Hubbry Logo
Welsh MarchesWelsh MarchesMain
Open search
Welsh Marches
Community hub
Welsh Marches
logo
7 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Welsh Marches
Welsh Marches
Welsh Marches
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia

The Welsh Marches (Welsh: Y Mers) is an imprecisely defined area along the border between England and Wales in the United Kingdom. The precise meaning of the term has varied at different periods.

The English term Welsh March (in Medieval Latin Marchia Walliae)[1] was originally used in the Middle Ages to denote the marches between England and the Principality of Wales, in which Marcher lords had specific rights, exercised to some extent independently of the king of England. In modern usage, "the Marches" is often used to describe those English counties which lie along the border with Wales, particularly Shropshire and Herefordshire, and sometimes adjoining areas of Wales. However, at one time the Marches included all of the historic counties of Cheshire, Shropshire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Gloucestershire.

Etymology

[edit]

The term March is from the 13th-century Middle English marche ("border region, frontier"). The term was borrowed from Old French marche ("limit, boundary"), itself borrowed from a Frankish term derived from Proto-Germanic *markō ("border, area"). The term is a doublet of English mark, and is cognate with German Mark ("boundary").[2] Cognates are found in the English toponyms "Mercia" and "Mersey", and in continental place-names containing mark, such as "Denmark".

The term is distantly related to the verb march, both ultimately derived from Proto-Indo-European *mereg-, "edge" or "boundary".

Origins: Mercia and the Welsh

[edit]
Offa's Dyke near Clun in Shropshire

After the decline and fall of the Roman Empire which occupied southern Britain until about AD 410, the area which is now Wales comprised a number of separate Romano-British kingdoms, including Powys in the east. Over the next few centuries, the Angles, Saxons and others gradually conquered and settled in eastern and southern Britain. The kingdom of Mercia, under Penda, became established around Lichfield, and initially established strong alliances with the Welsh kings.

However, his successors sought to expand Mercia further westwards into what is now Cheshire, Shropshire and Herefordshire. As the power of Mercia grew, a string of garrisoned market towns such as Shrewsbury and Hereford defined the borderlands as much as Offa's Dyke, a stronger and longer boundary earthwork erected by order of Offa of Mercia between AD 757 and 796. The Dyke still exists, and can best be seen at Knighton, close to the modern border between England and Wales.[3] Campaigns and raids from Powys led, possibly around about AD 820, to the building of Wat's Dyke, a boundary earthwork extending from the Severn valley near Oswestry to the Dee estuary.[4][5]

In the centuries which followed, Offa's Dyke largely remained the frontier between the Welsh and English. Æthelstan, often seen as the first king of a united England, summoned the British kings to a meeting at Hereford in AD 926, and according to William of Malmesbury laid down the boundary between Wales and England, particularly the disputed southern stretch where he specified that the River Wye should form the boundary.[6]

By the mid-eleventh century, Wales was united under Gruffydd ap Llywelyn of Gwynedd, until his death in 1063.[citation needed]

The Marches in the Middle Ages

[edit]

Immediately after the Norman Conquest, King William of England installed three of his most trusted confidants, Hugh d'Avranches, Roger de Montgomerie, and William FitzOsbern, as Earls of Chester, Shrewsbury and Hereford respectively, with responsibilities for containing and subduing the Welsh. The process took a century and was never permanently effective.[7]

The term "March of Wales" was first used in the Domesday Book of 1086. Over the next four centuries, Norman lords established mostly small marcher lordships between the Dee and Severn, and further west. Military adventurers went to Wales from Normandy and elsewhere and after raiding an area of Wales, then fortified it and granted land to some of their supporters.[8]

One example was Bernard de Neufmarché, responsible for conquering and pacifying the Welsh kingdom of Brycheiniog. The precise dates and means of formation of the lordships varied, as did their size.

Wales in the 14th Century showing Marcher Lordships

The March, or Marchia Wallie, was to a greater or lesser extent independent of both the English monarchy and the Principality of Wales or Pura Wallia, which remained based in Gwynedd in the north west of the country. By about AD 1100 the March covered the areas which would later become Monmouthshire and much of Flintshire, Montgomeryshire, Radnorshire, Brecknockshire, Glamorgan, Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire. Ultimately, this amounted to about two-thirds of Wales.[4][9][10]

During the period, the Marches were a frontier society in every sense, and a stamp was set on the region that lasted into the time of the Industrial Revolution. Hundreds of small castles were built in the border area in the 12th and 13th centuries, predominantly by Norman lords as assertions of power as well as defences against Welsh raiders and rebels. The area still contains Britain's densest concentration of motte-and-bailey castles. The Marcher lords encouraged immigration from all the Norman-Angevin realms, and encouraged trade from "fair haven" ports like Cardiff. Peasants went to Wales in large numbers: Henry I encouraged Bretons, Flemings, Normans, and English settlers to move into the south of Wales. Many new towns were established, some such as Chepstow, Monmouth, Ludlow and Newtown becoming successful trading centres, and these tended also to be a focus of English settlement. At the same time, the Welsh continued to attack English soil and supported rebellions against the Normans.[4]

The Norman lords each had similar rights to the Welsh princes. Each owed personal allegiance, as subjects, to the English king whom they were bound to support in times of war, but their lands were exempt from royal taxation and they possessed rights which elsewhere were reserved to the crown, such as the rights to create forests, markets and boroughs.[10]

The lordships were geographically compact and jurisdictionally separate one from another, and their privileges differentiated them from English lordships. Marcher lords ruled their lands by their own law—sicut regale ("like unto a king") as Gilbert de Clare, 7th Earl of Gloucester stated[11] — whereas in England fief-holders were directly accountable to the king. The crown's powers in the Marches were normally limited to those periods when the king held a lordship in its own hands, such as when it was forfeited for treason or on the death of the lord without a legitimate heir whereupon the title reverted to the Crown in escheat. At the top of a culturally diverse, intensely feudalised and local society, the Marcher barons combined the authority of feudal lord and vassal of the King among their Normans, and of supplanting the traditional tywysog among their conquered Welsh. However, Welsh law was sometimes used in the Marches in preference to English law, and there were disputes as to which code should be used to decide a particular case. From this developed the distinctive March law.[4][5][11]

The Statute of Rhuddlan in 1284 followed the conquest of the Principality by Edward I of England. It assumed the lands held by the Princes of Gwynedd under the title "Prince of Wales" as legally part of the lands of the Crown, and established shire counties on the English model over those areas. The Marcher Lords were progressively tied to the English kings by the grants of lands and lordships in England, where control was stricter, and where many marcher lords spent most of their time, and through the English kings' dynastic alliances with the great magnates. The Council of Wales and the Marches, administered from Ludlow Castle, was initially established in 1472 by Edward IV of England to govern the lands held under the Principality of Wales which had become directly administered by the English crown following the Edwardian conquest of Wales in the 13th century.[12]

The end of Marcher powers

[edit]
Marches in Wales Act 1534
Act of Parliament
Parliament of England
Long titleAn Act that Murthers and Felonies done or committed within any Lordship Marcher in Wales, shall be inquired of at the Sessions holden within the Shire Grounds next adjoining; with many goods Orders for Ministration of Justice there to be had.
Citation26 Hen. 8. c. 6
Territorial extent England and Wales
Dates
Royal assent18 December 1534
Commencement3 November 1534[a]
Repealed21 July 1856
Other legislation
Repealed byRepeal of Obsolete Statutes Act 1856
Relates to
Status: Repealed
Text of statute as originally enacted

By the 16th century, many marcher lordships had passed into the hands of the crown, as the result of the accessions of Henry IV, who was previously Duke of Lancaster, and Edward IV, the heir of the Earls of March; of the attainder of other lords during the Wars of the Roses; and of other events. The crown was also directly responsible for the government of the Principality of Wales, which had its own institutions and was, like England, divided into counties. The jurisdiction of the remaining marcher lords was therefore seen as an anomaly, and their independence from the crown enabled criminals from England to evade justice by moving into the area and claiming "marcher liberties".[citation needed]

Under the Laws in Wales Acts 1535–1542 introduced under Henry VIII, the jurisdiction of the marcher lords was abolished in 1536. The acts had the effect of annexing Wales with England and creating a single state and legal jurisdiction, commonly referred to as England and Wales. The powers of the marcher lordships were abolished, and their areas were organised into the new Welsh counties of Denbighshire, Montgomeryshire, Radnorshire, Brecknockshire, Monmouthshire, and Carmarthenshire. The counties of Pembrokeshire and Glamorgan were created by adding other districts to existing lordships. In place of assize courts of England, there were Courts of Great Sessions. These administered English law, in contrast with the marcher lordships, which had administered Welsh law for their Welsh subjects. Some lordships were added to adjoining English counties: Ludlow, Clun, Caus and part of Montgomery were incorporated into Shropshire; Wigmore, Huntington, Clifford and most of Ewyas were included in Herefordshire; and that part of Chepstow east of the River Wye was included in Gloucestershire.[4]

The Council of Wales, based at Ludlow Castle, was reconstituted as the Council of Wales and the Marches, with statutory responsibilities for the whole of Wales together with, initially, Cheshire, Shropshire, Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Gloucestershire. The City of Bristol was exempted in 1562, and Cheshire in 1569.[13][14]

The Council was eventually abolished in 1689, following the "Glorious Revolution" which overthrew James II (VII of Scotland) and established William III (William of Orange) as king.[citation needed]

List of Marcher lordships and successor shires

[edit]
See also: List of Marcher lordships

List of Marcher lordships and successor shires:[8]

The Marches today

[edit]
the map of the Welsh Marches line, with the area labeled
Welsh Marches Line
A Class 175 'Coradia' running through currently closed Dinmore railway station, Herefordshire on the Welsh Marches Line on an Arriva Trains Wales service.

There is no modern legal or official definition of the extent of the Welsh Marches. However, the term the Welsh Marches (or sometimes just the Marches) is commonly used to describe those English counties which lie along the border with Wales, particularly Shropshire and Herefordshire.[16] The term is also sometimes applied to parts of Powys, Monmouthshire and Wrexham.[17]

The Welsh Marches Line is a railway line from Newport in the south of Wales to Shrewsbury, via Abergavenny, Hereford, and Craven Arms.

The Marches Way is a long distance footpath which connects Chester in the north of England, via Whitchurch, Shrewsbury, Leominster and Abergavenny to the Welsh capital, Cardiff.

The Marches School is a secondary school in Oswestry, Shropshire. The school has several meeting rooms named in Welsh, and has students and staff from both sides of the border.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

Welsh Marches

View on Grokipedia
from Grokipedia
The Welsh Marches comprise the historic borderlands between , a contested region deriving its name from the mearc meaning "boundary" or "mark," and characterized by a dense concentration of medieval castles and semi-autonomous lordships established to defend against Welsh incursions. This area, spanning modern English counties such as and and extending into parts of , served as a of strategic and political significance from antiquity through the Tudor era. The origins of the Marches trace to early medieval efforts to delineate territories, most notably exemplified by , an extensive earthwork constructed in the late 8th century by King to establish a defensive boundary separating Mercian lands from Welsh kingdoms like , featuring a substantial bank and V-shaped ditch designed to impede crossings and raids. Following the of 1066, William I granted these frontier territories to loyal barons as marcher lordships, endowing them with exceptional privileges—including the rights to build castles, administer justice via Marcher law, and wage war independently of royal oversight—to secure the border and facilitate conquest. These lords, such as the Mortimers and Clares, erected motte-and-bailey fortifications like those at , , and Montgomery, fostering a hybrid Anglo-Welsh amid ongoing conflicts. The distinctive governance of the Marches persisted until the Laws in Wales Acts of 1535 and 1542 under , which abolished the marcher lordships, incorporated the region into the English shire system, and extended English , thereby ending centuries of quasi-independent rule and integrating more fully into the Kingdom of . This transition marked the decline of the Marches as a distinct political entity, though the area retains a legacy of fortified landscapes and border heritage, evident in enduring structures like and numerous preserved castles that highlight its role in shaping Anglo-Welsh relations.

Definition and Etymology

Etymology

The term "Welsh Marches" denotes the frontier region between , with "Marches" deriving from the mearc, signifying a boundary or mark. This etymological root reflects the area's role as a contested borderland, akin to the "march" in the sense of a margin or edge. The adjective "Welsh" specifies the orientation toward , distinguishing it from other marches, such as those along the Scottish border. In medieval Latin, the region was termed Marchia Walliae, a Latinization of the Anglo-Saxon concept applied post-Norman Conquest to the semi-autonomous lordships along the . The earliest recorded English usage of "Welsh Marches" appears in 1587, though the underlying "March of Wales" concept traces to earlier documentation like the of 1086, which referenced border territories under Norman control. The term's dual linguistic heritage—Germanic via and Romance via Old French (frontier)—underscores its evolution from a descriptive boundary marker to a designation for a distinct socio-political zone.

Geographical Extent and Boundaries

The constitute the border region between , characterized by an imprecise geographical extent that has varied historically without a fixed or officially recognized boundary. This fluidity stems from the region's evolution as a contested , where political control shifted over centuries, rendering strict demarcation challenging. Historically, the primary boundary marker was , an earthen embankment constructed around 785 by Offa, King of , spanning approximately 150 miles (240 km) from near on the in the north to Sedbury Cliffs on the in the south. The dyke, with surviving sections totaling about 82 miles (132 km), largely parallels the modern England-Wales border, serving as a defensive frontier against Welsh incursions and delineating Mercian territory from Welsh principalities. Complementary features like in the north reinforced this division, while natural barriers such as the Rivers Dee, Severn, and Wye influenced the effective limits in various locales. In medieval contexts, the Marches extended inland from this border line, encompassing over 150 lordships granted to Norman barons as buffer zones, primarily on the English side but occasionally protruding into . The core area included English counties adjacent to —, , and portions of , , , and —wedged between Welsh uplands and English lowlands, with key settlements like , , , and marking central points. Southern extensions reached toward the , incorporating areas later formalized as , though administrative reforms under the Laws in Wales Acts (1535–1542) integrated much of the region into shire systems, blurring prior distinctions. Contemporary references to the Welsh Marches typically denote the English border counties of and , emphasizing their shared Anglo-Welsh cultural landscape rather than rigid territorial claims. This usage reflects the absence of modern political delineation, with the area defined more by historical legacy and topography than by contemporary administrative lines.

Historical Origins

Anglo-Saxon Frontier: Mercia and Early Welsh Interactions

The kingdom of , emerging in the as one of the principal Anglo-Saxon states, developed its western frontier as a zone of persistent tension with the adjacent British kingdoms, later known as Welsh principalities such as and . By the , under kings like Aethelbald (r. 716–757), Mercia conducted military operations against these neighbors, including a recorded conflict in 743 alongside Wessex forces. This expansionist stance reflected Mercian efforts to secure fertile borderlands and counter raids from the hilly Welsh territories, establishing patterns of tribute extraction and territorial assertion that characterized early interactions. Offa of Mercia (r. 757–796), who elevated the kingdom to dominance over much of , intensified these engagements through repeated campaigns against the Welsh, documented in annals for years including 760 (a battle at ), 778, 784, and 796. These operations targeted in particular, aiming to subdue its rulers and enforce submissions, often resulting in the payment of or displacement of local leadership. Offa's policies, blending warfare with , such as hosting exiled Welsh princes, underscored a pragmatic approach to stabilization amid mutual hostilities. Central to Offa's strategy was the construction of , a monumental linear earthwork initiated around 785 and completed over several years, stretching roughly 150 miles from the in the north to the Severn (or Wye) in the south. Comprising a bank up to 8 meters high with a facing , the structure—up to 27 meters wide in places—served primarily as a defensive barrier against Welsh incursions and a marker of sovereignty, aligning closely with segments of the modern England-Wales border. Archaeological evidence confirms its attribution, though its maintenance waned after Offa's death, highlighting the dyke's role in defining an enduring, if fluid, Anglo-Saxon frontier. These Mercian initiatives laid foundational precedents for the Welsh Marches as a militarized border region, where centralized royal control yielded to semi-autonomous defenses against perennial threats from the west. Interactions evolved from opportunistic raiding to structured deterrence, fostering a cultural and political divide that persisted beyond the Anglo-Saxon era, with the dyke symbolizing the limits of English expansion into British-held uplands.

Norman Establishment of Marcher Lordships

Following the of in 1066, William I granted large estates along the Welsh border to loyal followers to defend against incursions from independent Welsh kingdoms, which lacked centralized authority and frequently raided English territories. These grants created semi-autonomous lordships, where recipients exercised extensive powers akin to those of counts palatine on the Continent, including the right to hold courts, mint coins, and wage war without royal interference, a necessity given the remote and volatile frontier. The system emerged organically as , incentivized by land and plunder, constructed motte-and-bailey castles—such as those at and Montgomery—to consolidate control and facilitate incursions into , with over 80 such fortifications erected in the Marches by 1100. William FitzOsbern, a key companion at , was appointed circa 1067 and received the honor of plus border lands south of the Wye River, enabling him to erect by 1070 to secure the vital river crossing into Gwent. His rapid fortification efforts subdued local resistance and extended Norman influence westward, though his death in 1071 at the Battle of Cassel prompted his son to inherit but later rebel, leading to the earldom's temporary forfeiture. In the north, , another pre-Conquest ally, was enfeoffed with around 1071, becoming and constructing castles at and Montgomery to anchor defenses against . Montgomery's campaigns, including the 1093 invasion after ap Tewdwr's death, exemplified the lords' dual role in border security and opportunistic expansion. These early lordships, centered on earldoms of , , and later , formalized under William II (1087–1100) through charters affirming their privileges, as royal expeditions into proved logistically challenging and yielded limited permanent gains. The arrangement prioritized military pragmatism over uniform governance, allowing lords to exploit feudal levies and local resources for perpetual vigilance, though it fostered rivalries that occasionally destabilized the border until Henry I's interventions around 1100 imposed greater oversight.

Medieval Marcher System

Powers and Autonomy of Marcher Lords

The Marcher lords exercised near-sovereign authority over their lordships, ruling sicut regale—as if they were kings—within a semi-autonomous zone distinct from both proper and native Welsh principalities. This status, originating from Norman royal grants after the conquest to fortify the border against Welsh incursions, exempted them from many constraints of and royal oversight, with the king's not running in the Marches. Lords held their territories by knight's service but enjoyed practical in , including the full suite of iura —regalian typically reserved to , such as administering justice, levying tolls, and managing resources—allowing them to exploit lands for personal gain while serving as a buffer for interests. Judicially, Marcher lords operated independent courts that handled a wide range of disputes, from property and debt to theft and felony, blending English procedures like with Welsh customary practices emphasizing fines over corporal punishment. These courts convened frequently—for instance, the Dyffryn court met 136 times between 1322 and 1323—and relied on designated judges rather than the lords themselves, enforcing decisions through communal sureties, of goods, and fines without a formal police apparatus. Lords possessed privileges like pit and gallows, enabling for capital offenses, and derived significant revenue from judicial fees and eyres (itinerant sessions), such as £2,000 collected in in 1373 or £778 of total lordship income in 1398. Appeals rarely reached the king, underscoring their jurisdictional exclusivity, though Welsh tenants in some lordships retained elements of native customs akin to the laws codified by in the 10th century for matters like and compensation. This system prioritized rapid, coercive justice suited to a environment, exempt from Magna Carta's guarantees and English assize courts until the 1535–1543 Laws in Wales Acts imposed uniformity. Militarily, the lords' autonomy enabled them to raise private armies from tenants and mercenaries, declare on Welsh rulers, and conclude treaties independently, without needing royal approval—a privilege granted explicitly to defend against raids and conquests, as in the subjugation of by in 1091 or by Bernard de Neufmarché around 1093. They held the right of free encastellation, constructing castles at will to delineate and secure territories—a denied in core—to project power and deter incursions, often holding vast areas for minimal feudal dues, such as William de Braose's control of Gower for one knight's fee. While owing the Crown nominal and payments, their forces operated with minimal central interference, fostering a militarized society where lords like the Mortimers or Bohuns could challenge even royal authority during disputes. Administratively and economically, lords managed , taxation, and with broad discretion, collecting indirect levies and market tolls while exempt from direct royal taxes in many cases, though they attended when summoned and faced occasional royal interventions. This framework, while stabilizing the border through decentralized incentives, invited abuses due to unchecked power, persisting until Henry VIII's legislation in 1535–1542 reorganized lordships into shires, abolished franchises, and extended , effectively ending Marcher autonomy by 1543.

Prominent Families, Lordships, and Governance

Prominent families in the medieval Welsh Marches included the Mortimers, who held the lordship of Wigmore and controlled territories such as Maelienydd, conquered by Ralph Mortimer in the 1070s through military campaigns and castle construction. The de Braose family governed lordships like Brecon and Gower, leveraging rights to encastellation and private warfare to maintain dominance. The Clares managed Glamorgan and associated earldoms, while the Marshals, as earls of Pembroke, oversaw Pembrokeshire domains, with William Marshal serving as regent of England from 1216 to 1219. These families exemplified the Anglo-Norman aristocracy that shaped the Marches as a buffer zone, amassing over 150 semi-autonomous lordships by the 12th century.
Major LordshipProminent FamilyKey Features
WigmoreCentral Marches stronghold; included Maelienydd and over 200 manors; fortified with motte-and-bailey castles for defense against Welsh incursions.
de Braose / de NeufmarchéSouthern Marches; granted post-1093 conquest; emphasized judicial and military autonomy.
de / FitzhamonExtensive southern territory post-1091; integrated Norman with local customs.
PembrokeWestern coastal lordship; key to suppressing Welsh resistance; linked to royal regency roles.
Marcher lords exercised governance with exceptional autonomy, ruling sicut regale—as if they were kings—free from direct royal oversight, including the absence of sheriffs, , or writs of English . They administered justice through proprietary courts that blended Norman feudal obligations with Welsh , such as the laws of , convening regularly to adjudicate disputes over property, theft, and land use, often generating substantial revenue from fines and distraints. Lords held rights to raise private armies, wage war on neighbors, impose taxes, and claim royal prerogatives like treasure-trove and salvage, enabling them to fortify borders with unlicensed castles while enforcing communal responsibility for order. This structure prioritized territorial control and profit, with judicial proceedings serving as tools for and suppression of native unrest, though appeals remained internal to the lordship without recourse to . By I's reign in the late , seven of England's ten earls were marcher lords, underscoring their integrated yet independent influence.

Military Role, Conflicts, and Defense Against Welsh Incursions

The Marcher Lords were vested with extensive military authority to secure the Anglo-Welsh border, including the rights to , construct fortifications without royal license, and administer in martial matters, functioning as the primary bulwark against Welsh princely ambitions and raids. This autonomy stemmed from the need for rapid, localized responses to threats in a volatile zone, where centralized English royal forces were often distant and slow to mobilize. Lords maintained private armies drawn from feudal obligations, enabling them to launch preemptive strikes or defensive campaigns independently. Conflicts arose frequently from Welsh resistance to Norman encroachment, with princes from and launching incursions to reclaim territories or exploit English civil strife, such as during (1135–1153). In 1136, and other rulers coordinated uprisings, capturing and from Marcher control, prompting retaliatory campaigns by lords like Robert of . Later, ap Gruffudd's expansion in the 1250s–1260s ignited direct clashes, including the 1256 of Mortimer lands in Gwrtheyrion, where Roger repelled advances but faced prolonged border warfare. These engagements often involved guerrilla tactics by Welsh forces, countered by Marcher lords' superior resources in sieges and field battles. Defense strategies centered on an extensive network of castles, which served as administrative hubs, supply depots, and strongpoints to deter and repel incursions; by the , Marcher lords had erected scores of motte-and-bailey structures along the frontier, evolving into stone fortresses like those at and Pembroke. Lords employed scorched-earth policies and reprisal raids to disrupt Welsh and mobility, while fostering alliances with compliant Welsh chieftains to divide opposition. This militarized regime proved effective in containing Welsh power until Edward I's decisive campaigns (1277 and 1282–1283), which integrated Marcher forces into royal conquests, culminating in Llywelyn's death at the on 11 December 1282. Despite occasional overreach leading to royal interventions, the system maintained border stability through coercive deterrence rather than outright until the late .

Economic Development, Achievements, and Societal Impacts

The medieval economy of the centered on , with —especially —dominating due to extensive moorlands and pastures suitable for grazing. production thrived in border counties like , where breeds such as the Ryeland sheep yielded high-quality fleeces known as "Leominster Ore," traded through ports and fairs. Wools from the Marches were exported across , contributing to England's broader medieval , which peaked from 1250 to 1350 and generated substantial revenues for lords and merchants via sales to Flemish cloth producers. Marcher lords drove economic development by founding market towns and boroughs to stimulate commerce and control trade routes, including centers like , , , Monmouth, and , which hosted fairs for wool, livestock, and cross-border goods between . Their autonomy allowed retention of judicial profits, taxes, and resource rights—such as salvage and treasure-trove—which funded infrastructure like castles that anchored emerging settlements and protected trade. These efforts transformed frontier lordships into semi-urban hubs, with post-Norman castle-building (over 120 in alone by the 12th century) spurring ancillary village growth and manorial economies recorded in the of 1086. Key achievements included leveraging wool wealth for public and ecclesiastical investments; profits from Hereford's trade in Marcher wool financed 14th-century cathedral expansions and the establishment of a grammar school in 1384, now Hereford Cathedral School. Lords' establishment of boroughs also introduced chartered markets, enhancing regional connectivity and export orientation, though often bypassing royal staple ports to maximize local gains. Societally, the Marcher system fostered a hybrid culture under unique "customs of the March," blending English with Welsh tenurial practices and enabling lords to administer , mint coins, and wage private wars independently of . This autonomy promoted population influx from Norman realms, diversifying local societies but exacerbating inequalities, as peasant tenantry faced heavy exactions and crop destruction during conflicts. The of 1348–49 halved clergy and disrupted rural settlements, yet wool-driven recovery bolstered urban resilience and lordly power, shaping a militarized yet commercially vibrant ethos persisting until the .

Controversies and Criticisms of Marcher Rule

Abuses of Power and Lawlessness

The of Marcher lords, who operated beyond the reach of royal courts and , enabled systemic abuses including summary executions, of property without , and the maintenance of private armies for personal vendettas rather than collective defense. Lords exercised ius marchiae, permitting them to try, convict, and hang offenders in their own courts without to the king, often extending this to political rivals or Welsh chieftains perceived as threats, which bred resentment and cycles of retaliation. This lack of oversight contrasted sharply with shire-based governance in , where royal justices periodically enforced uniformity, leading historians to note the Marches as a zone of "feudal " where personal loyalty superseded legal accountability. A prominent instance occurred in 1290, when Gilbert de Clare, and lord of , clashed with Humphrey de Bohun, , over territorial disputes in and other lordships, escalating to armed confrontations that threatened open private war; Edward I personally intervened, summoning both to appear before him and prohibiting further hostilities under pain of royal forfeiture to reassert crown authority over marcher privileges. Similarly, in 1291, Edward seized the lands of Theobald de , a Hereford baron, for initiating unauthorized warfare against Welsh forces without royal permission, underscoring how customary rights to hereditary enmity often devolved into predatory raids on neighboring lordships or Welsh territories. These feuds exemplified broader lawlessness, as offenders could evade justice by fleeing across jurisdictional boundaries between lordships, complicating enforcement and perpetuating disorder. By the 15th century, despite some lordships escheating to the Crown, residual autonomy fueled ongoing misconduct, including neglect of infrastructure and biased adjudication favoring lordly interests, which contemporaries decried as breeding "neglect and misconduct" in border governance. This culminated in the perceived chaos that prompted Henry VIII's Laws in Wales Acts of 1536 and 1543, which abolished marcher jurisdictions to impose English shire structures and royal courts, explicitly citing the need to curb "lawlessness and disorder" through centralized administration and legal uniformity. Such reforms reflected causal recognition that unchecked feudal privileges, while initially adaptive for frontier defense, had devolved into self-perpetuating instability detrimental to both English and Welsh subjects.

Welsh Perspectives: Resistance and National Narratives

From a Welsh historical viewpoint, the Marcher lordships represented an intrusive Anglo-Norman imposed on native territories, prompting sustained princely resistance aimed at preserving and . Welsh rulers, fragmented by dynastic divisions yet unified in opposition to external encroachment, frequently clashed with Marcher lords over borderlands, viewing their castles and jurisdictions as symbols of rather than defensive necessities. This perspective frames the Marches not as a neutral buffer but as a zone of cultural and political subjugation, where Norman autonomy exacerbated local grievances through land seizures and exploitative governance. In the 13th century, , , exemplified organized resistance by allying with baronial dissidents and launching campaigns against Marcher strongholds, reclaiming territories like those held by the Mortimers and de Braoses during the 1260s and 1270s. His forces targeted key lordships in mid-Wales, such as Builth and , forcing temporary submissions and highlighting the vulnerability of Marcher power to coordinated Welsh offensives. The decisive defeat at the on December 11, 1282, where was killed amid an English-Marcher alliance, marked the end of effective princely unification, yet Welsh chronicles portray it as a martyrdom fueling enduring resentment toward the system that enabled such coalitions. The 15th-century revolt led by Owain Glyndŵr further embedded resistance narratives, as his uprising from September 16, 1400, rapidly expanded into Marcher territories, capturing castles like Aberystwyth and Harlech and forging alliances with disaffected lords such as Edmund Mortimer. Glyndŵr's forces overran lordships in Powys and the southern Marches, proclaiming Welsh independence at assemblies like that at Machynlleth in 1404, which challenged the entire Anglo-Welsh border structure. Though suppressed by 1415 through English military superiority, the rebellion's scope—controlling much of Wales and disrupting Marcher economies—reinforced Welsh accounts of the Marches as a contested space of national aspiration rather than stable governance. Welsh national narratives, preserved in medieval poetry and later historiography, interpret these conflicts as pivotal struggles for cultural survival against assimilation, emphasizing themes of heroic defiance over the Marcher lords' documented lawlessness and autonomy. Bards like Iolo Goch lauded Glyndŵr as a prophesied deliverer, embedding the Marches' history in a continuum of resistance that informs modern Welsh identity debates, where the region's hybridity is often critiqued as a legacy of imposed division rather than organic evolution. This framing prioritizes native agency and loss of independence, attributing the Marches' persistence to English strategic imperatives rather than mutual consent.

English Pragmatism: Necessity for Border Stability

The English crown's delegation of extraordinary autonomy to marcher lords along the Welsh border embodied a pragmatic adaptation to the realities of medieval frontier warfare. Following the Norman Conquest of 1066, the western marches faced persistent threats from fragmented yet aggressive Welsh kingdoms, whose raids exploited the region's mountainous terrain and poor communications to disrupt English settlements. Centralized royal armies, mustered from southern England, often arrived too late to prevent depredations, rendering direct control inefficient for a border spanning hundreds of miles. By granting lords rights to raise private forces, construct fortifications without royal license, and conduct preemptive campaigns, the system harnessed self-interested defense mechanisms, where territorial security directly preserved personal wealth and power. This autonomy proved effective in containing Welsh incursions and facilitating incremental territorial advances. Between 1067 and 1093, marcher lords such as and , secured lowland areas along the Dee and rivers, establishing over a dozen motte-and-bailey castles that served as bases for counter-raids. By the reign of Henry I (1100–1135), Norman expansion peaked, with lords controlling fertile valleys of the Wye, , and Severn, reducing the frequency of successful deep penetrations into proper. Castles enabled rapid responses to raids, as evidenced by the ability of garrisons to withstand sieges and launch sorties, thereby deterring larger Welsh coalitions fragmented by internal rivalries. Despite criticisms of within the marches, the system's net contribution to stability outweighed its flaws, as royal oversight alone could not match the vigilance of invested local potentates. English kings, from William I—who created earldoms at in 1071 and to anchor the frontier—to Edward I, pragmatically tolerated marcher excesses in exchange for a buffered defense that minimized core English vulnerabilities. This approach sustained relative peace along the until the final Welsh conquest in 1282–1283, when marcher gains provided the staging ground for decisive royal campaigns, underscoring the causal efficacy of decentralized authority in asymmetric conflicts.

Decline and Incorporation

Tudor Legislation and Abolition

The Laws in Wales Act 1535, enacted as 26 Hen. VIII c. 26, marked the initial Tudor effort to dismantle the Marcher lordships by annexing their territories to English administrative structures or forming new shires, aiming to curb chronic disorders arising from the lords' semi-autonomous jurisdictions. This legislation explicitly addressed "the Disorders committed" in the lordships marcher, subjecting them to English , courts, and officials such as sheriffs and justices of the peace, thereby eroding the privileges that had allowed lords to maintain private armies, mint coins, and administer justice independently of . Specific lordships, including those of Arwystli, Builth, and Hay, were divided or incorporated into counties like and , while five new Welsh counties—, , , , and —were established to integrate the region systematically. The complementary Laws in Wales Act 1542, or 34 & 35 Hen. VIII c. 26, extended this reform to the and remaining northern Marcher territories, completing the "shiring" process by creating additional counties such as , , , and , and fully subordinating all Welsh lands to the English legal framework. These measures abolished the dual legal systems, mandating English as the language of the courts and parliament while granting Welsh subjects equal rights under , a pragmatic step toward centralizing authority amid Henry VIII's broader assertions of royal supremacy following the break with . The acts effectively terminated the Marcher system's feudal autonomies, which had persisted since the , by vesting administrative control in crown-appointed officials and integrating into the realm's parliamentary representation, with each new shire returning members to the English . This legislative abolition reflected Henry VIII's strategic response to the Marches' instability, where powerful families like the Mortimers and had wielded unchecked influence, often fueling border conflicts and resisting royal oversight; the reforms empowered emerging Welsh aligned with Tudor interests, fostering administrative uniformity without outright conquest. By 1543, the Marcher lordships as political entities ceased to exist, transitioning their lands into standard English-style counties governed by , though vestiges of local custom endured informally until later codifications.

Transition to Modern Shires

The Laws in Wales Acts of 1535 and 1542, enacted under , marked the formal abolition of the marcher lordships' autonomous jurisdictions, integrating the Welsh Marches into the English shire system. The 1535 Act (26 Hen. VIII c. 26) annexed the and the marcher territories to , declaring that "the Marches and Wales shall stand upon the same laws as ." This legislation ended the semi-independent palatinates and private courts of the lords marcher, replacing them with standardized English administration. Under these acts, former marcher lands in Wales were reorganized into twelve counties, mirroring England's structure with appointed sheriffs, justices of the , and quarter sessions for governance and justice. New shires included , , , , and , carved from amalgamated lordships such as those of , , and . English border counties like , , and absorbed residual marcher jurisdictions on their side, subjecting them to oversight without private feudal privileges. The 1542 Act further refined this by establishing circuits for assize courts and confirming parliamentary representation, ensuring uniform legal application across the former Marches. This transition curtailed the marcher lords' hereditary powers, such as arbitrary justice and military autonomy, which had persisted since the , in favor of centralized Tudor authority. While the Council in the Marches retained some supervisory role until its abolition in 1689, the core shift to shire-based administration eliminated the fragmented lordships, fostering administrative consistency but also imposing English linguistic and legal norms on Welsh-speaking regions. The process reflected Henry VIII's pragmatic centralization to curb noble overreach and stabilize the border, as evidenced by the acts' explicit aim to convert lordships into "shire ground."

List of Major Lordships and Successor Administrative Units

The Laws in Wales Acts of 1535 and 1542 abolished the marcher lordships as distinct political entities, annexing their territories to shires under centralized English governance to promote uniformity in law and administration. This process integrated border regions previously ruled by semi-autonomous lords into counties such as , , and newly formed Welsh shires like and . Early post-Norman Conquest earldoms laid the foundation for many of these lordships, with territories evolving into core shire boundaries by the . Key marcher lordships and their successor units included:
  • Earldom of Chester, established under Hugh d'Avranches after 1066, encompassing northern border areas; successor units were and (with formalized as a shire in the 1536 legislation).
  • Earldom of Shropshire, granted to Hugh de Montgomery post-1066, controlling central Marches territories; incorporated into (Salop).
  • Earldom of Hereford, awarded to William FitzOsbern after 1066, dominating southwestern borderlands; successor was , with additions like Wigmore and Ewyas Lacy annexed by 1535.
  • Lordship of Oswestry, a northern Marcher holding; annexed to (Salop) under the 1535 Act.
  • Lordship of Denbigh (including Denbighland and ); formed the core of the new created in 1535.
  • Lordship of Montgomery (including Mountgomerey and Kedewenkery); incorporated into the new .
  • Lordship of Radnor (including Newe Radnore and Glistherman); annexed to the new .
  • Lordship of Brecon (including Brekenoke, Crekehowell, and Tretowre); integrated into the new .
  • Lordship of Monmouth (including and Newport); annexed to the new .
  • Lordship of Gower (including Gowerkylvey); united with Glamorganshire.
These units encompassed approximately 20 lordships in the central and northern Marches alone, spanning modern equivalents of , , , , and adjacent English counties. Further southern lordships, such as those in Pembroke and , extended Marcher influence but were more distantly tied to the core border defenses.

Modern Welsh Marches

Administrative Divisions and Political Status

In contemporary terms, the Welsh Marches do not constitute a unified administrative entity but are fragmented across local government structures in England and Wales. The English portions primarily align with the unitary authorities of Shropshire and Herefordshire, which were established under the Local Government Act 1994 and exercise full local powers over services including education, highways, and waste management. These counties, with populations of approximately 498,100 in Shropshire and 194,600 in Herefordshire as of the 2021 Census, operate within the West Midlands region for strategic planning purposes. On the Welsh side, the area corresponds to the unitary authorities of Powys (encompassing former Montgomeryshire and Radnorshire) and Monmouthshire, created by the Local Government (Wales) Act 1994, with Powys covering 5,179 square kilometers and serving a sparse population of 133,200. These Welsh authorities handle devolved functions under the unitary system, distinct from England's mix of counties and districts. Politically, the Marches reflect the post-devolution divide formalized by the , with English areas subject to Westminster legislation and Welsh areas benefiting from Cymru's powers over health, transport, and since 1999. This bifurcation has resulted in policy divergences, such as differing agricultural subsidies and planning regulations, complicating cross-border issues like flood management along the River Wye. No overarching political status exists for the Marches as a whole, which remains an informal geographical and historical designation rather than a devolved or regional entity. Cross-border collaboration mitigates administrative fragmentation through partnerships like the Marches Forward Partnership, involving , , , and councils to coordinate on shared priorities including and rural connectivity. Signed in 2023, this agreement enables joint procurement and but does not confer new powers or alter sovereign boundaries. Such initiatives underscore the Marches' enduring role as a transitional zone, where local addresses practical disparities without formal integration.

Cultural Heritage and Identity Debates

The of the Welsh Marches embodies a syncretic blend of Anglo-Saxon, Norman, and native Welsh traditions, shaped by medieval dynamics that prioritized over unified national allegiance. This legacy manifests in architectural remnants like motte-and-bailey castles, bilingual (e.g., Welsh-derived names such as "Clun" from cluain, meaning meadow), and drawing from both Celtic and English sources, fostering a regional distinctiveness often termed "Marcher culture." Scholars note that this hybridity arose from the marcher lords' semi-independent rule, which integrated Welsh kinship networks with English , distinct from core Welsh principalities or English shires. Modern identity debates center on whether this heritage aligns the Marches more with , , or a separate ethos, particularly since the counties of and —core Marcher territories—remain administratively English despite proximity to devolved . Residents frequently report a "borderland" self-perception, rejecting binary national labels; for example, archaeological analyses of heritage symbols like flags highlight local preferences for emblems evoking medieval over modern Welsh or English icons. Welsh nationalist advocates, however, emphasize enduring Celtic substrata, citing low but persistent Welsh-language (over 20% of place names have Welsh roots) and historical resistance narratives to argue for cultural reorientation toward . Counterarguments stress empirical assimilation: by the , English linguistic dominance was near-total, with Welsh speakers comprising under 1% in by the 1901 census, reflecting centuries of anglicization rather than suppressed identity. These tensions resurfaced post-1999 , which amplified disparities in funding and policy, prompting fringe proposals for boundary adjustments. In 2006, Welsh Assembly Member Mick Bates suggested integrating into for access to European grants and infrastructure benefits, claiming cultural affinities outweighed administrative inertia—though local polls indicated majority opposition, with 68% of residents identifying as English in a 2001 survey. Academic critiques of such views highlight in , which overstates Welsh continuity while downplaying the Marches' role as an English bulwark against invasion, evidenced by 13th-century records of lordships granting lands primarily to Anglo-Norman settlers. Ongoing projects, such as the 2023-2028 "Medieval of " initiative, seek to reframe this heritage through analysis, underscoring a pragmatic, multi-ethnic identity over romanticized national claims.

Economic Significance and Recent Developments

The economy of the Welsh Marches, spanning rural border areas in (, , ) and (, ), relies heavily on , particularly farming and production, which utilize family-operated holdings and support ancillary activities like and environmental technologies such as 53 anaerobic digesters converting farm waste to energy. leverages the region's natural assets, including Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty like the and , contributing significantly to rural employment through visitor spending on heritage sites, recreation, and food services, with bolstering the broader Welsh sector's £3.8 billion GVA impact in 2022. Advanced , focused on metals, machinery, and automotive components, accounts for 9.4% of jobs—above the average of 6.2%—while and exports reach £1.8 billion annually. Despite these strengths, (GVA) stood at £14.3 billion in 2016 with annual growth of 0.9% since 2014 (below the 's 2.2%), and productivity lags 22% under the national average at £27.76 per hour worked, hampered by skills shortages and rural infrastructure gaps. Recent developments emphasize cross-border initiatives to address low productivity and foster sustainable growth. The Marches Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) reported 5.9% over the five years prior to 2023, adding £800 million to output, and supported 8,555 businesses via its Growth Hub in the 2022-2023 financial year. Following the UK's phase-out of LEP core funding by March 2024, the Marches Forward Partnership—launched in 2023 across English and Welsh councils—has advanced collaborative projects in , , , and the visitor economy, targeting investment to serve 750,000 residents and reset skills training for higher-wage sectors. These efforts build on post-Brexit adjustments in , including diversification into resilient farming practices amid volatile feed costs and policy shifts, while faces pressures from proposed visitor levies that could deter spending in border areas.

References

  1. https://www.castlewales.com/march.html
  2. https://htt.herefordshire.gov.uk/herefordshires-past/the-anglo-saxon-period/herefordshire-sites/offas-dyke/
  3. https://senedd.wales/how-we-work/history-of-devolution/
  4. https://www.osterlund.co.uk/the-welsh-marches/
  5. https://mortimerhistory.com/medieval-mortimers/chapter-2/
  6. https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/article/defining-a-region-the-march-of-wales/197005/
  7. https://www.history.org.uk/podcasts/categories/432/podcast/516/the-welsh-marches
  8. https://www.oed.com/dictionary/welsh-marches_n
  9. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryMagazine/DestinationsUK/Ludlow/
  10. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Welsh_Marches
  11. https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/offas-dyke/history/
  12. https://www.nationaltrail.co.uk/en_GB/trails/offas-dyke-path/
  13. https://www.ludlow.org.uk/historyofthemarches.html
  14. https://www.ludlow.org.uk/marches.html
  15. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofEngland/Kings-Queens-of-Mercia/
  16. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofEngland/King-Offa/
  17. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/offas-wars
  18. https://offasdyke.org.uk/history/
  19. https://www.historyhit.com/facts-about-offas-dyke/
  20. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=pat_pnw
  21. https://academic.oup.com/book/32962/chapter/278024023
  22. https://mortimerhistorysociety.org.uk/the-mortimers/about-the-mortimers/marcher-lords/
  23. https://mondes-normands.caen.fr/angleterre/cultures/gb_fr/culture1_5.htm
  24. https://www.castlewales.com/roger_m.html
  25. https://originalshrewsbury.co.uk/timelines/era/norman
  26. https://www.academia.edu/18331117/The_Nature_of_Marcher_Lordships
  27. https://ir.vanderbilt.edu/bitstreams/c2ac4e72-7c27-4458-ad28-47d9f729e575/download
  28. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1862&context=hc_pubs
  29. https://htt.herefordshire.gov.uk/herefordshires-past/the-medieval-period/the-norman-conquest/the-marcher-lords/
  30. https://www.britainexpress.com/wales/history/marchers.htm
  31. https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/middle_ages/wales_conquest_01.shtml
  32. https://www.swansea.gov.uk/article/15003/1100---1200---Welsh-Princes-and-Marcher-Lords
  33. https://mortimerhistory.com/medieval-mortimers/chapter-3/
  34. https://www.ewyaslacy.org.uk/-/War-and-Rebellion-in-Wales-and-the-Marches/1039-1689/rs_ewy_0025
  35. https://www.warhistoryonline.com/medieval/english-lords-fought-welsh-raiders-2.html
  36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3679112
  37. https://htt.herefordshire.gov.uk/herefordshires-past/the-medieval-period/
  38. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofEngland/Wool-Trade/
  39. https://www.odysseytraveller.com/articles/history-of-english-wool/
  40. http://www.castlewales.com/march.html
  41. http://users.trytel.com/tristan/towns/market/marches.html
  42. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-349-25048-6_8
  43. https://academic.oup.com/book/27384/chapter/197167649
  44. http://www.theosophycardiff.org/pagesaboutwaleswelshmarches.htm
  45. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296822849_Cultural_boundaries_within_the_Tudor_state_Bishop_Rowland_Lee_and_the_Welsh_settlement_of_1536
  46. https://www.facebook.com/TheHistoryOfWales/posts/the-laws-in-wales-acts-1536-and-1543-were-the-result-of-henry-viiis-desire-to-re/1910737072380299/
  47. https://academic.oup.com/book/26898/chapter/195967840
  48. https://cadw.gov.wales/sites/default/files/2019-04/InterpplanlordsSouthernMarch_EN_CY.pdf
  49. https://academic.oup.com/book/26898/chapter/195973264
  50. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofWales/The-Battle-of-Orewin-Bridge/
  51. https://cadw.gov.wales/sites/default/files/2022-04/Llywelyn%2520the%2520Last%2520and%2520the%2520Marcher%2520Lords%2520-%2520English.pdf
  52. https://www.historyextra.com/period/medieval/owain-glyndwr-rebellion-revolt-middle-ages-misnamed/
  53. https://welshhistories.co.uk/owain-glyndwr-a-welsh-rebel-who-challenged-english-rule/
  54. https://www.historyhit.com/owain-glyndwr-the-welsh-rebel-who-almost-broke-england/
  55. https://www.academia.edu/6541795/The_Normans_in_Welsh_History
  56. https://academic.oup.com/book/59910/chapter/512173030
  57. https://www.sarahwoodbury.com/welsh-resistance-in-south-wales/
  58. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofWales/The-English-conquest-of-Wales/
  59. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/345085992.pdf
  60. https://resolve.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/E0F0400B5858B513DC0AF7FCFED933C3/9781139167888c3_p44-66_CBO.pdf/marcher_lordships.pdf
  61. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Hen8/27/26/1991-02-01/data.html
  62. https://bylines.cymru/voices-lleisiau/laws-in-wales-acts/
  63. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/acts-union-between-england-and-wales
  64. https://spartacus-educational.com/TUDactunion.htm
  65. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100133199
  66. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Statutes_of_Wales_%281908%29/Introduction
  67. https://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/history/sites/themes/periods/tudors_05.shtml
  68. https://www.facebook.com/TheHistoryOfWales/posts/the-laws-in-wales-acts-1536-and-1543-were-the-result-of-henry-viiis-desire-to-re/1191030799055973/
  69. https://mortimerhistorysociety.org.uk/society/publications/marcher-lordships-central-and-north/
  70. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx8140yrdv0o
  71. https://www.marchesforwardpartnership.org.uk/who-we-are
  72. https://www.europeandissemination.eu/article/the-medieval-march-of-wales/21923
  73. https://howardwilliamsblog.wordpress.com/2017/09/11/identity-and-flags-a-welsh-borders-perspective/
  74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327121794_Language_literacy_and_aspects_of_identity_in_early_modern_Wales
  75. https://www.bbc.co.uk/herefordandworcester/content/articles/2006/11/13/hereford_in_wales_feature.shtml
  76. https://bob-lynn.medium.com/frontier-forged-shropshires-medieval-marches-and-their-global-echo-c4b6dfb7d347
  77. https://www.bordersandborderlands.ac.uk/2023/07/29/the-medieval-march-of-wales-a-five-year-research-project/
  78. https://www.marcheslep.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The-Marches-SEP-Evidence-Base.pdf
  79. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/70689/html/
  80. https://www.fsb.org.uk/media-centre/press-release/tourism-a-cornerstone-of-wales-economy-MCMTHPH4DE4FDTFAGXEAPZCCE2DQ
  81. https://www.marcheslep.org.uk/our-region/our-economy/
  82. https://newsroom.shropshire.gov.uk/2023/07/8500-businesses-helped-marches-growth-hub/
  83. https://www.fdiintelligence.com/content/8d713735-b426-527b-b012-0f4810d3fd4c
  84. https://newsroom.shropshire.gov.uk/2024/05/marches-forward-partnership-shapes-future-proposals/
  85. https://www.marchesforwardpartnership.org.uk/
  86. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/296/29638681007.pdf
  87. https://newsfromwales.co.uk/welsh-tourism-industry-protests-planned-to-highlight-controversial-visitor-levy-on-st-davids-day/
Add your contribution
Related Hubs
User Avatar
No comments yet.