Hubbry Logo
Pointing stickPointing stickMain
Open search
Pointing stick
Community hub
Pointing stick
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Pointing stick
Pointing stick
Pointing stick
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Pointing stick on a Lenovo ThinkPad
Detail: rear side of a Lenovo ThinkPad pointing stick with the strain gauges. Size: 8 x 8 mm. Out of patent
IBM ThinkPad caps (left-to-right): Soft Dome, Soft Rim, Classic Dome, Eraser Head (discontinued)

A pointing stick (or trackpoint, also referred to generically as a nub, nipple or eraser head) is a small analog stick used as a pointing device typically mounted centrally in a computer keyboard. Like other pointing devices such as mice, touchpads or trackballs, operating system software translates manipulation of the device into movements of the pointer on the computer screen. Unlike other pointing devices, it reacts to sustained force or strain rather than to gross movement, so it is called an "isometric"[1] pointing device. IBM introduced it commercially in 1992 on the ThinkPad 700 series under the name "TrackPoint", and patented an improved version of it in 1997 (but the patent expired in 2017).[2] It has been used for business laptops, such as Acer's TravelMate, Dell's Latitude, HP's EliteBook and Lenovo's ThinkPad.

The pointing stick senses applied force by using two pairs of resistive strain gauges. A pointing stick can be used by pushing with the fingers in the general direction the user wants the pointer to move. The velocity of the pointer depends on the applied force so increasing pressure causes faster movement. The relation between pressure and pointer speed can be adjusted, just as mouse speed is adjusted.

On a QWERTY keyboard, the stick is typically embedded between the G, H and B keys, and the mouse buttons are placed just below the space bar. The mouse buttons can be operated right-handed or left-handed due to their placement below the keyboard along the centerline. This pointing device has also appeared next to screens on compact-sized laptops such as the Toshiba Libretto and Sony VAIO UX.

Variants

[edit]

Pointing sticks typically have a replaceable rubber cap, called a nub, which can be a slightly rough "eraser head" material or another shape.[3]

The cap is red on ThinkPads, but is also found in other colors on other machines. It may be gray, pink, black or blue on some Dell models, blue on some HP/Compaq laptops, and green or gray on most Toshiba laptops produced before the 2000s.

Button configurations vary depending on vendor and laptop model. ThinkPads have a prominent middle mouse button, but some models have no physical buttons. Toshiba employs concentric arcs.

In the early 1990s, Zenith Data Systems shipped a number of laptop computers equipped with a device called J-Mouse,[4] which essentially used a special keyswitch under the J key to allow the J keycap to be used as a pointing stick.

In addition to appearing between the G, H and B keys on a QWERTY keyboard, these devices or similar can also appear on gaming devices as an alternative to a D-pad or analog stick. On certain Toshiba Libretto mini laptops, the pointing stick was located next to the display. IBM sold a mouse with a pointing stick in the location where a scroll wheel is common now.

A pointing stick on a mid-1990s-era Toshiba laptop. The two buttons below the keyboard act as a computer mouse: the top button is used for left-clicking while the bottom button is used for right-clicking.

Optical pointing sticks are also used on some Ultrabook tablet hybrids, such as the Sony Duo 11, ThinkPad Tablet and Samsung Ativ Q.

On the Gateway 2000 Liberty laptop the pointing stick is above the enter key on the right side of the keyboard.

A pointing stick was featured in the New Nintendo 3DS as a secondary analog stick, known as the C-Stick.

Design challenges

[edit]

The IBM TrackPoint III and the TrackPoint IV have a feature called Negative Inertia that causes the pointer's velocity to "overreact" when it is accelerated or decelerated. Negative Inertia is intended to avoid the feeling of inertia or sluggishness when starting or stopping movement.[5] Usability tests at IBM have shown that it is easier for users to position the pointer with Negative Inertia, and performance is 7.8% better.[6]

Another challenge with pointing stick design is identification of the zero position (the position where no motion is desired). Because the amount of motion is small, the sensitivity of the sensors must be high, and they are subject to noise interference.

A typical solution, which assumes that pointing sticks frequently go out of calibration, is to interpret a variation below a certain threshold (over a given interval, perhaps one or several seconds) as being a neutral stick. However, the recalibration can also allow brief periods of 'drifting' (movement of the pointer while the user is not moving the pointing stick).[7]

In practice, if the re-calibration interval is set too short and if the user applies moderately consistent pressure to the stick for such an interval, this method results in an incorrect zero point. Additional pressure again moves the pointer, but the calibration may occur again, requiring even more force. If the user releases pressure at this point, the change will be interpreted as an instruction to move the opposite direction. In time, the software will re-calibrate and stop the motion.

Additionally, if "press-to-select" is enabled, the software may generate unexpected click events by touching the pointing stick during typing.

History

[edit]

In 1984, Ted Selker, a researcher at PARC, worked on a pointing stick based on a study[citation needed] showing that it takes a typist 0.75 seconds to shift from the keyboard to the mouse, and comparable time to shift back. Selker built a model of a device that would minimize this time. It was only three years later, working at IBM, that Selker refined his design, resulting in the TrackPoint product[8] for which IBM received US patents in 1996[9][10] and 2000.[11]

Pointing sticks were the dominant pointing device for laptops before the advent of the touchpad. During later years, they faced a decline in popularity as most laptop-producing brands switched to touchpads, although as of 2021, some manufacturers like Lenovo still produce laptops with pointing sticks.[12]

Problem scope

[edit]
A ThinkPad UltraNav featuring both a red pointing stick (top right) and a touchpad (bottom left)

Space constraints

[edit]
A Dell Latitude E6430 laptop with a pointing stick (upper middle) and a touchpad (bottom). They were commonly featured together on Dell Latitude laptops, beginning in the late 1990s.

The pointing stick can be used in ultra-compact netbooks[13] where there would be no place for a touchpad.

Finger motion reduction

[edit]

The pointing stick is positioned such that the hands do not need to be removed from the home row to manipulate the mouse pointer.[14]

Continuous motion

[edit]

Some people find them more appealing for mobile gaming than a touchpad, because the trackpoint allows infinite movement without repositioning.[14] This is because a user's finger may run off the edge of a touchpad while positioning the pointer, requiring them to reposition their finger in order to continue.[15]

Ergonomics

[edit]

Some users feel that pointing sticks cause less wrist strain because a user does not need to avoid resting wrists on a touchpad, which are usually located just below the keyboard. One criticism is that because the pointing stick depends on the user's applying pressure, it can cause hand cramps (although this can be partly solved by setting the sensitivity higher and lifting the finger when the pointer is not being moved). Another criticism is that it stresses the index finger and may lead to repetitive strain injury[citation needed].

A number of ergonomic studies to compare trackpoint and touchpad performance have been performed.[16][17] Most studies find that touchpad is slightly faster; one study found that "the touchpad was operated 15% faster than the trackpoint".[18] Another study found that average object selection time was faster with a touchpad, 1.7 seconds compared to 2.2 seconds with a trackpoint, and object manipulation took 6.2 seconds with a touchpad, on average, against 8.1 seconds with trackpoint.[19]

Naming and brands

[edit]
Name Brand Current Models Past Models Color
Acer FineTrack None TravelMate 6410, 6460, 6492, 6492G, 6592, 6592G, 6593 Green
Asus SensePoint ExpertBook P2 S200, S200N, S200Ne, S300N
ASUS pro: B8230UA; ADVANCED BU201		 Black/Gray, Blue/Gray
Casio ? Cassiopeia Fiva MPC series
Dell TrackStick, Dual Point None Latitude: 13": E4300, E4310, E6320, E6330, XT3; 14": E5400, E5410, E5420, E5430, E5440, E5450, E5470, 5480, 5490/95, E6420, E6430, E6430s, 6430u, E7440, E7450, E7470, 7480, 7490; 15": E5530, E5540, E5550, E5570, 5580, 5590, E6500, E6510, E6520, E6540
Retro Latitude: D400, D410, D420, D430, D600, D610, D620, D630, D800, D810, D820, D830, XT;
Precision: M2300, M2400, M4300, M4400, M4500, M4600, M4700, M4800, M6700, M6800, M6400, M6500, 3510, 3520, 3530, 7510, 7520, 7530, 7540, 7710, 7720, 7730, 7740;
Inspiron: 4000, 8100, 8200, 8600, 9100; L		 Blue, black or gray
Elonex Mouse emulator None Elonex ONE Black
Fujitsu StickPoint, QuickPoint, Quick Touch[20] None Lifebook T2010, T2020, S7110, S7210, S7220, B2400/2500/2600 series, E8310 (optional), E8410 (optional), E8420 (optional), U1010/U810/U50, U820/U2010, P1100/1500/1600 series, P1620, P1610, P1630, P2120, Black or blue
GPD ? None Pocket 1 Blue
HP PointStick All EliteBooks excluding 1000 series and Folio;
Some ZBooks excluding Studio series;
ProBook 6450b, 6455b & 6550b		 All EliteBooks excluding 1000 series; all models ending with p or w; all models starting with nc, nw or c; 6445b (optional), 6545b (optional), tc4200, tc4400; Presario models starting with v, 8500 Black, orange or blue (older models)
JVC, Victor (InterLink) Pointing Stick, Trackpoint MP-XP3210, MP-XP5220, MP-XP7210, MP-XP7220, MP-XP7230, MP-XP7250, MP-XP731, MP-XP7310, MP-XP741, MP-XV631, MP-XP831, MP-XV841, MP-XV941
Blue/Gray
IBM, Lenovo TrackPoint All ThinkPads, excluding most Chromebooks; Travel Keyboard with Ultranav Most ThinkPads, Space Saver II, Model M13, Model M4-1, Trackpoint IV, Trackpoint USB Keyboard, TransNote, Trackpoint Mouse Red
NEC NX Point LaVie Nextreme EasyNote MX45, MX65, S5 Dark Gray
Nintendo C-Stick None New Nintendo 3DS, New Nintendo 3DS XL and New Nintendo 2DS XL[21][22] Gray
Samsung Pointing stick Series 6, Ativ Q Series 4 All colors
Sony Pointing stick None Sony Vaio Duo 11, Sony VAIO P series, BX series, C1 series, U8 series, UX series, X505, Sony PS3 Wireless Keyboard[23] None
Sprintek FlexPoint SK8702/SK8703 for Laptop/Tablet PC/Netbook/Industrial Keyboard None None
Dynabook (formerly Toshiba) AccuPoint Tecra R Series, Z Series and W Series, Portege Z Series and R Series Portégé (not current models 06/2007), 300-7000 series, T3000 series; Tecra series 500-9000, A7, A8, A9, A10, A11, M2, M5, M9, M10, M11, S Series; Satellite Pro series 400-4000, T2000; Satellite 100-4000 series, Libretto 50CT, 70CT, 100CT Green, blue
Unicomp Pointing stick EnduraPro (for desktop) On-The-Stick, Mighty Mouse Red

Informal names

[edit]

Various informal names have been invented, including "nub",[24] "clit mouse", which is an intercommunity term, usually seen on ThinkPad forums, and "nipple mouse".[24][25]

Other uses

[edit]

While typically employed on a computer keyboard, IBM included one on its Trackpoint Mouse product; suggested uses included scrolling (as with a scroll wheel) or a dual-cursor system.[26]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Pointing stick

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The pointing stick, also known as the TrackPoint, is a compact isometric joystick-like integrated into the keyboard of select computers, positioned typically between the G, H, and B keys, that allows users to manipulate the on-screen cursor by applying gentle pressure in any direction with their fingertip. Unlike traditional joysticks, the pointing stick remains stationary while sensing applied force through resistive strain gauges arranged in pairs to measure deflection in perpendicular (X and Y) axes, converting this mechanical input into proportional cursor movement for precise control. Invented in 1984 by computer scientist Ted Selker—initially as a personal project inspired by human-computer interaction research—the device was refined through extensive user testing at starting in 1985, in collaboration with engineer Joseph Rutledge, and patented prior to its commercial debut. launched the pointing stick commercially in October 1992 as the TrackPoint on its 700 series laptops, marking a key innovation in by enabling efficient pointing without interrupting typing workflows. Praised for its ergonomic design, the pointing stick reduces hand and wrist strain compared to external mice or touchpads, supports high-precision tasks like and coding, and has evolved with features such as adjustable sensitivity and replaceable rubber caps, remaining a hallmark of ThinkPads after IBM sold its PC business in 2005.

Definition and Operation

Physical Description

A pointing stick is a compact isometric embedded directly into the keyboard of computers, functioning as an alternative to touchpads or external mice for cursor control. It typically appears as a short, cylindrical nub made of rubber or durable plastic, positioned centrally between the G, H, and B keys in a keyboard layout to enable operation without removing hands from the home row. This design allows for thumb or fingertip actuation while typing, promoting efficient navigation in compact devices. The primary visible component is the replaceable dome-shaped , often textured for better grip and available in materials like soft rubber to reduce slippage during use. Beneath the lies a rigid post or shaft that connects to a flexible rubber gaiter or supporting dome, which seals the assembly against dust and transmits lateral and vertical forces evenly to the underlying . The itself comprises an of strain gauges—small resistive sensors mounted on a —that detect minute deflections without requiring mechanical movement of the entire device. These components are housed in a low-profile module, typically measuring approximately 8 mm in diameter and 3–6 mm in height for the protruding nub, depending on the variant, ensuring minimal interference with keyboard ergonomics. For basic operation, users tilt the nub by applying gentle lateral with their finger, which flexes the and compresses the gaiter to strain the gauges proportionally in the X or Y direction, generating analog signals that translate to smooth, velocity-based cursor movement on the screen. While Z-axis force is detected, button clicks are primarily performed using separate switches integrated into the keyboard below ; vertical may support configurable functions like middle-click in some setups. This pressure-sensitive approach allows precise control over speed and direction without physical displacement of the stick.

Sensing Mechanism

The pointing stick operates on an isometric principle, detecting user input through applied or rather than physical displacement of the device itself. When is applied to the nub, it tilts slightly, generating that deforms an underlying strain-sensitive substrate. This deformation is measured using resistive strain gauges, which change electrical resistance in proportion to the induced strain, allowing the to interpret the force vector for cursor control. The core sensing technology employs four strain gauges arranged in two half-bridge configurations, one for each axis (X and Y), to enhance sensitivity and cancel out environmental factors like variations. Gauges are oriented to detect strain in the x-direction (horizontal) and y-direction (vertical), with opposite gauges experiencing tension and compression under applied force. The bridge imbalance produces an output voltage proportional to the strain ε, approximated by the : ΔV≈GF⋅Vex⋅ε2\Delta V \approx \frac{GF \cdot V_{ex} \cdot \varepsilon}{2} where GF is the gauge factor (a material-specific constant, often around 2 for common strain gauges), V_ex is the excitation voltage (typically 5 V), and ε is the axial strain. This setup measures from the tilting nub, converting mechanical input into differential analog voltages representing force magnitude and direction. These analog signals undergo processing via onboard circuitry, including amplification and analog-to-digital conversion, to generate digital values at rates around 100 Hz. The converted data determines cursor , where movement speed is proportional to the applied magnitude, and direction aligns with the force vector; for instance, a sigmoid or parabolic maps force to , with low forces yielding fine control (e.g., 1.5 cm/s) and higher forces enabling faster traversal (up to 50 cm/s or more). This velocity-based mapping ensures intuitive control without requiring sustained physical motion. The mechanism consumes low power, typically in the milliwatt range (e.g., 890 µA idle and 3.21 mA during operation at 5 V), making it suitable for battery-powered laptops. It interfaces through protocols such as PS/2 for legacy systems or USB via (HID) standards in modern implementations, allowing seamless integration with host controllers for mouse-like input.

History

Invention and Development

The pointing stick, also known as the TrackPoint, was invented by Ted Selker, a researcher at 's T.J. Watson Research Center in , who initially conceived the idea while at PARC in 1984 and joined in 1985 to develop the device in response to the growing need for efficient input mechanisms in portable computers. The allowed users to control the cursor without removing their hands from the keyboard, addressing the limitations of emerging designs constrained by space. Development of the pointing stick spanned several years, with prototypes created starting in 1985 through collaboration with engineer Joseph D. Rutledge. Selker filed for a on the core technology in 1985, which was granted in 1988; this isometric design, where the stick itself does not pivot but instead measures strain via sensors, represented a key innovation aimed at minimizing mechanical wear compared to traditional joysticks. Initial testing occurred in the early 1990s, culminating in the device's integration into IBM's 700C , released in October as the first commercial product featuring the TrackPoint. During , teams built over 100 prototypes and conducted extensive user studies, including trials in , Austin, and Boca Raton, to refine the force-to-motion using custom software like JoyTest. Early challenges, such as achieving consistent sensitivity across units due to variations in calibration, were addressed through iterative software adjustments and hardware tweaks, ensuring reliable performance in real-world typing and pointing tasks.

Commercial Adoption

The pointing stick debuted commercially in 1992 with the 700C , where it was branded as TrackPoint and integrated as a core to enhance portability without requiring additional peripherals. This introduction marked the first widespread implementation in a production , positioning it as a novel solution for cursor control in compact form factors. Following IBM's divestiture of its personal computer division, Lenovo acquired the ThinkPad line in 2005 and maintained the pointing stick as a standard feature across all subsequent ThinkPad models, reinforcing its role in enterprise productivity tools. Adoption extended beyond and , with incorporating licensed versions under the AccuPoint branding in various business-oriented laptops during the 1990s and early 2000s, such as the Portege series. HP also featured pointing sticks sporadically in select EliteBook models aimed at users, though less consistently than in ThinkPads. As of 2025, the feature persists in key lines, including the X1 Carbon Gen 13, underscoring its enduring presence in premium ultrabooks. Market trends for pointing sticks in enterprise laptops peaked during the 1990s and 2000s, driven by demand for efficient input in mobile workstations, but began declining in the as larger touchpads gained dominance for their intuitive capabilities. Despite this shift, remains relevant for productivity-focused users, appearing in a notable portion of high-end business laptops where precise control without hand repositioning is prioritized. IBM retained core intellectual property on the pointing stick through patents, including US6115030A filed in for an improved TrackPoint mechanism, which allowed selective licensing to partners like during the technology's early commercial phase. These patents expired around 2017, enabling the development of generic implementations by third-party manufacturers in the late and beyond without licensing restrictions. continues to hold related IP for enhancements in its devices, sustaining the TrackPoint as a proprietary hallmark.

Design Motivations

Space and Portability Constraints

In the , designs rapidly evolved toward smaller form factors to enhance portability, with screen sizes typically 9 to 12 inches, making traditional pointing devices like external mice or trackballs increasingly impractical due to their added bulk and the need for dedicated desk space. This miniaturization trend, driven by advances in component integration, prioritized compact that could fit into briefcases while maintaining functionality for mobile professionals. The pointing stick addressed these constraints by integrating directly into the keyboard with a minimal footprint, allowing for fuller keyboard layouts in slim devices without sacrificing input capabilities. It also eliminated the need for external peripherals, further reducing overall system bulk and enabling true portability in battery-powered systems. In terms of added hardware impact, the pointing stick adds minimal weight and thickness compared to touchpads, preserving the lightweight profile essential for subnotebooks. This efficiency proved particularly valuable in early portables like the IBM ThinkPad 701C, a 1995 subnotebook with a 10.4-inch screen and innovative expanding keyboard, where space limitations left no room for alternative pointing mechanisms such as a mouse or touchpad.

Ergonomic and Motion Efficiency

The pointing stick was designed to enable users to maintain their hands on the home row keys during cursor control, thereby minimizing disruptions to flow and reducing overall hand repositioning. This core ergonomic rationale stems from the device's force-sensitive mechanism, which requires only subtle pressure from the index or without lifting or sliding the hand away from the keyboard. Compared to touchpads, where users must move their hand to the device and slide the finger across a surface, the pointing stick limits average finger travel while supporting continuous input without finger lifts. IBM's studies on finger force precision confirmed that maximum finger displacement remains undetectable at 0.13 mm even under peak force (225 grams). These design features contribute to lower risks of repetitive strain injuries (RSI), such as , by curtailing the repetitive wrist extensions and finger slides common in or interactions. The isometric input promotes a neutral hand posture aligned with typing, reducing during prolonged sessions. This is especially advantageous for typing-intensive tasks like coding, where rapid cursor adjustments amid keystrokes enhance without ergonomic compromise. A 1990 ergonomics study demonstrated that the pointing stick's force-to-motion mapping allows for efficient two-dimensional control with minimal effort, outperforming position-based devices in intermixed typing-pointing scenarios by reducing the time needed for hand repositioning compared to alternatives. Quantitative evaluations from IBM's in the further underscored motion efficiency, showing faster pointing times with the pointing stick compared to a mouse, with benefits extending to touchpads requiring similar hand shifts. Studies reported improvements attributable to these reduced interruptions and sustained typing posture, validating the device's role in high-output environments.

Technical Challenges

Precision and Control Issues

One significant challenge with pointing sticks is and drift, where minor variations in finger pressure—often as low as 5-12 grams—can cause unintended cursor movements due to the device's reliance on sensors that detect force rather than absolute position. This arises from natural hand tremors or inconsistent pressure application, leading to oscillatory or drifting cursor paths during steady aiming, as observed in movement microstructure analyses comparing pointing sticks to mice. To mitigate these issues, software filters incorporate dead zones and plateaus, typically thresholding inputs below 5-10 grams (approximately 0.05-0.1 N) to stabilize output and prevent erroneous motion without requiring hardware changes. Users often face a notable when adapting to the pressure-based control of pointing sticks, requiring consistent practice to master the non-linear force-to-velocity mapping that differs from positional inputs like touchpads. Studies indicate that proficiency develops over several sessions involving thousands of selections, with middle-aged users showing greater relative gains in speed and accuracy after training compared to younger ones, though overall error reduction stabilizes after initial exposure. For instance, force precision improves from initial errors of 9-25 grams to more consistent 3-15 grams per dimension with repeated use, enabling better control over time. The device performs auto-calibration periodically—triggered by sustained constant for a few seconds—to reset baselines and account for thermal or mechanical offsets, ensuring reliable force detection. User-adjustable settings further refine Z-axis sensitivity for tasks like , allowing customization of the threshold for secondary functions, which helps tailor the device to individual force application habits. Despite these mitigations, pointing sticks exhibit limitations in precision for fine-grained tasks compared to touchpads due to the inherent variability in input. Benchmarks reveal that touchpads achieve higher throughput and lower movement errors overall, with pointing sticks lagging in such tasks because of their joystick-like transduction, which amplifies small inconsistencies.

Durability and Maintenance

The pointing stick's rubber or cap is the primary component subject to wear, as constant from user input causes , flattening, or loss of grip over time. This cap, often red in models, can become smooth or detached, affecting usability and requiring periodic replacement to maintain precise control. provides replaceable caps in various designs, such as the classic dome for traditional feel or soft dome for enhanced comfort with rubber dots, available in kits of 10 for approximately $10. Internally, the pointing stick relies on strain gauges or capacitive sensors that detect pressure and deflection, but these can fatigue under repeated mechanical . Early designs using strain gauges were prone to drift after extended use, while later capacitive implementations, introduced around 2000, improved resilience by withstanding over 1 million actuation cycles under a 350-gram load and passing stress tests with 10 pounds of lateral without performance degradation. Failure modes typically include sensor drift, where the cursor moves erratically without input, or cap detachment, often resolvable through like reconnection or brief disuse. Maintenance is straightforward and user-focused on external components, with no serviceable internals due to the integrated design. Users can clean the cap and surrounding area using to remove oils and debris, and temporarily disable the device via keyboard shortcuts for thorough wiping. Replacement caps snap on easily by aligning the recess with the post and pressing firmly, a process supported across series without tools. Post-2010 models incorporate more resilient polymers in soft dome caps and reduced height for thinner , enhancing overall by minimizing wear points and improving grip durability.

Variants and Implementations

Physical Design Variants

The pointing stick's physical design centers on a small, replaceable known as the nub, which serves as the user's primary interface for applying pressure and directional force. The original design features a convex red rubber nub approximately 6 mm in height, offering a grippy surface that facilitates precise control through against the fingertip. This rubber material provides initial traction but is prone to wear over time, necessitating periodic replacement to maintain performance. Subsequent variants have modified the nub's height and shape to accommodate evolving laptop ergonomics and user preferences. Lenovo offers low-profile options at 3 mm height with a soft dome shape and embedded rubber dots for enhanced grip, suitable for ultra-thin chassis like the . Super low-profile caps measure 4 mm in height, retaining the soft dome but optimized for minimal protrusion above the keyboard surface. Classic caps are approximately 6 mm and low-profile caps 5.5 mm, providing taller profiles for users seeking greater leverage and easier access without straining the thumb. These height adjustments balance portability with usability, as shorter nubs reduce interference in slim designs while taller ones improve motion efficiency. Shape variations further refine ergonomics and traction. ' TouchStyk employs a 4 mm wide concave nub elevated above the key plane, incorporating sharp dots on the surface for added , though this can cause discomfort during prolonged use. patents describe additional options like dimpled centers or ridged texturing on the rubber cap to prevent slippage under firm pressure, enhancing control in dynamic pointing tasks. Concave or ridged designs promote better fingertip centering compared to smooth convex shapes, reducing accidental overshoots. Material choices prioritize durability and tactile feedback while addressing wear. The standard rubber nub, often in iconic red for IBM TrackPoint models, delivers a soft yet resilient feel but degrades with oils and friction from repeated use. Later implementations use firmer rubber compounds with textured surfaces to extend lifespan and maintain grip consistency. While plastic alternatives exist in some prototypes for a harder, more precise response, rubber remains dominant for its balance of compliance and hypoallergenic properties in everyday applications. Aesthetic adaptations include color variations beyond the signature red, with OEM implementations in or gray to blend seamlessly with keyboard layouts. These neutral tones appear in designs from manufacturers like and , prioritizing subtlety over the distinctive crimson hue.

Integration in Devices

Pointing sticks are typically embedded directly into the keyboard assembly of and external keyboards, positioned centrally within the key cluster—most commonly between the G, H, and B keys on standard layouts—to facilitate cursor control without interrupting typing. This integration leverages the keyboard's existing structural components, such as the palm rest area for ergonomic support, ensuring the device remains unobtrusive during prolonged use. In contemporary designs, particularly those from manufacturers like , pointing sticks are frequently implemented alongside touchpads as dual-input solutions, allowing users to alternate between precise, keyboard-centric navigation and broader gesture-based control. As of 2025, however, some new models such as Lenovo's X9 series have omitted the pointing stick, reflecting a trend toward touchpad-only designs in certain premium ultrabooks. Connectivity for pointing sticks has evolved from legacy PS/2 interfaces, which were common in early implementations for direct attachment to host systems, to the USB-HID standard prevalent since the early , enabling universal compatibility and simplified setup without proprietary drivers in most cases. At the firmware level, pointing sticks interface with operating systems through standardized protocols; Windows handles them natively via the HID class for seamless recognition, while supports configuration and input processing via the evdev subsystem, which manages events from the device kernel module. Hybrid input systems often pair pointing sticks with complementary devices to enhance overall usability within device ecosystems. For example, Lenovo's UltraNav combines a TrackPoint pointing stick with an integrated and scroll buttons, providing multi-modal pointing options that support both fine-grained control and multi-finger gestures in a single . This approach fosters synergies in professional hardware, where the pointing stick's efficiency pairs with touchpad versatility for tasks requiring varied precision levels. Modern adaptations in the 2020s have introduced wireless variants, such as Lenovo's TrackPoint Keyboard II, which incorporates the pointing stick into a or 2.4 GHz USB dongle-enabled keyboard for untethered desktop use. enhancements, including software-adjustable sensitivity and acceleration profiles, are integrated via OS drivers, allowing users to fine-tune responsiveness for ergonomic comfort or specific needs like reduced hand strain.

Naming and Branding

Official Trademarks

The TrackPoint is a registered owned by PC International, originally filed by on January 25, 1993, and covering and electronic pointing devices specific to its implementation, excluding generic pointing sticks. acquired the trademark along with IBM's PC division in 2005, maintaining exclusive rights to the term for its branded isometric joystick technology. Other brands have developed proprietary names for similar technologies, such as ' TouchStyk, a for their capacitive or resistive pointing stick variants used in various laptops. Alps Electric, an early manufacturer, used the term Isopoint for an older rolling-cylinder style licensed in the late 1980s, though it differs from modern isometric sticks. Licensing agreements have allowed integration in devices from and , where the technology appears without the TrackPoint branding but under cross-licensing for strain-gauge or sensor-based implementations. The core for the TrackPoint, US 5,521,596, was granted to on May 28, 1996, for an analog input device in keyboard typing areas using strain gauges, and expired on May 28, 2013, 17 years from the grant date under pre-1995 U.S. rules (filed July 20, 1992, as U.S. national stage of PCT application filed November 29, 1990). Post-expiration, generic pointing sticks can be produced openly, but restrictions prevent use of protected names like TrackPoint. continues to hold active , including 2023 filings for enhancements such as improved displacement detection in pointing sticks (e.g., US 2023/0205323 A1).

Informal and Generic Names

The pointing stick is frequently referred to informally as a "nub" or "red dot" in tech discussions and user forums, emphasizing its compact, protruding design integrated into laptop keyboards. These nicknames arose from its visual resemblance to a small bump or colored eraser-like tip, particularly in descriptions of devices like those on ThinkPad models. Pejorative or affectionate slang terms such as "clit mouse" and "nipple mouse" originated in 1990s tech communities and circles, drawing analogies to the device's shape and position between keyboard keys. These expressions, often used humorously or crudely in early online forums, are cataloged as common in the , a longstanding reference for computer terminology. "" serves as another informal descriptor, evoking its directional control mechanism, though it can carry a playful or dismissive tone in casual conversations. Beyond nicknames, generic terms include "pointing stick," the widely adopted neutral label in technical and encyclopedic contexts, and "isometric pointer" or "isometric joystick," used in engineering documentation to describe its force-sensing operation. Misspellings like "track point" occasionally appear in user queries and non-technical writing, stemming from confusion with the branded "TrackPoint." In gaming and enthusiast communities, hybrid terms like "TrackNub" have surfaced sporadically since the , blending branding with the "nub" nickname for emphasis on its utility in precise control. Cultural references to these names persist in media, including 2000s tech reviews that debated their with a mix of humor and critique, though professional discourse in the favors neutral phrasing to promote inclusivity.

Applications and Usage

Primary Use in Laptops

The pointing stick serves as a core in many business laptops, particularly Lenovo's series, where it enables precise cursor control integrated directly into the keyboard. This design allows users to navigate the interface using subtle finger pressure on the central nub without lifting hands from the typing position, supporting efficient one-handed operation during or document editing. As a hallmark of models since the 1990s, it remains standard in the majority of 2025 ThinkPad configurations, such as the T-series and P-series workstations, though select premium variants like the X9 Aura Edition have omitted it in favor of sleeker designs. In professional workflows, the pointing stick integrates seamlessly with keyboard-centric tasks, offering adjustable sensitivity to match user needs—typically via driver settings that control cursor speed and pressure thresholds for activation. For instance, Lenovo's software allows fine-tuning of the force required to move the cursor, enhancing accuracy for prolonged sessions. In Linux-based environments, common among developers, the middle mouse button emulation paired with the pointing stick facilitates smooth , where holding the button while nudging the nub simulates wheel movement, streamlining and document navigation without additional hardware. This feature is natively supported in distributions like and through kernel modules. Among power users, including programmers and analysts handling spreadsheets or coding, the pointing stick is favored for its superior precision over in confined spaces, allowing pinpoint selections without accidental gestures. It coexists alongside and multi-finger gestures in hybrid setups, providing a reliable alternative for users prioritizing keyboard proximity. While overall adoption has declined since the early with the proliferation of interfaces, the pointing stick endures in durable and rugged devices due to its mechanical robustness, with no prone to wear like surfaces. models, certified to MIL-STD-810H standards, exemplify this retention, appealing to field professionals in demanding environments.

Alternative and Niche Applications

Pointing sticks have found application in embedded systems within devices, where their compact design enables precise cursor control in sterile environments. For instance, a study on alternative input devices for CT datasets included evaluation of a incorporating a TrackPoint-like for scrolling, suggesting potential efficiency gains over trackballs for navigation tasks. In industrial settings, variants like the Hula Point— a analogous to the TrackPoint— are integrated into IP65- and IP68-rated keyboards for rugged PCs used in and harsh environments. These allow gloved operation, providing reliable pressure-sensitive input for controlling machinery interfaces without the need for precise finger placement, which is essential in cleanrooms or assembly lines where protective gear is mandatory. Manufacturers such as Tastiere Industriali have incorporated such devices into silicone keyboards, ensuring durability against chemicals and exposure. Though uncommon in mainstream gaming hardware, pointing sticks have been adapted as analog substitutes in modded controllers and software emulations. Enthusiasts convert TrackPoint modules to function as inputs via drivers that map pressure to axes, enabling use in flight simulators and casual titles where fine control is preferred over thumbsticks. This niche persists in DIY communities, with tools like X-Mouse Button Control facilitating the emulation for Windows-based gaming setups. In aviation and simulation domains, pointing sticks provide low-motion, precise input for training systems and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) controls. Research on semi-autonomous UAV interfaces has utilized TrackPoint devices to approximate pilot stick forces, mapping directional pressure to roll and pitch commands in fixed-wing mini-UAVs. For accessibility aids targeting motor-impaired users, pointing sticks serve as low-effort alternatives to traditional mice, integrable with eye-tracking systems in the 2020s. Wearable and assistive computing studies highlight their use in body-mounted devices, where minimal hand pressure suffices for cursor movement, complementing gaze-based selection for those with limited dexterity. Community discussions in the OLPC project suggested TrackPoint-style pointing devices as a potential enhancement for accessibility in low-cost laptops, citing reliability over touchpads for users with limited dexterity.

References

  1. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/TrackPoint-pointing-stick
  2. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5521596A/en
  3. https://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/2017/09/102740176-05-01-acc.pdf
  4. https://www.pcworld.com/article/2578193/an-ode-to-lenovos-trackpoint-nub.html
  5. https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/glossary/trackpoint/
  6. https://sharktastica.co.uk/wiki/trackpoint
  7. https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/p/accessories-and-software/keyboards-and-mice/trackpoint-caps/4xh0l55146
  8. https://www.amazon.com/LeFix-Replacement-Profile-Trackpoint-Thinkpad/dp/B07BBLJ5G1
  9. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5867808A/en
  10. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5489900A/en
  11. http://elektron.pol.lublin.pl/elekp/ap_notes/ni_an078_strain_gauge_meas.pdf
  12. http://www.ted.selker.com/documents/resumefiles/Papers%20in%20Refereed%20Conference%20Proceedings/Force_to_Motion%20Funct%20for%20Pointing.pdf
  13. https://www.sprintek.com/en/products/pointing_stick/SK8707-06.aspx
  14. https://www.ibm.com/history/thinkpad
  15. https://www.laptopmag.com/laptops/windows-laptops/lenovo-thinkpads-trackpoint-isnt-history-and-history-tells-us-why
  16. https://www.laptopmag.com/articles/looking-for-nub-best-and-worst-notebook-pointing-sticks
  17. https://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Notebooks-Archive-Read-Only/Laptops-with-pointing-stick-nub/td-p/8309011
  18. https://download.lenovo.com/manual/thinkpad_x1_carbon_gen13/user_guide/en/Use_the_TrackPoint_pointing_device.html
  19. https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/b2b-laptop-and-pc-market
  20. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6115030A/en
  21. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39276089
  22. https://www.pcworld.com/article/481759/the_race_to_thin_a_look_back_at_the_incredible_shrinking_laptop.html
  23. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-07-23-fi-135-story.html
  24. https://laptopretrospective.com/design/
  25. https://blog.codinghorror.com/touchpad-vs-trackpoint/
  26. https://www.computinghistory.org.uk/det/16981/IBM-ThinkPad-701CS/
  27. https://laptopretrospective.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/TrackPoint-IBM.pdf
  28. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140130601127885
  29. https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/ThinkPad-T400-T500-and-newer-T-series-Laptops/TrackPoint-recalibration-too-aggressive/m-p/5304791
  30. https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/pd013643-trackpoint-caps-and-how-to-order-for-thinkpad-systems-and-trackpoint-keyboards
  31. https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/p/accessories-and-software/keyboards-and-mice/trackpoint-caps/4xh0x88960
  32. https://download.lenovo.com/pccbbs/options/0b58442_tp_compact_usb_bt_kb_en.pdf
  33. https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/02/thinkpad_david_hill_interview/
  34. https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/p/accessories-and-software/keyboards-and-mice/trackpoint-caps/0a33908
  35. https://www.cdwg.com/product/lenovo-thinkpad-super-low-profile-trackpoint-cap/4236757
  36. https://thunderboltlaptop.com/best-laptops-with-trackpoint-buying-guide/
  37. https://sharktastica.co.uk/topics/trackpoint-keyboards
  38. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/TrackPoint
  39. https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/downloads/ds506564-synaptics-thinkpad-ultranav-driver-for-windows-10-version-1709-or-later-thinkpad
  40. https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/p/accessories-and-software/keyboards-and-mice/keyboards/4y40x49493
  41. https://it.nmu.edu/docs/customize-touchpad-and-trackpoint-thinkpad
  42. https://trademarks.justia.com/743/51/trackpoint-74351853.html
  43. https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/legal/copytrade/
  44. https://investor.synaptics.com/news-releases/news-release-details/synaptics-announces-industry-first-usb-dual-pointing-solution
  45. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-11-18-fi-511-story.html
  46. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20230205323A1/en
  47. https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2020/6/30/21292182/thinkpad-trackpoint-mouse-nub-button-trackpad-challenges-design-user-input
  48. http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/N/nipple-mouse.html
  49. https://www.computerhope.com/jargon/t/tracpoin.htm
  50. https://www.pcworld.com/article/2566195/lenovo-has-removed-its-iconic-trackpoint-nub-from-new-thinkpad-laptops.html
  51. https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/p/laptops/thinkpad/thinkpadp/thinkpad-p1-gen-7-16-inch-intel/len101t0107
  52. https://askubuntu.com/questions/2557/thinkpad-middle-button-scrolling
  53. https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/thinkpad-milspec/
  54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8060816_Alternative_Input_Devices_for_Efficient_Navigation_of_Large_CT_Angiography_Data_Sets1
  55. https://www.tastiereindustriali.com/en/module/zeroblog/zpost?id_post=16
  56. https://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?t=85831
  57. https://www.thinkpads.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12145
  58. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2226&context=facpub
  59. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2014/527320
  60. https://wiki.laptop.org/go/Accessibility
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.