necessarily inevitable.[120] Their sovereignty was revoked only through force of arms.[121] Conceptually there could only be one Son of Heaven but regional autonomy was still possible. Some kingdoms nominally accepted the suzerianity of the Five Dynasties. Several rulers simultaneously claimed to be emperors and still engaged in diplomatic exchanges with each other despite this breach of imperial orthodoxy.[122][123]

Min

[edit]

Wang Yanxi sent Zhu Wenjin in 938 to represent the Min court and praised Li Bian for his assumption of the throne.[12] In January 940 Min representatives renewed arrangements previously made with the Southern Tang.[124]

Throughout the early 940s the Min Emperor Wang Yanxi faced strife with his rebellious brother Wang Yanzheng.[125][124] In 943 Wang Yanzheng seized the northwest regions of Min and formed the Kingdom of Yin.[126] By February 945 Wang Yanxin had died and Wang Yanzheng reunited Min.[127] The Southern Tang invaded soon afterwards. On 2 October 945 Jianzhou fell and Wang Yangzheng was captured. The majority of Min territory was now under Southern Tang rule.[127]

Li Renda controlled the affluent port of Fuzhou. He initially submitted to Li Jing but was attacked after Southern Tang officials fabricated orders for his surrender. Li Renda appealed to Qian Hongzuo of Wuyue for aid. Throughout winter 946 and spring 947 Wuyue forces arrived on naval transports to protect their new vassal. The Wuyue and Fuzhou garrison killed over 20,000 Southern Tang troops.[128][129] The siege was lifted and the war soon came to a close.

The conflict had incurred many expenses and for the Southern Tang and drained their treasury.[130][131] The Southern Tang gained control of the Jianzhou and Tingzhou prefectures, while the Wuyue secured the area around Fuzhou.[129] Control over the coastal prefectures of Quanzhou and Zhangzhou by Liu Congxiao was recognized by the Southern Tang, who appointed him Qingyuan Jiedushi. This vassal state maintained de facto autonomy from the Southern Tang until forcible incorporation into the Song dynasty three decades later.[132]

Wuyue

[edit]

The Wuyue had antagonistic relations with Wu and several conflicts occurred between the latter's pretensions to Min territory.[133] The rulers of Wuyue maintained a status of vassal to the Northern dynasties as this protected them against Wu and later Southern Tang aggression. If attacked, their northern suzerians could strike at Southern Tang territories along the Huai River. This kept the Southern Tang and Wuyue in a state of equilibrium.[134][92][126]

When Li Bian sent messengers announcing his assumption to the throne; the Wuyue were the first to send their congratulations.[133] In January 941 emissaries presented gifts from Wuyue to celebrate Li Bian's birthday.[124] In August 941 the Wuyue capital of Hangzhou was devastated by fires. The ensuing chaos greatly distressed Qian Yuanguan, who died soon afterwards. Southern Tang military officers pushed for an invasion to seize Wuyue. Li Bian demurred to the idea: "How can I take advantage of the calamity of other people?"[135] Instead, an army from Li Bian sent out foodstuffs for the beleaguered people of Hangzhou. An opportune time to strike at a major rival of the Southern Tang was therefore passed over.[135] Dialogue between the two states apparently ended in 942 due to their mutual contentions over Min.[133]

The Wuyue Kingdom in 978, before incorporation into the Song dynasty

Wuyue became entangled in the Southern Tang conquest of Min. They sent forces to Fuzhou throughout winter 946 and spring 947. The combined forces of the Fuzhou garrison and Wuyue army defeated the Southern Tang in the Battle of Fuzhou. Subsequently, Fuzhou joined the Wuyue domain as a vassal.[130] The Wuyue participated in the Later Zhou invasion of the Southern Tang. In 956 armies were sent capture Changzhou Xuanzhou. Changzhou was put under siege but the Wuyue army suffered heavy losses against a Southern Tang relief force.[136] This defeat made the Wuyue army sent against Xuanzhou retreat before reaching the city. The Wuyue did not try attacking the Southern Tang again until 958 when Later Zhou victory was apparent. 20,000 troops were sent to assist in the final stages of the campaign.[137]

Li Yu pleaded for military assistance from Qian Chu At the beginning of the Song conquest of Southern Tang. The Wuyue ruler instead forwarded the letter to Emperor Taizu.[137] Quan Chu joined his suzerain in attacking the Southern Tang. Changzhou and Runzhou were seized. Wuyue forces joined the Song siege of Jinling.[138]

Chu

[edit]

To secure his uncertain position Ma Xi'e became a vassal of the Southern Tang in 951.[126] Bian Hao and a 10,000 strong Tang force was sent to the Chu capital of Tanzhou. Ma Xi'e invited them into the city but was deposed in December 951.[111] The majority of Chu territory was now in Southern Tang possession. Officials argued that Bian Hao needed to be replaced due to his incompetence, or the former Chu realm would be lost. Li Jing however took no heed.[139] Liu Yan gathered a coalition of former Chu troops and launched attacks on Southern Tang positions across Hunan. Bian Hao fled Tanzhou on 1 December 952. Liu Yan submitted to the Later Zhou in order to protect against a potentially revanchist Southern Tang.[140] Thus Li Jing's effort to control Hunan ended in an embarrassing rout.[141][142]

Southern Han

[edit]

The Southern Han sent envoys in 940 to reconfirm agreements made with Southern Tang. In 941 the Southern Han proposed for the partition of the Chu realm. However, Li Bian was unwilling to commit to the enterprise.[125] [135] The same year they sent gifts to celebrate Li Bian's birthday.[96]

Taking advantage of the Southern Tang invasion of Chu, in winter 951 Liu Sheng launched a successful invasion to secure Lingnan. The Southern Tang counterattack ended in failure and the Southern Han secured their territorial gains.[143]

Liao dynasty

[edit]
Khitan riders hunting with eagles. Painting by Hu Gui (胡瓌), 10th century

The Khitan were an important partner for the Southern Tang.[144] Positive relations were used to counter the threat posed by the Central Plains regimes and their Wuyue vassal.[145] Dialog and gift exchanges were frequent during Li Bian's rule. He sent ambassadors to the Khitan court at Shangjing to announce the start of his reign. In correspondence Yelü Deguang and Li Bian referred to each other as brothers. This demonstrated the favorable opinion the Khitan held of the southern state compared to the reigning Later Tang.[146]

In 938 both Yelü Deguang and his brother Yelü Lihu dispatched gifts to Li Bian. Later that year a group of Khitan envoys visited with an impressive herd of 35,000 sheep and 300 horses.[147] In return for the livestock the Khitan received medicinal supplies, silk, and tea.[148] The Southern Tang court financed a piece called "Two Qidan Bringing Tribute" by an unnamed artist in honor of these proceedings. The painting symbolized the importance put on relations with the Khitan by Li Bian.[149]

Contact between the two states was blocked by the Central Plains regimes. Consequently, a naval route was developed. Starting at Chunzhou Southern Tang ships sailed north along the coastline until the Shandong Peninsula, where ships crossed the Yellow Sea and landed at the Liaodong Peninsula.[150] The Khitans sent six diplomatic missions to the Southern Tang between 938 and 943. In 940 Khitan envoys presented Li a snow-fox fur robe. In both 941 and 942 the Southern Tang sent three diplomatic missions to the Khitans.[96]

After being insulted by an antagonistic Shi Chonggui, Yelü Deguang destroyed the Later Jin in 946. In early 947 he founded the Liao dynasty as Emperor Taizong after entering Bian. Shortly afterwards Taizong offered Li Jing to become the "ruler of the Central Plains."[151] This proposal was rejected, potentially due to the Southern Tang considering themselves culturally superior to the Khitan. Receiving the Central Plains, rather than conquering it, would have left the legitimacy of the Southern Tang far from certain.[152]

Nonetheless, Li Jing praised Taizong of Liao for dethroning the Later Jin and petitioned him to allow the Southern Tang to repair the dilapidated Imperial Tang tombs of Chang'an. The request was denied and greatly infuriated Li Jing who then ordered meetings to formulate an invasion of the Central Plains.[153] Han Xizai advised the Southern Tang Emperor to capture Bian at this time:

"If your Majesty wants to revive your ancestors' enterprise, then the right time is now. Once the ruler of the slaves has returned to the north, and another ruler has appeared in the Central Plains, it will not be as easy to realize."[154]

Despite the motions made by the Khitan in founding an imperial dynasty, they treated the conquest as a "very large scale raid." Taizong soon departed for the Khitan homeland in March 947 and died on the journey[155][156] Meanwhile, the Southern Tang were embroiled in a war of conquest against Min. This left them unable to effectively pursue a northern invasion. The campaign ended successfully late in 947. By this point however Liu Zhiyuan had already captured Bian from the Khitan and founded the Later Han dynasty. The opportunity to move against the north had been missed by the Southern Tang.[157]

Efforts by the Southern Tang to secure an alliance with the Liao against the northern dynasties continued to flounder. In 948 Liao and Southern Tang officials formulated a joint attack against the Later Han.[158] Yet the Liao delayed for over a year. Once they did attack the Later Han, Khitan forces only raided Hebei.[159][156]

When Muzong took the Liao throne, securing aid became more difficult for the Southern Tang. He was far less interested in participating in Chinese affairs than his predecessors.[113] [146] In 955 the Later Zhou began a campaign to subdue the Southern Tang. Li Jing requested military intervention by Muzong. His brother-in-law was sent to Tanzhou as an envoy to the Southern Tang in 959. The Liao were treated to a sumptuous feast by their Southern Tang hosts. Spies loyal to the Later Zhou were among those present. Muzong's brother-in-law was beheaded by the Later Zhou spies.[160] The Liao court was unaware that the Later Zhou perpetrated the murder. Muzong furiously revoked all contact with Li Jing, ending Liao-Southern Tang relations.[3][161][146]

Goryeo

[edit]

In 936 Taejo united the Korean Peninsula under Goryeo. The newly formed state bordered the Khitans. The Later Jin reigned as a Khitan vassal which made them undesirable to the Koreans.[162] The strategic position of Goryeo was likely valued by the Southern Tang as a means to threaten the Khitan. Taejo sent a tribute mission to the Southern Tang in the summer of 938. A variety of locally produced goods were presented to Li Bian. Another mission from the Korean Peninsula arrived at Jinling in 938. The group was likely private traders from the recently conquered Silla.[163] A later mission from Goryeo brought more goods as tribute in 940.[162]

Decline

[edit]

By the close of Li Jing's reign the Southern Tang was well on the way to obscurity. He had pursued a number of foreign adventures managed by incompetent military officers that generally ended in costly disaster.[164] From 955 to 988 the Later Zhou successfully campaigned against the Southern Tang. Li Jing was forced to cede all prefectures north of the Yangtze River and become a Later Zhou tributary. The realm became territorially truncated and lost the economic and political relevance it enjoyed when Li Jing assumed the throne 15 years earlier.

In February 960 Zhao Kuangyin deposed Guo Zongxun and established the Song dynasty as Emperor Taizu. Li Jing quickly sent envoys to confirm his loyalty and vassalage to Taizu.[164][161] Taizu pursued an expansionist agenda to unite China under his rule. Jiangnan was not a tactical priority compared to other states and was left alone in return for considerable tribute. In August 961 Li Jing died and his son Li Yu took over.[164]

Li Yu kept a semi-independent status but came at a steep price of consistent tribute of gold, silver, and silk. Jiangnan was significantly smaller than the Southern Tang territorial apex achieved in the 950s. This made the large quotas demanded by the Song challenging to meet.[165] In 964 the Song decreed new economic regulations that made the situation even more dire. Northern merchants were forbidden travel into Jiangnan. New commodity taxes were imposed in Jiangnan that could only be paid in gold or silver.[166]

The Later Shu were crushed in 965 by Taizu. In 971 the Southern Han were likewise conquered by the Song. Taizu now turned his attention to Jiangnan.[167][168][169] Throughout 973 and 974 Li Yu was repeatedly summoned to the Song court. He feigned illness and claimed to be unable to make the trip. Tired of these excuses, Taizu raised an invasion force under the command of Cao Bin to extinguish Jiangnan.

The campaign began in November 974 and proceeded favorably for the Song. The Yangtze River was overcome with a floating bridge built across from Caishiji. Song forces crossed the waterway and secured a bridgehead. Outside Caishiji an army of 20,000 Jiangnan troops was defeated by Cao Bin.[170] Song forces continued to advance and reached the outskirts of Jinling in March 975. No defensive preparations were made by Li Yu. Both he and his court officials foolishly felt existing fortifications were adequate enough to keep the Song at bay. Starting in April the capital was put under siege by Cao Bin.[171]

In January 976 Li Yu surrendered outside his palace. He and his remaining courtiers kneeled down at the feet of Cao Bin. The deposed ruler reached Bian in February. The imperial portrait of Li Bian produced by Zhou Wenju was presented to Taizu. This measure signified the complete submission of Jiangnan to the Song.[65] Jiangnan was formally annexed and dissolved by the Song. The newly incorporated territories had 650,565 registered families. Lu Jiang acting Military Governor of Zhaowu Circuit continued to resist Song army after seizing She Prefecture before persuaded to surrender; Jiangnan general Hu Ze who was stationed at Jiang Prefecture refused to surrender to Song and continued to resist until his failure in May. In 978 Li Yu died probably from actual illness, rather than being poisoned on the command of Taizu as some accounts claim.[172]

Historiography

[edit]
Ming dynasty depiction of Nanjing when it was the Southern Tang capital.

Song historians tended to favor presenting the Five Dynasties as passing on the mandate of heaven in a linear fashion to the succeeding dynasty. The Song were at the end of this process, gaining the mandate from the Later Zhou. This logic, which did not factor the Southern Tang or other states, was critical to Song claims of legitimacy.[173] Other states of the period were seen as not in possession of the mandate and therefore entirely illegitimate.[174][175][176][177] Song histographers likewise disregarded the Southern Tang and its potential "as a southern alternative to empire building."[178]

The Jiu Wudai Shi was released in 974 and is the earliest work to deal with the Southern Tang. It was composed to justify Song political pretensions.[177] Li Yu still ruled as a vassal of Taizu and so was excluded from the work. The Southern Tang was denounced as a state of "usurpation and thievery" or jianqie 僭竊. Rulers were generally referred to using the word to label them as swindlers.[174][176] Despite these ideological attacks, the work accurately recorded political events between the Central Plain dynasties and the Southern Tang.[179]

The Jiangnan lu 江南錄 was written on the order of Emperor Taizong, the successor and younger brother of Taizu. He had a keen interest in the Southern Tang, whose final ruler Li Yu had been dethroned at the beginning of 976. Southern Tang governmental documents remained unprocessed when Taizong ascended to the Song throne later that year.[180] Li Yu was posthumously granted the title prince of Wu (吳王) by Taizong in 978.[181] This was the same title once held by Li Ke, the supposed ancestor of the Southern Tang house. Taizong probably saw it possible to claim to be the legitimate successor of the Tang through transmission from Li Yu and the Southern Tang.[182]

The Jiangnan lu was drafted by Tang Yue (湯悅) and Xu Xuan, both prominent members of the former Southern Tang government, to further the goal of connecting Taizong to the Southern Tang.[176] It likely did not achieve more than a minor circulation.[183] By the 980s Taizong was more firmly in power and the text its significance as a source for him to claim legitimacy.[180] The Jiangnan lu has been lost besides several passages existing in largely hostile sources. Xu Xuan was criticized by various scholars of the era for incorrectly depicting events that occurred in the Southern Tang. The author of the Diaoji litan accused Xu Xuan of blaming other officials for his own ruinous policies.[184] The Jiangbiao Zhi by Zheng Wenbao and the Jiangnan Bielu by Chen Pengnian both in a partisan manner to fix these supposed errors.[185] Later historians like Wang Anshi and Ouyang Xiu likewise critiqued the Jiangnan lu.[186] Hostility to Xu Xuan by other Song historians likely came from a combination of his social prominence and prior service to the Southern Tang.[187]

The Diaoji litan 釣磯立談 was composed by a private citizen of the Southern Tang after its conquest by the Song. In the work the author defended the legacy of the Southern Tang. The Tang-Song interregnum was conceived as a period where competing states potentially had a limited mandate of heaven. They called the Southern Tang a "peripheral hegemonic state" 偏霸. An account was given of the Southern Tang geopolitical position and its plans for unifying China. By utilizing this terminology and logic the author disputed the negative status given to the Southern Tang by Song historians.[188]

The Zizhi Tongjian is an authoritative historical text published in 1084 that remains an important source for Chinese historiography. Sima Guang oversaw and edited the compilation that covered 1,300 years of Chinese history. Leaders of the southern states that claimed the title of emperor were instead referred to as "ruler" ().[189] The final chapters of the Zizhi Tongjian deal with the Southern Tang. They provide significant amount of information about the state.[190] Sima Guang opined that conquering the north was beyond the capabilities of the Southern Tang.[191][128] Contemporary scholars have noted that the personal biases of Sima Guang at times removed a sense of objectivity in the text. The ideological stances of the Zizhi Tongjian greatly influenced subsequent Song historiography,[192] and are still prominent in modern scholarship.[193]

The Wudai shiji largely followed the Zizhi Tongjian in its treatment of the Southern Tang. However, the work has been seen as less accurate by contemporary scholars.[190] In the work Ouyang defined the histographical concept of the Ten Kingdoms (十國).[194] He also wrote a treatise on political legitimacy, determining that the principal factor lay in controlling a unified Chinese state. He laid out how to determine the legitimacy of a regime without necessarily giving into personal or cultural biases.[195] He postulated that there were interregnums where no authority was necessarily legitimate.[196]

In 1355 Yang Weizhen wrote an essay critiquing the recently published Song shi. In it he questioned the prevailing belief that the Southern Tang were not a legitimate political entity. He recorded statements from Taizu and Qubilai that supposedly demonstrated the importance of controlling Southern China to acquire political legitimacy. Neither quotation appears in any other historical sources, making them of doubtful authenticity.[173]

"Five Demons"

[edit]

The Song political experiences influenced the depiction of the Southern Tang in their historical works. During the reign of Emperor Zhenzhong a group of financial and political reformists were derided as the "Five Demons" by opposing interest groups.[197] This designation was later employed by Song historians to describe xiaoren 小人 officials that made a faction to illicitly gain power in the Southern Tang government. Membership in this ostensible group varies somewhat between the sources. It was however almost always affiliated with Song Qiqiu in some capacity. The existence of this supposed faction has been critiqued by Johannes Kurz as a product of the personal biases of Song historians and their deliberate rearrangement of historical materials.[198]

The Diaoji litan was the first work to employ the term. The claimed members of this group were Song Qiqiu, Chen Jue, Feng Yanji, Feng Yanlu, and Zha Wenhui 查文徽. While some men included did act for self-aggrandisement there is not an obvious reason to consider them operating as a cohesive unit.[199] Ma Ling detailed eight men operating as a faction; Song Qiqiu, Chen Jue, Li Zhenggu 李徵古, Feng Yanlu, Feng Yansi, Wei Cen 魏岑, and Zha Wenhui.[198][200] The Jiangnan Yeshi depicted Song Qiqiu as starting as an honest official that eventually became corrupt. Notably he is not recorded as affiliated with any supposed political faction nor that he established one.[201] In the Wudau Shiji Wei Cen replaces Song Qiqiu as a member of the Five Demons, although the latter reportedly controlled the group through Chen Jue.[202][7] This purported arrangement was also reported in the Zizhi Tongjian.[203][204]

Rulers

[edit]
'Sovereigns in Southern Tang Kingdom 937–975
Temple Names Personal Names Period of Reigns Reign periods and dates
Liezu (烈祖 Liè Zǔ) 李昪 Lǐ Biàn 937–943 Shengyuan (昇元 Shēng Yuán) 937–943
Yuanzong (元宗 Yuán Zōng) 李璟 Lǐ Jǐng 943–961 Baoda (保大 Bǎo Dà) 943–958
Jiaotai (交泰 Jiāo Tài) 958
Zhongxing (中興 Zhōng Xīng) 958
Houzhu (後主 Hòu Zhǔ) 李煜 Lǐ Yù 961–975 (Under Li Yu, the Southern Tang did not have its own reign periods)

Southern Tang and Wu rulers family tree

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Kurz 2016a, p. 37.
  2. ^ a b Kurz 2011a, p. 27.
  3. ^ a b Kurz 2011, p. 89.
  4. ^ Mote 1999, p. 14.
  5. ^ Guang 1084, vol. 281.
  6. ^ Xue 974, vol. 134.
  7. ^ a b Ouyang 1073, vol. 62.
  8. ^ Renchen n.d.e, vol. 15.
  9. ^ Krompart 1973, pp. 271–272.
  10. ^ Krompart 1973, p. 282.
  11. ^ a b c d e Kurz 2014, pp. 602–603.
  12. ^ a b c Kurz 2011a, p. 26.
  13. ^ Guang 1084, vol. 294.
  14. ^ Lorge 2013, p. 121.
  15. ^ Kurz 1997, p. 42.
  16. ^ Renchen n.d.e, vol. 17.
  17. ^ a b Kurz 2016b, p. 36.
  18. ^ Woolley 2010, pp. 120–121.
  19. ^ Woolley 2014, pp. 558–560.
  20. ^ Guang 1084, vol. 260.
  21. ^ a b c Clark 2009, pp. 165–167.
  22. ^ Krompart 1973, p. 228.
  23. ^ Krompart 1973, p. 174.
  24. ^ Krompart 1973, p. 236.
  25. ^ Krompart 1973, p. 27.
  26. ^ Kurz 2014, p. 619.
  27. ^ a b Kurz 2011a, p. 33.
  28. ^ Clark 2016b, p. 10.
  29. ^ Clark 2017, p. 11.
  30. ^ Ling n.d.e, vol. 1.
  31. ^ Clark 2016b, p. 25.
  32. ^ Kurz 2011a, p. 38.
  33. ^ Clark 2016b, p. 26.
  34. ^ Clark 2017, p. 15.
  35. ^ Krompart 1973, p. 271.
  36. ^ Clark 2009, p. 174.
  37. ^ a b Fu & Cao 2019, p. 186.
  38. ^ Mote 1999, p. 21.
  39. ^ a b Lamouroux 1995, pp. 163–165.
  40. ^ Woolley 2010, p. 26.
  41. ^ a b Kurz 2016a, p. 26.
  42. ^ Guang 1084, vol. 274.
  43. ^ Clark 2016b, p. 17.
  44. ^ Fu & Cao 2019, pp. 191–192.
  45. ^ Krompart 1973, p. 26.
  46. ^ Clark 2009, p. 205.
  47. ^ Hartill 2005, p. 113.
  48. ^ Clark 2009, p. 187.
  49. ^ Horesh 2013, pp. 375–376.
  50. ^ Ashkenazy 2016.
  51. ^ Hartill 2005, pp. 119–120.
  52. ^ Kokotailo 2018.
  53. ^ Kurz 2011, pp. 87–88.
  54. ^ Ashkenazy 2015.
  55. ^ Kao 2015.
  56. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, pp. 103–104.
  57. ^ Hay 2012, p. 302.
  58. ^ a b Lee 2004, pp. 4–6.
  59. ^ Lee 2004, p. 18.
  60. ^ Clark 2017, pp. 15–16.
  61. ^ Hay 2012, p. 306.
  62. ^ Lee 2004, p. 8.
  63. ^ Lee 2004, p. 38.
  64. ^ Hay 2012, p. 298.
  65. ^ a b Lee 2004, p. 26.
  66. ^ Lee 2004, p. 37.
  67. ^ Standen 1994, p. 274.
  68. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 58.
  69. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, pp. 113–115.
  70. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 67.
  71. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, pp. 70–71.
  72. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 71.
  73. ^ Ouyang n.d.e, vol. 130.
  74. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 72.
  75. ^ Ling n.d.e, vol. 23.
  76. ^ a b Pak-sheung 2016, p. 77.
  77. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 81.
  78. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 79.
  79. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 80.
  80. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, pp. 83–84.
  81. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, pp. 85–86.
  82. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, pp. 89–90.
  83. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 87.
  84. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 95.
  85. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, pp. 97–99.
  86. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 109.
  87. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 100.
  88. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 98.
  89. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 104.
  90. ^ Gu n.d.e, vol. 13.
  91. ^ Pak-sheung 2016, p. 65.
  92. ^ a b Krompart 1973, p. 303.
  93. ^ a b Kurz 2016a, p. 29.
  94. ^ Cho-ying 2018, p. 258.
  95. ^ Cho-ying 2018, pp. 259–260.
  96. ^ a b c Kurz 2011a, pp. 34–35.
  97. ^ Cho-ying 2018, p. 261.
  98. ^ Kurz 2016a, p. 31.
  99. ^ Guang 1084, vol. 292.
  100. ^ Kurz 2016a, pp. 30–31.
  101. ^ Kote 1999, pp. 9.
  102. ^ Lorge 2005, pp. 18–19.
  103. ^ Clark 2016b, p. 18.
  104. ^ Clark 2009, pp. 89–90.
  105. ^ Worthy 1983, pp. 21–22.
  106. ^ Standen 2009, p. 887.
  107. ^ a b c Kurz 2011a, pp. 28–29.
  108. ^ Standen 2009, p. 93.
  109. ^ Standen 2009, pp. 97–98.
  110. ^ a b c d e Kurz 2011a, pp. 60–62.
  111. ^ a b c Kurz 2011a, pp. 63–64.
  112. ^ a b Kurz 2011a, p. 69.
  113. ^ a b Standen 1994, p. 46.
  114. ^ Kurz 2016a, pp. 37–38.
  115. ^ Lorge 2013, p. 112.
  116. ^ Kurz 2011a, pp. 71–75.
  117. ^ Lorge 2005, pp. 27–28.
  118. ^ Clark 2009, p. 201.
  119. ^ Kurz 2011, pp. 80–84.
  120. ^ Lorge 2005, p. 32.
  121. ^ Lorge 2005, p. 39.
  122. ^ Lorge 2013, pp. 108–110.
  123. ^ Worthy 1983, p. 18.
  124. ^ a b c Kurz 2011a, p. 34.
  125. ^ a b Krompart 1973, p. 304.
  126. ^ a b c Kote 1999, pp. 14–15.
  127. ^ a b Kurz 2011a, pp. 52–53.
  128. ^ a b Guang 1084, vol. 286.
  129. ^ a b Kurz 1997, p. 32.
  130. ^ a b Kurz 2011a, pp. 55–57.
  131. ^ Woolley 2010, p. 28.
  132. ^ Worthy 1983, p. 29.
  133. ^ a b c Worthy 1983, pp. 27–28.
  134. ^ Worthy 1983, p. 25.
  135. ^ a b c Kurz 2011a, p. 36.
  136. ^ Kurz 2011a, pp. 76–78.
  137. ^ a b Worthy 1983, p. 31.
  138. ^ Kurz 2011a, pp. 107–108.
  139. ^ Guang 1084, vol. 289.
  140. ^ Kurz 2011a, pp. 67–68.
  141. ^ Clark 2009, pp. 198–199.
  142. ^ Guang 1084, vol. 291.
  143. ^ Kurz 2011a, pp. 65–67.
  144. ^ Krompart 1973, p. 238.
  145. ^ Worthy 1983, p. 37.
  146. ^ a b c Twitchett & Tietze 1994, p. 72.
  147. ^ Krompart 1973, p. 306.
  148. ^ Li 2016, p. 36.
  149. ^ Lee 2004, p. 28.
  150. ^ Li 2016, p. 45.
  151. ^ Kurz 2016a, p. 32.
  152. ^ Kurz 2016a, p. 39.
  153. ^ Standen 2009, p. 106.
  154. ^ Kurz 2016a, p. 34.
  155. ^ Standen 2009, pp. 102–103.
  156. ^ a b Twitchett & Tietze 1994, pp. 80–81.
  157. ^ Kurz 2011a, p. 60.
  158. ^ Kurz 2016a, p. 34-35.
  159. ^ Standen 1994, p. 44.
  160. ^ Li 2016, p. 37.
  161. ^ a b Standen 1994, p. 49.
  162. ^ a b Kurz 2011a, p. 35.
  163. ^ Krompart 1973, p. 307.
  164. ^ a b c Kurz 2011, pp. 89–90.
  165. ^ Kurz 2011, p. 93.
  166. ^ Kurz 2011, p. 95.
  167. ^ Clark 2009, p. 204.
  168. ^ Lorge 2005, p. 40.
  169. ^ Twitchett & Tietze 1994, p. 85.
  170. ^ Kurz 2011a, pp. 103–104.
  171. ^ Kurz 2011a, p. 106.
  172. ^ Kurz 2011a, pp. 110–113.
  173. ^ a b Davis 1983, p. 67.
  174. ^ a b Cho-ying 2018, pp. 253–254.
  175. ^ Kurz 2016a, p. 23.
  176. ^ a b c Kurz 2016b, p. 31.
  177. ^ a b Woolley 2010, p. 116.
  178. ^ Kurz 2016a, p. 41.
  179. ^ Kurz 1994, pp. 219–220.
  180. ^ a b Kurz 2016b, p. 53.
  181. ^ Kurz 2016b, p. 46.
  182. ^ Kurz 2016b, p. 42.
  183. ^ Kurz 2016b, p. 45.
  184. ^ Cho-ying 2018, pp. 245.
  185. ^ Kurz 1994, pp. 221–222.
  186. ^ Woolley 2014, p. 549.
  187. ^ Woolley 2010, p. 63.
  188. ^ Cho-ying 2018, pp. 249–250.
  189. ^ Woolley 2014, p. 553.
  190. ^ a b Kurz 1994, p. 224.
  191. ^ Kurz 2016a, pp. 40–41.
  192. ^ Chan 1974, pp. 37–38.
  193. ^ Kurz 1998, p. 33.
  194. ^ Clark 2016b, p. 2.
  195. ^ Davis 1983, pp. 38–39.
  196. ^ Davis 1983, p. 62.
  197. ^ Hartwell 1988, p. 24.
  198. ^ a b Kurz 1998, p. 5.
  199. ^ Kurz 1998, pp. 11–13.
  200. ^ Ling, vol. 20.
  201. ^ Kurz 1998, p. 16.
  202. ^ Kurz 1998, p. 18.
  203. ^ Kurz 1998, p. 25.
  204. ^ Guang 1084, vol. 282.

Bibliography

[edit]

See also

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
The Southern Tang (937–975) was a regional kingdom in southern China during the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period of fragmentation following the Tang dynasty's collapse, founded by Li Sheng (also known as Li Bian, r. 937–943) who deposed the last ruler of the preceding Wu state, Yang Pu. It controlled territories encompassing modern-day Jiangxi province, southern Anhui, central and southern Jiangsu, eastern Hubei, and parts of western Fujian, leveraging the fertile Yangtze River basin for economic strength through promoted agriculture, irrigation projects, and commerce in tea and silk exchanged for northern horses and sheep. Under its three rulers—Li Sheng, his son Li Jing (r. 943–961), and grandson Li Yu (r. 961–975)—the Southern Tang pursued policies of relative peace with neighbors, established a and examination system to foster , and actively patronized , compiling books and supporting scholarly endeavors that preserved Tang-era cultural traditions. The court became a center for refined artistic expression, particularly in , , and , with Li Yu renowned as a composer of poignant ci lyrics reflecting personal and dynastic melancholy, and painters like Gu Hongzhong producing seminal works such as Night Revels of Han Xizai. Despite military reforms and initial successes, internal decadence and external pressures culminated in its conquest by the rising in 975, after which Li Yu was captured and executed, marking the kingdom's end but leaving a legacy of cultural sophistication amid political transience.

Name and Terminology

Etymology and Official Designations

The name "Tang," adopted by the kingdom's founder Li Bian upon his proclamation as emperor in 937, deliberately emulated the illustrious (618–907 CE) to bolster legitimacy amid the political fragmentation of the era, positioning the regime as a cultural and imperial successor rather than a parochial successor state to the Wu kingdom. Li Bian, formerly known as Xu Zhigao, changed his surname to Li to fabricate a genealogical link to the Tang imperial house, a maneuver that facilitated claims of hereditary imperial mandate despite his adoptive origins under the Wu rulers. This self-designation as "Tang" or "Great Tang" in internal edicts and coinage underscored ambitions for universal sovereignty, even as territorial control remained confined to the region. Li Bian's , Liezu (烈祖), was conferred posthumously in recognition of his foundational role, aligning with Tang-era conventions for imperial forebears to reinforce dynastic continuity. Contemporaneous external observers, including rival northern courts, often acknowledged the regime simply as Tang, though this evoked the precedent dynasty without geographic qualifiers. The retrospective prefix "Southern" emerged in historiography to differentiate it spatially from the original Tang, with early usage traceable to Zheng Wenbao's anecdotal compilation Nan Tang jinshi (977 CE), reflecting a post-conquest convention for labeling southern successor states. Such designations highlighted the kingdom's aspirational rather than achieved imperial scope, as self-proclaimed titles outpaced actual unification efforts.

Historiographical Naming Conventions

The rulers of the Southern Tang self-identified as the legitimate continuation of the (618–907), with founder Li Bian proclaiming the dynastic name Tang upon his ascension as emperor in 937, supported by fabricated genealogical links tracing his ancestry to Tang imperial kin. This self-designation is evidenced in contemporary s and inscriptions, such as those issued under Li Bian and his successors, which employed imperial Tang regnal titles and era names without regional qualifiers, reflecting claims to universal sovereignty amid the fragmented Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period. External recognition aligned with this during the dynasty's existence; for instance, a 951 from emperor Guo Wei addressed the state simply as Tang, indicating diplomatic acknowledgment of its imperial pretensions without the "southern" prefix. Following the Song conquest in 975–976, official Song historiography systematically reframed the Southern Tang as a mere regional kingdom (guo) rather than a full dynasty, appending "southern" to its name to underscore its parochial status and delegitimize its Tang heritage claims, which conflicted with Song's self-positioning as the orthodox Tang successor. This nomenclature served to integrate the southern regimes into a narrative of Song unification, demoting their emperors to kings in annals like the Jiu Wudai shi (Old History of the Five Dynasties), thereby emphasizing territorial fragmentation over imperial continuity. Such alterations reveal a historiographical bias toward central legitimacy, where Song compilers imposed retrospective labels to align pre-conquest records with dynastic orthodoxy. A notable variation appears in Sima Guang's Zizhi tongjian (Comprehensive Mirror for Aid in Government, completed 1084), which predominantly refers to the state as Tang from its 937 foundation, preserving original self-referential terminology and internal calculations of rulers like Li Jing, in contrast to the more pervasive "Southern Tang" in other Song-era compilations. This divergence likely stems from the chronicle's annalistic fidelity to primary sources, including edicts and regional annals that retained unaltered Tang designations, highlighting inconsistencies in Song historiographical practices where source authenticity occasionally trumped ideological reframing.

Historical Background

The Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms Era

The collapse of the in 907 CE, precipitated by the usurpation of the last emperor by the warlord (who founded the Later Liang), ushered in the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period, spanning 907 to 960 CE, a time of acute political fragmentation in . This era saw five successive short-lived dynasties control the northern heartland—Later Liang (907–923), (923–937), Later Jin (936–947), Later Han (947–951), and (951–960)—each ousted by internal coups or external pressures, reflecting the instability bred by entrenched warlordism. The roots lay in the late Tang's devolution of power to , regional military governors originally appointed to quell rebellions like (755–763 CE) and (874–884 CE); these figures amassed autonomous armies, tax revenues, and loyalties, eroding central authority and fostering independence that persisted post-907. Eunuch cliques, which had dominated Tang court intrigue and suppressed civil officials, further undermined imperial governance, though their influence waned amid military takeovers. Warfare and upheaval drove massive population displacements northward-to-southward migrations, as northern residents fled endemic conflicts, famines, and nomadic incursions, bolstering southern demographics and regional economies. Estimates suggest millions relocated over the Tang-Song transition, shifting China's economic center southward and enabling southern polities to cultivate paddies, reclaim wetlands, and expand networks with relative impunity from northern chaos. Economic disruptions in the north—disrupted grain transport along the Grand Canal, abandoned farmlands, and depreciated currencies—contrasted with southern resilience, where divided kingdoms pursued localized trade in , , and , laying foundations for later prosperity. These dynamics entrenched regionalism, as southern rulers leveraged geographic barriers like the Yangtze River to prioritize internal consolidation over northern reconquest. Southern kingdoms' endurance amid this turmoil owed much to pragmatic interstate , marked by alliances forged for mutual defense against northern dynasties or powers like the Khitan Liao, often punctuated by betrayals to extract concessions. Rulers navigated payments and ties to northern courts for nominal legitimacy and military respite, while opportunistic shifts—such as pledging to a rising dynasty only to renege upon its fall—preserved autonomy. Verifiable cases include southern states coordinating against incursions, yet exploiting northern succession crises to expand borders unchecked. This web of expedient pacts, devoid of ideological unity, sustained fragmentation until the regent Zhao Kuangyin founded the in 960 CE, initiating gradual unification by 979 CE through superior and administrative reforms rather than sheer .

Predecessor Kingdom of Wu

The Kingdom of Wu emerged in 902 when Yang Xingmi, a of Circuit under the declining , was granted the title Prince of Wu by Emperor Zhaozong, marking the foundation of the state amid the chaos of the late Tang period. Yang Xingmi consolidated control over the River region, including modern , , and parts of , through campaigns against rival warlords, establishing Wu as a regional power in the emerging Ten Kingdoms framework. Following Yang Xingmi's death in 905, succession passed to his son Yang Wo, but persistent internal factionalism among the Yang heirs eroded central authority, as rival generals vied for influence and the rulers increasingly became figureheads manipulated by military strongmen. This culminated in the dominance of Xu Wen, a key general who, after eliminating rivals, assumed effective regency by 920 under the nominal Yang Pu, reducing the throne to a puppet institution amid chronic court intrigues and assassinations that undermined Wu's cohesion. Wu's structural weaknesses were exacerbated by military overextension in protracted campaigns against northern dynasties like Later Liang and southern rivals such as Min Kingdom, which strained resources without commensurate territorial gains, while fiscal mismanagement—evident in heavy taxation to sustain bloated armies and elite patronage—fueled elite corruption and peasant discontent, priming the state for collapse. After Xu Wen's death in 927, his adopted son Xu Zhigao (later Li Bian) inherited the regency, consolidating control over military and administrative levers by 937, when he compelled Yang Pu's on November 29, formally ending Wu and inheriting its core as the foundation for the subsequent .

Foundation and Consolidation

Rise of Li Bian

Li Bian, born Xu Zhigao in 889, rose from an orphaned background in to prominence as an adopted son of the powerful Wu general Xu Wen. Initially under the patronage of Wu founder Yang Xingmi, Xu Zhigao was transferred to Xu Wen's household amid familial tensions, where he gained favor through administrative acumen and loyalty. Xu Wen, who effectively controlled the Kingdom of Wu after Yang Longyan's death in 920, positioned his adopted son in key military and court roles, fostering Xu Zhigao's influence over the warlord-dominated regime. Following Xu Wen's death in 927, Xu Zhigao inherited regency over Wu, navigating jealousy from Xu Wen's biological sons who repeatedly plotted against him. Leveraging alliances with loyal officers and bureaucrats, he systematically marginalized and eliminated these rivals, reshaping the meritorious elite through purges that prioritized civil administration over factional warlordism. By 932, his control solidified, enabling centralization efforts such as bureaucratic reforms to curb autonomous generals, evidenced in contemporary records of reduced autonomy and increased oversight. In a decisive opportunist move amid the fragmented Five Dynasties era, Xu Zhigao compelled the puppet emperor Yang Pu to abdicate on November 11, 937, proclaiming himself emperor under the short-lived name Great Qi before renaming the state and adopting the personal name Li Bian to claim Tang dynastic legitimacy. This transition marked his consolidation of power, initiating policies like state examinations and a to foster merit-based , thereby undercutting hereditary threats and stabilizing rule through administrative realism rather than perpetual conquest. Early restraint, avoiding major campaigns until later, underscored his preference for internal pacification over expansion, as supported by detailing trade promotion and elite restructuring.

Establishment in 937 and Initial Reforms

In 937, following the effective seizure of power from the Kingdom of Wu, Li Bian (originally Xu Zhigao, r. 937–943) deposed the nominal ruler Yang Pu and proclaimed the establishment of a new dynasty, initially designating it Great Qi before adopting the name in 938 to evoke imperial legitimacy tied to the Tang heritage. He assumed the throne as emperor, changing his name to Li Bian, and fixed the capital at Jinling (Jiangning Prefecture, modern ), with a secondary administrative center at Jiangdu (modern ). This founding marked a deliberate break from Wu's military-heavy governance, emphasizing consolidation amid the fragmented Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms era. Li Bian's initial reforms prioritized bureaucratic stabilization and administrative efficiency to counteract Wu's fiscal extravagance and internal decay. He established a and instituted state examinations for official recruitment, shifting toward a civil literati system that favored scholarly merit over hereditary or martial favoritism, thereby fostering a more professional . These measures aimed to rebuild , though specific data on land redistribution remains unverified in primary accounts; instead, emphasis fell on pragmatic economic policies, including promotion of internal in commodities like and to generate revenue without aggressive expansion. To secure northern borders against the volatile Five Dynasties regimes, Li Bian pursued diplomatic overtures, maintaining largely peaceable relations through exchanges—such as southern goods for northern horses and sheep—avoiding immediate military confrontations and allowing focus on domestic recovery. This approach reflected causal priorities of border stability over ideological posturing, enabling the nascent dynasty to prioritize internal reforms amid regional instability.

Government and Rulers

Administrative Structure

The Southern Tang adopted a centralized bureaucratic model derived from the , structured around the three provinces (sansheng)—the Department of State Affairs (Shangshu sheng), which oversaw executive implementation; the Secretariat (Zhongshu sheng), responsible for drafting policies; and the Chancellery (Menxia sheng), tasked with reviewing and censoring edicts—and the six ministries (liubu) handling personnel (Libu), revenue (Hubu), rites (Libu), war (Bingbu), justice (Xingbu), and public works (Gongbu). This framework aimed to distribute authority across deliberation, execution, and oversight, mitigating the unchecked power that had destabilized late , though in a smaller kingdom it often resulted in overlapping roles dominated by chancellors or imperial relatives. Regional control was maintained through a of prefectures (zhou) and counties (xian), with (jiedushi) overseeing strategic circuits to blend civil administration and defense, particularly in frontier areas acquired from predecessor states like Wu and Min. For instance, after annexing Min territories in 945, the Southern Tang appointed Liu Congxiao as Qingyuan jiedushi to secure coastal prefectures such as and . These adaptations addressed the era's military fragmentation but introduced risks of local , as jiedushi retained fiscal and recruitment powers, echoing Tang-era devolution without fully resolving it. The bureaucracy emphasized scholar-officials selected via state examinations, instituted by the founding emperor to cultivate administrative talent, alongside a for training. Eunuchs occupied subordinate positions with minimal political influence, unlike in the Tang, prioritizing civil mechanisms over palace intrigue; however, the system's brevity—spanning just 39 years—highlights inherent vulnerabilities, including insufficient checks against favoritism that eroded institutional rigor over time.

Succession of Emperors: Li Bian, Li Jing, and Li Yu

Li Sheng, posthumously known as Emperor Liezu and commonly referred to as Li Bian, ruled Southern Tang from 937 to 942 after usurping the throne from the Kingdom of Wu through military means, thereby consolidating control over the region. His reign emphasized peaceful internal governance over aggressive expansion, fostering economic stability by promoting in and in exchange for northern commodities like horses and sheep, which strengthened fiscal resources but potentially at the expense of military readiness. Li Bian advanced cultural and administrative patronage by establishing a and initiating state examination systems to recruit literati, shifting toward civil bureaucracy and merit-based recruitment that diluted the influence of hereditary military elites inherited from Wu. This policy, while enhancing scholarly administration, contributed causally to a long-term decline in martial vigor, as evidenced by subsequent vulnerabilities to northern incursions. He died of natural causes in 942 and was succeeded by his son Li Jing. Li Jing, posthumously Emperor Yuandi, ascended in 943 and ruled until his death in 961, during which Southern Tang reached its territorial zenith through opportunistic conquests of weaker neighbors, including western Min in 945—via proxy control in —and incursions into in 951 that temporarily expanded influence into . These gains, however, proved unsustainable due to overextension and logistical strains, as demonstrated by the failed campaign that depleted resources without securing lasting control. Facing pressure from the rising in 955, Li Jing ceded 14 northern prefectures, relocated the capital to for defensive purposes, and submitted to nominal , revealing failures in maintaining military deterrence amid internal factionalism and inadequate regency preparations during periods of weakened leadership. Although no explicit records detail personal health decline, the era's strategic concessions indicate causal links between deferred military reforms—rooted in his father's civil priorities—and escalating external threats, culminating in his natural death in 961 and succession by his son Li Yu. Li Yu, posthumously titled Houzhu or "Later Lord" in Song historiography—a demotion reflecting the conquerors' against Southern Tang legitimacy—reigned from 961 to 975, restoring the capital to Jinling but prioritizing personal artistic pursuits over state affairs, which fostered administrative neglect and eroded institutional capacity. This disinterest manifested in inadequate oversight of military descendants from founding elites, who exhibited leadership shortfalls, and a failure to revitalize defenses against unification efforts, causally amplifying vulnerabilities inherited from prior reigns' civil-military imbalances. sources, shaped by their triumphant narrative, further denigrated Li Yu's rule to justify annexation, yet primary causal factors lie in verifiable policy inertia rather than mere personal failings. His reign ended with the conquest in 975, after which he was captured and later executed by poisoning in 978.

Territorial Expansion and Control

Core Regions and Annexations

The Southern Tang initially controlled core territories encompassing the modern provinces of , southern , central and southern , and eastern upon its foundation in 937, inheriting much of the domain of its predecessor, the Kingdom of Wu. These regions formed a strategic base along the River, with administrative centers at Jinling (modern in ) and Jiangdu (modern ). The heartland's fertile Jianghuai plains provided economic stability, but its elongated shape exposed flanks to northern threats from the Central Plains dynasties. Under Emperor Li Jing (r. 943–961), the Southern Tang pursued aggressive annexations to bolster its position among the southern kingdoms. In 945, it conquered the western territories of the Min kingdom in , incorporating resource-rich areas and eliminating a rival coastal power. This was followed by the invasion of the Ma Chu kingdom in 951, where general Ma Xichong's surrender allowed annexation of substantial midstream holdings, though residual pockets under Zhou Xingfeng retained nominal independence. These victories elevated the realm to its territorial zenith by late 951, extending influence into parts of and further consolidating control over vital riverine trade routes. Border adjustments reflected both opportunistic gains and defensive concessions amid pressures from northern powers. In 955, following military setbacks against the , the Southern Tang ceded 14 northern prefectures, accepted nominal , and relocated its primary capital to in to shorten defensive lines. While these expansions demonstrated tactical acumen in exploiting fragmented southern polities, they stretched administrative and military capacities, fostering internal vulnerabilities that northern forces later exploited in the dynasty's 975 conquest. The resultant overextension, without proportional reinforcement of garrisons or , underscored limits to sustaining conquests in a era of competing states.

Administrative Divisions and Local Governance

The Southern Tang (937–975) organized its territory into three principal circuits: Huainan Circuit (Huainan dao), East Circuit (Jiangnan dongdao), and West Circuit (Jiangnan xidao), which encompassed core regions along the Yangtze River valley including modern , southern , and parts of , , and . These circuits served as intermediate administrative layers between the central court at Jinling (modern ) and subordinate prefectures (zhou) or military prefectures (jun), with most prefectures subdivided into three to seven districts (qu) for granular management of civil and military functions. Local governance relied on appointed officials, including military commissioners () tasked with overseeing circuit-level affairs, though the dynasty emphasized central oversight by favoring kin or trusted retainers in these roles to curb autonomy inherited from the preceding Kingdom of Wu. This approach reflected ongoing tensions, as wielded combined civil-military authority, potentially enabling regional defiance if loyalty faltered, yet the court's strategy of rotational appointments and mitigated fragmentation seen in northern dynasties. Tax collection occurred via prefectural officials who assessed and remitted levies upward, with mechanisms like household registers ensuring accountability, though incomplete central audits occasionally allowed local discrepancies. Rebellions underscored these frictions, such as the 942–943 uprising led by Zhang Yuxian, a in a southern who mobilized local forces against central policies; it was swiftly suppressed by imperial troops dispatched from the capital, reinforcing direct control over peripheral commands. The Yangtze River's navigability aided such interventions by enabling rapid naval redeployments for quelling and enforcement, yet its role as a natural corridor also heightened vulnerability to external pressures, as upstream access invited probing by northern rivals without robust local fortifications. This geographic dynamic thus amplified the need for vigilant prefectural loyalty, where autonomous fiscal retention could fund defiance, though the dynasty's riverine generally preserved cohesion until broader conquests eroded it.

Economy

Agricultural Base and Trade Networks

The Southern Tang state's agricultural economy centered on the fertile region along the lower River, where alluvial soils and abundant water resources enabled intensive cultivation as the primary staple. Double-cropping practices, supported by irrigation networks inherited from prior regimes, yielded surpluses that underpinned population growth and state revenues, with serving as a key tax commodity. complemented agriculture, as mulberry cultivation thrived in the humid climate, fostering production as a widespread cottage industry among rural households; this output not only met domestic needs but also fueled exports, building on the area's established role as a silk-producing hub since the Southern and Northern Dynasties period. Trade networks leveraged the Yangtze River as a vital artery for transporting , , , and medicines northward and to adjacent southern polities, integrating Southern Tang markets with broader regional . Riverine market towns emerged as hubs for merchant activity, where surplus grains and textiles were exchanged for northern like , enhancing economic resilience amid political fragmentation. Early linkages, facilitating bulk shipment from interior farmlands to coastal outlets, prefigured later Grand Canal expansions and supported state-promoted overseas exchanges, including silk and gauze trades with the . Land distribution, however, exhibited inequalities typical of the era, with elite clans and officials accumulating estates through purchase or usurpation, reducing freeholding peasants and increasing tenancy rates; Li Bian's early reforms aimed to redistribute idle lands and curb aristocratic hoarding to bolster agrarian stability, yet persistent demands and taxation strains exacerbated rural discontent, contributing to localized unrest such as the 942–943 Zhang Yuxian rebellion, which reflected broader tensions over resource extraction.

Monetary System and Coinage Innovations

During the reign of Li Jing (943–961), the Southern Tang state introduced iron cash coins inscribed with Tang guo tong bao (唐國通寶, "Circulating treasure of the Tang state") to supplement issues amid copper shortages exacerbated by campaigns and minting demands. These iron coins, typically weighing around 3 grams similar to contemporary counterparts, carried nominal values equivalent to standard cash but relied on state enforcement for acceptance due to iron's inferior durability and intrinsic worth compared to . This shift marked an innovation in material substitution, allowing expanded mint output without depleting reserves, though it deviated from the heavier, pure standards of earlier Tang precedents like the Kai yuan tong bao (c. 621–907), which averaged 4–5 grams of high- alloy. The adoption of iron and occasional lead alloys in Southern Tang coinage constituted a form of , reducing effective metallic value while increasing production volume to fund territorial expansions, such as the conquests of Min (945) and (951). In contrast to northern regimes like the (951–960), which prioritized consistent coinage to maintain credibility with steppe economies, Southern Tang policies reflected resource scarcity in the region, where imports were limited. Historical records indicate that such token coinage circulated alongside older dynastic issues, but acceptance varied, with merchants often preferring , leading to informal premiums and localized hoarding of higher-value metals. Under Li Yu (961–975), efforts to reform coinage included recasting bronze Kai yuan tong bao in clerical and seal scripts, aiming to restore confidence by evoking Tang imperial legitimacy amid fiscal strain from payments to the rising . However, persistent reliance on debased iron issues contributed to monetary instability, as evidenced by contemporary accounts of uneven circulation and the eventual conquest in 975, which unified coinage standards and melted down substandard Southern Tang mints. Empirical effects included elevated transaction costs in inter-regional trade, though quantitative inflation data remains sparse; the policy's unsustainability underscored causal links between wartime expenditures and currency dilution, without mitigating broader economic vulnerabilities.

Military Organization and Conflicts

Armed Forces and Defense Strategies

The Southern Tang military emphasized naval capabilities to exploit the kingdom's riverine terrain, particularly the , which served as both a conduit for expansion and a natural defensive barrier against northern foes. Land forces comprised divisions stationed at key garrisons, supplemented by for rapid response, while the included fleets of riverine warships designed for amphibious operations and blockades. Under Emperor Li Jing (r. 943–961), post-war revitalization efforts after conflicts with the (951–960) involved recruiting and reorganizing troops to bolster depleted ranks, reflecting a of hybrid professional and conscripted units rather than a fully . Defense strategies centered on the fortification of the line as the primary northern bulwark, where Li Jing ordered the construction of dikes, , and fortified camps to monitor and repel invasions, capitalizing on the river's seasonal shallowing for tactical advantage. These measures aimed at a layered defense integrating , early warning systems, and mobile reserves, though proved inconsistent; by winter 955, reduced vigilance along the exposed vulnerabilities to crossing by enemy forces. The kingdom's overall approach critiqued reliance on static defenses over aggressive field maneuvers, as overextension in earlier campaigns had strained resources without yielding lasting gains. During Li Yu's reign (961–975), military cohesion eroded due to lax oversight, with troops exhibiting poor discipline and wavering loyalty, exacerbated by the emperor's disinterest in affairs in favor of cultural . Heavy dependence on mercenaries—often transient hires from frontier regions or ethnic minorities—fostered internal divisions and desertions, as these units prioritized pay over allegiance, rendering defenses brittle against coordinated threats. This structural weakness, rooted in inadequate training and integration, contrasted sharply with the more disciplined forces of emerging rivals like the .

Key Military Engagements

The Southern Tang's early military expansion under founder Li Bian (r. 937–943) included the invasion of the Min Kingdom in 943, which escalated into a full of its western territories by 945, securing control over much of province despite Wuyue forces occupying the northern capital . This campaign capitalized on Min's internal divisions but highlighted Southern Tang's opportunistic rather than overwhelming force, as the kingdom's armies numbered around 100,000 yet failed to fully consolidate gains amid rival interventions. In 951, Southern Tang forces exploited rebellions within the Kingdom, rapidly annexing its core regions in and after Ma Xifan sought aid against his generals, incorporating approximately 20 prefectures into Li Jing's domain (r. 943–961). However, the subsequent imposition of heavy taxes and forced relocations provoked widespread uprisings, resulting in the loss of most annexed lands within a year and exposing administrative overreach that undermined military holdings. These engagements demonstrated tactical but revealed vulnerabilities in sustaining control over heterogeneous terrains without local buy-in. From 955 to 958, armies under Emperor Shizong Chai Rong invaded the Huai'nan circuit, breaching Southern Tang defenses despite the River's natural barrier, which inflicted over 100,000 casualties on Southern Tang forces in repeated clashes and compelled Li Jing to cede 14 prefectures, adopt a princely title, and recognize Zhou . Poor leadership coordination and failure to reinforce riverine fortifications squandered geographic advantages, as Zhou's disciplined exploited divided Southern Tang commands, marking a shift from expansion to defensive attrition. By 974, under Li Yu (r. 961–975), campaigns targeted (Jinling), with forces constructing pontoon bridges at Caishi to cross the , defeating Southern Tang naval and land troops in a series of engagements that captured key cities like despite initial resistance from fire ships and archers. This offensive, involving over 300,000 troops, overwhelmed Southern Tang's estimated 200,000 defenders due to neglected reforms and leadership focused on cultural pursuits, eroding the river defenses that had previously stalled northern foes. Overall, these conflicts underscored how Southern Tang's early gains relied on rivals' weaknesses rather than inherent superiority, with later stalemates and losses attributable to strategic inertia amid favorable hydrology and manpower.

Foreign Relations

Diplomacy with Northern Dynasties

The Southern Tang's diplomatic strategy toward the northern dynasties—Later Jin (936–947), Later Han (947–951), and (951–960)—centered on nominal submissions, tribute offerings, and envoy dispatches to avert invasion and legitimize its sovereignty amid northern instability. This pragmatic approach prioritized control over southern territories, enabling southward annexations like those of Min in 945 and in 951, while minimizing northern entanglements through ritual deference rather than ideological commitment to northern supremacy. Relations with the Later Han involved envoy exchanges amid mutual suspicion; a Southern Tang mission to the in 948 sought support for operations against Later Han forces, highlighting opportunistic alliances over subservience, though the plan faltered due to Liao delays. With the Later Jin, interactions were limited but followed similar patterns of tribute to secure recognition shortly after Southern Tang's founding in 937, avoiding escalation during the north's Khitan pressures. The zenith of this diplomacy manifested under Emperor Shizong (Chai Rong), whose campaigns from 955–956 captured strongholds, compelling Emperor Li Jing to submit in 958. Li Jing ceded 14 prefectures north of the Yangtze River, accepted the subordinate title of King of Tang, synchronized his reign era with Zhou's, and relocated the capital to for defensive consolidation. This border delineation and vassalage pact stabilized frontiers, permitted intermittent trade in silk and grain, and deferred further conflict until ascendancy, exemplifying as a calculated expedient for regime preservation.

Interactions with Contemporaneous Southern States

The Southern Tang engaged in opportunistic military expansions against weaker contemporaneous southern kingdoms, capitalizing on their internal divisions to consolidate control over the region and beyond. In 945, during a period of civil strife in the Min kingdom, Southern Tang forces under Li Jing invaded and annexed its western territories, including key areas around modern , where Congyi was appointed as military commissioner. This eliminated Min as a rival and extended Southern Tang influence eastward into , though northern portions fell to . Similarly, in 951, Southern Tang armies invaded the Ma Chu kingdom ( region), prompting the surrender of general Ma Xifan and the absorption of substantial western territories, leaving only remnant holdings under local warlords like Zhou Xingfeng. These annexations exemplified , as Southern Tang exploited dynastic weaknesses without prolonged campaigns, prioritizing territorial gains over ideological claims. Relations with Wuyue remained antagonistic, marked by territorial disputes and occasional incursions rather than outright war. forces launched attacks on Southern Tang's easternmost district in 958, supporting broader pressures amid Southern Tang's northern vulnerabilities. Such hostilities stemmed from overlapping ambitions in the Jiangnan-Zhejiang borderlands, where both states vied for economic dominance in fertile coastal areas, though mutual threats from northern powers often deterred escalation into full-scale conflict. Diplomatic exchanges with were pragmatic but tense, reflecting border rivalries in the southwest. In 940, dispatched envoys to reaffirm prior border agreements with the nascent Southern Tang, aiming to stabilize frontiers amid shared threats from . The following year, in 941, proposed a joint partition of the weakening kingdom, indicating coordinated opportunistic interests, though implementation favored Southern Tang's unilateral advances. By 942, frictions erupted when rebels under Zhang Yuxian in 's Xunzhou mobilized local forces to raid Southern Tang borders, underscoring the fragility of these pacts and the persistent competition for borderlands. Overall, interactions prioritized short-term stability and expansion, with betrayals of weaker allies viewed in historical accounts as strategic necessities rather than ethical lapses.

Early Contacts with Emerging Song

Following the establishment of the in 960 by Zhao Kuangyin (Emperor Taizu), Southern Tang ruler Li Jing acknowledged overlordship by dispatching an emissary to congratulate Taizu's ascension after the Chenqiao mutiny. This initiated formal tributary relations, with Southern Tang sending missions to the court in bearing tribute such as gold, silver, silk, and regional products, nominally affirming 's imperial authority while preserving Southern Tang's autonomy south of the . These exchanges, however, imposed escalating economic demands on Southern Tang, as tribute obligations intensified post-960 to sustain the vassalage. As Song consolidated its position through military campaigns—subjugating Jingnan in 963, in 965, and in 971—diplomatic contacts with Southern Tang shifted toward integration efforts. Under Li Yu, who succeeded Li Jing in 961, these interactions revealed Southern Tang's misjudgment of Song's unification drive; despite observable Song advances demonstrating superior logistics and resolve, Southern Tang leadership persisted in semi-independent posturing rather than full submission. Tensions peaked in the mid-970s with failed negotiations, as Taizu issued repeated summons for Li Yu to attend in 973 and 974 to perform obeisance, ostensibly to strengthen ties but effectively demanding . Li Yu's refusals, excused by claims of illness, underscored diplomatic breakdowns and Southern Tang's underestimation of Song's capacity to enforce compliance, prioritizing Yangtze defenses over conciliatory concessions despite the pattern of Song's prior conquests. This stance reflected broader intelligence shortcomings, where Southern Tang envoys' reports on Song's growing strength were evidently discounted in favor of optimistic assessments of mutual exhaustion or alliances among southern states.

Cultural Flourishing

Literary and Poetic Traditions

The Southern Tang dynasty (937–975) cultivated ci poetry, a lyrical genre tuned to musical patterns, as a hallmark of its elite literary culture, with imperial patronage fostering compositions that emphasized refined emotion over didacticism. Emperors Li Jing (r. 943–961) and Li Yu (r. 961–975) personally composed ci, elevating the form through innovations in structure and sentiment; Li Yu, in particular, is regarded by Song critics as the preeminent ci poet of the Five Dynasties era, refining its capacity for introspective depth. Court poets like Feng Yanji, a minister and son-in-law to Li Jing, produced verses on romantic longing and seasonal melancholy, often evoking a sense of refined detachment suited to aristocratic circles. Ci themes in Southern Tang works frequently centered on personal sorrow, floral imagery, and ephemeral pleasures, reflecting an escapist orientation among the literati amid geopolitical instability, rather than engaging directly with state affairs. This focus aligned with the genre's origins in banquet songs but marked a shift toward literati sophistication, as seen in surviving pieces preserved through compilations that admired the dynasty's stylistic elegance. Approximately 42 ci by Li Yu endure, drawn from collections like the Wanling Ji, which Song scholars anthologized for their emotional authenticity, though many contemporary works were lost due to the dynasty's fall and selective transmission favoring poignant examples. The tradition's legacy lies in bridging late Tang experimentation with Song maturation, yet its elite introspection has drawn critique for prioritizing aesthetic indulgence over broader societal concerns, as evidenced by the scarcity of ci addressing military or administrative realities during the dynasty's defensive struggles. Preservation relied on Song-era editors who valued Southern Tang ci for melodic , compiling them into miscellanies that contrasted the genre's "soft" with the era's hardening political landscape.

Artistic and Calligraphic Developments

The Southern Tang court under emperors Li Jing (r. 943–961) and Li Yu (r. 961–975) patronized , achieving refined depictions of human activities and court life. Court artist Gu Hongzhong produced the The Night Revels of Han Xizai around 960, illustrating sequential scenes of a minister's private gatherings to convey the emperor's curiosity about elite behaviors without direct observation. This work exemplifies Southern Tang advancements in narrative handscrolls, using delicate ink lines and color washes to capture dynamic social interactions among musicians, dancers, and officials. Zhou Wenju, another prominent court painter, specialized in detailed figure compositions, contributing to the dynasty's emphasis on realistic portrayals of imperial and scholarly subjects. The emperors themselves engaged in painting, fostering an environment where artistic production intertwined with royal connoisseurship; Li Jing and Li Yu amassed collections that preserved earlier works while inspiring contemporary innovations in brushwork and composition. In calligraphy, Li Yu demonstrated personal skill, producing works that reflected the dynasty's cultural refinement amid political fragmentation. Archaeological evidence from founder Li Bian's (d. 943) includes figurines of dancers, showcasing sculpted motifs with fluid poses that echo the era's interest in performative arts and ceramic artistry. These artifacts highlight Southern Tang's integration of visual and , though production remained consistent with regional Tang-Song transitions rather than introducing novel techniques.

Scholarly and Technological Contributions

The Southern Tang operated a examination system inherited from the , emphasizing degrees through tests in , Confucian , and (celun). From 953 to 975, these examinations occurred 17 times, yielding 93 successful candidates amid fierce competition and high failure rates that prompted multiple attempts by aspirants, sometimes exceeding ten. Institutions supporting scholarly preparation included the national academy and Lushan Guoxue, which enrolled hundreds of students in classical studies, supplemented by private clan schools focused on Confucian texts rather than specialized exam training. While more consistent than contemporaneous northern systems under the , the Southern Tang's approach lacked innovations like the Song dynasty's enforced candidate anonymity (huming), reflecting lower procedural rigor amid frequent interruptions from military engagements and court funerals. Ideologically, the dynasty pragmatically blended Confucian bureaucracy with Buddhist patronage, employing examinations to recruit officials while emperors such as Li Jing (r. 943–961) and Li Yu (r. 961–975) funded temples and ordained monks, yet without documented Daoist integration or novel synthesis of the . This alignment served administrative stability in a fragmented but prioritized political utility over philosophical innovation, contrasting with northern emphases on Confucian revival. Primary accounts like the Nan Tang shu and anecdotal biji sources, potentially prone to exaggeration due to Southern Tang historiographical marginalization, underscore this functional rather than transformative role. Technological contributions remained incremental, centered on regional production of the —particularly and Hui ink in territories encompassing —enhancing tools for and without attested refinements beyond Tang precedents. No major advancements in or medical texts are verifiably attributed to the dynasty, as resources focused on defense and courtly amid threats from northern powers, limiting empirical pursuits relative to the Song's post-conquest expansions in woodblock dissemination. This constrained highlights how political imperatives in a divided landscape curtailed broader scholarly-technological progress.

Decline and Fall

Internal Decadence Under Li Yu

Li Yu ascended to the throne in 961 following the death of his father Li Jing, reigning until the Southern Tang's annexation by the in 975. His rule was marked by a profound disinterest in political administration, as he prioritized personal artistic endeavors including , , and music over state governance. This detachment from duties enabled the proliferation of courtly indulgences, with Li Yu reportedly devoting excessive resources to entertainments and relationships with women, fostering an atmosphere of luxury amid fiscal strain. Favoritism toward sycophantic and corrupt officials exacerbated internal weaknesses, notably through factional blocs like that of Song Qiqiu and his allies, pejoratively labeled the "Five Ghosts" (wugui) by contemporaries for their self-serving influence. These groups, through political maneuvering, undermined effective policymaking and , prioritizing intrigue over merit-based appointments essential for stability. Such dynamics causally linked personal favoritism to administrative , as empirical accounts from the period document ministers advancing via rather than competence, eroding institutional integrity. The neglect of defensive preparations stemmed directly from this decadence, with court extravagance diverting funds and attention from military reforms at a time when the was consolidating power northward. In late 971, Song Emperor Taizu compelled Li Yu to relinquish his imperial title, demoting him to "Ruler of " in a diplomatic that underscored the kingdom's internal vulnerabilities and inability to project strength. Records of lavish palace constructions and patronage of musicians further illustrate resource misprioritization, correlating with depleted treasuries and demoralized troops. Romantic portrayals of Li Yu as a tragic poet-king overlook how his lyrical focus—evident in ci poems lamenting personal loss—symptomized rather than mitigated detachment from causal governance imperatives. First-principles analysis reveals that indulgence, by sidelining empirical statecraft like fiscal prudence and , precipitated ; traditional Song-era histories, while potentially biased toward legitimizing , align with verifiable outcomes such as the swift 975 capitulation after minimal resistance. This internal rot, unaddressed amid rising external threats, rendered Southern Tang defenseless beyond superficial diplomacy.

Song Dynasty Conquest in 975

In early 975, dispatched General Cao Bin with an army of approximately 70,000 troops to conquer the , leveraging the dynasty's recently consolidated northern resources for superior , including reliable grain transport via the River and coordinated naval support from captured vessels. forces, weakened by years of defensive wars and Li Yu's prioritization of poetic pursuits over military reforms, proved unable to mount effective resistance despite initial skirmishes. troops rapidly overran key prefectures north of the , such as , by midsummer, with minimal casualties due to Cao Bin's strategy of offering amnesty to defectors and avoiding unnecessary slaughter to encourage surrenders. The campaign culminated in the siege of the Southern Tang capital at Jinling (modern ) starting in April 975, where Song forces blockaded the city and its river approaches, severing supply lines and prompting internal collapse. Reports indicate no major by a figure named Cai Yu, but widespread surrenders among Tang officers occurred as morale crumbled, facilitated by propaganda promising lenient treatment. By late 975, with relief forces from western Tang garrisons unable to break through, Li Yu sued for peace; the capital fell without a prolonged , attributed to starvation and desertions rather than decisive battle. Li Yu formally surrendered in January 976 outside his palace, ending Southern Tang independence after he ceded all territories unconditionally; he was escorted to the capital at Bianjing () as a captive, initially granted the title of of Wu and a , though traditional accounts emphasize his . Taizong later ordered Li Yu's execution in 978 on charges of plotting restoration, a move some historians view as preemptive to eliminate dynastic rivals. Casualty figures remain sparse, but records claim the involved few deaths—exaggerated in hagiographic portrayals of Cao Bin as taking the realm "without killing"—with thousands of Tang soldiers integrated into ranks rather than executed. Post-conquest, Song administrators incorporated Southern Tang bureaucracy and elites into the imperial system, relocating over 20,000 households from to northern provinces to dilute regional loyalties and bolster Song heartlands, though this displaced populations and sparked minor refugee flows southward. Tang loyalists faced suppression through purges of resistant officials, but many adapted, contributing to Song governance without widespread revolts.

Historiography

Traditional Chinese Accounts and Biases

The primary traditional Chinese accounts of the Southern Tang derive from compilations, notably Sima Guang's (completed in 1084 CE), which chronicles events up to 959 CE but extends coverage into the Southern Tang period through its final volumes. These texts frame the Southern Tang as a regime marked by decadence and moral laxity, attributing its vulnerability to conquest by the to the rulers' indulgence in arts and luxury at the expense of administrative vigor and military preparedness. For instance, the highlights instances of court excess under Li Jing (r. 943–961 CE) and Li Yu (r. 961–975 CE), portraying their patronage of poetry and music as symptomatic of a broader ethical decline that eroded the dynasty's heavenly mandate. This narrative aligns with the Confucian theory, wherein a ruler's personal failings—such as favoritism toward eunuchs, neglect of Confucian rites, and prioritization of aesthetic pursuits—signal the forfeiture of legitimacy, paving the way for a virtuous successor like the . -era historians, operating under the new dynasty's patronage, applied this framework selectively, emphasizing anecdotal evidence of corruption while downplaying the Southern Tang's effective governance in taxation and , which sustained its economy for decades. Empirical details in the , such as records of Li Yu's alleged reluctance to mobilize defenses in 975 CE, are sourced from fragmented Southern Tang annals but reframed to underscore fatal rather than strategic miscalculations amid multi-front pressures. Orthodox biases inherent in these accounts stem from the court's imperative to legitimize its unification campaign, casting southern polities like the Southern Tang as illegitimate "usurpers" who disrupted the natural order post-Tang collapse. Northern-based chroniclers, distant from Jiangnan's cultural milieu, often omitted or marginalized primary Southern Tang records that documented territorial expansions under Li Bian (r. 937–943 CE), such as the annexation of Min in 945 CE, in favor of moralistic vignettes reinforcing the superiority of rectitude. This selective reflects a systemic preference for northern-centric perspectives, where southern regimes were stereotyped as effete to contrast with the Song's purported restoration of imperial unity, though such portrayals overlook verifiable fiscal stability evidenced in surviving fiscal ledgers.

The "Five Demons" Narrative

The "Five Ghosts" (wūguǐ 五鬼), also rendered as "Five Demons," designates a cadre of influential ministers under Southern Tang Li Jing (r. 943–961), derisively named in subsequent for purportedly orchestrating , factionalism, and fiscal mismanagement that undermined the dynasty's stability. The core members comprised Feng Yansi (903–960), his relative Feng Yanlu, Chen Jue (d. 959), Wei Cen, and Zha Wenhui, operating within a broader political bloc led by Song Qiqiu (886–942). These figures allegedly embezzled treasury resources through patronage networks, extravagant court expenditures, and self-enrichment schemes, while prioritizing personal alliances over military preparedness amid threats from northern regimes. Chen Jue, for example, stands accused of fabricating imperial edicts in 945 to provoke an unauthorized invasion of the Min kingdom, resulting in resource-draining setbacks and further depletion of state coffers. The narrative posits Li Yu's (r. 961–975) heavy dependence on this entrenched bureaucratic apparatus and its lingering effects, including inherited fiscal strains and administrative inertia, which hindered effective reforms despite his cultural . Traditional accounts, such as those in Song-era compilations, amplify these ministers' roles in fostering , portraying them as sycophants who eroded Confucian governance norms through intrigue and moral laxity. Historiographical scrutiny reveals contention over the narrative's veracity: while chroniclers, motivated by the need to retroactively validate Emperor Taizu's 975 conquest, likely inflated charges of malfeasance to depict Southern Tang as inherently corrupt and unfit for survival, contemporary indicate substantive factional conflicts and failures, such as overextension in southern campaigns that exhausted estimated in the millions of strings of . Defenses, drawn from reassessments of their administrative , frame the group as pragmatic technocrats who sustained Jiangnan's amid dynastic fragmentation, implementing innovations like enhanced taxation and trade monopolies that temporarily bolstered court liquidity. Nonetheless, prevailing analysis concurs that excesses in self-aggrandizement and short-term fiscal expedients, including documented embezzlements via inflated procurement contracts, contributed to systemic vulnerabilities, though not solely causative of the dynasty's fall. This duality underscores the narrative's role as both evidentiary critique and propagandistic tool in post-conquest .

Modern Scholarly Reassessments

Modern scholars have reassessed the Southern Tang's capacity, highlighting efforts at revitalization amid challenges from hereditary elites whose descendants often lacked effective . A 2025 analysis details how, despite initial strengths positioning the Southern Tang as the era's most formidable southern state, defeats like the 958 Battle of Zhengyang eroded forces, and subsequent reforms failed to restore parity against the Song's coordinated campaigns. This view counters earlier dismissals of inherent weakness, attributing decline to specific failures rather than systemic obsolescence, with from administrative records showing of literati to bolster civil- balance. Archaeological evidence from sites like the 943 CE tomb of founder Li Bian in reveals economic resilience through luxurious artifacts, including glazed figures depicting dancers, indicative of sustained artisanal production and patronage in the prosperous economy. These findings, combined with textual accounts of agricultural output and trade networks, suggest structural economic vitality persisted into the dynasty's later years, challenging narratives of pre-conquest collapse. Reassessments debunk the traditional emphasis on under Li Yu (r. 961–975) as the primary cause of fall, instead foregrounding geopolitical inevitability driven by the 's unification momentum after 960 CE conquests of northern rivals. Johannes Kurz argues that propagandistic historiography exaggerated Southern Tang "barbarian" traits and moral failings to legitimize annexation, while structural factors—such as territorial losses to Earlier Shu and by 945 CE—left the state defensively overextended. This perspective prioritizes causal realism in interstate dynamics over character-based decline. Contemporary studies further illuminate verifiable cultural exports to the , including the relocation of Southern Tang scholars, painters, and artifacts post-975, which transmitted Tang-era like refined and styles into Song academies. Kurz documents how Southern Tang preservation of pre-907 Tang heritage influenced cultural revival, evident in integrated literati networks and artistic motifs. Such transfers underscore the dynasty's role as a transitional cultural bridge, supported by material evidence like surviving palace relics absorbed into collections.

Legacy

Cultural and Historical Impact

The Southern Tang's cultural legacy centers on advancements in ci poetry, court painting, and music, which persisted into the despite the regime's short duration from 937 to 975. Emperor Li Yu (r. 961–975) composed over 40 ci poems, renowned for their poignant expression of personal loss and nostalgia following the dynasty's conquest, establishing him as the earliest major literati practitioner of the form. These works introduced deeper emotional intimacy to ci, influencing poets who expanded the genre beyond musical constraints, as seen in Su Shi's (1037–1101) innovations. Court patronage under the Li rulers fostered artistic refinement, exemplified by painters like Gu Hongzhong (active ca. 960), whose handscroll Night Revels of Han Xizai (ca. 961–975) depicts elite banquets with meticulous attention to social rituals, , and , reflecting Southern Tang sophistication in . Zhou Wenju (active ca. 961–975), another imperial artist, specialized in screen paintings of games and gatherings, contributing to the era's emphasis on lyrical, introspective themes that prefigured Song literati art. Musical developments included refined southern styles and new compositions by Li Yu, who personally tuned instruments and created melodies, preserving regional traditions amid political fragmentation. Historically, the Southern Tang exemplified a cautionary model of cultural excess undermining , as its rulers' immersion in arts correlated with military neglect, facilitating Song conquest in 975; traditional accounts, such as those in the Song Shi, portray this decadence as a key factor in the dynasty's fall, tempering romanticized views of its achievements. (then Jiangning or Jinling), the capital, retained a legacy as a southern cultural hub, influencing later regional identity through literati networks that transmitted Nan Tang artifacts like the "" to scholars, fostering continuity in southern intellectual heritage without elevating the period to an unmerited given its 38-year span.

Archaeological and Material Evidence

Archaeological excavations in , the capital of Southern Tang, have revealed imperial containing artifacts that attest to the dynasty's burial practices and artistic production. The of founder Li Bian (r. 937–943) produced painted gray figures of dancers, dated to 943 CE, featuring flowing garments and dynamic poses suggestive of Central Asian stylistic influences transmitted through trade routes. These figurines, now housed in institutions like the Museum, exemplify the era's ceramic craftsmanship and funerary customs, where mingqi (spirit articles) accompanied the deceased. Further discoveries from mausoleums attributed to Southern Tang rulers, including those of Li Jing (r. 943–961), include seals with official titles and inscriptions detailing administrative roles and royal pedigrees, aligning with documented structures. Relics such as these, unearthed in the Jiangning district, provide physical corroboration of elite , encompassing , , and stone epigraphs preserved despite historical disturbances. The Provincial Archaeological Site Park in preserves two such tombs, identified through stratigraphic analysis and artifact typology as belonging to Li Bian and Li Jing, yielding over 1,000 items that illuminate courtly aesthetics. The remains fragmentary owing to the dynasty's in 975, which entailed the razing of palaces and repositories in , compounded by subsequent looting and urban development. This underscores reliance on surviving assemblages for empirical insights, countering potential distortions in textual narratives; for instance, the presence of high-quality ceramics and seals indicates sustained artisanal capacity amid political fragmentation. Absent widespread hoards specific to Southern Tang mints, points to continuity in monetary systems from prior eras, with limited dynasty-branded issues reflecting economic policies favoring established Tang precedents.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.