Hubbry Logo
TeqoaTeqoaMain
Open search
Teqoa
Community hub
Teqoa
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Teqoa
Teqoa
Teqoa
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

Teqoa (Arabic: تقوع, also spelled Tuquʿ) is a Palestinian town in the Bethlehem Governorate, located 12 km (7.5 mi) southeast of Bethlehem in the land Samaria And Judah West Bank. The town is built adjacent to the biblical site of Tekoa (Hebrew: תְּקוֹעַ, romanized: Təqōaʿ; also called Thecoe), now Khirbet Tuqu', from which it takes its name. Today's town includes three other localities: Khirbet ad-Deir,[4] al-Halkoom, and Khirbet Teqoa.[5] According to the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS), Teqoa had a population of 8,767 in 2017.[2]

Key Information

The town is a part of the 'Arab al-Ta'amira village cluster, along with Za'atara, Beit Ta'mir, Hindaza, Khirbet ad-Deir, Nuaman, Ubeidiya and al-Asakra. Tuqu has a municipal jurisdiction of over 191,262 dunams, but its built-up area consists of 590 dunams,[5] as 98.5% of the village's land was classified as Area C, and 1.5% as Area B in the 1995 accords.[6] Situated in the immediate vicinity is the modern Israeli settlement of Tekoa, established in 1975 as a military outpost. Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, are illegal under international law.[7]

Etymology

[edit]

Strong's Concordance states that Tekoa means in Hebrew "a stockade".[8] Gesenius' lexicon uses "the pitching" in reference to tents.[9]

Location

[edit]

Teqoa is located 12 km (horizontal distance) south-east of Bethlehem. It is bordered by Teqoa wilds to the east, Jannatah town to the north, Al Manshiya and Marah Rabah to the west, and Al Maniya and Kisan villages to the south.[10]

In the Hebrew Bible

[edit]

According to biblical sources, Ephrathites from Bethlehem and the Calebites from Hebron founded Teqoa.[citation needed] Samuel speaks of a "wise woman" of Tekoa in the time of David (2 Samuel 14:2).[11] King Rehoboam fortified the city and made it strategically important (2 Chronicles 11:6).[11] The people of Teqoa who returned from Babylon were Calebites (1 Chronicles 2:24), and they participated in rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem (Nehemiah 3:5,27).[11]

Identification

[edit]

The location of biblical Teqoa is well defined in Scripture.[11] In the Jewish Encyclopedia (1901), Isidore Singer notes that "the Greek text of a passage (Joshua 15:59) lost in the Hebrew [i.e., in the Masoretic Text (Joshua 15:60)] places it, together with Bethlehem and other towns of the hill-country of Judah, south of Jerusalem".[11] Singer offers as secure the identification of the site at "Khirbat Taḳu'ah".[11] Jeremiah places Teqoa in the south (Jeremiah 6:1), and two other passages speak about the desert, or wilderness, of Tekoa (2 Chronicles 20:20 and 1 Maccabees 9:33).[11] However, Amos 1:1 describes the prophet as "a herdsman of Tekoa", suggesting that the land was reasonable for shepherding.[citation needed]

Archaeology of Khirbet Teqoa

[edit]
General view of the vicinity. The Israeli settlement of Tekoa is situated in the front, while Teqoa is seen directly behind and the left of the settlement. To the right is the village of Khirbet al-Deir, part of the Teqoa municipality.

Teqoa, the town known from the Hebrew Bible and other classical ancient sources, has been identified with Khirbet Teqoa ("ruins of Teqoa"), immediately east of modern Teqoa,[12] both of which are c. 5 miles (8 km) south of Bethlehem,[13] also spelled Khirbet al-Tuq'u.[14][15]

Various ruins were seen at the site in the mid-19th century. These included the walls of houses, cisterns, broken columns and heaps of building stones, some of which had "bevelled edges" which supposedly indicated ancient Jewish origin.[16]

History of excavation

[edit]

Khirbet Teqoa (Grid Ref. 170100/115600), has been excavated by Martin Heicksen (1968), John J. Davis (1970), and Sayf al-Din Haddad (1981).[17]

Periods

[edit]

The main periods of habitation brought to light by archaeological digs at Khirbet Teqoa are the Iron Age II, and the Byzantine period.[17] Less well represented are the Iron Age IIb, Persian, Early and Late Roman, and medieval (Crusader to Mamluk) periods.[17]

Byzantine-period remnants

[edit]

The Bible indicates Teqoa as the birthplace of prophet Amos, and from the 4th century CE on a tomb alleged to be his was said to be visible at the village.[15] A chapel built over the tomb is attested in the 6th century and is mentioned again in the 8th.[15] The ruins consist of a double cave over what was a baptismal font, mosaic floors; a Monophysite monastery is located near the tomb.[12] Byzantine ceramics have been found.[18] The remains of the Byzantine church and monastery are still visible.[12][19]

When Victor Guérin visited the site in 1863, he described the remains of an almost completely destroyed church, and an octagonal baptismal font, carved into a monolithic block of reddish limestone, measuring a meter and ten centimeters deep inside, and one meter thirty centimeters in diameter. On different sides of the octagon crosses were carved. At the bottom of the baptismal font the water flowed through an opening into a tank.[20] The Survey of Western Palestine, with data collected between 1872 and 1877, refers again to the font: "There is also a very fine octagonal font about 4 feet high and 4 feet 3 inches diameter of inscribed circle; on every other side is a design. Two of these designs represent crosses, a third is a wreath, the fourth is formed by two squares interlaced diagonally to one another. The font is of good reddish stone."[21]

A magical amulet etched on a silver plate and written in Aramaic is among the findings from the Byzantine period. The amulet contains 16 lines, 11 of which use Hebrew script; the others show magic characters. It dates to the fifth to seventh centuries CE, and is currently located in the SBF Museum, Jerusalem.[22]

Other archaeological sites and landmarks

[edit]
The Byzantine baptismal font, described by Guérin in 1863, photographed in 1940

The site of Khirbet Teqoa is considered "qualified in terms of tourism".[5] A second archaeological site near Teqoa, Khirbet Umm El 'Amd, is "not qualified" in terms of tourism.[5]

The New Lavra of Saint Sabbas (est. 507 by Sabbas the Sanctified) is today in ruins at the site of Bir el-Wa'ar, c. 3 km south of Tuqu'.[23]

Paleolithic caves in Wadi Khureitun

[edit]

Outside Teqoa, adjacent to the Israeli settlement of Tekoa is Wadi Khureitun,[15] sometimes spelled Khreiton ("Chariton Valley"). The valley is notable for containing three prominent caves inhabited since the Paleolithic era: Umm Qatfa, Umm Qala'a and Erq al-Ahmar. The latter was inhabited since 8,000 BCE and traces of fire have been found in Umm Qala'a, dating back 500,000 years.[24]

History of Teqoa

[edit]

Hellenistic period

[edit]

During the Maccabean Revolt it was fortified by the Greek general Bacchides (Josephus, Ant. XIII, 15).[13]

Roman period

[edit]

Josephus again mentions Teqoa in connection with the First Jewish–Roman War (Life 420, War IV, 518).[13]

Eusebius (c. 260s-340) mentions a village by the name of Teqoa (Onomasticon 98:17, etc.).[13]

Byzantine period

[edit]

Teqoa is again mentioned in Byzantine sources.[13]

Muslim conquest and Early Muslim period

[edit]

Teqoa was captured during the Muslim conquest of Syria and with time, several of its inhabitants converted to Islam. There was a significant nomadic Bedouin presence in the village's vicinity.[14]

Crusader and Ayyubid period

[edit]

Teqoa was known as "Casal Techue" by the Crusaders who conquered Palestine in 1099. Its Christian residents welcomed the Crusaders.[14] Medieval chronicler William of Tyre relates that the Christians of the village aided the Crusaders during the Siege of Jerusalem in 1099, by guiding them to local springs and food sources. Many of the villagers also joined the Crusader army.[25]

In 1108, the Russian traveller Abbot Daniel noted that Casal Techue was "a very big village" with a mixed Christian and Muslim population.[14] The village was granted by King Fulk and Queen Melisende to the canons of the Holy Sepulchre in 1138 in exchange for Bethany, the concession allowing the inhabitants to collect bitumen and 'salt' from the Dead Sea shores.[15][14] The area's population included villeins comprising local Christians and Muslims, the latter being Islamised former Christians, and apparently also recent Frankish (West European) settlers, with Bedouin living outside the village.[14]

The ruins of a castle, a Frankish manor house[14] from the period, are found at Khirbat at-Teqoa at the edge of the biblical and Byzantine archaeological mound, some 41x48x60 m in size, and protected by a rock-cut ditch.[15][26]

Zengid forces captured Casal Techue in 1138. The Knights Templar under Robert the Burgundian managed to recapture the town easily, but experienced their first military defeat when Zengid forces counterattacked, leaving the area between the town and Hebron "strewn with Templar bodies" according to William of Tyre. He blamed the Templars' defeat on their failure to pursue fleeing Muslim forces which allowed them to regroup just outside Casal Techue.[27]

Syrian geographer Yaqut al-Hamawi described it as "a village famous for its honey" during a visit there in 1225,[15][28] during Ayyubid rule.

Ottoman period

[edit]

Teqoa, like all of Palestine, was incorporated into the Ottoman Empire in 1517. According to an Ottoman census in 1526, 82 families lived in the village, 55 of which were Christians.[14] In 1596 the village appeared in Ottoman tax registers as being in the Nahiya of Quds of the Liwa of Quds. It had a population of 62 Muslim households and five Christian households. The villagers paid taxes on wheat, barley, olives, vines or fruit trees, and goats or beehives; a total of 27,000 akçe. All of the revenue went to a waqf.[29]

The majority of Teqoa's Christian inhabitants emigrated to Bethlehem in the 18th century.[12] Teqoa's Christian migrants formed Bethlehem's Qawawsa Quarter.[19]

French explorer Victor Guérin visited the place in 1863, and he described finding the scarce remains of a church, and an octagonal baptismal font.[20]

The PEF's Survey of Western Palestine in 1883 mentions that Khurbet Tequa "seems to have been large and important in Christian times. It is still inhabited by a few persons living in the caves [...]"[21]

Jordanian period

[edit]

The modern town of Teqoa was established in 1948 during Jordanian rule.[5][30] The inhabitants were Bedouin tribesmen from the 'Arab al-Ta'amira tribe.[5][30] In 1961, the population was 555.[31]

Post-1967

[edit]
Street sign

During the Six-Day War in 1967, Teqoa came under Israeli occupation, remaining so until this day. The population in the 1967 census conducted by the Israeli authorities was 1,362.[32]

Over the years, Israel has confiscated 1,436 dunams of Teqoa's land for the construction of three Israeli settlements: Tekoa, Mitzpe Shalem, and a resort, Metzoke Dragot. In addition, the settlers have constructed various outposts.[33]

In May 2001, after the killing of two Jewish Israeli boys outside the nearby Israeli settlement of Tekoa, Teqoa was temporarily sealed off by the Israeli Army. Consequently, residents could not reach their jobs in Bethlehem and Israel, and shepherds could not reach grazing lands outside the village.[34]

Demographics

[edit]

According to a 1997 census by the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS), Teqoa had a population of 4,890 inhabitants. There were only 24 Palestinian refugees, making up 0.5% of the population.[35] There were 2,534 males and 2,356 females.[36] Tuqu's population grew to 8,881 in the 2007 PCBS census. There were 1,368 households, with the average household size consisting of between six and seven members. The gender ratio was 49% women and 51% men.[37]

Teqoa has a Muslim majority and there are ten mosques in the town. They are the following: Abu Bakr as-Siddik Mosque, Bilal Ibn Rabah Mosque, al-Sahaba Mosque, al-Tawba Mosque, Abd al-Rahman Ibn 'Oof Mosque, Zaid Ibn Haritha Mosque, al-Abbas Mosque and Salah ad-Deen Mosque, al-Ansar Mosque and Ali Ibn Abi Talib Mosque. Most of the inhabitants belong to the 'Arab al-Ta'amira tribe. Principal clans include Badan, Jibreen, Sha'er, 'Emur, Nawawra, 'Urooj, Abu Mifrih, az-Zawahra, Sbeih, at-Tnooh, Sleiman and Sabbah.[5]

Tuqu' is one of the villages of the Ta'amra tribe. There are people who trace their origins to Tuqu' that now live in Tarqumiya.[38]

Economy

[edit]

Agriculture, particularly livestock, dominates Teqoa's economy. Dairy is produced and sold in local markets and in Bethlehem. Industry is virtually nonexistent, although there is a stone quarry and brick factory in the town. Unemployment is high at about 50% and mostly caused by Israeli restrictions on movement and access to the labor market in Israel proper as a result of the Second Intifada between 2000 and 2004.[5]

As of 2008 around 45% of Teqoa's workforce was employed in the Israeli labor market while another 30% worked in agriculture. The remainder of economic activity was split between employment in the Palestinian government or trade and services.[5] Efforts have been made to attract tourists. A municipal center was built near the ruins of a Byzantine church in Teqoa.[34] Tuqu' is well known for its vegetables.[12]

Government

[edit]

98.5% of Teqoa's land area has been located in Area C (West Bank), or Nature reserves since 1995, thus giving the Palestinian National Authority no control over its administration and civil affairs. Originally, twelve tribal elders managed the town, but unable to plan and carry out internal improvements, they ceded their power to a council of younger men.[39] The 13-member municipal council was established in 1997 to administer Teqoa as well as the villages of Khirbet al-Deir, al-Halqum and Khirbet Tuqu' which were put under Tuqu's jurisdiction.[5] Its first mayor, Suleiman Abu Mufarreh, initiated the construction of the municipal hall and recovered Tuqu's stolen baptismal font, relocating it to the front of the municipal hall.[39]

Teqoa is governed by a municipal council consisting of eleven members, including the mayor. In the 2005 Palestinian municipal elections, the Hamas-backed Reform list won the majority of the seats (eight), while the independent local United Teqoa list won three. Reform member Khaled Ahmad Hamida won the post of mayor, succeeding Raed Hamida.[40]

References

[edit]

Bibliography

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Teqoa

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Teqoa (Hebrew: תְּקוֹעַ) is an Israeli in the Regional Council, located in the eastern Judean Mountains of the , approximately 16 kilometers south of and adjacent to the Palestinian village of Tuqu'. Established in 1975 as a military outpost and transitioned to civilian administration in 1977, it was founded by a group including Jewish-American immigrants organized under Garin Lev . The settlement, named after the nearby ancient biblical town of Tekoa—birthplace of the prophet —sits on a mountainous ridge overlooking the Judean Desert and features a diverse of around 1,500 residents comprising secular and religious , artists, and activists. Known for its eclectic community atmosphere, often characterized as having a "hippy vibe," Teqoa has been promoted in some contexts as a model of internal Jewish coexistence amid the broader regional tensions. However, it has been embroiled in ongoing disputes with neighboring over land access and security, including incidents of settler violence and military restrictions on Palestinian movement.

Geography and Location

Topographical Features

Teqoa is situated in the Judean Hills, within the of the , at an average elevation of 727 meters above , though the ancient ruins at Khirbet Tequ'a occupy a prominent ridge reaching approximately 825 meters. The terrain consists of undulating hills characteristic of the central Judean highlands, with rocky outcrops and features formed by erosion over millennia. To the east, the landscape abruptly transitions into the Judean Desert, marked by steep descents into deep wadis, sparse vegetation, and arid badlands that slope toward the Dead Sea , approximately 20 kilometers distant. The site's elevated position provides panoramic vistas westward over the hill country toward (5 kilometers north) and (16 kilometers northwest), including visibility of the on clear days, while eastward views encompass the rugged wilderness expanse. Local topography includes incised valleys such as Nahal Tekoa, which encircles the area on multiple sides, creating natural defensive contours and facilitating seasonal flash floods that shape the fluvial . Soils are predominantly thin terra rosa over bedrock, supporting limited terraced on the slopes but transitioning to barren expanses in the fringe.

Strategic Position and Proximity to Key Sites

Teqoa is perched in the Judean Hills at an elevation of around 675 meters above sea level, commanding views over the eastern slopes descending into the Judean Wilderness and toward the . This elevated topography historically conferred defensive advantages, positioning the settlement as a frontier outpost guarding eastern approaches to against incursions from the wilderness. King fortified Teqoa as part of a chain of Judean strongholds to bolster regional security (2 Chronicles 11:6), and its ramparts remained operational into the era of as a signal station for military alerts (Jeremiah 6:1). The site's strategic perch also facilitated control over caravan and routes skirting the wilderness, maintaining relevance through the Hellenistic-Roman periods when figures like Antiochus IV leveraged its vantage for regional dominance. Overlooking ancient paths eastward, Teqoa provided surveillance of trails connecting to oases, underscoring its role in securing trade and communication lines amid the arid frontier. In terms of proximity to key sites, Teqoa lies approximately 16 kilometers (10 miles) south of , placing it within a day's march of the capital for rapid reinforcement. It is situated about 9 kilometers (six Roman miles) southeast of , facilitating interactions with that regional hub. To the northwest, —Herod the Great's fortified palace and mausoleum—stands just a few kilometers distant, linking Teqoa to Herodian-era infrastructure and defensive networks. Further east, the ruins afford oversight of roads descending to En Gedi, roughly 40 kilometers away along the Judean escarpment, a biblical refuge and oasis site associated with (1 Samuel 24:1).

Etymology and Identification

Linguistic Origins

The name Teqoa (Hebrew: תְּקוֹעַ, Teqoa) originates from the *t-q-', specifically the verb תקע (taqa'), denoting "to blow," "to thrust," or "to drive in" with sudden force, as in sounding a horn or . This root gives rise to the noun תקוע (taqoa'), meaning "" or "blast," evoking imagery of signaling or , which aligns with the town's strategic highland position for watchtowers and alarms in ancient Judah. In , the place name thus carries connotations of a fortified or signaling site, reinforced by textual references like 6:1, where inhabitants are urged to "blow the trumpet in Tekoa," playing on the homophonic root for auditory warning. Scholarly analyses of confirm this derivation, distinguishing it from unrelated interpretations like "stockade" or "pitching tents," which lack direct philological support in primary Hebrew sources. The contemporary Arabic rendering Tuqu' (تقوع) preserves phonetic continuity from the Hebrew but may reflect a linking to Arabic taqā' ("to pitch" or "to fix in place"), suggesting "place of tents" or settlement, though this appears secondary to the ancient focused on sonic or thrusting action. No evidence supports pre-Hebrew Canaanite origins independent of this , as attested place-name corpora from the Late onward align with Judahite Hebrew nomenclature.

Historical and Biblical Correlations

The modern Palestinian village of Teqoa (also spelled Tuquʿ) lies adjacent to the archaeological ruins known as Khirbet et-Tuquʿ (or Khirbet Tekoa), which scholars identify as the site of the biblical town of Tekoa based on phonetic continuity between the תְּקוֹעַ (Teqoaʿ) and the Arabic Tuquʿ, alongside matching geographical coordinates approximately 10–12 kilometers southeast of and 16 kilometers south of . This positioning aligns with biblical portrayals of Tekoa as a settlement in the Judean , overlooking the eastern and serving as a strategic outpost on the southern approaches to . Historical records corroborate the site's antiquity and defensive role, with fortifications attributed to (circa 930–913 BCE) as part of Judah's border defenses listed in 2 Chronicles 11:6, evidenced by remains including hewn stones and wall segments observed in surveys, though full-scale excavations remain limited due to the site's partial occupation and antiquity looting. By the Hellenistic and Roman periods, the location retained significance, appearing in ' accounts indirectly through regional Judahite town lists, and in Byzantine sources as a monastic center linked to ' purported , reflecting early Christian veneration of its prophetic heritage. Biblical correlations extend to Tekoa's depiction as a pastoral highland town yielding figures like the prophet Amos (Amos 1:1) and Ira the Tekoite (2 Samuel 23:26), with its wilderness expanse invoked in narratives of military maneuvers, such as Jehoshaphat's campaign (2 Chronicles 20:20), where the site's elevated terrain provided vantage for signaling and assembly. Archaeological traces, including sherds and pottery from surface surveys, support continuous habitation from prehistoric times, reinforcing the linkage without contradicting textual placements in Calebite tribal allotments (1 Chronicles 2:24; 4:5). This identification, first noted in early like (Onomasticon, circa 325 CE), has endured due to toponymic stability and landscape fidelity, despite minimal modern digs yielding primarily Byzantine-era churches and refuse.

Biblical References and Significance

Mentions in the Hebrew Bible

Tekoa is referenced multiple times in the , primarily as a settlement in the territory of the located in the hill country south of . In genealogical records, it appears as the designation for descendants of Ashhur, the father of Tekoa, noted in 1 Chronicles 2:24 and elaborated in 1 Chronicles 4:5 as pertaining to his sons and their clans. These passages situate Tekoa within Judahite tribal lineages during the period of settlement and monarchy. During the reign of King David, Tekoa features in military and advisory contexts. Ira the son of Ikkesh from Tekoa is listed among David's thirty mighty men in 2 Samuel 23:26 and paralleled in 1 Chronicles 11:28, highlighting the town's contribution to David's elite forces. Additionally, in 2 Samuel 14:2, , David's commander, summons a wise woman from Tekoa to devise a that persuades the king to reconcile with his son , with further details in verses 4 and 9 emphasizing her role in this intrigue. In the divided monarchy era, King of Judah fortified Tekoa as part of defensive preparations against potential threats from and the north, as recorded in 2 Chronicles 11:6 alongside other cities like and Etam. Later, during Jehoshaphat's reign, the wilderness of Tekoa marks the staging area for Judah's army confronting Moabite and Ammonite invaders, where the king exhorts the people to trust in divine intervention before advancing from that frontier in 2 Chronicles 20:20. Prophetic texts associate Tekoa with warnings and origins. The prophet , addressing Jerusalem's impending doom from the north around 597 BCE, urges inhabitants to flee for safety to Tekoa and Beth Haccherem, leveraging the town's elevated position for signaling beacons in 6:1. , active circa 760-750 BCE, is identified as a and dresser of sycamore figs from Tekoa in 1:1, underscoring the locale's pastoral character amid his oracles against Israel and surrounding nations. While absent from the of 15, Tekoa appears in the Septuagint's extension of verse 59 among Judah's southern towns, reflecting variant traditions of tribal allotments. These references collectively portray Tekoa as a strategically peripheral Judean outpost with roles in governance, warfare, and .

Key Figures and Events

The Amos, one of the earliest writing s in the , originated from Tekoa, where he worked as a and tender of sycamore fig trees before receiving a divine call to prophesy against the northern kingdom of during the reigns of Uzziah of Judah and Jeroboam II of , circa 760–750 BCE. His book opens with this identification, emphasizing his humble rural background in contrast to the urban elite he critiqued for social injustices and . In 2 Samuel 14, during King 's reign (circa 1000 BCE), , David's military commander, enlisted an unnamed wise woman from Tekoa to approach the king with a fabricated of familial blood feud, aiming to persuade David to lift the exile of his son after Absalom's murder of . The woman, instructed by to feign mourning attire and widowhood, argued for royal mercy in her story of one son killing another, drawing parallels to David's situation and invoking themes of inheritance and divine justice, which prompted David to authorize 's conditional return from . This event highlights Tekoa's association with strategic counsel amid royal intrigue. Ira the Tekoite served as a to and is listed among the king's thirty mighty warriors in 2 Samuel 23:26 and 1 Chronicles 11:28, indicating Tekoa's contribution of notable military and advisory figures to Judah's leadership during the united . These biblical accounts portray Tekoa as a source of prophetic, diplomatic, and martial talent in Judah's hill country.

Archaeological Evidence

Excavation History

The archaeological investigations at Khirbet Teqoa, identified with biblical Tekoa, have been limited, consisting primarily of surveys, tomb excavations, and preliminary probes rather than comprehensive stratigraphic excavations of the main settlement mound. Early modern surveys noted surface remains, including Byzantine-era structures and pottery sherds indicating occupation, but systematic work began in the late amid regional surveys of Judah's hill country. In 1968, Martin H. Heicksen directed the Tekoa Archaeological Expedition under the auspices of the Near Eastern Archaeological Society, conducting environmental assessments, surface surveys, and excavations of multiple rock-cut tombs adjacent to the site. The work also included initial trenching into the site's fortifications, revealing walls and Iron Age II pottery (8th–7th centuries BCE) consistent with Judahite military architecture. Heicksen identified the site's strategic role in Judea's southern frontier defense system, with findings supporting continuous occupation from the onward, though full publication of ceramic typologies and remains partial. A follow-up season in 1970, supervised by John J. Davis, focused on Tomb 302—a multi-chambered loculus tomb yielding artifacts from the Iron Age through Byzantine periods, including lamps, vessels, and ossuaries indicative of Jewish burial practices. This effort expanded on Heicksen's tomb explorations but did not extend to the tell's core. Limited additional work occurred in 1981 under Sayf al-Din Haddad, affiliated with the Staff Officer for Archaeology in the Civil Administration, targeting salvage aspects amid regional development pressures; however, results from this probe remain unpublished and sparsely documented. Beyond formal efforts, extensive illegal antiquities looting has scarred the site, exposing unstratified artifacts and undermining potential future excavations, with no major authorized digs conducted since.

Findings from Prehistoric to Iron Age

Archaeological surveys and limited excavations at Khirbet Teqoa, the proposed location of ancient Teqoa, have yielded no evidence of prehistoric occupation, with the site's earliest documented remains dating to the II period (approximately 1000–586 BCE). Pottery sherds from IIA–IIC, including characteristic Judahite red-slipped and hand-burnished wares as well as black juglets with grayish fabric and burnished slip, indicate settlement activity consistent with Judean highland . These finds, recovered through surface surveys, suggest a fortified village or small town, aligning with biblical references to Teqoa as a defended settlement in the Judean . Additional Iron Age evidence includes possible fortification lines and eighth-century BCE seals, pointing to administrative or economic functions during the late monarchy period, though full-scale excavations remain limited due to the site's location and modern restrictions. No substantial structures from earlier Iron Age I phases have been identified, implying initial settlement or intensification in Iron II.

Hellenistic to Byzantine Periods

Archaeological evidence for the (c. 333–63 BCE) at Khirbet Teqoa consists primarily of scattered pottery sherds, indicating limited but continuous settlement following the Persian era, though no monumental structures or extensive features have been identified from systematic surveys or limited probes. Similar ceramic remains attest to occupation during the subsequent Roman period (63 BCE–324 CE), suggesting the site served as a modest rural outpost in the Judean hinterland without evidence of urban development or fortification reuse from earlier phases. The Byzantine period (324–638 CE) marks a phase of more pronounced activity, with visible surface ruins spanning approximately 17 acres (7 hectares) and including two churches, residential houses, possible hostels or market structures, cisterns, and burial , pointing to a developed village or monastic complex overlooking the Judean . One church is traditionally linked to the veneration of the prophet Amos, whose purported tomb—a northeast of the structure—has been honored since at least the CE, with the Byzantine edifice likely constructed to commemorate this association. A rock-hewn , dated to the CE and originating from one of these ruined churches, exemplifies the Christian liturgical infrastructure at the site before its looting around 2000 CE. No large-scale excavations have occurred, limiting interpretations to surface observations and illicit dig byproducts, but the architectural remnants and ceramics confirm Teqoa's role as a Christian settlement in the periphery during .

Later Periods and Refuse Pits

Archaeological evidence for occupation at Khirbet Teqoa following the Byzantine period is minimal, reflecting a general decline in settlement across the Judean hills after the 7th century CE Muslim conquests. Excavations, including those directed by Martin H. Heicksen in 1968, documented Byzantine-era churches, monasteries, and a but yielded no structures, stratified layers, or artifacts attributable to Early Islamic, Crusader, , or Ottoman phases. Surveys have recovered scattered primarily from earlier periods, with no indication of sustained habitation or economic activity in later eras. Refuse pits, valuable for preserving domestic debris, faunal remains, and datable sherds from transitional or low-intensity occupations, have not been documented at Teqoa for post-Byzantine contexts. The absence of such features underscores the site's reduced role, likely limited to occasional or transit use along routes to the Dead Sea, rather than . This pattern mirrors regional trends where Byzantine villages in the of were depopulated, with recovery only in select urban centers during the Islamic period. Further salvage work or systematic surveys could reveal minor evidence, but current data indicate no significant later-period presence.

Associated Sites and Surveys

Wadi Khureitun and Caves

Wadi Khureitun, also known as Nahal Tekoa, forms a deep ravine in the Judean Desert adjacent to the ancient settlement of Teqoa, extending westward from the hills toward the Dead Sea. The wadi's cliffs house multiple natural caves that served as shelters for prehistoric human groups, with archaeological evidence indicating occupation during the late and Epipaleolithic periods. These sites contribute to understanding early adaptations in the arid Judean landscape, where small bands exploited local resources amid transitioning climates. The El Khiam terrace site, situated along the wadi's margins, preserves stratified deposits spanning the Epipaleolithic Kebaran (Atlitian) culture, with underlying horizons evident in shifts from bladelet-based toolkits to microlithic industries dominated by geometric forms like lunates and trapezes. Excavations reveal hearths, faunal remains including and small game, and ground stone tools signaling incipient , dated roughly to 12,000–10,000 BCE. This sequence documents a gradual transition toward , bridging hunter-gatherer mobility with early Neolithic experimentation in plant cultivation. Additional caves, such as Ain Sakhri within Wadi Khureitun, yield Natufian artifacts—hallmarks of the succeeding Epipaleolithic phase (ca. 12,500–9,500 BCE)—including microliths, bone tools, and perforated marine shells likely used for adornment or exchange, imported from coastal or sources up to 60 km distant. Nearby Umm ez-Zouweitna in the Nahal Tekoa drainage also contains Natufian lithics and structural features like stone alignments, suggesting semi-permanent campsites. These findings underscore the wadi's role as a refugium for resilient Epipaleolithic populations navigating post-Last Glacial Maximum environmental stresses. Surveys along trails have identified further unnamed caves with scattered and occupation debris, though limited systematic excavation restricts detailed chronologies. Later Byzantine-era monastic reuse of these cavities, as seen in adaptations near the Chariton (Souka) laura founded ca. 345 CE, overlays but does not erase the prehistoric signatures, preserved by the desert's aridity. Such palimpsests highlight the wadi's enduring appeal for human habitation across millennia.

Nahal Teqoa Cliff Surveys

In 2019, an archaeological team led by Dvir Raviv conducted a survey of caves located along the cliffsides of the eastern bank of Chariton, also known as Teqoa, a canyon draining southeastern toward the Dead Sea. The initiative stemmed from archival reports of Roman-period artifacts in the area, prompting systematic exploration of approximately a dozen hard-to-access caves using mapping and collection methods. Key findings included pottery sherds, stone tools, and metal artifacts spanning multiple periods, with notable evidence such as a blade indicating early prehistoric activity. The surveys yielded significant evidence of refuge use during the Bar-Kokhba Revolt (132–135 CE), particularly in two caves designated Haner Cave and another unnamed site. Artifacts comprised silver tetradrachms minted by the revolt's administration—previously attested only at three Judean Desert refuge caves—as well as iron arrowheads, spearheads, and storage jar fragments consistent with short-term hideouts amid Roman suppression. Among these, a rare Tyrian-style silver overstruck with a Bar-Kokhba and grape cluster motif was recovered, underscoring local minting efforts and the strategic exploitation of the rugged terrain for evasion. These discoveries expand the known distribution of Bar-Kokhba activity beyond entrenched desert caves, highlighting Nahal Teqoa's cliffs as viable temporary shelters proximate to settlements like Teqoa in the Judean foothills. The finds align with patterns of sporadic occupation rather than permanent habitation, corroborated by the absence of domestic architecture and the presence of conflict-related debris. Earlier surveys in the broader wadi, such as those at the Monastery of Chariton (Khirbet Khureitun) in 1981–1982, had identified Byzantine remains but overlooked these revolt-era traces, emphasizing the value of targeted cliffside prospection.

Historical Development

Biblical and Iron Age Settlement

Tekoa appears in the as a settlement within the tribal territory of Judah, first referenced in genealogical lists associating it with the clan of Ashhur (1 Chronicles 2:24; 4:5). King fortified Tekoa as part of Judah's defensive network against potential threats from and the northern kingdom around the early BCE (2 Chronicles 11:6). The town gained narrative prominence during the reign of or shortly after, when summoned a wise woman from Tekoa to counsel the king on reconciliation and succession (2 Samuel 14:1–20). By the BCE, Tekoa served as the hometown of the , a shepherd who prophesied against social injustices in the kingdoms of and Judah circa 760–750 BCE ( 1:1). These references indicate Tekoa's role as a rural Judean outpost on the edge of the desert, involved in military, prophetic, and advisory capacities during the II period (ca. 1000–586 BCE). Archaeological evidence supports occupation at Khirbet Tuqu', the site's identification as ancient Tekoa. Surveys and limited excavations have recovered sherds attributable to Iron Age IIA–IIC (ca. 1000–586 BCE), aligning with Judah's monarchic expansion into the Judean hills and wilderness fringes. A key find is Tomb 302, excavated by John J. Davis in the 1970s, which exemplifies Judahite rock-cut burial practices of Iron Age II–III, featuring a rectangular chamber with loculi and artifacts like lamps and vessels consistent with 8th–6th century BCE Judean material culture. This tomb's typology—simple hewn benches and minimal decoration—reflects standard rural Judahite funerary customs, corroborating textual evidence of settled communities rather than nomadic presence. No large-scale fortifications from this era have been definitively linked to Rehoboam's works, though scattered wall remnants and terrace systems suggest agricultural adaptation to the arid terrain. The site's modest scale underscores Tekoa's function as a peripheral village supporting Jerusalem's kingdom, with settlement patterns evidencing continuity from the late Iron Age I transition amid Judah's .

Persian to Roman Periods

During the Persian period (c. 539–332 BCE), Tekoa was resettled as part of the rural economy in the province of Yehud under Achaemenid administration, with the site incorporated into the Beth-haccherem district south of . The inhabitants, referred to as the "men of Tekoa," participated in the repair of 's walls circa 445 BCE, as recorded in 3:5, indicating and labor contributions to provincial . Archaeological evidence includes scattered Persian-period sherds at Khirbet Teqoa, attesting to modest habitation amid a broader pattern of dispersed rural settlements in Judah, though no major structures or fortifications from this era have been identified. The (332–63 BCE), following the Great's conquest, shows limited but continuous occupation at Tekoa, evidenced primarily by diagnostic pottery forms associated with Ptolemaic and Seleucid influences. Settlement patterns in the region suggest Tekoa functioned as a small agricultural village, benefiting from Hellenistic trade networks but without significant urban development or Hellenistic architectural imprints like those seen at larger Judean centers. No specific literary references to Tekoa appear in Hellenistic sources, aligning with the site's peripheral role in the Judean hinterland during Ptolemaic-Seleucid transitions and the . In the Roman period (63 BCE–324 CE), Tekoa maintained village status under direct Roman oversight after Pompey's annexation, with pottery assemblages reflecting Early Roman (Herodian) and Late Roman ceramic types, including imported amphorae indicative of Mediterranean connectivity. The site's proximity to , constructed by between 23–15 BCE as a fortress-palace complex approximately 5 km southeast, underscores Tekoa's position within a fortified Judean landscape amid Herodian building projects and Roman provincial administration. Additional Roman-era artifacts, such as those from nearby cliff surveys in Teqoa, include utilitarian items supporting agrarian activities, though the core settlement yielded no monumental remains, consistent with its role as a secondary rural outpost rather than a key administrative or military hub.

Byzantine and Early Islamic Eras

In the Byzantine era, Teqoa emerged as a notable settlement in the Judean hill country, characterized by ecclesiastical structures tied to biblical traditions. A was established there by the fifth century, reflecting the region's monastic expansion. The site featured a church dedicated to the , whose tomb—venerated since —was associated with a northeast of the church; this tradition is attested by in the fourth century and reinforced in Byzantine sources. of Scythopolis referenced the "holy " at Teqoa in the sixth century, underscoring its religious significance. Archaeological remains from this period include the church, monastery complex, burial caves, and cisterns, spanning roughly 17 acres and overlooking an ancient route toward En Gedi. A prominent artifact is a fifth-century octagonal , indicative of baptismal practices in the local church. These structures highlight Teqoa's role in the Byzantine network of pilgrimage and monastic sites in , supported by agricultural terraces and water systems adapted to the semi-arid environment. Evidence for the early Islamic period (seventh to tenth centuries) at Teqoa remains limited, with no major excavations documenting distinct Umayyad or Abbasid phases. The settlement appears to have maintained continuity from Byzantine times into the early medieval era, as inferred from persistent habitation patterns in the Judean hills, though specific Islamic-era or has not been prominently identified at the site. Later medieval features, such as Crusader-period fortifications, suggest ongoing occupation, but detailed early Islamic awaits further investigation.

Medieval to Ottoman Decline

In 1138, during the Crusader era, Teqoa (known then as Thecua) was pillaged by Turkish raiders from east of the , prompting inhabitants to flee to nearby caves for refuge and resulting in the site's effective abandonment and ruin. This event marked a sharp downturn from the settlement's prior Christian habitation, which had briefly aligned with Crusader forces following their 1099 conquest of the region. After the Mamluks ousted the Crusaders from in 1291, Teqoa's vicinity remained sparsely populated amid broader regional instability, with no major recorded rebuilding or fortification efforts specific to the site. Ottoman control from 1517 onward incorporated the area into administrative units like the Sanjak of , where it functioned as a minor agricultural village under the name Tuqu'. Tax assessments from this period reflect modest economic activity, primarily from crops and herding, but without evidence of significant growth or restoration of ancient structures. Demographic changes accelerated the decline in the , as most Christian residents emigrated to , establishing the Al-Qawawsa quarter there, thereby shifting Tuqu' to a Muslim-majority community. This , amid Ottoman-era economic pressures and intercommunal dynamics, contributed to the village's reduced vitality and the persistent ruination of the biblical-era core by the .

Modern Context

Jordanian Administration (1948–1967)

Following the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, seized control of the , including the Teqoa region southeast of , establishing military administration over the territory. On 24 April 1950, formally annexed the to its Hashemite Kingdom, granting its inhabitants Jordanian citizenship while maintaining rule until 1967. This annexation, recognized only by Britain, , and , integrated the area into 's administrative framework, with local governance handled through subdistrict offices under the Ministry of Interior. The modern village of Tuqu' (also known as Teqoa) originated in amid the post-war displacements and Jordanian occupation, founded by semi-nomadic from the 'Arab al-Ta'amira tribe who transitioned to settled and in the vicinity of the ancient ruins. These , previously pastoralists in the Judean Desert, repurposed elements of the ancient Teqoa site—such as elevated ruins for watchtowers—to monitor flocks and grazing lands, reflecting pragmatic adaptation to the terrain rather than cultural continuity with biblical-era inhabitants. Under Jordanian rule, the village developed basic infrastructure, including mosques and agricultural plots, supported by tribal networks and limited state services like road access and water provision, though archaeological preservation was negligible amid regional neglect of pre-Islamic sites. Socioeconomic life centered on subsistence farming of olives, grains, and , with the Ta'amira Bedouin's mobility curtailed by Jordanian efforts to sedentarize nomads for administrative control and . No major conflicts or developments specific to Teqoa are recorded, but the period saw broader population growth from refugee influxes, straining resources in rural areas like this one. Jordanian policies emphasized Arab unity, granting West Bankers parliamentary representation, yet local autonomy remained limited, with Teqoa falling under the Bethlehem subdistrict. The ancient site's remains, spanning roughly 30 acres of tells and cisterns, endured as overlooked rubble, occasionally quarried informally, underscoring the era's prioritization of immediate settlement over heritage amid geopolitical tensions.

Post-1967 Israeli Settlement and Continuity

Following Israel's capture of the West Bank from Jordan during the 1967 Six-Day War, the Gush Etzion bloc, including areas around Teqoa, saw the re-establishment of Jewish communities destroyed in 1948. Tekoa was initially founded in 1975 as a Nahal outpost by the Israel Defense Forces' pioneering unit, providing military support in the Judean Hills post-Yom Kippur War. In 1977, the site transitioned to civilian administration, with a nucleus group of settlers taking residence to develop it as a community settlement under the Gush Etzion Regional Council. The settlement's establishment reflects broader Israeli efforts to restore Jewish presence in historically significant areas, drawing on biblical associations with Tekoa—the prophesied hometown of —and proximity to pre-1948 kibbutzim overrun during the War of Independence. Positioned on a overlooking village of Tuqu' (Teqoa), Tekoa has grown into a mixed ideological community emphasizing education, arts, and coexistence models, distinguishing it from more uniform religious or secular settlements. This development aligns with Israel's post-1967 of strategic settlement for and demographic continuity, countering narratives of interruption under Jordanian administration (1948–1967), during which Jewish sites were neglected or repurposed. Critics, often from Palestinian advocacy groups, portray Tekoa's expansion as land expropriation impacting local Arab agriculture, citing incidents like settler on groves in 2007. However, settlement proponents substantiate continuity through archaeological ties to Jewish remains at nearby Khirbet Tequ'a and revival of Etzion Bloc farming traditions, arguing against biased international designations of illegality that overlook defensive necessities and historical rights. By the , Tekoa hosted around 4,000–5,000 residents, sustaining communal institutions amid ongoing regional tensions.

Palestinian Village and Demographics

Tuqu' (Arabic: تقوع) is a Palestinian town in the Bethlehem Governorate of the State of Palestine, situated in the West Bank approximately 12 kilometers southeast of Bethlehem and overlooking the Judean Desert. The town functions as an urban locality under Palestinian Authority administration, primarily in Area B of the Oslo Accords framework, though portions fall under Area C with associated land access restrictions due to proximity to Israeli settlements. Its economy relies on agriculture, including olive and fruit cultivation on terraced hillsides, alongside limited quarrying and commuting to urban centers like Bethlehem for employment. The town's area spans 4.210 square kilometers, yielding a of approximately 2,082 inhabitants per square kilometer as of the 2017 census. Residents are overwhelmingly Palestinian Arabs, with as the predominant religion; no significant non-Muslim or Jewish populations are recorded in official statistics. Historical continuity traces to Ottoman-era settlement patterns, with modern demographics reflecting post-1948 influxes and natural growth amid regional conflicts. Population data from the Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) indicate steady growth: 6,669 estimated in 2006, rising to 8,691 in the 2017 census, and projected at 10,469 by based on mid-year estimates assuming a 2.1% annual growth rate. This expansion aligns with broader trends, driven by high fertility rates (around 3.5 children per woman in ) and limited out-migration despite economic pressures. The 2017 census breakdown showed roughly equal gender distribution, with about 49% males and 51% females, and a median age under 20 reflecting a youthful .
YearPopulation (PCBS)
20178,691
20188,881
20199,074
20209,270
20219,469
2026 (proj.)10,469
Housing data from surveys report over 1,800 structures, predominantly stone-built with modern utilities, though infrastructure challenges persist due to and checkpoint-related mobility constraints. hovers above 20%, exceeding the governorate average, tied to agricultural land fragmentation and settlement expansion pressures.

Controversies and Interpretations

Debates on Site Identification

The identification of the biblical town of Tekoa with the of Khirbet Tuqu' (also rendered Khirbet Tequ'a), situated on a approximately 12 kilometers (7.5 miles) southeast of and 16 kilometers (10 miles) south of at an elevation of about 825 meters (2,707 feet), enjoys broad scholarly consensus based on toponymic continuity, biblical topography, and surface archaeology. The Arabic name Tuqu' preserves the ancient Hebrew Teqoa, and the site's proximity to the Judean Desert wilderness aligns with scriptural descriptions, such as 6:1, which positions Tekoa as a southern lookout toward . Early Christian sources, including ' Onomasticon (c. 325 CE), locate Thekoa (Thekoe) as a village 12 Roman miles from () near the desert, a description matching Khirbet Tuqu' and associating it with the prophet ' purported . Archaeological evidence from surveys and limited digs supports occupation contemporaneous with biblical references to Tekoa as a fortified town under (2 Chronicles 11:6) and the hometown of (Amos 1:1). Surveys by Moshe Kochavi in 1968 documented remains including cisterns, tombs, and fortification elements, while small-scale excavations that year uncovered pottery and structural features indicative of a Judahite settlement in the southern border defense system. Pottery sherds spanning IIA–IIC, Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman periods have been recovered, affirming continuous habitation from the monarchic era onward, though full-scale excavation remains absent due to the site's location in a contested area. No substantial alternative identifications have been seriously proposed in modern scholarship, as biblical coordinates—such as its association with the Valley of Berachah (2 Chronicles 20:16) and the (midbar) of Tekoa (1 Chronicles 4:5)—converge on this locale without viable competitors. Historical uncertainties, such as the exact extent of fortifications or the precise birthplace of amid the site's expansive ruins covering 4–5 acres, persist pending comprehensive digs, but these do not challenge the core identification. Byzantine and medieval traditions further reinforced the link by venerating the site as ' burial place, with churches and monasteries documented until the Crusader period.

Claims of Historical Continuity vs. Modern Narratives

Jewish advocates for settlement in the Teqoa area emphasize the site's identification with biblical Tekoa, a fortified town in the Kingdom of Judah established during the II period (circa 1000–586 BCE) and explicitly mentioned as reinforced by King Rehoboam around 930 BCE to defend against Egyptian incursions. The prophet , active in the BCE, hailed from Tekoa, underscoring its role as a and strategic Judean outpost overlooking the Dead Sea. Archaeological surveys at Khirbet Tuqu', the presumed ruins of ancient Tekoa, reveal pottery, fortification remnants, and settlement layers consistent with Judahite material culture, supporting claims of indigenous Jewish roots predating Arab conquests by over a millennium. These historical ties inform ideology, with the community of Tekoa—initially a military outpost established on November 22, 1975, near the Palestinian village of Tuqu', and transitioned to civilian control in —explicitly named to evoke biblical continuity and assert Jewish reclamation of , a region central to -era demographics comprising up to 80% of the population before the Roman-Jewish wars. Settler groups, including the American Jewish pioneers of Garin Lev who formalized the community in , frame such endeavors as reviving pre-exilic presence amid millennia of foreign rule, backed by post-1967 excavations revealing artifacts in the bloc. This perspective aligns with broader Zionist historiography prioritizing empirical Judean sovereignty from the BCE through Herod the Great's era (37–4 BCE), when nearby exemplified regional fortification. Opposing narratives, prevalent in Palestinian advocacy and segments of international reporting, recast Teqoa/Tuqu' primarily as an Arab village with demographic continuity from the Byzantine and early Islamic periods, evidenced by a 6th-century unearthed at the site and Ottoman-era land records showing Arab fellahin cultivation by the . These accounts depict post-1967 Jewish settlements as exogenous implants—deemed illegal under Article 49 of the by UN bodies—facilitating land appropriation, such as the October 2023 installation of military gates restricting Tuqu' residents' access to over 1,700 dunams of farmland, thereby prioritizing recent Arab inhabitation (population circa 8,000 in 2024) over ancient precedents. Critics, including outlets like , argue that biblical invocations serve settler expansionism, obscuring causal shifts from 7th-century Arab conquests onward, when population replacement via migration and conversion established enduring Muslim majorities. The tension reflects divergent causal interpretations: continuity claims rest on archaeological primacy of Jewish foundations and intermittent post-exilic returns (e.g., Hasmonean reconquest circa 140 BCE), while modern counter-narratives, often amplified by institutions with documented ideological skews toward framing as colonial, stress uninterrupted stewardship post-638 CE despite empirical discontinuities from Mongol invasions to British Mandate depopulation. Such views attribute settlement growth—Tekoa expanding to 200 families by 1980s—to strategic rather than heritage, with 2024 reports noting accelerated outpost construction amid Gaza conflict, displacing pastoral economies.

References

  1. https://www.jpost.com/israel/gush-etzions-outermost-settlements-contemplate-an-uncertain-future
  2. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.4159/9780674979161-005/html?lang=en
  3. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/01/world/middleeast/west-bank-settlers-land-tuqu-takoa.html
  4. https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2025/feb/27/seized-settled-let-how-airbnb-and-bookingcom-help-israelis-make-money-from-stolen-palestinian-land
  5. https://www.btselem.org/publications/202103_this_is_ours_and_this_too
  6. https://en-nz.topographic-map.com/map-h4l8gt/Tuqu/
  7. https://www.bibleplaces.com/tekoa/
  8. https://www.biblegateway.com/resources/encyclopedia-of-the-bible/Tekoa
  9. https://biblehub.com/topical/w/wilderness_of_tekoa.htm
  10. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/tekoa
  11. https://www.palestineremembered.com/images/V2/Books/Arij/Bethlehem/Taqu/en/Tuqu-tp-en.pdf
  12. https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/AJA10109919_650
  13. https://biblebento.com/maps/BL1142.html
  14. https://www.biblicalcyclopedia.com/T/tekoa.html
  15. https://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Tekoa.html
  16. https://www.gotquestions.org/Tekoa-in-the-Bible.html
  17. https://christiananswers.net/dictionary/tekoatekoah.html
  18. https://www.galaxie.com/article/gj10-2-01
  19. https://dig.corps-cmhl.huji.ac.il/Monasteries/thecoa-kh-tekoa-teqoa-monastery
  20. https://biblehub.com/topical/t/tekoa.htm
  21. https://www.biblicaltraining.org/library/tekoa
  22. https://biblehub.com/study/2_samuel/14-9.htm
  23. https://kingjamesbibledictionary.com/Dictionary/Tekoa
  24. https://gospelstudies.org.uk/biblicalstudies/pdf/grace-journal/10-2_03.pdf
  25. https://etsjets.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/files_JETS-PDFs_13_13-2_13-2-pp081-089_JETS.pdf
  26. https://www.emekshaveh.org/he/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/WBADB_sourcebook.pdf
  27. https://www.academia.edu/38546875/The_Black_Juglets_in_Iron_Age_II_Palestine_A_Collation_of_Finds_and_an_Analysis_of_Typology_Chronology_Technology_and_Distribution
  28. https://biblehub.com/q/Evidence_for_building_Bethlehem_Etam_Tekoa.htm
  29. https://biblehub.com/q/1_Chronicles_4_7_s_role_in_Israel_s_lineage.htm
  30. https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-says-ancient-baptismal-font-stolen-20-years-ago-retrieved-in-west-bank/
  31. https://www.academia.edu/14953280/The_Hinterland_of_Jerusalem_during_the_Byzantine_Period
  32. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781575066592-010/html
  33. https://www.ub.edu/ipoa/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/19891AuOrGonzalez.pdf
  34. https://www.persee.fr/doc/paleo_0153-9345_1982_num_8_2_4323
  35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41489543
  36. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288079998_The_Monastery_of_Chariton_Survey_and_Excavations
  37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27194661
  38. https://cris.huji.ac.il/en/publications/finds-from-the-bar-kokhba-revolt-on-the-cliffsides-of-wadi-charit
  39. https://jeselsohncenter.com/dvir-raviv-archaeological-survey-nachal-teqoa/
  40. https://www.biu.ac.il/en/article/11192
  41. https://www.academia.edu/12433459/Typology_and_Chronology_of_the_Iron_Age_II_III_Judahite_Rock_Cut_Tombs_IEJ_63_2013_50_77
  42. https://www.academia.edu/45502387/Lipschits_O_2015_The_Rural_Economy_of_Judah_during_the_Persian_Period_and_the_Settlement_History_of_the_District_System
  43. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/idf-returns-5th-century-stolen-baptismal-font-to-original-site-in-tekoa-635702
  44. https://www.internationalstandardbible.com/T/tekoa.html
  45. https://www.history-maps.com/story/History-of-Palestine/event/Mamluk-Period-in-Palestine
  46. https://history-maps.com/story/History-of-Palestine/event/Mamluk-Period-in-Palestine
  47. https://cavac.at/cavacopedia/Bethlehem
  48. https://www.palquest.org/en/highlight/6586/palestinians-jordan-1948-1967
  49. https://www.quest-cdecjournal.it/city-on-a-hilltop-american-jews-and-the-israeli-settler-movement/
  50. https://cfoic.com/tekoa/
  51. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/335771
  52. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-etzion-bloc-gush-etzion
  53. https://poica.org/upload/Image/lrc_aug_2015/report.pdf
  54. https://poica.org/2007/08/israeli-settlers-set-fire-to-palestinian-agricultural-lands-in-the-village-of-tequ-in-bethlehem-governorate/
  55. https://www.citypopulation.de/en/palestine/westbank/bayt_lahm/452495__tuqu/
  56. https://www.pcbs.gov.ps/statisticsIndicatorsTables.aspx?lang=en&table_id=704
  57. https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/14291-tekoa
  58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27924513
  59. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.4159/9780674979161-005/html
  60. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/facts-about-jewish-settlements-in-the-west-bank
  61. https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/118582
  62. https://www.un.org/unispal/document/israeli-settlements-in-opt-including-east-jerusalem-and-the-occupied-syrian-golan-sg-report-12sep24/
  63. https://www.algemeiner.com/2020/09/30/historical-proof-of-jewish-continuity-in-israel/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.