Hubbry Logo
Water cremationWater cremationMain
Open search
Water cremation
Community hub
Water cremation
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Water cremation
Water cremation
Water cremation
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
An alkaline hydrolysis disposal system at the Biosecurity Research Institute inside of Pat Roberts Hall at Kansas State University

Alkaline hydrolysis (also called biocremation, resomation,[1][2] flameless cremation,[3] aquamation[4] or water cremation[5]) is a process for the disposal of human and animal remains using lye and heat; it is an alternative to burial, cremation, or sky burial.

Process

[edit]

The process is based on alkaline hydrolysis: the body is placed in a pressure vessel which is then filled with a mixture of water and potassium hydroxide, and heated to a temperature of around 160 °C (320 °F) at an elevated pressure which precludes boiling. The body is efficiently broken down into its chemical components, completely disintegrating its DNA, a process which takes approximately four to six hours. Also, lower temperatures (98 °C (208 °F)) and pressures may be used such that the process takes 14 to 16 hours.[6] At the start, the mixture is very alkaline, with a pH level of approximately 14; this drops to approximately 11 by the end, but the exact value depends on the total operation time and the amount of fat in the body.[7]

Alkaline hydrolysis treatment times of infected animal carcasses[7]
Pathogen Temperature Pressure Time
Microbial 212 °F
100 °C		 15 psi
100 kPa		 3 hours
TSE 300 °F
149 °C		 70 psi
480 kPa		 6–8 hours

The result is a quantity of green-brown tinted liquid (containing amino acids, peptides, sugars and salts) and soft, porous white bone remains (calcium phosphate) easily crushed in the hand (although a cremulator is more commonly used) to form a white-colored dust. The "ash" can then be returned to the next of kin of the deceased. The liquid is disposed of either through the sanitary sewer system, or through some other method, including use in a garden or green space.[8] To dispose of 1,000 pounds (450 kg) of biomass, approximately 60–240 US gallons (230–910 L; 50–200 imp gal) of water are used, resulting in 120–300 US gallons (450–1,140 L; 100–250 imp gal) of effluent, which carries a dried weight (inorganic and mineral content) of 20 pounds (9.1 kg) (approximately 2% of original weight).[7]

This alkaline hydrolysis process has been championed by a number of ecological campaigning groups,[9] for using 90 kWh of electricity,[10] one-quarter the energy of flame-based cremation, and producing less carbon dioxide and pollutants.[1][5] It is being presented as an alternative option at some British crematorium sites.[11] As of August 2007, about 1,000 people had chosen this method for the disposal of their remains in the United States.[12] The operating cost of materials, maintenance, and labor associated with the disposal of 2,000 pounds (910 kg) of remains was estimated at $116.40,[7] excluding the capital investment cost of equipment.

Alkaline hydrolysis has also been adopted by the pet and animal industry. A handful of companies in North America offer the procedure as an alternative to pet cremation.[13] Alkaline hydrolysis is also used in the agricultural industry to sterilize animal carcasses that may pose a health hazard, because the process inactivates viruses, bacteria, and prions that cause transmissible spongiform encephalopathy.[7][14][15]

History

[edit]

The process was patented by Amos Herbert Hobson in 1888 as a method to process animal carcasses into plant food.[6][16][10] In 2005, Bio-Response Solutions designed, sold, and installed the first single cadaver alkaline hydrolysis system at the Mayo Clinic, where it was still in use as of 2019.[17] In 2007, a Scottish biochemist, Sandy Sullivan, started a company making the machines, and calling the process (and company) Resomation.[18]

Religious views

[edit]
See also: Cremation § Religious views

In Christian countries and cultures, cremation has historically been discouraged and viewed as a desecration of God's image, and as interference with the resurrection of the dead taught in scripture. It is now acceptable to some denominations.[19] Desmond Tutu, former Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town, was aquamated, per his wish.[20] The Eastern Orthodox Church does not allow cremation.

The Roman Catholic Church allows cremation of bodies as long as it is not done in denial of the beliefs in the sacredness of the human body or the resurrection of the dead.[21] In 2008, Renée Mirkes published the first Catholic moral analysis of alkaline hydrolysis.[22][23] He argued that it is morally neutral and may be an alternative to burial on similar grounds to cremation.[23] However, the Catholic Church in the United States does not approve of alkaline hydrolysis as a method of final disposal of human remains. In 2011, Donald Cardinal Wuerl, Archbishop of Washington and then chairman of the Committee on Doctrine of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), determined it "unnecessarily disrespectful of the human body."[24] The Archdiocese of St. Louis explained that it was considered this way because the Church took concern with the final disposal of the liquid solution, which is typically to the sewer system.[25] This was considered disrespectful of the sanctity of the human body.[25] Additionally, when alkaline hydrolysis was proposed in New York state in 2012, the New York State Catholic Conference condemned the practice, stating that hydrolysis does not show sufficient respect for the teaching of the intrinsic dignity of the human body.[26]

Judaism forbids cremation as it is not in line with the religion’s teachings of respect and dignity for humans, who are believed by the religion to be created in God’s image. Islam also forbids cremation of the deceased. Both religions are likely to reject alkaline hydrolysis as they believe that the body must be laid to rest through burial in order to prepare for the afterlife.[22] The Baháʼí Faith, like other Abrahamic religions, discourages cremation of the deceased. The human body is seen as having to be treated with respect, and merely wrapped in a shroud before burial no further than an hour from the place of death.

Sikhism, Hinduism, and Buddhism each place theological emphasis on the complete immolation of the corpse.[22]

Native Hawaiians consider aquamation a way to approximate their traditional burial ritual, which involves removing the bones (iwi) cleanly from the flesh using a beachside underground oven (imu), wrapping the bones, and hiding them. The use of an imu on human bodies is no longer allowed, but aquamation may offer an alternative as it produces similarly clean bones.[27]

[edit]

Australia

[edit]

Aquamation based in New South Wales is the only company to provide alkaline hydrolysis in Australia, with the remains being used as fertilizer on plantation forests, due to difficulty with obtaining permits from Sydney Water.[28]

New Zealand

[edit]

Water Cremation Aotearoa[29] has been an advocate for bringing the service to New Zealand (Aotearoa). Bell, Lamb and Trotter, in Christchurch, started to offer water cremation in June 2025.[30]

Belgium

[edit]

Flanders

[edit]

The Flemish minister of Interior Administration Bart Somers asked in September 2021 the opinion of an advisory bioethics committee on resomation. The advice, received in November 2021, saw no objections.[31]

In October 2025 a scientific trial project was launched at one crematorium in Wilrijk (Antwerp). During the trial, only bodies donated to science are eligible for resomation. The aim of the study is to determine the environmental impact, while also investigating ethical questions. The trial will be monitored by the University of Antwerp, KU Leuven, the Flemish Institute for Technological Research [nl] (VITO) and Aquafin.[32]

Canada

[edit]

Saskatchewan approved the process in 2012, becoming the first province to do so.[33] Quebec and Ontario have also legalized the process.[34] A funeral home in Granby, Quebec, was the first in the province to receive an alkaline hydrolysis machine.[35] In June 2025 a Manitoba company became the first in the province to offer the service.[36]

Ireland

[edit]

In 2023, water cremation became available in Ireland, making it the first country in Europe to offer this form of burial.[37]

When the process is complete, the remaining water undergoes further treatment to ensure that it is completely sterile. Analysis is then completed to ensure Water Authority standards are met. At this stage, the water can be recycled back to the Local Authority water treatment plant.

Mexico

[edit]

Since 2019, Grupo Gayosso offers alkaline hydrolysis in Baja California.[38]

The Netherlands

[edit]

In May 2020, the Health Council of the Netherlands issued an advisory report on the admissibility of new techniques of disposing of the dead. The Council proposed a framework to assess alkaline hydrolysis. It concluded that alkaline hydrolysis is safe, dignified and sustainable.[39] In addition to alkaline hydrolysis, the council also considered human composting as a technique to dispose bodies yet concluded that too little is known about composting and hence it cannot be assessed whether this technique fulfills the conditions.[39] Taking into account the council's recommendations, the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations prepared a law proposal to amend the Corpse Disposal Act. Once the proposed law has been submitted to the Parliament, the democratic process to admit alkaline hydrolysis as body disposal technique can be commenced.

Singapore

[edit]

In Singapore, aquamation has been available for pets since 2023,[40] but is not yet available for humans pending government approval.[41]

South Africa

[edit]

In November 2019, Avbob introduced aquamation in South Africa, following the mutual assurance society's recent introduction of the alkaline hydrolysis process at its Maitland agency in Cape Town.[42] Aquamation has been legal in South Africa since then. Following his death in December 2021 the body of Archbishop Desmond Tutu was aquamated.[20]

United Kingdom

[edit]

A public crematorium operated by Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council at Rowley Regis, central England, was the first to receive planning permission to offer the process but in March 2017, the local water utility, Severn Trent Water, refused the council's application for a "trade effluent permit" because there was no water industry standard regulating the disposal of liquefied human remains into sewers.[43][44]

In July 2023, the BBC reported that “[w]ater cremation is set to be made available for the first time in the UK.”[45]

United States

[edit]

Alkaline hydrolysis as a method of final disposition of human remains is legal in 24 states as of 2022.[5][46] Legislation is pending in New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia.[47][48] The process was legal in New Hampshire for several years but amid opposition by religious lobby groups it was banned in 2008[49] and a proposal to legalize it was rejected in 2013.[50][51] Alkaline hydrolysis has been used for cadavers donated for research at the University of Florida since the mid-1990s and at the Mayo Clinic[1] since 2005.[52] UCLA uses the process to dispose of donor bodies.[2]

Alkaline hydrolysis policy by state
State Policy Year Legislation Notes Ref.
Alabama 2017 H-212 Added definition of alkaline hydrolysis. [53]
Arizona 2022 HB2024 Approved alkaline hydrolysis licensure. [54]
California 2017 AB967 Alkaline hydrolysis has been used at UCLA since 1995 for donated cadavers. Previously, AB 1615 (2012) was advanced and passed the Assembly, but died in Senate. [55][56]
Colorado 2011 HB11-1178 [57]
Connecticut 2016 SSB 142 Available. [58]
Florida 2010 SB1152 In use at the University of Florida since the mid-1990s. [59][60]
Georgia 2012 HB933 SB296 pending in House to remove conflicting language. [61][62]
Hawaii 2022 HB1894 Signed into law July, 2022 [63]
Idaho 2014 Docket 24-0801-1301 Adopted in a docket amending the Rules of the State Board of Morticians, available only in Coeur d'Alene. [64][65]
Illinois 2012 SB1830 Enacted as Public Act 97–0679. Available. [66]
Kansas 2010 HB2310 Amended K.S.A. 65–1760 to define cremation as "the mechanical and/or other dissolution process that reduces human remains to bone fragments." Unavailable except KCMO. [67]
Maine 2009 144 CMR 244 Available. [68]
Maryland 2011 HB995 Added definition for cremation as "the process of reducing human remains to bone fragments through intense heat and evaporation, including any mechanical or thermal process." Unavailable within state. [69]
Minnesota 2003 SF1071 In use at the Mayo Clinic since 2005. Available. [70]
Missouri ? ? 20 CSR 2120–2.071 does not prohibit alkaline hydrolysis in the definition of cremation.
Nevada 2017 AB205 Available. [71]
New Hampshire 2008 SB332 Approved from 2006–2008; Legislation to reinstate approval was rejected in 2013. [51]
North Carolina 2018 GS 90-210.136 Available. [72]
Oklahoma 2021 Title 59 Sec.396.2 Approved 2021, available as of 2023 [73]
Oregon 2009 SB796 Added "dissolution" to the definition of final disposal. Available. [74]
Tennessee 2013 HB1125 Availability unclear. [75]
Texas 2017 HB1155 Bill died in committee. [76]
Utah 2018 HB0121 Available at least one location. [77]
Vermont 2014 H.656 Minor Funeral Home and Bear Trap Crematory is the sole provider in the state [78]
Virginia 2023 SB1487 Bill passed in House, but died in Senate. [79]
Washington 2020 SB 5001 Available. [80]
Wyoming 2014 HB25 Enrolled Act No. 21 adds definition for "chemical disposition." However, unavailable as of 2022. [81]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Water cremation

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
Water cremation, also known as alkaline or aquamation, is a method for human and animal remains that accelerates natural by immersing the body in a solution of and alkaline agents, such as , within a pressurized vessel heated to temperatures around 150–180°C (302–356°F), resulting in the breakdown of soft tissues into a sterile while leaving behind fragments for further processing. Introduced to the funeral industry around 2011, the process has seen adoption in over 20 U.S. states and select international locations, often promoted for its reduced energy consumption—approximately one-tenth that of flame —and absence of direct atmospheric pollutant releases, though disposal practices vary by . Proponents highlight its efficiency in neutralizing pathogens, pharmaceuticals, and without mercury emissions from dental amalgams, contrasting with traditional 's dependency. However, it faces scrutiny over high usage—potentially millions of gallons annually at scale in populous regions—and incomplete regulatory frameworks, with some jurisdictions prohibiting it due to concerns over handling or cultural preferences for intact remains. Recent incidents, such as a medical school's suspension of the practice amid procedural lapses, underscore ongoing debates about oversight in non-funeral applications.

Definition and Process

Technical Procedure

Water cremation, also known as alkaline hydrolysis, involves placing the deceased in a designed to hold approximately 100 gallons of liquid. The body is typically encased in a biodegradable pouch or basket to facilitate handling and containment. The vessel is then filled with a solution consisting of about 95% water and 5% alkali, commonly (KOH), which initiates the reaction. Heat is applied to raise the temperature to 150–180°C (300–350°F), while is maintained at 10–145 psi to prevent and ensure the solution remains liquid. This combination accelerates the natural decomposition process through and of soft tissues into , peptides, sugars, and salts, typically over 3–4 hours in commercial systems, though durations can extend to 16 hours depending on equipment and body size. Agitation or circulation of the solution may be employed in some machines to enhance uniformity of the reaction. Upon completion, the sterile —neutralized to a suitable for disposal—is drained, often into municipal systems after verification of safety standards. The remaining brittle fragments, which constitute about 20–30% of the original body weight and are whiter than those from flame due to mineral preservation, are recovered, rinsed, dried at around 93°C (200°F), and pulverized into a fine powder resembling cremated ashes for return to the family.

Byproducts and Residue Handling

The alkaline hydrolysis process produces a liquid effluent comprising approximately 95% of the original body mass, consisting of sterile water enriched with salts, sugars, amino acids, peptides, and trace nutrients, with no residual tissue, DNA, or pathogens detectable after completion. This effluent is pH-neutralized prior to disposal and routinely discharged into municipal wastewater treatment systems, where it integrates seamlessly with standard sewage processing due to its biochemical similarity to diluted effluent from hospitals or households; direct land application or composting is permitted in select agricultural contexts but prohibited in many urban regulations to avoid potential nutrient overload in waterways. The remaining solid residue, about 5% of the original mass, includes inorganic minerals and any non-degradable implants such as prosthetics or dental fillings, which are separated post-dissolution. These fragments, initially softened and hydrated from the aqueous medium, undergo rinsing, mechanical at low temperatures (typically under 200°F to preserve ), and pulverization via a cremulator—a rotating drum with steel balls that grinds them into a fine, white-gray indistinguishable in texture from flame-cremated ashes. This yields roughly 32% more processed remains by weight than traditional , as the water-based avoids the oxidative mass loss from high-temperature . The final , free of organic contaminants, is returned to next-of-kin in an for , , or retention, while extracted metals may be recycled separately per facility protocols.

Historical Development

Origins and Invention

The chemical process underlying water cremation, known scientifically as alkaline hydrolysis, was first patented on December 25, 1888, by Amos Herbert Hobson, a British-born farmer who had immigrated to the United States. Hobson's U.S. Patent No. 394,982 described a method for treating animal bones and waste with an alkaline solution under heat to extract fats and produce manure fertilizer, marking the earliest documented application of the technique for organic decomposition rather than human disposition. Adaptation of alkaline hydrolysis for human remains emerged in the late , initially for institutional purposes outside commercial funeral contexts. In the mid-1990s, Albany Medical College in New York employed the process to dispose of research animal carcasses, such as rabbits, addressing biohazard disposal challenges more efficiently than . Similarly, the installed an alkaline hydrolysis system in the early for processing pathological waste and donated human bodies used in , representing the first documented use on human remains at scale, though not for public end-of-life services. The contemporary invention of water cremation as a viable alternative to flame cremation or for general public use is attributed to Sandy Sullivan, a Scottish . Sullivan developed the Resomation system—a pressurized machine optimized for human bodies—during the early 2000s, founding Resomation Ltd. in in 2007 to commercialize it. This innovation culminated in the world's first commercial human disposition unit installed at Anderson-McQueen Funeral Home in in 2011, enabling the process to dissolve soft tissues while preserving bone fragments for pulverization into ash-like remains.

Modern Commercialization and Expansion

The commercialization of alkaline hydrolysis for human remains began in the medical sector during the early 1990s, with the installation of the first commercial system at Albany Medical College in 1993 for the disposal of cadavers used in anatomical education. This marked the transition from experimental and patented processes to practical application in institutions handling human tissue, followed by adoption in other universities and body donation programs for efficient, low-emission residue management. By 2005, Bio-Response Solutions manufactured the first unit designed for broader human use, facilitating equipment availability beyond strictly academic settings. Entry into the commercial industry occurred in 2011, when homes in and became the first to offer alkaline hydrolysis services to the public, with Edwards Funeral Home in performing the initial procedures that year. Expansion accelerated as regulatory approvals proliferated, with the process legalized in approximately 28 U.S. states by 2025, though operational facilities remain limited to dozens nationwide due to equipment costs and needs. By 2023, over 6,000 procedures had been completed in the United States, driven by providers like Bio-Response Solutions and interest from environmentally focused operators. Internationally, commercialization gained traction in the 2020s, with Resomation Ltd. enabling installations in , where services became available in multiple provinces, including Manitoba's first provider in June 2025. In the , Co-op Funeralcare launched resomation offerings in 2023 as the nation's pioneer, partnering with equipment suppliers for scalable adoption. European expansion included facilities in Ireland and the by 2023, supported by companies like Resomation Ltd., reflecting growing market demand amid legalization efforts in regions prioritizing reduced emissions over traditional .

Environmental Analysis

Purported Advantages

Proponents of alkaline hydrolysis assert that it consumes approximately 90% less energy than traditional flame cremation, which requires natural gas or propane to sustain temperatures of 1,400–1,800°C for 2–3 hours per body. In contrast, the process operates at 150–180°C under pressure, primarily using electricity for heating and pumping, with total energy input equivalent to running an average household for 1–2 days. This efficiency is said to yield a carbon footprint roughly 10% of flame cremation's, avoiding the release of 200–400 kg of CO2-equivalent emissions per procedure associated with fossil fuel combustion in retorts. A 2011 lifecycle assessment by the Dutch TNO organization, compliant with ISO standards and peer-reviewed, concluded that exhibits the lowest overall environmental impact among common disposition methods, including and , across categories like , acidification, and . The analysis accounted for resource use, emissions, and waste handling, attributing benefits to the absence of airborne pollutants such as dioxins, particulates, and nitrogen oxides generated during high-temperature . Unlike flame cremation, where mercury from dental amalgams vaporizes and enters the atmosphere (contributing up to 1–2% of U.S. anthropogenic mercury emissions from all sources), alkaline hydrolysis retains in the aqueous , which is pH-neutralized, sterilized, and directed to municipal for filtration and removal. Advocates further claim the process returns nutrient-rich minerals to the without introducing synthetic fluids or casket materials, potentially reducing risks compared to burial , though empirical quantification remains limited beyond the TNO framework.

Empirical Criticisms and Limitations

Despite its lower direct energy requirements compared to flame cremation, alkaline hydrolysis consumes substantial volumes of water, approximately 300 gallons per procedure, which raises concerns in regions facing or droughts. For context, if applied to all annual deaths in , the process would require about 64 million gallons yearly, equivalent to a modest fraction of municipal usage but potentially straining local supplies during shortages. The liquid , while sterile after processing, exhibits a high exceeding 11, surpassing limits in some municipal systems—such as Los Angeles's pH 11 threshold and San Francisco's pH 9 standard—posing risks of pipe and necessitating neutralization, permits, or third-party disposal rather than direct sewer release. This adds logistical and infrastructural burdens, particularly in areas with aging sewer systems or stringent regulations, potentially undermining without advanced treatment. Lifecycle assessments indicate reduced —around 80% less CO2 than flame cremation—but these benefits hinge on the electricity grid's cleanliness for heating the solution to 180–350°F over several hours; in regions reliant on fossil fuels, indirect emissions could diminish the advantage. Additionally, production of alkali agents like introduces upstream environmental costs not always quantified in promotional claims, though peer-reviewed analyses generally affirm net positives when compared to alternatives.

Economic and Practical Aspects

Costs and Accessibility

Water cremation, or alkaline hydrolysis, typically costs between $1,295 and $4,600 in the United States, with a national average of approximately $2,500, depending on location, provider packages, and additional services such as viewings or transportation. These prices reflect the specialized equipment required, which can cost providers $175,000 to $260,000 per unit, contributing to higher operational expenses compared to flame cremation retorts priced around $130,000. For instance, in Connecticut, one facility charges $3,995 for a package including an in-person viewing as of February 2025. Relative to alternatives, water cremation is generally more expensive than direct flame , which averages $1,600 to $2,000, but remains substantially lower than traditional costs exceeding $7,000 on average. The premium stems from lower processing volumes due to limited facilities and regulatory hurdles, though could reduce costs as adoption grows. Accessibility remains constrained, with services legally permitted in roughly half of U.S. states as of 2025, including , , , Georgia, , , , and , but prohibited or unregulated in others like and pending legislation. Only a handful of specialized facilities operate nationwide, often requiring families to transport remains to approved sites, which adds logistical barriers and potential fees. Expansion has been gradual, with new providers emerging in states like and since 2022, but high equipment costs and public unfamiliarity limit broader rollout. Outside the U.S., availability is even scarcer, primarily experimental or restricted to research settings in countries like and , with no widespread commercial infrastructure reported as of late 2025.

Comparison to Alternatives

Water cremation, or alkaline hydrolysis, differs from flame cremation primarily in its use of a heated alkaline solution rather than high-temperature incineration, resulting in approximately 90% lower energy consumption and the absence of direct emissions such as , nitrogen oxides, or mercury vapors associated with burning fossil fuels and amalgam fillings. cremation typically requires 1,800–2,000°F for 2–3 hours, consuming equivalent to about 28 gallons of fuel per body, whereas water cremation operates at 180–350°F for 3–16 hours using to heat water and , producing sterile that can be safely discharged into municipal sewers after neutralization. A 2011 study by the Dutch research organization TNO concluded that alkaline has a lower overall environmental impact than both and conventional , factoring in lifecycle energy and emissions, though it noted water usage as a potential drawback offset by the process's . Economically, water cremation costs range from $2,000 to $3,500 , often $500–$1,500 more than basic flame cremation ($1,000–$2,000), due to specialized equipment requirements, though this gap narrows when comparing full-service options and excludes add-ons like urns or transport. In contrast, traditional burial averages $7,000–$12,000, including casket ($2,000–$5,000), plot, and vault fees, with ongoing maintenance; green burial, an eco-alternative avoiding and vaults, reduces costs to $3,000–$5,000 but still requires land allocation. Water cremation yields 20–30% more pulverized residue (about 20–30% of body weight) than flame cremation's fragmented remains (1–8 pounds), providing families with a greater volume of returnable material without the coarser texture sometimes reported in . Compared to , water cremation eliminates perpetual land use—traditional s occupy about 1 million acres in the U.S. for cemeteries, with fluids like leaching into —while producing no persistent physical site, aligning with urban space constraints but raising concerns over effluent handling despite its pH-neutralized, pathogen-free composition verified in . Green burial preserves natural in shroud or biodegradable casket, minimizing resource inputs but extending timelines to years versus water cremation's hours, and it avoids the chemical accelerants of alkaline , though both reduce casket and vault demands. Peer-reviewed analyses emphasize that while water cremation's consumption (roughly 100–300 gallons per process, recycled in some systems) exceeds 's negligible direct use, its net carbon savings—up to 90% versus flame methods—outweigh 's indirect impacts from vaults and maintenance.
AspectWater CremationFlame CremationTraditional Burial
Energy Use~10% of flame High (, 28 gal equiv.)Low (none direct, but )
GHG EmissionsNegligible directSignificant (CO2, )Indirect (casket production)
Cost (U.S. avg.)$2,000–$3,500$1,000–$2,000$7,000–$12,000
Process Time3–16 hours2–3 hoursDays to years ()
Land RequirementNoneNonePermanent plot

United States

Alkaline hydrolysis, also known as water cremation or aquamation, is regulated exclusively at the state level in the , with no federal statutes governing its use for human remains disposition. As of 2025, the process is explicitly authorized in 25 states, either through direct statutes defining it as a form of or by broadening existing definitions to encompass chemical dissolution. Legalization began with in 2003, which established licensing and operational requirements, and has expanded variably since, often involving amendments to or laws. In legal states, facilities must typically comply with standards for pressure vessels, chemical handling, and effluent disposal, though enforcement and availability differ; for instance, legalized it via explicit statute in October 2017, while achieved indirect approval in 2011 by redefining .
StateLegalization Year/Notes
Alabama2017; redefined cremation to include chemical processes.
Arizona2023; includes licensing for facilities.
California2017; explicit statute.
Colorado2011; indirect via cremation redefinition.
Connecticut2016, updated 2024 as cremation method.
FloridaProgressive expansion of cremation definition.
Georgia2012, updated 2021.
Hawaii2022; defined as "water cremation."
Idaho2014; in mortician rules.
Illinois2012; cremation redefinition.
Kansas2011; broadened cremation definition.
Maine2009; "chemical dissolution" in rules.
Maryland2010, effective 2024.
Minnesota2003; licensing required.
Missouri2020 explicit; earlier broad definition.
Nevada2017; defined alkaline hydrolysis.
North Carolina2018; acceptable disposition method.
Oklahoma2021; in licensing act.
Oregon2009, defined 2021.
South Carolina2024; added to cremation definition.
Tennessee2021; specific statutes.
Utah2018; definitions and requirements.
Vermont2014; as cremation method.
Washington2020; defined as disposition method.
West Virginia2022.
Wyoming2014; amended cremation statutes.
In two states, and , alkaline hydrolysis is explicitly prohibited; bans it outright, while 's attorney general ruled it unacceptable in 2011, with further opposition from the Catholic Conference in 2013 citing concerns over human dignity. The remaining 23 states and , lack specific legislation, which generally precludes its practice absent explicit authorization under existing funeral laws, though some providers operate in gray areas pending bills. Regulatory variations include requirements for sterile release into sewers or treatment systems, reflecting environmental considerations, but no uniform national standards exist.

Other Countries and Regions

In , alkaline hydrolysis for human remains is permitted in , , , , and the as of April 2023. became the first province to legalize it in 2010, followed by expansions in other provinces. In the , alkaline , marketed as resomation, became available for public use in July 2023, subject to , , and environmental regulations, with the Co-op Funeralcare announcing plans to offer it. is regulating the process as of May 2024 to facilitate its adoption as a sustainable disposition method. In Ireland, the process was first offered to the public in January 2023, marking it as the initial country to permit commercial alkaline hydrolysis services. The Netherlands has permitted alkaline hydrolysis since at least 2020, with government recommendations supporting its use for human disposition. In , it is legal in and the Australian Capital Territory as of 2023. Mexico allows the practice, with services available for human remains. legalized alkaline prior to 2022, as evidenced by its use for Desmond Tutu's disposition in 2021. Adoption remains limited outside , with regulatory hurdles and low infrastructure uptake in most regions despite legal permissions in select areas.

Religious and Cultural Reception

Major Religious Positions

The opposes alkaline hydrolysis, viewing it as incompatible with the respect due to human remains, which must be treated as a unified whole rather than dissolved and potentially dispersed in systems. In a 2023 statement, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' Committee on Doctrine emphasized that the process fails to accord bodily remains the reverence required by , distinguishing it from permitted where ashes are retained intact. Catholic teaching prioritizes burial or with subsequent interment to honor the body's role in doctrine. Protestant denominations generally lack a unified stance but often permit alternatives to , including , provided they do not contradict beliefs in bodily . Many evangelical and groups accept alkaline akin to flame , emphasizing the soul's primacy over the physical form post-death, though some conservative factions express reservations about perceived . Judaism, particularly in Orthodox and Conservative branches, rejects alkaline hydrolysis, equating it to 's under kavod ha-met (respect for the dead) and the expectation of bodily . Traditional Jewish law mandates prompt of the intact body in earth-contact soil to facilitate natural , viewing chemical dissolution as a violation of these principles. shows greater flexibility, occasionally analogizing it to accepted , but even there, remains normative. Islam prohibits alkaline hydrolysis, as it contravenes the requirement for swift burial of the unaltered body in direct earth contact, reflecting beliefs in the soul's accountability and physical resurrection. Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) deems any form of cremation or body dissolution a mutilation forbidden by Quranic injunctions against harming the deceased, with no scholarly consensus permitting exceptions for environmental reasons. Hinduism accommodates alkaline hydrolysis as a modern variant of , which is traditionally favored to liberate the (atman) from the body for . While open-air pyres remain ideal for ritual purity, eco-conscious in communities have adopted aquamation for its alignment with (non-violence) toward the environment, though purists prioritize fire's symbolic transformation. Buddhism typically endorses alkaline hydrolysis, consistent with its acceptance of as a means to release attachment to the impermanent body (skandhas), facilitating rebirth. and traditions emphasize impermanence over physical preservation, with some Western Buddhist groups praising the method's reduced emissions as compassionate. Tibetan variants, focused on sky burials, underscore the body's utilitarian post-death role.

Cultural Debates and Adoption Patterns

Cultural debates surrounding water cremation, also known as alkaline or aquamation, often center on tensions between environmental imperatives and traditional notions of bodily and . Proponents argue it aligns with modern ecological values by mimicking natural decomposition processes, appealing to secular and environmentally conscious individuals who prioritize over fire-based cremation's carbon emissions. Critics, however, contend that the chemical dissolution of remains evokes imagery of industrial processing or "unbirthing," undermining the reverence associated with intact skeletal retention in flame cremation or , which many cultures view as essential for honoring the deceased. Ethical analyses highlight concerns that the method's efficiency may commodify death, prioritizing resource conservation over symbolic closure, though such critiques often stem from philosophical rather than empirical grounds. Adoption patterns reflect uneven cultural acceptance, with uptake remaining marginal despite legalization in select regions. , where alkaline hydrolysis is permitted in over 25 states as of 2023, it accounts for less than 0.1% of cremations, indicating strong preference for established practices amid public wariness of the process's novelty. offers services in provinces like and , yet logistical barriers and cultural inertia limit its prevalence, even as surveys show broad interest in eco-friendly options—56% of U.S. consumers over 40 expressed openness to green funerals in 2021, though specific endorsement of aquamation lags. In , plans regulation by 2024 for sustainability benefits, while Germany's younger demographics show tentative support—43% under 40 would consider it if environmental gains are proven—contrasting with broader resistance tied to historical norms. Globally, adoption is sporadic, with availability in parts of , , and , often driven by high-profile cases like Archbishop Desmond Tutu's 2022 aquamation, which spotlighted its low-energy profile but did not spur widespread shifts. In high-cremation societies like those in or , where rates exceed 90%, water cremation has yet to penetrate significantly, suggesting cultural entrenchment of flame methods outweighs promotional narratives of green innovation. Overall, patterns indicate niche appeal among progressive urbanites, with slower rural or traditionalist uptake underscoring debates over whether technological alternatives can supplant rituals evolved over centuries.

Controversies and Criticisms

Ethical and Dignity Concerns

Critics of alkaline hydrolysis, also known as water cremation, contend that the process undermines the of human remains by chemically dissolving the body into a effluent, much of which is disposed of through municipal sewer systems. This method involves subjecting the remains to a solution of water, alkali, and heat, resulting in a sterile comprising , peptides, and salts, alongside pulverized fragments returned to families. Opponents argue that routing the effluent—derived from soft tissues and organs—down drains equates to treating the deceased as disposable waste, evoking phrases such as "pouring grandma down the drain." A notable example arose in November 2024, when the Funeral Service Commission ordered the Health Science Center to cease alkaline hydrolysis operations after it liquefied donated bodies used for medical training and , disposing of the resulting via drains. The facility had installed units in 2020 to process remains, promising in consent forms but employing dissolution instead, which violated state law permitting only or flame for non-medical dispositions. This incident highlighted ethical lapses in and disposal, as families expected traditional cremated remains rather than partitioned liquids, with regulators imposing potential $5,000 daily fines for non-compliance. Further dignity concerns stem from the high (over 11) of the , which can corrode sewer and poses handling risks, prompting sanitation agencies to demand permits or alternative disposal in jurisdictions like . Lawmakers and funeral industry representatives have decried the process as undignified, with Indiana's Rep. Dick Hamm stating in 2017 legislative debates, "We’re going to put them in acid and just let them dissolve away," emphasizing a perceived lack of reverence compared to methods yielding intact, collectible ashes. In , the Board of Embalmers and Directors cited "immoral or unprofessional conduct" against early practitioners, reflecting broader unease that the dissolution obscures the body's form and finality, potentially eroding rituals centered on tangible remains.

Public Misconceptions and Industry Opposition

One prevalent public misconception about water cremation, or , portrays the process as dumping liquified remains directly into sewers for public consumption, evoking fears of unwittingly "drinking grandma." In reality, the produced is sterile, contains no DNA or identifiable material, and consists primarily of salts, , and peptides that are released into municipal systems for standard treatment, rendering such claims misleading. Experts, including Dean Fisher of UCLA, have noted that the is "better than what you and I are putting down our toilets every day," as it undergoes and purification processes before any potential reuse, while Barbara Kemmis of the Association of (CANA) affirms it is "not possible for the public to unknowingly consume liquified s." Similarly, Jessica Koth of the National Funeral Directors Association (NFDA) states the liquid includes "nothing that could even be classified as ." Another misunderstanding stems from media depictions, such as in , which inaccurately associate alkaline hydrolysis with violent acid dissolution of bodies, fostering perceptions of the method as gruesome or disrespectful despite its use of heated alkaline solution rather than corrosive acids. Public discomfort often centers on the wastewater aspect, overlooking that fluids from traditional funerals already enter similar systems, and the process yields bone remains—typically 20-30% more than flame cremation—for return to families after pulverization. Additional myths include the belief that water cremation is exclusively for medical waste or precludes receiving remains, both refuted by its established use for full human disposition in permitted facilities since the early . Opposition from segments of the funeral industry arises primarily from economic incentives, as water cremation eliminates needs for caskets, vaults, and , threatening revenue streams in and traditional sectors. For instance, in 2015, Representative Dick Hamm, who owned two casket companies and led the Casket & Funeral Supply Association of America, opposed by misrepresenting the process as using to "flush bodies down drains," contributing to the bill's defeat (34-59 vote) despite evidence of its alkaline-based, low-energy operation. Casket manufacturers have similarly questioned its safety to preserve market share, while cemetery associations resist due to reduced plots. Although organizations like provide factual resources on the method, viewing it as compatible with practices, broader industry resistance has slowed adoption, with the process remaining illegal in about 30 U.S. states as of 2020 amid such .

Current Status and Future Outlook

In the United States, water cremation adoption has expanded modestly since its commercial introduction in 2011, with over 6,000 dispositions recorded by early 2023, primarily through Resomation systems. As of mid-2025, it is legally permitted in at least 28 states, though operational facilities number only about 17, creating regional disparities in availability. Funeral homes dominate service provision, capturing 48.9% of the U.S. market share in 2025, driven by demand for eco-friendly alternatives amid broader rates projected to reach 82.1% by 2045. Globally, leads with a 44.7% in 2025, reflecting established infrastructure and regulatory progress, while adoption in and parts of is accelerating through pilot programs and legalization efforts. The overall aquamation market, valued at USD 210.5 million in 2025, is forecasted to grow to USD 423.6 million by 2032 at a influenced by partitioned systems holding 58.3% dominance for their efficiency in handling multiple remains. Parallel trends in pet aquamation underscore broader acceptance, with the sector valued at USD 845 million in 2024 and expected to double by 2033 due to cost-effectiveness (25-30% lower than alternatives) and environmental appeals. Growth is tempered by high equipment costs and public awareness gaps, yet alkaline hydrolysis systems market expansion—from USD 7.5 million in 2023 to a USD 12.1 million by 2031 at a 10.3% CAGR—signals investment amid rising preferences for low-emission disposition methods. International uptake remains nascent outside , with applications extending to medical waste and veterinary disposal worldwide, but human funerary use lags due to varying cultural and regulatory hurdles.

Potential Developments and Challenges

Advancements in alkaline hydrolysis technology may include optimizations for energy efficiency and process duration, as ongoing research explores variations in pressure, temperature, and chemical formulations to reduce operational costs while maintaining efficacy. Market forecasts project the U.S. aquamation sector to expand through 2032, driven by supportive regulatory frameworks emphasizing environmental preservation and increasing consumer demand for low-emission alternatives to flame cremation. Legislative progress, such as Pennsylvania's House approval of alkaline hydrolysis authorization on October 1, 2025, signals potential for broader U.S. adoption, potentially standardizing practices across states currently divided on legality. Integration into sustainability frameworks for the funeral industry could further promote alkaline hydrolysis as a measurable option for reducing sector-wide carbon footprints. Challenges persist in scalability, with high initial capital investments for specialized equipment—estimated in the hundreds of thousands per unit—limiting deployment to larger facilities and deterring smaller operators. Regulatory inconsistencies across jurisdictions, where alkaline hydrolysis remains unapproved or restricted in over half of U.S. states as of , create uneven access and compliance burdens, compounded by varying effluent disposal standards. Public awareness gaps and cultural resistance, often rooted in misconceptions about the process's dignity or environmental safety, hinder uptake, despite life-cycle assessments indicating alkaline hydrolysis has among the lowest overall ecological impacts compared to traditional methods. Additional hurdles include unresolved questions on long-term sewage infrastructure effects from discharged , prompting calls for more empirical data on biochemical persistence and pH neutralization before widespread scaling.

References

  1. https://www.cremationassociation.org/alkalinehydrolysis.html
  2. https://nfda.org/resources/alternative-disposition/alkaline-hydrolysis
  3. https://www.verywellhealth.com/what-is-alkaline-hydrolysis-1131908
  4. https://www.uclahealth.org/programs/donatedbody/about-us/water-cremation-thru-resomation
  5. https://resomation.com/news/setting-the-record-straight-on-water-cremation-by-runar-fromyhr/
  6. https://www.keefefuneralhome.com/what-on-green-earth-is-water-cremation
  7. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dissolve-the-dead-controversy-swirls-around-liquid-cremation/
  8. https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/alkaline-hydrolysis-laws-your-state.html
  9. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/university-north-texas-alkaline-hydrolysis-water-cremation-bodies-rcna179946
  10. https://aquamationinfo.com/how-is-aquamation-done/
  11. https://www.cremation.green/water-cremation-process/
  12. https://endswellfuneralhome.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-alkaline-hydrolysis-aquamation-a-gentle-and-eco-friendly-alternative-to-cremation/
  13. https://bioliquidator.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/BRS_BioLiquidator_Brochure.pdf
  14. https://www.beatreecremation.com/learn/when-was-water-cremation-invented
  15. https://www.cremation.green/who-invented-alkaline-hydrolysis/
  16. https://www.wired.com/story/alkaline-hydrolysis-liquid-biocremation/
  17. https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1224&context=acteclj
  18. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/could-water-cremation-become-the-new-american-way-of-death-180980479/
  19. https://resomation.com/about/
  20. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13035653.scots-alternative-to-burial-or-cremation-in-us-launch/
  21. https://talkdeath.com/five-things-you-didnt-know-about-water-cremation/
  22. https://ofdaonline.org/aws/OFDA/pt/sd/news_article/56232/_PARENT/layout_details/true
  23. https://www.us-funerals.com/where-is-aquamation-legal-which-states-have-legalized-aquamation-or-bio-cremation/
  24. https://www.us-funerals.com/directory-of-aquamation-providers-in-the-u-s/
  25. https://resomation.com/news/resomation-global-update/
  26. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66081058
  27. https://www.funeralvision.com/two-businesses-in-europe-begin-offering-resomation/
  28. https://www.betterplaceforests.com/blog/aquamation-vs-cremation/
  29. https://mymortuarycooler.com/blogs/news/alkaline-hydrolysis-vs-cremation-the-cost-winner-revealed
  30. https://www.us-funerals.com/aquamation-or-resomation/
  31. https://www.ijraset.com/research-paper/an-investigation-into-green-influence-on-materials-and-mechanism-of-water-cremation
  32. https://www.petmemorialcenter.ca/aquamation/TNO_report_Environmental_impact_of_different_funeral_technologies.pdf
  33. https://ncceh.ca/resources/evidence-reviews/alternative-disposition-services-green-burial-alkaline-hydrolysis-and
  34. https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/cmte_testimony/2024/eee/1kWwwKFmZQndwz1zC2nkZsl1Z56HxXZgV.pdf
  35. https://earthfuneral.com/reports/the-environmental-impact-of-funeral-choices
  36. https://connectingdirectors.com/66675-eco-impact-of-alkaline-hydrolysis
  37. https://mymortuarycooler.com/blogs/news/the-complete-guide-to-alkaline-hydrolysis-cremation-costs
  38. https://www.cremationaustin.com/water-cremation-cost-your-complete-pricing-guide/
  39. https://www.cremation.green/cost-of-water-cremation/
  40. https://mymortuarycooler.com/blogs/news/aquamation-or-flame-cremation-the-price-tag-showdown
  41. https://www.courant.com/2025/02/05/ct-funeral-home-the-only-one-in-the-state-to-offer-water-cremations/
  42. https://titancasket.com/blogs/funeral-guides-and-more/aquamation-vs-cremation-cost-types-and-differences
  43. https://www.lonestarcremation.com/2024/10/16/aquamation-vs-cremation-a-detailed-comparison-of-costs-and-processes/
  44. https://www.after.com/articles/aquamation-vs-cremation
  45. https://www.themodernmortician.com/water
  46. https://www.after.com/articles/water-cremation
  47. https://www.cremation.green/what-are-the-aquamation-regulations-in-your-state-2/
  48. https://www.greenfarewells.com/aquamation-vs-cremation-how-do-they-compare
  49. https://returnhome.com/water-vs-flame-cremation-alkaline-hydrolysis-vs-cremation/
  50. https://www.cremation.green/environmental-impact-of-cremation/
  51. https://earthfuneral.com/resources/human-composting-vs-aquamation
  52. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9403370/
  53. https://voices.uchicago.edu/triplehelix/2025/01/02/green-burials-how-the-climate-crisis-is-changing-after-life-services/
  54. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=134642
  55. https://endswellfuneralhome.com/aquamation-vs-cremation-understanding-the-differences/
  56. https://ncceh.ca/sites/default/files/2023-04/Alternative%2520Disposition%2520Services_EN_Apr%25202023_FINAL_0.pdf
  57. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jul/02/boil-in-the-bag-environmentally-friendly-funerals-arrive-in-uk-resomation-acquamation
  58. https://www.durham.ac.uk/research/current/thought-leadership/2024/05/water-cremation-sustainable-body-disposal-is-coming-to-scotland/
  59. https://resomation.com/our-funeral-partners/where-is-resomation-permitted/
  60. https://funeraldirectordaily.com/2020-and-the-realities-of-smaller-cemeteries/
  61. https://partingstone.com/blogs/news/alkaline-hydrolysis
  62. https://www.usccb.org/news/2023/us-bishops-doctrine-committee-issues-statement-proper-disposition-bodily-remains
  63. https://catholicdioceseofwichita.org/u-s-bishops-new-methods-of-body-disposal-go-against-church-teaching/
  64. https://eirene.ca/articles/major-religions-aquamation-alkaline-hydrolysis
  65. https://www.ccarnet.org/responsa-topics/resomation-the-liquid-disposal-of-remains/
  66. https://www.lastjourney.in/blog/best-3-eco-friendly-ways-to-dispose-of-a-dead-body-hindu-rituals/
  67. https://undark.org/2022/03/30/podcast-59/
  68. https://www.santacruzsentinel.com/2025/02/01/will-the-unbirthing-process-of-aquamation-replace-burial-and-cremation-2/
  69. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13576275.2024.2338284
  70. https://www.cremationassociation.org/blog/category/alkaline-hydrolysis
  71. https://www.cbc.ca/life/culture/a-look-at-aquamation-cremation-by-water-instead-of-fire-in-canada-1.6576172
  72. https://time.com/6151559/aquamation-cremation-funeral-alternative/
  73. https://theconversation.com/water-cremation-sustainable-body-disposal-is-coming-to-scotland-here-are-the-benefits-229213
  74. https://www.wasserladenonline.com/en/blog/post/alkaline-hydrolysis-burial
  75. https://www.gov.scot/publications/alkaline-hydrolysis-water-cremation-regulation-scotland/pages/10/
  76. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/02/what-is-aquamation-the-process-behind-desmond-tutus-green-cremation
  77. https://www.kenoshafuneralhome.com/2024/05/09/cremations-across-the-world/
  78. https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/alkaline-hydrolysis-or-liquid-cremation-does-not-mean-human-remains-are-fed-t-idUSL1N3621X5/
  79. https://www.cnet.com/culture/features/the-misunderstood-funeral-tech-thats-illegal-in-30-states/
  80. https://www.orderofthegooddeath.com/article/weaponizing-fear-against-green-death/
  81. https://www.cremation.green/states-where-people-are-the-least-likely-to-choose-alkaline-hydrolysis-cremation/
  82. https://www.kates-boylston.com/american-cemetery-and-cremation/an-update-on-alkaline-hydrolysis-and-why-it-will-continue-to-grow/article_962adc00-e835-11ed-87ce-73567254177c.html
  83. https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/industry-reports/us-aquamation-market
  84. https://dfsmemorials.com/cremation-blog/cremation-industry-overview/
  85. https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/industry-reports/aquamation-market
  86. https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/trends/aquamation-7-things-to-know-about-the-eco-friendly-funeral-practice-trending-globally-13629363.html
  87. https://www.openpr.com/news/4126593/aquamation-market-revenue-growth-2025-emerging-technologies
  88. https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/alkaline-hydrolysis-systems-market/
  89. https://veterinarysustainabilityalliance.org/aquamation/
  90. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13576275.2024.2445852
  91. https://www.pahouse.com/InTheNews/NewsRelease/?id=140408
  92. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725003101
  93. https://insurancefunerals.com/blog/aquamation-awareness-regulations-and-infrastructure/
  94. https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-governments-consultation-analysis-report-regulation-alkaline-hydrolysis-scotland-water-cremation/pages/6/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.