Hubbry Logo
Western alienationWestern alienationMain
Open search
Western alienation
Community hub
Western alienation
logo
8 pages, 0 posts
0 subscribers
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Be the first to start a discussion here.
Western alienation
Western alienation
Western alienation
View on Wikipedia
from Wikipedia
Western Canada

Western alienation, in the context of Canadian politics, refers to the notion that the Western provinces—British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba—have been marginalized within Confederation, particularly compared to Central Canada, which consists of Canada's two most populous provinces, Ontario and Quebec. Expressions of western alienation frequently allege that Eastern Canada is politically over-represented and receives out-sized economic benefits at the expense of western Canadians.[1]

Western alienation has a long history within Canada, dating back to the nineteenth century. It has led to the establishment of many Western regional political parties at both the provincial and federal levels and from both the right and left sides of the political spectrum, although since the 1980s western alienation has been more closely associated with and espoused by conservative politicians. While such movements have tended to express a desire for a larger place for the west within Confederation, western alienation has at times resulted in calls for western separatism and independence. Given this long history, western alienation has had a profound impact on the development of Canadian politics.

According to a 2019 analysis by Global News, Western alienation is considered especially potent in Alberta and Saskatchewan politics.[2] However, alienation sentiments vary over time and place. For instance, a 2010 study published by the Canada West Foundation found that such sentiments had decreased across the region in the first decade of the twenty-first century.[3] More recently, a 2019 Ipsos poll found historically high levels of support for secession from Canada in both Alberta and Saskatchewan.[4]

Historical roots

[edit]

Upon Confederation in 1867, the new Dominion of Canada consisted only of Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. However, what was then known as the North-West—much of it officially Rupert's Land and owned by the Hudson's Bay Company—was already a significant factor in Canadian plans.[5][6] Among the country's founders, George Brown was particularly insistent that the North-West was the key to Canadian prosperity, offering resources, plentiful land for agricultural settlement, and the potential for a captive market for eastern manufacturers.[5][7] In 1869, HBC gave up its control of Rupert's Land, which became part of Canada in 1870 under the name North-West Territories.[8]

The National Policy

[edit]

The first Canadian Prime Minister, John A. Macdonald, designed the National Policy to integrate the North-West Territories into Canada and to develop it economically as part of a Canadian economy. The key planks of the National Policy were the building of a trans-continental railway that would connect the east to British Columbia, help to settle and populate the west, and easily ship goods across the country (mostly grain and agricultural products grown in the Prairies, manufactured goods produced in central Canada); immigration to populate the Prairies with homesteaders; and tariffs to protect Canadian manufacturers.[9][10] The protectionist tariffs were an immediate issue in the North-West, as it effectively forced western farmers to purchase more expensive equipment from eastern Canadian manufacturers rather than less-expensive farm equipment from manufacturers in the United States, and it impacted prices for farm products—farmers of the North-West Territories therefore favoured free trade between Canada and the U.S.[11] This began a long battle between farmers on the prairies and the federal government and led to the establishment of farmers' organizations to help control grain shipping and marketing, and to agitate politically for free trade and economic protection for farmers as well.[12] Eventually, farmers entered the political sphere directly, forming United Farmers parties and the Progressive Party, both of which helped to lay a foundation for a national democratic-socialist party, Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF).[13][14]

Western provinces

[edit]

The first province established in the North-West was Manitoba, and it entered Confederation under unusual circumstances. Negotiations were instigated at the behest of the Métis at Red River, who were wary of losing their land and rights as Canada encroached upon the territory. After the quelling of the Red River Resistance, Manitoba entered Confederation as a small province—it was jokingly derided as the "postage stamp province"—with limited rights, including a lack of control over its natural resources.[15]

British Columbia negotiated its own entry in 1871, but it was better positioned than the rest of the North-West and demanded and got a promise of the construction of a trans-continental railway.[16]

By the turn of the twentieth century, agitation for provincehood for the rest of the North-West increased as the land settlement grew. NWT premier Frederick Haultain proposed the creation of a large province between Manitoba and British Columbia, for which he favoured the name Buffalo.[17] However, some in the federal government, wary of creating too powerful of a province, opposed the creation of such a large province in the west.[18] The result was the 1905 establishment of the provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan, both of which were not given control of their resources, like Manitoba a generation earlier.[19] To protest this, Haultain led the Provincial Rights Party in Saskatchewan from 1905 until 1912.

While each of these provinces received federal grants as compensation for this lack of resource control, it remained a significant issue until 1930, when the Natural Resources Transfer Acts finally gave those provinces control of their own resources.[20]

The Great Depression

[edit]

The Prairie provinces were by far the most impacted by the Great Depression. The economic depression was deepened on the Prairies by drought and dust bowl conditions, and all together farmers across the region were impoverished. Getting little in the way of relief from the federal government, the region was the slowest to recover from the Depression, which only passed with the arrival of the Second World War and the consequent revival in manufacturing, primarily benefiting business interests in Central Canada.[21] The depression caused the establishment of two parties that would dominate politics in Alberta and Saskatchewan for much of the next half-century- Social Credit and the CCF, both of which drew on the legacy of the United Farmer movements. The two new parties sought to transform economic and social conditions on the Prairies, albeit from different ideological positions, and their successes contributed to a tempering of western alienation for much of the middle of the twentieth century.[22] A related factor was an increased focus on resource development on the Prairies. This succeeded, filled provincial coffers and buoyed a recovery from the Depression.[23]

When John Diefenbaker became prime minister as the leader of a Progressive Conservative government in 1957, this also marked a shift in western relations. Diefenbaker, hailing from Saskatchewan, considered himself an unabashed champion of western interests, and his popularity helped to align conservatism at the federal level with the needs of Prairie farmers.[24]

Resource development

[edit]
Further information: National Energy Program

Before the Second World War, western alienation was principally rooted in a sense of being unequal in Confederation and held back in economic development—in a sense, the notion that the west was a colony of eastern Canada. This changed after the war, when the prairie provinces in particular became more prosperous, based largely on newfound resource wealth. Feelings of alienation returned in the 1970s, but by then were based principally on a sense of unjustified intrusion by the federal government into western economic interests. In part, this was an outcome of the expansion of the federal state in the postwar period, and in part this was due to the rising economic power of the prairie provinces. It had largely to do with debates over federalism versus decentralization in Canadian politics. The 1970s energy crises led to rapid increases in energy resource prices, which produced windfall profits in the energy-rich western provinces. The 1974 federal budget from Pierre Trudeau's Liberal government terminated the deduction of provincial natural resources royalties from federal tax. According to Roy Romanow—then Saskatchewan's attorney general—this move kicked off the "resource wars", a confrontation between Trudeau's federal government and the prairie provinces over the control of and revenues from natural resource extraction and energy production.[25]

Following an increase in the world price of oil between 1979 and 1980, Trudeau's government introduced the National Energy Program (NEP), which was designed to increase Canadian ownership in the oil industry, increase Canada's oil self-sufficiency, and redistribute the wealth generated by oil production with a greater share going to the federal government.[26] While the program was meant to mitigate the effect of higher gas prices in eastern Canada, it was extremely unpopular in the west due to the perception that the federal government was implementing unfair revenue sharing.[27] In response, a quote from future Alberta Premier Ralph Klein—then the mayor of Calgary—featured prominently on bumper stickers in that province: "Let the eastern bastards freeze in the dark".[28] The program was ultimately repealed in 1985.

Resource rights were prominent in negotiations of the Patriation of the Canadian Constitution in the early 1980s. Alberta and Saskatchewan premiers Peter Lougheed and Allan Blakeney negotiated to ensure that provincial resource rights were enshrined in Section 92A of the Constitution.[29]

The Reform Party

[edit]

Brian Mulroney's Progressive Conservatives replaced the Liberals with an historic majority in the 1984 election. However, Mulroney was seen as similarly neglectful of western Canada, which led to the establishment of the conservative Reform Party in 1987.[30] Led by Preston Manning—son of former Alberta Social Credit premier Ernest Manning—Reform campaigned on the slogan "The West Wants In". Despite controversy over the party's social conservatism, it surged to third party status in 1993, winning 52 seats—all but one of them in Western Canada—in the fall election while the PCs were reduced to just 2. In the 1997 election, Reform became the Official Opposition. In 2000, Reform rebranded as the Canadian Alliance in an attempt to appeal to voters beyond Western Canada; in 2003, the party merged with the PCs to form the Conservative Party of Canada, the power base of which has since resided in the west.[31]

Contemporary western alienation

[edit]
Political map of Canada

The twenty-first century has seen a resurgence of western alienation sentiments, which coincided again with the boom and bust of commodity prices.[32] Paul Martin stated that addressing western alienation was one of his two priorities when he became prime minister in 2003.[33] In 2007, he said he had learned that the phenomenon ebbs and flows, and by the end of that decade such sentiments were reported to have decreased.[3][33] However, particularly since the 2015 election of a Liberal federal government under the leadership of Justin Trudeau—the son of Pierre Trudeau—western alienation has reached heights not seen since the 1980s.[34][35] This has largely to do with perceptions of federal overreach by a governing party that has frequently been shut out of much of the Prairies. In particular, federal environmental policy and efforts at addressing climate change, such as the Pan-Canadian Framework, have been at the core of contemporary western alienation, stoking fears of a forced economic downturn for key resource industries. However, this resurgence of western alienation also coincided with a major downturn in commodity prices after 2014.[36]

Governments in both Alberta and Saskatchewan have characterized federal environmental policy as an attack on their respective resource industries, and therefore as a threat to their provinces' economic stability. The Saskatchewan Party, especially under the leadership of Scott Moe since 2018, and since its formation in 2017 Alberta's United Conservative Party—currently under the leadership of Danielle Smith—have positioned themselves in opposition to Ottawa, and sought greater autonomy within Canada. At the same time, polling has consistently suggested that Alberta and Saskatchewan residents perceive the federal government as harmful to their province's interests.[2][4][35] Moreover, residents in British Columbia and Manitoba have also indicated a sense of rising resentment towards Ottawa, and residents in all four western provinces indicated that they would support a new "Western Canada Party" at the federal level to advocate for the region's interests.[37]

Also at question is the degree to which westerners identify more with their region or province than with the country. 2018 polling suggested that 76% of western Canadians felt a sense of "unique western Canadian identity", the same percentage that said so in 2001.[38] Governments have at times contributed to such sentiments. For example, Scott Moe in 2021 called for recognition of Saskatchewan as a "nation within a nation"—drawing on terminology frequently employed by Quebec nationalists—and argued that the province has its own "cultural identity".[39] In 2023, Saskatchewan made it mandatory for schools in the province to fly the provincial flag, which the government indicated was meant to increase pride in provincial identity.[40]

[edit]

The federal effort to institute a carbon tax across the country has been a significant point of contention. Saskatchewan—which was later joined by Alberta along with Ontario—challenged the constitutionality of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act in court. The challenge was first launched in April 2018, and in March 2021 the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the Act is constitutional.[41] The western provinces found some success in their constitutional challenge against federal environmental impact assessment legislation, as the Supreme Court ruled in October 2023 that portions of the 2019 Impact Assessment Act dealing with "designated projects" outside of federal jurisdiction were unconstitutional.[42] An amended Impact Assessment Act received royal assent in June 2024.[43]

In 2022, both Alberta and Saskatchewan passed new legislation to affirm their control over natural resources and to try and mitigate the encroachment of federal power. The Alberta Sovereignty Act and the Saskatchewan First Act were both introduced in November 2022.[44][45]

Alberta and Saskatchewan have made other efforts to distance themselves from Ottawa. Both have frequently criticized the equalization payment scheme as unfair. In his call for "A New Deal with Canada", Moe has signaled a desire for more control over taxation and immigration, and Saskatchewan has introduced plans to create a provincial police force.[46][47] Smith has opened discussions about Alberta withdrawing from the Canada Pension Plan and starting its own.[48]

Trucks participating in the convoy protest and occupation of Ottawa in February 2022; the truck on the left is adorned with Saskatchewan flags.

Convoy protests

[edit]

Since 2019, a number of popular protests have organized convoys to Ottawa to take demands directly to the federal government, something that has a long tradition in western Canada dating back to the early twentieth century, including the attempted On-to-Ottawa Trek during the Great Depression. In particular, large convoy protests in 2018 and 2022 have received international attention.[36][49][50] The first of these convoys was organized by the "yellow vests movement", which drew inspiration from the 2018 French yellow vests protests. The Canadian protest demanded, among other things, the elimination of the federal carbon tax. The second was the self-styled "freedom convoy", which purported to be focused on protesting COVID-19 vaccine mandates, but shared many of the same organizers and resources as the 2018 protest. In both cases, the extent to which the convoys were supported by western Canadians was a subject of debate; for example, a 2022 study suggested that fewer than 20% of Albertans thought positively of the convoy protest.[51] Moreover, several studies have indicated that these protests included a high degree of far-right political elements, including xenophobic and conspiratorial elements.[52][53][54]

Western separatism

[edit]

Particularly since the 1970s, when the resource-based economies of Alberta and Saskatchewan began to see rapid growth, the idea of separatism and independence for western provinces—on their own or in some combination together—has at times gained political traction and led to the creation of new movements and parties working towards that end. Such sentiment did not arise in a vacuum, with agitation for Quebec sovereignty reaching new heights in the 1970s. The extent to which agitation for western sovereignty has merely been a "bargaining tool" for the west, as former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau characterized it in 1980, has been debated, and western Premiers, including Peter Lougheed, have tended to downplay any push for secession.[55] Parties advocating for western secession have tended to fare poorly at the polls.

1980s

[edit]
A Western Canadian flag adopted by the Western Independence Party in 1988.

While movements like the Reform Party stated that they were dedicated to realizing a bigger role for the west within Canada, other movements, like the Western Canada Concept, founded in 1980, argued that the west would be better off carving out its own nation, and was politically and economically capable of doing so.[56] Although envisioned as a federal movement, Western Canada Concept never ran candidates in a federal election. However, it did field provincial branches in each of the western provinces. It found its biggest success in Alberta, where Gordon Kesler won a 1982 by-election under the WCC banner; in that year's general election, the party was one candidate short of a full slate and earned 12% of the vote, although none of its candidates were elected.[57] During Saskatchewan's 20th Legislature, two sitting MLAs—Bill Sveinson and Lloyd Hampton—took up the WCC banner. However, the party failed to have any candidates elected in the 1986 election.

The short-lived Unionest Party in Saskatchewan offered another separatist option in that province. Former Progressive Conservative leader Dick Collver founded the party in 1980, and advocated for a secession of western provinces and a subsequent union with the United States—Unionest was a contraction of "best" and "union". This was seen as "traitorous" by some, and somewhat ironic given that one factor in Canada's acquisition of the west was to avoid its annexation by the US.[58]

Other such movements that arose to advocate for secession include the Western Independence Party, which fielded candidates in federal and provincial elections from 1988 into the twenty-first century, and the Western Block Party.[59]

Wexit (2019–)

[edit]

Separatist sentiment began to re-emerge ahead of the 2019 federal election, with one study indicating record levels of separatist sentiment in Alberta and Saskatchewan.[18][34] In the wake of the 2019 election—which saw the governing Liberal Party shut out from both Alberta and Saskatchewan—the "Wexit" movement consolidated this new wave of separatist sentiment.[36] A play on the British "Brexit" movement, Wexit established federal and provincial branches to advocate for western secession, and adopted a reversed version of Preston Manning's slogan: "The West Wants Out".[60] In 2020, Wexit Canada rebranded as the Maverick Party;[61] Wexit Alberta merged with the Freedom Conservative Party to form the Wildrose Independence Party;[62] and Wexit Saskatchewan rebranded as the Buffalo Party.[63] Wexit BC was de-registered in 2022.[64]

In the 2020 Saskatchewan provincial election, the Buffalo Party ran just 17 candidates but received 2.6% of the popular vote, more than any other third party, and finished second in a handful of rural ridings.[65] The result prompted Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe to state that his Saskatchewan Party—which handily won a majority government—"share your frustrations", and to call for more "independence" from Ottawa, although he downplayed talk of secession.[66] Ahead of the 2021 federal election, the Maverick Party stated that it was trying to emulate the model laid out by the Bloc Québécois.[67] However, the party failed to gain traction in the election, earning just over 1% of the vote in each of Alberta and Saskatchewan. Then-interim leader Jay Hill acknowledged after the election that focusing on separatism created "a certain degree of discomfort with most westerners who aren’t prepared at this point to go that far."[68] Although Maverick did not officially endorse the 2022 convoy protest that occupied Ottawa, many of its members supported it and one of the party's secretaries, Tamara Lich, was a key convoy organizer.[69] The party ultimately lost momentum and was de-registered in 2025.[70] There are also signs of the movement losing traction in Saskatchewan. After its surprising 2020 performance, the Buffalo Party fell to sixth place in the 2024 provincial election, earning less than 1% of the popular vote.[71]

In the wake of the 2025 Canadian federal election, which resulted in the Liberal Party being re-elected to a fourth term, this time under the leadership of Mark Carney, United Conservative Party members reignited agitation for Alberta separatism.[72] The day after the election, Danielle Smith introduced legislative changes to make it easier for citizens to trigger a referendum.[73]

Impact of Quebec separatism

[edit]

It was revealed in 2014 that Roy Romanow's New Democratic Party government in Saskatchewan held secret meetings to discuss contingencies for the event of a successful secession vote in the 1995 Quebec referendum, including the possibility of following suit and potentially courting annexation by the United States. Romanow stated that Allan Blakeney had held similar discussions ahead of the 1980 Quebec referendum. He further explained that, in his view, secession for Saskatchewan "would not make sense economically and socially".[74]

Responses to western alienation

[edit]

Federal government

[edit]

In the 1980s, Pierre Trudeau called talk of western alienation and separatism a "bargaining tool" for the west, and urged the west to find ways to get more representation in the federal government.[55] For his part, given the lack of Liberal representation in the west—his party won only two seats west of Ontario, both of them in Manitoba—Trudeau took the uncommon step of appointing western senators to his cabinet.[75][76]

Amidst criticism that the federal government was inhibiting pipeline development, Justin Trudeau's Liberals purchased the Trans Mountain pipeline in 2018 to try and help ensure the completion of its expansion project, which has before and since been mired in financial uncertainty.[77][78]

First Nations

[edit]

First Nations leaders have often asserted that they have been forgotten in discussions of western alienation. Given that First Nations in Canada have direct relationships with the federal government, and the large number of First Nations in western Canada, such assertions complicate those discussions. This is particularly true in British Columbia, where a large number of First Nations have never entered into treaty agreements with the federal government.[79]

In recent years, Indigenous leaders have pushed back against talk of western alienation, particularly talk of western separatism. In 2019, Assembly of First Nations National Chief Perry Bellegarde said that First Nations consent would be required for any secession, given that "provincial boundaries came after treaty territories", further adding that western leaders "have to be careful when you go down that road of Western alienation... We have inherent rights... and those are international agreements with the Crown."[80] Saskatoon Tribal Council Chief Marc Arcand added that any western province "does not have the authority to decide if they want to separate".[80] First Nations chiefs from Treaty 8 territory also released a statement in 2019, declaring that they were "strongly opposed to the idea of separation from Canada."[81] In 2025, two First Nations chiefs in Alberta again pushed back against separatist rhetoric, addressing a letter to Danielle Smith, urging the Premier to respect Treaty rights and stop stoking separatist sentiments.[82] First Nations leaders have been similarly vocal in their opposition to the 2022 Alberta Sovereignty and Saskatchewan First Acts, arguing that they infringe on treaty rights and circumvent their relationship with the Crown. Both Acts were drafted without consultation with Indigenous communities.[83]

Political parties

[edit]

The following is a list of federal and provincial political parties that were founded in response to western alienation, to advance western interests within Canada, or to promote western independence. Some such parties, like the CCF and Reform, have merged with other entities to become truly national parties.

Party name Founded Level Political position Notes
  Provincial Rights Party 1905 Provincial (SK) Right-wing Advocated for equal rights for the province within Confederation. Became the provincial Conservative Party in 1912.
  United Farmers 1919 Provincial Left-wing Agrarian parties that formed government in Alberta (1921) and Manitoba (1922); also formed government in Ontario (1919). Parties played roles in forming the Progressive Party and CCF.
  Progressive Party 1920 Federal/provincial Left-wing Outgrowth of the agrarian United Farmers movement. Won the second most seats in the 1921 election, but declined to form the Official Opposition
  Co-operative Commonwealth Federation 1932 Federal/provincial Left-wing Democratic socialist party formed out of a union of labour and agrarian interests. Formed government in Saskatchewan in 1944. Merged with Canadian Labour Congress in 1961 to form the NDP.
  Social Credit Party 1935 Federal/provincial Right-wing A mix of social credit monetary reform theory and Christian right social conservatism. Formed government in Alberta in 1935.
  Western Canada Concept 1980 Federal/provincial Right-wing Separatist party.
  Unionest Party 1980 Provincial (SK) Right-wing Advocated for Western Canada to join the United States.
  Alberta Party 1985 Provincial (AB) Centrist Originally a separatist party; especially since 2009, seen as centrist and Alberta-focused.
  Reform Party 1987 Federal Right-wing Populist party with Christian right influences. In 2000, became Canadian Alliance, and in 2003 merged with the Progressive Conservatives to form the modern Conservative Party.
  Western Independence Party 1988 Federal/provincial Right-wing Separatist party.
  Saskatchewan Party 1997 Provincial (SK) Right-wing Although initially focused on Saskatchewan politics, especially since 2015 seen as increasingly focused on provincial independence.
  Alberta First Party 1999 Provincial (AB) Right-wing Separatist party.
  Western Block Party 2005 Federal Right-wing Separatist party.
  Wildrose Party 2007 Provincial (AB) Right-wing Autonomist party.
  Independence Party 2017 Provincial (AB) Right-wing Separatist party. In 2018, became the Freedom Conservative Party.
  Freedom Conservative Party 2018 Provincial (AB) Right-wing Separatist party. In 2018, merged into the Wildrose Independence Party.
  Maverick Party 2020 Federal Right-wing Originally Wexit Canada. Separatist party.
  Buffalo Party 2020 Provincial (SK) Right-wing Originally Wexit Saskatchewan. Separatist party.
  Wildrose Independence Party 2020 Provincial (AB) Right-wing Originally Wexit Alberta and the Freedom Conservative Party. Separatist party.
  Republican Party 2022 Provincial (AB) Right-wing Originally Buffalo Party of Alberta. Pro-American party.
  Wildrose Loyalty Coalition 2023 Provincial (AB) Right-wing Separatist party.

See also

[edit]
Part of a series on
Conservatism in Canada
Schools
Principles
History
Active parties
Federal

Provincial

Defunct parties
Federal

Provincial

Media
Other organizations
Related
  • flagCanada portal

    • References

    [edit]

    Further reading

    [edit]
    Revisions and contributorsEdit on WikipediaRead on Wikipedia

    Western alienation

    View on Grokipedia
    from Grokipedia

    Western alienation denotes the persistent sentiment in Canada's western provinces—primarily Alberta, Saskatchewan, and to varying degrees Manitoba and British Columbia—of political marginalization and economic disadvantage imposed by a federal system oriented toward the interests of Central Canada, encompassing Ontario and Quebec. This perception arises from structural imbalances in federal representation, where the West's parliamentary influence remains limited despite its economic contributions, compounded by policies that redirect resource revenues eastward without equitable reciprocity.     Historically rooted in the post-Confederation era, western alienation intensified under the of 1879, which imposed protective tariffs benefiting Eastern manufacturers while burdening Prairie farmers with higher costs for imported goods and restricted . Subsequent flashpoints, such as the 1980 , exemplified federal intervention in provincial resource sectors, aiming to nationalize oil and gas revenues and impose that disproportionately harmed Alberta's economy, evoking widespread resentment over lost sovereignty and fiscal autonomy. Central to these grievances is the federal equalization program, under which high-revenue provinces like —never a recipient since the program's in 1957—effectively subsidize transfers to lower-fiscal-capacity regions through general revenues, fostering perceptions of systemic wealth extraction without corresponding or policy concessions for contributors. Defining characteristics include advocacy for institutional reforms, such as an elected to amplify regional voices, and the emergence of protest movements and parties like the Reform Party, which channeled alienation into demands for and . In contemporary contexts, regulatory hurdles to energy projects and carbon pricing have sustained these tensions, underscoring causal links between federal centralization and regional discontent.

    Definition and Core Concepts

    Scope and Regional Boundaries

    Western alienation refers to the persistent sense of political, economic, and cultural disconnection experienced by residents of Canada's four westernmost provinces: , , , and . This regional discontent stems from perceptions that federal policies disproportionately benefit — and —at the expense of Western interests, particularly in resource development and fiscal transfers. Geographically, the scope is bounded by Manitoba's eastern edge, adjacent to , and extends westward to the Pacific coast of , encompassing approximately 2.9 million square kilometers or about 29% of Canada's land area. While the three Prairie provinces—, , and —form the historical core due to shared agrarian and resource-based economies, 's inclusion reflects common grievances over federal overreach in areas like energy pipelines and environmental regulations, despite its more diverse urban and coastal profile. The sentiment is less pronounced in the northern territories (, , ), which face distinct Indigenous and resource challenges but lack the same provincial autonomy and population scale. Regional boundaries are not rigidly fixed, as alienation's intensity fluctuates; for instance, post-2015 federal policies intensified feelings in and , narrowing focus to these oil-dependent provinces amid pipeline delays and carbon taxes, while and exhibit more variable alignment with national politics. Surveys indicate that in 2019, over 50% of Albertans and Saskatchewan residents expressed strong alienation, compared to lower rates elsewhere in the West. This variability underscores that Western alienation operates as a fluid rather than a uniform geographic bloc, often amplified during federal elections where Western seats yield disproportionate policy influence relative to population.

    Fundamental Grievances and Causal Factors

    Western alienation arises from a of systemic economic disadvantage, wherein resource-producing provinces in , particularly , generate substantial federal revenues from oil, gas, and minerals but experience net fiscal outflows that subsidize other regions. , for example, has not received equalization payments since the program's start in 1957 and contributed an estimated $3.3 billion to the $24 billion in total equalization entitlements in 2023, representing a drain exceeding $700 annually when accounting for broader federal transfers. This dynamic stems from the federal tax system's aggregation of resource royalties and corporate taxes, which flow eastward to fund programs like healthcare and infrastructure in recipient provinces such as and , fostering resentment over unequal burden-sharing in a where Western GDP significantly outpaces the national average—'s at $78,000 in 2023 versus Canada's $59,000. Federal energy policies have historically amplified these economic grievances by prioritizing national objectives over regional interests, as exemplified by the (NEP) implemented on October 28, 1980, which imposed federal taxes on revenues, mandated Canadian ownership quotas, and controlled domestic prices to benefit Eastern consumers. The NEP triggered an exodus of foreign investment from , with over $100 billion in by 1982, job losses exceeding 100,000 in the energy sector, and a provincial GDP contraction of 5.5% in 1982 alone, events widely interpreted as deliberate extraction of Western wealth to offset Eastern manufacturing declines amid global oil price volatility. Subsequent policies, including regulatory delays and vetoes on pipelines like Energy East (cancelled in 2017) and Northern Gateway (denied in 2016), have restricted market diversification, leaving 's output—peaking at 3.4 million barrels per day in 2019—vulnerable to Western Canadian Select discounts averaging $15–20 per barrel below from 2018–2023 due to limited export infrastructure. Politically, underrepresentation exacerbates alienation, as Western provinces hold only 106 of 338 seats despite comprising 30% of Canada's population in 2021, a disparity rooted in the electoral quotient that caps Western growth relative to slower-growing Atlantic provinces. The unelected Senate's equal provincial allocation fails to counterbalance this, as its ineffectiveness—evident in stalled Western-initiated bills—reinforces perceptions of Central Canadian dominance, where and control 198 seats and shape policies favoring urban and manufacturing priorities over rural resource economies. Causal factors include Canada's quasi-federal structure, which centralizes fiscal and regulatory power in , geographic isolation breeding cultural divergence (e.g., Western emphasis on versus Eastern reliance on transfers), and resource curse dynamics amplifying vulnerability to federal interventions that ignore local comparative advantages.

    Historical Development

    National Policy and Early Exploitation (1867–1910s)

    The acquisition of and the from the in 1870 for £300,000 (£300,000 equivalent to approximately $1.5 million CAD at the time) marked the federal government's initial thrust into prairie expansion following in 1867. This purchase, ratified by the Rupert's Land Act 1868 and , transferred roughly 1.5 million square miles to Canadian control, but implementation involved surveys and treaties that prioritized settler interests over , setting a precedent for centralized resource oversight from . The , passed on May 12, 1870, then carved out the small province of —initially just 18 townships in area—from this territory, admitting it as Canada's fifth province on July 15, 1870, amid the Red River Resistance led by , whose provisional government's demands for larger boundaries and protections were partially unmet, fueling early regional tensions. British Columbia's entry into on July 20, 1871, further exemplified federal inducements to Western integration, with the Terms of Union stipulating a cash , , and crucially, completion of a transcontinental railway within ten years to link the eastward. Delayed beyond the 1881 deadline due to fiscal constraints and engineering challenges, this commitment highlighted the West's peripheral status: provinces joined on conditions favoring national connectivity over local autonomy, with British Columbia receiving 400,000 acres annually for public works but reliant on Ottawa's timeline and financing. policies complemented these efforts, drawing over 1.5 million settlers to the prairies by 1911, yet federal control of land sales and surveys often directed revenues eastward, reinforcing perceptions of the West as an undeveloped frontier for Central Canadian benefit. John A. Macdonald's , unveiled in the 1879 budget after the Conservative victory in 1878, formalized this dynamic through three interlocking elements: protective tariffs averaging 17.5–20% on manufactured goods (rising the weighted average from 14% pre-policy to 21%), transcontinental railway construction, and aggressive via . For prairie farmers, who exported and livestock tariff-free but imported binders, plows, and other machinery at elevated costs—often 30–50% higher on key items—the policy acted as a , transferring wealth to protected factories in and without insulating Western agriculture from global price volatility. Empirical data from the era show prices fluctuating between $0.70–$1.00 per bushel in markets (1880–1900), while tariff-induced input costs eroded margins, prompting farmers' associations like the Manitoba and North-West Farmers' Union (founded ) to decry the system as colonial extraction. The Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR), incorporated in and spanning 3,000 miles upon completion in November 1885, epitomized policy-driven exploitation, subsidized by $25 million in cash and 25 million acres of fertile land grants—equivalent to one-eighth of Canada's arable territory at the time. These incentives enabled amid labor shortages (including 15,000 Chinese workers paid $1.00 daily), but the CPR's legal monopoly until the early 1900s allowed freight rates as high as $0.20–$0.30 per on from Regina to , capturing up to 40% of export values and directing surpluses to bondholders and Eastern ports rather than reinvesting locally. By the , as production surged to 200 million bushels annually in the prairies, these rates and tariffs had entrenched a staple-export model where Western output financed national —such as the $50 million+ in total railway subsidies—while yielding minimal political or fiscal reciprocity, crystallizing the causal roots of alienation through demonstrable economic subordination.

    Settlement Era and Great Depression (1920s–1930s)

    The settlement of the Prairie provinces accelerated in the 1920s following the post-World War I wheat boom, with over 500,000 immigrants arriving in Western Canada between 1920 and 1930, primarily to farm the region's vast grasslands. This era saw initial prosperity driven by high global demand for Canadian wheat, enabling rapid expansion of agricultural infrastructure and rural communities in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. However, underlying structural issues emerged, as the region's export-oriented grain economy clashed with federal policies inherited from the National Policy, including high protective tariffs averaging 20-30% on manufactured imports, which inflated costs for prairie farmers needing affordable machinery and goods while shielding Ontario and Quebec industries. Freight rate structures exacerbated these tensions, with the Crow's Nest Pass Agreement of 1897 providing subsidized eastbound grain rates but imposing higher westbound charges for imports, effectively subsidizing Central Canadian consumers at the expense of prairie producers. Prairie farmers and organizations like the Saskatchewan Grain Growers' Association repeatedly lobbied for tariff reductions and freer trade to access larger markets, arguing that Ottawa's protectionism prioritized industrial heartland interests over western agricultural needs; these demands gained traction through the Progressive Party, which secured 65 federal seats in 1921 on a platform of agrarian reform. In Alberta, the United Farmers of Alberta (UFA) captured provincial power in 1921, implementing policies to address local grievances but facing federal resistance to broader changes. The , beginning with the 1929 stock market crash, devastated the prairies more severely than other regions, as prices collapsed from $1.05 per in 1929 to $0.31 by 1932 amid overproduction, global surpluses, and the droughts that eroded topsoil across southern and , displacing over 100,000 farmers. Unemployment soared to 30% in prairie urban centers, and federal relief under Prime Ministers Mackenzie King and —limited to work camps and minimal direct aid—was criticized as inadequate and oriented toward eastern industrial recovery rather than agricultural relief, fueling perceptions of systemic neglect. Political dissent intensified, with groups like the of Progressive MPs breaking from the Liberals to advocate for and abolition, laying groundwork for later autonomy movements as westerners viewed federal policies as perpetuating economic extraction without equitable support.

    Post-War Resource Expansion and National Energy Program (1940s–1980s)

    The discovery of a major oil deposit at on February 13, 1947, marked the onset of Alberta's post-war boom, shifting the province's economic base toward extraction after decades of limited success in earlier drilling efforts. This find in the Formation prompted widespread exploration, drawing American capital and expertise that expanded production across and beyond, with initial flows exceeding 1,400 barrels per day from the well. By the , had emerged as Canada's leading oil producer, supporting infrastructure like the Interprovincial Pipeline (completed 1950) to deliver crude to refineries in and . The 1970s amplified this resource expansion amid global oil shocks, as embargoes drove prices from $3 per barrel in 1973 to over $30 by 1980, fueling Alberta's GDP growth at rates averaging 5-6% annually and positioning the province as a net exporter of wealth to federal coffers via taxes and royalties. developments paralleled oil, with and pipelines feeding eastern markets, yet provincial governments under leaders like Alberta's (premier 1971-1985) asserted ownership rights under the 1930 Natural Resources Transfer Acts, resisting federal encroachments on resource rents. This era underscored Western Canada's causal role in national , as domestic production offset imports and generated fiscal transfers eastward, though without proportional political influence in . Tensions peaked with the (NEP), unveiled on October 28, 1980, by Trudeau's Liberal government, which imposed federal price ceilings on , escalated taxes on provincial resource revenues to capture up to 50% of industry profits, and mandated Petro-Canada's back-in rights for new projects to promote "Canadianization." officials, including Lougheed, condemned the NEP as unconstitutional expropriation, arguing it violated provincial jurisdiction and deterred $60 billion in planned investments by hiking effective tax rates to 75% on projects. The policy accelerated capital outflows, with foreign firms divesting assets and drilling rigs declining 40% by 1982, contributing to 's unemployment surge from under 4% in 1980 to over 12% by 1984 amid concurrent global price collapses. These measures crystallized Western alienation, evoking perceptions of deliberate federal bias favoring Ontario-Quebec manufacturing subsidies over prairie resource economies, as NEP revenues funded eastern job creation while bore disproportionate regulatory and fiscal burdens. Lougheed's retaliatory production cuts in 1982 forced negotiations, yielding partial concessions like reduced back-in rights, but the program's 1985 repeal under Mulroney's Progressive Conservatives followed electoral backlash, including Liberal wipeouts in Western ridings. Empirical analyses attribute 20-30% of early-1980s western job losses directly to NEP distortions, beyond oil price drops, reinforcing long-term distrust of centralized energy policymaking.

    Reform Party Emergence (1990s)

    The arose in the late 1980s as a populist response to deepening western alienation, particularly after the Progressive Conservative government's 1988 election victory failed to deliver on commitments to reform and regional equity, leaving Western provinces feeling sidelined in federal policy-making. Founded in November 1987 in with —son of former Premier —as its inaugural leader, the party drew from earlier grassroots efforts like the 1987 Western Assembly on Canada's Economic Future, which highlighted grievances over economic exploitation and underrepresentation. Initial support was concentrated in and , where voters sought alternatives to established parties perceived as beholden to Central Canadian interests. The party's platform directly targeted core elements of western alienation, including demands for a "Triple-E" (elected, equal per province, and effective in checking legislation) to counter the appointed upper chamber's bias toward and , alongside aimed at eliminating federal deficits through spending cuts and reduced equalization payments that transferred Western resource revenues eastward. In the 1993 federal election on , secured a dramatic breakthrough, winning 52 seats—all in the West except for two in —with 18.7% of the national popular vote amid the Progressive Conservatives' collapse to just 2 seats. This outcome reflected widespread discontent with incoming Liberal Jean Chrétien's policies, which prioritized deficit reduction but maintained federal interventions in energy and transfers that exacerbated perceptions of Western subsidization of other regions. Reform's 1997 election gains further entrenched it as the West's dominant conservative force, capturing 60 seats (20.5% of the vote) and official opposition status, primarily by consolidating rural, small-business, and resource-sector voters alienated by federal regulatory burdens and the absence of democratic reforms. Manning's "The West Wants In" emphasized inclusion over independence, advocating citizen-initiated referendums and provincial autonomy to address causal factors like disproportionate seat representation—where Western provinces held only 28% of Commons seats despite 32% of population—and policy biases in areas such as and . While the party's Western-centric focus limited national appeal, it pressured mainstream parties toward fiscal restraint and , though critics noted its occasionally alienated urban moderates.

    Economic Underpinnings

    Fiscal Transfers and Equalization Payments

    Canada's equalization program, enacted in 1957 under the , transfers federal funds to provinces unable to generate sufficient for comparable public services at average rates, calculated based on fiscal capacity from five revenue sources excluding equalized transfers. The formula assesses fiscal capacity against a national standard, with payments to provinces below that threshold; non-renewable resource revenues are partially excluded (50 percent since ) to mitigate disincentives for extraction. In fiscal year 2024-25, total equalization payments reached $25.3 billion, distributed solely to "have-not" provinces including ($13.56 billion), , and the Atlantic provinces, while , , and received none due to their resource-driven fiscal capacities exceeding the standard. Alberta, a consistent net contributor, has received no equalization payments since 1964-65, despite its residents paying disproportionately high federal taxes relative to population due to elevated GDP from and gas. Estimates indicate Alberta taxpayers have funded approximately $67 billion of the program since 1957, equivalent to $20,200 per Albertan, through pooled federal revenues where high-income provinces implicitly subsidize recipients. From 2000 to 2019, Alberta's net fiscal outflow—federal spending received minus taxes paid—totaled $324 billion across all transfers, or $79,870 , far exceeding contributions from other donor provinces like . Broader net contributions to federal finances from 2007 to 2022 amounted to $244.6 billion for Alberta, over five times British Columbia's $46.9 billion and reflecting resource sector volatility not fully offset by transfers like the Health Transfer ($52.2 billion nationally in 2024-25). This fiscal asymmetry exacerbates Western alienation, as and perceive equalization as a one-way extraction of resource wealth to finance services in recipient provinces—particularly , which has received payments annually since inception—without mechanisms for donor input or reciprocity. Critics, including the , argue the program's growth amid converging provincial capacities (e.g., resource exclusions shielding recipients from full fiscal accountability) perpetuates imbalances, with 's revenues funding transfers despite federal policies constraining domestic production. Proponents counter that transfers are population-based for non-equalization programs and formula-driven, not targeted extraction, though net donor status persists due to economic structure rather than deliberate . Empirical data on flows, however, substantiate grievances of fiscal exploitation, fueling demands for reform such as a cap on payments or resource revenue exemptions.

    Resource Revenue Disparities

    The equalization program's treatment of non-renewable resource revenues underscores fiscal disparities affecting Western provinces, where high provincial royalties from oil, , and minerals inflate fiscal capacity calculations, disqualifying and from receiving payments despite their outsized contributions to national energy production. Under the formula, 50% of actual revenues—defined as royalties, rents, bonuses, and provincial shares of resource es—are incorporated into a province's representative tax system to assess revenue-raising potential against a national standard. This mechanism, adjusted in 2007 to include only half of such revenues (up from full inclusion previously), partially mitigates disincentives for resource extraction but ensures that booming sectors in , which account for over 80% of national output in alone, systematically elevate fiscal capacity beyond the threshold. In practice, these dynamics result in zero equalization entitlements for , , and in recent years, including the 2023-24 fiscal year, while provinces like received the largest share of the $24 billion total program outlay. has not qualified for payments since the early , when resource revenues were first fully integrated into capacity assessments, leading to persistent net fiscal outflows estimated at $3.3 billion from Albertan federal tax contributions in 2023 alone. similarly reports no receipts over the past 15 years as of 2024, with resource-driven fiscal strength—bolstered by and oil—positioning it among "have" provinces despite spending pressures from volatile commodity prices. Critics, including analyses from independent think tanks, argue that the formula's resource component creates by capping upside for high-output provinces without reciprocal or development support, fostering alienation as federal policies like restrictions further constrain potential. For example, equalization's reliance on federal general revenues—disproportionately sourced from higher-income resource economies—effectively transfers Western gains eastward, with Alberta's net contribution exceeding $2.9 billion in 2021 amid subdued global prices. This structure, while constitutionally entrenched under section 36(2) of the , amplifies grievances by linking provincial prosperity to national redistribution without opt-out provisions or resource-specific offsets.
    ProvinceEqualization Entitlement (2023-24, CAD billions)Receives Payment?Primary Resource Influence on Capacity
    0NoHigh oil/gas royalties exclude eligibility
    0NoOil, potash revenues boost capacity above standard
    ~13 (largest recipient)YesLower resource base yields entitlement
    Total Program24N/AResource formula at 50% inclusion
    Such disparities fuel demands for , as Western sectors face federal regulatory hurdles that depress revenues while equalization perpetuates dependency elsewhere, without adjusting for the economic multipliers of exports in provinces like , which generated over $20 billion in provincial royalties in peak years pre-2015 downturn.

    Federal Regulatory Burdens

    Federal regulations on resource development, particularly in the oil and gas sector, have imposed significant compliance costs and approval delays on Western Canadian provinces, contributing to perceptions of economic hindrance from . The Act (Bill C-69, enacted in 2019) expanded federal oversight of major projects, requiring assessments of environmental, health, social, and economic impacts, which critics argue creates excessive uncertainty and veto opportunities for multiple stakeholders, effectively stalling new infrastructure like pipelines. This legislation has been linked to the absence of major new interprovincial pipeline proposals since its passage, aside from expansions of pre-existing projects such as the . Regulatory measures targeting further exacerbate burdens, with the 2023 methane regulations alone projected to cost the oil and gas industry over $100 million annually in compliance expenses. The proposed federal emissions cap on oil and gas, intended to reduce sector emissions by up to 45% by 2030, could curtail production and impose economy-wide costs exceeding $280 billion between 2030 and 2040, disproportionately affecting and where the sector accounts for a large share of GDP and . Investment in upstream oil and gas activities declined from $76 billion in 2014 to $35 billion in 2023, with industry executives citing regulatory uncertainty as a primary deterrent. Broader federal regulatory accumulation from 2006 to 2021 correlates with a 1.7 reduction in national GDP growth and lower growth, effects amplified in resource-dependent Western economies through prolonged project timelines and heightened administrative requirements. These burdens manifest in a "," where overlapping federal, provincial, and Indigenous approvals grant numerous entities power, delaying exports and inflating costs that undermine Western competitiveness against global rivals like U.S. producers. In , such policies have fueled grievances by prioritizing national climate targets over regional economic contributions, which generated $74.3 billion in GDP from oil and gas in recent years while facing export barriers.

    Political and Institutional Challenges

    Underrepresentation in Federal Decision-Making

    Western Canada's representation in the aligns roughly with its share of the national population, with the four western provinces (, , , and ) holding 108 seats out of 338 as of the 43rd , comprising approximately 32% of total seats for a population share of about 30%. However, this proportionality does not fully mitigate perceptions of underrepresentation, as electoral outcomes often concentrate executive power in ; the western provinces' consistent support for Conservative parties rarely results in without eastern majorities, rendering many western votes ineffective in shaping federal policy. An Angus Reid Institute survey in 2022 found that only about half of Canadians overall feel well-represented in , with residents expressing higher levels of grievance due to this dynamic. In the Senate, western underrepresentation is more pronounced relative to population. The four western provinces collectively hold 24 seats out of 105, or 23%, allocated equally at six per province regardless of size— and alone account for over 25% of Canada's population but share this fixed regional bloc. This structure, inherited from the British North America Act, prioritizes regional balance over population proportionality, exacerbating sentiments that the chamber fails to amplify western interests in federal deliberations. Executive decision-making highlights further disparities, particularly in Cabinet composition. Historical patterns show limited appointments from the West; for instance, post-1917 efforts aimed to include at least one minister per western province, but totals remained low relative to Central Canada's dominance. In recent Liberal governments under , as of 2024, held 16 Cabinet positions and 12, while and each had only one, despite the West's outsized economic contributions through resource sectors. This skew reflects population concentrations in the East ( and comprising about 62% of ) but fuels alienation, as key portfolios influencing resource policy—such as and environment—are often held by eastern ministers with limited regional experience. Judicial appointments to the similarly underrepresent the West. By constitutional convention, two of the nine justices hail from the western provinces, equating to 22% of the bench for 30% of the population, with the remainder allocated as three each from and , and one from the Atlantic provinces. This formula, while ensuring regional diversity, limits western perspectives on cases involving national resource management and federal-provincial disputes, reinforcing views of centralized control. A Canada West Foundation report documented broad regional consensus on such institutional imbalances contributing to federal distrust. Prime ministerial origins underscore long-term executive underrepresentation; only one prime minister, from (1957–1963), has come from the Prairies, with most leaders drawn from or , centralizing strategic decision-making in eastern political networks. Environics Institute polling in 2025 indicated persistent prairie dissatisfaction with federalism's operation, attributing it partly to these structural factors over electoral representation alone.

    Policy Biases Favoring Central Canada

    Federal agricultural policies, particularly the supply management system governing , , and egg production, exemplify biases toward by allocating production quotas and import controls that disproportionately benefit producers in and . These provinces host the majority of regulated farms, with accounting for about 40 percent of quotas and around 30 percent, while Western provinces like and have minimal shares despite similar population demands for these products. The system raises consumer prices nationwide through tariffs and quota rents, imposing an estimated annual cost of $300 to $433 per household based on 2015 data, with Western households subsidizing Central Canadian farmers without reciprocal economic gains in production or revenue. This framework persists due to the political influence of Quebec and Ontario's large voting blocs and farm lobbies, which have resisted reforms even as the policy hinders Canada's negotiations and interprovincial efforts. For instance, concessions in trade deals like the USMCA required federal compensation packages totaling billions, predominantly directed to Central Canadian producers, further entrenching the disparity. Critics, including economists at the , argue the system favors a small, affluent minority of farmers (less than 8 percent of total farms) at the expense of broader and consumer affordability, particularly in import-dependent Western markets. Federal expenditure patterns also reveal imbalances, with data from 2011 to 2018 showing and receiving higher per-capita spending relative to their contributions compared to Western provinces. , , and generated substantial federal revenues—driven by resource sectors—but experienced lower returns in program spending, transfers, and , fostering over net fiscal outflows. Such distributions, analyzed by the , underscore how federal budgeting prioritizes population centers in , amplifying Western perceptions of systemic favoritism confirmed in surveys where 85 percent of non- identified or as preferentially treated.

    Modern Expressions (2000s–Present)

    Energy Sector Conflicts and Carbon Policies

    Federal carbon pricing policies, introduced as a backstop under the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act in 2018, have been a major source of conflict with Western provinces, particularly and , which view them as an infringement on provincial over natural resources and an economic burden on energy-dependent economies. The federal government imposed the policy in jurisdictions lacking equivalent systems, leading to consumer and industrial carbon levies starting in 2019, despite opposition from 's government, which argued it disproportionately harms oil and gas sectors by increasing operational costs without commensurate emissions reductions elsewhere. 's own carbon pricing framework, the Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction regulation, was deemed insufficient by , prompting the federal override and fueling perceptions of central Canadian dominance in resource policy. Pipeline development disputes have compounded these tensions, with federal regulatory delays and environmental assessments stalling projects like the Trans Mountain Expansion, approved in 2016 but repeatedly challenged through Indigenous consultations and court rulings until construction advanced in 2019 under federal ownership. Western provinces, especially , have cited these as examples of federal bias favoring Eastern manufacturing interests and climate activism over export infrastructure, resulting in lost revenues estimated at billions annually from blocked access to international markets. The cancellation of Keystone XL in 2021 by U.S. policy further highlighted jurisdictional vulnerabilities, but Canadian federal emphasis on emissions caps and net-zero targets by 2050 has been criticized for undermining production in provinces contributing over 80% of national output. Economic analyses indicate the has raised fuel prices by approximately 14 cents per liter in by 2023, contributing to concerns and , with polls showing 62% of Albertans viewing it as exacerbating cost-of-living pressures amid minimal global emissions impact given Canada's 1.5% share of worldwide totals. In response, launched legal challenges in 2024 against federal exemptions for certain large emitters, arguing they create uneven competition and violate constitutional uniformity, while 14 and gas CEOs urged scrapping the system in a 2025 open letter citing threats to industry competitiveness. similarly resisted implementation, with Premier publicly defying collection in 2023, underscoring a pattern of provincial non-compliance that amplifies alienation sentiments tied to perceived federal disregard for regional economic realities. These policies, while aimed at commitments, have intensified calls for sovereignty over energy decisions, as Western output faces supply-side constraints conflicting with national production goals.

    Freedom Convoy Protests (2022)

    The Freedom Convoy protests erupted in early 2022 primarily in response to the federal government's mandate for cross-border truck drivers, announced on January 15, 2022, requiring unvaccinated drivers entering to . This policy threatened the livelihoods of many truckers, particularly those in resource-dependent Western provinces like and , where trucking supports oil and gas transport amid ongoing federal regulatory pressures. The protests crystallized Western alienation by portraying the mandates as emblematic of 's pattern of imposing national policies that disproportionately burden prairie economies without adequate regional input. Organizers mobilized convoys from across , with vehicles departing Western locations as early as January 22, 2022, converging on by January 29 to streets near . In , protesters established a significant at the Coutts border crossing on January 29, halting traffic at a key commercial handling over $1 billion in monthly trade, underscoring direct economic stakes for the province's export-driven sectors. Similar actions occurred at other sites, but the Western focus highlighted frustrations with federal overreach, as truckers argued the mandates ignored practical realities of supply chains vital to national and . National polling during the protests revealed broad opposition, with Leger reporting 62% of Canadians opposing the actions by early February 2022, though support was more pronounced among conservative-leaning demographics prevalent in the Prairies. The federal response, including Justin Trudeau's invocation of the on February 14, 2022, enabled bank freezes, fuel seizures, and arrests, which critics in decried as authoritarian escalation that validated long-standing perceptions of central Canadian dominance in policymaking. The Coutts standoff ended with RCMP interventions uncovering weapons caches, leading to charges against some participants, yet the events fueled narratives of against Western interests. The protests concluded by late February 2022 following coordinated clearances, but they intensified Western alienation by linking health mandates to economic grievances, contributing to discussions of and reform in , where alienation was described as reaching a critical juncture threatening national unity. Subsequent U.S. policy reversals in March 2022 validated some protesters' concerns over mandate efficacy, though Canadian officials maintained the measures' necessity amid data.

    Sovereignty Acts and Recent Polling (2022–2025)

    In December 2022, the legislature passed the Alberta Sovereignty Within a United Canada Act, providing a legal mechanism for the province to refuse enforcement of federal laws or regulations deemed by the provincial cabinet to infringe on 's constitutional jurisdiction or cause economic harm. The act empowers the Lieutenant Governor in Council to direct provincial entities not to enforce such federal measures, while directing the development of alternative provincial actions to protect local interests, without altering federal law itself. Introduced by Premier shortly after her election, it responded to perceived federal overreach in areas like and firearms , though critics, including some constitutional scholars, argued it risks unilateral nullification and legal uncertainty. In May 2023, Saskatchewan enacted the Saskatchewan First Act, a parallel measure affirming provincial control over natural resources and autonomy in economic matters, amid similar grievances over federal intrusions into resource development. The legislation reasserts 's jurisdiction under section 109 of the , enabling resistance to federal policies like the Impact Assessment Act through legal challenges or non-cooperation, as demonstrated in the province's 2025 intervention supporting Alberta's court action against it. Unlike Alberta's act, 's emphasizes resource without explicit cabinet directives for suspending federal laws, but it has been invoked in disputes over carbon taxation, including SaskEnergy's refusal to collect the federal levy starting in 2023. Public support for these sovereignty measures and broader separatist options has hovered around 30% in Alberta and Saskatchewan from 2022 to 2025, per multiple polls, reflecting persistent alienation but not majority backing for . An 2025 Angus Reid Institute survey found 30% of respondents in both provinces would "seriously consider" separation if federal policies on and equalization remain unchanged, with higher rates among conservative voters. A May 2025 Leger poll indicated 31% national support for a provincial , with stronger endorsement in Western provinces tied to distrust in Ottawa's resource policies. Similarly, a May 2025 Janet Brown Opinion Research survey in showed steady 30% support for separation, though attachment to increased overall, suggesting the acts amplify rhetorical pushback more than secessionist momentum. A January 2026 Research Co. survey of 703 Alberta adults found 31% support for Alberta independence, up from 22% in 2023, with 42% among those aged 18 to 34 and higher rates among United Conservative Party voters; however, opposition stood at 60%, reflecting a roughly 2-to-1 preference for remaining in Canada. These figures contrast with earlier peaks post-2019 election but underscore ongoing regional frustration without tipping into widespread endorsement of exit.

    Separatist Movements

    Precursors in the 1980s

    The (NEP), announced on October 28, 1980, by Pierre Trudeau's Liberal government, served as a primary catalyst for early separatist stirrings in . Intended to promote energy self-sufficiency, boost Canadian ownership in the sector to 50% by 1990, and capture a larger share of resource rents for federal redistribution, the policy imposed on oil below international levels, levied a "petro-Canada share" tax on provincial revenues, and incentivized foreign divestment. In and , where oil and gas accounted for over 20% of GDP and the sector employed tens of thousands, these measures triggered immediate economic contraction, including a 15-20% drop in drilling activity and capital outflows exceeding $100 billion by 1982, fostering perceptions of deliberate federal predation on provincial wealth to subsidize . Alberta Premier , representing the resource-dependent province that produced 85% of Canada's conventional oil, mounted fierce opposition, cutting oil shipments to refineries for 13 days in and withholding $4 billion in royalties until concessions were negotiated, highlighting intergovernmental tensions over resource jurisdiction under the 1982 Constitution Act's section 92A. Public outrage manifested in widespread protests, bumper stickers decrying Eastern exploitation, and a surge in anti-federal sentiment polls showing over 50% of Albertans viewing as hostile to Western interests by mid-decade. These grievances, rooted in the NEP's estimated $100 billion cost to the Western economy over its lifespan, amplified longstanding complaints about unequal equalization payments—where resource-rich provinces subsidized have-nots without reciprocal benefits—laying groundwork for organized dissent. Separatist formations crystallized amid this turmoil, with lawyer establishing the Western Canada Concept (WCC) in October 1980 to advocate secession of , , , and into an independent republic, citing federal overreach as irreconcilable. The WCC rapidly expanded, collecting over 200,000 signatures by 1981 and fielding candidates in provincial elections, though it achieved limited electoral success, such as electing one MLA in in 1983. Complementary efforts, like Saskatchewan's short-lived Western Canada Party under Dick Collver, echoed calls for either separation or a Western economic bloc, reflecting how NEP-induced hardships— rates hitting 13% in by 1984—transformed economic alienation into proto-sovereigntist activism, though momentum waned after the NEP's partial dismantling under Brian Mulroney's Western Accord in 1985.

    Wexit and Post-2019 Revival

    The Wexit movement emerged in the immediate aftermath of the October 21, , federal election, where the Liberal Party formed a without securing any seats in or , exacerbating long-standing grievances over federal energy policies and economic neglect of the resource-dependent West. Peter Downing, a former oil industry worker, founded Wexit Canada as a separatist organization in September , advocating for a on for , , and potentially other Western provinces, modeled after the United Kingdom's process. The group quickly organized rallies in cities like and , where participants waved inverted Canadian flags symbolizing distress and called for due to perceived federal bias against and gas development. By November 2019, Wexit had formalized as a federal , registering with and launching petitions that garnered thousands of signatures for a separation vote, though exact figures varied and lacked independent verification beyond organizer claims. The movement framed its platform around economic , arguing that Ottawa's carbon taxes and restrictions disproportionately harmed Western producers while benefiting . Initial enthusiasm peaked with public demonstrations drawing hundreds, but critics, including some conservative analysts, dismissed it as a fringe reaction unlikely to achieve majority support given Canada's constitutional hurdles for . In August 2020, amid internal debates over viability, Wexit rebranded as the to shift emphasis from outright independence toward greater provincial autonomy and a "" within , while retaining leaders like Downing. The party contested the September 2021 federal election, targeting Conservative strongholds in the West but securing only 0.4% of the popular vote and no seats, highlighting limited mainstream appeal. Separatist sentiment, as measured by polls, dipped following the 2021 Liberal re-election but persisted at low double-digits; a July 2020 survey found support for leaving had declined from post-2019 highs, yet around 20-25% of Albertans expressed openness to separation if federal policies remained unchanged. The post-2019 revival waned electorally by the mid-2020s, with the Maverick Party announcing in March 2025 that it would not field candidates in the upcoming federal election, citing strategic focus on provincial advocacy instead. However, underlying tensions fueled sporadic resurgence, particularly in Alberta, where 2025 polling indicated 25% of residents would vote for separation in a referendum amid frustrations over energy regulations and fiscal transfers. Saskatchewan showed similar trends, with about 30% considering exit options under sustained federal opposition to resource projects, though premier-level responses emphasized negotiation over rupture. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's United Conservative Party government, elected in 2022, absorbed much of the grievance energy through sovereignty legislation without endorsing Wexit, effectively marginalizing pure separatist groups to the political fringes. Despite this, smaller entities like the Alberta Prosperity Project continued advocating referendums, reflecting a persistent but contained revival tied to cyclical electoral discontent.

    2020s Developments and Referendum Threats

    In the early , sentiments of Western alienation manifested in legislative efforts to assert provincial , exemplified by Alberta's passage of the Sovereignty within a United Canada Act on , , which empowers the province to refuse implementation of federal laws it views as overreaching into provincial jurisdiction. This measure, introduced by Premier Danielle Smith's government, targeted policies such as carbon taxes and , reflecting broader frustrations over federal intervention in resource-dependent economies. Saskatchewan followed a similar path in 2024 with its Saskatchewan First Act, emphasizing provincial rights without explicit language, amid ongoing disputes over resource revenues and equalization payments. By 2023–2024, polls indicated persistent but minority support for outright , with Angus Reid Institute surveys finding approximately 30% of Albertans and Saskatchewanians open to separation under certain conditions, such as continued federal Liberal governance favoring Eastern interests. A May 2025 Angus Reid poll further revealed that half of respondents in both provinces favored holding a on the issue, even if outcomes remained uncertain. These figures, while not commanding majorities, marked a steady undercurrent, with support concentrated among conservative voters disillusioned by federal election results, including the 2021 Liberal minority win despite strong Western Conservative majorities. Referendum threats escalated in 2025 following the April federal election, where the Liberal Party under secured victory, prompting Smith to signal in a May 5 livestream that separation discussions were viable if federal policies persisted in undermining provincial economies. The Prosperity Project, a pro-independence group, claimed over 240,000 pledges by mid-2025 toward triggering a citizen-initiated under 's Elections Act, targeting a vote on by 2026. In August 2025, the Republican Party of advocated for a binding bypassing petition thresholds, framing it as a response to perceived economic exploitation. , while rejecting separation, stated in May 2025 he would not block a if pursued democratically, amid legislative debates on Western unity. These developments drew national concern, with Ontario Premier warning on May 6, 2025, of separatist risks to , a caution dismissed by Smith as overreaction. Polls like one from Kolosowski Strategies in August 2025 showed urban-rural divides, with 45% support for among select voter cohorts, underscoring economic grievances over and gas restrictions. No has occurred as of 2025, but the momentum reflects causal links to federal fiscal transfers—Alberta's net contribution exceeding $20 billion annually—and policy divergences, rather than transient . Senior Conservatives, including , highlighted in April 2025 the spread beyond Alberta to and , urging federal reforms to avert unity threats. In January 2026, following approval by Elections Alberta on January 2, the Alberta Prosperity Project launched signature collection for the independence referendum petition, requiring approximately 177,000 signatures by May 2, 2026, to initiate a citizen-led referendum under Alberta's Elections Act. Initial signing events drew reports of thousands lining up across city blocks in Calgary with hours-long waits and standing-room-only crowds, alongside collections in nearby areas including Queensland, Water Valley, Didsbury, and Beiseker, as well as larger turnouts in Red Deer, Fort McMurray, and South Calgary; in Red Deer on January 14, hundreds queued in long lines described by organizers as the longest yet, stretching nearly blocks long even in cold temperatures after dark, while smaller communities such as Bentley (population approximately 1,100), Spruce Grove, and Millet saw lines stretching blocks, packed halls, and huge crowds despite winter conditions and last-minute venue changes, reflecting sustained grassroots separatist momentum.

    Responses and Debates

    Provincial Countermeasures

    In response to perceived federal intrusions into provincial jurisdictions, enacted the Sovereignty within a United Canada Act on December 8, 2022, which empowers the provincial cabinet to identify federal laws or policies deemed unconstitutional or harmful to 's interests and direct provincial entities to disregard their enforcement. The legislation was first invoked on November 28, 2023, through a provincial resolution opposing the federal Clean Electricity Regulations, which aim to eliminate carbon emissions from by 2035 and were viewed by as an overreach into resource management and economic policy. Saskatchewan has pursued analogous countermeasures, asserting provincial sovereignty over natural resources against federal environmental mandates. In December 2023, the province declared proposed federal regulations an unconstitutional intrusion into areas of provincial authority under the , refusing to align with Ottawa's directives on emissions caps for oil and gas operations. Building on this, intervened in June 2025 to support Alberta's Court of Appeal challenge to the federal Impact Assessment Act, arguing the law unconstitutionally expands federal oversight of intra-provincial projects, thereby infringing on provincial control over and infrastructure. These provincial initiatives reflect a broader of legal and legislative resistance, including coordinated court challenges to federal carbon pricing frameworks, which Western provinces have contested multiple times since 2019 on grounds of jurisdictional overreach, though the upheld the policy's validity in 2021. Such actions aim to reassert division of powers without pursuing outright separation, prioritizing empirical defense of constitutional limits over federal expansions into economic sectors disproportionately affecting resource-dependent Western economies.

    Federal Government Actions

    The federal government established Western Economic Diversification Canada (now PrairiesCan) in 1988 under Prime Minister to foster economic development, diversification, and regional advocacy for , , , and , partly in response to lingering economic resentments from the . The agency has since invested billions in infrastructure, innovation, and trade initiatives tailored to western priorities, such as energy market access and supply chain resilience, with annual budgets exceeding $300 million by the 2020s. The Harper Conservative government (2006–2015), led by former Alberta MP , pursued fiscal policies including a reduction of the Goods and Services Tax from 7% to 5% in 2008 and corporate tax cuts from 22% to 15%, which lowered operational costs for resource industries and boosted provincial revenues in oil- and gas-dependent western economies. It also allocated $40 billion through the 2009 Economic Action Plan for infrastructure, including northern and energy-related projects, while withdrawing from the in 2011 to avoid penalties on emissions that would disproportionately affect western producers. The Trudeau Liberal government (2015–2025) acquired the stalled expansion in 2018 for $4.5 billion to expedite construction and enhance export capacity for 's heavy oil, completing the project in May 2024 after federal regulatory interventions. However, enactments like the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (2018), imposing a federal rising to $170 per tonne by 2030, and the Act (Bill C-69, assented December 2019), which expanded federal oversight of major projects, drew accusations from and premiers of jurisdictional overreach, leading to provincial legal challenges upheld in part by the in October 2023. To support amid these tensions, the administration committed $8.3 million in March 2025 for 13 clean technology projects in via PrairiesCan, targeting Indigenous-led initiatives and development, alongside $28.7 million in 2025 for workforce training in clean energy and AI to retrain oil sands workers. These measures, while framed as balancing environmental goals with economic support, have been critiqued by conservative-leaning analysts like the for failing to reverse a 56% decline in upstream oil and gas investment from $84 billion in 2014 to $37.2 billion in 2023 (inflation-adjusted), attributing it to regulatory uncertainty.

    Counterarguments and Data on Mutual Benefits

    Despite perceptions of fiscal imbalance, Western provinces, particularly Alberta and Saskatchewan, receive substantial federal transfers that bolster public services and infrastructure. In the 2025-26 fiscal year, Alberta alone is projected to receive $8.6 billion in major federal transfers, including Canada Health Transfer and Canada Social Transfer payments, which fund healthcare and social programs essential for population stability and economic productivity. These inflows, while lower relative to contributions from resource revenues, mitigate the volatility of commodity-dependent economies by providing predictable support for services that independent jurisdictions would need to fully self-fund, potentially straining budgets during downturns. Saskatchewan similarly benefits from comparable per-capita transfers, enabling investments in education and health that enhance human capital and attract investment within a stable national framework. Interprovincial trade underscores , with exporting energy, agriculture, and manufactured goods to Eastern markets, fostering and diversified revenue streams. Estimates indicate that existing internal trade volumes already contribute significantly to GDP; for instance, a 2025 analysis by TD Economics highlights that even modest reductions in interprovincial barriers could yield a 0.2% annual GDP uplift nationwide, implying the current integrated market provides baseline efficiencies worth billions in avoided costs and expanded opportunities for Western exporters. Alberta's oil and gas sector, for example, relies on Eastern refineries and pipelines integrated into national , while Saskatchewan's and grains access broader Canadian distribution networks, reducing exposure to global disruptions like those seen in 2022-2023 supply chain crises. Federal facilitation of such , including regulatory harmonization efforts, delivers mutual gains by pooling resources for national ports and transportation corridors that handle one-third of Canada's external goods through Western gateways. Polling data reveals limited appetite for separation, reflecting an empirical assessment that confederation's benefits—such as shared stability, defense expenditures, and international negotiating leverage—outweigh grievances. A June 2025 Pollara survey found only 22% of Albertans and 20% of Saskatchewanians would vote to separate in a hypothetical , with majorities favoring reform over exit. Similarly, a May 2025 Leger poll indicated 58% of Albertans view federal actions as potentially influential on unity sentiments but not to the point of majority secession support, suggesting alienation drives policy demands rather than dissolution. These figures, from established polling firms with transparent methodologies, contrast with vocal separatist and align with historical patterns where resource booms amplify complaints but economic realities— including federal backstops during the 2020 pandemic recession—reinforce unity. Critics of alienation narratives, including economists at the , argue that net federal contributions from (averaging over $20 billion annually in recent years) fund programs like Employment Insurance and , where the province receives slightly less in payouts but gains from nationwide portability and investment returns that stabilize retirement and unemployment risks across cycles. simulations, such as those referenced in analyses, project higher borrowing costs and frictions for a standalone Western entity, lacking Canada's G7-scale credit and , which have historically buffered provinces against global shocks like the 2014-2016 oil crash. Thus, while fiscal transfers highlight imbalances, the federation's scale enables collective risk-sharing that empirical growth data—Western GDP per capita remaining among Canada's highest at over $70,000 in —demonstrates as net positive.

    References

    1. https://centre.irpp.org/research-studies/the-persistence-of-western-alienation/
    2. https://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp04/nq64811.pdf
    3. https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/imbalance-of-power-how-federal-overreach-fuels-western-alienation-sonya-savage-and-heather-exner-pirot/
    4. https://centre.irpp.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2021/05/The-Persistence-of-Western-Alienation.pdf
    5. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/trudeaus-emissions-cap-reminds-westerns-his-fathers-national-energy-program
    6. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/podcast/the-past-present-and-future-of-western-alienation/
    7. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/albertans-contribute-disproportionately-cpp-and-other-programs
    8. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/minor-tweaks-wont-fix-major-flaws-bill-c-69
    9. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/2022/12/western-alienation-constitutional-challenges/
    10. https://globalnews.ca/news/6084080/analysis-western-alienation-alberta-saskatchewan/
    11. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/albertans-simply-want-fair-shake-federation
    12. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/2025-03/understanding-albertas-role-in-national-programs-including-the-CPP.pdf
    13. https://www.history.alberta.ca/energyheritage/gas/transformation/west-vs-east/nep.aspx
    14. https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/pi/index.php/pi/article/download/1399/944/4498
    15. https://businesscouncilab.com/insights-category/analysis/why-alberta-continues-to-be-under-represented-in-ottawa/
    16. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/RebalancedandRevitalized.pdf
    17. https://www.cbc.ca/history/EPCONTENTSE1EP9CH1PA3LE.html
    18. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/manitoba-and-confederation
    19. http://challengeracistbc.ca/BCTermsUnion1871.pdf
    20. https://opentextbc.ca/postconfederation/chapter/3-3-the-national-policy/
    21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014498317300554
    22. https://otc-cta.gc.ca/sites/default/files/canadian-pacific-railway-cp.pdf
    23. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/prairie-west
    24. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/economic-history-of-western-canada
    25. http://david-kilgour.com/uneasy/chap03.htm
    26. https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/great-depression
    27. https://opentextbc.ca/postconfederation/chapter/8-5-the-great-depression/
    28. https://www.history.alberta.ca/EnergyHeritage/oil/the-leduc-era-1947-to-1970s/default.aspx
    29. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/aapg/aapgbull/article/33/4/572/547725/Leduc-Oil-Field-Alberta-A-Devonian-Coral-Reef
    30. https://economics.ubc.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/38/2013/05/pdf_paper_david-green-long-term-consequences-natural.pdf
    31. https://www.history.alberta.ca/energyheritage/gas/transformation/west-vs-east/default.aspx
    32. https://www.cbc.ca/alberta/features/tories40/nep.html
    33. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/2019/11/the-trudeaus-and-western-alienation/
    34. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429265594-10/national-energy-program-three-years-economic-perspective-brian-scarfe
    35. https://origins.osu.edu/sites/default/files/migrated_files/origins-archive/Volume2Issue1Article4.pdf
    36. https://www.alberta.ca/aoe-preston-manning
    37. https://journals.lib.sfu.ca/index.php/gadfly/article/download/2927/3025
    38. http://www.sfu.ca/~aheard/elections/1867-present.html
    39. https://electoral-reform.org.uk/first-past-the-post-has-played-havoc-with-canadian-federal-elections/
    40. https://nationalpost.com/news/the-rise-of-western-alienation-again-when-it-comes-to-anger-in-the-west-history-keeps-repeating-itself
    41. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/programs/federal-transfers/equalization.html
    42. https://www.policyschool.ca/news/why-equalization-is-not-unfair-to-alberta/
    43. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/broken-equalization-program-bad-for-all-provinces
    44. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/pierre-poilievre-danielle-smith-scott-moe-alberta-canada-equalization-1.7422150
    45. https://www.taxpayer.com/newsroom/cost-of-equalization-to-alberta-taxpayers
    46. https://fairnessalberta.ca/equalization/
    47. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/understanding-albertas-outsized-contribution-to-confederation.pdf
    48. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/programs/federal-transfers/major-federal-transfers.html
    49. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/should-equalization-keep-on-growing-in-an-era-of-converging-fiscal-capacity.pdf
    50. https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/feehan-equalization.pdf
    51. https://www.schoolofpublicpolicy.sk.ca/research-ideas/publications-and-policy-insight/policy-brief/policy-paper-equalisation-canada.php
    52. https://irpp.org/research-studies/resource-revenues-and-equalization/
    53. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/canadas-equalization-program-broken-and-requires-major-overhaul
    54. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/equalization-program-disincentivizes-provinces-improving-their-economies
    55. https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/dicereport108-forum1.pdf
    56. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/bc-would-benefit-new-pipeline-bad-policy-stands-way
    57. https://financialpost.com/federal_election/bill-c-69-campaign-wedge-issue
    58. https://www.alberta.ca/albertas-response-to-the-federal-impact-assessment-act
    59. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/ottawa-must-eliminate-harmful-regulations-spur-private-investment-pipelines
    60. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/carney-government-should-undo-trudeaus-damaging-energy-policies
    61. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/pbo-provides-latest-dire-predictions-about-ottawas-emissions-cap
    62. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/red-tape-and-uncertainty-hurting-oil-and-gas-investment-canada
    63. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11f0019m/11f0019m2025002-eng.htm
    64. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/canada-cant-allow-so-many-people-say-no-energy-projects
    65. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/mounting-evidence-suggests-emissions-cap-will-harm-canadians
    66. https://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=res&dir=cir/red/allo&document=index&lang=e
    67. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/2019/10/two-senate-changes-are-long-overdue-and-within-reach/
    68. https://sencanada.ca/en/Content/Sen/committee/381/pub/legislative-e
    69. https://cbr.cba.org/index.php/cbr/article/download/198/198
    70. https://www.quora.com/Why-are-most-cabinet-ministers-in-Canada-distributed-in-Ontario-16-and-Quebec-12-while-Alberta-and-Manitoba-only-have-1
    71. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/csc-scc/JU5-27-2013-eng.pdf
    72. https://cwf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/CWF_WestInCanada_Report_SEP2003.pdf
    73. https://www.environicsinstitute.org/projects/project-details/the-prairies-and-b.c.-in-confederation
    74. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/canadas-supply-management-system-favours-affluent-and-burdens-poor
    75. https://lop.parl.ca/sites/PublicWebsite/default/en_CA/ResearchPublications/201842E
    76. https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/sacred-cash-cows-the-urgent-need-to-eliminate-supply-management-stuart-j-smyth/
    77. https://reason.com/2025/06/21/quebecs-dairy-farmers-are-blocking-free-trade-in-canada/
    78. https://lop.parl.ca/sites/PublicWebsite/default/en_CA/ResearchPublications/201701E
    79. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/2023/05/one-region-favoured-ottawa/
    80. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25001820
    81. https://jenniferwinter.github.io/website/MakingEnergyPolicy_Canada.pdf
    82. https://www.arcenergyinstitute.com/canadian-energy-politics-and-western-alienation/
    83. https://www.commongroundpolitics.ca/carbon-tax-attitudes-in-alberta
    84. https://centralalbertaonline.com/articles/alberta-takes-carbon-tax-battle-to-court-citing-double-standard
    85. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/22/5802
    86. https://www.reuters.com/markets/carbon/canadian-opposition-oil-ceos-call-scrapping-federal-carbon-price-system-2025-03-21/
    87. https://publicorderemergencycommission.ca/files/exhibits/HRF00001221.pdf
    88. https://publicorderemergencycommission.ca/files/documents/Policy-Papers/Social-Cleaveges-Alberta-Separatism-and-the-Freedom-Convoy-Wesley.pdf
    89. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/trnsprnc/brfng-mtrls/prlmntry-bndrs/20221013/03-en.aspx
    90. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/trans/bm-mb/other-autre/emergencies-urgence/58.html
    91. https://tc.canada.ca/en/binder/13-trucker-protests
    92. https://leger360.com/legers-north-american-tracker-february-8-2022/
    93. https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/11/americas/canada-covid-protests-outcome-explainer
    94. https://www.alberta.ca/alberta-sovereignty-within-a-united-canada-act
    95. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/what-is-albertas-sovereignty-act-2023-11-27/
    96. https://rmrf.com/bill-1-the-alberta-sovereignty-within-a-united-canada-act/
    97. https://calgary.citynews.ca/2022/11/29/alberta-introduces-sovereignty-bill/
    98. https://www.constitutionalstudies.ca/2023/10/alberta-sovereignty-act/
    99. https://angusreid.org/smith-shapiro-sovereignty/
    100. https://www.saskatchewan.ca/government/news-and-media/2025/june/30/saskatchewan-joins-alberta-in-challenging-federal-impact-assessment-act
    101. https://lisayoung.substack.com/p/the-saskatchewan-sovereignty-act
    102. https://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025.04.05_Sovereignty.pdf
    103. https://leger360.com/in-the-news-trust-in-government-and-views-on-provincial-sovereignty/
    104. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-janet-brown-may-2025-poll-separation-sentiment-1.7544074
    105. https://researchco.ca/2026/01/08/alberta-separation-3/
    106. https://www.saskoer.ca/primeministersandcrisis/chapter/how-the-west-was-lost/
    107. https://www.cbc.ca/archives/how-some-albertans-advocated-for-separation-in-the-early-1980s-1.5081723
    108. https://tnc.news/2020/09/21/malcolm-the-history-of-western-separatism/
    109. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/analysis-alberta-wexit-democracy-1.5359857
    110. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/25/wexit-alberta-canada-independence-separatism
    111. https://mcgillpolicyassociation.com/latest-articles/2019/11/12/wexit-what-you-need-to-know
    112. https://businessfactors.com/why-western-canada-wants-to-separate-from-the-east/
    113. https://activehistory.ca/blog/2019/12/02/wexit-and-the-alternative-right/
    114. https://www.huffpost.com/archive/ca/entry/wexit-party-maverick-party-name_ca_5f6507bec5b6de79b6749016
    115. https://theconversation.com/canadian-populism-got-shut-out-this-election-but-its-still-a-growing-movement-168133
    116. https://www.huffpost.com/archive/ca/entry/wexit-liberals-alberta-saskatchewan_ca_5f0e1176c5b63b8fc10fa39e
    117. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/maverick-party-out-federal-election-1.7491939
    118. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/1-in-4-albertans-would-vote-to-separate-in-a-referendum-angus-reid-poll-suggests-1.7505516
    119. https://winnipegsun.com/news/western-separatist-sentiment-rises-ahead-of-federal-election
    120. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/02/15/western-canada-wexit-danielle-smith-00082885
    121. https://macleans.ca/longforms/albertas-new-separatists/
    122. https://angusreid.org/referendum-alberta-saskatchewan-smith-moe/
    123. https://time.com/7283108/alberta-canada-separatism-referendum-conservative-province-liberal-government-smith-carney/
    124. https://theconversation.com/why-albertas-push-for-independence-pales-in-comparison-to-scotlands-in-2014-256838
    125. https://www.ctvnews.ca/calgary/article/albertas-republican-party-calls-for-binding-referendum-on-sovereignty/
    126. https://www.ctvnews.ca/regina/article/sask-ndp-says-premier-missing-opportunities-to-shut-down-separation-speculation/
    127. https://globalnews.ca/news/11166956/danielle-smith-doug-ford-alberta-separatists-canada/
    128. https://www.facebook.com/groups/letstalkalbertaindependence/posts/1845764699355064/
    129. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/alberta-separatism-movement-explained
    130. https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/canada/canada-to-break-up-and-cease-being-a-country-senior-conservative-leader-sounds-alarm-as-western-secession-threat-spreads-beyond-alberta-and-saskatchewan/articleshow/119990094.cms
    131. https://www.elections.ab.ca/new-citizen-initiative-petition-issued-2/
    132. https://www.facebook.com/61574749268500/posts/122156924084824975/
    133. https://calgary.citynews.ca/2026/01/15/red-deer-alberta-seperation-petition/
    134. https://globalnews.ca/news/10118035/alberta-sovereignty-act-explained/
    135. https://globalnews.ca/video/10147864/proposed-federal-methane-regulations-an-unconstitutional-overreach-according-to-one-sask-minister
    136. https://www.on-federalism.eu/images/2024/Vol16_issue1/PoF_2024_Vol16-1_09_Mendes.pdf
    137. https://www.alberta.ca/aoe-stephen-harper
    138. https://www.wealthprofessional.ca/news/industry-news/trudeaus-resignation-drives-energy-stock-gains-amid-industry-uncertainty/387980
    139. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/federal-policies-continue-block-oil-pipelines
    140. https://www.canada.ca/en/prairies-economic-development/news/2025/03/backgrounder-government-of-canada-announces-federal-investments-to-advance-albertas-clean-technology-sector.html
    141. https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/news/2025/09/government-of-canada-invests-287-million-to-train-clean-energy-workers-and-expand-ai-research-capacity.html
    142. https://economics.td.com/ca-interprovincial-trade
    143. https://chamber.ca/news/maximizing-western-canadas-huge-economic-potential-key-to-building-a-stronger-economy/
    144. https://www.pollara.com/22-of-albertans-would-vote-to-separate/
    145. https://leger360.com/in-the-news-alberta-separatism/
    146. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/71-607-x/71-607-x2023022-eng.htm
    Add your contribution
    Related Hubs
    User Avatar
    No comments yet.