Hubbry Logo
Dance in ThailandDance in ThailandMain
Open search
Dance in Thailand
Community hub
Dance in Thailand
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Dance in Thailand
Dance in Thailand
from Wikipedia
Rabam farang khu dance

Dance in Thailand (Thai: นาฏศิลป์, pronounced [nāːt.tā.sǐn] or Thai: นาฏกรรม, pronounced [nāːt.tā.kām]) is the main dramatic art form in Thailand. Thai dance can be divided into two major categories, high art (classical dance) and low art (folk dance).

Etymology

[edit]

The term nattasin (Thai: นาฏศิลป์) means "art of the classical Thai dance, art of drama", and the term nattakam (Thai: นาฏกรรม) means "poetry, music drama and dance", according to The Thai Official Dictionary of Royal Institute 2545 BE. Both terms are derived from Sanskrit:

  • naṭa (Sanskrit: नाट) → nata, which means "dancing, acting, a dance,"
  • śilpa (Sanskrit: शिल्प) → sin, meaning "artistic work,"
  • karma (Sanskrit: कर्म) → kama[1]

The term for dance in Thai, also known as the Dance of the Four Regions, is as follows:

  • Northern Thailand: The term fon (Thai: ฟ้อน) describes a category of traditional dance forms, such as Fon Khan Dok. Historical evidence, including stone inscriptions, engravings, and the Buddhist cosmological treatise Trai Phum Phra Ruang (Tribhumikatha Buddhist Cosmology) written in 1345 AD by King Li Thai (Maha Thammaracha I) of Sukhothai, shows the long-standing importance of this term within the broader Tai cultural area.[2][3] The development of fon dances in the Lanna region shows a unique cultural path that evolved alongside, rather than just borrowing from, other Tai states like Sukhothai.[4]
  • Upper Northeastern Thailand: Traditional dances are classified using terms from Tai languages. The term fon (Thai: ฟ้อน) usually describes a graceful and classical style of dance. This type of dance features refined movements and elaborate costumes for ceremonies or artistic events. On the other hand, soeng (Thai: เซิ้ง) refers to a more energetic and vibrant dance form. It is often linked to communal celebrations, festivals, and folk traditions, marked by lively rhythms and frequently improvised movements.[5] Examples include Fon Oen Khwan, which is a welcoming or blessing dance, and Soeng Bang Fai, performed during the rocket festival.[6]
  • Lower Northeastern Thailand: A region with deep historical and cultural ties to Khmer civilization, the word rueam (Thai: เรือม) describes traditional dances. It likely comes from the Old Khmer word rapaṃ (Khmer: របាំ), which means 'to dance'.[7] A notable example of these native dance forms is Rueam Kan Truem, commonly performed during local festivals and ceremonies.[8]
  • Central Thailand and Upper Southern Thailand: Several terms describe different types of dance. The terms ram (Thai: รำ) and rabam (Thai: ระบำ) are commonly used as generic terms for many traditional Thai dances. In contrast, ten (Thai: เต้น) refers specifically to informal, lively, or energetic movements.[9]
    • The etymology of these terms reveals a rich linguistic history. Ram and ten are thought to derive from Proto-Tai roots, respectively ram and ten meaning 'to dance', and showing cognates in related Tai languages such as Lao and Shan.[10] This demonstrates their deep historical presence within Tai-speaking cultures.
    • The term rabam is derived from Old Khmer words, including rapaṃ, rapam, rpam, and raṃ (Khmer: រាំ, របាំ), signifying a historical borrowing from the ancient Khmer language.[11]

While the individual terms ten and ram have ancient Tai origins, their combination to form tenram (Thai: เต้นรำ) refers to social or ballroom dancing in contemporary Thai.[9] It is important to note that the concept of Western-style ballroom dance was introduced to Thailand much later, primarily during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, not in the early 14th century.[12]

However, the terms fon, ram, and rabam themselves were indeed present in various forms during the Sukhothai period. These terms evolved over time to encompass a wide array of Thai traditional dances, including classical forms like Ram Baht Sakunee and folk dances such as Ten Kam Ram Kiew.[13]

The Thai term khon (Thai: โขน), which refers to a highly stylized masked dance-drama, is predominantly associated with performances of the Ramakien, the Thai national epic derived from the Indian Ramayana.[16] The precise etymology of the word "khon" remains a subject of academic discussion.

It is widely acknowledged that Thai performing arts, including Khon, have been significantly influenced by Indian cultural traditions and the epic narratives of the Ramayana. However, direct linguistic derivation from specific terms like the Tamil kōṉ (Tamil: கோன்), meaning "king or god," is not universally accepted among linguists and historians as the definitive origin of the Thai word "khon".[13][6] The evolution of Khon is understood as a complex interplay of indigenous artistic traditions and adaptations of foreign influences, particularly from India and other parts of Asia, culminating in a unique Thai art form.[16][17]

There are various hypothesis in which the Thai term lakon (also spelt: lakorn, lakhon) derives from. Scholarly consensus points to the Old Khmer term lakhon (Khmer: ល្ខោន) meaning “theatre, drama, play” which ultimately originated from the Pali/Sanskrit root lakkhaṇa/lakṣaṇa (Sanskrit: लक्षण) meaning “characteristic”.[18] This theory is more popularized amongst scholars due to the historical influence of ancient Khmer culture and linguistics on early Thai civilizations. Another theory is that the Thai term lakon derives from the Javanese word lakon [19] (Javanese: ꦭꦏꦺꦴꦤ꧀), a derivation of lakuan, lagon and laku,[20] meaning "to walk, to act, to run". Following this theory, Thai historian Prince Damrong Rajanubhab hypothesized that the term lakon originated from the name of Nakhon Si Thammarat when Javanese culture during the Ayutthaya period was first introduced.[19]: 20 

History

[edit]

Origin

[edit]

Thai classical dance forms, like many performing arts in Southeast Asia, are heavily influenced by ancient Indian art.[21] They include ideas from the Natya Shastra, an important Sanskrit text on the performing arts that describes basic dance poses and movements known as karanas.[22] The depiction of 108 karanas in temples like the Nataraja Temple in Chidambaram, India, shows these principles that resonated throughout the region.[23] However, Thai dance developed into a unique blend. It combined these outside influences with local traditions and innovations that grew from interactions with nearby cultures, especially the Khmer Empire.[4][24]

Archaeological evidence offers a glimpse into the early performing arts traditions that later shaped Thai classical dance. Stuccos and sculptures showing dance-like poses, dating back to the Dvaravati era (6th–11th century CE), have been found at sites like Khok Mai Den and Chansen in Nakhon Sawan, as well as Ban Khu Bua in Ratchaburi.[25] These Dvaravati artifacts show a clear influence from Indian culture in their iconography and artistic expression.[21] In addition, later archaeological discoveries from the Khmer period, highlighted by the detailed dance figures at Prasat Phimai in Nakhon Ratchasima (primarily 11th–12th century CE), were also important in the developing performing arts scene of the region.[23][26]

Stuccos and sculptures based on the Natya Shastra scriptures, unearthed in Thailand, dating back to the Dvaravati era.

Over time, Thai dance grew through a steady blend of cultural influences. It transformed various elements into a unique artistic form. This evolution involved creatively using different cultural aspects, musical instruments, and storytelling traditions from India, China, the Malay world, Mon, Khmer, Myanmar, and local groups in the Chao Phraya River Basin.[4][24] Through this broad mixing and local adaptation, these varied influences were reshaped. This process helped create a distinct Thai dance identity that, while connected to its historical roots in neighboring cultures, developed its own aesthetic and performance styles.[4][27]

Nanzhao Period

[edit]

Traditional accounts and historical narratives suggest that early forms of martial dance emerged in kingdoms associated with Tai-speaking peoples in mainland Southeast Asia. One tradition, often linked to the historical kingdom of Nanzhao, which dates from the 8th century CE onwards, is known as Fon Joeng.[2][28] This art form, practiced by northern Thai peoples, combines ceremonial dance for rituals with martial movements for self-defense. It showcases both offensive and defensive fighting styles.[4] Fon Joeng features various drum rhythms and is traditionally believed to have been passed down through a lineage that includes the Ngoenyang and Lanna kingdoms. Its cultural influences extend to other Tai states like Sukhothai.[2][29] Today, Fon Joeng is still practiced in Thailand as a recreational dance and is recognized as a historical precursor to elements found in the martial art of Muay Thai.[24]

Sukhothai Period

[edit]

Evidence from the Sukhothai period, particularly the famous inscription attributed to King Ramkhamhaeng, shows that public festivities and performing arts were present. The inscription describes the sounds of pipes and drums during a celebration, likely the Kathina festival. This suggests that music and festive activities played a role in community life.[30] While these records confirm the existence of performances, scholars point out that the evidence highlights communal, ritualistic, or festive events rather than structured, narrative drama, which arose in later periods.[31] The performing arts in the Sukhothai kingdom were part of a larger regional mix, combining various cultural influences from mainland Southeast Asia during that time.[32][31]

Early inscriptions indicate that public performances were festive. However, more structured dance-drama based on stories developed in the region due to a blend of cultures. The emerging states in the Chao Phraya basin, such as Sukhothai, interacted closely with the well-established Mon and Khmer civilizations.[31] The Khmer, especially, had a rich court culture at Angkor, filled with complex, Indian-influenced religious and theatrical traditions.[33] As Sukhothai gained power, it started to adopt and modify these respected Khmer performance styles, which focused on storytelling and graceful movement. This cultural blending played a key role in creating the classical dramatic arts later linked to Siamese courts, combining local traditions with the refined aesthetics of the Khmer.[31][33]

Further evidence of performance in this era comes from inscriptions and literature, although their details are often misunderstood. For instance, Sukhothai Inscription No. 8, dated 1357 CE, describes a royal pilgrimage marked by the sounds of horns, conches, drums, and other instruments. This creates a vivid image of ceremonial processions filled with music.[34][35] While this inscription confirms the importance of music in royal and religious events, it lacks specific verbs for dancing. A separate and influential literary work from the time, the Buddhist cosmological text Traibhumikatha (c. 1345), describes celestial beings (devas) in various heavens who entertain themselves by singing and performing. The text uses the general term len (Thai: เล่น), meaning "to play" or "to perform," to refer to these heavenly activities.[36] Together, these sources show that music and performance were recognized concepts, connected with both earthly ceremonies and heavenly joy. They provide a basis for the more complex dramatic forms that would emerge in later centuries.

Dancing Girls of Siam in 1919, in which Siam performed the classical Thai dance to welcome Sir Ross Macpherson Smith's pilots at Don Mueang Aerodome. Photograph by Theodore Macklin (1921), the National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.

Investigating the vocabulary of performance from this period offers insight into its various origins. Historical linguists point out that key Thai terms for dance have unique roots. For instance, the general verb ram (Thai: รำ) comes from Tai, while the term for a choreographed, often ceremonial group performance, rabam (Thai: ระบำ), is generally accepted as a loanword from Old Khmer (rapam).[37][38] This linguistic evidence aligns with art historical and archaeological findings that show significant Khmer cultural influence on Sukhothai. Although Sukhothai rulers managed to gain political independence from the declining Khmer empire, they also adopted important aspects of Angkorean court culture.[39] This included ideas of divine kingship, religious art, and state ceremony, which were the established standards of power and refinement in the area. Therefore, although Sukhothai created its own distinct artistic style, it was based on a deep connection to sophisticated Khmer aesthetic and performance traditions.[40]

Ayutthaya Period

[edit]

Archaeological and historical evidence indicates that before the Ayutthaya Kingdom was officially established in the mid-14th century, the area was home to earlier settlements influenced by the Mon and especially the Khmer civilizations. The site that became Ayutthaya likely held strategic and cultural importance because of its location near the Chao Phraya River. It was under Khmer control before gradually shifting toward the influence of emerging Tai polities.[41][42] While the Sukhothai Kingdom was officially established earlier, around 1238 CE, Ayutthaya gained prominence later. By the 15th century, it became a major center of power in central Thailand.[43]

Ayutthaya was a diverse kingdom with a mix of different people, as noted by several European visitors in the 17th century. Simon de la Loubère, in his work Du Royaume de Siam, mentioned the presence of various ethnic groups, including Persians, Indians, Chinese, Malays, and others.[44] Nicolas Gervaise also highlighted the kingdom’s diversity, estimating that many urban residents were foreigners.[45] While it is hard to confirm exact demographic numbers, Ayutthaya’s position as a regional trade center drew immigrants from throughout Asia. This included communities such as Khmer, Mon, Lao, Burmese, Chinese, Cham, and Indian.[43] Some legal documents, like the Palace Law from 1358 CE, reference these groups, showing they were recognized in the kingdom’s administration. However, this recognition does not necessarily indicate their social status or how well they fit into society.[46]

The Palace Law of Ayutthaya, especially the parts about court entertainment, mentions several types of performance art practiced in the royal court. These include len (play or recreation), ram and rabam (dance), ra-beng (likely a type of dance or movement-based performance), and Nang yai (large shadow puppetry). Other forms are open to interpretation since terminology and transliteration in historical records change over time.[2] French envoy Simon de la Loubère, who visited in 1687 and 1688, noted three main types of performances at the Siamese court: rabam (dance), lakhon (drama), and khon (masked dance-drama).[44]

Group of Siamese theatre in 1900 performed in Berlin, Germany.

Thai classical dance-drama includes several distinct genres, such as Lakhon chatri, Lakhon nok, and Lakhon nai. Lakhon chatri, which started in southern Thailand, is closely related to the Menora performance tradition of the Malay Peninsula. This connection suggests shared roots with both Mon and Malay cultural practices.[47][48] While words like ram (to dance) and rabam (a stylized dance form) show up in later Thai literature and may indicate a link to earlier rituals and court traditions, there is not much written evidence that clearly explains their organized use during the Sukhothai period.[39]

Khon is a highly stylized masked dance-drama performed at the royal court. It appears to be more fully developed during the Ayutthaya period, particularly by the 17th century.[43] Its narrative is based on the Ramakien, a Thai version of the Indian Ramayana.

Khmer cultural influence on the Siamese court, especially in dance-drama, began before the military invasion of Angkor in 1431. During the early Ayutthaya period, Siamese court traditions were greatly affected by interactions with the weakening Khmer empire, which had deep-rooted ritual and artistic practices linked to Hindu-Buddhist court culture.[49][50] Although the 1431 campaign under King Borommarachathirat II was a key moment for Thai power, cultural exchange had already been happening through migration, intermarriage, and support from the elite. Many aspects of classical Thai court dance, such as masked performances like Khon and stylized movements in Lakhon, show structural similarities to Khmer court dance.[51]

According to performance scholar Surapone Virulrak, Thai court performance art changed a lot during the Ayutthaya period, especially between the 15th and 18th centuries. One important ritual, Chak nak Dukdamban, is a ceremonial enactment based on the Samudra Manthana myth from the Indian Mahābhārata. This ritual was performed during special court events and religious festivals.[52] The myth, which involves churning the ocean to produce immortality, has a deep significance across South and Southeast Asia.

Beyond regional and folk traditions such as Manora, a dance-drama deeply rooted in southern Thailand’s diverse culture and influenced by Indian and Malay performance styles, the two most prominent forms of Thai classical dance drama are Khon and Lakhon Nai. These genres developed in royal courts and were historically performed by dancers trained in the palace. Research shows that Khon and Lakhon Nai were significantly influenced by Khmer court performances, especially during the Ayutthaya period. This reflects broader patterns of cultural exchange in mainland Southeast Asia.[53][23] Likay, a more popular and improvisational form of folk theatre, did not just emerge as an alternative to court arts. It resulted from interactions among local traditions, Buddhist Jataka tales, and regional performance styles across the Malay Peninsula and Southeast Asia.[54]

When studying historical records and archaeological findings alongside classical dance postures from early manuscripts, the growth of drama during the Ayutthaya period seems to show a mix of regional influences. Prince Damrong Rajanubhab’s work offers an early understanding of Thai performing arts. However, modern research highlights the varied origins of Lakhon. For instance, Lakhon Nai likely emerged in the royal court and shares strong similarities with Khmer classical dance, which had a notable presence in the area before and during Ayutthaya’s expansion.[23] At the same time, Lakhon Chatri, often linked to Southern traditions like Manora, was formed by local beliefs and performance styles, possibly influenced by Indian and Southeast Asian elements, including those from Malay and Javanese cultures.[55]

Evidence of cultural transmission from the Srivijaya-influenced areas of the Malay Peninsula to what is now Southern Thailand can be seen in the spread of Indic religious practices, temple architecture, and literary traditions.[56][57] The story of Inao in Thai drama comes from the Javanese Panji cycle. This narrative tradition began in Java during the time after Srivijaya, likely in the 13th century, and was later adapted into Thai royal and folk performances like lakhon nai and likay.[58] Borobudur, built in Central Java in the 9th century by the Sailendra dynasty, shows the rich Buddhist culture of that time and Srivijaya’s influence in the region. However, it does not directly prove how performance traditions like Nang Yai or Likay later developed or spread into Ayutthaya.[59] Instead, the sharing of Southeast Asian theatrical themes took place through slower and more complex channels over centuries of cultural exchange.

Portrait of Siamese actor and actress in Siamese Literature and Art, illustrated in 1870 by Anna H. Leonowens in the reign of King Rama V from the book, The English Governess at the Siamese Court (1873).[60] The portrait sketched from the photograph taken by Francis Chit.

Since the Ayutthaya period (1350–1767), court and classical dance traditions in what is now Thailand have developed through a mix of cultural influences. These include earlier local styles from Sukhothai and Chaiya, significant Khmer court traditions from the Khmer Empire, and regional Mon and Malay influences.[61][62] Instead of forming in isolation, these dance forms show the interconnected nature of cultural exchange in Southeast Asia. Key performance traditions like Ramakien and Inao highlight this complexity. Ramakien adapts the Indic Ramayana story, influenced by Khmer and Mon performance practices.[63] Inside and outside the royal courts, these traditions showed wider regional interactions shaped by politics, religion, and artistic support.[62][64]

After the fall of Ayutthaya in 1767, the Burmese sack caused major cultural disruption. It led to the scattering of artists and a partial loss of dramatic works, such as those related to Lakhon Nai. Some performers fled to cities that the Burmese did not occupy, like Phitsanulok and Nakhon Si Thammarat. Others were captured and taken to Burma, creating a complex cultural exchange throughout the region.[43] Despite this chaos, the Lakhon Nok tradition, which was more popular among the general public and performed outside royal circles, remained widespread and continued into later periods.[23] Some figures, like Princess Pinthawadi, the daughter of King Borommakot, helped pass on court customs into the early Rattanakosin period, but these customs were not kept exactly the same.

During the Rattanakosin era, King Rama I ordered the restoration of Ramakien. This work relied on storytelling traditions that had been passed down orally and in writing since the Ayutthaya period. Instead of directly using Indian versions of the Ramayana, like the Sanskrit, Tamil, or Bengali retellings, the Thai Ramakien was mainly shaped by Khmer adaptations. These adaptations had been part of the Ayutthayan court for a long time and were themselves regional takes on the Indian epic.[65][66]

Foreigner Record

[edit]
Khon performance

The first detailed European record of Khon and other Thai classical dances was made during the Ayutthaya Kingdom. The tradition and styles employed are almost identical to the Thai traditions we still see today. Historical evidence establishes that the Thai art of stage plays was already perfected by the 17th-century. Louis XIV, the Sun King of France, had a formal diplomatic relation with Ayutthaya's King Narai. In 1687, France sent the diplomat Simon de la Loubère to record all that he saw in the Siamese Kingdom and its traditions. In his famous account Du Royaume de Siam, La Loubère carefully observed the classic 17th-century theatre of Siam, including an epic battle scene from a Khon performance, and recorded what he saw in great detail:[67]: 49 

The Siamese have three sorts of Stage Plays: That which they call Cone [Khon] is a figure dance, to the sound of the violin and some other instruments. The dancers are masked and armed and represent rather combat than a dance. And though everyone runs into high motions, and extravagant postures, they cease not continually to intermix some word. Most of their masks are hideous and represent either monstrous Beasts or kinds of Devils. The Show which they call Lacone is a poem intermix with Epic and Dramatic, which lasts three days, from eight in the morning till seven at night. They are histories in verse, serious, and sung by several actors always present, and which do only sing reciprocally.... The Rabam is a double dance of men and women, which is not martial, but gallant ... they can perform it without much tyring themselves, because their way of dancing is a simple march round, very slow, and without any high motion; but with a great many slow contortions of the body and arms.

Of the attires of Siamese Khon dancers, La Loubère recorded that: "[T]hose that dance in Rabam, and Cone, have gilded high and pointed. It was introduced by Persian Lombok hat in King Naraya reign. but which hang down at the sides below their ears, which are adorned with counterfeit stones, and with two pendants of gilded wood."[67]: 49 

Dancers in traditional costumes perform a courtship dance.

La Loubère also observed the existence of muay Thai and muay Lao, noting that they looked similar (i.e., using both fists and elbows to fight), but the hand-wrapping techniques were different.[67]: 49 

The accomplishment and influence of Thai art and culture, developed during the Ayutthaya Period, on neighboring countries was evident in the observation of Captain James Low a British scholar of Southeast Asia, during the early Rattanakosin Era:

The Siamese have attained to a considerable degree of perfection in dramatic exhibitions — and are in this respect envied by their neighbours the Burmans, Laos, and Cambojans who all employ Siamese actors when they can be got.[68]

Thonburi Period

[edit]

In 1768–81, Thai dance was greatly revived by King Taksin and Thais.[69]: 28  There was evidence that there are still performances of Lakhon Nai and Lakhon Nok, both actors and actresses, in the capital and outside major cities, such as Nakhon Ratchasima, Chiang Mai, Fang or Sawangkhaburi (now Utaradit), and Phitsanulok during Taksin's reunification of Siam. There also were collections of dramatic compositions composed during the Ayutthaya period—more than 10 stories.[69]: 29 

In 1769, in the early period after the establishment of Thonburi Kingdom, King Taksin gathered many scattered actors and actresses. There were actors from Nakhon Si Thammarat sent by the governor of Pattani to King Taksin, and a Thai dance performance was organized at that time on the occasion of the consecration of the Buddha's relics at Wat Phra Mahathat in Nakhon Si Thammarat.[70] When King Taksin led his army to siege the assembly of Chao Phra Fang,[71] he organized a Thai dance performance in Fang and Phitsanulok to celebrate the cities after his victory.[69]: 28 

Prince Damrong Rajanubhap stated that the actors and actresses of Nakhon Si Thammarat were members of the Lakhon Nai who had fled from Ayutthaya.[72]

Throughout the reign of King Taksin, he composed five additional episodes (Four Folding-book manuscripts in total)[73] of the Thai version, Ramakien. He ordered the establishment of several royal drama theaters for training. There were performances of the Khon, Ramakien, Inao, and royal drama competitions in the Emerald Buddha celebration in 1782 near the end of the reign.[74]

Meanwhile, at the Burmese royal court, the royal family members of the Ayutthaya court and Thais who were taken to Burma brought the Thai dance to the Burmese court, resulting in Burmese dance being greatly influenced by the Ayutthaya. However, it was an opportunity to be able to revive Thai dance during the Thonburi period until the Rattanakosin period because Thai dance can be traced back to the Thai-Burmese multiculturalism in another way.[69]: 29–30 

Classical dance drama

[edit]

Lakhon

[edit]
A Lakhon Chatri dance excerpt from the story of Manohara

Lakhon features a wider range of stories than Khon, including folk tales and Jataka stories. Dancers are usually female who play both male and female roles and perform as a group rather than representing individual characters. Lakhon draws inspiration primarily from the Ramakien (Thai adaptation of Hindu epic Ramayana). Percussion instruments and piphat, a type of woodwind, accompany the dance.[75] Thai literature and drama draw great inspiration from Indian arts and legends.

Khon

[edit]

Khon is the most stylized form of Thai dance. It is performed by troupes of non-speaking dancers, the story being told by a chorus at the side of the stage. Choreography follows traditional models rather than attempting to innovate. Most Khon performances feature episodes from the Ramakien. Costumes are dictated by tradition, with angels, both good and bad, wearing colored masks.

Fon

[edit]

Fon (Thai: ฟ้อน; RTGSfon) is a form of folk dance accompanied by the folk music of the region. The first fon originated in the northern region of Thailand. It was designed and taught by Chao Dararasami of Chiang Mai. Since then, a variety of fon came into practice, featuring the music and style of each province, such as the fon lep (Thai: ฟ้อนเล็บ; RTGSfon lep) fingernail dance from Chiang Mai and the fon ngiew from Chiang Rai, which was influenced by Burmese music and costume.[citation needed]

Fon is divided into three types:

  • Fon lep (fingernail dance): A northern Thai dance style. Each dancer wears six-inch-long brass fingernails. The long fingernails accentuate the finger movement of each dancer. Dancers wear their hair in a chignon-style with a yellow jasmine flower tiara.
  • Fon tian (candle dance): A performance consists of eight dancers, each carrying candles. Dancers are in pairs, one pair to each side. They wear full-length sarongs and jackets with a matching shoulder cloth. This dance is always held at night.
  • Fon ngiew (scarf dance): A dance performed at a happy event. The dance is similar to the fon lep but the dance is faster and more fun. Each dancer wears a yellow flower tiara, jong kra bane, and sabai.

Connections between Thai classical dance and the neighbouring countries

[edit]

Myanmar

[edit]

The two golden periods of Burmese literature were the direct consequences of the Thai literary influence. The first transmission happened during the two-decade period (1564–83), in which the Toungoo Dynasty briefly managed to subject Siam as its vassal state. This conquest incorporated many Thai elements into Burmese literature. the most evident ones were the yadu or yatu (ရာတု), an emotional and philosophic verse and the yagan (ရာကန်) genre. The next transmission of Thai literary influence to Burma happened in the aftermath of the fall of Ayutthaya Kingdom in 1767. After the second conquest of Ayutthaya (Thailand), many Siamese royal dancers and poets were brought back to the court of Konbaung. Ramakien, the Thai version of Ramayana (ရာမယန), was introduced and was adapted in Burmese where it is now called Yama Zatdaw. Burmese literature during this period was therefore modelled after the Ramayana, and dramatic plays were patronised by the Burmese court.[76]

Cambodia

[edit]
Interviews given by HRH Princess Norodom Buppha Devi and Em Theay regarding the Cambodian Royal Dances and influence from the Siamese style
video icon By Norodom Buppha Devi
video icon By Em Theay
The Asia Society provides an explanation for the illustration: "At a court modeled on Bangkok's, Norodom I, great-grandfather of Sihanouk, greeted French visitors in 1866 with Thai dancers."[77]
Saweewath Pramoj, a Siamese princess who brought the Siamese Royal Troupe to Cambodia in the 19th century.
Ampha [th]'s Siamese Royal Troupe, which was brought to Cambodia by Saweewath Pramoj after she fled to Cambodia due to the conflict between the Siamese Grand Palace and Front Palace during the reign of King Rama V.

The earliest mention of Cambodian classical dance appeared in the 7th century CE in a Sanskrit inscription.[78] After the Siamese herded thousands of people from Angkor to the Ayutthaya Kingdom in 1421, it resulted in a cultural fusion between these two kingdoms.[79][80] [81] It's believed by modern Thais that the Cambodian Royal Ballet is derived Thai ballet, whereas Cambodians believe the Cambodian ballet is derived from Angkorean dance as it was prior to the Siamese carrying the dancers off to Ayutthaya.[79][82] [83][84]. Khmer court dance reached Ayutthaya in the 1400s and then a modified version returned to Cambodia in the 19th century.[85]


Meanwhile, after the second fall of Ayutthaya in the Burmese–Siamese War (1765–1767), most of the royal court dances of the Ayutthaya period were completely lost. From the Thonburi and Rattanakosin eras, a lot of Siamese verses and dramatic compositions were reproduced and recomposed again in the period of King Taksin and King Rama I.[86]

In Theatre In Southeast Asia (1967), James R.Brandon, a specialist and professor of Asian Theatre, wrote:

" It is popular to claim that the dance style of Angkor's apsaras of the twelfth century is perfectly preserved in the Royal Cambodian Ballet dance style. Unfortunately, this is romantic nonsense. A world of difference separates the elaborately costumed, chaste, and refined Cambodian dancers of today from the bare-breasted, hip-swinging beauties of Angkor. Between the thirteenth and the nineteenth centuries, the Thai developed Khmer dance and music in distinctive new directions. Present-day Cambodian dance-drama is virtually a copy of this Thai creation from earlier Khmer forms. Up until World War II, the Royal Cambodian Ballet performed its classic repertory in the Thai language; only since the war have the Thai play scripts been translated into Cambodian" [23]

Nonetheless, “poses,” “gestures,” and “movements” present in modern Thai (and Cambodian) dance bear likeness to depictions in ancient Khmer art, underscoring an enduring Khmer impact on Thai dance. Even the Thai words for dance (ระบำ or ‘rabam,’ and รำ or ‘ram’) come from Old Khmer. [87][88] Art historian, journalist, and author Denise Heywood puts it:

“It is said that Siamese dancers emulated Khmer movements and Khmer dancers adopted Siamese costumes.”[89]

Cambodia's King Ang Duong, who came to the throne in 1841, is known to had taken refuge in the court of Siam. He decided to set a new standardization for his own court dance, inspired by the dance he had seen in Thailand. He also adapted the costumes of Siamese models.[90]

Siam was not exceptional in this regard:

"Cravath notes that the king returned with musicians after his 1872 visit to Manila; that same year, a visit to Singapore saw his return with ‘Malayan coachmen’ [who resided] in Phnom Penh under his protection; the daughter of one of these eventually became a leading dancer in the royal troupe and subsequently one of the most respected teachers of princess roles.' All these artists were given access to Khmer classical dance lessons, additionally performing dances and songs from their own traditions for the entertainment of the king.”[91]


King Ang Duong's changes may have been an effort to update the dance and make it more palatable to French sensibilities:

First off, he separated male and female dancers into separate troupes and commanded that they each be able to enact dances and dramas without depending on each other. This has resulted in the modern female tradition we associate with the royal court today and the modern all‑male masked tradition of khaol, which is associated with villages and only performs excerpts of the Reamker. Secondly, he covered the half‑clad bodies of the dancers with heavy costumes. This decision reflected an interaction with 'modern' French values as well as the conservative ideas of the Thammayut branch of Theravada Buddhism, which was developed by both Thai and Khmer monks in Bangkok.”[92]

In 1868–1910, Aunt Chawiwat, also known as Princess Chawiwat Pramoj, daughter of Siamese Prince Vorachak Tharanubhab, took the Siamese Royal dance and Siamese troupe of Chao Chorm Manda Ampa [th] [a high-ranking Siamese court lady], all accessories, along with the Siamese Piphat ensemble, to the court of the Norodom Palace in the Fifth Reign of King Rama V.[93][94] Contemporary accounts attest that, throughout the reign of King Norodom of Cambodia (r. 1860–1904), the Cambodian royal dance troupe almost entirely consisted of Siamese performers, numbering approximately 500 dancers and instructors. At the time of Norodom's demise (or during the reign of Sisowath), more than 300 Siamese dancers were resident in the Royal Palace at Phnom Penh. Of particular note, the supervision and codification of the troupe's ceremonial protocols were entrusted solely to a single Siamese woman.[95]: 152 

In Cambodian history—Le Royaume du Cambodge (1883) by Jean MOURA (1827–85), a French administrator, it is mentioned that Siamese females provided recruits of Siamese dancers to the ballet corps of King Norodon's palace:

Les femmes siamoises sont charmantes; elles sont grandes généralement et bien faites; elles fournissent des recrues appréciées au corps de ballet du palais du roi Norodon, et ce sont des Siamois qui, moyennant finances, se chargent de ce recrutement en allant, à leurs risques et périls, faire des chargements de filles à Bangkok.[96]

(Translation): The Siamese women were generally attractive, tall, and beautiful. They assisted in recruiting young Siamese female dancers for the ballet troupe to perform in the palace of King Norodom, and the Siamese took upon themselves the responsibility of taking the errand at their own risk to bring the shipload of dancers back to Bangkok with a charge.

— Jean MOURA (1883).

George Groslier (1887–1945), a French civil servant who studied Cambodia's traditional dance art and had access to royal dancers and teachers connected to the king Sisowath’s court, wrote:

Les danseuses cambodgiennes étaient si bien parties de leur malheureux pays que les derniers rois khmers, jusqu’à Norodom, avaient des troupes presque en totalité siamoises. Tous les professeurs des cinq cents "lokhon" de Norodom étaient siamoises. A sa mort, il y avait plus de trois cents actrices thaï au palais de Phnom Penh. De nos jours encore, l’ensemble des professeurs, moins deux, est siamois!...[97]

(Translation): The Cambodian dancers were so well out of their unfortunate country (after the sack of Angkor) that the last Khmer kings, up to Norodom, had almost entirely Siamese troupes. All the teachers of the five hundred 'lokhon' of Norodom were Siamese. At his death, there were more than three hundred Thai actresses in the palace of Phnom Penh. Even today (under the reign of H. M. Sisowath) all the teachers, minus two, are Siamese! ….[98][99]

— George Groslier (1913).

Groslier maintained that the dance itself and "gestures" are Khmer in origin, "preserved" by the Siamese:

Depuis la ruine d’Angkor,depuis que les esclaves sont les maîtres,depuis que tout ce qui était puissance, orgueil n’est plus rien, les Siamois vainqueurs ont conservé, dépositaires respectueux et gardiens adorateurs, les fragiles «lokhon ». Mais si le même rituel, les mêmes gestes demeurent,— parce qu’ils sont immortels, — les costumes subirent l’influence des nouveaux maîtres.[100]

(Translation) Since the ruin of Angkor, since slaves became masters, since all that was power and pride became nothing, the victorious Siamese have preserved, as respectful custodians and adoring guardians, the fragile "lokhon." But while the same rituals and gestures remain,— because they are immortal — the costumes have been influenced by the new masters.[101]

— George Groslier (1913)


Author and ballet practitioner Prumsodun Ok wrote:

"Scholars such as Paul Cravath believe the Churning of the Ocean of Milk, as carved onto the walls of Angkor Wat, is an actual depiction of khaol, or male masked dance. He believes the performance was enacted during coronation ceremonies to assert the king’s role as the central force presiding over the kingdom and the cosmos it represented, whose harmonious control of these forces produced the apsara, celestial dancers, themselves. Cravath notes that Thai dance experts believe this ritual was introduced to Thailand by way of Khmer artists, where it was known as the len dukdamban and performed as late as the reign of King Chulalongkorn (1868 – 1911).”[102]

A French historian working for Prince of Songkla University (Thailand) in the early 1900s noted:

From the close of the eighteenth century and through the nineteenth century, a number of Khmer pages, classical women dancers, and musicians studied with Thai Ajarn (masters or teachers) in Cambodia. The presence of these Thai elite in Cambodia contributed to the development of strong Thai cultural influence among the Khmer upper classes. Moreover, some members of the Khmer royal family went to the Thai court and developed close relations with well-educated Thai nobility, as well as several court poets. Such cultural links were so powerful that, in some fields, one might use the term Siamization in referring to the processes of cultural absorption at the Khmer court at that time.[103]

In 1958, King Norodom Sihanouk shared the following with Malcolm MacDonald:

“King Sihanouk propounded to me a theory about the dancers costumes. He told me that in the court of the ancient Khmer empire dancers were lightly clad, like the half-naked apsaras.…Then the dancers were forgotten when the court fled Angkor, in their private quarters, so they fell in the hands of the Thais who took them with other splendid booty to their own capital of Ayuthia…The Thais’ idea of costume, however, was different from that of the Khmers. They were people originating from the cold north in Yunnan, and were used to wear a lot of clothes.”[104]

In 1968, Frederick P. Munson (et al.) wrote of the Royal Ballet of Cambodia:

"The costumes and crowns used by the Cambodian palace dancers show an unmistakable Thai influence, but there is one notable exception. Every item of jewelry worn by the dancers is authentic. The bracelets and anklets are gold studded with precious stones, and the crowns for male roles are of beaten gold and weigh as much as 5 pounds. When not in use the costumes and jewelry are kept in a museum in the palace."[79]

Folk dance

[edit]

Folk dance forms include dance theater forms like likay, numerous regional dances (ram), the ritual dance ram muay, and homage to the teacher, wai khru. Both ram muay and wai khru take place before all traditional muay Thai matches. The wai is also an annual ceremony performed by Thai classical dance groups to honor their artistic ancestors.[citation needed]

Regional dances

[edit]

Central Thailand

[edit]
  • Ram si nuan (Thai: รำศรีนวล): A typical dance of central Thailand. Its great popularity is due to the choreography and the sweetness of the music that accompanies it. The lyrics and music evoke the sweet nature of Thai girls. The dance is also an expression of the yearning of a young man won over by such great charm.[citation needed]
  • Ram thoet thoeng (Thai: รำเถิดเทิง, 'drum dance'): The teut-teung drum, an instrument used in Thai folk music, is played throughout the country to accompany the parades held at traditional festivals. It is said that the modern style of the teut-teung dance was created by some music teachers.[citation needed]
  • Rabam chao na (Thai: ระบำชาวนา, 'farmers' dance'): This is a modern dance created by the Thai Ministry of Culture. The dancers wear the rice growers' traditional costume, and the dance itself enacts the daily activities of these workers who are the backbone of the nation. The ballet opens with the farmers as they come to plough and sow the fields. When they are sure that the rice is growing well, they gather together to pray to Mae Po Sop, the goddess who protects rice-growing. Lastly, the harvest is celebrated with songs and dancing.[citation needed]
  • Ram krabi krabong (Thai: รำกระบี่กระบอง): These dances are inspired by types of combat that were typical of Thailand, in which either sticks or swords are used. The skillful use of the short stick depends on the agility of the fighter, who must attack and always remain close to his opponent, while the combatant who takes up the long stick must maintain a critical distance from his rival to use his weapon effectively. The art of sword fighting has been practiced in Thailand since the beginning of time, and, traditionally, a ceremonial dance is performed prior to combat.[citation needed]

Northeast Thailand

[edit]
  • Serng kratip khoa: This dance is performed during traditional celebrations. Usually, the word serng is added to the name of the domestic object used on stage by the dancers. In the case of the serng kratip, the dancers carry typical rice baskets, known as kratip. Their movements imitate those of the women who bring food to the men working in the fields. The choreography is accompanied by music with a lively rhythm. The instruments used are a long drum, charb (cymbals), grab (a kind of castanet), mong (gong), and the kahen (similar to an old-fashioned syringe).[citation needed]
  • Serng Isan: This folk dance is generally performed at traditional festivals. The choreography is entrusted to the dancers, who wear brightly colored costumes and express all the joy of the celebration.[citation needed]
  • Fon Phu Thai: This dance is part of a propitiatory ceremony performed by the Phu Thai tribe, who live in the northeast. The music that accompanies it is played on typical instruments like the gong ching (a tribal drum), along with other drums and pipes. The gong ching plays a fundamental part because it sets the rhythm for the dance.[citation needed]
  • Serng krapo ('coconut dance'): Krapo is the word for 'coconut' in the Isan language. The dance illustrates the activities of a group of nubile girls from the southern part of the region, known as Isan. The dancers hold two coconut shells, with which they execute complex choreographic movements, shaking them, tossing them, or tapping them lightly. This dance is often accompanied by the sound of the pong lang, a kind of upright xylophone made of strips of wood arranged according to the musical scale.[citation needed]
  • Isan bantheong ('the happiness of Isan'): This is a series of folk dances usually performed on festive occasions. The swift, harmonious movements are accompanied by folk songs associated with the northeast region.[citation needed]

Northern Thailand

[edit]
  • Fon sao mai ('silk weaving dance'): Fon is a type of dance in northern and northeastern Thailand. It is performed in groups and has very slow, graceful, and almost meditative movements. Fon sao mai depicts a traditional profession of northern Thai women in silk weaving. The dance imitates different processes of silk-weaving. For generations, silk production is one of the top home industries in northern and northeastern Thailand and Laos.[citation needed]
  • Dance of the Nantha-peri and Pu-cha drums: The nantha-peri is a drum characteristic of northern Thailand, which is used for two purposes: to spur on warriors prior to battle and to pay homage to the Buddha in religious ceremonies. The pu-che, on the other hand, is a type of drum used by the tribes that live in the north: the Tay Yai, the Tai Lue and the Tay Yan. It is used to accompany various dances including, the sword dance, and the kai lai and king ka lai dances.[citation needed]
  • Sword Dance: This dance is inspired by an ancient martial art that requires tremendous courage and strength and excellent reflexes. The dancers balance a number of swords on different parts of their bodies while fighting off their rival with a sword sheath.[citation needed]
  • Ka-lai dance: Beginners learn to execute graceful and balanced movements through the choreography of this dance.[citation needed]
  • King-ka-la dance: The hand movements and steps of the female dancers, who wear spectacular fan-shaped costumes, evoke the movements of a bird.[citation needed]
  • The Sounds of the Mountains: The music that accompanies this dance is played on wind instruments characteristic of three tribes in North Thailand: the pi hom (a gourd pipe) of the Tai Lue, the pi joom of the Tay Yuan and the kan nam tao (a gourd flute) of the Li Saw.[citation needed]
  • Candle Dance: Typical of the Thai Kheun tribe, this dance is performed in honor of the Buddha. The female dancers pay homage to the divinities that protect the eight cardinal points of the Earth, asking them to pass through the candlelight in homage to the Buddha.[citation needed]
  • Khan Dok Dance: The striking choreography of this dance of blessing expresses the calm, serene temperament of the northern peoples.[citation needed]
  • Choeng Tua Auk-son Dance: This dance, performed in the Buddha's honor, is characterized by a complex choreography inspired by the calligraphy of the ancient alphabets of the northern regions and by the movements used in martial arts.[citation needed]
  • The Sounds of Lanna, the Ancient Kingdom of the North: This music is played on two instruments typical of this region. The phin-phia is a stringed instrument whose body is made from a coconut shell. When he plays it, the musician rests the shell on his bare chest, then moves it or presses it to achieve the desired tonality. In the past, the phin-phia was the instrument used by youths to court the maidens of their village. Few musicians still play it. The sueng is a stringed instrument made of teak or hardwood. It is played by plucking the two metal or brass strings with a horn plectrum.[citation needed]

Southern Thailand

[edit]
  • Nora: Nora is a traditional dance of southern Thailand (called the Chatri in southern Thai ). Its origins lie in various legends, which there are different versions of. The choreography of Nora varies from region to region, but it is generally composed of 12 positions and 17 movements.[citation needed]
  • Nora tua oon: This more refined version of Nora often requires greater interpretive skills and experience. Nora tua oon is often studied from a very young age so that the body can achieve the flexibility necessary to execute the dance's complicated movements. Female Nora tua oon dancers follow a demanding exercise regime and strict discipline.[citation needed]
  • Ram taeng kae: Ram taeng kae is an elaborate Nora dance that requires great interpretative skills. In the dance, the protagonist launches a harpoon at a crocodile, whose back, lit by candles, is made from the trunk of a banyan tree. A female dancer moves around the writhing crocodile, poised to pierce its head at the right moment.[citation needed]
  • Ram Nora son ram: This dance consists of a basic posture, which is executed by concentrating on hand, arm, and shoulder movements, as well as on the equilibrium and movement of various parts of the body. Ram Nora son ram is accompanied by long lyrics.[citation needed]
  • Ram kien pral / yieb louk manao / ram ko soet: This advanced level of Nora is usually performed during competitions between two groups of dancers. To intimidate the rival group, a male dancer strikes an effigy. In the yieb louk manao version, the female protagonist stamps on three lemons, symbolizing the hearts of the rivals. The dance is performed as a sign of victory. Afterward, the female protagonist asks the pran, a comical hunter, to give her a headdress as a symbol of her victory. This is a ceremonial ritual carried out to dishonor rivals and to encourage the members of the group. The dance is characterized by a certain sacredness.[citation needed]
  • Ram Nora bot pratom: The choreography of ram Nora bot pratom uses a basic posture in which hand, arm, and shoulder movements are synchronized with head movements.[citation needed]
  • Ram ooak pran: In a Nora performance company, the pran, or hunter, plays the part of the fool. He usually wears a hunter's mask or headdress, and the movements are often amusing and designed to make the audience laugh. Each position is in harmony with the dynamic rhythm of the music.[citation needed]
  • Ram Nora klong Hong: This advanced level of Nora is performed only on important occasions. The female protagonist plays the role of Hong or kinnaree, a legendary creature who is half woman and half bird. According to a celebrated Nora teacher, ram Nora klong Hong is partly based on the legend of Prasuton-Manora: the seven kinnaree play in the lake in the middle of a wood. Struck by their beauty and lightheartedness, pran Boon, the hunter, chases the maidens in an attempt to catch the youngest. The lively, harmonious movements perfectly evoke pran Boon's pursuit of the kinnaree as the youngest tries to escape.[citation needed]
  • Ram Nora tam bot / ram ooak pran: In this dance, the hand movements evoke the beautiful scenery of Songkhla Province in South Thailand. The verses of the song are accompanied by a lively rhythm.[citation needed]
  • Rabam Srivichai / rabam Sevichai: This is one of the so-called "Thai archaeological dances". It is a reinvented dance that represents the kingdom of Srivijaya, an 8th to 13th-century Buddhist maritime empire that encompassed present-day Indonesia, Malaysia, and south Thailand. The choreography and dance costumes are based on images carved as a bas-relief on the stupa of Borobudur in central Java and other artifacts of the Srivijaya period. The musical melody is composed in Javanese style, while its colors, black, red, and green, are characteristic of southern Thailand. The dance headdress is called a krabang naa. Some of the movements, poses, and stances are based on classical Javanese and Balinese dance traditions.[105]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia
from Grokipedia
Dance in Thailand refers to a diverse array of classical and folk performance arts that integrate stylized movements, gestures, and rhythms, serving ceremonial, , and communal purposes while reflecting the nation's Buddhist, Hindu-influenced, and regional . Rooted in traditions dating back to at least the Ayutthaya period (14th–18th centuries), Thai dance evolved from influences including Khmer court performances captured during the 1431 siege of and adaptations of the Indian epic into the Thai . These forms emphasize precise postures from the "Alphabet of Dancing" (comprising 68 fundamental figures in its second version), synchronized to ensemble music, and are preserved through rigorous training programs established by the Department of Fine Arts since the post-World War II era. Classical Thai dance, known as natasin, includes masked and unmasked styles performed primarily in royal or temple settings to enact mythological tales. Khon, the most iconic form, is a masked dance-drama depicting episodes from the Ramakien, featuring roles such as heroes (phra), heroines (nang), demons, and monkeys, with performers executing acrobatic combat and graceful gestures accompanied by reciters, singers, and orchestra. Lakhon, encompassing dance-dramas, divides into subtypes like Lakhon Nai (refined, female-led court performances), Lakhon Nok (outdoor, mixed-gender folk-influenced), and Lakhon Chatri (elegant, historical narratives), all prioritizing narrative through mime, song, and dance. Non-narrative classical dances, such as Rabam (standardized ensemble pieces in royal attire) and Ram (solo or duet displays of aesthetic poise), highlight technical mastery and are often integral to royal ceremonies. In contrast, folk dances (rabam phun muang) vary by Thailand's four regions, embodying , , and rituals with simpler, participatory movements. Northern styles like Fon Lep (candle dance) involve graceful arm undulations symbolizing light in the dark, while Northeastern Lam Thao features improvisational storytelling with mouth organ accompaniment. Southern Nora is a ritualistic masked dance blending spirit invocation and , inscribed on UNESCO's Representative List of the of Humanity in 2018, and Central Ram Wong encourages group circle dancing at festivals. These over 100 regional traditions, passed orally through communities, continue to adapt in contemporary contexts, including and health programs, underscoring dance's enduring role in Thai identity.

Overview

Etymology

The general term for Thai dance, "ram Thai," derives from the root "," which conveys notions of pleasing, delightful, or enjoyable performance, reflecting the aesthetic and performative essence of these arts as adapted through regional influences. This linguistic borrowing underscores the historical integration of Indian dramatic traditions into Thai culture, where "ram" specifically denotes stylized, classical movements often linked to epic narratives like the . The term "," referring to the masked dance-drama form, emphasizes the narrative-driven nature of performances that enact tales through masked and . Similarly, "lakhon," denoting various unmasked dance-drama styles, stems from the "lakhon," meaning "theatre," "drama," or "play," with influences from Javanese traditions and concepts central to Indian treatises like the Natyashastra that shaped Thai gestural vocabulary in dance. For folk traditions, the phrase "rabam phun muang" combines "rabam," an ancient Thai term for choreographed dances performed in specific ceremonial or social contexts, with "phun muang," literally "of the people and land," highlighting indigenous, regional expressions tied to community life and local customs. These terms evolved significantly after the fall of the in 1767, during the early Bangkok period under King (r. 1782–1809), when royal court initiatives standardized nomenclature and techniques to preserve and refine classical forms amid cultural reconstruction. This standardization also reinforced the ritual significance of terminology, linking dances to spiritual homage in performances.

Cultural Significance

Dance in Thailand serves as a vital medium for , particularly through enactments of the , the Thai adaptation of the Hindu epic , which intertwines Buddhist and Hindu mythological narratives to convey moral lessons of virtue triumphing over vice. Forms like masked dance-drama portray the adventures of , an incarnation of the god , emphasizing themes of , justice, and cosmic order, thereby reinforcing ethical and spiritual values central to Thai worldview. In 2018, was inscribed on UNESCO's Representative List of the of Humanity, highlighting its role in preserving cultural traditions. These performances not only preserve ancient tales but also foster communal reflection on harmony between humans, nature, and the divine. Thai dance is deeply integrated into royal ceremonies, national festivals, and spirit rituals, where it facilitates rituals of reverence and communal bonding. In royal contexts, classical dances such as and Lakhon accompany auspicious events, symbolizing continuity of tradition and royal legitimacy. During festivals like , traditional dances accompany music and lantern releases to honor water spirits and express gratitude, enhancing the event's spiritual and celebratory essence. In spirit rituals, such as the ghost festival in , participants don elaborate masks and perform exuberant dances to invoke ancestral guardians, blending merriment with offerings for bountiful harvests and protection, thus maintaining animist beliefs alongside . Following the 1932 constitutional revolution, which transitioned from to constitutional rule, dance emerged as a symbol of , with state institutions like the Fine Arts Department centralizing patronage to standardize and promote "Thai-ness" amid modernization. This effort revived courtly forms to counter cultural erosion, integrating them into education and public spectacles to instill national pride. Under King Rama IX (, r. 1946–2016), sponsorship intensified through subsidies for training, recordings, and ceremonies like the 1963 ritual, which revitalized endangered dances such as the sacred Ong Phra Phirap, ensuring their transmission and embedding them in royal and national narratives. Amid , Thai bolsters the via , attracting visitors to performances and workshops that generate while aiding preservation. Initiatives like the Creative Tourism Thailand project, featuring lessons among 21 activities, promote cultural immersion, fostering economic growth—such as through increased tourist spending—and sustaining traditions by engaging international audiences in authentic experiences. This dual role helps mitigate homogenization pressures, as state and local efforts disseminate globally to affirm 's cultural .

Historical Development

Origins and Early Influences

The establishment of the (1238–1438 CE), Thailand's first independent Thai state, marked a pivotal integration of dance into courtly entertainment and Buddhist rituals, as described in the 14th-century Trai Phum Phra Ruang, a cosmological text by King Lithai that references dance within depictions of the 31 levels of the Buddhist universe. These performances served both aesthetic and devotional purposes, honoring Buddhist narratives and royal patronage. Early Indian influences arrived via maritime and overland trade routes by the 13th century, adapting elements from the Natya Shastra—such as mudras (hand gestures)—into Thai performative arts, evidenced by a Sanskrit manuscript of the text preserved in Thailand's National Library and reflected in Sukhothai-era reliefs showing stylized poses. This synthesis reduced the Natya Shastra's 108 karanas (basic movements) to around 68 in Thai practice, incorporating three speeds of motion while localizing gestures for narrative expression.

Classical Periods

The classical periods of Thai dance, spanning the Ayutthaya (1351–1767), Thonburi (1767–1782), and early Rattanakosin (1782–1932) eras, marked the formalization and refinement of dance-drama forms under royal patronage, transforming them into sophisticated court arts integral to Siamese cultural identity. During the Ayutthaya period, khon (masked dance-drama) and lakhon (unmasked dance-drama) emerged as prominent genres, drawing from earlier influences such as Khmer and Indian traditions while achieving greater stylization in royal performances. Under King Borommakot (r. 1733–1758), these forms were standardized for court ceremonies, including cremations and ordinations, emphasizing graceful, symbolic gestures to narrate epics like the Ramakien. French envoy Simon de la Loubère, in his 1687 account, described these performances as elegant and ritualistic, noting khon as a mimed drama with masked actors portraying divine and demonic characters in battle scenes, accompanied by rhythmic music and stylized movements. The Burmese sacking of Ayutthaya in 1767 caused widespread destruction, scattering performers and leading to the partial loss of dance repertoires, including scripts, costumes, and training lineages. In the ensuing period, King Taksin (r. 1767–1782) actively promoted the revival of these arts to bolster national morale and preserve cultural continuity amid post-invasion recovery efforts. Taksin's patronage focused on reassembling surviving artists and restoring dramatic traditions, laying the groundwork for their resurgence as symbols of resilience. The early Rattanakosin era, beginning with King (r. 1782–1809), saw systematic reconstruction of lost repertoires through royal initiatives, including the recompilation of the epic from fragmented manuscripts and oral recollections to serve as the core narrative for and lakhon. established formal training structures, such as the Bureau of Royal Pages, to educate young courtiers in precise gestures, choreography, and musical accompaniment, ensuring the transmission of stylized techniques like the nattasala (heroic poses) and phaju (finger extensions). Under King (r. 1809–1824), innovations flourished as he personally composed lakhon scripts, including adaptations of the Inao (a Panji romance) and refinements to episodes, enhancing dramatic depth and emotional expressiveness while integrating dream-inspired elements like the Bulan Loy Luen dance sequence. These efforts elevated classical dance-drama to its artistic peak, with royal courts hosting elaborate productions that blended ritual, literature, and performance.

Modern Evolution

The 1932 Siamese Revolution marked a transformative shift in Thai by ending and transferring patronage of court arts from the royal family to the state, thereby democratizing access and reorienting from an elite courtly practice to a national cultural asset. This change prompted the establishment of the Fine Arts Department in 1933 and the School of Dramatic Arts in 1934, which formalized training programs blending traditional techniques with Western pedagogical methods to produce educators and performers for dissemination. As a result, classical forms like and lakhon, rooted in Ayutthaya-era foundations, transitioned from sacred royal rituals to secular entertainment, initially facing neglect in official curricula as the focus shifted toward nationalist expressions. Under Plaek Phibunsongkhram's cultural policies from 1938 to 1944, Thai dance underwent further modernization to align with efforts, including the issuance of Ratthaniyom decrees that promoted Western-influenced aesthetics and standardized forms like ramwong as symbols of Thai identity. These policies led to simplified costumes and condensed performances, making intricate classical dances more accessible for mass audiences and stripping away elaborate royal elements to suit public theaters and propaganda stages. Public performances proliferated through state-sponsored productions, such as those at the Sinlapakon Theatre, fostering a broader cultural engagement while suppressing "uncivilized" folk rituals, including khru teacher homage ceremony via a 1943 anti-superstition edict. Following , under King (Rama IX, r. 1946–2016), Thai dance experienced a revival emphasizing preservation and national unity, with the Fine Arts Department establishing its Division of Dance and Music in 1949 to codify classical repertoires and train professional troupes for both domestic and international stages. Dhanit Yupho, a key figure in the department, led efforts to restore and lakhon by incorporating modern staging techniques like lighting while shortening episodes for wider appeal, resulting in increased attendance—from 34,779 spectators in 1949 to 88,179 in 1952—and revenue growth that supported institutional expansion. This era solidified state control over dance transmission, publishing pedagogical texts like Performing Art of the Fine Arts Department 1949–1951 to document and standardize practices. UNESCO recognition efforts gained momentum from the 1980s onward, culminating in the 2018 inscription of as an of Humanity, which highlighted its syncretic elements of music, , , and craftsmanship while promoting global safeguarding initiatives. In the post-2010 period, digital archiving advanced preservation through platforms like the Open Dance Lab, a web-based tool developed by MIT that catalogs 59 poses from (mae bot yai) in interactive 3D models to facilitate analysis and innovation. The accelerated adaptation, with institutions like Lopburi College of Dramatic Arts producing virtual performances such as the "Stay Away from " dance video for public dissemination via , and the Foundation's Rakram program offering free online tutorials for regional Thai dances to maintain transmission during lockdowns.

Classical Dance-Drama

Khon

Khon is a classical Thai masked dance-drama that narrates episodes from the , the Thai adaptation of the Indian epic , through stylized movements, music, and narration. Originating in the royal courts of the (1350–1767), it evolved from ritualistic performances blending dance, drama, and Hindu influences into a sophisticated court art form emphasizing moral lessons of good versus evil. Traditionally performed by all-male ensembles, with male dancers portraying both genders, khon maintains a hierarchical structure of characters including phra (noble humans), nang (female leads), yak (demons), and ling (monkeys). The performance features elaborate lacquered masks for non-principal roles such as demons and monkeys, crafted meticulously over months using and to convey character traits—fierce for and playful for ling—while principal human characters like and wear ornate headdresses and facial makeup instead of masks to allow expressive visibility. Dancers employ a vocabulary of 59 codified poses and gestures, drawn from an ancient system of stylized hand movements (mudras) and body positions, to silently depict emotions, actions, and , accompanied by a chorus that recites poetic in verse. These gestures share foundational elements with those in lakhon dance-drama, adapting common Thai performative lexicon for khon's masked format. Training for performers is intensive, typically spanning 5 to 7 years in royal academies or specialized institutions, beginning in childhood and emphasizing mastery of natasin—stylized walks and poses that denote character status and mood—alongside intricate combat sequences involving and mock battles. This instills precision and endurance, as performers must execute fluid yet rigid movements in heavy costumes under the guidance of master teachers, preserving the form's ritualistic purity. Key episodes from the commonly staged include Rama's exile to the forest, the abduction of by the demon king Thosakan (), and the heroic exploits of , the monkey general, who leads the army in rescue efforts and battles. These narratives unfold in open-air theaters or palace stages, synchronized with the rhythmic orchestra featuring percussion like drums and gongs, woodwinds such as the pi nai oboe, and metallophones including the , which dictate tempo and evoke atmospheres. From its roots in Ayutthaya-era masked rites performed for royalty, transitioned to public stages in the , with significant revivals post-World War II through government initiatives, adapting to contemporary audiences while retaining core traditions. In 2018, inscribed on the Representative List of the of Humanity, recognizing its role in cultural transmission and efforts to safeguard it through education and youth clubs.

Lakhon

Lakhon represents a cornerstone of Thai classical dance-drama, distinguished by its unmasked performers who integrate stylized dance, vocal , and spoken elements to dramatize epic tales and moral fables. Emerging prominently during the Ayutthaya and early periods, lakhon emphasizes narrative fluidity, allowing for emotional depth through visible facial expressions and versatile character portrayals, in contrast to the more static, masked conventions borrowed from . This form flourished under royal patronage, evolving into a medium that blends poetic recitation with physical eloquence to engage audiences in stories of heroism, romance, and divine intervention. Lakhon manifests in distinct subtypes tailored to specific social and performative contexts. Lakhon Nai, the refined courtly style, features predominantly female performers executing slow-paced, elongated movements in romantic narratives, originally staged in the private quarters of the royal palace by trained maidens. Lakhon Nok, by contrast, employs mixed-gender ensembles for outdoor spectacles with brisker tempos and dynamic action, appealing to broader public gatherings like temple fairs. Lakhon Chatri, a hybrid variant, centers on tragic historical episodes, incorporating folk-inspired singing and improvised dialogue to heighten dramatic tension. The artistry of lakhon hinges on a sophisticated of gestures, including over 100 mudra-like hand positions integrated into 108 original basic movements—later streamlined to 68—that prioritize graceful elongation of the limbs alongside subtle facial cues to symbolize emotions, objects, and interactions. Performers master these phasa, or gesture languages, to mime complex scenes without props, enhancing the form's mimetic precision. The repertoire draws from adaptations of the , Buddhist , and indigenous Thai folklore such as and Phra Aphaimani, with King Rama II's foundational scripts—numbering more than 20—providing poetic blueprints that infuse local sensibilities into these timeless narratives. Traditionally presented in palace interiors for elite viewings or open-air venues for communal events, lakhon performances have transitioned to modern theaters while retaining their core structure of dance interludes punctuated by melodic singing and colloquial dialogue, often supported by a piphat orchestra of percussion and winds. This adaptability has preserved lakhon's role as a vibrant conduit for cultural transmission across generations.

Other Classical Forms

Likay, a semi-classical folk-drama hybrid, emerged in 19th-century as an entertaining alternative to courtly spectacles, featuring improvised , humor, and integration of modern alongside traditional melodies. Performers don elaborate costumes and engage audiences directly with rhymed singing and dance sequences drawn from , allowing for spontaneous adaptations to contemporary social issues. Its popularity stems from its accessibility, performed at temple fairs and events, making it a vital link between classical forms and everyday .

Folk Dances

Characteristics and Origins

Thai folk dances, collectively known as rabam phun muang, are community-based and participatory performances that emphasize collective involvement through simple steps and group formations. These dances are typically enacted during harvest celebrations, weddings, and animist rituals, serving as expressions of joy, gratitude, and spiritual connection in rural and ethnic settings. The origins of rabam phun muang lie in indigenous tribal traditions, including those of ethnic hill tribes that incorporated circular group dances symbolizing communal harmony. These early forms blended with broader cultural influences during the Ayutthaya period (1350–1767), evolving distinctly from the formalized courtly arts by the to reflect local agrarian and minority lifestyles. Key characteristics include energetic and improvisational movements that allow for spontaneous participation, contrasting with the precise gestures of classical forms. Costumes remain minimal and practical, often featuring sarongs, simple blouses, and floral elements in the hair or as props to evoke natural themes. Accompaniment typically involves local folk instruments such as the khlui flute, , and cymbals, creating rhythmic patterns suited to communal gatherings. In their social function, rabam phun muang foster community bonds by bringing together participants of and genders in mixed circles, symbolizing unity and reinforcing social ties during life events and seasonal rites. Regional variations adapt these elements to local customs, though the core emphasis on accessibility and shared expression persists nationwide.

Prominent Folk Dance Types

Thai folk dances are characterized by their communal nature, often involving group participation to foster social bonds and celebrate through rhythmic movements and music. Ram Thai is a general term encompassing various traditional Thai dances, including folk ensemble performances that blend graceful arm gestures and circular formations to depict everyday stories or rituals. These are commonly showcased in cultural presentations across the country. Ram Muay is a ritualistic integral to , executed by fighters before bouts as a form of homage to teachers, parents, and ancestral spirits. This choreographed sequence features flowing movements, precise footwork, and the wai kru gesture—a bow of respect—typically lasting about five minutes and varying by regional or gym styles. Originating from ancient warrior traditions, it was standardized in the early during Muay Thai's modernization under Rama VII, who introduced rules and gloves to formalize the sport while preserving the ritual. Lao Kra Top Mai, a lively dance from rural festivals in northern and , involves participants navigating agile footwork between pairs of bamboo poles clapped rhythmically by performers to create percussive beats. This group activity mimics agricultural labors and communal joy, with dancers stepping in and out of the moving poles in sync with the tempo, often accompanied by traditional instruments. It highlights dexterity and timing as core elements. Other prominent forms include Likay, a comedic folk dance-theater blending improvisation, music, and dialogue to narrate local tales, popular at village festivals, and Fawn Thai, an elegant ensemble dance emphasizing fluid arm movements and synchronized patterns. Efforts to preserve these prominent folk dance types have been bolstered since the 1970s through Ministry of Education programs, which expanded specialized schools nationwide to integrate traditional into curricula, ensuring transmission to younger generations via formal training.

Regional Dances

Northern Thailand

's dance traditions, rooted in the historical Lanna Kingdom, reflect a unique blend of Burmese and Lao influences, manifesting in fluid, expressive movements that often incorporate circular formations and hill tribe elements. These dances emphasize community participation and spiritual harmony, drawing from animist beliefs that honor nature and ancestral spirits. The Lanna region's choreography frequently features graceful arm extensions and rhythmic footwork, performed during festivals to invoke blessings for prosperity and protection. The Fon Lep (fingernail dance), a traditional Northern Thai (Lanna) form, emphasizes graceful hand movements with dancers wearing long brass fingernails to showcase elegance and harmony. Adorned in vibrant traditional costumes, performers execute synchronized patterns, often during cultural festivals to celebrate Lanna heritage. This participatory style fosters social bonds in communities across provinces like and . The ceremony, influenced by Lao customs, is a in northern communities involving meditative gatherings around a central with offerings and thread-tying to safeguard the and ensure bountiful harvests. Blending animist reverence for rice spirits with communal prayer, it is often held post-harvest in ethnic Lao settlements near the , underscoring themes of gratitude and spiritual protection. While not a formal , it may include rhythmic movements. Elements of Jerng, a dynamic martial art from the royal courts of , incorporate sword-handling and evasive maneuvers that embody warrior heritage and reenact historic battles. Practitioners, clad in traditional Lanna attire, demonstrate valor and defense, accompanied by percussive gongs and . Evolved from ancient practices, it highlights and at cultural events to preserve Lanna military lore. These dances are deeply intertwined with animist beliefs, where movements invoke guardian spirits and natural forces, particularly during the Yi Peng lantern festival in , where floating lights accompany performances to release misfortunes and welcome good fortune. In the 20th century, amid modernization, these traditions experienced a revival through tourism initiatives, with cultural centers and festivals promoting preservation and global appreciation while adapting to contemporary audiences.

Northeastern Thailand

The dances of Northeastern Thailand, known as , are characterized by their energetic and music-driven nature, deeply rooted in the agrarian lifestyle influenced by Lao and Khmer traditions. These performances often blend singing, storytelling, and rhythmic movements, reflecting the region's rural communities and their connection to the land and spirits. Unlike the more formalized classical forms, Isan dances emphasize improvisation, audience participation, and communal joy, typically performed during festivals, harvests, and rituals to foster social bonds and cultural continuity. Mor Lam stands as the quintessential singing-dance hybrid of , where skilled performers, known as , recite and improvise folk tales, proverbs, and everyday narratives through melodic chants and gestures. Accompanied primarily by the , a three-stringed carved from a single piece of wood that provides intricate plucking patterns, the form evolved from 19th-century village entertainment in Isan communities, drawing from Lao influences as migrant workers brought the tradition across borders. Originally a casual evening gathering for sharing stories under the moonlight, it developed into a structured , often enacted during harvest seasons to celebrate agricultural cycles and community resilience. Kantrum, prevalent along the Khmer border areas of such as Surin and provinces, features fast-paced rhythms and lively couple dances that encourage paired partners to mirror steps in sync with upbeat melodies. Rooted in Khmer ethnic traditions, it employs instruments like the tro khmer (a bowed resembling an in its reedy tone) and percussion ensembles with cymbals and drums to drive the tempo, creating an infectious energy suited to social gatherings. The dance's quick footwork and hip sways symbolize joy and courtship, preserving Khmer-Isan cultural fusion amid border communities. These dances play a vital socio-economic role in Isan, frequently performed at bon phi (spirit merit-making) ceremonies to honor ancestral and nature spirits, invoking blessings for bountiful crops and protection from misfortune. In the 1960s, rapid urbanization threatened rural traditions by drawing youth to cities, but radio broadcasts on stations like those operated by the Thai government helped preserve and popularize forms like Mor Lam, allowing performers to reach wider audiences and sustain livelihoods through recorded performances and live transmissions. This media adaptation not only countered cultural erosion but also integrated Isan dances into national consciousness, supporting local economies via tourism and recordings. Additionally, Lam Thao, a scarf dance involving improvisational storytelling with khaen mouth organ accompaniment, exemplifies the region's narrative folk traditions.

Central Thailand

Central Thailand, encompassing the Bangkok plains and surrounding agrarian heartlands, features folk dances that blend communal rituals with everyday rural life, often performed during festivals to foster social harmony and celebrate agricultural cycles. These dances emphasize synchronized group movements and lively rhythms, drawing from local traditions while incorporating elements of national classical forms for broader appeal. Unlike more isolated regional styles, Central Thai dances have historically served as a cultural bridge, adapting to urban settings while preserving their roots in village gatherings and merit-making ceremonies. One prominent example is Ram Wong, a integral to the festival, where participants form a ring and perform simple hand-holding steps to rhythmic melodies, promoting community bonding and courtship. Originating from seasonal folk entertainments known as Ram Thon, it evolved into a widespread around , with adaptations incorporating in the 1950s that popularized it through recorded songs and live performances. Dancers move in a continuous circular pattern, clapping and swaying gently, often accompanied by traditional instruments like the () blended with modern beats. Klong Yao, the long-drum dance, revolves around the resonant beats of the klong yao (elongated barrel drum), evoking percussive rhythms that drive communal processions and symbolize unity in agrarian communities. Male and female dancers alternate playful interactions, marching and twirling in formation while striking the drum's sides to mimic calls and responses, often during temple fairs as part of merit-making rituals to honor Buddhist traditions. This dance underscores Central Thailand's festive spirit, with movements that blend martial precision and joyful , accompanied by cymbals (ching and chap) for added intensity. Post-1940s urbanization in facilitated the integration of these dances into city nightlife and educational programs, as government initiatives through the Fine Arts Department revived and standardized folk forms for national unity, leading to performances in theaters, events, and modern festivals. This synthesis preserved rural essence while adapting to contemporary audiences, such as through hybrid shows in urban venues that combine traditional steps with amplified music. Note that dances like Serng Kratop Mai (coconut shell dance), while performed centrally, originate from the Northeast and depict market activities with prop .

Southern Thailand

Southern Thailand, encompassing the provinces, hosts a rich array of dances that blend dramatic , ritualistic elements, and influences from Islamic traditions alongside the region's seafaring heritage. These forms often draw from local and serve communal functions in predominantly Muslim communities, emphasizing expressive movements that evoke , spirits, and social bonds. Unlike the courtly elegance of central Thai dances, southern styles incorporate acrobatic vigor and improvisational flair, reflecting the area's multicultural Malay-Thai fabric. The Menora (or ) is a theatrical dance-drama originating from the Patani region (present-day ), characterized by performers with painted faces and fluid, bird-like movements that imitate the mythical from folklore. Rooted in Indian and Khmer influences, the form traces its development to at least the , evolving from ancient like the story of Sudhana and , which spread through Southeast Asian trade and cultural exchanges. Performances feature 12 basic stylized steps—such as "spider weaving its web" or graceful arm extensions—accompanied by slow percussion and rhymed verse, often lasting through the night to narrate epic legends. Closely related to Menora, the Nora represents a vibrant live dance-drama tradition, serving as a precursor to shadow puppetry in its narrative style while emphasizing physical embodiment through acrobatic displays and trance-like invocations. Originating over 500 years ago in southern communities, Nora performances begin with extended oral rituals to honor ancestors and expel harmful spirits, incorporating vigorous leg kicks, arm sweeps, and finger gestures inspired by the bird's wings. Dancers, both men and women, don elaborate costumes including metallic fingernails, beaded headdresses, and flowing scarves mimicking swan tails, accompanied by southern , drums, and gongs for rhythmic intensity. This form holds ritual significance in healing ceremonies and social gatherings, fostering amid the region's diverse heritage. Among folk expressions tied to Muslim communities, the Rabum (also known as a variant of in local contexts) stands out as a celebratory featuring undulating fan waves and synchronized couple formations that symbolize and . Performed in coastal fishing villages, it depicts maritime life through graceful hand flourishes and paired steps, often during auspicious events to invoke blessings, highlighting Islamic social customs blended with Thai-Malay aesthetics. These dances faced challenges during periods of regional unrest, including the southern from the 1970s onward, where assimilation policies impacted Malay cultural expressions, leading to declines in transmission. However, revival initiatives since the , supported by community organizations and educational institutions, have bolstered preservation efforts, with performances now common at local cultural centers, temple fairs, and festivals to transmit skills orally from masters to apprentices. The 2021 UNESCO inscription of Nora as has further amplified global recognition and local safeguarding.

Cultural Influences

Indian and Khmer Roots

The foundational elements of Thai dance trace back to ancient Indian influences, particularly through the adaptation of the , an ancient treatise on dating to the 2nd century BCE. This text introduced the concept of rasa—the nine fundamental emotions such as love, anger, and heroism—and codified 108 mudras (hand gestures) to express them, which were transmitted to via trade and cultural exchanges beginning around the CE. In Thai classical forms like masked dance-drama, these principles are evident in the stylized gestures and facial expressions under masks that convey emotional depth, with performers using simplified mudras to depict narrative actions and moods from epics. A manuscript of the preserved in Thailand's underscores this direct lineage, though Thai adaptations reduced the original 108 movements to about 68 while retaining core expressive techniques. Parallel to Indian roots, Khmer influences from the Angkor Empire (9th–15th centuries CE) profoundly shaped Thai dance aesthetics, especially in courtly forms. The ethereal apsara dances of Khmer royalty, performed by female temple dancers as ritual offerings, inspired the graceful, angular poses and fluid arm movements seen in Thai lakhon (classical dance-drama). Intricate bas-reliefs at the Temple in depict these apsara figures in dynamic stances with turned-out legs, bent torsos, and elaborate hand flourishes, reflecting a localized Khmer interpretation of Indian elements that later permeated Thai repertoires during periods of Khmer-Thai cultural exchange. Historical records from Angkorian inscriptions, such as those at and temples, document hundreds of court dancers, highlighting the institutional role of dance in Khmer society that influenced Thai adaptations. This Indian-Khmer heritage reached Thailand through early kingdoms like (2nd–6th centuries CE) and (6th–11th centuries CE), where Mon and Khmer intermediaries facilitated the transmission of Hindu-Buddhist via maritime trade routes. , as an early hub of Indian commerce, introduced Brahmanic rituals and epic storytelling, while 's Mon principalities in blended these with local aesthetics, evident in artifacts showing Indian-inspired iconography. Over time, syncretism occurred as these foreign elements merged with indigenous Thai ; for instance, motifs like the (a mythical bird from Hindu epics) in the Thai —the localized version of the Indian —incorporate animistic spirits and nature guardians, enriching dance narratives with hybrid symbolism that underscores moral and cosmic themes in performances. The itself forms the core storyline for much of Thai classical dance, adapting Indian rasa theory to evoke emotions intertwined with Thai folk beliefs.

Connections with Neighboring Countries

Thai dance maintains deep interconnections with the performing arts of neighboring Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos, shaped by historical migrations, shared ethnic traditions, and modern regional collaborations. These exchanges have facilitated the borrowing and adaptation of dance forms across borders, preserving repertoires amid political upheavals and fostering cultural continuity. Relations with Myanmar trace back to the 18th century, particularly following the Burmese conquest of Ayutthaya in 1767, when hundreds of Thai artisans, including palace dancers, were relocated to Burma's capital as war captives. This migration profoundly influenced Burmese theatrical arts, with Thai dance techniques integrating into local forms such as marionette puppetry (yo le pwe), which shares stylistic elements with Thailand's lakhon yok, a shadow puppet variant of lakhon drama. The Thai-influenced dance style persists in Burmese performances today, evident in expressive gestures and narrative structures derived from these exchanges. Joint celebrations of the Songkran (Thai) and Thingyan (Myanmar) water festivals further highlight shared practices, where communal dances accompany New Year rituals, promoting cross-border cultural affinity through synchronized folk movements and music. Connections with Cambodia emphasize post-conflict revivals and stylistic parallels, notably in apsara dance and masked theatre. Since the 1990s, following the era, Cambodian classical dance has undergone significant revival in , with surviving artists and international support rebuilding repertoires; Thai troupes have contributed through training exchanges, drawing on historical Khmer roots while adapting apsara motifs into Thai performances. Similarities extend to romvong, a common across , , and , characterized by slow, communal rotations and graceful hand gestures that reflect shared Mon-Khmer folk traditions. In , romvong (ramvong) evolved alongside influences from neighboring styles, incorporating rhythmic patterns seen in Thai and Lao variants during social gatherings. Exchanges with Laos are prominent in the northeastern region of , where lam performances borrow from Lao kratop mai, a bamboo pole dance involving rhythmic stepping over poles, akin to communal folk dances that emphasize improvisation and audience participation. These borrowings stem from ethnic and linguistic ties between and Lao communities, with lam vông circle dances mirroring Lao lamvong in structure and accompaniment by the reed instrument. In the , refugee movements across the Thai-Lao border, particularly during conflicts, facilitated the preservation of Lanna dance styles from , as displaced communities shared northern Thai repertoires with Lao groups, sustaining intricate gestures and rituals through oral transmission and joint performances. Contemporary collaborations within frameworks have amplified these ties, with initiatives in the 2010s promoting joint productions of (Thai masked drama) and lakhon (related Cambodian and regional forms). For instance, UNESCO's 2018 inscription of both Thai and Cambodian lakhon khol as underscored their shared dramatic elements, inspiring cross-border workshops and performances that blend repertoires from , , and to celebrate regional unity. These efforts, supported by cultural programs, have led to hybrid shows incorporating influences from and elements from , enhancing the global visibility of Southeast Asian traditions.

Elements of Thai Dance

Movements and Gestures

Thai dance, particularly in its classical form known as natasin, features highly stylized movements and gestures that convey narrative, emotion, and character through precise body language. These techniques are rooted in ancient traditions influenced by Indian and Khmer but have been adapted to reflect Thai aesthetics, emphasizing grace, control, and symbolism across genres like (masked dance-drama) and lakhon (dance-drama). Dancers maintain a straight torso from neck to hips while bending the knees in a demi-plié position (lim) for fluidity, with light, elevated steps where the toes often point upward and soles barely touch the ground, creating an ethereal quality. Central to natasin are various stylized gaits, or walks, that define character locomotion and mood, performed with bent knees and subtle hip sways to evoke specific environments or states. These walks are executed at varying speeds—slow (phleng cha) for or fast (phleng reo) for action—drawing from an original of 108 basic movements, later refined to 68 for principal roles. The system in Thai employs intricate hand positions (phasa tha), derived from Indian traditions but localized with distinctive wrist flicks and backward-bent fingers for elegance. Arms form curved shapes () at high (bon), medium (klang), or low (lang) levels, with fingertips flexed upward (tung mu) to enhance expressivity; these are combined to narrate stories without words. Postures in Thai dance are gender-specific and character-driven, underscoring power dynamics and emotional depth. Female roles (neo or nang) emphasize soft, curving lines with refined knee bends and gentle arm arcs for delicacy, while male roles (phra) adopt rigid, powerful extensions with broader stances to convey authority and prowess. These postures integrate elements for dynamic genres like dances. Training for these techniques prioritizes breath control to sustain fluid motion and eye focus to direct audience attention toward emotional intent, fostering a connection between performer and narrative. Aspiring dancers, typically beginning at ages 8–10, undergo rigorous programs at institutions like the College of Dramatic Arts (Witthayalai Natasin), mastering fundamentals before specializing in role-specific patterns based on physique and aptitude. This disciplined regimen ensures the preservation of stylized expression across Thailand's diverse dance genres.

Music and Accompaniment

The music accompanying Thai dance performances is primarily provided by traditional ensembles that emphasize rhythmic complexity and melodic intricacy, tailored to the dramatic needs of classical and folk forms. In classical dances such as (masked drama) and lakhon (stylized dance-drama), the ensemble dominates, delivering a robust sound through its combination of wind and percussion instruments. This ensemble features the pi nai, a quadruple-reed that provides piercing melodic leads; the , a wooden that outlines the primary tune with precise strikes; and the klong that, including barrel drums like the taphon, which drive the rhythmic foundation with layered beats. The 's music is structured around the thang system of modes, often employing a seven-tone scale akin to the , which allows for modal variations that enhance the narrative tension in performances. For more intimate classical styles like lakhon nai, the ensemble offers a softer, more lyrical , blending elements from and string-based groups to support subtle emotional expressions. Key instruments include the saw u, a low-pitched four-stringed that delivers sustained melodic lines in a heterophonic texture; and the khlui, a vertical that adds airy ornamentations and harmonic fills. Like the , the adheres to thang modes, but its rhythms are less percussive, favoring flowing patterns punctuated by light percussion such as the ching cymbals to guide tempo. In regional folk dances, particularly the lam tradition from northeastern , accompaniments incorporate local string and wind instruments to foster communal energy and . The salo, a three-stringed spike , contributes bowed melodies that weave through the , often in syncopated 4/4 rhythms that encourage spontaneous vocal and interplay. These rhythms, driven by percussion like hand and the free-reed , create a lively, oscillating pulse suited to the storytelling of lam performances. Across these ensembles, percussion instruments serve as vital cues for structuring performances, signaling transitions such as character entrances or scene shifts. The taphon drum, with its versatile hand-played beats, issues distinct patterns—for instance, rapid rolls to announce arrivals—that synchronize the musicians and dancers without verbal direction.

Costumes and Makeup

In classical Thai dance forms such as , masks are integral to portraying characters from the , the Thai adaptation of the epic, with fixed expressions that convey their personalities—such as serene smiles for heroes like or fierce snarls for demons like Thotsakan. These masks, covering the entire head for demons and monkeys, are crafted primarily from layered over a base, then coated in and adorned with and colored glass for a shimmering effect; colors vary by character, with green often used for demons to highlight their otherworldly nature, while royal figures feature delicate features and multi-tiered crowns. Lakhon performances, which emphasize graceful narratives without full masks, feature elaborate attire that symbolizes status and divinity, including pha sin—tubular silk skirts woven with and intricate gold depicting floral or mythical motifs to evoke royalty. Performers complement these with jeweled headdresses known as chatra or chada, tall and ornate crowns encrusted with glass beads and metallic threads that frame the face and enhance the ethereal quality of the dance. In contrast, folk dances across regions adopt simpler yet vibrant costumes reflective of local traditions. Southern menora (nora) dancers wear colorful, layered outfits with tall chada crowns, ornate jewelry, and waist-tied bird-like wings, often accented by glittering beads to mimic mythical kinari figures, prioritizing mobility for acrobatic elements. Northern tribal dances, such as those of the Hmong and Karen hill tribes, incorporate everyday fabrics embellished with silver necklaces, heavy coils, and bells that jingle with movement, symbolizing prosperity and cultural identity without the opulence of court styles. Makeup in Thai dance creates an otherworldly appearance, starting with a base of white talcum powder or rice powder applied thickly to the face and neck for a luminous, ethereal glow that evokes divine or beings under stage lights. lipstick and rouge emphasize the lips and cheeks for dramatic contrast, highlighting expressions in unmasked roles like lakhon principals. Following the 1932 Siamese Revolution, which democratized the arts, elaborate masks were increasingly replaced by simplified makeup for human characters to improve accessibility and allow broader participation, while retaining the white base and bold accents for visual impact.

Contemporary Developments

20th-Century Adaptations

Following the 1932 Siamese Revolution, which ended and ushered in constitutional rule, Thai classical dance underwent significant Western influences under state patronage. The Fine Arts Department, established to oversee national arts, incorporated elements such as footwork, spoken drama, and modern lighting into traditional forms, drawing from French institutions like L'École des Beaux-Arts and L'Académie de Danse et Musique. This hybridization was evident in plays like Luang Wichit's Luat Suphan (1936), which blended Thai narratives with Western theatrical techniques. During King Rama VII's reign (1925–1935), court dance had declined amid economic crises by the mid-1920s, but revival efforts began in 1929, with performances like the Ong Phra Phirap dance staged at on 16 November 1927, aiming to restore royal standards. The push for modernization intensified under Plaek Phibunsongkhram's cultural mandates (1939–1942), which banned traditional attire like sarongs in public spaces to promote Western dress as a symbol of progress and patriotism. This policy extended to dance, fostering hybrid costumes that combined Thai elements with Western styles, as seen in the 1944 ramwong dance, which merged folk and classical movements with ballet-inspired footwork for broader appeal. These adaptations aligned dance with , transforming it from courtly ritual to a tool for cultural unification. In the 1950s, the Fine Arts Department centralized Thai dance education through nationalization efforts, standardizing ram thai curricula for schools by shortening the preliminary training course from six to three years as part of a structured program (six-year preliminary, two-year intermediate, and three-year advanced levels starting in 1950), with further refinements by 1977 under state reforms, to increase accessibility and the quantity of performers. The Department's Office of Performing Arts, founded in 1945, published resources like The Khon (1953) to preserve and promote these forms as public cultural assets. This shift emphasized pedagogy over elite apprenticeship, embedding dance in national school systems. Cinema and theater in the 1960s amplified these adaptations, with films like Manohra (1954 and 1955) incorporating lakhon scenes to captivate audiences and boost traditional dance's popularity amid rising Western media influences. Public performances at the National Theatre further disseminated hybrid styles, making dance a staple of urban entertainment. By the 1970s, gender norms evolved, allowing women to perform roles traditionally reserved for men, challenging the all-male convention and reflecting broader societal participation, though some ritual restrictions like mastery remained gender-specific.

Modern Practices and Global Impact

In the , Thai dance has seen innovative fusions that blend traditional forms like with contemporary styles such as hip-hop and , revitalizing the art for global audiences. Pioneering choreographer Pichet Klunchun and his Pichet Klunchun Dance Company (PKDC) have been instrumental in this movement since the 2010s, creating works that integrate khon gestures and narratives with Western contemporary techniques, performed internationally to bridge cultural divides. These fusions, often showcased at major festivals, emphasize thematic continuity from ancient epics while adapting to modern sensibilities, attracting younger performers and viewers. Education in Thai dance has expanded significantly since the , with formal programs fostering both preservation and . Chulalongkorn University's Department of Dance, established within the Faculty of Fine and Applied Arts, began offering a in Thai Dance around 2005, specializing in classical forms like and lakhon alongside creative adaptations. The curriculum trains students in traditional techniques while encouraging interdisciplinary approaches, producing graduates who contribute to both domestic troupes and international collaborations. Post-2020, digital platforms have democratized access, with initiatives like the Rakram virtual program by Foundation providing free online tutorials on Thai dance movements, enabling global learners to engage remotely during the . Similarly, the Open Dance Lab, launched in 2023, offers a web-based archive of 59 traditional poses for interactive experimentation and preservation. Thai dance plays a pivotal role in tourism, enhancing cultural diplomacy and economic contributions. Venues like Siam Niramit, which opened in in 2005, stage elaborate nightly shows depicting Thai history through dance, music, and spectacle, drawing millions of visitors annually and bolstering the tourism sector that generated over 1.8 trillion baht in 2024. These performances, featuring over 100 dancers and advanced effects, have earned international acclaim and support Thailand's soft power strategy. The 2018 inscription of as of Humanity further elevated its global profile, promoting tied to heritage preservation. In 2025, tourism revenue continued to grow, reaching over 937 billion baht in the first eight months from more than 20 million international visitors. Despite these advances, modern Thai dance faces challenges from aging practitioners and commercialization pressures. Many master artists, trained in pre-2000 traditions, are retiring without sufficient successors, threatening the transmission of nuanced techniques amid an aging population with over 20% aged 60+ as of 2023. Commercial adaptations in tourist shows often prioritize spectacle over authenticity, raising concerns about cultural dilution. In response, the Thai government has introduced 2020s subsidies through initiatives, including a 60 million baht fund for projects and tax incentives for cultural productions to support training and innovation.

References

Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.