Hubbry Logo
Recto and versoRecto and versoMain
Open search
Recto and verso
Community hub
Recto and verso
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Contribute something
Recto and verso
Recto and verso
Recto and verso
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Left-to-right language books (e.g. books in Western languages): recto is the front page, verso is the back page. In this picture, the recto page shown is of the following leaf in a book and hence comes next to the verso of the previous leaf.
Right-to-left language books: recto is the front page, verso is the back page (vertical Chinese, vertical Japanese, Arabic, or Hebrew). In this picture, the recto page shown is of the following leaf in a book and hence comes next to the verso of the previous leaf.

Recto is the "right" or "front" side and verso is the "left" or "back" side when text is written or printed on a leaf of paper (folium) in a bound item such as a codex, book, broadsheet, or pamphlet.

In double-sided printing, each leaf has two pages – front and back. In modern books, the physical sheets of paper are stacked and folded in half, producing two leaves and four pages for each sheet. For example, the outer sheet in a 16-page book will have one leaf with pages 1 (recto) and 2 (verso), and another leaf with pages 15 (recto) and 16 (verso). Pages 1 and 16, for example, are printed on the same side of the physical sheet of paper, combining recto and verso sides of different leaves. The number of pages in a book using this binding technique must thus be a multiple of four, and the number of leaves must be a multiple of two, but unused pages are typically left unnumbered and uncounted. A sheet folded in this manner is known as a folio, a word also used for a book or pamphlet made with this technique.

Looseleaf paper consists of unbound leaves. Sometimes single-sided or blank leaves are used for numbering or counting and abbreviated "l." instead of "p." for the number of pages.

Etymology

[edit]

The terms are shortened from Latin: rēctō foliō and versō foliō (which translate as "on the right side of the leaf" and "on the back side of the leaf"). The two opposite pages themselves are called folium rēctum and folium versum in Latin,[1] and the ablative rēctō, versō already imply that the text on the page (and not the physical page itself) are referred to.

Usage

[edit]

Latin script

[edit]
Grandes Heures of Anne of Brittany, f. 189v-190r

In codicology, each physical sheet (folium, abbreviated fol. or f.) of a manuscript is numbered, and the sides are referred to as folium rēctum and folium versum, abbreviated as r and v respectively. Editions of manuscripts will thus mark the position of text in the original manuscript in the form fol. 1r, sometimes with the r and v in superscript, as in 1r, or with a superscript o indicating the ablative rēctō foliō, versō, as in 1ro.[2] This terminology has been standard since the beginnings of modern codicology in the 17th century.

In 2011, Martyn Lyons argued that the term rēctum "right, correct, proper" for the front side of the leaf derives from the use of papyrus in late antiquity, as a different grain ran across each side, and only one side was suitable to be written on, so that usually papyrus would carry writing only on the "correct", smooth side (and just in exceptional cases would there be writing on the reverse side of the leaf).[3]

The terms "recto" and "verso" are also used in the codicology of manuscripts written in right-to-left scripts, like Syriac, Arabic and Hebrew. However, as these scripts are written in the other direction to the scripts witnessed in European codices, the recto page is to the left while the verso is to the right. The reading order of each folio remains first verso, then recto, regardless of writing direction.

The terms are carried over into printing; recto-verso[4] is the norm for printed books but was an important advantage of the printing press over the much older Asian woodblock printing method, which printed by rubbing from behind the page being printed, and so could only print on one side of a piece of paper. The distinction between recto and verso can be convenient in the annotation of scholarly books, particularly in bilingual edition translations.

The "recto" and "verso" terms can also be employed for the front and back of a one-sheet artwork, particularly in drawing. A recto-verso drawing is a sheet with drawings on both sides, for example in a sketchbook—although usually in these cases there is no obvious primary side. Some works are planned to exploit being on two sides of the same piece of paper, but usually the works are not intended to be considered together. Paper was relatively expensive in the past; good drawing paper still is much more expensive than normal paper.

By book publishing convention, the first page of a book, and sometimes of each section and chapter of a book, is a recto page,[5] and hence all recto pages will have odd numbers and all verso pages will have even numbers.[6][7]

In many early printed books or incunables and still in some 16th-century books (e.g. João de Barros's Décadas da Ásia), it is the folia ("leaves") rather than the pages, that are numbered. Thus, each folium carries a consecutive number on its recto side, while on the verso side there is no number.[8] This was also very common in e.g. internal company reports in the 20th century, before double-sided printers became commonplace in offices.

Cyrillic script

[edit]
Hypatian Codex, folio 3 verso, pencil-marked "3 об" in the top left corner. At Izbornyk, this is written as "/л.3об./".

In Cyrillic script, the letters "лл" and "об." are abbreviations used in a similar way to recto and verso.

  • recto is "лл.", the abbreviation for "лицевая сторона" litsevaja storona (Russian) or "лицьова сторона" lytsjova storona (Ukrainian), meaning "front side" or "face side".
  • verso is, "об.", the abbreviation for "оборотная сторона" oborotnaja storona (Russian) or "обернена сторона" obernena storona (Ukrainian), meaning "reverse side" or "back side".

Therefore, when referring to the front and back of a page in Cyrillic documents, "лл." would correspond to recto (front), and "об." would correspond to verso (back, reverse). This applies to pencil-marked folios of medieval and early modern manuscripts, such as the Hypatian Codex, in Old East Slavic, Old Church Slavonic, Ruthenian, or the (early) modern East Slavic languages and some South Slavic languages. It may also be used in modern critical editions of those manuscripts, such as by the Complete Collection of Rus' Chronicles (PSRL), or its digitised editions on websites such as Izbornyk in Ukraine, or the National Library of Russia's Laurentian Codex Project.[9] For example, when the Izbornyk edition of the Hypatian Codex reads "/л.3об./", that means "folio 3, reverse side" (об.; verso).[10] This is the exact spot where the text of the previous page, folio 3 recto (/л.3/), ends and that of folio 3 verso begins.

Early scholars of East Slavic manuscripts such as the Supraśl Manuscript used ink to mark page numbers, while later researchers preferred to use pencils.[11] The page numbers would be helpful for themselves or colleagues to keep track of the manuscript's structure, and to make notes referring to specific places in the text. A major issue with using ink, however, was that the numbering could be wrong, and thus a scholar could accidentally permanently damage a highly valuable manuscript by adding incorrect markings in unerasable ink. For this reason, later researchers preferred to mark page numbers with pencils, which could be easily corrected with an eraser (rubber) without doing significant damage to the precious archival materials.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Recto and verso

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
In , , and studies, recto and verso refer to the two sides of a single (a sheet of or folded once to form two pages) in a or bound . The recto is the front side of the leaf, which appears on the right-hand page when the is open, typically bearing an odd-numbered page, while the verso is the back side, appearing on the left-hand page with an even-numbered page. The terms originate from Latin: "recto" derives from rectus, meaning "right" or "straight," reflecting its position on the right side of an open , and "verso" comes from vertere, meaning "to turn," indicating the side revealed when the leaf is turned over. These designations have been standard since the development of the format in antiquity, replacing scrolls by enabling efficient use of both sides of a for writing or , which conserved materials and allowed for easier through content. In medieval and early modern manuscripts, recto and verso facilitated precise referencing of content, with folios (leaves) often numbered on the recto to distinguish them from pages, and illuminations or text layouts prioritizing the recto for its visibility in reading sequences. This convention persisted into the age of print after Johannes Gutenberg's invention of in the 15th century, where printers aligned text across recto-verso spreads to maintain visual and narrative continuity, such as in double-page illustrations or chapter openings. In modern and , recto and verso remain essential for layout decisions, with the recto often treated as more prominent—featuring chapter titles, images, or running heads—due to its position in Western reading habits from left to right. Digital publishing has extended these terms to e-books and PDFs, where "recto" and "verso" simulate traditional spreads for reflowable content, ensuring compatibility with print conventions in fields like and . The recto is generally considered more significant for visual impact, influencing decisions on color, margins, and element placement to enhance and .

Terminology

Definitions

In bookbinding and printing, a leaf refers to a single sheet of paper or other material that forms a unit in a bound volume, possessing two sides capable of bearing content. Each leaf thus consists of a front and a back, distinguishing it from single-sided media such as scrolls or loose prints, where content appears only on one surface. The recto is defined as the front or right-hand side of a leaf when the volume is open and viewed in a standard orientation. In Western books, which follow left-to-right reading traditions, the recto typically bears odd-numbered pages, such as page 1 or 3. Conversely, the verso is the back or left-hand side of the leaf, usually featuring even-numbered pages like 2 or 4. This orientation ensures that when two facing leaves form a spread, the recto of one aligns on the right and the verso of the preceding leaf on the left. These terms originated in the context of and early printed books but apply broadly to any bound format.

The terms "recto" and "verso" derive from the phrases recto folio and verso folio, literally meaning "on the right " and "on the turned ," respectively. The word "recto" stems from the ablative form of rectus, signifying "right" or "straight," referring to the front or right-hand side of a in a bound volume. Similarly, "verso" originates from the ablative of vertere, meaning "to turn," denoting the reverse or back side of the , accessed by turning the page. These abbreviations emerged in manuscripts to specify folio sides precisely during and description, reflecting the practical needs of production where leaves were written on both surfaces. The terminology's adoption was shaped by the Roman-era format, which replaced scrolls and established the convention of reading from the right-hand page onward in Western binding traditions.

Historical Development

In Manuscripts

In ancient codices, particularly those from early Christian and Islamic traditions, the recto side of a typically bore the primary text, positioned as the right-hand page when the manuscript was opened, allowing for a natural reading flow from verso to recto across an opening. This convention maximized the utility of both sides of or , with scribes beginning new sections or quires on the recto to align with the directional reading habits of their scripts. For instance, in early Christian codices like those containing texts, the recto often featured the continuation of narrative or scriptural content, reflecting the codex's over scrolls for its efficiency in accessing both surfaces. In Islamic manuscripts, the left-hand page served as the recto due to the right-to-left writing direction of , where primary text placement on this side facilitated seamless progression. Illuminated manuscripts presented unique challenges in coordinating illustrations across recto and verso, requiring precise alignment to maintain visual and textual coherence when pages were turned or opened flat. Scribes and artists employed techniques such as the edges of folios with awls and ruling lines in transmitted light to ensure that decorative elements, like historiated initials or miniature scenes, registered accurately between sides, preventing misalignment that could disrupt the intended flow. This meticulous process was essential in works like medieval , where borders or figures spanning an opening demanded synchronization to avoid aesthetic or interpretative errors. Regional variations emerged during the transition from scrolls to formats in Chinese and manuscript traditions, adapting recto-verso usage to new binding structures. In contexts, scrolls initially limited writing to one side, but the shift to codices in the early Islamic period enabled full utilization of both recto and verso, with scribes exploiting the codex's quires for without the linear constraints of rolls. Similarly, Chinese manuscripts evolved from or scrolls—primarily inscribed on the recto facing outward—to codex-like butterfly bindings by the , where verso usage became viable for annotations or secondary texts, though full double-sided writing remained less common than in Western traditions due to cultural preferences for scroll . Preservation of manuscript leaves is complicated by ink bleeding, where pigments from the verso penetrate to the recto, often due to the corrosive nature of used in medieval production. This phenomenon, exacerbated by humidity and aging, compromises readability on the facing side and requires careful handling during conservation, such as separating folios or using non-invasive imaging to mitigate damage without further degradation. In historical collections, such issues have led to specialized techniques like hyperspectral analysis to distinguish and remove bleed-through effects while preserving original media.

In Printed Books

The introduction of movable-type printing by in around 1455 marked a pivotal adaptation of the recto and verso concept to printed books. In the , also known as the 42-line Bible, large sheets of paper were printed on both the recto (front) and verso (back) sides using a wooden , then folded into quires—typically quinternions of five sheets yielding 10 leaves or 20 pages each—to form signatures that were sewn together. This double-sided or "perfected" printing technique, inherited from traditions but scaled for mechanical reproduction, ensured efficient paper use and correct pagination after folding, with layouts carefully planned to align text across sides. During the incunabula era (ca. 1450–1501), encompassing approximately 30,000 editions across , recto-verso printing evolved as printers refined formats such as (single fold), (double fold), and (triple fold). Sheets were imposed in specific patterns—for instance, in a quaternion, the recto of the outer sheet might bear pages 1, 4, 5, and 8, while the verso carried 2, 3, 6, and 7—to achieve sequential order post-folding. Verso pages frequently accommodated secondary content, including colophons, catchwords, or to guide binders, and in some works, ancillary materials like tables of contents or indices, enhancing navigational utility without disrupting primary text flow on rectos. Signatures, lettered or numbered marks in the lower margins (e.g., "a1" on the recto of the first ), became a standard aid for assembly, reflecting growing standardization amid regional variations in paper quality and press operations. From the 16th to 18th centuries, recto-verso practices standardized further through systematic techniques tailored to formats, enabling reliable double-sided on hand presses little changed from Gutenberg's design. Printers developed templated schemes for quires, with signatures evolving to include leaf numbers (e.g., "Aii" for the verso of the second in quire A), and —numbering leaves rather than pages—giving way to paginated systems by the mid-16th century, where rectos typically held odd numbers on the right and versos even numbers on the left. This era's trade expansion, centered in hubs like and , prioritized consistent layouts for scholarly and works, though paper shortages occasionally prompted single-sided in cheaper editions. The profoundly influenced recto-verso layouts in mass-produced books by mechanizing double-sided printing, shifting from labor-intensive hand presses to steam-powered cylinder models in the early . Innovations like Friedrich Koenig's steam press, capable of 1,100 impressions per hour, and later rotary presses using continuous paper rolls, perfected for high-volume output while preserving the traditional orientation—recto on the right, verso on the left—to suit reader habits and binding efficiency. This enabled uniform layouts in affordable editions, with reduced errors in and greater scalability for illustrated texts, democratizing access to printed matter.

Usage Across Scripts

Latin Script

In books using the Latin alphabet, the recto page—the right-hand side when the book is open—is conventionally assigned an odd number, while the verso page—the left-hand side—receives an even number. This practice became standardized in Western European printed books during the , following the advent of movable-type printing in the mid-15th century, as publishers adopted consistent to facilitate navigation and reference. Although early incunabula (books printed before 1501) rarely included page numbers, (leaf numbering) occasionally appeared on recto margins, evolving into full pagination by the late to support scholarly citation and binding. Exceptions to this numbering occur in the front matter, where elements like the are placed on a recto without a number or with , and the facing verso is often left blank to maintain visual balance and protect the opening spread. Similarly, the page typically appears on the verso following the title page, while dedications or epigraphs may occupy a recto with the subsequent verso blank. These conventions ensure that the main text begins on a recto (page 1, odd-numbered), preserving the traditional flow from right to left in left-to-right reading cultures. The recto-verso distinction significantly influenced in for Latin-script texts, where pages were arranged on large sheets to account for folding and binding. In standard "work-and-turn" or "coming-and-going" , recto pages sequence numerically from front to back on one side of the sheet, while verso pages sequence in reverse on the other side, ensuring correct orientation after both sides and folding. This method, common since the , optimized use and alignment in formats like and , directly tying layout to the odd-even numbering norm. In the modern era, following the introduction of the International Standard Book Number (ISBN) in 1970, Latin-script publications maintain high consistency in these conventions across global publishing standards, with digital tools enforcing recto-odd and verso-even pagination to align with print traditions. This uniformity supports in cataloging, e-book conversion, and , as outlined in typographic guidelines that prioritize balanced spreads and minimal reading disruptions.

Cyrillic Script

In the context of Cyrillic script, early printed books followed manuscript practices in binding and layout, as seen in works produced by Ivan Fyodorov, the first known Russian printer, who published the Apostol in 1564 using techniques adapted from Byzantine and local codex traditions. These practices began to shift with the reforms of in the early 18th century, as part of his broader efforts that included modernizing the printing industry. Peter's civil script reform of 1708–1710 simplified the and encouraged the adoption of Latin-style typography and book production methods, including standardized binding that mirrored European conventions to facilitate technical and scientific publications. By the mid-18th century, Russian books increasingly followed this aligned format, as evidenced in state-sponsored imprints from the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences press. During the Soviet era, recto and verso conventions played a key role in bilingual layouts for publications aimed at non-Russian ethnic groups or international audiences. In books featuring Cyrillic alongside Latin-script languages, such as Russian-English technical manuals or propaganda materials, designers often placed the primary Cyrillic text on recto pages for prominence, with translations on verso to maintain readability flow, particularly in parallel-column formats. This approach is illustrated in 1930s–1940s imprints like those from the State Publishing House of Foreign Literature, where the layout ensured seamless transitions between scripts without disrupting the left-to-right reading direction. Contemporary conventions in non-Slavic languages using Cyrillic, notably Mongolian, where the script was adopted in 1940, follow the standard Latin-aligned recto (right-hand, odd) and verso (left-hand, even) in horizontal left-to-right printed books.

Greek Script

In books using the Greek alphabet, which reads left to right, recto and verso conventions align with Latin-script norms: recto is the right-hand page (odd-numbered) and verso the left-hand (even-numbered). This standardization dates to Byzantine manuscript traditions and persisted in printed Greek books from the 15th century onward, facilitating continuity in Orthodox liturgical and scholarly works. In right-to-left scripts such as and Hebrew, the conventions for recto and verso align with left-to-right systems: recto is the right-hand page (odd-numbered, primary reading side) when the book is open, while verso is the left-hand page (even-numbered). Books are typically bound with the spine on the right, ensuring the first page (recto) is encountered on the right upon opening, with reading proceeding right-to-left within pages. Vertical writing systems, exemplified by traditional Chinese books, employ recto and verso in formats like the or thread-stitched bindings, where text runs top-to-bottom parallel to the spine and progresses from right to left across the spread. In these codices, the recto is generally the right-hand when the is opened, maintaining continuity with the directional flow, though conservators often prefer neutral terms like "side A" and "side B" to sidestep confusion arising from single-sided printing traditions and folded sheets. This layout facilitates turning pages along the fore-edge while preserving the vertical orientation along the spine. In Japanese illustrated books (ehon) from the tradition, recto and verso were printed separately using multiple woodblocks per color, with careful registration for alignments across facing pages in multi-sheet compositions. This method supported the production of images on of leaves in bound volumes. In colonial-era imprints involving Indic scripts like and , recto and verso saw hybrid adaptations to accommodate multilingual content, often blending European printing norms with traditional pothi formats. Palm-leaf-derived pothis, common in Indic manuscript traditions, inscribed text on both recto (obverse, with holes for lacing) and verso (reverse), typically 4–8 lines per side in scripts such as , to maximize surface use on long, narrow leaves bound accordion-style. Colonial presses in extended this to printed books, using recto for primary or vernacular text and verso for translations or annotations in English or regional languages, as seen in early 19th-century Mission publications.

Modern Applications

In Publishing

In software, recto and verso play a central role in layout design, particularly through features that enable facing pages. , for instance, allows users to activate the "Facing Pages" option in the Document Setup dialog, which organizes pages into spreads—a pair consisting of the verso (left-hand, even-numbered) page and the recto (right-hand, odd-numbered) page—mirroring the traditional format for previewing and editing. This setup facilitates precise control over elements like margins, bleeds, and gutters that span across the recto-verso divide, ensuring visual continuity in double-page layouts for magazines, brochures, and books. Standards such as define trimmed paper sizes for printed matter, influencing the process where recto and verso pages are arranged on larger sheets for efficient double-sided printing and binding. These dimensions, such as A4 (210 × 297 mm) or A5 (148 × 210 mm), guide publishers in optimizing sheet utilization during to minimize waste and ensure proper alignment of front and back sides after folding, as larger untrimmed formats like SRA2 are commonly used in workflows. Compliance with promotes international consistency in book production, allowing seamless adaptation across global markets without altering core recto-verso orientations. In e-books and PDFs, recto and verso adaptations simulate traditional print layouts, particularly in fixed-layout formats that preserve spreads for visual fidelity. Fixed-layout , governed by EPUB 3 specifications, enable designers to maintain recto (right-facing) and verso (left-facing) page structures, ideal for illustrated or complex content where reflowable text would disrupt the intended design. PDFs exported from tools like InDesign can likewise retain facing pages as spreads, viewable in mode to replicate the physical turning of pages, though reflowable e-book formats prioritize flexible text flow over strict recto-verso simulation. Trends in sustainable increasingly leverage double-sided on recto and verso to conserve resources, a practice inherent to production that reduces paper usage by up to 50% relative to single-sided methods and lowers the of large runs. Eco-conscious publishers combine this with recycled stocks and vegetable-based inks, aligning techniques to maximize sheet efficiency and minimize offcuts, as seen in operations powered by . The shift toward digital formats further supports by decreasing reliance on physical double-sided prints, though hybrid workflows ensure recto-verso integrity in both print and e-book outputs.

In Art and Conservation

In , particularly and related techniques, the recto typically serves as the primary surface for the intended image or composition, while the verso often bears incidental marks such as the artist's preparatory notes, offsets from the plate, or transferred . For instance, in soft-ground , a on one side of the can transfer to the opposite side during the printing process, creating a recto-verso dialogue that highlights the medium's tactile and reversible nature. Conservation practices for artworks and frequently address recto-verso elements to preserve both sides of a single without destructive intervention. A key technique is paper splitting, where a double-sided or print is delaminated into ultra-thin layers— one retaining the recto content and the other the verso—allowing separate display or stabilization while maintaining the integrity of the original sheet. This method, developed for valuable double-sided prints and manuscripts, prevents further damage from handling or environmental factors and has been applied to fragile items like illuminated folios with media on both surfaces. Beyond paper-based media, recto and verso terminology extends to collectibles in and , where it denotes the principal and secondary faces of objects. In , the recto of a corresponds to the obverse (often featuring the main or ), and the verso to the reverse (typically with supplementary motifs or inscriptions), facilitating precise cataloging and analysis in archaeological contexts. Similarly, in , recto-verso describes stamps printed on both sides or with offset impressions, distinguishing varieties where the front (recto) design appears inverted or duplicated on the back (verso), a feature noted in early 20th-century issues. Contemporary artists leverage recto-verso dynamics in installations and conceptual books to explore themes of duality, perception, and materiality, often flipping or layering sides to challenge linear viewing. For example, Sol LeWitt's works, such as his 1970 Plan for Tokyo Biennale, utilize ink on both recto and verso of sheets to instruct spatial interventions, blurring the boundaries between front and back in book-like formats. This approach echoes broader practices in artists' books, where the sketchbook's recto-verso structure is redefined to incorporate digital flips and philosophical inquiries into surface and depth.

References

  1. https://folgerpedia.folger.edu/Glossary_of_book_history_terms
  2. https://rarebooks.stanford.edu/rarebooks/feature/glossary
  3. https://www.baylor.edu/content/services/document.php/14022.pdf
  4. https://library.missouri.edu/specialcollections/exhibits/show/fragmenta-manuscripta/manuscript-decoration
  5. https://tra.extension.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2018/04/43.Bookbinding.pdf
  6. https://guides.lib.fsu.edu/hott/bindings
  7. https://folgerpedia.folger.edu/Glossary_of_manuscript_terms
  8. http://ege.denison.edu/manuscript_terms.php
  9. https://libguides.lib.msu.edu/c.php?g=97090&p=908734
  10. https://upm.utk.edu/glossary/
  11. https://www.fhsu.edu/printshop/help-terms/
  12. https://bindery.berkeley.edu/campus-libraries/definitions-common-terms
  13. https://library.missouri.edu/specialcollections/exhibits/show/glossary/page6
  14. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=lib_pubs
  15. https://www.etymonline.com/word/recto
  16. https://www.wordreference.com/definition/verso
  17. https://www.bl.uk/stories/blogs/posts/the-beginnings-of-the-codex
  18. https://www.biblicaltraining.org/learn/institute/nt605-textual-criticism/nt605-07-the-materials-used-for-making-a-codex-manuscript
  19. https://al-furqan.com/the-quires-of-a-codex/
  20. https://artconservator.williamstownart.org/makingilluminatedmanuscripts
  21. https://mouse.digitalscholarship.nl/images/uploads/Gacek-Vademecum.pdf
  22. https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:cj82nb64g/fulltext.pdf
  23. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12112446/
  24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326062115_Ink_Bleed-Through_Removal_of_Historical_Manuscripts_Based_on_Hyperspectral_Imaging
  25. https://www.ndl.go.jp/incunabula/e/chapter3/index.html
  26. https://www.folger.edu/blogs/collation/deciphering-signature-marks/
  27. https://library.fandm.edu/c.php?g=116957&p=3913689
  28. https://cool.culturalheritage.org/don/dt/dt1816.html
  29. https://guides.library.ubc.ca/historyofthebook/modernday
  30. https://www.prepressure.com/printing/history/1850-1899
  31. https://www.w3.org/TR/dpub-latinreq/
  32. https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/02/page-numbers-where-did-they-come-from-and-are-they-even-useful-anymore.html
  33. https://www.bookdesignmadesimple.com/book-front-matter-elements/
  34. https://printwiki.org/Imposition
  35. https://drc.usask.ca/projects/archbook/thepage.php
  36. https://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/0xx/020.html
  37. https://www.gw2ru.com/history/1390-russian-gutenberg-ivan-fedorov
  38. https://hermitagemuseum.org/what-s-on/f34e842c2b95f4df62f4c0a90afd9302?lng=en
  39. https://www.bookvica.com/images/upload/cat-11s.pdf
  40. https://www.w3.org/TR/mlreq/
  41. https://www.colorvisionprinting.com/blog/printing-terminology-recto-and-verso
  42. https://www.conservation-wiki.com/wiki/BPG_East_Asian_Book_Formats
  43. https://asia.si.edu/explore-art-culture/collections/search/edanmdm:fsg_F1904.346a-b/
  44. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09719458241231669
  45. https://www.academia.edu/27910413/A_Forgotten_Chapter_in_South_Asian_Book_History_A_Birds_Eye_View_of_Sanskrit_Print_Culture
  46. https://helpx.adobe.com/indesign/using/pages-spreads.html
  47. https://www.iso.org/standard/36631.html
  48. https://papersizes.org/
  49. https://idpf.org/epub/fxl/
  50. https://www.velocityprint.com/print-and-mailing/double-sided-printing-vs-single-side-printing/
  51. https://www.greenerprinter.com/products/custom-eco-friendly-book-printing
  52. https://www.papercut.com/blog/insights/sustainability/5-ways-to-prevent-waste-with-sustainable-printing/
  53. https://doi.org/10.54632/20.2.IMPJ5
  54. https://cool.culturalheritage.org/jaic/articles/jaic39-03-001.html
  55. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1296207424002115
  56. https://www.franceandcolonies.org/philatelist/154_supp.pdf
  57. https://www.moma.org/collection/works/289163
  58. https://www.routledge.com/Recto-Verso-Redefining-the-Sketchbook/Bartram-El-Bizri-Gittens/p/book/9781138279605
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
Contribute something
User Avatar
No comments yet.